Receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) in Dunning R3327 prostate cancers and rat anterior pituitaries after treatment with a sustained delivery system of LHRH antagonist SB-75

Dissecting the Hormonal Signaling Landscape in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer (PCa) progression towards its most aggressive, castration-resistant (CRPC) stage is urgently needed to improve the therapeutic options for this almost incurable pathology. Interestingly, CRPC is known to be characterized by a peculiar hormonal landscape. It is now well established that the androgen/androgen receptor (AR) axis is still active in CRPC cells. The persistent activity of this axis in PCa progression has been shown to be related to different mechanisms, such as intratumoral androgen synthesis, AR amplification and mutations, AR mRNA alternative splicing, increased expression/activity of AR-related transcription factors and coregulators. The hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), by binding to its specific receptors (GnRH-Rs) at the pituitary level, plays a pivotal role in the regulation of the reproductive functions. GnRH and GnRH-R are also expressed in different types of tumors, including PCa. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that, in CRPC cells, the activation of GnRH-Rs is associated with a significant antiproliferative/proapoptotic, antimetastatic and antiangiogenic activity. This antitumor activity is mainly mediated by the GnRH-R-associated Gαi/cAMP signaling pathway. In this review, we dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of the androgen/AR and GnRH/GnRH-R axes in CRPC progression and the possible therapeutic implications.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors in Prostate Cancer: Molecular Aspects and Biological Functions

Pituitary Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone receptors (GnRH-R) mediate the activity of the hypothalamic decapeptide GnRH, thus playing a key role in the regulation of the reproductive axis. Early-stage prostate cancer (PCa) is dependent on serum androgen levels, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), based on GnRH agonists and antagonists, represents the standard therapeutic approach for PCa patients. Unfortunately, the tumor often progresses towards the more aggressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) stage. GnRH receptors are also expressed in CRPC tissues, where their binding to both GnRH agonists and antagonists is associated with significant antiproliferative/proapoptotic, antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects, mediated by the Gαi/cAMP signaling cascade. GnRH agonists and antagonists are now considered as an effective therapeutic strategy for CRPC patients with many clinical trials demonstrating that the combined use of these drugs with standard therapies (i.e., docetaxel, enzalutamide, abiraterone) significantly improves disease-free survival. In this context, GnRH-based bioconjugates (cytotoxic drugs covalently linked to a GnRH-based decapeptide) have been recently developed. The rationale of this treatment is that the GnRH peptide selectively binds to its receptors, delivering the cytotoxic drug to CRPC cells while sparing nontumor cells. Some of these compounds have already entered clinical trials.

Comparative response of rams and bulls to long-term treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs

The objective was to compare the relative response between rams and bulls in characteristics of LH, FSH and testosterone (T) secretion, during and after long-term treatment with GnRH analogs. Animals were treated with GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, or vehicle (Control) for 28 days. Serial blood samples were collected on day 21 of treatment, and at several intervals after treatment. Injections of natural sequence GnRH were used to evaluate the capacity of the pituitary to release gonadotropins during and after treatment. Treatment with GnRH agonist increased basal LH and T concentrations in both rams and bulls, with a greater relative increase in bulls. Endogenous LH pulses and LH release after administration of GnRH were suppressed during treatment with GnRH agonist. Treatment with GnRH antagonist decreased mean hormone concentrations, LH and T pulse frequency, and the release of LH and T after exogenous GnRH, with greater relative effects in bulls. Rams previously treated with antagonist had a greater release of LH after administration of GnRH compared with control rams, while rams previously treated with agonist showed a reduced LH response. Bulls previously treated with agonist had reduced FSH concentrations and LH pulse amplitudes compared with control bulls while bulls previously treated with antagonist had greater T concentrations and pulse frequency. The present study was the first direct comparison between domestic species of the response in males to treatment with GnRH analogs. The findings demonstrated that differences do occur between rams and bulls in LH, FSH and testosterone secretion during and after treatment. Also, the consequences of treatment with either GnRH analog can persist for a considerable time after discontinuation of treatment.

Effect of leuprolide and cetrorelix on cell growth, apoptosis, and GnRH receptor expression in primary cell cultures from human prostate carcinoma

Contradictory data have been reported regarding the effect of GnRH agonists and antagonists on cell growth and survival, using prostate cancer-derived cell lines expressing either endogenous or exogenous GnRH receptors. We addressed the issue studying the effect of leuprolide (agonist) and cetrorelix (antagonist) on cell growth, apoptosis and GnRH receptor expression using a primary cell coculture system. Also, binding characteristics of prostate GnRH receptor in this culture system are described. Epithelial and stromal cells were obtained from prostate adenocarcinoma samples and cocultured in a bicameral system. Expression of GnRH receptors was evaluated by semiquantitative RT-PCR (transcript level) and Western blot (protein level). Cell growth was estimated by MTT method and apoptosis by DNA fragmentation using COMET assay. Saturation and competition binding studies were carried out using 125I-GnRH as radioligand. GnRH receptors from cell cultures of prostate cancer exhibited a single class of binding sites with a Kd of 1.11 +/- 0.28 nM and a Bmax of 2.81 +/- 0.37 pmol/mg of membrane protein for GnRH. Leuprolide and cetrorelix showed no effect on GnRH receptor expression. Both analogues showed a significant reduction in cell growth rate and an increase in DNA-fragmented cell number. These effects were dependent on the analogue concentrations (from 5-20 ng/mL). Considering that the culture system used in this work represents more closely the in vivo conditions of tumor cells than metastatic derived cell lines, we conclude that GnRH analogues have a significant inhibitory effect on cell viability of cells expressing GnRH receptors. In addition, GnRH receptors expressed in tumor prostatic cells seem not discriminate between agonist and antagonist, both analogues activating these receptors. Also, leuprolide and cetrorelix treatments did not influence GnRH receptor expression in our culture system. These differences with pituitary receptors may be explained by differences in affinity, transduction mechanism and molecular context in prostatic tissue.

Immunohistochemical demonstration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in prostate carcinoma

The antiandrogen and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn-RH) analogue treatment of prostate carcinoma is based on decreased proliferative and increased apoptotic activity of tumor cells, induced by androgen ablation. Gn-RH analogues decrease the serum level of androgens by breaking the pituitary-gonadal axis, but increasing evidence points to the direct effect of Gn-RH analogues on tumor cells. Immunohistochemical demonstration of Gn-RH receptors recently became possible. Cryostat and paraffin sections of prostate biopsy samples of 10 untreated patients with prostate carcinoma (T2-T3, Gleason score 5-8) were investigated for Gn-RH receptors (Gn-RHR) and androgen receptors, respectively, using the immunoperoxidase method. Membrane bound, focal Gn-RHR positivity was found in 5 samples. Nuclear androgen receptor positivity appeared in 7 samples. No correlation between Gn-RHR and androgen receptor positivity was found, neither receptor status and tumor-nodes-metastasis stage nor Gleason score could be related to each other. Correlation between Gn-RHR positivity and response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue treatment will be investigated further.

