Genomic cloning, heterologous expression and pharmacological characterization of a human histamine H1 receptor

Common Allergens and Immune Responses Associated with Allergic Rhinitis in China

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic allergic disease of the upper respiratory system that affects approximately 10-40% of the global population. Due to the large number of plant pollen allergens with obvious seasonal variations, AR is common in China. AR is primarily caused by the abnormal regulation of the immune system. Its pathophysiological mechanism involves a series of immune cells and immune mediators, including cytokines. The present review summarizes the common allergens in China and the complex pathophysiological mechanism of AR. Additionally, host allergen contact, signal transduction, immune cell activation, cytokine release, and a series of inflammatory reactions are described according to their sequence of occurrence.

Histaminergic regulation of food intake

Histamine is a biogenic amine that acts as a neuromodulator within the brain. In the hypothalamus, histaminergic signaling contributes to the regulation of numerous physiological and homeostatic processes, including the regulation of energy balance. Histaminergic neurons project extensively throughout the hypothalamus and two histamine receptors (H1R, H3R) are strongly expressed in key hypothalamic nuclei known to regulate energy homeostasis, including the paraventricular (PVH), ventromedial (VMH), dorsomedial (DMH), and arcuate (ARC) nuclei. The activation of different histamine receptors is associated with differential effects on neuronal activity, mediated by their different G protein-coupling. Consequently, activation of H1R has opposing effects on food intake to that of H3R: H1R activation suppresses food intake, while H3R activation mediates an orexigenic response. The central histaminergic system has been implicated in atypical antipsychotic-induced weight gain and has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity. It has also been demonstrated to interact with other major regulators of energy homeostasis, including the central melanocortin system and the adipose-derived hormone leptin. However, the exact mechanisms by which the histaminergic system contributes to the modification of these satiety signals remain underexplored. The present review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the central histaminergic system's role in regulating feeding and highlights unanswered questions remaining in our knowledge of the functionality of this system.

Function and Role of Histamine H1 Receptor in the Mammalian Heart

Histamine can change the force of cardiac contraction and alter the beating rate in mammals, including humans. However, striking species and regional differences have been observed. Depending on the species and the cardiac region (atrium versus ventricle) studied, the contractile, chronotropic, dromotropic, and bathmotropic effects of histamine vary. Histamine is present and is produced in the mammalian heart. Thus, histamine may exert autocrine or paracrine effects in the mammalian heart. Histamine uses at least four heptahelical receptors: H₁, H₂, H₃ and H₄. Depending on the species and region studied, cardiomyocytes express only histamine H₁ or only histamine H₂ receptors or both. These receptors are not necessarily functional concerning contractility. We have considerable knowledge of the cardiac expression and function of histamine H₂ receptors. In contrast, we have a poor understanding of the cardiac role of the histamine H₁ receptor. Therefore, we address the structure, signal transduction, and expressional regulation of the histamine H₁ receptor with an eye on its cardiac role. We point out signal transduction and the role of the histamine H₁ receptor in various animal species. This review aims to identify gaps in our knowledge of cardiac histamine H₁ receptors. We highlight where the published research shows disagreements and requires a new approach. Moreover, we show that diseases alter the expression and functional effects of histamine H₁ receptors in the heart. We found that antidepressive drugs and neuroleptic drugs might act as antagonists of cardiac histamine H₁ receptors, and believe that histamine H₁ receptors in the heart might be attractive targets for drug therapy. The authors believe that a better understanding of the role of histamine H₁ receptors in the human heart might be clinically relevant for improving drug therapy.

Histamine H3 receptor antagonists - Roles in neurological and endocrine diseases and diabetes mellitus

Human histamine H3 receptor (H3R) was initially described in the brain of rat in 1983 and cloned in 1999. It can be found in the human brain and functions as a regulator of histamine synthesis and release. H3 receptors are predominantly resident in the presynaptic region of neurons containing histamine, where they modulate the synthesis and release of histamine (autoreceptor) or other neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate, acetylcholine and serotonin (all heteroreceptors). The human histamine H3 receptor has twenty isoforms of which eight are functional. H3 receptor expression is seen in the cerebral cortex, neurons of the basal ganglia and hippocampus, which are important for process of cognition, sleep and homoeostatic regulation. In addition, histamine H3R antagonists stimulate insulin release, through inducing the release of acetylcholine and cause significant reduction in total body weight and triglycerides in obese subjects by causing a feeling of satiety in the hypothalamus. The ability of histamine H3R antagonist to reduce diabetes-induced hyperglycaemia is comparable to that of metformin. It is reasonable therefore, to claim that H3 receptor antagonists may play an important role in the therapy of disorders of cognition, the ability to sleep, oxidative stress, inflammation and anomaly of glucose homoeostasis. A large number of H3R antagonists are being developed by pharmaceutical companies and university research centres. As examples of these new drugs, this review will discuss a number of drugs, including the first histamine H3R receptor antagonist produced.

Inhibition of Astrocytic Histamine N-Methyltransferase as a Possible Target for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) represents the principal cause of dementia among the elderly. Great efforts have been established to understand the physiopathology of AD. Changes in neurotransmitter systems in patients with AD, including cholinergic, GABAergic, serotoninergic, noradrenergic, and histaminergic changes have been reported. Interestingly, changes in the histaminergic system have been related to cognitive impairment in AD patients. The principal pathological changes in the brains of AD patients, related to the histaminergic system, are neurofibrillary degeneration of the tuberomammillary nucleus, the main source of histamine in the brain, low histamine levels, and altered signaling of its receptors. The increase of histamine levels can be achieved by inhibiting its degrading enzyme, histamine N-methyltransferase (HNMT), a cytoplasmatic enzyme located in astrocytes. Thus, increasing histamine levels could be employed in AD patients as co-therapy due to their effects on cognitive functions, neuroplasticity, neuronal survival, neurogenesis, and the degradation of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides. In this sense, the evaluation of the impact of HNMT inhibitors on animal models of AD would be interesting, consequently highlighting its relevance.

