Apolipoprotein E phenotypes in familial hypercholesterolaemia: importance for expression of disease and response to therapy

Pravastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

A detailed summary and meta-analysis of the dose-related effect of pravastatin on lipids is not available.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To assess the pharmacology of pravastatin by characterizing the dose-related effect and variability of the effect of pravastatin on the surrogate marker: low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol). The effect of pravastatin on morbidity and mortality is not the objective of this systematic review. Secondary objectives • To assess the dose-related effect and variability of effect of pravastatin on the following surrogate markers: total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol); and triglycerides. • To assess the effect of pravastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2021: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Bireme LILACS, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pravastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered lipid data from placebo-controlled trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous data and withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs) data as dichotomous data. We searched for WDAEs information from all trials. We assessed all trials using Cochrane's risk of bias tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-four RCTs evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pravastatin in 9771 participants. The participants were of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and pravastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be moderate to high. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 4.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol. This represented a dose-response slope that was less than the other studied statins: atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. From other systematic reviews we conducted on statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pravastatin is similar to fluvastatin, but has a decreased effect compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03). The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pravastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with pravastatin because of the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 48.4% of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Both Targeted Mass Spectrometry and Flow Sorting Analysis Methods Detected the Decreased Serum Apolipoprotein E Level in Alzheimer's Disease Patients

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism has been appreciated as a valuable predictor of Alzheimer disease (AD), and the associated ε4 allele has been recognized as an indicator of susceptibility to this disease. However, serum ApoE levels have been a controversial issue in AD, due to the great variability regarding the different target detection methods, ethnicity, and the geographic variations of cohorts. The aim of this study was to validate serum ApoE levels in relation to AD, particularly using two distinct detection methods, liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry and microsphere-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, to overcome experimental variations. Also, comparison of serum ApoE levels was performed between the level of protein detection by FACS and peptide level by SRM in both control and AD patients. Results from the two detection methods were cross-confirmed and validated. Both methods produced fairly consistent results, showing a significant decrease of serum ApoE levels in AD patients relative to those of a control cohort (43 control versus 45 AD, p < 0.0001). Significant correlation has been revealed between results from FACS and SRM (p < 0.0001) even though lower serum ApoE concentration values were measured in protein by FACS analysis than in peptide-level detections by SRM. Correlation study suggested that a decrease of the serum ApoE level in AD is related to the mini-mental state exam score in both results from different experimental methods, but it failed to show consistent correlation with age, gender, or clinical dementia rating.

Novel therapies for severe dyslipidemia originating from human genetics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Novel therapies for severe dyslipidemia target a wide range of unmet medical needs: severe familial hypercholesterolemia, severe hypertriglyceridemia and chylomicronemia, elevated lipoprotein (a), lipodystrophies, high-density lipoprotein particle diseases, lysosomal acid lipase deficiency and storage diseases, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and others. The purpose of this review is to describe the contribution of human genetics to the development of therapeutic approaches targeting severe dyslipidemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in human genetics and the identification of rare genetic variants having strong effects on disease risk not only accelerated the development of therapies for severe dyslipidemia, they also revealed new pathways, genes and mechanisms of health, disease or drug response, and facilitated molecular diagnosis, which may prove essential as the authorized use of some of these novel drugs is limited to specific conditions. In addition, the dissection of the gene and cell machinery gave rise to new technologies, gene-based therapies and biodrugs covering a broad range of novel agents currently available or in clinical development to treat severe lipid disorders.

SUMMARY

Several novel therapies are recently available or under development to treat severe dyslipidemia and associated risk stem directly from genetic research. Altogether, these therapies target a broad variety of severe dyslipidemia pathways or mechanisms and illustrate that clinical lipidology has now entered the era of precision medicine.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on statin-induced decreases in plasma lipids and cardiovascular events

Hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and statins (inhibitors of a key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, 3-hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) are the drugs of choice for decreasing plasma cholesterol. It has been estimated that genetic factors can explain 40%-60% of final cholesterol concentrations and approximately 70% of the efficacy of statin treatment. The gene most often analyzed in the context of statin efficacy is the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE). This review summarizes evidence of the association between variations in the APOE gene locus and the response of plasma lipids to statin therapy. Although the results are not consistent, carriers of the APOE4 allele seems to be less responsive to statins than carriers of APOE2 and APOE3 alleles. This effect is partially context-dependent (gene-gender interactions; gene-nutrition and gene-smoking interactions have not yet been studied) and the absolute differences vary between different population groups.

The vascular contribution to Alzheimer's disease

AD (Alzheimer's disease) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of unknown origin. Despite questions as to the underlying cause(s) of this disease, shared risk factors for both AD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease indicate that vascular mechanisms may critically contribute to the development and progression of both AD and atherosclerosis. An increased risk of developing AD is linked to the presence of the apoE4 (apolipoprotein E4) allele, which is also strongly associated with increased risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Recent studies also indicate that cardiovascular risk factors, including elevated blood cholesterol and triacylglycerol (triglyceride), increase the likelihood of AD and vascular dementia. Lipids and lipoproteins in the circulation interact intimately with the cerebrovasculature, and may have important effects on its constituent brain microvascular endothelial cells and the adjoining astrocytes, which are components of the neurovascular unit. The present review will examine the potential mechanisms for understanding the contributions of vascular factors, including lipids, lipoproteins and cerebrovascular Abeta (amyloid beta), to AD, and suggest therapeutic strategies for the attenuation of this devastating disease process. Specifically, we will focus on the actions of apoE, TGRLs (triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins) and TGRL lipolysis products on injury of the neurovascular unit and increases in blood-brain barrier permeability.

