Novel trends with biologics in inflammatory bowel disease: sequential and combined approaches

Advanced Combination Therapy with Biologics and Upadacitinib in Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan

Background

Refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging despite the availability of various biologics. Advanced combination therapy (ACT) with biologics and Upadacitinib (UPA), a rapid-onset oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in managing refractory IBD. However, its use in Asia has not been explored. This study aims to fill that gap by providing data from Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included refractory IBD patients who received ACT with biologics and UPA, followed up at the Chang Gung Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center from July 2020 to August 2024. Patients were assessed for clinical response and remission at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Safety profiles were monitored throughout the follow-up period to evaluate the risk of adverse events.

Results

Sixteen refractory IBD patients were enrolled. The median disease duration was 4.5 years [IQR 2.25-9.50]. The most common regimen was Ustekinumab plus UPA (63%). Clinical response rates at weeks 4, 12, and 24 were 88%, 83%, and 100%, respectively, while remission rates were 31%, 50%, and 80%. One patient (6.25%) experienced a minor adverse event (acne), with no major events like herpes zoster reactivation or major cardiac complications.

Conclusion

This is the first study in Asia to demonstrate that UPA-based ACT is both effective and safe in treating refractory IBD. However, the limitations of this retrospective, single-center study with a relatively small sample size highlight the need for future larger-scale, multi-center prospective studies to confirm these findings, identify predictors of treatment response, and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Temporal Trends in the Use of Biological Agents in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Data from a Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Greek Center During a 5-Year Period

Background/Objectives: Therapeutic management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is rapidly evolving in the era of novel biological therapies. However, real-world data relating to the usage trends and treatment persistence remain inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate trends in biological use, dose intensification, and treatment persistence in IBD patients, who received treatment in a large tertiary center in Greece. Methods: Patients with IBD who underwent at least one biological treatment between 2018 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Data on patients' demographics, type of disease, use of biologicals, dose intensification, and treatment persistence were analyzed for time trends. Results: Data from 409 patients with IBD (mean age 39 (range 17-87), female 51%, 56.9% CD, mean duration of disease: 9.3 years) were included in the study. The number of patients on biologics was raised from 133 in 2018 to 368 in 2022 (a 28.1% yearly increase), while the percentage of patients who were treated with anti-TNF biosimilars increased to >60% of the total anti-TNF population in 2022. We observed a gradual increase in non-anti-TNF therapies in bio-naïve patients, in particular vedolizumab (46% of all biologicals in UC; 16% in CD) and ustekinumab (16.3% of all biologicals in UC, 31% in CD). The 3-year persistence rate of IFX was 64% in CD and 56% in UC, whereas it was 61% for ADA in CD. Dose intensification of anti-TNF was efficient in >50% of CD patients and >30% of UC patients; however, the majority of patients who required dose escalation within the first year eventually became unresponsive. The 3-year persistence of vedolizumab as a first-line treatment was 82% for CD and 69% for UC, respectively. The 3-year persistence of ustekinumab as first-line treatment for CD was 65%. No significant differences regarding the efficacy of anti-TNF, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab were detected when they were used as first-line treatments for Crohn's disease; similarly, no significant differences were detected between infliximab and vedolizumab as first-line treatments for UC. Conclusions: There was a gradual increase in the use of biologicals, including biosimilars, between the years 2018-2022, reflecting adherence to current guidance with adoption of an early escalation strategy. Newer, post-anti-TNF biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab have been rapidly incorporated into therapeutic approaches for both CD and UC.

Dual Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic and complex autoimmune conditions. Despite the advancements in biologics and small molecules, the therapeutic ceiling persists, posing significant treatment challenges and contributing to the concept of difficult-to-treat IBD. Dual-targeted therapy (DTT), combining two biologic agents or biologics with small molecules, has emerged as a novel approach to address this unmet need by targeting multiple inflammatory pathways simultaneously. Evidence suggests that DTT holds promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes, especially in patients with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. Safety data, while consistent with monotherapy profiles, highlight the importance of vigilant monitoring for infections and other adverse events. Continued research and high-quality trials are crucial to defining optimal DTT regimens and broadening its clinical applicability. This review explores the efficacy and safety of DTT in IBD, reporting data from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and real-world studies.

Real-World Impact of Uncontrolled Symptoms and Suboptimal Treatment Response in Patients With Crohn's Disease in the United States and Europe

Background

Despite a wide range of available treatments, there is limited evidence as to why significant numbers of Crohn's disease (CD) patients do not achieve disease remission or continue to have residual symptom burden. We aimed to quantify the impact of this suboptimal treatment on patient symptom incidence and severity, quality of life (QoL), and work impairment.

Methods

Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World CD Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of CD patients and their treating physicians in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States between January 2020 and March 2021. Physicians reported on patients' clinical history, disease status, symptom load, and treatment. Patients reported their QoL and activity impairment using the EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment measures. Patients were divided into remitters, partial remitters, and non-remitters. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the impact of remission status on clinical and QoL outcomes.

Results

Of 1786 patients, 24.1% were remitters, 53.2% were partial remitters, and 22.7% were non-remitters. Partial remitters and non-remitters had a significantly higher symptom load than remitters (P < .05), and non-remitters were up to 15 times more likely to experience key symptoms than remitters. Both non-remitters and partial remitters were also significantly more likely to have increased symptom severity (P < .05). Non-remitters were more likely to have switched treatment and received more treatment lines, as well as having significantly worse QoL, than remitters.

Conclusions

Suboptimal treatment response was associated with increased symptoms and QoL burden. Despite the increased burden experienced, partial remitters were not more likely to switch or receive more treatment lines than remitters, demonstrating the need to initiate effective therapy.

Berberine in combination with anti-PD-L1 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis via Erk signaling pathway

Background

Berberine (BBR) is an isoquinoline alkaloid extracted from Huang Lian and other herbal medicines. It has been reported to play a crucial role in multiple metabolic diseases and cancers. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-L1) is known as the immune checkpoint; immunotherapy targeting PD1/PD-L1 axis can effectively block its pro-tumor activity. However, the effect of the combined use of BBR and anti-PD-L1 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been reported.

Methods

Hep-3B and HCCLM3 cells were chosen as the experimental objects. To determine the potential anti-cancer activity of the combination of BBR and anti-PD-L1, we first treated v cells with BBR. The cell viability of Hep-3B and HCCLM3 with BBR treatment was measured by Cell Count Kit 8 assay. Cytometry by time-of-flight was performed to analyze tumor tissues after treatment with BBR and/or anti-PD-L1. Proliferation-, migration-, and invasion-related markers were measured by western blotting and immunohistochemistry.

Results

The results showed that BBR significantly inhibited the proliferation of Hep-3B and HCCLM3.The combination treatment of BBR and anti-PD-L1 had a prominent inhibitory effect on HCC tumorigenesis. Cytometry by time-of-flight analysis indicated that BBR affects the immune subsets in the tumors. Besides, BBR and anti-PD-L1 inhibited the migration and invasion of HCC by inactivating the phosphorylation of Erk.

Conclusion

Our study proposed that the combination treatment of BBR and anti-PD-L1 markedly inhibited the tumorigenesis of HCC by Erk signaling pathway. We hope our research can provide a new strategy for the potential of BBR as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of HCC.

