Clinical activity of durvalumab for patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient and repair-proficient endometrial cancer. A nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial

Modifying surgical extents in patients with preoperatively presumed early-stage endometrial cancer based on ProMisE classification: a retrospective, single-center study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore differences in disease extent based on the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) classification and to establish personalized staging surgery strategies in patients with preoperatively presumed uterus-confined endometrial cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with endometrial cancer. These patients were classified according to the ProMisE classification based on tissue samples obtained from dilation and curettage or staging surgeries, and the disease extent was analyzed based on pathologic reports.

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients were clinically estimated to be in stage 1/2 before staging surgery, with immunohistochemistry (IHC) results available. This cohort included 332 patients (96.2%) with clinical stage 1 and 13 patients (3.8%) with stage 2 based on the 2009 FIGO staging system. Among these, 81 patients (23.5%) were assigned to an mismatch repair deficient group (MMRd), 33 (9.6%) to an abnormal p53 group, and 123 (71.1%) to a no specific molecular profile (NSMP) group. Overall, 13 patients had nodal metastasis, with a higher rate observed in the abnormal p53 group (1.2%, 12.1%, and 2.2% for the MMRd, abnormal p53, and NSMP groups, respectively, p=0.013). One patient (0.3%) had parametrial metastasis and four (1.1%) had peritoneal metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with abnormal p53 IHC results exhibited a higher likelihood of lymph node metastasis, even when initially presumed to be at an early stage. For the abnormal p53 group, proactive lymphadenectomy surgery appears beneficial for accurate staging and establishing a subsequent treatment plan.

Are all mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancers created equal? A large, retrospective, tertiary center experience

BACKGROUND

One third of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) presents with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Of these, 70 % are caused by somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter; the remaining cases are determined by Lynch syndrome or double somatic inactivation of MMR genes. Although associated with good-intermediate prognosis, heterogeneity in treatment response and survival has been reported among MMRd ECs. We aim to investigate differences in pathologic aggressiveness and event-free survival (EFS) among three MMRd EC subtypes, classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 methylation analysis.

METHODS

Subjects undergone surgical staging for EC were retrospectively included. IHC analysis was performed in all patients to assess MMR and p53 status. Methylation analysis was performed in MMRd patients with IHC-negative MLH1. The MMRd population was classified into: 1)MLH1-hypermethylated (MLH1-HyMet); 2)MLH1-unmethylated (MLH1-UnMet); 3)IHC-negative MSH2 and/or MSH6 or PMS2 alone (non-MLH1).

RESULTS

Of 1171 patients undergoing surgical staging and IHC assessment, 362 (30.9 %) were classified as MMRd and included in the analysis. Among these, 59.7 % (n = 216) were MLH1-HyMet, 11 % (n = 40) MLH1-UnMet, and 29.3 % (n = 106) non-MLH1. Compared to MLH1-UnMet and non-MLH1, MLH1-HyMet was associated with older age, higher BMI, larger tumor size, deeper myometrial invasion, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, lower frequency of early-stage and low-risk disease. EFS was similar when comparing the MMRd subtypes, even after adjusting for stage and tumor histology. However, a trend of MLH1-HyMet toward poorer prognosis can be observed, particularly in the advanced/metastatic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd ECs display more aggressive clinicopathologic features compared to the other MMRd subgroups. However, although a suggestive trend toward poorer EFS was observed in the hypermethylated subset, particularly in the advanced setting, no significant differences in prognosis were detected among the MMRd subtypes.

A phase II study of induction PD-1 blockade (nivolumab) in patients with surgically completely resectable mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer (NIVEC)

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors are known to be highly immunogenic and of great interest for immune checkpoint inhibitor. However, there is no data about the complete response (CR) rate of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade and surgery in subjects with MMRd surgically resectable endometrial cancer. In this regard, we suggest a window of opportunity study of induction PD-1 blockade (nivolumab) in patients with surgically resectable MMRd endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial. A total of 30 surgically resectable MMRd endometrial cancer patients will be enrolled. Inclusion criteria include clinical stage I-IIIC2, tumor specimen that demonstrates MMRd by immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability. Exclusion criteria include multiple primary cancers, residual adverse effects of prior therapy or effects of surgery. Patients are treated with nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks up to 6 months followed by standard surgery and/or adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is clinical CR rate or pathological CR rate after treatment of nivolumab. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Correlative studies include genomic characterization of tumors, assessment of immune infiltration of tumor microenvironment, and serial circulating cell-free DNA and immune biomarkers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05795244.

An ambispective, real-world multi-center study of DOstarlimab in patients with Recurrent or Advanced DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer (GEICO 120-R/DORA study)

OBJECTIVE

Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who experience progression following platinum-based chemotherapy have limited treatment options. The phase I GARNET trial showed the high efficacy of dostarlimab in treating mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer.

METHODS

DORA is a multi-center, ambispective, observational real-world study evaluating the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab. The study included patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer who had experienced tumor progression on or after a platinum-based treatment and had received at least 1 cycle of dostarlimab within the Spanish Expanded Access Program. The primary endpoints were objective response rate and duration of response.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients from 57 of the Spanish Research Group for Gynaecological Cancer (GEICO) affiliated hospitals were enrolled, with 125 evaluable for radiological response. The median duration of dostarlimab administration was 8.8 months (interquartile range; 13.2), and 73 patients (57%) remained on therapy at the data cutoff. With a median follow-up of 11.6 months (range; 0.8-30.1), the objective response rate was 53.6% (95% CI 44.4 to 62.5). Complete response was observed in 27 patients (21.6%), and partial response in 40 (32%), with a median time to response of 2.9 months (95% CI 2.6 to 3.6). The median duration of response was not reached. The probability of maintaining the response at 12 and 24 months was 84.98% (95% CI 70.8 to 92.5) and 73.39% (95% CI 50.5 to 86.9), respectively. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 4.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Dostarlimab monotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer patients shows similar efficacy in real-world practice to that observed in the GARNET trial.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis, biology and evolving management of MSI-H/dMMR cancers

Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is a common pathway of carcinogenesis across different tumour types and confers a characteristic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) molecular phenotype. The prevalence of the MSI-H/dMMR phenotype is highest in endometrial and colorectal cancers, and this phenotype is associated with a distinct tumour biology, prognosis and responsiveness to various anticancer treatments. In a minority of patients, MSI-H/dMMR cancers result from an inherited pathogenic variant in the context of Lynch syndrome, which has important implications for familial genetic screening. Whether these hereditary cancers have a different biology and clinical behaviour to their sporadic counterparts remains uncertain. Interest in this tumour molecular subtype has increased following the discovery of the high sensitivity of metastatic MSI-H/dMMR cancers to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a histology-agnostic manner, which reflects the genomic hypermutation resulting from dMMR that renders these tumours highly immunogenic and immune infiltrated. This vulnerability is now also being exploited in early stage disease settings. Despite this common biological foundation, different MSI-H/dMMR cancers have histotype-specific features that correspond to their particular cell or tissue of origin, which might be associated with differences in prognosis and sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, biology, pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis and treatment of MSI-H/dMMR tumours as a histology-agnostic cancer phenomenon. We also highlight peculiarities associated with specific pathogenetic alterations and histologies of MSI-H/dMMR tumours.

