1
|
Wazir U, Michell MJ, Alamoodi M, Mokbel K. Evaluating Radar Reflector Localisation in Targeted Axillary Dissection in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1345. [PMID: 38611023 PMCID: PMC11011109 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
SAVI SCOUT® or radar reflector localisation (RRL) has proven accurate in localising non-palpable breast and axillary lesions, with minimal interference with MRI. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), combining marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), is becoming a standard post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for node-positive early breast cancer. Compared to SLNB alone, TAD reduces the false negative rate (FNR) to below 6%, enabling safer axillary surgery de-escalation. This systematic review evaluates RRL's performance during TAD, assessing localisation and retrieval rates, the concordance between MLNB and SLNB, and the pathological complete response (pCR) in clinically node-positive patients post-NST. Four studies (252 TAD procedures) met the inclusion criteria, with a 99.6% (95% confidence [CI]: 98.9-100) successful localisation rate, 100% retrieval rate, and 81% (95% CI: 76-86) concordance rate between SLNB and MLNB. The average duration from RRL deployment to surgery was 52 days (range:1-202). pCR was observed in 42% (95% CI: 36-48) of cases, with no significant migration or complications reported. Omitting MLNB or SLNB would have under-staged the axilla in 9.7% or 3.4% (p = 0.03) of cases, respectively, underscoring the importance of incorporating MLNB in axillary staging post-NST in initially node-positive patients in line with the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. These findings underscore the excellent efficacy of RRL in TAD for NST-treated patients with positive nodes, aiding in accurate axillary pCR identification and the safe omission of axillary dissection in strong responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kefah Mokbel
- The London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London W1U 5NY, UK; (U.W.); (M.J.M.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Godina C, Belting M, Vallon-Christersson J, Isaksson K, Bosch A, Jernström H. Caveolin-1 gene expression provides additional prognostic information combined with PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) score in breast cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6675. [PMID: 38509243 PMCID: PMC10954762 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57365-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Combining information from the tumor microenvironment (TME) with PAM50 Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score could improve breast cancer prognostication. Caveolin-1 (CAV1) is a marker of an active TME. CAV1 is a membrane protein involved in cell signaling, extracellular matrix organization, and tumor-stroma interactions. We sought to investigate CAV1 gene expression in relation to PAM50 subtypes, ROR score, and their joint prognostic impact. CAV1 expression was compared between PAM50 subtypes and ROR categories in two cohorts (SCAN-B, n = 5326 and METABRIC, n = 1980). CAV1 expression was assessed in relation to clinical outcomes using Cox regression and adjusted for clinicopathological predictors. Effect modifications between CAV1 expression and ROR categories on clinical outcome were investigated using multiplicative and additive two-way interaction analyses. Differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analyses were applied to compare high and low expressing CAV1 tumors. All samples expressed CAV1 with the highest expression in the Normal-like subtype. Gene modules consistent with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), hypoxia, and stromal activation were associated with high CAV1 expression. CAV1 expression was inversely associated with ROR category. Interactions between CAV1 expression and ROR categories were observed in both cohorts. High expressing CAV1 tumors conferred worse prognosis only within the group classified as ROR high. ROR gave markedly different prognostic information depending on the underlying CAV1 expression. CAV1, a potential mediator between the malignant cells and TME, could be a useful biomarker that enhances and further refines PAM50 ROR risk stratification in patients with ROR high tumors and a potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Godina
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Mattias Belting
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Skåne, Sweden
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johan Vallon-Christersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karolin Isaksson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Lund University and Kristianstad Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Ana Bosch
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Skåne, Sweden
| | - Helena Jernström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Freitas AJA, Nunes CR, Mano MS, Causin RL, Santana IVV, de Oliveira MA, Calfa S, Silveira HCS, de Pádua Souza C, Marques MMC. Gene expression alterations predict the pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer exploratory analysis of the NACATRINE trial. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21411. [PMID: 38049525 PMCID: PMC10695933 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48657-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This exploratory analysis of the Neoadjuvant Carboplatin in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (NACATRINE) study aimed to identify the biomarkers of pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) within the context of a clinical trial. The NACATRINE trial is a phase II, single-center, randomized, open-label clinical trial that investigated the addition of carboplatin to sequential anthracycline- and taxane-based NAC for TNBC. We evaluated the gene expression in untreated samples to investigate its association with pCR, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RNA was extracted from the tissue biopsy, and the nCounter Breast Cancer panel was used to analyze gene expression. Of the 66 patients included in the gene expression profiling analysis, 24 (36.4%) achieved pCR and 42 (63.6%) had residual disease. In unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses, differentially expressed genes between patients with and without pCR were identified irrespective of the treatment (24 genes), carboplatin (37 genes), and non-carboplatin (27 genes) arms. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, 10 genes in the carboplatin arm (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.936) and three genes in the non-carboplatin arm (AUC, 0.939) were considered to be potential pCR-associated biomarkers. We identified genes that were associated with improvements in OS and DFS in addition to being related to pCR. We successfully identified gene expression signatures associated with pCR in pretreatment samples of patients with TNBC treated with NAC. Further investigation of these biomarkers is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Julia Aguiar Freitas
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
| | - Caroline Rocha Nunes
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Rhafaela Lima Causin
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Stéphanie Calfa
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Araújo RA, da Luz FAC, da Costa Marinho E, Nascimento CP, Mendes TR, Mosca ERT, de Andrade Marques L, Delfino PFR, Antonioli RM, da Silva ACAL, Dos Reis Monteiro MLG, Neto MB, Silva MJB. The elusive Luminal B breast cancer and the mysterious chemokines. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12807-12819. [PMID: 37458802 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) is heterogeneous. Staging and immunohistochemistry (IH) allow for effective therapy but are not yet ideal. Women with Luminal B tumors show an erratic response to treatment. This prospective study with 81 women with breast cancer aims to improve the prognostic stratification of Luminal B patients. METHODS This is a prospective translational study with 81 women with infiltrating ductal carcinoma, grouped by TNM staging and immunohistochemistry, for survival analysis, and their correlations with the chemokines. Serum measurements of 13 chemokines were performed, including 7 CC chemokines [CCL2(MCP1), CCL3(MIP1α), CCL4(MIP1β), CCL5(Rantes), CCL11(Eotaxin), CCL17(TARC), CCL20(MIP3α)], 6 CXC chemokines [CXCL1(GroAlpha), CXCL5(ENA78), CCXCL8(IL-8), CXCL9(MIG), CXCL10(IP10), CXCL11(ITAC)]. RESULTS Overall survival was significantly dependent on tumor staging and subtypes by immunohistochemistry, with a median follow-up time the 32.87 months (3.67-65.63 months). There were age correlations with IP10/CXCL10 chemokines (r = 0.4360; p = 0.0079) and TARC/CCL17 (Spearman + 0.2648; p = 0.0360). An inverse correlation was found between body weight and the chemokines Rantes/CCL5 (r = - 0.3098; p = 0.0169) and Eotaxin/CCL11 (r = - 0.2575; p = 0.0470). Smokers had a higher concentration of MIP3α/CCL20 (Spearman + 0.3344; p = 0.0267). Luminal B subtype patients who expressed lower concentrations of ENA78/CXCL5 (≤ 254.83 pg/ml) (Log-Rank p = 0.016) and higher expression of MIP1β/CCL4 (> 34.84 pg/ml) (Log-Rank p = 0.014) had a higher risk of metastases. CONCLUSION Patients with Luminal B breast tumors can be better stratified by serum chemokine expression, suggesting that prognosis is dependent on biomarkers other than TNM and IH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogério Agenor de Araújo
- Medical Faculty, Federal University of Uberlândia, Avenida Pará, Bloco 2U, 1720, Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38400-902, Brazil.
