Seasonal respiratory virus circulation was diminished during the COVID-19 pandemic

Pneumococcal density and respiratory co-detection in severe pediatric pneumonia in Laos

There is growing evidence on the importance of bacterial/viral interaction in the course of pneumonia. In Laos, no study has investigated respiratory pathogen co-detection. We conducted a study at Mahosot Hospital in Vientiane to determine whether bacterial/viral co-detection and pneumococcal density are associated with severe pneumonia. Between December 2013 and December 2016, 934 under 5 years old hospitalized children with ARI were enrolled. Swabs from the upper respiratory tract were collected and analyzed by real-time PCR. The most common co-detected microorganisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae/Haemophilus influenzae (24%), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)/S. pneumoniae (12%) and RSV/H. influenzae (16%). Pneumococcal density was 4.52 times higher in influenza virus positive participants. RSV/S. pneumoniae and RSV/H. influenzae co-detections were positively associated with severe pneumonia in univariate analysis (OR 1.86, 95%CI:1.22-2.81, p = 0.003 and OR 2.09, 95%CI:1.46-3.00), but not confirmed in adjusted analysis (aOR 0.72, 95%CI:0.38-1.6, p = 0.309 and aOR 1.37, 95%CI:0.73-2.58). In RSV positive patients, there was no association between pneumococcal density and severe pneumonia. Our findings confirmed an association between pneumococcal density and influenza but not RSV severe pneumonia in young children. Results highlight the complexity of the interaction of viral/bacterial pathogens, which might not have a simple synergistic action in the evolution of pneumonia.

Respiratory virus circulation during pandemic: Why were some viruses still circulating?

A few months after the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020, several non-pharmacological measures were adopted worldwide, with varying degrees of strictness, to contain the transmission of the virus and mitigate its impacts. These measures, in addition to effectively reducing the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2), these measures also appeared to impact the circulation of other respiratory viruses. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the most relevant data available regarding the circulation of the major respiratory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring the factors that allowed some viruses to continue circulating while others experienced a decline. Several authors report that the detection of influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human coronaviruses (hCoVs), human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs), and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) dropped significantly. However, non-enveloped viruses such as adenovirus, and especially human rhinovirus (HRV), did not seem to be as affected. Hypotheses for this scenario include adopting of non-pharmacological measures to curb the spread of COVID-19, behavioral changes in hygiene habits, intrinsic characteristics of each virus such as transmission mode, the presence or absence of a viral envelope and viral interference. Rhinovirus is particularly intriguing, as it maintained a high prevalence during the years of the pandemic. Further investigation into the possible explanations for this phenomenon may be worthwhile.

Trends of respiratory viruses and factors associated with severe acute respiratory infection in patients presenting at a university hospital: a 6-year retrospective study across the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted the epidemiology of respiratory viruses, altering seasonal patterns and reducing circulation. While recovery trends have been observed, factors associated with severe acute respiratory infections (SARIs) during pre- and post-pandemic periods remain underexplored in middle-income countries.

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the trends in respiratory virus circulation and identify factors associated with SARI in patients attending a tertiary care university hospital in western Mexico over a six-year period spanning the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic phases.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using data from 19,088 symptomatic patients tested for respiratory viruses between 2018 and 2024. Viral trends were analyzed through interrupted time series (ITS) modeling, incorporating locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) and raw positivity rates. Additionally, ITS analysis was performed to evaluate temporal changes in SARI proportions across different phases of the pandemic. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to determine independent risk factors for SARI across different time periods.

Results

During the pandemic (2020-2021), respiratory virus positivity rates significantly declined, particularly for influenza, which experienced a sharp reduction but rebounded post-2022. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) demonstrated a delayed resurgence, whereas other respiratory viruses exhibited heterogeneous rebound patterns. ITS modeling of SARI proportions revealed a significant pre-pandemic increasing trend, followed by a slower rise during the pandemic, and a sharp post-pandemic drop in early 2022, before resuming an upward trajectory. Among older adults (>65 years), a marked increase in SARI was observed at the beginning of the pandemic, while younger groups showed more stable patterns. Logistic regression identified advanced age, male sex, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and immunosuppression as major risk factors for SARI, while vaccination consistently showed a protective effect across all periods and subgroups.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic induced persistent shifts in respiratory virus circulation, disrupting seasonal dynamics and modifying the burden of SARI. The findings underscore the importance of continuous surveillance, targeted vaccination programs, and early diagnostics to mitigate severe outcomes. These results highlight the need for adaptive public health strategies in middle-income countries to address evolving respiratory disease threats.