Real-World Evidence of Clinical Outcomes of the Use of the Adalimumab Biosimilar SB5 in Rheumatic and Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: 12-Month Data from the PERFUSE Study

BACKGROUND

There is a need for published data on real-world use of SB5, an adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar approved in Europe in 2017, on the basis of evidence from pre-clinical and analytic data as well as phase I and III clinical studies demonstrating equivalent efficacy and comparable pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity profiles as the reference ADL.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to estimate patient persistence on SB5 at 12 months post-initiation using clinical and healthcare claims data from the French Système National des Données de Santé (national healthcare claims database, SNDS) in addressing data gaps.

METHODS

PERFUSE is a 12-month, observational, multi-centre cohort study of patients with rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) who initiated routine SB5 treatment between October 2018 and October 2020, either as their first ADL (naïve) or transitioning from another ADL (switched). Clinical data, including disease activity scores, C-reactive protein levels, and dosing information, were collected as available from patient records captured during routine visits to specialist physicians. Persistence data were supplemented with data from the French national healthcare claims database (SNDS). Analyses of clinical data were descriptive, while persistence was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 911 patients were included: 507 from rheumatology centres [116 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 78 psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 313 ankylosing spondylitis (AS)] and 404 from gastroenterology centres [316 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 88 ulcerative colitis (UC)]. Among naïve patients, 12-month remission/low activity rates were 58% for RA, 66% for PsA, 59% for AS, 94% for CD, and 85% for UC, increasing significantly from baseline for all indications (p < 0.05). Switched patients' remission rates remained stable between baseline and month 12 (M12) for all indications (p > 0.05). Persistence (95% CI) at M12 among naïve patients was 59% (46.5, 68.8) for RA, 65% (49.7, 77.1) for PsA, 56% (48.3, 62.6) for AS, 70% (63.0, 75.7) for CD, and 42% (30.7, 53.1) for UC, compared to 60% (42.7, 73.7) for RA, 57% (37.3, 72.1) for PsA, 55% (45.8, 64.0) for AS, 63% (53.4, 71.7) for CD, and 56% (27.2, 77.6) for UC among switched patients. No significant differences were observed between naïve and switched patients (p > 0.05). SNDS pairing provided information on 68 of the 132 patients (52%) who were lost to follow-up in the clinical database, of whom 57 (84%) were confirmed persistent at M12 and 11 (16%) non-persistent. Primary treatment failure (naïve patients) and patient decision (switched patients) were the most common reasons stated for treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

SB5 provides clinically effective treatment of both gastrointestinal and rheumatic IMIDs for naïve and switched patients, with no loss of control observed when switching. Persistence was comparable between naïve and switched populations, though the reasons for non-persistence differed.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Trial registration number: Clinical Trials identifier NCT03662919. Trial registration date: 10 September 2018.

Real-world clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategies in patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease in Argentina: Data from the RISE-AR study

OBJECTIVE

Real-world evidence on the adoption of different pharmacological strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America is scarce. Herein, we describe real-world sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and different therapeutic approaches used in patients with IBD in Argentina.

METHODS

RISE AR (NCT03488030) was a multicenter, non-interventional study with a cross-sectional evaluation and a 3-year retrospective chart review conducted in Argentina. Adult patients with a previous diagnosis of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) at least 6 months prior to enrollment were included.

RESULTS

This study included 246 patients with IBD (CD: 41%; UC: 59%), with a median age of 39.5 years (IQR 30.7-51.7) for CD and 41.9 years (33.3-55.3) for UC. Overall, 51.5% of CD patients had colonic disease involvement, while 45.5% of UC patients had extensive colitis. At enrollment, the overall use of biologics was high, especially in CD patients (CD: 73.2% vs. UC: 30.3%, p<0.001), while the use of immunosuppressants was similar (∼41%, p=1.000) for both diseases. IBD treatments ever prescribed and healthcare resources utilization during the retrospective period were (CD, UC): biologics: 79.2%, 33.8% (p<0.001); immunosuppressants: 65.3%, 58.6% (p=0.352); aminosalicylates: 62.4%, 97.9% (p<0.001); corticosteroids: 55.4%, 69.7% (p=0.031); surgery: 17.8%, 1.4% (p<0.001); and hospitalizations: 33.7%, 21.4% (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of IBD patients, overall prescription patterns of conventional therapy were similar to reports elsewhere; however, biologic therapy use was high, especially in CD, consistent with disease behavior and possibly reflecting better access to care in referral centers. Interestingly, over half of CD patients presented colonic involvement.

Efficacy of Second-Line Biological Therapies in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Patients with Prior Failure of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Multi-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of second-line biological therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with prior exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety between ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib, a current option as second-line biological therapy with different mechanisms in those patients.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-center study was conducted across five institutions from 2011 to 2022. We enrolled patients with moderate to severe UC who failed anti-TNF therapy and subsequently received ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib as second-line biological therapy. The outcomes were analyzed for clinical response/remission and endoscopic improvement/remission rates after induction therapy, drug persistency, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 70 UC patients were included and grouped into ustekinumab (11 patients), vedolizumab (40 patients), and tofacitinib (19 patients) treatments. The clinical response/remission rates after induction therapy were similar between ustekinumab (90.9/81.8%), vedolizumab (92.5/65.0%), and tofacitinib (94.7/73.7%). There were no significant differences in the endoscopic improvement/remission rates between the three groups: 90.9/18.2% for ustekinumab, 72.5/12.5% for vedolizumab, and 84.2/26.3% for tofacitinib. Drug persistence was similar across the three agents (p = 0.130). Three patients of the tofacitinib group experienced adverse events (herpes zoster and hypertriglyceridemia).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world data, second-line biological therapy with ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib showed comparable efficacy in patients with moderate to severe UC with prior exposure to anti-TNF therapy.

Upadacitinib in Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease

Upadacitinib has recently been approved for treating Crohn’s disease (CD). Here, we report on the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in a cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat CD being cared for at clinical centers across Italy.

Dual-targeted treatment for inflammatory bowel disease: Whether fecal microbiota transplantation can be an important part of it

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory disease. With the emergence of biologics and other therapeutic methods, two biologics or one biologic combined with a novel small-molecule drug has been proposed in recent years to treat IBD. Although treatment strategies for IBD are being optimized, their efficacy and risks still warrant further consideration. This editorial explores the current risks associated with dual-targeted treatment for IBD and the great potential that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may have for use in combination therapy for IBD. We are focused on addressing refractory IBD or biologically resistant IBD based on currently available dual-targeted treatment by incorporating FMT as part of this dual-targeted treatment. In this new therapy regimen, FMT represents a promising combination therapy.

How comparative studies can inform treatment decisions for Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing.

AREAS COVERED

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

Interferon-gamma signaling drives epithelial TNF-alpha receptor-2 expression during colonic tissue repair

Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) is traditionally recognized for its pro-inflammatory role during intestinal inflammation. Here, we demonstrate that IFNγ also functions as a pro-repair molecule by increasing TNFα receptor 2 (TNFR2 protein/TNFRSF1B gene) expression on intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) following injury in vitro and in vivo. In silico analyses identified binding sites for the IFNγ signaling transcription factor STAT1 in the promoter region of TNFRSF1B. Scratch-wounded IEC exposed to IFNγ exhibited a STAT1-dependent increase in TNFR2 expression. In situ hybridization revealed elevated Tnfrsf1b mRNA levels in biopsy-induced colonic mucosal wounds, while intraperitoneal administration of IFNγ neutralizing antibodies following mucosal injury resulted in impaired IEC Tnfrsf1b mRNA and inhibited colonic mucosal repair. These findings challenge conventional notions that "pro-inflammatory" mediators solely exacerbate damage by highlighting latent pro-repair functions. Moreover, these results emphasize the critical importance of timing and amount in the synthesis and release of IFNγ and TNFα during the inflammatory process, as they are pivotal in restoring tissue homeostasis.

