Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with angiotensin II receptor antagonism in the human forearm

Importance of endogenous compensatory vasoactive peptides in broadening the effects of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system for the treatment of heart failure

The magnitude of the clinical benefits produced by inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system in heart failure has been modest, possibly because of the ability of renin-angiotensin activity to escape from suppression during long-term treatment. Efforts to intensify pharmacological blockade by use of dual inhibitors that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system at multiple sites have not yielded consistent incremental clinical benefits, but have been associated with serious adverse reactions. By contrast, potentiation of endogenous compensatory vasoactive peptides can act to enhance the survival effects of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, as evidenced by trials that have compared angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with drugs that inhibit both the renin-angiotensin system and neprilysin. Several endogenous vasoactive peptides act as adaptive mechanisms, and their augmentation could help to broaden the benefits of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for patients with heart failure.

The role of cytokines and inducible nitric oxide synthase in endotoxemia-induced endothelial dysfunction

Sepsis is characterized by a blunted vascular responses due to impairment of endothelial function. The aim of our study was to assess endothelial function and the role of cytokines and nitric oxide (NO). Endotoxin tolerance was induced in 14 healthy volunteers by intravenous injection of 2 ng.kg.d lipopolysaccharide on 5 consecutive days. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography during dose-response curves of endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine and endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside before and 4 hours after LPS administration on days 1 and 5. In another study, 7 healthy volunteers were given selective inducible NO synthase inhibitor aminoguanidine intravenous continuously from 1 hour after a single LPS administration until 5 hours. FBF showed an attenuation of ACh-induced vasodilatory response with 67% (45%-72%) 4 hours after the first LPS administration (P = 0.01) with an unchanged dose-response curve to sodium nitroprusside. This attenuation to ACh infusion did not occur in the presence of aminoguanidine (P = 0.21) and also did not occur when tolerance was present on day 5 (P = 0.45). Our data demonstrate that endothelial dysfunction caused by endotoxemia does not occur when endotoxin tolerance develops, indicated by the absence of cytokine production and during administration of selective inducible NO synthase inhibitor aminoguanidine in vivo.

Effects of bradykinin on venous capacitance in health and treated chronic heart failure

In the present study, we investigated the effects of basal and intra-arterial infusion of bradykinin on unstressed forearm vascular volume (a measure of venous tone) and blood flow in healthy volunteers (n=20) and in chronic heart failure patients treated with ACEIs [ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors] (n=16) and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers) (n=14). We used radionuclide plethysmography to examine the effects of bradykinin and of the bradykinin antagonists B9340 [B1 (type 1)/B2 (type 2) receptor antagonist] and HOE140 (B2 antagonist). Bradykinin infusion increased unstressed forearm vascular volume in a similar dose-dependent manner in healthy volunteers and ARB-treated CHF patients (healthy volunteers maximum 12.3±2.1%, P<0.001 compared with baseline; ARB-treated CHF patients maximum 9.3±3.3%, P<0.05 compared with baseline; P=not significant for difference between groups), but the increase in unstressed volume in ACEI-treated CHF patients was higher (maximum 28.8±7.8%, P<0.001 compared with baseline; P<0.05 for the difference between groups). In contrast, while the increase in blood flow in healthy volunteers (maximum 362±9%, P<0.001) and in ACEI-treated CHF patients (maximum 376±12%, P<0.001) was similar (P=not significant for the difference between groups), the increase in ARB-treated CHF patients was less (maximum 335±7%, P<0.001; P<0.05 for the difference between groups). Infusion of each receptor antagonist alone similarly reduced basal unstressed volume and blood flow in ACEI-treated CHF patients, but not in healthy volunteers or ARB-treated CHF patients. In conclusion, bradykinin does not contribute to basal venous tone in health, but in ACEI-treated chronic heart failure it does. In ARB-treated heart failure, venous responses to bradykinin are preserved but arterial responses are reduced compared with healthy controls. Bradykinin-mediated vascular responses in both health and heart failure are mediated by the B2, rather than the B1, receptor.

AT1 Receptor Ligands: Virtual-Screening-Based Design with TOPP Descriptors, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Pyrrolidine Derivatives

As a continuing effort to establish the structure-activity relationships (SARs) within the series of the angiotensin II antagonists (sartans), a pharmacophoric model was built by using novel TOPP 3D descriptors. Statistical values were satisfactory (PC4: r(2)=0.96, q(2) ((5) (random) (groups))=0.84; SDEP=0.26) and encouraged the synthesis and consequent biological evaluation of a series of new pyrrolidine derivatives. SAR together with a combined 3D quantitative SAR and high-throughput virtual screening showed that the newly synthesized 1-acyl-N-(biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamides may represent an interesting starting point for the design of new antihypertensive agents. In particular, biological tests performed on CHO-hAT(1) cells stably expressing the human AT(1) receptor showed that the length of the acyl chain is crucial for the receptor interaction and that the valeric chain is the optimal one.

Synthesis and biological activity of 2-alkylbenzimidazoles bearing a N-phenylpyrrole moiety as novel angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists

A series of 2-alkylbenzimidazoles bearing a N-phenylpyrrole moiety were synthesized and evaluated as a novel class of AT(1) receptor antagonists. Among them, compounds 10a and 10g inhibited [(125)I] AngII-binding affinity to AT(1) receptor at nanomolar level and potently inhibited the Ang II-induced pressor response by oral administration. Moreover, evaluation in spontaneously hypertensive rats showed that 10a is an orally active AT(1) receptor antagonist.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema

Angioedema, characterized by swelling of the lips, face, and tongue, occurs in anywhere from 0.1% to 6% of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor users. The incidence is more common in black Americans than in white Americans, in women than in men, and in smokers than in nonsmokers. The remitting and relapsing nature of ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema can confound clinical recognition of the adverse event but also provides clues to its causes. Defective degradation of vasoactive peptide substrates of ACE, such as bradykinin or substance P, may contribute via non-ACE pathways to the pathogenesis of ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema.