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil.
| | - Felipe Andrés Cordero da Luz
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Eduarda da Costa Marinho
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Camila Piqui Nascimento
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Thais Rezende Mendes
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Etelvina Rocha Tolentino Mosca
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Lara de Andrade Marques
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | | | - Rafael Mathias Antonioli
- Cancer Research and Prevention Nucleus, Grupo Luta Pela Vida, Cancer Hospital in Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-302, Brazil
| | | | | | - Morun Bernardino Neto
- Department of Basic and Environmental Sciences, University of São Paulo, Lorena, SP, CEP 12602-810, Brazil
| | - Marcelo José Barbosa Silva
- Laboratory of Tumor Biomarkers and Osteoimmunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, CEP 38405-320, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tovey H, Sipos O, Parker JS, Hoadley KA, Quist J, Kernaghan S, Kilburn L, Salgado R, Loi S, Kennedy RD, Roxanis I, Gazinska P, Pinder SE, Bliss J, Perou CM, Haider S, Grigoriadis A, Tutt A, Cheang MCU. Integrated Multimodal Analyses of DNA Damage Response and Immune Markers as Predictors of Response in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the TNT Trial (NCT00532727). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3691-3705. [PMID: 37574209 PMCID: PMC10502473 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The TNT trial (NCT00532727) showed no evidence of carboplatin superiority over docetaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), but carboplatin benefit was observed in the germline BRCA1/2 mutation subgroup. Broader response-predictive biomarkers are needed. We explored the predictive ability of DNA damage response (DDR) and immune markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were evaluated for 222 of 376 patients. Primary tumors (PT) from 186 TNT participants (13 matched recurrences) were profiled using total RNA sequencing. Four transcriptional DDR-related and 25 immune-related signatures were evaluated. We assessed their association with objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Conditional inference forest clustering was applied to integrate multimodal data. The biology of subgroups was characterized by 693 gene expression modules and other markers. RESULTS Transcriptional DDR-related biomarkers were not predictive of ORR to either treatment overall. Changes from PT to recurrence were demonstrated; in chemotherapy-naïve patients, transcriptional DDR markers separated carboplatin responders from nonresponders (P values = 0.017; 0.046). High immune infiltration was associated with docetaxel ORR (interaction P values < 0.05). Six subgroups were identified; the immune-enriched cluster had preferential docetaxel response [62.5% (D) vs. 29.4% (C); P = 0.016]. The immune-depleted cluster had preferential carboplatin response [8.0% (D) vs. 40.0% (C); P = 0.011]. DDR-related subgroups were too small to assess ORR. CONCLUSIONS High immune features predict docetaxel response, and high DDR signature scores predict carboplatin response in treatment-naïve mTNBC. Integrating multimodal DDR and immune-related markers identifies subgroups with differential treatment sensitivity. Treatment options for patients with immune-low and DDR-proficient tumors remains an outstanding need. Caution is needed using PT-derived transcriptional signatures to direct treatment in mTNBC, particularly DDR-related markers following prior chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Tovey
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Orsolya Sipos
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joel S. Parker
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine A. Hoadley
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jelmar Quist
- The Breast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Kernaghan
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Kilburn
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sherene Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Ioannis Roxanis
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrycja Gazinska
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Biobank Research Group, Lukasiewicz Research Network – PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Sarah E. Pinder
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles M. Perou
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Syed Haider
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Grigoriadis
- The Breast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Breast Cancer Now Unit, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maggie Chon U. Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mason SR, Willson ML, Egger SJ, Beith J, Dear RF, Goodwin A. Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:CD014805. [PMID: 37681577 PMCID: PMC10486188 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014805.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with shorter survival and a higher likelihood of the cancer returning. In early TNBC, platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve pathological complete response (pCR); however, its effect on long-term survival outcomes has not been fully elucidated and recommendations to include platinum chemotherapy are not consistent in international guidelines. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of platinum-based chemotherapy as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in people with early triple-negative breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 4 April 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials examining neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum chemotherapy for early TNBC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Our secondary outcomes were pCR, treatment adherence, grade III or IV toxicity related to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Prespecified subgroups included BRCA mutation status, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, frequency of chemotherapy, type of platinum agent used, and the presence or absence of anthracycline chemotherapy. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS From 3972 records, we included 20 published studies involving 21 treatment comparisons, and 25 ongoing studies. For most domains, risk of bias was low across studies. There were 16 neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies (one of which combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy) and four adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Most studies used carboplatin (17 studies) followed by cisplatin (two), and lobaplatin (one). Eight studies had an anthracycline-free intervention arm, five of which had a carboplatin-taxane intervention compared to an anthracycline-taxane control. All studies reporting DFS and OS used carboplatin. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy improved DFS in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings (neoadjuvant: hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.75; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1966 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.88; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Platinum chemotherapy in the regimen improved OS (neoadjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.86; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1973 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Median follow-up for survival outcomes ranged from 36 to 97.6 months. Our analysis confirmed platinum chemotherapy increased pCR rates (risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.59; 15 studies, 16 treatment comparisons, 3083 participants; high-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses showed no evidence of differences in DFS according to BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, or whether the intervention arm contained anthracycline chemotherapy or not. Platinum chemotherapy was associated with reduced dose intensity, with participants more likely to require chemotherapy delays (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.94; 4 studies, 5 treatment comparisons, 1053 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), dose reductions (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.02; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 2055 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and early cessation of treatment (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38; 16 studies, 17 treatment comparisons, 4178 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Increased haematological toxicity occurred in the platinum group who were more likely to experience grade III/IV neutropenia (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.63; 19 studies, 20 treatment comparisons, 4849 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), anaemia (RR 8.20, 95% CI 5.66 to 11.89; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4757 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and thrombocytopenia (RR 7.59, 95% CI 5.10 to 11.29; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4731 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between chemotherapy groups in febrile neutropenia (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.49; 11 studies, 3771 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Renal impairment was very rare (0.4%, 2 events in 463 participants; note 3 studies reported 0 events in both arms; 4 studies; high-certainty evidence). Treatment-related death was very rare (0.2%, 7 events in 3176 participants and similar across treatment groups; RR 0.58, 95% 0.14 to 2.33; 10 studies, 11 treatment comparisons; note 8 studies reported treatment-related deaths but recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 3 studies rather than 11; 3176 participants; high-certainty evidence). Five studies collected quality of life data but did not report them. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Platinum-based chemotherapy using carboplatin in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting improves long-term outcomes of DFS and OS in early TNBC, with no evidence of differences by subgroup. This was at the cost of more frequent chemotherapy delays and dose reductions, and greater haematological toxicity, though serious adverse events including neuropathy, febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death were not increased. These findings support the use of platinum-based chemotherapy for people with early TNBC. The optimal dose and regimen are not defined by this analysis, but there is a suggestion that similar relative benefits result from the addition of carboplatin to either anthracycline-free regimens or those containing anthracycline agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Re Mason
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia
| | - Melina L Willson
- Evidence Integration, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sam J Egger
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane Beith
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Rachel F Dear
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu C, Huang X, Chen X, Shi Z, Liu C, Liang Y, Huang X, Chen M, Chen X, Liang C, Liu Z. Use of Pretreatment Multiparametric MRI to Predict Tumor Regression Pattern to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 Suppl 2:S62-S70. [PMID: 37019697 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To develop an easy-to-use model by combining pretreatment MRI and clinicopathologic features for early prediction of tumor regression pattern to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 420 patients who received NAC and underwent definitive surgery in our hospital from February 2012 to August 2020. Pathologic findings of surgical specimens were used as the gold standard to classify tumor regression patterns into concentric and non-concentric shrinkage. Morphologic and kinetic MRI features were both analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to select the key clinicopathologic and MRI features for pretreatment prediction of regression pattern. Logistic regression and six machine learning methods were used to construct prediction models, and their performance were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS Two clinicopathologic variables and three MRI features were selected as independent predictors to construct prediction models. The apparent area under the curve (AUC) of seven prediction models were in the range of 0.669-0.740. The logistic regression model yielded an AUC of 0.708 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.658-0.759), and the decision tree model achieved the highest AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.691-0.787). For internal validation, the optimism-corrected AUCs of seven models were in the range of 0.592-0.684. There was no significant difference between the AUCs of the logistic regression model and that of each machine learning model. CONCLUSION Prediction models combining pretreatment MRI and clinicopathologic features are useful for predicting tumor regression pattern in breast cancer, which can assist to select patients who can benefit from NAC for de-escalation of breast surgery and modify treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Liu