The Natural Products Targeting on Allergic Rhinitis: From Traditional Medicine to Modern Drug Discovery

More than 500 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis (AR) in the world. Current treatments include oral antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids; however, they often cause side effects and are unsuitable for long-term exposure. Natural products could work as a feasible alternative, and this study aimed to review the efficacies and mechanisms of natural substances in AR therapies by examining previous literature. Fifty-seven studies were collected and classified into plants, fungi, and minerals decoction; clinical trials were organized separately. The majority of the natural products showed their efficacies by two mechanisms: anti-inflammation regulating diverse mediators and anti-oxidation controlling the activity of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) pathway stimulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). The main AR factors modified by natural products included interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and phospho-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2). Although further studies are required to verify their efficacies and safeties, natural products can significantly contribute to the treatment of AR.

New insights on the arylpiperazinylalkyl pyridazinone ET1 as potent antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory agent

Pyridazine derivatives, such as arylpiperazinylalkyl pyridazinones, display antinociceptive effects to thermal and chemical stimuli. Here, we extended our previous knowledge on the pharmacological profile of 4-amino-6-methyl-2-(3-(4-(4-methylcyclohexa-1,3-dien-1-yl)piperazin-1-yl)propyl)-5-vinylpyridazin-3(2H)-one, here referred as ET1, paving the way for the comprehension of its complete mechanism of action. To this aim, we have evaluated the mouse behavioural responses in several animal models of pain, the effect of ET1 in the murine model of zymosan-induced paw oedema and air-pouch, assessing the cytokines and the cellular phenotype and finally, an in vitro radioligand binding study was performed on a panel of 30 different receptors. In the formalin test, ET1 reduced both neurogenic and inflammatory phase of nociception induced by the aldehyde. Similarly, ET1 strongly reduced paw licking response in the capsaicin test, the abdominal stretching in the writhing test and the carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia. ET1 also evoked a long-lasting reduction of thermal hyperalgesia. Furthermore, ET1 produced a long-lasting anti-inflammatory effect in the zymosan-induced mouse paw oedema and air-pouch through the selective inhibition of inflammatory monocytes recruitment and the modulation of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and MCP-1. Binding experiments confirmed an inhibitory effect on adrenergic α_1A, α_1B and α_2A receptors subtypes and, for the first time, a moderate affinity was observed for the following receptors: histamine H₁, imidazoline I₂, sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 and σ2. These results prompt ET1 as a potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory agent, and support the possibility that it may be suitable for clinical applications in a wide-range of inflammatory-based diseases.

Structural and clinical impact of anti-allergy agents: An overview

Allergic disorders are markedly rising in industrialized countries. The identification of compounds that trigger the immunoglobulin E (IgE)-dependent allergic reaction remain the means to improve the quality of life by limiting patient's exposure to critical allergens. Information concerning the treatment and onset of allergic disorders including atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and bronchial asthma has been provided by the research over the past decade. Recent studies also indicated that allergic inflammation is associated closely with their exacerbation and progression and indeed is the basic pathophysiology of allergic diseases. As a result of immunological and molecular biological studies our understanding of the mechanism of allergic inflammation with regard to therapeutic agents has improved. While much effort has been paid to developing a new anti-allergic agent, the allergic disease has yet to be completely conquered. The more extensive research will allow the development of new therapeutics to combat allergic diseases. Currently, with respect to mechanism of action anti-allergy drugs are classified into five types including histamine H₁ antagonists, leukotriene antagonists, Th₂ cytokine inhibitors, thromboxane A₂ inhibitors and mediator-release inhibitors. The use of two or more anti-allergy agents together is not acknowledged at present, but this will be the subject of research in the future because with different mechanisms of action anti-allergy agents used at the same time will theoretically increase their effects. This review article focuses on anti-allergy agents highlighting their applications, clinical trials and recent advancement on drugs.

Histamine pharmacology: from Sir Henry Dale to the 21st century

Histamine has been one of the most studied substances in medicine, playing a major role in diverse (patho)physiological processes. It elicits its multifaceted modulatory functions by activating four types of GPCRs, designated as H_1-4 . Despite the heterogeneity and the complexity of histamine receptor pharmacology, many discoveries over the past 100 years resulted in the development of H₁ antihistamines and H₂ -targeting 'blockbuster' therapeutics for the management of allergies and gastrointestinal disorders respectively. Recently, a first-in-class H₃ inverse agonist was approved for the treatment of narcolepsy, whereas H₄ antagonists are under clinical evaluation for their potential therapeutic exploitation in immune-related diseases. This review critically presents the past successes and drawbacks in histamine research, complemented by the modern conceptual innovations in molecular and receptor pharmacology. It targets both young and experienced researchers in an ongoing effort to stimulate novel insights for the dissection of the translational potential of histamine pharmacology. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on New Uses for 21st Century. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.3/issuetoc.

Changes in gene expression induced by histamine, fexofenadine and osthole: Expression of histamine H1 receptor, COX-2, NF-κB, CCR1, chemokine CCL5/RANTES and interleukin-1β in PBMC allergic and non-allergic patients

INTRODUCTION

Fexofenadine (FXF) is a third-generation antihistamine drug and osthole is assumed as a natural antihistamine alternative. This paper compares results of histamine, FXF and osthole impact on HRH-1, COX-2, NF-κB-p50, CCR1 mRNA expression. We also measured mRNA expression of IL-1β and CCL5/RANTES in incubated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to compared how histamine, FXF and osthole had influence on expression level and interacts on product secretion.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to investigate expression pattern in asthma PBMC.