Rhinovirus infection and co-infection in children with severe acute respiratory infection during the COVID-19 pandemic period

Rhinovirus causes respiratory tract infections in children and is found in co-infections. The objective of this research was to study the clinical profile of rhinovirus infection and co-infection in children with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) during the COVID-19 pandemic period. We included 606 children ranging in age from 0.1 to 144 months of age from March 2020 to December 2021, hospitalized in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The samples were collected by secretion from the nasopharynx region. A total of 259 children were tested positive for viral infection, 153 (59.07%) of them had a single rhinovirus infection and, 56 (36.6%) were aged between 60.1 and 144 months. Nine types of co-infections were identified and were found coinfection with three or more viruses (22/104, 21.15%). Observing the seasonality, the number of cases was similar between 2020 (49.53%) and 2021 (51.47%). Patients with a single infection (86.88%) and coinfection (67.30%) were more likely to have coughed. Patients with co-infection required the use of O2 for longer than those with a single rhinovirus infection. Hemogram results obtained from individuals with a single infection had higher levels of urea when compared to patients with co-infection with and other respiratory viruses. Multiple correspondence analyses indicated different clinical symptoms and comorbidities in patients with co-infection compared to those with single infection. The results found that the rhinovirus was much prevalent virus during the pandemic period and was found in co-infection with other virus types, what is important to diagnostic for the correct treatment of patients.

Prevalence and Seasonal Patterns of 16 Common Viral Respiratory Pathogens during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Gauteng Province, South Africa, 2020-2021

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in widespread morbidity and mortality, but generally, the diagnosis of other respiratory viruses was limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of other respiratory viruses during the 2020/2021 pandemic among patients of all ages who accessed care at public healthcare facilities in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Laboratory diagnosis for respiratory viruses, with or without SARS-CoV-2, was conducted via multiplex real-time polymerase chain reactions using respiratory specimens. A total of 1776 patients were included from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021, of which 766 (43.1%) were positive for respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2. RV (368/1776; 20.7%) was the most prevalent, followed by RSV (304/1776; 17.1%), AdV (112/1776; 6.3%) and EV (105/1776; 5.9%). hCoV-OC43 (39/1776; 2.2%) was the most prevalent common coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 co-infections were detected in 4.8% (24/500) of patients. Only 27.1% (482/1776) of patients were admitted to high-care or intensive care units. A decrease in respiratory virus detections was observed, except for RSV, EV and hCoV-OC43. RSV prevalence increased in 2021, while influenza A/B viruses remained undetected.

Global analysis of respiratory viral circulation and timing of epidemics in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic eras, based on data from the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS)

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly changed respiratory viruses' epidemiology due to non-pharmaceutical interventions and possible viral interactions. This study investigates whether the circulation patterns of respiratory viruses have returned to pre-pandemic norms by comparing their peak timing and duration during the first three SARS-CoV-2 seasons to pre-pandemic times.

METHODS

Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System data from 194 countries (2014-2023) was analyzed for epidemic peak timing and duration, focusing on pre-pandemic and pandemic periods across both hemispheres and the intertropical belt. The analysis was restricted to countries meeting specific data thresholds to ensure robustness.

RESULTS

In 2022/2023, the northern hemisphere experienced earlier influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) peaks by 1.9 months (P <0.001). The duration of influenza epidemics increased by 2.2 weeks (P <0.001), with RSV showing a similar trend. The southern hemisphere's influenza peak shift was not significant (P = 0.437). Intertropical regions presented no substantial change in peak timing but experienced a significant reduction in the duration for human metapneumovirus and adenovirus (7.2 and 6.5 weeks shorter, respectively, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic altered the typical patterns of influenza and RSV, with earlier peaks in 2022 in temperate areas. These findings highlight the importance of robust surveillance data to inform public health strategies on evolving viral dynamics in the years to come.

Reduced seasonal coronavirus incidence in high-risk population groups during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological data on seasonal coronaviruses (sCoVs) may provide insight on transmission patterns and demographic factors that favor coronaviruses (CoVs) with greater disease severity. This study describes the incidence of CoVs in several high-risk groups in Ottawa, Canada, from October 2020 to March 2022.

METHODS

Serological assays quantified IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-229E. Incident infections were compared between four population groups: individuals exposed to children, transit users, immunocompromised, and controls. Associations between antibody prevalence indicative of natural infection and demographic variables were assessed using regression analyses.

RESULTS

Transit users and those exposed to children were at no greater risk of infection compared to the control group. Fewer infections were detected in the immunocompromised group (p = .03). SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was greater in individuals with low income and within ethnic minorities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions intended to reduce SAR-CoV-2 transmission protected populations at high risk of exposure. The re-emergence of sCoVs and other common respiratory viruses alongside SARS-CoV-2 may alter infection patterns and increase the risk in vulnerable populations.

Seasonal human coronavirus humoral responses in AZD1222 (ChaAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccinated adults reveal limited cross-immunity

Background

Immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now widespread; however, the degree of cross-immunity between SARS-CoV-2 and endemic, seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) remains unclear.

Methods

SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV cross-immunity was evaluated in adult participants enrolled in a US sub-study in the phase III, randomized controlled trial (NCT04516746) of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) primary-series vaccination for one-year. Anti-HCoV spike-binding antibodies against HCoV-229E, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-NL63 were evaluated in participants following study dosing and, in the AZD1222 group, after a non-study third-dose booster. Timing of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion (assessed via anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels) and incidence of COVID-19 were evaluated in those who received AZD1222 primary-series by baseline anti-HCoV titers.

