Immunotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: state of the art and novel therapeutic approaches

Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Model for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in NSCLC: comparison with RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and develop a quantitative pCR prediction model. We compared the model's performance with RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST.

METHOD

A retrospective review was conducted on patients with resectable NSCLC who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy from January 2020 to December 2023. Patients with both pre-treatment (18F-FDG PET/CT scan-1) and preoperative scans (18F-FDG PET/CT scan-2) were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters, clinical characteristics, and follow-up data were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors and construct the prediction model. The model's predictive performance was compared with RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria. The model was validated with an external cohort from January to September 2024. Postoperative pathological results serve as the gold standard for pCR.

RESULTS

36 patients were included for model development, with 19 (52.8%) achieving pCR. ΔTLR% (percentage change between two scans in tumor-to-liver ratio) and SULpeak from scan-2 were significant predictors. The developed prediction model demonstrated outstanding performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.975, 100% sensitivity, and 94.1% specificity. In comparison, RECIST 1.1 showed poor sensitivity (10.5%) but high specificity (100%), while PERCIST had moderate sensitivity (73.7%) and specificity (94.1%). Validation with 8 patients confirmed the model's accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that 18F-FDG PET/CT, specifically the ΔTLR% and SULpeak from scan-2, is a reliable predictor of pCR in resectable NSCLC undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. The quantitative prediction model outperforms both RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST. These findings highlight the potential clinical utility of this model, although further validation with larger cohorts is required to confirm its robustness and generalizability.

Tumour and microenvironment crosstalk in NSCLC progression and response to therapy

The treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is evolving rapidly, driven by advances in the development of targeted agents and immunotherapies. Despite this progress, some patients have suboptimal responses to treatment, highlighting the need for new therapeutic strategies. In the past decade, the important role of the tumour microenvironment (TME) in NSCLC progression, metastatic dissemination and response to treatment has become increasingly evident. Understanding the complexity of the TME and its interactions with NSCLC can propel efforts to improve current treatment modalities, overcome resistance and develop new treatments, which will ultimately improve the outcomes of patients. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive view of the NSCLC TME, examining its components and highlighting distinct archetypes characterized by spatial niches within and surrounding tumour nests, which form complex neighbourhoods. Next, we explore the interactions within these components, focusing on how inflammation and immunosuppression shape the dynamics of the NSCLC TME. We also address the emerging influences of patient-related factors, such as ageing, sex and health disparities, on the NSCLC-TME crosstalk. Finally, we discuss how various therapeutic strategies interact with and are influenced by the TME in NSCLC. Overall, we emphasize the interconnectedness of these elements and how they influence therapeutic outcomes and tumour progression.

Real-world outcomes of subsequent treatment strategies after durvalumab consolidation in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC trial established chemoradiation followed by 1-year durvalumab consolidation as standard of care for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). This study aims to investigate therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes after durvalumab failure in the real-world.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III LA-NSCLC from 23 Italian centres were retrospectively enrolled at durvalumab progression. Subsequent treatments (Sub-Tx) were prospectively collected and classified as follows:chemo-immunotherapy (subgroup-1), platinum-based chemotherapy (subgroup-2), non-platinum-based chemotherapy (subgroup-3), and targeted therapy (subgroup-4). Durvalumab progression free survival (Dur-PFS) and overall survival (Dur-OS), as well as outcomes of Sub-Tx (Sub-PFS and Sub-OS) were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier approach.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were enrolled. Median Dur-PFS was 9.3 months (95 % CI: 7.1 - 11.4) and median Dur-OS 24.2 months (95 % CI: 18.7 - 29.7). Out of 93 patients receiving a Sub-Tx, 21.5 %, 43.0 %, 28.0 %, and 7.5 % were in the subgroup 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Median Sub-PFS were 12.0, 4.1, 2.7, and 6.0 months, respectively. Patients who completed 12 months of durvalumab were 65.0 %, 27.5 %, 19.2 %, and 42.9 % across the four subgroups. In univariate analysis, the duration of durvalumab therapy was an independent factor for selecting Sub-Tx (p < 0.007). Median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 6.7 months with chemo-immunotherapy and 2.1 with chemotherapy (p = 0.009). Out of 15 patients with a TTNT > 1 year, 40 % were rechallenged with immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Platinum-based chemotherapy was the predominant treatment after durvalumab consolidation. Immunotherapy rechallenge was associated with the best survival outcome in selected cases, warranting further investigation.

Chemoradiotherapy efficacy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A prognostic clinical and biomarker-based model

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant durvalumab is the standard of care for fit patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, 20-25 % of the patients do not survive longer than 1 year after treatment initiation, i.e. receive futile treatment. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that can identify patients at high risk of early mortality during and after CRT.

METHODS

Patients with stage III NSCLC treated with CRT were included in the development- (N = 328; MAASTRO Biobank, 2004-2020, NCT01084785) and validation cohorts (N = 39; NCT02921854, NCT04432142). Both clinical parameters (age, sex, body mass index, performance status (PS), tumor stage (UICC 8), and sequence of chemotherapy administration) and peripheral immune-related biomarkers were included in the model development. Futile treatment was defined as death within one year after the first fraction of RT.

RESULTS

In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, PS ≥ 2 (OR = 2.89, 95 % CI 1.25-6.66, p = 0.013), stage IIIC (OR = 3.07, 95 % CI 3.07-6.9, p = 0.007), sequential chemotherapy (OR = 2.07, 95 % CI 1.19-3.62, p = 0.010), IL-6 (OR = 2.17, 95 % CI 1.27-3.70, p = 0.005), IP-10 (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI 0.92-2.73, p = 0.099), and soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) (OR = 3.24, 95 % CI 1.90-5.54, p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors of early mortality. A nomogram was developed to calculate the risk of receiving futile treatment for each patient. The AUC of the development and validation cohort was 0.774 (95 % CI 0.716-0.832) and 0.734 (95 % CI 0.568-0.902), respectively. Patients classified as intermediate or high risk to receive futile treatment presented 23.7 % of the total cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A prognostic model was developed that can identify patients who are at high risk of early mortality during and after CRT. These patients may be included in clinical trials aiming to improve their outcome.