Pharmacogenetics of apolipoprotein E gene during lipid-lowering therapy: lipid levels and prevention of coronary heart disease

A non-optimal plasma concentration of lipids is among the major modifiable risk factors of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the prevention of cardiovascular disease by means of lipid-lowering therapy with statins and other agents is of great importance for patient groups where a lifestyle change, for example, diet modification, does not lead to adequately reduced lipid levels. The response of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to statin therapy is highly variable. This is partly attributed to hereditary variation in genes involved in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and lipid metabolism. The pharmacogenetics of lipid-lowering therapy have been investigated for more than 40 different genes. The gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE) has been the most frequently studied, particularly regarding the epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism. Those with the epsilon4 allele seem to have the poorest and those with the epsilon2 allele the strongest response to statins with regards to LDL-C levels. In addition, the epsilon2 carriers may reach the LDL-C treatment goals more frequently than epsilon4 carriers. Few studies have investigated the interaction of the APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism and lipid-lowering therapy in relation to the course of coronary heart disease; the results are contradictory and so far inconclusive. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic findings related to the influence of APOE gene variation on lipid responses and the prevention of coronary heart disease during lipid-lowering therapy.

The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.

The discrete and combined effect of SREBP-2 and SCAP isoforms in the control of plasma lipids among familial hypercholesterolaemia patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hypercholesterolaemia is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. Cholesterol is modulated by genetic and environmental factors. An important regulatory pathway is controlled by the sterol-regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) and the SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP). Both SREBP-2 and SCAP are candidates to contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. We investigated the possible effects of the variability of proteins involved in this regulatory pathway on plasma lipids among familial hypercholesterolaemia patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding SREBP-2 and SCAP causing amino acid changes at positions 595 (595G/A) and 796 (796I/V), respectively, were genotyped in 801 FH individuals originating from Israel, The Netherlands, and Switzerland. A linear regression model to examine the associations between SREBP-2 and SCAP isoforms and lipid and lipoprotein levels was used. In females, homozygosity either for the SREBP-2-595A or for the SCAP-796I isoform was associated with higher LDL-cholesterol plasma concentrations (14.7 mg/dl and 20.3 mg/dl, respectively). Surprisingly, heterozygosity for the combination SREBP-2-595A/SCAP-796I was associated with a decrease of 30.28 mg/dl in LDL-C (p-value for gene-gene interaction=0.09). No such effect was observed among FH males. Subgroup analysis considering the most frequent (N>/=24) LDL receptor mutations (del191-2, ins313+1-2, C660X, E207K, S285L) revealed further gene-dosage- and gender-dependent effects of the SCAP mutations on LDL-cholesterol concentrations (p=0.0345). These effects were, however, not present when less frequent LDL receptor mutations were investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a possible gene-gene interaction between the genes encoding SREBP-2 and SCAP that modulate plasma lipids in a strictly gender-specific fashion. Further investigation is needed to confirm this effect. A study in a larger FH group or in non-FH hypercholesterolaemic subjects may further define the role of this regulatory mechanism in determining plasma lipid concentration.

Genetic and environmental factors affecting the response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common inherited metabolic disease characterized by elevated serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and ischaemic heart disease early in life. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent premature atherosclerosis in FH patients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the effects of genetic [class of the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene mutation, apolipoprotein (apo)E, apoA-IV and cholesterol ester transfer protein gene polymorphisms] and environmental factors (age, sex, smoking habit and body mass index) on the lipid-lowering response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined FH. Atorvastatin 20 mg/day was prescribed in 49 patients with heterozygous FH. The lipid profile was examined before and after 12 weeks of therapy. Statin therapy resulted in a decrease of 37% and 36% in LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The study population was then divided into 2 groups according to the class of the LDLR mutation [patients sharing a class V mutation (the G1775A mutation, n=21) and patients sharing class II mutations (the G1646A and the C858A mutations, n=28)]. In both groups, the percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels were correlated with the initial LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The class of the LDLR mutation affected the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. In detail, heterozygotes sharing a class V mutation of the LDLR showed a higher percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels after atorvastatin administration compared to patients sharing class II mutations (49+/-9% versus 34+/-9%, P=0.001 for LDL-C and 42+/-16% versus 35+/-20%, P=0.001 for apoB). The influence of the classes of the LDLR gene mutations on the change of LDL-C and apoB levels to atorvastatin was still significant in a multivariate analysis. None of the other genetic and environmental factors studied affected the lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin therapy in patients with heterozygous FH in a multivariate analysis. Our data indicate that the class of the LDLR gene mutation affects the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. Specifically, patients with a class V mutation exhibit higher percentage decrease in LDL-C and apoB levels after statin therapy compared to patients sharing class II mutations.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

Influence of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein promoter polymorphism −493 GT on fasting plasma triglyceride values and interaction with treatment response to atorvastatin in subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). Phenotypic expression is highly variable, being influenced by diet, age, gender, body mass index, apolipoprotein E genotype and type of LDL-receptor gene mutation. Microsomal triglyceride (TG) transfer protein (MTP) is a protein involved in lipid metabolism. Polymorphism MTP -493 GT has been shown to modulate lipid levels in several populations. To analyse the effect of this polymorphism in the lipid phenotype expression of FH and treatment response, we studied a sample of 222 Spanish FH patients, of whom 147 were studied before and after treatment with 20 mg of atorvastatin daily during 6 weeks. The variant was analysed by polymerase chain reaction amplification and single-strand confirmation polymorphism. Treatment reduced LDL-C, total cholesterol and TGs. Baseline fasting TGs and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in female T allele carriers (TG: 111+/-51 mg/dl GG, 89+/-35 mg/dl GT, 83+/-26 mg/dl TT, P=0.022; very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 24+/-13 mg/dl GG, 16+/-5 mg/dl GT, 17+/-5 mg/dl TT, P=0.018). Triglyceride response to atorvastatin was modulated by this polymorphism in men (P=0.009), but not in women, although differences between genotypes were maintained after treatment. In conclusion, the MTP -493 GT polymorphism modulates pre- and post-treatment plasma TG values of FH in Spanish subjects in a gender-specific way. Other environmental and genetic factors likely also modulate this response.

