PD-L1 Expression Heterogeneity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Defining Criteria for Harmonization between Biopsy Specimens and Whole Sections

RICTOR amplification is associated with Rictor membrane staining and does not correlate with PD-L1 expression in lung squamous cell carcinoma

RICTOR gene, which encodes the scaffold protein of mTORC2, can be amplified in various tumor types, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. RICTOR amplification can lead to hyperactivation of mTORC2 and may serve as a targetable genetic alteration, including in lung SCC patients with no PD-L1 expression who are not expected to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This study aimed to compare RICTOR amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with Rictor and PD-L1 protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in SCC of the lung. The study was complemented by analysis of the publicly available Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Firehose legacy) dataset. RICTOR amplification was observed in 20% of our cases and 16% of the lung SCC cases of the TCGA dataset. Rictor and PD-L1 expression was seen in 74% and 44% of the cases, respectively. Rictor IHC showed two staining patterns: membrane staining (16% of the cases) and cytoplasmic staining (58% of the cases). Rictor membrane staining predicted RICTOR amplification as detected by FISH with high specificity (95%) and sensitivity (70%). We did not find any correlation between RICTOR amplification and PD-L1 expression; RICTOR amplification was detected in 18% and 26% of PD-L1 positive and negative cases, respectively. The TCGA dataset analysis showed similar results; RICTOR copy number correlated with Rictor mRNA and protein expression but showed no association with PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression. In conclusion, the correlation between RICTOR amplification and Rictor membrane staining suggests that the latter can potentially be used as a surrogate marker to identify lung SCC cases with RICTOR amplification. Since a significant proportion of PD-L1 negative SCC cases harbor RICTOR amplification, analyzing PD-L1 negative tumors by RICTOR FISH or Rictor IHC can help select patients who may benefit from mTORC2 inhibitor therapy.

Recent advances in nanotechnology for programmed death ligand 1-targeted cancer theranostics

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy has provided a unique and potent weapon against cancer in clinical practice. The likelihood of achieving beneficial effects from PD-L1/PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is clinically assessed by detecting PD-L1 expression through invasive tissue biopsies. However, PD-L1 expression is susceptible to tumor heterogeneity and dynamic response to ICB therapy. Moreover, currently, anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy still faces challenges of the low targeting efficiency of antibody drugs and the risk of immune-associated adverse events. To overcome these issues, advanced nanotechnology has been developed for the purpose of quantitative, non-invasive, and dynamic analyses of PD-L1, and to enhance the efficiency of ICB therapy. In this review, we first introduce the nanoprobe-assisted in vitro/in vivo modalities for the selective and sensitive analysis of PD-L1 during the diagnostic and therapeutic process. On the other hand, the feasibility of fabricating diverse functional nanocarriers as smart delivery systems for precisely targeted delivery of PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors and combined therapies is highlighted. Finally, the current challenges are discussed and future perspectives for PD-L1-targeted cancer theranostics in preclinical research and clinical settings are proposed.

PD-L1 assessment in lung cancer biopsies-pitfalls and limitations

The programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression on tumor cells predicts the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, the assessment of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells has limited power for selecting patients for immunotherapy due to intra-tumoral heterogeneity and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression, the inter-observer variability in scoring PD-L1 staining, and reproducibility. These difficulties and pitfalls in interpreting the PD-L1 assessment are discussed in detail in this review.

Immunotherapy Guided by Immunohistochemistry PD-L1 Testing for Patients with NSCLC: A Microsimulation Model-Based Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

On the basis of immunohistochemistry PD-L1 testing results, patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated differently. Theoretically, patients with high PD-L1 expression (50% or 1%) should receive PD-1 monotherapy for fewer adverse reactions and cost savings from avoiding chemotherapy; however, there is controversy surrounding the cut-off criteria (1% or 50%) for immunohistochemistry testing and threshold for PD-1 monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to predict the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different immunotherapy strategies for patients with NSCLC in China from the healthcare system perspective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A microsimulation model was developed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies: PD-L1 testing (1%) (PD-1 monotherapy for those with PD-L1 expression at 1% threshold, and combination with chemotherapy for others with immunohistochemistry testing), PD-L1 testing (50%) (PD-1 monotherapy for those with PD-L1 expression at 50% threshold, and combination with chemotherapy for others with immunohistochemistry testing), and No PD-L1 testing (PD-1 combined with chemotherapy without immunohistochemistry testing). The model assumed 1000 patients per strategy, with each patient entering a unique clinical path prior to receiving treatment on the basis of PD-L1 test results. Clinical inputs were derived from clinical trials. Cost and utility parameters were obtained from the database and literature. One-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) and six scenario analyses were used to test the model's robustness.

RESULTS

The study revealed a hierarchy of survival benefits across three strategies, with No PD-L1 testing demonstrating the most survival advantage, followed by PD-L1 testing (50%), and finally, PD-L1 testing (1%). The comparative analysis demonstrated that No PD-L1 testing significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93), progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90), and progression-free2 survival (PFS2) (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) when juxtaposed against PD-L1 testing (1%). However, these improvements were not as pronounced when compared with PD-L1 testing (50%), particularly in relation to PFS, PFS2, and OS. The cost-effectiveness analysis further unveiled incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR), with No PD-L1 testing versus PD-L1 testing (50%) at $34,003 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and No PD-L1 testing versus PD-L1 testing (1%) at $34,804 per QALY. In parallel, the ICUR for PD-L1 testing (50%) versus PD-L1 testing (1%) stood at $35,713 per QALY. Remarkably, the PSA result under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $10,144 per QALY, with a 100% probability, demonstrated PD-L1 testing (1%) as the most cost-effective option.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival benefits of PD-1 monotherapy for high expression with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing are inferior to those of PD-1 combined with chemotherapy without testing, but it is found to be more cost-effective at the WTP thresholds in China and holds great potential in increasing affordability and reducing the economic burden.

Serum ferritin level is an effective prognostic factor for lung cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy of lung cancer has achieved promising clinical results. However, it is urgent to develop predictive biomarkers for effective immunotherapy. While ferroptosis plays a critical role in immunotherapy efficacy, ferritin is an important regulatory factor. We, therefore, hypothesize that basal serum ferritin levels before immunotherapy and their corresponding changes during immunotherapy can be useful predictors of immunotherapy response in patients with lung cancer. We measured serum ferritin levels in 107 patients with lung cancer before and during immune checkpoint blockade treatments and studied the correlation between ferritin levels, response rate, and survival. Moreover, the correlation between basal ferritin and PD-L1 expression, tumor stages and pathological types was also analyzed. Patients with lower basal serum ferritin levels before immunotherapy had longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median 7 vs 4 months, P = .023) and higher disease control rate (DCR) (X2 = 4.837, P = .028), those with downregulated serum ferritin levels during immunotherapy correlated with longer PFS (median 9.5 vs 4 months, P < .001) and higher DCR (X2 = 6.475, P = .011). However, the "integrated factor", which was calculated as the combination of lower basal serum ferritin levels before immunotherapy and downregulated serum ferritin levels during immunotherapy, correlated with prolonged PFS (P < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the basal serum ferritin levels before immunotherapy and the corresponding changes during immunotherapy were both strong independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60, P = .041; HR = 2.65, P = .001). These findings suggest that serum ferritin levels can be used as a prognostic biomarker for lung cancer in predicting immunotherapy efficacy.

Diagnostic biopsy does not accurately reflect the PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer

PD-L1 expression is known to predict the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We examined whether the PD-L1 expression evaluated in biopsy specimens accurately reflects its expression in the whole tumor. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 81 biopsy and resection specimens from patients with TNBC to determine their PD-L1 status. We found PD-L1-positive tumors in 23 (28%) biopsy specimens and primarily PD-L1-negative tumors in 58 (72%). The PD-L1 status was reevaluated in matching postoperative specimens of primarily PD-L1-negative tumors. Of them, 31% (18/58) were positive, whereas 69% (40/58) were negative. Considering the pre- and postoperative analyses, 41 (51%) patients had PD-L1-positive tumors, while 40 had PD-L1-negative tumors. We found 18 (22%) more PD-L1-positive tumors while examining the resection specimens compared to biopsies, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0038). Diagnostic biopsies do not fully reflect the PD-L1 expression in TNBC. Our results suggest that a significant subset of TNBC patients may be misclassified as PD-L1-negative and disqualified from anti-PD-L1 therapy.