METHODS

The cultures were treated 72h with FXF and osthole. We measured mRNA expression of histamine HRH-1, COX-2, NF-κB-p50, CCR1, IL-1β and CCL5/RANTES with Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

The present study suggest that osthole may be a potential inhibitor of histamine H₁ receptor activity. We also demonstrated that cells cultured with histamine increase COX-2 mRNA expression and osthole reduce it.

CONCLUSION

Allergy remains one of the most common chronic diseases in Europe and it is rapidly approaching epidemic proportions; with current predictions estimating that the number of allergy-afflicted will equal the healthy population by 2020. It is therefore paramount to find new pharmaceuticals which successfully combat allergic disease.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors

Histamine is a developmentally highly conserved autacoid found in most vertebrate tissues. Its physiological functions are mediated by four 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) that are all targets of pharmacological intervention. The receptors display molecular heterogeneity and constitutive activity. H1R antagonists are long known antiallergic and sedating drugs, whereas the H2R was identified in the 1970s and led to the development of H2R-antagonists that revolutionized stomach ulcer treatment. The crystal structure of ligand-bound H1R has rendered it possible to design new ligands with novel properties. The H3R is an autoreceptor and heteroreceptor providing negative feedback on histaminergic and inhibition on other neurons. A block of these actions promotes waking. The H4R occurs on immuncompetent cells and the development of anti-inflammatory drugs is anticipated.

The histamine H4 receptor: from orphan to the clinic

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) was first noted as a sequence in genomic databases that had features of a class A G-protein coupled receptor. This putative receptor was found to bind histamine consistent with its homology to other histamine receptors and thus became the fourth member of the histamine receptor family. Due to the previous success of drugs that target the H1 and H2 receptors, an effort was made to understand the function of this new receptor and determine if it represented a viable drug target. Taking advantage of the vast literature on the function of histamine, a search for histamine activity that did not appear to be mediated by the other three histamine receptors was undertaken. From this asthma and pruritus emerged as areas of particular interest. Histamine has long been suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but antihistamines that target the H1 and H2 receptors have not been shown to be effective for this condition. The use of selective ligands in animal models of asthma has now potentially filled this gap by showing a role for the H4R in mediating lung function and inflammation. A similar story exists for chronic pruritus associated with conditions such as atopic dermatitis. Antihistamines that target the H1 receptor are effective in reducing acute pruritus, but are ineffective in pruritus experienced by patients with atopic dermatitis. As for asthma, animal models have now suggested a role for the H4R in mediating pruritic responses, with antagonists of the H4R reducing pruritus in a number of different conditions. The anti-pruritic effect of H4R antagonists has recently been shown in human clinical studies, validating the preclinical findings in the animal models. A selective H4R antagonist inhibited histamine-induced pruritus in health volunteers and reduced pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. The history to date of the H4R provides an excellent example of the deorphanization of a novel receptor and the translation of this into clinical efficacy in humans.

Antihistamines and itch

Histamine is one of the best-characterized pruritogens in humans. It is known to play a role in pruritus associated with urticaria as well as ocular and nasal allergic reactions. Histamine mediates its effect via four receptors. Antihistamines that block the activation of the histamine H₁receptor, H₁R, have been shown to be effective therapeutics for the treatment of pruritus associated with urticaria, allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis. However, their efficacy in other pruritic diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis is limited. The other histamine receptors may also play a role in pruritus, with the exception of the histamine H₂receptor, H₂R. Preclinical evidence indicates that local antagonism of the histamine H₃receptor, H₃R, can induce scratching perhaps via blocking inhibitory neuronal signals. The histamine H₄receptor, H₄R, has received a significant amount of attention as to its role in mediating pruritic signals. Indeed, it has now been shown that a selective H₄R antagonist can inhibit histamine-induced itch in humans. This clinical result, in conjunction with efficacy in various preclinical pruritus models, points to the therapeutic potential of H₄R antagonists for the treatment of pruritus not controlled by antihistamines that target the H₁R.

Effects of histamine on cultured interstitial cells of cajal in murine small intestine

Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) are the pacemaker cells in the gastrointestinal tract, and histamine is known to regulate neuronal activity, control vascular tone, alter endothelial permeability, and modulate gastric acid secretion. However, the action mechanisms of histamine in mouse small intestinal ICCs have not been previously investigated, and thus, in the present study, we investigated the effects of histamine on mouse small intestinal ICCs, and sought to identify the receptors involved. Enzymatic digestions were used to dissociate ICCs from small intestines, and the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration was used to record potentials (in current clamp mode) from cultured ICCs. Histamine was found to depolarize resting membrane potentials concentration dependently, and whereas 2-PEA (a selective H1 receptor agonist) induced membrane depolarizations, Dimaprit (a selective H2-agonist), R-alpha-methylhistamine (R-alpha-MeHa; a selective H3-agonist), and 4-methylhistamine (4-MH; a selective H4-agonist) did not. Pretreatment with Ca²⁺-free solution or thapsigargin (a Ca²⁺-ATPase inhibitor in endoplasmic reticulum) abolished the generation of pacemaker potentials and suppressed histamine-induced membrane depolarization. Furthermore, treatments with U-73122 (a phospholipase C inhibitor) or 5-fluoro-2-indolyl des-chlorohalopemide (FIPI; a phospholipase D inhibitor) blocked histamine-induced membrane depolarizations in ICCs. On the other hand, KT5720 (a protein kinase A inhibitor) did not block histamine-induced membrane depolarization. These results suggest that histamine modulates pacemaker potentials through H1 receptor-mediated pathways via external Ca²⁺ influx and Ca²⁺ release from internal stores in a PLC and PLD dependent manner.

