Activation of transcription by PU.1 requires both acidic and glutamine domains

The Myeloid-Specific Transcription Factor PU.1 Upregulates Mannose Receptor Expression but Represses Basal Activity of the HIV-LTR Promoter

Human mannose receptor 1 (MRC1) is a cell surface receptor expressed in macrophages and other myeloid cells that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particle release by tethering virions to producer cell membranes. HIV-1 counteracts MRC1 expression by inhibiting mrc1 transcription. Here, we investigated the mechanism of MRC1 downregulation in HIV-1-infected macrophages. We identified the myeloid cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 as critical for regulating MRC1 expression. In the course of our study, we recognized a complex interplay between HIV-1 Tat and PU.1 transcription factors: Tat upregulated HIV-1 gene expression but inhibited mrc1 transcription, whereas PU.1 inhibited HIV-1 transcription but activated MRC1 expression. Disturbing this equilibrium by silencing PU.1 resulted in increased HIV-1 gene expression and reduced MRC1 promoter activity. Our study identified PU.1 as a central player in transcriptional control, regulating a complex interplay between viral and host gene expression in HIV-infected macrophages. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 replication in primary human cells depends on the activity of virus-encoded proteins but also involves cellular factors that can either promote (viral dependency factors) or inhibit (host restriction factors) virus replication. In previous work, we identified human MRC1 as a macrophage-specific host restriction factor that inhibits the detachment of viral particles from infected cells. Here, we report that HIV-1 counteracts this effect of MRC1 by imposing a transcriptional block on cellular MRC1 gene expression. The transcriptional inhibition of the MRC1 gene is accomplished by Tat, an HIV-1 factor whose best-described function actually is the enhancement of HIV-1 gene expression. Thus, HIV-1 has evolved to use the same protein for (i) activation of its own gene expression while (ii) inhibiting expression of MRC1 and other host factors.

Ulmoidol, an unusual nortriterpenoid from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. Leaves prevents neuroinflammation by targeting the PU.1 transcriptional signaling pathway

Chronic neuroinflammation is closely associated with the development of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the current study, 13 anti-neuroinflammatory compounds were isolated from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. leaves. Among these compounds, trans-sinapaldehyde (6), 3',4',5,7-tetrahydroxy-3-methylflavone (7), and amarusine A (13) were isolated from E. ulmoides leaves for the first time. The ursane-type C₂₉-triterpenoid, ulmoidol (ULM, 9), significantly inhibited the production of proinflammatory mediators and reduced the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Moreover, ULM inhibited the cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14)/Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway and consequently limited the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Notably, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and molecular docking analyses indicated that ULM could prevent PU box binding-1 (PU.1) from binding to DNA, suggesting that PU.1 might be a potential ULM target. In conclusion, ULM alleviates neuroinflammatory responses in microglia, which could be partly explained by its targeting of PU.1 and the resulting suppression of the TLR4/MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways. These results suggested that ULM may have therapeutic potential as an agent for treating neuroinflammation-related neurodegenerative diseases.

Identifying molecular features that are associated with biological function of intrinsically disordered protein regions

In previous work, we showed that intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of proteins contain sequence-distributed molecular features that are conserved over evolution, despite little sequence similarity that can be detected in alignments (Zarin et al., 2019). Here, we aim to use these molecular features to predict specific biological functions for individual IDRs and identify the molecular features within them that are associated with these functions. We find that the predictable functions are diverse. Examining the associated molecular features, we note some that are consistent with previous reports and identify others that were previously unknown. We experimentally confirm that elevated isoelectric point and hydrophobicity, features that are positively associated with mitochondrial localization, are necessary for mitochondrial targeting function. Remarkably, increasing isoelectric point in a synthetic IDR restores weak mitochondrial targeting. We believe feature analysis represents a new systematic approach to understand how biological functions of IDRs are specified by their protein sequences.

Mechanisms governing the pioneering and redistribution capabilities of the non-classical pioneer PU.1

Establishing gene regulatory networks during differentiation or reprogramming requires master or pioneer transcription factors (TFs) such as PU.1, a prototype master TF of hematopoietic lineage differentiation. To systematically determine molecular features that control its activity, here we analyze DNA-binding in vitro and genome-wide in vivo across different cell types with native or ectopic PU.1 expression. Although PU.1, in contrast to classical pioneer factors, is unable to access nucleosomal target sites in vitro, ectopic induction of PU.1 leads to the extensive remodeling of chromatin and redistribution of partner TFs. De novo chromatin access, stable binding, and redistribution of partner TFs both require PU.1's N-terminal acidic activation domain and its ability to recruit SWI/SNF remodeling complexes, suggesting that the latter may collect and distribute co-associated TFs in conjunction with the non-classical pioneer TF PU.1.

The transcription factor PU.1 mediates enhancer-promoter looping that is required for IL-1β eRNA and mRNA transcription in mouse melanoma and macrophage cell lines

The DNA-binding protein PU.1 is a myeloid lineage-determining and pioneering transcription factor due to its ability to bind "closed" genomic sites and maintain "open" chromatin state for myeloid lineage-specific genes. The precise mechanism of PU.1 in cell type-specific programming is yet to be elucidated. The melanoma cell line B16BL6, although it is nonmyeloid lineage, expressed Toll-like receptors and activated the transcription factor NF-κB upon stimulation by the bacterial cell wall component lipopolysaccharide. However, it did not produce cytokines, such as IL-1β mRNA. Ectopic PU.1 expression induced remodeling of a novel distal enhancer (located ∼10 kbp upstream of the IL-1β transcription start site), marked by nucleosome depletion, enhancer-promoter looping, and histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac). PU.1 induced enhancer-promoter looping and H3K27ac through two distinct PU.1 regions. These PU.1-dependent events were independently required for subsequent signal-dependent and co-dependent events: NF-κB recruitment and further H3K27ac, both of which were required for enhancer RNA (eRNA) transcription. In murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells, these PU.1-dependent events were constitutively established and readily expressed eRNA and subsequently IL-1β mRNA by lipopolysaccharide stimulation. In summary, this study showed a sequence of epigenetic events in programming IL-1β transcription by the distal enhancer priming and eRNA production mediated by PU.1 and the signal-dependent transcription factor NF-κB.

Distinct regulatory networks control the development of macrophages of different origins in zebrafish

Macrophages are key components of the innate immune system and play pivotal roles in immune response, organ development, and tissue homeostasis. Studies in mice and zebrafish have shown that tissue-resident macrophages derived from different hematopoietic origins manifest distinct developmental kinetics and colonization potential, yet the genetic programs controlling the development of macrophages of different origins remain incompletely defined. In this study, we use zebrafish, where tissue-resident macrophages arise from the rostral blood island (RBI) and ventral wall of dorsal aorta (VDA), the zebrafish hematopoietic tissue equivalents to the mouse yolk sac and aorta-gonad-mesonephros for myelopoiesis, to address this issue. We show that RBI- and VDA-born macrophages are orchestrated by distinctive regulatory networks formed by the E-twenty-six (Ets) transcription factors Pu.1 and Spi-b, the zebrafish ortholog of mouse spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene B (SPI-B), and the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain containing protein Irf8. Epistatic studies document that during RBI macrophage development, Pu.1 acts upstream of Spi-b, which, upon induction by Pu.1, partially compensates the function of Pu.1. In contrast, Pu.1 and Spi-b act in parallel and cooperatively to regulate the development of VDA-derived macrophages. Interestingly, these two distinct regulatory networks orchestrate the RBI- and VDA-born macrophage development largely by regulating a common downstream gene, Irf8. Our study indicates that macrophages derived from different origins are governed by distinct genetic networks formed by the same repertoire of myeloid-specific transcription factors.