The nexus of dynamic T cell states and immune checkpoint blockade therapy in the periphery and tumor microenvironment

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, that is, using monoclonal antibodies to reinvigorate tumor-reactive, antigen-specific T cells from the inhibitory effects of CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoints, have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of modern oncology. However, only a subset of patients can benefit from the ICB therapy. Biomarkers associated with ICB response, resistance and prognosis have been subjected to intensive research in the past decade. Early studies focused on the analysis of tumor specimens and their residing microenvironment. However, biopsies can be challenging to obtain in clinical practice, and do not reflect the dynamic changes of immunological parameters during the ICB therapy. Recent studies have investigated profiles of antigen-specific T cells derived from the peripheral compartment using multi-omics approaches. By tracking the clonotype and diversity of tumor-reactive T cell receptor repertoire, these studies collectively establish that de novo priming of antigen-specific T cells in peripheral blood occurs throughout the course of ICB, whereas preexisting T cells prior to ICB are exhausted to various degrees. Here, we review what is known about ICB-induced T cell phenotypic and functional changes in cancer patients both within the tumor microenvironment and in the peripheral compartment. A better understanding of parameters influencing the response to ICBs will provide rationales for developing novel diagnostics and combinatorial therapeutic strategies to maximize the clinical efficacies of ICB therapies.

Update in Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Optimizing Treatment Sequencing and Identifying the Best Choices

The introduction of immunotherapy has brought about a paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has not only significantly improved the prognosis of patients but has also become a cornerstone of treatment, particularly in those without oncogenic driver mutations. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a crucial role in the treatment of lung cancer and can be classified into two main groups: Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (Anti-CTLA-4) and anti-T-cell receptor programmed cell death-1 or its ligand (Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1). Certainly, the landscape of approved first line immunotherapeutic approaches has expanded to encompass monotherapy, immunotherapy-exclusive protocols, and combinations with chemotherapy. The complexity of decision-making in this realm arises due to the absence of direct prospective comparisons. However, a thorough analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety data derived from pivotal clinical trials can offer valuable insights into optimizing treatment for different patient subsets. Moreover, ongoing research is investigating emerging biomarkers and innovative therapeutic strategies that could potentially refine the current treatment approach even further. In this comprehensive review, our aim is to highlight the latest advances in immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC, including the mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles, and clinical significance of ICI.

PD-L1 (22C3) Expression Correlates with Clinical and Molecular Features of Lung Adenocarcinomas in Cytological Samples

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 expression is the most widely used predictive marker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. However, the current understanding of the association between PD-L1 expression and treatment response is suboptimal. A significant percentage of patients have only a cytological specimen available for clinical management. Therefore, it is relevant to examine the impact of molecular features on PD-L1 expression in cytological samples and how it might correlate with a therapeutic response.

METHODS

We evaluated patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the lung who had both in-house targeted next-generation sequencing analysis and paired PD-L1 (22C3) immunohistochemical staining performed on the same cell blocks. We explored the association between molecular features and PD-L1 expression. In patients who underwent ICIs therapy, we assessed how a specific gene mutation impacted a therapeutic response.

RESULTS

145 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included in this study. PD-L1-high expression was found to be more common in pleural fluid than in other sample sites. Regional lymph node samples showed a higher proportion of PD-L1-high expression (29%) compared with lung samples (6%). The predictive value of PD-L1 expression was retained in cytological samples. Mutations in KRAS were also associated with a PD-L1-high expression. However, tumors with TP53 or KRAS mutations showed a lower therapy response rate regardless of the PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Cytological samples maintain a predictive value for PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma as regards the benefit of ICI treatment. Specific molecular alterations additionally impact PD-L1 expression and its predictive value.

What to do after immune-checkpoint inhibitors failure in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an expert opinion and review

INTRODUCTION

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (IO) have significantly improved outcomes of patients with non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), becoming the first-line agents for advanced disease. However, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge, limiting their effectiveness.

AREAS COVERED

Hereby, we addressed standard and innovative therapeutic approaches for NSCLC patients experiencing progression after IO treatment, discussing the emerging resistance mechanisms and the ongoing efforts to overcome them. In order to provide a complete overview of the matter, we performed a comprehensive literature search across prominent databases, including PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), and the Cochrane Library, and a research of the main ongoing studies on clinicaltrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The dynamics of progression to IO, especially in terms of time to treatment failure and burden of progressive disease, should guide the best subsequent management, together with patient clinical conditions. Long-responders to IO might benefit from continuation of IO beyond-progression, in combination with other treatments. Patients who experience early progression should be treated with salvage CT in case of preserved clinical conditions. Finally, patients who respond to IO for a considerable timeframe and who later present oligo-progression could be treated with a multimodal approach in order to maximize the benefit of immunotherapy.

On-treatment lung immune prognostic index is predictive for first-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Inflammation is a factor that promotes tumor progression and immunosuppression. Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is a non-invasive and easily calculated indicator of inflammation. This study aimed to investigate whether continuous assessment of LIPI has predictive value for chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving first-line programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus chemotherapy. In addition, the predictive value of LIPI in patients with the negative or low programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression level was also explored.

Methods

Totally, 146 stage IIIB to IV or recurrent NSCLC patients who received first-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. The LIPI scores were calculated at baseline (PRE-LIPI) and after two cycles of the combined administration (POST-LIPI). This study analyzed the relationship between good/intermediate/poor PRE (POST)-LIPI and objective response rate (ORR), as well as progression-free survival (PFS) using logistic and Cox regression models. In addition, the predictive value of LIPI in patients with the negative or low PD-L1 expression level was explored. To further assess the potential predictive value of continuous assessment of LIPI, the association of sum (LIPI) [sum(LIPI) = PRE-LIPI + POST-LIPI] and PFS was analyzed in the 146 patients.

Results

Compared with good POST-LIPI group, significantly lower ORRs were found in intermediate POST-LIPI (P = 0.005) and poor POST-LIPI (P = 0.018) groups. Moreover, intermediate POST-LIPI (P =0.003) and poor POST-LIPI (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with a shorter PFS than good POST-LIPI. Additionally, a higher POST-LIPI score was still significantly associated with poorer treatment efficacy in patients with the negative or low PD-L1 expression level. Moreover, a higher sum (LIPI) score was significantly correlated with a shorter PFS (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Continuous assessment of LIPI might be an effective method for predicting the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. In addition, in patients with the negative or low PD-L1 expression level, it might also have a potential predictive value for therapeutic efficacy to continuously assess LIPI during the treatment.

Effect of body tissue composition on the outcome of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Obesity and sarcopenia have been reported to affect outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We analyzed prospective data from 52 patients with non-oncogene driven metastatic NSCLC treated with ICIs. Body tissue composition was calculated by measuring the fat and muscle densities at the level of 3rd lumbar vertebra in each patient computed tomography scan before ICI initiation using sliceOmatic tomovision. We converted the densities to indices [Intramuscular Fat Index (IMFI), Visceral Fat Index (VFI), Subcutaneous Fat Index (SFI), Lumbar Skeletal Muscle Index (LSMI)] by dividing them by height in meters squared. Patients were dichotomized based on their baseline IMFI, VFI and SFI according to their gender-specific median value. The cut-offs that were set for LMSI values were 55 cm2/m2 for males and 39 cm2/m2 for females. SFI distribution was significantly higher (p = 0.040) in responders compared to non-responders. None of the other variables affected response rates. Low LSMI HR: 2.90 (95% CI: 1.261-6.667, p = 0.012) and low SFI: 2.20 (95% CI: 1.114-4.333, p = 0.023) values predicted for inferior OS. VFI and IMFI values did not affect survival. Subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle tissue composition significantly affected immunotherapy outcomes in our cohort.