Combination biologic therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Safety and efficacy over a minimum 12-month follow-up period

OBJECTIVES

The severe course of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) refractory to advanced therapies in children results in the search for new therapeutic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with biologics in a cohort of children with IBD.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from 29 children with a diagnosis of IBD, 19 with ulcerative colitis (66%), 10 with Crohn's disease (CD) (34%) qualified for dual biological therapy (DBT). The median age of patients was five (interquartile range [IQR], 1-15) years at diagnosis of IBD and 14 (IQR, 3-17) years at eligibility for dual therapy. Thirteen (45%) patients were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), 13 (45%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), three (10%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ).

RESULTS

Clinical remission was achieved in 13 (45%; seven UC and six CD) and 12 (41%; seven UC and five CD) Pediatric Weighted Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI)/Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) patients after 4 and 12 months at the initiation of dual therapy. Clinical response based on wPCDAI/PUCAI was reported in 16 (55%; nine UC and seven CD) and 12 (41% seven UC and five CD) children after 4 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. The median fecal calprotectin decreased significantly from 1240 µg/g (53-10,100) to 160 µg/g (5-2500; p = 0.004) between baseline and Month 4 and from 749 at baseline (57-10,100) to 17 (5-3110; p = 0.12) over 12 months. Moreover, 34% (six UC and four CD) of patients achieved endoscopic remission.

CONCLUSIONS

DBT seems to be an effective alternative therapeutic option for patients with moderate and severe IBD.

Burden of Bowel Urgency in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Real-World Global Study

Background

Bowel urgency is a highly disruptive and bothersome symptom experienced by patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), (ulcerative colitis [UC], and Crohn's disease [CD]). However, the burden of bowel urgency among patients with varying experiences in targeted treatment has not been consistently assessed. This real-world study explored the clinical and health-related quality of life burden of bowel urgency among patients with IBD with differing treatment experiences.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey included gastroenterologists and their patients with IBD across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States treated for over 3 months. Physicians provided patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment history. Patients reported their health-related quality of life and work productivity. Patients with UC and CD were analyzed separately and stratified into 3 groups: Targeted therapy naïve, those receiving their first-line targeted therapy, and targeted therapy experienced.

Results

This study found that 17%-26% of UC and 13%-17% of CD patients experienced persistent bowel urgency, irrespective of receiving conventional or targeted therapy. Moreover, patients with bowel urgency experienced an increased clinical and health-related quality of life burden compared to patients without bowel urgency, which physicians most commonly regarded as one of the most difficult symptoms to treat, with the burden remaining substantial irrespective of their treatment experience.

Conclusions

Despite several current treatment options, new therapeutic strategies are necessary to provide relief from bowel urgency, one of the most challenging symptoms for people living with IBD.

Clinical Guide to Navigating the Landscape of Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Annual out-of-pocket expenditures for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are estimated to be as high as $41,000, with medications, such as biologics, being one of the main cost contributors. Although biologics have revolutionized IBD management, these medications are costly owing to their molecular makeup and manufacturing processes. Biosimilars, which are biologic medications that are highly similar to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved reference product with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency, offer the same therapeutic benefits at a reduced cost. Other additional benefits offered with biosimilars include increased treatment access and fostered development of new therapeutic options. Despite the expansion of biosimilars in IBD, their adoption and utilization have been suboptimal in the United States. This article provides an overview of the biosimilar landscape in IBD, including FDA-approved biosimilars available, and a clinical guide to navigate switching to biosimilars in various clinical scenarios based on current evidence.

A practical guide to combination advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy.

SUMMARY

While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events.

Therapeutic sequencing in inflammatory bowel disease: Determining the optimal position of vedolizumab for long-term Crohn's disease control using real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Several biologics are available for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease, but data to optimize their use are scarce. Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking monoclonal antibody that was approved in 2014 for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Based on real-world evidence, a model was developed to examine the effect of VDZ's position in the treatment sequence on clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a model using real-world data to investigate how the positioning of VDZ in a sequence of biologic therapies for CD affects clinical effectiveness outcomes of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS), patient-reported disease activity, and surgery rates.

METHODS

A semi-Markov sequential model was developed to identify the optimal position of VDZ in a treatment sequence that included corticosteroids (CS), two biologics, and best supportive care (BSC). Using real-world data, three sequences were compared: VDZ as first (position), second, and last biologic (with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) and the anti-interleukin-12 and -23 agent ustekinumab (UST) as alternative biologic treatments). Published real-world evidence informed model inputs. Vedolizumab sequences were compared and ranked based on QALYS, patient-reported outcomes from Crohn's disease activity index scores, or proportion of patients undergoing surgery by the 10-year time horizon for model simulation. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of model input uncertainty.

RESULTS

Vedolizumab as the first biologic was the optimal position for this treatment according to all criteria, including yielding the highest QALYs (5.09) versus VDZ in second (4.97) and third (4.96) biologic sequence positions in sequences containing CS, anti-TNFα (aggregated data), UST, and BSC; 1780/2000 (89%) probabilistic simulations. In sequences containing ADA, VDZ, and UST biologics, ADA and VDZ in the first-line biologic position yielded QALYs of 5.09 versus 5.07, respectively. Adalimumab as the first biologic was best for clinical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation model using real-world evidence indicates that positioning VDZ or ADA as the first biologic is likely to lead to improved long-term patient outcomes when compared to administering these treatments later or starting with IFX monotherapy.

A Comprehensive Global Population-Based Analysis on the Coexistence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

We explored inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) coexistence using a global dataset. Investigating their epidemiology, risks, and impact, we aimed to enhance the understanding of concurrent diagnoses and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using deidentified patient data from the TriNetX database (2011-2022). We estimated the incidence and prevalence of EoE in patients with IBD, including both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and vice versa. Risks of select immune-mediated conditions and disease complications were compared among patients with EoE, IBD, or concurrent diagnoses.

RESULTS

Our results included 174,755 patients with CD; 150,774 patients with UC; and 44,714 patients with EoE. The risk of EoE was significantly higher among patients with CD (prevalence ratio [PR] 11.2) or UC (PR 8.7) compared with individuals without IBD. The risk of IBD was higher in patients with EoE (CD: PR 11.6; UC: PR 9.1) versus those without EoE. A propensity-matched analysis of IBD patients revealed that, when comparing patients with and without EoE, the relative risk of immune-mediated comorbidities was significantly greater for celiac disease, IBD-related inflammatory conditions, eczema and asthma (CD: n = 1896; UC: n = 1231; p < 0.001). Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of EoE and IBD had a higher composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.14, p < 0.005; UC: aHR 1.17, p < 0.01) and lower risk of food bolus impaction (aHR 0.445, p = 0.0011).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous EoE and IBD increased IBD-related complications risk, needing more treatment (glucocorticoids, biologic therapy, abdominal surgery), while reducing EoE-related issues like food bolus impaction.