Transcriptional Factor PU.1 Regulates Decidual C1q Expression in Early Pregnancy in Human

C1q is the first recognition subcomponent of the complement classical pathway, which in addition to being synthesized in the liver, is also expressed by macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Trophoblast invasion during early placentation results in accumulation of debris that triggers the complement system. Hence, both early and late components of the classical pathway are widely distributed in the placenta and decidua. In addition, C1q has recently been shown to significantly contribute to feto-maternal tolerance, trophoblast migration, and spiral artery remodeling, although the exact mechanism remains unknown. Pregnancy in mice, genetically deficient in C1q, mirrors symptoms similar to that of human preeclampsia. Thus, regulated complement activation has been proposed as an essential requirement for normal successful pregnancy. Little is known about the molecular pathways that regulate C1q expression in pregnancy. PU.1, an Ets-family transcription factor, is required for the development of hematopoietic myeloid lineage immune cells, and its expression is tissue-specific. Recently, PU.1 has been shown to regulate C1q gene expression in DCs and macrophages. Here, we have examined if PU.1 transcription factor regulates decidual C1q expression. We used immune-histochemical analysis, PCR, and immunostaining to localize and study the gene expression of PU.1 transcription factor in early human decidua. PU.1 was highly expressed at gene and protein level in early human decidual cells including trophoblast and stromal cells. Surprisingly, nuclear as well as cytoplasmic PU.1 expression was observed. Decidual cells with predominantly nuclear PU.1 expression had higher C1q expression. It is likely that nuclear and cytoplasmic PU.1 localization has a role to play in early pregnancy via regulating C1q expression in the decidua during implantation.

Gcn5 is required for PU.1-dependent IL-9 induction in Th9 cells

Naive CD4+ T cells differentiate into various effector Th subsets depending on the Ags and cytokine microenvironment they encounter. IL-9-secreting Th9 cells are the most recent Th subset to be described. PU.1, one of the transcription factors required for the development of Th9 cells, binds to the Il9 gene. In this study, we show that PU.1 increases histone acetylation at the Il9 locus through direct interactions with histone acetyltransferases. In the absence of PU.1, there is decreased association of Gcn5 and p300/CBP associated factor and increased association of histone deacetylases at the Il9 locus in Th9 cells. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity augments PU.1-dependent IL-9 production. PU.1 forms a complex with Gcn5, and inhibition of the expression of Gcn5 results in reduced IL-9 production. Moreover, the effects of Gcn5 on IL-9 production are specific as the production of IL-10 and IL-21, two additional cytokines produced by Th9 cells, is not altered after decreased Gcn5 expression. Together, these data define a PU.1-dependent mechanism for altered histone acetylation and expression of the Il9 locus in Th9 cells.

Two potent transactivation domains in the C-terminal region of human NANOG mediate transcriptional activation in human embryonic carcinoma cells

The core embryonic stem cell transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog are expressed in germ cell tumors (GCTs) and have been proposed to play a regulatory role in tumorigenesis. However, little is known about the mechanism of regulation of tumorigenesis by the complicated network of these proteins. Nanog is a novel homeobox-containing transcription factor that is expressed in pluripotent cells as well as GCTs. To understand the molecular and functional role of human NANOG (hNANOG) in germ cells, mutagenesis of the C-terminal domain (CD) of hNANOG and transient transfection assays in NCCIT human embryonic carcinoma cells were carried out to identify critical transactivation motifs. We divided the CD into three putative functional subdomains, CD1, tryptophan-repeat (WR) subdomain, and CD2. WR subdomain and CD2 independently contained transcriptional potential and, in combination, had a synergistic effect on transcriptional activity, while CD1 was transcriptionally inactive. The glutamine (Q) motif in WR subdomain, and multiple acidic residues in CD2 were required for maximal and synergistic transcriptional activation by the hNANOG CD. The results of the current study contribute to a better understanding of the complicated molecular machinery of stem cell transcription factors and their role in unregulated proliferation in germ cell tumorigenesis.

Mi2beta shows chromatin enzyme specificity by erasing a DNase I-hypersensitive site established by ACF

ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes are linked to changes in gene expression; however, it is not clear how the multiple remodeling enzymes found in eukaryotes differ in function and work together. In this report, we demonstrate that the ATP-dependent remodeling enzymes ACF and Mi2beta can direct consecutive, opposing chromatin-remodeling events, when recruited to chromatin by different transcription factors. In a cell-free system based on the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene enhancer, we show that TFE3 induces a DNase I-hypersensitive site in an ATP-dependent reaction that requires ACF following transcription factor binding to chromatin. In a second step, PU.1 directs Mi2beta to erase an established DNase I-hypersensitive site, in an ATP-dependent reaction subsequent to PU.1 binding to chromatin, whereas ACF will not support erasure. Erasure occurred without displacing the transcription factor that initiated the site. Other tested enzymes were unable to erase the DNase I-hypersensitive site. Establishing and erasing the DNase I-hypersensitive site required transcriptional activation domains from TFE3 and PU.1, respectively. Together, these results provide important new mechanistic insight into the combinatorial control of chromatin structure.

Identification of a monopartite sequence in PU.1 essential for nuclear import, DNA-binding and transcription of myeloid-specific genes

The Ets transcription factor PU.1 is an essential regulator of normal hematopoiesis, especially within the myeloid lineage. As such, endogenous PU.1 predominantly localizes to the nucleus of mammalian cells to facilitate gene regulation. However, to date, little is known regarding the mechanisms of PU.1 nuclear transport. We found, using HeLa and RAW 264.7 macrophage cells, that PU.1 enters the nucleus via passive diffusion and active transport. The latter can be facilitated by: (i) the classical pathway requiring importin alpha and beta; (ii) the non-classical pathway requiring only importin beta; or (iii) direct interaction with nucleoporins. A group of six positively charged lysine or arginine residues within the Ets DNA-binding domain was determined to be crucial in active nuclear import. These residues directly interact with importin beta to facilitate a predominantly non-classical import pathway. Furthermore, luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that these same six amino acids are crucial for PU.1-mediated transcriptional activation of myeloid-specific genes. Indeed, these residues may represent a consensus sequence vital for nuclear import, DNA-binding and transcriptional activity of Ets family members. By identifying and characterizing the mechanisms of PU.1 nuclear import and the specific amino acids involved, this report may provide insights into the molecular basis of diseases.

