1
|
Baraf HSB, Khanna PP, Kivitz AJ, Strand V, Choi HK, Terkeltaub R, Dalbeth N, DeHaan W, Azeem R, Traber PG, Keenan RT. The COMPARE head-to-head, randomized controlled trial of SEL-212 (pegadricase plus rapamycin-containing nanoparticle, ImmTOR™) versus pegloticase for refractory gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:1058-1067. [PMID: 37449908 PMCID: PMC10986798 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Serum urate (SU) lowering with PEGylated uricases in gout can reduce flares and tophi. However, treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies adversely affect safety and efficacy and the currently approved PEGylated uricase pegloticase requires twice-monthly infusions. Investigational SEL-212 therapy aims to promote uricase-specific tolerance via monthly sequential infusions of a proprietary rapamycin-containing nanoparticle (ImmTOR) and pegadricase. METHODS COMPARE was a randomized, phase 2, open-label trial of SEL-212 vs pegloticase in adults with refractory gout. SEL-212 [ImmTOR (0.15 mg/kg) and pegadricase (0.2 mg/kg)] was infused monthly or pegloticase (8 mg) twice monthly for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with SU <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of the time during 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were mean SU, gout flares, number of tender and/or swollen joints and safety. RESULTS During months 3 and 6 combined, numerically more participants achieved and maintained a SU <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of the time with SEL-212 vs pegloticase (53.0% vs 46.0%, P = 0.181). The percentage reductions in SU levels were statistically greater during months 3 and 6 with SEL-212 vs pegloticase (-73.79% and -47.96%, P = 0.0161). Reductions in gout flare incidence and number of tender and/or swollen joints were comparable between treatments. There were numerical differences between the most common treatment-related adverse events of interest with SEL-212 and pegloticase: gout flares (60.2% vs 50.6%), infections (25.3% vs 18.4%) and infusion-related reactions (15.7% vs 11.5%), respectively. Stomatitis (and related terms) was experienced by eight participants (9.6%) with SEL-212 and none with pegloticase. Stomatitis, a known event for rapamycin, was associated with ImmTOR only. CONCLUSIONS SEL-212 efficacy and tolerability were comparable to pegloticase in refractory gout. This was associated with a substantial reduction in treatment burden with SEL-212 due to decreased infusion frequency vs pegloticase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03905512.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert S B Baraf
- Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research, Wheaton, MD, USA
- Rheumatology, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alan J Kivitz
- Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Hyon K Choi
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Terkeltaub
- Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology Division, San Diego VA Healthcare Service and UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Robert T Keenan
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Arthrosi Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khanna D, Padilla C, Tsoi LC, Nagaraja V, Khanna PP, Tabib T, Kahlenberg JM, Young A, Huang S, Gudjonsson JE, Fox DA, Lafyatis R. Tofacitinib blocks IFN-regulated biomarker genes in skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a systemic sclerosis trial. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e159566. [PMID: 35943798 PMCID: PMC9536259 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.159566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune, connective tissue disease characterized by vasculopathy and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs.METHODSWe randomized 15 participants with early diffuse cutaneous SSc to tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day or matching placebo in a phase I/II double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was safety and tolerability at or before week 24. To understand the changes in gene expression associated with tofacitinib treatment in each skin cell population, we compared single-cell gene expression in punch skin biopsies obtained at baseline and 6 weeks following the initiation of treatment.RESULTSTofacitinib was well tolerated; no participants experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events before or at week 24. Trends in efficacy outcome measures favored tofacitnib. Baseline gene expression in fibroblast and keratinocyte subpopulations indicated IFN-activated gene expression. Tofacitinib inhibited IFN-regulated gene expression in SFRP2/DPP4 fibroblasts (progenitors of myofibroblasts) and in MYOC/CCL19, representing adventitial fibroblasts (P < 0.05), as well as in the basal and keratinized layers of the epidermis. Gene expression in macrophages and DCs indicated inhibition of STAT3 by tofacitinib (P < 0.05). No clinically meaningful inhibition of T cells and endothelial cells in the skin tissue was observed.CONCLUSIONThese results indicate that mesenchymal and epithelial cells of a target organ in SSc, not the infiltrating lymphocytes, may be the primary focus for therapeutic effects of a Janus kinase inhibitor.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03274076.FUNDINGPfizer, NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01 AR070470, NIH/NIAMS K24 AR063120, Taubman Medical Research Institute and NIH P30 AR075043, and NIH/NIAMS K01 AR072129.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
- University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cristina Padilla
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lam C Tsoi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Vivek Nagaraja
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
- University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
- VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Tracy Tabib
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Amber Young
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
| | - Suiyuan Huang
- University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - David A Fox
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
| | - Robert Lafyatis
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khanna PP, Khanna D, Cutter G, Foster J, Melnick J, Jaafar S, Biggers S, Rahman AKMF, Kuo HC, Feese M, Kivitz A, King C, Shergy W, Kent J, Peloso PM, Danila MI, Saag KG. Reducing Immunogenicity of Pegloticase With Concomitant Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients With Refractory Gout: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:1523-1532. [PMID: 33750034 DOI: 10.1002/art.41731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pegloticase is used for the treatment of severe gout, but its use is limited by immunogenicity. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs the efficacy of pegloticase. METHODS Participants were randomized 3:1 to receive 1,000 mg MMF twice daily or placebo for 14 weeks, starting 2 weeks before receiving pegloticase and continuing while receiving intravenous pegloticase 8 mg biweekly for 12 weeks. Participants then received pegloticase alone from week 12 to week 24. The primary end points were the proportion of patients who sustained a serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl at 12 weeks and the rate of adverse events (AEs). Secondary end points included 24-week durability of serum urate level ≤6 mg/dl. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's 2-sample test were used for analyses, along with Kaplan-Meier estimates and log rank tests. RESULTS A total of 32 participants received ≥1 dose of pegloticase. Participants were predominantly men (88%), with a mean age of 55.2 years, mean gout duration of 13.4 years, and mean baseline serum urate level of 9.2 mg/dl. At 12 weeks, a serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl was achieved in 19 (86%) of 22 participants in the MMF arm compared to 4 (40%) of 10 in the placebo arm (P = 0.01). At week 24, the serum urate level was ≤6 mg/dl in 68% of MMF-treated patients versus 30% of placebo-treated patients (P = 0.06), and rates of AEs were similar between groups, with more infusion reactions occurring in the placebo arm (30% versus 0%). CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that MMF therapy with pegloticase is well tolerated and shows a clinically meaningful improvement in targeted serum urate level of ≤6 mg/dl at 12 and 24 weeks. This study suggests an innovative approach to pegloticase therapy in gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Jeff Kent
- Horizon Therapeutics, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saag KG, Khanna PP, Keenan RT, Ohlman S, Osterling Koskinen L, Sparve E, Åkerblad AC, Wikén M, So A, Pillinger MH, Terkeltaub R. A Randomized, Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra in the Treatment of Gout Flares. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:1533-1542. [PMID: 33605029 DOI: 10.1002/art.41699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra compared to triamcinolone in the treatment of gout flares. METHODS Patients for whom nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and colchicine were not suitable treatments were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with follow-up for up to 2 years. The study was designed to assess superiority of anakinra (100 or 200 mg/day for 5 days) over triamcinolone (40 mg in a single injection) for the primary end point of changed patient-assessed pain intensity in the most affected joint (scored on a visual analog scale of 0-100) from baseline to 24-72 hours. Secondary outcome measures included: safety, immunogenicity, and patient- and physician-assessed global response. RESULTS One hundred sixty-five patients were randomized to receive anakinra (n = 110) or triamcinolone (n = 55). The median age was 55 years (range 25-83), 87% were men, the mean disease duration was 8.7 years, and the mean number of self-reported flares during the prior year was 4.5. A total of 301 flares were treated (214 with anakinra; 87 with triamcinolone). Anakinra in both doses and triamcinolone provided clinically meaningful reduction in patient-assessed pain intensity in the first and subsequent flares. For the first flare, the mean decline in pain intensity from baseline to 24-72 hours for total anakinra and triamcinolone was -41.2 and -39.4, respectively (P = 0.688). Anakinra performed better than triamcinolone for most secondary end points. There were no unexpected safety findings. The presence of antidrug antibodies was not associated with adverse events or altered pain reduction. CONCLUSION Anakinra was not superior to triamcinolone for the primary end point, but had comparable efficacy in pain reduction and was favored for most secondary end points. Anakinra is an effective option for gout flares when conventional therapy is unsuitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Terkeltaub
- San Diego VA Healthcare Service and University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, Gelber AC, Harrold LR, Khanna D, King C, Levy G, Libbey C, Mount D, Pillinger MH, Rosenthal A, Singh JA, Sims JE, Smith BJ, Wenger NS, Sharon Bae S, Danve A, Khanna PP, Kim SC, Lenert A, Poon S, Qasim A, Sehra ST, Sharma TSK, Toprover M, Turgunbaev M, Zeng L, Zhang MA, Turner AS, Neogi T. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:744-760. [PMID: 32391934 PMCID: PMC10563586 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 327] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidance for the management of gout, including indications for and optimal use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), treatment of gout flares, and lifestyle and other medication recommendations. METHODS Fifty-seven population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions were developed, followed by a systematic literature review, including network meta-analyses with ratings of the available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and patient input. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as strong or conditional. RESULTS Forty-two recommendations (including 16 strong recommendations) were generated. Strong recommendations included initiation of ULT for all patients with tophaceous gout, radiographic damage due to gout, or frequent gout flares; allopurinol as the preferred first-line ULT, including for those with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; stage >3); using a low starting dose of allopurinol (≤100 mg/day, and lower in CKD) or febuxostat (<40 mg/day); and a treat-to-target management strategy with ULT dose titration guided by serial serum urate (SU) measurements, with an SU target of <6 mg/dl. When initiating ULT, concomitant antiinflammatory prophylaxis therapy for a duration of at least 3-6 months was strongly recommended. For management of gout flares, colchicine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or glucocorticoids (oral, intraarticular, or intramuscular) were strongly recommended. CONCLUSION Using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process based on evidence from the current literature and patient preferences, this guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making decisions on the management of gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. FitzGerald
- University of California, Los Angeles and VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Ted Mikuls
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and VA Nebraska–Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | | | | | | | - Leslie R. Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester Massachusetts, and Corrona, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Caryn Libbey
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Mount
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Benjamin J. Smith
- Florida State University College of Medicine School of Physician Assistant Practice, Tallahassee
| | | | | | | | - Puja P. Khanna
- University of Michigan, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Seoyoung C. Kim
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Samuel Poon
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Manchester, New Hampshire
| | - Anila Qasim
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Linan Zeng
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Ann Zhang
