HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials

Differential response of HER2-positive breast cancer to anti-HER2 therapy based on HER2 protein expression level

BACKGROUND

Increasing data indicate that HER2-positive (HER2 + ) breast cancer (BC) subtypes exhibit differential responses to targeted anti-HER2 therapy. This study aims to investigate these differences and the potential underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

A large cohort of BC patients (n = 7390) was utilised. The clinicopathological characteristics and differential gene expression (DGE) of HER2+ immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes, specifically HER2 IHC 3+ and IHC 2 + /Amplified, were assessed and correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, respectively. The role of oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also investigated.

RESULTS

Compared to HER2 IHC 3+ tumours, BC patients with IHC 2 + /Amplified showed a significantly lower pCR rate (22% versus 57%, P < 0.001), shorter survival regardless of HER2 gene copy number, were less classified as HER2 enriched, and enriched for trastuzumab resistance and ER signalling pathway genes. ER positivity significantly decreased response to anti-HER2 therapy in IHC 2 + /Amplified, but not in IHC 3 + BC patients.

CONCLUSION

In HER2 + BC, overexpression of HER2 protein is the driver of the oncogenic pathway, and it is the main predictor of response to anti-HER2 therapy. ER signalling pathways are more dominant in BC with equivocal HER2 expression. personalised anti-HER2 therapy based on IHC classes should be considered.

Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing

PURPOSE

To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial.

METHODS

Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test.

RESULTS

The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR- cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system.

CONCLUSION

Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies.

Recent Developments in Combination Chemotherapy for Colorectal and Breast Cancers with Topoisomerase Inhibitors

DNA topoisomerases are important enzymes that stabilize DNA supercoiling and resolve entanglements. There are two main types of topoisomerases in all cells: type I, which causes single-stranded DNA breaks, and type II, which cuts double-stranded DNA. Topoisomerase activity is particularly increased in rapidly dividing cells, such as cancer cells. Topoisomerase inhibitors have been an effective chemotherapeutic option for the treatment of several cancers. In addition, combination cancer therapy with topoisomerase inhibitors may increase therapeutic efficacy and decrease resistance or side effects. Topoisomerase inhibitors are currently being used worldwide, including in the United States, and clinical trials on the combination of topoisomerase inhibitors with other drugs are currently underway. The primary objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the current clinical landscape concerning the combined application of irinotecan, an extensively investigated type I topoisomerase inhibitor for colorectal cancer, and doxorubicin, an extensively researched type II topoisomerase inhibitor for breast cancer, while presenting a novel approach for cancer therapy.

Nanoproteomics deciphers the prognostic value of EGFR family proteins-based liquid biopsy

Monitoring tumor-associated protein status in serum can effectively track tumors and avoid time-consuming, costly, and invasive tissue biopsy. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family proteins are often recommended in the clinical management of multiple solid tumors. However, the low-abundance of serum EGFR (sEGFR) family proteins hinders the depth-understanding of their function and tumor management. Herein, a nanoproteomics approach coupling with aptamer-modified MOFs (NMOFs-Apt) with mass spectrometry was developed for the enrichment and quantitative analysis of sEGFR family proteins. This nanoproteomics approach exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for sEGFR family protein quantification, with the limit of quantification as low as 1.00 nM. After detecting 626 patients' sEGFR family proteins with various malignant tumors, we concluded that the levels of serum proteins had a moderate concordance with tissue counterparts. Metastatic breast cancer patients with a high level of serum human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (sHER2) and a low level of sEGFR had a poor prognosis, and patients with a sHER2 decrease of more than 20% had longer disease-free time after receiving chemotherapy. This nanoproteomics method provided a simple and effective approach for low-abundant serum protein detection and our results clarified the potential of sHER2 and sEGFR as cancer markers.

UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update

The last UK breast cancer (BC) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline recommendations were published in 2015. Since then, new data and therapeutic strategies have emerged. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) published a focused update in 2018 that reclassified in situ hybridisation (ISH) Group 2 (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 2+and HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio ≥2.0 and HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell), as well as addressed other concerns raised by previous guidelines. The present article further refines UK guidelines, with specific attention to definitions of HER2 status focusing on eight key areas: (1) HER2 equivocal (IHC 2+) and assignment of the ASCO/CAP ISH group 2 tumours; (2) the definition of the group of BCs with low IHC scores for HER2 with emphasis on the distinction between IHC score 1+ (HER2-Low) from HER2 IHC score 0 (HER2 negative); (3) reporting cases showing HER2 heterogeneity; (4) HER2 testing in specific settings, including on cytological material; (5) repeat HER2 testing, (6) HER2 testing turnaround time targets; (7) the potential role of next generation sequencing and other diagnostic molecular assays for routine testing of HER2 status in BC and (8) use of image analysis to score HER2 IHC. The two tiered system of HER2 assessment remains unchanged, with first line IHC and then ISH limited to IHC equivocal cases (IHC score 2+) but emerging data on the relationship between IHC scores and levels of response to anti-HER2 therapy are considered. Here, we present the latest UK recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in BC, and where relevant, the differences from other published guidelines.

Breast Cancer With a HER2 FISH Group 2 Result: Should HER2 Tests be Repeated?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) group 2 pattern (HER2 <4 and HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2, a subset of monosomy CEP17) was historically considered HER2-positive, but mostly HER2-negative according to updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines unless 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Therapeutic relevance of this group remained elusive, therefore we assessed if repeat IHC and FISH can assist final HER2 classification.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2014 to 2018 and identified 23 of 3554 (0.6%) breast cancer cases with at least one-time measurement of HER2 FISH categorized as group 2. Repeat HER2 tests were performed for cases with available alternative tumor samples and compared with initial testing following 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 1 of 23 group 2 cases was HER2-positive, 0/18 in primary and 1/5 in metastatic/recurrent tumors. Of 13 primary tumors with repeat HER2 results; 10 (77%) remained HER2-negative; 3 (23%) changed from HER2-negative (group 2 and IHC 2+) to HER2-positive (group 1 and IHC 2+). Among 8 of these 13 patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy containing anti-HER2 agent, 3 (38%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). Two of 3 pCR cases were HER2-positive converters on repeat testing. Three pCR cases were ER-negative or -low positive and Ki67 ≥40%, while 5 partial responders were ER-positive and Ki67 <40% (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer with HER2 FISH group 2 result may represent heterogeneous populations of tumor cells being originated de novo or preferentially selected secondary to therapy. Repeat HER2 tests on alternative samples may be considered to guide anti-HER2 therapy.

A clinicopathological study and survival analysis of 99 breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0 and an average HER2 copy number < 4.0 per cell in China

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients of American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) Group 2 were all HER2-negative according to the 2018 guideline, not HER2-positive as defined in the 2013 guideline.

METHODS

We aims to elucidate the unique clinicopathological features of ASCO/CAP Group 2 patients by comparing with classic HER2-nonamplified cancers, and reveal the efficacy of the former to anti-HER2 therapy. The clinicopathological features, treatment and prognosis information of 99 patients between 2014 and 2018 were collected. HER2 status was re-defined using the updated recommendations.