Pharmacogenetics of lipid diseases

The genetic basis for most of the rare lipid monogenic disorders have been elucidated, but the challenge remains in determining the combination of genes that contribute to the genetic variability in lipid levels in the general population; this has been estimated to be in the range of 40-60 per cent of the total variability. Therefore, the effect of common polymorphisms on lipid phenotypes will be greatly modulated by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. This approach can also be used to characterise the individuality of the response to lipid-lowering therapies, whether using drugs (pharmacogenetics) or dietary interventions (nutrigenetics). In this regard, multiple studies have already described significant interactions between candidate genes for lipid and drug metabolism that modulate therapeutic response--although the outcomes of these studies have been controversial and call for more rigorous experimental design and analytical approaches. Once solid evidence about the predictive value of genetic panels is obtained, risk and therapeutic algorithms can begin to be generated that should provide an accurate measure of genetic predisposition, as well as targeted behavioural modifications or drugs of choice and personalised dosages of these drugs.

Genetically defined hyperlipidemia

The unraveling of genetic defects associated with disorders in lipid metabolism has contributed to the understanding of lipoprotein metabolism and the pathophysiological consequences of a particular mutation. The translation, however, of a single genetic defect into the individual's risk of cardiovascular disease and subsequent treatment strategies is an extremely complex issue that involves the identification of multiple additional determinants, including genetic, metabolic and environmental factors. The discovery of these factors, including genetic determinants of drug efficacy, provides insight into the interaction between regulatory systems traditionally thought to be unrelated and may, in the future, lead to a more complete diagnostic and therapeutic appreciation of the individual patient.

The apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele confers additional risk in children with familial hypercholesterolemia

Children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) exhibit substantial variance of LDL cholesterol. In previous studies, family members of children with FH were included, which may have influenced results. To avoid such bias, we studied phenotype in 450 unrelated children with FH and in 154 affected sib-pairs. In known families with classical FH, diagnosis was based on plasma LDL cholesterol above the age- and gender-specific 95th percentile. Girls had 0.47 +/- 0.15 mmol/L higher LDL cholesterol, compared with boys (p = 0.002). Also in girls, HDL cholesterol increased by 0.07 +/- 0.03 mmol/L per 5 y (pfor trend = 0.005); this age effect was not observed in boys. The distribution of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotypes was not significantly different between probands, their paired affected siblings, or a Dutch control population. Carriers with or without one epsilon4 allele had similar LDL and HDL cholesterol levels. Within the affected sib-pairs, the epsilon4 allele explained 72.4% of the variance of HDL cholesterol levels (-0.15 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval -0.24 to -0.05, p = 0.003). The effect of apoE4 on HDL cholesterol differed with an analysis based on probands or on affected sib-pairs. The affected sib-pair model used adjustment for shared environment, type of LDL receptor gene mutation, and a proportion of additional genetic factors and may, therefore, be more accurate in estimating effects of risk factors on complex traits. We conclude that the epsilon4 allele was associated with lower HDL cholesterol levels in an affected sib-pair analysis, which strongly suggests that apoE4 influences HDL cholesterol levels in FH children. Moreover, the strong association suggests that apoE4 carries an additional disadvantage for FH children.

DNA testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: improving disease recognition and patient care

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide and, like most chronic diseases, it has major genetic and environmental components. Among patients with coronary heart disease onset before the age of 55, about 5% of cases are attributable to heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disease following autosomal dominant inheritance. About 50% of individuals with FH die before the age of 60 due to myocardial infarction. The frequency of FH is estimated to be 1 : 500. FH is related to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol LDL-receptor gene and apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene. The identification of individuals with FH has been based on lipid levels and segregation of lipid levels within the family. However, phenotypes are overlapping and family history is not always informative. Therefore, a DNA-based genetic test for FH appears to offer the best alternative. The DNA test gives a simple yes/no answer. The FH test is a definitive tool for the identification of affected family members. The approach of targeted family genetic screening to find new patients is faster and more reliable compared with a biochemical form of screening. Early identification and efficient treatment of such patients is important and highly cost effective. There is evidence to suggest that the nature of the LDL-receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). The observed differences in the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) responses to these drugs among the various LDLR gene mutations are not yet completely understood. The relationships shown between LDLR mutation types and lipid levels, and the response of lipid levels to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment, will have to be investigated within the framework of pharmacogenetic studies. The variables, which are important in determining the overall atherosclerosis risk, are the result of combined activity in a dynamic network of numerous genes and environment. Candidate genes for atherosclerosis need to be further tested and validated. Future research should be directed at determining the significance of such targets, which patients with FH are at particularly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, and which environmental factors are effective in modulating this risk. Genetics-based diagnostics will complement identification of FH while improving cardiovascular risk prediction, prevention of disease and treatment efficacy.

Pharmacogenomics of drugs affecting the cardiovascular system

The variability in drug response originates partly from genetics, with possible consequences for drug efficacy, adverse effects, and toxicity. Until now, pharmacogenetics mainly indicated the best known source of variability, that is, the variability caused by drug metabolism. However, simultaneous progress in the knowledge of biochemical targets of drugs and of the human genome, together with the development of new technologies, revealed many new sources of human genetic variation, e.g., in receptors or transporters. Drugs are metabolized by various polymorphic phase I enzymes, including cytochromes P450 (CYP). Among them, the most relevant for the metabolism of cardiovascular drugs are CYP3A4, CYP2C9 or CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. The role of phase II enzymes is limited with regard to cardiovascular drugs biotransformation, but some polymorphisms (glutathion-S-transferase; GSH-T) are linked to cardiovascular risk. Phase III proteins or transporters, especially from the ABC family, must also be considered, as their polymorphisms affect cholesterol and other sterols transport. Among pharmacological targets, some proteins were identified as involved in interindividual variations in the response to cardiovascular drugs. Some examples are apolipoprotein E, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and the beta-adrenergic receptor. From the risk concept emphasizing impaired metabolism and adverse effects, we now moved to an approach, which is a personalized, genotype-dependent adaptation of therapy.