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaomei Huang
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaobo Chen
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenwei Shi
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunling Liu
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanting Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Huang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China; Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Minglei Chen
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zaiyi Liu
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No.106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang J, Saltzman AB, Jaehnig EJ, Lei JT, Malovannaya A, Holt MV, Young MN, Rimawi MF, Ademuyiwa FO, Anurag M, Kim BJ, Ellis MJ. Kinase Inhibitor Pulldown Assay Identifies a Chemotherapy Response Signature in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Based on Purine-binding Proteins. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:1551-1563. [PMID: 37587913 PMCID: PMC10426551 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes 10%-15% of all breast tumors. The current standard of care is multiagent chemotherapy, which is effective in only a subset of patients. The original objective of this study was to deploy a mass spectrometry (MS)-based kinase inhibitor pulldown assay (KIPA) to identify kinases elevated in non-pCR (pathologic complete response) cases for therapeutic targeting. Frozen optimal cutting temperature compound-embedded core needle biopsies were obtained from 43 patients with TNBC before docetaxel- and carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. KIPA was applied to the native tumor lysates that were extracted from samples with high tumor content. Seven percent of all identified proteins were kinases, and none were significantly associated with lack of pCR. However, among a large population of "off-target" purine-binding proteins (PBP) identified, seven were enriched in pCR-associated samples (P < 0.01). In orthogonal mRNA-based TNBC datasets, this seven-gene "PBP signature" was associated with chemotherapy sensitivity and favorable clinical outcomes. Functional annotation demonstrated IFN gamma response, nuclear import of DNA repair proteins, and cell death associations. Comparisons with standard tandem mass tagged-based discovery proteomics performed on the same samples demonstrated that KIPA-nominated pCR biomarkers were unique to the platform. KIPA is a novel biomarker discovery tool with unexpected utility for the identification of PBPs related to cytotoxic drug response. The PBP signature has the potential to contribute to clinical trials designed to either escalate or de-escalate therapy based on pCR probability. Significance The identification of pretreatment predictive biomarkers for pCR in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would advance precision treatment for TNBC. To complement standard proteogenomic discovery profiling, a KIPA was deployed and unexpectedly identified a seven-member non-kinase PBP pCR-associated signature. Individual members served diverse pathways including IFN gamma response, nuclear import of DNA repair proteins, and cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junkai Wang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexander B. Saltzman
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core, Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric J. Jaehnig
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jonathan T. Lei
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna Malovannaya
- Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core, Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew V. Holt
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Meggie N. Young
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mothaffar F. Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Foluso O. Ademuyiwa
- Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Meenakshi Anurag
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Beom-Jun Kim
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Matthew J. Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guven DC, Yildirim HC, Kus F, Erul E, Kertmen N, Dizdar O, Aksoy S. Optimal adjuvant treatment strategies for TNBC patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:1049-1059. [PMID: 37224429 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2218090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The therapeutic armamentarium for the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has significantly expanded with the hopes of improving pathological complete response (pCR) rates and the possibility of a cure. However, the data on optimal adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment is limited. AREAS COVERED We discuss the available data on adjuvant treatment for residual TNBC after neoadjuvant treatment considering clinical trials. Additionally, we discuss ongoing trials to give perspectives on how the field may evolve in the next decade. EXPERT OPINION The available data support the use of adjuvant capecitabine for all patients and either adjuvant capecitabine or olaparib for patients with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, according to availability. The CREATE-X study of capecitabine and OlympiA study of olaparib demonstrated disease-free and overall survival benefits. There is an unmet need for studies comparing these two options for patients with germline BRCA mutations. Further research is needed to delineate the use of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, molecular targeted therapy for patients with molecular alterations other than germline BRCA mutation, combinations, and antibody-drug conjugates to further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hasan Cagri Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Kus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Enes Erul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neyran Kertmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omer Dizdar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tang L, Zhang Z, Fan J, Xu J, Xiong J, Tang L, Jiang Y, Zhang S, Zhang G, Luo W, Xu Y. Comprehensively analysis of immunophenotyping signature in triple-negative breast cancer patients based on machine learning. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1195864. [PMID: 37426809 PMCID: PMC10328722 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1195864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is a promising strategy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, however, the overall survival (OS) of 5-years is still not satisfactory. Hence, developing more valuable prognostic signature is urgently needed for clinical practice. This study established and verified an effective risk model based on machine learning methods through a series of publicly available datasets. Furthermore, the correlation between risk signature and chemotherapy drug sensitivity were also performed. The findings showed that comprehensive immune typing is highly effective and accurate in assessing prognosis of TNBC patients. Analysis showed that IL18R1, BTN3A1, CD160, CD226, IL12B, GNLY and PDCD1LG2 are key genes that may affect immune typing of TNBC patients. The risk signature plays a robust ability in prognosis prediction compared with other clinicopathological features in TNBC patients. In addition, the effect of our constructed risk model on immunotherapy response was superior to TIDE results. Finally, high-risk groups were more sensitive to MR-1220, GSK2110183 and temsirolimus, indicating that risk characteristics could predict drug sensitivity in TNBC patients to a certain extent. This study proposes an immunophenotype-based risk assessment model that provides a more accurate prognostic assessment tool for patients with TNBC and also predicts new potential compounds by performing machine learning algorithms.
Collapse
|
11
|
García-Torralba E, Navarro Manzano E, Luengo-Gil G, De la Morena Barrio P, Chaves Benito A, Pérez-Ramos M, Álvarez-Abril B, Ivars Rubio A, García-Garre E, Ayala de la Peña F, García-Martínez E. A new prognostic model including immune biomarkers, genomic proliferation tumor markers ( AURKA and MYBL2) and clinical-pathological features optimizes prognosis in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1182725. [PMID: 37313470 PMCID: PMC10258327 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 30% of breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) will relapse. Our objective was to analyze the predictive capacity of several markers associated with immune response and cell proliferation combined with clinical parameters. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of BC patients treated with NCT (2001-2010), in whom pretreatment biomarkers were analyzed: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood, CD3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and gene expression of AURKA, MYBL2 and MKI67 using qRT-PCR. Results A total of 121 patients were included. Median followup was 12 years. In a univariate analysis, NLR, TILs, AURKA, and MYBL2 showed prognostic value for overall survival. In multivariate analyses, including hormone receptor, HER2 status, and response to NCT, NLR (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), TILs (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.93), AURKA (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11) and MYBL2 (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.35) remained as independent predictor variables. Conclusion Consecutive addition of these biomarkers to a regression model progressively increased its discriminatory capacity for survival. Should independent cohort studies validate these findings, management of early BC patients may well be changed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmeralda García-Torralba
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Esther Navarro Manzano
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Gines Luengo-Gil
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Pilar De la Morena Barrio
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Miguel Pérez-Ramos
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez-Abril
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Alejandra Ivars Rubio
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Elisa García-Garre
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco Ayala de la Peña
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Elena García-Martínez
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Medical School, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bellini D, Milan M, Bordin A, Rizzi R, Rengo M, Vicini S, Onori A, Carbone I, De Falco E. A Focus on the Synergy of Radiomics and RNA Sequencing in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24087214. [PMID: 37108377 PMCID: PMC10138689 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiological imaging is currently employed as the most effective technique for screening, diagnosis, and follow up of patients with breast cancer (BC), the most common type of tumor in women worldwide. However, the introduction of the omics sciences such as metabolomics, proteomics, and molecular genomics, have optimized the therapeutic path for patients and implementing novel information parallel to the mutational asset targetable by specific clinical treatments. Parallel to the "omics" clusters, radiological imaging has been gradually employed to generate a specific omics cluster termed "radiomics". Radiomics is a novel advanced approach to imaging, extracting quantitative, and ideally, reproducible data from radiological images using sophisticated mathematical analysis, including disease-specific patterns, that could not be detected by the human eye. Along with radiomics, radiogenomics, defined as the integration of "radiology" and "genomics", is an emerging field exploring the relationship between specific features extracted from radiological images and genetic or molecular traits of a particular disease to construct adequate predictive models. Accordingly, radiological characteristics of the tissue are supposed to mimic a defined genotype and phenotype and to better explore the heterogeneity and the dynamic evolution of the tumor over the time. Despite such improvements, we are still far from achieving approved and standardized protocols in clinical practice. Nevertheless, what can we learn by this emerging multidisciplinary clinical approach? This minireview provides a focused overview on the significance of radiomics integrated by RNA sequencing in BC. We will also discuss advances and future challenges of such radiomics-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Bellini