Safety of bronchial artery infusion immunotherapy: from comparative analysis in beagle canines to clinical validation

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in systemic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to exhibit poor prognosis, underscoring an urgent need for safer and more effective therapeutic strategies. This study investigates the safety profile and biological effects of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI)-administered anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (aPD-1 mAb) using a preclinical beagle model and a clinical cohort of advanced NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In preclinical evaluations, male beagles (n = 3/group) were randomized to receive 5 mg/kg aPD-1 mAb via BAI or intravenous routes (Venous group). Safety assessments included longitudinal imaging, biochemical analyses, and histopathological evaluation. Clinically, patients with advanced NSCLC meeting stringent inclusion criteria underwent BAI immunotherapy, with systematic monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Both administration routes demonstrated comparable safety in canines, with no evidence of immune-related pneumonitis or structural lung alterations on CT or histology. Transient AEs (e.g., hematoma, lameness) resolved spontaneously. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed similar systemic drug concentrations and tissue distribution between BAI and Venous groups (all p > 0.05). Biochemical profiling identified isolated mild LDH elevation in one BAI-treated canine. Notably, the BAI group exhibited significantly enhanced systemic IL-2 levels (80.15 ± 5.24 pg/mL vs. 66.47 ± 5.24 pg/mL in Venous groups, p = 0.001) at day 28, paralleled by elevated pulmonary IL-2 expression (626.90 ± 18.49 vs. 559.18 ± 45.61 pg/mg, p = 0.03). In the clinical cohort (n = 17; 94.1% male, mean age 61.6 ± 7.1 years), BAI immunotherapy was well-tolerated with mild AEs including nausea (n = 1), dyspnea (n = 1), atrial fibrillation (n = 1), and puncture-site hematoma (n = 1). No severe immune-related toxicities (e.g., pneumonitis) emerged during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggest the preliminary safety and feasibility of delivering aPD-1 mAb via BAI in both canine models and NSCLC patients.

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses revealing tumor microenvironment remodeling after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most common pathological type of lung cancer, and the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy has emerged as the first-line treatment for NSCLC. Nevertheless, the efficacy of this therapeutic approach remains variable. The present study aims to examine the impact of chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC patients, with a view to identifying key molecules, critical cell subpopulations, communication patterns and spatial distributions that potentially correlate with therapeutic sensitivity. A total of 16 lung cancer tissue samples were collected from a cohort of 12 NSCLC patients and subjected to single-cell RNA and spatial transcriptome sequencing. Our data demonstrated that the distribution of CD4 + Treg T cells and mCAFs indicated an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, while the accumulation of CD4 + Th17 T cells and iCAFs could act as a positive marker for the sensitivity to chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, a significant high level of SELENOP-macrophages was observed in tissues from positive responders, and a strong co-localization between SELENOP-macrophages and antigen-presenting cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor boundaries was identified, indicating the cooperative roles of these two cell types in response to combined therapy. Moreover, SELENOP-macrophages were observed to be accumulated in tertiary lymphoid structures, which further suggested its critical role in recruiting lymphocytes. Furthermore, analysis of cell-cell communication, based on spatial transcriptomics, suggests that the interactions between SELENOP-macrophages, apCAFs, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were significantly enhanced in responders. In addition, SELENOP-macrophages recruited CD4 + Naïve, Helper and CD8 + Naïve T cells through pathways such as the cholesterol, interleukin, chemokine and HLA when responding to combined therapy. The present study further unveils the dynamic spatial and transcriptional changes in the tumor microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer in response to combination therapy.

The evolving landscape of stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer "between lights and shadows"

Despite PACIFIC set a new milestone in the clinical management of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it left some critical questions pending for clinical research: the efficacy of durvalumab in the real-world setting; the activity of less intensive regimens for frail populations; the role of targeted therapies in oncogene-addicted tumors; the selection of subsequent strategies at immunotherapy failure; the efficacy of novel and intensified treatments; the role of molecular biomarkers for patients' selection. This review aims to describe the evolving landscape of unresectable stage III NSCLC and provides an updated overview of the available evidence, analyzing lights and shadows emerging from recent clinical trials and discussing the most relevant challenges of post-PACIFIC era.

Efficacy and safety of induction immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has displayed considerable advantages in consolidation therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). However, many patients are considered unsuitable for cCRT owing to concerns with tolerability. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of induction immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for unresectable LA-NSCLC who are not capable of receiving cCRT.

METHODS

From January 2019 and December 2022, LA-NSCLC patients treated with induction immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy as initial treatment at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The short-term efficacy, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and tolerability of induction immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy were evaluated in these patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 patients were enrolled (median age 64 years, 33.3% with ECOG performance status score 2, and 62.5% with stage IIIB-IIIC). Median follow-up from the start of induction immunochemotherapy was 30.5 months. Median number of induction immunochemotherapy was 4 cycles. A median radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy was delivered. After radiotherapy, 16 patients (66.6%) received consolidation immunotherapy. The overall response rate in these patients was 87.5%. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 91.7%, 74.8% and 57.0%, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year PFS were 87.0%, 54.1% and 37.1%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis were 37.5% and 16.7%, respectively. Radiation pneumonitis of any grade occurred in 8 patients (33.3%), and the incidence of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis were 16.7% and 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Induction immunochemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and consolidated immunotherapy had encouraging efficacy with acceptable toxicity for LA-NSCLC not capable of receiving cCRT.

Mathematical Modeling Predicts Optimal Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Radiotherapy Combinations and Timing of Administration

Radiotherapy (RT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has attracted substantial attention due to its potential to improve outcomes for patients with several types of cancer. However, the optimal administration timepoints and drug combinations remain unclear because the mechanisms underlying RT-induced changes in immune checkpoint molecule expression and interaction with their ligand(s) remain unclear. In this study, we demonstrated the dynamics of lymphocyte-mediated molecular interactions in tissue samples from patients with esophageal cancer throughout RT schedules. Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic analyses were performed to investigate the dynamics of these interactions. The biological signal in lymphocytes transitioned from innate to adaptive immune reaction, with increases in ligand-receptor interactions, such as PD-1-PD-L1, CTLA4-CD80/86, and TIGIT-PVR interactions. A mathematical model was constructed to predict the efficacy of five types of ICIs when administered at four different timepoints. The model suggested that concurrent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy or concurrent/adjuvant anti-CTLA4/TIGIT therapy would exert a maximal effect with RT. This study provides rationale for clinical trials of RT combined with defined ICI therapy, and these findings will support future studies to search for more effective targets and timing of therapy administration.