The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment

Clinical utilization of ovulation stimulation to facilitate the ability of a couple to conceive has not only provided a valuable therapeutic approach, but has also yielded extensive information on the physiology of ovarian follicular recruitment, endometrial receptivity and early embryo competency. One of the consequences of the use of fertility enhancing agents for ovarian stimulation has been the creation of a hyperestrogenic state, which may influence each of these parameters. Use of aromatase inhibitors reduces hyperestrogenism inevitably attained during ovarian stimulation. In addition, the adjunct use of aromatase inhibitors during ovarian stimulation reduces amount of gonadotropins required for optimum stimulation. The unique approach of reducing hyperestrogenism, as well as lowering amount of gonadotropins without affecting the number of mature ovarian follicles is an exciting strategy that could result in improvement in the treatment outcome by ameliorating the deleterious effects of the ovarian stimulation on follicular development, endometrial receptivity, as well as oocyte and embryo quality.

Regulation of expression of mammalian gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor genes

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), acting via its cognate GnRH receptor (GnRHR), is the primary regulator of mammalian reproductive function, and hence GnRH analogues are extensively used in the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases, as well as for assisted reproductive techniques. In addition to its established endocrine role in gonadotrophin regulation in the pituitary, evidence is rapidly accumulating to support the expression and functional roles for two forms of GnRHR (GnRHR I and GnRHR II) in multiple and diverse extra-pituitary mammalian tissues and cells. These findings, together with findings indicating that mutations of the GnRHR are linked to the disease hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and that GnRHRs play a direct role in neuronal migration and reproductive cancers, have presented new therapeutic targets and intensified research into the structure, function and mechanisms of regulation of expression of GnRHR genes. The present review focuses on the current knowledge on tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of transcription of mammalian GnRH receptor genes. Emerging insights, such as the discovery of diverse regulatory mechanisms in pituitary and extra-pituitary cell types, nonclassical mechanisms of steroid regulation, the use of composite elements for cell-specific expression, the increasing profile of hormones involved in regulation, the complexity of kinase pathways that target the GnRHR I gene, as well as species-differences, are highlighted. Although further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms of regulation of expression of GnRHR I and GnRHR II genes, the GnRHR is emerging as a potential target gene for facilitating cross-talk between neuroendocrine, immune and stress-response systems in multiple tissues via autocrine, paracrine and endocrine signalling.

Synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) vaccine for effective androgen deprivation and its application to prostate cancer immunotherapy

We have designed a peptide-based immunotherapeutic vaccine for treatment of androgen-responsive prostate cancer. The vaccine targets the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) decapeptide that results in an androgen-deprivation immunotherapy. The design elements of the peptide immunogens are the LHRH peptide or B cell epitope synthetically linked to different promiscuous helper T cell (Th) sequences, the UBITh epitopes, derived from four natural pathogens for effective immunogenicity in outbred populations, and in some cases, also linked to an adjuvanting peptide from Yersinia invasin (Inv) protein. The UBITh LHRH immunogens are adsorbed on Alhydrogel or formulated as several different oil-based emulsions and tested in rodents, dogs, and a non-human primate, baboons. The immunogens generate an anti-LHRH antibody response specific to the LHRH decapeptide element in contrast to LHRH conjugate-carrier protein vaccines where only a small portion of the antibody response is directed to the target epitope and epitopic suppression is noted. Individual UBITh peptide domains, but not the LHRH and Inv peptide domains, are stimulatory in lymphocyte cultures. The UBITh LHRH immunogens in a clinically applicable formulation, controlled the growth of Dunning R3327-H androgen-responsive prostate tumor cells in rats. The results demonstrate universal responsiveness and long duration of androgen deprivation from three diverse species, and thus vaccine efficacy.

Human prostate cancer cells and xenografts are targeted and destroyed through luteinizing hormone releasing hormone receptors

BACKGROUND

A conjugate of a lytic peptide, hecate, and a 15-amino acid segment of the beta-chain of chorionic gonadotropin (CG) destroyed human prostate xenografts in nude mice by targeting LH receptors. Since these xenografts also express LHRH receptors, we prepared a LHRH-hecate conjugate and tested its ability to destroy PC-3 cells in vitro and in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LHRH-hecate was added to cultures of PC-3, BRF 41 T, DU145, and LNCaP cells in the presence and absence of steroids. PC-3 xenografts were established in nude male mice, which were treated with LHRH-hecate.

RESULTS

Injections of LHRH-hecate resulted in tumor growth arrest and marked reduction of tumor burden (62.2 mg/g body weight in saline controls vs. 10.5 mg/g body weight in treated mice; P < 0.0001); unconjugated LHRH and hecate had no effect on tumor burden and tumor viability (48.5 mg/g body weight in LHRH treated animals vs. 63.2 mg/g body weight in hecate treated mice). Marked tumor necrosis occurred in conjugate treated mice. Removal of steroids from the culture media decreased the sensitivity of LNCaP and PC-3 cells to the LHRH-hecate; adding estrogen restored the sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

LHRH-hecate may be effective in treating hormone dependent and independent prostate cancers.

Immunization against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone fusion proteins does not decrease prostate cancer in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate model

This study was undertaken to test the effect of immunization against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) fusion proteins on the development and progression of prostate cancer in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. Two LHRH fusion proteins, ovalbumin with seven LHRH peptides (OV-LHRH-7), and thioredoxin with seven LHRH peptides (TH-LHRH-7) were used in a cocktail vaccine. Two groups of male TRAMP mice were immunized with the cocktail. Primary immunizations were at either 4 or 8 weeks of age. LHRH immunized mice (n=19) were compared with castrated (n=19) and intact mice (n=18) for testosterone concentration, tumor weight, and lifespan. Immunization against LHRH in the TRAMP mice resulted in significant production of antibodies to LHRH compared with surgically castrated and intact control mice. Testicular weight was significantly reduced in the LHRH immunized groups compared with intact control mice. Serum testosterone was reduced (P<0.05) in the immunized mice compared with intact control mice and was not different from that of castrated mice (P>0.05). Tumor weight was variable and inconsistent throughout all treatment groups. Lifespan was not increased by immunization against LHRH or castration. Intact control mice (lived the longest (227+/-11 days), whereas immunized mice lived 206+/-11 days and castrated mice lived 213+/-13 days. Tumors from immunized TRAMP mice appeared more aggressive than tumors of castrated and intact mice, as demonstrated by 35% expression of gross lung tumors in the immunized mice whereas none were observed in the castrated or intact TRAMP mice. Prostate cancer is initially dependent upon androgens for growth and development, but cells have the ability to escape androgen dependence and progress to an androgen independent state, which was evident in this study. The TRAMP mouse model immunized against LHRH may have utility in future studies and treatments of the androgen independent prostate cancer.