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Marika Milan
- UOC Neurology, Fondazione Ca'Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza, 28, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Bordin
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Roberto Rizzi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Simone Vicini
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Onori
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Iacopo Carbone
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, I.C.O.T. Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Elena De Falco
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, C.so della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, 80122 Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang W, Li E, Wang L, Lehmann BD, Chen XS. Transcriptome Meta-Analysis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2194. [PMID: 37190123 PMCID: PMC10137141 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with varying responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The identification of biomarkers to predict NAC response and inform personalized treatment strategies is essential. In this study, we conducted large-scale gene expression meta-analyses to identify genes associated with NAC response and survival outcomes. The results showed that immune, cell cycle/mitotic, and RNA splicing-related pathways were significantly associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we integrated and divided the gene association results from NAC response and survival outcomes into four quadrants, which provided more insights into potential NAC response mechanisms and biomarker discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Emma Li
- California Academy of Mathematics and Science, 1000 E Victoria St, Carson, CA 90747, USA
| | - Lily Wang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Brian D. Lehmann
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - X. Steven Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu Y, Zhang H, Pan C, He G, Cui X, Yu X, Zhang X, Wu D, Yang J, Wu X, Luo H, Liu X. Integrated tumor genomic and immune microenvironment analysis identifies predictive biomarkers associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:5846-5858. [PMID: 36271505 PMCID: PMC10028167 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is currently the best therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), resistance still occurs in a considerable proportion, thus it is crucial to understand resistance mechanisms and identify predictive biomarkers for patients selection. METHODS Biopsy samples were collected from 21 patients with TNBC who underwent NAC. Whole-exome sequencing (WES), targeted sequencing, and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were carried out on the clinical samples and used to identify and validate potential biomarkers associated with response to NAC. In addition, data on 190 TNBC patients who had undergone chemotherapy were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and analyzed to further validate our findings. RESULTS Both the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. Higher response rates and longer survival rates were observed in patients with higher TMB. Patients with higher ratios of CD8 to M2 macrophages had higher response rates and improved survival rates. Finally, the integrated analysis demonstrated that the combination of TMB and the ratio of CD8 T cells to M2 macrophages could further distinguish patients who benefitted from the treatment in both enrolled patients and public data. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study indicated that the combination of TMB and the ratio of CD8 T cells to M2 macrophages may be a potential biomarker for improving the recognition of NAC responders, thereby providing a basis for developing precision NAC regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhui Zhu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hongfei Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chaohu Pan
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Medicine, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Gao He
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoli Cui
- Department of Medicine, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiafei Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Dongfang Wu
- Department of Medicine, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Junzhe Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xian Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Haitao Luo
- Department of Medicine, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoan Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Systemically Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype-Specific Prognosis Signatures, Based on Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data. Cells 2023; 12:cells12030367. [PMID: 36766710 PMCID: PMC9913740 DOI: 10.3390/cells12030367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes. Although progress has been made, the identification of TNBC subtype-associated biomarkers is still hindered by traditional RNA-seq or array technologies, since bulk data detected by them usually have some non-disease tissue samples, or they are confined to measure the averaged properties of whole tissues. To overcome these constraints and discover TNBC subtype-specific prognosis signatures (TSPSigs), we proposed a single-cell RNA-seq-based bioinformatics approach for identifying TSPSigs. Notably, the TSPSigs we developed mostly were found to be disease-related and involved in cancer development through investigating their enrichment analysis results. In addition, the prognostic power of TSPSigs was successfully confirmed in four independent validation datasets. The multivariate analysis results showed that TSPSigs in two TNBC subtypes-BL1 and LAR, were two independent prognostic factors. Further, analysis results of the TNBC cell lines revealed that the TSPSigs expressions and drug sensitivities had significant associations. Based on the preceding data, we concluded that TSPSigs could be exploited as novel candidate prognostic markers for TNBC patients and applied to individualized treatment in the future.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tsang JY, Tse GM. Update on triple-negative breast cancers - highlighting subtyping update and treatment implication. Histopathology 2023; 82:17-35. [PMID: 36468263 DOI: 10.1111/his.14784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a major challenge in breast cancer management. Continuing research in the past years aimed at understanding the biology of this tumour and developing more effective therapeutic options. It is now clear that TNBC is vastly heterogeneous with diverse histological, molecular, immunological profiles and clinical differences. Current evidence suggested the existence of at least four predominant subtypes based on expression profiling across studies. These subtypes exhibited specific genomic alterations and tumour microenvironment. Subtype-specific therapeutic strategies were identified. Recognising these subtypes allows not only an improved prognostication but also a better treatment decision. Herein, we provide an overview of the recent findings on TNBC heterogeneity at different levels and corresponding subtyping. The characteristic of subtypes and the implication of these subtypings in therapeutic approaches are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Y Tsang
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Gary M Tse
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Freitas-Junior R, de Oliveira VM, Frasson AL, Cavalcante FP, Mansani FP, Mattar A, Zerwes FP, de Oliveira Freitas AM, de Souza ABA, Damin AP, dos Santos AMR, Ruiz CA, de Lucena CÊM, Millen EC, Bagnoli F, Andrade F, Rodrigues FLB, Facina G, Novita G, Pedrini JL, Guará JP, Soares LR, de Nigro Corpa MV, Passos M, de Lucena Ferreira NCF, Freitas NMA, Machado RHS, da Cunha Amaral RK, Reinert T, Budel VM. Management of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: recommendations of a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Mastology. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1201. [PMID: 36419031 PMCID: PMC9682792 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10250-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous subtype involving different patterns of behavior and clinical course, demanding a complex, individualized sequence of treatment. The knowledge and attitudes of the affiliated members of the Brazilian Society of Mastology regarding TNBC were evaluated and a consensus regarding management and treatment was reached. METHODS Affiliates completed a survey involving 44 objective questions. In addition, a specialist meeting was held with 27 experts and 3 ad hoc consultants. The panelists completed the survey before and after brainstorming. Answers achieving 70% of agreement were considered consensual. The chi-square test was used to compare answers between panelists and affiliates and the Kappa coefficient to calculate agreement. RESULTS Consensus among the panelists increased from 26 (59.1%) to 32 questions (72.7%) following brainstorming (p = 0.17), including 7/10 questions on systemic treatment. Among the affiliates, consensus was achieved for 24 questions (54.5%), resulting in moderate agreement (κ = 0.445). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be indicated for almost all cases (except cT1a-b N0) and should include platinum agents. When indicated, immunotherapy is part of the standard of care. The panel reaffirmed the concept of no ink on tumor as indicative of adequate margins and the possibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cN1 patients who become cN0 following neoadjuvant therapy. Controversies remain on combining immunotherapy with capecitabine/olaparib in pertinent cases. CONCLUSION Expert consensus was achieved for > 70% of the questions, with moderate agreement between panelists and affiliates. Educational interventions on systemic breast cancer treatment affected decision-making in 60% of the questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruffo Freitas-Junior
- grid.411195.90000 0001 2192 5801Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, 1ª Avenida, s/n, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO 74605-050 Brazil
| | - Vilmar Marques de Oliveira
- grid.419432.90000 0000 8872 5006School of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Antonio Luiz Frasson
- grid.413562.70000 0001 0385 1941Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - Fabio Postiglione Mansani
- grid.412323.50000 0001 2218 3838Department of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR Brazil
| | - André Mattar
- grid.459930.2Reference Center in Women’s Health Care, Pérola Byington Hospital, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Felipe Pereira Zerwes
- grid.412519.a0000 0001 2166 9094Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Brazil
| | | | | | - Andrea P. Damin
- grid.8532.c0000 0001 2200 7498Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Brazil
| | | | - Carlos Alberto Ruiz
- grid.11899.380000 0004 1937 0722Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | | | - Fábio Bagnoli
- grid.419432.90000 0000 8872 5006School of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Felipe Andrade
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Department of Breast Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - Gil Facina
- grid.411249.b0000 0001 0514 7202Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Guilherme Novita