Predictive performance of PD-L1 tumor proportion score for nivolumab response evaluated using archived specimens in patients with non-small cell lung cancer experiencing a postoperative recurrence

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative recurrence in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a major issue for life expectancy. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells is important in the prognosis of NSCLC. However, the predictive ability of PD-L1 evaluated with archived surgical specimens for nivolumab treatment have remained unknown. This study was aimed to analyze the predictive ability of the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) for nivolumab response in patients with NSCLC experiencing a postoperative recurrence using archived surgical specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involved patients with advanced NSCLC (N = 78) treated with nivolumab between April 2016 and September 2018. They were categorized into postoperative recurrence (N = 24) and non-postoperative recurrence (N = 54) groups. The predictive ability of PD-L1 TPS for response to nivolumab treatment in these two groups was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive ability of PD-L1 TPS using rebiopsy specimens collected from the recurrent lesions in six patients of the postoperative recurrence group.

RESULTS

PD-L1 TPS exhibited lower predictive performance in the postoperative recurrent group (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.58) compared with that in the non-post operative recurrent group (AUC = 0.81). Furthermore, PD-L1 TPS was significantly increased in rebiopsy specimens. The predictive performance of PD-L1 TPS in these specimens was higher (AUC = 0.90) than that in the archived surgical specimens.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that archived surgical specimens are inadequate for assessing the predictive ability of PD-L1 for nivolumab response, while rebiopsy specimens are adequate.

PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing: A review with reference to cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy based on disruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is standard of care for many high stage malignancies including melanomas, non-small cell carcinomas of the lung, triple negative breast carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Eligibility for immunotherapy requires immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1 expression. Currently, many high stage malignancies are diagnosed by cytology and cytologic material is the only specimen available for ancillary testing. Formal guidelines do not currently exist defining the optimal specimen type, antibody to be used or the best scoring system for cytologic material. Significant information has been published for PD-L1 testing of pulmonary specimens but much less data exists for the reproducibility, accuracy and best practices for material obtained from other body sites and types of malignancy.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed data base for manuscripts relating to PD-L1 testing of cytologic specimens. The search period was between 2016 and 2022. The search terms used were PD-L1, cytology, FNA, immunotherapy, immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, cytology-histology correlation. Cross referencing techniques were used to screen for the most relevant manuscripts. The abstracts of these were then reviewed for final data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were identified conforming to study relevancy. These were reviewed in their entirety by two authors (LJL, TZ) for extraction of data. The majority of studies involved pulmonary specimens (79) with three relating to PD-L1 testing of head and neck cytologic specimens and one each for PD-L1 testing of cytology specimens from melanomas, pancreas, pleural fluids, and triple negative breast carcinomas. While smears could be used, most studies found cell blocks optimal for testing.

SUMMARY

Currently, four drugs are approved for immunotherapy based on PD-L1 status. These drugs require specific antibody clones as well as scoring systems. Scoring systems and cut points vary with the type of neoplasm being treated. Cytology specimens from the lung, head and neck and melanomas can all be used for PD-L1 testing with good agreement with corresponding histology specimens.

Comparison of 22C3-PD-L1 Expression Between Paired Tumor Paraffin Blocks of Surgical Resection Specimens of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

In this study, our aim was to evaluate the discordance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression between 2 paired paraffin blocks from surgical nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens, thus providing recommendations for choosing paraffin blocks for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry detection. A total of 460 paired paraffin blocks of surgical NSCLC specimens were analyzed using the 22C3-PD-L1 assay. PD-L1 expression between 2 paired paraffin blocks was calculated using 3 classification schemes, tumor proportion score (TPS)-based 3-level classification and TPS-based binary classification using TPS ≥1% or TPS ≥50% as the cutoff. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed for cases with discordant PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression in 2 paired paraffin blocks of surgical NSCLC specimens was highly correlated from a single tumor ( R2 =0.89) in the overall trend. The overall discordance rates were 10.9%, 7.4%, and 3.5% respectively when using TPS-based 3-level classification or binary classification. No statistical differences were observed in PD-L1 expression discordance rates when patients were stratified by age, sex, smoking status, histologic types, TNM stage, or years of paraffin blocks ( P >0.05). The presence of a solid histologic pattern was associated with a higher PD-L1 expression discordance rate in adenocarcinomas ( P <0.05). Twenty-five cases with discordant PD-L1 expression were divided into 2 categories: spatial heterogeneity without recognizable morphology difference (76%) and spatial heterogeneity with significantly different morphology (24%). The discordance rate in TPS scores was much higher in cases with different morphology than those without different morphology. One representative paraffin block containing adequate neoplastic tissue may be adequate to determine PD-L1 expression in most of the surgical specimens of NSCLC. In cases that harbored different morphology in different paraffin blocks, the dual-block immunohistochemistry assessment method is recommended due to the intratumoral heterogeneity.

Pyroptosis-based risk score predicts prognosis and drug sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma

Pyroptosis is a recently identified form of programmed cell death; however, its role in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we set out to explore the prognostic potential of pyroptosis-related genes in LUAD. The pyroptosis-related risk score (PRRS) was developed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression. We found that PRRS was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD. LUAD patients in the high-PRRS group showed a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and enriched in cell proliferation-related pathways. Then pathway enrichment analyses, mutation profile, tumor microenvironment, and drug sensitivity analysis were further studied in PRRS stratified LUAD patients. Tumor purity (TP) analyses revealed that L-PRRS LUAD patients had a lower TP, and patients in L-TP + L-PRRS subgroup had the most prolonged OS. Mutation analyses suggested that the L-PRRS LUAD patients had a lower tumor mutation burden (TMB), and patients in H-TMB + L-PRRS subgroup had the most prolonged OS. Drug sensitivity analyses showed that PRRS was significantly negatively correlated with the sensitivity of cisplatin, besarotene, etc., while it was significantly positively correlated with the sensitivity of kin001-135. Eventually, a nomogram was constructed based on PRRS and clinical characters of LUAD. Overall, the pyroptosis-related signature is helpful for prognostic prediction and in guiding treatment for LUAD patients.

Case report: Variable response to immunotherapy in ovarian cancer: Our experience within the current state of the art

Despite recent advances in ovarian cancer (OC) treatment, including the introduction of bevacizumab and PARP-inhibitors, OC remains a lethal disease. Other therapeutic options are being explored, such as immunotherapy (IT), which has been proved effective in many solid tumors. Findings about tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic and regulatory T cells, together with the expression of PD-1 on immune cells and of PD-L1 on tumor cells, gave the rationale for an attempt to the use of IT also in OC. We treated two patients with avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, after the first line of chemotherapy: Patient A underwent 19 cycles of maintenance therapy with avelumab with a disease-free interval of 12 months, whereas patient B showed a slight progression of disease after only eight cycles. A higher PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of patient A was detected. She also underwent a genomic assessment that described the presence of a high Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) and a status of Loss of Heterozygosity (LoH). This different response to the same treatment puts in evidence that some genomic and immune features might be investigated.

Modifying factors of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression predicts immunotherapy utility in nononcogenic addictive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, its reproducibility and reliability may be compromised outside clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with PD-L1 expression in lung ADC.

METHODS

This observational study assessed 547 tumor samples with advanced lung ADC from January 2016 to December 2020 in a single cancer institution. Tumor samples were stained by at least one approved PD-L1 clone, SP263 (Ventana) or 22C3 (Dako), and stratified in tumor proportion score (TPS) <1%, 1-49%, or ≥50%.