Molecular and cellular analysis of human histamine receptor subtypes

The human histamine receptors hH(1)R and hH(2)R constitute important drug targets, and hH(3)R and hH(4)R have substantial potential in this area. Considering the species-specificity of pharmacology of H(x)R orthologs, it is important to analyze hH(x)Rs. Here, we summarize current knowledge of hH(x)Rs endogenously expressed in human cells and hH(x)Rs recombinantly expressed in mammalian and insect cells. We present the advantages and disadvantages of the various systems. We also discuss problems associated with the use of hH(x)R antibodies, an issue of general relevance for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). There is much greater overlap in activity of 'selective' ligands for other hH(x)Rs than the cognate receptor subtype than generally appreciated. Studies with native and recombinant systems support the concept of ligand-specific receptor conformations, encompassing agonists and antagonists. It is emerging that for characterization of hH(x)R ligands, one cannot rely on a single test system and a single parameter. Rather, multiple systems and parameters have to be studied. Although such studies are time-consuming and expensive, ultimately, they will increase drug safety and efficacy.

One hundred years of histamine research

In this introductory chapter, we revisit some of the landmarks in the history of histamine research. Since histamine was first synthesized (1907) and isolated as a bacterial contaminant of an extract of ergot (1910), the elucidation of its role in health and disease and its molecular mechanism of action have been continuous, reflecting the application of advances in scientific knowledge, technology and therapeutics over the last 100 years. It appears that the research will continue indefinitely as the nature of the problem is inherently fractal. First, there was a single chemical entity, described in terms of state-of-the-art, two-dimensional projections of structures introduced by Fischer in 1891, and an idea that such potent chemicals produced their effects on biological systems as a consequence of an exquisite interaction with a receptive substance, the revolutionary concept of Langley (1905). Today, we recognize four receptor subtypes with multiple activation states and multiple coupling to intracellular effector systems, so that we are no longer able to reliably and in all instances classify compounds interacting with the histamine receptors simply as agonists or antagonists. The complexity is potentially overwhelming, but the promise of value to patients beyond that already provided by the first approved generations of histamine receptor blockers is a compelling driver.

Inhibition of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase improves allergic nasal blockage in guinea pigs

Although it has been suggested that prostaglandin (PG) D(2) is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis, whether the inhibition of hematopoietic PGD(2) synthase (H-PGDS) shows beneficial effects on allergic rhinitis has been unclear. We evaluated the effects of a selective H-PGDS inhibitor, TFC-007, on nasal symptoms on Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis of guinea pigs. Sensitized animals were challenged with the pollen once a week. TFC-007 (30mg/kg, p.o.) given once before a challenge almost completely suppressed PGD(2) production in the nasal tissue early and late after the challenge. Although pre-treatment did not affect the incidences of sneezing and early phase nasal blockage, late phase nasal blockage was partially but significantly attenuated; however, nasal eosinophilia was not suppressed. In contrast, when TFC-007 was given once 1.5h after the challenge, the late phase response was not affected. Collectively, PGD(2) produced by H-PGDS early after an antigen challenge can participate in the induction of late phase nasal blockage, although the mechanism may be independent of eosinophil infilatration. The strategy for H-PGDS inhibition may be beneficial for allergic rhinitis therapy.

Cognition-enhancing properties of Dimebon in a rat novel object recognition task are unlikely to be associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibition or N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism

Dimebon (dimebolin) treatment enhances cognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Huntington's disease. Although Dimebon was originally thought to improve cognition and memory through inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, the low in vitro affinity for these targets suggests that these mechanisms may not contribute to its clinical effects. To test this hypothesis, we assessed whether Dimebon enhances cognition in rats and if such an action is related to either mechanism or additional candidate mechanisms. Acute oral administration of Dimebon to rats (0.05, 0.5, and 5 mg/kg) enhanced cognition in a novel object recognition task and produced Dimebon brain concentrations of 1.7 +/- 0.43, 14 +/- 5.1, and 172 +/- 94 nM, respectively. At these concentrations, Dimebon did not alter the activity of recombinant human or rat brain AChE. Unlike the AChE inhibitors donepezil and galantamine, Dimebon did not change acetylcholine levels in the hippocampus or prefrontal cortex of freely moving rats. Dimebon displays affinity for the NMDA receptor (K(i) = 105 +/- 18 microM) that is considerably higher than brain concentrations associated with cognition enhancement in the novel object recognition task and 200-fold weaker than that of memantine (K(i) = 0.54 +/- 0.05 microM). Dimebon did not block NMDA-induced calcium influx in primary neuronal cells (IC(50) > 50 microM), consistent with a lack of significant effect on this pathway. The cognition-enhancing effects of Dimebon are unlikely to be mediated by AChE inhibition or NMDA receptor antagonism, and its mechanism of action appears to be distinct from currently approved medications for AD.

A reporter assay for G-protein-coupled receptors using a B-cell line suitable for stable episomal expression

We have established a cAMP response element (CRE)-mediated reporter assay system for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using an oriP-based estrogen-inducible expression vector and the B-cell line (GBC53 or GBCC71) that expresses EBNA-1 and is adapted to serum-free culture. GBC53 harbors a GAL4-ER expression unit and a CRE-luciferase gene in the genome, and GBCC71 also harbors expression units for two chimeric Galphas proteins (Gs/q and Gs/i). Introduction of a GPCR expression plasmid into GBC53 or GBCC71 creates polyclonal stable transformants in 2 weeks, and these are easily expanded and used for assays after induction of the GPCR expression. Using GBC53, we detected ligand-dependent signals of Gs-coupled GPCRs such as glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) and beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) with high sensitivity. Interestingly, we also detected constitutive activity of beta2AR. Using GBCC71, we detected ligand-dependent signals of Gq- or Gi-coupled GPCRs such as H1 histamine receptor and CXCR1 chemokine receptor in addition to Gs-coupled GPCRs. An agonist, antagonist, or inverse agonist was successfully evaluated in this system. We succeeded in constructing a 384-well high-throughput screening (HTS) system for GLP1R. This system enabled us to easily and rapidly make a large number of efficient GPCR assay systems suitable for HTS as well as ligand hunting of orphan GPCRs.