Gene expression and soluble protein level of PD-1 and its ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) in endometrial cancer

Checkpoint programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligands (PD-Ls) are negative immunoregulatory molecules that assist tumour cells in evading the immune system. The interaction of PD-1 and PD-Ls inhibits T cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) while increasing the function of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). This leads to the evasion of the immune response by tumour cells. The roles of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in endometrial cancer (EC) have not been fully elucidated. This study investigates the mRNA gene expression and soluble protein levels of these molecules in EC compared to controls, with detailed analysis of clinical profiles. The results showed that EC had significantly higher mRNA gene expression and soluble protein levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2, but not PD-1. Specifically, PD-1 mRNA gene expression was significantly higher in cases with less than 50% myometrial invasion. Additionally, the soluble protein level of PD-1 was substantially higher in patients under the age of 60. Higher gene expression of PD-L1 was observed only in advanced stages of EC. However, the soluble PD-L1 protein level was significantly elevated in type II EC, advanced stage, higher grade, lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI), and in cases with myometrial invasion of 50% or more. PD-L2 mRNA gene expression and soluble protein levels significantly differed across all clinical profiles except for LVSI. These findings suggest that PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 may serve as potential predictive biomarkers, which could be beneficial for the management of endometrial cancer patients through immunotherapy.

Efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibition in the treatment of endometrial cancer across molecular classes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown benefit in mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer. However, their efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (comprising POLE-mutated (POLEmut), p53-abnormal (p53abn), and no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) molecular classes) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, across the 4 molecular classes.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted across Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with manual searches of reference lists and conference websites. A total of 7 reports on 5 clinical trials were identified, with 3 included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

In patients with primary advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer (n=215), adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62) and progression-free survival (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53). In patients with p53abn endometrial cancer, no significant benefits in overall (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.22; n=135) or progression-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.70; n=326) were observed, but both were affected by significant heterogeneity. In patients with NSMP endometrial cancer, a significant benefit was observed for progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95; n=373), but no overall survival benefit (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39; n=242). Insufficient data were available for patients with POLEmut endometrial cancer (n=12), with no events reported in 2 of 3 clinical trials comprising the majority of patients (n=11).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-(L)1 inhibition demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer. In NSMP endometrial cancer, adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy showed potential benefit, whereas in p53abn endometrial cancer, such benefit was not found. POLEmut endometrial cancer, although rare in recurrent or metastatic settings, was associated with a favorable prognosis, regardless of treatment. These findings underscore the relevance of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer and highlight the importance of prioritizing molecular analyses in clinical trials to guide personalized PD-(L)1 inhibition strategies.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of patients with primary advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI high endometrial cancer in 2025

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four distinct molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer (EC): POLE mutated, mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), copy number low, and copy number high. The goal of this review is to summarize the profound clinical implications of molecular subtyping, particularly in guiding treatment decisions for dMMR and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) EC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H EC tumors. Trials including GARNET, KEYNOTE-158, NRG GY-018, and RUBY have shown significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with advanced and recurrent disease, leading to FDA approvals for immunotherapy in both frontline and recurrent EC treatment settings.Building on these successes, recent studies, including DUO-E, are exploring combination therapies to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in EC. Simultaneously, trials including NRG GY-020, are investigating the potential benefits of immunotherapy in early-stage disease.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy therapy has revolutionized the treatment of endometrial cancer in both upfront and recurrent settings, with molecular subtyping identifying patients most likely to benefit, especially those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with chemotherapy (CT) is currently under evaluation as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic combination in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

Methods

We performed an exhaustive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 25, 2024, examining the efficacy and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT versus CT alone (or plus placebo) in advanced or recurrent EC. Efficacy was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while safety was assessed by the incidence of any grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS, as well as risk ratios (RRs) for AEs, each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To evaluate heterogeneity, we employed Cochran's Q test, I2 statistics, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted using R Version 4.3.1, STATA Version 12.0, and TSA Version 0.9.5.10 Beta software.

Results

Our analysis incorporated 6 studies, encompassing a total of 2,954 patients. The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.617, 95% CI: 0.506-0.752; 95% PI: 0.334-1.140) and OS (HR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.664-0.902; 95% PI: 0.553-1.083) compared to CT alone (or plus placebo) in the overall population. Subgroup analysis based on mismatch repair (MMR) status revealed pronounced benefits in PFS and OS for patients with deficient MMR (dMMR) (PFS: HR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.269-0.438; 95% PI: 0.231-0.510; OS: HR = 0.371, 95% CI: 0.245-0.562; 95% PI: 0.025-5.461) compared to those with proficient MMR (pMMR) (PFS: HR = 0.772, 95% CI: 0.627-0.950; 95% PI: 0.394-1.512; OS: HR = 0.996, 95% CI: 0.692-1.435; 95% PI: 0.021-47.662). Although there was no observed difference in the incidence of any grades AEs (RR = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.982-1.006; 95% PI: 0.978-1.009), the risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs was elevated in the group receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with CT (RR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.023-1.252; 95% PI: 0.836-1.532).

Conclusion

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS and OS in advanced or recurrent EC patients, with particularly pronounced benefits observed in those with dMMR. Clinicians can tailor treatment strategies according to individual patient characteristics to optimize therapeutic outcomes, while remaining alert to the possibility of AEs in clinical practice.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024595455.

From Genes to Clinical Practice: Exploring the Genomic Underpinnings of Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC), a prevalent gynecological malignancy, presents significant challenges due to its genetic complexity and heterogeneity. The genomic landscape of EC is underpinned by genetic alterations, such as mutations in PTEN, PIK3CA, and ARID1A, and chromosomal abnormalities. The identification of molecular subtypes-POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability (MSI), copy number low, and copy number high-illustrates the diverse genetic profiles within EC and underscores the need for subtype-specific therapeutic strategies. The integration of multi-omics technologies such as single-cell genomics and spatial transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding and approach to studying EC and offers a holistic perspective that enhances the ability to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The translation of these multi-omics findings into personalized medicine and precision oncology is increasingly feasible in clinical practice. Targeted therapies such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors have demonstrated the potential for improved treatment efficacy tailored to specific genetic alterations. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in terms of variability in patient responses, the integration of genomic data into clinical workflows, and ethical considerations. This review explores the genomic underpinnings of EC, from genes to clinical practice. It highlights the ongoing need for multidisciplinary research and collaboration to address the complexities of EC and improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes.

PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background/Objectives: Cancer immunotherapy through the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have shown significant promise in endometrial carcinoma (EC), particularly in tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), present in approximately 30% of cases. This review evaluated PD-L1 and PD-1 expression as potential biomarkers for immunotherapy response in EC, focusing on their relationship with MSI status. Methods: A systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, analyzed studies from MEDLINE and Embase until February 2023 on PD-1/PD-L1 expression in EC stratified by MSI status, including diverse study designs but excluding conference abstracts, with independent screening, data extraction, and additional reference checks to ensure comprehensive coverage. Results: A systematic analysis of 10 studies found that PD-L1 expression was more frequently expressed in MSI tumors (49%) compared to microsatellite-stable tumors (MSS) (33.5%), while PD-1 was expressed in 58% of MSI cases and 48% of MSS cases. Despite these findings, the prognostic value of PD-L1/PD-1 remains uncertain, with conflicting results regarding their association with survival outcomes. PD-L1 expression varied across molecular subtypes, being highest in POLE-mutated tumors (76.56%) and serous carcinomas (73%). Differences in PD-L1 expression between primary and metastatic sites were also noted, complicating its use as a biomarker. Conclusions: The assessment of PD-L1 expression in EC could represent a valuable option for selecting patients who may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), including those in the MSS cohort, thereby ensuring a more tailored and personalized treatment strategy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers: a narrative review on the practice-changing trials

During the last decades, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has radically changed the treatment landscape of several cancer types, improving the prognosis and the quality of life of cancer patients. Even for gynecological cancers, where the prognosis has historically been poor despite advancements in surgery, radiotherapy and oncological treatment, immunotherapy has represented a significant leap forward. In cervical and endometrial cancer, the introduction of immunotherapy has radically changed the treatment algorithm, especially for advanced disease. However, the scenario remains less promising for ovarian cancer, where, despite extensive research efforts, no consistent positive results have been achieved with immune checkpoint inhibitors, except for a few cases in rarer histological subtypes Here, we present a narrative review summarizing the most important practice-changing studies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers, particularly in cervical, endometrial, ovarian and vulvar cancer.