The clinical implications of the difference between castration, gonadotrophin releasing-hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonist treatment on the morphology and expression of GnRH receptors in the rat ventral prostate

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of castration and continuous gonadotrophin releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist therapy on the expression of GnRH-receptors type I (GnRH-RI) in rat ventral prostate (VP) and pituitary tissue, and to compare the effects on prostate morphology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mature Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to four treatment groups: group 1, vehicle only; group 2, GnRH agonist goserelin (100 microg/rat/day); group 3, GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (100 microg/rat/day); and group 4, orchidectomy. After 4 weeks the body weights were recorded and VP and pituitary tissue analysed for GnRH-RI expression using a competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

GnRH antagonist and orchidectomy decreased testosterone secretion and VP volume similarly, but the effects were not identical. The involution of the glandular lumina was more pronounced after orchidectomy while the antagonist therapy was more effective in suppressing epithelial cell proliferation. In the VP, GnRH-RI mRNA levels were increased after GnRH analogue therapy, but were unaffected by orchidectomy. In the pituitary, GnRH-RI mRNA expression was higher in response to orchidectomy and decreased after GnRH analogue treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a GnRH antagonist for 4 weeks is more effective than an agonist in suppressing testosterone and inducing VP involution. The GnRH antagonist was more effective in suppressing VP epithelial cell proliferation than was castration, suggesting that it induces reduced proliferation by interfering with effects of locally produced GnRH. These results suggest that different regulatory mechanisms may operate in the rat VP than in the pituitary to control GnRH-RI mRNA expression.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist: how good is the new hope?

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists have been widely used to prevent luteinizing hormone surges during controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists of uterine myoma, endometriosis and some hormone-dependent cancers, such as breast, ovarian, endometrial and prostate cancer, also seems to have a beneficial effect. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists have the disadvantage of inducing an initial stimulatory effect on gonadotropin secretion, necessitating 2-3 weeks before pituitary desensitization is achieved. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, on the contrary, cause an immediate inhibition of gonadotropin secretion by competitive blocking of pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors. Some advantages of their clinical use in controlled ovarian stimulation have already been demonstrated. Randomized comparative studies are needed to investigate their benefit over gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for myoma and hormone-related disorders.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor expression in the human prostate

BACKGROUND

Inhibitory effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs on prostate cancer cell proliferation, both in vivo and in vitro, indicate the presence of specific binding sites for GnRH on prostate cancer cells. To investigate this issue further, we examined the expression of GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) mRNA and protein in human prostate biopsies as well as in other extrapituitary tissues.

METHODS

The relative quantity of GnRH-R mRNA was determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in human prostate biopsies. Extrapituitary GnRH-R levels were determined by a semiquantitative PCR reaction.

RESULTS

Using PCR, a relatively high expression level of GnRH-R mRNA was found in prostate tumor tissue followed by normal prostate, thymus, and kidney expression levels. The levels showed by heart, brain, placenta, lung, liver, skeletal muscle, pancreas, colon, ovary, small intestine, spleen, and testis were low but detectable, whereas peripheral blood leukocyte showed no demonstrable product. GnRH-R immunoreactivity was localized in both luminal and basal epithelial cells in benign and malignant prostate tissue, and GnRH-R were also observed in intraprostatic lymphocytes. The relative GnRH-R mRNA levels in prostate biopsies from 16 patients showed a wide range of individual differences, but these differences were not related to histological grade. Castration therapy did not significantly influence GnRH-R mRNA expression in normal and malignant prostate tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that epithelial cells and infiltrating lymphocytes are targets for GnRH action in the human prostate. Comparative data show relatively high GnRH-R expression in human prostate tissue compared to other human tissues.

Targeted destruction of androgen-sensitive and -insensitive prostate cancer cells and xenografts through luteinizing hormone receptors

BACKGROUND

We have prepared a conjugate of a lytic peptide (hecate) and a 15-amino acid segment of the beta-chain of LH to test the concept that this conjugate will target cancer cells expressing LH receptors.

METHODS

Hecate-betaLH was added in vitro to cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with and without LH receptors and to prostate cancer cells in the presence or absence of steroids, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), epidermal growth factor (EGF), or betaLH. PC-3 xenografts were established in male athymic nude mice and treated once a week for 3 weeks with hecate-betaLH via the lateral tail vein.

RESULTS

The conjugate showed concentration-dependent toxicity for the following prostate cancer cell lines: BRF 41 T>DU145>PC-3>LNCaP, according to their LH receptor capacities. Steroid removal reduced sensitivity to the drug in a reversible manner. Hecate-betaLH reduced the tumor burden in the nude mice from 60 to 12.5 mg/g body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the hecate-betaLH conjugate selectively kills androgen-dependent and-independent prostate cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro; its toxicity depends on the number of LH receptor sites present.

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists

When gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was discovered, the agonist and antagonist of GnRH were developed to control the release of FSH and LH by the gonadotrophs. More than 10 years of research were needed to develop a GnRH antagonist free of histamine release. Recent studies have shown that these GnRH antagonists are effective in preventing a rise in LH during ovarian stimulation in IVF. However, a decrease in ongoing pregnancies seems to suggest that implantation rates per transferred embryo are reduced in GnRH antagonist-stimulated cycles. In my opinion, these data highlight an area less well known to clinicians: the role of the GnRH antagonist at the cellular level in extrapituitary tissues. There are sufficient data in the literature suggesting that GnRH antagonist is an inhibitor of the cell cycle by decreasing the synthesis of growth factors. Given that, for folliculogenesis, blastomere formation and endometrium development, mitosis is everything; the interaction between the GnRH antagonist and the GnRH receptor (present in all these cells and tissues) may compromise the mitotic programme of these cells. This is the Rubicon for the GnRH antagonist: to demonstrate irrevocably that, at the minimal doses necessary to suppress LH release, it does not affect processes such as implantation, embryo development and folliculogenesis.

Cytotoxic activity of a recombinant GnRH-PAP fusion toxin on human tumor cell lines

Pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP), a ribosome-inactivating protein isolated from the leaves of Phytolacca americana, reveals potent antiviral activity against viruses or cytotoxic action against cells once inside the cytoplasm. Therefore PAP is a good candidate to be used as an immunotoxin. We constructed a bacterial expression plasmid encoding PAP as a fusion protein with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), a neuropeptide with receptor sites on several gynaecologic tumors. The resulting recombinant toxin was produced in Escherichia coli and accumulated in inclusion bodies. After purification under denaturing conditions, renaturated GnRH-PAP shows an IC(50) of 3 nM on in vitro translation assays and selectively inhibits the growth of the GnRH receptor positive Ishikawa cell line (ID(50) of 15 nM); on the other hand, neither GnRH nor PAP alone had any effect.