G-protein coupled receptor array technologies: site directed immobilisation of liposomes containing the H1-histamine or M2-muscarinic receptors

This paper describes a novel strategy to create a microarray of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), an important group of membrane proteins both physiologically and pharmacologically. The H(1)-histamine receptor and the M(2)-muscarinic receptor were both used as model GPCRs in this study. The receptor proteins were embedded in liposomes created from the cellular membrane extracts of Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cell culture line with its accompanying baculovirus protein insert used for overexpression of the receptors. Once captured onto a surface these liposomes provide a favourable lipidic environment for the integral membrane proteins. Site directed immobilisation of these liposomes was achieved by introduction of cholesterol-modified oligonucleotides (oligos). These oligo/cholesterol conjugates incorporate within the lipid bilayer and were captured by the complementary oligo strand exposed on the surface. Sequence specific immobilisation was demonstrated using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). Confirmatory results were also obtained by monitoring fluorescent ligand binding to GPCRs captured on a spotted oligo microarray using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and the Zepto-READER microarray imaging system. Sequence specific immobilisation of such biologically important membrane proteins could lead to the development of a heterogeneous self-sorting liposome array of GPCRs which would underpin a variety of future novel applications.

Stimulation of histamine H2 receptors activates TRPC3 channels through both phospholipase C and phospholipase D

Histamine plays an important role in many physiological functions; and a change in cytosolic Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)) may be an early signal in these processes. In the present study, we investigated the activation mechanism of TRPC3, the Canonical Transient Receptors Potential 3 Channels, by histamine via a non-capacitative Ca(2+) entry pathway. TRPC3 was transfected into HEK293 cells and the cells were treated with thapsigargin to deplete the intracellular Ca(2+) stores; re-addition of Ca(2+) initiated a capacitative Ca(2+) entry (CCE). A subsequent application of histamine evoked another Ca(2+) influx on top of the CCE signal only in the TRPC3-transfected HEK293 cells, indicating that histamine can activate TRPC3 via a non-capacitative Ca(2+) entry pathway (non-CCE). This histamine-induced non-CCE was abolished by cimitidine, a histamine H(2) receptors antagonist, but not by histamine H(1) receptor antagonists pyrilamine and diphenhydramine. KT5720, a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, had no effect on the histamine-induced non-CCE. This histamine-induced non-CCE was partially reduced by U73122, a phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor, and by butan-1-ol, a phospholipase D (PLD) inhibitor. When both PLC and PLD inhibitors were simultaneously applied, the non-CCE signal was completely abolished. Taken together, our results showed, for the first time, that histamine could activate TRPC3 via histamine H(2) receptors, and both PLC and PLD participated in this process.

Using guinea pigs in studies relevant to asthma and COPD

The guinea pig has been the most commonly used small animal species in preclinical studies related to asthma and COPD. The primary advantages of the guinea pig are the similar potencies and efficacies of agonists and antagonists in human and guinea pig airways and the many similarities in physiological processes, especially airway autonomic control and the response to allergen. The primary disadvantages to using guinea pigs are the lack of transgenic methods, limited numbers of guinea pig strains for comparative studies and a prominent axon reflex that is unlikely to be present in human airways. These attributes and various models developed in guinea pigs are discussed.

The histamine H4 receptor: A novel modulator of inflammatory and immune disorders

All 4 known histamine receptors (H(1)R, H(2)R, H(3)R and H(4)R) have been used or proposed as therapeutic targets for varied diseases. This article reviews the recent progress in understanding the function of the recently described histamine receptor H(4)R in a variety of immune responses and the potential therapeutic value of H(4)R antagonists. The H(4)R is expressed primarily on cells involved in inflammation and immune response. It has effects on chemotaxis, as well as cytokine and chemokine production of mast cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells, and T cells. H(4)R antagonists, JNJ 7777120 and JNJ 10191584 (also known as VUF 6002) have been developed with excellent affinity and selectivity towards human and rodent H(4)R. These antagonists also demonstrate efficacy as anti-inflammatory agents in vivo. H(4)R antagonists have shown promising activity in down-regulating immune responses in a range of animal disease models including acute inflammation, hapten-mediated colitis, and allergic airway inflammation. Due to its distribution on immune cells and its proven role in inflammatory functions, the H(4)R appears to be a therapeutic target for the treatment of a variety of immune disorders.

Novel ligands for the human histamine H1 receptor: Synthesis, pharmacology, and comparative molecular field analysis studies of 2-dimethylamino-5-(6)-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes

This paper reports the synthesis of a novel series of (+/-)-2-dimethylamino- 5- and 6-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives (5- and 6-APTs), and, corresponding affinity, functional activity, and, molecular modeling studies with regard to drug design targeting the human histamine H1 receptor. The 5-APTs have 2- to 4-fold higher H1 receptor affinity than the endogenous agonist histamine. The chemical nature of a meta-substituent on the 5-APT pendant phenyl moiety does not significantly affect H1 affinity. In contrast, analogous meta-substitution for the 6-APTs increases H1 affinity up to 100-fold. The new APTs do not activate H1 receptor-linked intracellular signaling and apparently are competitive H1 antagonists. A new model that establishes structural parameters for binding to the human H1 receptor by APTs and other ligands was developed using 3-D QSAR (CoMFA). The model predicts H1 ligand binding with a higher degree of external predictability compared to a previously reported model. The APTs also were examined for activity at human serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, which are phylogenetically closely related to the H1 receptor. 5-APT and m-Cl-6-APT were identified as novel agonists that selectively activate 5-HT2C receptors. It is concluded that the lipophilic (brain-penetrating) APT molecular scaffold may have pharmacotherapeutic potential in neuropsychiatric diseases.