Anti-PD1 based precision induction therapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II umbrella clinical trial

The efficacy and safety of induction-immunotherapy followed by surgery for unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain challenging. In this open-label, single-center, phase II clinical umbrella trial (ChiCTR2000035367), 100 unresectable Stage III NSCLC patients are enrolled. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% but contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immuno-monotherapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% and no contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression between 1% and 49%, contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy, or negative/unknown PD-L1 expression receive chemoimmunotherapy. The primary endpoint is the major pathological response (MPR) rate. Among 47 surgically-treated patients, the MPR rate is 61.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.4%-75.5%), achieving the prespecified endpoint. For secondary endpoints, the objective response rate for all patients is 54.0% (95% CI: 43.7-64.0). The median event-free survival is 29.9 months (95% CI: 17.0-42.7). Most common adverse event is anemia (49.0%). Exploratory transcriptomic analyses reveal Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Antigen 1 (BST1) as a promising biomarker for response to chemoimmunotherapy. Generally, for unresectable stage III NSCLC patients, anti-PD1 based induction-therapy according to PD-L1 expression and contraindication to antiangiogenic therapy followed by surgery is a feasible option.

Early Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy Through Monitoring of Plasma Chemokines

PURPOSE

This study is aimed to identify biomarkers for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multicenter, prospective study enrolled patients with lung cancer receiving thoracic radiation therapy (RT) between 2021 and 2023. Plasma cytokines were measured using Luminex assays. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors and biomarkers for RP. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Fine-Gray competing risk analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the predictive value of the cytokines.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients receiving thoracic RT were included in this study, with 75 (35.05%) patients experiencing symptomatic RP. Among the 71 patients with prior ICI treatment, 32 (45.07%) developed symptomatic RP. Patients with prior ICI treatment had higher incidence of symptomatic RP and plasma chemokines than those without prior ICI treatment. For patients with prior ICI treatment, plasma CXCL10 before RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.61) and at 2 weeks (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.59) and 4 weeks during RT (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.19-2.28) were significantly associated with RP. The area under the curves (AUC) of plasma CXCL10 at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks during RT were 0.625, 0.680, and 0.679, respectively. Plasma CXCL14 before RT and CXCL2 during RT were also predictors of RP. A risk score integrating CXCL10, CXCL14, CXCL2, and mean lung dose showed better predictive performance than individual factors (AUC = 0.757).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, plasma chemokines predict future risk of symptomatic RP in patients with lung cancer who have received prior immunotherapy. Despite with moderate AUC, the scoring system based on plasma chemokines and mean lung dose is a feasible tool for predicting symptomatic RP, aiding in tailoring personalized and optimal treatment for patients.

Safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To explore the safety of PD-L1 inhibitors vs. PD-1 inhibitors in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 20 December 2023. Randomized controlled trials on patients with NSCLC/ES-SCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor were included and synthesized with Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 58 studies. Regarding grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), PD-L1 inhibitors had better safety compared with PD-1 inhibitors when combined with chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC, presenting larger surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) (0.577 vs. 0.168), similar with those in advanced NSCLC and ES-SCLC. The safety of PD-L1 inhibitors was better than PD-1 inhibitors regarding grade ≥3 pneumonia in resectable NSCLC when combined with chemotherapy (0.648 vs. 0.307), as well as in advanced NSCLC and ES-SCLC. When combined with chemotherapy, PD-L1 inhibitors had better safety regarding grade ≥3 pneumonitis, compared to PD-1 inhibitor (resectable NSCLC: 0.934 vs. 0.019; advanced NSCLC: 0.618 vs. 0.584; ES-SCLC: 0.505 vs 0.059).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 inhibitors might be a safer option than PD-1 inhibitors regarding grade ≥3 TRAEs and pneumonia, monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, and when combined with chemotherapy regarding grade ≥3 pneumonitis.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024620372).

Surgery/non-surgery-based strategies for invasive locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine

BACKGROUND

Treatments for invasive T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors have been traditionally individualized and often require multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. Advances in precision medicine may open up new opportunities for these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified T4N0-3M0 NSCLC patients with central structure invasion from 2010 to 2020. Precision medicine has progressed in three periods: 2010-2014 (targeted therapy), 2015-2017 (initial immunotherapy), and 2018-2020 (latest immunotherapy). We utilized Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control confounding factors and competing risk regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 9,106 cases were matched after PSM. For all populations, the median overall survival (OS) significantly increased with the advancement of precision medicine: 23.0 months in Period I (95 ​% CI: 22.0-25.0), 28.0 months in Period II (95 ​% CI: 26.0-31.0), and not reached (NR) in Period III (95 ​% CI: 30.0 - NR). Multivariate analysis also revealed a sequential survival improvement from Period I to III (p ​< ​0.001). Surgery-based treatment yielded the longest median OS at 46.0 months (95 ​% CI: 43.0-49.0, p ​< ​0.001), compared with chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone and radiation alone. Surgery-based treatment has also yielded the best survival in three precision medicine eras, in both N0-1 and N2-3 categories. After analyzing CSS, the results above remained consistent. The survival following chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone has seen significant and progressive enhancements across the three eras of precision medicine. There were no significant survival differences between Periods I and II among surgery-based patients, but a slight improvement trend was noted in Period III.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study indicated that as precision medicine for NSCLC evolved, personalized treatment strategies supported by effective MDT led to survival improvement. Notably, for invasive stage III patients, surgery-based strategies have consistently shown substantial benefits across all the periods, irrespective of the N stage. The integration of perioperative therapies to enhance surgical feasibility, especially the latest immunotherapy, holds particular promise for further survival benefits.