Bradykinin B(2) receptor does not contribute to blood pressure lowering during AT(1) receptor blockade

This study tested the hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the effects of angiotensin AT(1) receptor blockade in humans. The effect of the bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonist d-Arg-Arg-Pro-Hyp-Gly-Thi-Ser-d-Tic-Oic-Arg (HOE-140) (18 microg/kg/h i.v. for 6 h) on hemodynamic and endocrine responses to acute and chronic (1-month) treatment with valsartan (160 mg/day) was determined in 13 normotensive and 12 hypertensive salt-deplete subjects. Acute valsartan increased plasma renin activity (PRA) from 5.3 +/- 9.9 to 15.6 +/- 19.8 ng of angiotensin (Ang) I/ml/h (P < 0.001) and decreased aldosterone from 18.3 +/- 10.5 to 12.0 +/- 9.6 ng/dl (P < 0.001). Chronic valsartan significantly increased baseline PRA (10.5 +/- 15.5 ng of Ang I/ml/h; P = 0.004) but did not affect baseline angiotensin-converting enzyme activity or aldosterone. HOE-140 tended to increase the PRA response to valsartan, and it attenuated the decrease in aldosterone following chronic valsartan (P = 0.03). Acute valsartan decreased mean arterial pressure 12.7 +/- 6.9% (from 100.2 +/- 8.4 to 87.5 +/- 9.8 mm Hg in hypertensives and from 82.4 +/- 8.6 to 70.3 +/- 8.4 mm Hg in normotensives). HOE-140 did not affect the blood pressure response to either acute (effect of valsartan, P < 0.001; effect of HOE-140, P = 0.98) or chronic (valsartan, P = 0.01; HOE-140, P = 0.84) valsartan. Plasma cGMP was increased significantly during chronic valsartan (P = 0.048) through a bradykinin receptor-independent mechanism (effect of HOE-140, P = 0.13). Both acute (P < 0.001) and chronic (P < 0.001) valsartan increased heart rate. HOE-140 augmented the heart rate response to chronic valsartan (P = 0.04). These data suggest that endogenous bradykinin does not contribute significantly to the blood pressure-lowering effect of valsartan through its B(2) receptor.

The contribution of nitric oxide and vasodilatory prostanoids to bradykinin-mediated vasodilation in Type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the effect of bradykinin on endothelial tone in normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients and specifically whether any changes are mediated through nitric oxide or prostaglandins.

METHODS

Forearm blood flow was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography at baseline and after brachial artery infusions of incremental doses of bradykinin (50, 100 and 200 ng/min) in 15 patients with Type 1 diabetes and 13 non-diabetic controls. Forearm blood flow at baseline and following bradykinin was then re-examined after local infusion of L-NMMA, a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, and L-NMMA with indomethacin, a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor.

RESULTS

Baseline blood flow in the diabetic and control groups were similar (4.46 +/- 1.11 vs. 3.41 +/- 1.23 ml/min/100 ml, respectively; P = 0.07). After infusion of L-NMMA and L-NMMA with indomethacin, there was a similar reduction in blood flow responses to bradykinin in both groups. There was no significant difference between the diabetic patients and control subjects in the percentage reduction in forearm blood flow following L-NMMA (16.55 vs. 18.12%, respectively, P = 0.94) and L-NMMA with indomethacin (47.1 vs. 37.3%, respectively, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that bradykinin-stimulated vasodilation is mediated by both nitric oxide and prostaglandin release from the endothelium in patients with Type 1 diabetes and normoalbuminuria, and in healthy control subjects. We have also shown that the relative contributions of nitric oxide and prostaglandin to bradykinin-mediated vasodilation are similar in these diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects.

Effect of delapril-manidipine combination vs irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination on fibrinolytic function in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus

The aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was to compare the effects of delapril-manidipine combination vs a irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination on plasma tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasmogen activator inhibitor type I (PAI-l) activities in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus. After a 4-week run-in placebo period, 80 patients (37 male and 43 female), aged 41-65 years, were randomly allocated to an 8-week treatment with delapril 30 mg once daily or irbesartan 150 mg once daily. Thereafter, manidipine l0 mg once daily was added to delapril treatment and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg to irbesartan treatment for a further 8 weeks. Blood pressure (BP), plasma t-PA and PAI-l activities were evaluated at the end of the run-in period, after 4-week monotherapy treatments, and at the end of the combination treatment periods. Both combination treatments, delapril-manidipine and irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide, produced a greater reduction in systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) values (-27.6/21.8 mmHg and -26.4/20.2 mmHg, respectively) than the respective monotherapies (-15.2/11.7 mmHg with delapril and -16.3/11.3 mmHg with irbesartan). Delapril monotherapy significantly decreased plasma PAI-l activity (-10.4 IU/mI; P<0.05). The addition of manidipine produced a significant increase in t-PA activity (+0.27 IU/mI); P<0.05). Irbesartan monotherapy did not significantly affect the fibrinolytic balance, whereas the addition of hydrochlorothiazide worsened it, producing a significant increase in PAI-l activity (+9.5 IU/ml; P<0.05). In hypertensive patients with type II diabetes mellitus, the combination delapril-manidipine may determine a greater improvement of the fibrinolytic function than the respective monotherapy, while the association irbesartan-hydrochlorothiazide may worsen it.

Losartan increases bradykinin levels in hypertensive humans

BACKGROUND

Studies in animals and humans indicate a role for kinins in the actions of angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers. However, the effect of these compounds on kinin levels in humans is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured angiotensin (Ang), bradykinin (BK), and kallidin peptides in subjects with essential hypertension administered placebo, losartan (50 mg OD), and eprosartan (600 mg OD) in randomized order in a double-blind, 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover trial. Peptides were measured in arterial blood using high-performance liquid chromatography-based radioimmunoassays. Losartan increased blood levels of BK-(1-9) and hydroxylated BK-(1-9) by approximately 2-fold and reduced the BK-(1-7)/BK-(1-9) ratio by 55%. There was a trend for eprosartan to produce similar changes in bradykinin levels. There were no changes in blood kallidin levels. Both losartan and eprosartan increased plasma levels of Ang I, Ang II, and Ang-(2-8), and eprosartan increased Ang-(3-8) levels. Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-9) levels were unchanged. There was an associated 30% to 35% reduction in Ang II/Ang I ratio and 63% to 69% reduction in Ang-(1-7)/Ang I ratio. Plasma ACE activity was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan increases bradykinin levels. The reductions in BK-(1-7)/BK-(1-9), Ang II/Ang I, and Ang-(1-7)/Ang I ratios suggest that the increased bradykinin levels were the result of reduced metabolism by ACE and neutral endopeptidase. Increased bradykinin levels may represent a class effect of AT1 receptor blockers that contributes to their therapeutic actions and may also contribute to the angioedema that may accompany this therapy.

Design, Synthesis, Structural Studies, Biological Evaluation, and Computational Simulations of Novel Potent AT1Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists Based on the 4-Phenylquinoline Structure

Novel AT(1) receptor antagonists bearing substituted 4-phenylquinoline moieties instead of the classical biphenyl fragment were designed and synthesized as the first step of an investigation devoted to the development of new antihypertensive agents and to the understanding of the molecular basis of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. The newly synthesized compounds were tested for their potential ability to displace [(125)I]Sar(1),Ile(8)-Ang II specifically bound to AT(1) receptor in rat hepatic membranes. These AT(1) receptor binding studies revealed nanomolar affinity in several of the compounds under study. The most potent ligands 4b,t were found to be equipotent with losartan and possessed either a 3-tetrazolylquinoline or a 2-amino-3-quinolinecarboxylic moiety, respectively. Moreover, some selected compounds were evaluated for antagonism of Ang II-induced contraction in rabbit aortic strips, and the most potent compounds in the binding test 4b,t were slightly more potent than losartan in inhibiting Ang II-induced contraction. Finally, the most relevant structure-affinity relationship data were rationalized by means of computational studies performed on the isolated ligands as well as by computational simulations on the ligands complexed with a theoretical AT(1) receptor model.

