Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease

Patient-reported outcomes with subcutaneous immunoglobulin in secondary immunodeficiency

Subcutaneous (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement are both used to prevent infections in patients with secondary immunodeficiency (SID). Compared with IVIG, SCIG has fewer systemic side effects and, additionally, facilitates home-based treatment. Shared decision-making practice should include discussion of aspects such as patient preference as well as the associated risks and benefits of treatment. We review the available evidence for the use of SCIG treatment in patients with SID, focusing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In most studies, there were improvements to health-related quality of life with SCIG treatment, compared with before initiating SCIG without prior IVIG treatment, or after switching to SCIG from IVIG treatment, or a no-SCIG/IVIG cohort. Treatment satisfaction with SCIG was similar between patients with SID and primary immunodeficiency disease. Patient preference and perception assessments highlighted the benefits of SCIG compared with IVIG, such as ease of use and administration, convenience, and time-effectiveness. In addition, many patients self-administered SCIG at home. Such aspects may be of specific benefit to patients with SID and hematological malignancy by reducing the risk of infection exposure in clinical settings. PRO data may be useful during shared decision-making discussions with patients with SID.

Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Care of Patients with Predominantly Antibody Deficiencies (PADs)-A Qualitative Study with Perspectives from Both Patients and Nurses

Background/Objectives: One of the risk groups during the COVID-19 pandemic was people with predominantly antibody deficiencies (PADs) that have a compromised immune system. In the absence of evidence and clinical experience, there were challenges for patients in their daily life and for staff in counseling during this time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the experiences of PAD patients and nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Focus group interviews with patients (n = 12) and nurses (n = 12) were performed separately, which were then analyzed using content analysis. Results: The daily life of PAD patients was affected during the pandemic, with concerns about becoming seriously ill. Social isolation and adherence to recommendations by the majority of the Swedish population resulted in patients feeling infectiously healthier during this period. The rapid transition of specialist care to telemedicine care encounters was an important measure taken to address patients' concerns and questions according to both patients and nurses. In addition, patients expressed a need for a coordinated care plan to facilitate access to integrated care. Conclusions: The high level of trust for authorities in Sweden was related to the high compliance with the recommendations, which reduced the spread of the infection. The role of specialized care is an important support for PAD patients, which was particularly evident during the pandemic. Information transfer to a specific risk group, such as people with PADs, is important and can usefully be coordinated by their specialist clinic. Telemedicine meetings are an important complement for people with PADs and need to be further elaborated. Also, there is a need to clarify how to better coordinate primary and specialized care.

Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Serum IgG Trough Levels of Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 10% in US Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and serum IgG trough levels of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% in US pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs).

METHODS

This phase 3, open-label, prospective study (NCT03277313) was conducted at 17 US centers. Eligible patients aged 2 to < 16 years had PIDDs and had received immunoglobulin G (IgG) at a consistent dose for ≥ 3 months before screening. Participants received fSCIG 10% via dose ramp-up for up to 6 weeks (Epoch 1), then every 3-4 weeks for ≤ 3 years (Epoch 2). The primary endpoint was the rate of acute serious bacterial infections (ASBIs).

RESULTS

Data were provided by 44 participants for Epoch 1 (mean ± SD age: 9.0 ± 3.6 years) and 43 (97.7%) for Epoch 2; 34 (77.3%) completed the study. Two ASBIs (both bacterial pneumonia) were reported in one participant with specific antibody deficiency. The mean rate of ASBIs was 0.04 events/participant-year (99% upper confidence interval limit: 0.20), significantly lower than the regulatory-defined threshold of 1.0 (p < 0.001). The mean rate of all infections was 3.12 events/participant-year. Stable mean serum IgG trough levels were maintained during Epoch 2 (10.4, 9.2, and 9.2 g/L at Months 0, 6, and 12, respectively). Most related treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No participant developed anti-recombinant human hyaluronidase neutralizing antibodies; 1/44 participants (2.3%) developed binding antibodies.

CONCLUSION

fSCIG 10% effectively prevented ASBIs in pediatric patients with PIDDs, with a favorable safety profile consistent with previous clinical studies.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs in immunodeficient patients receiving subcutaneous Ig: Real-world evidence from France

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) replacement therapy is indicated for patients with hypogammaglobulinemia caused by primary (PID) and secondary immunodeficiencies (SID).

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and related direct medical costs of patients in France treated with weekly conventional SCIg (cSCIg) vs monthly hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIg (fSCIg).

METHODS

This retrospective study of Ig-naïve patients with PID or SID newly receiving a SCIg between 2016 and 2018, extracted from the French National Healthcare reimbursement database (SNDS), analyzed the SCIg-related HCRU and reimbursed costs generated from in-hospital (hospitalizations and SCIg doses) or at-home (nurse visits [NV] and pump provider visits [PPV], drug doses) SCIg administration.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,012 patients (PID:534; SID:1,478) were analyzed. The follow-up duration varied between 7.5 and 8.7 months according to sub-groups. Compared with fSCIg-treated patients, monthly mean rates of NV and PPV were respectively 2.5 and 3.1 times higher in PID, and 1.6 and 3.1 times higher in SID cSCIg-treated patients. Monthly mean rates for SCIg administration-related hospitalizations were lower overall, while their costs were 1.6 and 1.8 times higher for cSCIg than fSCIg subgroups, in PIDs and SIDs respectively; these results are due to more frequent hospitalizations with fSCIg being mainly shorter, without stayover. Total HCRU costs from the French NHI's perspective were estimated to be lower with fSCIg vs cSCIg, in PIDs and SIDs.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world evidence of SCIg administration in a large French population. Patients with PID or SID treated with fSCIg had fewer at-home HCRU and lower overall costs for in-hospital or at-home SCIg administration compared with cSCIg-treated patients.

Feasibility and resource utilization of nurse-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in antibody deficiency: A cross-sectional study

Primary and secondary antibody deficiencies (PAD and SAD) are amongst the most prevalent immunodeficiency syndromes, often necessitating long-term immune globulin replacement therapy (IRT). Both intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) have demonstrated efficacy in antibody deficiency. Comparative analyses of these two routes of administration are limited to nurse-administered IVIG and home therapy with self-administered SCIG. A third programmatic approach, SCIG administered by nurses in hospital-based outpatient infusion clinics, combines certain advantages of IVIG and home SCIG such as the provision of nursing support and the reduced risk of systemic reactions associated with the subcutaneous route. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the viability and resource utilization of nurse-administered SCIG with IVIG in patients with antibody deficiency. We hypothesized that nurse-administered SCIG would require a similar amount of infusion clinic time per month as IVIG, despite more frequent dosing, due to shorter individual appointments, while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Information on infusion duration, time in the infusion chair, direct nursing time, and treatment satisfaction using the Life Quality Index was collected. Time measures for each patient were expressed as minutes/4 weeks to account for the more frequent dosing of nurse-administered SCIG compared to IVIG. We determined that the total time, infusion time, and nursing time needed to provide nurse-administered SCIG was comparable to IVIG. The more frequent dosing of SCIG was offset by the shorter times required per infusion. Patients reported favorable treatment satisfaction with both nurse-administered SCIG and IVIG. We conclude that nurse-administered SCIG may be a useful treatment modality for well-selected individuals.