Signatures of H3K4me3 modification predict cancer immunotherapy response and identify a new immune checkpoint-SLAMF9

H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) modification and related regulators extensively regulate various crucial transcriptional courses in health and disease. However, the regulatory relationship between H3K4me3 modification and anti-tumor immunity has not been fully elucidated. We identified 72 independent prognostic genes of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) whose transcriptional expression were closely correlated with known 27 H3K4me3 regulators. We constructed three H3K4me3 modification patterns utilizing the expression profiles of the 72 genes, and patients classified in each pattern exhibited unique tumor immune infiltration characteristics. Using the principal component analysis (PCA) of H3K4me3-related patterns, we constructed a H3K4me3 risk score (H3K4me3-RS) system. The deep learning analysis using 12,159 cancer samples from 26 cancer types and 725 cancer samples from 5 immunotherapy cohorts revealed that H3K4me3-RS was significantly correlated with cancer immune tolerance and sensitivity. Importantly, this risk-score system showed satisfactory predictive performance for the ICB therapy responses of patients suffering from several cancer types, and we identified that SLAMF9 was one of the immunosuppressive phenotype and immunotherapy resistance-determined genes of H3K4me3-RS. The mice melanoma model showed Slamf9 knockdown remarkably restrained cancer progression and enhanced the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-L1 therapies by elevating CD8 + T cell infiltration. This study provided a new H3K4me3-associated biomarker system to predict tumor immunotherapy response and suggested the preclinical rationale for investigating the roles of SLAMF9 in cancer immunity regulation and treatment.

CD73/adenosine dynamics in treatment-induced pneumonitis: balancing efficacy with risks of adverse events in combined radio-immunotherapies

Consolidation with PD-1/PD-L1-based immune checkpoint blockade after concurrent platinum-based chemo-radiotherapy has become the new standard of care for advanced stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In order to further improve therapy outcomes, innovative combinatorial treatment strategies aim to target additional immunosuppressive barriers in the tumor microenvironment such as the CD73/adenosine pathway. CD73 and adenosine are known as crucial endogenous regulators of lung homeostasis and inflammation, but also contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, the CD73/adenosine pathway can also limit the immune-activating effects of cytotoxic therapies by degrading the pro-inflammatory danger molecule ATP, which is released into the tumor microenvironment and normal lung tissue upon therapy-induced cell damage. Thus, while targeting CD73 may enhance the efficacy of radio-immunotherapies in cancer treatment by mitigating tumor immune escape and improving immune-mediated tumor killing, it also raises concerns about increased immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the normal tissue. In fact, combined radio-immunotherapies bear an increased risk of irAEs in the lungs, and additional pharmacologic inhibition of CD73 may further enhance the risk of overwhelming or overlapping pulmonary toxicity and thereby limit therapy outcome. This review explores how therapeutic interventions targeting CD73/adenosine dynamics could enhance radiation-induced immune activation in combined radio-immunotherapies, whilst potentially driving irAEs in the lung. We specifically investigate the interactions between radiotherapy and the CD73/adenosine pathway in radiation pneumonitis. Additionally, we compare the incidence of (radiation) pneumonitis reported in relevant trials to determine if there is an increased risk of irAEs in the clinical setting. By understanding these dynamics, we aim to inform future strategies for optimizing radio-immunotherapy regimens, ensuring effective cancer control while preserving pulmonary integrity and patient quality of life.

Development and characterisation of [18F]TTDP, a novel T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain tracer, in humanised mice and non-human primates

PURPOSE

The T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) blockade immunotherapy response is directly associated with individual differences of TIGIT expression on tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we developed a TIGIT-targeted PET tracer to evaluate its feasibility in predicting immunotherapy efficacy, aiming to manage NSCLC patients accurately.

METHODS

We synthesised a 18F-labeled TIGIT-targeted D-peptide, [18F]TTDP, and investigated the specificity of [18F]TTDP both to murine TIGIT and human TIGIT by a series of in vitro and in vivo assays. [18F]TTDP PET imaging was performed in humanised immune system (HIS) mice models bearing NSCLC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to evaluate the predictive value of FDA-approved combination immunotherapy of atezolizumab plus tiragolumab. Lastly, rhesus macaque was applied for [18F] TTDP PET to explore the tracer's in vivo distribution and translational potential in non-human primates.

RESULTS

[18F]TTDP showed high specificity for both murine TIGIT and human TIGIT in vitro and in vivo. The HIS NSCLC PDX platform was successfully established for [18F]TTDP PET imaging, and tumour uptake of [18F]TTDP was significantly correlated with the TIGIT expression of TILs in the TIME. [18F]TTDP PET imaging, in predicting treatment response to the combination immunotherapy in NSCLC HIS-PDX models, showed a sensitivity of 83.33% and a specificity of 100%. In addition, [18F]TTDP PET also showed cross-species consistency of the tracer biodistribution between non-human primate and murine animals, and no adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

The combined implementation of the [18F]TTDP and HIS-PDX model creates a state-of-the-art preclinical platform that will impact the identification and validation of TIGIT-targeted PET image-guided diagnosis, treatment response prediction, beneficial patient screening, novel immunotherapies, and ultimately the outcome of NSCLC patients. We first provided in vivo biodistribution of [18F]TTDP PET imaging in rhesus macaque, indicating its excellent translational potential in the clinic.

FLASH radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: From biological mechanisms to blockbuster therapeutics

FLASH ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (RT) can effectively exert the protective effect on normal tissue and reduce the risk of treatment-related toxicity, without compromising the killing effect on tumor tissue, resulting in a significant differential biological effect between tumor control and normal tissue damage, namely the FLASH effect. To date, the precise biological details of the FLASH effect remain uncertain. The currently mainstream mechanisms proposed by the academic community include the transient oxygen depletion hypothesis, free radical hypothesis, immune protection hypothesis, and DNA integrity hypothesis, which have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Based on these theoretical principles and numerous investigations on the FLASH effect in vivo and in vitro, the combined application of FLASH and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been considered synergistic and potentially practical. The primary underlying basis is that FLASH might actively preserve the number and function of circulating immune cells, thereby enhancing the efficacy of immune cell-mediated immunotherapy. Meanwhile, FLASH RT could activate the tumor immune microenvironment and transform "cold'' tumors into ''hot'' ones, consequently boosting local and systemic anti-tumor immunity and expanding the therapeutic benefits of ICIs. Moreover, FLASH might attenuate immunoinflammatory responses and minimize the incidence of radiation-related adverse events, allowing for the potentially safer and promising clinical application of combing FLASH RT with ICI therapy. Nevertheless, data on this treatment modality is currently lacking, and several barriers remain to be addressed, including the logistical bottlenecks, technical hurdles, limited availability, and unclear biological mechanisms. Further research is warranted in the future.

