1
|
Newton JC, Halkett GKB, Wright C, O 'Connor M, Nowak AK, Moorin R. Out-of-pocket costs for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and their carers. Neurooncol Pract 2025; 12:231-245. [PMID: 40110064 PMCID: PMC11913655 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to describe the out-of-pocket costs incurred by patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma (HGG) and their carers in the standard care arm of the Care-IS trial in the 6 to 8 months following their diagnosis. Methods Carers completed monthly cost surveys detailing the out-of-pocket costs incurred by patients and carers over a 6-month period. Seventy carers reported out-of-pocket costs at baseline (within 2 months following patient diagnosis), and a maximum of 50% of participants reported costs in any subsequent month. Costs were adjusted to 2023 AUD and reported as medians with an interquartile range. Demographic factors were assessed to determine if any were significantly associated with being in the first or fourth quartile of total out-of-pocket costs at baseline. Results Median monthly costs for patient-carer dyads were highest at baseline ($535[IQR:$170-$930]), and 2 months post-recruitment ($314 [IQR:$150-$772]). The largest contributors to patient-carer costs were patient health service use and patient medications. Patient and carer health service use and medication costs varied over time. The median health service use and medication out-of-pocket costs for patients and carers were mostly below $100 per month; however, there was a large variance in the upper 75th percentile for these cost categories. No factors were significantly associated with higher baseline out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions A HGG diagnosis has a significant and sustained financial impact on people who are diagnosed and their carers. Patients experience significant additional costs relating to their diagnosis and travel to receive care, and their carers also continue to experience sustained costs whilst managing the additional tasks associated with informal caregiving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade C Newton
- Curtin School of Nursing, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Georgia K B Halkett
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Curtin School of Nursing, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Cameron Wright
- School of Medicine, College of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
- Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, WA, Australia
- Health Economics and Data Analytics, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Moira O 'Connor
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Rachael Moorin
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahjalal M, Mosharaf MP, Dahal PK, Hoque ME, Mahumud RA. Cancer driven direct medical costs in Bangladesh: Evidence from patient perspective. J Cancer Policy 2025; 43:100565. [PMID: 39993627 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 01/26/2025] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatment costs are rising, and the disease is becoming a major challenge to healthcare systems in developing countries like Bangladesh. The direct medical costs of cancer have yet to be comprehensively studied in the country. Hence, the study aimed to estimate the direct medical costs associated with cancer from patients' perspective. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary specialised cancer hospitals. Data on direct medical costs incurred during treatment in the last three months were collected. The average per-patient costs for cancer treatment were computed and stratified by cancer sites, stages, and types of health facilities. A generalised linear model was used to test the mean cost difference in healthcare services by cancer sites, stages, and type of health facility. RESULTS Overall, the per-patient direct medical costs were BDT 41,019 (US$477), with 33 % allocated to hospitalisation (BDT 13,420; $156) followed by 29 % for surgery (BDT 11,833; $138). Patients with gallbladder (BDT 94,722; $1101), brain (BDT 82,608; $961), and esophageal cancer (BDT 82,556; $960) had the highest average treatment costs. The mean costs per patient were BDT 42,050 ($489), BDT 40,583 ($472), BDT 40,892 ($475), BDT 38,252 ($445) and BDT 53,306 ($620) for disease stages 0, I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The costs increased by 0.63 % from stage I to II but decreased by 7 % from stage II to III while rising sharply by 39 % from stage III to IV. The costs for patients with gallbladder, pancreatic and brain cancer were significantly higher at BDT 51,194 ($595), BDT 43,637 ($507) and BDT 39,338 ($457) compared to patients with oral cancer, respectively. On average, per-patient costs were 5 % higher in private health facility (BDT 42,947; $499) compared to public hospital (BDT 40,743; $474). CONCLUSION This study reveals that cancer treatment costs are high in advanced stages and in private hospital. The findings suggest that earlier diagnosis and financial subsidies may help curb the ongoing high cancer treatment costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Shahjalal
- Global Health Institute, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Research Rats, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| | - Md Parvez Mosharaf
- School of Business and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Padam Kanta Dahal
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney Campus, NSW, Australia
| | - Mohammad Enamul Hoque
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rashidul Alam Mahumud
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahumud RA, Shahjalal M, Dahal PK, Mosharaf MP, Mistry SK, Koly KN, Chowdhury SH, Renzaho AMN, Gow J, Alam K, Wawryk O. Emerging burden of post-cancer therapy complications on unplanned hospitalisation and costs among Australian cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study over 14 years. Sci Rep 2025; 15:4709. [PMID: 39922897 PMCID: PMC11807139 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatment using systemic therapy and radiotherapy may cause post-therapy complications, resulting in increased unplanned hospitalisation. The evidence on such complications, their impact on unplanned hospitalisations, and associated costs is scant in Australia. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of post-therapy complications, evaluate their impact on unplanned hospitalisation, length of stay (LOS) and investigate the associated medical costs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 8,633 cancer patients (1.03 million emergency hospital admissions) in Victoria, Australia from July 2006 to June 2020, from the Australian healthcare system perspective. Multivariate generalised linear regression models were employed to estimate the adjusted association between post-therapy complications and clinical characteristics with hospital LOS and associated hospitalisation medical costs. Approximately 52% of patients were male with an average patient age of 59.9 years. Annually, post-therapy complications leading to unplanned hospitalisations increased by 7.25%, outpacing the growth in overall hospitalisation admissions, which was 5.66% for overall hospitalisation admissions. A significant proportion of patients (71%) experienced multiple complications, with the most common being anemia (26%), sepsis (15%), nausea and vomiting (14%), and neutropenia (11%). Patients undergoing combined systemic and radiotherapy exhibited higher odds of post-therapy complications (OR = 8.24, 95%CI: 7.48 to 9.08) compared with those who only received systemic therapy. Mean hospital stay among patients who experienced post-therapy complications was 2.23 days per admission (360 days per patient), an extra 1.72 days per admission [95%CI: 1.68 to 1.76; 354 days per patient, 95%CI: 336 to 371 days] longer than patients without complications (0.51 days per admission and 6.48 days per patients). Overall, per-admission medical hospitalisation costs among patients with post-therapy complications were $8,791 higher than for patients who did not experience complications ($11,418 vs. $2,627 per admission, 95%CI: $8,685 to $8,897). Per-patient costs for unplanned hospitalisation due to post-therapy complications were significantly $1.82 million higher among patients than those without complications ($1.86 million vs. $33,599 per patient, 95%CI: $1.71 million to $1.94 million). The cost and hospitalisation stay (in days) varied by the type of therapy and cancer type. The study results indicate that post-therapy complications in cancer patients varied by the type of cancer and increased over the study period, leading to longer unplanned hospital stays and higher hospitalisation medical costs. The results highlight the need for better-customized treatment delivery strategies to address this burden and optimise resources in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashidul Alam Mahumud
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Md Shahjalal
- Global Health Institute, Department of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
| | - Padam Kanta Dahal
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Md Parvez Mosharaf
- School of Business and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Sabuj Kanti Mistry
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Kamrun Nahar Koly
- Health System and Population Studies Division, Urban Health, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Andre M N Renzaho
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia
| | - Jeff Gow
- School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- School of Health, University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia
| | - Khorshed Alam
- School of Business and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Olivia Wawryk
- Department of General Practice, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Data Connect, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parkinson-Zarb L, Duff C, Wang Y, Mills J. A cross-case study comparison of Australian metropolitan and regional cancer nurses' experiences of work-related stressors and supports. BMC Nurs 2025; 24:138. [PMID: 39915764 PMCID: PMC11800449 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02703-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Registered nurses are the largest single professional group working in the field of cancer care and support one of the most vulnerable patient cohorts in the healthcare system. Cancer nurses are known to experience high rates of burnout, but there are significant limitations to current research on the unique stressors experienced by this group of nurses, particularly since the emergence of COVID-19. METHODS This study employs the Job Demands Resource Model (JD-R model) to better understand the experiences of Victorian cancer nurses' work and describe factors which ameliorate burnout and work-related stress. A multiple case study research design was used in this study, with two groups of cancer nurses making up a total of 30 participants, allocated to separate cases bounded by geographical location. A two-phase study of Victorian cancer nurses in metropolitan and regional healthcare services was conducted from 2019 to 2021. Data included field notes and in-depth interviews. Data analysis used a process of elaborative coding, with a pre-conceived coding framework based on the JD-R model. A combination of thematic analysis and storyline analysis was employed to analyse the data. RESULTS A cross-case analysis of similarities and differences identified the job demands affecting cancer nurses, and conversely, any positive job resources which may buffer these demands. Job demands identified in both cases appeared to have similar causes but were more explicitly linked to poor resourcing in the regional case. Job resources identified in both cases were similar, but it was noted how few job resources were available to buffer the many demands inherent in cancer nurses' work. This multiple case study found that the work of cancer nurses is high in demands and low in resources. CONCLUSIONS Despite challenging work conditions, findings identified a highly engaged workforce. The job resources identified in this study suggest there are modifiable strategies to cultivate a supportive work environment for cancer nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cameron Duff
- RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Ying Wang
- RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Jane Mills
- La Trobe University, Edwards Rd, Flora Hill, Bendigo, Victoria, 3550, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gama MAB, Tonmukayakul U, Saraswat N, McCaffrey N, Nguyen TM. Cost of Illness Study on Oral Cancer in Australia. Oral Dis 2025. [PMID: 39846356 DOI: 10.1111/odi.15267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2025] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to estimate the economic burden of oral cancer in Australia from the societal perspective. METHODS The population consisted of the prevalence of lip and oral cavity cancer, and other lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancers for ages 40 years and older. Healthcare costs of oral cancer were estimated using 2019-2020 Australian Disease Expenditure Data. Productivity losses were estimated using disability-adjusted life years, derived from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study and 2019 Australian gross domestic product per capita. RESULTS The estimated annual healthcare costs for oral cancer in Australia were approximately AUD$113.2 million. Over half of the total healthcare costs (54%) were attributable to public hospital admissions (AUD$61.2 million), followed by private hospital services (28%) and pharmaceutical benefits (8%). The total costs, including healthcare and productivity losses, were around AUD$2.1 billion. The productivity losses due to oral cancer were higher for males compared to females (AUD$1.5 billion versus AUD$0.6 billion). CONCLUSIONS The study reveals a significant economic burden of oral cancer for 2019 in Australia at AUD$2.1 billion, largely due to productivity losses and public hospital admissions. This highlights the need for effective screening and prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A B Gama
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia
| | - U Tonmukayakul
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia
| | - N Saraswat
- Dental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - N McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T M Nguyen
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia
- Dental Health Services Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Health Economics Group, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leusder M, Relijveld S, Demirtas D, Emery J, Tew M, Gibbs P, Millar J, White V, Jefford M, Franchini F, IJzerman M. Toward value-based care using cost mining: cost aggregation and visualization across the entire colorectal cancer patient pathway. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:321. [PMID: 39730997 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02446-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to develop a method we call "cost mining" to unravel cost variation and identify cost drivers by modelling integrated patient pathways from primary care to the palliative care setting. This approach fills an urgent need to quantify financial strains on healthcare systems, particularly for colorectal cancer, which is the most expensive cancer in Australia, and the second most expensive cancer globally. METHODS We developed and published a customized algorithm that dynamically estimates and visualizes the mean, minimum, and total costs of care at the patient level, by aggregating activity-based healthcare system costs (e.g. DRGs) across integrated pathways. This extends traditional process mining approaches by making the resulting process maps actionable and informative and by displaying cost estimates. We demonstrate the method by constructing a unique dataset of colorectal cancer pathways in Victoria, Australia, using records of primary care, diagnosis, hospital admission and chemotherapy, medication, health system costs, and life events to create integrated colorectal cancer patient pathways from 2012 to 2020. RESULTS Cost mining with the algorithm enabled exploration of costly integrated pathways, i.e. drilling down in high-cost pathways to discover cost drivers, for 4246 cases covering approx. 4 million care activities. Per-patient CRC pathway costs ranged from $10,379 AUD to $41,643 AUD, and varied significantly per cancer stage such that e.g. chemotherapy costs in one cancer stage are different to the same chemotherapy regimen in a different stage. Admitted episodes were most costly, representing 93.34% or $56.6 M AUD of the total healthcare system costs covered in the sample. CONCLUSIONS Cost mining can supplement other health economic methods by providing contextual, sequence and timing-related information depicting how patients flow through complex care pathways. This approach can also facilitate health economic studies informing decision-makers on where to target care improvement or to evaluate the consequences of new treatments or care delivery interventions. Through this study we provide an approach for hospitals and policymakers to leverage their health data infrastructure and to enable real time patient level cost mining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura Leusder