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, Gelber AC, Harrold LR, Khanna D, King C, Levy G, Libbey C, Mount D, Pillinger MH, Rosenthal A, Singh JA, Sims JE, Smith BJ, Wenger NS, Bae SS, Danve A, Khanna PP, Kim SC, Lenert A, Poon S, Qasim A, Sehra ST, Sharma TSK, Toprover M, Turgunbaev M, Zeng L, Zhang MA, Turner AS, Neogi T. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72:879-895. [PMID: 32390306 DOI: 10.1002/art.41247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidance for the management of gout, including indications for and optimal use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), treatment of gout flares, and lifestyle and other medication recommendations. METHODS Fifty-seven population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions were developed, followed by a systematic literature review, including network meta-analyses with ratings of the available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and patient input. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as strong or conditional. RESULTS Forty-two recommendations (including 16 strong recommendations) were generated. Strong recommendations included initiation of ULT for all patients with tophaceous gout, radiographic damage due to gout, or frequent gout flares; allopurinol as the preferred first-line ULT, including for those with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; stage >3); using a low starting dose of allopurinol (≤100 mg/day, and lower in CKD) or febuxostat (<40 mg/day); and a treat-to-target management strategy with ULT dose titration guided by serial serum urate (SU) measurements, with an SU target of <6 mg/dl. When initiating ULT, concomitant antiinflammatory prophylaxis therapy for a duration of at least 3-6 months was strongly recommended. For management of gout flares, colchicine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or glucocorticoids (oral, intraarticular, or intramuscular) were strongly recommended. CONCLUSION Using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process based on evidence from the current literature and patient preferences, this guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making decisions on the management of gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D FitzGerald
- University of California, Los Angeles and VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Ted Mikuls
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | | | - Aryeh M Abeles
- New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | | | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester Massachusetts, and Corrona, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Caryn Libbey
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Mount
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jasvinder A Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham
| | | | - Benjamin J Smith
- Florida State University College of Medicine School of Physician Assistant Practice, Tallahassee
| | | | | | | | - Puja P Khanna
- University of Michigan, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor
| | - Seoyoung C Kim
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Samuel Poon
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Manchester, New Hampshire
| | - Anila Qasim
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Linan Zeng
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Ann Zhang
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy S Turner
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bursill D, Taylor WJ, Terkeltaub R, Abhishek A, So AK, Vargas-Santos AB, Gaffo AL, Rosenthal A, Tausche AK, Reginato A, Manger B, Sciré C, Pineda C, van Durme C, Lin CT, Yin C, Albert DA, Biernat-Kaluza E, Roddy E, Pascual E, Becce F, Perez-Ruiz F, Sivera F, Lioté F, Schett G, Nuki G, Filippou G, McCarthy G, da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro G, Ea HK, Tupinambá HDA, Yamanaka H, Choi HK, Mackay J, ODell JR, Vázquez Mellado J, Singh JA, Fitzgerald JD, Jacobsson LTH, Joosten L, Harrold LR, Stamp L, Andrés M, Gutierrez M, Kuwabara M, Dehlin M, Janssen M, Doherty M, Hershfield MS, Pillinger M, Edwards NL, Schlesinger N, Kumar N, Slot O, Ottaviani S, Richette P, MacMullan PA, Chapman PT, Lipsky PE, Robinson P, Khanna PP, Gancheva RN, Grainger R, Johnson RJ, Te Kampe R, Keenan RT, Tedeschi SK, Kim S, Choi SJ, Fields TR, Bardin T, Uhlig T, Jansen T, Merriman T, Pascart T, Neogi T, Klück V, Louthrenoo W, Dalbeth N. Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) consensus statement regarding labels and definitions of disease states of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:1592-1600. [PMID: 31501138 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a lack of standardisation in the terminology used to describe gout. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus statement describing the recommended nomenclature for disease states of gout. METHODS A content analysis of gout-related articles from rheumatology and general internal medicine journals published over a 5-year period identified potential disease states and the labels commonly assigned to them. Based on these findings, experts in gout were invited to participate in a Delphi exercise and face-to-face consensus meeting to reach agreement on disease state labels and definitions. RESULTS The content analysis identified 13 unique disease states and a total of 63 unique labels. The Delphi exercise (n=76 respondents) and face-to-face meeting (n=35 attendees) established consensus agreement for eight disease state labels and definitions. The agreed labels were as follows: 'asymptomatic hyperuricaemia', 'asymptomatic monosodium urate crystal deposition', 'asymptomatic hyperuricaemia with monosodium urate crystal deposition', 'gout', 'tophaceous gout', 'erosive gout', 'first gout flare' and 'recurrent gout flares'. There was consensus agreement that the label 'gout' should be restricted to current or prior clinically evident disease caused by monosodium urate crystal deposition (gout flare, chronic gouty arthritis or subcutaneous tophus). CONCLUSION Consensus agreement has been established for the labels and definitions of eight gout disease states, including 'gout' itself. The Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network recommends the use of these labels when describing disease states of gout in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bursill
- Department of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William J Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.,Wellington Regional Rheumatology Unit, Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
| | - Robert Terkeltaub
- Department of Rheumatology, UCSD/ VA Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Abhishek Abhishek
- Department of Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alexander K So
- Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Service de RMR, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Angelo Lino Gaffo
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ann Rosenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.,Translational Research Unit, Clement J Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Anne-Kathrin Tausche
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital 'Carl Gustav Carus' of the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anthony Reginato
- Division of Rheumatology, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bernhard Manger
- Rheumatology and Immunology, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carlo Sciré
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.,Epidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlos Pineda
- Department of Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Caroline van Durme
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ching-Tsai Lin
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Congcong Yin
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel Arthur Albert
- Department of Rheumatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Edyta Biernat-Kaluza
- Outpatient Rheumatology Clinic, Nutritional and Lifestyle Medicine Centre, ORLIK, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Edward Roddy
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Eliseo Pascual
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.,Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Fabio Becce
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fernando Perez-Ruiz
- Rheumatology Division, Cruces University Hospital, Baracaldo, Spain.,Department of Medicine, University of the Basque Country, Biscay, Spain.,Investigation Group for Arthritis, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Baracaldo, Spain
| | - Francisca Sivera
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Elda, Elda, Spain
| | - Frédéric Lioté
- Department of Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Department of Rhumatologie, INSERM UMR-1132 and Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - George Nuki
- Insititute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Georgios Filippou
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Geraldine McCarthy
- Department of Rheumatology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Hang-Korng Ea
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | | | - Hisashi Yamanaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hyon K Choi
- Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James Mackay
- President and CEO, Aristea Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA
| | - James R ODell
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Janitzia Vázquez Mellado
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General de Mexico and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Medicine Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - John D Fitzgerald
- Department of Medicine/Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lennart T H Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Leo Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leslie R Harrold
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.,Chief Scientific Officer, Corrona, LLC, Southborough, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lisa Stamp
- Department of Medicine, Otago University, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Mariano Andrés
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.,Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Marwin Gutierrez
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Diseases, Instituto Nacional Rehabilitación, México City, México
| | - Masanari Kuwabara
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Cardiology, Toranomon Hospital, Minato-ku, Japan
| | - Mats Dehlin
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Matthijs Janssen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Doherty
- Department of Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael S Hershfield
- Division of Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Pillinger
- Department of Rheumatology/Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | - Naomi Schlesinger
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nitin Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Ole Slot
- Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spinal Disorders, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Sebastien Ottaviani
- Department of Rheumatology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, University of Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Richette
- Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, and INSERM UMR-1132 and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Paul A MacMullan
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Peter T Chapman
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Peter E Lipsky
- CEO and CMO, AMPEL BioSolutions, LLC, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Philip Robinson
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rada N Gancheva
- Clinic of Rheumatology, University Hospital 'St. Ivan Rilski', Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.,Wellington Regional Rheumatology Unit, Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
| | - Richard J Johnson
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Ritch Te Kampe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert T Keenan
- Division of Rheumatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sara K Tedeschi
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Arthritis Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seoyoung Kim
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sung Jae Choi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical College, Ansan, South Korea
| | - Theodore R Fields
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Bardin
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, and INSERM UMR-1132 and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Till Uhlig
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tim Jansen
- Department of Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Tony Merriman
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Tristan Pascart
- Department of Rheumatology, Lille Catholic University, Saint-Philibert Hospital, Lomme, France
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Viola Klück
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Worawit Louthrenoo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schlesinger N, Edwards NL, Khanna PP, Yeo AE, Lipsky PE. Evaluation of Proposed Criteria for Remission and Evidence-Based Development of Criteria for Complete Response in Patients With Chronic Refractory Gout. ACR Open Rheumatol 2019; 1:236-243. [PMID: 31777799 PMCID: PMC6857961 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.1025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study is to assess criteria for gout remission and to use the results to inform criteria for a complete response (CR). Methods A post hoc analysis of two clinical trials was undertaken to determine the frequency with which subjects with chronic refractory gout who were treated with pegloticase met remission criteria. Mixed modeling was then employed to identify the components that best correlated with time to maximum benefit. Results Of the 56 subjects treated with biweekly pegloticase for whom adequate data were collected, 48.2% met the remission criteria. When subjects with persistent lowering of urate levels were examined separately, 27 of 32 (84.4%) met the criteria for remission. In contrast, even when the requirement for lowering of serum urate levels was waived, only 2 of 24 (8.3%) subjects without persistent lowering of urate levels and 0 of 43 subjects receiving placebo met criteria. Mixed modeling indicated that in addition to urate levels, assessment of tophi, swollen joints, and tender joints and patient global assessment best correlated with time to maximum benefit. Using these criteria of CR, 23 of the responders (71.9%) met the criteria. All patients who achieved a CR maintained it for a mean duration of 507.4 days. Finally, 64% of persistent responders to monthly pegloticase also met criteria for CR. Conclusion These results have validated the proposed remission criteria for gout and have helped define criteria for CR in individuals with chronic gout treated with pegloticase. This composite CR index can serve as an evidence-based target to inform the design and end points of future clinical trials.
