Serum FGF21 levels in adult m.3243A>G carriers: clinical implications

Biomarkers of mitochondrial disorders

Mitochondrial diseases encompass a heterogeneous group of disorders with a wide range of clinical manifestations, most classically resulting in neurological, muscular, and metabolic abnormalities, but having the potential to affect any organ system. Over the years, substantial progress has been made in identifying and characterizing various biomarkers associated with mitochondrial diseases. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mitochondrial biomarkers based on a literature review and discusses the evidence behind their use in clinical practice. A total of 13 biomarkers were thoroughly reviewed including lactate, pyruvate, lactate:pyruvate ratio, creatine kinase, creatine, amino acid profiles, glutathione, malondialdehyde, GDF-15, FGF-21, gelsolin, neurofilament light-chain, and circulating cell-free mtDNA. Most biomarkers had mixed findings depending on the study, especially when considering their utility for specific mitochondrial diseases versus mitochondrial conditions in general. However, in large biomarker comparison studies, GDF-15 followed by FGF-21, seem to have the greatest value though they are still not perfect. As such, additional studies are needed, especially in light of newer biomarkers that have not yet been thoroughly investigated. Understanding the landscape of biomarkers in mitochondrial diseases is crucial for advancing early detection, improving patient management, and developing targeted therapies.

The West of Scotland Cohort of Mitochondrial Individuals with the m.3243A>G Variant: Variations in Phenotypes and Predictors of Disease Severity

BACKGROUND

The m.3243A>G variant is the commonest mitochondrial (mt) DNA pathogenic variant and a frequent cause of mitochondrial disease. Individuals present with a variety of clinical manifestations from diabetes to neurological events resembling strokes. Due to this, patients are commonly cared for by a multidisciplinary team.

OBJECTIVES

This project aimed to identify patients with confirmed mt.3243A>G-related mitochondrial disease attending the Muscle Clinic at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow. We explored potential correlates between clinical phenotypes and mtDNA heteroplasmy levels, HbA1c levels, body mass index, and specific clinical manifestations. We investigated if there were discrepancies between non-neurological speciality labelling in clinical records and individuals' phenotypes.

METHODS

Data were gathered from the West of Scotland electronic records. Phenotypes were ascertained by a clinician with expertise in mitochondrial disorders. Statistical analyses were applied to study relationships between tissue heteroplasmy, HbA1c and clinical phenotypes including body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Forty-six individuals were identified from 31 unrelated pedigrees. Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness was the prominent syndromic phenotype (48%). A significant association was found between overall number of symptoms and bowel dysmotility (p < 0.01). HbA1c was investigated as a predictor of severity with potential association seen. Although used widely as a prognosticator, neither corrected blood nor urine mtDNA heteroplasmy levels were associated with increased number of symptoms. In 74.1% of records, syndromic phenotypes were incorrectly used by non-neurological specialities.

CONCLUSIONS

This m.3243 A > G patient cohort present with marked clinical heterogeneity. Urine and blood heteroplasmy levels are not reliable predictors of disease severity. HbA1c may be a novel predictor of disease severity with further research required to investigate this association. We infer that prognosis may be worse in patients with low BMIs and in those with bowel dysmotility. These results underscore a multidisciplinary approach and highlight a problem with inaccurate use of the existing nomenclature.

Circulating FGF21 and GDF15 as Biomarkers for Screening, Diagnosis, and Severity Assessment of Primary Mitochondrial Disorders in Children

BACKGROUND

Primary mitochondrial disorders (PMDs) are a diagnostic challenge for paediatricians, and identification of reliable and easily measurable biomarkers has become a high priority. This study aimed to investigate the role of serum fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in children with PMDs.

METHODS

We analysed serum FGF21 and GDF15 concentrations by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in children with PMDs, patients with non-mitochondrial neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), and aged-matched healthy children, and compared them with serum lactate and ratio of lactate and pyruvate (L/P). We also evaluated correlations between these biomarkers and the phenotype, genotype, and severity of PMDs.

RESULTS

The median serum GDF15 and FGF21 concentrations were significantly elevated in fifty-one patients with PMDs (919.46 pg/ml and 281.3 pg/ml) compared with those of thirty patients with NMDs (294.86 pg/ml and 140.51 pg/ml, both P < 0.05) and fifty healthy controls (221.21 pg/ml and 85.02 pg/ml, both P < 0.05). The area under the curve of GDF15 for the diagnosis of PMDs was 0.891, which was higher than that of the other biomarkers, including FGF21 (0.814), lactate (0.863) and L/P ratio (0.671). Calculated by the maximum Youden index, the critical value of GDF15 was 606.369 pg/ml, and corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 74.5and 100%. In the PMD group, FGF21 was significantly correlated with International Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (IPMDS) score. The levels of GDF15 and FGF21 were positively correlated with age, critical illness condition, and multisystem involvement but were not correlated with syndromic/non-syndromic PMDs, different mitochondrial syndromes, nuclear DNA/mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants, gene functions, or different organ/system involvement.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of clinical phenotype and genotype, circulating GDF15 and FGF21 are reliable biomarkers for children with PMDs. GDF15 can serve as a screening biomarker for diagnosis, and FGF21 can serve as a severity biomarker for monitoring.