Inhibition of IL-1beta transcription by peptides derived from the hCMV IE2 transactivator

The immediate early (IE) proteins of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) have diverse roles in directing viral and host cell transcription. Among these is the ability of IE2 to induce transcription of the IL1B gene that codes for IL-1beta in monocytes. This function is partially explained by interaction between IE2 and the host cell transcription factor Spi-1/PU.1 (Spi-1). We now show that maximal IE2 function also depends on productive interactions localizing to two C/EBP sites on the IL1B promoter suggesting either bi- or tri-molecular interactions between IE2, Spi-1 and C/EBPbeta at two different locations on the promoter. The IE2 interaction region on Spi-1 was previously mapped to the DNA-binding ETS domain and overlaps the region of Spi-1 that interacts with the transcription factor C/EBPbeta, a factor known to be critical for the induction of IL1B in response to Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) family signal transduction. The Spi-1 interacting region of IE2 maps to amino acids 315-328, a sequence that also interacts with the bZIP domain of C/EBPbeta. An expression vector coding for amino acids 291-364 of IE2 can suppress LPS induction of a co-transfected IL1B enhancer-promoter fragment in a monocyte cell line. This inhibition is likely the result of competition between Spi-1 and C/EBPbeta, thus blunting gene induction.

PU.1: An ETS Family Transcription Factor That Regulates Leukemogenesis Besides Normal Hematopoiesis

The hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1, which is required for lymphomyeloid differentiation of stem cells, was originally identified as an oncogene. In erythroid progenitors, the integration of spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) into the PU.1 locus causes its overexpression, which blocks their terminal differentiation into erythrocytes and ultimately leads to the development of erythroleukemia. However, in myeloid lineages, PU.1 promotes granulocytic and monocytic differentiation, and graded reduction in its expression blocks their differentiation or maturation and thereby causes myelogenous leukemia. Thus, in addition to normal hematopoietic regulation, PU.1 plays a significant role in leukemogenesis. In the following review, we have consolidated our understanding of the role of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of erythroid as well myeloid leukemia.

The HTLV-I p30 Interferes with TLR4 Signaling and Modulates the Release of Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines from Human Macrophages

Whereas adaptive immunity has been extensively studied, very little is known about the innate immunity of the host to HTLV-I infection. HTLV-I-infected ATL patients have pronounced immunodeficiency associated with frequent opportunistic infections, and in these patients, concurrent infections with bacteria and/or parasites are known to increase risks of progression to ATL. The Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) activation in response to bacterial infection is essential for dendritic cell maturation and links the innate and adaptive immune responses. Recent reports indicate that TLR4 is targeted by viruses such as RSV, HCV, and MMTV. Here we report that HTLV-I has also evolved a protein that interferes with TLR4 signaling; p30 interacts with and inhibits the DNA binding and transcription activity of PU.1 resulting in the down-regulation of the TLR4 expression from the cell surface. Expression of p30 hampers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines MCP-1, TNF-alpha, and IL-8 and stimulates release of anti-inflammatory IL-10 following stimulation of TLR4 in human macrophage. Finally, we found that p30 increases phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK3-beta a key step for IL-10 production. Our study suggests a novel function of p30, which may instigate immune tolerance by reducing activation of adaptive immunity in ATL patients.

SPI-C and STAT6 can cooperate to stimulate IgE germline transcription

SPI-C is a novel ETS protein that is expressed in B lymphocytes. No target gene for SPI-C has so far been defined. We have performed a yeast two-hybrid screen using SPI-C as bait in order to further analyze the functional role of this orphan transcription factor. We found that SPI-C interacted specifically with the C-terminus of STAT6 in yeast. By co-immunoprecipitation in transfected COS7 cells the physical interaction between SPI-C and STAT6 was confirmed. Furthermore, this protein-protein interaction is functional since we could demonstrate that SPI-C and STAT6 stimulated IL4 induced Iepsilon transcription synergistically but only when both proteins bound to DNA. Thus, a protein interaction between SPI-C and STAT6 is the basis for a novel mechanism for regulation of IL4 induced gene expression.

Protein acetylation regulates both PU.1 transactivation and Ig kappa 3' enhancer activity

Igkappa gene expression and chromatin structure change during B cell development. At the pre-B cell stage, the locus is relatively hypoacetylated on histone H3, whereas it is hyperacetylated at the plasma cell stage. We find in this study that the histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) stimulated 3' enhancer activity through the PU.1 binding site. TSA also stimulated PU.1 transactivation potential. PU.1 activity was increased by the coactivator acetyltransferase protein, p300, and p300 physically interacted with PU.1 residues 7-30. PU.1 served as a substrate for p300 and was acetylated on lysine residues 170, 171, 206, and 208. Mutation of PU.1 lysines 170 and 171 did not affect PU.1 DNA binding, but did lower the ability of PU.1 to activate transcription in association with p300. Lysine 170 was acetylated in pre-B cells and plasmacytoma cells, but TSA treatment did not stimulate PU.1 acetylation at this residue arguing that a second mechanism can stimulate 3' enhancer activity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays we found that TSA caused preferential acetylation of histone H3 at the 3' enhancer. The relevance of these studies for PU.1 function in transcription and hemopoietic development is discussed.

PU.1 expression delineates heterogeneity in primary Th2 cells

Primary T helper 2 cells are heterogeneous, expressing subsets of cytokines at varying levels. Mechanisms controlling this spectrum of phenotypes are still unclear. The ETS family transcription factor PU.1 is expressed in Th2 but not Th1 cells. Th2 cytokine production is decreased in cultures transduced with a PU.1-expressing retrovirus and increased in Th2 cells following RNAi that decreases PU.1 expression. In primary cultures, PU.1 expression is restricted to a subpopulation of Th2 cells that express CCL22 and a subset of Th2 cytokines. PU.1 regulates the Th2 phenotype by interfering with GATA-3 DNA binding without altering GATA-3 protein levels. Thus, the expression of PU.1 in subsets of Th2 cells establishes a defined cytokine profile and contributes towards establishing the spectrum of cytokine production observed in Th2 populations.

Stem Cell Fate Specification: Role of Master Regulatory Switch Transcription Factor PU.1 in Differential Hematopoiesis

PU.1 is a versatile hematopoietic cell-specific ETS-family transcriptional regulator required for the development of both the inborn and the adaptive immunity, owing to its potential ability to regulate the expression of multiple genes specific for different lineages during normal hematopoiesis. It functions in a cell-autonomous manner to control the proliferation and differentiation, predominantly of lymphomyeloid progenitors, by binding to the promoters of many myeloid genes including the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor, granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF receptor alpha, and CD11b. In B cells, it regulates the immunoglobulin lambda 2-4 and kappa 3' enhancers, and J chain promoters. Besides lineage development, PU.1 also directs homing and long-term engraftment of hematopoietic progenitors to the bone marrow. PU.1 gene disruption causes a cell-intrinsic defect in hematopoietic progenitor cells, recognized by an aberrant myeloid and B lymphoid development. It also immortalizes erythroblasts when overexpressed in many cell lines. Although a number of reviews have been published on its functional significance, in the following review we attempted to consolidate information about the differential participation and role of transcription factor PU.1 at various stages of hematopoietic development beginning from stem cell proliferation, lineage commitment and terminal differentiation into distinct blood cell types, and leukemogenesis.