Collapse
|
9
|
FitzGerald JD, Mikuls TR, Neogi T, Singh JA, Robbins M, Khanna PP, Turner AS, Myslinski R, Suter LG. Development of the American College of Rheumatology Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:659-671. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ted R. Mikuls
- VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System; and University of Nebraska Medical Center; Omaha
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; and University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Mark Robbins
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Association; Somerville Massachusetts
| | - Puja P. Khanna
- University of Michigan; and VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | | | - Lisa G. Suter
- Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center; West Haven Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5422, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagaraja V, Mara C, Khanna PP, Namas R, Young A, Fox DA, Laing T, McCune WJ, Dodge C, Rizzo D, Almackenzie M, Khanna D. Establishing clinical severity for PROMIS ® measures in adult patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res 2017; 27:755-764. [PMID: 28983738 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1709-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Different patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used for rheumatic diseases (RD). The aims of this study are-(1) Identify PROMIS® domains most relevant to care of patients with RD, (2) Collect T-Score metrics in patients with RD, and (3) Identify clinically meaningful cut-points for these domains. METHODS A convenience sample of RD patients was recruited consecutively during clinic visits, and asked to complete computer-adaptive tests on thirteen Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) instruments. Based on discussion with clinical providers, four measures were chosen to be relevant and actionable (from rheumatologists' perspective) in RD patients. Data from RD patients were used to develop clinical vignettes across a range of symptom severity. Vignettes were created based on most likely item responses at different levels on the T-score metric (mean = 50; SD = 10) and anchored at 5-point intervals (0.5 SDs). Patients with RD (N = 9) and clinical providers (N = 10) participated as expert panelists in separate one-day meetings using a modified educational standard setting method. RESULTS Four domains (physical function, pain interferences, sleep disturbance, depression) that are actionable at the point-of-care were selected. For all domains, patients endorsed cut-points at lower levels of impairment than providers by 0.5 to 1 SD (e.g., severe impairment in physical function was defined as a T-score of 35 by patients and 25 by providers). CONCLUSIONS We used a modified educational method to estimate clinically relevant cut-points to classify severity for PROMIS measures This allows for meaningful interpretation of PROMIS® measures in a clinical setting of RD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Nagaraja
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA.,University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Constance Mara
- Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave. MLC 7039, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA.,Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rajaie Namas
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - Amber Young
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA.,University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David A Fox
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - Timothy Laing
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - William J McCune
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - Carol Dodge
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - Debra Rizzo
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA
| | - Maha Almackenzie
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.,Divison of Rheumatology, University of Toledo, 3000 Arlington Ave, mailstop 1186, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5422, USA. .,University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Lautour H, Taylor WJ, Adebajo A, Alten R, Burgos-Vargas R, Chapman P, Cimmino MA, da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro G, Day R, Harrold LR, Helliwell P, Janssen M, Kerr G, Kavanaugh A, Khanna D, Khanna PP, Lin C, Louthrenoo W, McCarthy G, Vazquez-Mellado J, Mikuls TR, Neogi T, Ogdie A, Perez-Ruiz F, Schlesinger N, Ralph Schumacher H, Scirè CA, Singh JA, Sivera F, Slot O, Stamp LK, Tausche AK, Terkeltaub R, Uhlig T, van de Laar M, White D, Yamanaka H, Zeng X, Dalbeth N. Development of Preliminary Remission Criteria for Gout Using Delphi and 1000Minds Consensus Exercises. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 68:667-72. [PMID: 26414176 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish consensus for potential remission criteria to use in clinical trials of gout. METHODS Experts (n = 88) in gout from multiple countries were invited to participate in a web-based questionnaire study. Three rounds of Delphi consensus exercises were conducted using SurveyMonkey, followed by a discrete-choice experiment using 1000Minds software. The exercises focused on identifying domains, definitions for each domain, and the timeframe over which remission should be defined. RESULTS There were 49 respondents (56% response) to the initial survey, with subsequent response rates ranging from 57% to 90%. Consensus was reached for the inclusion of serum urate (98% agreement), flares (96%), tophi (92%), pain (83%), and patient global assessment of disease activity (93%) as measurement domains in remission criteria. Consensus was also reached for domain definitions, including serum urate (<0.36 mm), pain (<2 on a 10-point scale), and patient global assessment (<2 on a 10-point scale), all of which should be measured at least twice over a set time interval. Consensus was not achieved in the Delphi exercise for the timeframe for remission, with equal responses for 6 months (51%) and 1 year (49%). In the discrete-choice experiment, there was a preference towards 12 months as a timeframe for remission. CONCLUSION These consensus exercises have identified domains and provisional definitions for gout remission criteria. Based on the results of these exercises, preliminary remission criteria are proposed with domains of serum urate, acute flares, tophus, pain, and patient global assessment. These preliminary criteria now require testing in clinical data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rieke Alten
- Schlosspark-Klinik, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ric Day
- University of New South Wales and St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, and Corrona, LLC, Southborough
| | - Philip Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Gail Kerr
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Georgetown and Howard University Hospitals, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Puja P Khanna
- University of Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor
| | - Chingtsai Lin
- Taichung Veteran's General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Geraldine McCarthy
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Ted R Mikuls
- Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Fernando Perez-Ruiz
- Hospital Universitario Cruces, OSI-EEC, and Biocruces Health Research Institute, Biscay, Spain
| | - Naomi Schlesinger
- Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | - Carlo A Scirè
- IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham
| | | | - Ole Slot
- Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Till Uhlig
- National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Douglas White
- Waikato DHB and Waikato Clinical School, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Xuejun Zeng
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- University of Auckland and Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh JA, Bharat A, Khanna D, Aquino-Beaton C, Persselin JE, Duffy E, Elashoff D, Khanna PP. Health care utilization in patients with gout: a prospective multicenter cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:233. [PMID: 28569193 PMCID: PMC5452408 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1573-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND All published studies of health care utilization in gout have been cross-sectional to date, and most used a patient-reported diagnosis of gout. Our objective was to assess health care utilization and its predictors in patients with physician-confirmed gout in a prospective cohort study. METHODS In a multi-center prospective cohort study of U.S. veterans with rheumatologist-confirmed gout (N = 186; two centers), we assessed patient self-reported overall and gout-specific health care utilization with the Gout Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) every 3-months for a 9-month period. Comparisons were made using the student's t test or the chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to assess potential correlates of gout-related health care utilization. RESULTS Mean age was 64.6 years, 98% were men, 13% Hispanic or Latino, 32% were African-American, 6% did not graduate high school, mean serum urate was 8.3 and mean Deyo-Charlson score was 3.1. During the past year, mean gout-related visits were as follows: rheumatologist, 1.5; primary care physician, 2 visits; ≥1 inpatient visits, 7%; ≥1 ER visits, 26%; and urgent care/walk-in visit, 33%. In longitudinal analyses, African-American race and gout flares in the last 3 months were associated with significantly higher rate ratio of gout-related outpatient visits. African-American race and lack of college education were associated with significantly higher rate ratio for gout-related urgent visits and overnight stays. CONCLUSIONS African-American race and recent gout flares were associated with higher outpatient utilization and African-American race and no college education with higher urgent or inpatient utilization. Future studies should examine whether modifiable predictors of utilization can be targeted to reduce healthcare utilization in patients with gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasvinder A Singh
- Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, and Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, 35294, AL, USA. .,Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Aseem Bharat
- Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Jay E Persselin
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin Duffy
- University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Puja P Khanna
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khanna D, Hays RD, Shreiner AB, Melmed GY, Chang L, Khanna PP, Bolus R, Whitman C, Paz SH, Hays T, Reise SP, Spiegel B. Responsiveness to Change and Minimally Important Differences of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:1186-1192. [PMID: 28251500 PMCID: PMC5532518 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4499-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NIH-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms scales were developed to assess patients' GI symptoms in clinical settings. AIMS To assess responsiveness to change and provide minimally important difference (MID) estimates for the PROMIS GI Symptoms scales. METHODS A sample of 256 GI outpatients self-administered the eight PROMIS GI Symptoms scales (gastroesophageal reflux, disrupted swallowing, diarrhea, bowel incontinence/soilage, nausea and vomiting, constipation, belly pain, and gas/bloating/flatulence) at two visits. Patient self-reported and physician-reported assessments of the subjects' overall GI condition were employed as change anchors. In addition, we prospectively assessed change at both visits using a GI-symptom anchor, the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Responsiveness to change was assessed using F-statistics. The minimally changed group was those somewhat better or somewhat worse on the retrospective anchors and changing by one category on the modified GSRS (e.g., from slight to mild discomfort to moderate to moderately severe discomfort). RESULTS Responsiveness to change was statistically significant for 6 of 8 PROMIS scales using the self-report GI anchor, 3 of 8 scales using the physician-reported anchor, and 5 of 5 scales using the corresponding GSRS scales as anchors. The MID estimates for scales for improvement and worsening were about 0.5-0.6 SD using the GSRS anchor and generally larger in magnitude than the change for the "about the same" group. CONCLUSIONS The responsiveness and MID estimates provided here for the PROMIS GI Symptoms scales can aid in scale score interpretation in clinical trials and observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5370, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA,Division of Rheumatology/Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, 300 North Ingalls Street, Suite 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ron D. Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Andrew B. Shreiner