Genetic polymorphisms: importance for response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

Coronary artery disease is among the leading causes of death worldwide. Clinical trials show a protective effect of statins against the sequelae of coronary artery disease. The mean risk reductions for subjects using statins compared with placebo found in these trials is about 30%. These are average reductions for all patients included in the trials. Important factors in interpreting the variability in the outcome of drug therapy include the patient's health profile, prognosis, disease severity, quality of drug prescribing, compliance with prescribed pharmacotherapy and the genetic profile of the patient. This review aims to give an overview of the known polymorphisms (Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein polymorphism, Stromelysin-1 polymorphism, -455G/A and TaqI polymorphisms of the beta-fibrinogen gene, apoE4, Asp(9)Asn mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene, the -514 CT polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene and the ACE deletion type gene) that have an influence on the effects of statins in the general population. The expectation is that in the future a subject's genotype may determine whether he will be treated with statins or not. Determining the genotype will not deny therapy to a subject, but will help in deciding the therapy that will suit the patient best.

Effect of apoE genotype on the hypolipidaemic response to pravastatin in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Considerable variability exists in the plasma lipid and lipoprotein response to statin treatment due, in part, to genetic factors. The gene for apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is polymorphic and the different genotypes modulate baseline lipid levels. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the apoE genotype on the lipoprotein response to pravastatin treatment in an outpatient population followed-up in several different clinics across Spain. Subjects and methods. Subjects (n=401; 56% female; mean age 57 years), who were hypercholesterolaemic despite a diet poor in saturated fat and cholesterol, were treated according to NCEP-ATP II guidelines. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins were measured centrally before and after 16 weeks of treatment with 20 mg day-1 of pravastatin.

RESULTS

ApoE genotype distributions were 3.2% with varepsilon2/3, 73.1% with varepsilon3/3 and 22.4% with varepsilon3/4 or varepsilon4/4. ApoE genotype did not have any effect on baseline lipid levels except on triglycerides such that the carriers of the varepsilon2 allele had concentrations significantly greater than those subjects with varepsilon3/3 genotype and carriers of the varepsilon4 allele after adjustment for age, gender and body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001). Once adjusted for age, gender, BMI and baseline lipid levels, the apoE polymorphism did not significantly influence the plasma lipid and lipoprotein response to pravastatin.

CONCLUSION

ApoE genotype appears not to influence the hypolipidaemic effect of pravastatin in patients monitored in a general outpatient setting.

Phenotypic variability in familial hypercholesterolaemia: an update

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is among the most common inherited dominant disorders, and is characterized by severely elevated LDL-cholesterol levels and premature cardiovascular disease. Although the cause of familial hypercholesterolaemia is monogenic, there is a substantial variation in the onset and severity of atherosclerotic disease symptoms. Additional atherogenic risk factors of environmental, metabolic and genetic origin, in conjunction with the LDL receptor defect, are presumed to influence the clinical phenotype in familial hypercholesterolaemia. The present review discusses recent developments in this field.

LDL-receptor gene mutations and the hypocholesterolemic response to statin therapy

Studies of the cholesterol lowering effect of statin therapy as a function of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor mutation type have not produced a clear picture, possibly because they included patients with several different kinds of LDL-receptor mutations. We studied the response to treatment with fluvastatin in 28 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as a result of a receptor-negative mutation (Trp23-stop) and in 30 patients with a receptor-binding defective mutation (Trp66-Gly) to test the hypothesis that response to treatment depends on the type of mutation. Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin 40 mg daily and 12 weeks of placebo treatment, preceded by a placebo run-in period of 8 weeks in a double-blind, cross-over design. Untreated plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins were similar in the two groups of patients. Plasma cholesterol and LDL cholesterol response to therapy tended to be less marked in receptor-binding defective patients, but the differences were not statistically significant. A tabulation of the results of the present and earlier studies suggests that differences in treatment response as an apparent function of LDL-receptor gene mutational type occur mainly in populations with recent genetic admixture (<400 years). In such populations, persons with the same mutation in the LDL-receptor gene are more likely to share other but undetermined genetic variations affecting the pharmacology of statins.

Determinants of Variable Response to Statin Treatment in Patients With Refractory Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract —Interindividual variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) response during treatment with statins is well documented but poorly understood. To investigate potential metabolic and genetic determinants of statin responsiveness, 19 patients with refractory heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were sequentially treated with placebo, atorvastatin (10 mg/d), bile acid sequestrant, and the 2 combined, each for 4 weeks. Levels of LDL-C, mevalonic acid (MVA), 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, and leukocyte LDL receptor and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA were determined after each treatment period. Atorvastatin (10 mg/d) reduced LDL-C by an overall mean of 32.5%. Above-average responders (ΔLDL-C −39.5%) had higher basal MVA levels (34.4±6.1 μmol/L) than did below-average responders (ΔLDL-C −23.6%, P <0.02; basal MVA 26.3±6.1 μmol/L, P <0.01). Fewer good responders compared with the poor responders had an apolipoprotein E4 allele (3 of 11 versus 6 of 8, respectively; P <0.05). There were no baseline differences between them in 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA, or LDL receptor mRNA, but the latter increased in the good responders on combination therapy ( P <0.05). Severe mutations were not more common in poor than in good responders. We conclude that poor responders to statins have a low basal rate of cholesterol synthesis that may be secondary to a genetically determined increase in cholesterol absorption, possibly mediated by apolipoprotein E4. If so, statin responsiveness could be enhanced by reducing dietary cholesterol intake or inhibiting absorption.