Functional analysis of PU.1 domains in monocyte-specific gene regulation

The Ets family transcription factor PU.1 is required for the development of various lymphoid and myeloid cell lineages, and regulates the expression of several genes in a cell type-specific manner. Recently we found that overproduction of PU.1 in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cell progenitors induced the expression of monocyte-specific genes. This prompted us to analyze the functions of each domain of PU.1 in monocyte-specific gene expression, using transfection of mast cell progenitors with a series of retrovirus vectors for overexpression of various truncation mutants. Both the acidic region and the Ets domain of PU.1 were required for expression of monocyte-specific genes, and for enhanced interleukin-6 production in response to lipopolysaccharide. The Gln-rich region was suggested to be involved in expression of both MHC class II and F4/80. On the other hand, when PU.1 protein lacking the PEST domain was produced in the progenitor cells, expression of monocyte-specific genes was substantially enhanced, suggesting that the PEST domain plays a negative role in monocyte-specific gene expression.

Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse μ Opioid Receptor Gene by PU.1

We previously reported that the 34-bp cis-acting element of the mouse micro opioid receptor (MOR) gene represses transcription of the MOR gene from the distal promoter. Using a yeast one-hybrid screen to identify potential transcription factors of the MOR promoter, we have identified PU.1 as one of the candidate genes. PU.1 is a member of the ets family of transcription factors, expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells and microglia of brain. PU.1 plays an essential role in the development of both lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Opioids exert neuromodulatory as well as immunomodulatory effects, which are transduced by MOR. Moreover, MOR-deficient mice exhibit increased proliferation of hematopoietic cells, suggesting a possible link between the opioid system and hematopoietic development. The PU.1 protein binds to the 34-bp element of the MOR gene in a sequence-specific manner confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and supershift assays. We have also determined endogenous PU.1 interactions with the 34-bp element of MOR promoter by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. In co-transfection studies PU.1 represses MOR promoter reporter constructs through its PU.1 binding site. When the PU.1 gene is disrupted as in PU.1 knock-out mice and using small interfering RNA-based strategy in RAW264.7 cells, the transcription of the endogenous target MOR gene is increased significantly. This increase is probably mediated through modification of the chromatin structure, as suggested by the reversal of the PU.1-mediated repression of MOR promoter activity after trichostatin A treatment in neuroblastoma NMB cells. Our results suggest that PU.1 may be an important regulator of the MOR gene, particularly in brain and immune cells.

Isoforms of the Ets transcription factor NERF/ELF-2 physically interact with AML1 and mediate opposing effects on AML1-mediated transcription of the B cell-specific blk gene

We previously isolated different isoforms of a new Ets transcription factor family member, NERF/ELF-2, NERF-2, NERF-1a, and NERF-1b. In contrast to the inhibitory isoforms NERF-1a and NERF-1b, NERF-2 acts as a transactivator of the B cell-specific blk promoter. We now report that NERF-2 and NERF-1 physically interact with AML1 (RUNX1), a frequent target for chromosomal translocations in leukemia. NERF-2 bound to AML1 via an interaction site located in a basic region upstream of the Ets domain. This is in contrast to most other Ets factors such as Ets-1 that bind to AML1 via the Ets domain, suggesting that different Ets factors utilize different domains for interaction with AML1. The interaction between AML1 and NERF-2 led to cooperative transactivation of the blk promoter, whereas the interaction between AML1 and NERF-1a led to repression of AML1-mediated transactivation. To delineate the differences in function of the different NERF isoforms, we determined that the transactivation domain of NERF-2 is encoded by the N-terminal 100 amino acids, which have been replaced in NERF-1a by a 19-amino acid transcriptionally inactive sequence. Furthermore, acidic domains A and B, which are conserved in NERF-2 and the related proteins ELF-1 and MEF/ELF-4, but not in NERF-1a, are largely responsible for NERF-2-mediated transactivation. Because translocation of the Ets factor Tel to AML1 is a frequent event in childhood pre-B leukemia, understanding the interaction of Ets factors with AML1 in the context of a B cell-specific promoter might help to determine the function of Ets factors and AML1 in leukemia.

Analysis of Gene Expression and Ig Transcription in PU.1/Spi-B-Deficient Progenitor B Cell Lines

A number of presumptive target genes for the Ets-family transcription factor PU.1 have been identified in the B cell lineage. However, the precise function of PU.1 in B cells has not been studied because targeted null mutation of the PU.1 gene results in a block to lymphomyeloid development at an early developmental stage. In this study, we take advantage of recently developed PU.1(-/-)Spi-B(-/-) IL-7 and stromal cell-dependent progenitor B (pro-B) cell lines to analyze the function of PU.1 and Spi-B in B cell development. We show that contrary to previously published expectations, PU.1 and/or Spi-B are not required for Ig H chain (IgH) gene transcription in pro-B cells. In fact, PU.1(-/-)Spi-B(-/-) pro-B cells have increased levels of IgH transcription compared with wild-type pro-B cells. In addition, high levels of Igkappa transcription are induced after IL-7 withdrawal of wild-type or PU.1(-/-)Spi-B(-/-) pro-B cells. In contrast, we found that Iglambda transcription is reduced in PU.1(-/-)Spi-B(-/-) pro-B cells relative to wild-type pro-B cells after IL-7 withdrawal. These results suggest that Iglambda, but not IgH or Igkappa, transcription, is dependent on PU.1 and/or Spi-B. The PU.1(-/-)Spi-B(-/-) pro-B cells have other phenotypic changes relative to wild-type pro-B cells including increased proliferation, increased CD25 expression, decreased c-Kit expression, and decreased RAG-1 expression. Taken together, our observations suggest that reduction of PU.1 and/or Spi-B activity in pro-B cells promotes their differentiation to a stage intermediate between late pro-B cells and large pre-B cells.

Transcriptional Regulation of ILT Family Receptors

Ig-like transcripts (ILT/leukocyte Ig-like receptor/monocyte/macrophage Ig-like receptor or CD85) are encoded on human chromosome 19q13.4, designated the human leukocyte receptor complex, and are predominantly expressed on myeloid lineage cells. We investigated the transcriptional regulation of ILT1, ILT2, and ILT4 genes to elucidate control mechanisms operating on the specific expression of ILT receptors. Inhibitory ILT2 and ILT4 both have a similar genomic structure, in which the approximately 160-bp 5'-flanking regions function as core promoters with critically important PU.1 binding sites. However, an Sp1 family-binding GC-box is more influential in trans-activation of ILT2 than ILT4. Additionally, ILT4 transcription is tightly regulated by chromatin modifications accompanied by histone acetylation, which strictly controls expression within myeloid lineage cells. Activating ILT1 carries a core promoter corresponding to the intronic region of ILT2 and ILT4, where PU.1 and Runx1 binding sites are essential, but a downstream heat shock element also augments promoter activity. Thus, each ILT is regulated by a distinct transcriptional mechanism, although PU.1 acts as a common trans-acting factor. We also found that human CMV infection strongly trans-activates inhibitory ILT2 and ILT4 genes through the expression of immediate-early proteins.

