1
|
Peter D, Li SX, Wang Y, Zhang J, Grady J, McDowell K, Norton E, Lin Z, Bernheim S, Venkatesh AK, Fleisher LA, Schreiber M, Suter LG, Triche EW. Pre-COVID-19 hospital quality and hospital response to COVID-19: examining associations between risk-adjusted mortality for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 hospital quality. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077394. [PMID: 38553067 PMCID: PMC10982775 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The extent to which care quality influenced outcomes for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 is unknown. Our objective was to determine if prepandemic hospital quality is associated with mortality among Medicare patients hospitalised with COVID-19. DESIGN This is a retrospective observational study. We calculated hospital-level risk-standardised in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates (risk-standardised mortality rates, RSMRs) for patients hospitalised with COVID-19, and correlation coefficients between RSMRs and pre-COVID-19 hospital quality, overall and stratified by hospital characteristics. SETTING Short-term acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals in the USA. PARTICIPANTS Hospitalised Medicare beneficiaries (Fee-For-Service and Medicare Advantage) age 65 and older hospitalised with COVID-19, discharged between 1 April 2020 and 30 September 2021. INTERVENTION/EXPOSURE Pre-COVID-19 hospital quality. OUTCOMES Risk-standardised COVID-19 in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates (RSMRs). RESULTS In-hospital (n=4256) RSMRs for Medicare patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (April 2020-September 2021) ranged from 4.5% to 59.9% (median 18.2%; IQR 14.7%-23.7%); 30-day RSMRs ranged from 12.9% to 56.2% (IQR 24.6%-30.6%). COVID-19 RSMRs were negatively correlated with star rating summary scores (in-hospital correlation coefficient -0.41, p<0.0001; 30 days -0.38, p<0.0001). Correlations with in-hospital RSMRs were strongest for patient experience (-0.39, p<0.0001) and timely and effective care (-0.30, p<0.0001) group scores; 30-day RSMRs were strongest for patient experience (-0.34, p<0.0001) and mortality (-0.33, p<0.0001) groups. Patients admitted to 1-star hospitals had higher odds of mortality (in-hospital OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.83 to 1.91; 30-day OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.48) compared with 5-star hospitals. If all hospitals performed like an average 5-star hospital, we estimate 38 000 fewer COVID-19-related deaths would have occurred between April 2020 and September 2021. CONCLUSIONS Hospitals with better prepandemic quality may have care structures and processes that allowed for better care delivery and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the relationship between pre-COVID-19 hospital quality and COVID-19 outcomes will allow policy-makers and hospitals better prepare for future public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Peter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Shu-Xia Li
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Yongfei Wang
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jing Zhang
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jacqueline Grady
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kerry McDowell
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Erica Norton
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susannah Bernheim
- The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michelle Schreiber
- The Center for Clinical Standards and Quality, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Elizabeth W Triche
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gettel CJ, Suter LG, Bagshaw K, Sheares KD, Balestracci KMB, Lin Z, Venkatesh AK. Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures in Alternative Payment Models: Current Use, Implementation Barriers, and Principles to Succeed. Value Health 2024; 27:199-205. [PMID: 38042334 PMCID: PMC10872237 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based performance measures (PRO-PMs) offer opportunities to aggregate survey data into a reliable and valid assessment of performance at the entity-level (eg, clinician, hospital, and accountable care organization). Our objective was to address the existing literature gap regarding the implementation barriers, current use, and principles for PRO-PMs to succeed. METHODS As quality measurement experts, we first highlighted key principles of PRO-PMs and how alternative payment models (APMs) may be integral in promoting more widespread use. In May 2023, we reviewed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Measures Inventory Tool for active PRO-PM usage within CMS programs. We finally present principles to prioritize as part PRO-PMs succeeding within APMs. RESULTS We identified 5 implementation barriers to PRO-PM use: original development of instrument, response rate sufficiency, provider burden, hesitancy regarding fairness, and attribution of desired outcomes. There existed 54 instances of active PRO-PM usage across CMS programs, including 46 unique PRO-PMs within 14 CMS programs. Five principles to prioritize as part of greater PRO-PM development and incorporation within APMs include the following: (1) clinical salience, (2) adequate sample size, (3) meaningful range of performance among measured entities and the ability to detect performance change in a reasonable time frame, (4) equity focus, and (5) appropriate risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Identified barriers and principles to prioritize should be considered during PRO-PM development and implementation phases to link available and novel measures to payment programs while ensuring provider and stakeholder engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA.
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kyle Bagshaw
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA
| | - Karen D Sheares
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jatwani S, Suter LG. Leveraging Quality Measurement to Achieve Best Practice Rheumatology Care: Can Pediatrics Lead Us? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:2420-2422. [PMID: 37458090 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shraddha Jatwani
- Dignity Health Mercy Medical Group, Citrus Heights, California, and Tuoro University, Vallejo, California
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartels CM, Jorge A, Feldman CH, Zell J, Bermas B, Barber CEH, Duarte-García A, Garg S, Haseley L, Jatwani S, Johansson T, Limanni A, Rodgers W, Rovin BH, Santiago-Casas Y, Suter LG, Barnado A, Ude J, Aguirre A, Li J, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Development of American College of Rheumatology Quality Measures for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Modified Delphi Process With Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) Registry Data Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:2295-2305. [PMID: 37165898 PMCID: PMC10615706 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop readily measurable digital quality measure statements for clinical care in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a multistep process guided by consensus methods. METHODS Using a modified Delphi process, an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) workgroup of SLE experts reviewed all North American and European guidelines from 2000 to 2020 on treatment, monitoring, and phenotyping of patients with lupus. Workgroup members extracted quality constructs from guidelines, rated these by importance and feasibility, and generated evidence-based quality measure statements. The ACR Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) Registry was queried for measurement data availability. In 3 consecutive Delphi sessions, a multidisciplinary Delphi panel voted on the importance and feasibility of each statement. Proposed measures with consensus on feasibility and importance were ranked to identify the top 3 measures. RESULTS Review of guidelines and distillation of 57 quality constructs resulted in 15 quality measure statements. Among these, 5 met high consensus for importance and feasibility, including 2 on treatment and 3 on laboratory monitoring measures. The 3 highest-ranked statements were recommended for further measure specification as SLE digital quality measures: 1) hydroxychloroquine use, 2) limiting glucocorticoid use >7.5 mg/day to <6 months, and 3) end-organ monitoring of kidney function and urine protein excretion at least every 6 months. CONCLUSION The Delphi process selected 3 quality measures for SLE care on hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoid reduction, and kidney monitoring. Next, measures will undergo specification and validity testing in RISE and US rheumatology practices as the foundation for national implementation and use in quality improvement programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shivani Garg
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | | | | | | | | | - Wendy Rodgers
- Lupus Foundation Care and Support Services, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brad H Rovin
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, and Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - April Barnado
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer Ude
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Jing Li
- University of California San Francisco
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baker H, Fine R, Suter F, Allore H, Hsiao B, Chowdhary V, Lavelle E, Chen P, Hintz R, Suter LG, Danve A. Implementation of a Best Practice Advisory to Improve Infection Screening Prior to New Prescriptions of Biologics and Targeted Synthetic Drugs. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023. [PMID: 37382043 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with preexisting tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can have serious consequences. Although various society guidelines recommend routine screening for these infections before initiating certain b/tsDMARDs, adherence to these recommendations varies widely. This quality improvement initiative evaluated local compliance with screening and assessed whether an automated computerized decision support system in the form of a best practice advisory (BPA) in the electronic health record could improve patient screening. METHODS Established patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) aged 18 years or older with at least one visit to our rheumatology practice between October 1, 2017, and March 3, 2022, were included. When prescribing a new b/tsDMARD, clinicians were alerted via a BPA that showed the most recent results for TB, HBV, and HCV. Screening proportions for TB, HBV, and HCV before BPA initiation were compared with those of eligible patients after the BPA implementation. RESULTS A total of 711 patients pre-BPA and 257 patients post-BPA implementation were included in the study. The BPA implementation was associated with statistically significant improvement in screening for TB from 66% to 82% (P ≤ 0.001), HCV from 60% to 79% (P ≤ 0.001), hepatitis B core antibody 32% to 51% (P ≤ 0.001), and hepatitis B surface antigen from 51% to 70% (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Implementation of a BPA can improve infectious disease screening for patients with ARD who are started on b/tsDMARDs and has potential to improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey Baker
- Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Rebecca Fine
- Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ping Chen
- Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale University and West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kostic AM, Leifer VP, Gong Y, Robinson MK, Collins JE, Neogi T, Messier SP, Hunter DJ, Selzer F, Suter LG, Katz JN, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Weight-Loss Interventions for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Class III Obesity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:491-500. [PMID: 35657632 PMCID: PMC9827536 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Class III obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2 ) is associated with worse knee pain and total knee replacement (TKR) outcomes. Because bariatric surgery yields sustainable weight loss for individuals with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 , our objective was to establish the value of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in conjunction with usual care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 . METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy model to assess long-term clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of RYGB and LSG. We derived model inputs for efficacy, costs, and complications associated with these treatments from published data. Primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), all discounted at 3%/year. This analysis was conducted from a health care sector perspective. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in input parameters. RESULTS The usual care + RYGB strategy increased the quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1.35 years and lifetime costs by $7,209, compared to usual care alone (ICER = $5,300/QALY). The usual care + LSG strategy yielded less benefit than usual care + RYGB and was dominated. Relative to usual care alone, both usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG reduced opioid use from 13% to 4%, and increased TKR usage from 30% to 50% and 41%, respectively. For cohorts with BMI between 38 and 41 kg/m2 , usual care + LSG dominated usual care + RYGB. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, usual care + RYGB and usual care + LSG were cost-effective in 70% and 30% of iterations, respectively. CONCLUSION RYGB offers good value among knee OA patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 , while LSG may provide good value among those with BMI between 35 and 41 kg/m2 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra M. Kostic
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valia P. Leifer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yusi Gong
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Malcolm K. Robinson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie E. Collins
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University of School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen P. Messier
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Salem, NC, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Faith Selzer
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Losina
- Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Williams EE, Katz JN, Leifer VP, Collins JE, Neogi T, Suter LG, Levy B, Farid A, Safran‐Norton CE, Paltiel AD, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy and Physical Therapy for Degenerative Meniscal Tear. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022; 4:853-862. [PMID: 35866194 PMCID: PMC9555200 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We examined the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for concomitant meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involving arthroscopic partial meniscectomy surgery and physical therapy (PT). METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated Monte Carlo microsimulation, to compare three strategies, 1) PT-only, 2) immediate surgery, and 3) PT + optional surgery, for participants whose pain persists following initial PT. We modeled a cohort with baseline meniscal tear, OA, and demographics from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus PT. We estimated risks and costs of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy complications and accounted for heightened OA progression post surgery using published data. We estimated surgery use rates and treatment efficacies using MeTeOR data. We considered a 5-year time horizon, discounted costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) 3% per year and conducted sensitivity analyses. We report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS Relative to PT-only, PT + optional surgery added 0.0651 QALY and $2,010 over 5 years (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $30,900 per QALY). Relative to PT + optional surgery, immediate surgery added 0.0065 QALY and $3080 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $473,800 per QALY). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were sensitive to optional surgery efficacy in the PT + optional surgery strategy. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PT + optional surgery was cost-effective in 51% of simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of both $50,000 per QALY and $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSION First-line arthroscopic partial meniscectomy has a prohibitively high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Under base case assumptions, second-line arthroscopic partial meniscectomy offered to participants with persistent pain following initial PT is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds between $31,000 and $473,000 per QALY. Our analyses suggest that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy can be a high-value treatment option for patients with meniscal tear and OA when performed following an initial PT course and should remain a covered treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard UniversityBostonMassachusetts
| | | | - Jamie E. Collins
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard UniversityBostonMassachusetts
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of MedicineBostonMassachusetts
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical CenterWest HavenConnecticut
| | | | | | | | | | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Public HealthBostonMassachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wahl E, Makris UE, Suter LG. Taxonomy of Quality of Care Indicators. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2022; 48:601-615. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Izadi Z, Li J, Evans M, Hammam N, Katz P, Ogdie A, Suter LG, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. Socioeconomic Disparities in Functional Status in a National Sample of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2119400. [PMID: 34347058 PMCID: PMC8339935 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Little is known about the association of poverty with functional status (FS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who use rheumatology care. OBJECTIVES To examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and FS among patients with RA and to evaluate the association between SES and functional declines over time in patients who received at least some rheumatology care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data from the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Analyses included all adult patients with a confirmed RA diagnosis (ie, had ≥2 encounters associated with RA International Classification of Diseases codes ≥30 days apart) and at least 1 FS score documented between 2016 and 2018 seen at participating rheumatology practices. Data analysis was conducted from April to December 2020. EXPOSURES The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a zip code-based indicator of neighborhood poverty, was used as a proxy for SES. ADI scores were categorized into quintiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES FS measures included Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-II. Cross-sectionally, mean FS scores were compared across ADI quintiles. Longitudinally, among patients with at least 2 FS scores, multilevel multivariate regression computed the probability of functional decline, defined as a change greater than the minimum clinically important difference, across ADI quintiles. In a subgroup analysis, whether disease activity mediated the association between SES and functional decline was examined. RESULTS Of the 83 965 patients included in the study, 66 649 (77%) were women, and 60 037 (72%) were non-Hispanic White. Mean (SD) age was 63.4 (13.7) years. MDHAQ was the most reported FS measure (56 928 patients [67.8%]). For all measures, mean (SD) FS score was worse at lower SES levels (eg, for MDHAQ quintile 1: 1.79 [1.87]; quintile 5: 2.43 [2.17]). In longitudinal analyses, the probability of functional decline was 14.1% (95% CI, 12.5%-15.7%) in the highest SES quintile and 18.9% (95% CI, 17.1%-20.7%) in the lowest SES quintile. The association between SES and functional decline was partially mediated (7%; 95% CI, 4%-22%) by disease activity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients with RA, worse FS and faster declines in functioning over time were observed in patients with lower SES. These findings provide a framework for monitoring disparities in RA and for generating evidence to spur action toward achieving health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zara Izadi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jing Li
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Michael Evans
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Nevin Hammam
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Patricia Katz
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Alexis Ogdie
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- VA Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jinoos Yazdany
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Gabriela Schmajuk
- Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matty R, Heckmann R, George E, Barthel AB, Suter LG, Ross JS, Bernheim SM. Identification of Hospitals That Care for a High Proportion of Patients With Social Risk Factors. JAMA Health Forum 2021; 2:e211323. [PMID: 35977204 PMCID: PMC8796989 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Question Are hospitals that care for a high proportion of patients with social risk factors consistently identified using varied definitions of these factors? Findings In this cross-sectional study, among 4465 US hospitals qualified for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital performance measures, one-third were identified as caring for a high proportion of patients with social risk factors across 7 definitions of social risk; fewer than 1% met all 7 definitions. Most hospitals serving patients with social risk factors could be identified using 3 or 4 definitions. Meaning Inconsistencies in identifying hospitals caring for high proportions of patients with social risk factors suggest value in developing a common definition of social risk. Importance Hospitals can face significant clinical and financial challenges in caring for patients with social risk factors. Currently the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program stratifies hospitals by proportion of patients eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid when calculating payment penalties to account for the patient population. However, additional social risk factors should be considered. Objective To evaluate 7 different definitions of social risk and understand the degree to which differing definitions identify the same hospitals caring for a high proportion of patients with social risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants Across 18 publicly reported Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital performance measures, highly disadvantaged hospitals were identified by the the proportion of patients with social risk factors using the following 7 commonly used definitions of social risk: living below the US poverty line, educational attainment of less than high school, unemployment, living in a crowded household, African American race (as a proxy for the social risk factor of exposure to racism), Medicaid coverage, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality index of socioeconomic status score. In this cross-sectional study, social risk factors were evaluated by measure because hospitals may serve a disadvantaged patient population for one measure but not another. Data were collected from April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017, and analyzed from July 25, 2019, to April 25, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of hospitals identified as caring for patients with social risk factors using 7 definitions of social risk, across 18 publicly reported CMS hospital performance measures. Results Among 4465 hospitals, a mean of 31.0% (range, 28.9%-32.3%) were identified at least once when using the 7 definitions of social risk as caring for a high proportion of patients with social risk factors. Among all hospitals meeting at least 1 definition of social risk, a mean of 0.7% (range, 0%-1.0%) were identified as highly disadvantaged by all 7 definitions. Among hospitals meeting at least 1 definition of social risk, a mean of 2.7% (range, 1.3%-5.1%) were identified by 6 definitions; 6.5% (range, 5.9%-7.1%), by 5 definitions; 10.4% (range, 9.5%-12.1%), by 4 definitions; 13.2% (range, 10.1%-14.4%), by 3 definitions; 21.4% (range, 20.1%-22.4%), by 2 definitions; and 45.2% (range, 42.6%-47.1%), by only 1 definition. This pattern was consistent across all 18 performance measures. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, there were inconsistencies in the identification of hospitals caring for disadvantaged populations using different definitions of social risk factors. Without consensus on how to define disadvantaged hospitals, policies to support such hospitals may be applied inconsistently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Matty
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebekah Heckmann
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Elizabeth George
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
- Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut
| | - Andrea Barbo Barthel
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph S. Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M. Bernheim
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chock YP, Ross JS, Suter LG, Rhee TG. Gout Treatment in the USA from 2009 to 2016: A Repeated Cross-sectional Analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:1134-1136. [PMID: 32524250 PMCID: PMC8041910 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05942-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Pei Chock
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Section of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Taeho Greg Rhee
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mori M, Nasir K, Bao H, Jimenez A, Legore SS, Wang Y, Grady J, Lama SD, Brandi N, Lin Z, Kurlansky P, Geirsson A, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM, Suter LG. Administrative Claims Measure for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 90-Day All-Cause Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2021; 14:e006644. [PMID: 33535776 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a focus of bundled and alternate payment models that capture outcomes up to 90 days postsurgery. While clinical registry risk models perform well, measures encompassing mortality beyond 30 days do not currently exist. We aimed to develop a risk-adjusted hospital-level 90-day all-cause mortality measure intended for assessing hospital performance in payment models of CABG surgery using administrative data. METHODS Building upon Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital-level 30-day all-cause CABG mortality measure specifications, we extended the mortality timeframe to 90 days after surgery and developed a new hierarchical logistic regression model to calculate hospital risk-standardized 90-day all-cause mortality rates for patients hospitalized for isolated CABG. The model was derived from Medicare claims data for a 3-year cohort between July 2014 to June 2017. The data set was randomly split into 50:50 development and validation samples. The model performance was evaluated with C statistics, overfitting indices, and calibration plot. The empirical validity of the measure result at the hospital level was evaluated against the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite star rating. RESULTS Among 137 819 CABG procedures performed in 1183 hospitals, the unadjusted mortality rate within 30 and 90 days were 3.1% and 4.7%, respectively. The final model included 27 variables. Hospital-level 90-day risk-standardized mortality rates ranged between 2.04% and 11.26%, with a median of 4.67%. C statistics in the development and validation samples were 0.766 and 0.772, respectively. We identified a strong positive correlation between 30- and 90-day risk-standardized mortality rates, with a regression slope of 1.09. Risk-standardized mortality rates also showed a stepwise trend of lower 90-day mortality with higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite star ratings. CONCLUSIONS We present a measure of hospital-level 90-day risk-standardized mortality rates following isolated CABG. This measure complements Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' existing 30-day CABG mortality measure by providing greater insight into the postacute recovery period. It offers a balancing measure to ensure efforts to reduce costs associated with CABG recovery and rehabilitation do not result in unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Mori
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, (M.M., A.G.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Khurram Nasir
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.N., H.M.K), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Haikun Bao
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Andreina Jimenez
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Shani S Legore
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Yongfei Wang
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Jacqueline Grady
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Sonam D Lama
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Nina Brandi
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Paul Kurlansky
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, (M.M., A.G.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Section of General Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.)
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.).,Department of Health Policy and Administration, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (H.M.K.)