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sven Relijveld
- Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Derya Demirtas
- Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
- Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jon Emery
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle Tew
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Public and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Cancer Research Program, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fanny Franchini
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Public and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Public and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Flinkier A, Chu F, Berman J, Slifirski H, Barnett S, Caragata R, Weinberg L. Financial burden of complications following lung resection: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e083015. [PMID: 39806581 PMCID: PMC11667246 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Global healthcare expenditures are rising, driven largely by increased spending in both high- and low-income countries with hospitalisation as a primary contributor. Respiratory diseases, particularly lung cancer, pose significant public health and economic challenges with thoracic surgery as the standard curative treatment. Complications post resection, such as arrhythmias, infections and respiratory failure, result in substantial healthcare costs and resource demands. Although studies have explored the economic impact of surgeries, there is a limited comprehensive analysis of the financial burden of postoperative complications after lung resection surgery. To address this gap, this scoping review aims to map existing literature on lung resection complications and associated costs, providing insights for future research and healthcare policy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review will be conducting according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews standards. Eligible peer-reviewed articles and grey literature will be identified across Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Cost data will be converted into US dollars as per the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis and adjusted for inflation as per the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index inflation calculator. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was not required. The results will be communicated through established professional networks, conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Flinkier
- Department of
Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fabien Chu
- Department of
Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jordan Berman
- Department of
Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Stephen Barnett
- Department of Thoracic
Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of
Surgery, The University of Melbourne,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Caragata
- Department of
Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laurence Weinberg
- Department of
Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Critical
Care, The University of Melbourne - Parkville
Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kersen J, Kurbatfinski S, Thomas A, Ibadin S, Hezam A, Lorenzetti D, Chandarana S, Dort JC, Sauro KM. Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078210. [PMID: 39672587 PMCID: PMC11647354 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer experience many Transitions in Care (TiC), occurring when a patient's care transfers between healthcare providers or institutions/settings. Among other patient populations, TiC are associated with medical errors, patient dissatisfaction and elevated healthcare use and expenditure. However, our understanding of TiC among patients with cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVE To map and characterise evidence about TiC among patients with cancer. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with cancer at any stage in the cancer continuum. INTERVENTION Evidence sources exploring TiC among patients with cancer were eligible. OUTCOME Evidence sources exploring TiC among patients with cancer using any outcome were eligible. SETTING Any setting where a patient with cancer received care. DESIGN This scoping review included any study describing TiC among patients with cancer with no restrictions on study design, publication type, publication date or language. Evidence sources, identified by searching six databases using search terms for the population and TiC, were included if they described TiC. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility and completed data abstraction. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were synthesised using thematic analysis. RESULTS This scoping review identified 801 evidence sources examining TiC among patients with cancer. Most evidence sources focused on the TiC between diagnosis and treatment and breast or colorectal cancer. Six themes emerged from the qualitative evidence sources: the transfer of information, emotional impacts of TiC, continuity of care, patient-related factors, healthcare provider-related factors and healthcare system-related factors. Interventions intended to improve TiC among patients with cancer were developed, implemented or reviewed in 163 evidence sources. CONCLUSION While there is a large body of research related to TiC among patients with cancer, there remains a gap in our understanding of several TiC and certain types of cancer, suggesting the need for additional evidence exploring these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaling Kersen
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kurbatfinski
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seremi Ibadin
- Department of Surgery, Community Health Sciences, and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calagary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Areej Hezam
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane Lorenzetti
- Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shamir Chandarana
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joseph C Dort
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Khara M Sauro
- Department of Surgery, Community Health Sciences, and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calagary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang O, Zhang Y, To YH, M J IJzerman M, Liu J, Gibbs P, Trapani K, Pearson SA, Franchini F. Effects of clinical and socioeconomic factors on Medicare and patient costs for colorectal cancer in Australia: a retrospective multivariate regression analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081483. [PMID: 39653563 PMCID: PMC11628990 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We study how clinical and socioeconomic factors influence colorectal cancer (CRC) costs for patients and Medicare in Australia. The study seeks to extend the limited Australian literature on CRC costs by analysing comprehensive patient-level medical services and pharmaceutical cost data. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Using the Victorian Cancer Registry, we identified all patients in Victoria who were diagnosed with CRC from 2010 to 2019 and extracted their linked 2010-2021 Medicare data. This data includes expenses from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule services. We examined variables such as disease stage, CRC type, molecular profile, metastasis status and demographics (eg, age, birth country, socioeconomic level via the SEIFA index, and native language). We applied descriptive and log-linear multivariate regression analyses to explore patient and Medicare costs related to CRC treatment. RESULTS Costs significantly rise with advanced cancer stages, especially on medication costs. Patients' average out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses are roughly $A441 per year. Key cost influencers are gender, age and socioeconomic status. On average, males incur 13.5% higher annual costs, a significantly larger OOP expense, than females. Compared with patients aged 50 or below, there is a 7.1% cost increase for individuals aged 50-70 and an 8.8% decrease post-70, likely reflecting less intensive treatment for the elderly. Socioeconomic factors show a clear gradient. Wealthier areas experience higher costs, especially among native English speakers. Costs also vary based on cancer's anatomical location and specific genetic mutations. CONCLUSION The research highlights that CRC treatment expenses for patients and Medicare differ considerably due to factors such as diagnostic stage, demographics, anatomical location of the tumour and mutations. These cost variations lead to concerns about healthcare equality and decision-making autonomy. Policymakers may need to focus on early detection, increased support for advanced-stage patients, gender-sensitive healthcare, and equitable access to treatment across different socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ou Yang
- Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yuting Zhang
- Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yat Hang To
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maarten M J IJzerman
- Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Judith Liu
- Department of Economics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Queensland, USA
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Trapani
- Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- Medicines Intelligence Research Program, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fanny Franchini
- Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mitchell RJ, Delaney GP, Arnolda G, Liauw W, Lystad RP, Braithwaite J. Three-year hospital service use trajectories of people diagnosed with cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 93:102676. [PMID: 39303658 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information regarding hospital service use by people newly diagnosed with cancer can inform patterns of healthcare utilisation and resource demands. This study aims to identify characteristics of group-based trajectories of hospital service use three years after an individual was diagnosed with cancer; and determine factors predictive of trajectory group membership. METHOD A group-based trajectory analysis of hospital service use of people aged ≥30 years who had a new diagnosis of cancer during 2018 in New South Wales, Australia was conducted. Linked cancer registry, hospital and mortality data were examined for a three-year period after diagnosis. Group-based trajectory models were derived based on number of hospital admissions. Multinominal logistic regression examined predictors of trajectory group membership. RESULTS Of the 44,577 new cancer diagnosis patients, 29,085 (65.2 %) were hospitalised at least once since their cancer diagnosis. Four distinct trajectory groups of hospital users were identified: Low (68.4 %), Very-Low (25.1 %), Moderate-Chronic (2.2 %), and Early-High (4.2 %). Key predictors of trajectory group membership were age group, cancer type, degree of cancer spread, prior history of cancer, receiving chemotherapy, and presence of comorbidities, including renal disease, moderate/serious liver disease, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidities should be considered in cancer treatment and management decision making. Caring for people diagnosed with cancer with multimorbidity requires multidisciplinary shared care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Geoffrey P Delaney
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal - Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, South-Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Reidar P Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pakneshan S, Moy N, O'Connor S, Hourigan L, Messmann H, Shah A, Dulleck U, Holtmann G. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E1334-E1341. [PMID: 39559417 PMCID: PMC11573468 DOI: 10.1055/a-2444-6292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Reduction of colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality is one of the primary objectives of colonoscopy. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) are critical outcome parameters. Analysis of PCCRC rates can validate quality assurance measures in colonoscopy. We assessed the effectiveness of implementing a gastroenterologist-led quality framework that monitors key procedure quality indicators (i.e., bowel preparation quality, adenoma detection rates, or patient satisfaction) by comparing the PCCRC rate before and after implementation. Patients and methods Individuals who had a colonoscopy between 2010 and 2017 at a single tertiary center in Queensland, Australia, were included and divided into two groups: baseline (2010-2014) and redesign phase (2015-2017). Data linkage of the state-wide cancer registry and hospital records enabled identification of subjects who developed colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy. Costs associated with quality improvement were assessed for effectiveness. Results A total of 19,383 individuals had a colonoscopy during the study period. Seventeen PCCRCs were detected. The PCCRC rate was 0.376 per 1,000 person-years and the average 5-year PCCRC risk ranged from 0.165% to 0.051%. The rate of PCCRCs was higher at the beginning (0.166%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15%-0.17%) compared with the later period with full implementation of quality control measures (0.027%; 95% CI 0.023%-0.03%). The quality process determined an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -$5,670.53 per PCCRC avoided. Conclusions This large cohort study demonstrated that a formal gastroenterologist-led quality assurance framework embedded into the routine operations of a clinical department not only reduces interval cancers but is also cost-effective regarding life years gained and quality-adjusted life years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Pakneshan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Health - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Naomi Moy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Hospital - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sam O'Connor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Hospital - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- III. Med. Klinik, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Luke Hourigan
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Hospital - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Ayesha Shah
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Hospital - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Uwe Dulleck
- Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - G.J. Holtmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queensland Health - Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- TRI, Translational Research Institute Australia, South Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gulliver T, Hewett M, Konstantopoulos P, Tran L, Mantzioris E. The neutropenic diet and its impacts on clinical, nutritional, and lifestyle outcomes for people with cancer: a scoping review. J Nutr Sci 2024; 13:e60. [PMID: 39469195 PMCID: PMC11514644 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024] Open
Abstract
The neutropenic diet (ND) is often recommended to people with cancer to reduce infection risk despite recommendations of clinical guidelines advising against its use. While recent literature suggests the ND does not reduce infection risk, other outcomes related to health, nutrition, and lifestyle are unknown. The aim of this review is to systematically scope the literature on the ND in people with cancer for all outcomes related to clinical health, nutrition, and lifestyle. Scientific databases were systematically searched. Eligible studies were in English, people with any cancer type, consuming an ND, any age group, date, or setting. Eligible study types were randomised control trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest found were infection rates, fever, mortality, antibiotic use, gastrointestinal side effects, comorbidities, biochemistry, hospitalisation, nutritional status, quality of life (QoL), well-being, and financial costs. Most research has focused on infection and mortality rates with few assessing hospitalisation rates, nutritional status, financial costs, and QoL. Most included studies found no significant differences between ND and comparator diet for mortality, antibiotics use, comorbidities, and QoL; however, several studies reported the ND significantly increased the risk of infection. Gaps in the literature included effect of ND on QoL in an adult population, microbiome, lifestyle changes, and financial burden. Further research is needed regarding how the ND affects the microbiome and QoL of its consumers, but in the interim, it is important for hospitals providing an ND to their patients to liberalise the ND wherever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trinity Gulliver
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Melissa Hewett
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Tran
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Evangeline Mantzioris