High incidence of receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) and LHRH receptor gene expression in human prostate cancers

PURPOSE

Agonistic analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) are widely used for therapy of advanced prostate cancer based upon their ability to suppress testosterone secretion in patients. Various studies also indicate that LHRH analogs might have direct inhibitory effects on prostate tumors mediated by specific LHRH receptors. In this study we investigated the presence and characteristics of receptors for LHRH and their messenger (m) ribonucleic acid (RNA) expression in specimens of human prostate adenocarcinomas and benign prostatic tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro ligand competition assays as well as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were performed to investigate the expression of receptors for LHRH in surgical specimens of human prostate cancers and benign prostatic tissue.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine of 80 (86%) cancers exhibited specific, medium to high-affinity binding for [D-Trp6]LHRH with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 6.55+/-0.4 nM and a maximal binding capacity (Bmax) of 483.6+/-25.4 fmol./mg. membrane protein. Two prostate cancer patients who were treated with the LHRH agonist goserelin prior to prostatectomy did not show tumor LHRH receptors. The expression of mRNA for LHRH receptors was observed in 19 of 22 (86%) prostate cancers. Benign prostatic tissue also displayed LHRH receptor gene expression, but exhibited lower Bmax value. There was a negative correlation (p <0.001) between LHRH receptor binding capacity and cancer grade (Gleason score); higher Gleason scores were associated with significantly lower binding capacity but an increased binding affinity.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of specific receptor proteins for LHRH in human prostate cancer provides a rationale for the improvement in methods for therapy of this malignancy based on LHRH analogs.

Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone increases proliferation of meningioma cells in vitro

The fact that meningioma shows at least a 2:1 predilection for women over men is considered to be due to endocrinological and paracrine regulation of the development of this tumour. The presence of receptors for the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) in gynaecological cancer permits the use of LHRH agonistic or antagonistic analogues with a direct effect or by the gonado-pituitary axis suppression in the treatment of these tumours. Therefore, the effect of LHRH on meningioma cells is tested in this study. Meningioma cells from three female patients were cultured and LHRH (50 ng/ml) was added to the growth medium daily, for fourteen days. At the end of this period the cells were counted by means of a Coulter Counter. The stimulating effects of LHRH on the increase of the amount of cells in the meningioma monolayer culture were 146% (p < 0.01), 134% (p < 0.05) and 141% (p < 0.05) of the control, respectively, for the three patients.

Luteal phase and clinical outcome after human menopausal gonadotrophin/gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist treatment for ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

The luteal phase hormonal profile and the clinical outcome of 69 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix were analysed. Twenty-four patients received Cetrorelix 0.5 mg (group I) while in 45 patients Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered (group II). Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was used as luteal support. Nine clinical pregnancies were obtained in group I (37.5%) and 12 in group II (26. 6%). These results were not significantly different. Serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations did not differ between the two groups either in pregnant or non-pregnant patients. An expected decrease of the same hormones was observed 8 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection in non-pregnant women. With regard to serum luteinizing hormone concentrations, a decrease was observed 2 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection and was maintained at almost undetectable levels throughout the entire luteal phase in both conception and non-conception cycles of group I and group II. This study demonstrates that different doses of GnRH antagonist do not have any impact on the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles when hormonal support is given.

Expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor mRNA in the rat ventral prostate and dunning R3327 PAP adenocarcinoma before and after castration

BACKGROUND

Continuous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in prostate cancer patients results in involution of the tumors due to suppression of androgen production. In addition to the effect of GnRH at the hypothalamic-pituitary level, experiments in vitro on breast, ovary, and prostatic cells have shown an inhibition of cell proliferation, indicating the presence of local GnRH receptors (GnRH-R). The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of GnRH-R mRNA in the normal rat ventral prostate (VP) and Dunning R3327 PAP adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the effects of castration on receptor mRNA expression.

METHODS

RNA was prepared from ovaries, pituitaries, VP, and Dunning tumors from both intact and castrated animals. GnRH-R mRNA levels were quantified by a competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method.

RESULTS

GnRH-R mRNA was detected in normal VP and Dunning tumors. Normal VP showed lower amounts of GnRH-R mRNA compared to Dunning tumors. An elevation of mRNA expression was observed 7 days after castration in Dunning tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

GnRH-R mRNA was found in both VP and Dunning tumors, indicating the presence of a local GnRH system. Normal VP showed lower amounts of GnRH-R mRNA when compared to malignant tissues. GnRH-R mRNA levels were elevated in Dunning tumors following castration.

Induction of early and bioeffective antibody response in rodents with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone vaccine given as a single dose in biodegradable microspheres along with alum

BACKGROUND

Previous studies in animals and phase I/phase II clinical trials in humans have shown the suppressive effect of immunization with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) vaccine on prostatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia. A drawback of this vaccine was a delay of about 8 weeks in buildup of antibody titers to efficacy level and the requirement of three injections of the vaccine given at monthly interval for full primary immunization.

METHODS

LHRH vaccine was encapsulated in poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) 50:50 copolymer microspheres of reproducible physicochemical characteristics. Immunogenicity studies were carried out in rodents and prostate weights were determined at various antibody titers.

RESULTS

The vaccine entrapped in biodegradable microspheres generated high antibody response in rats, persisting for 5-7 months following a single immunization. One hundred micrograms was the optimum dose, and the intramuscular route was more immunogenic than the subcutaneous. It was further observed that coadministration of 75% of the vaccine entrapped in microspheres with 25% adsorbed on alum generated higher antibody response in rodents, exceeding the bioeffective threshold as early as day 15 postimmunization.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of the LHRH vaccine in biodegradable PLGA microspheres with a quarter of the dose adsorbed on alum generates high antibody titers within 15 days, which are effective in causing atrophy of the prostate.

Effect of active immunization against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on the androgen-sensitive Dunning R3327-PAP and androgen-independent Dunning R3327-AT2.1 prostate cancer sublines

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of active immunization against LHRH on the growth characteristics and histology of subcutaneously implanted tumors of the androgen-sensitive Dunning R3327-PAP and androgen-independent R3327-AT2.1 rat prostate adenocarcinoma sublines.

RESULTS

We herein demonstrate that 1) active immunization with an LHRH-diphtheria toxoid-conjugate (LHRH-DT) leads to the downregulation of gonadotropins and testosterone and consequently the atrophy of testosterone-dependent organs such as the testes, prostate, and androgen-sensitive Dunning R3327-PAP tumors, 2) growth inhibition of Dunning R3327-PAP tumors is caused by suppression of cell division rather than by an increase in cell death and is associated with an increase of the tumor stroma content, and 3) volume increase of the androgen-independent Dunning R3327-AT2.1 tumor is slightly but significantly reduced, indicating a local stimulatory LHRH loop within this tumor cell line.

Pharmacological studies with cetrorelix (SB-75), a potent antagonist of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone

The antitumour and hormone-suppressive effects of the luteinising hormone-releasing hormone LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix (D-20761) and its pamoate salt (D-20762) were investigated in the model of the DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma of female rats and by testosterone determinations in normal male rats. Treatment with single high doses of D-20761 induced a rapid decrease of tumour weights with a dose-dependent duration of action. Strong antitumour effects were also observed by applying different multiple dose schedules, including a initial high dose (3.16 mg/kg, s.c.) followed by a low maintenance dose (31.6 micrograms/kg, s.c.). The stability of the molecule against degrading enzymes led to the idea of using the poorly soluble pamoate salt for facilitating a sustained release of active compound. This salt indeed induced a prolonged suppression of tumour growth and of testosterone levels. In conclusion, we found that Cetrorelix is a highly effective LH-RH antagonist which should be further developed for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases.