FGF21 outperforms GDF15 as a diagnostic biomarker of mitochondrial disease in children

Several studies have shown serum fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) levels are elevated in patients with mitochondrial disease (MD) where myopathy is a feature. In this study we investigated the utility of FGF21 and GDF15 as biomarkers for MD in a phenotypically and genotypically diverse pediatric cohort with suspected MD against a panel of healthy controls and non-mitochondrial disease controls with some overlapping clinical features. Serum was collected from 56 children with MD, 104 children with non-mitochondrial disease (27 neuromuscular, 26 cardiac, 21 hepatic, 30 renal) and 30 pediatric controls. Serum FGF21 and GDF15 concentrations were measured using ELISA, and their ability to detect MD was determined. Median FGF21 and GDF15 serum concentrations were elevated 17-fold and 3-fold respectively in pediatric MD patients compared to the healthy control group. Non-mitochondrial disease controls had elevated serum GDF15 concentrations while FGF21 concentrations were in the normal range. Elevation of GDF15 in a range of non-mitochondrial pediatric disorders limits its use as a MD biomarker. FGF21 was elevated in MD patients with a spectrum of clinical phenotypes, including those without myopathy. Serum FGF21 had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, indicating good ability to discriminate between pediatric MD and healthy and non-mitochondrial disease controls. Triaging of pediatric MD patients by clinical phenotyping and serum FGF21 testing, followed by massively parallel sequencing, may enable more rapid diagnosis of pediatric MD.

Blood biomarkers for assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction: An expert review

Although mitochondrial dysfunction is the known cause of primary mitochondrial disease, mitochondrial dysfunction is often difficult to measure and prove, especially when biopsies of affected tissue are not available. In order to identify blood biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction, we reviewed studies that measured blood biomarkers in genetically, clinically or biochemically confirmed primary mitochondrial disease patients. In this way, we were certain that there was an underlying mitochondrial dysfunction which could validate the biomarker. We found biomarkers of three classes: 1) functional markers measured in blood cells, 2) biochemical markers of serum/plasma and 3) DNA markers. While none of the reviewed single biomarkers may perfectly reveal all underlying mitochondrial dysfunction, combining biomarkers that cover different aspects of mitochondrial impairment probably is a good strategy. This biomarker panel may assist in the diagnosis of primary mitochondrial disease patients. As mitochondrial dysfunction may also play a significant role in the pathophysiology of multifactorial disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and glaucoma, the panel may serve to assess mitochondrial dysfunction in complex multifactorial diseases as well and enable selection of patients who could benefit from therapies targeting mitochondria.

The Saga of Endocrine FGFs

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are cell-signaling proteins with diverse functions in cell development, repair, and metabolism. The human FGF family consists of 22 structurally related members, which can be classified into three separate groups based on their action of mechanisms, namely: intracrine, paracrine/autocrine, and endocrine FGF subfamilies. FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23 belong to the hormone-like/endocrine FGF subfamily. These endocrine FGFs are mainly associated with the regulation of cell metabolic activities such as homeostasis of lipids, glucose, energy, bile acids, and minerals (phosphate/active vitamin D). Endocrine FGFs function through a unique protein family called klotho. Two members of this family, α-klotho, or β-klotho, act as main cofactors which can scaffold to tether FGF19/21/23 to their receptor(s) (FGFRs) to form an active complex. There are ongoing studies pertaining to the structure and mechanism of these individual ternary complexes. These studies aim to provide potential insights into the physiological and pathophysiological roles and therapeutic strategies for metabolic diseases. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the history, structure–function relationship(s), downstream signaling, physiological roles, and future perspectives on endocrine FGFs.

Serum fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth differentiation factor 15: Two sensitive biomarkers in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders

Mitochondrial disorders are often difficult to diagnose because of diverse clinical phenotypes. FGF-21 and GDF-15 are metabolic hormones and promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of these disorders. This study has systematically evaluated serum FGF-21 and GDF-15 levels by ELISA in a well-defined cohort of patients with definite mitochondrial disorders (n = 30), neuromuscular disease controls (n = 36) and healthy controls (n = 36) and aimed to ascertain their utility in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders. Both serum FGF-21 and GDF-15 were significantly elevated in patients with mitochondrial disorders, especially in those with muscle involvement. The levels were higher in patients with mitochondrial deletions (both single and multiple) and translation disorders compared to respiratory chain subunit or assembly factor defects.