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine (L.G.S.) Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT (M.M., K.N., H.B., A.J., S.L., Y.W., J.G., S.L., N.B., Z.L, S.M.B., H.M.K., L.G.S.).,West Haven Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, CT (L.G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Losina E, Silva GS, Smith KC, Collins JE, Hunter DJ, Shrestha S, Messier SP, Yelin EH, Suter LG, Paltiel AD, Katz JN. Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Lost Due to Physical Inactivity in a US Population With Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:1349-1357. [PMID: 31350803 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE One-half of the 14 million persons in the US with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are not physically active, despite evidence that physical activity (PA) is associated with improved health. We undertook this study to estimate both the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses in a US population with knee OA due to physical inactivity and the health benefits associated with higher PA levels. METHODS We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to estimate the proportions of a US population with knee OA ages ≥45 years that are inactive, insufficiently active, and active, and the likelihood of a shift in their PA level. We used the OA Policy Model, a computer simulation of knee OA, to determine QALYs lost due to inactivity and to measure potential benefits of increased PA (comorbidities averted and QALYs saved). RESULTS Among 13.7 million persons with knee OA, a total of 7.5 million QALYs, or 0.55 QALYs per person, were lost due to inactivity or insufficient PA relative to activity over their remaining lifetimes. Black Hispanic women experienced the highest losses, at 0.76 QALYs per person. Women of all races/ethnicities had ~20% higher loss burdens than men. According to our model, if 20% of the inactive population were instead active, 95,920 cases of cancer, 222,413 of cardiovascular disease, and 214,725 of diabetes mellitus would potentially be averted, and 871,541 potential QALYs would be saved. CONCLUSION Physical inactivity leads to substantial QALY losses in a US population with knee OA. Increases in the activity levels in even a fraction of this population may have considerable collateral health benefits, potentially averting cases of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jamie E Collins
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Hunter
- University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bozic K, Yu H, Zywiel MG, Li L, Lin Z, Simoes JL, Dorsey Sheares K, Grady J, Bernheim SM, Suter LG. Quality Measure Public Reporting Is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Hip and Knee Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:1799-1806. [PMID: 33086347 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the inclusion of orthopaedic quality measures in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services national hospital payment programs, the present study sought to assess whether the public reporting of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs) and complication rates (RSCRs) was temporally associated with a decrease in the rates of these outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS Annual trends in national observed and hospital-level RSRRs and RSCRs were evaluated for patients who underwent hospital-based inpatient hip and/or knee replacement procedures from fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2016. Hospital-level rates were calculated with use of the same measures and methodology that were utilized in public reporting. Annual trends in the distribution of hospital-level outcomes were then examined with use of density plots. RESULTS Complication and readmission rates and variation declined steadily from fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2016. Reductions of 33% and 25% were noted in hospital-level RSCRs and RSRRs, respectively. The interquartile range decreased by 18% (relative reduction) for RSCRs and by 34% (relative reduction) for RSRRs. The frequency of risk variables in the complication and readmission models did not systematically change over time, suggesting no evidence of widespread bias or up-coding. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that hospital-level complication and readmission rates following THA and TKA and the variation in hospital-level performance declined during a period coinciding with the start of public reporting and financial incentives associated with measurement. The consistently decreasing trend in rates of and variation in outcomes suggests steady improvements and greater consistency among hospitals in clinical outcomes for THA and TKA patients in the 2016 fiscal year compared with the 2010 fiscal year. The interactions between public reporting, payment, and hospital coding practices are complex and require further study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/standards
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/standards
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Medicare/statistics & numerical data
- Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data
- Public Reporting of Healthcare Data
- Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data
- United States
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Bozic
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Huihui Yu
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael G Zywiel
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Li Li
- Beigene Corporation, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jaymie L Simoes
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Karen Dorsey Sheares
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Pediatrics (K.D.S.) and Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jacqueline Grady
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Pediatrics (K.D.S.) and Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, West Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
England BR, Barber CEH, Bergman M, Ranganath VK, Suter LG, Michaud K. Brief Report: Adaptation of American College of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity and Functional Status Measures for Telehealth Visits. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:1809-1814. [PMID: 32813284 PMCID: PMC7461171 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To provide guidance on the implementation of recommended American College of Rheumatology (ACR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and functional status assessment measures in telehealth settings. Methods An expert panel was assembled from the recently convened ACR RA disease activity and functional status measures working groups to summarize strategies for implementation of ACR‐recommended RA disease activity (the Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI], Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or the C‐reactive protein level [DAS28‐ESR/CRP], Patient Activity Scale II [PAS‐II], Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI], and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) and functional status (the Health Assessment Questionnaire II [HAQ‐II], Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ], and PROMIS physical function 10‐item short form [PROMIS PF‐10]) measures in telehealth settings. Results Measures composed of patient‐reported items (disease activity: PAS‐II, RAPID3; functional status: HAQ‐II, MDHAQ, PROMIS PF‐10) require minimal modification for use in telehealth settings. Measures requiring formal joint counts (the CDAI, DAS28‐ESR/CRP, and SDAI) can be calculated using patient‐reported swollen and tender joint counts. When the feasibility of laboratory testing is limited, the CDAI can be used in place of the SDAI, and scoring modifications of the DAS28‐ESR/CRP without the acute‐phase reactant are available. Assessment of the validity of these modifications is limited. Implementation of these measures can be facilitated by electronic health record collection, mobile applications, and provider/staff administration during telehealth visits. Conclusion The ACR‐recommended RA disease activity and functional status measures can be adapted for use in telehealth settings to support high‐quality clinical care. Research is needed to better understand how telehealth settings may impact the validity of these measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant R England
- Division of Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center & VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Heath Care System, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Department of Medicine & Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Arthritis Research Canada, Canada
| | - Martin Bergman
- Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Veena K Ranganath
- University of California, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Yale-New Haven Health System, Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health System, United States
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- Division of Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center & VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Heath Care System, Omaha, NE, United States.,FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li SX, Wang Y, Lama SD, Schwartz J, Herrin J, Mei H, Lin Z, Bernheim SM, Spivack S, Krumholz HM, Suter LG. Timely estimation of National Admission, readmission, and observation-stay rates in medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia using near real-time claims data. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:733. [PMID: 32778098 PMCID: PMC7416804 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05611-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To estimate, prior to finalization of claims, the national monthly numbers of admissions and rates of 30-day readmissions and post-discharge observation-stays for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia. Methods The centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Integrated Data Repository, including the Medicare beneficiary enrollment database, was accessed in June 2015, February 2017, and February 2018. We evaluated patterns of delay in Medicare claims accrual, and used incomplete, non-final claims data to develop and validate models for real-time estimation of admissions, readmissions, and observation stays. Results These real-time reporting models accurately estimate, within 2 months from admission, the monthly numbers of admissions, 30-day readmission and observation-stay rates for patients with AMI, HF, or pneumonia. Conclusions This work will allow CMS to track the impact of policy decisions in real time and enable hospitals to better monitor their performance nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Xia Li
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yongfei Wang
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sonam D Lama
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA.,National Opinion Research Center University of Chicago, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Jennifer Schwartz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA.,UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hao Mei
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Steven Spivack
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Public Health, Univeristy of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT, USA. .,Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. .,West Haven Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Spatz ES, Suter LG, George E, Perez M, Curry L, Desai V, Bao H, Geary LL, Herrin J, Lin Z, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM. An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033297. [PMID: 32434933 PMCID: PMC7247404 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a nationally applicable tool for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures. DESIGN Mixed qualitative-quantitative approach. SETTING Convened seven meetings with stakeholders to obtain input and feedback on the tool. PARTICIPANTS Team of physician investigators, measure development experts, and a working group of nine patients and patient advocates (caregivers, advocates for vulnerable populations and patient safety experts) from different regions of the country. INTERVENTIONS With stakeholder input, we identified elements of high-quality informed consent documents, aggregated into three domains: content, presentation and timing. Based on this comprehensive taxonomy of key elements, we convened the working group to offer input on the development of an abstraction tool to assess the quality of informed consent documents in three phases: (1) selecting the highest-priority elements to be operationalised as items in the tool; (2) iteratively refining and testing the tool using a sample of qualifying informed consent documents from eight hospitals; and (3) developing a scoring approach for the tool. Finally, we tested the reliability of the tool in a subsample of 250 informed consent documents from 25 additional hospitals. OUTCOMES Abstraction tool to evaluate the quality of informed consent documents. RESULTS We identified 53 elements of informed consent quality; of these, 15 were selected as highest priority for inclusion in the abstraction tool and 8 were feasible to measure. After seven cycles of iterative development and testing of survey items, and development and refinement of a training manual, two trained raters achieved high item-level agreement, ranging from 92% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS We identified key quality elements of an informed consent document and operationalised the highest-priority elements to define a minimum standard for informed consent documents. This tool is a starting point that can enable hospitals and other providers to evaluate and improve the quality of informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Spatz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Elizabeth George
- School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mallory Perez
- Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Leslie Curry
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Health Policy and Administration, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Vrunda Desai
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Haikun Bao
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lori L Geary
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale-New Haven Health Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spatz ES, Bao H, Herrin J, Desai V, Ramanan S, Lines L, Dendy R, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM, Lin Z, Suter LG. Quality of informed consent documents among US. hospitals: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033299. [PMID: 32434934 PMCID: PMC7247389 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether informed consent for surgical procedures performed in US hospitals meet a minimum standard of quality, we developed and tested a quality measure of informed consent documents. DESIGN Retrospective observational study of informed consent documents. SETTING 25 US hospitals, diverse in size and geographical region. COHORT Among Medicare fee-for-service patients undergoing elective procedures in participating hospitals, we assessed the informed consent documents associated with these procedures. We aimed to review 100 qualifying procedures per hospital; the selected sample was representative of the procedure types performed at each hospital. PRIMARY OUTCOME The outcome was hospital quality of informed consent documents, assessed by two independent raters using an eight-item instrument previously developed for this measure and scored on a scale of 0-20, with 20 representing the highest quality. The outcome was reported as the mean hospital document score and the proportion of documents meeting a quality threshold of 10. Reliability of the hospital score was determined based on subsets of randomly selected documents; face validity was assessed using stakeholder feedback. RESULTS Among 2480 informed consent documents from 25 hospitals, mean hospital scores ranged from 0.6 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9) to 10.8 (95% CI 10.0 to 11.6). Most hospitals had at least one document score at least 10 out of 20 points, but only two hospitals had >50% of their documents score above a 10-point threshold. The Spearman correlation of the measures score was 0.92. Stakeholders reported that the measure was important, though some felt it did not go far enough to assess informed consent quality. CONCLUSION All hospitals performed poorly on a measure of informed consent document quality, though there was some variation across hospitals. Measuring the quality of hospital's informed consent documents can serve as a first step in driving attention to gaps in quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Spatz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Haikun Bao