Down-regulation of pituitary receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) in rats by LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix

Antagonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH), unlike the LH-RH agonists, suppress gonadotropins and sex steroid secretion immediately after administration, without initial stimulatory effects. [Ac-D-Nal(2)1,D-Ph(4Cl)2,D-Pal(3)3,D-Cit6,D-Ala10]LH-R H (SB-75; Cetrorelix) is a modern, potent antagonistic analog of LH-RH. In this study, the binding characteristics of receptors for LH-RH in membrane fractions from rat anterior pituitaries were investigated after a single injection of Cetrorelix at a dose of 100 microg per rat. To determine whether the treatment with Cetrorelix can affect the concentration of measurable LH-RH binding sites, we applied an in vitro method to desaturate LH-RH receptors by chaotropic agents such as manganous chloride (MnCl2) and ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN). Our results show that the percentages of occupied LH-RH receptors at 1, 3, and 6 h after administration of Cetrorelix were approximately 28%, 14%, and 10%, respectively, of total receptors. At later time intervals, we could not detect occupied LH-RH binding sites. Ligand competition assays, following in vitro desaturation, demonstrated that rat pituitary LH-RH receptors were significantly (P < 0.01) down-regulated for at least 72 h after administration of Cetrorelix. The lowest receptor concentration was found 3-6 h after Cetrorelix treatment and a recovery in receptor number began within approximately 24 h. The down-regulation of LH-RH binding sites induced by Cetrorelix was accompanied by serum LH and testosterone suppression. Higher LH-RH receptor concentrations coincided with elevated serum hormone levels at later time intervals. Our results indicate that administration of LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix produces a marked down-regulation of pituitary receptors for LH-RH and not merely an occupancy of binding sites.

Evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo activity of the L-, D,L- and D-Cit6 forms of the LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix (SB-75)

The objective of this study was to examine the in vivo and in vitro gonadotropin-inhibiting potencies, edematogenic activities and the receptor binding affinities of the D-Cit6, D,L-Cit6 and L-Cit6 forms of the LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix (SB-75) [Ac-D-Nal(2)1,D-Phe(4Cl)2,D-Pal(3)3,D-Cit6,D-Ala10]LH- RH. In order to demonstrate the suppressive effects of two different diastereomers of SB-75 and their racemic mixture on LH and FSH release, [D-Cit6] SB-75 was injected subcutaneously in doses of 2.5 and 10 micrograms/rat, [D,L-Cit6]-SB-75 in doses of 5 and 20 micrograms/rat and [L-Cit6] SB-75 in doses of 12.5 and 50 micrograms/rat to castrated male rats. Two hours after administration, there was no difference in LH levels between rats injected with the L-form and control animals, indicating a low activity and/or a rapid enzymatic degradation of this peptide. The (1:1) diastereomeric mixture was only about half as potent in suppression of LH release compared to [D-Cit6] SB-75. Serum FSH levels were suppressed significantly (p < 0.01) for more than 48 h after the administration of 10 micrograms [D-Cit6] SB-75 and 20 micrograms of [D,L-Cit6] SB-75, respectively. [D-Cit6] SB-75 administered at a dose of 2 micrograms/rat induced 100% inhibition of ovulation, while 4 micrograms/rat of the D,L-Cit6 peptide were necessary to produce the same effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of luteal steroidogenesis by two LHRH antagonists (Nal-Glu and Nal-Arg antagonists) in the pregnant rat

We have examined the effect of two LHRH antagonists (Nal-Glu and Nal-Arg antagonists) on the basal progesterone (P4), pregnenolone (P5) and 20 alpha-dihydroprogesterone (20 alpha-DHP) production by luteal cells obtained from day 8 pregnant rats. A dose of 0.1 mmol/l of Nal-Glu or Nal-Arg attenuated basal P4 production by luteal cells after 12, 24 or 48 h of incubation. P5, a precursor for P4 synthesis was also reduced by both doses of Nal-Glu or Nal-Arg (0.1 mmol or 0.1 mumol/l) after 24 h of incubation. A period of 12 h was not sufficient to inhibit P5 production by luteal cells incubated with both doses of Nal-Glu or with the lower dose of Nal-Arg. The higher dose of Nal-Glu and Nal-Arg remained effective in attenuating P5 production by luteal cells after 48 h of incubation. We measured the production of a metabolite of P4, i.e., 20 alpha-DHP to assess whether this suppression in P4 production is due to an enhancement in the P4 metabolism by increasing the activity of 20 alpha-hydroxydehydrogenase. However, instead, we observed (i) a decrease in the production of 20 alpha-DHP by the higher dose of Nal-Glu and Nal-Arg after 12, 24 or 48 h of incubation and (ii) a decrease or no change in the production of 20 alpha-DHP by the lower dose of Nal-Glu or Nal-Arg at all time periods of incubation. Based on these observations we conclude that LHRH antagonists exert a direct effect on the corpus luteum and suppress luteal steroidogenesis. This suppression in luteal steroidogenesis could be due to a decrease in the activity of any one of these enzymes of the steroidogenic pathway, viz., cholesterol side chain cleavage (P450scc), a rate limiting enzyme involved in the synthesis of P5 from cholesterol, or 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3 beta-HSD), which catalyzes the oxidation of P5 to P4 or due to a decrease in activity of both enzymes.

The effect of active immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone on the ultrastructure of the rat ventral prostate

To evaluate the effects of active immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on the ultrastructure of the rat ventral prostate, male Sprague-Dawley rats received three consecutive intramuscular injections of 10 micrograms/100 g body weight (D-Lys6)-GnRH-diphtheria toxoid conjugate (GnRH-DT vaccine). Following immunization, test animals developed sufficiently high antibody titres to block the pituitary gonadal axis. Consequently testosterone values dropped to the levels in castrates. This therapy leads to atrophy of the prostate. Following immunization a strong immunological response, indicating the presence of considerable amounts of a GnRH-like peptide, was observed in the ventral prostates as early as 14 days after the first injection of GnRH-DT. Immunoneutralisation of GnRH-like activity may contribute to the effects observed.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of the decapeptide cetrorelix, a novel luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist, in human plasma

This is the first paper which describes a HPLC method for the determination of the decapeptide cetrorelix, a potent luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist, in human plasma by liquid-liquid extraction, concentration by back-extraction with diluted acid into a smaller volume, and fluorescence detection, using the decapeptide D-21740 as internal standard. The excitation (227 nm) and emission wavelengths (340 nm) for cetrorelix and the internal standard are identical. The extraction yield for both peptides is ca. 50% and the assay is linear over the concentration range 2-20 ng/ml in plasma. The mobile phase components are ammonium acetate buffer (0.05 mol/l, pH 4) as solvent A and methanol-acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) as solvent B. The elution condition for the peptides from the column (Lichrospher 60 RP-Select B 5 microns, 250 x 4 mm I.D.) is isocratic with a 49:51 mixture of solvent A-solvent B. The lower limit of quantitation for cetrorelix is 2 ng/ml human plasma.