- grid.413562.70000 0001 0385 1941Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - José Pereira Guará
- grid.411204.20000 0001 2165 7632Teaching Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA Brazil
| | - Leonardo Ribeiro Soares
- grid.411195.90000 0001 2192 5801Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Dona Iris Women’s and Maternity Hospital, Goiânia, GO Brazil
| | | | - Mauro Passos
- grid.414433.5Hospital de Base, Federal District, Brasília, DF Brazil
| | | | - Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas
- Radiotherapy Unit, Araújo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, and Brazilian Center for Radiotherapy, Oncology and Mastology (CEBROM), Goiânia, GO Brazil
| | | | | | - Tomás Reinert
- Oncoclínicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) and the Serra Gaúcha Research Center, Caxias do Sul, RS Brazil
| | - Vinicius Milani Budel
- grid.20736.300000 0001 1941 472XTeaching Hospital of the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Asad S, Damicis A, Heng YJ, Kananen K, Collier KA, Adams EJ, Kensler KH, Baker GM, Wesolowski R, Sardesai S, Gatti-Mays M, Ramaswamy B, Eliassen AH, Hankinson SE, Tabung FK, Tamimi RM, Stover DG. Association of body mass index and inflammatory dietary pattern with breast cancer pathologic and genomic immunophenotype in the nurses' health study. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:78. [PMID: 36376974 PMCID: PMC9661734 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast tumor immune infiltration is clearly associated with improved treatment response and outcomes in breast cancer. However, modifiable patient factors associated with breast cancer immune infiltrates are poorly understood. The Nurses' Health Study (NHS) offers a unique cohort to study immune gene expression in tumor and adjacent normal breast tissue, immune cell-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC), and patient exposures. We evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI) change since age 18, physical activity, and the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score, all implicated in systemic inflammation, with immune cell-specific expression scores. METHODS This population-based, prospective observational study evaluated 882 NHS and NHSII participants diagnosed with invasive breast cancer with detailed exposure and gene expression data. Of these, 262 women (training cohort) had breast tumor IHC for four classic immune cell markers (CD8, CD4, CD20, and CD163). Four immune cell-specific scores were derived via lasso regression using 105 published immune expression signatures' association with IHC. In the remaining 620 patient evaluation cohort, we evaluated association of each immune cell-specific score as outcomes, with BMI change since age 18, physical activity, and EDIP score as predictors, using multivariable-adjusted linear regression. RESULTS Among women with paired expression/IHC data from breast tumor tissue, we identified robust correlation between novel immune cell-specific expression scores and IHC. BMI change since age 18 was positively associated with CD4+ (β = 0.16; p = 0.009), and CD163 novel immune scores (β = 0.14; p = 0.04) in multivariable analyses. In other words, for each 10 unit (kg/m2) increase in BMI, the percentage of cells positive for CD4 and CD163 increased 1.6% and 1.4%, respectively. Neither physical activity nor EDIP was significantly associated with any immune cell-specific expression score in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS BMI change since age 18 was positively associated with novel CD4+ and CD163+ cell scores in breast cancer, supporting further study of the effect of modifiable factors like weight gain on the immune microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Asad
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Adrienne Damicis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Yujing J Heng
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kathryn Kananen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Katharine A Collier
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Adams
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Kevin H Kensler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Gabrielle M Baker
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sagar Sardesai
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Margaret Gatti-Mays
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Susan E Hankinson
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - Fred K Tabung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sharma P. Time to Optimize Deescalation Strategies in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer? Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4840-4842. [PMID: 36083131 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Pathologic response serves as a tool to optimize escalation and deescalation of adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant carboplatin-taxane combination is a promising chemotherapy deescalation strategy for triple-negative breast cancer. Many key points, such as trial design/patient selection, response biomarkers, role of immunotherapy, and patient advocate input, will have to be carefully considered in order to advance neoadjuvant chemotherapy deescalation investigations. See related article by Gluz et al., p. 4995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trapani D, Ferraro E, Giugliano F, Boscolo Bielo L, Curigliano G, Burstein HJ. Postneoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:623-634. [PMID: 35993306 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been conventionally associated with poor prognosis, as a result of limited therapeutic options. In the early setting, prognosis is informed by clinical-pathological factors; for patients receiving neoadjuvant treatments, pathological complete response (pCR) is the strongest factor. In this review, we mapped the landscape of clinical trials in the postneoadjuvant space, and identified three patterns of clinical trial design. RECENT FINDINGS For patients at higher risk, effective postneoadjuvant treatments are of paramount importance to address a high clinical need. Postneoadjuvant risk-adapted treatments have demonstrated to improve survival in patients at high of recurrence. SUMMARY Patients at high risk have indication for adjuvant treatment intensification, informed by baseline clinical, pathological or molecular factors (type 1 approach), on the presence, extent and molecular characteristics of the residual disease at the time of surgery (type 2) or on risk factors assessed in the postsurgical setting (type 3), for example, circulating tumour DNA. Most of the past trials were based on type 2 approaches, for example, with capecitabine and Olaparib. Few trials were based on a type 1 approach, notably pembrolizumab for early TNBC. The clinical validity of type 3 approaches is under investigation in several ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emanuela Ferraro
- Breast Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Federica Giugliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Harold J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yin J, Zhu C, Wang G, Gu J. Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:5901-5914. [PMID: 35795302 PMCID: PMC9252584 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s370351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In recent years, many meta-analyses of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment have been published; however, these studies still lack systematic summary. Therefore, the aim of this study is to summarize and evaluate the evidence level and efficacy of treatment for TNBC. Materials and Methods Retrospective and prospective studies on treatment of TNBC were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The literature search deadline was June 30, 2021. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted the data. In addition, the joint World Health Organization–United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization expert consultation was used to evaluate the validity of the evidence. Results A total of 28 meta-analyses were included in this study. The treatment interventions for TNBC mainly included surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, zoledronic acid, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog. Platinum improves the pathological complete response (PCR) rate of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the objective remission rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Capecitabine improves disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in patients treated with adjuvant CT. Bevacizumab was added to NACT to improve the PCR rate in patients. Immunotherapy improves the PCR rate in patients treated with NACT. The improvement in PCR rate in patients with high Ki67 expression treated with neoadjuvant therapy is highly suggestive. Other interventions had suggestive or weak evidence. Conclusion Among the strategies for treating TNBC, platinum, bevacizumab, and immunotherapy can lead to better PCR rates as part of a NACT regimen. Capecitabine as adjuvant CT and platinum in the treatment of metastatic TNBC can benefit patients’ survival. However, the effectiveness of other interventions for TNBC is not yet clear. Further research is needed in the future to obtain more reliable clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyun Yin
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Changtai Zhu
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Shanghai Sixth Peoples' Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaofeng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Gu
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wolf DM, Yau C, Wulfkuhle J, Brown-Swigart L, Gallagher RI, Lee PRE, Zhu Z, Magbanua MJ, Sayaman R, O'Grady N, Basu A, Delson A, Coppé JP, Lu R, Braun J, Asare SM, Sit L, Matthews JB, Perlmutter J, Hylton N, Liu MC, Pohlmann P, Symmans WF, Rugo HS, Isaacs C, DeMichele AM, Yee D, Berry DA, Pusztai L, Petricoin EF, Hirst GL, Esserman LJ, van 't Veer LJ. Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:609-623.e6. [PMID: 35623341 PMCID: PMC9426306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Using pre-treatment gene expression, protein/phosphoprotein, and clinical data from the I-SPY2 neoadjuvant platform trial (NCT01042379), we create alternative breast cancer subtypes incorporating tumor biology beyond clinical hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status to better predict drug responses. We assess the predictive performance of mechanism-of-action biomarkers from ∼990 patients treated with 10 regimens targeting diverse biology. We explore >11 subtyping schemas and identify treatment-subtype pairs maximizing the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate over the population. The best performing schemas incorporate Immune, DNA repair, and HER2/Luminal phenotypes. Subsequent treatment allocation increases the overall pCR rate to 63% from 51% using HR/HER2-based treatment selection. pCR gains from reclassification and improved patient selection are highest in HR+ subsets (>15%). As new treatments are introduced, the subtyping schema determines the minimum response needed to show efficacy. This data platform provides an unprecedented resource and supports the usage of response-based subtypes to guide future treatment prioritization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M Wolf
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Julia Wulfkuhle
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA
| | - Lamorna Brown-Swigart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Rosa I Gallagher
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA
| | - Pei Rong Evelyn Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Zelos Zhu
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Mark J Magbanua
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Rosalyn Sayaman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Nicholas O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Amrita Basu
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Amy Delson
- Breast Science Advocacy Core, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Jean Philippe Coppé
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ruixiao Lu
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
| | - Jerome Braun
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
| | - Smita M Asare
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
| | - Laura Sit
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Matthews