Long-term safety and tolerability of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% as maintenance therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Results from the ADVANCE-CIDP 3 trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) consists of subcutaneous human immunoglobulin G (IgG) 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) and can be administered at the same dose and interval as intravenous IgG (IVIG). fSCIG recently received US approval as maintenance therapy for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and European approval for adults and children with CIDP after stabilization with IVIG.

METHODS

ADVANCE-CIDP 3 (NCT02955355) was an open-label long-term extension of the Phase 3 double-blind randomized placebo-controlled ADVANCE-CIDP 1 study (NCT02549170) that examined fSCIG safety and efficacy as maintenance CIDP therapy. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Efficacy was an exploratory outcome.

RESULTS

The study provided 220 patient-years of follow-up data from 85 patients. Median (range) exposure was 33 (0-77) months. Patients received fSCIG every 4 weeks (88.2%) or every 3 weeks (11.8%). Median (range) 4-weekly IgG dose equivalent was 64.0 (28.0-200.0) g. Mean (standard deviation) infusion duration was 135.5 (62.8) minutes. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate and self-limiting. Of the 1406 AEs, only 48 were severe and 30 were serious. fSCIG-related AEs (n = 798) included infusion site reactions such as pain, redness, and pruritus. Three infusions (0.1%) were reduced in rate, interrupted, or stopped due to intolerability. Relapse occurred in 10 of 77 patients (13.0%); annual relapse rate was 4.5%. An anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 was detected in 14 of 84 patients (16.7%); patients who tested positive (≥1:160) had similar relapse rates versus those who tested negative (16.7% vs. 12.3%, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

ADVANCE-CIDP 3 demonstrated favorable fSCIG long-term safety and tolerability consistent with its established safety profile, and a low relapse rate, supporting use as maintenance CIDP treatment.

Infusion parameters, safety, and practical guidance for the manual administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20% (Ig20Gly)

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs), also referred to as inborn errors of immunity, constitute a group of genetic conditions that affect the immune system. The current standard of care for patients with PIDs is lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy, delivered by intravenous (IVIG) or subcutaneous (SCIG) infusion. Immune globulin subcutaneous (human) 20% solution stabilized with glycine (Ig20Gly) is indicated as a replacement therapy for PIDs in adults and children of any age in Europe and in patients aged 2 years and above in the USA. Typically, Ig20Gly is administered using an infusion pump; however, delivery of Ig20Gly by manual administration has recently been approved in Europe. Practical recommendations on the use of Ig20Gly manual administration are lacking; this review therefore aims to provide guidance for use of this method of administration. Additionally, we summarize the infusion parameters, safety, patient-reported outcomes, and economic benefits associated with Ig20Gly manual administration. Manual administration of Ig20Gly was shown to permit faster rates of infusion than administration via infusion pump. Patients typically infused at two or fewer infusion sites with manual administration of Ig20Gly. Safety and tolerability profiles were similar for Ig20Gly manual administration and administration by infusion pump. Overall, there were comparable levels of patient satisfaction with manual administration and infusion pump, with patient preference deemed to be a key determinator of success for either method of administration. Economic studies identified cost savings for the healthcare system through manual administration compared with IVIG or SCIG infusion by infusion pump because of the reduced equipment costs and nurse support. For infusion of Ig20Gly by manual administration, a syringe and butterfly needle are used; patients are advised to start infusion at 1-2 mL/min to prevent discomfort. Overall, manual administration of Ig20Gly offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative to administration by infusion pump.

Changes in health-related quality of life in common variable immunodeficiency: an eight-year journey, including the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Personalized medicine requires the assessment of the impact of health care interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We run an observational study of HRQoL in 140 CVID patients with biannual assessments over 8  years using a disease-specific tool, the CVID_QoL, and the GHQ questionnaires. Factors influencing changes in HRQoL scores were identified using multiple linear regression models with a stepwise procedure.

RESULTS

Infections frequency, female gender, and chronic enteropathy were associated with worse global CVID_QoL scores. The presence of permanent organ damage and older age contributed to the perception of being at risk of health deterioration, while chronic enteropathy was associated with fatigue. The presence of permanent organ damage was also associated with perceived difficulties in usual activities. The frequency of infections was the main risk factor for difficulties in long-term planning and perceptions of vulnerability. Before COVID-19, improved HRQoL scores were associated with reduced respiratory infections and changes in immunoglobulin replacement route and setting. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a sudden deterioration in all HRQoL dimensions, and a further deterioration in the emotional dimension was observed during the pandemic period. Patients who died during the study had worse CVID_QoL scores at all time points, confirming that HRQoL performance is strongly related to patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodic HRQoL assessments are needed to capture relevant issues that change over time in patients affected by long-term chronic conditions such CVID, possibly identifying areas of intervention.

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 1): understanding the pharmacokinetics

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) therapies have been used for decades as standard treatment for patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Monitoring the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IgG is a key component in guiding treatment regimens. Despite the wealth of clinical experience, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the true nature of IgGs and their disposition in humans. Furthermore, intrinsic and extrinsic factors may alter the PK of IgG, necessitating an individualized approach for patients. A comprehensive literature review was performed in order to summarize the PK of IgGs, examine the mechanisms of IgG disposition (including catabolism), outline considerations for special patient populations and discuss knowledge gaps and future perspectives for improving our understanding of IgG PK in relation to the individualized treatment paradigm.

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 2): considerations for dosing strategies

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) dosing in treating primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) is individualized, which often involves regular monitoring of IgG levels, and considers patient experiences with immunoglobulin therapies, their clinical status and physician judgment. The frequency and dose(s) of intravenously (IVIG) and subcutaneously (SCIG) administered IgGs (including hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIG) require rigorous evaluation to maximize therapeutic benefits. Monitoring serum IgG levels represents an integral part of diagnosing primary immunodeficiency diseases and determining or adjusting IgG dosing strategies to meet individual patient needs, but cannot be conducted in isolation. This review discusses the current state and future perspectives on dosing strategies for different types of IgG therapies, as well as dosing considerations for specific patient populations, immunoglobulin-naive patients and patients switching between IVIG and SCIG.

fSCIG 10% in pediatric primary immunodeficiency diseases: a European post-authorization safety study

BACKGROUND

The safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% (dual-vial unit of human immunoglobulin 10% and recombinant human hyaluronidase [rHuPH20]) were assessed in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs).

METHODS

This phase 4, post-authorization, prospective, interventional, multicenter study (NCT03116347) conducted in the European Economic Area, enrolled patients aged 2 to < 18 years with a documented PID diagnosis who had received immunoglobulin therapy for ≥ 3 months before enrollment. New fSCIG 10% starters underwent fSCIG 10% dose ramp-up for ≤ 6 weeks (epoch 1) before receiving fSCIG 10% for ≤ 3 years (epoch 2); patients pretreated with fSCIG 10% entered epoch 2 directly. The primary outcome was the number and rate (per infusion) of all noninfectious treatment-related serious and severe adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In total, 42 patients were enrolled and dosed (median [range] age: 11.5 [3-17] years; 81% male; 23 new starters; 19 pretreated). Overall, 49 related noninfectious, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 15 patients; most were mild in severity (87.8%). No treatment-related serious TEAEs were reported. Two TEAEs (infusion site pain and emotional distress) were reported as severe and treatment-related in a single new fSCIG 10% starter. The rate of local TEAEs was lower in pretreated patients (0.1 event/patient-year) versus new starters (1.3 events/patient-year). No patients tested positive for binding anti-rHuPH20 antibodies (titer of ≥ 1:160).