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Vrunda Desai
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sriram Ramanan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lynette Lines
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rebecca Dendy
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kulhawy-Wibe SC, Zell J, Michaud K, Yazdany J, Davis AM, Ehrlich-Jones L, Thorne JC, Everix D, Cappelli LC, Suter LG, Limanni A, Barber CEH. Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Cross-Cultural Validity of Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:798-805. [PMID: 30980507 PMCID: PMC7317906 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective We conducted a systematic review and appraisal of the cross‐cultural adaptation and cross‐cultural validity of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and its derivatives, and of the more recent Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) functional status assessment measures (FSAMs) in rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Four electronic medical databases were searched from inception until April 4, 2018 according to the Consensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) group search strategy. Included studies were evaluated using the COSMIN tool for cross‐cultural validity and were scored as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Results Of 58 articles identified by our search strategy and 3 by manual search, 39 were included: 29 described the translation, cultural adaptation, or cross‐cultural validity of the HAQ disability index, 8 other HAQ derivatives, and 2 PROMIS measures, representing 22 languages. Of the 39 articles reviewed, 3 examined the cross‐cultural validity of translated versions. These studies were rated as follows: 2 as excellent, 3 good, 13 fair, and 21 poor. Two studies examining cross‐cultural validity noted differential item functioning (DIF) between Dutch and US populations for the HAQ‐II and PROMIS measures, and a third study found DIF between Turkish and UK populations on the HAQ, indicating cultural differences in questionnaire response. Conclusion This review highlights a paucity of data on the cross‐cultural validity of FSAMs and the mostly poor‐ or fair‐quality methods by which they were translated and adapted, which needs to be considered when using these measures for multinational clinical trials and for day‐to‐day use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - JoAnn Zell
- Denver Health and University of Colorado, Denver
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and Forward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| | | | - Aileen M Davis
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Claire E H Barber
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and Arthritis Research Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mori M, Shahian DM, Suter LG, Geirsson A, Lin Z, Krumholz HM. Relevance of Cardiac Surgery Outcome Reporting 3 Years Later in a New York and California Statewide Analysis. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:442-444. [PMID: 32129801 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Mori
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David M Shahian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.,Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.,Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.,Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
England BR, Mikuls TR, O'Dell JR, Tiong BK, Ranganath VK, Bergman MJ, Curtis JR, Kazi S, Limanni A, Suter LG, Michaud K. Reply. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:736-738. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.24157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant R. England
- Veterans Administration Nebraska–Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE
| | - Ted R. Mikuls
- Veterans Administration Nebraska–Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE
| | - James R. O'Dell
- Veterans Administration Nebraska–Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE
| | - Benedict K. Tiong
- University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles CA
| | - Veena K. Ranganath
- University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa G. Suter
- Yale University New Haven, CT and Veterans Affairs Medical Center West Haven CT
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE and FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases Wichita KS
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schwarzkopf R, Behery OA, Yu H, Suter LG, Li L, Horwitz LI. Corrigendum to 'Patterns and Costs of 90-Day Readmission for Surgical and Medical Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty' [The Journal of Arthroplasty 34 (2019) 2304-2307]. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:909. [PMID: 31785962 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Schwarzkopf
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Omar A Behery
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - HuiHui Yu
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT; Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; West Haven Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, CT
| | - Li Li
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT
| | - Leora I Horwitz
- Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY; Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Losina E, Smith KC, Paltiel AD, Collins JE, Suter LG, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Messier SP. Cost-Effectiveness of Diet and Exercise for Overweight and Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 71:855-864. [PMID: 30055077 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis (IDEA) trial showed that an intensive diet and exercise (D+E) program led to a mean 10.6-kg weight reduction and 51% pain reduction in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of the current study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of adding this D+E program to treatment in overweight and obese (body mass index >27 kg/m2 ) patients with knee OA. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs for overweight and obese patients with knee OA, with and without the D+E program. We evaluated cost-effectiveness with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), a ratio of the differences in lifetime cost and QALYs between treatment strategies. We considered 3 cost-effectiveness thresholds: $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY, and $200,000/QALY. Analyses were conducted from health care sector and societal perspectives and used a lifetime horizon. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year. D+E characteristics were derived from the IDEA trial. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were used to evaluate parameter uncertainty and the effect of extending the duration of the D+E program. RESULTS In the base case, D+E led to 0.054 QALYs gained per person and cost $1,845 from the health care sector perspective and $1,624 from the societal perspective. This resulted in ICERs of $34,100/QALY and $30,000/QALY. In the health care sector perspective PSA, D+E had 58% and 100% likelihoods of being cost-effective with thresholds of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION Adding D+E to usual care for overweight and obese patients with knee OA is cost-effective and should be implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen C Smith
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A David Paltiel
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jamie E Collins
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Policy and Innovation eValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
England BR, Tiong BK, Bergman MJ, Curtis JR, Kazi S, Mikuls TR, O'Dell JR, Ranganath VK, Limanni A, Suter LG, Michaud K. 2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology Recommended Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:1540-1555. [PMID: 31709779 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide updated American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity measurements to facilitate a treat-to-target approach in routine clinical care. METHODS A working group conducted a systematic literature review from the time of the prior ACR recommendations literature search. Properties of disease activity measures were abstracted, and study quality was assessed using the Consensus-Based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments 4-point scoring method, allowing for overall level of evidence assessment. Measures that fulfilled a minimum standard were identified, and through a modified Delphi process preferred measures were selected for regular use in most clinic settings. RESULTS The search identified 5,199 articles, of which 110 were included in the review. This search identified 46 RA disease activity measures that contained patient, provider, laboratory, and/or imaging data. Descriptions of the measures, properties, study quality, level of evidence, and feasibility were abstracted and scored. Following a modified Delphi process, 11 measures fulfilled a minimum standard for regular use in most clinic settings, and 5 measures were recommended: the Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints with Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate or C-Reactive Protein Level, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, and Patient Activity Scale-II. CONCLUSION We have updated prior ACR recommendations for preferred RA disease activity measures, identifying 11 measures that met a minimum standard for regular use and 5 measures that were preferred for regular use in most clinic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant R England
- VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | | | | | | | | | - Ted R Mikuls
- VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - James R O'Dell
- VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | | | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, and VA Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and FORWARD, the National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mori M, Angraal S, Chaudhry SI, Suter LG, Geirsson A, Wallach JD, Krumholz HM. Characterizing Patient-Centered Postoperative Recovery After Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8:e013546. [PMID: 31617435 PMCID: PMC6898802 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.013546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Improving postoperative recovery is important, with a national focus on postacute care, but the volume and quality of evidence in this area are not well characterized. We conducted a systematic review to characterize studies on postoperative recovery after adult cardiac surgery using patient‐reported outcome measures. Methods and Results From MEDLINE and Web of Science, studies were included if they prospectively assessed postoperative recovery on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using patient‐reported outcome measures. Six recovery domains were defined by prior literature: nociceptive symptoms, mental health, physical function, activities of daily living, sleep, and cognitive function. Of the 3432 studies, 105 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were small (median sample size, 119), and mostly conducted in single‐center settings (n=81; 77%). Study participants were predominantly men (71%) and white (88%). Coronary artery bypass graft was included in 93% (n=98). Studies commonly selected for elective cases (n=56; 53%) and patients with less comorbidity (n=67; 64%). Median follow‐up duration was 91 (interquartile range, 42–182) days. Studies most commonly assessed 1 domain (n=42; 40%). The studies also varied in the instruments used and differed in their reporting approach. Studies commonly excluded patients who died during the follow‐up period (n=48; 46%), and 45% (n=47) did not specify how those patients were analyzed. Conclusions Studies of postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures are low in volume, most often single site without external validation, varied in their approach to missing data, and narrow in the domains and diversity of patients. The evidence base for postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures needs to be strengthened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Mori
- Section of Cardiac Surgery Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT
| | - Suveen Angraal
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT
| | - Sarwat I Chaudhry
- Section of General Internal Medicine Department of Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT.,Section of Rheumatology Department of Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.,Section of Rheumatology Department of Medicine VA Medical Center West Haven CT
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- Section of Cardiac Surgery Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT
| | - Joshua D Wallach
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences Yale School of Public Health New Haven CT.,Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT.,Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.,Department of Health Policy and Management Yale School of Public Health New Haven CT
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schwarzkopf R, Behery OA, Yu H, Suter LG, Li L, Horwitz LI. Patterns and Costs of 90-Day Readmission for Surgical and Medical Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2304-2307. [PMID: 31279598 PMCID: PMC7011860 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unplanned readmissions following elective total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty as a result of surgical complications likely have different quality improvement targets and cost implications than those for nonsurgical readmissions. We compared payments, timing, and location of unplanned readmissions with Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined surgical complications to readmissions without such complications. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis on unplanned readmissions within 90 days of discharge following elective primary THA/TKA among Medicare patients discharged between April 2013 and March 2016. We categorized unplanned readmissions into groups with and without CMS-defined complications. We compared the location, timing, and payments for unplanned readmissions between both readmission categories. RESULTS Among THA (N = 23,231) and TKA (N = 43,655) patients with unplanned 90-day readmissions, 27.1% (n = 6307) and 16.4% (n = 7173) had CMS-defined surgical complications, respectively. These readmissions with surgical complications were most commonly at the hospital of index procedure (THA: 84%; TKA: 80%) and within 30 days postdischarge (THA: 73%; TKA: 77%). In comparison, it was significantly less likely for patients without CMS-defined surgical complications to be rehospitalized at the index hospital (THA: 63%; TKA: 63%; P < .001) or within 30 days of discharge (THA: 58%; TKA: 59%; P < .001). Generally, payments associated with 90-day readmissions were higher for THA and TKA patients with CMS-defined complications than without (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION Readmissions associated with surgical complications following THA and TKA are more likely to occur at the hospital of index surgery, within 30 days of discharge, and cost more than readmissions without CMS-defined surgical complications, yet they account for only 1 in 5 readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Schwarzkopf
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Omar A Behery
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - HuiHui Yu
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT; Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; West Haven Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, CT
| | - Li Li
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT
| | - Leora I Horwitz
- Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY; Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kerman HM, Smith SR, Smith KC, Collins JE, Suter LG, Katz JN, Losina E. Disparities in Total Knee Replacement: Population Losses in Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Due to Differential Offer, Acceptance, and Complication Rates for African Americans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:1326-1334. [PMID: 29363280 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). American racial minorities undergo fewer TKRs than whites. We estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost for African American knee OA patients due to differences in TKR offer, acceptance, and complication rates. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a computer simulation of knee OA, to predict QALY outcomes for African American and white knee OA patients with and without TKR. We estimated per-person QALYs gained from TKR as the difference between QALYs with current TKR use and QALYs when no TKR was performed. We estimated average, per-person QALY losses in African Americans as the difference between QALYs gained with white rates of TKR and QALYs gained with African American rates of TKR. We calculated population-level QALY losses by multiplying per-person QALY losses by the number of persons with advanced knee OA. Finally, we estimated QALYs lost specifically due to lower TKR offer and acceptance rates and higher rates of complications among African American knee OA patients. RESULTS African American men and women gain 64,100 QALYs from current TKR use. With white offer and complications rates, they would gain an additional 72,000 QALYs. Because these additional gains are unrealized, we call this a loss of 72,000 QALYs. African Americans lose 67,500 QALYs because of lower offer rates, 15,800 QALYs because of lower acceptance rates, and 2,600 QALYs because of higher complication rates. CONCLUSION African Americans lose 72,000 QALYs due to disparities in TKR offer and complication rates. Programs to decrease disparities in TKR use are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Kerman
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Savannah R Smith
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen C Smith
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jamie E Collins
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research Policy and Innovation Evaluation in Orthopaedic Treatments Center, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
FitzGerald JD, Mikuls TR, Neogi T, Singh JA, Robbins M, Khanna PP, Turner AS, Myslinski R, Suter LG. Development of the American College of Rheumatology Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:659-671. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ted R. Mikuls
- VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System; and University of Nebraska Medical Center; Omaha
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; and University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Mark Robbins
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Association; Somerville Massachusetts
| | - Puja P. Khanna
- University of Michigan; and VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | | | - Lisa G. Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center; West Haven Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schwartz J, Wang Y, Qin L, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Cormier N, Dorsey K, McNamara RL, Suter LG, Krumholz HM, Bernheim SM. Incorporating Stroke Severity Into Hospital Measures of 30-Day Mortality After Ischemic Stroke Hospitalization. Stroke 2017; 48:3101-3107. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Schwartz
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Yongfei Wang
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Li Qin
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Lee H. Schwamm
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Gregg C. Fonarow
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Nicole Cormier
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Karen Dorsey
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Robert L. McNamara
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Harlan M. Krumholz
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| | - Susannah M. Bernheim
- From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (J.S., Y.W., L.Q., N.C., K.D., R.L.M., L.G.S., H.M.K.); Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.S., Y.W., R.L.M., H.M.K.), Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (L.G.S.), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (S.M.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dharmarajan K, Wang Y, Lin Z, Normand SLT, Ross JS, Horwitz LI, Desai NR, Suter LG, Drye EE, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM. Association of Changing Hospital Readmission Rates With Mortality Rates After Hospital Discharge. JAMA 2017; 318:270-278. [PMID: 28719692 PMCID: PMC5817448 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.8444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Affordable Care Act has led to US national reductions in hospital 30-day readmission rates for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and pneumonia. Whether readmission reductions have had the unintended consequence of increasing mortality after hospitalization is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine the correlation of paired trends in hospital 30-day readmission rates and hospital 30-day mortality rates after discharge. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older hospitalized with HF, AMI, or pneumonia from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2014. EXPOSURE Thirty-day risk-adjusted readmission rate (RARR). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thirty-day RARRs and 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates (RAMRs) after discharge were calculated for each condition in each month at each hospital in 2008 through 2014. Monthly trends in each hospital's 30-day RARRs and 30-day RAMRs after discharge were examined for each condition. The weighted Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for hospitals' paired monthly trends in 30-day RARRs and 30-day RAMRs after discharge for each condition. RESULTS In 2008 through 2014, 2 962 554 hospitalizations for HF, 1 229 939 for AMI, and 2 544 530 for pneumonia were identified at 5016, 4772, and 5057 hospitals, respectively. In January 2008, mean hospital 30-day RARRs and 30-day RAMRs after discharge were 24.6% and 8.4% for HF, 19.3% and 7.6% for AMI, and 18.3% and 8.5% for pneumonia. Hospital 30-day RARRs declined in the aggregate across hospitals from 2008 through 2014; monthly changes in RARRs were -0.053% (95% CI, -0.055% to -0.051%) for HF, -0.044% (95% CI, -0.047% to -0.041%) for AMI, and -0.033% (95% CI, -0.035% to -0.031%) for pneumonia. In contrast, monthly aggregate changes across hospitals in hospital 30-day RAMRs after discharge varied by condition: HF, 0.008% (95% CI, 0.007% to 0.010%); AMI, -0.003% (95% CI, -0.005% to -0.001%); and pneumonia, 0.001% (95% CI, -0.001% to 0.003%). However, correlation coefficients in hospitals' paired monthly changes in 30-day RARRs and 30-day RAMRs after discharge were weakly positive: HF, 0.066 (95% CI, 0.036 to 0.096); AMI, 0.067 (95% CI, 0.027 to 0.106); and pneumonia, 0.108 (95% CI, 0.079 to 0.137). Findings were similar in secondary analyses, including with alternate definitions of hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia, reductions in hospital 30-day readmission rates were weakly but significantly correlated with reductions in hospital 30-day mortality rates after discharge. These findings do not support increasing postdischarge mortality related to reducing hospital readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Dharmarajan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Now with Clover Health, Jersey City, New Jersey
| | - Yongfei Wang
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sharon-Lise T. Normand
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph S. Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Leora I. Horwitz
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
- Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Nihar R. Desai
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Elizabeth E. Drye
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M. Bernheim
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harlan M. Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Smith SR, Katz JN, Collins JE, Solomon DH, Jordan JM, Suter LG, Yelin EH, David Paltiel A, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Tramadol and Oxycodone in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69:234-242. [PMID: 27111538 PMCID: PMC5378156 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating tramadol or oxycodone into knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes of knee OA patients with a mean age of 60 years with persistent pain despite conservative treatment. We evaluated 3 strategies: opioid-sparing (OS), tramadol (T), and tramadol followed by oxycodone (T+O). We obtained estimates of pain reduction and toxicity from published literature and annual costs for tramadol ($600) and oxycodone ($2,300) from Red Book Online. Based on published data, in the base case, we assumed a 10% reduction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectiveness in opioid-based strategies. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and were discounted at 3% per year. RESULTS In the base case, T and T+O strategies delayed TKA by 7 and 9 years, respectively, and led to reduction in TKA utilization by 4% and 10%, respectively. Both opioid-based strategies increased cost and decreased QALYs compared to the OS strategy. Tramadol's ICER was highly sensitive to its effect on TKA outcomes. Reduction in TKA effectiveness by 5% (compared to base case 10%) resulted in an ICER for the T strategy of $110,600 per QALY; with no reduction in TKA effectiveness, the ICER was $26,900 per QALY. When TKA was not considered a treatment option, the ICER for T was $39,600 per QALY. CONCLUSION Opioids do not appear to be cost-effective in OA patients without comorbidities, principally because of their negative impact on pain relief after TKA. The influence of opioids on TKA outcomes should be a research priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah R Smith
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jamie E Collins
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel H Solomon
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Elena Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Suter LG, Smith SR, Katz JN, Englund M, Hunter DJ, Frobell R, Losina E. Projecting Lifetime Risk of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis and Total Knee Replacement in Individuals Sustaining a Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Early Adulthood. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 69:201-208. [PMID: 27214559 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the lifetime risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and total knee replacement (TKR) in persons sustaining anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear by age 25 years. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to project the cumulative incidence of symptomatic knee OA requiring TKR in varying situations: no prevalent or incident injury; isolated ACL tear, surgically treated; isolated ACL tear, nonoperatively treated; or a prevalent history or surgically treated ACL and meniscal tear (MT). We estimated MT prevalence and incidence and increased risk of knee OA associated with ACL injury and MT from published literature. We conducted a range of sensitivity analyses to examine the impact of uncertainty in input parameters. RESULTS Estimated lifetime risk of symptomatic knee OA was 34% for the cohort with ACL injury and MT, compared to 14% for the no-injury cohort. ACL injury without MT was associated with a lifetime risk of knee OA between 16% and 17%, depending on ACL treatment modality. Estimated lifetime risk of TKR ranged from 6% in the no-injury cohort to 22% for the ACL injury and MT cohort. Subjects in the ACL injury and MT cohort developed OA approximately 1.5 years earlier (55.7 versus 57.1) and underwent TKR approximately 2 years earlier (66 versus 68) than the cohort without knee injuries. CONCLUSION Sustaining ACL injury early in adulthood leads to greater lifetime risk and earlier onset of knee OA and TKR; concomitant MTs compound this risk. These data provide insight into the impact of sustainable injury prevention interventions in young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
| | | | - Jeffrey N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martin Englund
- Lund University, Lund, Sweden, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Hunter
- University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Solomon DH, Yelin EH, Hunter DJ, Messier SP, Suter LG, Losina E. Number of Persons With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in the US: Impact of Race and Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Obesity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68:1743-1750. [PMID: 27014966 PMCID: PMC5319385 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 375] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been increasing over the past several decades in the US, concurrent with an aging population and the growing obesity epidemic. We quantify the impact of these factors on the number of persons with symptomatic knee OA in the early decades of the 21st century. METHODS We calculated the prevalence of clinically diagnosed symptomatic knee OA from the National Health Interview Survey 2007-2008 and derived the proportion with advanced disease (defined as Kellgren/Lawrence grade 3 or 4) using the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated simulation model of knee OA. Incorporating contemporary obesity rates and population estimates, we calculated the number of persons living with symptomatic knee OA. RESULTS We estimate that approximately 14 million persons had symptomatic knee OA, with advanced OA comprising more than half of those cases. This includes more than 3 million persons of racial/ethnic minorities (African American, Hispanic, and other). Adults younger than 45 years of age represented nearly 2 million cases of symptomatic knee OA and individuals between 45 and 65 years of age comprised 6 million more cases. CONCLUSION More than half of all persons with symptomatic knee OA are younger than 65 years of age. As many of these younger persons will live for 3 decades or more, there is substantially more time for greater disability to occur, and policymakers should anticipate health care utilization for knee OA to increase in the upcoming decades. These data emphasize the need for the deployment of innovative prevention and treatment strategies for knee OA, especially among younger persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhushan R. Deshpande
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Daniel H. Solomon
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Edward H. Yelin
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
- Rosalind Russell / Ephraim P. Engleman Rheumatology Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - David J. Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen P. Messier
- J.B. Snow Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
- Section on Rheumatology and Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
- Center for Biomolecular Imaging, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Elena Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Suter LG, Barber CE, Herrin J, Leong A, Losina E, Miller A, Newman E, Robbins M, Tory H, Yazdany J. American College of Rheumatology White Paper on Performance Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68:1390-401. [PMID: 27159835 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To highlight the opportunities and challenges of developing and implementing performance outcome measures in rheumatology for accountability purposes. METHODS We constructed a hypothetical performance outcome measure to demonstrate the benefits and challenges of designing quality measures that assess patient outcomes. We defined the data source, measure cohort, reporting period, period at risk, measure outcome, outcome attribution, risk adjustment, reliability and validity, and reporting approach. We discussed outcome measure challenges specific to rheumatology and to fields where patients have predominantly chronic, complex, ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. RESULTS Our hypothetical outcome measure was a measure of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity intended for evaluating Accountable Care Organization performance. We summarized the components, benefits, challenges, and tradeoffs between feasibility and usability. We highlighted how different measure applications, such as for rapid cycle quality improvement efforts versus pay for performance programs, require different approaches to measure development and testing. We provided a summary table of key take-home points for clinicians and policymakers. CONCLUSION Performance outcome measures are coming to rheumatology, and the most effective and meaningful measures can only be created through the close collaboration of patients, providers, measure developers, and policymakers. This study provides an overview of key issues and is intended to stimulate a productive dialogue between patients, practitioners, insurers, and government agencies regarding optimal performance outcome measure development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa G Suter
- Yale School of Medicine and YNHHSC Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.