APO E gene and gene-environment effects on plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels

Apolipoprotein E (apo E) is important in plasma lipid metabolism and is a component of several plasma lipoprotein-lipid particles. Three major apo E isoforms are encoded by three common alleles at the APO E locus. The E2 allele is associated with lower and the E4 allele with higher total plasma cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels compared with the E3 allele. Available data generally indicate that APO E2, and possibly E3, genotype individuals reduce plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels more than APO E4 individuals with statin therapy. Some evidence also indicates that APO E2 individuals are more likely to respond favorably to gemfibrozil and cholestyramine. On the other hand, it appears that with probucol, APO E4 genotype individuals may improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more than APO E3 individuals. APO E2 and E3 genotype perimenopausal women appear to improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more with hormone replacement therapy than APO E4 women. On the other hand, low-fat diet interventions tend to reduce plasma LDL cholesterol and, perhaps, plasma total cholesterol levels more in APO E4 than in APO E2 or E3 individuals. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies generally indicate that APO E2 and E3 individuals improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more with exercise training than APO E4 individuals. Although these data are hardly definitive, they lend strong support for the possibility that in the near future individuals will be directed to what might be their optimal therapy for improving plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles and cardiovascular disease risk based partially on APO E genotype.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes and response of plasma lipids and progression-regression of coronary atherosclerosis to lipid-lowering drug therapy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the association of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotypes with baseline plasma lipid levels and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), as well as the response to treatment with fluvastatin in the Lipoprotein and Coronary Atherosclerosis Study (LCAS).

BACKGROUND

Apo E genotypes have been associated with plasma lipid levels and CAD. However, the influence of apo E genotypes on the response of plasma lipids and CAD progression or regression to statin treatment in patients with mildly to moderately elevated cholesterol remains unknown.

METHODS

Apo E genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction mapping. Plasma lipids were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after therapy with fluvastatin or placebo in 320 subjects. In 287 subjects, quantitative coronary angiography was performed at baseline and after 2.5 years of treatment.

RESULTS

Subjects with the 3/3 genotype had greater reductions in total cholesterol (20.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.01) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (28.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03) than did the subjects with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype. In contrast, subjects with the 2/3 genotype (n = 10) had a greater increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (19.1%) than did the subjects with the 3/3 genotype (4.3%, p = 0.002) and those with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype (7.0%, p = 0.02). Subjects with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype had an increased frequency of previous angioplasty, but other measures of baseline CAD severity and baseline lipids did not differ significantly among the genotypes, nor did CAD progression or clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although subjects with the epsilon4 allele had less reduction in LDL cholesterol with fluvastatin, they had similar benefit in terms of CAD progression.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and concentration in chronic diseases and drug responses

Apolipoprotein (apo) E is an important circulating and tissue protein involved in cholesterol homeostasis and many other functions. The common polymorphism in the coding region of the gene, four polymorphisms in the promoter region, other additional single nucleotide polymorphisms, as well as several apo E variants have been identified. The common coding polymorphism strongly influences the lipid metabolism and the circulating concentration of apo E itself. This polymorphism is at the origin of the implication of apo E in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, but also of the relation of apo E with longevity. Probably due to its many metabolic and functional consequences, apo E polymorphism has been shown to influence the responses of patients to several drugs (fibrates, statins, hormone replacement therapy, anti-Alzheimer drugs) or environmental interventions (black tea, alcohol, diet). Apo E genotyping may be clinically helpful in defining the risk of patients and their responses to therapeutics. Finally, circulating apo E concentration appears to be altered in diseases and can be modulated by some of the drugs cited above. This parameter can thus also give interesting clinical information and could be a therapeutic target, providing it is validated. At the present time, we cannot exclude that apo E concentration may be the most prominent apo E parameter to be considered in health and disease, while apo E polymorphisms would represent only secondary parameters influencing apo E concentration.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and serum concentration in Alzheimer's disease in nine European centres: the ApoEurope study. ApoEurope group

As part of the ApoEurope Project, apolipoprotein E (apo E) common polymorphism and serum concentration were determined in 489 Alzheimer's disease patients and 429 controls. Patients and controls were recruited through nine centres in eight European countries. Age, sex ratios and education levels of both case and control populations were similar, although discrete differences appeared between centres. The prevalence of the epsilon4 allele was higher in Alzheimer's disease than in controls (increased by 140%), while serum apo E concentration was lower by 11.2% (p<0.001). In addition, serum total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were lower in Alzheimer's disease (p<0.001), while that of apo Al was not affected. The decrease in serum apo E concentration was not accounted for by the epsilon4 allele, age or gender, suggesting that apo E concentration might represent an additional risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, complementary and independent of the epsilon4 allele. Further analysis will be aimed at determining whether the quantitative link between apo E concentration and Alzheimer's disease occurs through the effect of apo E genotype on lipid parameters or by other mechanisms.

A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP -493G/T) influences lipoprotein phenotype in familial hypercholesterolemia

The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) has a key function in intracellular apolipoprotein (apo) B lipidation and secretion of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL). A recently discovered functional polymorphism in the promoter of the MTP gene (-493G/T) affects the plasma concentration of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and the VLDL distribution between large and small particle species in healthy men. This phenotype is likely to be explained by an effect on VLDL synthesis. Against this background, we studied the effect of the MTP-493G/T polymorphism in a large cohort (217 men and 211 women) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A 40% to 50% lower serum triglyceride level was observed in homozygous carriers of the MTP-493 T allele (T/T, 0.93+/-0.34; G/T, 1.54+/-1.40; and G/G, 1.56+/-1.24 mmol/L; T/T vs G/T P=0.04, T/T vs G/G P=0.02). In contrast to the situation in healthy subjects, the MTP promoter polymorphism did not have a significant effect on the LDL cholesterol levels in FH subjects, although the same trend was observed (T/T, 7.31+/-1.87; G/T, 7. 80+/-2.12; and G/G, 7.91+/-2.31 mmol/L, NS). Adjustment for the apo E gene polymorphism by inclusion of subjects homozygous for the apo E3 allele only revealed a reciprocal high density lipoprotein cholesterol-elevating effect (T/T, 1.41+/-0.73; G/T, 1.18+/-0.27; and G/G, 1.16+/-0.29 mmol/L; T/T vs G/T P=0.06, T/T vs G/G P=0.04). This effect seemed to be sex-specific because it was accounted for by the female patients. In conclusion, the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of the rare MTP gene promoter variant (MTP-493T) present in healthy subjects is shifted to a triglyceride-lowering effect in FH. These data suggest that the MTP gene has a role in modulating the clinical phenotype of FH.