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition & Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Degeling K, To YH, Trapani K, Athan S, Gibbs P, IJzerman MJ, Franchini F. Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments for Colorectal Cancer: A Data-Driven Whole Disease Simulation Model for Predicting the Number of Patients with Colorectal Cancer by Stage and Treatment Line in Australia. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:1382-1392. [PMID: 38977190 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Effective healthcare planning, resource allocation, and budgeting require accurate predictions of the number of patients needing treatment at specific cancer stages and treatment lines. The Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) simulation model (PRIMCAT-CRC) was developed to meet this requirement for all CRC stages and relevant molecular profiles in Australia. METHODS Real-world data were used to estimate treatment utilization and time-to-event distributions. This populated a discrete-event simulation, projecting the number of patients receiving treatment across all disease stages and treatment lines for CRC and forecasting the number of patients likely to utilize future treatments. Illustrative analyses were undertaken, estimating treatments across disease stages and treatment lines over a 5-year period (2022-2026). We demonstrated the model's applicability through a case study introducing pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient stage IV. RESULTS Clinical registry data from 7163 patients informed the model. The model forecasts 15 738 incident and 2821 prevalent cases requiring treatment in 2022, rising to 15 921 and 2871, respectively, by 2026. Projections show that over 2022 to 2026, there will be a total of 116 752 treatments initiated, with 43% intended for stage IV disease. The introduction of pembrolizumab is projected for 706 patients annually, totaling 3530 individuals starting treatment with pembrolizumab over the forecasted period, without significantly altering downstream utilization of subsequent treatments. CONCLUSIONS PRIMCAT-CRC is a versatile tool that can be used to estimate the eligible patient populations for novel cancer therapies, thereby reducing uncertainty for policymakers in decisions to publicly reimburse new treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yat Hang To
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Trapani
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophy Athan
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalized Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fanny Franchini
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Merollini KMD, Collins LG, Jones AT, Aitken JF, Kimlin MG. Factors impacting hospitalisation and related health service costs in cancer survivors in Australia: Results from a population data linkage study in Queensland (COS-Q). Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70201. [PMID: 39254066 PMCID: PMC11386302 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global economic cost of cancer and the costs of ongoing care for survivors are increasing. Little is known about factors affecting hospitalisations and related costs for the growing number of cancer survivors. Our aim was to identify associated factors of cancer survivors admitted to hospital in the public system and their costs from a health services perspective. METHODS A population-based, retrospective, data linkage study was conducted in Queensland (COS-Q), Australia, including individuals diagnosed with a first primary cancer who incurred healthcare costs between 2013 and 2016. Generalised linear models were fitted to explore associations between socio-demographic (age, sex, country of birth, marital status, occupation, geographic remoteness category and socio-economic index) and clinical (cancer type, year of/time since diagnosis, vital status and care type) factors with mean annual hospital costs and mean episode costs. RESULTS Of the cohort (N = 230,380) 48.5% (n = 111,820) incurred hospitalisations in the public system (n = 682,483 admissions). Hospital costs were highest for individuals who died during the costing period (cost ratio 'CR': 1.79, p < 0.001) or living in very remote or remote location (CR: 1.71 and CR: 1.36, p < 0.001) or aged 0-24 years (CR: 1.63, p < 0.001). Episode costs were highest for individuals in rehabilitation or palliative care (CR: 2.94 and CR: 2.34, p < 0.001), or very remote location (CR: 2.10, p < 0.001). Higher contributors to overall hospital costs were 'diseases and disorders of the digestive system' (AU$661 m, 21% of admissions) and 'neoplastic disorders' (AU$554 m, 20% of admissions). CONCLUSIONS We identified a range of factors associated with hospitalisation and higher hospital costs for cancer survivors, and our results clearly demonstrate very high public health costs of hospitalisation. There is a lack of obvious means to reduce these costs in the short or medium term which emphasises an increasing economic imperative to improving cancer prevention and investments in home- or community-based patient support services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydoreQueenslandAustralia
- Sunshine Coast Health InstituteBirtinyaQueenslandAustralia
| | - Louisa G. Collins
- Health Economics, Population Health DepartmentQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Andrew T. Jones
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Joanne F. Aitken
- Cancer Council QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of Public HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Michael G. Kimlin
- Faculty of Health Sciences & MedicineBond UniversityRobinaQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shah KK, Hedley JA, Robledo KP, Wyld M, Webster AC, Morton RL. Cost-effectiveness of Accepting Kidneys From Deceased Donors With Common Cancers-A Modeling Study. Transplantation 2024; 108:e187-e197. [PMID: 38499509 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The disparity between the demand for and supply of kidney transplants has resulted in prolonged waiting times for patients with kidney failure. A potential approach to address this shortage is to consider kidneys from donors with a history of common cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. METHODS We used a patient-level Markov model to evaluate the outcomes of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a perceived history of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer characterized by minimal to intermediate transmission risk. Data from the Australian transplant registry were used in this analysis. The study compared the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system between the proposed practice of accepting these donors and the conservative practice of declining them. The model simulated outcomes for 1500 individuals waitlisted for a deceased donor kidney transplant for a 25-y horizon. RESULTS Under the proposed practice, when an additional 15 donors with minimal to intermediate cancer transmission risk were accepted, QALY gains ranged from 7.32 to 20.12. This translates to an approximate increase of 7 to 20 additional years of perfect health. The shift in practice also led to substantial cost savings, ranging between $1.06 and $2.3 million. CONCLUSIONS The proposed practice of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a history of common cancers with minimal to intermediate transmission risk offers a promising solution to bridge the gap between demand and supply. This approach likely results in QALY gains for recipients and significant cost savings for the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan K Shah
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James A Hedley
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristy P Robledo
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Wyld
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela C Webster
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee J, Panagiotelis A, Cairns R, Wheate NJ. An analysis of the trends in the usage of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme-subsidised cancer drugs in Australia from 2012 to 2022. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:375. [PMID: 39085470 PMCID: PMC11291628 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05889-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer treatment remains a significant and escalating healthcare expense worldwide. Although annual reports on total cancer care costs are available, the potential impact of evolving treatment guidelines and the introduction of new drugs on future budgeting remains largely uncertain. The aim of this study was to examine the trends in the use of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-subsidised cancer drugs in Australia over the past decade. METHODS PBS codes for all PBS-subsidised cancer drugs that were listed in government-endorsed treatment protocols were obtained and used to retrieve usage data. Their patterns of use, represented by the number of prescriptions (services) processed by Services Australia, were analysed for the period between 2012 and 2022. RESULTS The overall prescribing of cancer drugs is outpacing Australia's population growth, primarily due to an ageing population and the accelerated rise in cancer diagnoses observed over the past decade. From 846 eviQ protocols, 141 cancer drugs were available on the PBS, of which kinase inhibitor (39 drugs) and monoclonal antibody drugs (24 drugs) had the highest increase in use during the study period; 16% and 23% respectively. Of the 8 drug classes, hormonal agents (20 drugs) were the most prescribed. CONCLUSION The utilisation of PBS-listed cancer drugs is increasing faster than population growth, especially for high-cost monoclonal antibody and kinase inhibitor drugs, indicating continued pressure on government spending.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rose Cairns
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- New South Wales Poisons Information Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nial J Wheate
- School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhuang Q, Zhang AY, Cong RSTY, Yang GM, Neo PSH, Tan DS, Chua ML, Tan IB, Wong FY, Eng Hock Ong M, Shao Wei Lam S, Liu N. Towards proactive palliative care in oncology: developing an explainable EHR-based machine learning model for mortality risk prediction. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:124. [PMID: 38769564 PMCID: PMC11103848 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ex-ante identification of the last year in life facilitates a proactive palliative approach. Machine learning models trained on electronic health records (EHR) demonstrate promising performance in cancer prognostication. However, gaps in literature include incomplete reporting of model performance, inadequate alignment of model formulation with implementation use-case, and insufficient explainability hindering trust and adoption in clinical settings. Hence, we aim to develop an explainable machine learning EHR-based model that prompts palliative care processes by predicting for 365-day mortality risk among patients with advanced cancer within an outpatient setting. METHODS Our cohort consisted of 5,926 adults diagnosed with Stage 3 or 4 solid organ cancer between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020 and receiving ambulatory cancer care within a tertiary center. The classification problem was modelled using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and aligned to our envisioned use-case: "Given a prediction point that corresponds to an outpatient cancer encounter, predict for mortality within 365-days from prediction point, using EHR data up to 365-days prior." The model was trained with 75% of the dataset (n = 39,416 outpatient encounters) and validated on a 25% hold-out dataset (n = 13,122 outpatient encounters). To explain model outputs, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. Clinical characteristics, laboratory tests and treatment data were used to train the model. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), while model calibration was assessed using the Brier score. RESULTS In total, 17,149 of the 52,538 prediction points (32.6%) had a mortality event within the 365-day prediction window. The model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.861 (95% CI 0.856-0.867) and AUPRC of 0.771. The Brier score was 0.147, indicating slight overestimations of mortality risk. Explanatory diagrams utilizing SHAP values allowed visualization of feature impacts on predictions at both the global and individual levels. CONCLUSION Our machine learning model demonstrated good discrimination and precision-recall in predicting 365-day mortality risk among individuals with advanced cancer. It has the potential to provide personalized mortality predictions and facilitate earlier integration of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyuan Zhuang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Data Computational Science Core, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Alwin Yaoxian Zhang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Ryan Shea Tan Ying Cong
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Data Computational Science Core, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Meijuan Yang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
- Lien Centre of Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patricia Soek Hui Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Daniel Sw Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melvin Lk Chua
- Data Computational Science Core, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iain Beehuat Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Data Computational Science Core, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fuh Yong Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Cancer Informatics, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- Health Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sean Shao Wei Lam
- Health Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Liu
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McIntosh JG, Jenkins M, Wood A, Chondros P, Campbell T, Wenkart E, O'Reilly C, Dixon I, Toner J, Martinez-Gutierrez J, Govan L, Emery JD. Increasing bowel cancer screening using SMS in general practice: the SMARTscreen cluster randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract 2024; 74:BJGP.2023.0230. [PMID: 38164588 PMCID: PMC10962502 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) is a best-practice, organised screening programme, but uptake is low (40.9%) and increasing participation could reduce morbidity and mortality associated with CRC. Endorsement by GPs is strongly associated with increasing screening uptake. AIM This study (SMARTscreen) aimed to test whether a multi-intervention short message service (SMS) sent by general practices to 50-60-year-old patients who were due to receive the NBCSP kit would increase NBCSP uptake, by comparing it with usual care. DESIGN AND SETTING A stratified cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken, involving 21 Australian general practices in Western Victoria, Australia. METHOD For intervention practices, people due to receive the NBCSP kit within a 6-month study period were sent an SMS just before receiving the kit. The SMS included a personalised message from the person's general practice endorsing the kit, a motivational narrative video, an instructional video, and a link to more information. Control practices continued with usual care, comprising at-home testing with a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) through the NBCSP. The primary outcome was the between-arm percentage difference in uptake of FIT screening within 12 months from randomisation, which was estimated using generalised linear model regression. RESULTS In total, 39.2% (1143/2914) of people in 11 intervention practices and 23.0% (583/2537) of people in 10 control practices had a FIT result in their electronic health records - a difference of 16.5% (95% confidence interval = 2.02 to 30.9). CONCLUSION The SMS intervention increased NBCSP kit return in 50-60-year-old patients in general practice. This finding informed a larger trial - SMARTERscreen - to test this intervention in a broader Australian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer G McIntosh
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| | - Anna Wood
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| | - Patty Chondros
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| | | | | | - Clare O'Reilly
- Workforce Development, Screening Early Detection and Immunisation, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, and executive manager, Chronic Health, Population Health Unit, VACCHO, Melbourne
| | | | | | | | - Linda Govan
- Ballarat Goldfields/Wimmera Grampians, Western Victoria Primary Health Network, Ballarat