Plasma Gelsolin Reinforces the Diagnostic Value of FGF-21 and GDF-15 for Mitochondrial Disorders

Mitochondrial disorders (MD) comprise a group of heterogeneous clinical disorders for which non-invasive diagnosis remains a challenge. Two protein biomarkers have so far emerged for MD detection, FGF-21 and GDF-15, but the identification of additional biomarkers capable of improving their diagnostic accuracy is highly relevant. Previous studies identified Gelsolin as a regulator of cell survival adaptations triggered by mitochondrial defects. Gelsolin presents a circulating plasma isoform (pGSN), whose altered levels could be a hallmark of mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, we investigated the diagnostic performance of pGSN for MD relative to FGF-21 and GDF-15. Using ELISA assays, we quantified plasma levels of pGSN, FGF-21, and GDF-15 in three age- and gender-matched adult cohorts: 60 genetically diagnosed MD patients, 56 healthy donors, and 41 patients with unrelated neuromuscular pathologies (non-MD). Clinical variables and biomarkers’ plasma levels were compared between groups. Discrimination ability was calculated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Optimal cut-offs and the following diagnostic parameters were determined: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and efficiency. Comprehensive statistical analyses revealed significant discrimination ability for the three biomarkers to classify between MD and healthy individuals, with the best diagnostic performance for the GDF-15/pGSN combination. pGSN and GDF-15 preferentially discriminated between MD and non-MD patients under 50 years, whereas FGF-21 best classified older subjects. Conclusion: pGSN improves the diagnosis accuracy for MD provided by FGF-21 and GDF-15.

Diagnostic value of serum biomarkers FGF21 and GDF15 compared to muscle sample in mitochondrial disease

The aim of this study was to compare the value of serum biomarkers, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), with histological analysis of muscle in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disease. We collected 194 serum samples from patients with a suspected or known mitochondrial disease. Biomarkers were analyzed blinded using enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay. Clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Only 39% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease had mitochondrial pathology in their muscle histology. In contrast, biomarkers were elevated in 62% of patients with genetically verified mitochondrial disease. Those with both biomarkers elevated had a muscle manifesting disorder and a defect affecting mitochondrial DNA expression. If at least one of the biomarkers was induced and the patient had a myopathic disease, a mitochondrial DNA expression disease was the cause with 94% probability. Among patients with biomarker analysis and muscle biopsy taken <12 months apart, a mitochondrial disorder would have been identified in 70% with analysis of FGF21 and GDF15 compared to 50% of patients whom could have been identified with muscle biopsy alone. Muscle findings were nondiagnostic in 72% (children) and 45% (adults). Induction of FGF21 and GDF15 suggest a mitochondrial etiology as an underlying cause of a muscle manifesting disease. Normal biomarker values do not, however, rule out a mitochondrial disorder, especially if the disease does not manifest in muscle. We suggest that FGF21 and GDF15 together should be first-line diagnostic investigations in mitochondrial disease complementing muscle biopsy.

Mitochondriopathies as a Clue to Systemic Disorders-Analytical Tools and Mitigating Measures in Context of Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized (3P) Medicine

The mitochondrial respiratory chain is the main site of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the cell. Although mitochondria possess a powerful antioxidant system, an excess of ROS cannot be completely neutralized and cumulative oxidative damage may lead to decreasing mitochondrial efficiency in energy production, as well as an increasing ROS excess, which is known to cause a critical imbalance in antioxidant/oxidant mechanisms and a "vicious circle" in mitochondrial injury. Due to insufficient energy production, chronic exposure to ROS overproduction consequently leads to the oxidative damage of life-important biomolecules, including nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and amino acids, among others. Different forms of mitochondrial dysfunction (mitochondriopathies) may affect the brain, heart, peripheral nervous and endocrine systems, eyes, ears, gut, and kidney, among other organs. Consequently, mitochondriopathies have been proposed as an attractive diagnostic target to be investigated in any patient with unexplained progressive multisystem disorder. This review article highlights the pathomechanisms of mitochondriopathies, details advanced analytical tools, and suggests predictive approaches, targeted prevention and personalization of medical services as instrumental for the overall management of mitochondriopathy-related cascading pathologies.

Accuracy of FGF-21 and GDF-15 for the diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders: A meta-analysis

Objective

Given their diverse phenotypes, mitochondrial diseases (MDs) are often difficult to diagnose. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF‐21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF‐15) represent promising biomarkers for MD diagnosis. Herein we conducted a meta‐analysis to compare their diagnostic accuracy for MDs.

Methods

We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to 1 January 2020. Data were analyzed by two independent reviewers. We obtained the sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR‐), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves of each diagnostic method.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1563 participants (five encompassing 718 FGF‐21 assessments; seven encompassing 845 participants for GDF‐15) were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and SROC of FGF‐21 were 0.71 (95% CI 0.53, 0.84), 0.88(95% CI 0.82, 0.93), 18 (95% CI 6, 54), 0.90 (95% CI 0.87, 0.92), respectively, which were lower than GDF‐15 values; 0.83 (95% CI 0.65, 0.92), 0.92 (95% CI 0.84, 0.96), 52 (95% CI 13, 205), 0.94 (95% CI 0.92, 0.96).