Chemical genetics reveals an RGS/G-protein role in the action of a compound

We report here on a chemical genetic screen designed to address the mechanism of action of a small molecule. Small molecules that were active in models of urinary incontinence were tested on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and the resulting phenotypes were used as readouts in a genetic screen to identify possible molecular targets. The mutations giving resistance to compound were found to affect members of the RGS protein/G-protein complex. Studies in mammalian systems confirmed that the small molecules inhibit muscarinic G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling involving G-αq (G-protein alpha subunit). Our studies suggest that the small molecules act at the level of the RGS/G-αq signaling complex, and define new mutations in both RGS and G-αq, including a unique hypo-adapation allele of G-αq. These findings suggest that therapeutics targeted to downstream components of GPCR signaling may be effective for treatment of diseases involving inappropriate receptor activation.

The authors have utilized Caenorhabditis elegans, and yeast genetics, combined with mammalian tissue and cell culture experiments to investigate the mechanism of action of a unique set of small molecules. These molecules are active in tissue models of urinary incontinence and allow for increased bladder filling. In the course of studying sensitivity and resistance to these compounds, Fitzgerald et al. uncovered novel alleles of RGS and Gq proteins. Further characterization of one such allele identified that its action conferred a hypo-adaptive phenotype on yeast during pheromone signaling assays. Their data as a whole indicate that these small molecules are able to diminish signaling from G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) downstream of the receptors themselves. Since GPCR signaling is very important in many diseases in humans, the novel mechanism of these compounds may offer new ways to treat human disease.

Alternative promoter use and splice variation in the human histamine H1 receptor gene

Upstream gene structure and mRNA expression of the human histamine H1 receptor gene was investigated in cells relevant to the pathogenesis of asthma, (primary cultured human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells, primary cultured human bronchial epithelial cells and bronchial epithelial cell line [BEAS2B]), and other tissues known to express histamine H1 receptors (placenta and brain). Splice variation of the 5' terminal exons gave three separate locations for novel promoters upstream of the detected transcription start sites. Further splice variants in the 5' untranslated region were also observed. Transient transfections of promoter/luciferase constructs showed these regions directed expression in HASM cells and BEAS2B cells. Polymorphism screening of the major regulatory regions identified a number of novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Expression of splice variants was confirmed by real-time PCR assays. Results showed one 5' terminal exon splice variant, comprising exons B/K, expressed preferentially in all tissues. Interestingly, the other 5' terminal exon splice variants showed tissue-specific patterns of expression, with variant F/K expressed negligibly (0.1%) in HASM cells, but accounting for 19.3% and 8.3% of total expression in BEAS2B cells and differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells, respectively. Splice variant A/K was second most highly expressed in differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells (23%), whereas its expression in BEAS2B and HASM cells was 1.7% and 4.4%, respectively. These data suggest the use of alternative promoters directing human H1 receptor gene expression, both within and between cell types.

Preclinical Pharmacology of FMPD [6-Fluoro-10-[3-(2-methoxyethyl)-4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl]-2-methyl-4H-3-thia-4,9-diaza-benzo[f]azulene]: A Potential Novel Antipsychotic with Lower Histamine H1 Receptor Affinity Than Olanzapine

FMPD [6-fluoro-10-[3-(2-methoxyethyl)-4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl]-2-methyl-4H-3-thia-4,9-diaza-benzo[f]azulene] is a potential novel antipsychotic with high affinity for dopamine D2 (Ki= 6.3 nM), 5-HT(2A) (Ki= 7.3 nM), and 5-HT6 (Ki= 8.0 nM) human recombinant receptors and lower affinity for histamine H1 (Ki= 30 nM) and 5-HT2C (Ki= 102 nM) human recombinant receptors than olanzapine. Oral administration of FMPD increased rat nucleus accumbens 3,4-dihyroxyphenylacetic acid concentrations (ED200 = 6 mg/kg), blocked 5-HT2A agonist-induced increases in rat serum corticosterone levels (ED50= 1.8 mg/kg), and inhibited the ex vivo binding of [125I]SB-258585 [4-iodo-N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenyl]-benzenesulfonamide] to striatal 5-HT6 receptors (ED50= 10 mg/kg) but failed to inhibit ex vivo binding of [3H]pyrilamine to hypothalamic histamine H1 receptors at doses of up to 30 mg/kg. In electrophysiology studies, acute administration of FMPD selectively elevated the number of spontaneously active A10 (versus A9) dopamine neurons and chronic administration selectively decreased the number of spontaneously active A10 (versus A9) dopamine neurons. FMPD did not produce catalepsy at doses lower than 25 mg/kg p.o. In Fos-induction studies, FMPD had an atypical antipsychotic profile in the striatum and nucleus accumbens and increased Fos expression in orexin-containing neurons of the hypothalamus. FMPD produced only a transient elevation of prolactin levels. These data indicate that FMPD is an orally available potent antagonist of dopamine D2, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT6 receptors and a weak antagonist of H1 and 5-HT2C receptors. FMPD has the potential to have efficacy in treating schizophrenia and bipolar mania with a low risk of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms, prolactin elevation, and weight gain. Clinical trials are needed to test these hypotheses.