Pharmacologic Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System: Vascular Benefits Beyond Commonly Understood Pharmacologic Actions

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are recognized primarily for their use in hypertension, in heart failure, and after myocardial infarction. New evidence, particularly with ACE inhibitors, has shown their ability to reduce acute coronary events associated with atherosclerosis in patients without a history of the aforementioned cardiac conditions. This is likely due to inhibitory effects on the renin-angiotensin system--a system that adversely influences fibrinolytic balance, vascular endothelial function, and vascular inflammation, all key components of atherosclerotic progression and adverse coronary outcomes. Results of various studies suggest favorable effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on markers of these components, including effects on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, endothelin-1, and nitric oxide by ACE inhibitors, and effects on vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and C-reactive protein by ARBs. Although early evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors may provide a greater beneficial effect on some of these markers compared with ARBs, and that certain ACE inhibitors may provide greater vascular benefits than others, further investigation is required to verify such findings. Overall, understanding the distinct coronary vascular benefits of these agents will emphasize the importance of using them, particularly ACE inhibitors, to improve outcomes in patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Valsartan-induced angioedema

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of dose-dependent angioedema secondary to the use of the angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan.

CASE SUMMARY

A 64-year-old Hispanic woman presented with swelling of the lips shortly after an increase in her valsartan dose for uncontrolled hypertension. Other potential causes were not identified. The angioedema subsequently resided after a dosage reduction and observation. Use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the angioedema and valsartan therapy in this patient.

DISCUSSION

Drug-induced angioedema is often associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and is probably secondary to their effects on bradykinin levels. ARBs are thought to produce few, if any, cases of angioedema if excess bradykinin levels are the root cause of angioedema secondary to ACE inhibitor use. Several potential ARB-induced cases of angioedema have been reported. The exact mechanism of angioedema induced by drugs in both of these classes is unknown. Animal data suggest that there may be a relationship between ARB use and increased tissue bradykinin levels secondary to stimulation of angiotensin II AT2 receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the third reported case of valsartan-induced angioedema and the first thought to be dose dependent. Practitioners should be aware of this potential adverse effect of valsartan, although the underlying cause is still not known.

Vitamin C improves resistance but not conduit artery endothelial function in patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and accelerated atherogenesis. To examine whether endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) modify endothelial function in renal failure, we evaluated the effect of the antioxidant vitamin C on endothelium-dependent responses in both the conduit and resistance vasculature of subjects with severe renal impairment.

METHODS

Endothelial function of the forearm resistance vasculature was assessed using plethysmography to measure the dilator response to intra-arterial acetylcholine (Ach) (25 to 100 nmol/min). Endothelial function of radial and brachial arteries was assessed using vascular ultrasound to measure the dilator response to flow during reactive hyperemia [flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)]. Studies were performed before and after administration of vitamin C by intra-arterial infusion (25 mg/min) in 33 predialysis patients or by intravenous infusion (3 g) in 17 hemodialysis patients.

RESULTS

Parenteral administration of vitamin C resulted in a 100-fold increase (intra-arterial studies) and a 4.5-fold increase (intravenous studies) in serum antioxidant activity. Vitamin C administration increased the dilator response to ACh in resistance vessels (P = 0.01), but did not alter the dilator response to flow in conduit vessels of either dialysis (P = 0.3) or predialysis subjects (P = 0.8). In the presence of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor NGmonomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), there was no effect of vitamin C on resistance vessel endothelial function. In all cases the dilator response to the endothelium-independent dilators was unaffected by vitamin C.

CONCLUSION

Acute administration of vitamin C reduces oxidant stress in renal failure and improves NO-mediated resistance vessel dilatation.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in adult hypertensive rats: a stereological study of renal filtration surface area

1. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment leads to beneficial effects on kidney function. The aim of the present study was to determine whether ACE inhibition at high or low doses affects glomerular capillary surface area and length, glomerular number or total renal filtration surface area in rats with established hypertension and, if so, to determine whether these effects are mediated through bradykinin potentiation. 2. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were treated with the ACE inhibitor perindopril at either 3 or 0.1 mg/kg per day (high and low doses, respectively) from 16 to 24 weeks of age. Some rats were concomitantly treated with the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist S16118 (10 nmol/kg per day). Blood pressure was measured twice weekly during the treatment period. At 24 weeks of age, rats were perfusion fixed at 140 mmHg, the kidneys removed, embedded in resin and examined stereologically to estimate glomerular number and volume, length and surface area of glomerular capillaries and total renal filtration surface area. 3. High- and low-perindopril treatment significantly reduced systolic blood pressure compared with control SHR. However, the rats treated with low-dose perindopril were still considered hypertensive. Neither low-dose nor high-dose perindopril treatment had any observable effect on glomerular number (23 876 +/- 1201 vs 26 240 +/- 1465 glomeruli/kidney, respectively) or volume (2.25 +/- 0.21 and 1.96 +/- 0.06 x 10-3 mm3, respectively) compared with controls (glomerular number 25866 +/- 1210 glomeruli/kidney; glomerular volume 2.24 +/- 0.21 x 10-3 mm3). As a result, there was no significant difference in total renal filtration surface area between any of the experimental groups (8161.6 +/- 550.9, 8699.7 +/- 427.6, 9081.9 +/- 453.6, 8830.2 +/- 521.2 and 8559.4 +/- 341.4 mm2 for SHR, SHR low-dose perindopril, SHR low-dose perindopril + B2 antagonist, SHR high-dose perindopril and SHR high-dose perindopril + B2 antagonist, respectively). Coadministration of the bradykinin antagonist had no observable effect on any of the parameters studied. 4. In conclusion, because neither high-dose nor low-dose perindopril had any effect on total renal filtration surface area, the observed beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on kidney function are not the result of enhancement in glomerular capillary surface area.