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5362, USA
| | - Gil Y. Melmed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Lin Chang
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA,G. Oppenheimer Family Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Puja P. Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC 5370, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Roger Bolus
- Department of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA,UCLA/VA Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
| | - Cynthia Whitman
- UCLA/VA Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
| | - Sylvia H. Paz
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Tonya Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Steven P. Reise
- UCLA Department of Psychology, 3857 Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Brennan Spiegel
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 911 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA,Department of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA,UCLA/VA Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA,Medicine and Public Health, Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Cedars-Sinai and UCLA, 8723 W. Alden Drive, Steven Spielberg Building, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bardin T, Keenan RT, Khanna PP, Kopicko J, Fung M, Bhakta N, Adler S, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, So A. Lesinurad in combination with allopurinol: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with gout with inadequate response to standard of care (the multinational CLEAR 2 study). Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:811-820. [PMID: 27821644 PMCID: PMC5530336 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Determine the efficacy and safety of daily lesinurad (200 or 400 mg orally) added to allopurinol in patients with serum uric acid (sUA) above target in a 12-month, randomised, phase III trial. Methods Patients on allopurinol ≥300 mg (≥200 mg in moderate renal impairment) had sUA level of ≥6.5 mg/dL (≥387 µmol/L) at screening and two or more gout flares in the prior year. Primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving sUA level of <6.0 mg/dL (<357 µmol/L) (month 6). Key secondary end points were mean gout flare rate requiring treatment (months 7 through 12) and proportions of patients with complete resolution of one or more target tophi (month 12). Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory data. Results Patients (n=610) were predominantly male, with mean (±SD) age 51.2±10.90 years, gout duration 11.5±9.26 years and baseline sUA of 6.9±1.2 mg/dL (410±71 µmol/L). Lesinurad at 200 and 400 mg doses, added to allopurinol, significantly increased proportions of patients achieving sUA target versus allopurinol-alone therapy by month 6 (55.4%, 66.5% and 23.3%, respectively, p<0.0001 both lesinurad+allopurinol groups). In key secondary end points, there were no statistically significant treatment-group differences favouring lesinurad. Lesinurad was generally well tolerated; the 200 mg dose had a safety profile comparable with allopurinol-alone therapy. Renal-related adverse events occurred in 5.9% of lesinurad 200 mg+allopurinol, 15.0% of lesinurad 400 mg+allopurinol and 4.9% of allopurinol-alone groups, with serum creatinine elevation of ≥1.5× baseline in 5.9%, 15.0% and 3.4%, respectively. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 4.4% of lesinurad 200 mg+allopurinol, in 9.5% of lesinurad 400 mg+allopurinol and in 3.9% of allopurinol-alone groups, respectively. Conclusion Lesinurad added to allopurinol demonstrated superior sUA lowering versus allopurinol-alone therapy and lesinurad 200 mg was generally well tolerated in patients with gout warranting additional therapy. Trial registration number NCT01493531.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bardin
- Rhumatologie, Lariboisière Hospital, and Université Paris Diderot Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France
| | - Robert T Keenan
- Division of Rheumatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jeff Kopicko
- Biometrics, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Maple Fung
- Research & Development, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Nihar Bhakta
- Research & Development, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Scott Adler
- Research & Development, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Chris Storgard
- Research & Development, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Scott Baumgartner
- Medical Affairs, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Alexander So
- Service de rhumatologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singh JA, Bharat A, Khanna D, Aquino-Beaton C, Persselin JE, Duffy E, Elashoff D, Khanna PP. Racial differences in health-related quality of life and functional ability in patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 56:103-112. [PMID: 28028159 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the functional ability by race in patients with gout. METHODS In a 9-month prospective cohort multicentre study, patients with gout self-reported race, dichotomized as Caucasian or African American (others excluded). We calculated HRQOL/function scores adjusted for age, study site and college education for Short Form-36 (SF-36; generic HRQOL), Gout Impact Scale (GIS; disease-specific HRQOL) and HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI; functional ability). Longitudinally adjusted scores were computed using multivariable mixed-effect regression models with a random patient effect and fixed sequential visit effect (3-monthly visits). RESULTS Compared with Caucasians (n = 107), African Americans (n = 60) with gout were younger (61.1 vs 67.3 years) and had higher median baseline serum urate (9.0 vs 7.9 mg/dl) (P < 0.01). African Americans with gout had worse HRQOL scores on three SF-36 domains, the mental component summary (MCS) and two of the five GIS scales than Caucasians [mean (se); P ⩽ 0.02 for all]: SF-36 mental health, 39.7 (1.1) vs 45.2 (0.9); SF-36 role emotional, 42.1 (4.2) vs 51.4 (4.2); SF-36 social functioning, 36.0 (1.1) vs 40.0 (0.9) (P = 0.04); SF-36 MCS, 43.2 (3.1) vs 50.0 (3.2); GIS unmet treatment need, 37.6 (1.6) vs 31.5 (1.4); and GIS concern during attacks, 53.3 (3.7) vs 47.4 (3.7). Differences between the respective HAQ-DI total scores were not statistically significant; 0.98 (0.1) vs 0.80 (1.0) (P = 0.11). Racial differences in SF-36 mental health, role emotional and MCS scales exceeded, and for HAQ-DI approached, the minimal clinically important difference thresholds. CONCLUSIONS African Americans with gout have significantly worse HRQOL compared with Caucasians. Further research is necessary in the form of studies targeted at African Americans on how best to improve these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasvinder A Singh
- Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center .,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine.,Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Aseem Bharat
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine.,Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Jay E Persselin
- Department of Biostatistics, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
| | - Erin Duffy
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.,Department of Medicine, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wallace B, Khanna D, Aquino-Beaton C, Singh JA, Duffy E, Elashoff D, Khanna PP. Performance of Gout Impact Scale in a longitudinal observational study of patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55:982-90. [PMID: 26888852 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness to change of the Gout Impact Scale (GIS), a disease-specific measure of patient-reported outcomes, in a multicentre longitudinal prospective cohort of gout patients. METHODS Subjects completed the GIS, a 24-item instrument with five scales: Concern Overall, Medication Side Effects, Unmet Treatment Need, Well-Being during Attack, and Concern Over Attack. The total GIS score was calculated by averaging the GIS scale scores. HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form (SF)-36 physical and mental component summaries (PCS and MCS) and physician and patient gout severity assessments were also completed. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α. Baseline GIS scores were compared in subjects with and without gout attacks in the past 3 months using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate predictors of total GIS. Pearson's correlation coefficients 0.24-0.36 were considered moderate and >0.37 considered large. The effect size for responsiveness to change was interpreted as follows: 0.20-0.49 small, 0.50-0.79 medium and >0.79 large. RESULTS In 147 subjects, reliability was acceptable for total GIS (0.93) and all GIS scales (0.82-0.94) except Medication Side Effects and Unmet Treatment Need. Total GIS and all scales except Medication Side Effects discriminated between subjects with and without recent gout attacks (P < 0.05). Total GIS showed moderate-to-large correlations with HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS and MCS (0.33-0.46). Improvement in total GIS tracked with improved physician and patient severity scores. Worsening physician severity score and recent gout attack predicted worsening total GIS. CONCLUSION Total GIS score is reliable, valid and responsive to change in patients with gout, and differentiates between subjects with and without recent gout attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Wallace
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Cleopatra Aquino-Beaton
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, University of Alabama and Birmingham VA, Birmingham, AL
| | - Erin Duffy
- University of California Los Angeles Department of Medicine Statistics Core, Los Angeles, CA and
| | - David Elashoff
- University of California Los Angeles Department of Medicine Statistics Core, Los Angeles, CA and
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spiegel BMR, Hays RD, Bolus R, Melmed GY, Chang L, Whitman C, Khanna PP, Paz SH, Hays T, Reise S, Khanna D. Corrigendum: development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) gastrointestinal symptom scales. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:608. [PMID: 25853211 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
19
|
Khanna PP, Shiozawa A, Walker V, Bancroft T, Essoi B, Akhras KS, Khanna D. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients with gout: results from a cross-sectional study in a managed care setting. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9:971-81. [PMID: 26185426 PMCID: PMC4501348 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s83700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction with treatment directly impacts adherence to medication. OBJECTIVE The objective was to assess and compare treatment satisfaction with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), gout-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with the Gout Impact Scale (GIS), and generic HRQoL with the SF-12v2(®) Health Survey (SF-12) in patients with gout in a real-world practice setting. METHODS This cross-sectional mail survey included gout patients enrolled in a large commercial health plan in the US. Patients were ≥18 years with self-reported gout diagnosis, who filled ≥1 prescription for febuxostat during April 26, 2012 to July 26, 2012 and were not taking any other urate-lowering therapies. The survey included the TSQM version II (TSQM vII, score 0-100, higher scores indicate better satisfaction), GIS (score 0-100, higher scores indicate worse condition), and SF-12 (physical component summary and mental component summary). Patients were stratified by self-report of currently experiencing a gout attack or not to assess the discriminant ability of the questionnaires. RESULTS A total of 257 patients were included in the analysis (mean age, 54.9 years; 87% male). Patients with current gout attack (n=29, 11%) had worse scores than those without gout attack on most instrument scales. Mean differences between current attack and no current attack for the TSQM domains were: -20.6, effectiveness; -10.6, side effects; -12.1, global satisfaction (all P<0.05); and -6.1, convenience (NS). For the GIS, mean differences were: 30.5, gout overall concern; 14.6, gout medication side effects; 22.7, unmet gout treatment needs; 11.5, gout concern during attack (all P<0.05); and 7.9, well-being during attack (NS). Mean difference in SF-12 was -6.6 for physical component summary (P<0.05) and -2.9 for mental component summary (NS). Correlations between several TSQM and GIS scales were moderate. CONCLUSION The TSQM and GIS were complementary in evaluating the impact of gout flare on treatment satisfaction and HRQoL. Correlations between the two instruments supported the relationship between treatment satisfaction and HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja P Khanna