Antagonists of bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptides as adjuncts to agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in the treatment of experimental prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative methods for treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma, including those based on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists, cannot prevent the ultimate growth of hormone-independent cells, and the duration of disease remission in patients with prostate cancer is limited. New therapeutic approaches combining androgen ablation therapy with other compounds must be explored. Various studies suggest that bombesin or gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) act as autocrine growth factors and may play a role in the initiation and progression of some cancers, including those of the prostate.

METHODS

The effects of treatment with bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor antagonist [D-Tpi6, Leu13 psi(CH2NH)Leu14]BN(6-14)(RC-3095), an agonist of LH-RH [D-Lys6]-LH-RH and their combination were investigated in the androgen-dependent Dunning R-3327H rat prostate cancer model. Both analogs were administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion from osmotic minipumps for 7 weeks.

RESULTS

Tumor volumes and weights were significantly reduced by treatment with RC-3095, compared with those of controls. In rats that received [D-Lys6]-LH-RH, there was a greater decrease in tumor weight and volume than that produced by RC-3095, and the weights of testes, ventral prostate, and seminal vesicles also were reduced. The combination of RC-3095 and [D-Lys6]-LH-RH had the greatest inhibitory effect on tumor growth. Histologic parameters demonstrated a significant increase of the ratio of apoptotic to mitotic indices in the groups treated with [D-Lys6]-LH-RH or the combination. Serum LH and testosterone levels were greatly depressed by [D-Lys6]-LH-RH or the combination. Specific high-affinity binding sites for bombesin/GRP, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and insulin-like growth Factor I (IGF-I) were found on the tumor membranes. The concentration of receptors for EGF was significantly reduced by treatment with the bombesin/GRP antagonist RC-3095.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of LH-RH analogs with bombesin antagonists such as RC-3095 might be considered for improvement of hormonal therapy of prostate cancer.

Evaluation of biological activities of new LH-RH antagonists (T-series) in male and female rats

A series of new highly potent LH-RH antagonists (T-series) has been synthesized in our laboratory. Among these analogs, antagonists [Ac-D-Nal(2), D-Phe(4Cl)2, D-Pal(3)3, D-Lys(A2pr(Car)2)6, D-Ala10]LH-RH (T-140); [Ac-D-Nal(2)1, D-Phe(4Cl)2, D-Pal(3)3, D-Lys(A2pr(Ac)2)6, D-Ala10]LH-RH (T-148); [Ac-D-Nal(2)1, D-Phe(4Cl)2, D-Pal(3)3, D-Lys(A2pr(For)2)6, D-Ala10]LH-RH (T-151) and [Ac-D-Nal(2)1, D-Phe(4Cl)2, D-Pal(3)3, D-Lys(A2bu(For)2)6, D-Ala10]LH-RH (T-159) were the most powerful. Antagonists T-140, T-148 and T-151 produced a complete blockade of ovulation in normal cycling rats at a dose of 1.5 micrograms/rat and antagonist T-159 at a dose of only 0.75 micrograms/rat. The inhibitory effects of compounds T-148, T-151 and T-159 on gonadotropin and sex steroid secretion were investigated in male and female rats. To determine their effect on LH levels in castrated male and ovariectomized female rats, T-148, T-151 and T-159 were injected subcutaneously in doses of 0.625 and 2.5 micrograms/rat. Blood samples were taken at different intervals for 48 h. All three compounds at either dose caused a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in LH levels for more than 6 h. Significant (P < 0.01) inhibition of LH lasted for more than 24 h following a dose of 2.5 micrograms sc of all 3 antagonists in both male and female rats. Serum FSH levels were also suppressed significantly for more than 48 h in castrated male rats by all three antagonists at a dose of 5 micrograms/rat sc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of growth of experimental prostate cancer in rats by LH-RH analogs linked to cytotoxic radicals

The effects of hybrid cytotoxic LH-RH analogs, produced by linking anthraquinone or methotrexate to carrier LH-RH agonist [D-Lys6]LH-RH, were evaluated in Copenhagen-Fisher F1 rats bearing Dunning R-3327H prostate adenocarcinoma. The two cytotoxic LH-RH analogs T-98 [(D-Lys6)LH-RH coupled to glutaryl-2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone (G-HMAQ)], and AJ-04 [(D-Lys6)LH-RH linked to methotrexate (MTX)], carrier [D-Lys6]LH-RH, or the free cytotoxic compounds MTX and G-HMAQ were administered from Alzet Osmotic minipumps for 7-8 weeks. The cytotoxic LH-RH analogs caused somewhat greater tumor growth inhibition than the carrier peptide, while anthraquinone or methotrexate alone, administered in equimolar doses, were ineffective. The inhibition of androgen sensitive organs (testes, ventral prostates, and seminal vesicles) was pronounced with both carrier and cytotoxic analogs, showing the latter to be fully hormonally active in suppressing the pituitary-gonadal axis. Histological changes were also evaluated. The inhibition of mitosis and the frequency of apoptosis were higher in tumors treated with AJ-04, T-98, [D-Lys6]LH-RH, or by castration than in those of controls. Serum hormone levels were lowered by both carrier peptide and cytotoxic analogs, LH being substantially depressed, and testosterone not detectable. These results and other findings indicate that LH-RH analogs containing cytotoxic radicals anthraquinone or methotrexate retain their hormonal activity after administration in vivo, and can effectively inhibit tumor growth. Extensive further studies are required on this new class of compounds, but apparent binding of cytotoxic LH-RH analogs to tumors such as prostate cancer, which have receptors for LH-RH, could greatly reduce peripheral toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. This approach, based on targeted chemotherapy, might be of practical therapeutic importance for the management of advanced prostate cancers, which eventually relapse after palliative hormonal therapy.

Arguments against the prostatic origin of the R-3327 Dunning H tumor

The Dunning tumor, originally described as a carcinoma of the rat dorsal prostate, has for long been used as an experimental model of prostatic cancer. We have recently presented a number of morphological findings that are incompatible with the prostatic origin of the H-subline of the Dunning tumor. In this paper, biochemical and immunohistochemical markers of rat prostate and mammary gland are studied in the R-3327 Dunning H tumor. Pieces of the H tumor were inoculated in male or lactating female rats. The electrophoretic protein pattern of Dunning tumor extracts was more similar to that of the mammary gland than the dorsolateral prostate. Proteins selectively appearing after metabolic labeling in Dunning tumors grown in lactating rats corresponded to labeled proteins in mammary glands from the same animals. Secretory proteins typical of the lateral prostate (SVS II) and dorsal prostate (transglutaminase) could not be detected immunohistochemically in the Dunning tumor. Western blot studies of tumor extracts and slot blot analysis of RNA preparations from the tumor confirmed the absence of SVS II and prostate specific transglutaminase from the Dunning tumor. On the other hand, the presence of mammary gland proteins such as milk fat globule membrane proteins, lactoperoxidase and lactalbumin were detected in the Dunning tumor by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting, but were absent from the dorsolateral prostate. Transferrin-mRNA, expressed in the male urogenital tract and also in the liver and other tissues, was detected in the mammary gland and Dunning tumor, but not in the dorsolateral prostate. The absence of mammary gland secretory beta-casein in the Dunning tumor was related to the elevated Ha-ras oncogene expression in the tumor, previously reported to suppress casein expression. The findings clearly demonstrate that the prostate cannot be the origin of the Dunning tumor, presently being used in prostatic cancer research. The designation prostatic adenocarcinoma for this tumor is therefore invalid. Furthermore, the data support our view that mammary gland might be the origin of the Dunning tumor, although the derivation from the bulbourethral or the parotid glands cannot strictly be excluded.