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 2 increases neuronal cGMP, synaptic plasticity and memory performance

An essential element of the signalling cascade leading to synaptic plasticity is the intracellular second messenger molecule guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP). Using the novel, potent, and selective inhibitor Bay 60-7550, we show that the enzyme 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase type 2 (PDE2) is responsible for the degradation of newly synthesized cGMP in cultured neurons and hippocampal slices. Inhibition of PDE2 enhanced long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission without altering basal synaptic transmission. Inhibition of PDE2 also improved the performance of rats in social and object recognition memory tasks, and reversed MK801-induced deficits in spontaneous alternation in mice in a T-maze. Our data provide strong evidence that inhibition of PDE2 can improve memory functions by enhancing neuronal plasticity.

Large-scale overproduction, functional purification and ligand affinities of the His-tagged human histamine H1 receptor

This report describes an efficient strategy for amplified functional purification of the human H1 receptor after heterologous expression in Sf9 cells. The cDNA encoding a C-terminally histidine-tagged (10xHis) human histamine H1 receptor was used to generate recombinant baculovirus in a Spodoptera frugiperda-derived cell line (IPLB-Sf9). As judged from its ligand affinity profile, functional receptor could be expressed at high levels (30-40 pmol per 10(6) cells). Rapid proteolysis in the cell culture led to limited fragmentation, without loss of ligand binding, but could be efficiently suppressed by including the protease inhibitor leupeptin during cell culture and all subsequent manipulations. Effective solubilization of functional receptor with optimal recovery and stability required the use of dodecylmaltoside as a detergent in the presence of a high concentration of NaCl and of a suitable inverse agonist. Efficient purification of solubilized receptor could be achieved by affinity chromatography over nickel(II) nitrilotriacetic acid resin. Functional membrane reconstitution of purified H1 receptor was accomplished in mixed soybean lipids (asolectin). The final proteoliposomic H1 receptor preparation has a purity greater than 90% on a protein basis and displays a ligand binding affinity profile very similar to the untagged receptor expressed in COS-7 cells. In conclusion, we are able to produce pharmacologically viable H1 receptor in a stable membrane environment allowing economic large-batch operation. This opens the way to detailed studies of structure-function relationships of this medically and biologically important receptor protein by 3D-crystallography, FT-IR spectroscopy and solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Ligand-directed functional heterogeneity of histamine H1 receptors: novel dual-function ligands selectively activate and block H1-mediated phospholipase C and adenylyl cyclase signaling

The autacoid and neurotransmitter histamine activates the H(1) G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to stimulate predominantly phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol phosphate (IP) signaling and, to a lesser extent, adenylyl cyclase (AC)/cAMP signaling in a variety of mammalian cells and tissues, as well as H(1)-transfected clonal cell lines. This study reports that two novel H(1) receptor ligands developed in our laboratory, (-)-trans-1-phenyl-3-dimethylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (trans-PAT) and (+/-)-cis-5-phenyl-7-dimethylamino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-9H-benzocycloheptane (cis-PAB), activate H(1) receptors to selectively stimulate AC/cAMP formation and PLC/IP formation, respectively, in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with guinea pig H(1) receptor cDNA. trans-PAT and cis-PAB also are shown to be functionally selective antagonists of H(1)-linked PLC/IP and AC/cAMP signaling, respectively. Whereas cis-PAB H(1) receptor activity is shown to be typically competitive, trans-PAT displays a complex interaction with the H(1) receptor that is not competitive regarding antagonism of saturation binding by the standard H(1) antagonist radioligand [(3)H]mepyramine or H(1)/PLC/IP functional activation by histamine. trans-PAT, however, does competitively block H(1)/PLC/IP functional activation by cis-PAB. Molecular determinants for trans-PAT versus cis-PAB differential binding to H(1) receptors, which presumably leads to differential activation of AC/cAMP versus PLC/IP signaling, likely involves stereochemical factors as well as more subtle steric influences. Results suggest the trans-PAT and cis-PAB probes will be useful to study molecular mechanisms of ligand-directed GPCR multifunctional signaling. Moreover, because most untoward cardiovascular-, respiratory-, and gastrointestinal H(1) receptor-mediated effects proceed via the PLC/IP pathway, PAT-type agonists that selectively enhance H(1)-mediated AC/cAMP signaling provide a mechanistic basis for exploiting H(1) receptor activation for drug design purposes.

Identification of Amino Acid Residues Responsible for Agonist-Induced Down-Regulation of Histamine H1 Receptors

The histamine H(1) receptor (H1R) level is dynamically regulated in vivo under various physiological and pathological conditions. The H1R regulation may consist of various processes, and this study focused on the process of receptor trafficking, that is, receptor internalization to endosomes and the following receptor degradation. First, we identified five possible phosphorylation residues of human H1R, Thr(140), Thr(142), Ser(396), Ser(398), and Thr(478), based on in vitro phosphorylation studies. Then to determine the role of these residues, we constructed a mutant H1R in which all of these five residues were substituted with alanine. Both wild-type and the mutant receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells had similar values of K(d) for [(3)H]mepyramine binding and K(i) for histamine, and these cells showed similar levels of histamine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation. Both types of H1Rs were internalized essentially in the same way upon stimulation with histamine (100 microM) for 30 min. However, down-regulation of the mutant H1R was completely impaired, whereas that of wild-type H1R occurred by approximately 60% by the treatment with 100 microM histamine for 24 h. These results suggest that these residues are responsible for receptor down-regulation but not for receptor internalization. Possibly, phosphorylation of the residues is required for receptor transport from endosomes to lysosomes.

H1-receptors: localization and role in airway physiology and in immune functions

Histamine H(1)-receptors are involved in the pathologic processes of allergy. Clinical trials of H(1)-receptor antagonists have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents in reducing the sneezing, pruritus, and rhinorrhea associated with allergic rhinitis. In the lung, H(1)-receptors mediate the bronchoconstrictive effects of histamine and increase vascular permeability, which lead to plasma exudation. H(1)-receptors are present on T cells, B cells, monocytes, and lymphocytes, and stimulation of these receptors induces pro-inflammatory effects. It has been suggested that a signal from the H(1)-receptor contributes to the antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathways that induce proliferative responses and lead to the production of cytokines and antibodies by T cells and B cells, respectively. It would appear, therefore, that the H(1)-receptor has a wider role in inflammatory processes than simply mediating the actions of histamine.