A nomogram model to predict recurrence of early-onset endometrial cancer after resection based on clinical parameters and immunohistochemical markers: a multi-institutional study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the prognosis value of the clinical parameters and immunohistochemical markers of patients with early-onset endometrial cancer (EC) and establish a nomogram to accurately predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) of early-onset EC after resection.

Methods

A training dataset containing 458 patients and an independent testing dataset consisting of 170 patients were employed in this retrospective study. The independent risk factors related to RFS were confirmed using Cox regression models. A nomogram model was established to predict RFS at 3 and 5 years post-hysterectomy. The C-index, area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curve were calculated to assess the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.

Results

In all early-onset EC patients, more than half (368/628, 58.6%) were diagnosed in the age range of 45-49 years. Meanwhile, the recurrence rate of early-onset EC is approximately 10.8%. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that histological subtype, FIGO stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), P53 expression, and MMR status were independent prognostic factors related to RFS (all P < 0.05) and established the nomogram predicting 3- and 5-year RFS. The C-index and calibration curves of the nomogram demonstrated a close correlation between predicted and actual RFS. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the model of RFS.

Conclusions

Combining clinical parameters and immunohistochemical markers, we developed a robust nomogram to predict RFS after surgery for early-onset EC patients. This nomogram can predict prognosis well and guide treatment decisions.

Expression, regulation, and function of PD-L1 on non-tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy is a leading immunotherapy, but only some patients with solid cancers benefit. Overwhelming evidence has revealed that PD-L1 is expressed on various immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), including macrophages, dendritic cells, and regulatory T cells, modulating tumor immunity and influencing tumor progression. PD-L1 can also be located on tumor cell membranes as well as in exosomes and cytoplasm. Accordingly, the dynamic expression and various forms of PD-L1 might explain the therapy's limited efficacy and resistance. Herein a systematic summary of the expression of PD-L1 on different immune cells and their regulatory mechanisms is provided to offer a solid foundation for future studies.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer; however, the optimal treatment strategy remains undetermined.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted to identify RCTs published until December 31, 2023. Network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate PFS, OS, TRAEs, irAEs, and the ranking of different treatment regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 2702 patients from five RCTs (six reports) were included in the analysis. The combination therapy of ICIs significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.63-0.76, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.63-0.85, p < 0.0001) in the overall population. Among the different ICIs combinations evaluated, Durva-Olap-CP exhibited superior efficacy for both PFS and OS outcomes. In the pMMR population, both Durva-Olap-CP and Pembro-CP significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death compared to Avelu-CP and Atezo-CP treatments; however, no significant differences were observed among various ICI combination therapies in patients with dMMR. In the dMMR population, Dostar-CP demonstrates a 42.2% probability of achieving first rank in terms of PFS, whereas in the pMMR population, Pembro-CP exhibits a 60% likelihood of securing the top position. Importantly, the toxicity associated with ICIs combination therapy was manageable and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer has demonstrated superior survival outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. Durva-Olap-CP exhibited the most favorable PFS and OS benefits in the overall population. In patients with dMMR, Dostar-CP showed the greatest improvement in PFS, while Pembro-CP demonstrated the most pronounced PFS benefit in patients with pMMR.

Identification of molecular subtypes for endometrial carcinoma using a 46-gene next-generation sequencing panel: a retrospective study on a consecutive cohort

BACKGROUND

Traditional classification tools for endometrial carcinoma (EC), such as DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC), or PCR, are cumbersome and time-consuming. Large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels have simplified testing but are expensive. In this study, we propose a concise NGS panel as an effectively viable approach for classifying EC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled a consecutive EC cohort of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 2020 and 2022. A 46-gene NGS panel was utilized to identify POLE exonuclease domain mutations, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), TP53 mutations, and other clinically relevant targets.

RESULTS

Tumor tissue samples from 331 EC patients were evaluated, with 284 (85.8%) cases classified as endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. The median follow-up time was 32.6 months (n = 303), during which 23 patients experienced recurrence or disease progression. Using the concise NGS panel, patients were stratified into four molecular subgroups according to the World Health Organization classification criteria: POLE mut (n = 47; 14.2%), mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) (n = 79; 23.9%), non-specific molecular profile (n = 148; 44.7%), and abnormal p53 expression (p53 abn) (n = 57; 17.2%). POLE mut displayed the most favorable prognosis, while p53 abn had the worst prognosis (P < 0.001). The concordance between NGS and IHC was 91.8% (269/293) for detecting MMR status and 65.3% (201/308) for detecting p53 status. Patients detected solely by NGS had significantly worse prognosis than those detected solely by IHC, indicating higher accuracy of the NGS panel. With the molecular subtyping information, adjuvant treatment plans for 19.6% of patients could potentially be altered, mainly concentrated in the POLE mut and p53 abn subtypes. This panel also aids targeted therapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-related gene mutation detection, as well as auxiliary genetic screening.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the concise NGS panel is an effective 'one-stop' strategy for precisely classifying EC with high clinical availability.

Management of endometrial cancer in Latin America: raising the standard of care and optimizing outcomes

Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer is allowing for increased understanding of the natural history of tumors and paving a more solid pathway for novel therapies. It is becoming increasingly apparent that molecular classification is superior to histological classification in terms of reproducibility and prognostic discrimination. In particular, the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer allows classification of endometrial cancer into groups very close to those determined by the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network-that is, DNA polymerase epsilon-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient, p53 abnormal, and non-specific molecular profile tumors. The transition from the chemotherapy era to the age of targeted agents and immunotherapy, which started later in endometrial cancer than in many other tumor types, requires widespread availability of specialized pathology and access to novel agents. Likewise, surgical expertise and state-of-the-art radiotherapy modalities are required to ensure adequate care. Nevertheless, Latin American countries still face considerable barriers to implementation of international guidelines. As we witness the dawn of precision medicine as applied to endometrial cancer, we must make continued efforts towards improving the quality of care in this region. The current article discusses some of these challenges and possible solutions.

Immunotherapy in MMR-d/MSI-H recurrent/metastatic endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

The advent of immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the management of mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer (EC). Initially investigated as monotherapy in phase I-II clinical trials for recurrent disease, immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable activity, yielding overall response rates (ORR) ranging from 27% to 58%. Based on these promising findings, phase III trials have explored the integration of immunotherapy into first-line treatment regimens for advanced/recurrent EC in combination with chemotherapy or other agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resulting in improved ORR, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to the standard chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin. As a result, the incorporation of ICIs with standard platinum-based chemotherapy is becoming a new standard of care in MMR-d/MSI-H EC.