RESULTS

Of the 99 ASCO/CAP Group 2 tumors, 25.5% (25/99) tumors were immunohistochemical (IHC) 0/1+ and 74.7% (74/99) tumors were IHC 2+. According to the updated 2018 guideline, all of them were HER2 negative. When compared to ASCO/CAP Group 5, patients of ASCO/CAP Group 2 displayed higher ratio of histological grade 3 (P = .03), high Ki67 proliferation index (P = .03) and pN3 (more than 9 lymph nodes metastasis, P = .02), and lower estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (P = .04). There was no statistical difference in the survival of patients received anti-HER2 therapy and patients not received anti-HER2 therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of ASCO/CAP Group 2 did not received apparent benefit from anti-HER2 treatment. Although according to the updated guidelines and latest reports, HER2 is negative, but when compared with classic HER2-nonamplified cancers, patients of this group seemed to be more aggressive. We suggest that this group still be regarded as an independent category, in order to accumulate more cases in the future to expand the scope of research.

A Multi-Center Clinical Study to Harvest and Characterize Circulating Tumor Cells from Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Using the Parsortix® PC1 System

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) captured from the blood of cancer patients may serve as a surrogate source of tumor material that can be obtained via a venipuncture (also known as a liquid biopsy) and used to better understand tumor characteristics. However, the only FDA-cleared CTC assay has been limited to the enumeration of surface marker-defined cells and not further characterization of the CTCs. In this study, we tested the ability of a semi-automated device capable of capturing and harvesting CTCs from peripheral blood based on cell size and deformability, agnostic of cell-surface markers (the Parsortix® PC1 System), to yield CTCs for evaluation by downstream techniques commonly available in clinical laboratories. The data generated from this study were used to support a De Novo request (DEN200062) for the classification of this device, which the FDA recently granted. As part of a multicenter clinical trial, peripheral blood samples from 216 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and 205 healthy volunteers were subjected to CTC enrichment. A board-certified pathologist enumerated the CTCs from each participant by cytologic evaluation of Wright-Giemsa-stained slides. As proof of principle, cells harvested from a concurrent parallel sample provided by each participant were evaluated using one of three additional evaluation techniques: molecular profiling by qRT-PCR, RNA sequencing, or cytogenetic analysis of HER2 amplification by FISH. The study demonstrated that the Parsortix® PC1 System can effectively capture and harvest CTCs from the peripheral blood of MBC patients and that the harvested cells can be evaluated using orthogonal methodologies such as gene expression and/or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH).

Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines

Biren ParikhIntroduction  Hormonal status and HER2 expression are valuable biomarkers and dictate the management of the patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (IBC). It is crucial to identify the patients who truly respond to anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines has recommended certain modifications in HER2 interpretation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with concomitant immunohistochemistry (IHC). Objectives  We aimed to evaluate HER2 FISH interpretation in IBC with equivocal IHC results as per 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations and compare FISH results with hormonal receptor status. Materials and Methods  FISH results of 502 cases of IBC with equivocal IHC report between January 2016 to January 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. FISH results were categorized according to ASCO/CAP guidelines 2018 into five respective groups. Results  FISH testing in IHC equivocal cases showed 219 (43.6%) cases were classic amplified (positive) belonged to group 1, 217(43.2%) cases were classic nonamplified (negative) fell into group 5, 39 (7.8%) and 02 (0.4%) patients were in group 2 (negative) and group 3 (positive), and 25 (5.0%) cases were in group 4 (negative). About 52.1 and 49.3% of cases with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity were reported as HER2 positive. Among 502 cases, 25 equivocal cases according to the 2013 guidelines were redefined as HER2 negative and 02 (0.4%) cases reported positive were classified negative as per updated 2018 guidelines. Conclusion  Revised 2018 guidelines is helpful in accurate identification of HER2 status and in avoiding targeted therapy in unwarranted cases. Updated 2018 guidelines has removed equivocal HER2-FISH category that has eliminated management dilemma in these cases. Only long-term clinical follow-up will establish the validity of the updated guidelines.

3D reconstruction based novel methods are more effective than traditional clinical assessment in breast cancer axillary lymph node metastasis prediction

The status of axillary lymph node metastases determines the treatment and overall survival of breast cancer (BC) patients. Three-dimensional (3D) assessment methods have advantages for spatial localization and are more responsive to morphological changes in lymph nodes than two-dimensional (2D) assessment methods, and we speculate that methods developed using 3D reconstruction systems have high diagnostic efficacy. This exploratory study included 43 patients with histologically confirmed BC diagnosed at Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between July 2017 and August 2020, all of whom underwent preoperative CT scans. Patients were divided into a training cohort to train the model and a validation cohort to validate the model. A 3D axillary lymph node atlas was constructed on a 3D reconstruction system to create various methods of assessing lymph node metastases for a comparison of diagnostic efficacy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic values of these methods. A total of 43 patients (mean [SD] age, 47 [10] years) met the eligibility criteria and completed 3D reconstruction. An axillary lymph node atlas was established, and a correlation between lymph node sphericity and lymph node metastasis was revealed. By continuously fitting the size and characteristics of axillary lymph nodes on the 3D reconstruction system, formulas and models were established to determine the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, and the 3D method had better sensitivity for axillary lymph node assessment than the 2D method, with a statistically significant difference in the correct classification rate. The combined diagnostic method was superior to a single diagnostic method, with a 92.3% correct classification rate for the 3D method combined with ultrasound. In addition, in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the correct classification rate of the 3D method (72.7%) was significantly higher than that of ultrasound (45.5%) and CT (54.5%). By establishing an axillary lymph node atlas, the sphericity formula and model developed with the 3D reconstruction system achieve a high correct classification rate when combined with ultrasound or CT and can also be applied to patients receiving NAC.

Computer-Aided Scoring Of () Gene Amplification Status In Breast Cancer

Background

Identification of HER2 protein overexpression and/or amplification of the HER2 gene are required to qualify breast cancer patients for HER2 targeted therapies. In situ hybridization (ISH) assays that identify HER2 gene amplification function as a stand-alone test for determination of HER2 status and rely on the manual quantification of the number of HER2 genes and copies of chromosome 17 to determine HER2 amplification.

Methods

To assist pathologists, we have developed the uPath HER2 Dual ISH Image Analysis for Breast (uPath HER2 DISH IA) algorithm, as an adjunctive aid in the determination of HER2 gene status in breast cancer specimens. The objective of this study was to compare uPath HER2 DISH image analysis vs manual read scoring of VENTANA HER2 DISH-stained breast carcinoma specimens with ground truth (GT) gene status as the reference. Three reader pathologists reviewed 220, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer cases by both manual and uPath HER2 DISH IA methods. Scoring results from manual read (MR) and computer-assisted scores (image analysis, IA) were compared against the GT gene status generated by consensus of a panel of pathologists. The differences in agreement rates of HER2 gene status between manual, computer-assisted, and GT gene status were determined.

Results

The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) rates for image analysis (IA) vs GT were 97.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.0, 99.3) and 94.3% (95% CI: 90.8, 97.3) respectively. Comparison of agreement rates showed that the lower bounds of the 95% CIs for the difference of PPA and NPA for IA vs MR were –0.9% and –6.2%, respectively. Further, inter- and intra-reader agreement rates in the IA method were observed with point estimates of at least 96.7%.

Conclusions

Overall, our data show that the uPath HER2 DISH IA is non-inferior to manual scoring and supports its use as an aid for pathologists in routine diagnosis of breast cancer.

•

Image analysis algorithm for HER2 amplification using Bright-field ISH in Breast.

•

Automated tumor cell selection and quantitation within pathologist defined ROI.

•

The image analysis algorithm is non-inferior to manual scoring.

•

Integrated solution to support pathologists in determining HER2 gene status.

Loss of human epidermal receptor-2 in human epidermal receptor-2+ breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: A case report

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal receptor-2 (HER-2) expression has been reported to be discordant between primary tumor and metastatic tissue.