| | | | - Jeph Herrin
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and Health Research & Educational Trust, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amye Leong
- Healthy Motivation, and Bone and Joint Decade, the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Elena Losina
- Orthopedics and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy Miller
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Newman
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark Robbins
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates/Atrius Health, Somerville, Massachusetts
| | - Heather Tory
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, and University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bernheim SM, Parzynski CS, Horwitz L, Lin Z, Araas MJ, Ross JS, Drye EE, Suter LG, Normand SLT, Krumholz HM. Accounting For Patients' Socioeconomic Status Does Not Change Hospital Readmission Rates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35:1461-70. [PMID: 27503972 PMCID: PMC7664840 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
There is an active public debate about whether patients' socioeconomic status should be included in the readmission measures used to determine penalties in Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). Using the current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services methodology, we compared risk-standardized readmission rates for hospitals caring for high and low proportions of patients of low socioeconomic status (as defined by their Medicaid status or neighborhood income). We then calculated risk-standardized readmission rates after additionally adjusting for patients' socioeconomic status. Our results demonstrate that hospitals caring for large proportions of patients of low socioeconomic status have readmission rates similar to those of other hospitals. Moreover, readmission rates calculated with and without adjustment for patients' socioeconomic status are highly correlated. Readmission rates of hospitals caring for patients of low socioeconomic status changed by approximately 0.1 percent with adjustment for patients' socioeconomic status, and only 3-4 percent fewer such hospitals reached the threshold for payment penalty in Medicare's HRRP. Overall, adjustment for socioeconomic status does not change hospital results in meaningful ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah M Bernheim
- Susannah M. Bernheim is director of quality measurement at the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE) at Yale-New Haven Hospital and an assistant clinical professor in the Department of Internal Medicine at Yale School of Medicine, both in New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Craig S Parzynski
- Craig S. Parzynski is a senior statistician at CORE, Yale-New Haven Hospital
| | - Leora Horwitz
- Leora Horwitz is an associate professor of internal medicine, population health, at New York University School of Medicine, in New York City
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Zhenqiu Lin is director of analytics at CORE, Yale-New Haven Hospital
| | - Michael J Araas
- Michael J. Araas is research project manager at CORE, Yale-New Haven Hospital
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Joseph S. Ross is an associate professor of medicine in the Department of Internal Medicine at Yale School of Medicine
| | - Elizabeth E Drye
- Elizabeth E. Drye is a director of quality measurement at CORE, Yale-New Haven Hospital
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Lisa G. Suter is associate director of quality measurement at CORE, Yale-New Haven Hospital, and an associate professor of medicine in the Section of Rheumatology at Yale School of Medicine
| | - Sharon-Lise T Normand
- Sharon-Lise T. Normand is a professor of health care policy and biostatistics at Harvard Medical School and at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, both in Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Harlan M. Krumholz is the Harold H. Hines, Jr. Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology and Public Health at Yale School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Katz JN, Smith SR, Collins JE, Solomon DH, Jordan JM, Hunter DJ, Suter LG, Yelin E, Paltiel AD, Losina E. Cost-effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in older patients with multiple comorbidities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24:409-18. [PMID: 26525846 PMCID: PMC4761310 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes of naproxen, ibuprofen, celecoxib or tramadol for OA patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. DESIGN We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to examine treatment with these analgesics after standard of care (SOC) - acetaminophen and corticosteroid injections - failed to control pain. NSAID regimens were evaluated with and without proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) regimens where available. Estimates of treatment efficacy (pain reduction, occurring in ∼57% of patients on all regimens) and toxicity (major cardiac or gastrointestinal toxicity or fractures, risk ranging from 1.09% with celecoxib to 5.62% with tramadol) were derived from published literature. Annual costs came from Red Book Online(®). Outcomes were discounted at 3%/year and included costs, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Key input parameters were varied in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Adding ibuprofen to SOC was cost saving, increasing QALYs by 0.07 while decreasing cost by $800. Incorporating OTC naproxen rather than ibuprofen added 0.01 QALYs and increased costs by $300, resulting in an ICER of $54,800/QALY. Using prescription naproxen with OTC PPIs led to an ICER of $76,700/QALY, while use of prescription naproxen with prescription PPIs resulted in an ICER of $252,300/QALY. Regimens including tramadol or celecoxib cost more but added fewer QALYs and thus were dominated by several of the naproxen-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS In patients with multiple comorbidities, naproxen- and ibuprofen-containing regimens are more effective and cost-effective in managing OA pain than opioids, celecoxib or SOC.
Collapse
|
37
|
Nuti SV, Qin L, Rumsfeld JS, Ross JS, Masoudi FA, Normand SLT, Murugiah K, Bernheim SM, Suter LG, Krumholz HM. Association of Admission to Veterans Affairs Hospitals vs Non-Veterans Affairs Hospitals With Mortality and Readmission Rates Among Older Men Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, or Pneumonia. JAMA 2016; 315:582-92. [PMID: 26864412 PMCID: PMC5459395 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Little contemporary information is available about comparative performance between Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA hospitals, particularly related to mortality and readmission rates, 2 important outcomes of care. OBJECTIVE To assess and compare mortality and readmission rates among men in VA and non-VA hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional analysis involving male Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older hospitalized between 2010 and 2013 in VA and non-VA acute care hospitals for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia using the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and Enrollment Database together with VA administrative claims data. To avoid confounding geographic effects with health care system effects, we studied VA and non-VA hospitals within the same metropolitan statistical area (MSA). EXPOSURES Hospitalization in a VA or non-VA hospital in MSAs that contained at least 1 VA and non-VA hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES For each condition, 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates and risk-standardized readmission rates for VA and non-VA hospitals. Mean aggregated within-MSA differences in mortality and readmission rates were also assessed. RESULTS We studied 104 VA and 1513 non-VA hospitals, with each condition-outcome analysis cohort for VA and non-VA hospitals containing at least 7900 patients (men; ≥65 years), in 92 MSAs. Mortality rates were lower in VA hospitals than non-VA hospitals for AMI (13.5% vs 13.7%, P = .02; -0.2 percentage-point difference) and HF (11.4% vs 11.9%, P = .008; -0.5 percentage-point difference), but higher for pneumonia (12.6% vs 12.2%, P = .045; 0.4 percentage-point difference). In contrast, readmission rates were higher in VA hospitals for all 3 conditions (AMI, 17.8% vs 17.2%, 0.6 percentage-point difference; HF, 24.7% vs 23.5%, 1.2 percentage-point difference; pneumonia, 19.4% vs 18.7%, 0.7 percentage-point difference, all P < .001). In within-MSA comparisons, VA hospitals had lower mortality rates for AMI (percentage-point difference, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.40 to -0.04) and HF (-0.63; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.31), and mortality rates for pneumonia were not significantly different (-0.03; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.40); however, VA hospitals had higher readmission rates for AMI (0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.75), HF (0.97; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.34), or pneumonia (0.66; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among older men with AMI, HF, or pneumonia, hospitalization at VA hospitals, compared with hospitalization at non-VA hospitals, was associated with lower 30-day risk-standardized all-cause mortality rates for AMI and HF, and higher 30-day risk-standardized all-cause readmission rates for all 3 conditions, both nationally and within similar geographic areas, although absolute differences between these outcomes at VA and non-VA hospitals were small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhakar V Nuti
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Li Qin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut2Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, the Section of General Internal Medicine, and Section of Rheumat
| | | | - Joseph S Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut2Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, the Section of General Internal Medicine, and Section of Rheumat
| | - Frederick A Masoudi
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Sharon-Lise T Normand
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts7Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karthik Murugiah
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut2Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, the Section of General Internal Medicine, and Section of Rheumat
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut2Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, the Section of General Internal Medicine, and Section of Rheumat
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Horwitz LI, Grady JN, Cohen DB, Lin Z, Volpe M, Ngo CK, Masica AL, Long T, Wang J, Keenan M, Montague J, Suter LG, Ross JS, Drye EE, Krumholz HM, Bernheim SM. Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Planned Readmissions From Claims Data. J Hosp Med 2015; 10:670-7. [PMID: 26149225 PMCID: PMC5459369 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Revised: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is desirable not to include planned readmissions in readmission measures because they represent deliberate, scheduled care. OBJECTIVES To develop an algorithm to identify planned readmissions, describe its performance characteristics, and identify improvements. DESIGN Consensus-driven algorithm development and chart review validation study at 7 acute-care hospitals in 2 health systems. PATIENTS For development, all discharges qualifying for the publicly reported hospital-wide readmission measure. For validation, all qualifying same-hospital readmissions that were characterized by the algorithm as planned, and a random sampling of same-hospital readmissions that were characterized as unplanned. MEASUREMENTS We calculated weighted sensitivity and specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the algorithm (version 2.1), compared to gold standard chart review. RESULTS In consultation with 27 experts, we developed an algorithm that characterizes 7.8% of readmissions as planned. For validation we reviewed 634 readmissions. The weighted sensitivity of the algorithm was 45.1% overall, 50.9% in large teaching centers and 40.2% in smaller community hospitals. The weighted specificity was 95.9%, positive predictive value was 51.6%, and negative predictive value was 94.7%. We identified 4 minor changes to improve algorithm performance. The revised algorithm had a weighted sensitivity 49.8% (57.1% at large hospitals), weighted specificity 96.5%, positive predictive value 58.7%, and negative predictive value 94.5%. Positive predictive value was poor for the 2 most common potentially planned procedures: diagnostic cardiac catheterization (25%) and procedures involving cardiac devices (33%). CONCLUSIONS An administrative claims-based algorithm to identify planned readmissions is feasible and can facilitate public reporting of primarily unplanned readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leora I Horwitz
- Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
- Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jacqueline N Grady
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Dorothy B Cohen
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mark Volpe
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Chi K Ngo
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Andrew L Masica
- Center for Clinical Effectiveness, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Theodore Long
- Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Megan Keenan
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Julia Montague
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Elizabeth E Drye
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M Bernheim