ACE inhibition versus angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism: differential effects on PAI-1 over time

ACE inhibition reduces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), a risk factor for myocardial infarction, whereas the effect of angiotensin receptor antagonism on PAI-1 is uncertain. The present study compares the time course of effects of ACE inhibition and angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonism on morning plasma PAI-1 antigen. Blood pressure and endocrine, metabolic, and fibrinolytic variables were measured in 20 insulin-resistant (defined by fasting glucose >8.3 mmol/L, body mass index >28 kg/m2, or fasting serum triglyceride > or =2.8 mmol/L) hypertensive subjects (mean age, 47.9+/-2.1 years) (1) before and after 1 week of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/d, and (2) before and 1, 3, 4, and 6 weeks after addition of ramipril (escalated to 10 mg/d) or losartan (escalated to 100 mg/d). Hydrochlorothiazide decreased systolic (P=0.011) and diastolic (P=0.019) pressure. Ramipril (from 133.6+/-5.1/94.5+/-2.4 to 127.0+/-3.1/91.4+/-3.3 mm Hg) or losartan (from 137.0+/-3.9/93.1+/-2.9 to 123.7+/-2.6/86.4+/-2.1 mm Hg) further reduced systolic (P=0.009) and diastolic (P=0.037) pressure. The pressure effects of the 2 drugs were similar. Hydrochlorothiazide increased plasma PAI-1 (P=0.013) but not tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) (P=0.431) antigen. Addition of either ramipril or losartan significantly decreased plasma PAI-1 antigen (P=0.046). However, the effect of losartan on PAI-1 antigen was not sustained throughout the 6-week treatment period, such that there was a significant drugxtime interaction (P=0.043). tPA antigen decreased during either ramipril or losartan (P=0.032), but tPA activity decreased only during losartan (P=0.018). Short-term interruption of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by either ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor antagonism decreases PAI-1 antigen, but the duration of this effect is greater for ACE inhibition than for AT1 receptor antagonism.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1: physiologic role, regulation, and the influence of common pharmacologic agents

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is the major inhibitor of endogenous thrombolysis, thereby promoting thrombosis. PAI-1 is also a primary contributor to the development and recurrence of acute myocardial infarction. The renin angiotensin system, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, and estrogen all influence the fibrinolytic system and PAI-1 in particular. Available data strongly suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and hormone replacement therapy with estrogen beneficially reduce PAI-1 production. Metformin, an agent commonly used for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), appears to favorably decrease PAI-1 production in NIDDM patients but not nondiabetic patients. Among the cholesterol-lowering statins, clinical literature evaluating pravastatin provides the most compelling data to support this agent's favorable effect on PAI-1. Other available statins either have not displayed an effect on PAI-1 or do not have clear data to conclusively define their effects on the fibrinolytic system.

Effects of chronic subdepressor dose of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with congestive heart failure

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (AIIRA) has been reported to improve exercise capacity and prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the effects of AIIRA on peripheral endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation remain undefined in this disorder. This study examined the effects and the mechanism of chronic AIIRA therapy on peripheral vasomotion in CHF. Twenty-six patients with CHF were recruited for this study. In protocol 1, 20 patients with CHF were randomly assigned into a losartan (AIIRA) group (n = 10) and a placebo group (n = 10). Forearm blood flow (FBF; ml/min per 100 ml tissue) changes induced by intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and synthetic angiotensin II were determined by plethysmography before and 3 months after administration of a subdepressor dose of AIIRA or placebo. The goal of protocol 2 was to determine whether the effect of AIIRA is due to a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism in the remaining subset of the CHF group (n = 6). In this group, FBF responses to acetylcholine were examined with and without coadministration of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (N(G)-monomethyl->L-arginine; >L-NMMA) either before and 3 months after AIIRA therapy. No significant differences were found in changes in systemic blood pressure and basal FBF among patient groups during the study period. In protocol 1, although in both groups FBF responses induced by sodium nitroprusside as well as angiotensin II remained constant throughout the study, acetylcholine-induced FBF response was significantly enhanced in the losartan group (p < 0.05) but not in the placebo group. In protocol 2, acetylcholine-induced FBF response without >L-NMMA was significantly enhanced after AIIRA administration (p < 0.05), whereas this augmentation effect was diminished under >L-NMMA coinfusion. In conclusion, selective administration of an AIIRA for 3 months improves peripheral endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with CHF. This mechanism may be independent of direct AIIRA effects and may be due, in part, to increased bioavailability of nitric oxide.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists in chronic heart failure: where do they fit?

Heart failure is a common and disabling condition with a dismal prognosis. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has proven to be a valuable therapeutic strategy in this condition, with well-proven morbidity and mortality benefits. Nonetheless, ACE inhibitors provide incomplete blockade of the RAAS and also inhibit the degradation of bradykinin. Although increased levels of bradykinin may have haemodynamic advantages by contributing to vasodilatation, they may also be largely responsible for some of the adverse effects of ACE inhibitors. Angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonists offer more complete blockade of the RAAS without the potentiation of bradykinin, and it was therefore hoped that they would provide even greater benefits for patients with heart failure. So far, much of the initial promise of the Ang II receptor antagonists in heart failure has not been realised. There has been no conclusive demonstration of their superiority to ACE inhibitors in their effects on morbidity and mortality, and their equivalence to ACE inhibitors has not been proven. The Ang II receptor antagonists have, however, proven to be better tolerated than ACE inhibitors and they are therefore likely to be a reasonable alternative for those patients with heart failure who cannot tolerate ACE inhibition. Recent evidence has indicated that the Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist valsartan is of value when used in patients already receiving either an ACE inhibitor or a beta-blocker, but has also suggested that giving all three drugs together is deleterious. Further evidence about the value of Ang II receptor antagonists in heart failure may be provided by further studies, of which several are currently ongoing.

Risk-benefit assessment of angiotensin II receptor antagonists

Inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system through the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has proven very useful in the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF) and progressive renal failure. More recently, agents that directly block the angiotensin II Type 1 (AT(1)) receptor--angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRAs)--have been developed. These agents are thought to have a more specific mechanism of action since they do not affect other hormone systems as do the ACE inhibitors. Whether such specificity results in a different efficacy profile is still being determined. However, these drugs are extremely well-tolerated and very safe. AIIRAs are effective in the reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and compare favourably to other classes of agents. Recent results indicate that at least one AIIRA has a favourable effect on stroke in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Additional studies with other members of the class will provide further information on similar outcomes. In CHF patients, ACE inhibitors remain the drug of choice and AIIRAs are best utilised in patients who cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor or in those receiving an ACE inhibitor who cannot tolerate a beta-blocker and need additional therapy. AIIRAs are effective in slowing the progression of renal failure in patients with Type II diabetes and may be effective in other proteinuric conditions. Whether they are more or less effective than ACE inhibitors is unknown. Overall, AIIRAs represent an important addition to the armamentarium of cardiovascular therapies with an excellent safety record and an emerging profile of utility in multiple cardiovascular conditions.

Effect of aspirin on vasodilation to bradykinin and substance P in patients with heart failure treated with ACE inhibitor

AIMS

We wanted to examine some of the mechanisms by which aspirin might be responsible for counteraction of the effects of ACE inhibitors. Aspirin has been reported to counteract the effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure. Despite this, there is little evidence on what the mediator of such an effect might be, although there is some evidence to implicate bradykinin and, perhaps, substance P.

METHODS

Twelve patients with congestive heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor were studied on two occasions, after abstaining from aspirin for 14 days, and after 14 days of aspirin 150 mg once daily. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography during intrabrachial infusions of bradykinin and substance P, before and after intrabrachial aspirin.