CASE SUMMARY

We presented a case diagnosed with the HER-2+ breast cancer patient who exhibited changes in the expression of HER-2 receptors on tumour samples from surgical specimens obtained after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) compared with initial biopsy. The patient underwent a HER-2-targeted therapy consequently, in spite of HER+ gene loss. After the surgery, the patient subsequently underwent endocrine therapy and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Changes in HER-2 expression after NAT should be retested by physicians and pathologists before systemic treatment instead of avoiding further HER-2-targeted therapy, and we will perform immunohistochemical multiple-spot biopsy analyses of other important clinical issues to better define prognosis and tailor subsequent adjuvant therapy.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Carrying Germline Pathogenic Variants in DNA Repair-Related Genes

PURPOSE

In recent years, unprecedented benefits have been observed with the development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, there is scarce evidence of their value in specific populations, such as patients carrying germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied the efficacy of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Three cohorts were compared, including patients harboring germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes (gBRCA1/2-ATM-CHEK2 mutated), those tested without these mutations (wild type [WT]), and the nontested subgroup. Relevant prognostic factors including age, metastatic site (visceral v nonvisceral), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and prior treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were stratified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among the total population (n = 217), 15 (6.9%) patients carried gBRCA1/2 (n = 10)-ATM (n = 4)-CHEK2 (n = 1) pathogenic variants, 45 (20.7%) were WT, and 157 (72.4%) were nontested. Gene pathogenic variant carriers were younger (P < .001). Most patients (164, 75.6%) had not received prior endocrine therapy in the advanced setting. Median progression-free survival was shorter in patients with evaluated germline pathogenic variants (10.2 months [95% CI, 5.7 to 14.7]), compared with WT and nontested patients (15.6 months [95% CI, 7.8 to 23.4], and (17.6 months [95% CI, 12.9 to 22.2]; P = .002). Consistently, a worse median overall survival was observed in the subgroup with germline pathogenic variants than in the WT group (P = .006). Multivariable analysis showed that mutation status was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival (P = .020) and overall survival (P = .012).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective real-world study, gBRCA1/2-ATM-CHEK2 pathogenic variants were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay

We aimed to document the pathological characteristics of breast cancer (BC) cases with different scores of HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as to establish a relationship between HER2 expression and HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). A cohort of 258 primary BC cases was evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. All HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases by IHC were concordant with the ISH classification. BC cases with score of 0 had lower average of HER2 copy number compared to cases with score of 1 + . HER2-equivocal cases by IHC had intermediate pathological characteristics between HER2-negative and HER2-positive cases. About 12% of HER2-equivocal cases were classified as ISH-positive. HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 gene amplification had proliferation index, HER2/CEP17 ratio, and average of HER2 copy number between HER2-equivocal cases without HER2 gene amplification and HER2-positive cases by IHC. Additionally, HER2-equivocal cases with HER2 amplification had score of 2 + in at least 50% of the total tumor area, with a proportion of ISH-positive cases increasing with the amount of score of 2 + present in the tumor. The quantification of score of 2 + in the tumor predicted the ISH classification with an AUC of 0.902. A logistic regression model using the same HER2 quantification and the nuclear score was able to increase the abovementioned prediction to an AUC of 0.929. As such, we were able to link HER2 quantification by IHC and morphological analysis with HER2 amplification by ISH.

Histologic analysis according to HER2 gene status in HER2 2 + invasive breast cancer: a study of 280 cases comparing ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guideline recommendations

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer (BC) have been updated with more stringent criteria regarding immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2 + interpretation. The aim of our study was to determine HER2 status in IHC 2 + cases based on 2013 and 2018 guidelines and to investigate specific histologic characteristics that might predict HER2 status in tumors with equivocal IHC staining. Two hundred eighty BC cases reported as IHC 2 + and 24 cases reported as non-IHC 2 + were reviewed with 12 histologic characteristics. Of the IHC 2 + cases based on 2013 guideline, 21% were reclassified to IHC 1 + when applying the 2018 guidelines. Consequently, it led to an 8% increase of HER2 amplification rate in 2018 IHC 2 + group. Seven characteristics were significantly associated with prediction of HER2 amplification in IHC 2 + BCs, including high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), distinct cellular membrane, no apical snout, large nuclear size, nuclear size variation, high nuclear grade, and tubule formation < 10%. Using these criteria, the presence of four or more characteristics significantly indicates HER2 amplification. Moreover, four characteristics among them, including high TILs, distinct cellular membrane, nuclear size variation, and high nuclear grade, were also associated with HER2 amplification in non-IHC 2 + cases, demonstrating their predictive value as complements to IHC. In conclusion, we provide specific morphologic features that will improve pathologist performance in identifying more HER2-positive BCs. We further suggest an algorithm for trastuzumab therapy decisions using a combination of histomorphologic evaluation and the updated 2018 guidelines.

Updates on breast biomarkers

Recent advancements in breast cancer treatment have ushered in a new era of precision medicine. Novel trials have led to the approval of a growing list of personalized therapies and corresponding biomarkers. These advancements have shifted the pathologist's practice into a leading role in the management breast cancer. Understanding the complex algorithms and diagnostic modalities used to assess predictive and prognostic biomarkers is central for quality oncology care. ER and HER2 subcategorize breast cancers into treatment groups under which different biomarkers and therapies are indicated, while they also serve as predictive biomarkers for specific targeted treatments. This review will cover the evolution and latest updates of the CAP/ASCO guidelines relevant to these two important biomarkers in breast cancer. Still evolving concepts such as HER2 heterogeneity, HER2 "low," and HER2-mutated cancers have the potential to continue to change HER2 testing in breast cancers. In addition to ER and HER2, biomarkers used in specific clinical scenarios will be covered. In early-stage ER-positive/HER2-negative disease, multi-gene expression panels (such as OncotypeDX) have emerged as the new standard biomarker when determining if chemotherapy should be added to endocrine therapy. In the more aggressive ER-negative/HER2-positive or triple negative early-stage breast cancers, response to neoadjuvant therapy has proved to be a useful biomarker to help determine if additional therapy should be added for patients with an incomplete response. Ki67 has also recently emerged as a marker that can be used to identify the highest risk ER-positive and HER2-negative cancers if considering adding a cell cycle inhibitor (abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy. Importantly, in the metastatic setting, numerous predictive biomarkers have emerged, including recommendations for germline BRCA mutation testing for all metastatic patients (to determine if PARP inhibitor therapy is an option) and other ER-/HER2-dependent biomarkers such as PD-L1 (for potential immunotherapy in triple negative patients) and PIK3CA mutation status (for potential PI3K inhibitor therapy in ER-positive metastatic patients). Other less common biomarkers of targeted therapy options (e.g., MSI/MMR, TMB, NTRK) as well as comprehensive genomic profiling to identify uncommon targets are also available in the metastatic setting to determine additional treatment options.

Characteristics of HER2-negative breast cancers with FISH-equivocal status according to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline

BACKGROUND

According to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers will be categorized as HER2 negative except those with IHC 3+. However, whether or not HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers was a heterogeneous group has not been well illustrated.

METHODS

195 HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancer samples were collected from 2014 to 2018. The molecular subtype was identified according to 2013 St Gallen consensus, and HER2 status was also re-determined following 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. All samples were classified into 4 groups according to the average HER2 copy number (4.0-4.4, 4.5-4.9, 5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9 signals/cell). The relationship between HER2 copy number and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed.