Estimation of patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease potentially eligible for biological treatment in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This analysis estimated the number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients presenting criteria of eligibility for biological therapies in an Italian real-world setting.

METHODS

An observational analysis was performed on administrative databases of a sample of Local Health Units, covering 11.3% of the national population. Adult IBD patients (CD or UC) from 2010 to the end of data availability were included. Eligibility criteria for biologics were the following: Criterion A, steroid-refractory active disease; Criterion B, steroid-dependent patients; Criterion C, intolerance or contraindication to conventional therapies; Criterion D, severe relapsing disease; Criterion E (CD only), highly active CD disease and poor prognosis.

RESULTS

Of 26,781 IBD patient identified, 18,264 (68.2%) were treated: 3,125 (11.7%) with biologics and 15,139 (56.5%) non-biotreated. Among non-biotreated, 7,651 (28.6%) met at least one eligibility criterion for biologics, with criterion B (steroid-dependence) and criterion D (relapse) as the most represented (58-27% and 56-76%, respectively). Data reportioned to the Italian population estimated 67,635 patients as potentially eligible for biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis showed a trend towards undertreatment with biologics in IBD patients with 28.6% being potentially eligible, suggesting that an unmet medical need still exists among the Italian general clinical practice for IBD management.

Clinical profiles and outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving standard and escalated doses of targeted therapies: findings from a global real-world study

OBJECTIVE

Although dosing regimens of targeted therapies (TT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are guided by market authorizations and clinical guidelines, little is known about clinical guideline adherence or outcomes in patients receiving escalated doses of TT due to lack of response. This real-world study explored the prevalence of dose escalation and compared outcomes between patients receiving standard and escalated TT doses.

METHODS

Data were from the 2020-2021 Adelphi Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC and CD patients across five European countries and the US. Physicians provided retrospective data collection of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment history, and satisfaction; patients reported quality-of-life and work productivity. Patients were grouped by TT maintenance dose; standard and escalated dose groups were compared. Outcomes were adjusted for time on current TT and severity at current TT initiation using regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1,241 UC and 1,477 CD patients, 19.1% and 24.1%, respectively, received escalated TT doses. Despite escalation, a substantial proportion of patients had not achieved remission, had moderate or severe disease activity, or were flaring. Most physicians were not fully satisfied with treatment in the escalated dose group and were more likely to switch patients to another treatment regimen than patients on standard dose.

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation is not always an effective approach to resolve inadequate or loss of response in UC and CD, highlighting a need for more therapeutic options or alternative treatment strategies in patients unresponsive to TT.

Long-term persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab

OBJECTIVE

To estimate long-term persistence among bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab.

METHODS

Adults with CD initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between September 23, 2016 and August 1, 2019) were sampled from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Patients without CD-indicated biologics (bio-naïve) and with no diagnoses for other autoimmune diseases 12 months pre-index date (baseline) were included. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Persistence was defined as the absence of therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab) or >60 (adalimumab) between days of supply. Composite endpoints were persistence and being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroids >14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics). Persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's models.

RESULTS

Ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts included 671 and 2,975 patients. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.93), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.24-1.65), and trended toward being more persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.99-1.30) vs adalimumab. At 24 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.40-1.97), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.26-1.64), and persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.31) vs adalimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab demonstrated significantly more persistence than patients initiated on adalimumab at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Long-term persistence is a measure of a drug's real-world performance and findings may aid clinical decision-making.

Role of Biologic Therapies in the Rheumatic Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Analysis

In the recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the intricate relationship between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs). EIMs of IBD include rheumatological, mucocutaneous, ocular, neurologic, pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatobiliary, and hematologic manifestations. Rheumatic manifestations are identified as the most common EIM, including axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, arthralgia, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and dactylitis. The convergence of the two distinct yet interconnected medical domains has spurred extensive research into the potential benefits of biological therapies as a treatment approach compared to the traditional method of treatment. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and overall impact of biological therapies in managing the rheumatic manifestations associated with IBD. Seventy-five articles from reputed journals published between January 1, 2013 and August 19, 2023 were reviewed. A set of eight papers were chosen for the focused study. The evaluation considered variables, such as rheumatic symptoms, in established IBD patients and compared the available biologic treatment and its benefits in alleviating rheumatic manifestations of IBD. By delving into the available literature and critically evaluating the relevant studies, this review shows insights into the role of biological therapies in the management of rheumatic symptoms in IBD. However, we must also address the limitations in implementing these since newer therapies are on the horizon. Hence, in-depth exploration and refinement of therapeutic strategies are needed to ultimately enhance patient care and quality of life for those affected by IBD. Infact, emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being used to improve the precision of diagnosis and enhance patient management.

A retrospective analysis of treatment patterns, drug discontinuation and healthcare costs in Crohn's disease patients treated with biologics

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This real-world analysis evaluated the persistence and direct healthcare costs of Crohn's Disease (CD) patients treated with biologics in Italy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on administrative databases of Italian healthcare entities, covering 10.4 million residents, was performed. Adult CD patients under biologics between 2015 and 2020 were included and attributed to first/second treatment line based on absence/presence of biologic prescriptions 5-years before index-date (first biologic prescription).

RESULTS

Of 16,374 CD patients identified, 1,398 (8.5%) were biologic-treated: 1,256 (89.8%) in first line and 135 (9.7%) in second line. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated a higher persistence for ustekinumab-treated patients followed by vedolizumab, infliximab and adalimumab, in both lines. Considering baseline variables and adalimumab as reference, infliximab in first line (HR: 0.537) and ustekinumab in first (HR: 0.057) and second line (HR: 0.213) were associated with significantly reduced risk of drug-discontinuation. First line total/average healthcare direct-costs were €13,637, €11,201, €17,104 and €18,340 in patients persistent on adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis showed differences in persistence over 12-months between biologic treatments, being higher in ustekinumab-treated group, followed by vedolizumab, infliximab and adalimumab. Patients' management was associated with comparable direct healthcare costs among treatment lines, mainly driven by drug-related expenses.

Quality of Life (QoL) in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: How Much Better with Biological Drugs?

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic and disabling diseases that affect patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). IBD patients are frequently exposed to high levels of stress and psychological distress. Biological drugs have been proven to reduce inflammation, hospitalization, and most of the complications that characterize IBDs; their potential contribution to patients' HRQoL remains to be explored.

AIM

To evaluate and compare any change in the HRQoL and markers of inflammation in IBD patients undergoing biological drugs (infliximab or vedolizumab).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted on a cohort of IBD patients, aged >18 years, who were prescribed with infliximab or vedolizumab. Demographic and disease-related data at baseline were collected. Standard hematological and clinical biochemistry parameters, including C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells count (WBC), erythrocytes sedimentation rate (ESR), and α1 and α2 globulins were measured after a 12-h fast at baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T1), and at 14 weeks (T2) of biological treatment. Steroid use, disease activity as measured by the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) and partial Mayo score (pMS) for the CD and UC, respectively, were also recorded at each timepoint. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-F), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health Questionnaire (WPAI:GH) were administered to each patient at baseline, T1, and T2 to address the study aims.