RESULTS

Of all the tumor samples, positive PD-L1 staining was higher in poorly differentiated tumors (67.3% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001). Analytical factors associated with a PD-L1 high expression (TPS ≥ 50%) were the SP263 clone (19.6% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001), time of archival tumor tissue <12 months (15.3% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.024), whenever the analysis was performed in the most recent years (2019-2020) (19.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), and whenever the analysis was performed by pathologists in the academic setting (Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, INCan) (19.9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.001). In the molecular analysis, EGFR wild-type tumors had an increased proportion of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 high cases (60.2% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.006 and 17.4% vs.8.5%, p = 0.004). A moderate correlation (r = 0.69) in the PD-L1 TPS% was observed between the two different settings (INCan vs. external laboratories).

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathological factors were associated with an increased PD-L1 positivity rate. These differences were significant in the PD-L1 high group and associated with the academic setting, the SPS263 clone, time of archival tumor tissue <12 months, and a more recent period in the PD-L1 analysis.

Accuracy of next-generation sequencing for molecular profiling of small specimen of lung cancer: a prospective pilot study of side-by-side comparison

Background

Successful practice of precision medicine in advanced lung cancers relies on therapeutic regimens tailored to individual molecular characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of small specimens for molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Methods

Genetic alternations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), status of microsatellite instability (MSI), and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) were compared side-by-side between the concurrently obtained core needle biopsy (CNB) and resection specimens in 17 patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancers.

Results

DNA yield and library complexity were significantly lower in CNB specimens (both p < 0.01), whereas the insert size, sequencing depth, and Q30 ratio were similar between the matched specimens (all p > 0.05). The total numbers of genetic alternations detected in resection and CNB specimens were 186 and 211, respectively, with 156 alternations in common, yielding a specific concordance rate of 83.9%. The prevalence of mutations in 8 major driver genes was 100% identical between surgical and CNB specimens, though the allele frequency was lower in CNB specimens, with a median underestimation of 57%. Results of TMB were similar (p = 0.547) and MSI status was 100% matched in all paired specimens.

Conclusions

Pulmonary CNB specimens were suitable for NGS given the satisfactory accuracy when compared to corresponding surgical specimens. NGS results yielding from CNB specimens should be deemed reliable to provide instructive information for the treatment of advanced lung cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-022-01255-y.

From rough to precise: PD-L1 evaluation for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades

Developing biomarkers for accurately predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies is conducive to avoiding unwanted side effects and economic burden. At the moment, the quantification of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor tissues is clinically used as one of the combined diagnostic assays of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. However, the current assays for evaluating PD-L1 remain imperfect. Recent studies are promoting the methodologies of PD-L1 evaluation from rough to precise. Standardization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry tests is being promoted by using optimized reagents, platforms, and cutoff values. Combining novel in vivo probes with PET or SPECT will probably be of benefit to map the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. The dynamic change of PD-L1 in the circulatory system can also be realized by liquid biopsy. Consider PD-L1 expressed on non-tumor (immune and non-immune) cells, and optimized combination detection indexes are further improving the accuracy of PD-L1 in predicting the efficacy of ICIs. The combinations of artificial intelligence with novel technologies are conducive to the intelligence of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker. In this review, we will provide an overview of the recent progress in this rapidly growing area and discuss the clinical and technical challenges.

Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Past, present, and future directions

Many decades in the making, immunotherapy has demonstrated its ability to produce durable responses in several cancer types. In the last decade, immunotherapy has shown itself to be a viable therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several clinical trials have established the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), particularly in the form of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies and anti-programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) antibodies. Many trials have shown progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with either ICB alone or in combination with chemotherapy when compared to chemotherapy alone. The identification of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy continues to be evaluated. The future of immunotherapy in lung cancer continues to hold promise with the development of combination therapies, cytokine modulating therapies and cellular therapies. Lastly, we expect that innovative advances in technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, will begin to play a role in the future care of patients with lung cancer.

Comparison of three validated PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: interchangeability and issues related to patient selection

Different programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays and scoring algorithms are being used in the evaluation of PD-L1 expression for the selection of patients for immunotherapy in specific settings of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). In this paper, we sought to investigate three approved assays (Ventana SP142 and SP263, and Dako 22C3) in UC with emphasis on implications for patient selection for atezolizumab/pembrolizumab as the first line of treatment. Tumors from 124 patients with invasive UC of the bladder were analyzed using tissue microarrays (TMA). Serial sections were stained with SP263 and SP142 on Ventana Benchmark Ultra and with 22C3 on Dako Autostainer Link 48. Stains were evaluated independently by two observers and scored using the combined positive score (CPS) and tumor infiltrating immune cells (IC) algorithms. Differences in proportions (DP), overall percent agreement (OPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and Cohen κ were calculated for all comparable cases. Good overall concordance in analytic performance was observed for 22C3 and SP263 with both scoring algorithms; specifically, the highest OPA was observed between 22C3 and SP263 (89.6%) when using CPS. On the other hand, SP142 consistently showed lower positivity rates with high differences in proportions (DP) compared with 22C3 and SP263 with both CPS and IC, and with a low PPA, especially when using the CPS algorithm. In conclusion, 22C3 and SP263 assays show comparable analytical performance while SP142 shows divergent staining results, with important implications for the selection of patients for both pembrolizumab and atezolizumab.

Exploring immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Chemotherapy combined with or without targeted therapy is the fundamental treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Due to the adverse effects of chemotherapeutic drugs and the biological characteristics of the tumor cells, it is difficult to make breakthroughs in traditional strategies. The immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) therapy has made significant progress in the treatment of advanced malignant tumors, and patients who benefit from this therapy may obtain a long-lasting response. Unfortunately, immunotherapy is only effective in a limited number of patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), and segment initial responders can subsequently develop acquired resistance. From September 4, 2014, the first anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drug Pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA for the second-line treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. Subsequently, it was approved for mCRC second-line treatment in 2017. Immunotherapy has rapidly developed in the past 7 years. The in-depth research of the ICB treatment indicated that the mechanism of colorectal cancer immune-resistance has become gradually clear, and new predictive biomarkers are constantly emerging. Clinical trials examining the effect of immune checkpoints are actively carried out, in order to produce long-lasting effects for mCRC patients. This review summarizes the treatment strategies for mCRC patients, discusses the mechanism and application of ICB in mCRC treatment, outlines the potential markers of the ICB efficacy, lists the key results of the clinical trials, and collects the recent basic research results, in order to provide a theoretical basis and practical direction for immunotherapy strategies.

Standardized 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features provide information on PD-L1 expression status in treatment-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To study the relationship between standardized 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features and clinicopathological variables and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

58 NSCLC patients with preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans and postoperative results of PD-L1 expression were retrospectively analysed. A standardized, open-source software was used to extract 86 radiomic features from PET and low-dose CT images. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to find independent predictors of PD-L1 expression. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the ability of variables and their combination in predicting PD-L1 expression.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression resulted in the PET radiomic feature GLRLM_LGRE (Odds Rate (OR): 0.300 vs 0.114, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.096-0.931 vs 0.021-0.616, in NSCLC and adenocarcinoma respectively) and the CT radiomic feature GLZLM_SZE (OR: 3.338 vs 7.504, 95%CI: 1.074-10.375 vs 1.382-40.755, in NSCLC and adenocarcinoma respectively), being independent predictors of PD-L1 status. In NSCLC group, after adjusting for gender and histology, the PET radiomic feature GLRLM_LGRE (OR: 0.282, 95%CI: 0.085-0.936) remained an independent predictor for PD-L1 status. In the adenocarcinoma group, when adjusting for gender the PET radiomic feature GLRLM_LGRE (OR: 0.115, 95%CI: 0.021-0.631) and the CT radiomic feature GLZLM_SZE (OR: 7.343, 95%CI: 1.285-41.965) remained associated with PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC and adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 expression show higher tumour heterogeneity. Heterogeneity-related 18F-FDG PET and CT radiomic features showed good ability to non-invasively predict PD-L1 expression.