AREAS COVERED

This review synthesizes literature from PubMed, Embase databases, and recent congress abstracts on gynecological cancers. It covers MMR-d/MSI-H EC incidence, molecular diagnostics, clinical trial outcomes, predictive biomarkers for ICIs, patient profiles likely to benefit, resistance mechanisms, and the future of immunotherapy in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

By offering a comprehensive overview, this review delineates the pivotal role of ICIs in the management of MMR-d/MSI-H EC.

Beyond monotherapy: An era ushering in combinations of PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors for solid tumors

The introduction of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has marked a significant shift in the treatment landscape for solid tumors. Emerging preclinical evidence and initial clinical trials have indicated that the synergistic application of PARPis and ICIs may enhance treatment efficacy and potentially improve long-term patient outcomes. Nonetheless, how to identify specific tumor types and molecular subgroups most likely to benefit from this combination remains an area of ongoing research. This review thoroughly examines current studies on the co-administration of PARPis and ICIs across various solid tumors. It explores the underlying mechanisms of action, evaluates clinical efficacy, identifies potential responder populations, and delineates common adverse events alongside strategic management approaches. The aim is to offer a detailed understanding of this combination therapy, potentially guiding future therapeutic strategies for solid tumors.

Omics-based molecular classifications empowering in precision oncology

BACKGROUND

In the past decades, cancer enigmatical heterogeneity at distinct expression levels could interpret disparities in therapeutic response and prognosis. It built hindrances to precision medicine, a tactic to tailor customized treatment informed by the tumors' molecular profile. Single-omics analysis dissected the biological features associated with carcinogenesis to some extent but still failed to revolutionize cancer treatment as expected. Integrated omics analysis incorporated tumor biological networks from diverse layers and deciphered a holistic overview of cancer behaviors, yielding precise molecular classification to facilitate the evolution and refinement of precision medicine.

CONCLUSION

This review outlined the biomarkers at multiple expression layers to tutor molecular classification and pinpoint tumor diagnosis, and explored the paradigm shift in precision therapy: from single- to multi-omics-based subtyping to optimize therapeutic regimens. Ultimately, we firmly believe that by parsing molecular characteristics, omics-based typing will be a powerful assistant for precision oncology.

Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and Its Impact on Therapy Selection

Endometrial cancer (EC) accounts for 90% of uterine cancer cases. It is considered not only one of the most common gynecological malignancies but also one of the most frequent cancers among women overall. Nowadays, the differentiation of EC subtypes is based on immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques. It is considered that patients' prognosis and the implementation of the appropriate treatment depend on the cancer subtype. Patients with pathogenic variants in POLE have the most favorable outcome, while those with abnormal p53 protein have the poorest. Therefore, in patients with POLE mutation, the de-escalation of postoperative treatment may be considered, and patients with abnormal p53 protein should be subjected to intensive adjuvant therapy. Patients with a DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) deficiency are classified in the intermediate prognosis group as EC patients without a specific molecular profile. Immunotherapy has been recognized as an effective treatment method in patients with advanced or recurrent EC with a mismatch deficiency. Thus, different adjuvant therapy approaches, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, are being proposed depending on the EC subtype, and international guidelines, such as those published by ESMO and ESGO/ESTRO/ESP, include recommendations for performing the molecular classification of all EC cases. The decision about adjuvant therapy selection has to be based not only on clinical data and histological type and stage of cancer, but, following international recommendations, has to include EC molecular subtyping. This review describes how molecular classification could support more optimal therapeutic management in endometrial cancer patients.

Molecular characterization as new driver in prognostic signatures and therapeutic strategies for endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence and mortality rates have been increasing, particularly among young females. Although more than 90% of ECs are sporadic, 5-10% are hereditary, a majority of which occurs within Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer syndrome (HNPCC) or Lynch syndrome. The traditional histopathological classification differentiates EC between two main groups: type I (or endometrioid) and type II (including all other histopathological subtypes). However, this classification lacks reproducibility and does not account for the emerging molecular heterogeneity. In 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project proposed EC molecular classification defining four groups with different prognostic and predictive values and the current international guidelines are progressively establishing EC risk stratification and treatment based on both histopathological and molecular criteria. Our manuscript aims to summarize the current state of EC molecular characterizations, including germline alterations at the basis of hereditary EC predisposition, to discuss their clinical utility as prognostic and predictive markers.

Application and progress of nanozymes in antitumor therapy

Tumors remain one of the major threats to public health and there is an urgent need to design new pharmaceutical agents for their diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, due to the rapid development of nanotechnology, biotechnology, catalytic science, and theoretical computing, subtlety has gradually made great progress in research related to tumor diagnosis and treatment. Compared to conventional drugs, enzymes can improve drug distribution and enhance drug enrichment at the tumor site, thereby reducing drug side effects and enhancing drug efficacy. Nanozymes can also be used as tumor tracking imaging agents to reshape the tumor microenvironment, providing a versatile platform for the diagnosis and treatment of malignancies. In this paper, we review the current status of research on enzymes in oncology and analyze novel oncology therapeutic approaches and related mechanisms. To date, a large number of nanomaterials, such as noble metal nanomaterials, nonmetallic nanomaterials, and carbon-based nanomaterials, have been shown to be able to function like natural enzymes, particularly with significant advantages in tumor therapy. In light of this, the authors in this review have systematically summarized and evaluated the construction, enzymatic activity, and their characteristics of nanozymes with respect to current modalities of tumor treatment. In addition, the application and research progress of different types of nicknames and their features in recent years are summarized in detail. We conclude with a summary and outlook on the study of nanozymes in tumor diagnosis and treatment. It is hoped that this review will inspire researchers in the fields of nanotechnology, chemistry, biology, materials science and theoretical computing, and contribute to the development of nano-enzymology.

Novel Molecular Targets in Endometrial Cancer: Mechanisms and Perspectives for Therapy

Endometrial cancer (EC) has a high epidemiological impact with incidence and mortality rising worldwide. In recent years, the integration of the pathologic and molecular classification has provided relevant information to understand the heterogeneity in the biology of EC, which led to the evolution in the management of patients. Currently, therapeutic breakthroughs have been made in advanced EC to improve oncologic outcomes, with efforts to include patient reported outcomes. Precision and personalized medicine are under way in EC exploring different combination approaches to target cross-talk pathways, cancer cell microenvironment, and metabolic vulnerabilities and improve drug delivery. Yet, collaborative efforts are needed to face the challenges in practice by refining patient selection, ideal biomarker identification, and de-escalation of therapies according to emerging molecular and genomic features of EC.

Recent Therapeutic Advances in Gynecologic Oncology: A Review

Gynecologic malignancies have high incidence rates both nationally and internationally, and cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers account for high mortality rates worldwide. Significant research is ongoing to develop targeted therapies to address unmet needs in the field and improve patient outcomes. As tumors mutate and progress through traditional lines of treatment, new therapies must be developed to overcome resistance and target cancer-specific receptors and mutations. Recent advances in the development of immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates have resulted in compelling and clinically meaningful results in cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. In the last decade, several immunotherapy agents have received FDA approval or NCCN guideline recommendation for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, including dostarlimab for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and pembrolizumab for advanced or recurrent cervical and endometrial cancers. Several other immunotherapeutic agents are under active investigation. Development of antibody-drug conjugates including tisotumab vedotin in cervical cancer, mirvetuximab soravtansine in ovarian cancer, and trastuzumab deruxtecan in multiple gynecologic cancers has translated into exciting efficacy signals, prompting full drug approvals and additional investigation. This article aims to review recent novel advances in targeted treatments for gynecologic malignancies, highlighting the trials and data underlying these novel interventions.