RESULTS

Fifty eligible consecutive patients (52% with CD and 48% with UC) were included in the study. Twenty-two patients received infliximab and twenty-eight received vedolizumab. We noted a significant reduction in the CRP, WBC, α1, and α2 globulins from T0 to T2 (p = 0.046, p = 0.002, p = 0.008, and p = 0.002, respectively). Participants showed a significant decrease in steroid administration during the observation period. A significant reduction in the HBI of CD patients at all three timepoints and a similarly significant decrease in the pMS of UC patients from baseline to T1 were recorded. Statistically significant changes were observed in all questionnaires during follow-up as well as an overall improvement in the HRQoL. The interdependence analysis carried out between the biomarkers and the scores of the individual subscales showed a significant correlation between the variation (Δ) of the CRP, Hb, MCH, and MCV with physical and emotional dimensions of the SF-36 and FACIT-F tools; work productivity loss expressed by some of the WPAI:GH items negatively correlated with the ΔWBC and positively with the ΔMCV, ΔMCH, and Δ α1 globulins. A sub-analysis according to the type of treatment showed that patients receiving infliximab experienced a more pronounced improvement in their HRQoL (according to both SF-36 and FACIT-F) compared with patients receiving vedolizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Both infliximab and vedolizumab played an important role in contributing to the improvement of the HRQoL in IBD patients by also reducing inflammation and, consequently, steroid use in patients with an active disease. HRQoL, being one of the treatment goals, should also be assessed when taking charge of IBD patients to assess their clinical response and remission. The specific correlation between the biomarkers of inflammation and life's spheres, as well as their possible role as clinical markers of HRQoL, should be further investigated.

Immunomodulator comedication promotes the reversal of anti-drug antibody-mediated loss of response to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Loss of therapeutic response (LOR) due to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to investigate whether immunomodulator comedication can reverse the immunogenic LOR to TNF inhibitors in IBD.

METHODS

In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 123 IBD patients with neutralizing ADA to infliximab or adalimumab and concomitant subtherapeutic trough levels were screened for clinical LOR. Subsequent ADA and trough level measurements and clinical outcomes were analyzed for patients who received either immunomodulator comedication or dose intensification of infliximab or adalimumab to overcome LOR.

RESULTS

Following immunogenic LOR, the initial anti-TNF regimen was optimized in 33 patients. In univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, immunomodulator comedication was identified as the crucial factor for regaining clinical remission and ADA clearance. Detectable trough levels (≥ 0.98 or ≥ 1.00 mg/L, respectively) had optimal predictive performance for both endpoints in receiver operating characteristics curves [area under the curve 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.00) for regaining clinical remission, 0.87 (0.71-1.00) for ADA clearance]. Furthermore, 11/20 patients (55%) on a comedication with azathioprine or methotrexate and 2/13 patients (15%) receiving anti-TNF dose intensification exclusively (P = 0.032) exhibited ADA elimination, regain of therapeutic trough levels, and clinical remission. Regain of clinical remission alone was achieved in 17/20 (85%) patients receiving comedication and 2/13 (15%) patients receiving anti-TNF dose intensification (P = 1.6 × 10-4).

CONCLUSION

Immunogenic LOR to infliximab or adalimumab in IBD can be successfully reversed using immunomodulator comedication.

Multiple infliximab biosimilar switches appear to be safe and effective in a real-world inflammatory bowel disease cohort

BACKGROUND

Switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to biosimilar IFX is effective and safe. However, data on multiple switching are scarce. The Edinburgh inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) unit has undertaken three switch programmes: (1) Remicade to CT-P13 (2016), (2) CT-P13 to SB2 (2020), and (3) SB2 to CT-P13 (2021).

OBJECTIVE

The primary endpoint of this study was to assess CT-P13 persistence following switch from SB2. Secondary endpoints included persistence stratified by the number of biosimilar switches (single, double and triple), effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study. All adult IBD patients on IFX biosimilar SB2 underwent an elective switch to CT-P13. Patients were reviewed in a virtual biologic clinic with protocol driven collection of clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC), IFX trough/antibody levels, and drug survival.

RESULTS

297 patients (CD n = 196 [66%], ulcerative colitis/inflammatory bowel disease unclassified n = 101, [34%]) were switched (followed-up: 7.5 months [6.8-8.1]). This was the third, second and first IFX switch for 67/297 (22.5%), 138/297 (46.5%) and 92/297 (31%) of the cohort respectively. 90.6% of patients remained on IFX during follow-up. The number of switches was not independently associated with IFX persistence after adjusting for confounders. Clinical (p = 0.77), biochemical (CRP ≤5 mg/ml; p = 0.75) and faecal biomarker (FC<250 µg/g; p = 0.63) remission were comparable at baseline, week 12 and week 24.

CONCLUSION

Multiple successive switches from IFX originator to biosimilars are effective and safe in patients with IBD, irrespective of the number of IFX switches.

Assessing the Relationship between the Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics: A Systematic Review

Current inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatments including non-biological, biological, and nutritional therapies aim to achieve remission and mucosal healing. Treatment efficacy, however, is highly variable, and there is growing evidence that the gut microbiota influences therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to define changes in the gut microbiota following IBD treatment and to identify microbial predictors of treatment response. A systematic search using MEDLINE/Embase and PubMed was performed in July 2022. The review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they reported longitudinal microbiota analysis (>2 weeks) using next-generation sequencing or high-throughput sequencing of faecal/mucosal samples from IBD patients commencing treatment. Meta-analysis on alpha-diversity changes following infliximab treatment was conducted. Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, and four studies were included in the meta-analysis. An increase in alpha diversity was observed following treatment with 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and biological therapies in most studies. Characteristic signatures involving the enrichment of short-chain-fatty-acid-producing bacteria including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and a reduction of pathogenic bacteria including various Proteobacteria were demonstrated following treatment with specific signatures identified based on treatment outcome. The meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in bacterial richness following infliximab treatment (standardised mean difference -1.16 (-1.50, -0.83), p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Distinct microbial signatures are seen following treatment and are associated with treatment response. The interrogation of large longitudinal studies is needed to establish the link between the gut microbiota and IBD therapeutic outcomes.

Breaking through the therapeutic ceiling of inflammatory bowel disease: Dual-targeted therapies

Emerging biologics and small-molecule drugs have changed the clinical status quo of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, current treatments remain at a standstill in terms of response and remission in many cases. Accumulating evidence indicates that dual-targeted therapy (DTT) could be promising in overcoming the existing ceiling of IBD treatment. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DTT on Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are still limited or insufficient. Moreover, there is a lack of studies delineating the mechanisms of DTT. Given that various targeted drugs have different targets among the extensive redundant inflammatory networks, DTT could result in various outcomes. In this review, we have summarized the current data on the safety, effectiveness, and clinical development status of novel targeted drugs related to refractory IBD, and have explored the mechanism of action of therapy. We have categorized therapeutic agents into "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Cellular Signaling Pathways" and "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking" based on the different therapeutic targets, and also by classifying therapeutic agents targeting the cellular signaling pathways into "JAK-dependent" and "JAK-independent," and placed the existing drug combinations into 3 categories based on their mechanisms, namely, overlapping, synergistic, and complementary effects. Lastly, we have proposed the possible mechanisms of DTT to conceive a theoretical framework for clinical decision-making and further drug development and research from an IBD standpoint.

Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rapidly evolving with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs (SMDs). However, these drugs are not guaranteed to be effective in all patients, and a “ceiling effect” of biologic monotherapy may occur. This issue highlights an unmet need for optimizing the use of biologics and predicting therapeutic responses. Thus, the development of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action is urgently needed for patients with primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to conventional biologics and SMDs. In addition, combining different biologics or SMDs has been proposed as a novel strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD, which theoretically has multidimensional anti-inflammatory potential. Based on the current evidence available for IBD, dual targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for refractory IBD patients who have failed in multiple biologic trea-tments or who have extraintestinal manifestation. Additionally, identifying the subgroup of IBD patients who are responding to biological combination therapies is also equally important in stable disease remission. In this review, we sum-marize the newly developed biologics and SMDs and the current status of bio-logics/SMDs to highlight the development of individualized treatment in IBD.

Role of the combination of biologics and/or small molecules in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic diseases that includes ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and indeterminate colitis. Patients with IBD require prolonged treatment and high utilization of healthcare resources for proper management. The treatment of patients with IBD is focused on achieving therapeutic goals including clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic variables that result in improvement of the quality of life and prevention of disability. Advanced IBD treatment includes tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, integrin antagonist, antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin 12/23, and small molecule drugs. However, despite the multiple treatments available, about 40% of patients are refractory to therapy and present with persistent symptoms that have a great impact on their quality of life, with hospitalization and surgery being necessary in many cases. Dual therapy, a strategy sometimes applicable to refractory IBD patients, includes the combination of two biologics or a biologic in combination with a small molecule drug. There are two distinct scenarios in IBD patients in which this approach can be used: (1) Refractory active luminal disease without extraintestinal manifestations; and (2) patients with IBD in remission, but with active extraintestinal manifestations or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. This review provides a summary of the results (clinical response and remission) of different combinations of advanced drugs in patients with IBD, both in adults and in the pediatric population. In addition, the safety profile of different combinations of dual therapy is analyzed. The use of newer combinations, including recently approved treatments, the application of new biomarkers and artificial intelligence, and clinical trials to establish effectiveness during long-term follow-up, are needed to establish new strategies for the use of advanced treatments in patients with refractory IBD.

Dual Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases in children are characterized by a wide variety of symptoms and often a severe clinical course. In the treatment, we aimed to induce and maintain remission. We focused on assessing the efficacy and safety of the concomitant use of two biologic therapies including: anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab) vedolizumab and ustekinumab in a refractory pediatric IBD cohort.

METHODS

Fourteen children (nine ulcerative colitis, one ulcerative colitis/IBD-unspecified, four Crohn's disease) with a disease duration of 5.2 (8 months-14 years) years, initiated dual therapy at an age of 11.7 (3-17) years after failure of monotherapy with a biological drug. Five patients (36%) were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), five (36%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), and three (21%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ). One patient (7%) was switched from a combination of vedolizumab and adalimumab to ustekinumab and adalimumab during follow-up.

RESULTS

A clinical improvement was obtained in ten children (73%; 5 UC, 1 UC/IBD-unspecified, 4 CD) on the PCDAI/PUCAI scale after 4 months of a second biological drug being added. The median fecal calprotectin decreased from 1610 µg/g (140-10,100) to 586 µg/g (5-3410; p = 0.028) between baseline and 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical experience suggests that dual therapy may be an option for pediatric patients with moderate and severe courses of IBD with limited therapeutic options.

Biologics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Clinical Practice: A Calabria (Southern Italy) Prospective Pharmacovigilance Study

BACKGROUND

The use of immune-modifying biological agents has markedly changed the clinical course and the management of Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Active post-marketing surveillance programs are fundamental to early recognize expected and unexpected adverse events (AEs), representing a powerful tool to better determine the safety profiles of biologics in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This study aimed to identify the occurrence of AEs and therapeutic failures linked to biological drugs used in gastroenterology units during a prospective pharmacovigilance program in Southern Italy. Patients affected by IBDs and treated with a biologic agent, from 1 January 2019, to 31 December 2021 (study period) in three gastroenterology units were enrolled.

RESULTS

Overall, 358 patients with a diagnosis of active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis satisfying inclusion criteria have been enrolled. Infliximab (IFX) was the most administered drug at the index date (214; 59.8%), followed by Adalimumab (ADA; 89; 24.9%), Golimumab (GOL; 37; 10.3%), Vedolizumab (VDZ; 17; 4.7%) and Ustekimumab (UST; 1; 0.3%). Seventy-three patients (20.4%) experienced at least one AE, while 62 patients (17.3%) had therapeutic ineffectiveness. No serious AEs were reported in the follow-up period in the enrolled patients. AEs have been described with IFX (50/214; p = 0.47), GOL (7/37; p = 0.78), ADA (13/89; p = 0.18), and VDZ (3/17; p = 0.52), no AEs have been noticed with UST (0/1).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the low rate of AEs observed and withdrawal from treatment, our data seem to corroborate the favorable beneficial/risk profile of biologics for IBDs.

Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Roadmap to Sail the Seas of IBD Therapies

The drug pipeline for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has dramatically expanded over the last two decades, and it is expected to further grow in the upcoming years with the introduction of new agents with different mechanisms of action. However, such an increase of therapeutic options needs to be paralleled with an appropriate development of research to help physicians in the decision-making process when choosing which drug to prescribe. On the population level, comparative effectiveness research (CER) is intended to explore and identify relevant differences-in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes-amongst different therapeutic regimens and/or strategies, in order to find the correct placement for each treatment in the therapeutic algorithm. CER revolves around three cornerstones: network meta-analyses, head-to-head trials and real-world studies, each of which has specific pros and cons, and can therefore offer answers to different questions. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on the methodological features specific to each of these research approaches, as well as to illustrate the main findings coming from CER on IBD target therapies (i.e., biologics and small molecules) and to discuss their appropriate interpretation.

New and Emerging Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The specific etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still unknown. Although the conventional anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory drugs relatively nonspecific to pathogenesis have been quite useful in many cases, elucidating the pathogenesis has gradually facilitated developments of disease-specific therapies for refractory cases in the last 2 decades.

SUMMARY

With a greater understanding of the multiple overactive signaling pathways of the gut mucosal immune response and enhanced leukocyte trafficking, several biological agents or small molecule drugs following the first novel biologic, anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα), have been developed against several modes of action including adhesion molecules, sphingosine-1-phospate receptors, cytokines (IL-12/23, TL1A, and IL-36), Janus kinase (JAK), and phosphodiesterase. Although preceding biological agents have dramatically changed the IBD treatment strategy, many patients still require alternative therapies due to failure or side effects. Newer treatments are now expected to be provided for better efficacy with an improved adverse event profile. In addition, translational studies have highlighted the new therapeutic concepts' potential, including modulation of host-microbiome interactions, stem therapy for perianal fistula, regulation of fibrosis, regulation of the gut-brain axis, and control of previously less targeted immune cells (B cells and innate lymphoid cells). This paper comprehensively reviewed not only the latest already or shortly available therapies but also emerging promising treatments that will be hopefully established in the future for IBD.

KEY MESSAGES

Many kinds of new treatments are available, and promising treatments with new perspectives are expected to emerge for refractory IBD in the future.

Human intestinal myofibroblasts deposited collagen VI enhances adhesiveness for T cells - A novel mechanism for maintenance of intestinal inflammation

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) cause chronic intestinal damage and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. The ECM may play an active role in inflammation by modulating immune cell functions, including cell adhesion, but this hypothesis has not been tested in IBD.