RESULTS

Bradykinin caused profound vasodilation (peak 390%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 300, 480%; P < 0.01), substance P slightly less (peak 222%, 95% CI 162, 283%; P < 0.01). Intra-brachial aspirin had no effect on its own. The response to bradykinin was unchanged by intrabrachial aspirin (peak 404%, 95% CI 304, 504%) or oral aspirin (peak 320%, 95% CI 209, 431%; P = 0.2). The response to substance P was unchanged by intrabrachial aspirin (peak 226%, 95% CI 171, 281%) or oral aspirin (peak 220%, 95% CI 142, 297%; P = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin has no effect on the vasodilator response to bradykinin and substance P in patients with heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor. Neither bradykinin nor substance P is likely to contribute to the reported interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors.

Acute administration of L-arginine does not improve arterial endothelial function in chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Reduced activity of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway has been implicated in the endothelial dysfunction that occurs in patients with renal failure. NO is generated from L-arginine by NO synthase, and certain uremic toxins including asymmetrical dimethyl-L-arginine (ADMA), inhibit NO synthase and might contribute to endothelial dysfunction. We hypothesized that exogenous L-arginine might improve endothelial function in patients with renal failure by overcoming the effects of uremic toxins.

METHODS

Endothelial function of the forearm resistance vasculature was assessed using plethysmography to measure the dilator response to intra-arterial acetylcholine (25 to 100 nmol/min). Endothelial function of radial and brachial arteries was assessed using vascular ultrasound to measure the dilator response to flow during reactive hyperemia (flow-mediated dilation; FMD). Studies were performed before and after administration of L-arginine by intra-arterial infusion (50 micromol/min) in 8 pre-dialysis patients or by intravenous infusion (10 g) in 18 hemodialysis patients.

RESULTS

Local L-arginine did not improve the dilator response of forearm resistance vessels (AUC 23.1 +/- 6.4 pre, 23.1 +/- 5.1 post; P = 0.9) or FMD of the radial artery (6.5 +/- 1.2% pre, 6.3 +/- 0.8% post; P = 0.8). Systemic L-arginine did not improve FMD of the brachial artery (4.1 +/- 1.1% pre, 3.0 +/- 1.1% post; P = 0.07). These data demonstrate that acute local or systemic administration of L-arginine did not improve endothelial function in resistance or conduit arteries of patients with chronic renal failure.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that competitive inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) by circulating inhibitors is not the principal explanation for impaired endothelial dilator function in chronic renal failure.

New competition in the realm of renin-angiotensin axis inhibition; the angiotensin II receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the studies comparing angiotensin II (AgII) receptor antagonists with placebo or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1988 to January 2000) was used to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were also retrieved from selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

As most published CHF studies were performed with candesartan and losartan, these agents are the main focus of this article. However, all identified comparative clinical studies were reviewed and included, regardless of the agent used.

DATA SYNTHESIS

AgII receptor antagonists inhibit the effects of AgII at its sub-type 1 receptor, independently of AgII's synthesis pathway. They present a hemodynamic profile similar to that of ACE inhibitors, without reflex neurohormonal activation. They have been shown to be at least as effective as ACE inhibitors in improving symptoms, exercise capacity, and New York Heart Association functional class in CHF patients. Although the ELITE (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly) trial suggested that losartan improved survival compared with captopril, this study was not designed to look at mortality. ELITE-II, an adequately powered study, showed no difference in mortality rates between patients taking captopril and those taking losartan. The combination of AgII receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors provides additional benefit on blood pressure lowering and prevention of ventricular remodeling. AgII receptor antagonists are well tolerated, with an incidence of adverse effects similar to or lower than that of ACE inhibitors. Their lack of effect on bradykinin degradation might explain their lower incidence of cough.

CONCLUSIONS

The data cumulated thus far in patients with CHF highlight that ACE inhibitors must remain the treatment of choice and that AgII receptor antagonists may be considered as an acceptable alternative for patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors.

Combined treatment with losartan and an ACE inhibitor in mild to moderate heart failure: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although the beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with heart failure are well recognized, there are theoretical advantages in combining ACE inhibition with angiotensin (AT)1 receptor antagonism.

METHODS

Twenty patients with mild to moderate heart failure and maximally treated with an ACE inhibitor were randomly assigned to losartan or placebo. Patients underwent repeated assessment of exercise tolerance, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, and neurohumoral and biochemical parameters over a period of 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Losartan treatment was well tolerated in terms of adverse events, heart rate, and blood pressure response, and there were no significant changes in serum creatinine or potassium. After 12 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were observed between the losartan and placebo groups in exercise tolerance, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, or neurohumoral parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild to moderate heart failure already maximally treated with an ACE inhibitor, additional treatment with losartan is well tolerated, but we have not observed any significant improvement in exercise capacity, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, or neurohormones. Our data suggest that the combination of losartan with an ACE inhibitor does not offer any substantial advantages over treatment with an ACE inhibitor alone in these patients.

Nitric oxide mediates inhibitory effect of losartan on angiotensin-induced contractions in hamster but not rat aorta

We investigated a possible contribution of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins to the inhibitory effect of losartan on contractions to Ang I (10(-6) M) and Ang II (10(-7) M) with or without L-NAME (10(-4) M) or indomethacin (10(-5) M) in the aorta of WKY, SHR and hamster (n=7 each). Rings of thoracic aorta (2-mm long) were placed in a myograph (5 ml). Endothelium-dependent vasodilations were evaluated with acetylcholine (10(-8) to 10(-6) M). After a 45-minute incubation with L-NAME under a resting tension of 2 g, only hamster aorta contracted (p<0.01). The SHR aorta showed impaired relaxations to acetylcholine compared with the WKY and hamster aorta (p<0.05). Despite the difference in the stimulated NO release, losartan completely abolished the responses to Ang I and Ang II both in WKY and SHR vessels irrespective of the presence of L-NAME. In contrast to the rat aorta, the inhibitory effect of losartan was attenuated in the presence of L-NAME in the hamster aorta (78% vs 99% inhibition, p<0.05). Indomethacin did not alter the effect of losartan in any vessels. Our results suggest that the presence of NO, particularly a basal secretion of NO, is necessary for the full expression of the inhibitory effect of losartan in the hamster, but not in WKY or SHR, aorta. Unlike NO, prostaglandins do not appear to play a role in the effect of losartan.

Risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in end-stage renal disease

The effective treatment of hypertension is an extremely important consideration in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Virtually any drug class--with the possible exception of diuretics--can be used to treat hypertension in the patient with ESRD. Despite there being such a wide range of treatment options, drugs which interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis are generally suggested as agents of choice in this population, even though the evidence in support of their preferential use is quite scanty. ACE inhibitors, and more recently angiotensin antagonists, are the 2 drug classes most commonly employed to alter renin-angiotensin axis activity and therefore produce blood pressure control. ACE inhibitor use in patients with ESRD can sometimes prove an exacting proposition. ACE inhibitors are variably dialysed, with compounds such as catopril, enalapril, lisinopril and perindopril undergoing substantial cross-dialyser clearance during a standard dialysis session. This phenomenon makes the selection of a dose and the timing of administration for an ACE inhibitor a complex issue in patients with ESRD. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease thirst drive and to decrease erythropoiesis. In addition, ACE inhibitors have a unique adverse effect profile. As is the case with their use in patients without renal failure, use of ACE inhibitors in patients with ESRD can be accompanied by cough and less frequently by angioneurotic oedema. In the ESRD population, ACE inhibitor use is also accompanied by so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions. Angiotensin antagonists are similar to ACE inhibitors in their mechanism of blood pressure lowering. Angiotensin antagonists are not dialysable and therefore can be distinguished from a number of the ACE inhibitors. In addition, the adverse effect profile for angiotensin antagonists is remarkably bland, with cough and angioneurotic oedema rarely, if ever, occurring. In patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists are also not associated with the anaphylactoid dialyser reactions which occur with ACE inhibitors. The nonpressor effects of angiotensin antagonists--such as an influence on thirst drive and erythropoiesis--have not been explored in nearly the depth, as they have been with ACE inhibitors. Although ACE inhibitors have not been compared directly to angiotensin antagonists in patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists possess a number of pharmacokinetic and adverse effect characteristics, which would favour their use in this population.

Candesartan cilexetil in hypertension: effects of six weeks' treatment on haemodynamics, baroreceptor sensitivity and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

The effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil on systemic and forearm haemodynamics and baroreceptor sensitivity were evaluated in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 22 patients with essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 100-114 mmHg) were randomized to receive either candesartan cilexetil 16 mg or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. At the end of each period, 24 h after the last dose, invasive haemodynamic assessments were performed. Simultaneously, the plasma renin activity and plasma concentrations of angiotensin II, aldosterone and catecholamines were measured. Compared to placebo, candesartan cilexetil significantly reduced mean arterial pressure by 8 mmHg (95% CI: 2.6; 12.3), while cardiac output, stroke volume and heart rate were unchanged. Forearm vascular resistance was reduced by 1 mmHg x ml(-1) x L x min (CI: 0.3; 2.3). The baroreceptor sensitivity was not influenced, but a change in the set-point was noted. Plasma renin activity and angiotensin II concentrations were increased, while the aldosterone concentration was significantly reduced. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were unaffected. In conclusion, 6 weeks' treatment with candesartan cilexetil 16 mg o.d. induced systemic and forearm vasodilatation and a reduction in blood pressure without compromising cardiac performance. The plasma concentration of aldosterone was reduced.

Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients

Losartan is an orally active, nonpeptide, selective angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist. It provides a more specific and complete blockade of the actions of angiotensin II than renin or ACE inhibitors. Short term (up to 12 weeks' duration) clinical trials have shown losartan to be as effective at lowering blood pressure (BP) [causes a decrease in BP < or = 26/20 mm Hg] in elderly patients with hypertension as recommended dosages of captopril, atenolol, enalapril, felodipine and nifedipine. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) the efficacy of losartan was similar to that of atenolol. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide to losartan therapy provides greater antihypertensive efficacy, equivalent to that seen with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide. Preliminary evidence also indicates that losartan therapy contributes to the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy associated with chronic hypertension. Exercise capacity is increased by losartan in patients with either asymptomatic or symptomatic heart failure. Results from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival or ELITE II (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly II) study indicate that there was no statistically significant difference between losartan and captopril in reducing overall deaths or in reducing sudden cardiac death and/or resuscitated cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure. Other than ELITE II, little conclusive long term mortality and morbidity data exist for losartan. Additional long term trials to evaluate the survival benefits of losartan in elderly patients with hypertension, renal disease or after an acute myocardial infarction are currently in progress. In elderly patients with hypertension, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events associated with once daily losartan (alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide) [19 to 27%] was similar to felodipine (23%) and nifedipine (21%), however, losartan tended to be better tolerated than captopril (11 vs 16%). Losartan was also better tolerated than atenolol in patients with ISH (10.4 vs 23%). In patients with heart failure the renal tolerability of losartan was similar to that of captopril, but losartan was associated with a lower withdrawal rate because of adverse events. No dosage adjustment is required in elderly or in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, and the risk of first-dose hypotension is low.

CONCLUSIONS

comparative data have shown losartan to be as effective as other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. Treatment with losartan is therefore an option for first-line therapy in all patients with hypertension, particularly those who are not well managed with or who are intolerant of their current therapy. Morbidity and mortality data from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival (ELITE II) study show that losartan has potential in the treatment of heart failure.

Specific angiotensin II receptor blockage improves intestinal perfusion during graded hypovolemia in pigs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential of specific angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor blockade to modify the mesenteric hemodynamic response to acute hypovolemia and retransfusion.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled experimental study.

SETTING

University-affiliated animal research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Fasted, anesthetized, ventilated, juvenile domestic pigs of both sexes.

INTERVENTIONS

Acute, graded hypovolemia by 20% and 40% of the total estimated blood volume followed by retransfusion in control animals (CTRL; n = 10) and animals pretreated with the AT1 receptor blocker candesartan (CAND; n = 10).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Invasive monitoring of arterial and central venous blood pressures, cardiac output, portal venous blood flow, and jejunal mucosal blood flow. Blood gases were repeatedly analyzed to calculate oxygen delivery and consumption. Thirty minutes after each level of hypovolemia at 20% and 40%, cardiac output was decreased in CTRL animals from a baseline of 2.9 +/- 0.1 to 1.8 +/- 0.2 and 1.1 +/- 0.2 L/min, with no differences compared with CAND animals. Cardiac output was restored to 3.0 +/- 0.3 L/min 30 mins after retransfusion in CTRL animals, with no significant intergroup differences. Baseline portal venous blood flow (Q(MES)) and jejunal mucosal perfusion (PU(JEJ)) were greater in CAND animals compared with CTRL animals. During graded hypovolemia, CAND animals maintained Q(MES) and PU(JEJ) at significantly higher levels compared with CTRL animals, particularly after 40% hemorrhage (+221% and + 244%, respectively, relative to the mean values in CTRL animals). The same pattern was observed after retransfusion. Moreover, the calculated mesenteric critical oxygen delivery was significantly greater in CTRL animals (74 mL/min) compared with CAND animals (34 mL/min). No animals died in the CAND group, whereas four animals died during 40% hypovolemia or retransfusion in the CTRL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific AT1 blockade before acute hypovolemia significantly ameliorated mesenteric and, in particular, jejunal mucosal hypoperfusion. In addition, cardiovascular stability was improved, and mortality in conjunction with acute hypovolemia and retransfusion could be completely avoided. These findings support a fundamental role of the renin-angiotensin system in the mesenteric response to acute hypovolemia and indicate a substantial interventional potential for candesartan in conjunction with circulatory stress.