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nabukalu D, Gordon LG, Lowe J, Merollini KMD. Healthcare costs of cancer among children, adolescents, and young adults: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6925. [PMID: 38214042 PMCID: PMC10905233 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To collate and critically review international evidence on the direct health system costs of children and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. METHODS We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus. Articles were limited to studies involving people aged 0-39 years at cancer diagnosis and published from 2012 to 2022. Two reviewers screened the articles and evaluated the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. The reviewers synthesized the findings using a narrative approach and presented the costs in 2022 US dollars for comparability. RESULTS Overall, the mean healthcare costs for all cancers in the 5 years post diagnosis ranged from US$36,670 among children in Korea to US$127,946 among AYA in the USA. During the first year, the mean costs among children 0-14 years ranged from US$34,953 in Chile to over US$130,000 in Canada. These were higher than the costs for AYA, estimated at US$61,855 in Canada. At the end of life, the mean costs were estimated at over US$300,000 among children and US$235,265 among adolescents in Canada. Leukemia was the most expensive cancer type, estimated at US$50,133 in Chile, to US$152,533 among children in Canada. Overall, more than a third of the total cost is related to hospitalizations. All the included studies were of good quality. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare costs associated with cancer are substantial among children, and AYA. More research is needed on the cost of cancer in low- and middle-income countries and harmonization of costs across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Nabukalu
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveQueenslandAustralia
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - John Lowe
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Sunshine Coast Health InstituteSunshine Coast University HospitalBirtinyaQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mizrahi D, Lai JKL, Wareing H, Ren Y, Li T, Swain CTV, Smith DP, Adams D, Martiniuk A, David M. Effect of exercise interventions on hospital length of stay and admissions during cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2024; 58:97-109. [PMID: 37989539 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of participating in an exercise intervention compared with no exercise during cancer treatment on the duration and frequency of hospital admissions. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro and Cochrane Central Registry of Randomized Controlled Trials. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised studies published until August 2023 evaluating exercise interventions during chemotherapy, radiotherapy or stem cell transplant regimens, compared with usual care, and which assessed hospital admissions (length of stay and/or frequency of admissions). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted by pooling the data using random-effects models. RESULTS Of 3918 screened abstracts, 20 studies met inclusion criteria, including 2635 participants (1383 intervention and 1252 control). Twelve studies were conducted during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation regimens. There was a small effect size in a pooled analysis that found exercise during treatment reduced hospital length of stay by 1.40 days (95% CI: -2.26 to -0.54 days; low-quality evidence) and lowered the rate of hospital admission by 8% (difference in proportions=-0.08, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.03, low-quality evidence) compared with usual care. CONCLUSION Exercise during cancer treatment can decrease hospital length of stay and admissions, although a small effect size and high heterogeneity limits the certainty. While exercise is factored into some multidisciplinary care plans, it could be included as standard practice for patients as cancer care pathways evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Mizrahi
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan King Lam Lai
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Sciences Division, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hayley Wareing
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yi Ren
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tong Li
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher T V Swain
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David P Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diana Adams
- Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Martiniuk
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Office of the Chief Scientist, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael David
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang H, Li Y, Lei L, Liu C, Chen W, Dai M, Wang X, Lew J, Shi J, Li N, He J. Estimating the economic burden of colorectal cancer in China, 2019-2030: A population-level prevalence-based analysis. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6787. [PMID: 38112048 PMCID: PMC10807552 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Comprehensive data on the economic burden of CRC at a population-level is critical in informing policymaking, but such data are currently limited in China. METHODS From a societal perspective, the economic burden of CRC in 2019 was estimated, including direct medical and nonmedical expenditure, disability, and premature-death-related indirect expenditure. Data on disease burden was taken from the GBD 2019 and analyzed using a prevalence-based approach. The per-person direct expenditure and work loss days were from a multicenter study; the premature-death-related expenditure was estimated using a human capital approach. Projections were conducted in different simulated scenarios. All expenditure data were in Chinese Yuan (CNY) and discounted to 2019. RESULTS In 2019, the estimated overall economic burden of CRC in China was CNY170.5 billion (0.189% of the local GDP). The direct expenditure was CNY106.4 billion (62.4% of the total economic burden), 91.4% of which was a direct medical expenditure. The indirect expenditure was CNY64.1 billion, of which 63.7% was related to premature death. The predicted burden would reach CNY560.0 billion in 2030 given constant trends for disease burden; however, it would be alternatively reduced to CONCLUSIONS The population-level economic burden of CRC in China in 2019 seemed noteworthy, with the direct expenditure accounting for more than half. Without effectively reducing exposure to modifiable factors and expanding screening coverage, the burden would continue increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
- Department of Cancer EpidemiologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Yan‐Jie Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Lin Lei
- Department of Cancer Control and PreventionShenzhen Center for Chronic Disease ControlShenzhenChina
| | - Cheng‐Cheng Liu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Wan‐Qing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and ImplementChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Min Dai
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Xin Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jie‐Bin Lew
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Ju‐Fang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and ImplementChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and ImplementChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lacaze P, Marquina C, Tiller J, Brotchie A, Kang YJ, Merritt MA, Green RC, Watts GF, Nowak KJ, Manchanda R, Canfell K, James P, Winship I, McNeil JJ, Ademi Z. Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 66:102297. [PMID: 38192593 PMCID: PMC10772163 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background No previous health-economic evaluation has assessed the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering combined adult population genomic screening for mutliple high-risk conditions in a national public healthcare system. Methods This modeling study assessed the impact of offering combined genomic screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and familial hypercholesterolaemia to all young adults in Australia, compared with the current practice of clinical criteria-based testing for each condition separately. The intervention of genomic screening, assumed as an up-front single cost in the first annual model cycle, would detect pathogenic variants in seven high-risk genes. The simulated population was 18-40 year-olds (8,324,242 individuals), modelling per-sample test costs ranging AU$100-$1200 (base-case AU$200) from the year 2023 onwards with testing uptake of 50%. Interventions for identified high-risk variant carriers follow current Australian guidelines, modelling imperfect uptake and adherence. Outcome measures were morbidity and mortality due to cancer (breast, ovarian, colorectal and endometrial) and coronary heart disease (CHD) over a lifetime horizon, from healthcare-system and societal perspectives. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), discounted 5% annually (with 3% discounting in scenario analysis). Findings Over the population lifetime (to age 80 years), the model estimated that genomic screening per-100,000 individuals would lead to 747 QALYs gained by preventing 63 cancers, 31 CHD cases and 97 deaths. In the total model population, this would translate to 31,094 QALYs gained by preventing 2612 cancers, 542 non-fatal CHD events and 4047 total deaths. At AU$200 per-test, genomic screening would require an investment of AU$832 million for screening of 50% of the population. Our findings suggest that this intervention would be cost-effective from a healthcare-system perspective, yielding an ICER of AU$23,926 (∼£12,050/€14,110/US$15,345) per QALY gained over the status quo. In scenario analysis with 3% discounting, an ICER of AU$4758/QALY was obtained. Sensitivity analysis for the base case indicated that combined genomic screening would be cost-effective under 70% of simulations, cost-saving under 25% and not cost-effective under 5%. Threshold analysis showed that genomic screening would be cost-effective under the AU$50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold at per-test costs up to AU$325 (∼£164/€192/US$208). Interpretation Our findings suggest that offering combined genomic screening for high-risk conditions to young adults would be cost-effective in the Australian public healthcare system, at currently realistic testing costs. Other matters, including psychosocial impacts, ethical and societal issues, and implementation challenges, also need consideration. Funding Australian Government, Department of Health, Medical Research Future Fund, Genomics Health Futures Mission (APP2009024). National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (102604).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Lacaze
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Clara Marquina
- Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Group, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jane Tiller
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Adam Brotchie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Yoon-Jung Kang
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Melissa A. Merritt
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Robert C. Green
- Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, Ariadne Labs and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Gerald F. Watts
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Departments of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia
| | - Kristen J. Nowak
- Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Western Australia Department of Health, East Perth, WA, 6004, Australia
- Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - John J. McNeil
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Group, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
De Santis KK, Helmer S, Barnes B, Kraywinkel K, Imhoff M, Müller-Eberstein R, Kirstein M, Quatmann A, Simke J, Stiens L, Christianson L, Zeeb H. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14329-14340. [PMID: 37507594 PMCID: PMC10590309 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical care for chronic diseases. This study aimed to systematically assess the pandemic impact on oncological care in Germany using a rapid review. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, study and preprint registries and study bibliographies were searched for studies published between 2020 and 2 November 2022. Inclusion was based on the PCC framework: population (cancer), concept (oncological care) and context (COVID-19 pandemic in Germany). Studies were selected after title/abstract and full-text screening by two authors. Extracted data were synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively. Risk of bias was assessed and summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Overall, 77 records (59 peer-reviewed studies and 18 reports) with administrative, cancer registry and survey data were included. Disruptions in oncological care were reported and varied according to pandemic-related factors (e.g., pandemic stage) and other (non-pandemic) factors (e.g., care details). During higher restriction periods fewer consultations and non-urgent surgeries, and delayed diagnosis and screening were consistently reported. Heterogeneous results were reported for treatment types other than surgery (e.g., psychosocial care) and aftercare, while ongoing care remained mostly unchanged. The risk of bias was on average moderate. CONCLUSIONS Disruptions in oncological care were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Such disruptions probably depended on factors that were insufficiently controlled for in statistical analyses and evidence quality was on average only moderate. Research focus on patient outcomes (e.g., longer term consequences of disruptions) and pandemic management by healthcare systems is potentially relevant for future pandemics or health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Karolina De Santis
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Helmer
- Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Barnes
- German Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- German Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany
| | - Maren Imhoff
- German Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mathia Kirstein
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Anna Quatmann
- Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Julia Simke
- Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Lisa Stiens
- Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Lara Christianson
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chiu JWY, Lee SC, Ho JCM, Park YH, Chao TC, Kim SB, Lim E, Lin CH, Loi S, Low SY, Teo LLS, Yeo W, Dent R. Clinical Guidance on the Monitoring and Management of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd)-Related Adverse Events: Insights from an Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Panel. Drug Saf 2023; 46:927-949. [PMID: 37552439 PMCID: PMC10584766 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01328-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-improved outcomes of patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Guidance on monitoring and managing T-DXd-related adverse events (AEs) is an emerging unmet need as translating clinical trial experience into real-world practice may be difficult due to practical and cultural considerations and differences in health care infrastructure. Thus, 13 experts including oncologists, pulmonologists and a radiologist from the Asia-Pacific region gathered to provide recommendations for T-DXd-related AE monitoring and management by using the latest evidence from the DESTINY-Breast trials, our own clinical trial experience and loco-regional health care considerations. While subgroup analysis of Asian (excluding Japanese) versus overall population in the DESTINY-Breast03 uncovered no major differences in the AE profile, we concluded that proactive monitoring and management are essential in maximising the benefits with T-DXd. As interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is a serious AE, patients should undergo regular computed tomography scans, but the frequency may have to account for the median time of ILD/pneumonitis onset and access. Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to be a highly emetic regimen, and prophylaxis with serotonin receptor antagonists and dexamethasone (with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) should be considered. Health care professionals should be vigilant for treatable causes of fatigue, and patients should be encouraged to use support groups and practice low-intensity exercises. To increase treatment acceptance, patients should be made aware of alopecia risk prior to starting T-DXd. Detailed monitoring and management recommendations for T-DXd-related AEs are discussed further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Wing Yan Chiu
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hong Kong
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Chung-man Ho
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hong Kong
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ta-Chung Chao
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Elgene Lim
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Ching-Hung Lin
- Cancer Center Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Su Ying Low
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Winnie Yeo
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Hong Kong
| | - Rebecca Dent