CD8+ T cells infiltrating into tumors were controlled by immune status of pulmonary lymph nodes and correlated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients' prognosis treated with chemoimmunotherapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has the potential to reduce tumor burden, improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and significantly prolong patients' disease-free survival (DFS). However, the treatment's effectiveness varies among NSCLC patients. The immunological mechanisms contributing to tumor regression still require further exploration and elucidation.

METHODS

The immune status of patients' local tumor microenvironment (TME) before and after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, their paired pulmonary lymph nodes (11th LNs) after therapy, including infiltrating immune cell densities and their correlations, were analyzed using multiplex immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Fifty-six NSCLC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled and subsequently underwent surgical resection and pathological evaluation. Among these, 19 patients achieved a pCR, 6 patients exhibited a major pathological response (MPR), and 31 patients did not achieve MPR. There were no significant difference in the densities of CD8+ T cell, Treg and Dendritic cell (DC) in patients' TME before neoadjuvant therapy (n = 26, P = 0.091, P = 0.753, P = 0.905, respectively), but after treament, these immune cells' dynamics were significantly different between different response group. CD8+ T cell densities were increased in pCR gourp (P = 0.006), but not in non-pCR group (P = 0.389); the densities of Treg were increased in non-pCR gourp (P = 0.0004), but DC were significantly decreased in non-pCR gourp (P = 0.005). After surgery, the TME were also significantly different: patients achieving pCR typically demonstrated high densities of CD8+ T cell, DC and low densities of Tregs (P = 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004). The immune status of 11th LNs also exhibited significant differences. DC densities were much higher in pCR patients, whereas Treg in the pCR group were significantly lower than those in the non-pCR group (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.003). Furthermore, the densities of DC in the TME showed a moderate positive correlation with DC in 11th LNs (P = 0.0002), while the densities of Tregs in the TME exhibited a moderate negative correlation with DC densities in 11th LNs (P = 0.03). Patients who had high densities of CD8+ T cell in the resection tissues and DC in the LNs, experienced longer DFS (P = 0.048 and P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Immune cells in both pulmonary LNs and the TME collectively influence the remodeling of the NSCLC patient's TME, thus impacting treatment response and prognosis.

Temporal Effect on PD-L1 Detection and Novel Insights Into Its Clinical Implications in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Several studies rely on archived tissue blocks to assess the PD-L1 scores; however, a detailed analysis of potential variations of scores between fresh and archived tissue blocks still lacks. In addition, the prognostic implications of PD-L1 in lung cancers have not yet been completely understood. Here, we aimed to investigate the temporal variation in PD-L1 scores from clinical samples and the clinical implications of PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

NSCLC cases from January 2005 to June 2023 were considered for this study, and PD-L1 scores in archived and fresh tissue blocks were analyzed. Association of PD-L1 with various driver mutations was explored, and implications of PD-L1 in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Our study revealed a significant disparity in PD-L1 scores between archived and fresh tissue blocks, and a temporal variation in scores within 6 months of tissue acquisition. Advanced-stage primary tumors, metastatic lymph nodes, and visceral pleural invasion revealed higher PD-L1 expression as presented by tumor proportion score (TPS). Notably, in fully resected stage I/II NSCLC cases, OS was better in the high PD-L1 (≥ 50% TPS) cohort with driver mutations compared to cases without driver mutations (hazard ratio-0.5129, 95% confidence interval 0.2058-1.084, p = 0.0779). In contrast, high PD-L1 was associated with worse OS compared to no PD-L1 (< 1% TPS) (hazard ratio-2.431, 95% confidence interval 1.144-6.656, p = 0.0242) in the cohort without driver mutations. Furthermore, the presence of a KRAS mutation favored the outcome of anti-PD-L1/PD1 immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 detection from tissue blocks was found to vary temporally, urging for a prioritized consideration for patients with marginal scores when archived blocks are employed for its detection. Prognostic roles of PD-L1 were associated with driver mutations, and KRAS mutations favored the outcome of anti-PD-L1/PD1 therapy in advanced NSCLC.

Stage III NSCLC treatment options: too many choices

Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a wide range of tumour (T1 to T4) and nodal (N0 to N3) components, requiring variable management and a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advancements in minimally invasive techniques, molecular biology and novel drug discoveries have accelerated the refinement of stage III NSCLC management. The latest developments in staging include the forthcoming update of the nodal component in the 9th TNM (tumour-node-metastasis) edition, which emphasises the critical role for endobronchial ultrasonography in mediastinal staging. Recent treatment developments include the use of immunotherapy and targeted molecular therapy in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, either in combination with other modalities or used alone as consolidation. Surgical and radiotherapy advancements have further enhanced patient outcomes. These developments have significantly improved the prognosis for patients with stage III NSCLC. Fast-changing recommendations have also brought about a challenge, with clinicians facing a number of options to choose from. Therefore, a multimodal approach by a multidisciplinary team has become even more crucial in managing stage III NSCLC.

Non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequent cancer types and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The management of NSCLC has improved considerably, especially in the past 10 years. The systematic screening of populations at risk with low-dose CT, the implementation of novel surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques and a deeper biological understanding of NSCLC that has led to innovative systemic treatment options have improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In non-metastatic NSCLC, the combination of various perioperative strategies and adjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced disease seem to enhance cure rates. In metastatic NSCLC, the implementation of novel drugs might prolong disease control together with preserving quality of life. The further development of predictive clinical and genetic markers will be essential for the next steps in individualized treatment concepts.

Vaccine-based therapeutic interventions in lung cancer management: A recent perspective

The incidence of lung cancer continues to grow globally, contributing to an ever-increasing load on healthcare systems. Emerging evidence has indicated lowered efficacy of conventional treatment strategies, such as chemotherapy, surgical interventions and radiotherapy, prompting the need for exploring alternative interventions. A growing focus on immunotherapy and the development of personalized medicine has paved the way for vaccine-based delivery in lung cancer. With various prominent targets such as CD8+T cells and PD-L1, immune-targeted, anti-cancer vaccines have been evaluated in both, pre-clinical and clinical settings, to improve therapeutic outcomes. However, there are a number of challenges that must be addressed, including the scalability of such delivery systems, heterogeneity of lung cancers, and long-term safety as well as efficacy. In addition to this, natural compounds, in combination with immunotherapy, have gained considerable research interest in recent times. This makes it necessary to explore their role in synergism with immune-targeted agents. The authors of this review aim to offer an overview of recent advances in our understanding of lung cancer pathogenesis, detection and management strategies, and the emergence of immunotherapy with a special focus on vaccine delivery. This finding is supported with evidence from testing in non-human and human models, showcasing promising results. Prospects for phytotherapy have also been discussed, in order to combat some pitfalls and limitations. Finally, the future perspectives of vaccine usage in lung cancer management have also been discussed, to offer a holistic perspective to readers, and to prompt further research in the domain.