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Aki Shiozawa
- Global Outcome Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA
- Correspondence: Aki Shiozawa, Global Outcome Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., One Takeda Parkway, Deerfield, IL 60015, USA, Tel +1 224 554 7161, Fax +1 224 554 7983, Email
| | - Valery Walker
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Tim Bancroft
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Breanna Essoi
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Kasem S Akhras
- Novartis Pharmacy Services AG, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nagaraja V, Hays RD, Khanna PP, Spiegel BMR, Chang L, Melmed GY, Bolus R, Khanna D. Construct validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System gastrointestinal symptom scales in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66:1725-30. [PMID: 24692332 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gastrointestinal (GI) involvement is common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) GI symptom item bank captures upper and lower GI symptoms (reflux, disrupted swallowing, nausea/vomiting, belly pain, gas/bloating/flatulence, diarrhea, constipation, and fecal incontinence). The objective of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of the PROMIS GI bank in SSc. METHODS A total of 167 patients with SSc were administered the PROMIS GI bank and the University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Scale (GIT 2.0) instrument. GIT 2.0 is a multi-item instrument that measures SSc-associated GI symptoms. Product-moment correlations and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of the PROMIS GI scales with the GIT 2.0 symptom scales were used to evaluate convergent and discriminant validity. RESULTS Patients with SSc GI involvement had PROMIS GI scale scores 0.2-0.7 SD worse than the US general population. Correlations among scales measuring the same domains for the PROMIS GI and GIT 2.0 measures were large, ranging from 0.61 to 0.87 (average r = 0.77). The average correlation between different symptom scales was 0.22, supporting discriminant validity. CONCLUSION This study provides support for the construct validity of the PROMIS GI scales in SSc. Future research is needed to assess the responsiveness to change of these scales in patients with SSc.
Collapse
|
21
|
Spiegel BM, Hays RD, Bolus R, Melmed GY, Chang L, Whitman C, Khanna PP, Paz SH, Hays T, Reise S, Khanna D. Development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) gastrointestinal symptom scales. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1804-14. [PMID: 25199473 PMCID: PMC4285435 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) is a standardized set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that cover physical, mental, and social health. The aim of this study was to develop the NIH PROMIS gastrointestinal (GI) symptom measures. METHODS We first conducted a systematic literature review to develop a broad conceptual model of GI symptoms. We complemented the review with 12 focus groups including 102 GI patients. We developed PROMIS items based on the literature and input from the focus groups followed by cognitive debriefing in 28 patients. We administered the items to diverse GI patients (irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and other common GI disorders) and a census-based US general population (GP) control sample. We created scales based on confirmatory factor analyses and item response theory modeling, and evaluated the scales for reliability and validity. RESULTS A total of 102 items were developed and administered to 865 patients with GI conditions and 1,177 GP participants. Factor analyses provided support for eight scales: gastroesophageal reflux (13 items), disrupted swallowing (7 items), diarrhea (5 items), bowel incontinence/soilage (4 items), nausea and vomiting (4 items), constipation (9 items), belly pain (6 items), and gas/bloat/flatulence (12 items). The scales correlated significantly with both generic and disease-targeted legacy instruments, and demonstrate evidence of reliability. CONCLUSIONS Using the NIH PROMIS framework, we developed eight GI symptom scales that can now be used for clinical care and research across the full range of GI disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan M.R. Spiegel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA,Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA,Department of Gastroenterology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ron D. Hays
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA,Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Roger Bolus
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gil Y. Melmed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lin Chang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA,Gail and Gerald Oppenheimer Family Center for Neurobiology of Stress, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cynthia Whitman
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Puja P. Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sylvia H. Paz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tonya Hays
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Steve Reise
- Department of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Five core domains have been endorsed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) for acute gout: pain, joint swelling, joint tenderness, patient global assessment, and activity limitation. We evaluated instruments for these domains according to the OMERACT filter: truth, feasibility, and discrimination. METHODS A systematic search strategy for instruments used to measure the acute gout core domains was formulated. For each method, articles were assessed by 2 reviewers to summarize information according to the specific components of the OMERACT filter. RESULTS Seventy-seven articles and abstracts met the inclusion criteria. Pain was most frequently reported (76 studies, 20 instruments). The pain instruments used most often were 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and 5-point Likert scale. Both methods have high feasibility, face and content validity, and within- and between-group discrimination. Four-point Likert scales assessing index joint swelling and tenderness have been used in numerous acute gout studies; these instruments are feasible, with high face and content validity, and show within- and between-group discrimination. Five-point Patient Global Assessment of Response to Treatment (PGART) scales are feasible and valid, and show within- and between-group discrimination. Measures of activity limitations were infrequently reported, and insufficient data were available to make definite assessments of the instruments for this domain. CONCLUSION Many different instruments have been used to assess the acute gout core domains. Pain VAS and 5-point Likert scales, 4-point Likert scales of index joint swelling and tenderness and 5-point PGART instruments meet the criteria for the OMERACT filter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cathy S Zhong
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. USA
| | - Fiona M McQueen
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - William J Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, Bae S, Singh MK, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Lioté F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013. [PMID: 23024028 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21772;10.1002/acr.21772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
24
|
Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, Singh MK, Bae S, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Lioté F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 64:1447-61. [PMID: 23024029 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 481] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
25
|
Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, Singh MK, Bae S, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Lioté F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013. [PMID: 23024029 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21773;10.1002/acr.21773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
26
|
Khanna D, FitzGerald JD, Khanna PP, Bae S, Singh M, Neogi T, Pillinger MH, Merill J, Lee S, Prakash S, Kaldas M, Gogia M, Perez-Ruiz F, Taylor W, Lioté F, Choi H, Singh JA, Dalbeth N, Kaplan S, Niyyar V, Jones D, Yarows SA, Roessler B, Kerr G, King C, Levy G, Furst DE, Edwards NL, Mandell B, Schumacher HR, Robbins M, Wenger N, Terkeltaub R. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64:1431-46. [PMID: 23024028 PMCID: PMC3683400 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1049] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sangmee Bae
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Joan Merill
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Susan Lee
- VA Healthcare System and University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Marian Kaldas
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maneesh Gogia
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Will Taylor
- University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Frédéric Lioté
- Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, and Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Hyon Choi
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jasvinder A. Singh
- VA Medical Center. Birmingham, Alabama and University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Sanford Kaplan
- Private Practice, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Beverly Hills, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gail Kerr
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | | | - Gerald Levy
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Downey, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Robbins
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates/Atrius Health, Somerville, MA
| | - Neil Wenger
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert Terkeltaub
- VA Healthcare System and University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khanna PP, Nuki G, Bardin T, Tausche AK, Forsythe A, Goren A, Vietri J, Khanna D. Tophi and frequent gout flares are associated with impairments to quality of life, productivity, and increased healthcare resource use: Results from a cross-sectional survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10:117. [PMID: 22999027 PMCID: PMC3499162 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of gout is increasing, and most research on the associated burden has focused on serum urate (sUA) levels. The present study quantifies the impact of the presence of tophi and frequency of acute gout attacks on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), productivity, and healthcare resource utilization. Methods Patients with self-reported gout (n = 620; 338 in US and 282 across France, Germany, and UK) were contacted based on inclusion in the 2010 US and EU National Health and Wellness Surveys (Kantar Health) and the Lightspeed Research ailment panel. Respondents were categorized into mutually-exclusive groups based on number of gout flares experienced in the past 12 months (0/don’t recall, 1–2, 3, 4–5, 6+), current presence of tophi (none, 1+, or not sure), and sUA level awareness (yes, no). HRQOL (SF-12v2), healthcare provider visits in the last 6 months, and work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) were compared across groups. Results Most patients were males, mean age of 61 years, who reported experiencing at least one acute gout flare in the past 12 months, and 12.3% (n = 76) reported presence of tophi. Among the 27.7% (n = 172) of patients who were aware of their sUA levels, higher sUA was associated with more flares and tophi. Decreased HRQOL was associated with more frequent flares and presence of tophi. In multivariable models predicting outcomes based on presence of tophi and number of flares, both flares (≥4) and tophi (≥1) were associated with HRQOL decrements on physical and mental component summary scores and health utilities (all p < 0.05), after adjustment for age, gender, and time since diagnosis. Flares were also associated with greater activity impairment. Conclusions Impairments associated with gout flares and presence of tophi, across patients in the US and EU, underscore the importance of effective management of this potentially curable condition.