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Batchelor S, Lunnay B, Macdonald S, Ward PR. Extending the sociology of candidacy: Bourdieu's relational social class and mid-life women's perceptions of alcohol-related breast cancer risk. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:1502-1522. [PMID: 37056162 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol is a modifiable breast cancer risk, increasing risk in a dose-dependent manner. Mid-life women (aged 45-64 years) consume alcohol at higher rates than younger women and this, combined with age, make them a high-risk group for breast cancer. This critical public health problem has a seemingly obvious solution (reduce drinking); however, women do not necessarily know alcohol causes breast cancer, and if they do, reducing consumption is not always possible, or desirable. To innovate public health responses, we employ an interpretative sociological framework 'candidacy' to understand women's perspectives on breast cancer risk relative to alcohol consumption and their social class. Drawing on 50 interviews with Australian mid-life women, our findings reveal the socio-structural determinants of 'candidacy', that mean modifying alcohol consumption for breast cancer prevention is impacted by social class. Utilising Bourdieu's relational capitals, our interpretations show how social class shapes women's ascriptions and enactments of breast cancer candidacy. We offer an important theoretical extension to 'candidacy' by demonstrating more or less fluidity in women's assessment of breast cancer risk according to their agency to adopt breast cancer prevention messages. Understanding the social class possibilities and limitations in women's perceptions of breast cancer risk provides a new opportunity to reduce inequities in breast cancer incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Batchelor
- Research Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Adelaide Campus, Torrens University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Belinda Lunnay
- Research Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Adelaide Campus, Torrens University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sara Macdonald
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul R Ward
- Research Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Adelaide Campus, Torrens University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hodgson R, Albatat B, Tacey M, Zucchi E, Strugnell N, Lee B. An integrated interpreting service normalizes access to care for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients with colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:559-565. [PMID: 36507563 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare access to the initial management and overall survival with colorectal cancer for limited English proficient (LEP) patients compared with patients from an English background. METHODS All newly diagnosed patients from 2017 with colorectal cancer from a single health service with a highly multicultural catchment area and a well-developed and integrated translation and language support (TALS) department were recruited. Time from referral to: biopsy, date seen by a surgeon, oncologist, discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), and day of commencement of the first treatment modality, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred sixty-two patients were analyzed, including 57 LEP patients from 22 countries of birth. Interpreters were present at 687/782 appointments with LEP patients. There were no differences in demographics or cancer staging. There were no differences between English background and LEP patients with regard to times from referral to biopsy (1 vs. 0 days), specialist review (surgical: 4 vs. 6 days, oncological: 45 vs. 57 days), MDM discussion (23 vs. 15 days), or commencement of treatment (32 vs. 28.5 days). There were no differences in treatment for colorectal cancer, although a higher rate of stomas was noted in LEP patients. There was no difference in overall survival between groups. CONCLUSION Time to critical initial checkpoints and overall survival were similar in LEP and English background patients with colorectal cancer. An integrated TALS department may abrogate the language and cultural barriers that are known to disadvantage LEP patients and may contribute to normalizing care for the culturally and linguistically diverse community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Hodgson
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Batool Albatat
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- Department of Research, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emiliano Zucchi
- Transcultural and Language Services, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- School of Languages, Literature, Cultures and Linguistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Strugnell
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Department of Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Oncology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Oswald TK, Azadi L, Sinclair S, Lawn S, Redpath P, Beecroft L, Ranogajec M, Yoo J, Venning A. "Somebody was standing in my corner": a mixed methods exploration of survivor, coach, and hospital staff perspectives and outcomes in an Australian cancer survivorship program. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:478. [PMID: 37477703 PMCID: PMC10361845 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07908-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer survivorship in Australia continues to increase due to new methods for early detection and treatment. Cancer survivors face challenges in the survivorship phase and require ongoing support. A telephone-delivered cancer survivorship program (CSP), including health and mental health coaches, was developed, piloted, and evaluated in Eastern Australia. METHODS Cancer survivors' (n = 7), coaches' (n = 7), and hospital staff (n = 3) experiences of the CSP were explored through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data routinely collected throughout the pilot of the CSP was described (N = 25). RESULTS Three syntheses and 11 themes were generated through thematic analysis. The first synthesis centred around operational factors and highlighted a need to streamline communication from the point of recruitment, through to program delivery, emphasising that the program could be beneficial when timed right and tailored correctly. The second synthesis indicated that the CSP focused on appropriate information, filled a gap in support, and met the needs of cancer survivors by empowering them. The third synthesis focussed on the value of mental health support in the CSP, but also highlighted challenges coaches faced in providing this support. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data indicated improvements in self-management, weekly physical activity, and meeting previously unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors expressed appreciation for the support they received through the CSP and, in line with other cancer survivorship research, predominantly valued just having somebody in their corner. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Recommendations are made for improving cancer survivorship programs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tassia Kate Oswald
- Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford, South Australia, 5042, Australia
- Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Leva Azadi
- Remedy Healthcare Group, 271 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Sue Sinclair
- Ramsay Health, Level 3, 5 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2113, Australia
| | - Sharon Lawn
- Discipline of Public Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Paula Redpath
- Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Liam Beecroft
- Remedy Healthcare Group, 271 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Miles Ranogajec
- Remedy Healthcare Group, 271 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Jeannie Yoo
- Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford, South Australia, 5042, Australia
- Remedy Healthcare Group, 271 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Anthony Venning
- Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jang Y, Kim T, Kim BHS, Kim JH, Seong H, Kim YJ, Park B. Economic Burden of Cancer for the First Five Years after Cancer Diagnosis in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Korea. J Cancer Prev 2023; 28:53-63. [PMID: 37434797 PMCID: PMC10331032 DOI: 10.15430/jcp.2023.28.2.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the medical cost of cancer in the first five years of diagnosis and in the final six months before death in people who developed cancer after human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Korea. The study utilized the Korea National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database (NHIS-NHID). Among 16,671 patients diagnosed with HIV infection from 2004 to 2020 in Korea, we identified 757 patients newly diagnosed with cancer after HIV diagnosis. The medical costs for 60 months after diagnosis and the last six months before death were calculated from 2006 to 2020. The mean annual medical cost due to cancer in HIV-infected people with cancer was higher for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining cancers (48,242 USD) than for non-AIDS-defining cancers (24,338 USD), particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (53,007 USD), for the first year of cancer diagnosis. Approximately 25% of the cost for the first year was disbursed during the first month of cancer diagnosis. From the second year, the mean annual medical cost due to cancer was significantly reduced. The total medical cost was higher for non-AIDS-defining cancers, reflecting their higher incidence rates despite lower mean medical costs. The mean monthly total medical cost per HIV-infected person who died after cancer diagnosis increased closer to the time of death. The estimated burden of medical costs in patients with HIV in the present study may be an important index for defining healthcare policies in HIV patients in whom the cancer-related burden is expected to increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoonyoung Jang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Program in Regional Information, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taehwa Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Psychology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Brian H. S. Kim
- Program in Regional Information, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- AIDS Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Seong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youn Jeong Kim
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang Y, McCarthy AL, Tuffaha H. Cost-utility analysis of a supervised exercise intervention for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:391. [PMID: 37310516 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07819-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death after treatment for endometrial cancer (EC). There is clinical evidence that exercise significantly reduces the risks of CVD and cancer recurrence in this population; however, it is unclear whether there is value for money in integrating exercise into cancer recovery care for women treated for EC. This paper assesses the long-term cost-effectiveness of a 12-week supervised exercise intervention, as compared with standard care, for women diagnosed with early-stage EC. METHOD A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the Australian health system perspective for a time horizon of 5 years. A Markov cohort model was designed with six mutually exclusive health states: (i) no CVD, (ii) post-stroke, (iii) post-coronary heart disease (CHD), (iv) post-heart failure, (v) post-cancer recurrence, and (vi) death. The model was populated using the best available evidence. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 5% annual rate. Uncertainty in the results was explored using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULT The incremental cost of supervised exercise versus standard care was AUD $358, and the incremental QALY was 0.0789, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AUD $5184 per QALY gained. The likelihood that the supervised exercise intervention was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD $50,000 per QALY was 99.5%. CONCLUSION This is the first economic evaluation of exercise after treatment for EC. The results suggest that exercise is cost-effective for Australian EC survivors. Given the compelling evidence, efforts could now focus on the implementation of exercise as part of cancer recovery care in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufan Wang
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Alexandra L McCarthy
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Haitham Tuffaha
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Qin M, Zhang C, Li Y. Circular RNAs in gynecologic cancers: mechanisms and implications for chemotherapy resistance. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1194719. [PMID: 37361215 PMCID: PMC10285541 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1194719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Increasing evidence suggests that circular RNAs (circRNAs) play a significant role in conferring chemoresistance in these cancers. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms by which circRNAs regulate chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance in gynecologic malignancies. We also discuss the potential clinical implications of these findings and highlight areas for future research. CircRNAs are a novel class of RNA molecules that are characterized by their unique circular structure, which confers increased stability and resistance to degradation by exonucleases. Recent studies have shown that circRNAs can act as miRNA sponges, sequestering miRNAs and preventing them from binding to their target mRNAs. This can lead to upregulation of genes involved in drug resistance pathways, ultimately resulting in decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy. We discuss several specific examples of circRNAs that have been implicated in chemoresistance in gynecologic cancers, including cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. We also highlight the potential clinical applications of circRNA-based biomarkers for predicting chemotherapy response and guiding treatment decisions. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the role of circRNAs in chemotherapy resistance in gynecologic malignancies. By elucidating the underlying mechanisms by which circRNAs regulate drug sensitivity, this work has important implications for improving patient outcomes and developing more effective therapeutic strategies for these challenging cancers.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bhimani N, Wong GY, Molloy C, Dieng M, Kelly PJ, Hugh TJ. Lifetime direct healthcare costs of treating colorectal cancer: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:513-537. [PMID: 35844018 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01497-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a global public health issue and imposes a significant economic burden on populations and healthcare systems. This paper systematically reviews the literature to estimate the direct costs of colorectal cancer incurred during different phases of treatment (initial, continuing and end of life). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of science, Evidence-based medicine reviews: National health service economic evaluation database guide, econlit and grey literature from the 1st of January 2000 to the 1st of February 2020. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Evers' Consensus on health economic criteria checklist. In total, 39,489 records were retrieved, and 17 studies were included. Costs by phase of treatment varied due to heterogeneity. However, studies that examined average costs for each phase of treatment showed a V-shaped distribution where the initial and end of life phases contribute the most and the continuing phase the least. The initial phase ranged from $7,893 to $60,289; the continuing annual phase ranged from $2,323 to $15,744; and the end of life phase ranged from $15,916 to $99,687. Studies that provided the total cost of each phase conversely showed that the continuing phase was the highest contributor to the cost of treating CRC. This study estimates the cost of the contemporary management of colorectal cancer despite the methodological heterogeneity. These costs place a heavy burden on healthcare providers, patients and their families. Identifying these costs can impact health care budgets and guide policymakers in making informed decisions for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Bhimani
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Clinical Administration 8A, Acute Services Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Geoffrey Ym Wong
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Clinical Administration 8A, Acute Services Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Charles Molloy
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Clinical Administration 8A, Acute Services Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Mbathio Dieng
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Patrick J Kelly