Predictive value of primary tumor volume change during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

No established early biomarkers currently exist to predict responses during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the potential of gross tumor volume (GTV) and its changes during CCRT as predictors of survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 227 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who underwent definitive CCRT followed by durvalumab between November 2018 and December 2022. GTV was defined as the volume of the primary tumor, assessed at two time points: before starting CCRT for initial planning (GTV1), and at the fourth week of CCRT for adaptive planning (GTV2). Both relative and absolute regressions between GTV1 and GTV2 were calculated.

RESULTS

The median GTV1 volume was 90 mL (range, 5-840 mL), and the median GTV2 volume was 64 mL (range, 1-520 mL), resulting in median absolute and relative regressions of 18.6 mL and 25.0 %, respectively. Among the GTV parameters, relative GTV regression exhibited the strongest predictive value, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.804 for in-field progression and 0.711 for overall progression. The 1-year progression-free survival rates for the high (>30 %), intermediate (0-30 %), and low (≤0%) relative regression groups were 88.0 %, 62.6 %, and 14.3 %, respectively (p = 0.006 for high vs. intermediate; p < 0.001 for intermediate vs. low). Additionally, GTV2 volume demonstrated stronger associations with survival outcomes than GTV1 volume.

CONCLUSION

Relative GTV regression was identified as a promising early predictor for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Further development of a multi-parametric predictive model is warranted to guide patient-tailored therapeutic approaches.

Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial

We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial to assess neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, and then consolidation SHR-1701 in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the primary cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant combination therapy (n = 97), both primary endpoints were met, with a post-induction objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-68) and an 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rate of 56.6% (95% CI 45.2-66.5). Overall, 27 (25%) patients underwent surgery; all achieved R0 resection. Among them, 12 (44%) major pathological responses and seven (26%) pathological complete responses were recorded. The 18-month EFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 53.2-86.7) in surgical patients and 57.3% (43.0-69.3) in radiotherapy-treated patients. Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, showed promising efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Surgical conversion was feasible in a notable proportion of patients and associated with better survival outcomes.

LILRB2 inhibition enhances radiation sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer by attenuating radiation-induced senescence

Radiotherapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) triggers cellular senescence, complicating tumor microenvironments and affecting treatment outcomes. This study examines the role of lymphocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 (LILRB2) in modulating RT-induced senescence and radiosensitivity in NSCLC. Through methodologies including irradiation, lentivirus transfection, and various molecular assays, we assessed LILRB2's expression and its impact on cellular senescence levels and tumor cell behaviors. Our findings reveal that RT upregulates LILRB2, facilitating senescence and a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which in turn enhances tumor proliferation and resistance to radiation. Importantly, LILRB2 silencing attenuates these effects by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 pathway, significantly increasing radiosensitivity in NSCLC models. Clinical data correlate high LILRB2 expression with reduced RT response and poorer prognosis, suggesting LILRB2's pivotal role in RT-induced senescence and its potential as a therapeutic target to improve NSCLC radiosensitivity.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Following Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Resectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among Chinese Populations: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but may pose greater technical challenges for surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

Initial stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing either VATS or open lobectomy at 6 medical centers during 2019-2023 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes and 2-year survival was analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to balance patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the total 143 patients, PSM yielded 62 cases each for VATS and OPEN groups. Induction-related adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. VATS showed a 14.5% conversion rate. Notably, VATS decreased numeric rating scales for postoperative pain, shortened chest tube duration (5[4-7] vs. 6[5-8] days, P = .021), reduced postoperative comorbidities (21.0% vs. 37.1%, P = .048), and dissected less N1 lymph nodes (5[4-6] vs. 7[5-9], P = .005) compared with thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieves perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Additionally, over a median follow-up of 29.5 months, VATS and thoracotomy demonstrated comparable 2-year recurrence-free survival (77.20% vs. 73.73%, P = .640), overall survival (87.22% vs. 88.00%, P = .738), cumulative incidences of cancer-related death, and recurrence patterns. Subsequent subgroup comparisons and multivariate Cox analysis likewise revealed no statistical difference between VATS and thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

VATS is a viable and effective option for resectable stage III NSCLC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, leading to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, reduced postoperative complications, and similar survival outcomes compared to thoracotomy.

Beyond success: unveiling the hidden potential of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in solid tumors

Immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly transformed cancer treatment. Despite its success, many patients struggle to respond adequately or sustain long-lasting clinical improvement. A growing consensus has emerged that radiotherapy (RT) enhances the response rate and overall efficacy of immunotherapy. Although combining RT and immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in preclinical models and has shown promising results, establishing itself as a dynamic and thriving area of research, clinical evidence for this combination strategy over the past five years has shown both positive and disappointing results, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding. This review provides a balanced and updated analysis of the combination of immunotherapy and RT. We summarized the preclinical mechanisms through which RT boosts antitumor immune responses and mainly focused on the outcomes of recently updated clinical trials, including those that may not have met expectations. We investigated the optimization of the therapeutic potential of this combined strategy, including key challenges, such as fractionation and scheduling, lymph node irradiation, and toxicity. Finally, we offered insights into the prospects and challenges associated with the clinical translation of this combination therapy, providing a realistic perspective on the current state of research and potential future directions.