Interpretation

FGF‐21 and GDF‐15 showed acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. Of the biomarkers, GDF‐15 had the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Fibroblast growth factor 21 and grow differentiation factor 15 are sensitive biomarkers of mitochondrial diseases due to mitochondrial transfer-RNA mutations and mitochondrial DNA deletions

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of mitochondrial diseases (MDs) is challenging, since they are multisystemic disorders, characterized by a heterogeneous symptomatology. Recently, an increase in serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has been found in the majority of patients with MDs compared with healthy controls. On the other hand, the finding of low FGF21 and GDF15 levels in some patients with MDs suggests that different types of respiratory chain defects may lead to different profiles of these two proteins.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to validate the diagnostic reliability of FGF21 and GDF15 assays in MDs and to evaluate a possible correlation between serum levels of the two biomarkers with genotype of MD patients. Serum FGF21 and GDF15 levels were measured by a quantitative ELISA.

RESULTS

Our results showed increased serum FGF21 and GDF15 levels in MD patients; however, GDF15 measurement seems to be more sensitive and specific for screening tests for MD than FGF21. Moreover, we showed a positive correlation with both FGF21 and GDF15 levels and the number of COX-negative fibers.

CONCLUSION

Finally, we also demonstrated that the increase of FGF21 and GDF15 was related to MDs caused by mitochondrial translation defects, and multiple and single mtDNA deletions, but not to MDs due to mutations in the respiratory chain subunits.

Oxidative Phosphorylation Dysfunction Modifies the Cell Secretome

Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation disorders are extremely heterogeneous conditions. Their clinical and genetic variability makes the identification of reliable and specific biomarkers very challenging. Until now, only a few studies have focused on the effect of a defective oxidative phosphorylation functioning on the cell’s secretome, although it could be a promising approach for the identification and pre-selection of potential circulating biomarkers for mitochondrial diseases. Here, we review the insights obtained from secretome studies with regard to oxidative phosphorylation dysfunction, and the biomarkers that appear, so far, to be promising to identify mitochondrial diseases. We propose two new biomarkers to be taken into account in future diagnostic trials.

Muscle Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) Deficiency: A Conceptual Approach

Carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT) catalyzes the transfer of long- and medium-chain fatty acids from cytoplasm into mitochondria, where oxidation of fatty acids takes place. Deficiency of CPT enzyme is associated with rare diseases of fatty acid metabolism. CPT is present in two subforms: CPT I at the outer mitochondrial membrane and carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) inside the mitochondria. Deficiency of CPT II results in the most common inherited disorder of long-chain fatty acid oxidation affecting skeletal muscle. There is a lethal neonatal form, a severe infantile hepato-cardio-muscular form, and a rather mild myopathic form characterized by exercise-induced myalgia, weakness, and myoglobinuria. Total CPT activity (CPT I + CPT II) in muscles of CPT II-deficient patients is generally normal. Nevertheless, in some patients, not detectable to reduced total activities are also reported. CPT II protein is also shown in normal concentration in patients with normal CPT enzymatic activity. However, residual CPT II shows abnormal inhibition sensitivity towards malonyl-CoA, Triton X-100 and fatty acid metabolites in patients. Genetic studies have identified a common p.Ser113Leu mutation in the muscle form along with around 100 different rare mutations. The biochemical consequences of these mutations have been controversial. Hypotheses include lack of enzymatically active protein, partial enzyme deficiency and abnormally regulated enzyme. The recombinant enzyme experiments that we recently conducted have shown that CPT II enzyme is extremely thermoliable and is abnormally inhibited by different emulsifiers and detergents such as malonyl-CoA, palmitoyl-CoA, palmitoylcarnitine, Tween 20 and Triton X-100. Here, we present a conceptual overview on CPT II deficiency based on our own findings and on results from other studies addressing clinical, biochemical, histological, immunohistological and genetic aspects, as well as recent advancements in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies in this disorder.

Normal FGF-21-Serum Levels in Patients with Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) Deficiency

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) is known to be a biomarker for mitochondrial disorders. An upregulation of FGF-21 in serum and muscle of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) knock-out mice has been reported. In human CPT II deficiency, enzyme activity and protein content are normal, but the enzyme is abnormally regulated by malonyl-CoA and is abnormally thermolabile. Citrate synthase (CS) activity is increased in patients with CPT II deficiency. This may indicate a compensatory response to an impaired function of CPT II. In this study, FGF-21 serum levels in patients with CPT II deficiency during attack free intervals and in healthy controls were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The data showed no significant difference between FGF-21 concentration in the serum of patients with CPT II deficiency and that in the healthy controls. The results of the present work support the hypothesis that in muscle CPT II deficiency, in contrast to the mouse knockout model, mitochondrial fatty acid utilization is not persistently reduced. Thus, FGF-21 does not seem to be a useful biomarker in the diagnosis of CPT II deficiency.