CONCLUSIONS

No safety signals were identified, and the incidence of local AEs declined over the duration of fSCIG 10% treatment. This study supports fSCIG 10% long-term safety in children with PIDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT03116347.

Delineating the Clinical and Immunologic Characteristics: A Comparative Study of Inborn Errors of Immunity in Adult versus Pediatric Diagnosed

INTRODUCTION

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are rare genetic disorders primarily identified in children due to their significant effects on immune system functionality. However, an increasing number of IEI cases are being diagnosed in adults, attributed to delayed presentation or advancements in diagnostic capabilities. This study explores the clinical and immunologic distinctions between IEIs diagnosed in adulthood versus childhood, shedding light on their differential presentations, the impact of diagnostic delays, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study focused on 122 adult patients with IEI above 17 years old, diagnosed in adulthood or childhood. We collected comprehensive data on demographics, clinical presentations, genetic mutations, and therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The study revealed that 72.9% of participants were diagnosed in adulthood, facing a median diagnostic delay of 96 months. Diagnostic delays were longer in adults (132 months vs. 24 months) than in children. The most common clinical manifestations at onset were recurrent infections (46.7%) and autoimmunity (18%). Predominantly antibody deficiency was the most frequently diagnosed immunodeficiency (54.9%), followed by immunodysregulation at a rate of 26.2%. A higher incidence of immune thrombocytopenia or other complications, such as hepatomegaly and enteropathy, was observed in adult-diagnosed patients with IEI. Malignancies were more prevalent in patients with adult-onset IEI compared to those with childhood-onset (18.1% vs. 5.2%). Overall, 15 different malignancies were recorded in 13 patients (10.6%), including lymphomas and cancers of the stomach, thymus, skin, breast, and colon.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight a considerable diagnostic delay in recognizing IEI, especially in adults, and illustrate distinct differences in disease manifestation and progression between adult-onset and delayed-diagnosis groups.

Long-Term Safety of Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 10% Treatment in US Clinical Practice in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: Results from a Post-Authorization Safety Study

Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% is an immunoglobulin replacement therapy that utilizes recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) to enhance immunoglobulin dispersion and absorption, allowing for longer treatment intervals similar to intravenous immunoglobulin (up to once monthly). fSCIG 10% is indicated in the USA for treating adults and children aged ≥ 2 years with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). This prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multicenter, post-authorization safety study (NCT02593188) was conducted in the USA from November 2015 to October 2021 to assess the long-term safety of fSCIG 10% in routine clinical practice. Patients with PIDs aged ≥ 16 years who were prescribed and/or had started fSCIG 10% treatment were enrolled. In total, 253 patients were enrolled and included (full analysis set). Participants received fSCIG 10% treatment for a median (interquartile range) of 10.0 (3.5-11.8) months, with the majority of infusions administered every 4 weeks (54.4% [1197/2201 infusions]) and at home (62.6% [1395/2230 infusions]). Overall, 98.5% of infusions were administered without rate reduction, interruption, or discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Treatment-related, non-serious AEs were experienced by 52 patients (20.6%, 284 events). Two patients (0.8%) each experienced one treatment-related serious AE (aseptic meningitis and deep vein thrombosis). Development of antibodies against rHuPH20 was uncommon; 14/196 patients (7.1%) tested positive for binding antibodies (titer ≥ 1:160) with no neutralizing antibodies detected. There was no relationship between anti-rHuPH20 antibody positivity and the occurrence of treatment-related serious or non-serious AEs. Long-term, repeated self-administration of fSCIG 10% was well tolerated in US clinical practice by patients with PIDs.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Predominantly Antibody Deficiency

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures individual well-being across physical, psychological, and social domains. Patients with predominantly antibody deficiency (PAD) are at risk for morbidity and mortality, however, the effect of these complications on HRQoL requires additional study. Patients with PAD were asked to voluntarily complete the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HRQoL-14 Healthy Days Measure questionnaire. These results were compared to data from the CDC-initiated Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a cross-sectional questionnaire including questions from CDC-HRQOL-14. Statistical analyses included two-proportion Z-test, t-tests, and analysis of variance. 83 patients with PAD completed the survey. Patients were sub-stratified into mild (23.7%), moderate (35.5%), severe (40.8%), and secondary (8.4%) PAD. "Fair or poor" health status was reported in 52.6% of PAD patients. Mental health challenges ≥ 14 days/month occurred in 25% of patients. Physical health issues ≥ 14 days/month was reported in 44.7% of patients. Activity limitations were noted by 80.3% of patients. There were no statistically significant differences by PAD severity. Patients with autoinflammatory disease co-morbidities reported more mental health challenges compared to those without (78% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.02). Compared to the CDC-BRFSS data, significantly more patients with PAD reported "fair or poor" health status (53% vs 12.0%; p < 0.0001), mental health challenges (24.1% vs 14.7%; p = 0.02), and poor physical health (44.6% vs 8.0%; p < 0.0001). Patients with PAD had significantly reduced HRQoL compared to CDC-BRFSS respondents from a similar geographical region. Decreased HRQoL was prevalent across all PAD severity levels. Additional research is needed to improve HRQoL for patients with PAD.

Long-term safety of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10%: a European post-authorization study

Aim: To assess the long-term safety of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% in European routine clinical practice.Materials & methods: This prospective, noninterventional, open-label, post-authorization safety study (EUPAS5812) sourced data on adverse events, immunogenicity, treatment regimens and product administration for 106 adult patients prescribed fSCIG 10% across 17 sites in six European countries from July 2014 to February 2020.Results: In total, 1171 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 94 patients (88.7%); 25.5% of these events were considered related to fSCIG 10%. Positive binding antibody titers developed in three patients; no neutralizing antibodies to recombinant human hyaluronidase were detected.Conclusion: This real-world study of fSCIG 10% is the longest to date and confirms its long-term safety and tolerability in adults with antibody deficiency diseases.

Towards more tolerable subcutaneous administration: Review of contributing factors for improving combination product design

Subcutaneous (SC) injections can be associated with local pain and discomfort that is subjective and may affect treatment adherence and overall patient experience. With innovations increasingly focused on finding ways to deliver higher doses and volumes (≥2 mL), there is a need to better understand the multiple intertwined factors that influence pain upon SC injection. As a priority for the SC Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, this manuscript provides a comprehensive review of known attributes from published literature that contribute to pain/discomfort upon SC injection from three perspectives: (1) device and delivery factors that cause physical pain, (2) formulation factors that trigger pain responses, and (3) human factors impacting pain perception. Leveraging the Consortium's collective expertise, we provide an assessment of the comparative and interdependent factors likely to impact SC injection pain. In addition, we offer expert insights and future perspectives to fill identified gaps in knowledge to help advance the development of patient-centric and well tolerated high-dose/high-volume SC drug delivery solutions.

Effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in preventing infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is a standard treatment for patients with antibody production deficiencies, which is of interest in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021281118), assessed the current literature regarding immunoglobulin replacement therapy on COPD clinical outcomes in patients with low immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum concentrations.

METHODS

Literature searches conducted from inception to August 23, 2021, in databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Population (sex, age, comorbidities), baseline clinical characteristics (pulmonary function testing results, IgG levels), and outcome (hospitalizations, emergency department visits) were extracted after title/abstract and full text screening. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment form was used for risk of bias assessment of randomized controlled trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) assessment was used for pre and post studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1381 studies were identified in the preliminary search, and 874 records were screened after duplicates were removed. Screening 77 full texts yielded four studies that were included in the review.