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry: Clones, cutoffs, and controversies

Cancer immunotherapy has become a major component of oncologic treatment for a growing number of malignancies. Of particular interest to pathology has been monoclonal antibody therapy targeting immune checkpoints, notably programmed cell death (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1). Targeting of these checkpoints attempt to overcome tumor evasion of the immune system. While PD-L1 testing is currently implemented as a predictive biomarker in multiple indications with the PD-L1 axis blockade, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry has been a complex issue for the pathology laboratory as it requires an understanding of multiple clones, on multiple testing platforms for multiple different malignancies, each with variable scoring criteria and thresholds. This review attempts to summarize the important PD-L1 testing algorithms and test performance for the practicing pathologist who actively reviews PD-L1 immunohistochemistry.

Radiopharmaceuticals as Novel Immune System Tracers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment paradigms for multiple cancers. However, ICI therapy often fails to generate measurable and sustained antitumor responses, and clinically meaningful benefits remain limited to a small proportion of overall patients. A major obstacle to development and effective application of novel therapeutic regimens is optimized patient selection and response assessment. Noninvasive imaging using novel immunoconjugate radiopharmaceuticals (immuno–positron emission tomography and immuno-single-photon emission computed tomography) can assess for expression of cell surface immune markers, such as programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1), akin to a virtual biopsy. This emerging technology has the potential to provide clinicians with a quantitative, specific, real-time evaluation of immunologic responses relative to cancer burden in the body. We discuss the rationale for using noninvasive molecular imaging of the programmed cell death protein-1 and PD-L1 axis as a biomarker for immunotherapy and summarize the current status of preclinical and clinical studies examining PD-L1 immuno–positron emission tomography. The strategies described in this review provide insight for future clinical trials exploring the use of immune checkpoint imaging as a biomarker for both ICI and radiation therapy, and for the rational design of combinatorial therapeutic regimens.

The risk of PD-L1 expression misclassification in triple-negative breast cancer

Purpose

Stratification of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) for anti-PD-L1 therapy is based on PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsies. This study sought to evaluate the risk of PD-L1 misclassification.

Methods

We conducted a high-resolution analysis on ten surgical specimens of TNBC. First, we determined PD-L1 expression pattern distribution via manual segmentation and measurement of 6666 microscopic clusters of positive PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining. Then, based on these results, we generated a computer model to calculate the effect of the positive PD-L1 fraction, aggregate size, and distribution of PD-L1 positive cells on the diagnostic accuracy.

Results

Our computer-based model showed that larger aggregates of PD-L1 positive cells and smaller biopsy size were associated with higher fraction of false results (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, our model showed a significant increase in error rate when the fraction of PD-L1 expression was close to the cut-off (error rate of 12.1%, 0.84%, and 0.65% for PD-L1 positivity of 0.5–1.5%, ≤ 0.5% ,and ≥ 1.5%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, false positive results were significantly higher than false negative results (0.51–22.62%, with an average of 6.31% versus 0.11–11.36% with an average of 1.58% for false positive and false negative results, respectively, P < 0.05). Furthermore, heterogeneous tumors with different aggregate sizes in the same tumor, were associated with increased rate of false results in comparison to homogenous tumors (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our model can be used to estimate the risk of PD-L1 misclassification in biopsies, with potential implications for treatment decisions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06630-3.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for approximately 80–85% of all lung cancers and at present represents the main cause of cancer death among both men and women. To date, surgery represents the cornerstone; nevertheless, around 40% of completely resected patients develop disease recurrence. Therefore, combining neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and surgery might lead to improved survival. Immunotherapy is normally well tolerated, although significant adverse reactions have been reported in certain patients treated with inhibitors of immune checkpoints. In this review, we explore the current literature on the use of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy followed by surgery for treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with particular attention to the histological aspects, ongoing trials, and the most common surgical approaches. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy whether combined or not with chemotherapy reveals a promising survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer; nevertheless, more data remain necessary to identify the best candidates for neoadjuvant regimens.

Analytical validation and initial clinical testing of quantitative microscopic evaluation for PD-L1 and HLA I expression on circulating tumor cells from patients with non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predicts response to immune checkpoint blockade, however is an imperfect biomarker given tumor heterogeneity, and the antigen presentation pathway requiring other components including HLA I expression. HLA I downregulation may contribute to resistance, warranting its evaluation in attempts to guide patient selection. In addition, earlier detection of acquired resistance could prompt earlier change in treatment and prolong patient survival. Analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) captures heterogeneity across multiple sites of metastases, enables detection of changes in tumor burden that precede radiographic response, and can be obtained in serial fashion.

METHODS

To quantify the expression of both PD-L1 and HLA I on CTCs, we developed exclusion-based sample preparation technology, achieving high-yield with gentle magnetic movement of antibody-labeled cells through virtual barriers of surface tension. To achieve clinical-grade quantification of rare cells, we employ high quality fluorescence microscopy image acquisition and automated image analysis together termed quantitative microscopy.

RESULTS

In preparation for clinical laboratory implementation, we demonstrate high precision and accuracy of these methodologies using a diverse set of control materials. Preliminary testing of CTCs isolated from patients with NSCLC demonstrate heterogeneity in PD-L1 and HLA I expression and promising clinical value in predicting PFS in response to PD-L1 targeted therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

By confirming high performance, we ensure compatibility for clinical laboratory implementation and future application to better predict and detect resistance to PD-L1 targeted therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Among Multiple Needle Core Biopsy Samples, the One with the Highest Tumor Proportion Score Best Represents the PD-L1 Status of the Whole Surgical Specimen in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The heterogeneity of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status between core needle biopsies (CNBs) from one tumor has not been well studied before. The current study attempts to find out the best index using multiple core biopsies from one tumor which can better reflect the actual PD-L1 status. Random CNB was performed in surgical specimens from 170 consecutive non-small cell lung cancer samples. Fifty-one cases (41 cases with PD-L1 positive and 10 cases with PD-L1 negative) and 216 matched CNBs were analyzed by DAKO 22C3 PharmDx Link 48 Autostainer. The PD-L1 status was compared between the surgical specimens and matched CNBs. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 status between CNBs from one tumor was observed in 56% of PD-L1 positive cases. Different tumor proportion score (TPS) statistical forms with regard to the highest, mean, median, weighted average TPS, as well as TPS showed by the longest biopsy specimen and the biopsy with most tumor volume were compared. At a cut-off of 1%, the concordance rates were 94.1%, 88.2%, 90.2%, 86.3%, 86.3%, and 86.3%; At a cut-off of 50%, the concordance rates were 92.2%, 86.3%, 84.3%, 82.4%, 82.4%, and 86.3%, respectively. The CNB with the highest TPS can best represent PD-L1 status estimated by whole surgical specimen. The highest TPS among the multiple biopsies is a robust evaluation of the PD-L1 status, but not mean TPS, at the 1% and 50% cut-offs.

Study on PD-L1 Expression in NSCLC Patients and Related Influencing Factors in the Real World

PD-L1 is one of the current biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the expression of PD-L1 in the real world and its related influencing factors remain unclear. We want to observe the expression of PD-L1 in the real world and study the related influencing factors through the collection and analysis of clinical data. R software (version 4.0) was used to perform data analysis and the “corplot” package for correlation analysis. A total of 296 individuals (mean [SD] age, 67 [9] years; 23%female) were assessed. According to the expression amount of PD-L1, the cohort was divided into low nonexpression group (PD‐L1 < 1%, 26.7%), low-expression group (1% ≤ PD‐L1 < 50%, 49.3%), and high-expression group (PD‐L1 ≥ 50%, 23.5%). Age, gender, underlying diseases, smoking status, and PD-L1 expression level were not statistically significant. We found that the expression of PD-L1 was correlated with serum albumin (P < 0.05) and pathological type (P < 0.05) and had a negative correlation with EGFR mutation but did not correlate with gender, age, smoking status, combined with underlying diseases, tumor stage, whether it was initially treated or not, sampling site, specimen type, specimen storage time, R-IFN, CD4, CD8, NLR, CRP, and LDH. The present findings indicated that serum albumin, pathological type, and EGFR mutations are associated with PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC, which may provide a new basis for individualized immunotherapy and need further study to confirm. The results of this study help to further reveal the actual expression of PD-L1 in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with real events.