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | - Nola Hylton
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Minetta C Liu
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Paula Pohlmann
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - W Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Angela M DeMichele
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Douglas Yee
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Emanuel F Petricoin
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA
| | - Gillian L Hirst
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Laura J van 't Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shepherd JH, Ballman K, Polley MYC, Campbell JD, Fan C, Selitsky S, Fernandez-Martinez A, Parker JS, Hoadley KA, Hu Z, Li Y, Soloway MG, Spears PA, Singh B, Tolaney SM, Somlo G, Port ER, Ma C, Kuzma C, Mamounas E, Golshan M, Bellon JR, Collyar D, Hahn OM, Hudis CA, Winer EP, Partridge A, Hyslop T, Carey LA, Perou CM, Sikov WM. CALGB 40603 (Alliance): Long-Term Outcomes and Genomic Correlates of Response and Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1323-1334. [PMID: 35044810 PMCID: PMC9015203 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CALGB 40603 (NCT00861705), a 2 × 2 randomized phase II trial, demonstrated that adding carboplatin or bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel (wP) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide significantly increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. We now report long-term outcomes (LTOs) and correlative science end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LTOs in 443 patients who initiated study treatment. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of clinical characteristics, pathologic response, calculated residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients with residual disease (RD), treatment assignment, and dose delivery during wP on LTOs, including event-free survival (EFS). Genomic predictors of treatment response and outcomes were assessed on pretreatment tumor samples by mRNA sequencing. RESULTS Among baseline characteristics, only the clinical stage was associated with LTOs. At a median follow-up of 7.9 years, LTOs were not significantly improved with either carboplatin or bevacizumab, overall or in patients with basal-like subtype cancers by genomic analysis. Patients with pCR (n = 205, 46.3%) had significantly higher 5-year EFS (85.5% v 56.6%, log-rank P < .0001) and overall survival (87.9% v 63.4%, P < .0001) rates compared with patients with RD, even those with RCB class I. Among clinical and genomic features, evidence of immune activation, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and low B-cell receptor evenness, was associated with pCR and improved EFS. CONCLUSION Despite higher pCR rates, neither carboplatin nor bevacizumab appeared to improve LTOs although the study was not powered to assess these secondary end points. pCR was associated with superior LTOs even when compared with minimal RD. Markers of immune activation in pretreatment tumor biopsies were independently associated with higher pCR rates and improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H. Shepherd
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Karla Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mei-Yin C. Polley
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jordan D. Campbell
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Cheng Fan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Katherine A. Hoadley
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Zhiyuan Hu
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Yan Li
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Matthew G. Soloway
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Patricia A. Spears
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - George Somlo
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Cynthia Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Charles Kuzma
- FirstHealth Sanford Hematology and Oncology, Sanford, NC
| | | | - Mehra Golshan
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Terry Hyslop
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Lisa A. Carey
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Charles M. Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - William M. Sikov
- Program in Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Llera AS, Abdelhay ESFW, Artagaveytia N, Daneri-Navarro A, Müller B, Velazquez C, Alcoba EB, Alonso I, Alves da Quinta DB, Binato R, Bravo AI, Camejo N, Carraro DM, Castro M, Castro-Cervantes JM, Cataldi S, Cayota A, Cerda M, Colombo A, Crocamo S, Del Toro-Arreola A, Delgadillo-Cisterna R, Delgado L, Dreyer-Breitenbach M, Fejerman L, Fernández EA, Fernández J, Fernández W, Franco-Topete RA, Gabay C, Gaete F, Garibay-Escobar A, Gómez J, Greif G, Gross TG, Guerrero M, Henderson MK, Lopez-Muñoz ME, Lopez-Vazquez A, Maldonado S, Morán-Mendoza AJ, Nagai MA, Oceguera-Villanueva A, Ortiz-Martínez MA, Quintero J, Quintero-Ramos A, Reis RM, Retamales J, Rivera-Claisse E, Rocha D, Rodríguez R, Rosales C, Salas-González E, Sanchotena V, Segovia L, Sendoya JM, Silva-García AA, Trinchero A, Valenzuela O, Vedham V, Zagame L, Podhajcer OL. The Transcriptomic Portrait of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer and Its Prognostic Value in a Multi-Country Cohort of Latin American Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:835626. [PMID: 35433488 PMCID: PMC9007037 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.835626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purposes Most molecular-based published studies on breast cancer do not adequately represent the unique and diverse genetic admixture of the Latin American population. Searching for similarities and differences in molecular pathways associated with these tumors and evaluating its impact on prognosis may help to select better therapeutic approaches. Patients and Methods We collected clinical, pathological, and transcriptomic data of a multi-country Latin American cohort of 1,071 stage II-III breast cancer patients of the Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) cohort. The 5-year prognostic ability of intrinsic (transcriptomic-based) PAM50 and immunohistochemical classifications, both at the cancer-specific (OSC) and disease-free survival (DFS) stages, was compared. Pathway analyses (GSEA, GSVA and MetaCore) were performed to explore differences among intrinsic subtypes. Results PAM50 classification of the MPBCS cohort defined 42·6% of tumors as LumA, 21·3% as LumB, 13·3% as HER2E and 16·6% as Basal. Both OSC and DFS for LumA tumors were significantly better than for other subtypes, while Basal tumors had the worst prognosis. While the prognostic power of traditional subtypes calculated with hormone receptors (HR), HER2 and Ki67 determinations showed an acceptable performance, PAM50-derived risk of recurrence best discriminated low, intermediate and high-risk groups. Transcriptomic pathway analysis showed high proliferation (i.e. cell cycle control and DNA damage repair) associated with LumB, HER2E and Basal tumors, and a strong dependency on the estrogen pathway for LumA. Terms related to both innate and adaptive immune responses were seen predominantly upregulated in Basal tumors, and, to a lesser extent, in HER2E, with respect to LumA and B tumors. Conclusions This is the first study that assesses molecular features at the transcriptomic level in a multicountry Latin American breast cancer patient cohort. Hormone-related and proliferation pathways that predominate in PAM50 and other breast cancer molecular classifications are also the main tumor-driving mechanisms in this cohort and have prognostic power. The immune-related features seen in the most aggressive subtypes may pave the way for therapeutic approaches not yet disseminated in Latin America. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02326857).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sabina Llera
- Molecular and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Nora Artagaveytia
- Hospital de Clínicas Manuel Quintela, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | | | | | - Elsa B Alcoba
- Hospital Municipal de Oncología María Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Isabel Alonso
- Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Daniela B Alves da Quinta
- Molecular and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE), Instituto de Tecnología (INTEC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Renata Binato
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Natalia Camejo
- Hospital de Clínicas Manuel Quintela, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Dirce Maria Carraro
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology/Centro Internacional de Pesquisa (CIPE), AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mónica Castro
- Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Mauricio Cerda
- Integrative Biology Program, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas (ICBM), Centro de Informática Médica y Telemedicina, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurociencias Biomédicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alicia Colombo
- Department of Pathology, Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Clínico, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Susanne Crocamo
- Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Lucía Delgado
- Hospital de Clínicas Manuel Quintela, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Marisa Dreyer-Breitenbach
- Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Laura Fejerman
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Elmer A Fernández
- Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas [Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIDIE) CONICET/Universidad Católica de Córdoba], Córdoba, Argentina.,Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | | | - Ramón A Franco-Topete
- Organismo Público Descentralizado (OPD), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Carolina Gabay
- Instituto de Oncología Angel Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Jorge Gómez
- Texas A&M University, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Thomas G Gross
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
| | | | - Marianne K Henderson
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria Aparecida Nagai
- Center for Translational Research in Oncology, Cancer Institute of São Paulo (ICESP), Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Rui M Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Javier Retamales
- Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Chileno de Investigación, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Darío Rocha
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | - Cristina Rosales
- Hospital Municipal de Oncología María Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Juan Martín Sendoya
- Molecular and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Aida A Silva-García
- Organismo Público Descentralizado (OPD), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | | | | | - Vidya Vedham
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Livia Zagame
- Instituto Jalisciense de Cancerologia, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | | | - Osvaldo L Podhajcer
- Molecular and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Asad S, Kananen K, Mueller KR, Symmans WF, Wen Y, Perou CM, Blachly JS, Chen J, Vincent BG, Stover DG. Challenges and Gaps in Clinical Trial Genomic Data Management. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2022; 6:e2100193. [PMID: 35404674 PMCID: PMC9012601 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Asad
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Kathryn Kananen
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Kurt R. Mueller
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Yujia Wen
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL
| | - Charles M. Perou
- Department of Genetics, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - James Chen
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Benjamin G. Vincent