Angioedema due to losartan

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of angioedema associated with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old African-American woman was admitted to the hospital for acute renal failure and uncontrolled hypertension. After attempting blood pressure control with three different agents, captopril was combined with metoprolol. The patient noted swelling of the lips combined with shortness of breath after four days of captopril. Losartan was substituted for captopril, which then produced similar swelling of the lips (without shortness of breath) after only one dose. These symptoms resolved after discontinuation of losartan and administration of antihistamines.

DISCUSSION

Losartan, like other angiotensin II receptor antagonists, blocks the action of angiotensin II at the receptor level. Five published case reports involved patients with a prior history of intolerance to the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Two published case reports of similar reactions also occurred in patients with renal compromise. The mechanism for this reaction from losartan is not known, but may not be due to bradykinin excess.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that angiotensin receptor antagonists may not be safe alternatives in patients who have a history of angioedema secondary to the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Effect of angiotensin-(1-7) and bradykinin in patients with heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor

Angiotensin-(1-7) is a product of angiotensin processing that has been proposed to have vasodepressor effects, both on its own and in combination with bradykinin, which may be pathophysiologically and therapeutically important. Despite this, there has been very little examination of its effects in humans and none in heart failure patients or in other patients treated with ACE inhibitors. We therefore sought to determine the effects of angiotensin-(1-7) in patients with heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor, as well as any interaction with the effects of bradykinin. A locally active dose of angiotensin-(1-7), alone and in combination with bradykinin, was infused into the nondominant brachial artery while forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in 8 patients with heart failure treated with ACE inhibitors. Although bradykinin on its own caused profound vasodilation, there was no effect of angiotensin-(1 to 7) on its own or any effect of angiotensin-(1-7) on the response to bradykinin. We conclude that angiotensin-(1-7) is biologically inactive in the forearm circulation of patients with heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor. The contrast between these findings and previously reported preclinical findings calls into question the relevance of angiotensin-(1-7) to the hemodynamic effects of ACE inhibitors.

Comparative effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism on plasma fibrinolytic balance in humans

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition significantly decreases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) without altering tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) during activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in humans. Because ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists differ in their effects on angiotensin II formation and bradykinin degradation, the present study compared the effect of equivalent hypotensive doses of an ACE inhibitor and AT(1) antagonist on fibrinolytic balance. Plasma PAI-1 antigen, tPA antigen, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone were measured in 25 normotensive subjects (19 white, 6 black; 14 men, 11 women; mean age 38.5+/-1.8 years; mean body mass index 25.3+/-0.7 kg/m(2)) during low salt intake alone (10 mmol Na/d), low salt intake + quinapril (40 mg PO bid), and low salt intake + losartan (50 mg PO bid). Compared with low salt alone (systolic blood pressure [BP] 118.8+/-2.2 mm Hg), both quinapril (106.3+/-2.5 mm Hg, P<0.001) and losartan (105.4+/-2. 8 mm Hg, P<0.001) reduced BP. No statistical difference was found between quinapril and losartan in their BP lowering effect. Losartan (P=0.009), but not quinapril, lowered heart rate. Both drugs significantly lowered aldosterone (P<0.001 versus low salt alone for each); however, this effect was significantly greater for quinapril than for losartan (P<0.001 for quinapril versus losartan). Treatment with quinapril, but not with losartan, was associated with a decrease in both PAI-1 antigen (P=0.03) and activity (P=0.018). PAI-1 activity was lower during treatment with quinapril than with losartan (P=0.015). The average PAI-1 antigen concentration was 13. 0+/-2.0 ng/mL during low salt alone, 10.5+/-1.6 ng/mL during quinapril treatment, and 12.3+/-2.1 ng/mL during losartan treatment. In contrast, plasma tPA antigen concentrations were reduced during treatment with losartan (P=0.03) but not with quinapril. This study provides the first evidence that ACE inhibitors and AT(1) antagonists differ in their effects on fibrinolytic balance under conditions of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Further studies are needed to address the mechanism for the contrasting effects of these 2 classes of drugs on fibrinolysis and to define the clinical significance of these differences.

Role of bradykinin in the vasodilator effects of losartan and enalapril in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors have been shown to potentiate the effects of exogenous bradykinin by inhibition of its breakdown. Despite this, there is little evidence that inhibition of endogenous bradykinin breakdown actually contributes to the effects of ACE inhibitors, or indeed, other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin II type I receptor (AT(1)) antagonists, and no evidence at all that it does so in patients with heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve patients with heart failure (11 male, 1 female, ages 59 to 81 years) were randomized to double-blind crossover treatment with enalapril 10 mg BID followed by losartan 25 mg BID, or the reverse, each for 5 weeks. At the end of each treatment period, forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography during an intrabrachial infusion of bradykinin before and after an intrabrachial infusion of Hoe-140 (a potent, selective, and long-acting bradykinin antagonist). Bradykinin caused profound vasodilatation after enalapril (peak, 357+/-67%) and less after losartan (peak, 230+/-46%). Despite this, Hoe-140 had no discernible effects after enalapril or losartan. Similarly, this was despite the finding that Hoe-140 significantly reduced vasodilatation to bradykinin after enalapril (peak, 192+/-35%) and losartan (peak, 66+/-13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of endogenous bradykinin breakdown does not appear to contribute to the effects of ACE inhibition or AT(1) antagonism in the forearm of patients with heart failure at rest, despite the very obvious effects of ACE inhibition compared with AT(1) antagonism on exogenous bradykinin.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and hypertension

Over recent years, a number of imidazole derivatives that specifically bind to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, thereafter called sartans, have been developed and made available to the clinician. Whether targeting antihypertensive treatment with such a high specificity within the renin cascade may carry major clinical advantage over inhibiting angiotensin converting-enzyme remains to be demonstrated. In short-term studies, the efficacy of these drugs at reducing blood pressure was similar to that of established comparators, whereas overall side effect profile was comparable to that of placebo.

Bradykinin stimulates tissue plasminogen activator release in human vasculature

Bradykinin stimulates tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) release in isolated perfused animal tissues. The present study tests the hypothesis that bradykinin increases tPA release in humans through local effects on the vasculature. Graded doses of sodium nitroprusside (0.8 to 3.2 micrograms/min), acetylcholine (ACh) (7.5 to 60 micrograms/min), and bradykinin (100 to 400 ng/min) were administered intra-arterially in random order in 10 salt-depleted (10 mmol/d of Na) normotensive volunteers. None of the drugs altered mean arterial pressure or heart rate. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. All 3 drugs caused a dose-dependent increase in FBF, although ACh was less potent than either nitroprusside or bradykinin (maximum FBF 7.5+/-2.4 versus 10.0+/-1.5 and 11.9+/-2.1 mL. 100 mL-1. min-1, respectively). Bradykinin caused a significant, dose-dependent increase in venous (effect of dose F=9. 9, P=0.028 by ANOVA), but not arterial (F=0.154, P=0.92) tPA antigen in the infused arm. Thus, net tPA release increased significantly in response to bradykinin (50.6+/-13.3 at the highest dose versus 0. 9+/-0.4 ng. 100 mL-1. min -1 at baseline, P=0.014). In contrast, bradykinin did not affect plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen. Neither nitroprusside nor ACh altered plasma levels of tPA or plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen. Bradykinin increased tPA release across the forearm in the absence of systemic effects. This effect could not be attributed to changes in blood flow because doses of equivalent potency of the vasodilator nitroprusside did not increase tPA. These data demonstrate that bradykinin stimulates tPA release in the human vasculature.