Integrated analysis of purine metabolism assists in predicting prognosis and treatment decisions for patients with lung adenocarcinoma

The incidence of lung cancer, especially lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), has recently increased. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy combined with conventional treatment have shown surprising benefits in enhancing the LUAD patient's prognosis. For the purpose of guiding treatment planning and the prognosis of LUAD, more research is required. The particular aim of this work was to establish a purine metabolism scoring (PMS) model for the purpose of individually forecasting treatment outcomes and overall survival for patients who have LUAD. Clinical and whole genome data were obtained from the TCGA-LUAD cohort via "UCSC". The 25 driver purine metabolism-related prognostic genes were determined founded on univariate Cox regression. Then PMS was developed through stepwise LASSO Cox regression. Survival analysis indicated that patients who have PMS experienced worse outcomes. We validated the PGM2 effect on lung adenocarcinoma malignancy in in vitro experiments. Univariate as well as multivariate Cox regression suggested that PMS was an independent prognostic indicator for LUAD patients, which was confirmed in subgroup analysis. Functional assay demonstrated that immune response as well as cytotoxicity pathways have a connection with lower PMS, and patients who have low PMS possess an active immune microenvironment. Moreover, the LUAD patients who have low PMS showed greater sensitivity to immunotherapy, targeted therapy, as well as chemotherapy. Knockdown of PGM2 was discovered to decrease the proliferation, invasion, as well as migration of lung adenocarcinoma cells in an in vitro assay. Pertaining to this particular research, we created a PMS model and conducted a thorough analysis of purine metabolism in LUAD in order to determine prognosis and offer recommendations for treatment. This finding offered a fresh concept for the clinical management of LUAD and novel therapy protocols.

Improved automated one-pot two-step radiosynthesis of (S)-[18F]FETrp, a radiotracer for PET imaging of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1)

BACKGROUND

(S)-[18F]FETrp is a promising PET radiotracer for imaging IDO1 activity, one of the main enzymes involved in the tryptophan metabolism that plays a key role in several diseases including cancers. To date, the radiosynthesis of this tryptophan analogue remains highly challenging due to partial racemization occurring during the nucleophilic radiofluorination step. This work aims to develop a short, epimerization-free and efficient automated procedure of (S)-[18F]FETrp from a corresponding enantiopure tosylate precursor.

RESULTS

Enantiomerically pure (S)- and (R)-FETrp references as well as tosylate precursors (S)- and (R)-3 were obtained from corresponding Na-Boc-(L and D)-tryptophan in 2 and 4 steps, respectively. Manual optimisation of the radiolabelling conditions resulted in > 90% radiochemical conversion with more than 99% enantiomeric purity. Based on these results, the (S)-[18F]FETrp radiosynthesis was fully automated on a SynChrom R&D EVOI module to produce the radiotracer in 55.2 ± 7.5% radiochemical yield, 99.9% radiochemical purity, 99.1 ± 0.5% enantiomeric excess, and molar activity of 53.2 ± 9.3 GBq/µmol (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid racemisation and complicated purification processes, currently encountered for the radiosynthesis of (S)-[18F]FETrp, we report herein significant improvements, including a versatile synthesis of enantiomerically pure tosylate precursor and reference compound and a convenient one-pot two-step automated procedure for the radiosynthesis of (S)-[18F]FETrp. This optimised and robust production method could facilitate further investigations of this relevant PET radiotracer for imaging IDO1 activity.

Immunotherapy for Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas: Current Status and Future Directions

Thymic epithelial tumors are a histologically diverse group of cancers arising from the epithelial compartment of the thymus. These tumors are characterized by a low tumor mutation burden, a lack of actionable genomic changes, and, especially with thymomas, defects in immune tolerance. Surgery is the mainstay of the management of resectable disease, whereas advanced, unresectable tumors are treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease recurrence can occur months to years after frontline treatment. Although several options are available for conventional treatment of recurrent thymic tumors, response rates are generally low, and treatment-related toxicity can affect quality of life. A subset of patients benefit from biologic therapies, but there remains an unmet need for the development of new treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are safe, clinically active, and have contributed to an improvement in survival for patients with a wide variety of cancers. However, the application of these revolutionary treatments for thymic cancers is limited to their use for the management of recurrent thymic carcinoma because of the risk of immune toxicity. In this paper, we review the current uses of immunotherapy for the management of thymic epithelial tumors and highlight potential strategies to improve safety and broaden the application of these treatments for patients with thymic cancers.

Phase II Study of Durvalumab Immediately after Completion of Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: TORG1937 (DATE Study)

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation for up to 12 months is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, exactly when to initiate durvalumab therapy after chemoradiation completion remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab, administered immediately after CCRT completion, for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial. Patients without disease progression after definitive CCRT (two cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with 60 Gy/30 Fr radiotherapy) received durvalumab (every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) from the next day (up to 5 days) after the final radiation dose. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) from registration before the start of CCRT.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to August 2020, 47 of 50 enrolled patients were evaluable for treatment efficacy and safety. The 1-year PFS from registration was 75.0% [60% confidence interval (CI), 69.0-80.0 and 95% CI, 59.4-85.3]. The objective response rate throughout the study treatment and median PFS from registration were 78.7% and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.4 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3/4 pneumonitis and febrile neutropenia were each 4.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study met the primary endpoint. The incidence of pneumonitis was similar to that of a Japanese subset in the PACIFIC study. Our data support the efficacy and safety of durvalumab administered immediately after the completion of CCRT for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment Options for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Based on PACIFIC trial, durvalumab as consolidation therapy following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has been a new standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical applications, there are heterogeneous adjustments or novel strategies following specialized discussions in experienced multidisciplinary teams. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments for unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 397 patients who received first-line treatment for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Comparisons and statistical analyses of treatment were made in terms of efficacy and safety. Adverse events and responses were assessed using CTCAE v5.0 and RECIST v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or the Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test.

Results

In wild-type driver genes group, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the radiotherapy group compared to those in the nonradiotherapy group (ORR: 50.94% vs. 30.06%, p < 0.001; DCR: 98.11% vs. 80.37%, p < 0.001; and mPFS: 21.00 vs. 8.20 months, p < 0.001). The incidence of pneumonia at any grade in the radiotherapy group was higher than that in the nonradiotherapy group (9.43% vs. 2.45%, p = 0.008). In the radiotherapy group, the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus immunotherapy subgroup had longer mPFS than the CRT subgroup, with increased toxicity at any grade (24.60 vs. 17.90 months, p = 0.025, and 83.17% vs. 65.52%, p = 0.011). In the nonradiotherapy group, the DCR and mPFS were higher in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy subgroup than in the chemotherapy subgroup, with increased toxicity at any grade (DCR: 93.67% vs. 67.86%, p < 0.001; mPFS: 13.53 vs. 5.07 months, p < 0.001; and 68.35% vs. 41.67%, p = 0.001). In the mutant driver genes group, the efficacy did not significantly differ among the radiotherapy subgroup, targeted therapy subgroup, and radiotherapy plus targeted therapy subgroup (ORR: p = 0.633; mPFS: p = 0.450).