Collapse
|
28
|
Khanna D, Krishnan E, Dewitt EM, Khanna PP, Spiegel B, Hays RD. The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 63 Suppl 11:S486-90. [PMID: 22588770 DOI: 10.1002/acr.20581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stamp LK, Khanna PP, Dalbeth N, Boers M, Maksymowych WP, Schumacher HR, Becker MA, MacDonald PA, Edwards NL, Singh JA, Simon LS, McQueen FM, Neogi T, Gaffo AL, Strand V, Taylor WJ. Serum urate in chronic gout--will it be the first validated soluble biomarker in rheumatology? J Rheumatol 2012; 38:1462-6. [PMID: 21724717 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize evidence for and endorsement of serum urate (SU) as having fulfilled the OMERACT filter as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout at the 2010 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Meeting (OMERACT 10). METHODS Data were presented to support the use of SU as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout and specifically the ability to utilize it to predict future patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS SU was accepted as having fulfilled the OMERACT filter by 78% of voters. However, consensus was not obtained regarding its use as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout. Although the majority of the criteria for a soluble biomarker were fulfilled, the key criterion of association of the biomarker with outcomes was not agreed upon. It was agreed that the appropriate choice of endpoint must be linked to its clinical importance to the individual with the disorder and its temporal relationship to the intervention. Appropriate outcomes in chronic gout may therefore include gout flares, reduction in tophi, and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION SU is a critical outcome measure. It has the potential to fulfil criteria for a soluble biomarker. Further analyses of existing data from randomized controlled trials will be required to determine whether SU can predict future important outcomes, in particular disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa K Stamp
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Taylor WJ, Singh JA, Saag KG, Dalbeth N, MacDonald PA, Edwards NL, Simon LS, Stamp LK, Neogi T, Gaffo AL, Khanna PP, Becker MA, Schumacher HR. Bringing it all together: a novel approach to the development of response criteria for chronic gout clinical trials. J Rheumatol 2012; 38:1467-70. [PMID: 21724718 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review a novel approach for constructing composite response criteria for use in chronic gout clinical trials that implements a method of multicriteria decision-making. METHODS Preliminary work with paper patient profiles led to a restricted set of core-set domains that were examined using 1000Minds™ by rheumatologists with an interest in gout, and (separately) by OMERACT registrants prior to OMERACT 10. These results and the 1000Minds approach were discussed during OMERACT 10 to help guide next steps in developing composite response criteria. RESULTS There were differences in how individual indicators of response were weighted between gout experts and OMERACT registrants. Gout experts placed more weight upon changes in uric acid levels, whereas OMERACT registrants placed more weight upon reducing flares. Discussion highlighted the need for a "pain" domain to be included, for "worsening" to be an additional level within each indicator, for a group process to determine the decision-making within a 1000Minds exercise, and for the value of patient involvement. CONCLUSION Although there was not unanimous support for the 1000Minds approach to inform the construction of composite response criteria, there is sufficient interest to justify ongoing development of this methodology and its application to real clinical trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dalbeth N, McQueen FM, Singh JA, MacDonald PA, Edwards NL, Schumacher HR, Simon LS, Stamp LK, Neogi T, Gaffo AL, Khanna PP, Becker MA, Taylor WJ. Tophus measurement as an outcome measure for clinical trials of chronic gout: progress and research priorities. J Rheumatol 2012; 38:1458-61. [PMID: 21724716 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Despite the recognition that tophus regression is an important outcome measure in clinical trials of chronic gout, there is no agreed upon method of tophus measurement. A number of methods have been used in clinical trials of chronic gout, from simple physical measurement techniques to more complex advanced imaging methods. This article summarizes methods of tophus measurement and discusses their properties. Physical measurement using Vernier calipers meets most aspects of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) filter. Rigorous testing of the complex methods, particularly with respect to reliability and sensitivity to change, is needed to determine the appropriate use of these methods. Further information is also required regarding which method of physical measurement is best for use in future clinical trials. The need to develop and test a patient-reported outcome measure of tophus burden is also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Dalbeth
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Khanna D, Maranian P, Rothrock N, Cella D, Gershon R, Khanna PP, Spiegel B, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Bechtel A, Hays RD. Feasibility and construct validity of PROMIS and "legacy" instruments in an academic scleroderma clinic. Value Health 2012; 15:128-134. [PMID: 22264980 PMCID: PMC3457915 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2011] [Revised: 07/17/2011] [Accepted: 08/08/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) roadmap initiative is a cooperative group program of research designed to develop, evaluate, and standardize item banks to measure patient-reported outcomes relevant across medical conditions. The objective of the current study was to assess feasibility and evaluation of the construct validity of PROMIS item banks versus legacy measures in an observational study in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We hypothesized that the PROMIS item banks can be administered in a clinical setting if there is adequate staff support without disrupting the flow of clinic. METHODS Patients with SSc in a single academic center completed computerized adaptive test (CAT) administered PROMIS item banks during the clinic visit and legacy measures (using paper and pencil). The construct validity of PROMIS items was evaluated by examining correlations with corresponding legacy measures using multitrait-multimethod analysis. RESULTS Participants consisted of 143 SSc patients with an average age of 51.5 years; 71% were female and 68% were white. The average number of items completed for each CAT-administered item bank ranged from 5 to 8 (69 CAT items per patient), and the average time to complete each CAT-administered item bank ranged from 48 seconds to 1.9 minutes per patient (average time = 11.9 minutes/per patient for 11 banks). All correlations between PROMIS domains and respective legacy measures were large and in the hypothesized direction (ranged from 0.61 to 0.82). CONCLUSION Our study supports the construct validity of the CAT-administered PROMIS item banks and shows that they can be administered successfully in a clinic with support staff. Future studies should assess the feasibility of PROMIS item banks in a busy clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Singh JA, Taylor WJ, Simon LS, Khanna PP, Stamp LK, McQueen FM, Neogi T, Gaffo AL, Becker MA, MacDonald PA, Dabbous O, Strand V, Dalbeth ND, Aletaha D, Edwards NL, Schumacher HR. Patient-reported outcomes in chronic gout: a report from OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol 2011; 38:1452-7. [PMID: 21724715 PMCID: PMC3850171 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the endorsement of measures of patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains in chronic gout at the 2010 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Meeting (OMERACT 10). METHODS During the OMERACT 10 gout workshop, validation data were presented for key PRO domains including pain [pain by visual analog scale (VAS)], patient global (patient global VAS), activity limitation [Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)], and a disease-specific measure, the Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ v2.0). Data were presented on all 3 aspects of the OMERACT filters of truth, discrimination, and feasibility. One PRO, health-related quality of life measurement with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 36 (SF-36), was previously endorsed at OMERACT 9. RESULTS One measure for each of the 3 PRO of pain, patient global, and activity limitation was endorsed by > 70% of the OMERACT delegates to have appropriate validation data. Specifically, pain measurement by VAS was endorsed by 85%, patient global assessment by VAS by 73%, and activity limitation by HAQ-DI by 71%. GAQ v2.0 received 30% vote and was not endorsed due to several concerns including low internal consistency and lack of familiarity with the measure. More validation studies are needed for this measure. CONCLUSION With the endorsement of one measure each for pain, patient global, SF-36, and activity limitation, all 4 PRO for chronic gout have been endorsed. Future validation studies are needed for the disease-specific measure, GAQ v2.0. Validation for PRO for acute gout will be the focus of the next validation exercise for the OMERACT gout group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasvinder A Singh
- Medicine Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Khanna D, Sarkin AJ, Khanna PP, Shieh MM, Kavanaugh AF, Terkeltaub RA, Lee SJ, Singh JA, Hirsch JD. Minimally important differences of the gout impact scale in a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50:1331-6. [PMID: 21372003 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Gout Impact Scale (GIS) is a gout-specific quality of life instrument that assesses impact of gout during an attack and impact of overall gout. The GIS has five scales and each is scored from 0 to 100 (worse health). Our objective was to assess minimally important differences (MIDs) for the GIS administered in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing rilonacept vs placebo for prevention of gout flares during initiation of allopurinol therapy. METHODS Trial subjects (n = 83) included those with two or more gout flares (self-reported) in the past year. Of these, 73 had data for Weeks 8 vs 4 and formed the MID analysis group and were analysed irrespective of the treatment assignment. Subjects completed the GIS and seven patient-reported anchors. Subjects with a one-step change (e.g. from very poor to poor) were considered as the MID group for each anchor. The mean change in GIS scores and effect size (ES) was calculated for each anchor's MID group. The average of these created the overall summary MID statistics for each GIS. An ES of 0.2-0.5 was considered to represent MID estimates. Results. Trial subjects (n = 73) were males (96.0%), White (90.4%), with mean age of 50.5 years and serum uric acid of 9.0 mg/dl. The mean change score for the MID improvement group for scales ranged from -5.24 to -7.61 (0-100 scale). The ES for the MID improvement group for the four scales ranged from 0.22 to 0.38. CONCLUSION The MID estimates for GIS scales are between 5 and 8 points (0-100 scale). This information can aid in interpreting the GIS results in future gout RCTs. Trial Registration. Clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00610363.