CONCLUSION

It is unclear whether immune globulin replacement therapy reduces acute exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD. Current evidence suggests that it is worth considering, but better developed protocols for administration of immune globulin supplementation is required for future randomized controlled trials.

[Immunoglobulin G Replacement Therapy: Particularities of a Portuguese Cohort]

N/a.

Pulmonary Computed Tomography Screening Frequency in Primary Antibody Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary antibody deficiency (PAD) frequently suffer from pulmonary complications, associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Hence, regular pulmonary screening by computed tomography (CT) scanning is advised. However, predictive risk factors for pulmonary morbidity are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients with PAD at risk for pulmonary complications necessitating regular CT screening.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with PAD (median follow-up 7.4 [2.3-14.8] years) was performed. CTs were scored using the modified Brody-II scoring system. Clinical and laboratory parameters were retrospectively collected. Potential risk factors were identified by univariate analysis when P < .2 and confirmed by multivariable logistic regression when P < .05.

RESULTS

The following independent risk factors for progression of airway disease (AD) were identified: (1) diagnosis of X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), (2) recurrent airway infections (2.5/year), and (3) the presence of AD at baseline. Signs of AD progression were detected in 5 of 11 patients with XLA and in 17 of 80 of the other patients with PAD. Of the 22 patients who progressed, 17 had pre-existent AD scores ≥7.0%. Increased AD scores were related to poorer forced expiratory volume in 1 second values and chronic cough. Common variable immunodeficiency and increased CD4 effector/memory cells were risk factors for an interstitial lung disease (ILD) score ≥13.0%. ILD ≥13.0% occurred in 12 of 80 patients. Signs of ILD progression were detected in 8 of 80 patients, and 4 of 8 patients showing progression had pre-existent ILD scores ≥13.0%.

CONCLUSION

We identified risk factors that distinguished patients with PAD at risk for AD and ILD presence and progression, which could guide future screening frequency; however, independent and preferably prospective validation is needed.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with immunodeficiencies - impact of drug packaging and administration method on patient reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Here, the perspective of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiency receiving subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) via introductory smaller size pre-filled syringes (PFS) or vials were compared.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in Canada by the Association des Patients Immunodéficients du Québec (APIQ) (10/2020-03/2021). Survey questions included: reasons for choosing SCIg packaging and administration methods, training experiences, infusion characteristics, and switching methods. The survey captured structured patient-reported outcomes: treatment satisfaction and its sub-domains, symptom state, general health perception, and physical and mental function. Respondents using PFS were compared with vial users, overall and stratified by their administration method (pump or manual push).

RESULTS

Of the 132 total respondents, 66 respondents used vials, with 38 using a pump and 28 using manual push. PFS (5 and 10 mL sizes) were being used by 120 respondents, with 38 using a pump and 82 using manual push. PFS users were associated with a 17% lower median (interquartile range) SCIg dose (10 [8, 12] vs. 12 [9, 16] g/week, respectively), a significantly shorter infusion preparation time (15 [10, 20] vs. 15 [10, 30] mins, respectively), and a trend for shorter length of infusion (60 [35, 90] vs. 70 [48, 90] mins, respectively) compared with those on vials. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction scores were overall similar between vial and PFS users (including on the domains of effectiveness and convenience), except for a higher score for vials over PFS on the domain of global satisfaction (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with prescribing that reflects a recognition of less wastage, PFS users were associated with a significantly lower SCIg dose compared with vial users. PFS users were also associated with shorter pre-infusion times, reflecting simpler administration mechanics compared with vial users. Higher global satisfaction with treatment among vial users compared with PFS users was consistent with users being limited to smaller PFS size options in Canada during the study period. Patient experience on PFS is expected to improve with the introduction of larger PFS sizes. Overall, treatment satisfaction for SCIg remains consistently high with the introduction of PFS packaging compared with vials.

A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Assess the Tolerability, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 20% in Healthy Adults

PURPOSE

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 20% will allow reduced infusion volumes and frequency versus existing subcutaneous therapies such as fSCIG 10% and conventional subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20%, respectively. We assessed the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of warmed and unwarmed fSCIG 20%.

METHODS

This phase 1, single-dose, open-label, three-arm study enrolled healthy adults aged 19-50 years (inclusive) at a single US center (NCT05059977). Post-screening, participants received a single fSCIG 20% dose comprising recombinant human hyaluronidase and varying doses of in-line warmed or unwarmed immunoglobulin G (IgG) during a 4-day treatment period in a sentinel and sequential dosing design (treatment arm 1, warmed IgG 20% 0.4 g/kg; treatment arm 2, warmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg; treatment arm 3, unwarmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg). Participants were followed for 12 (± 1) weeks post-infusion. The primary endpoint was tolerability ("tolerable" infusions were not interrupted, stopped, or reduced in rate owing to fSCIG 20%-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)). Secondary endpoints included occurrence of TEAEs.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 participants were included, 8 per treatment arm (mean age 39.0 years, 54.2% men). All participants tolerated the infusions. All TEAEs were mild (107 events, in all participants), and all participants experienced fSCIG 20%-related (105 events) and local (102 events) TEAEs. Infusion site erythema and infusion site swelling were most frequently reported. No serious TEAEs occurred, and no participants discontinued the study owing to TEAEs.

CONCLUSION

fSCIG 20% was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile in healthy adults. Future studies will evaluate fSCIG 20% in primary immunodeficiency diseases. Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT05059977 (registered 28 September 2021).

Parental preferences for the procedural sedation of children in dentistry: a discrete choice experiment

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore parental preferences for the procedural sedation of children in dentistry through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to inform clinical decisions and oral health management.

Methods

Based on literature reviews, interviews with parents of pediatric dental patients, and expert consultation, six attributes, including fasting time, recovery time, sedative administration routes, adverse reactions, sedation depth and procedure cost, were incorporated into the DCE questionnaire. The DCE questionnaire collected data on parental preferences for pediatric dental sedation treatment from June to August 2022. A conditional logit model was used to analyze preference and willingness to pay (WTP) for each attribute and its level. Subgroup analyses assessing the impact of parents' dental anxiety on procedural sedation preferences were also conducted using conditional logit models.

Results

A total of 186 valid questionnaires were gathered. Parents' preferences for fewer adverse reactions, a milder sedation depth, lower out-of-pocket cost, shorter fasting and recovery times and administration by inhalation were significantly associated with their choice of sedation model. The conditional logit model showed that parents were most interested in treatments with no adverse reactions (0% vs. 15%) (Coef, 1.033; 95% CI, 0.833-1.233), followed by those providing minimal sedation (vs. deep sedation) (Coef, 0.609; 95% CI, 0.448-0.769). Moreover, the relative importance of adverse reactions and fasting time was higher among anxious than nonanxious parents. The study found a WTP threshold of ¥1,538 for reducing adverse reactions (15% to 0%). The WTP threshold for the best sedation procedure scenario (no fasting requirement, 10 min recovery time, administration by inhalation, 0% adverse reaction incidence and minimal sedation) was ¥3,830.

Conclusion

Reducing the adverse reactions and depth of sedation are predominant considerations for parents regarding procedural sedation in pediatric dentistry, followed by lower cost, shorter fasting and recovery times and inhalation sedation. Parents with dental anxiety had a stronger preference for options with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and shorter fasting time than parents without dental anxiety. This discovery is helpful for doctors and can promote collaborative decision-making among parents and doctors.