Results

We evaluated 2,020/21,634 participants in the AZD1222 group and 1,007/10,816 in the placebo group. At the one-year data cutoff (March 11, 2022) mean duration of follow up was 230.9 (SD: 106.36, range: 1-325) and 94.3 (74.12, 1-321) days for participants in the AZD1222 (n = 1,940) and placebo (n = 962) groups, respectively. We observed little elevation in anti-HCoV humoral titers post study-dosing or post-boosting, nor evidence of waning over time. The occurrence and timing of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and incidence of COVID-19 were not largely impacted by baseline anti-HCoV titers.

Conclusion

We found limited evidence for cross-immunity between SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs following AZD1222 primary series and booster vaccination. Susceptibility to future emergence of novel coronaviruses will likely persist despite a high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunity in global populations.

Prevalence and clinical impact of mono- and co-infections with endemic coronaviruses 229E, OC43, NL63, and HKU-1 during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

Endemic human coronaviruses (eHCoVs) are found worldwide and usually result in mild to moderate upper respiratory tract infections. They can lead to more severe illnesses such as croup, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia in vulnerable populations. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, information on HCoV prevalence and incidence and clinical impact of co-infections of HCoV with SARS-CoV-2 was lacking.

Objectives

Thus, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of infections caused by eHCoVs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bulgaria.

Methods

From January 2021 to December 2022, nasopharyngeal swabs of patients with acute upper or lower respiratory tract infections were tested for 17 respiratory viruses using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. The clinical data and laboratory parameters of patients infected with respiratory viruses were analysed.

Results

Of the 1375 patients screened, 24 (1.7 %) were positive for HCoVs, and 197 (14.3 %) were positive for eight other seasonal respiratory viruses. Five (0.7 %) of 740 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were co-infected with eHCoVs. Co-infected patients had a mean C-reactive protein level of 198.5 ± 2.12 mg/mL and a mean oxygen saturation of 82 ± 2.8 mmHg, while those in patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses were 61.8 mg/mL and 92.8 ± 4.6 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.05). Pneumonia was diagnosed in 63.3 % of patients with HCoV infection and 6 % of patients positive for other seasonal respiratory viruses (p < 0.05). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection stayed in hospital for an average of 5.8 ± 3.7 days, whereas the average hospital stay of patients with eHCoV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection was 9 ± 1.4 days (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

These findings indicate the low prevalence of eHCoVs and low co-infection rate between eHCoVs and SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bulgaria. Despite their low incidence, such mixed infections can cause severe signs that require oxygen therapy and longer hospital stays, underlining the need for targeted testing of severe COVID-19 cases to identify potential co-infections.

Changes in incidence of hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands in 2020

This population-based cohort study aimed to describe changes in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospital diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands compared with the pre-pandemic period. We used Dutch nationwide statistics about hospitalizations to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) of hospital diagnoses of CVD during the first and second COVID-19 waves in The Netherlands in 2020 versus the same periods in 2019. Compared with 2019, the incidence rate of a hospital diagnosis of ischemic stroke (IRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.95), major bleeding (IRR 0.74; 95% CI 0.68-0.82), atrial fibrillation (IRR 0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82), myocardial infarction (IRR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.84), and heart failure (IRR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65-0.85) declined during the first wave, but returned to pre-pandemic levels throughout 2020. However, the incidence rate of a hospital diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) increased during both the first and second wave in 2020 compared with 2019 (IRR 1.30; 95% CI 1.15-1.48 and IRR 1.31; 95% CI 1.19-1.44, respectively). In conclusion, we observed substantial declines in incidences of CVD during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands in 2020, especially during the first wave, with an exception for an increase in incidence of PE. This study contributes to quantifying the collateral damage of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of a Novel FluA/FluB/SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex LAMP and Commercial FluA/FluB/SARS-CoV-2/RSV RT-qPCR Assays

Influenza and coronaviruses cause highly contagious respiratory diseases that cause millions of deaths worldwide. Public health measures implemented during the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have gradually reduced influenza circulation worldwide. As COVID-19 measures have relaxed, it is necessary to monitor and control seasonal influenza during this COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, the development of rapid and accurate diagnostic methods for influenza and COVID-19 is of paramount importance because both diseases have significant public health and economic impacts. To address this, we developed a multi-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit capable of simultaneously detecting influenza A/B and SARS-CoV-2. The kit was optimized by testing various ratios of primer sets for influenza A/B (FluA/FluB) and SARS-CoV-2 and internal control (IC). The FluA/FluB/SARS-CoV-2 multiplex LAMP assay showed 100% specificity for uninfected clinical samples and sensitivities of 90.6%, 86.89%, and 98.96% for LAMP kits against influenza A, influenza B, and SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples, respectively. Finally, the attribute agreement analysis for clinical tests indicated substantial agreement between the multiplex FluA/FluB/SARS-CoV-2/IC LAMP and commercial Allplex^TM SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV assays.