- Yale Physician Associate Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Losina E, Paltiel AD, Weinstein AM, Yelin E, Hunter DJ, Chen SP, Klara K, Suter LG, Solomon DH, Burbine SA, Walensky RP, Katz JN. Lifetime medical costs of knee osteoarthritis management in the United States: impact of extending indications for total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015; 67:203-15. [PMID: 25048053 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The impact of increasing utilization of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on lifetime costs in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is understudied. METHODS We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model to estimate total lifetime costs and TKA utilization under a range of TKA eligibility criteria among US persons with symptomatic knee OA. Current TKA utilization was estimated from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and calibrated to Health Care Cost and Utilization Project data. OA treatment efficacy and toxicity were drawn from published literature. Costs in 2013 dollars were derived from Medicare reimbursement schedules and Red Book Online. Time costs were derived from published literature and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. RESULTS Estimated average discounted (3% per year) lifetime costs for persons diagnosed with knee OA were $140,300. Direct medical costs were $129,600, with $12,400 (10%) attributable to knee OA over 28 years. OA patients spent a mean ± SD of 13 ± 10 years waiting for TKA after failing nonsurgical regimens. Under current TKA eligibility criteria, 54% of knee OA patients underwent TKA over their lifetimes. Estimated OA-related discounted lifetime direct medical costs ranged from $12,400 (54% TKA uptake) when TKA eligibility was limited to Kellgren/Lawrence grades 3 or 4 to $16,000 (70% TKA uptake) when eligibility was expanded to include symptomatic OA with a lesser degree of structural damage. CONCLUSION Because of low efficacy of nonsurgical regimens, knee OA treatment-attributable costs are low, representing a small portion of all costs for OA patients. Expanding TKA eligibility increases OA-related costs substantially for the population, underscoring the need for more effective nonoperative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Kulkarni VT, Lin Z, Ross JS, Horwitz LI, Kim N, Suter LG, Lin H, Normand SLT, Krumholz HM. Trajectories of risk after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2015; 350:h411. [PMID: 25656852 PMCID: PMC4353309 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the absolute risks for older patients of readmission to hospital and death in the year after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING 4767 hospitals caring for Medicare fee for service beneficiaries in the United States, 2008-10. PARTICIPANTS More than 3 million Medicare fee for service beneficiaries, aged 65 years or more, surviving hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Daily absolute risks of first readmission to hospital and death for one year after discharge. To illustrate risk trajectories, we identified the time required for risks of readmission to hospital and death to decline 50% from maximum values after discharge; the time required for risks to approach plateau periods of minimal day to day change, defined as 95% reductions in daily changes in risk from maximum daily declines after discharge; and the extent to which risks are higher among patients recently discharged from hospital compared with the general elderly population. RESULTS Within one year of hospital discharge, readmission to hospital and death, respectively, occurred following 67.4% and 35.8% of hospitalizations for heart failure, 49.9% and 25.1% for acute myocardial infarction, and 55.6% and 31.1% for pneumonia. Risk of first readmission had declined 50% by day 38 after hospitalization for heart failure, day 13 after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, and day 25 after hospitalization for pneumonia; risk of death declined 50% by day 11, 6, and 10, respectively. Daily change in risk of first readmission to hospital declined 95% by day 45, 38, and 45; daily change in risk of death declined 95% by day 21, 19, and 21. After hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia, the magnitude of the relative risk for hospital admission over the first 90 days was 8, 6, and 6 times greater than that of the general older population; the relative risk of death was 11, 8, and 10 times greater. CONCLUSIONS Risk declines slowly for older patients after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia and is increased for months. Specific risk trajectories vary by discharge diagnosis and outcome. Patients should remain vigilant for deterioration in health for an extended time after discharge. Health providers can use knowledge of absolute risks and their changes over time to better align interventions designed to reduce adverse outcomes after discharge with the highest risk periods for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Dharmarajan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Angela F Hsieh
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Vivek T Kulkarni
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Leora I Horwitz
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nancy Kim
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Section of Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Haiqun Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Horwitz LI, Partovian C, Lin Z, Grady JN, Herrin J, Conover M, Montague J, Dillaway C, Bartczak K, Suter LG, Ross JS, Bernheim SM, Krumholz HM, Drye EE. Development and use of an administrative claims measure for profiling hospital-wide performance on 30-day unplanned readmission. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:S66-75. [PMID: 25402406 PMCID: PMC4235629 DOI: 10.7326/m13-3000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing publicly reported readmission measures are condition-specific, representing less than 20% of adult hospitalizations. An all-condition measure may better measure quality and promote innovation. OBJECTIVE To develop an all-condition, hospital-wide readmission measure. DESIGN Measure development study. SETTING 4821 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. MEASUREMENTS Hospital-level, risk-standardized unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. The measure uses Medicare fee-for-service claims and is a composite of 5 specialty-based, risk-standardized rates for medicine, surgery/gynecology, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and neurology cohorts. The 2007-2008 admissions were randomly split for development and validation. Models were adjusted for age, principal diagnosis, and comorbid conditions. Calibration in Medicare and all-payer data was examined, and hospital rankings in the development and validation samples were compared. RESULTS The development data set contained 8 018 949 admissions associated with 1 276 165 unplanned readmissions (15.9%). The median hospital risk-standardized unplanned readmission rate was 15.8 (range, 11.6 to 21.9). The 5 specialty cohort models accurately predicted readmission risk in both Medicare and all-payer data sets for average-risk patients but slightly overestimated readmission risk at the extremes. Overall hospital risk-standardized readmission rates did not differ statistically in the split samples (P = 0.71 for difference in rank), and 76% of hospitals' validation-set rankings were within 2 deciles of the development rank (24% were more than 2 deciles). Of hospitals ranking in the top or bottom deciles, 90% remained within 2 deciles (10% were more than 2 deciles) and 82% remained within 1 decile (18% were more than 1 decile). LIMITATION Risk adjustment was limited to that available in claims data. CONCLUSION A claims-based, hospital-wide unplanned readmission measure for profiling hospitals produced reasonably consistent results in different data sets and was similarly calibrated in both Medicare and all-payer data. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Collapse
|
42
|
Suter LG, Li SX, Grady JN, Lin Z, Wang Y, Bhat KR, Turkmani D, Spivack SB, Lindenauer PK, Merrill AR, Drye EE, Krumholz HM, Bernheim SM. National patterns of risk-standardized mortality and readmission after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia: update on publicly reported outcomes measures based on the 2013 release. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29:1333-40. [PMID: 24825244 PMCID: PMC4175654 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2862-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Revised: 01/06/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publicly reports risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) within 30-days of admission and, in 2013, risk-standardized unplanned readmission rates (RSRRs) within 30-days of discharge for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia. Current publicly reported data do not focus on variation in national results or annual changes. OBJECTIVE Describe U.S. hospital performance on AMI, HF, and pneumonia mortality and updated readmission measures to provide perspective on national performance variation. DESIGN To identify recent changes and variation in national hospital-level mortality and readmission for AMI, HF, and pneumonia, we performed cross-sectional panel analyses of national hospital performance on publicly reported measures. PARTICIPANTS Fee-for-service Medicare and Veterans Health Administration beneficiaries, 65 years or older, hospitalized with principal discharge diagnoses of AMI, HF, or pneumonia between July 2009 and June 2012. RSMRs/RSRRs were calculated using hierarchical logistic models risk-adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and patients' clustering among hospitals. RESULTS Median (range) RSMRs for AMI, HF, and pneumonia were 15.1% (9.4-21.0%), 11.3% (6.4-17.9%), and 11.4% (6.5-24.5%), respectively. Median (range) RSRRs for AMI, HF, and pneumonia were 18.2% (14.4-24.3%), 22.9% (17.1-30.7%), and 17.5% (13.6-24.0%), respectively. Median RSMRs declined for AMI (15.5% in 2009-2010, 15.4% in 2010-2011, 14.7% in 2011-2012) and remained similar for HF (11.5% in 2009-2010, 11.9% in 2010-2011, 11.7% in 2011-2012) and pneumonia (11.8% in 2009-2010, 11.9% in 2010-2011, 11.6% in 2011-2012). Median hospital-level RSRRs declined: AMI (18.5% in 2009-2010, 18.5% in 2010-2011, 17.7% in 2011-2012), HF (23.3% in 2009-2010, 23.1% in 2010-2011, 22.5% in 2011-2012), and pneumonia (17.7% in 2009-2010, 17.6% in 2010-2011, 17.3% in 2011-2012). CONCLUSIONS We report the first national unplanned readmission results demonstrating declining rates for all three conditions between 2009-2012. Simultaneously, AMI mortality continued to decline, pneumonia mortality was stable, and HF mortality experienced a small increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa G Suter
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Bozic KJ, Grosso LM, Lin Z, Parzynski CS, Suter LG, Krumholz HM, Lieberman JR, Berry DJ, Bucholz R, Han L, Rapp MT, Bernheim S, Drye EE. Variation in hospital-level risk-standardized complication rates following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96:640-7. [PMID: 24740660 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.l.01639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the variation in complication rates among U.S. hospitals that perform elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The purpose of this study was to use National Quality Forum (NQF)-endorsed hospital-level risk-standardized complication rates to describe variations in, and disparities related to, hospital quality for elective primary THA and TKA procedures performed in U.S. hospitals. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of national Medicare Fee-for-Service data. The study cohort included 878,098 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, sixty-five years or older, who underwent elective THA or TKA from 2008 to 2010 at 3479 hospitals. Both medical and surgical complications were included in the composite measure. Hospital-specific complication rates were calculated from Medicare claims with use of hierarchical logistic regression to account for patient clustering and were risk-adjusted for age, sex, and patient comorbidities. We determined whether hospitals with higher proportions of Medicaid patients and black patients had higher risk-standardized complication rates. RESULTS The crude rate of measured complications was 3.6%. The most common complications were pneumonia (0.86%), pulmonary embolism (0.75%), and periprosthetic joint infection or wound infection (0.67%). The median risk-standardized complication rate was 3.6% (range, 1.8% to 9.0%). Among hospitals with at least twenty-five THA and TKA patients in the study cohort, 103 (3.6%) were better and seventy-five (2.6%) were worse than expected. Hospitals with the highest proportion of Medicaid patients had slightly higher but similar risk-standardized complication rates (median, 3.6%; range, 2.0% to 7.1%) compared with hospitals in the lowest decile (3.4%; 1.7% to 6.2%). Findings were similar for the analysis involving the proportion of black patients. CONCLUSIONS There was more than a fourfold difference in risk-standardized complication rates across U.S. hospitals in which elective THA and TKA are performed. Although hospitals with higher proportions of Medicaid and black patients had rates similar to those of hospitals with lower proportions, there is a continued need to monitor for disparities in outcomes. These findings suggest there are opportunities for quality improvement among hospitals in which elective THA and TKA procedures are performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Bozic
- UCSF Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU 320W, San Francisco, CA 94143-0728. E-mail address:
| | - Laura M Grosso
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Craig S Parzynski
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Jay R Lieberman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1520 San Pablo Street, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, CA 90033
| | - Daniel J Berry
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Robert Bucholz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, 4005 Wingren, Irving, TX 75062
| | - Lein Han
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244
| | - Michael T Rapp
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244
| | - Susannah Bernheim
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Elizabeth E Drye
- Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE), 1 Church Street, Suite 200, New Haven, CT 06510
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Losina E, Burbine SA, Suter LG, Hunter DJ, Solomon DH, Daigle ME, Dervan EE, Jordan JM, Katz JN. Pharmacologic regimens for knee osteoarthritis prevention: can they be cost-effective? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22:415-30. [PMID: 24487044 PMCID: PMC4006219 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2013] [Revised: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 01/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the target populations and drug efficacy, toxicity, cost, and initiation age thresholds under which a pharmacologic regimen for knee osteoarthritis (OA) prevention could be cost-effective. DESIGN We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model, a validated state-transition simulation model of knee OA, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) as prophylaxis for the disease. We assessed four cohorts at varying risk for developing OA: (1) no risk factors, (2) obese, (3) history of knee injury, and (4) high-risk (obese with history of knee injury). The base case DMOAD was initiated at age 50 with 40% efficacy in the first year, 5% failure per subsequent year, 0.22% major toxicity, and annual cost of $1,000. Outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Key parameters were varied in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS For the high-risk cohort, base case prophylaxis increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 0.04 and lifetime costs by $4,600, and produced an ICER of $118,000 per QALY gained. ICERs >$150,000/QALY were observed when comparing the base case DMOAD to the standard of care in the knee injury only cohort; for the obese only and no risk factors cohorts, the base case DMOAD was less cost-effective than the standard of care. Regimens priced at $3,000 per year and higher demonstrated ICERs above cost-effectiveness thresholds consistent with current US standards. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of DMOADs for OA prevention for persons at high risk for incident OA may be comparable to other accepted preventive therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - S A Burbine