Stability assessment of anti-bacterial antibodies in immunoglobulin G-depleted serum with validated immunoassays

Aim: To investigate the stability of the anti-pneumococcal (PCP) and anti-haemophilus type B (Hib) immunoglobulins (IgGs) in human IgG-depleted serum samples frozen at -20°C. Materials & methods: Modified commercially available immunoassays (ELISAs) were bioanalytically validated. These ELISAs were used to measure levels of the two anti-bacterial IgG in samples kept at -20°C for up to 15 months. Human IgG-depleted serum was spiked with GAMMAGARD Liquid to obtain those samples. Results: Both ELISAs passed the validation test. Anti-PCP IgG and anti-Hib IgG were shown to be stable for at least 15 months at -20°C. Conclusion: These data confirm the stability of anti-bacterial IgG in human IgG-depleted serum and support the common practice of testing frozen samples.

Clinical outcomes of immunoglobulin treatment for patients with secondary antibody deficiency: Data from the Ontario immunoglobulin treatment case registry

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing number of cases of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) and immunoglobulin (Ig) utilization, there is a paucity of data in the literature on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe immunoglobulin utilization patterns, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with SAD on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients with secondary antibody deficiency enrolled in the Ontario Immunoglobulin Treatment (ONIT) Case Registry from June 2020 to September 2022 was completed. Demographics, comorbidities, indications for immunoglobulin treatment, clinical infections at baseline and post IgRT, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 140 patients (58 males; 82 females; median age 68) with SAD during the study period; 131 were on subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) and 9 were on intravenous Ig (IVIG). The most common indication was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N = 52). IgRT reduced the average annual number of infections by 82.6%, emergency room (ER) visits by 84.6%, and hospitalizations by 83.3%. Overall, 84.6% of patients reported their health as better compared to before IgRT. Among those patients who switched from IVIG to SCIG (N = 35), 33.3% reported their health as the same, and 62.9% reported their health as better.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that IgRT significantly improved clinical outcomes and patient-reported general health state in patients with SAD. This study also further supports the use of SCIG in patients with SAD.

Effects of Body Mass and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous or Hyaluronidase-facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

PURPOSE

To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIG (fSCIG) therapy across body mass index (BMI) and age categories in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) previously treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

Using our previously published integrated population PK model based on data from eight clinical trials, simulations were conducted to examine the effects of BMI and age on serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) PK after administration of SCIG 0.15 g/kg weekly or fSCIG 0.6 g/kg every 4 weeks in patients switching from stable IVIG. Patients were assumed to have baseline IgG trough concentrations of 7 g/L (hypothetical protective threshold).

RESULTS

Mean steady-state serum IgG trough values (Cmin,ss or trough) increased with BMI and age. Mean Cmin,ss was 18% (SCIG) and 16% (fSCIG) higher in the obese than the healthy BMI group. Pediatric patients aged < 18 years had 8-22% (SCIG) and 4-20% (fSCIG) lower mean Cmin,ss values than adults, with the youngest group (2- < 6 years) having the lowest Cmin,ss. All patients across populations maintained Cmin,ss IgG concentrations of ≥ 7 g/L after switching to SCIG or fSCIG.

CONCLUSION

Both SCIG and fSCIG successfully maintained trough values at or above the hypothetical protective threshold after switching from stable IVIG, irrespective of BMI or age. Differences in trough values between BMI groups and age groups (≤ 22%) may not warrant SCIG or fSCIG dose adjustments based on BMI or age alone; instead, the dosing paradigm should be guided by prior IVIG dose, individual IgG monitoring, and clinical findings.

Recommendations for Management of Secondary Antibody Deficiency in Multiple Myeloma

Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) is a subtype of secondary immunodeficiency characterized by low serum antibody concentrations (hypogammaglobulinemia) or poor antibody function. SAD is common in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) due to underlying disease pathophysiology and treatment-related immune system effects. Patients with SAD are more susceptible to infections and infection-related morbidity and mortality. With therapeutic advancements improving MM disease control and survival, it is increasingly important to recognize and treat the often-overlooked concurrent immunodeficiency present in patients with MM. The aims of this review are to define SAD and its consequences in MM, increase SAD awareness, and provide recommendations for SAD management. Based on expert panel discussions at a standalone meeting and supportive literature, several recommendations were made. Firstly, all patients with MM should be suspected to have SAD regardless of serum antibody concentrations. Patients should be evaluated for immunodeficiency at MM diagnosis and stratified into management categories based on their individualized risk of SAD and infection. Infection-prevention strategy education, early infection reporting, and anti-infective prophylaxis are key. We recommend prophylactic antibiotics or immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) should be considered in patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia associated with a recurrent or persistent infection. To ensure an individualized and efficient treatment approach is utilized, patient's immunoglobin G concentration and infection burden should be closely monitored throughout treatment. Patient choice regarding route and IgRT treatment is also key in reducing treatment burden. Together, these recommendations and proposed management algorithms can be used to aid physician decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% as maintenance therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: The ADVANCE-CIDP 1 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

ADVANCE-CIDP 1 evaluated facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG; human immunoglobulin G 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase) efficacy and safety in preventing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse.

METHODS

ADVANCE-CIDP 1 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 54 sites in 21 countries. Eligible adults had definite or probable CIDP and adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores of 0-7 (inclusive), and received stable intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for ≥12 weeks before screening. After stopping IVIG, patients were randomized 1:1 to fSCIG 10% or placebo for 6 months or until relapse/discontinuation. fSCIG 10% was administered at the same dose (or matching placebo volume) and interval as pre-randomization IVIG. The primary outcome was patient proportion experiencing CIDP relapse (≥1-point increase in adjusted INCAT score from pre-subcutaneous treatment baseline) in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included time to relapse and safety endpoints.

RESULTS

Overall, 132 patients (mean age 54.4 years, 56.1% male) received fSCIG 10% (n = 62) or placebo (n = 70). CIDP relapse was reduced with fSCIG 10% versus placebo (n = 6 [9.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.5%, 19.6%] vs n = 22 [31.4%; 21.8%, 43.0%], respectively; absolute difference: -21.8% [-34.5%, -7.9%], p = .0045). Relapse probability was higher with placebo versus fSCIG 10% over time (p = .002). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with fSCIG 10% (79.0% of patients) than placebo (57.1%), but severe (1.6% vs 8.6%) and serious AEs (3.2% vs 7.1%) were less common.

INTERPRETATION

fSCIG 10% more effectively prevented CIDP relapse than placebo, supporting its potential use as maintenance CIDP treatment.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20% (Ig20Gly) treatment regimens in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies - real-world data from the IG TATRY study

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulins is associated with fewer systemic adverse events and easier infusion compared to intravenous administration. Ig20Gly is a 20% immunoglobulin formulation effective and safe in patients with primary immune deficiency diseases (PIDDs). Real-world data are scarce, therefore our study aimed to examine the real-life treatment regimen and clinical outcomes of Ig20Gly in Polish children with PIDDs.

RESEARCHDESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed the medical documentation of 75 pediatric patients aged 0-17 years (mean 9.9) who received Ig20Gly (Cuvitru®; Baxalta US, Inc.; part of Takeda, MA, U.S.A.).