RESULTS

183 (93.8%) of 195 FISH-equivocal cases were classified as luminal-like subtype, while the other 12 (6.2%) were undetermined. Following 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, all FISH-equivocal cases were recategorized as HER2 negative. Therefore, 31(15.9%) cases were luminal A-like, 152 (77.9%) were luminal B-like (HER2 negative) and 12 (6.2%) were triple negative. The average HER2 copy number showed a positive correlation with chromosome 17 polysomy, but had no significant association with other clinicopathological parameters as well as prognosis. 17 (8.7%) patients were treated with trastuzumab, but showed no difference in prognosis with those who didn't receive targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, all HER2 FISH-equivocal breast cancers were recategorized as HER2 negative according to 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. Most of these patients were luminal B-like (HER2 negative). The average HER2 copy number had no significant association with clinicopathological parameters, as well as prognosis.

Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.

CONCLUSION

Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.

Nuclear Morphological Characteristics in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Hormone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2

Background

Hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are the common diagnostic/prognostic markers in breast cancer. Few articles have recently reported the correlation between cytology and molecular subtypes. We combined nuclear morphological characteristics with HR and HER2 status to observe the relationship and provide ideas for machine learning.

Methods

We reanalyzed fine-needle aspiration cytology samples and core-needle puncture histological specimens from 142 patients with invasive breast cancer between March 2019 and December 2019, and the findings were compared with the two groups (HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2+) following nuclear cytomorphological features: nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, difference of nuclear size, nuclear pleomorphism, chromatin feature, nuclear membrane and nucleoli, and Nottingham grading.

Results

Two groups were significantly associated with the difference of nuclear size, nuclear pleomorphism, and nucleoli (P < 0.001) and consistent with histological grading (P < 0.001). Moreover, nucleolar characteristics of size and number had obviously statistical significance (P < 0.001). Multiple micro-nucleoli were frequently seen in the HR+/HER2- group compared with the HR-/HER2+ group which mostly were observed centered medium-large nucleoli. We described four interesting nuclear morphologies in the experiment.

Conclusions

There were significant differences in nuclear characteristics between two groups. HR and HER2 status not only might be predicted in cytological samples, but some specific nuclear morphological features might have potential value to help us understand molecular function and predict more information.

Reappraisal of HER2 Amplification in High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Based on 2018 ASCO/CAP Clinical Practice Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

To examine and compare human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification status in high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUCa), using both 2013 and 2018 HER2 reporting guidelines for breast carcinoma from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP).

METHODS

HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay in 78 cases of HGUCa was compared using 2013 and 2018 HER2 reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

HER2 amplification was observed in 22 (28.2%) of 78 tumors, of which 17 were in group 1, 1 in group 2, and 2 each in groups 3 and 4 (FISH assay, 2018). The remaining 14 HER2-amplified tumors (FISH assay, 2013) became negative, falling into group 2 (FISH assay, 2018) and were either negative or equivocal on immunohistochemistry (IHC, 2018). All FISH-negative tumors (n = 37) using 2013 criteria remained negative (group 5, 2018). FISH-equivocal tumors (2013) were further categorized into HER2 amplified (n = 1) and HER2 negative (n = 4) (2018). Overall, 20 (25.6%) tumors had discordant HER2 FISH results (2018 vs 2013).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing 2018 guidelines, HER2 amplification decreased from 36 to 22 cases. The group with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or more and average HER2 copy number less than 4 (group 2) were predominantly negative by IHC, suggesting a biologically distinct group of HGUCa that is different from HER2-amplified tumors, which may not respond to HER2-targeted therapy.

[2021 update of the GEFPICS' recommendations for HER2 status assessment in invasive breast cancer in France]

The last international guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have been updated in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists, on the basis of a twenty-year practice and results of numerous clinical trials. Moreover, the emerging HER2-low concept for 1+ and 2+ non amplified breast cancers lead to refine French practices for HER2 status assessment. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists, herein presents the latest French recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in breast cancer, taking into account the ASCO/CAP guidelines and introducing the HER2-low concept. In the era of personalized medicine, HER2 status assessment remains one of the most important biomarkers in breast cancer and its quality guaranties the optimal patients' care. French pathologists' commitment in theranostic biomarker quality is more than ever required to provide the most efficient cares in oncology.

Detailed Reanalysis of 500 Breast Cancers With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Borderline ERBB2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the impact of our laboratory's reflex testing process for resolving ERBB2 (HER2) status on breast cancer samples that require additional workup after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), per guideline recommendations published in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP).

METHODS

In total, 500 breast cancer specimens with ERBB2 FISH results in groups 2 through 4 (all reported as immunohistochemistry [IHC] equivocal [2+] at external laboratories) were resubmitted for IHC testing in our laboratory. Per the ASCO/CAP guideline, FISH was rescored when internal IHC was also equivocal (2+), targeted to tumor areas demonstrating more intense IHC staining, if observed.

RESULTS

Reflex IHC/FISH testing changed the final reported ERBB2 status in 185 of 500 (37.0%) samples. Result changes included discordant IHC (n = 4 score 0, n = 132 score 1+, and n = 16 score 3+) and discordant FISH (n = 33). Numerical differences in FISH scores were comparable for targeted vs nontargeted FISH rescoring (P = .086 for ERBB2 copy number; P = .49 for ERBB2 ratio). Two cases showed larger differences in FISH scores, suggesting heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Retesting of breast cancer samples with equivocal IHC frequently changes IHC results, but targeted reanalysis of borderline FISH results rarely identifies significant differences in ERBB2 copy number or ratio.

Clinical and Pathologic Features Associated With Invasive Breast Carcinoma with 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists In Situ Hybridization Group 2 Results (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 [HER2]/Chromosome 17 Centromere [CEP17] Ratio ≥2.0 and Average HER2 Copy Number <4.0)

CONTEXT.—

The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists updated the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) breast carcinoma testing guideline in 2018 to address issues from uncommon HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results. Based on the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline, cases wherein the HER2/chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) ratio of 2.0 or more with an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 were considered in situ hybridization (ISH) positive. Under the 2018 guideline, such cases are classified as ISH Group 2 and are no longer considered eligible for anti-HER2 therapy when the corresponding HER2 immunohistochemistry result is 0, 1+, or 2+.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess the clinical, pathologic, and treatment aspects of patients with ISH Group 2 results.

DESIGN.—

We retrospectively reviewed HER2 FISH results at our center between January 2012 and December 2014 and identified and characterized cases with ISH Group 2 results.

RESULTS.—

Thirty-nine cases with ISH Group 2 results from 39 patients were reviewed. Twenty of 39 (51%) patients received anti-HER2 therapy. Patients treated with HER2-targeted therapy were less likely to have hormone receptor-positive tumors, compared with patients without anti-HER2 treatment, though not significantly (P = .30). The only significant difference between the 2 patient groups was receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment (P < .001). Overall, clinical outcome was similar between the 2 groups (P > .99).

CONCLUSIONS.—

This retrospective study with median follow-up of at least 6 years shows patients with ISH Group 2 tumors had similar clinical outcomes, irrespective of HER2-targeted therapy. Further analysis in the prospective setting would provide valuable data that would potentially inform clinical decision making.