PU.1 and pRB interact and cooperate to repress GATA-1 and block erythroid differentiation

PU.1 and GATA-1 are two hematopoietic specific transcription factors that play key roles in development of the myeloid and erythroid lineages, respectively. The two proteins bind to one another and inhibit each other's function in transcriptional activation and promotion of their respective differentiation programs. This mutual antagonism may be an important aspect of lineage commitment decisions. PU.1 can also act as an oncoprotein since deregulated expression of PU.1 in erythroid precursors causes erythroleukemias in mice. Studies of cultured mouse erythroleukemia cell lines indicate that one aspect of PU.1 function in erythroleukemogenesis is its ability to block erythroid differentiation by repressing GATA-1 (N. Rekhtman, F. Radparvar, T. Evans, and A. I. Skoultchi, Genes Dev. 13:1398-1411, 1999). We have investigated the mechanism of PU.1-mediated repression of GATA-1. We report here that PU.1 binds to GATA-1 on DNA. We localized the repression activity of PU.1 to a small acidic N-terminal domain that interacts with the C pocket of pRB, a well-known transcriptional corepressor. Repression of GATA-1 by PU.1 requires pRB, and pRB colocalizes with PU.1 and GATA-1 at repressed GATA-1 target genes. PU.1 and pRB also cooperate to block erythroid differentiation. Our results suggest that one of the mechanisms by which PU.1 antagonizes GATA-1 is by binding to it at GATA-1 target genes and tethering to these sites a corepressor that blocks transcriptional activity and thereby erythroid differentiation.

The zebrafish spi1 promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in stable transgenic fish

The spi1 (pu.1) gene has recently been identified as a useful marker of early myeloid cells in zebrafish. To enhance the versatility of this organism as a model for studying myeloid development, the promoter of this gene has been isolated and characterized. Transient transgenesis revealed that a 5.3 kilobase promoter fragment immediately upstream of the spi1 coding sequence was sufficient to drive expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in injected embryos in a manner that largely recapitulated the native spi1 gene expression pattern. This fragment was successfully used to produce a germ line transgenic line of zebrafish with EGFP-expressing myeloid cells. These TG(spi1:EGFP)pA301 transgenic zebrafish represent a valuable tool for further studies of myeloid development and its perturbation.

PU.1 regulates glutathione peroxidase expression in neutrophils

Based on knockout models, the transcription factor PU.1 has been shown to be important for the maturation of neutrophils. As the list of genes PU.1 directly regulates in neutrophils is still quite limited, defining PU.1 target genes for this lineage will provide valuable insight into how this factor regulates neutrophil development and terminal function. Using the combined techniques of representational difference analysis and a cDNA library screen, we identified four genes that were differentially expressed in the PU.1-expressing 503PU myeloid cell line but not the PU.1 null parent cell line 503. Two of these genes, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and serine leukoprotease inhibitor, are involved in protecting neutrophils from the products they make to destroy pathogens and were analyzed further to determine if PU.1 directly regulates their expression. These studies showed that PU.1 directly regulated the expression of only the GPx gene through binding sites in the promoter and a 3' regulatory region. Thus, PU.1 not only regulates the expression of molecules involved in the production of reactive oxygen species but also a gene that protects the neutrophils from these same destructive enzymes.

SPI-C, a PU-box binding ETS protein expressed temporarily during B-cell development and in macrophages, contains an acidic transactivation domain located to the N-terminus

Mice deficient for SPI-group ETS transcription factors PU.1 or SPI-B fail to generate lymphocytes or do not mount normal antibody mediated immune responses, respectively. PU.1 expression is restricted to B-, T-lymphocytes and macrophages, while SPI-B is expressed in B- and T-lymphocytes. SPI-C is an ETS transcription factor closely related to PU.1 and SPI-B, and expressed temporarily during B-cell development and in macrophages. By deletion and mutation analysis we show that the SPI-C protein has a transactivation domain located to the N-terminus, and that the transactivation activity is reduced to that of the DNA binding domain (DBD) alone when four aspartic acid residues are mutated to alanines. PU.1 and SPI-B regulate transcription from acidic domains located to the N-terminus and by recruiting the co-activator PIP to adjacent sites in a sequence specific manner. In contrast to PU.1 and PIP, SPI-C and PIP were unable to form a distinct ternary complex on the Ig lambda light chain lambda(2-4) enhancer element, suggesting that SPI-C could act both as a positive and negative transcriptional regulator during B-lymphocyte differentiation.

Interleukin-3 stimulation of mcl-1 gene transcription involves activation of the PU.1 transcription factor through a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway

We have previously demonstrated that the antiapoptotic gene mcl-1 is activated by interleukin-3 (IL-3) in Ba/F3 pro-B cells through two promoter elements designated the CRE-2 and SIE motifs. While the CRE-2-binding complex contains the CREB protein and is activated by IL-3 through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway, the identity and cytokine activation pathway of the SIE-binding complex remains unclear. In this report, we demonstrated that PU.1 is one component of the SIE-binding complex. A chromatin immunoprecipitation assay further confirmed that PU.1 binds to the mcl-1 promoter region containing the SIE motif in vivo. While IL-3 stimulation does not significantly alter the SIE-binding activity of PU.1, it markedly increases PU.1's transactivation activity. The latter effect coincides with the increased phosphorylation of PU.1 following IL-3 activation of a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38(MAPK))-dependent pathway. A serine-to-alanine substitution at position 142 significantly weakens PU.1's ability to be phosphorylated by the p38(MAPK) immunocomplex. Furthermore, this S142A mutant is impaired in the ability to be further stimulated by IL-3 to transactivate the mcl-1 reporter through the SIE motif. Taken together, our results demonstrate that IL-3 stimulation of mcl-1 gene transcription through the SIE motif involves phosphorylation of PU.1 at serine 142 by a p38(MAPK)-dependent pathway.

Heterozygous PU.1 mutations are associated with acute myeloid leukemia

The transcription factor PU.1 is required for normal blood cell development. PU.1 regulates the expression of a number of crucial myeloid genes, such as the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor, the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor, and the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor. Myeloid cells derived from PU.1(-/-) mice are blocked at the earliest stage of myeloid differentiation, similar to the blast cells that are the hallmark of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These facts led us to hypothesize that molecular abnormalities involving the PU.1 gene could contribute to the development of AML. We identified 10 mutant alleles of the PU.1 gene in 9 of 126 AML patients. The PU.1 mutations comprised 5 deletions affecting the DNA-binding domain, and 5 point mutations in 1) the DNA-binding domain (2 patients), 2) the PEST domain (2 patients), and 3) the transactivation domain (one patient). DNA binding to and transactivation of the M-CSF receptor promoter, a direct PU.1 target gene, were deficient in the 7 PU.1 mutants that affected the DNA-binding domain. In addition, these mutations decreased the ability of PU.1 to synergize with PU.1-interacting proteins such as AML1 or c-Jun in the activation of PU.1 target genes. This is the first report of mutations in the PU.1 gene in human neoplasia and suggests that disruption of PU.1 function contributes to the block in differentiation found in AML patients.