Mismatch repair gene MSH6 correlates with the prognosis, immune status and immune checkpoint inhibitors response of endometrial cancer

Objective

Many patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) developed primary or secondary drug resistance for unknown reasons. This study investigates whether mismatch repair (MMR) genes are responsible for this therapeutic restriction.

Methods

We obtained the transcriptional, clinical and single nucleotide polymorphism data for endometrial cancer (EC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the immunophenoscore data of EC from The Cancer Immunome Atlas, then analyzed in R to evaluate the relationship between MMR genes and clinicopathological features, prognosis, immune infiltration, immune checkpoint expression and responsiveness to ICIs in EC. We used differentially expressed genes in the MSH6 high and low expression groups to conduct GO and KEGG analyses to explore the impact of MSH6 on the biological functions of EC. Finally, we verified the bioinformatics results with in vitro experiments.

Results

Our analyses showed that compared with the high MSH6 expression group, the low MSH6 expression group had better survival outcomes and less aggressive clinicopathological features. In the multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 was the only independent risk factor that could predict the prognosis of EC. Besides, the low MSH6 expression group also had a higher immune score, more active immune infiltration and higher immune checkpoint expression, resulting in better responsiveness to ICIs treatment, consistent with the enrichment of GO terms and KEGG pathways related to immune response in this group. Meanwhile, the GO and KEGG enrichment results of the MSH6 high expression group were associated with cell cycle, DNA damage repair and tumorigenesis. To exclude the influence of MSH6 mutations, we performed the previous analyses on the MSH6 wild-type tumor samples and obtained consistent results. In vitro experiments also confirmed that after knocking down MSH6 in endometrial cancer cells, their proliferation, migration and invasion abilities were weakened, while the expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2 were elevated. In comparison, overexpression of MSH6 showed an opposite trend.

Conclusion

Reduced MSH6 expression could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting better prognosis, active immune status, higher immune checkpoint expression level and better responsiveness to ICIs treatment in EC. MSH6 may become a potential target for treating solid tumors.

Molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer: Implications for adjuvant treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

When determining adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, the decision typically relies on factors such as cancer stage, histologic grade, subtype, and a few histopathologic markers. The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, which can provide more accurate prognostic information and guide personalized treatment plans.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the expression and molecular basis of the main biomarkers of endometrial cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed was searched from January 2000 to March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies evaluating molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and implications for adjuvant treatment strategies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently performed a comprehensive literature search, collected and extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We summarized the molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, including mismatch repair deficient, high microsatellite instability, polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain mutated, TP53 gene mutation, and non-specific molecular spectrum. We also summarized planned and ongoing clinical trials and common therapy methods in endometrial cancer. POLE mutated endometrial cancer consistently exhibits favorable patient outcomes, regardless of adjuvant therapy. Genomic similarities between p53 abnormality endometrial cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer suggested possible overlapping treatment strategies. High levels of immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 can counterbalance mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer immune phenotype. Hormonal treatment is an appealing option for high-risk non-specific molecular spectrum endometrial cancers, which are typically endometrioid and hormone receptor positive. Combining clinical and pathologic characteristics to guide treatment decisions for patients, including concurrent radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy, inhibitor therapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy, might improve the management of endometrial cancer and provide more effective treatment options for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We have characterized the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and discuss their value in terms of a patient-tailored therapy in order to prevent significant under- or overtreatment.

A comprehensive analysis of immunotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer (Review)

The morbidity and mortality rates of endometrial cancer (EC) are increasing yearly. Early-stage EC can be effectively treated through surgery or surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Advanced and recurrent EC is treated with chemotherapy and comprehensive treatment; however, the prognosis for patients at this disease stage is poor. Consequently, novel and effective treatment strategies are urgently required for these patients. Breakthrough progress has been made with the use of immunosuppressants in the treatment of EC, which have been included in treatment guidelines. In the present review, the etiology and classification of EC was outlined and the relevant scientific basis for the application of immunosuppressants in advanced and recurrent EC was discussed. The relevant published and ongoing clinical trials are also summarized. As such, the present review aimed to provide a scientific summary of immunotherapy of EC.

Durvalumab Plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: The Phase III DUO-E Trial

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy and chemotherapy combinations have shown activity in endometrial cancer, with greater benefit in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) than MMR-proficient (pMMR) disease. Adding a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor may improve outcomes, especially in pMMR disease.

METHODS

This phase III, global, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer 1:1:1 to: carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab placebo followed by placebo maintenance (control arm); carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib placebo (durvalumab arm); or carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) in the durvalumab arm versus control and the durvalumab + olaparib arm versus control.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighteen patients were randomly assigned. In the intention-to-treat population, statistically significant PFS benefit was observed in the durvalumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.89]; P = .003) and durvalumab + olaparib arms (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.69]; P < .0001) versus control. Prespecified, exploratory subgroup analyses showed PFS benefit in dMMR (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.75]) and pMMR subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.97]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control] 0.57; [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73]); and in PD-L1-positive subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.83]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.57]). Interim overall survival results (maturity approximately 28%) were supportive of the primary outcomes (durvalumab v control: HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.07]; P = .120; durvalumab + olaparib v control: HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83]; P = .003). The safety profiles of the experimental arms were generally consistent with individual agents.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Dostarlimab: From preclinical investigation to drug approval and future directions

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) act by reverting the immunosuppressive phenotype of cancer cells, thus allowing host immune system to generate an immune response to the tumor. One of the key mechanisms targeted by ICB is the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which lies onto the interaction between the programmed-cell death protein 1 and its ligand, overexpressed in several tumor types. This interaction leads to the inhibition of T-cell proliferation and their apoptosis and exhaustion. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies are now the mainstay of treatment for several advanced stage tumors. Dostarlimab is a novel IgG4 anti-PD-1 antibody which has yielded remarkable results in mismatch-repair deficient endometrial cancer and locally advanced rectal cancer. This product review will illustrate the preclinical development of dostarlimab and its pharmacological characteristics, the clinical trials published so far and the ongoing clinical investigations.

Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Studies in recent years have shown that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may have better effectiveness in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is thought to be related to mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) classification in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients classified as dMMR and pMMR. Methods: Medical databases were searched to identify relevant publications up to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome was comparison of objective response rate (ORR) in patients with dMMR and pMMR following treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors; secondary outcomes were single-group ORR in patients with dMMR and in patients with pMMR, respectively. Results: Eleven studies were eligible for analysis and patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular classification of dMMR had a higher total ORR than those with pMMR [odds ratio (OR), 7.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.22-18.38; p < 0.01], with low evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). The total ORR of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular type dMMR was 51.9% (95% CI, 33.6%-69.9%). The overall ORR of patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular type pMMR was 16.1% (95% CI, 5.5%-30.3%). Conclusion: In our including studies, the patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with molecular types of dMMR and pMMR, following treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the total ORR of patients with dMMR was higher than that of patients with pMMR. Since the current number of studies is not very large, it is possible that more studies will be published in the future and more precise results will be discussed further.