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Khanna D, Kowal-Bielecka O, Khanna PP, Lapinska A, Asch SM, Wenger N, Brown KK, Clements PJ, Getzug T, Mayes MD, Medsger TA, Oudiz R, Simms R, Steen V, Maranian P, Furst DE. Quality indicator set for systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011; 29:S33-S39. [PMID: 21586216 PMCID: PMC3887520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2011] [Accepted: 04/14/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with a marked economic burden, high treatment costs and decreased productivity. Although treatment strategies for SSc can have a substantial effect on patients' outcomes, it is not known whether patients with SSc consistently receive such care. Evaluation of process-of-care quality requires specification of quality indicators (QIs), clinically detailed statements of the eligible patients and the care they should receive to achieve a minimal level of quality of care. Our objective was to develop QIs for patients with SSc. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature review of diagnosis and treatment of SSc and proposed QIs that were evaluated by a national Expert Panel (n=9) who were asked to review the supporting literature and individually rank the validity of each QI. These rankings formed the basis of discussion at a face-to-face meeting following the RAND/UCLA method to integrate expert opinion with literature review to identify a set of final QIs. We then presented these QIs to members of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC). RESULTS Thirty-two QIs for SSc care were judged valid by the Expert Panel. The QI set includes 9 QIs for newly diagnosed with SSc, 12 follow-up QIs for management of SSc, and 11 treatment QIs. The SCTC experts agreed with the validity of each of the 32 QI and agreed that for all but one QI the specified tests, procedures and treatments recommended in the QI were generally available. CONCLUSIONS We have developed 32 QIs for SSc using a rigorous methodology that can be employed to evaluate and improve care for patients with SSc, as well as inform policy decisions supporting appropriate care for SSc patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khanna PP, Perez-Ruiz F, Maranian P, Khanna D. Long-term therapy for chronic gout results in clinically important improvements in the health-related quality of life: short form-36 is responsive to change in chronic gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 50:740-5. [PMID: 21147824 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a validated outcome measure to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with gout. We assessed responsiveness to change of SF-36 in patients with gout. METHODS SF-36 was administered at baseline and at yearly intervals. We assessed the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) at the first and second year. We also assessed the responsiveness to change (effect size) and interpreted it based on Cohen's criteria. We modelled the improvement (defined as ≥MCID) in SF-36 scales and summary scores. Covariates included age, presence of tophi, comorbidities, baseline joint involvement, baseline serum urate, change in serum urate and the number of flares from baseline to 12 months. RESULTS Of 99 subjects, 96 were male, mean age was 57.1 years, disease duration was 8.2 years and 40.4% had tophi. Ninety-two patients were treated with urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and daily colchicine, and seven were only on colchicine. Baseline mean serum urate level was 8.9 mg/dl and mean number of flares was 4.7 over last year. ULTs were associated with reduction in serum uric acid and number of flares (P < 0.001 for both) over 12 months. Therapy was associated with 22-70% of the patients achieving MCID in SF-36 scores at 12 months. Effect size estimates ranged from negligible to large (SF-36 mental component summary 0.08-bodily pain 1.09). Reduction in flares independently predicted improvements in three SF-36 physical scales (P = 0.001-0.06). Improvement in SF-36 scores was maintained at 2 years. CONCLUSION In our real-life observational cohort, chronic urate lowering therapy and colchicine was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL at 1 year and then maintained at 2 years. SF-36, especially physical domains and physical component summary, are responsive to change in gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja P Khanna
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Khanna D, Frech T, Khanna PP, Kaplan RM, Eckman MH, Hays RD, Ginsburg SS, Leonard AC, Tsevat J. Valuation of scleroderma and psoriatic arthritis health states by the general public. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8:112. [PMID: 20920309 PMCID: PMC2959096 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2010] [Accepted: 10/01/2010] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and scleroderma (SSc) are chronic rheumatic disorders with detrimental effects on health-related quality of life. Our objective was to assess health values (utilities) from the general public for health states common to people with PsA and SSc for economic evaluations. Methods Adult subjects from the general population in a Midwestern city (N = 218) completed the SF-12 Health Survey and computer-assisted 0-100 rating scale (RS), time trade-off (TTO, range: 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG, range: 0.0-1.0) utility assessments for several hypothetical PsA and SSc health states. Results Subjects included 135 (62%) females, 143 (66%) Caucasians, and 62 (28%) African-Americans. The mean (SD) scores for the SF-12 Physical Component Summary scale were 52.9 (8.3) and for the SF-12 Mental Component Summary scale were 49.0 (9.1), close to population norms. The mean RS, TTO, and SG scores for PsA health states varied with severity, ranging from 20.2 to 63.7 (14.4-20.3) for the RS 0.29 to 0.78 (0.24-0.31) for the TTO, and 0.48 to 0.82 (0.24-0.34) for the SG. The mean RS, TTO, and SG scores for SSc health states were 25.3-69.7 (15.2-16.3) for the RS, 0.36-0.80 (0.25-0.31) for the TTO, and 0.50-0.81 (0.26-0.32) for the SG, depending on disease severity. Conclusion Health utilities for PsA and SSc health states as assessed from the general public reflect the severity of the diseases. These descriptive findings could have implications regarding comparative effectiveness research for tests and treatments for PsA and SSc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nashid M, Khanna PP, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Maranian P, Seibold J, Postlethwaite AE, Louie JS, Mayes MD, Agrawal H, Khanna D. Gender and ethnicity differences in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis--analysis from three large randomized clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 50:335-42. [PMID: 20889574 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the incidence of dcSSc is higher in African-American and Hispanic populations compared with European Caucasian patients, it is not clear whether there are differences in subsequent disease course. Also, the potential impact of gender on the disease course of dcSSc is not well defined. Our objective was to assess the course of modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS), HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI) and forced vital capacity per cent (FVC%) predicted between men vs women and three ethnic groups with dcSSc participating in three randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHOD Data from RCTs (n = 495) were pooled and analysed. Baseline characteristics were compared in men vs women and among ethnic groups. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess the predictors of MRSS, HAQ-DI and FVC%. The primary independent variables were time-in-study and its interaction with gender and ethnicity. The models were adjusted for other covariates that were significant at baseline between gender and ethnicity analyses. RESULTS Men had lower HAQI-DI scores compared with women (P < 0.05). Among the three ethnic groups, Caucasians were older, African-Americans had lower FVC% predicted and Hispanics had greater tender joint counts (P < 0.05). The course of MRSS, HAQ-DI and FVC% predicted during the study period was not significantly different between gender and three ethnicities. Time-in-study was an independent predictor of improvement in MRSS and HAQ-DI. CONCLUSION Our analysis explores the influence of gender and ethnicity on disease course in RCTs. These findings are relevant to issues of future trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Nashid
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Khanna PP, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Maranian P, Indulkar L, Khanna D. Tendon friction rubs in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: prevalence, characteristics and longitudinal changes in a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49:955-9. [PMID: 20144926 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the baseline tendon friction rubs (TFRs) in early dcSSc and to evaluate the association of change in TFR over 6 and 12 months with changes in modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) and HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) over 12 and 24 months, respectively. METHODS We analysed data from the d-Pen study, a 2-year study in early dcSSc (< or =18 months from first non-Raynaud's symptom). TFR was scored as present/absent at seven anatomical sites at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Multivariable linear regression models assessed associations between TFR and change in MRSS, and change in the HAQ-DI, over 12 and 24 months, respectively. Covariates included baseline TFR, change in the TFR over 6 and 12 months, age, sex, duration of SSc, MRSS, and tender joint count and swollen joint count (SJC). RESULTS Forty-nine (37%) of 134 patients had TFR at baseline, 50% had resolution of their TFR, whereas 21% developed new TFRs. Patients with baseline TFRs were likely to be Caucasian (86 vs 58%) and had a higher HAQ-DI score (P = 0.008). In regression analyses, change in TFR (P = 0.04) and baseline MRSS (P = 0.03) predicted change in MRSS over a 12-month period (Model R(2 )= 0.14). For the HAQ-DI model, independent predictors were change in TFR at 6 months (P = 0.008) and baseline SJC (P = 0.04, Model R(2 )= 0.19). Results were similar for 24-month models. CONCLUSIONS We document the presence of TFR very early in the course of dcSSc. Changes in TFR over 6 and 12 months predict changes in MRSS and HAQ-DI over 12 and 24 months, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja P Khanna