Cancer Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Biomarkers of Response and Toxicity; Current Limitations and Future Promise

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that are used to treat over one in three cancer patients. While they have changed the natural history of disease, prolonging life and preserving quality of life, they are highly active in less than 40% of patients, even in the most responsive malignancies such as melanoma, and cause significant autoimmune side effects. Licenced biomarkers include tumour Programmed Death Ligand 1 expression by immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and tumour mutational burden, none of which are particularly sensitive or specific. Emerging tumour and immune tissue biomarkers such as novel immunohistochemistry scores, tumour, stromal and immune cell gene expression profiling, and liquid biomarkers such as systemic inflammatory markers, kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, circulating immune cells, cytokines and DNA are discussed in this review. We also examine the influence of the faecal microbiome on treatment outcome and its use as a biomarker of response and toxicity.

Prognostic significance of OX40+ lymphocytes in tumor stroma of surgically resected small-cell lung cancer

OX40 (CD134) is a co-stimulatory molecule mostly expressed on activated T lymphocytes. Previous reports have shown that OX40 can be an immuno-oncology target and a clinical biomarker for cancers of various organs. In this study, we collected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 124 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who had undergone surgery. We analyzed the expression profiles of OX40 and other relevant molecules, such as CD4, CD8, and Foxp3, in tumor stroma and cancer nest using immunohistochemistry and investigated their association with survival. High infiltration of OX40⁺ lymphocytes (OX40^high) in tumor stroma was positively associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with low infiltration of OX40⁺ lymphocytes (OX40^low) (RFS, median, 26.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), not reached (NR)–NR] vs 13.2 months [9.1–17.2], p = .024; OS, NR [95% CI, NR–NR] vs 29.8 months [21.3–38.2], p = .049). Multivariate analysis revealed that OX40^high in tumor stroma was an independent indicator of prolonged RFS. Moreover, RFS of patients with OX40^high/CD4^high in tumor stroma was significantly longer than that of patients with OX40^low/CD4^low. The RFS of patients with tumor stroma with OX40^high/CD8^high was significantly longer than that of patients with tumor stroma with OX40^low/CD8^high, OX40^high/CD8^low, or OX40^low/CD8^low. These findings suggest that OX40⁺ lymphocytes in tumor stroma play a complementary role in regulating the relapse of early-stage SCLC. Reinforcing immunity by coordinating the recruitment of OX40⁺ lymphocytes with CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in tumor stroma may constitute a potential immunotherapeutic strategy for patients with SCLC.

PD-L1 Dependent Immunogenic Landscape in Hot Lung Adenocarcinomas Identified by Transcriptome Analysis

Simple Summary

Lung cancer, with non-small-cell lung cancer as its most common form, is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality and shows a poor prognosis. Despite recent advantages in the field of immunotherapy, there is still a great need for an improved understanding of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade-responsive biology. Since immune cell infiltration is regarded as an important parameter in this field, we aimed to identify the immunogenic landscape in primary lung adenocarcinoma on the transcriptomic level in context with tumoral PD-L1 expression (positive vs. negative) and extent of immune infiltration (“hot” vs. “cold” phenotype). Our results reveal that genes that are related to the tumor microenvironment are differentially expressed based on tumoral PD-L1 expression indicating novel aspects of PD-L1 regulation, with potential biological relevance, as well as relevance for immunotherapy response stratification.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The clinical development of immune checkpoint blockade has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm for patients with lung cancer. Yet, an improved understanding of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade-responsive biology is warranted. Methods: We aimed to identify the landscape of immune cell infiltration in primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in the context of tumoral PD-L1 expression and the extent of immune infiltration (“hot” vs. “cold” phenotype). The study comprises LUAD cases (n = 138) with “hot” (≥150 lymphocytes/HPF) and “cold” (<150 lymphocytes/HPF) tumor immune phenotype and positive (>50%) and negative (<1%) tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively. Tumor samples were immunohistochemically analyzed for expression of PD-L1, CD4, and CD8, and further investigated by transcriptome analysis. Results: Gene set enrichment analysis defined complement, IL-JAK-STAT signaling, KRAS signaling, inflammatory response, TNF-alpha signaling, interferon-gamma response, interferon-alpha response, and allograft rejection as significantly upregulated pathways in the PD-L1-positive hot subgroup. Additionally, we demonstrated that STAT1 is upregulated in the PD-L1-positive hot subgroup and KIT in the PD-L1-negative hot subgroup. Conclusion: The presented study illustrates novel aspects of PD-L1 regulation, with potential biological relevance, as well as relevance for immunotherapy response stratification.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review

Objective

This review aims to summarize the possibilities of recently discovered molecular diagnostic techniques in lung cancer, by evaluating their impact on diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis in oligometastatic disease.

Background

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (OM-NSCLC) is currently defined based on morphological rather than biological features. Major advances in the detection of molecular biomarkers in cell-free tumoral DNA and the models of oncogene addiction make as feasible an early diagnosis and guide the therapeutic decision-making progress to improve the prognosis.

Methods

This narrative review EXAMINES current approaches of diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of OM-NSCLC and describes the fast-evolving therapeutic scenario of this disease. We provide an overview of the powerful capability of liquid biopsy techniques applied to blood and fluid and we focus on the technological advancement of circulant biomolecular factors in OM NSCLC pathology, starting from apparently simpler models such as oncogene addicted tumors to evaluate themselves in the light of treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusions

A better understanding of spatial and temporal evolution of oligometastatic diseases would contribute to a more accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment. Data from prospective clinical trials in the early stage of disease, coupled with knowledge of genetic characteristics of lung tumors, are warranted. These efforts would lead to improving the possibility to eradicate the residual disease in these low burden tumoral settings, thus enhancing the definitive cure perspectives.

The detection value of PD-L1 expression in biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The detection value of different types of specimens for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression remains controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the detection value of biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens for PD-L1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were searched prior to December 2020 to identify studies that compared the detection value of biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens for PD-L1 expression in NSCLC. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 scale was used to evaluate the quality of the literature included. The detection value of different types of specimens for PD-L1 expression was then assessed. Besides, the relative risk (RR) with 95% CI were pooled using Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software.

Results

The meta-analysis involved 12 articles and included 877 patients. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of PD-L1 at the 1% cutoff between biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens (RR =0.89, 95% CI: 0.70–1.12, P=0.33). However, there was a significant difference between two groups when the cutoff is 50% (RR =0.69, 95% CI: 0.58–0.83, P<0.01). In addition, a subgroup analysis of the type of biopsy specimens and the PD-L1 qualitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays showed that the detection rate of PD-L1 in small biopsies and using the SP142 antibody were lower than in surgical specimens and using other antibodies for both the 1% and 50% cut-offs (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests that caution must be taken when using biopsy specimens from patients with advanced NSCLC to evaluate PD-L1 status eligible for immunotherapy, additional biopsy specimens sampling may be needed to minimize the risk of tumor misclassification. In addition, PD-L1 qualitative IHC assays and the type of biopsy specimens related to PD-L1 expression detection.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: heterogeneity by pathologic types, tissue sampling and metastasis

Background

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a predictive marker of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy response. Intra-tumour heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but comprehensive studies regarding the determination of PD-L1 expression in different materials are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression in paired tumour samples and in different specimen types.

Methods

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, 35 biopsy specimens and 54 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples were performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing using the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the tumour proportion score (TPS) and categorized into three levels: negative (TPS <1%), low expression (TPS 1–49%) and high expression (TPS ≥50%).