Genetic and pharmacological aspects of histamine H3 receptor heterogeneity

Histaminergic H3 receptors modulate the release of neurotransmitters within the CNS and periphery. Ligands for these receptors have potential clinical utility in a variety of disease states. However, the pharmacological characteristics of these receptors have been enigmatic for more than a decade because of the diversity of pharmacological effects observed with the limited number of heretofore-available compounds. Recent cloning of the H3 receptor has revealed interspecies differences in the protein sequences in key regions, the existence of splice variants that differ in composition between species, and potential differences in signal transduction processes between either different tissues and/or species. This review attempts to summarize these findings within the context of the molecular biological and pharmacological data accumulated to date. Also, we suggest a nomenclature strategy to reduce potential confusion that has arisen from different naming systems used by various investigators. While some facets of this genetic and pharmacological diversity help to rationalize various aspects of H3 receptor heterogeneity, there remains an insufficient repertoire of selective ligands, assays, or other measures to completely resolve all components of this diversity. The promise of newly available tools to further explore H3 receptor function may provide the insight to bring the promised clinical potential of H3 receptor ligands to realization.

Application of thin-layer chromatographic data in quantitative structure-activity relationship assay of thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives with H1-antihistamine activity. I

A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of H1-antihistamine activity and chromatographic data of 2-[2-(phenylamino)thiazol-4-yl]ethanamine; 2-(2-benzyl-4-thiazolyl)ethanamine; 2-(2-benzhydrylthiazol-4-yl)ethylamine derivative; 2-(1-piperazinyl- and 2-(hexahydro-1H-1,4-diazepin-1-yl)benzothiazole derivatives was made. The RP2 thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (silica gel RP2 60F254 silanised precoated), impregnated with solutions of selected amino acid mixtures (L-Asp, L-Asn, L-Thr and L-Lys), were used in two developing solvents as hH1R antagonistic interaction models. Using regression analysis, the relationships between chromatographic and biological activity data were found. The correlations obtained in regression analysis for the examined thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives with H1-antihistamine activity [pA2(H1)] represent their interaction with all the proposed biochromatographic models (S1-S7). Some of the calculated equations can be applied to predict the pharmacological activity of new drug candidates. The best multivariate relationships useful in predicting the pharmacological activity of thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives were obtained under the condition of experiment with RP2 TLC plates using the developing solvent acetonitrile-methanol-buffer (40:40:20, v/v). The log P values of particular compounds are extremely important for this kind of activity.

New concepts of histamine receptors and actions

Histamine and antihistamines are so deeply woven into the fabric of allergic diseases that it is sometimes difficult to see how this field could advance beyond our current, potent histamine H1-receptor drugs. Investigations of other actions of histamine and the identification of H2, H3, and now H4 receptors have suddenly reignited the search for new mono- and multi-receptor-specific agonists and antagonists. There is great excitement due to preliminary findings that H3 receptors act as neural inhibitory autoreceptors, and H4 receptors might modulate immune cell functions.

Efficacy measurement of topical antihistamines: a review

More and more antihistamines are used in gels or ointments for local antipruritic therapy. Among other factors, the efficacy is dependent on the penetration properties of the respective agents and the optimal choice of vehicle substances. To avoid expensive treatment with unsatisfying success, a reliable efficacy measurement would be desirable prior to the admission of new topical antihistamine preparations. Therefore we reviewed the literature for common methods to assess the efficacy of local antihistamines in healthy volunteers. The principle is to apply the test substance to marked test areas and to challenge the skin after a certain time with a standardised amount of histamine, allergens or mast-cell-degranulating substances. For the test evaluation, the areas of wheal, flare and itch are measured and compared between antihistamine-treated and control fields. Challenge models and most of the described evaluation methods are suited for the preliminary efficacy measurement of antihistamines. However, to be able to compare the results, a standardised procedure used by all investigators would be desirable.

Biochemical characterization of desloratadine, a potent antagonist of the human histamine H(1) receptor

We have characterized desloratadine (5H-benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine, 8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-11-(4-piperidinylidene), CAS 100643-71-8) as a potent antagonist of the human histamine H(1) receptor. [3H]Desloratadine bound to membranes expressing the recombinant human histamine H(1) receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-H(1)) in a specific and saturable manner with a K(d) of 1.1+/-0.2 nM, a B(max) of 7.9+/-2.0 pmol/mg protein, and an association rate constant of 0.011 nM(-1) x min(-1). The K(d) calculated from the kinetic measurements was 1.5 nM. Dissociation of [3H]desloratadine from the human histamine H(1) receptor was slow, with only 37% of the binding reversed at 6 h in the presence of 5 microM unlabeled desloratadine. Seventeen histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists were evaluated in competition-binding studies. Desloratadine had a K(i) of 0.9+/-0.1 nM in these competition studies. In CHO-H(1) cells, histamine stimulation resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca(2+)](i) with an EC(50) of 170+/-30 nM. After a 90-min preincubation with desloratadine, the histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca(2+)](i) was shifted to the right, with a depression of the maximal response at higher concentrations of antagonist. The apparent K(b) value was 0.2+/-0.14 nM with a slope of 1.6+/-0.1. The slow dissociation from the receptor and noncompetitive antagonism suggests that desloratadine may be a pseudoirreversible antagonist of the human histamine H(1) receptor. The mechanism of desloratadine antagonism of the human histamine H(1) receptor may help to explain the high potency and 24-h duration of action observed in clinical studies.