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Clinical Administration 8A, Acute Services Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Edney LC, Roseleur J, Bright T, Watson DI, Arnolda G, Braithwaite J, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Mitchell R, Karnon J. DAta Linkage to Enhance Cancer Care (DaLECC): Protocol of a Large Australian Data Linkage Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:5987. [PMID: 37297591 PMCID: PMC10252629 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20115987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, accounting for 250 Disability-Adjusted Life Years and 10 million deaths in 2019. Minimising unwarranted variation and ensuring appropriate cost-effective treatment across primary and tertiary care to improve health outcomes is a key health priority. There are few studies that have used linked data to explore healthcare utilisation prior to diagnosis in addition to post-diagnosis patterns of care. This protocol outlines the aims of the DaLECC project and key methodological features of the linked dataset. The primary aim of this project is to explore predictors of variations in pre- and post-cancer diagnosis care, and to explore the economic and health impact of any variation. The cohort of patients includes all South Australian residents diagnosed with cancer between 2011 and 2020, who were recorded on the South Australian Cancer Registry. These cancer registry records are being linked with state and national healthcare databases to capture health service utilisation and costs for a minimum of one-year prior to diagnosis and to a maximum of 10 years post-diagnosis. Healthcare utilisation includes state databases for inpatient separations and emergency department presentations and national databases for Medicare services and pharmaceuticals. Our results will identify barriers to timely receipt of care, estimate the impact of variations in the use of health care, and provide evidence to support interventions to improve health outcomes to inform national and local decisions to enhance the access and uptake of health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Edney
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Jackie Roseleur
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Tim Bright
- Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - David I. Watson
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
- Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Geoffrey P. Delaney
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- St. George Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
- St. George Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hedley JA, Kelly PJ, Wyld M, Shah K, Morton RL, Byrnes J, Rosales BM, De La Mata NL, Wyburn K, Webster AC. Cost-effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Utilization of Kidneys From Deceased Donors With Primary Brain Malignancy in an Australian Setting. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1474. [PMID: 37090124 PMCID: PMC10118354 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidneys from potential deceased donors with brain cancer are often foregone due to concerns of cancer transmission risk to recipients. There may be uncertainty around donors' medical history and their absolute transmission risk or risk-averse decision-making among clinicians. However, brain cancer transmissions are rare, and prolonging waiting time for recipients is harmful. Methods We assessed the cost-effectiveness of increasing utilization of potential deceased donors with brain cancer using a Markov model simulation of 1500 patients waitlisted for a kidney transplant, based on linked transplant registry data and with a payer perspective (Australian government). We estimated costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for three interventions: decision support for clinicians in assessing donor risk, improved cancer classification accuracy with real-time data-linkage to hospital records and cancer registries, and increased risk tolerance to allow intermediate-risk donors (up to 6.4% potential transmission risk). Results Compared with current practice, decision support provided 0.3% more donors with an average transmission risk of 2%. Real-time data-linkage provided 0.6% more donors (1.1% average transmission risk) and increasing risk tolerance (accepting intermediate-risk 6.4%) provided 2.1% more donors (4.9% average transmission risk). Interventions were dominant (improved QALYs and saved costs) in 78%, 80%, and 87% of simulations, respectively. The largest benefit was from increasing risk tolerance (mean +18.6 QALYs and AU$2.2 million [US$1.6 million] cost-savings). Conclusions Despite the additional risk of cancer transmission, accepting intermediate-risk donors with brain cancer is likely to increase the number of donor kidneys available for transplant, improve patient outcomes, and reduce overall healthcare expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A. Hedley
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick J. Kelly
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie Wyld
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karan Shah
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael L. Morton
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juliet Byrnes
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brenda M. Rosales
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole L. De La Mata
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Wyburn
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Renal Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela C. Webster
- Collaborative Centre for Organ Donation Evidence, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Waller A, Hullick C, Sanson-Fisher R, Herrmann-Johns A. Optimal care of people with brain cancer in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey of outpatient perceptions. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100194. [PMID: 36915388 PMCID: PMC10006536 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective People diagnosed with brain cancer commonly present to the emergency department (ED). There is uncertainty about essential components and processes of optimal care from the perspective of consumers, and few guidelines exist to inform practice. This study examined the perceptions of outpatients and their support persons regarding what constitutes optimal care for people with brain cancer presenting to the ED. Methods A cross sectional descriptive survey study was undertaken. Participants included adults attending hospital outpatient clinics (n = 181, 60% of eligible participants). Participants completed a survey assessing perceptions of optimal care for brain cancer patients presenting to emergency department and socio-demographic characteristics. Results The survey items endorsed as 'essential' by participants included that the emergency department team help patients: 'understand signs and symptoms to watch out for' (51%); 'understand the next steps in care and why' (48%); 'understand if their medical condition suggests it is likely they will die in hospital' (47%); 'ask patients if they have a substitute decision maker and want that person told they are in the emergency department' (44%); 'understand the purpose of tests and procedures' (41%). Conclusions Symptom management, effective communication and supported decision-making should be prioritised by ED teams. Further research to establish the views of those affected by brain cancer about essential care delivered in the ED setting, and to compare these views with the quality of care that is actually delivered, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Carolyn Hullick
- Emergency Department, Belmont Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Herrmann-Johns
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Department for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Professorship for Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McCaffrey N, Cheah SL, Luckett T, Phillips JL, Agar M, Davidson PM, Boyle F, Shaw T, Currow DC, Lovell M. Treatment patterns and out-of-hospital healthcare resource utilisation by patients with advanced cancer living with pain: An analysis from the Stop Cancer PAIN trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282465. [PMID: 36854021 PMCID: PMC9974128 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 70% of patients with advanced cancer experience pain. Few studies have investigated the use of healthcare in this population and the relationship between pain intensity and costs. METHODS Adults with advanced cancer and scored worst pain ≥ 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) were recruited from 6 Australian oncology/palliative care outpatient services to the Stop Cancer PAIN trial (08/15-06/19). Out-of-hospital, publicly funded services, prescriptions and costs were estimated for the three months before pain screening. Descriptive statistics summarize the clinico-demographic variables, health services and costs, treatments and pain scores. Relationships with costs were explored using Spearman correlations, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and a gamma log-link generalized linear model. RESULTS Overall, 212 participants had median worst pain scores of five (inter-quartile range 4). The most frequently prescribed medications were opioids (60.1%) and peptic ulcer/gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) drugs (51.6%). The total average healthcare cost in the three months before the census date was A$6,742 (95% CI $5,637, $7,847), approximately $27,000 annually. Men had higher mean healthcare costs than women, adjusting for age, cancer type and pain levels (men $7,872, women $4,493, p<0.01) and higher expenditure on prescriptions (men $5,559, women $2,034, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this population with pain and cancer, there was no clear relationship between healthcare costs and pain severity. These treatment patterns requiring further exploration including the prevalence of peptic ulcer/GORD drugs, and lipid lowering agents and the higher healthcare costs for men. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12615000064505. World Health Organisation unique trial number U1111-1164-4649. Registered 23 January 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood Campus, Burwood, VIC, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Seong Leang Cheah
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L. Phillips
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Brisbane, Queensland
| | - Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Patricia M. Davidson
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Mater Hospital North Sydney, and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David C. Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Lovell
- Department of Palliative Care, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yap S, He E, Egger S, Goldsbury DE, Lew JB, Ngo PJ, Worthington J, Rillstone H, Zalcberg JR, Cuff J, Ward RL, Canfell K, Feletto E, Steinberg J. Colon and rectal cancer treatment patterns and their associations with clinical, sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics: analysis of the Australian 45 and Up Study cohort. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:60. [PMID: 36650482 PMCID: PMC9845101 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10528-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer globally and the second leading cause of cancer death. We examined colon and rectal cancer treatment patterns in Australia. METHODS From cancer registry records, we identified 1,236 and 542 people with incident colon and rectal cancer, respectively, diagnosed during 2006-2013 in the 45 and Up Study cohort (267,357 participants). Cancer treatment and deaths were determined via linkage to routinely collected data, including hospital and medical services records. For colon cancer, we examined treatment categories of "surgery only", "surgery plus chemotherapy", "other treatment" (i.e. other combinations of surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy), "no record of cancer-related treatment, died"; and, for rectal cancer, "surgery only", "surgery plus chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy", "other treatment", and "no record of cancer-related treatment, died". We analysed survival, time to first treatment, and characteristics associated with treatment receipt using competing risks regression. RESULTS 86.4% and 86.5% of people with colon and rectal cancer, respectively, had a record of receiving any treatment ≤2 years post-diagnosis. Of those treated, 93.2% and 90.8% started treatment ≤2 months post-diagnosis, respectively. Characteristics significantly associated with treatment receipt were similar for colon and rectal cancer, with strongest associations for spread of disease and age at diagnosis (p<0.003). For colon cancer, the rate of "no record of cancer-related treatment, died" was higher for people with distant spread of disease (versus localised, subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR)=13.6, 95% confidence interval (CI):5.5-33.9), age ≥75 years (versus age 45-74, SHR=3.6, 95%CI:1.8-7.1), and visiting an emergency department ≤1 month pre-diagnosis (SHR=2.9, 95%CI:1.6-5.2). For rectal cancer, the rate of "surgery plus chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy" was higher for people with regional spread of disease (versus localised, SHR=5.2, 95%CI:3.6-7.7) and lower for people with poorer physical functioning (SHR=0.5, 95%CI:0.3-0.8) or no private health insurance (SHR=0.7, 95%CI:0.5-0.9). CONCLUSION Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most people with colon or rectal cancer received treatment ≤2 months post-diagnosis, however, treatment patterns varied by spread of disease and age. This work can be used to inform future healthcare requirements, to estimate the impact of cancer control interventions to improve prevention and early diagnosis, and serve as a benchmark to assess treatment delays/disruptions during the pandemic. Future work should examine associations with clinical factors (e.g. performance status at diagnosis) and interdependencies between characteristics such as age, comorbidities, and emergency department visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarsha Yap
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Emily He
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Sam Egger
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - David E Goldsbury
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Preston J Ngo
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Joachim Worthington
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Hannah Rillstone
- grid.420082.c0000 0001 2166 6280Cancer Policy and Advocacy, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
| | - John R Zalcberg
- grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia ,grid.267362.40000 0004 0432 5259Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jeff Cuff
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432Faculty of Science Biotech and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales Australia ,Research Advocate, The Daffodil Centre, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| | - Julia Steinberg
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, Woolloomooloo, Sydney, New South Wales 2011 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Long-term benefits for lower socioeconomic groups by improving bowel screening participation in South Australia: A modelling study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279177. [PMID: 36542644 PMCID: PMC9770333 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The gap in bowel cancer screening participation rates between the lowest socioeconomic position (SEP) groups and the highest in Australia is widening. This study estimates the long-term health impacts and healthcare costs at current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation rates by SEP in South Australia (SA). METHODS A Markov microsimulation model for each socioeconomic quintile in SA estimated health outcomes over the lifetime of a population aged 50-74 years (total n = 513,000). The model simulated the development of CRC, considering participation rates in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program and estimated numbers of cases of CRC, CRC deaths, adenomas detected, mean costs of screening and treatment, and quality adjusted life years. Screened status, stage of diagnosis and survival were obtained for patients diagnosed with CRC in 2006-2013 using data linked to the SA Cancer Registry. RESULTS We predict 10915 cases of CRC (95%CI: 8017─13812) in the lowest quintile (Q1), 17% more than the highest quintile (Q5) and 3265 CRC deaths (95%CI: 2120─4410) in Q1, 24% more than Q5. Average costs per person, were 29% higher in Q1 at $11997 ($8754─$15240) compared to Q5 $9281 ($6555─$12007). When substituting Q1 screening and diagnostic testing rates with Q5's, 17% more colonoscopies occur and adenomas and cancers detected increase by 102% in Q1. CONCLUSION Inequalities were evident in CRC cases and deaths, as well as adenomas and cancers that could be detected earlier. Implementing programs to increase screening uptake and follow-up tests for lower socioeconomic groups is critical to improve the health of these priority population groups.