Zebrafish SPI-1 (PU.1) marks a site of myeloid development independent of primitive erythropoiesis: implications for axial patterning

The mammalian transcription factor SPI-1 (synonyms: SPI1, PU.1, or Sfpi1) plays a critical role in myeloid development. To examine early myeloid commitment in the zebrafish embryo, we isolated a gene from zebrafish that is a SPI-1 orthologue on the basis of homology and phylogenetic considerations. The zebrafish spi1 (pu1) gene was first expressed at 12 h postfertilization in rostral lateral plate mesoderm (LPM), anatomically isolated from erythroid development in caudal lateral plate mesoderm. Fate-mapping traced rostral LPM cells from the region of initial spi1 expression to a myeloid fate. spi1 expression was lost in the bloodless mutant cloche, but rostral spi1 expression and myeloid development were preserved in the mutant spadetail, despite its complete erythropoietic failure. This dissociation of myeloid and erythroid development was further explored in studies of embryos overexpressing BMP-4, or chordin, in bmp-deficient swirl and snailhouse mutants, and chordin-deficient chordino mutants. These studies demonstrate that, in zebrafish, spi1 marks a rostral population of LPM cells committed to a myeloid fate anatomically separated from and developmentally independent of erythroid commitment in the caudal LPM. Such complete anatomical and developmental dissociation of two hematopoietic lineages adds an interesting complexity to the understanding of vertebrate hematopoietic development and presents significant implications for the mechanisms regulating axial patterning.

Inhibition of CBP-mediated protein acetylation by the Ets family oncoprotein PU.1

Aberrant expression of PU.1 inhibits erythroid cell differentiation and contributes to the formation of murine erythroleukemias (MEL). The molecular mechanism by which this occurs is poorly understood. Here we show that PU.1 specifically and efficiently inhibits CBP-mediated acetylation of several nuclear proteins, including the hematopoietic transcription factors GATA-1, NF-E2, and erythroid Krüppel-like factor. In addition, PU.1 blocks acetylation of histones and interferes with acetylation-dependent transcriptional events. CBP acetyltransferase activity increases during MEL cell differentiation as PU.1 levels decline and is inhibited by sustained PU.1 expression. Finally, PU.1 inhibits the differentiation-associated increase in histone acetylation at an erythroid-specific gene locus in vivo. Together, these findings suggest that aberrant expression of PU.1 and possibly other members of the Ets family of oncoproteins subverts normal cellular differentiation in part by inhibiting the acetylation of critical nuclear factors involved in balancing cellular proliferation and maturation.

Control of myeloid-specific integrin alpha Mbeta 2 (CD11b/CD18) expression by cytokines is regulated by Stat3-dependent activation of PU.1

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays an essential role in regulating multiple aspects of hematopoiesis. To elucidate the role of G-CSF in controlling hematopoietic cell migration capabilities, we studied inducible expression of the myeloid-specific marker, integrin alpha(M)beta(2) (CD11b/CD18, Mac-1), in the myeloid cell line, 32D. We found that G-CSF stimulates the synthesis and cell surface expression of alpha(M) and beta(2) integrin subunits. Induction of both alpha(M) and beta(2) is dependent on Stat3, a major G-CSF-responsive signaling protein. However, the kinetics of expression suggested the involvement of an intermediate protein regulated by Stat3. Our results demonstrate that Stat3 signaling stimulates the expression of PU.1, a critical regulator of myelopoiesis. Furthermore, we show that PU.1 is an essential intermediate for the inducible expression of alpha(M)beta(2) integrin. Thus, Stat3 promotes alpha(M)beta(2) integrin expression through its activation of PU.1. These findings indicate that G-CSF-dependent Stat3 signals stimulate the changes in cell adhesion and migration capabilities that occur during myeloid cell development. These data also demonstrate a link between Stat3 and PU.1, suggesting that Stat3 may play an instructive role in hematopoiesis.

PU.1 is a lineage-specific regulator of tyrosine phosphatase CD45

The hematopoietic cell-specific ets family transcription factor PU.1 regulates many lymphoid and myeloid genes. We have determined that PU.1 is critical for lineage-specific expression of the tyrosine phosphatase CD45. CD45 is expressed exclusively in hematopoietic cells at all stages of development, except for mature red cells and platelets. Although CD45 is normally expressed in all leukocyte lineages, it is critically regulated by PU.1 only in myeloid cells. Whereas myeloid cells from PU.1 null mice failed to express CD45, lymphoid cells were CD45(+) by flow cytometry. Additionally, mRNA for CD45 was absent from PU.1-deficient myeloid cells. To understand the molecular basis for these observations, we characterized a transcriptional regulatory region of the murine CD45 gene containing exons 1a, 1b, and 2. Distinct transcriptional initiation sites for CD45 were demonstrated in T and B cells versus myeloid cells. A transcriptional initiation site in exon 1b (P1b) was principally utilized by myeloid cells. A PU.1 binding site was identified upstream of exon 1b by sequence analysis and DNA binding assays. Using this region of the CD45 locus we demonstrated that PU.1 directly transactivated reporter gene expression. Finally, retrovirus-mediated restoration of PU.1 expression to PU.1-deficient myeloid cells resulted in expression of cell surface CD45 and restored phosphatase activity, confirming the role of PU.1 in the positive regulation of this well known signaling molecule. We conclude that CD45 is regulated differentially in myeloid and lymphoid cells and that sequences critical to direct myeloid expression include a PU.1 binding site upstream of the P1b transcriptional initiation site.

Evolution of hematopoiesis: Three members of the PU.1 transcription factor family in a cartilaginous fish, Raja eglanteria

T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes are present in jawed vertebrates, including cartilaginous fishes, but not in jawless vertebrates or invertebrates. The origins of these lineages may be understood in terms of evolutionary changes in the structure and regulation of transcription factors that control lymphocyte development, such as PU.1. The identification and characterization of three members of the PU.1 family of transcription factors in a cartilaginous fish, Raja eglanteria, are described here. Two of these genes are orthologs of mammalian PU.1 and Spi-C, respectively, whereas the third gene, Spi-D, is a different family member. In addition, a PU.1-like gene has been identified in a jawless vertebrate, Petromyzon marinus (sea lamprey). Both DNA-binding and transactivation domains are highly conserved between mammalian and skate PU.1, in marked contrast to lamprey Spi, in which similarity is evident only in the DNA-binding domain. Phylogenetic analysis of sequence data suggests that the appearance of Spi-C may predate the divergence of the jawed and jawless vertebrates and that Spi-D arose before the divergence of the cartilaginous fish from the lineage leading to the mammals. The tissue-specific expression patterns of skate PU.1 and Spi-C suggest that these genes share regulatory as well as structural properties with their mammalian orthologs.