Identification of a common low density lipoprotein receptor mutation (C163Y) in the west of Scotland

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal codominant disorder characterised by high levels of LDL cholesterol and a high incidence of coronary artery disease. Our aims were to track the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene in individual families with phenotypic FH and to identify and characterise any mutations of the LDLR gene that may be common in the west of Scotland FH population using single strand conformational polymorphism analysis (SSCP). Patient samples consisted of 80 heterozygous probands with FH, 200 subjects who were related to the probands, and a further 50 normal, unrelated control subjects. Tracking of the LDLR gene was accomplished by amplification of a 19 allele tetranucleotide microsatellite that is tightly linked to the LDLR gene locus. Primers specific for exon 4 of the LDLR gene were used to amplify genomic DNA and used for SSCP analysis. Any PCR products with different migration patterns as assessed by SSCP were then sequenced directly. In addition to identifying probands with a common mutation, family members were screened using a forced restriction site assay and analysed using microplate array diagonal gel electrophoresis (MADGE). Microsatellite D19S394 analysis was informative in 20 of 23 families studied. In these families there was no inconsistency with segregation of the FH phenotype with the LDLR locus. Of the FH probands, 15/80 had a mutant allele as assessed by SSCP using three pairs of primers covering the whole of exon 4 of the LDLR gene. Direct DNA sequencing showed that 7/15 of the probands had a C163Y mutation. Using a PCR induced restriction site assay for the enzyme RsaI and MADGE, it was determined that the C163Y mutation cosegregated with the FH phenotype in family members of the FH probands. This mutant allele was not present in any of the control subjects. Microsatellite analysis has proven useful in tracking the LDLR gene and could be used in conjunction with LDL cholesterol levels to diagnose FH, especially in children and young adults where phenotypic diagnosis can be difficult.

Lack of interaction of apolipoprotein E phenotype with the lipoprotein response to lovastatin or gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

The magnitude of serum lipid changes in response to hypolipidemic drugs varies considerably between individuals. These differences may be due to interactions between genetic and environmental factors that effect drug bioavailability or the capacity of the lipid-regulating enzyme and receptor targets to be affected. The apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene locus has been examined in this regard, but reports are conflicting on the effect of its variability on the response to hypolipidemic drugs. We investigated the effect of apoE polymorphism on the serum lipid response to the hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor lovastatin and the fibric acid derivative gemfibrozil. Lipoprotein changes were assessed after 12 weeks of therapy in 106 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia treated with lovastastin and in 63 given gemfibrozil therapy. No significant effect of the apoE phenotypes E3/2, E3/3, or E4/3 on the heterogeneity of lipid responses to either drug was found.

A common mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene (N291S) alters the lipoprotein phenotype and risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Recently, a mutation in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene (N291S) has been reported in 2% to 5% of individuals in western populations and is associated with increased triglyceride (TG) and reduced HDL cholesterol (HDLC) concentrations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we report a significant alteration in biochemical and clinical phenotype in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who are heterozygous for this N291S LPL mutation. Sixty-four FH heterozygotes carrying the N291S mutation had significantly a higher TG level (P=.004), a higher ratio of total cholesterol to HDLC (P<.001), and lower HDLC concentrations (P=.002) compared with 175 FH heterozygotes without this LPL mutation. Moreover, the N291S mutation conferred a significantly greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease in FH heterozygotes compared with FH heterozygotes without this LPL mutation (odds ratio, 3.875; P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence that a common LPL variant (N291S) significantly influences the biochemical phenotype and risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with FH.

Familial hypercholesterolemia in the Finnish north Karelia. A molecular, clinical, and genealogical study

A specific mutation termed FH-North Karelia [FH-NK] accounts for almost 90% of familial hypercholesterolemia [FH] cases in the Finnish North Karelia, with a population of about 180,000. Extensive search for its presence in the entire North Karelia province revealed 340 carriers of this mutation. Other mutations of the LDL receptor [LDLR] gene accounted for 67 cases of heterozygous FH. This gives a minimum FH prevalence of 1 in 441 inhabitants in North Karelia, with the highest density of patients in the Polvijärvi commune (1 in 143 inhabitants). Old parish records, confirmation records, and tax records were used to track a common ancestor for most of the present-day North Karelian FH-NK patients in the village of Puso, located within an area where the FH prevalence today is the highest. DNA analysis indicated that 2% of the subjects aged 1 to 25 years would have been diagnosed as false-negative and 7% as false-positive FH patients on the basis of LDL cholesterol [LDL-C] determinations alone. Common genetic variations of apolipoprotein E [apoE], XbaI, polymorphism of apolipoprotein B [apoB], and PvuII polymorphism of the intact LDLR allele contributed little to serum lipid variation in established carriers of the FH-NK allele, although apoE2/4 genotype and the presence of the PvuII restriction site tended to be associated with relatively low LDL-C levels. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was present in 65 (30%) out of the 179 FH gene carriers aged > or = 25 years, and 19 individuals had a previous history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The average age (mean +/- SD) at onset of CHD was 42 +/- 7 years for males and 48 +/- 11 years for females (P < .05). In stepwise logistic regression analysis carried out in carriers of the FH-NK allele, age, gender, smoking, and apoE allele E2 all emerged as independent determinants of risk of CHD or AMI. It may be concluded that the relatively high prevalence of FH patients in North Karelia province provides a unique founder population in which genetic and nongenetic factors modifying the course of FH can be effectively investigated.