DESIGN

Primary human intestinal myofibroblast (HIMF)-derived ECM from IBD and controls, 3D decellularized colon or ECM molecule-coated scaffolds were tested for their adhesiveness for T cells. Matrisome was analysed via proteomics. Functional integrin blockade was used to investigate the underlying mechanism. Analysis of the pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) RISK inception cohort was used to explore an altered ECM gene expression as a potential predictor for a future complicated disease course.

RESULTS

HIMF-derived ECM and 3D decellularized colonic ECM from IBD bound more T cells compared to control. Control HIMFs exposed to the pro-inflammatory cytokines Iinterleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) increased, and to transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) decreased ECM adhesiveness to T cells. Matrisome analysis of the HIMF-derived ECM revealed collagen VI as a major culprit for differences in T cell adhesion. Collagen VI knockdown in HIMF reduced adhesion T cell as did the blockage of integrin αvβ1. Elevated gene expression of collagen VI in biopsies of pediatric CD patients was linked to risk for future stricturing disease.

CONCLUSION

HIMF-derived ECM in IBD binds a remarkably enhanced number of T cells, which is dependent on Collagen VI and integrin αvβ1. Collagen VI expression is a risk factor for a future complicated CD course. Blocking immune cells retention may represent a novel approach to treatment in IBD.

Hypoxia-inducible factor as a bridge between healthy barrier function, wound healing, and fibrosis

The healthy mammalian intestine is lined by a single layer of epithelial cells. These cells provide a selectively permeable barrier to luminal contents and normally do so in an efficient and effective manner. Barrier function in the healthy mucosa is provided via several mechanisms including epithelial junctional complexes, mucus production, as well as mucosal-derived antimicrobial proteins. As tissue metabolism is central to the maintenance of homeostasis in the mucosa, intestinal [Formula: see text] levels are uniquely low due to counter-current blood flow and the presence of the microbiota, resulting in the stabilization of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). Ongoing studies have revealed that HIF molds normal intestinal metabolism and is central to the coordination of barrier regulation during both homeostasis and active disease. During acute inflammation, HIF is central to controlling the rapid restitution of the epithelium consistent with normal wound healing responses. In contrast, HIF may also contribute to the fibrostenotic response associated with chronic, nonresolving inflammation. As such, HIF may function as a double-edged sword in the overall course of the inflammatory response. Here, we review recent literature on the contribution of HIF to mucosal barrier function, wound healing, and fibrosis.

Differential Effects of Anti-TNFα and Anti-α4β7 Drugs on Circulating Dendritic Cells Migratory Capacity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic and chronic disorder that includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Both diseases show an uncontrolled intestinal immune response that generates tissue inflammation. Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that play a key role in tolerance maintenance in the gastrointestinal mucosa. Although it has been reported that DC recruitment by the intestinal mucosa is more prominent in IBD patients, the specific mechanisms governing this migration are currently unknown. In this study, the expression of several homing markers and the migratory profile of circulating DC subsets towards intestinal chemo-attractants were evaluated and the effect of biological drugs with different mechanisms of action, such as anti-TNFα or anti-integrin α4β7 (vedolizumab), on this mechanism in healthy controls (HCs) and IBD patients was also assessed. Our results revealed that type 2 conventional DCs (cDC2) express differential homing marker profiles in UC and CD patients compared to HCs. Indeed, integrin β7 was differentially modulated by vedolizumab in CD and UC. Additionally, although CCL2 displayed a chemo-attractant effect over cDC2, while biological therapies did not modulate the expression of the homing markers, we paradoxically found that anti-TNF-treated cDC2 increased their migratory capacity towards CCL2 in HCs and IBD. Our results therefore suggest a key role for cDC2 migration towards the intestinal mucosa in IBD, something that could be explored in order to develop novel diagnostic biomarkers or to unravel new immunomodulatory targets in IBD.

Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Modulation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Keeping Lymphocytes Out of the Intestine

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic and disabling conditions that, uncontrolled, lead to irreversible bowel damage and associated comorbidities. Despite the new era of biological therapies, IBDs remain not curative. The treatment purpose is to induce endoscopic remission, reduce the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life. Optimal and early treatment could enable the prevention of their complications. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the capacity of overcoming the limitations of biologic agents (i.e., parenteral administration, rapidity of action and primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Of special interest are results from the use of oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (ozanimod, etrasimod, fingolimod and laquinimod), based on S1P activities to target lymphocyte recirculation in the mucosa, acting as immunosuppressive agents. Most S1P modulators are reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of both UC and CD. High and satisfactory rates of clinical remission as well as endoscopic improvement and remission can be achieved with these molecules. Safety alarms remain rather low, although the S1P binding to two of its G protein-coupled receptors, 2 and 3 (S1PR2 and S1PR3), may be associated with cardiovascular risks. Cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define their place in therapy. This review summarizes these emerging data published by PubMed and EMBASE databases and from ongoing clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of selectivity of S1P modulators in the treatment of IBD.

Indicators of Suboptimal Treatment and Associated Healthcare Costs Among Patients With Crohn's Disease Initiated on Biologic or Conventional Agents

Background

As the treatment landscape for Crohn's disease (CD) evolves, an up-to-date understanding of the burden associated with indicators of suboptimal treatment is needed. The aim of this study was to describe suboptimal treatment indicators and associated healthcare costs among CD patients initiated on a biologic or conventional agent.

Methods

Adults with CD were identified in a US healthcare claims database (Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart; 01/2004-03/2019). The first biologic or conventional agent claim within 12 months of a CD diagnosis was the index date/agent. Indicators of suboptimal treatment (nonadherence, dose escalation, chronic corticosteroid use, augmentation, ≥1 CD surgery, ≥2 CD emergency department visits, ≥1 CD inpatient (IP) stay, switch, cycling, restart, inadequate induction) were identified in the 12-month postindex landmark period. The mean per-patient-per-year (PPPY) healthcare costs (2019 USD) were evaluated in the year postlandmark.

Results

There were 5107 patients (mean age ~44 years, 56% female) in the biologic and 6072 patients (~51 years; 59% female) in the conventional cohort. In the biologic cohort, 79.4% of patients had ≥1 suboptimal treatment indicator. Mean PPPY healthcare costs increased with the number of suboptimal treatment indicators, from $46 100 (no indicator) to $68 572 (≥4 indicators). The conventional cohort had similar patterns: 72.5% of patients presented ≥1 suboptimal treatment indicator, and mean PPPY healthcare costs increased from $17 329 (no indicator) to $67 568 (≥4 indicators). In both cohorts, IP and outpatient medical costs (excluding biologics) contributed a major portion of the increase.

Conclusions

Among CD patients, suboptimal treatment indicators were common and were associated with an increased burden to the healthcare system.

Targeting IL12/23 in ulcerative colitis: update on the role of ustekinumab

As our comprehension of the pathogenic mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases, the therapeutic armamentarium for its treatment can expand, and novel target therapies join the treatment pipeline. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL23 are two key cytokines responsible for promoting and perpetuating bowel inflammation in IBD. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the shared p40 subunit of both cytokines, and it was recently approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In the pivotal phase III UNIFI trial, ustekinumab showed a superiority over placebo in both clinical and endoscopic outcomes; furthermore, it was characterized by a favorable safety profile, with a similar rate of adverse events as compared with placebo. Recent evidence from real-life experiences have started accumulating, generally confirming the effectiveness and safety figures emerged from the registration studies. However, most of these observational studies enrolled multirefractory patients; moreover, comparative data with other target therapies are lacking, leaving physicians without clear indications about the appropriate positioning of ustekinumab in the therapeutic pipeline for UC. This review examines the basis of targeting IL12-23 in UC therapy and summarizes the data from both clinical trials and real-life studies, to highlight the main evidence already available and the research gaps that need to be filled for the optimal usage of ustekinumab in UC.