- Department of Genetics, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Boo LW, Jóźwiak K, Joensuu H, Lindman H, Lauttia S, Opdam M, van Steenis C, Brugman W, Kluin RJC, Schouten PC, Kok M, Nederlof PM, Hauptmann M, Linn SC. Adjuvant capecitabine-containing chemotherapy benefit and homologous recombination deficiency in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1401-1409. [PMID: 35124703 PMCID: PMC9090783 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01711-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The addition of adjuvant capecitabine to standard chemotherapy of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved survival in a few randomised trials and in meta-analyses. However, many patients did not benefit. We evaluated the BRCA1-like DNA copy number signature, indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, as a predictive biomarker for capecitabine benefit in the TNBC subgroup of the FinXX trial. Methods Early-stage TNBC patients were randomised between adjuvant capecitabine-containing (TX + CEX: capecitabine-docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-capecitabine) and conventional chemotherapy (T + CEF: docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil). Tumour BRCA1-like status was determined on low-coverage, whole genome next-generation sequencing data using an established DNA comparative genomic hybridisation algorithm. Results For 129/202 (63.9%) patients the BRCA1-like status could be determined, mostly due to lack of tissue. During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 35 recurrences and 32 deaths occurred. Addition of capecitabine appears to improve recurrence-free survival more among 61 (47.3%) patients with non-BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.70) compared to 68 (52.7%) patients with BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24–1.81) (P-interaction = 0.17). Conclusion Based on our data, patients with non-BRCA1-like TNBC appear to benefit from the addition of capecitabine to adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with BRCA1-like TNBC may also benefit. Additional research is needed to define the subgroup within BRCA1-like TNBC patients who may not benefit from adjuvant capecitabine.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tian H, Ma D, Tan X, Yan W, Wu X, He C, Zhong L, Zhang Y, Yu B, Zhang Y, Qi X. Platinum and Taxane Based Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:770663. [PMID: 34938186 PMCID: PMC8685522 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.770663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Platinum (Pt) derivatives such as cisplatin and carboplatin are the class of drugs with proven activity against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This is due to the ability of Pt compounds to interfere with the DNA repair mechanisms of the neoplastic cells. Taxanes have been efficacious against estrogen receptor-negative tumors and act by disruption of microtubule function. Due to their distinct mechanisms of action and routes of metabolism, the combination of the Pt agents and taxanes results in reduced systemic toxicity, which is ideal for treating TNBC. Also, the sensitivity of BRCA1-mutated cells to taxanes remains unsolved as in vitro evidence indicates resistance against taxanes due to BRCA1 mutations. Recent evidence suggests that the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in better pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with TNBC, both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In vitro studies showed sequential dependency and optimal time scheduling of Pt- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Also, combining carboplatin with docetaxel in the NAC regimen yields an excellent pCR in patients with BRCA-associated and wild-type TNBC. TNBC is a therapeutic challenge that can be tackled by identifying new therapeutic sub-targets and specific cross-sections that can be benefitted from the addition of Pt- and taxane-based chemotherapy. This review summarizes the merits as well as the mechanism of Pt- and taxane-based adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies in early TNBC from the available and ongoing clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Tian
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Dandan Ma
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Xuanni Tan
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Wenting Yan
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Xiujuan Wu
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Cheng He
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Ling Zhong
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sanofi China Corporate, Shanghai, China
| | - Bingjie Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sanofi China Corporate, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| | - Xiaowei Qi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Shapingba, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gao Y, Kabotyanski EB, Shepherd JH, Villegas E, Acosta D, Hamor C, Sun T, Montmeyor-Garcia C, He X, Dobrolecki LE, Westbrook TF, Lewis MT, Hilsenbeck SG, Zhang XHF, Perou CM, Rosen JM. Tumor suppressor PLK2 may serve as a biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer for improved response to PLK1 therapeutics. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2021; 1:178-193. [PMID: 35156101 PMCID: PMC8827906 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-21-0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Polo-like kinase (PLK) family members play important roles in cell cycle regulation. The founding member PLK1 is oncogenic and preclinically validated as a cancer therapeutic target. Paradoxically, frequent loss of chromosome 5q11-35 which includes PLK2 is observed in basal-like breast cancer. In this study, we found that PLK2 was tumor suppressive in breast cancer, preferentially in basal-like and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. Knockdown of PLK1 rescued phenotypes induced by PLK2-loss both in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrated that PLK2 directly interacted with PLK1 at prometaphase through the kinase but not the polo-box domains of PLK2, suggesting PLK2 functioned at least partially through the interaction with PLK1. Furthermore, an improved treatment response was seen in both Plk2-deleted/low mouse preclinical and PDX TNBC models using the PLK1 inhibitor volasertib alone or in combination with carboplatin. Re-expression of PLK2 in an inducible PLK2-null mouse model reduced the therapeutic efficacy of volasertib. In summary, this study delineates the effects of chromosome 5q loss in TNBC that includes PLK2, the relationship between PLK2 and PLK1, and how this may render PLK2-deleted/low tumors more sensitive to PLK1 inhibition in combination with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Gao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Elena B. Kabotyanski
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Deanna Acosta
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Clark Hamor
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Tingting Sun
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Verna & Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Xiaping He
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lacey E. Dobrolecki
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas F. Westbrook
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Verna & Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael T. Lewis
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan G. Hilsenbeck
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiang H.-F. Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- McNair Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles M. Perou
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey M. Rosen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Corresponding Author: Jeffrey M. Rosen, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 832-215-9503; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Van Bockstal MR, François A, Altinay S, Arnould L, Balkenhol M, Broeckx G, Burguès O, Colpaert C, Dedeurwaerdere F, Dessauvagie B, Duwel V, Floris G, Fox S, Gerosa C, Hastir D, Jaffer S, Kurpershoek E, Lacroix-Triki M, Laka A, Lambein K, MacGrogan GM, Marchio C, Martinez MDM, Nofech-Mozes S, Peeters D, Ravarino A, Reisenbichler E, Resetkova E, Sanati S, Schelfhout AM, Schelfhout V, Shaaban A, Sinke R, Stanciu-Pop CM, van Deurzen CHM, Van de Vijver KK, Van Rompuy AS, Vincent-Salomon A, Wen H, Wong S, Bouzin C, Galant C. Interobserver variability in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma influences the association with pathological complete response: the IVITA study. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:2130-2140. [PMID: 34218258 PMCID: PMC8595512 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00865-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are associated with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathological assessment of sTILs in TNBC biopsies is characterized by substantial interobserver variability, but it is unknown whether this affects its association with pCR. Here, we aimed to investigate the degree of interobserver variability in an international study, and its impact on the relationship between sTILs and pCR. Forty pathologists assessed sTILs as a percentage in digitalized biopsy slides, originating from 41 TNBC patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Pathological response was quantified by the MD Anderson Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated per pathologist duo and Bland-Altman plots were constructed. The relation between sTILs and pCR or RCB class was investigated. The ICCs ranged from -0.376 to 0.947 (mean: 0.659), indicating substantial interobserver variability. Nevertheless, high sTILs scores were significantly associated with pCR for 36 participants (90%), and with RCB class for eight participants (20%). Post hoc sTILs cutoffs at 20% and 40% resulted in variable associations with pCR. The sTILs in TNBC with RCB-II and RCB-III were intermediate to those of RCB-0 and RCB-I, with lowest sTILs observed in RCB-I. However, the limited number of RCB-I cases precludes any definite conclusions due to lack of power, and this observation therefore requires further investigation. In conclusion, sTILs are a robust marker for pCR at the group level. However, if sTILs are to be used to guide the NAC scheme for individual patients, the observed interobserver variability might substantially affect the chance of obtaining a pCR. Future studies should determine the 'ideal' sTILs threshold, and attempt to fine-tune the patient selection for sTILs-based de-escalation of NAC regimens. At present, there is insufficient evidence for robust and reproducible sTILs-guided therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke R. Van Bockstal
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Aline François
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Serdar Altinay
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center, 34147 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Département de Biologie et de Pathologie des Tumeurs, Centre George-François Leclerc, 1 Rue Pr. Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Maschenka Balkenhol
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9100, 6500, HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Octavio Burguès
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. De Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, AZ Turnhout Campus Sint-Jozef, Steenweg op Merksplas 44, 2300 Turnhout, Belgium
| | | | - Benjamin Dessauvagie
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia,Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Valérie Duwel
- Department of pathology, AZ Klina Brasschaat, Augustijnslei 100, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium,Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephen Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
| | - Clara Gerosa
- Department of Pathology, University of Cagliari, AOU San Giovanni di Dio, Via Ospedale 54, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Delfyne Hastir
- Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 25, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shabnam Jaffer
- Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, NY10029 USA
| | | | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- Department of Pathology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Andoni Laka
- Department of Pathology, Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce (CNDG), Chaussée de Nivelles 212, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Lambein
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Lucas Hospital, Groenebriel 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gaëtan Marie MacGrogan
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Pathobiology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Caterina Marchio