Familial moderate hypercholesterolemia caused by Asp235-->Glu mutation of the LDL receptor gene and co-occurrence of a de novo deletion of the LDL receptor gene in the same family

We identified a large family in which a hitherto unreported point mutation of the LDL receptor gene (Asp235-->Glu) cosegregated with moderately elevated serum LDL cholesterol concentration. Within one generation, the mean serum total and LDL cholesterol levels in four heterozygous carriers of this mutation (7.76 +/- 1.46 and 5.89 +/- 1.56 mmol/L, respectively) were significantly (P < .05) higher than the corresponding concentrations in their five nonaffected siblings (5.81 +/- 0.57 and 3.77 +/- 0.54 mmol/L, respectively). Lipid levels in carriers of the Asp235-->Glu mutation were, however, markedly lower than the corresponding total and LDL cholesterol levels (about 12 and 10 mmol/L, respectively) in heterozygous patients with the two common LDL receptor mutations (FH-Helsinki and FH-North Karelia). None of the four siblings in the age range of 54 to 69 years had experienced a myocardial infarction, although symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease were present in two and tendon xanthomas were found in one. Expression of the mutant receptor in COS cells indicated an approximately 50% to 70% reduction of LDL-binding activity compared with the normal receptor. One patient (female, aged 39 years) had severe hypercholesterolemia in the range of 13 to 20 mmol/L when untreated, extensive coronary artery disease as demonstrated by angiography, and extensor tendon xanthomatosis. In addition to the Asp235-->Glu mutation, she was found to have a de novo deletion of exons 14 and 15 in her other LDL receptor allele. In this subject, the total LDL receptor activity of mitogen-stimulated blood lymphocytes was very low. In conclusion, along with another LDL receptor gene mutation (FH-Espoo or deletion of exon 15) described by us previously, the Asp235-->Glu mutation (designated as FH-Keuruu) indicates that moderate varieties of inherited hypercholesterolemia may result from LDL receptor gene mutations of mild expression.

Risk factors related to carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and control subjects

To assess the relationship between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and early atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery, we measured carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasonography in 61 boys and 29 girls 10 to 19 years old with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and 30 control subjects matched for age and sex. All were nonsmokers, and all the FH adolescents had a known mutation in the LDL receptor gene. Mean intima-media thickness in the far wall of the carotid bulb was greater (P = .03) in the FH group than in the control subjects: 0.54 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.56) versus 0.50 mm (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.52). In the entire group, mean and maximum intima-media thicknesses in the carotid bulb were positively associated with levels of apolipoprotein B and fibrinogen after control for pubertal stage (r = .19 to .24; P < .05), as was male sex. Plasma total homocysteine was similar in the FH and control groups and was associated with mean and maximum intima-media thicknesses in the far wall of the common carotid artery and carotid bulb after control for pubertal stage (r = .22 to .28; P < .05). With the exception of the relation between plasma fibrinogen level and mean carotid bulb intima-media thickness, these associations were essentially unchanged in stepwise multiple linear regression analyses, allowing for the entry of BMI and level of HDL cholesterol into the analysis. Carotid artery plaque was present in 10% of the children with FH versus none of the control subjects. Children with plaque had a higher mean cholesterol-years score than children without plaque. These findings suggest that the classic lipid and hemostatic risk factors as well as plasma total homocysteine are associated with markers of early carotid atherosclerosis from the second decade of life. B-mode ultrasonography may prove to be a useful tool in risk stratification of children with FH.

Influence of a diet regimen on glucose homeostasis and serum lipid levels of male elite athletes

Physical training affects carbohydrate metabolism and results in an increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal. To investigate if carbohydrate and lipid metabolism would be affected by nutritional factors in optimally trained elite athletes, during a 1-year period we studies elite ice-hockey players on two Swedish top-performance teams. Players on one team were subjected to extensive dietary monitoring and intervention, whereas players on the second team continued their ordinary diet. Blood levels of insulin, C-peptide, glucose, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), lipids, and lipoproteins were measured repeatedly. Basal insulin levels and insulin resistance (IR) were significantly lower among athletes on both teams compared with a sedentary group, and muscle weight and body mass index were significantly higher. During the course of the study in the intervention group, insulin levels decreased (3.6 +/- 0.3 v 6.2 +/- 0.6 [mean +/- SEM], P <.05) in conjunction with a decreased relative fat energy content, but returned toward baseline levels when relative fat energy content increased. IR decreased in parallel (0.59 +/- 0.05 v l.12 +/- 0.12, P <.05) and followed a similar pattern, reverting toward baseline levels. Also, levels of HbA1c changed during dietary manipulation. No changes in these parameters were observed among the elite players from the team not participating in the diet regimen. In contrast to the parameters for glucose homeostasis, no significant changes were found in serum lipid or lipoprotein levels in either team during the course of the study. The results verify the presence of an improved carbohydrate metabolism in elite athletes. The observed changes in glycemic control and glucose homeostasis as a consequence of dietary modification demonstrate further that nutritional factors may affect carbohydrate metabolism also in well-trained athletes.

Phenotypic presentation of the FH-Cincinnati type 5 low density lipoprotein receptor mutation

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease of lipid metabolism that in most families is caused by mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. Though more than 150 mutations are known, the clinical picture associated with most of these is not known. Genetic FH diagnosis may soon become routine in the setting of genetic counselling, and therefore thorough information on the phenotype-genotype relationship of different mutations is now important. In this study, index patients from each of 14 Danish FH families were screened for mutations in exon 2 of the LDLR gene using a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-based mutation screening assay. A deviating DGGE pattern identified two index patients, where subsequent sequencing revealed heterozygosity for the FH Cincinnati type 5 Trp23-to-Stop LDLR mutation. Data from three generations of the families allowed the first clinical and biochemical description of this mutation. Evidence that genetic analysis adds independent diagnostic information compared to traditional clinical/biochemical FH diagnosis was documented by demonstrating the presence of the FH Cincinnati mutation in a family member with a completely normal lipid profile. By comparison to non-FH family members, it was documented that carrier status for the FH Cincinnati mutation is associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular disease. Thus, genetic analysis may improve diagnostic precision and help to define more precisely which of the members of FH families are in need of preventive interventions and may aid in establishing phenotype-genotype relationships allowing more refined genetic counselling in FH.