Results

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, including 852 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); 35 paired biopsy and resected samples; 54 paired cell block and biopsy samples; 53 paired blocks from the same resected tissue and 49 paired primary and metastatic lesion samples were included in this study. Interestingly, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more frequent in poorly differentiated subtypes than in well-differentiated subtypes in the ADC subgroup (P<0.001). In the SCC subgroup, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more associated with the nonkeratinizing type than the keratinizing type (P=0.001). PD-L1 expression differed between cell blocks and matched biopsy specimens (discordance rate =11.1%, 6/54) and between biopsy and matched resected specimens (discordance rate =31.4%, 11/35). PD-L1 expression differed between different paraffin blocks from the same resected specimen (discordance rate =35.8%, 19/53), and the discordance rate of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and matched lymph node metastases was 28.6% (14/49).

Conclusions

Discordant PD-L1 expression is not uncommon in NSCLC and warrants additional studies and serious consideration when interpreting PD-L1 test results. Initial negative test results may lead to repeat PD-L1 testing in additional samples or the use of a different clone if necessary.

Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand (PD-L1) in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction change significantly after neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy on the expression of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in cancer cells and peritumoral cells are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction.

METHODS

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in cancer cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in paired diagnostic biopsies and surgical specimens from patients with pretreated and curatively resected adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Paired tumor samples were available from 40 patients. PD-1 expression in cancer cells (p < 0.001; Exact Symmetry Test) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p < 0.001; Exact Symmetry Test) increased significantly after neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease in PD-L1 expression in cancer cells (p = 0.003) after neoadjuvant therapy was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this study we could show that tumor-cell expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was significantly altered in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Based on these observations, patients might profit from the combined use of cytotoxic chemotherapy and the blockade of the PD-1 axis.

Selecting the optimal immunotherapy regimen in driver-negative metastatic NSCLC

The treatment landscape of driver-negative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors, specifically those targeting PD-1 or PD-L1, have demonstrated durable efficacy in a subset of patients with NSCLC, and these agents have become the cornerstone of first-line therapy. Approved immunotherapeutic strategies for treatment-naive patients now include monotherapy, immunotherapy-exclusive regimens or chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations. Decision making in this space is complex given the absence of head-to-head prospective comparisons, although a thorough analysis of long-term efficacy and safety data from pivotal clinical trials can provide insight into the optimal management of each subset of patients. Indeed, histological subtype and the extent of tumour cell PD-L1 expression are paramount to regimen selection, although other clinicopathological factors and patient preferences might also be relevant in certain scenarios. Finally, several emerging biomarkers and novel therapeutic strategies are currently under investigation, and these might further refine the current treatment paradigm. In this Review, we discuss the current treatment landscape and detail our approach to first-line immunotherapy regimen selection for patients with advanced-stage, driver-negative NSCLC.

Lynch syndrome-associated lung cancer: pitfalls of an immunotherapy-based treatment strategy in an unusual tumor type

Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline alterations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes leading to increased risk of colon cancer as well as other cancer types. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not among typical Lynch syndrome-associated tumors: pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is actually approved for the treatment of NSCLC patients and represents a promising treatment option for patients with advanced metastatic MMR-deficient cancer, regardless of tumor origin. This case report describes the clinical presentation and management of a 74-year-old female with a history of rectal adenocarcinoma and ovarian cancer, who has a documented frameshift pathogenic variant in the exon 8 of MSH6 gene and an intronic variant in the BRCA2 gene (classified as a variant of uncertain significance), affected by NSCLC with brain metastases. Despite these premises, the patient was treated with pembrolizumab and she did not benefit from this kind of treatment.

Impact of PD-L1 and PD-1 Expression on the Prognostic Significance of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The immune infiltrate within tumors has proved to be very powerful in the prognostic stratification of patients and much attention is also being paid towards its predictive value. In this work we therefore aimed at clarifying the significance and impact of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression on the prognostic value of CD8⁺ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in a cohort of consecutive patients with primary resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue microarrays (TMA) were built using one representative formalin fixed paraffin embedded block for every case, with 5 cores for each block. TMA sections were stained with PD-L1 (clone SP263), PD-1 (clone NAT105) and CD8 (clone SP57). Number of CD8⁺ cells per mm² were automatically counted; median, 25^th and 75^th percentiles of CD8⁺ cells were used as threshold for statistical clinical outcome analysis and evaluated in patients subgroups defined by expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 within tumors. We found an overall strong prognostic value of CD8⁺ cells in our cohort of 314 resected NSCLC, especially in PD-L1 negative tumors lacking PD-1⁺ TILs, and demonstrated that in PD-L1 positive tumors a higher density of CD8⁺ lymphocytes is necessary to improve the prognosis. Our data strengthen the concept of the importance of the assessment and quantification of the immune contexture in cancer and, similarly to what has been carried on in colorectal cancer, promote the efforts for the establishment of an Immunoscore for NSCLC for prognostic and possibly predictive purposes.

Biomarkers or factors for predicting the efficacy and adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: achievements and prospective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in lung cancer therapy due to their effectiveness and minimal side effects. However, only a few lung cancer patients benefit from ICI therapy, driving the need to develop alternative biomarkers. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) molecules expressed in tumor cells and immune cells play a key role in the immune checkpoint pathway. Therefore, PD-L1 expression is a prognostic biomarker in evaluating the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors. Nevertheless, adverse predictive outcomes suggest that other factors are implicated in the response. In this review, we present a detailed introduction of existing biomarkers concerning tumor abnormality and host immunity. PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, neoantigens, specific gene mutations, circulating tumor DNA, human leukocyte antigen class I, tumor microenvironment, peripheral inflammatory cells, and microbiome are discussed in detail. To sum up, this review provides information on the current application and future prospects of ICI biomarkers.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Resectable Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for most new diagnoses of lung cancer, with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has transformed the treatment of metastatic and advanced NSCLC. For resectable NSCLC, while surgery is the cornerstone of standard treatment, a number of clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy have been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review on the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant ICI therapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We undertook a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and abstracts and posters from annual meetings of the major oncology societies, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) up until 29 April 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 399 patients were identified from six articles and four meeting abstracts. 229, 140, and 30 patients received anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 therapy (anti-PD-L1, atezolizumab and durvalumab), anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy (anti-PD-1, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab), and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab), respectively. 255 patients received only ICI therapy before surgery, and 144 patients received ICI and chemotherapy. While ICI therapy was generally well tolerated, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events were observed in 13 of 144 patients (9.0%) in the five studies that reported such adverse events data. Patients displayed an overall mean surgical resection rate of 87.5% (349/399, range, 66.7-100%), a surgical delay rate of 1.4%, and an incidence of surgical complications of 21%. On average, 45.6% (159/349), (range 17-83%) of patients exhibited major pathological response (MPR), while 76/349 (21.8%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR). In the studies with patients undergoing ICI and chemotherapy, the MPR rate was 66.7% and pCR rate was 35.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI neoadjuvant therapy may be a safe and efficacious treatment option in patients with resectable NSCLC. Combined with chemotherapy, ICI appears to be more efficacious, but displays more adverse events. More ongoing clinical trials will shed further light on the safety and efficacy of ICI neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

PD-1/PD-L1 in Cancer: Pathophysiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Immune evasion is a key strategy adopted by tumor cells to escape the immune system while promoting their survival and metastatic spreading. Indeed, several mechanisms have been developed by tumors to inhibit immune responses. PD-1 is a cell surface inhibitory receptor, which plays a major physiological role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. In pathological conditions, activation of the PD-1/PD-Ls signaling pathway may block immune cell activation, a mechanism exploited by tumor cells to evade the antitumor immune control. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has represented a major breakthrough in cancer treatment. Indeed, the success of PD-1 blockade immunotherapies represents an unprecedented success in the treatment of different cancer types. To improve the therapeutic efficacy, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms regulating PD-1 expression and signaling in the tumor context is required. We provide an overview of the current knowledge of PD-1 expression on both tumor-infiltrating T and NK cells, summarizing the recent evidence on the stimuli regulating its expression. We also highlight perspectives and limitations of the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive marker, discuss well-established and novel potential approaches to improve patient selection and clinical outcome and summarize current indications for anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Fit-for-purpose quantitative liquid biopsy based droplet digital PCR assay development for detection of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) RNA expression in PAXgene blood samples