The KHENERGY Study: Safety and Efficacy of KH176 in Mitochondrial m.3243A>G Spectrum Disorders

KH176 is a potent intracellular reduction-oxidation-modulating compound developed to treat mitochondrial disease. We studied tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of twice daily oral 100 mg KH176 for 28 days in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover phase IIA study in 18 adult m.3243A>G patients without cardiovascular involvement. Efficacy parameters included clinical and functional outcome measures and biomarkers. The trial was registered within ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02909400), the European Clinical Trials Database (2016-001696-79), and ISRCTN (43372293) (The KHENERGY study). Twice daily oral 100 mg KH176 was well tolerated and appeared safe. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. No significant improvements in gait parameters or other outcome measures were obtained, except for a positive effect on alertness and mood, although a coincidence due to multiplicity cannot be ignored. The results of the study provide first data on safety and efficacy of KH176 in patients with mitochondrial disease and will be instrumental in designing future clinical trials.

Biomarkers for mitochondrial energy metabolism diseases

Biomarkers are an indicator of biologic or pathogenic processes, whose function is indicating the presence/absence of disease or monitoring disease course and its response to treatment. Since mitochondrial disorders (MDs) can represent a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, due to their clinical and genetic heterogeneity, the identification of easily measurable biomarkers becomes a high priority. Given the complexity of MD, in particular the primary mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) diseases due to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) dysfunction, a reliable single biomarker, relevant for the whole disease group, could be extremely difficult to find, most of times leading the physicians to better consider a 'biosignature' for the diagnosis, rather than a single biochemical marker. Serum biomarkers like lactate and pyruvate are largely determined in the diagnostic algorithm of MD, but they are not specific to this group of disorders. The concomitant determination of creatine (Cr), plasma amino acids, and urine organic acids might be helpful to reinforce the biosignature in some cases. In recent studies, serum fibroblast growth factor 21 (sFGF21) and serum growth differentiation factor 15 (sGDF15) appear to be promising molecules in identifying MD. Moreover, new different approaches have been developed to discover new MD biomarkers. This work discusses the most important biomarkers currently used in the diagnosis of MRC diseases, and some approaches under evaluation, discussing both their utility and weaknesses.

Biomarkers for Detecting Mitochondrial Disorders

(1) Objectives: Mitochondrial disorders (MIDs) are a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous group of slowly or rapidly progressive disorders with onset from birth to senescence. Because of their variegated clinical presentation, MIDs are difficult to diagnose and are frequently missed in their early and late stages. This is why there is a need to provide biomarkers, which can be easily obtained in the case of suspecting a MID to initiate the further diagnostic work-up. (2) Methods: Literature review. (3) Results: Biomarkers for diagnostic purposes are used to confirm a suspected diagnosis and to facilitate and speed up the diagnostic work-up. For diagnosing MIDs, a number of dry and wet biomarkers have been proposed. Dry biomarkers for MIDs include the history and clinical neurological exam and structural and functional imaging studies of the brain, muscle, or myocardium by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MR-spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), or functional MRI. Wet biomarkers from blood, urine, saliva, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for diagnosing MIDs include lactate, creatine-kinase, pyruvate, organic acids, amino acids, carnitines, oxidative stress markers, and circulating cytokines. The role of microRNAs, cutaneous respirometry, biopsy, exercise tests, and small molecule reporters as possible biomarkers is unsolved. (4) Conclusions: The disadvantages of most putative biomarkers for MIDs are that they hardly meet the criteria for being acceptable as a biomarker (missing longitudinal studies, not validated, not easily feasible, not cheap, not ubiquitously available) and that not all MIDs manifest in the brain, muscle, or myocardium. There is currently a lack of validated biomarkers for diagnosing MIDs.

Monitoring clinical progression with mitochondrial disease biomarkers

Mitochondrial disorders are genetically determined metabolic diseases due to a biochemical deficiency of the respiratory chain. Given that multi-system involvement and disease progression are common features of mitochondrial disorders they carry substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite this, no disease-modifying treatments exist with clear clinical benefits, and the current best management of mitochondrial disease is supportive. Several therapeutic strategies for mitochondrial disorders are now at a mature preclinical stage. Some are making the transition into early-phase patient trials, but the lack of validated biomarkers of disease progression presents a challenge when developing new therapies for patients. This update discusses current biomarkers of mitochondrial disease progression including metabolomics, circulating serum markers, exercise physiology, and both structural and functional imaging. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and consider emerging techniques with a potential role in trials of new therapies.