RESULTS

The median exposure to treatment of the study population was 22.3 months. At the end of the study, 59 (78.7%) were still on Ig20Gly. The median monthly dose was 0.40 g/kg. The median treatment interval was 7.7 days. Most patients (96%) used one infusion site. The median infusion rate increased with patient age. The median IgG level in the study population, 8.0 g/L, was stable. There was one case of serious bacterial infection.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest, long-term real-world study to date on the treatment patterns of Ig20Gly in pediatric patients with PIDDs. The results of this study support the feasibility and tolerability of Ig20Gly usage in PIDD patients across the pediatric age spectrum.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04636502).

Development of a novel shared decision making aid for primary immunodeficiency diseases

Aim: To describe development of a shared decision making (SDM) aid in treating primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) with immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT). Materials & methods: Expert engagement and qualitative formative research informed development. IGRT administration features were prioritized using object-case best-worst scaling (BWS) methodology. The aid was assessed by US adults self-reporting PID and revised following interviews/mock treatment-choice discussions with immunologists. Results: Patients participating in interviews (n = 19) and mock treatment-choice discussions (n = 5) deemed the aid useful/accessible and supported the utility of BWS, with content and BWS exercises refined following participant feedback. Conclusion: Formative research led to an improved SDM aid/BWS exercise, and illustrated how the aid may improve treatment decision making. The aid may help less-experienced patients and facilitate efficient SDM.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with primary immunodeficiencies: an international survey on patient vaccine hesitancy and self-reported adverse events

Introduction

The Sars-CoV-2 pandemic caused great concern for this novel virus among patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) or inborn errors of immunity (IEI) and their families. When COVID-19 vaccination program started, no data existed on adverse events (AEs) in this particular patient population, nor if patients felt hesitancy being vaccinated.

Objectives

To explore i) reasons for COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, ii) the number and symptoms of AEs and their severity, durability and management.

Method

The organisations International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and International Nursing Group for Immunodeficiencies (INGID) distributed a global self-administered online survey.

Results

The survey was completed by 1317 patients (mean 47, range 12-100, years) from 40 countries. 41.7% of the patients denoted some hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccination, mainly having doubts about postvaccination protection related to their underlying PID and concerns about negative long-term effects. More women (22.6%) reported "very" or "pretty much" hesitancy compared to men (16.4%) (P<0.05). The most common systemic AEs were fatigue, muscle/body pain and headache, usually the same day or the day after the vaccination and lasting for 1-2 days. 27.8% of the respondents reported severe systemic AEs after any dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Only a minority (7.8%) of these patients visited a health-care professional and 20 patients (1.5%) were hospitalized or seen at emergency room without specifying subsequent admission at the hospital. Significantly more local and systemic AEs were reported after the second dose. No differences regarding AEs were observed across different PID subgroups or vaccine types.

Conclusion

At the time of the survey, almost half of the patients reported having felt hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccination highlighting the importance and need of developing joint international guidelines and education programs about COVID-19 vaccination. The types of AEs were comparable to healthy controls, but more frequent AEs were reported. Clinical studies and prospective, detailed registration of AEs related to COVID-19 vaccines in this patient population is of great importance. It is crucial to elucidate whether there is a coincidental or causal association between COVID-19 vaccine and some severe systemic AEs. Our data do not contradict that patients with PID can be advised to be vaccinated against COVID-19, in accordance with applicable national guidelines.

Imaging of large volume subcutaneous deposition using MRI: exploratory clinical study results

Subcutaneous (SC) delivery is a preferred route of administration for biotherapeutics but has predominantly been limited to volumes below 3 mL. With higher volume drug formulations emerging, understanding large volume SC (LVSC) depot localization, dispersion, and impact on the SC environment has become more critical. The aim of this exploratory clinical imaging study was to assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify and characterize LVSC injections and their effect on SC tissue as a function of delivery site and volume. Healthy adult subjects received incremental injections of normal saline up to 5 mL total volume in the arm and up to 10 mL in the abdomen and thigh. MRI images were acquired after each incremental SC injection. Post-image analysis was performed to correct imaging artifacts, identify depot tissue location, create 3-dimensional (3D) SC depot rendering, and estimate in vivo bolus volumes and SC tissue distention. LVSC saline depots were readily achieved, imaged using MRI, and quantified via subsequent image reconstructions. Imaging artifacts occurred under some conditions, necessitating corrections applied during image analysis. 3D renderings were created for both the depot alone and in relation to the SC tissue boundaries. LVSC depots remained predominantly within the SC tissue and expanded with increasing injection volume. Depot geometry varied across injection sites and localized physiological structure changes were observed to accommodate LVSC injection volumes. MRI is an effective means to clinically visualize LVSC depots and SC architecture allowing assessment of deposition and dispersion of injected formulations.Trial Registration: Not applicable for this exploratory clinical imaging study.

Clinical Outcome of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Patients with Primary Antibody Deficiencies

In 2019, the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, caused a worldwide pandemic, affecting more than 630 million individuals and causing 6.5 million deaths. In the general population, poorer outcomes have been associated with older age, chronic lung and cardiovascular diseases, and lymphopenia, highlighting the important role of cellular immunity in the immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 variants may have a significant impact on disease severity. There is a significant overlap with complications commonly found in inborn errors of immunity (IEI), such as primary antibody deficiencies. The results of various studies have provided ambiguous findings. Several studies identified risk factors in the general population with a minor impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, other studies have found a significant contribution of underlying immunodeficiency and immune-system dysregulation to the disease course. This ambiguity probably reflects the demographic differences and viral evolution. Impaired antibody production was associated with prolonged viral shedding, suggesting a critical role of humoral immunity in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection. This may explain the poorer outcomes in primary antibody deficiencies compared to other IEIs. Understanding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathogenesis and identifying risk factors may help us identify patients at high risk of severe COVID-19 for whom preventive measures should be introduced.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with immunodeficiencies: impact of infusion method on patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Understanding the impact of different immunoglobulin (Ig) infusion methods (intravenous [IVIg] and subcutaneous [SCIg]) upon treatment experience can potentially facilitate optimization of patient outcomes. Here, the perspective of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases (PID and SID, respectively) receiving IVIg and SCIg was evaluated, in terms of treatment satisfaction, accounting for treatment history, using Association des Patients Immunodéficients du Québec (APIQ) survey data.

METHODS

The online APIQ survey (shared October 2020-March 2021) of patients with immunodeficiencies in Canada contained 101 questions on: Ig use, history, and detailed infusion characteristics; as well as structured patient-reported outcomes such as treatment satisfaction (via TSQM-9), symptom state (via PASS), general health perception (via GHP), and physical and mental function (via PROMIS). Adult respondents (≥ 18 years old) currently using Ig were compared by their current Ig infusion method (IVIg or SCIg cohort) overall, and in a sub-analysis, the IVIg cohort was compared with the SCIg cohort after stratification by respondents who started SCIg when naïve to Ig ('SCIg naïve') or with previous IVIg experience ('SCIg switch').

RESULTS

In total, 54 respondents currently used IVIg and 242 used SCIg. The average duration per infusion of a weekly SCIg infusion was significantly shorter compared with the average duration of a 3-4 weekly IVIg infusion (p < 0.001). The SCIg cohort was associated with significantly higher scores for the TSQM-9 effectiveness domain compared with the IVIg cohort. The scores for TSQM-9 convenience and global satisfaction domains were similar in the two cohorts. The SCIg cohort was also associated with a significantly higher proportion of respondents who were in an acceptable symptom state and a lower proportion who reported very poor or poor perception of health compared with the IVIg cohort. Further, the SCIg naïve subgroup was associated with significantly higher TSQM-9 effectiveness and convenience domain scores compared with the IVIg cohort, while there was no significant difference between the SCIg switch subgroup and the IVIg cohort in terms of convenience.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of how different IgRT administration methods impact treatment experience and satisfaction may assist with informed treatment decision making and ultimately further improvements in patient outcomes.