Oral Selinexor as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE

Selinexor inhibits exportin-1 (XPO1) resulting in nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins including p53 and has clinical activity in endometrial cancer (EC). The primary end point was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) with once-weekly oral selinexor in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO was a randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study at 107 sites in 10 countries. Patients 18 years or older with histologically confirmed EC were enrolled. All had completed a single line of at least 12 weeks of taxane-platinum combination chemotherapy and achieved partial or complete response. Patients were assigned to receive 80 mg oral selinexor once weekly or placebo with 2:1 random assignment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03555422).

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2021, 263 patients were randomly assigned, with 174 allocated to selinexor and 89 to placebo. The median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 9.20) with selinexor versus 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.39) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.08]; two-sided P = .126), which did not meet the criteria for statistical significance in the intent-to-treat population. Incorrect chemotherapy response stratification data for 7 (2.7%) patients were identified. In a prespecified exploratory analysis of PFS in audited stratification data, PFS for selinexor met the threshold for statistical significance (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.499 to 0.996; two-sided P = .049). Furthermore, patients with the TP53 wild-type (wt) EC had a median PFS of 13.7 and 3.7 months with selinexor and placebo. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were nausea (9%), neutropenia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (7%).

CONCLUSION

The significance level for PFS was only met in the audited analysis. However, a preliminary analysis of a prespecified exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC showed promising results with selinexor maintenance therapy.

Association of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinicopathological features and their prognostic value

PURPOSE

Identification of the mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in endometrial cancer (EC) may aid in the screening of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between MMR status and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features in patients with EC, as well as to explore their prognostic value.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 106 EC patients who were classified as MMR deficient (dMMR) or MMR proficient (pMMR) group based on MMR protein expression status evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathological characteristics and PET metabolic parameters were compared between the dMMR and pMMR groups, and their relationships with MMR status and prognosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 106 EC patients, 30 patients (28.1%) had dMMR, while 76 (71.7%) had pMMR. Compared with the pMMR group, the dMMR group showed a lower prevalence of overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (17.2% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.019) and more lymph vascular space invasion (43.3% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.029). Although no relationship between glucometabolism parameters and MMR status was observed in all enrolled patients, higher SUVmax was observed in the endometrioid type of EC with MMR deficiency (P = 0.047). Additionally, SUVmax related to MMR status was found in EC patients with advanced FIGO stage (P = 0.026) or deep myometrial invasion (P = 0.026). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was independently predictive of PFS, while advanced FIGO stage was an independent predictor of OS. No significant association between MMR status and prognosis was found in EC.

CONCLUSION

Higher SUVmax was associated with MMR deficiency in EC patients with endometrioid type, advanced stage, or deep myometrial invasion, which may be useful for predicting the MMR status and thus aiding in determination of immunotherapy for patients with EC.

Selinexor in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer

Selinexor is an oral inhibitor of the nuclear export protein called Exportin 1 (XPO1) with demonstrated antitumor activity in hematological and solid tumors. Selinexor, blocking XPO1, induces nuclear localization of tumor suppressor proteins (including p53, p73, BRCA1, and pRB), leading to the selective induction of apoptosis, and inhibition of DNA damage repair proteins. XPO1 overexpression is common in endometrial cancers. Phase I and II trials reported the antitumor activity of selinexor in patients with endometrial carcinoma. The preliminary results of the phase III Selinexor in ENDOmetrial Cancer (SIENDO/ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055) trial supported the use of selinexor as maintenance therapy in advanced endometrial cancer patients achieving at least partial response after a minimum of 12 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Selinexor maintenance resulted in a (nonsignificant) 30% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. Looking at the endometrial cancer molecular subgroup characterized by TP53 wild type, the antitumor activity of selinexor seemed more pronounced, resulting in approximately a 60% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The SIENDO and the XPORT-EC trials will clarify the benefits and risks of adding selinexor as a first-line chemotherapy maintenance treatment in all-comer and TP53 wild-type endometrial cancers. Preclinical data highlights the potential for selinexor to be synthetically lethal with PARP inhibitors and may also plan a role in overcoming acquired resistance to those therapies. Therefore, new possible combinations with PARP inhibitors and should be evaluated. Furthermore, the combination of selinexor plus immune checkpoint inhibitors deserves further investigation in clinical trials.

Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analyses of Dostarlimab in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Interim Results of the Phase I GARNET Study

PURPOSE

This interim report of the GARNET phase I trial presents efficacy and safety of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), with an analysis of tumor biomarkers as prognostic indicators.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and 161 patients with mismatch repair proficient (MMRp)/microsatellite stable (MSS) EC were enrolled and dosed. Patients received 500 mg dostarlimab every 3 weeks for four cycles, then 1,000 mg every 6 weeks until progression. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR).

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients with dMMR/MSI-H EC and 156 patients with MMRp/MSS EC were evaluated for efficacy. ORR was 45.5% (n = 65) and 15.4% (n = 24) for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. Median DOR for dMMR/MSI-H EC was not met (median follow-up, 27.6 months); median DOR for MMRp/MSS EC was 19.4 months. The ORRs by combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 status were 54.9% and 21.7% for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. ORRs by high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations/Mb) were 47.8% (43/90) and 45.5% (5/11) for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. ORR in TP53mut or POLεmut molecular subgroups was 18.1% (17/94) and 40.0% (2/5), respectively. The safety profile of dostarlimab was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity and safety in patients with dMMR/MSI-H EC. Biomarkers associated with EC may identify patients likely to respond to dostarlimab. See related commentary by Jangra and Dhani, p. 4521.

Real-world dostarlimab use in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer in France

INTRODUCTION

In October 2020, the French Health Authority granted early access outside of the clinical trial setting for dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor. Dostarlimab was approved by the European Medicines Agency (in April 2021) as monotherapy for patients with post-platinum mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, based on the results of the GARNET trial (NCT02715284).

METHODS

This was a real-world descriptive analysis of patients granted cohort temporary authorization of use to receive dostarlimab between November 2020 and June 2021. Physicians could complete follow-up forms at each treatment cycle to provide clinical information, safety, and efficacy data. Safety and disease progression data were also captured through pharmacovigilance reports.

RESULTS

Of 95 temporary authorization of use requests made by 80 oncologists in 59 French hospitals, 87 patients were eligible, and 80 received≥1 dose of dostarlimab. Based on treatment response assessments received (n=43), the mean (standard deviation) time from treatment initiation to response evaluation was 11 (6) weeks. The disease control rate (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease rates) was 56% (n=24/43), and the overall response rate was 35% (n=15/43); both consistent with those reported in the GARNET trial. No new safety signals were reported.

DISCUSSION

The enrolment of 80 patients in an 8-month period highlights the need for access to novel treatment regimens in France for these patients post-platinum. Prospective randomized studies are ongoing to assess the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab and other checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment in patients with endometrial cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Advanced, Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: A Scoping Review with SWOT Analysis

Results of recent clinical trials using the immune check point inhibitors (ICI) pembrolizumab or dostarlimab with/without lenvatinib has led to their approval for specific molecular subgroups of advanced recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). Herein, we summarise the clinical data leading to this first tissue-agnostic approval. As this novel therapy is not yet available in the United Kingdom standard care setting, we explore the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of ICI treatment in EC. Major databases were searched focusing on clinical trials using programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) ICI which ultimately contributed to anti-PD-1 approval in EC. We performed a data quality assessment, reviewing survival and safety analysis. We included 15 studies involving 1609 EC patients: 458 with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status and 1084 with mismatch repair proficiency/microsatellite stable (MMRp/MSS) status. Pembrolizumab/dostarlimab have been approved for MMRd ECs, with the addition of lenvatinib for MMRp cases in the recurrent setting. Future efforts will focus on the pathological assessment of biomarkers to determine molecular phenotypes that correlate with response or resistance to ICI in order to identify patients most likely to benefit from this treatment.