Guinea pig airway hyperresponsiveness induced by blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Role for endogenous nitric oxide

Losartan is the first angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist to become available for the treatment of hypertension. However, recent reports have revealed several cases of losartan-induced bronchoconstriction. We investigated to determine the mechanism of losartan-induced bronchoconstriction, considering in particular the involvement of endogenous nitric oxide (NO). In this study, we examined the effects of losartan on airway obstruction and endogenous NO production using anesthetized guinea pigs and cultured airway epithelial cells. Five minutes after administration of angiotensin II (Ang II), the bronchoconstriction induced by acetylcholine was not changed. In contrast, Ang II in the presence of losartan caused a significant increase in the acetylcholine responsiveness. Pretreatment with L-N omega-nitroarginine-methylester (L-NAME) potentiated acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction 5 min after administration of Ang II, and L-arginine reversed this action of L-NAME on the acetylcholine responsiveness. Moreover, Ang II administration increased NO concentration in expired air (12.5 +/- 1.5 ppb for saline, 40 +/- 5 ppb for Ang II, p < 0.01), and losartan significantly inhibited Ang II-stimulated NO release (20 +/- 3.5 ppb) from guinea pig airway. In cultured airway epithelial cells, Ang II also increased NO release (160 +/- 25 nM), and the effect of this Ang II-induced NO release was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with losartan (25 +/- 8 nM, p < 0.01). These findings suggest that losartan-induced bronchoconstriction may result from inhibition of endogenous NO release in the airway.

Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme in human hand veins

Conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II likely occurs in human veins, supporting the existence of endothelial angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in these vessels. Using the dorsal hand vein technique, we investigated the effects of 2 ACE inhibitors, captopril (single oral dose of 6.25 mg) and enalaprilat (local infusion of 1 microgram/min), on venous responsiveness in healthy subjects. Orally administered captopril induced a marked decrease in angiotensin I- but not angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction. This blunted response persisted for at least 4 hours. Enalaprilat and captopril increased the sensitivity to bradykinin, decreasing the dose producing half-maximal response (ED50) of bradykinin 18-fold and 5-fold, respectively, without changing the maximal venodilatory response. These results confirm that there is substantial rapid metabolism of angiotensin I in human veins and suggest that a single dose of locally infused angiotensin I can be used with the dorsal hand vein technique to assess the time-course effect of vascular ACE inhibition after oral administration. Our findings also extend previous in vitro observations in human veins by showing that these agents potentiate the venodilatory effects of bradykinin in vivo.

Use of losartan in the treatment of hypertensive patients with a history of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of dry cough in hypertensive patients with a history of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-induced cough after treatment with losartan (an angiotensin II-receptor antagonist), lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor), or placebo. One hundred patients from 16 outpatient treatment centers in the United States were included in this double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled study, with stratification according to sex. After a challenge phase with lisinopril and a placebo washout phase, patients were randomly allocated to receive losartan 50 mg once daily, lisinopril 20 mg once daily, or placebo for a maximum of 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point of the study was the presence or absence of dry cough during the double-masked period, as rated by the patient at each visit using a validated symptom assessment questionnaire. A secondary end point was the frequency of dry cough, as measured at each visit using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The incidence of dry cough was significantly higher in the lisinopril group than in the losartan and placebo groups (87.5% vs 36.7% and 31.4%, respectively) at the end of the double-masked treatment period; there was no statistically significant difference between the losartan and placebo groups. Mean VAS scores showed that patients treated with lisinopril rated themselves as having a significantly higher frequency of cough than did patients treated with losartan or placebo (4.0 vs 1.2 and 1.5, respectively). Again, the difference between the losartan and placebo groups was not statistically significant. All treatments were otherwise well tolerated, and no serious clinical or laboratory adverse events were reported during the double-masked phase of the study. These results demonstrate that the incidence, severity, and frequency of dry cough in patients with a history of ACE inhibitor-induced dry cough are significantly lower in those treated with losartan than in those treated with lisinopril and are similar to the incidence, severity, and frequency of dry cough in those receiving placebo.

How reproducible is bilateral forearm plethysmography?

AIMS

In studies using strain-gauge forearm plethysmography to measure changes in forearm blood flow (FBF) during intra-arterial infusions of vasoactive substances, measurements are often made in both arms simultaneously and the change in ratio of the infused and control arms used to express responses. However, the reproducibility of bilateral plethysmography in this setting has not been addressed in published studies. The unilateral technique remains in use, and forearm vascular resistance (FVR), an alternative method of expressing responses, is used by some investigators. We have assessed: (a) the intra-subject variability of bilateral FBF measurements (FBF ratios) at rest, after unilateral forearm exercise, and during intra-arterial infusions of vasoconstrictor substances; (b) whether bilateral plethysmography is more reproducible than unilateral plethysmography; and (c) the reproducibility of FVR (unilateral and bilateral).

METHODS

Study 1 Nine healthy subjects attended 3 study days, 1 week apart. FBF was measured at rest and after 2 min of standardized unilateral forearm exercise; between-day intra-subject variability was expressed as coefficients of variation (CV) calculated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Study 2 Five healthy subjects attended 2 study days when FBF was measured during incremental infusions of noradrenaline (15, 30, 150, 300 pmol min[-1]) and angiotensin II (1, 5, 10, 50 pmol min[-1]); for each individual subject at each dose intra-subject variability was assessed using the difference between responses (percentage change from baseline) on days 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Study 1 At rest, intra-subject variability (CV) of baseline FBF ratios was 19% compared with 31% (left) and 39% (right) for unilateral FBF measurements. After ipsilateral exercise, unilateral FBF measurements were more reproducible (32 vs 17%) than FBF ratios; by 20 min after exercise, the previous pattern had been re-established (19 vs 27%). Intra-subject variability (CV) of baseline FVR ratio and post-exercise FVR was 14%. Study 2 Inter-quartile ranges of the differences between responses on days 1 and 2 (FBF ratios vs FBF) were: angiotensin II 14 vs 18%; noradrenaline 16 vs 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

FBF ratios are more reproducible than unilateral FBF measurements at rest (CV 19% vs 39%) and for measuring responses to intra-arterial infusions of vasoconstrictor substances. FVR may have a small reproducibility advantage. Non-experimental stimuli can cause significant and misleading changes in measured responses if unilateral measurements are used; it is therefore recommended that responses to intra-arterial infusions should be measured using bilateral forearm plethysmography with the results expressed as FBF ratios.