Immunodeficient patient experience of emergency switch from intravenous to rapid push subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy during coronavirus disease 2019 shielding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Welsh immunodeficient patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) who were considered high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were directed to shield. Consequently, patients receiving hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) quickly transitioned to home-based self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg). This evaluation aimed to assess patients' perceptions and experiences and laboratory outcomes of emergency IgRT transition during COVID-19.

RECENT FINDINGS

A quick transition from in-hospital IVIg to home-based rapid push SCIg is achievable, however, patient IgRT administration preference remains key outside of emergency shielding measures.

SUMMARY

Subjective self-reported experiences ( n  = 23) and objective immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration ( n  = 28) assessments were prospectively collected from patients pre/post-IgRT switch. In total, 41/55 (75%) patients transitioned from IVIg to rapid push SCIg and all completed training to self-administer subcutaneously within 24 days. Twenty-two percent ( n  = 5) of patients preferred SCIg and 35% ( n  = 8) wanted to return to hospital-based IVIg at 6 weeks post-transition. Mean IgG levels were similar pre vs. post-SCIg switch (10.3 g/l vs. 10.6 g/l, respectively). Patients reported greater infection anxiety during COVID-19 and adapted behaviours to mitigate risk. Although a third of patients wished to return to IVIg following cessation of shielding, over time the percentage electing to remain on SCIg rose from 22% to 59%.

Immunosuppression in Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency-Walking the Line

Individuals with primary immunodeficiency (PIDD) experience not only infectious complications but also immune dysregulation leading to autoimmunity, inflammation, and lymphoproliferative manifestations. Management of these complications often requires treatment with additional immunosuppressive medications, which pose an additional risk of infectious complications. Immunosuppression in individuals with PIDD therefore requires careful assessment and consideration of risks and benefits. Medications should be closely monitored, and strategies for risk mitigation of adverse events considered, such as exposure reduction, appropriate vaccination, use of antibiotics/antivirals, and optimization of immunoglobulin replacement therapy. In a subset of individuals who are not tolerating immune modulation or experiencing disease progression despite appropriate interventions, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a management option.

Cutaquig® Is Well Tolerated in Immunodeficient Patients Who Did Not Tolerate Other Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Products

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment is generally tolerable, but some patients may experience adverse events to one or more SCIG products. We investigated whether 16.5% Cutaquig^® treatment offered a tolerable and safe alternative treatment for immunodeficient patients.

METHODS

A one-year prospective cohort study was conducted at a single center in Ottawa, Canada. Adult immunodeficient patients who reported previous intolerability, adverse events, or other difficulty to other 20% SCIG product(s) were recruited to start on 16.5% Cutaquig^®. Treatment tolerability, safety, and quality of life were observed and described.

RESULTS

Seven out of ten patients tolerated Cutaquig^®. There were no serious or severe adverse events related to the treatment. Three moderate infections were reported (two urinary tract infections and one injection site infection). The mean serum IgG level at the end of the study was comparable to baseline levels recorded before the study: 9.6 ± 4.5 vs. 7.6 ± 4.3 g/L, p = 0.07. The overall health and health domain changes in the SF-36 and quality of life tests using the EQ visual analog scale improved by 21.5% (p = 0.38), 16.7% (p = 0.29), and 7.7% (p = 0.23), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutaquig^® may be used as an alternative treatment option for patients who did not tolerate 20% SCIG products.

A clinician's guide for administration of high-concentration and facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who have impaired antibody production and function. Clinicians and patients may consider intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) options, and each route may offer different benefits for the individual. IVIG requires fewer infusion sites and less frequent infusions than some formulations of SCIG. However, SCIG does not require venous access, is associated with fewer systemic adverse infusion reactions than IVIG, and can independently be self-administered at home. Importantly, tailoring treatment experiences to the needs of the individual may improve treatment adherence and quality of life for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases who often rely on long-term or lifelong treatment. This review aims to educate United States (US) healthcare providers on the administration process of SCIG, with a focus on more concentrated formulations of SCIG and facilitated SCIG. It provides practical guidance on initiating, optimizing, and monitoring SCIG therapy. The advantages and disadvantages of the different treatment options are also presented for discussion between the patient and clinician.

Primary Immune Deficiency: Patients’ Preferences for Replacement Immunoglobulin Therapy

Purpose

Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy is an important life-saving treatment modality for patients with primary antibody immune deficiency disorders (PAD). IVIG and SCIg are suitable alternatives to treat patients with PAD but vary in key ways. Existing evidence on patient preferences for Ig treatments given the complexities associated with IVIG and SCIg treatment is limited and fails to account for variations in preferences across patients. For this reason, we sought to evaluate PAD patient preferences for features of IVIG and SCIg across different patient characteristics.

Materials and Methods

119 PAD patients completed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. The DCE asked respondents to make choices between carefully constructed treatment alternatives described in terms of generic treatment features. Choices from the DCE were analyzed to determine the relative influence of attribute changes on treatment preferences. We used subgroup analysis to evaluate systematic variations in preferences by patients’ age, gender, time since diagnosis, and treatment experience.

Results

Patients were primarily concerned about the duration of treatment side effects, but preferences were heterogeneous. This was particularly true around administration features. Time since diagnosis was associated with an increase in patients’ concerns with the number of needles required per infusion. Also, patients appear to prefer the kind of therapy they are currently using which could be the result of properly aligned patient preferences or evidence of patient adaptive behavior.

Conclusions

Heterogeneity in preferences for Ig replacement treatments suggests that a formal shared decision making process could have an important role in improving patient care.

SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNOGLOBULINS IN CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA WITH SECONDARY ANTIBODY DEFICIENCY. A MONOCENTRIC EXPERIENCE DURING COVID‐19 PANDEMICS

Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) is a frequent manifestation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that increases the risk of infections. However, no formal guideline are available regarding the eligibility for prophylaxis or the delivery method, dosage, frequency of administration and duration of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous IgRT (SCIg) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) of CLL pts in the Covid‐19 era. Ten CLL pts with SAD were treated with subcutaneous IgRT (SCIg) at our institution between October 2019 and December 2020. Median age was 66 years and five patients had comorbidities. Seven patients were receiving therapy for CLL when treatment with SCIg was initiated. All pts received 10 g total dose hyaluronidase‐free SCIg independently from body weight. The IgG level and CD4/CD8, CD19 and CD16/56 lymphocytes subset were recorded at baseline and every 3 months. No patient experienced infectious events nor Covid‐19 mediated interstitial pneumonia while on SCIg therapy. All patients tolerated well the therapy and experienced an increase of IgG levels, which was then stable in time. We conclude that SCIg administration in CLL pts with SAD is efficacious and safe as infectious prophylaxis. This route of administration appears particularly advantageous in the Covid‐19 era, because of the self‐administration at home which results in improvement in the QoL and reduced treatment expenditures.

Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of subcutaneous and intravenous IgG dosing in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for comparing the PK of subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy (SCIG) with Gamunex-C 10% or SCIG 20% formulations in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases was developed using data from 3 clinical trials (N = 95, 69.5% adults, 30.5% <18 years) of intravenous IG (IVIG) 10% and SCIG 10% or SCIG 20%. Serum IgG exposure following switches from IVIG 10% every 3 or 4 weeks to biweekly SCIG 20% (dose adjustment factor 1.0 or 1.37) and from weekly SCIG 20% to biweekly SCIG 20% or SCIG 20% 2-7 times/week was simulated. The PK of IVIG 10% and SCIG 20% were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption rate constant of exogenous IgG from an SC depot compartment into the central compartment and first-order elimination from the central compartment. Switching from IVIG 10% every 4 weeks to biweekly SCIG 20% produced similar serum IgG exposure, with lower peak and higher trough serum IgG concentrations. Switching from IVIG 10% every 3 or 4 weeks to weekly and biweekly SCIG 20% yielded comparable IgG exposure and clinically effective trough IgG concentrations.

Future of Therapy for Inborn Errors of Immunity

Over the past 20 years, the rapid evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiencies (PI) and the recognition of immune dysregulation as a feature in some have prompted the use of "inborn errors of immunity" (IEI) as a more encompassing term used to describe these disorders [1, 2] . This article aims to review the future of therapy of PI/IEI (referred to IEI throughout this paper). Historically, immune deficiencies have been characterized as monogenic disorders resulting in immune deficiencies affecting T cells, B cells, combination of T and B cells, or innate immune disorders. More recently, immunologists are also recognizing a variety of phenotypes associated with one genotype or similar phenotypes across genotypes and a role for incomplete penetrance or variable expressivity of some genes causing inborn errors of immunity [3]. The IUIS classification of immune deficiencies (IEIs) has evolved over time to include 10 categories, with disorders of immune dysregulation accounting for a new subset, some treatable with small molecule inhibitors or biologics. [1] Until recently, management options were limited to prompt treatment of infections, gammaglobulin replacement, and possibly bone marrow transplant depending on the defect. Available therapies have expanded to include small molecule inhibitors, biologics, gene therapy, and the use of adoptive transfer of virus-specific T cells to fight viral infections in immunocompromised patients. Several significant contributions to the field of clinical immunology have fueled the rapid advancement of therapies over the past two decades. Among these are educational efforts to recruit young immunologists to the field resulting in the growth of a world-wide community of clinicians and investigators interested in rare diseases, efforts to increase awareness of IEI globally contributing to international collaborations, along with advancements in diagnostic genetic testing, newborn screening, molecular biology techniques, gene correction, use of immune modulators, and ex vivo expansion of engineered T cells for therapeutic use. The development and widespread use of newborn screening have helped to identify severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) earlier resulting in better outcomes [4]. Continual improvements and accessibility of genetic sequencing have helped to identify new IEI diseases at an accelerated pace [5]. Advances in gene therapy and bone marrow transplant have made treatments possible in otherwise fatal diseases. Furthermore, the increased awareness of IEI across the world has driven networks of immunologists working together to improve the diagnosis and treatment of these rare diseases. These improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of IEI noted over the past 20 years bring hope for a better future for the IEI community. This paper will review future directions in a few of the newer therapies emerging for IEI. For easy reference, most of the diseases discussed in this paper are briefly described in a summary table, in the order mentioned within the paper (Appendix).

Real-world results with IgPro20 for hypo- or agammaglobulinemia in Japan

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin is one of the standard treatments for hypogammaglobulinemia in primary immunodeficiencies (PID) worldwide. In Japan, IgPro20 (Hizentra^® ; l-proline-stabilized 20% human subcutaneous immunoglobulin) is approved for agammaglobulinemia or hypogammaglobulinemia due to PID or secondary immunodeficiency (SID); however, its safety and effectiveness has not previously been assessed in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This multicenter, open label post-marketing surveillance study was conducted between January 2014 and March 2019. Patients who received IgPro20 due to PID or SID were included after informed consent. Physicians completed a case report form for each patient. Safety was determined from reported adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions, and serious AEs (SAEs); effectiveness was assessed by infection rates after the first IgPro20 dose.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients receiving IgPro20 in the safety analysis, 39 developed AEs (45.9%; PID n = 28, SID n = 11). At least one adverse drug reaction was observed in 27 patients (31.8%; PID n = 21, SID n = 6), and the most common were injection site reactions (n = 17, 20.0%). Four patients (PID n = 3, SID n = 1) reported SAEs but two were unrelated to IgPro20 administration. The infection rate decreased from 0.54 per patient during the 6 months before IgPro20 to 0.39 per patient during IgPro20 treatment. Serious bacterial infections occurred in six patients before IgPro20 (7.9%; PID n = 2; SID n = 4) but in only one patient with SID during IgPro20 treatment (1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, IgPro20 was considered safe and effective among patients with agammaglobulinemia or hypogammaglobulinemia due to PID or SID.

Infection rates and tolerability of three different immunoglobulin administration modalities in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Aim: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and overall tolerability of immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment modalities (intravenous Ig [iv.Ig], subcutaneous Ig [sc.Ig] and facilitated sc.Ig [fsc.Ig]). Materials & methods: A total of 30 participants with primary immunodeficiency diseases aged ≥2 years sequentially received iv.Ig, sc.Ig and fsc.Ig during consecutive clinical studies. Results: For iv.Ig, sc.Ig and fsc.Ig, rates of validated acute serious bacterial infections/participant-year (0, 0.09 and 0.04, respectively) and all infections/participant year (4.17, 3.68 and 2.42, respectively) were similarly low; rates of systemic and local causally related adverse events/participant-year were 5.60, 1.93 and 0.88, respectively and 0.13, 0.92 and 1.57, respectively. Conclusion: fsc.Ig provided similar efficacy to iv.Ig and sc.Ig. Clinical Trial registration: NCT00546871, NCT00814320, NCT01175213 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Secondary Immunodeficiency and Risk of Infection Following Immune Therapies in Neurology

Secondary immunodeficiencies (SIDs) are acquired conditions that may occur as sequelae of immune therapy. In recent years a number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has been approved for multiple sclerosis and related disorders such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, some of which are frequently also used in- or off-label to treat conditions such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), myasthenia gravis, myositis, and encephalitis. In this review, we focus on currently available immune therapeutics in neurology to explore their specific modes of action that might contribute to SID, with particular emphasis on their potential to induce secondary antibody deficiency. Considering evidence from clinical trials as well as long-term observational studies related to the patients' immune status and risks of severe infections, we delineate long-term anti-CD20 therapy, with the greatest data availability for rituximab, as a major risk factor for the development of SID, particularly through secondary antibody deficiency. Alemtuzumab and cladribine have relevant effects on circulating B-cell counts; however, evidence for SID mediated by antibody deficiency appears limited and urgently warrants further systematic evaluation. To date, there has been no evidence suggesting that treatment with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or natalizumab leads to antibody deficiency. Risk factors predisposing to development of SID include duration of therapy, increasing age, and pre-existing low immunoglobulin (Ig) levels. Prevention strategies of SID comprise awareness of risk factors, individualized treatment protocols, and vaccination concepts. Immune supplementation employing Ig replacement therapy might reduce morbidity and mortality associated with SIDs in neurological conditions. In light of the broad range of existing and emerging therapies, the potential for SID warrants urgent consideration among neurologists and other healthcare professionals.