Dual Biologic Therapy for the Treatment of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of the Literature

Background: pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who qualify for biological therapy represent a group of severely ill patients. They have never been successful with conventional medication. Biologic medications in monotherapy are frequently used in the disease course, however they result in a 1-year remission, which can be maintained in approximately 40% of IBD patients. Method: the present study aims to summarize the review of literature data on the use of therapy with a combination of two biological and small molecule drugs, anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), vedolizumab and ustekinumab, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib). The risks associated with the use of dual biological therapy and potential adverse effects are particularly important. The literature data was reviewed using the following terms: “use of combination biologic in paediatric IBD”, “combination biologics”, and “dual biologic for treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease”. Conclusion: the use of dual biological therapy is a new therapeutic option. In pediatric IBD, combining the different mechanisms of action of the two biological drugs seems to be safe and effective. Anti-TNF drugs with vedolizumab or ustekinumab may be a particularly beneficial combination. Nevertheless, the clarification and justification of potential advantages of combined biological therapies in further studies, such as randomized control trials, are needed.

Preclinical development of a bispecific TNFα/IL-23 neutralising domain antibody as a novel oral treatment for inflammatory bowel disease

Anti-TNFα and anti-IL-23 antibodies are highly effective therapies for Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis in a proportion of patients. V56B2 is a novel bispecific domain antibody in which a llama-derived IL-23p19-specific domain antibody, humanised and engineered for intestinal protease resistance, V900, was combined with a previously-described TNFα-specific domain antibody, V565. V56B2 contains a central protease-labile linker to create a single molecule for oral administration. Incubation of V56B2 with trypsin or human faecal supernatant resulted in a complete separation of the V565 and V900 monomers without loss of neutralising potency. Following oral administration of V900 and V565 in mice, high levels of each domain antibody were detected in the faeces, demonstrating stability in the intestinal milieu. In ex vivo cultures of colonic biopsies from IBD patients, treatment with V565 or V900 inhibited tissue phosphoprotein levels and with a combination of the two, inhibition was even greater. These results support further development of V56B2 as an oral therapy for IBD with improved safety and efficacy in a greater proportion of patients as well as greater convenience for patients compared with traditional monoclonal antibody therapies.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Systematic Scoping Review

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a biomarker of the systemic inflammatory response. The objective of this systematic scoping review was to examine the literature on NLR and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Specialized Register, DOAJ, PDQT, Biosis Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. A total of 2621 citations yielding 62 primary studies were synthesized under four categories: distinguishing patients with IBD from controls, disease activity differentiation, clinical outcome prediction, and association of NLR with other IBD biomarkers. Thirty-eight studies employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to generate optimal NLR cutpoints for applications including disease activity differentiation and prediction of response to treatment. Among the most promising findings, NLR may have utility for clinical and endoscopic disease activity differentiation and prediction of loss of response to infliximab (IFX). Overall findings suggest NLR may be a promising IBD biomarker. Assessment of NLR is non-invasive, low cost, and widely accessible given NLR is easily calculated from blood count data routinely and serially monitored in patients with IBD. Further research is justified to elucidate how evaluation of NLR in research and clinical practice would directly impact the quality and cost of care for patients living with IBD.

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Biologic Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of the Literature

Using 2 or more treatment modalities to achieve a synergistic effect in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been an area of focus for many years. This methodology, known as combination therapy, has been proposed for various therapeutic agents, most commonly biologics and immunomodulators. Although the mainstay of biologic therapy for IBD has traditionally focused on agents targeting tumor necrosis factor, the development of newer biologics with different targets, such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab, has introduced the possibility of concomitant dual biologic therapy. Dual biologic therapy has been proposed in the treatment algorithm for 2 types of patients with IBD: those with well-controlled luminal IBD and uncontrolled extraintestinal symptoms (secondary indications such as arthritis or psoriasis) and those with refractory, uncontrolled IBD. Thus far, the data on the efficacy and safety of dual biologic therapy as a treatment for Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis remain quite limited. In fact, the overwhelming majority of the literature consists of case reports and case series. Given this paucity of high-level data, physicians have looked to larger studies on dual biologic therapy in other fields of medicine, such as rheumatology and dermatology. The goal of this article is to summarize the current literature on the use of dual biologics in IBD, address the potential adverse effects or risks associated with combination therapy, and highlight future directions in the use of this therapeutic modality.

CytokineLink: A Cytokine Communication Map to Analyse Immune Responses-Case Studies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and COVID-19

Intercellular communication mediated by cytokines is critical to the development of immune responses, particularly in the context of infectious and inflammatory diseases. By releasing these small molecular weight peptides, the source cells can influence numerous intracellular processes in the target cells, including the secretion of other cytokines downstream. However, there are no readily available bioinformatic resources that can model cytokine-cytokine interactions. In this effort, we built a communication map between major tissues and blood cells that reveals how cytokine-mediated intercellular networks form during homeostatic conditions. We collated the most prevalent cytokines from the literature and assigned the proteins and their corresponding receptors to source tissue and blood cell types based on enriched consensus RNA-Seq data from the Human Protein Atlas database. To assign more confidence to the interactions, we integrated the literature information on cell-cytokine interactions from two systems of immunology databases, immuneXpresso and ImmunoGlobe. From the collated information, we defined two metanetworks: a cell-cell communication network connected by cytokines; and a cytokine-cytokine interaction network depicting the potential ways in which cytokines can affect the activity of each other. Using expression data from disease states, we then applied this resource to reveal perturbations in cytokine-mediated intercellular signalling in inflammatory and infectious diseases (ulcerative colitis and COVID-19, respectively). For ulcerative colitis, with CytokineLink, we demonstrated a significant rewiring of cytokine-mediated intercellular communication between non-inflamed and inflamed colonic tissues. For COVID-19, we were able to identify cell types and cytokine interactions following SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting important cytokine interactions that might contribute to severe illness in a subgroup of patients. Such findings have the potential to inform the development of novel, cytokine-targeted therapeutic strategies. CytokineLink is freely available for the scientific community through the NDEx platform and the project github repository.

Biological Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Complex Mix of Mechanisms and Actions

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease that requires lifelong medication and whose incidence is increasing over the world. There is currently no cure for IBD, and the current therapeutic objective is to control the inflammatory process. Approximately one third of treated patients do not respond to treatment and refractoriness to treatment is common. Therefore, pharmacological treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies, are urgently needed, and new treatment guidelines are regularly published. Due to the extremely important current role of biologics in the therapy of IBD, herein we have briefly reviewed the main biological treatments currently available. In addition, we have focused on the mechanisms of action of the most relevant groups of biological agents in IBD therapy, which are not completely clear but are undoubtfully important for understanding both their therapeutic efficacy and the adverse side effects they may have. Further studies are necessary to better understand the action mechanism of these drugs, which will in turn help us to understand how to improve their efficacy and safety. These studies will hopefully pave the path for a personalized medicine.