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy,Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Dieter Peeters
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Maarten, Liersesteenweg 435, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium,Histopathology, Imaging and Quantification Unit, HistoGeneX, Sint-Bavostraat 78, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alberto Ravarino
- Department of Pathology, University of Cagliari, AOU San Giovanni di Dio, Via Ospedale 54, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Emily Reisenbichler
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT06510, United States
| | - Erika Resetkova
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX77030, Texas, USA
| | - Souzan Sanati
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Rm8612, Los Angeles, CA90048, United States
| | - Anne-Marie Schelfhout
- Department of Pathology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
| | - Vera Schelfhout
- Department of Pathology, AZ St Maarten, Liersesteenweg 435, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Abeer Shaaban
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, United Kingdom
| | - Renata Sinke
- Pathan BV, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudia M Stanciu-Pop
- Department of Pathology, CHU UCL Namur, Site Godinne, Avenue Docteur G. Thérasse 1, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Carolien HM van Deurzen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Pôle de Médicine Diagnostique & Théranostique, INSERM U934, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Hannah Wen
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065
| | - Serena Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT06510, United States
| | - Caroline Bouzin
- 2IP IREC Imaging Platform, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Galant
- Department of pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium,Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Metzger-Filho O, Collier K, Asad S, Ansell PJ, Watson M, Bae J, Cherian M, O'Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Rugo HS, Huober JB, Golshan M, Sikov WM, von Minckwitz G, Rastogi P, Li L, Cheng L, Maag D, Wolmark N, Denkert C, Symmans WF, Geyer CE, Loibl S, Stover DG. Matched cohort study of germline BRCA mutation carriers with triple negative breast cancer in brightness. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:142. [PMID: 34764307 PMCID: PMC8586340 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00349-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In the BrighTNess trial, carboplatin added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in patients with stage II/III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this matched cohort study, cases with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCA; n = 75) were matched 1:2 with non-gBRCA controls (n = 150) by treatment arm, lymph node status, and age to evaluate pCR rates and association of benefit from platinum/PARP inhibitors with validated RNA expression-based immune, proliferation, and genomic instability scores among gBRCA with the addition of carboplatin ± veliparib to NAC. Among the well-matched cohorts, odds of pCR were not higher in gBRCA cancers who received standard NAC with carboplatin (OR 0.24, 95% CI [0.04-1.24], p = 0.09) or with carboplatin/veliparib (OR 0.44, 95% CI [0.10-1.84], p = 0.26) compared to non-gBRCA cancers. Higher PAM50 proliferation, GeparSixto immune, and CIN70 genomic instability scores were each associated with higher pCR rate in the overall cohort, but not specifically in gBRCA cases. In this study, gBRCA carriers did not have higher odds of pCR than non-gBRCA controls when carboplatin ± veliparib was added to NAC, and showed no significant differences in molecular, immune, chromosomal instability, or proliferation gene expression metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katharine Collier
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sarah Asad
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Mark Watson
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Junu Bae
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mathew Cherian
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, U.S. Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Mehra Golshan
- Department of Surgery, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - William M Sikov
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Priya Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lang Li
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lijun Cheng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - W Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles E Geyer
- Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
- Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel G Stover
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Personalized therapy has revolutionized our approach to breast cancer (BC). Patient selection strategies and new biomarkers are the basis for increasingly complex diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. In this short review, we discuss recent developments in breast oncology, focusing on controversial topics with relevance for clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS The use of gene expression signatures to guide adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive tumors and personalized strategies for systemic treatment of early stage HER2-positive disease represent significant advances. Additionally, the current role of platinum salts, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the (neo)adjuvant treatment remains controversial, with several ongoing randomized clinical trials exploring their use. In the metastatic disease setting, we identify important unmet needs such as the development of predictive biomarkers and the definition of the ideal sequencing algorithm with the incorporation of innovative agents in all subtypes of BC. SUMMARY Advances in understanding the molecular biology and heterogeneity of BC have led to the development of new biomarkers and therapeutic agents that significantly impact current and future clinical practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kossai M, Radosevic-Robin N, Penault-Llorca F. Refining patient selection for breast cancer immunotherapy: beyond PD-L1. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100257. [PMID: 34487970 PMCID: PMC8426207 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapies that modulate immune response to cancer, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, began an intense development a few years ago; however, in breast cancer (BC), the results have been relatively disappointing so far. Finding biomarkers for better selection of BC patients for various immunotherapies remains a significant unmet medical need. At present, only tumour tissue programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mismatch repair deficiency status are approved as theranostic biomarkers for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors in BC. However, due to the complexity of tumour microenvironment (TME) and cancer response to immunomodulators, none of them is a perfect selector. Therefore, an intense quest is ongoing for complementary tumour- or host-related predictive biomarkers in breast immuno-oncology. Among the upcoming biomarkers, quantity, immunophenotype and spatial distribution of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and other TME cells as well as immune gene signatures emerge as most promising and are being increasingly tested in clinical trials. Biomarkers or strategies allowing dynamic assessment of BC response to immunotherapy, such as circulating/exosomal PD-L1, quantity of white/immune blood cell subpopulations and molecular imaging are particularly suitable for immunotreatment monitoring. Finally, host-related factors, such as microbiome and lifestyle, should also be taken into account when planning integration of immunomodulating therapies into BC management. As none of the biomarkers taken separately is accurate enough, the solution could come from composite biomarkers, which would combine clinical, molecular and immunological features of the disease, possibly powered by artificial intelligence. At present, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the only approved immunotherapy drugs in BC. Tumour PD-L1 and microsatellite status are current companion biomarkers for ICIs in BC; however, these need improvement. Evaluation of tumour immune contexture and the dynamics of circulating immune cell counts are promising novel approaches. Development of noninvasive monitoring and composite biomarkers will facilitate cancer immunotherapy, including in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kossai
- Department of Pathology, University Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - N Radosevic-Robin
- Department of Pathology, University Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology, University Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hossain F, Majumder S, David J, Miele L. Precision Medicine and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153739. [PMID: 34359640 PMCID: PMC8345034 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The implementation of precision medicine will revolutionize cancer treatment paradigms. Notably, this goal is not far from reality: genetically similar cancers can be treated similarly. The heterogeneous nature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) made it a suitable candidate to practice precision medicine. Using TNBC molecular subtyping and genomic profiling, a precision medicine-based clinical trial is ongoing. This review summarizes the current landscape and future directions of precision medicine and TNBC. Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer associated with a high recurrence and metastasis rate that affects African-American women disproportionately. The recent approval of targeted therapies for small subgroups of TNBC patients by the US ‘Food and Drug Administration’ is a promising development. The advancement of next-generation sequencing, particularly somatic exome panels, has raised hopes for more individualized treatment plans. However, the use of precision medicine for TNBC is a work in progress. This review will discuss the potential benefits and challenges of precision medicine for TNBC. A recent clinical trial designed to target TNBC patients based on their subtype-specific classification shows promise. Yet, tumor heterogeneity and sub-clonal evolution in primary and metastatic TNBC remain a challenge for oncologists to design adaptive precision medicine-based treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fokhrul Hossain
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Samarpan Majumder
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Justin David
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
| | - Lucio Miele
- Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; (S.M.); (L.M.)
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA 70112, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
FDA approval standards for anticancer agents - lessons from two recent approvals in breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:397-398. [PMID: 33767454 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00504-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
35
|
Abstract
The second-generation anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor2 protein (HER2) monoclonal antibody margetuximab (MARGENZA™, margetuximab-cmkb) is being developed for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, gastric cancer and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. The antibody has been engineered for increased binding to activating Fcγ receptor IIIA (CD16A) and decreased binding to inhibitory Fcγ receptor IIB (CD32B) relative to trastuzumab with the aim of improving response rates. Based on the results of the phase III SOPHIA trial margetuximab has been approved in the USA for use in combination with chemotherapy as treatment of previously-treated metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of margetuximab leading to this first approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Markham
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Activity of novel anti-HER2 agents for breast cancer based on hormone receptors expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:885-886. [PMID: 33634418 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06150-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|