Mitochondrial disorders in children: toward development of small-molecule treatment strategies

This review presents our current understanding of the pathophysiology and potential treatment strategies with respect to mitochondrial disease in children. We focus on pathologies due to mutations in nuclear DNA‐encoded structural and assembly factors of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system, with a particular emphasis on isolated mitochondrial complex I deficiency. Following a brief introduction into mitochondrial disease and OXPHOS function, an overview is provided of the diagnostic process in children with mitochondrial disorders. This includes the impact of whole‐exome sequencing and relevance of cellular complementation studies. Next, we briefly present how OXPHOS mutations can affect cellular parameters, primarily based on studies in patient‐derived fibroblasts, and how this information can be used for the rational design of small‐molecule treatment strategies. Finally, we discuss clinical trial design and provide an overview of small molecules that are currently being developed for treatment of mitochondrial disease.

Use of FGF-21 as a Biomarker of Mitochondrial Disease in Clinical Practice

Recent work has suggested that fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) is a useful biomarker of mitochondrial disease (MD). We routinely measured FGF-21 levels on patients who were investigated at our centre for MD and evaluated its diagnostic performance based on detailed genetic and other laboratory findings. Patients’ FGF-21 results were assessed by the use of age-adjusted z-scores based on normalised FGF-21 values from a healthy population. One hundred and fifty five patients were investigated. One hundred and four of these patients had molecular evidence for MD, 27 were deemed to have disorders other than MD (non-MD), and 24 had possible MD. Patients with defects in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) maintenance (n = 32) and mtDNA rearrangements (n = 17) had the highest median FGF-21 among the MD group. Other MD patients harbouring mtDNA point mutations (n = 40) or mutations in other autosomal genes (n = 7) and those with partially characterised MD had lower FGF-21 levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for distinguishing MD from non-MD patients was 0.69. No correlation between FGF-21 and creatinine, creatine kinase, or cardio-skeletal myopathy score was found. FGF-21 was significantly associated with plasma lactate and ocular myopathy. Although FGF-21 was found to have a low sensitivity for detecting MD, at a z-score of 2.8, its specificity was above 90%. We suggest that a high serum concentration of FGF-21 would be clinically useful in MD, especially in adult patients with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, and may enable bypassing muscle biopsy and directly opting for genetic analysis. Availability of its assay has thus modified our diagnostic pathway.

Successful Glycemic Control Decreases the Elevated Serum FGF21 Level without Affecting Normal Serum GDF15 Levels in a Patient with Mitochondrial Diabetes

Mitochondrial diabetes mellitus is a subtype of diabetes linked to mutations in mitochondrial DNA. In patients with mitochondrial diabetes mellitus, the effect of glycemic control on the serum concentrations of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has not been evaluated. FGF21 and GDF15 have been reported to be useful biomarkers for the diagnosis and severity assessment of mitochondrial diseases like mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS). Recent studies have shown FGF21 acts in an endocrine fashion to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus, while the exact biological functions of GDF15 remain unknown. Although mitochondrial diabetes mellitus is commonly found in cases with mitochondrial diseases, the comparison of FGF21 and GDF15 levels between those with and without diabetes has not been performed. Here, we report a 24-year-old woman with mitochondrial diabetes mellitus, who showed a high level of serum FGF21, but not serum GDF15, at diagnosis. In our case, liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, added to insulin glargine was effective for her glycemic control and showed no adverse effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycemia, during a 14-week observation. The successful glycemic control caused a decrease in the FGF21 level, without affecting the GDF15 level. Thus, we should consider patients' glycemic control levels in using FGF21 values for the diagnosis of mitochondrial diseases. In addition, sustained GDF15 levels during glycemic treatment in our case suggest the usefulness of GDF15 as a marker for clinical severity of muscle-manifested mitochondrial diseases.

Is 2D speckle tracking echocardiography useful for detecting and monitoring myocardial dysfunction in adult m.3243A>G carriers? - a retrospective pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Cardiomyopathy is a common complication of mitochondrial disorders, associated with increased mortality. Two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) can be used to quantify myocardial deformation. Here, we aimed to determine the usefulness of 2DSTE in detecting and monitoring subtle changes in myocardial dysfunction in carriers of the 3243A>G mutation in mitochondrial DNA.

METHODS

In this retrospective pilot study, 30 symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers of the mitochondrial 3243A>G mutation of whom two subsequent echocardiograms were available were included. We measured longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain using 2DSTE. Results were compared to published reference values.

RESULTS

Speckle tracking was feasible in 90 % of the patients for longitudinal strain. Circumferential and radial strain showed low face validity (low number of images with sufficient quality; suboptimal tracking) and were therefore rejected for further analysis. Global longitudinal strain showed good face validity, and was abnormal in 56-70 % (depending on reference values used) of the carriers (n = 27). Reproducibility was good (mean difference of 0.83 for inter- and 0.40 for intra-rater reproducibility; ICC 0.78 and 0.89, respectively). The difference between the first and the second measurement exceeded the measurement variance in 39 % of the cases (n = 23; feasibility of follow-up 77 %).