Evolution of hematopoiesis: Three members of the PU.1 transcription factor family in a cartilaginous fish, Raja eglanteria

T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes are present in jawed vertebrates, including cartilaginous fishes, but not in jawless vertebrates or invertebrates. The origins of these lineages may be understood in terms of evolutionary changes in the structure and regulation of transcription factors that control lymphocyte development, such as PU.1. The identification and characterization of three members of the PU.1 family of transcription factors in a cartilaginous fish, Raja eglanteria, are described here. Two of these genes are orthologs of mammalian PU.1 and Spi-C, respectively, whereas the third gene, Spi-D, is a different family member. In addition, a PU.1-like gene has been identified in a jawless vertebrate, Petromyzon marinus (sea lamprey). Both DNA-binding and transactivation domains are highly conserved between mammalian and skate PU.1, in marked contrast to lamprey Spi, in which similarity is evident only in the DNA-binding domain. Phylogenetic analysis of sequence data suggests that the appearance of Spi-C may predate the divergence of the jawed and jawless vertebrates and that Spi-D arose before the divergence of the cartilaginous fish from the lineage leading to the mammals. The tissue-specific expression patterns of skate PU.1 and Spi-C suggest that these genes share regulatory as well as structural properties with their mammalian orthologs.

Synergistic induction of the Tap-1 gene by IFN-gamma and lipopolysaccharide in macrophages is regulated by STAT1

Proper regulation of the Tap-1 gene is critical for the initiation and continuation of a cellular immune response. Analysis of the Tap-1/low molecular mass polypeptide 2 bidirectional promoter showed that the IFN-gamma activation site element is critical for the rapid induction of the promoter by IFN-gamma following transfection into the human macrophage cell line THP-1. Furthermore, activation of STAT1 binding to this site was important for the synergistic response seen following the stimulation with both IFN-gamma and LPS. Mutation of an IFN-stimulated regulatory element that binds IFN regulatory factor 1 appeared to enhance the response to IFN-gamma and LPS. These data show that STAT1 is necessary for the activation of Tap-1 gene expression in APCs and initiation of cellular immune responses. Furthermore, our data suggest that bacterial products such as LPS may enhance cellular immune responses through augmenting the ability of STAT1 to regulate IFN-gamma-inducible genes.

Do lampreys have lymphocytes? The Spi evidence

It is generally accepted that living jawless vertebrates (lampreys and hagfishes) lack the capability of mounting an adaptive immune response. At the same time, however, there are reports describing histological evidence for the presence in agnathan tissues of lymphocytes, the key players in adaptive immunity. The question therefore arises whether the cells identified morphologically as lymphocytes are true lymphocytes in terms of their genetic developmental program. In this study, evidence is provided that the lampreys express a member of the purine box 1 (PU.1)/spleen focus-forming virus integration B (Spi-B) gene family known to be critically and specifically involved in the differentiation of lymphocytes in jawed vertebrates. The lamprey gene is expressed in the lymphocyte-like cells of the digestive tract and inexplicably also in the ovary.

Cooperation among Stat1, glucocorticoid receptor, and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of the high-affinity Fc gamma receptor I in monocytes

IFN-gamma and glucocorticoids regulate inflammatory and immune responses through Stat1 and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transcription factors, respectively. The biological responses to these polypeptides are determined by integration of various signaling pathways in a cell-type and promoter-dependent manner. In this study we have characterized the molecular basis for the functional cooperation between IFN-gamma and dexamethasone (Dex) in the induction of the high-affinity Fc gamma receptor I (Fc gamma RI) in monocytes. Dex did not affect IFN-gamma-induced Stat1 DNA binding activity or induce novel DNA-binding complexes to the Fc gamma RI promoter. By using cell systems lacking functional GR or Stat1, we showed that GR stimulated Stat1-dependent transcription in a ligand-dependent manner, while Stat1 did not influence GR-dependent transcription. The cooperation required phosphorylation of Tyr701, DNA binding, and the trans-activation domain of Stat1, but did not involve Ser727 phosphorylation of Stat1 or physical interaction between GR and Stat1. The costimulatory effect of Dex was not dependent on a consensus glucocorticoid response element in the Stat1-responsive promoters, but required the DNA-binding and trans-activation functions of GR, and Dex-induced protein synthesis. GR activated the natural Fc gamma RI promoter construct, and this response required both Stat1 and the Ets family transcription factor PU.1. Previously, physical association between GR and Stat5 has been shown to enhance Stat5-dependent and suppress GR-dependent transcription. The results shown here demonstrate a distinct, indirect mechanism of cross-modulation between cytokine and steroid receptor signaling that integrates Stat1 and GR pathways with cell type-specific PU.1 transcription factor in the regulation of Fc gamma RI gene transcription.

Regulation of granulopoiesis by transcription factors and cytokine signals

The development of mature granulocytes from hematopoietic precursor cells is controlled by a myriad of transcription factors which regulate the expression of essential genes, including those encoding growth factors and their receptors, enzymes, adhesion molecules, and transcription factors themselves. In particular, C/EBPalpha, PU.1, CBF, and c-Myb have emerged as critical players during early granulopoiesis. These transcription factors interact with one another as well as other factors to regulate the expression of a variety of genes important in granulocytic lineage commitment. An important goal remains to understand in greater detail how these various factors act in concert with signals emanating from cytokine receptors to influence the various steps of maturation, from the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell, to a committed myeloid progenitor, to myeloid precursors, and ultimately to mature granulocytes.

Regulation of B lymphocyte and macrophage development by graded expression of PU.1

The ets family transcription factor PU.1 is required for the development of multiple lineages of the immune system. Using retroviral transduction of PU.1 complementary DNA into mutant hematopoietic progenitors, we demonstrate that differing concentrations of the protein regulate the development of B lymphocytes as compared with macrophages. A low concentration of PU. 1 protein induces the B cell fate, whereas a high concentration promotes macrophage differentiation and blocks B cell development. Conversely, a transcriptionally weakened mutant protein preferentially induces B cell generation. Our results suggest that graded expression of a transcription factor can be used to specify distinct cell fates in the hematopoietic system.

PU.1 expression in microglia

The transcription factor PU.1 has a pivotal role in both the generation and function of macrophages. To determine whether PU.1 is also involved in microglial regulation, we investigated its expression following hypoxic-ischemia (HI) brain injury and in the BV-2 microglial cell line. We found that microglia constitutively expressed high levels of PU.1 protein in both their 'resting' and 'activated' states.

BSAP can repress enhancer activity by targeting PU.1 function

PU.1 and BSAP are transcription factors crucial for proper B-cell development. Absence of PU.1 results in loss of B, T, and myeloid cells, while absence of BSAP results in an early block in B-cell differentiation. Both of these proteins bind to the immunoglobulin kappa chain 3' enhancer, which is developmentally regulated during B-cell differentiation. We find here that BSAP can repress 3' enhancer activity. This repression can occur in plasmacytoma lines or in a non-B-cell line in which the enhancer is activated by addition of the appropriate enhancer binding transcription factors. We show that the transcription factor PU.1 is a target of the BSAP-mediated repression. Although PU.1 and BSAP can physically interact through their respective DNA binding domains, this interaction does not affect DNA binding. When PU.1 function is assayed in isolation on a multimerized PU.1 binding site, BSAP targets a portion of the PU.1 transactivation domain (residues 7 to 30) for repression. The BSAP inhibitory domain (residues 358 to 385) is needed for this repression. Interestingly, the coactivator protein p300 can eliminate this BSAP-mediated repression. We also show that PU.1 can inhibit BSAP transactivation and that this repression requires PU.1 amino acids 7 to 30. Transfection of p300 resulted in only a partial reversal of PU.1-mediated repression of BSAP. When PU.1 function is assayed in the context of the immunoglobulin kappa chain 3' enhancer and associated binding proteins, BSAP represses PU.1 function by a distinct mechanism. This repression does not require the PU.1 transactivation or PEST domains and cannot be reversed by p300 expression. The possible roles of BSAP and PU.1 antagonistic activities in hematopoietic development are discussed.