Collapse
|
38
|
Sun MY, Bhaskar SMM. When Two Maladies Meet: Disease Burden and Pathophysiology of Stroke in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:15769. [PMID: 36555410 PMCID: PMC9779017 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Stroke and cancer are disabling diseases with an enormous global burden, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations and low- and middle-income countries. Both these diseases share common risk factors, which warrant concerted attention toward reshaping population health approaches and the conducting of fundamental studies. In this article, an overview of epidemiological trends in the prevalence and burden of cancer and stroke, underlying biological mechanisms and clinical risk factors, and various tools available for risk prediction and prognosis are provided. Finally, future recommendations for research and existing gaps in our understanding of pathophysiology. Further research must investigate the causes that predispose patients to an increased risk of stroke and/or cancer, as well as biomarkers that can be used to predict growing morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Yee Sun
- Global Health Neurology Lab, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
- Neurovascular Imaging Laboratory, Clinical Sciences Stream, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), South Western Sydney Clinical Campuses, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Sonu M. M. Bhaskar
- Global Health Neurology Lab, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
- Neurovascular Imaging Laboratory, Clinical Sciences Stream, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- Department of Neurology & Neurophysiology, Liverpool Hospital and South West Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD), Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- NSW Brain Clot Bank, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
- Stroke & Neurology Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gregory J, Foster L, O'Shaughnessy P, Robson S. The socioeconomic gradient in mortality from ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer in Australian women, 2001-2018: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 62:714-719. [PMID: 35708170 PMCID: PMC9796872 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socio-economic (SE) status is closely linked to health status and the mechanisms of this association are complex. One important adverse effect of SE disadvantage is vulnerability to cancer and cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia. AIMS We aimed to estimate the effect of SE status on mortality rates from ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS National mortality data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for the calendar years from 2001 to 2018, inclusive. Individual deaths were grouped by the ABS Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage. Population data were obtained to provided denominators allowing calculation of mortality rates (deaths per 100 000 women aged 30-79 years). Statistical analyses performed included tabulating point-estimates of mortality rates and their changes over time and modelling the trends of rates using maximum likelihood method. RESULTS Age-standardised mortality rates for ovarian and cervical cancer fell over the study period but increased for endometrial cancer. There was clear evidence of a SE gradient in the mortality rate for all three cancers. This SE gradient increased over the study period for ovarian and cervical cancer but remained unchanged for endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS Women at greater SE disadvantage have higher rates of death from the commonest gynaecological cancers and this gradient has not reduced over the last two decades. After the COVID-19 pandemic efforts must be redoubled to ensure that Australians already at risk of ill health do not face even greater risks because of their circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Gregory
- Junior Medical OfficerNepean HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Leon Foster
- Senior Subspecialty Trainee, Gynaecological OncologyRoyal Hospital for WomenSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Pauline O'Shaughnessy
- School of Mathematics and Applied StatisticsUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Stephen J. Robson
- School of Health and MedicineAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhuang Q, Chong PH, Ong WS, Yeo ZZ, Foo CQZ, Yap SY, Lee G, Yang GM, Yoon S. Longitudinal patterns and predictors of healthcare utilization among cancer patients on home-based palliative care in Singapore: a group-based multi-trajectory analysis. BMC Med 2022; 20:313. [PMID: 36131339 PMCID: PMC9494890 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02513-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Home-based palliative care (HPC) is considered to moderate the problem of rising healthcare utilization of cancer patients at end-of-life. Reports however suggest a proportion of HPC patients continue to experience high care intensity. Little is known about differential trajectories of healthcare utilization in patients on HPC. Thus, we aimed to uncover the heterogeneity of healthcare utilization trajectories in HPC patients and identify predictors of each utilization pattern. METHODS This is a cohort study of adult cancer patients referred by Singapore Health Services to HCA Hospice Service who died between 1st January 2018 and 31st March 2020. We used patient-level data to capture predisposing, enabling, and need factors for healthcare utilization. Group-based multi-trajectory modelling was applied to identify trajectories for healthcare utilization based on the composite outcome of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and outpatient visits. RESULTS A total of 1572 cancer patients received HPC (median age, 71 years; interquartile range, 62-80 years; 51.1% female). We found three distinct trajectory groups: group 1 (31.9% of cohort) with persistently low frequencies of healthcare utilization, group 2 (44.1%) with persistently high frequencies, and group 3 (24.0%) that begin with moderate frequencies, which dropped over the next 9 months before increasing in the last 3 months. Predisposing (age, advance care plan completion, and care preferences), enabling (no medical subsidy, primary decision maker), and need factors (cancer type, comorbidity burden and performance status) were significantly associated with group membership. High symptom needs increased ED visits and hospitalizations in all three groups (ED visits, group 1-3: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.74-6.85; hospitalizations, group 1-3: IRR 1.69-6.60). High home visit intensity reduced outpatient visits in all three groups (group 1-3 IRR 0.54-0.84), while it contributed to reduction of ED visits (IRR 0.40; 95% CI 0.25-0.62) and hospitalizations (IRR 0.37; 95% CI 0.24-0.58) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS This study on HPC patients highlights three healthcare utilization trajectories with implications for targeted interventions. Future efforts could include improving advance care plan completion, supporting care preferences in the community, proactive interventions among symptomatic high-risk patients, and stratification of home visit intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyuan Zhuang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | | | - Whee Sze Ong
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Cherylyn Qun Zhen Foo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Su Yan Yap
- Palliative Care Services, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Guozhang Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Meijuan Yang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sungwon Yoon
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation, Singapore Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Merollini KMD, Gordon LG, Ho YM, Aitken JF, Kimlin MG. Cancer Survivors’ Long-Term Health Service Costs in Queensland, Australia: Results of a Population-Level Data Linkage Study (Cos-Q). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159473. [PMID: 35954835 PMCID: PMC9368477 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, the number of cancer survivors is rapidly increasing. The aim of this study was to quantify long-term health service costs of cancer survivorship on a population level. The study cohort comprised residents of Queensland, Australia, diagnosed with a first primary malignancy between 1997 and 2015. Administrative databases were linked with cancer registry records to capture all health service utilization. Health service costs between 2013–2016 were analyzed using a bottom-up costing approach. The cumulative mean annual healthcare expenditure (2013–2016) for the cohort of N = 230,380 individuals was AU$3.66 billion. The highest costs were incurred by patients with a history of prostate (AU$538 m), breast (AU$496 m) or colorectal (AU$476 m) cancers. Costs by time since diagnosis were typically highest in the first year after diagnosis and decreased over time. Overall mean annual healthcare costs per person (2013–2016) were AU$15,889 (SD: AU$25,065) and highest costs per individual were for myeloma (AU$45,951), brain (AU$30,264) or liver cancer (AU$29,619) patients. Our results inform policy makers in Australia of the long-term health service costs of cancer survivors, provide data for economic evaluations and reinforce the benefits of investing in cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia
- Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Birtinya, QLD 4575, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-7-5202-3159
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia;
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia;
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia;
| | - Yiu M. Ho
- Rockhampton Hospital, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, QLD 4700, Australia;
- Rural Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, QLD 4700, Australia
| | - Joanne F. Aitken
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia;
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Michael G. Kimlin
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cao MD, Liu CC, Wang H, Lei L, Cao M, Wang Y, Li H, Yan XX, Li YJ, Wang X, Peng J, Qu C, Feletto E, Shi JF, Chen W. The population-level economic burden of liver cancer in China, 2019-2030: prevalence-based estimations from a societal perspective. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2022; 20:36. [PMID: 35870941 PMCID: PMC9308023 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-022-00370-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmark data on the population-level economic burden are critical to inform policymakers about liver cancer control. However, comprehensive data in China are currently limited. METHODS A prevalence-based approach from a societal perspective was used to quantify the annual economic burden of liver cancer in China from 2019 to 2030. Detailed per-case data on medical/non-medical expenditure and work-loss days were extracted from a multicenter survey. The numbers/rates of new/prevalent cases and deaths, survival, and population-related parameters were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 and the literature. All expenditure data were reported in both 2019 Chinese Yuan (CNY) and United States dollar (US$, for main estimations). RESULT The overall economic burden of liver cancer was estimated at CNY76.7/US$11.1 billion in China in 2019 (0.047% of the local GDP). The direct expenditure was CNY21.6/US$3.1 billion, including CNY19.7/US$2.9 billion for medical expenditure and CNY1.9/US$0.3 billion for non-medical expenditure. The indirect cost was CNY55.1/US$8.0 billion (71.8% of the overall burden), including CNY3.0/US$0.4 billion due to disability and CNY52.0/US$7.5 billion due to premature death. The total burden would increase to CNY84.2/US$12.2 billion, CNY141.7/US$20.5 billion, and CNY234.3/US$34.0 billion in 2020, 2025, and 2030, accounting for 0.102%, 0.138%, and 0.192% of China's GDP, respectively. However, if China achieves the goals of Healthy China 2030 or the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals for non-communicable diseases, the burden in 2030 would be < CNY144.4/US$20.9 billion. CONCLUSIONS The population-level economic burden of liver cancer in China is currently substantial and will consistently increase in the future. Sustainable efforts in primary and secondary interventions for liver cancer need to be further strengthened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Di Cao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Liu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Lei
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, China
| | - Maomao Cao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuting Wang
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - He Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Xin Yan
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan-Jie Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ji Peng
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chunfeng Qu
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ju-Fang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tran PB, Kazibwe J, Nikolaidis GF, Linnosmaa I, Rijken M, van Olmen J. Costs of multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Med 2022; 20:234. [PMID: 35850686 PMCID: PMC9295506 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02427-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimorbidity is a rising global phenomenon, placing strains on countries' population health and finances. This systematic review provides insight into the costs of multimorbidity through addressing the following primary and secondary research questions: What evidence exists on the costs of multimorbidity? How do costs of specific disease combinations vary across countries? How do multimorbidity costs vary across disease combinations? What "cost ingredients" are most commonly included in these multimorbidity studies? METHODS We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42020204871) of studies published from January 2010 to January 2022, which reported on costs associated with combinations of at least two specified conditions. Systematic string-based searches were conducted in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Global Health, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete. We explored the association between costs of multimorbidity and country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita using a linear mixed model with random intercept. Annual mean direct medical costs per capita were pooled in fixed-effects meta-analyses for each of the frequently reported dyads. Costs are reported in 2021 International Dollars (I$). RESULTS Fifty-nine studies were included in the review, the majority of which were from high-income countries, particularly the United States. (1) Reported annual costs of multimorbidity per person ranged from I$800 to I$150,000, depending on disease combination, country, cost ingredients, and other study characteristics. (2) Our results further demonstrated that increased country GDP per capita was associated with higher costs of multimorbidity. (3) Meta-analyses of 15 studies showed that on average, dyads which featured Hypertension were among the least expensive to manage, with the most expensive dyads being Respiratory and Mental Health condition (I$36,840), Diabetes and Heart/vascular condition (I$37,090), and Cancer and Mental Health condition in the first year after cancer diagnosis (I$85,820). (4) Most studies reported only direct medical costs, such as costs of hospitalization, outpatient care, emergency care, and drugs. CONCLUSIONS Multimorbidity imposes a large economic burden on both the health system and society, most notably for patients with cancer and mental health condition in the first year after cancer diagnosis. Whether the cost of a disease combination is more or less than the additive costs of the component diseases needs to be further explored. Multimorbidity costing studies typically consider only a limited number of disease combinations, and few have been conducted in low- and middle-income countries and Europe. Rigorous and standardized methods of data collection and costing for multimorbidity should be developed to provide more comprehensive and comparable evidence for the costs of multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Bich Tran