FH Afrikaner-3 LDL receptor mutation results in defective LDL receptors and causes a mild form of familial hypercholesterolemia

Three founder-related gene mutations (FH Afrikaner-1, -2, and -3) that affect the LDL receptor are responsible for 90% of the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in South African Afrikaners. Patients heterozygous for the FH Afrikaner-1 (FH1) mutation, which results in receptors having approximately 20% of normal receptor activity, have significantly lower plasma cholesterol levels and milder clinical symptoms than heterozygotes with the FH Afrikaner-2 mutation, which completely abolishes LDL receptor activity. In this study we re-created the FH3 mutation (Asp154-->Asn) in exon 4 by site-directed mutagenesis and analyzed the expression of the mutant receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The mutation resulted in the formation of LDL receptors that are markedly defective in their ability to bind LDL, whereas binding of apoE-containing beta-VLDL is less affected. The mutant receptors are poorly expressed on the cell surface as a result of significant degradation of receptor precursors. The plasma cholesterol levels of 31 FH3 heterozygotes were similar to FH1 heterozygotes but significantly lower than FH2 heterozygotes. The FH1 and FH3 heterozygotes also tended to be less severely affected clinically (by coronary heart disease and xanthomata) than FH2 patients. This study demonstrates that mutational heterogeneity in the LDL receptor gene influences the phenotypic expression of heterozygous FH and that severity of expression correlates with the activity of the LDL receptor measured in vitro. The results further indicate that knowledge of the specific mutation underlying FH in heterozygotes is valuable in determining the potential risk of premature atherosclerosis and should influence the clinical management of FH patients.

Cholesterol absorption and synthesis during pravastatin, gemfibrozil and their combination

The study evaluates cholesterol metabolism off and on treatment with pravastatin (P), gemfibrozil (G) and their combination (PG) in 38 middle-age hyperlipidemic primary care patients with serum cholesterol > 6 mmol/l and serum triglycerides < 4 mmol/l after a low-fat low-cholesterol diet. The subjects were randomized to P (40 mg/g), G (1200 mg/day), PG (40 + 1200 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. We analyzed serum lipids, apolipoproteins A-I, B and E, serum cholesterol precursors (markers of cholesterol synthesis), serum plant sterols and cholestanol (markers of cholesterol absorption) and cholesterol metabolism by the sterol balance technique and cholesterol absorption efficiency. P alone or in combination with G lowered apoprotein E concentration, and serum cholesterol levels by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis measured by the precursor/cholesterol proportions with inconsistent change in fecal output of cholesterol. G alone decreased bile acid synthesis and increased biliary cholesterol secretion which were associated with reduced cholesterol absorption efficiency and the serum plant sterol and cholestanol proportions, and increased synthesis of cholesterol as measured both by the sterol balance technique and the precursor sterol proportions. A combination of PG also lowered LDL cholesterol similarly but triglyceride-rich lipoproteins significantly more than P alone, and otherwise inhibited the changes caused by G in cholesterol metabolism except that the precursor sterol proportions still indicated reduced cholesterol synthesis. Overall, the changes of the cholesterol precursor proportions were negatively related to that of cholesterol absorption efficiency and positively to that of cholesterol synthesis. The respective plant sterol and cholestanol values correlated oppositely to cholesterol absorption efficiency and synthesis. Serum precursor sterols reflected changes in cholesterol synthesis more sensitively than the sterol balance technique, even though only the latter method can quantitate cholesterol synthesis.

Effect of apolipoprotein E and A-IV phenotypes on the low density lipoprotein response to HMG CoA reductase inhibitor therapy

Our purpose was to assess the effect of apolipoprotein (apo) E and apo A-IV isoform variation on low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering response to the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, pravastatin. Plasma samples were obtained from participants (apo E, n = 97; apo A-IV, n = 144) in the PLAC-I (Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in Coronary Arteries Study-1). The mean LDL cholesterol reduction in these subjects who were randomized to pravastatin 40 mg/day was 28%. Subjects with the APOE*2 allele (n = 12) had significantly (P = 0.04) greater reductions at 36% than subjects homozygous for the APOE*3 allele (n = 66, 27%) or those with the APOE*4 allele (n = 19, 26%). No significant effect of apo A-IV phenotype on LDL cholesterol lowering in response to pravastatin was noted. A meta-analysis utilizing published data from 4 previously published studies as well as our own data with a total sample size of 625 subjects was carried out. This analysis indicates that the presence of the APOE*2 allele was associated with a significantly greater (P < 0.05) LDL-cholesterol lowering response at 37% than those subjects homozygous for the APOE*3 allele at 35%, while those with the APOE*4 allele had a significantly lower response (P < 0.05), at 33%. These data are consistent with the concept that apo E phenotype modulates the LDL cholesterol lowering response observed with the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Sex-specific effects

The impact of apolipoprotein (apo) E polymorphism on interindividual variation in plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels was studied in a sample of familial hypercholesterolemic (FH) patients (147 women, 116 men) with the same mutation, a > 10-kilobase deletion of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene. Each trait was adjusted for concomitants (age, age squared, height, weight, weight squared) for each sex separately before the apoE genotypic effects were estimated. The relative contribution of concomitants to sample variability was found to be very different in women and in men. Allelic variation in the apoE gene was shown to explain a statistically significant portion of the variability in adjusted lipid traits. Moreover, the contribution of apoE polymorphism was different between sexes. In women, there was significant variability (P < .01) among apoE genotypes for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total and LDL apoB. In men, significant variability (P < .01) was observed among apoE genotypes in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Women with the epsilon 3/2 genotype had significantly lower means for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and LDL apoB than women with the epsilon 3/3 genotype (P < .05). In men, the mean VLDL cholesterol was significantly higher for the epsilon 2/2 genotype and was significantly lower for the epsilon 4/2 genotype than the mean for the epsilon 3/3 genotype (P < .05). Overall, the greatest influence was associated with the epsilon 2 allele, and the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of this allele was present only in FH women. No statistically significant apoE effect was shown on lipoprotein(a) levels in either sex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)