The EICP22 protein of equine herpesvirus 1 physically interacts with the immediate-early protein and with itself to form dimers and higher-order complexes

The EICP22 protein (EICP22P) of Equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) is an early protein that functions synergistically with other EHV-1 regulatory proteins to transactivate the expression of early and late viral genes. We have previously identified EICP22P as an accessory regulatory protein that has the ability to enhance the transactivating properties and the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of the EHV-1 immediate-early protein (IEP). In the present study, we identify EICP22P as a self-associating protein able to form dimers and higher-order complexes during infection. Studies with the yeast two-hybrid system also indicate that physical interactions occur between EICP22P and IEP and that EICP22P self-aggregates. Results from in vitro and in vivo coimmunoprecipitation experiments and glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down studies confirmed a direct protein-protein interaction between EICP22P and IEP as well as self-interactions of EICP22P. Analyses of infected cells by laser-scanning confocal microscopy with antibodies specific for IEP and EICP22P revealed that these viral regulatory proteins colocalize in the nucleus at early times postinfection and form aggregates of dense nuclear structures within the nucleoplasm. Mutational analyses with a battery of EICP22P deletion mutants in both yeast two-hybrid and GST pull-down experiments implicated amino acids between positions 124 and 143 as the critical domain mediating the EICP22P self-interactions. Additional in vitro protein-binding assays with a library of GST-EICP22P deletion mutants identified amino acids mapping within region 2 (amino acids [aa] 65 to 196) and region 3 (aa 197 to 268) of EICP22P as residues that mediate its interaction with IEP.

DNA methylation and chromatin structure regulate PU.1 expression

Knockout studies have shown that PU.1 is required for the normal development of many blood cell lineages, yet overexpression of this transcription factor in erythroid cells can lead to erythroleukemia. Thus, how the tissue-specific expression of PU.1 is regulated is important to our understanding of hematopoiesis. In this study, we showed that B and macrophage cell lines expressing PU.1 contained DNase I-hypersensitive sites in intron 1 and were hypomethylated at three MspI sites flanking exon 1. Results from studies using several T-cell lines suggested that the pattern of methylation changed as these cells matured. A pre-T cell line that expresses PU.1 contained DNase I-hypersensitive sites in intron 1 and was also hypomethylated at both MspI sites. Other immature T-cell lines had methylated at least one of the MspI sites and displayed no hypersensitive sites. Mature T-cell lines had a methylation pattern more similar to that of fibroblasts. Treatment of an immature T-cell line with 5-azacytidine resulted in the expression of PU.1 transcripts. These data suggest that the tissue-specific expression of PU.1 is controlled by chromatin structure and DNA methylation and that this may be a mechanism used to shut off PU.1 expression in specific cell lineages during hematopoiesis.

GOOSECOID inhibits erythrocyte differentiation by competing with Rb for PU.1 binding in murine cells

Misexpression of the dorsal mesodermal patterning factor goosecoid on the ventral side of amphibian embryos results in inhibition of blood formation in early embryogenesis. To investigate the mechanism of this inhibition, we ectopically expressed goosecoid in erythroleukemia cells. While erythroid differentiation of these cells can be induced by activin, goosecoid expressing cells were unresponsive to activin. We demonstrate an in vitro interaction between the oncogene PU.1, an ets family transcription factor thought to play a role in erythropoiesis, and the goosecoid protein (GSC). Interaction with PU.1 was specific as GSC did not bind to the ets family members, Fli-1 or Ets-2. The ability of goosecoid expressing erythroleukemia cells to differentiate in response to activin was rescued by coexpression of the GSC-binding N-terminal portion of PU.1. The N-terminal portion of PU.1 was co-immunoprecipitated with anti-GSC antibodies as well. The N-terminal domain of PU.1 is the region recognized by the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), a tumor suppressor gene presumably involved in erythroid differentiation. We show that GSC competitively inhibits binding of Rb to PU.1. Our data suggest that the suppression of blood formation by GSC could, at least in part, be mediated by binding to PU.1.

Cytomegalovirus IE2 protein stimulates interleukin 1beta gene transcription via tethering to Spi-1/PU.1

Potent induction of the gene coding for human prointerleukin 1beta (il1b) normally requires a far-upstream inducible enhancer in addition to a minimal promoter located between positions -131 and +12. The transcription factor Spi-1 (also called PU.1) is necessary for expression and binds to the minimal promoter, thus providing an essential transcription activation domain (TAD). In contrast, infection by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can strongly activate il1b via the expression of immediate early (IE) viral proteins and eliminates the requirement for the upstream enhancer. Spi-1 has been circumstantially implicated as a host factor in this process. We report here the molecular basis for the direct involvement of Spi-1 in HCMV activation of il1b. Transfection of Spi-1-deficient HeLa cells demonstrated both the requirement of Spi-1 for IE activity and the need for a shorter promoter (-59 to +12) than that required in the absence of IE proteins. Furthermore, in contrast to normal, enhancer-dependent il1b expression, which absolutely requires both the Spi-1 winged helix-turn-helix (wHTH) DNA-binding domain and the majority of the Spi-1 TAD, il1b expression in the presence of IE proteins does not require the Spi-1 TAD, which plays a synergistic role. In addition, we demonstrate that a single IE protein, IE2, is critical for the induction of il1b. Protein-protein interaction experiments revealed that the wing motif within the Spi-1 wHTH domain directly recruits IE2. In turn, IE2 physically associates with the Spi-1 wing and requires the integrity of at least one region of IE2. Functional analysis demonstrates that both this region and a carboxy-terminal acidic TAD are required for IE2 function. Therefore, we propose a protein-tethered transactivation mechanism in which the il1b promoter-bound Spi-1 wHTH tethers IE2, which provides a TAD, resulting in the transactivation of il1b.

Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1

The process through which multipotential hematopoietic cells commit to distinct lineages involves the induction of specific transcription factors. PU.1 (also known as Spi-1) and GATA-1 are transcription factors essential for the development of myeloid and erythroid lineages, respectively. Overexpression of PU.1 and GATA-1 can block differentiation in lineages in which they normally are down-regulated, indicating that not only positive but negative regulation of these factors plays a role in normal hematopoietic lineage development. Here we demonstrate that a region of the PU.1 Ets domain (the winged helix-turn-helix wing) interacts with the conserved carboxyl-terminal zinc finger of GATA-1 and GATA-2 and that GATA proteins inhibit PU.1 transactivation of critical myeloid target genes. We demonstrate further that GATA inhibits binding of PU.1 to c-Jun, a critical coactivator of PU.1 transactivation of myeloid promoters. Finally, PU.1 protein can inhibit both GATA-1 and GATA-2 transactivation function. Our results suggest that interactions between PU.1 and GATA proteins play a critical role in the decision of stem cells to commit to erythroid vs. myeloid lineages.