DISCUSSION

Even in data collected as part of clinical care, two-dimensional strain echocardiography seems a feasible method to detect and monitor subtle changes in longitudinal myocardial deformation in adult carriers of the mitochondrial 3243A>G mutation. Based on our data and the reported accuracy of global longitudinal strain in other studies, we suggest the use of global longitudinal strain in a prospective follow-up or intervention study.

FGF21 is a biomarker for mitochondrial translation and mtDNA maintenance disorders

OBJECTIVE

To validate new mitochondrial myopathy serum biomarkers for diagnostic use.

METHODS

We analyzed serum FGF21 (S-FGF21) and GDF15 from patients with (1) mitochondrial diseases and (2) nonmitochondrial disorders partially overlapping with mitochondrial disorder phenotypes. We (3) did a meta-analysis of S-FGF21 in mitochondrial disease and (4) analyzed S-Fgf21 and skeletal muscle Fgf21 expression in 6 mouse models with different muscle-manifesting mitochondrial dysfunctions.

RESULTS

We report that S-FGF21 consistently increases in primary mitochondrial myopathy, especially in patients with mitochondrial translation defects or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions (675 and 347 pg/mL, respectively; controls: 66 pg/mL, p < 0.0001 for both). This is corroborated in mice (mtDNA deletions 1,163 vs 379 pg/mL, p < 0.0001). However, patients and mice with structural respiratory chain subunit or assembly factor defects showed low induction (human 335 pg/mL, p < 0.05; mice 335 pg/mL, not significant). Overall specificities of FGF21 and GDF15 to find patients with mitochondrial myopathy were 89.3% vs 86.4%, and sensitivities 67.3% and 76.0%, respectively. However, GDF15 was increased also in a wide range of nonmitochondrial conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

S-FGF21 is a specific biomarker for muscle-manifesting defects of mitochondrial translation, including mitochondrial transfer-RNA mutations and primary and secondary mtDNA deletions, the most common causes of mitochondrial disease. However, normal S-FGF21 does not exclude structural respiratory chain complex or assembly factor defects, important to acknowledge in diagnostics.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that elevated S-FGF21 accurately distinguishes patients with mitochondrial myopathies from patients with other conditions, and FGF21 and GDF15 mitochondrial myopathy from other myopathies.

Mitochondrial disease in adults: what's old and what's new?

Ten years ago, there was an emerging view that the molecular basis for adult mitochondrial disorders was largely known and that the clinical phenotypes had been well described. Nothing could have been further from the truth. The establishment of large cohorts of patients has revealed new aspects of the clinical presentation that were not previously appreciated. Over time, this approach is starting to provide an accurate understanding of the natural history of mitochondrial disease in adults. Advances in molecular diagnostics, underpinned by next generation sequencing technology, have identified novel molecular mechanisms. Recently described mitochondrial disease phenotypes have disparate causes, and yet share common mechanistic themes. In particular, disorders of mtDNA maintenance have emerged as a major cause of mitochondrial disease in adults. Progressive mtDNA depletion and the accumulation of mtDNA mutations explain some of the clinical features, but the genetic and cellular processes responsible for the mtDNA abnormalities are not entirely clear in each instance. Unfortunately, apart from a few specific examples, treatments for adult mitochondrial disease have not been forthcoming. However, the establishment of international consortia, and the first multinational randomised controlled trial, have paved the way for major progress in the near future, underpinned by growing interest from the pharmaceutical industry. Adult mitochondrial medicine is, therefore, in its infancy, and the challenge is to harness the new understanding of its molecular and cellular basis to develop treatments of real benefit to patients.

A comparison of current serum biomarkers as diagnostic indicators of mitochondrial diseases

OBJECTIVE

To directly compare the diagnostic utility of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) with our previous fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) findings in the same adult mitochondrial disease cohort.

METHODS

Serum GDF-15 levels were measured using a quantitative ELISA. Statistical analyses of GDF-15 data were compared with our published FGF-21 findings.

RESULTS

Median serum GDF-15 concentrations were elevated in patients with mitochondrial disease and differed between all experimental groups, mirroring group results for FGF-21. There was a difference between patients diagnosed by muscle biopsy and genetic diagnosis, suggesting that serum GDF-15 measurement may be more broadly specific for mitochondrial disease than for muscle manifesting mitochondrial disease, in contrast to FGF-21. GDF-15 showed a markedly higher diagnostic odds ratio when compared with FGF-21 (75.3 vs 45.7), was a better predictor of disease based on diagnostic sensitivity (77.8% vs 68.5%), and outperformed FGF-21 on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve 94.1% vs 91.1%). Combining both biomarkers did not improve the area under the curve remarkably over GDF-15 alone. GDF-15 was the best predictor of mitochondrial disease (p < 0.002) following multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

GDF-15 outperforms FGF-21 as an indicator of mitochondrial diseases. Our data suggest that GDF-15 is generally indicative of inherited mitochondrial disease regardless of clinical phenotype, whereas FGF-21 seems to be more indicative of mitochondrial disease when muscle manifestations are present.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that serum GDF-15 accurately distinguishes patients with mitochondrial diseases from those without them.