New insights for gynecological cancer therapies: from molecular mechanisms and clinical evidence to future directions

Advanced and recurrent gynecological cancers lack effective treatment and have poor prognosis. Besides, there is urgent need for conservative treatment for fertility protection of young patients. Therefore, continued efforts are needed to further define underlying therapeutic targets and explore novel targeted strategies. Considerable advancements have been made with new insights into molecular mechanisms on cancer progression and breakthroughs in novel treatment strategies. Herein, we review the research that holds unique novelty and potential translational power to alter the current landscape of gynecological cancers and improve effective treatments. We outline the advent of promising therapies with their targeted biomolecules, including hormone receptor-targeted agents, inhibitors targeting epigenetic regulators, antiangiogenic agents, inhibitors of abnormal signaling pathways, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, agents targeting immune-suppressive regulators, and repurposed existing drugs. We particularly highlight clinical evidence and trace the ongoing clinical trials to investigate the translational value. Taken together, we conduct a thorough review on emerging agents for gynecological cancer treatment and further discuss their potential challenges and future opportunities.

Targeting DNA Damage Repair and Immune Checkpoint Proteins for Optimizing the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer

The dependence of cancer cells on the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway for the repair of endogenous- or exogenous-factor-induced DNA damage has been extensively studied in various cancer types, including endometrial cancer (EC). Targeting one or more DNA damage repair protein with small molecules has shown encouraging treatment efficacy in preclinical and clinical models. However, the genes coding for DDR factors are rarely mutated in EC, limiting the utility of DDR inhibitors in this disease. In the current review, we recapitulate the functional role of the DNA repair system in the development and progression of cancer. Importantly, we discuss strategies that target DDR proteins, including PARP, CHK1 and WEE1, as monotherapies or in combination with cytotoxic agents in the treatment of EC and highlight the compounds currently being evaluated for their efficacy in EC in clinic. Recent studies indicate that the application of DNA damage agents in cancer cells leads to the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses; targeting immune checkpoint proteins could overcome the immune suppressive environment in tumors. We further summarize recently revolutionized immunotherapies that have been completed or are now being evaluated for their efficacy in advanced EC and propose future directions for the development of DDR-based cancer therapeutics in the treatment of EC.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor as Single-Agent Immunotherapy in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway plays a crucial role in the immune escape mechanism and growth of cancer cells in endometrial cancer (EC). Clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor have shown promising results in other cancers, but their efficacy in EC still remains uncertain. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to provide an updated and robust analysis of the effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PDL1 inhibitor as single-agent immunotherapy in EC, focusing on the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). This meta-analysis utilized STATA version 17 and RevMan version 5.4 software to pool the results of relevant studies. Five studies conducted between 2017 and 2022, comprising a total of 480 EC patients enrolled for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy met the inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of EC patients who achieved ORR through PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was 26.0% (95% CI: 16.0-36.0%; p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis based on mismatch repair (MMR) status showed an ORR of 44.0% (95% CI: 38.0-50.0%; p = 0.32) for the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group and 8.0% (95% CI: 0.0-16.0%; p = 0.07) for the proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group. Pooled proportion analysis by DCR demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 41.0% (95% CI: 36.0-46.0%, p = 0.83) for patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. Subgroup analysis based on MMR status revealed DCR of 54.0% (95% CI: 47.0-62.0%; p = 0.83) for the dMMR group, and 31.0% (95% CI: 25.0-39.0%; p = 0.14) for the pMMR group. The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was significantly higher in the dMMR group compared to the pMMR group, in terms of both ORR (OR = 6.30; 95% CI = 3.60-11.03; p < 0.05) and DCR (OR = 2.57; 95% CI = 1.66-3.99; p < 0.05). In terms of safety issues, the pooled proportion of patients experiencing at least one adverse event was 69.0% (95% CI: 65.0-73.0%; p > 0.05), with grade three or higher AEs occurring in 16.0% of cases (95% CI: 12.0-19.0%; p > 0.05). Based on the subgroup analysis of MMR status, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy showed significantly better efficacy among dMMR patients. These findings suggest that patients with dMMR status may be more suitable for this treatment approach. However, further research on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy strategies is needed to fully explore their potential and improve treatment outcomes in EC.

Therapeutic approaches in patients with bone metastasis due to endometrial carcinoma - A systematic review

Background

Bone metastases (BM) are uncommon in endometrial carcinoma (EC), without information on the optimal oncologic management of patients with BM in EC. Here, we systematically review clinical characteristics, treatment approaches and prognosis in patients with BM in EC.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search until 27th March 2022 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov. Outcomes included treatment frequency and survival after BM with comparators being treatment approaches (local cytoreductive bone surgery, systemic therapy, and local radiotherapy). Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool and Navigation Guide methodology.

Results

We retrieved 1096 records of which 112 retrospective studies (12 cohort studies, 12/12 fair quality; 100 case studies, 100/100 low quality) with a total of 1566 patients were included. The majority had a primary diagnosis of FIGO stage IV, grade 3 endometrioid EC. Singular BM were present in a median of 39.2%, multiple BM in 60.8% and synchronous additional distant metastases in 48.1% of patients respectively. In patients with secondary BM median time to bone recurrence was 14 months. Median survival after BM was 12 months. Local cytoreductive bone surgery was assessed in 7/13 cohorts and performed in a median of 15.8% (interquartile range [IQR] 10.3-43.0) of patients. Chemotherapy was assessed in 11/13 cohorts and administered in a median of 55.5% (IQR 41.0-63.9), hormonal therapy (7/13 cohorts) in 24.7% (IQR 16.3-36.0), and osteooncologic therapy (4/13 cohorts) in 2.7% (IQR 0.0-7.5) of patients respectively. Local radiotherapy was assessed in 9/13 cohorts and performed in a median of 66.7% (IQR 55.6-70.0) of patients. Survival benefits were seen in 2/3 cohorts after local cytoreductive bone surgery, and in 2/7 cohorts after chemotherapy without survival benefits in the remaining cohorts and investigated therapies. Limitations include the lack of controlled intervention studies, the heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the investigated populations.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows heterogenous therapeutic approaches in clinical practice without clear evidence for optimal oncologic management for patients with BM in EC.

Advances in immunotherapy for gynecological malignancies

To date, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are mainly used to treat or remove gynecological malignancies. However, these approaches have their limitations when facing complicated female diseases such as advanced cervical and endometrial cancer (EC), chemotherapy-resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Instead, immunotherapy, as an alternative, could significantly improve prognosis of those patients receiving traditional treatments, with better antitumor activities and possibly less cellular toxicities. Its' development is still not fast enough to meet the current clinical needs. More preclinical studies and larger-scale clinical trials are required. This review aims to introduce the landscape and up-to-date status of immunotherapy against gynecological malignancies, with a discussion of the challenges and future direction.