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - L G Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - D J Hunter
- University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - D H Solomon
- Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - M E Daigle
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - E E Dervan
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - J M Jordan
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - J N Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Lin Z, Bueno H, Ross JS, Horwitz LI, Barreto-Filho JA, Kim N, Suter LG, Bernheim SM, Drye EE, Krumholz HM. Hospital readmission performance and patterns of readmission: retrospective cohort study of Medicare admissions. BMJ 2013; 347:f6571. [PMID: 24259033 PMCID: PMC3898430 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether high performing hospitals with low 30 day risk standardized readmission rates have a lower proportion of readmissions from specific diagnoses and time periods after admission or instead have a similar distribution of readmission diagnoses and timing to lower performing institutions. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 65 and older who were readmitted within 30 days after hospital admission for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia in 2007-09. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Readmission diagnoses were classified with a modified version of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' condition categories, and readmission timing was classified by day (0-30) after hospital discharge. Hospital 30 day risk standardized readmission rates over the three years of study were calculated with public reporting methods of the US federal government, and hospitals were categorized with bootstrap analysis as having high, average, or low readmission performance for each index condition. High and low performing hospitals had ≥ 95% probability of having an interval estimate respectively less than or greater than the national 30 day readmission rate over the three year period of study. All remaining hospitals were considered average performers. RESULTS For readmissions in the 30 days after the index admission, there were 320,003 after 1,291,211 admissions for heart failure (4041 hospitals), 102,536 after 517,827 admissions for acute myocardial infarction (2378 hospitals), and 208,438 after 1,135,932 admissions for pneumonia (4283 hospitals). The distribution of readmissions by diagnosis was similar across categories of hospital performance for all three conditions. High performing hospitals had fewer readmissions for all common diagnoses. Median time to readmission was similar by hospital performance for heart failure and acute myocardial infarction, though was 1.4 days longer among high versus low performing hospitals for pneumonia (P<0.001). Findings were unchanged after adjustment for other hospital characteristics potentially associated with readmission patterns. CONCLUSIONS High performing hospitals have proportionately fewer 30 day readmissions without differences in readmission diagnoses and timing, suggesting the possible benefit of strategies that lower risk of readmission globally rather than for specific diagnoses or time periods after hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Dharmarajan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, Box 93, PH 10-203, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fox JP, Suter LG, Wang K, Wang Y, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Hospital-based, acute care use among patients within 30 days of discharge after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96:96-104. [PMID: 23702228 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2012] [Revised: 03/19/2013] [Accepted: 03/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in how frequently patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery require hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. Readmissions, however, may not capture all hospital-based, acute care needs after discharge. The purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of and diagnoses associated with emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge after CABG surgery and to compare outcomes across hospitals. METHODS Using the California State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases, we identified all adults who underwent isolated CABG surgery between January 2005 and June 2009. We then calculated hospitals' 30-day, risk-standardized readmission and ED visit rates using hierarchic generalized linear models. The correlation between hospital readmission and ED visit rates was estimated, weighting for hospital volume. RESULTS We identified 63,911 adults who underwent isolated CABG surgery at 114 hospitals. Hospital 30-day, risk-standardized ED visit without readmission rates (median ED visit rate = 11.9%, 25th to 75th percentile, 10.5% to 13.7%) nearly equaled the hospital 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates (median readmission rate = 15.0%, 25th to 75th percentile, 13.5% to 16.5%). Both outcomes varied widely among hospitals. A composite of these outcomes, the median 30-day risk-standardized hospital-based, acute care rate was 23.9% (25th to 75th percentile, 22.2% to 25.5%). Postoperative infections, congestive heart failure, and chest discomfort were among the most common reasons for both readmissions and ED visits. Hospitals' 30-day risk-standardized ED visit and readmission rates were not significantly correlated (weighted correlation coefficient = -0.07, p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS Patients discharged after CABG surgery frequently experienced ED visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days, often for similar diagnoses. Monitoring both hospital readmissions and ED visits after CABG surgery is important to our understanding of hospital-based, acute care needs after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin P Fox
- Department of Surgery, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Losina E, Weinstein AM, Reichmann WM, Burbine SA, Solomon DH, Daigle ME, Rome BN, Chen SP, Hunter DJ, Suter LG, Jordan JM, Katz JN. Lifetime risk and age at diagnosis of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65:703-11. [PMID: 23203864 PMCID: PMC3886119 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2012] [Accepted: 10/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence and lifetime risk of diagnosed symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the age at diagnosis of knee OA based on self-reports in the US population. METHODS We estimated the incidence of diagnosed symptomatic knee OA in the US by combining data on age-, sex-, and obesity-specific prevalence from the 2007-2008 National Health Interview Survey, with disease duration estimates derived from the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model, a validated computer simulation model of knee OA. We used the OAPol Model to estimate the mean and median ages at diagnosis and lifetime risk. RESULTS The estimated incidence of diagnosed symptomatic knee OA was highest among adults ages 55-64 years, ranging from 0.37% per year for nonobese men to 1.02% per year for obese women. The estimated median age at knee OA diagnosis was 55 years. The estimated lifetime risk was 13.83%, ranging from 9.60% for nonobese men to 23.87% in obese women. Approximately 9.29% of the US population is diagnosed with symptomatic knee OA by age 60 years. CONCLUSION The diagnosis of symptomatic knee OA occurs relatively early in life, suggesting that prevention programs should be offered relatively early in the life course. Further research is needed to understand the future burden of health care utilization resulting from earlier diagnosis of knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Losina E, Daigle ME, Reichmann WM, Suter LG, Hunter DJ, Solomon DH, Walensky RP, Jordan JM, Burbine SA, Paltiel AD, Katz JN. Disease-modifying drugs for knee osteoarthritis: can they be cost-effective? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:655-67. [PMID: 23380251 PMCID: PMC3670115 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2012] [Revised: 12/15/2012] [Accepted: 01/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) are under development. Our goal was to determine efficacy, toxicity, and cost thresholds under which DMOADs would be a cost-effective knee OA treatment. DESIGN We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated computer simulation of knee OA, to compare guideline-concordant care to strategies that insert DMOADs into the care sequence. The guideline-concordant care sequence included conservative pain management, corticosteroid injections, total knee replacement (TKR), and revision TKR. Base case DMOAD characteristics included: 50% chance of suspending progression in the first year (resumption rate of 10% thereafter) and 30% pain relief among those with suspended progression; 0.5%/year risk of major toxicity; and costs of $1,000/year. In sensitivity analyses, we varied suspended progression (20-100%), pain relief (10-100%), major toxicity (0.1-2%), and cost ($1,000-$7,000). Outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life expectancy, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and TKR utilization. RESULTS Base case DMOADs added 4.00 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and $230,000 per 100 persons, with an ICER of $57,500/QALY. DMOADs reduced need for TKR by 15%. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to likelihoods of suspended progression and pain relief. DMOADs costing $3,000/year achieved ICERs below $100,000/QALY if the likelihoods of suspended progression and pain relief were 20% and 70%. At a cost of $5,000, these ICERs were attained if the likelihoods of suspended progression and pain relief were both 60%. CONCLUSIONS Cost, suspended progression, and pain relief are key drivers of value for DMOADs. Plausible combinations of these factors could reduce need for TKR and satisfy commonly cited cost-effectiveness criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Meghan E. Daigle
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - William M. Reichmann
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Lisa G. Suter
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - David J. Hunter
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Daniel H. Solomon
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Rochelle P. Walensky
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Joanne M. Jordan
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Sara A. Burbine
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - A. David Paltiel
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| | - Jeffrey N. Katz
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (EL, MED, SAB, WMR, JNK), Division of Infectious Disease (RPW), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy (EL, DHS, JNK), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, DHS, RPW, JNK); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EL, WMR); Yale University, New Haven, CT (LGS, ADP); University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (DJH); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RPW); Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (JMJ)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dharmarajan K, Hsieh AF, Lin Z, Kim N, Ross JS, Horwitz LI, Kulkarni V, Suter LG, Bernheim SM, Drye EE, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. Abstract 13: Risks of Death and Hospital Readmission by Time Following Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013. [DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.6.suppl_1.a13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
After hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), patients experience increased risk of death and hospital readmission. Defining the trajectory and timing of this period of risk may help guide interventions to improve post-discharge outcomes.
Methods:
We used 2008-10 Medicare data to identify patients ≥65 years discharged alive after HF or AMI hospitalization. Using hazard rates, we characterized the risks of death and first readmission on each day after discharge to describe (1) the maximum daily risks of death and readmission after discharge; (2) risks of death and readmission 1 year after discharge; (3) the time in days after discharge for the risks of death and readmission to reach their maximum daily rates and 50% of their maximum daily rates to characterize the rapidity of decline in risk. We created separate survival models for death and first readmission. Data were censored after 1 year follow up. The readmission model also censored for death prior to readmission.
Results:
Of 878,963 HF hospitalizations, 367,542 (41.8%) died and 618,283 (70.3%) were readmitted in 1 year. Of 350,509 AMI hospitalizations, 90,623 (25.9%) died and 177,031(50.5%) were readmitted in 1 year. The Figure shows hazard rates by time after discharge. For HF, daily risk of death was 0.0056 maximally and 0.0011 at 1 year (19% of maximum). Daily risk of readmission was 0.013 maximally and 0.002 at 1 year (16% of maximum). Daily risk of death was highest 1 day after discharge and 50% less 11 days after discharge. Daily risk of readmission was highest 4 days after discharge and 50% less 49 days after discharge. For AMI, daily risk of death was 0.010 maximally and 0.0004 at 1 year (4% of maximum). Daily risk of readmission was 0.015 maximally and 0.0011 at 1 year (7% of maximum). Daily risk of death was highest 1 day after discharge and 50% less 6 days after discharge. Daily risk of readmission was highest 2 days after discharge and 50% less 13 days after discharge.
Conclusions:
After hospitalization for HF and AMI, risk of death is highest on day 1 after discharge and then declines rapidly. In contrast, risk of readmission peaks later and declines more slowly. This extended period of risk for readmission may justify continued vigilance beyond the 30-day period used by Medicare to evaluate hospital readmission performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela F Hsieh
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | - Nancy Kim
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | - Leora I Horwitz
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Lisa G Suter
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Elizabeth E Drye
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Yale-New Haven Hosp Cntr for Outcomes Rsch and Evaluation, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|