Quantification of HER2 in COS7 cells using quantum weak measurement

A Mach-Zehnder interferometer system based on weak measurement was set up to determinate the concentration variation of molecule by measuring the phase difference change between the two optical paths. The spectrum of the light was recorded to monitor the concentration of trastuzumab (Herceptin), which is a humanised monoclonal antibody, targeted to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The trastuzumab targeting to HER2 was real-time detected and continuously monitored, the HER2 numbers of COS7 cells on a coverslip was determined at pico-molar level. Our weak measurement enabled method proposes an alternative approach for the concentration detection of molecules, providing a promising functional tool for the quantification of HER2 in cancer cells, possibly promoting fields such as the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Routine Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients Diagnosed With Oestrogen Receptor Positive, Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) provides staging information and guides adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer (EBC). Routine SLNB in oncogeriatricians with low-risk EBC remains controversial.

Aims

To evaluate axillary management in elderly patients diagnosed with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+), clinically lymph node negative (cLN-) EBC, and to assess whether SLNB affects further axillary management or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACTX) decision making.

Methods

Female patients aged > 65 years, diagnosed with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-), and cLN- breast cancer (BC), who underwent surgery and SLNB were included. Clinicopathological predictors of ACTX and completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) were determined. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed survival outcomes.

Results

A total of 253 patients were included (median age: 72 years, range: 66-90), all underwent SLNB; 50 (19.8%) had lymphatic metastasis on SLNB (SLNB+). Of these, 19 proceeded to CALND (38.0%), 10 (52.6%) of whom had further axillary disease (ALND+). 20 of the 50 SLNB+ patients received ACTX (40.0%) as did 31 of the 203 SLNB- patients (15.2%) (P < .001). Oncotype DX (ODX) testing was utilized in 82 cases (32.8%). Younger age (P < .001), SLNB+ (P < .001) and ODX score (P = .003) were all associated with ACTX prescription. ODX > 25 (OR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.38-13.80, P = .012) independently predicted receiving ACTX. Receiving ACTX and proceeding to CALND did not improve disease-free (P = .485 and P = .345) or overall survival (P = .981 and P = .646).

Conclusions

Routine SNLB may not be necessary in elderly patients diagnosed with ER+, cLN- EBC. Future oncogeriatric practice is likely to see genomic testing guiding ACTX prescription in this group.

Analytical validation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry by the use of the A0485 antibody versus the 4B5 antibody and breast versus gastric scoring guidelines in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) by using two antibodies and two scoring guidelines in correlation with HER2 amplification and clinicopathological features.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tissue microarray was constructed by use of a total of 71 OCCC cases for IHC (the A0485 antibody and the 4B5 antibody) and dual-colour silver in-situ hybridisation (DISH). Two pathologists independently scored the IHC according to the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) breast cancer guidelines (breast guidelines) and the 2016 ASCO/CAP gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma guidelines (gastric guidelines). IHC concordances between A0485 and 4B5 were 87.3-93.0%. Three to 16 (4.2-22.5%) cases had an IHC score of 2+/3+ with frequent basolateral/lateral membranous staining. The 4B5 antibody yielded fewer IHC 2+ cases than the A0485 antibody (n = 2-6 versus n = 5-12). Five (7.0%) cases had HER2 amplification as determined with DISH. Cases with papillary-predominant growth patterns were significantly more likely to have HER2 amplification (P = 0.0051). In predicting DISH results, IHC scored according to the gastric guidelines yielded 100%/100% sensitivity and 83.3-95.5%/98.2-100% specificity, and IHC scored according to the breast guidelines yielded 60-80%/33.3-66.7% sensitivity and 95.5-100%/100% specificity (including/excluding IHC 2+ cases). One case had intratumoral heterogeneity, with discordant results between primary and metastatic tumour specimens.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated HER2 amplification in 7% of OCCC cases, and the molecular change is significantly associated with papillary-predominant growth patterns. In predicting HER2 amplification, a combination of 4B5 IHC and gastric guidelines provides the best sensitivity and fewer equivocal (IHC 2+) cases. Given the intratumoral heterogeneity, assessment of HER2 status on whole tissue sections and on both primary and metastatic tumour specimens is recommended.

Retrospective observational study of HER2 immunohistochemistry in borderline breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, with an emphasis on Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0, HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell) cases

BACKGROUND

The ASCO/CAP guidance on HER2 testing in breast cancer (BC) has recently changed. Group 2 tumours with immunohistochemistry score 2+ and HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 and HER2 copy number <4.0 signals/cell were re-classified as HER2 negative. This study aims to examine the response of Group 2 tumours to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

749 BC cases were identified from 11 institutions. The association between HER2 groups and pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed.

RESULTS

54% of immunohistochemistry HER2 positive (score 3+) BCs showed pCR, compared to 19% of immunohistochemistry 2+ FISH amplified cases. 27% of Group 2 treated with HER2 targeted therapy achieved pCR, compared to 19 and 11% in the combined Groups 1 + 3 and Groups 4 + 5, respectively. No difference in pCR rates was identified between Group 2 and Group 1 or combined Groups 1 + 3. However, Group 2 response rate was higher than Groups 4 + 5 (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

No difference in pCR was detected in tumours with a HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 and a HER2 score 2+ by IHC when stratified by HER2 gene copy number. Our data suggest that ASCO/CAP HER2 Group 2 carcinomas should be evaluated further with respect to eligibility for HER2 targeted therapy.

HER2 Testing Characteristics Can Predict Residual Cancer Burden following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Objectives

The response to HER2-targeted neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-positive (+) breast cancer can be quantified using residual cancer burden (RCB) pathologic evaluation to predict relapse free/overall survival. However, more information is needed to characterize the relationship between patterns of HER2 testing results and response to NAC. We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics associated with RCB categories in HER2+ patients who underwent HER2-directed NAC.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted with Stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer cases following NAC and surgical resection. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), histologic/clinical characteristics, hormone receptor status, and RCB scores (RCB-0, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III) were evaluated.

Results

64/151 (42.4%) patients with HER2+ disease had pathologic complete response (pCR). Tumors with suboptimal response (RCB-II and RCB-III) were more likely to demonstrate less than 100% HER2 IHC 3+ staining (p < 0.0001), lower HER2 FISH copies (p < 0.0001), and lower HER2/CEP17 ratios (p = 0.0015) compared to RCB-I and RCB-II responses. Estrogen receptor classification using ≥10% versus ≥1% staining showed greater association with higher RCB categories.

Conclusions

HER2+ characteristics show differing response to therapy despite all being categorized as positive; tumors with less than 100% IHC 3+ staining, lower HER2 FISH copies, and lower HER2/CEP17 ratios resulted in higher RCB scores.

An Evaluation of Clinicopathological Correlation and Outcome of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Subgroups Reclassified According to the Latest ASCO/CAP Guideline

BACKGROUND

The latest American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline has updated the interpretation of uncommon human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns (groups 2-4) with concomitant HER2 immunohistochemistry, leading to changes in the diagnosis of these subgroups. We sought to assess the clinicopathological features and outcomes in these subgroups in detail with our local cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic features of groups 2 to 4 were compared to the typical amplified group (group 1: HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2, HER2 ≥ 4) and non-amplified group (group 5: HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 < 4).

RESULTS

Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2, HER2 < 4) cases showed lower Ki67 expression and grade (P ≤ .002) than group 1 but no differences compared with group 5. Group 4 (HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 = 4-6) cases were associated with less necrosis, more estrogen receptor positivity, lower grade, more nodal metastases, and more special histotypes (P ≤ .037) than group 1, but higher grade and more nodal metastases (P ≤ .021) than group 5. Except for presenting as a larger tumor and of special histotypes, group 3 (HER2/CEP17 < 2, HER2 ≥ 6) cases showed no other significant differences from group 1, but were of higher grade and Ki67 level than groups 2, 4, and 5. Group 4, similar to group 5, showed worse survival than group 1 (disease-free survival: log-rank = 5.547, P = .019; overall survival: log-rank = 4.678, P = .031). The rate of relapse was similar in group 4 with and without anti-HER2 therapy, albeit with limited cases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate more similarities among groups 2, 4, and 5 than between groups 1 and 3, supporting the HER2 categorization in the latest guideline. Additional studies may be warranted to assess the outcomes of these patients with different management approaches.

HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines

PURPOSE

HER2 overexpression and gene amplification are routinely tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. In addition, HER2 mRNA expression is also tested by the Oncotype DX assay. Discordance between laboratories among the different assays remains a problem. To improve the routine HER2 reporting, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated their guidelines in 2018. Our study will compare concordance of HER2 status by IHC and FISH using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines with Oncotype DX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 657 estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancer cases with available Oncotype DX tests between 2011 and 2018. Medical records were reviewed for HER2 results by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. The HER2 results by different assays and between 2013 and 2018 guidelines were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 657 cases, 280 were tested by IHC, FISH, and Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by IHC 2013 guidelines were all negative (67/67, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines and by Oncotype DX. HER2-equivocal cases by FISH 2013 guidelines were all negative (16/16, 100%) by FISH 2018 guidelines, while 15/16 (93.8%) negative and 1/16 (6.2%) equivocal by Oncotype DX. The HER2-equivocal and HER2-negative groups were similar in age, gender, histology, grade, and Ki67 score.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 concordance was highest between Oncotype DX (99.6%) and FISH per 2018 guidelines. This suggests that the ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines improved the accurate stratification of HER2-equivocal cases.

Clinical significance of quantitative categorization of HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization results in invasive breast cancer patients treated with HER2-targeted agents

HER2 (ERBB2) gene status serves as a strong predictive marker of response to HER2-targeted agents in invasive breast cancers, albeit with heterogeneous response. Our aim was to determine the distribution and prognosis of HER2 groups by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologist (ASCO-CAP) guidelines. We identified 226 cases of equivocal or positive HER2 FISH invasive breast cancer (interpreted by ASCO-CAP guidelines at the time of reporting) who received HER2-targeted agents from 2006 to 2017. We subcategorized Group 1 further into three subgroups: low amplified (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0-2.99, mean HER2/cell 4.0-5.9), amplified (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0-2.99, mean HER2/cell ≥ 6), and excessive amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 3.0, mean HER2/cell ≥ 4.0). Outcomes studied were recurrence, metastasis, second breast primary, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis showed that the five categories of HER2 FISH were significantly associated with OS (p < 0.01), specifically higher HER2 amplification was associated with fewer deaths. HER2 FISH status also statistically significantly relates to DFS (p < 0.01) and metastasis (p = 0.01) but not with recurrence or second breast primary in our study. Tumor type and HER2 ISH Groups are independent predictors for both OS and DFS in our cohort. The proposed Group 1 subcategories were significantly associated with OS (p < 0.01) and DFS (p < 0.01), excessive HER2 amplification was associated with longer median survival. The Cox regression models showed better survival outcomes for the excessive amplification subgroup than the low amplified subgroup, with OS (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93) and DFS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.83). We demonstrated that in HER2 FISH Group 1 patients, high HER2 amplification was significantly associated with longer OS and DFS; these patients seem to benefit more from HER2-targeted regimens. We recommend reporting these Group 1 subcategories when assessing HER2 FISH.

Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer with Polysomy 17 and Its Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective

The interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results may be challenging in tumors with polysomy 17, which is defined as increased signals of chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17). The effect of polysomy 17 on HER2 protein expression and tumor treatment response has not been established. In this retrospective study, we investigated the clinicopathological features of breast cancer with polysomy 17 and determined the tumors' response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Materials and Methods

The study included 366 patients with primary breast cancer whose tumors had a CEP17 count of ≥ three/nucleus based on HER2 FISH studies. These cases were categorized according to HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 signals/nucleus using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and tumor response to NACT among different groups.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in patients' age at diagnosis, tumor pathological grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and NACT response among different HER2 FISH groups. Polysomy 17 tumors in group 1 had a higher rate of response (pathological complete response and residual cancer burden class I) to NACT containing anti-HER2 reagent than did those in other groups (p = 0.004), whereas polysomy 17 tumors in group 3 did not show a significant response to anti-HER2 treatment.

Conclusion

Polysomy 17 tumors in different HER2 FISH groups have different pathological features and respond to NACT differently. These results may help us identify patients who will benefit from anti-HER2 therapy.

Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry

In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or "Intermediate" (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.

Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment and changes to post-neoadjuvant HER2 status in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

The response of human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2)- positive breast cancer (BC) patients to anti-HER2 targeted therapy is significant. However, the response is not uniform and a proportion of HER2-positive patients do not respond. This study aims to identify predictors of response in the neoadjuvant treatment and to assess the discordance rate of HER2 status between pre- and post-treatment specimens in HER2-positive BC patients. The study group comprised 500 BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and/or neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy and surgery who had tumours that were 3+ or 2+ with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER2 IHC 2+ tumours were classified into five groups by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines of which Groups 1, 2 and 3 were considered HER2 amplified. Pathological complete response (pCR) was more frequent in HER2 IHC 3+ tumours than in HER2 IHC 2+/HER2 amplified tumours, when either in receipt of NACT alone (38% versus 13%; p = 0.22) or neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy (52% versus 20%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HER2 IHC 3+ and histological grade 3 were independent predictors of pCR following neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. In the HER2 IHC 2+/HER2 amplified tumours or ASCO/CAP FISH Group 1 alone, ER-negativity was an independent predictor of pCR following NACT and/or neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. In the current study, 22% of HER2-positive tumours became HER2-negative by IHC and FISH following neoadjuvant treatment, the majority (74%) HER2 IHC 2+/HER2 amplified tumours. Repeat HER2 testing after neoadjuvant treatment should therefore be considered.

Association Between the HER2 Protein Expression Level and the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Objective

This study aimed to assess the relationship between human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) protein expression level and clinicopathological features of HER2-positive breast cancer, and to analyze whether the expression level of HER2 protein could predict the response to anti-HER2 therapy.

Methods

The present study included 296 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) containing trastuzumab between January 2014 and November 2019. The univariate comparisons of the differences in clinicopathological parameters between different HER2 protein expression groups, and the association between HER2 protein expression level and efficacy of NAC, were made using a X² test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Multivariate analyses of the differences in clinicopathological parameters between different HER2 protein expression groups, and the association between HER2 protein expression level and efficacy of NAC, were performed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 110 patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC. The pCR rate was 37.2%. The study showed that patients who were HR-negative, AR-positive, and CK5/6-negative had significantly higher expression level of HER2 protein [odds ratio (OR) = 0.183, P < 0.001; OR = 6.414, P = 0.004; OR = 0.261, P = 0.004, respectively]. Patients with HER2 3+ detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) had significantly higher pCR rates compared with patients with HER2 2+. The HER2 protein expression level might effectively predict the efficacy of NAC in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (OR = 3.520, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The HER2 protein expression level was related to multiple clinical features in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. For example, hormone receptor, androgen receptor, cytokeratin5/6, and HER2 protein expression level may be used to predict the response to NAC in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and may serve as a predictive factor for NAC efficacy.

Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy

Purpose

The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guideline on HER2 testing in breast cancer permits reclassification of cases with HER2-equivocal results by FISH. The impact of such reclassification is unclear. We sought to determine the proportion of HER2-equivocal cases that are reclassified as HER2-negative and the impact of anti-HER2 therapy on survival in HER2-equivocal cases.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of breast cancer patients who had HER2 testing by fluorescence in stitu hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed or verified at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during April 2014 through March 2018 and had equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline. The population was divided into 2 cohorts according to whether the biopsy specimen analyzed came from primary or from recurrent or metastatic disease. HER2 status was reclassified according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between anti-HER2 therapy and clinical outcomes was assessed.

Results

We identified 139 cases with HER2-equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline: 90 cases of primary disease and 49 cases of recurrent/metastatic disease. Per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, these cases were classified as follows: overall, HER2-negative 112 cases (80%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), and unknown 26 (19%); primary cohort, HER2-negative 85 (94%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), unknown 4 (4%); and recurrent/metastatic, HER2-negative 27 (55%) and unknown 22 (45%). Five patients in the primary-disease cohort and 1 patient in the recurrent/metastatic-disease cohort received anti-HER2 therapy. There was no significant association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS in either cohort (primary disease: OS, p = 0.67; EFS, p = 0.49; recurrent/metastatic-disease, OS, p = 0.61; EFS, p = 0.78.

Conclusions

The majority of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases were reclassified as HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. No association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS was observed. HER2-equivocal cases seem to have clinical behavior similar to that of HER2-negative breast cancers.

Quantitative Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) Practice Guideline Update on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Analysis

CONTEXT.—

The global impact of the new 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) practice guideline update on the overall HER2 status designation, compared with the prior 2013 iteration, is unknown.

OBJECTIVES.—

To report the quantitative impact of the new guideline on HER2 status distribution.

DESIGN.—

The analysis comprised a retrospective cohort of patients from the authors' institution, combined with other peer-reviewed publications that assessed the impact of the 2018 guideline in relation to the 2013 guideline.

RESULTS.—

Our study revealed that the new guideline led to an average 9% reclassification rate for the overall HER2 status, with a net gain in overall HER2 negative designation. This is largely due to reclassification of the equivocal (Group 4) groups. Unexpectedly, infrequent but consistent discordance between Group 1/5 and fluorescence in situ hybridization results are observed across studies (1.8%; 73 of 3965 cases where fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry are both reported).

CONCLUSIONS.—

Early clinical recognition of these resultant changes, including emerging issues of tumor heterogeneity, and potential discordance between immunohistochemistry to fluorescence in situ hybridization, is important for accurate clinical assessment of individual HER2 test results.

Impact of the Updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer

CONTEXT.—

The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer requires pathologists to re-evaluate HER2 status.

OBJECTIVE.—

To define HER2 status of breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

DESIGN.—

Diagnostic reports of invasive breast cancers made between 2014 and 2018 with HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization results were retrieved. HER2 status was re-defined using the updated recommendations.

RESULTS.—

Of 2514 tumors, 89.7% (2254 of 2514) suggested for fluorescence in situ hybridization assay were HER2 immunohistochemistry 2+. Approximately 8.9% (225 of 2514) and 1.4% (35 of 2514) of tumors were of immunohistochemistry 0/1+ and 3+, respectively. Based on the average HER2 copy number and HER2:CEP17 ratio, tumors were assigned into 5 groups, including 13.1% (330 of 2514) group 1 tumors, 2.1% (52 of 2514) group 2 tumors, 1.1% (27 of 2514) group 3 tumors, 7.0% (175 of 2514) group 4 tumors, and 76.8% (1930 of 2514) group 5 tumors. In combination with immunohistochemistry, all tumors in group 2 and group 4 changed HER2 status, from positive and equivocal into negative, respectively, while group 3 tumors remained positive. Comparative analyses of clinicopathologic features of tumors in different groups revealed that group 2 and 4 tumors displayed worse clinicopathologic features than those of group 5, while group 3 tumors shared similar clinicopathologic features to those of group 1.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Following the updated guideline, HER2 status is clearly designated. Significant differences regarding clinical features were observed between tumors in different groups but they share the same HER2 status, suggesting further validation of the accuracy of this diagnostic approach is warranted.

Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer

Purpose

In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists had established a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline, which was updated in 2013 and subsequently in 2018. We assessed the clinical impact of the recent update by comparing the in situ hybridization (ISH) results based on the 2007, 2013, and 2018 guidelines.

Methods

We assessed 2 cohorts. The first cohort included 1,161 primary invasive breast cancer (IBC) samples including 18 bilateral IBC cases, with both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver-enhanced ISH (SISH) results available for the HER2 status. The second cohort included 160 IBC cases with equivocal HER2 IHC, assessed using SISH. We retrospectively evaluated and compared the HER2 SISH results.

Results

There were 22 (1.9%) and 20 (12.5%) cases with altered SISH results according to the 2013 guidelines in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. As per the 2018 guidelines, final HER2 statuses of 16 (1.4%) and 14 (8.5%) cases changed in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The 2013 guidelines increased the positive rate compared to the 2007 guidelines, in both cohorts (0.6% and 6.2%, respectively). Most equivocal cases in cohorts 1 (92.3%) and 2 (100%) as per the 2013 guidelines were reclassified as HER2-negative according to the 2018 guidelines. The 2018 guidelines increased the negative rates (1.3% in cohort 1 and 8.7% in cohort 2) and slightly decreased the positive rates (−0.2% in cohort 1 and −3.1% in cohort 2), compared to the 2013 guidelines. With each update, minor changes in the positive and negative rates were observed in whole breast cancer samples (cohort 1). However, the 2018 guidelines affected previously defined HER2-positive IBC with equivocal IHC results.

Conclusion

Under the 2013 guidelines, the positive and equivocal cases increased. However, the 2018 guidelines eliminated ambiguous cases by reclassifying them as HER2-negative.

Impact of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER-2 reporting categories of IHC and reflex FISH in breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) is an established prognostic and predictive biomarker for breast cancer. To ensure accuracy and uniformity for HER-2 testing, ASCO/CAP published guidelines in 2007 which were updated in 2013 and recently in 2018. In this first study from Indian Oncology center, we evaluated the impact of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. We found a substantial decrease in equivocal IHC cases (P-value < .00001). On reclassification, a total of 5.6% cases from equivocal and positive categories (2013 guidelines) shifted to the negative FISH result category (P-value < .0001), with adoption of 2018 guidelines and eliminated the double equivocal cases.

Impact of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification on the prognosis of breast cancer patients

Purpose

Various aberrations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor genes FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 are found in different cancers, including breast cancer (BC). This study analyzed the impact of FGFR amplification on the BC prognosis.

Methods

The study included 894 BC patients. The amplification rates of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 were evaluated on tissue microarrays using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Associations between these parameters and prognosis were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results

FGFR1 FISH was assessable in 503 samples, FGFR2 FISH in 447, and FGFR3 FISH in 562. The FGFR1 amplification rate was 6.6% (n = 33). Increased FGFR2 copy numbers were seen in 0.9% (n = 4); only one patient had FGFR3 amplification (0.2%). Most patients with FGFR1 amplification had luminal B-like tumors (69.7%, n = 23); only 32.6% (n = 153) of patients without FGFR1 amplification had luminal B-like BC. Other patient and tumor characteristics appeared similar between these two groups. Observed outcome differences between BC patients with and without FGFR1 amplification did not achieve statistical significance; however, there was a trend toward poorer distant metastasis-free survival in BC patients with FGFR1 amplification (HR = 2.08; 95% CI 0.98 to 4.39, P = 0.05).