Development of a clinically applicable liquid biopsy-based test for PD-L1 mRNA expression would be beneficial in providing complementary evidence to current immunohistochemistry assays. Hence, we report the development of a fit-for-purpose assay for detection of blood PD-L1 mRNA expression using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). TaqMan® assays were selected based on coverage of the PD-L1 gene and were tested for linearity and efficiency using real-time quantitative PCR. Four reference genes were analyzed in positive control cell line (A549 treated with interferon gamma, [IFN γ]) genomic DNA. The PD-L1 primer/probe sets were also evaluated in ddPCR for limit of blank, limit of detection, and precision. Finally, thirty-five healthy volunteer samples were evaluated to establish a baseline level of PD-L1 expression. In ddPCR, the limit of blank was determined to be 0 copies and the limit of detection was determined to be less than or equal to 19 copies of PD-L1. The average intra-run coefficient of variation in the ddPCR assay was 7.44% and average inter-run CV was 7.70%. Treatment of A549 cells with IFN γ resulted in a 6.7-fold increase in PD-L1 expression (21,580 copies in untreated cDNA versus 145,000 copies in treated cDNA). Analysis of healthy human samples yielded a median value of 1659 PD-L1 copies/μL with a range of 768-7510 copies/μL. The assay was transferred to an external service provider and results from our in-house experiments and those conducted externally shows a correlation of 0.994. In conclusion, a fit-for-purpose liquid biopsy-based, purely quantitative ddPCR assay for the detection of PD-L1 mRNA expression was developed and validated using PAXgene RNA blood samples. Linearity, reproducibility, limit of blank and limit of detection were measured and deemed suitable for clinical application. This ultra-sensitive liquid biopsy ddPCR assay has promising clinical potential in screening, longitudinal monitoring and disease progression detection.

PD-L1 in Cytological Samples: A Review and a Practical Approach

With a growing number of predictive biomarkers needed to manage patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there has been a paradigm shift in care and handling of diagnostic samples. Among the various testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most cost- effective and widely available. Furthermore, over the past decade immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. In this scenario IHC is the most used testing method available for PDL-1/PD1 immunotherapy. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathways have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments of a wide range of cancer types, once provided evidence of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Since currently available PD-L1 assays have been developed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) histological specimens, a growing body of research is being dedicated to confirm the feasibility of applying PDL-1 assays also to cytological samples. Albeit promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are the type of cytological samples, pre-analytical issues, cyto-histological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review briefly summarizes the knowledge of the role of cytopathology in the analysis of PD-L1 by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and future directions of cytopathology in the immunotherapy setting.

New developments in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer, due to its varying prognosis, is grouped according to TNM stage IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Developments over the last 3 years have been focused on the integration of immunotherapy into the combination treatment of a locally definitive therapy (surgery or radiotherapy) and chemotherapy. For concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidation therapy with durvalumab was established. Adjuvant targeted therapy has again gained increasing interest. In order to adapt treatment to the specific stage subgroup and its prognosis, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and pathological evaluation of the mediastinum are important. Tumours should be investigated for immunological features and driver mutations. Regarding toxicity, evaluation of pulmonary and cardiac function, as well as symptoms and quality of life, is of increasing importance. To improve the management and prognosis of this heterogeneous entity, clinical trials and registries should take these factors into account.

Performance of Different Diagnostic PD-L1 Clones in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with specific diagnostic biomarkers presents new challenges to pathologists as tumor tissue needs to be tested for expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) for a variety of indications. As there is currently no requirement to use companion diagnostic assays for PD-L1 testing in Germany different clones are used in daily routine. While the correlation of staining results has been tested in various entities, there is no data for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) so far.

Methods: We tested five different PD-L1 clones (SP263, SP142, E1L3N, 22-8, 22C3) on primary HNSCC tumor tissue of 75 patients in the form of tissue microarrays. Stainings of both immune and tumor cells were then assessed and quantified by pathologists to simulate real-world routine diagnostics. The results were analyzed descriptively and the resulting staining pattern across patients was further investigated by principal component analysis and non-negative matrix factorization clustering.

Results: Percentages of positive immune and tumor cells varied greatly. Both the resulting combined positive score as well as the eligibility for certain checkpoint inhibitor regimens was therefore strongly dependent on the choice of the antibody. No relevant co-clustering and low similarity of relative staining patterns across patients was found for the different antibodies.

Conclusions: Performance of different diagnostic anti PD-L1 antibody clones in HNSCC is less robust and interchangeable compared to reported data from other tumor entities. Determination of PD-L1 expression is critical for therapeutic decision making and may be aided by back-to-back testing of different PD-L1 clones.

Bloodborne Cytokines for Predicting Clinical Benefits and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death ligand 1 is a biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluated serum proteins from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs to determine their potential as noninvasive predictive biomarkers for efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity were integrated with previously reported nivolumab-treated patients. Blood samples were collected serially from baseline until the disease progressed. Serum protein levels were quantified using the Luminex assay. Associations of clinical benefit (CB) and onset of irAEs with serum protein levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients with advanced NSCLC were studied, and we used 63 and 47 paired serum samples at baseline and the second sampling point, respectively, for efficacy analysis. Baseline growth-regulated oncogene 1 (GRO-1) levels were significantly lower in durable CB (DCB) patients than in non-DCB patients (P < .05). Changes in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) levels significantly decreased between baseline and the second sampling point (P < .05). Patients with the low GRO-1/decreased MCP-1 subtype showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the high GRO-1/increased MCP-1 subgroup did (median PFS, not reached vs. 47 days, P < .0001; median OS, 985 days vs. 148 days, P = .0002, respectively). Elevated GRO-1 levels were associated with immune-related adverse event onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum GRO-1 and MCP-1 levels can identify patients with advanced NSCLC who are likely to benefit from ICI treatment. Time-course tracing of these protein levels might be valuable in ICI treatment.

Prevalence and Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression by 22C3 Assay in Routine Population-Based and Reflexive Clinical Testing in Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is used as a biomarker for anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapies in NSCLC. We report here the results of population-based PD-L1 testing using the 22C3 IHC pharmDx Assay (Agilent Technologies) in a large Canadian regional reference pathology laboratory.

METHODS

Testing was conducted reflexively on biopsies and resections for NSCLC during an 8-month period. Tumor proportion score (TPS) cutoffs for low and high expression were 1% and 50%, respectively.

RESULTS

Altogether, 2031 PD-L1 tests were performed on specimens from 1795 patients, with 107 inconclusive results (5.3%). Excluding cases with inconclusive/missing data, proportions for the remaining 1713 patients were 41.6% for TPS less than 1%, 28.6% for TPS 1% to 49%, and 29.8% for TPS greater than or equal to 50%. Higher PD-L1 expression rates were noted in EGFR wild-type versus mutant tumors (p < 0.001), squamous versus adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), and metastatic versus primary tumors (p < 0.001). PD-L1 among 103 patients with paired biopsy and resection specimens revealed moderate concordance (κ = 0.67). A total of 52% (25 of 48) of biopsies with TPS less than 1% had TPS greater than 1% in resection, whereas 84.6% (22 of 26) of biopsies with TPS greater than or equal to 50% were concordant in resected tumors. Discordance rates between biopsy and resection were 71.4% for biopsies with less than 8 mm² total area, compared with 33.3% for biopsies with greater than or equal to 8 mm² area (p < 0.026). Concordance among 27 patients with paired primary lung and metastatic tumor biopsies revealed only weak concordance (κ = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression may result in misclassification of PD-L1 status in a substantial proportion of PD-L1-negative small biopsy samples. Biopsy of metastatic site may increase proportion of patients with high PD-L1 expression.