ZAP70 interaction with 13 mRNAs as a potential immunotherapeutic target for endometrial cancer

For advanced, refractory endometrial cancer (EC), it is advisable to find effective immunotherapeutic targets. In the present study, genes affecting the immune status of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) samples within The Cancer Genome Atlas were explored by weighted correlation network analysis and differential gene expression analysis. The protein function and immune correlation of 14 key genes, including ζ-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70), were analyzed. Based on the expression levels of key genes, the patients with UCEC were divided into two groups using consensus clustering, low expression (group 1) and high expression (group 2). Next, the functions of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two groups were identified using Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. The immune status of the patients in the two groups was evaluated using immune infiltration score and the expression levels of targets of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The role of ZAP70 in the prognosis of patients with UCEC and the differences in ZAP70 expression between EC tissues and healthy intimal tissues were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry. The present study found strong correlations between key genes, including ZAP70, LCK, FOXP3, TIGIT, CTLA4, ICOS, CD5, IL2RG, PDCD1, TNFRSF4, CD27, CCR7, GZMB, CXCL9. From the enrichment analyses, it was found that the functions of these DEGs were related to T cells. Patients in group 2 had stronger immune infiltration and higher immune checkpoints expression compared with those in group 1. ZAP70 was expressed at higher levels in EC tissues compared with in normal tissues, and may act as a protective factor in EC. In conclusion, ZAP70 interaction with 13 mRNAs may affect the immune status of patients with EC and may be a potential target for immunotherapy.

Could Inhibiting the DNA Damage Repair Checkpoint Rescue Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Resistant Endometrial Cancer?

Endometrial cancer (EC) is increasingly undermining female health worldwide, with poor survival rates for advanced or recurrent/metastatic diseases. The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has opened a window of opportunity for patients with first-line therapy failure. However, there is a subset of patients with endometrial cancer who remain insensitive to immunotherapy alone. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new therapeutic agents and further explore reliable combinational strategies to optimize the efficacy of immunotherapy. DNA damage repair (DDR) inhibitors as novel targeted drugs are able to generate genomic toxicity and induce cell death in solid tumors, including EC. Recently, growing evidence has demonstrated the DDR pathway modulates innate and adaptive immunity in tumors. In this review, we concentrate on the exploration of the intrinsic correlation between DDR pathways, especially the ATM-CHK2-P53 pathway and the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway, and oncologic immune response, as well as the feasibility of adding DDR inhibitors to ICIs for the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent/metastatic EC. We hope that this review will offer some beneficial references to the investigation of immunotherapy and provide a reasonable basis for "double-checkpoint inhibition" in EC.

Advances in the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological tumors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoints are regulatory molecules that suppress immune effector cells, and are essential for maintaining tolerance, preventing autoimmune reactions, and minimizing tissue damage by controlling the duration and intensity of the immune responses. However, immune checkpoints are frequently upregulated during cancer and dampen the anti-tumor immune responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been effective against multiple tumors, and have improved patients' survival outcomes. Recent clinical trials have also reported promising therapeutic effects of ICIs in some gynecological cancers.

AIM

To review the current research and future directions in the treatment of gynecological malignancies, including ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancers, using ICIs.

CONCLUSION

Currently, cervical and ovarian cancers are the only gynecological tumors that are treated by immunotherapeutic approaches. In addition, ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)- and T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells targeting endometrial tumors, especially those originating in the vulva and fallopian tubes, are under development. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of ICIs, especially in combination with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, anti-angiogenesis drugs and poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), needs to be elucidated. Furthermore, novel predictive biomarkers have to be identified in order to increase the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs while reducing adverse reactions.

A rapidly evolving landscape: immune checkpoint inhibitors in pretreated metastatic endometrial cancer

Background and objectives

Endometrial cancer is a common malignancy and recurrences can be fatal. Although platinum-pretreated endometrial tumors are commonly treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, there is no current standard of care. Both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been extensively assessed in this setting, including tumors selected for DNA mismatch repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) and programmed death-ligand 1 expression status. This review will provide evidence-based guidance on use of ICIs alone or in combination with TKIs in patients with pretreated advanced, persistent, or recurrent metastatic endometrial cancer.

Data sources and methods

Randomized phase II-III trials in unselected populations pretreated, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer and phase I-II trials in biomarker selected populations were identified from PubMed as well as conference proceedings using the key search terms 'immune checkpoint inhibitors', 'endometrial cancer', and 'advanced'.

Results

A total of nine eligible studies were identified assessing ICI monotherapy for biomarker-selected or ICI plus TKI combinations and a dual ICI regimen for biomarker-unselected patients with pretreated recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer. In MMR/MSI-selected tumors, five phase I/II studies evaluated ICI monotherapy indicating benefit in these patients. Only the phase III KEYNOTE-775 trial reported a statistically significant overall survival improvement for the combination of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with docetaxel or paclitaxel regardless of MMR/MSI status.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is indicated for patients with unselected pretreated metastatic endometrial cancer and pembrolizumab monotherapy is a preferred option for patients with MMRd/MSI-H tumors.

Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) endometrial cancer data expanded our knowledge about the role of different immunotherapeutic approaches based on molecular subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated distinct antitumor activities as monotherapy or in combination. In microsatellite unstable (microsatellite instability-high) endometrial cancer, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising single agent activity in recurrent settings. Different strategies are needed to enhance the response or reverse resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors, or both, in microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer. On the other hand, single immune checkpoint inhibitors showed underwhelming efficacy in microsatellite stable endometrial cancer but this was significantly improved using a combination approach. Furthermore, studies are also needed to improve response along with ensuring safety and tolerability in microsatellite stable endometrial cancer. This review summarizes the current indications of immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. We also outline potential future strategies for an immunotherapy based combination approach in endometrial cancer to combat resistance or enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, or both.

Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours

BACKGROUND

In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease ≥16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-γ expression in patients without CB.

CONCLUSION

Durvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-γ expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration: NCT02925234. First registration date: 05/10/2016.

Molecular typing guiding treatment and prognosis of endometrial cancer

Genetic abnormalities, such asPTEN, PIK3CA,CTNNB1,ARID1A, andERBB2, which frequently occur in endometrial cancer (EC), are potential therapeutic targets. In 2013, integrated genomic analysis conducted by The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four molecular subtypes, including POLE ultra-mutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy-number low, and copy-number high, which strongly correlate with prognosis. Surrogate markers-based molecular classification methods have been developed to make these molecular classifications accessible and affordable, achieving classification into POLEmut, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53abn, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) with normal p53 expression. Although POLEmut EC has aggressive pathologic features, there are few cases of advanced and/or recurrence. Therefore, the possibility of de-escalating adjuvant therapy can be considered. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be a candidate for treating advanced and recurrent POLEmut EC because of their high immunogenicity. MMRd EC shows an intermediate prognosis between those of POLEmut and p53abn EC. MMRd EC is generally characterized by high immunogenicity similar to POLEmut EC, suggesting that ICI can also be a potential therapeutic agent. Among the four molecular subtypes, p53abn EC has the worst prognosis. However, some p53abn tumors have the molecular hallmark of homologous recombination deficiency and could be treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. In addition, some p53abn tumors overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, which can also be a potential therapeutic target. NSMP EC are a heterogeneous population because they lack characteristic molecular biological features. Approximately half of the NSMP EC show high expression of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor, suggesting the possibility of hormonal therapy. In addition, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway frequently altered in EC may be a therapeutic target. This review summarizes the molecular biological characteristics and potential therapeutic agents in molecularly featured EC. Several clinical trials are in progress to stratify EC into molecular classifications and demonstrate the efficacy and safety of molecularly matched treatment and management strategies.