Comparison of biological effects of a sustained delivery system and nonencapsulated LH-RH antagonist SB-75 in rats

Recently, we developed long-acting microcapsules and microgranules of the LH-RH antagonist SB-75. In this study, we compared the inhibitory effects of a single injection of encapsulated and nonencapsulated LH-RH antagonist SB-75 on gonadotropin and testosterone secretion. The resulting serum SB-75 levels were also measured by RIA. Microgranules containing 4% of this antagonist in poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) were administered IM at two different doses (30 and 60 mg/rat) to male rats. Other groups of rats were injected SC with equivalent doses of nonencapsulated SB-75 (1.25 and 2.5 mg/rat). The administration of microgranules at a dose of 60 mg/rat produced a significant elevation of serum SB-75 until day 76, and serum testosterone and LH levels were suppressed below the detection limit of the RIA for a period of 70 days. An equivalent dose of nonencapsulated SB-75 acetate (2.5 mg/rat) produced a significant elevation of SB-75 levels for 20 days and decreased testosterone to castration values and LH levels for merely 21 days. In rats treated with 30 mg microgranules of SB-75 or an equivalent dose of SB-75 acetate (1.25 mg/rat), serum testosterone and LH were suppressed to a similar extent, but for only 2 weeks. In another study, the effect of a single SC injection of 1.25 mg/rat of antagonist SB-75 on pituitary LH-RH receptors was determined, 7 and 60 days after administration. SB-75 produced a significant (p < 0.01) downregulation of membrane receptors for LH-RH 7 days after administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonistic activity in vitro

Antagonistic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) belong to a class of compounds that can be utilized for treatment of some hormone-dependent cancers and gynecologic disorders. Recently, we synthesized and tested a large number of LHRH analogues for LHRH antagonistic activity in the dispersed pituitary cell superfusion system. This fast, reliable, and dynamic system made it possible for us not only to evaluate the relative amounts of an analogue required for suppression of the LH-releasing activity of exogenous LHRH but also provided quantitative data on dynamic interactions between the LHRH analogue, LHRH receptors, and LH secretion. Three experimental paradigms were used: (i) LHRH responses after preincubation with the antagonist, (ii) pulsatile, simultaneous infusion of LHRH and the antagonistic analogue, and (iii) effects of the analogues on ongoing, continuous LH secretion induced by prolonged stimulation with LHRH. From the data obtained, we conclude that (i) the suppression of the LHRH-induced LH release was more effective and longer lasting when the cells were preincubated with the antagonistic analogues before the LHRH stimulation than in the case of simultaneous exposure; (ii) not only the potency but also the time of onset and the duration of the LH release-suppressing activity varied according to the different peptides used, resulting in different shapes of response curves; and (iii) from the accurate data obtained in this dynamic system, quantitative parameters of the in vivo interactions between the antagonists and LHRH on the LHRH receptor can be calculated.

Evaluation of binding of cytotoxic analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone to human breast cancer and mouse MXT mammary tumor

The binding characteristics of several cytotoxic analogs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) developed in our laboratory were examined in membranes from human breast cancer and estrogen independent MXT mammary cancer. Specific binding of [125I]D-Trp6-LH-RH and the cytotoxic LH-RH analog [125I]T-98 ([D-Lys6]LH-RH coupled to glutaryl-2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone) (HMAQG) was demonstrated in membrane preparations from human breast and MXT mammary tumor cells. Ligand binding of T-98 was specific, saturable, and dependent on temperature, time, and plasma membrane concentration. Analysis of the binding data showed that in human breast cancer, interaction of [125I]T-98 was consistent with the presence of two classes of LH-RH receptors, one class showing high affinity and low capacity, and the other class showing low affinity and high capacity binding. In membranes from MXT mammary cancer, T-98 bound to one class of saturable, specific, noncooperative binding sites with high affinity and low capacity. The rates of association and dissociation for [125I]T-98 were calculated to be 4.757 x 10(8) M-1 min-1 and 0.016 min-1 (t1/2 = 38.7) in membranes from MXT mammary cancer. In human breast cancer, association rate constants (K1a and K1b) were 2.3 x 10(6) M-1 min-1 for binding to high affinity and 1.8 x 10(4) M-1 min-1 for binding to low affinity binding sites. Dissociation rate constants were K-1a = 0.0801 min-1 (t1/2a = 63.4 min) and K-1b = 0.0467 min-1 (t1/2b = 23.5 min), respectively. [125I]T-98 was not displaced by either unlabeled somatostatin or epidermal growth factor, but was displaced completely by unlabeled T-98 or [D-Trp6]LH-RH. The analysis of displacement curves of [D-Trp6]LH-RH by cytotoxic agonists and antagonists of LH-RH synthesized in our laboratory showed that T-121, AJ-11, T-120, T-133, and T-98 were the most potent in displacing [125I]D-Trp6-LH-RH from breast and MXT cancer membranes. Binding kinetics and analyses of displacement curves of [125I]D-Trp6-LH-RH and [125I]T-98 in membranes of human breast cancer and estrogen independent MXT mouse mammary cancer suggest that binding of the cytotoxic analog T-98 to the LH-RH receptor proceeds reversibly like that of its congeners without cytotoxic radicals. Our findings may provide a stimulus for further studies with LH-RH analogs carrying cytotoxic radicals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Inhibition of growth of PC-82 human prostate cancer line xenografts in nude mice by bombesin antagonist RC-3095 or combination of agonist [D-Trp6]-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin analog RC-160

The effects of treatment with a bombesin receptor antagonist [D-Tpi6, Leu13 psi (CH2NH) Leu14]BN(6-14)(RC-3095) and the combination of an agonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [D-Trp6]-LH-RH and somatostatin analog D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Val- Cys-Trp-NH2 (RC-160) were studied in nude mice bearing xenografts of the hormone-dependent human prostate tumor PC-82. During the 5 weeks of treatment, tumor growth was decreased in all treated groups compared with controls. Bombesin antagonist RC-3095 and the combination of [D-Trp6]-LH-RH and RC-160 caused a greater inhibition of tumor growth than [D-Trp6]-LH-RH or RC-160 alone as based on measurement of tumor volume and percentage change in tumor volume. The largest decrease in tumor weight was also seen in the groups treated with the bombesin antagonist and with the combination of RC-160 and [D-Trp6]-LH-RH. Serum prostatic-specific antigen levels were greatly decreased, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) as well as growth hormone levels were reduced in all treated groups. Specific binding sites for [D-Trp6]-LH-RH, epidermal growth factor (EGF), IGF-I, and somatostatin (SS-14) were found in the tumor membranes. Receptors for EGF were significantly down-regulated by treatment with the bombesin antagonist or RC-160. Combination of LH-RH agonists with somatostatin analog RC-160 might be considered for improvement of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. The finding that bombesin antagonist RC-3095 inhibits the growth of PC-82 prostate cancer suggests the merit of further studies to evaluate the possible usefulness of antagonists of bombesin in the management of prostatic carcinoma.