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Joseph Kazibwe
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Global Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ismo Linnosmaa
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mieke Rijken
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Josefien van Olmen
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nguyen ALT, Blizzard CL, Yee KC, Campbell JA, Palmer AJ, de Graaff B. Hospitalisation costs of primary liver cancer in Australia: evidence from a data-linkage study. AUST HEALTH REV 2022; 46:463-470. [PMID: 35584964 DOI: 10.1071/ah21395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to estimate the public hospital costs associated with primary liver cancer (PLC) in the first and second years following the cancer diagnosis.MethodsThis study linked administrative datasets of patients diagnosed with PLC in Victoria, Australia, from January 2008 to December 2015. The health system perspective was adopted to estimate the direct healthcare costs associated with PLC, based on inpatient and emergency costs. Costs were estimated for the first 12 months and 12-24 months after the PLC diagnosis and expressed in 2017 Australian dollars (A$). The cost estimated was then extrapolated nationally. The linear mixed model with a Box-Cox transformation of the costs was used to explore the relationship between costs and patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsFor the first 12 months, the total and annual per-patient cost was A$211.4 million and A$63 664, respectively. Costs for the subsequent year were A$49.7 million and A$46 751, respectively. Regarding the cost extrapolation to Australia, the total cost was A$137 million for the first 12 months after notification and A$42.6 million for the period from 12 to 24 months. Higher costs per episode of care were mostly associated with older age, hepatocellular carcinoma type of PLC, metropolitan hospitals, and Asian birth region.ConclusionThis study showed the public hospital admission and emergency costs associated with PLC and the substantial economic burden this cancer has placed on the Australian health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | | | - Kwang Chien Yee
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Julie A Campbell
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Andrew J Palmer
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Barbara de Graaff
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Grobler L, O'Connor D, Rischin D, Putrik P, Karnon J, Rischin KJ, McKenzie BJ, Buchbinder R. Delivery of intravenous anti-cancer therapy at home versus in hospital or community settings for adults with cancer. Hippokratia 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Liesl Grobler
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| | - Denise O'Connor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| | - Danny Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Melbourne Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Australia
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health; Flinders University; Adelaide Australia
| | - Kobi J Rischin
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| | - Bayden J McKenzie
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Malvern Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lindsay D, Callander E. Quantifying the Costs to Different Funders over Five-Years for Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer in Queensland, Australia: A Data Linkage Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182412918. [PMID: 34948528 PMCID: PMC8701277 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Individuals diagnosed with breast cancer have the highest rates of survival among all cancer types. Due to high survival, the costs of breast cancer to different healthcare funders are of interest. This study aimed to describe the cost to public hospital and private health funders and individuals due to hospital and emergency department (ED) admissions, as well Medicare items and pharmaceuticals over five years for Queensland women with breast cancer. We used a linked administrative dataset, CancerCostMod, limited to Queensland female breast cancer diagnoses between July 2011 and June 2013 aged 18 years or over who survived for 5 years (n = 5383). Each record was linked to Queensland Health Admitted Patient Data Collection, Emergency Department Information Systems, Medicare Benefits Schedule, and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme records between July 2011 and June 2018. Total costs for different healthcare funders as a result of breast cancer diagnoses were reported, with high costs and service use identified in the first six months following a breast cancer diagnosis. After the first six months post-diagnosis, the financial burdens incurred by different healthcare funders for breast cancer diagnoses in Queensland remain steady over a long period. Recommendations for reducing long term costs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Goldsbury DE, Feletto E, Weber MF, Haywood P, Pearce A, Lew JB, Worthington J, He E, Steinberg J, O’Connell DL, Canfell K. Health system costs and days in hospital for colorectal cancer patients in New South Wales, Australia. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260088. [PMID: 34843520 PMCID: PMC8629237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) care costs the Australian healthcare system more than any other cancer. We estimated costs and days in hospital for CRC cases, stratified by site (colon/rectal cancer) and disease stage, to inform detailed analyses of CRC-related healthcare. Methods Incident CRC patients were identified using the Australian 45 and Up Study cohort linked with cancer registry records. We analysed linked hospital admission records, emergency department records, and reimbursement records for government-subsidised medical services and prescription medicines. Cases’ health system costs (2020 Australian dollars) and hospital days were compared with those for cancer-free controls (matched by age, sex, geography, smoking) to estimate excess resources by phase of care, analysed by sociodemographic, health, and disease characteristics. Results 1200 colon and 546 rectal cancer cases were diagnosed 2006–2013, and followed up to June 2016. Eighty-nine percent of cases had surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and excess costs were predominantly for hospitalisations. Initial phase (12 months post-diagnosis) mean excess health system costs were $50,434 for colon and $60,877 for rectal cancer cases, with means of 16 and 18.5 excess hospital days, respectively. The annual continuing mean excess costs were $6,779 (colon) and $8,336 (rectal), with a mean of 2 excess hospital days each. Resources utilised (costs and days) in these phases increased with more advanced disease, comorbidities, and younger age. Mean excess costs in the year before death were $74,952 (colon) and $67,733 (rectal), with means of 34 and 30 excess hospital days, respectively–resources utilised were similar across all characteristics, apart from lower costs for cases aged ≥75 at diagnosis. Conclusions Health system costs and hospital utilisation for CRC care are greater for people with more advanced disease. These findings provide a benchmark, and will help inform future cost-effectiveness analyses of potential approaches to CRC screening and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E. Goldsbury
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marianne F. Weber
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Haywood
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Pearce
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joachim Worthington
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily He
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Gastroenterology and Liver Department, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dianne L. O’Connell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nejati M, Razavi M, Harirchi I, Zanganeh M, Salari G, Tabatabaee SM. Resource Use and Costs Associated to the Initial Phase of Treatment for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Post-Surgery Chemotherapy: A Cost Analysis from a Healthcare Perspective. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 50:1887-1896. [PMID: 34722385 PMCID: PMC8542811 DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i9.7062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Background: To estimate the resource use and costs associated to the initial phase of treatment for colorectal cancer in Iran. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using routinely collected data within Electronic Health Records System (SEPAS), a national database representing public hospitals in Iran between March 20, 2016 and March 19, 2017. Primary end points included healthcare resource use, direct medical and non-medical costs of care in the 12-month study period. Results: The study population included 657 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery and the follow-up chemotherapy. We estimated a total direct cost of $21,407 per patient. The results indicated that direct medical costs were primarily driven by inpatient hospital care, followed by surgery, chemotherapy, and diagnostic services. Conclusion: The initial 12-month of treatment for colorectal cancer, including surgery and the follow-up chemotherapy, is resource intensive. The total direct costs associated to the disease are remarkable, with Inpatient hospital services being the main contributor followed by surgery and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nejati
- The Cancer Institute at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Moaven Razavi
- The Schneider Institutes for Health Policy at the Heller School of Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Iraj Harirchi
- The Cancer Institute at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Zanganeh
- Deputy of Medical Affairs, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
| | - Gholamreza Salari
- Iran Small Businesses and Industrial Parks Organization, Qazvin, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lindsay D, Bates N, Diaz A, Watt K, Callander E. Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2141-2150. [PMID: 34676449 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06570-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With increasing rates of cancer survival due to advances in screening and treatment options, the costs of breast cancer diagnoses are attracting interest. However, limited research has explored the costs to the Australian healthcare system associated with breast cancer. We aimed to describe the cost to hospital funders for hospital episodes and emergency department (ED) presentations for Queensland women with breast cancer, and whether costs varied by demographic characteristics. METHODS We used a linked administrative dataset, CancerCostMod, limited to all breast cancer diagnoses aged 18 years or over in Queensland between July 2011 and June 2015 (n = 13,285). Each record was linked to Queensland Health Admitted Patient Data Collection and Emergency Department Information Systems records between July 2011 and June 2018. The cost of hospital episodes and ED presentations were determined, with mean costs per patient modelled using generalised linear models with a gamma distribution and log link function. RESULTS The total cost to the Queensland healthcare system from hospital episodes for female breast cancer was AUD$309 million and AUD$12.6 million for ED presentations during the first 3 years following diagnosis. High levels of costs and service use were identified in the first 6 months following diagnosis. Some significant differences in cost of hospital and ED episodes were identified based on demographic characteristics, with Indigenous women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds having higher costs. CONCLUSION Hospitalisation costs for breast cancer in Queensland exert a high burden on the healthcare system. Costs are higher for women during the first 6 months from diagnosis and for Indigenous women, as well as those with underlying comorbidities and lower socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Nicole Bates
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Abbey Diaz
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kerrianne Watt
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
First-Year Healthcare Resource Utilization Costs of Five Major Cancers in Japan. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18189447. [PMID: 34574371 PMCID: PMC8466127 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Reports on the expenditure of cancer treatments per patient using comprehensive data remain unavailable in Japan. This study aimed to use Japan’s cancer registry data and health service utilization data for evaluating the disease-specific, per-patient costs of five major cancers—stomach, lung, colorectal, liver, and breast cancers. We used a database linking the 2017 data from a hospital-based cancer registry and the health service utilization data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination survey. All patients who started their first treatment course at each hospital were included. The costs were calculated using the total volume of the health services provided and the unit fee information included in the data. We analyzed 304,698 patients. Lung cancer had the highest healthcare cost per-patient for the first year of diagnosis and the longest median hospitalization duration. Conversely, breast cancer showed the lowest cost and the shortest median hospitalization duration. However, in the first month after diagnosis, colorectal cancer showed the highest cost. Subsequently, the gaps between the costs of the five common cancers drastically diminished. The cancer type having the longest hospitalization duration had the highest overall healthcare resource utilization costs. This information is essential for care planning and research studies.
Collapse
|