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Amjadi S, Maranian P, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Wong WK, Postlethwaite AE, Khanna PP, Khanna D. Course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis clinical trials: analysis of three large multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 60:2490-8. [PMID: 19644851 DOI: 10.1002/art.24681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) in 3 large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) with different baseline disease durations, as defined from the date of onset of the first dcSSc symptom (excluding Raynaud's phenomenon) or from the date of onset of the first dcSSc-related symptom (including Raynaud's phenomenon). METHODS Data from 3 RCTs examining high-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine (D-Pen Trial), recombinant human relaxin versus placebo (Relaxin Trial), and oral bovine type I collagen versus placebo (Collagen Trial) treatment in patients with dcSSc were pooled and analyzed. Patients were divided into 5 groups according to their disease duration at baseline. The linear mixed model for correlated data was used to model the 2 predictors of MRSS: time in study (expressed in months after baseline) and baseline disease duration (expressed in months, calculated from the date of onset of the first symptom characteristic of dcSSc with and without Raynaud's phenomenon). RESULTS At study entry, the mean MRSS value was 21.0 in the D-Pen Trial cohort, 27.3 in the Relaxin Trial cohort, and 26.1 in the Collagen Trial cohort. Time in study was a significant predictor of improvement in MRSS regardless of the disease duration at baseline (P<0.0001). Patients with a disease duration of >or=24 months showed a greater rate of decline as compared with patients with a disease duration of <24 months (P<0.05). Similar results were obtained when disease duration was reclassified by including the time of the first Raynaud's phenomenon symptom in the definition. CONCLUSION Our study confirms recent findings that in patients entered into these 3 RCTs, skin thickening did not follow the same trend in natural history as that seen in the dcSSc populations entered into early, open longitudinal studies previously reported. These findings have important implications for study design, in which "prevention of worsening" is the main objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sogol Amjadi
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kaldas M, Khanna PP, Furst DE, Clements PJ, Kee Wong W, Seibold JR, Postlethwaite AE, Khanna D. Sensitivity to change of the modified Rodnan skin score in diffuse systemic sclerosis--assessment of individual body sites in two large randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48:1143-6. [PMID: 19605370 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) is a standard outcome measure for skin disease in SSc and calculated by summation of skin thickness in 17 different body sites (total score = 51). Our objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of change over time of individual body sites used in the calculation of total MRSS. METHODS We analysed two randomized placebo controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of either recombinant human relaxin or type I oral collagen in dcSSc. Both trials used MRSS as the primary outcome measure. We used a change of >10 mm (on a 0-100 VAS) in the patient global assessment (PGA) as the clinically important improvement. We calculated the mean change and the effect size (ES) for each individual body site used in the total MRSS for each study. Magnitude of ES was assessed using Cohen's rule of thumb for ES. RESULTS In the relaxin and collagen studies, 71 of 199 patients (36%) and 54 of 129 (42%) of patients had an improvement >10 mm on the PGA at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Total MRSS had large ES in both studies (0.85-0.98); the chest, forearms and hands had moderate ES (0.50-0.74); and the lower extremities, face, abdomen and fingers had small ES (0.16-0.49). CONCLUSION Certain body sites (hands, forearms and chest) are more sensitive to change compared with other body sites in two randomized clinical trials. It remains to be seen whether decreasing the number of body sites by exclusion of relatively static areas would further increase the sensitivity to change over time of the total MRSS.
Collapse
|
42
|
Amjadi SS, Maranian PM, Paulus HE, Kaplan RM, Ranganath VK, Furst DE, Khanna PP, Khanna D. Validating and assessing the sensitivity of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index-derived Short Form-6D in patients with early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009; 36:1150-7. [PMID: 19369459 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New methodologies allow the scores for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) to be translated into preferences/utility scores. We evaluated the construct validity of the HAQ-DI-derived Short Form-6D (SF-6D) score and assessed its responsiveness to change over 6- and 12-month followup periods in patients with early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Patients (n=277) participating in an RA observational study completed self-reported measures of symptoms and the HAQ-DI at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Total Sharp scores, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were assessed along with clinical data. Construct validity was assessed by examining the association between SF-6D score and patient-reported and clinical measures using Spearman correlation coefficients. The responsiveness of SF-6D to change was assessed using patient and physician assessments of the disease as clinical anchors. The magnitude of responsiveness was calculated using SF-6D effect size (ES). RESULT Mean SF-6D scores were 0.690, 0.720, and 0.723 at baseline and 6 and 12-month followup, respectively. Baseline patient-reported measures had moderate to high correlations with baseline SF-6D (r=0.43 to 0.52); whereas clinical measures had negligible to low correlations with SF-6D (r=0.001 to 0.32). ES was moderate for the groups that were deemed to have improved (ES 0.63-0.75) but negligible to small for those that did not (ES 0.13-0.46). CONCLUSION Our data support the validity and responsiveness of the HAQ-DI derived SF-6D score in an early RA cohort. These results support the use of the HAQ-DI derived SF-6D in RA cohorts and clinical trials lacking preference-based measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sogol S Amjadi
- Division of Rheumatology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Department of Health Services, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Room 32-59, Rehabilitation Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Khanna PP, Maranian P, Gregory J, Khanna D. The minimally important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Raynaud's condition score in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon in a large randomised controlled clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 69:588-91. [PMID: 19364728 DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.107706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Raynaud's condition score (RCS) is a validated outcome measure for Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). OBJECTIVE To assess the minimally important difference (MID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for RCS in patients with RP. SUBJECTS and methods Patients with active RP (n=162) (mean RCS >25 (0-100 visual analogue scale) participated in a placebo-controlled, crossover randomised clinical trial (RCT). Data from the two treatment groups were combined for this analysis. Retrospective and prospective anchors were administered during the RCT. MID groups were defined as the group who reported being somewhat better (anchor #1) and a one-step change from "unbearable" to "very severe", etc (anchor #2). Patients were considered to have achieved PASS if they rated their Raynaud's condition as "very mild" or "mild" at the last study visit. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 48.9 years and the mean baseline RCS was 46.4 points. The RCS change score for the MID improvement group ranged from -13.9 to -14.3 points and PASS estimate was 34.0 points. CONCLUSION The MID and PASS estimates for RCS are 14-15 points for improvement and 34 points, respectively, on a 0-100 scale in a large RCT of patients with active RP. This information can aid in interpreting RCS in future RP trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja P Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Khanna D, Pope JE, Khanna PP, Maloney M, Samedi N, Norrie D, Ouimet G, Hays RD. The minimally important difference for the fatigue visual analog scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed in an academic clinical practice. J Rheumatol 2008; 35:2339-43. [PMID: 19004044 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the minimally important difference (MID) for a fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) using patient-reported anchors (fatigue, pain, and overall health). METHODS Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 307) had 2 clinic visits at a median of 5.9 months apart. They completed a fatigue VAS (0-10 scale) and the retrospective anchor items, "How would you describe your overall fatigue/pain/overall health since the last visit?" with response options: Much worsened, Somewhat worsened, Same, Somewhat better, or Much better. The fatigue anchor was used for primary analysis and the pain/overall health anchors for sensitivity analyses. The minimally changed group was defined by those reporting they were somewhat better or somewhat worsened. RESULTS The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 59.4 (13.2) years, disease duration was 14.1 (11.5) years, and 83% of patients were women. The baseline mean (SD) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score was 0.84 (0.75). The baseline fatigue VAS score was 4.2 (2.9) and at followup was 4.3 (2.8) [mean change of -0.07 (2.5); p = not significant]. The fatigue change score (0-10 scale) for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened for the fatigue anchor averaged -1.12 and 1.26, respectively. Using the pain anchor, the fatigue change score for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened averaged -0.87 and 1.13; and using the global anchor, the fatigue change score for Somewhat better and Somewhat worsened averaged -0.82 and 1.17, respectively. Effect size estimates using 3 anchors were small for the Somewhat better (range 0.27-0.39) and Somewhat worsened (0.40-0.44) groups, but larger than for the no-change group (0.03-0.08). CONCLUSION The MID for fatigue VAS is between -0.82 for -1.12 for improvement and is 1.13 to 1.26 for worsening on a 0-10 scale in a large RA clinical practice, and is similar to that seen in RA clinical trials. This information can aid in interpreting fatigue VAS in day-to-day care in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Much has been written in the last few months on the association between the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective inhibitors and cardiovascular events. We summarize the randomized controlled studies of different COX-2 inhibitors that led to rofecoxib withdrawal, provide evidence on the differences between various selective coxibs and summarize recommendations from the FDA and the American College of Rheumatology on use of COX-2 inhibitors. We give suggestions on the use of coxibs and briefly mention a general approach to the future of coxibs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Khanna
- Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|