Conclusion

FGFR1 amplification occurs most frequently in patients with luminal B-like BC. The study showed a nonsignificant correlation with the prognosis, probably due to the small sample size. Further research is therefore needed to address the role of FGFR1 amplifications in early BC patients. FGFR2 and FGFR3 amplifications are rare in patients with primary BC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05865-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes

OBJECTIVE

Dual probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer provide a ratio of HER2 to chromosome 17. The ratio may be skewed by copy number alterations (CNA) in the control locus for chromosome 17 (CEP17). We analyzed the impact of alternative chromosome 17 control probes on HER2 status in a series of breast cancers with an emphasis on patients reclassified as amplified.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry (2+) and equivocal FISH with CEP17 were included. Reclassification of HER2 status was assessed with alternative chromosome 17 control probes (LIS1 and RARA).

RESULTS

A total of 40 unique patients with 46 specimens reflexed to alternative chromosome 17 probe testing were identified. The majority (>80%) of patients had pT1-2, hormone receptor-positive tumors with an intermediate or high combined histologic grade. There were 34/46 (73.9%) specimens reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, corresponding to 29/40 (72.5%) patients. Of the patients reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, 34.5% (10/29) received HER2-targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this series, the majority of breast cancers tested with alternative chromosome 17 control probes under the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines were converted to HER2-amplified. The treatment data and the clinicopathologic profile of the tumors suggest that most of these patients will neither receive nor benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The findings support the recommendation in the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines to discontinue the use of alternative chromosome 17 probes.

A clinicopathological study of 30 breast cancer cases with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of ≥2.0 but an average HER2 copy number of <4.0 signals per cell

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) have recently issued updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancers. Cases with a HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio of ≥2.0 but an average HER2 copy number of <4.0 signals per cell (ISH group 2) are no longer automatically classified as ISH positive. Herein, 30 cases in ISH group 2 were collected. Another 100 patients with a HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 and <4.0 HER2 signals per cell (ISH group 5) and 100 patients with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of ≥2.0 and an average HER2 copy number of ≥4.0 signals per cell (ISH group 1) were also recruited for comparison. According to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines, all the cases in ISH group 2 were categorized as HER2 negative. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients in ISH group 2 were intermediate between ISH group 1 and group 5. Survival analyses revealed that there was no significant disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) difference between patients with or without targeted therapy in ISH group 2, as well as between patients with targeted therapy in ISH group 1 and patients in ISH group 2. Patients without targeted therapy in ISH group 2 had a significantly worse OS than patients with targeted therapy in ISH group 1 and patients in ISH group 5. In conclusion, patients in ISH group 2 represent a biologically heterogeneous subset, which are different from those in ISH group 1 and 5. A larger cohort of patients in ISH group 2 should be included for future researches to define the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy.

Integrated genomic characterization of ERBB2/HER2 alterations in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on unusual FISH groups

In patients with invasive breast cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for HER2 typically demonstrates the clear presence or lack of ERBB2 (HER2) amplification (i.e., groups 1 or 5). However, a small subset of patients can present with unusual HER2 FISH patterns (groups 2-4), resulting in diagnostic confusion. To provide clarity, the 2018 CAP/ASCO HER2 testing guideline recommends additional testing using HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for determining the final HER2 status. Despite this effort, the genomic correlates of unusual HER2 FISH groups remain poorly understood. Here, we used droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize the genomic features of both usual and unusual HER2 FISH groups. In this study, 51 clinical samples were selected to represent FISH groups 1-5. Furthermore, group 1 was subdivided into two groups, with groups 1A and 1B corresponding to cases with HER2 signals/cell ≥6.0 and 4-6, respectively. Overall, our findings revealed a wide range of copy number alterations in HER2 across the different FISH groups. As expected, groups 1A and 5 showed the clear presence and lack of HER2 copy number gain, respectively, as measured by ddPCR and NGS. In contrast, group 1B and other uncommon FISH groups (groups 2-4) were characterized by a broader range of HER2 copy levels with only a few select cases showing high-level gain. Notably, these cases with increased HER2 copy levels also showed HER2 overexpression by IHC, thus highlighting the correlation between HER2 copy number and HER2 protein expression. Given the concordance between the genomic and protein results, our findings suggest that HER2 IHC may inform HER2 copy number status in patients with unusual FISH patterns. Hence, our results support the current recommendation for using IHC to resolve HER2 status in FISH groups 2-4.

Six versus 12 months' adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: the PERSEPHONE non-inferiority RCT

BACKGROUND

The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months' trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority.

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether or not 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months' in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival.

DESIGN

This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

The setting was 152 NHS hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part.

INTERVENTION

Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months' or 12 months' trastuzumab treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months' trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model.

RESULTS

Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months' trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months' trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years' median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months' trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months' trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months' trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months' trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months' trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently.

LIMITATIONS

The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered.

CONCLUSIONS

PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months'. Six months' treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events.

FUTURE WORK

Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Experiences of trastuzumab plus paclitaxel combination therapy in metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive extramammary Paget's disease: Four cases and a review

Tumor cells in extramammary Paget's disease sometimes overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Several case reports indicated successful response to HER2 inhibitor in patients with HER2-positive metastatic extramammary Paget's disease. However, these were single-case reports, and most cases were evaluated only by immunohistochemistry and treated with HER2 inhibitor monotherapy. Here, we report cases of HER2-positive metastatic extramammary Paget's disease identified by both immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, and the patients were treated with HER2 inhibitor (trastuzumab) and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Partial response was observed in one case. The case was positive on both immunohistochemistry (3+) and in situ hybridization (HER2/chromosome 17 centromere, ≥2.0). Our observations suggest that HER2 should be checked in patients with advanced and/or metastatic extramammary Paget's disease, and that therapy with HER2 blockers should be considered as an option for treatment of HER2-positive extramammary Paget's disease, especially in cases positive for both HER2 gene amplification and overexpression.

Differential prognostic value of positive HER2 status determined by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor-receptor-2 (HER2) is a membrane-tyrosine-kinase that is amplified/overexpressed up to 20% in breast cancer. HER2 positive status is associated with faster disease progression, higher metastatic potential, and shorter disease-free/overall survival and also has emerged as an important therapeutic target in breast cancer. HER2 status can be determined by in-situ-hybridization (ISH) or immunohistochemistry (IHC). Although the concordance rate between ISH and IHC is well-known, the prognostic power of both technologies if tested in parallel on the same tumor has not been studied extensively.

METHODS

In this study we retrospectively analyzed a large HER2 positive breast cancer cohort tested both with fluorescence labeled ISH (FISH) and IHC in parallel on each case. We stratified HER2 positive results by FISH and IHC with long-term overall survival, 5-year survival and metastases/recurrence rates. Positive HER2 status both FISH and IHC was available in 364 patients.

RESULTS

The number of HER2 FISH-positive and FISH-negative patients was 342 and 22, respectively. The number of HER2 IHC 0/1 + , IHC 2 + , and IHC 3 + patients was 12, 42, and 310, respectively. Among the patients with IHC 3 + status, 288 were FISH-positive and 22 FISH-negative. HER2 status determined by FISH correlated with clinical outcomes (overall survival and with metastases/recurrence, p = 0.036, p = 0.039), whereas HER2 status determined by IHC did not.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that prognostic information in HER2 positive breast cancer also depends on the methodology of how positivity was determined. In our cohort, FISH was superior to IHC based positive HER2 status.