Effect of microcapsules of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist SB-75 and somatostatin analog RC-160 on endocrine status and tumor growth in the Dunning R-3327H rat prostate cancer model

Inhibitory effects of sustained delivery systems (microcapsules) of the modern antagonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [Ac-D-Nal(2)1, D-Phe(4Cl)2, D-Pal(3)3, D-Cit6, D-Ala10]LH-RH (SB-75) or the potent somatostatin analog D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys-Trp-NH2 (RC-160) were investigated in the Dunning R-3327H rat prostate cancer model. In the first experiment, the treatment was started 4 months after tumor transplantation, when the tumors measured approximately 2 cm3. Tumor volumes and weights were significantly reduced by SB-75 microcapsules releasing 48 micrograms/day or RC-160 microcapsules releasing 38 micrograms/day given alone, as compared with the control. The combination of these two analogs showed a synergistic effect. In the second experiment, the treatment was started 7 months after tumor transplantation, when the tumors were well developed and measured about 16 cm3. In addition to a significant reduction in volume, weight, and growth rate of tumors, histological signs of tumor regression were found in the groups treated with SB-75 microcapsules releasing 72 micrograms/day given alone or in combination with RC-160 microcapsules releasing 76 micrograms/day, but not with RC-160 alone. No synergistic effect of the combination therapy was found in the second experiment. Serum testosterone levels decreased to undetectable levels and LH levels were also diminished within 2 weeks by administration of SB-75 alone or in combination with RC-160. In both experiments, the weights of testes, ventral prostate, and seminal vesicles were greatly reduced by administration of SB-75 alone or in combination with RC-160. Our results suggest that the combined therapy with microcapsules of SB-75 and RC-160, started soon after the diagnosis of prostate cancer is made, could improve therapeutic response.

Blockade of the LH response induced by the agonist D-Trp-6-LHRH in rats by a highly potent LH-RH antagonist SB-75

During treatment of prostate cancer patients with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, a transient LH and sex steroid release, which precedes the secretion blockade, may result in a flare-up of the disease, whereas the antagonists induce an immediate suppression. The administration of the modern, superactive LHRH antagonist SB-75 before or together with the agonist D-Trp-6-LHRH should prevent the "flare-up" phenomena. In order to demonstrate that the LHRH antagonist can prevent the initial stimulation of gonadotropins in response to LHRH agonists, groups of 5-7 male rats were injected s.c. with the antagonist SB-75 in doses in 100, 500, and 1,000 micrograms/rat 1 hour prior to or 1, 2, and 3 days before administration of D-Trp-6-LHRH agonist (50 micrograms/rat). Supraphysiological doses of the agonist were used in order to obtain prolonged stimulation of LH release, which was necessary to study the duration and the extent of LH release inhibition. Blood samples were taken before and 2, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after D-Trp-6-LHRH stimulation for measurement of LH levels. The administration of SB-75 in doses of 500 and 1,000 micrograms/rat 3 days prior to administration of the agonist significantly lowered LH response (P less than 0.01), as compared to animals injected with D-Trp-6-LHRH alone. The D-Trp-6-LHRH-stimulated LH secretion was markedly more suppressed by all 3 doses of the antagonist in rats pretreated with SB-75 2 days prior to the stimulation with the agonist. An even greater reduction in LH response could be observed in rats injected with SB-75 1 day prior to the agonist, the magnitude of LH response being decreased by 75% with 500 micrograms/rat SB-75 and by 90% with 1 mg/rat SB-75. The LH response was virtually abolished when the antagonist, SB-75 was given in doses of 500 or 1,000 micrograms/rat 1 hour prior to the D-Trp-6-LHRH injection. Under these conditions, the agonist-induced LH and testosterone secretion was completely suppressed during the whole period of the experiment. The antagonist to agonist dose ratio of 2 to 1 produced a 90% decrease in the LH response to D-Trp-6-LHRH at 2 hours and 75% at 5 hours after agonist administration. The effects of LHRH decapeptide itself (500 micrograms/rat) on LH secretion could be totally suppressed by an injection of 50 micrograms/rat of SB-75 1 hour beforehand.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Inhibition of growth of experimental prostate cancer with sustained delivery systems (microcapsules and microgranules) of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist SB-75

Inhibitory effects of the sustained delivery systems (microcapsules and microgranules) of a potent antagonist of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone N-Ac-[3-(2-naphthyl)-D-alanine1, 4-chloro-D-phenylalanine2, 3-(3-pyridyl)-D-alanine3, D-citrulline6, D-alanine10]LH-RH (SB-75) on the growth of experimental prostate cancers were investigated. In the first experiment, three doses of a microcapsule preparation releasing 23.8, 47.6, and 71.4 micrograms of antagonist SB-75 per day were compared with microcapsules of agonist [D-Trp6]LH-RH liberating 25 micrograms/day in rats bearing Dunning R3327H transplantable prostate carcinoma. During 8 weeks of treatment, tumor growth was decreased by [D-Trp6]LH-RH and all three doses of SB-75 as compared to untreated controls. The highest dose of SB-75 (71.4 micrograms/day) caused a greater inhibition of prostate cancer growth than [D-Trp6]LH-RH as based on measurement of tumor volume and percentage change in tumor volume. Doses of 23.8 and 47.6 micrograms of SB-75 per day induced a partial and submaximal decrease, respectively, in tumor weight and volume. Tumor doubling time was the longest (50 days) with the high dose of SB-75 vs. 15 days for controls. The body weights were unchanged. The weights of testes, seminal vesicles, and ventral prostate were greatly reduced in all three groups that received SB-75, and testosterone levels were decreased to nondetectable values in the case of the two higher doses of SB-75. LH levels were also diminished. Similar results were obtained in the second experiment, in which the animals were treated for a period of 8 weeks with microgranules of SB-75. Therapy with microgranules of SB-75 significantly decreased tumor growth as measured by the final tumor volume, the percentage change from the initial tumor volume, and the reduction in tumor weight. The results indicate that antagonist SB-75, released from sustained delivery systems, can produce a state of chemical castration and effectively inhibit the growth of experimental prostate cancers. The efficacy of the antagonist SB-75 in inhibiting androgen-dependent Dunning prostatic carcinoma and the absence of side effects suggest its possible usefulness for the treatment of hormone-sensitive tumors.