Understanding the Physiology of FGF21

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a peptide hormone that is synthesized by several organs and regulates energy homeostasis. Excitement surrounding this relatively recently identified hormone is based on the documented metabolic beneficial effects of FGF21, which include weight loss and improved glycemia. The biology of FGF21 is intrinsically complicated owing to its diverse metabolic functions in multiple target organs and its ability to act as an autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine factor. In the liver, FGF21 plays an important role in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation both in the fasted state and in mice consuming a high-fat, low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet. FGF21 also regulates fatty acid metabolism in mice consuming a diet that promotes hepatic lipotoxicity. In white adipose tissue (WAT), FGF21 regulates aspects of glucose metabolism, and in susceptible WAT depots, it can cause browning. This peptide is highly expressed in the pancreas, where it appears to play an anti-inflammatory role in experimental pancreatitis. It also has an anti-inflammatory role in cardiac muscle. Although typically not expressed in skeletal muscle, FGF21 is induced in situations of muscle stress, particularly mitochondrial myopathies. FGF21 has been proposed as a novel therapeutic for metabolic complications such as diabetes and fatty liver disease. This review aims to interpret and delineate the ever-expanding complexity of FGF21 physiology.

Mitochondriopathien – neue Trends in Diagnostik und Therapie

Mitochondriopathien sind eine klinisch, biochemisch und genetisch ausgesprochen heterogene Krankheitsgruppe mit Mutationen in mehr als 250 Genen, wobei ein Teil davon im mitochondrialen Genom liegt, der Großteil aber im Kerngenom. Die Verteilung der Mutationen auf eine derart große Anzahl an Genen verschaffte den Mitochondriopathien eine Vorreiterrolle bei der Einführung der Next-Generation-Sequenzierung (NGS) in die klinische Praxis, wobei die Exomsequenzierung zurzeit die Methode der Wahl darstellt. Die Bedeutung der funktionellen Tests, vor allem der biochemischen Messung von frischen oder gefrorenen Biopsieproben und der histologischen Untersuchung, bleibt bestehen, in vielen Fällen rücken diese Analysen aber an die zweite Stelle. Diese Analysen sind vor allem zur Bestätigung der genetischen Ergebnisse häufig unerlässlich und bei Akutpatienten weiterhin als initiale bzw. parallele Untersuchung zu wählen. Es ist auch darauf zu achten, dass Mutationen gewebespezifisch auftreten können, vor allem Mutationen der mitochondrialen DNA sind im Blut nicht immer nachweisbar.

Die Therapie von Mitochondriopathien ist nach wie vor meist auf eine symptomatische Behandlung begrenzt, nur bei wenigen, vor allem bei cofaktorabhängigen Erkrankungen konnten bisher gute Therapieeffekte erzielt werden. Erfreulich ist die Entwicklung zahlreicher neuer Therapieansätze, die sich Fortschritte in der Proteinersatz- und Gentherapie zunutze machen. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit hat in jüngster Vergangenheit die Option der Spende von Eizellmitochondrien erhalten, eine in Großbritannien kürzlich zugelassene Methode zur Prävention der Vererbung von Mutationen der mitochondrialen DNA.

Serum GDF15 Levels Correlate to Mitochondrial Disease Severity and Myocardial Strain, but Not to Disease Progression in Adult m.3243A>G Carriers

In this observational cohort study, we examined the prognostic value of growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in indicating and monitoring general mitochondrial disease severity and progression in adult carriers of the m.3243A>G mutation.Ninety-seven adult carriers of the m.3243A>G mutation were included in this study. The Newcastle mitochondrial disease adult scale was used for rating mitochondrial disease severity. In parallel, blood was drawn for GDF15 analysis by ELISA. Forty-nine carriers were included in a follow-up study. In a small subset of subjects of whom an echocardiogram was available from general patient care, myocardial deformation was assessed using two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain analysis.A moderate positive correlation was found between the concentration of GDF15 and disease severity (r = 0.59; p < 0.001). The concentration of serum GDF15 was higher in m.3243A>G carriers with diabetes mellitus, cardiomyopathy, and renal abnormalities. After a 2-year follow-up, no significant correlation was found between the change in disease severity and the change in the concentration of GDF15 or between the GDF15 level at the first assessment and the change in disease severity. In the subcohort of patients of whom an echocardiogram was available, the concentration of GDF15 correlated moderately to longitudinal global strain (r = 0.55; p = 0.006; n = 23) but not to circumferential or radial strain.Our results indicate that serum GDF15 is not a strong surrogate marker for general mitochondrial disease severity. Its value in indicating myocardial deformation should be confirmed in a prospective longitudinal study.