Conclusions

For unresectable stage III NSCLC patients with wild-type driver genes, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the initial treatment was essential to significantly improve the efficacy. For patients with mutant driver genes, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy showed similar short-term efficacy.

Radiation and resolve: unlocking the synergistic potential of radioimmunotherapy in advanced lung cancer management

Plain language summary This editorial talks about combining radiation therapy (using high-energy rays to kill cancer cells) and immunotherapy (boosting the body's immune system to fight cancer) to treat advanced lung cancer. When used together, these therapies can work better to kill more cancer cells and help patients live longer. But, there's still a lot we don't know. For instance, we need to figure out the best timing and doses for these treatments, and which patients will benefit the most. The article stresses that more research is needed to answer these questions and make this combined treatment a more effective option for advanced lung cancer patients.

Induction PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation toripalimab for bulky locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: protocol for a randomized phase II trial (InTRist study)

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), whereas responses to anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are heterogeneous. Though consolidation ICI following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) improves survival of NSCLC, this regimen is challenging for patients with bulky tumors due to excessive target volumes and radiation-resistant hypoxia during upfront cCRT, leading to higher risk of pneumonitis and inferior local-regional control. Recent trials have demonstrated neoadjuvant ICI brought greater benefit to stage III than stage I-II NSCLC. Our previous study also supported the therapeutic advantage of 2-cycle induction ICI for patients with bulky unresectable stage III NSCLC. In the context of induction immunotherapy, radiotherapy is more likely to exert immune synergistic effects, reverse anti-PD-1 resistance, and activate abscopal immune responses. Prospective trials to determine the efficacy and safety of induction ICI for bulky LA-NSCLC are necessary.

Methods

This randomized, open-label, two-arm phase II study aims to explore whether 2 cycles of induction anti-PD-1 toripalimab plus chemotherapy can improve progression-free survival (PFS) in bulky LA-NSCLC. Bulky tumors are defined as primary lesion ≥5 cm in greatest dimension or metastatic lymph nodes ≥2 cm in shortest diameter. A total of 50 patients with bulky unresectable stage III NSCLC will be recruited and 1:1 randomized into the experimental arm: 2-cycle induction PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus chemotherapy followed by cCRT and consolidation toripalimab; or control arm: 2-cycle induction chemotherapy followed by cCRT and consolidation toripalimab. Patients are stratified by pathology (squamous versus non-squamous). The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and incidence of adverse events. Exploratory analyses include PD-L1 expression and liquid biopsy-based biomarker testing, tumor microenvironment profiling at single-cell levels, and quality-of-life assessments.

Discussion

The InTRist study is the first randomized phase II trial to investigate the feasibility of induction anti-PD-1 toripalimab plus chemotherapy followed by cCRT and consolidation toripalimab in bulky LA-NSCLC, providing novel evidence for the synergistic strategy combining anti-PD-1 blockade with radiotherapy to prolong immunotherapy benefits, overcome resistance, and enhance abscopal immune response.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05888402.

Proton and photon radiotherapy in stage III NSCLC: Effects on hematological toxicity and adjuvant immune therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) followed by adjuvant durvalumab is standard-of-care for fit patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) results in different doses to organs than intensity modulated photon therapy (IMRT). We investigated whether IMPT compared to IMRT reduce hematological toxicity and whether it affects durvalumab treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively collected series of consecutive patients with stage III NSCLC receiving CCRT between 06.16 and 12.22 (staged with FDG-PET-CT and brain imaging) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of lymphopenia grade ≥ 3 in IMPT vs IMRT treated patients.

RESULTS

271 patients were enrolled (IMPT: n = 71, IMRT: n = 200) in four centers. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy. Median age: 66 years, 58 % were male, 36 % had squamous NSCLC. The incidence of lymphopenia grade ≥ 3 during CCRT was 67 % and 47 % in the IMRT and IMPT group, respectively (OR 2.2, 95 % CI: 1.0-4.9, P = 0.03). The incidence of anemia grade ≥ 3 during CCRT was 26 % and 9 % in the IMRT and IMPT group respectively (OR = 4.9, 95 % CI: 1.9-12.6, P = 0.001). IMPT was associated with a lower rate of Performance Status (PS) ≥ 2 at day 21 and 42 after CCRT (13 % vs. 26 %, P = 0.04, and 24 % vs. 39 %, P = 0.02). Patients treated with IMPT had a higher probability of receiving adjuvant durvalumab (74 % vs. 52 %, OR 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.79, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

IMPT was associated with a lower incidence of severe lymphopenia and anemia, better PS after CCRT and a higher probability of receiving adjuvant durvalumab.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 expression levels: A comprehensive overview

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapies can substantially improve treatment efficacy, despite their high cost. A comprehensive overview of the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on different tumor proportion scores (TPSs) was conducted.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment Database, and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched from their inception until August 24, 2022. Data relevant to the CEA results were recorded, and quality assessments conducted based on the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) process.

FINDINGS

Fifty-one original studies from seven countries were included. The mean QHES score was 77.0 (range: 53-95). Twenty-seven studies were classified as high-quality, and the rest as fair quality. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, atezolizumab, camrelizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, and durvalumab were identified using three TPS categories. While nivolumab plus ipilimumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy were unlikely to be cost-effective in China, the results for the US were uncertain. Atezolizumab combinations were not cost-effective in China or the US, and tislelizumab and sintilimab were cost-effective in China. For TPSs ≥ 50%, the pembrolizumab monotherapy could be cost-effective in some developed countries. Cemiplimab was more cost-effective than chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab in the US. For TPSs ≥ 1%, the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab was controversial due to the different willingness-to-pay thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the atezolizumab combination regimens were found to be cost-effective in any perspective of evaluations. Camrelizumab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab have lower ICERs compared to atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab in China. Cemiplimab may be a more affordable alternative to pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. However, it remains unclear which ICIs are the best choices for each country. Future CEAs are required to select comprehensive regimens alongside randomized trials and real-world studies to help verify the economics of ICIs in specific decision-making settings.

Efficacy and safety of definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without induction immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In the era of immunotherapy, the optimal combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not defined. The current study investigated the efficacy and safety of definitive CRT(dCRT) plus consolidation ICIs with or without induction ICIs in stage III NSCLC.

Methods

123 consecutive patients treated with dCRT followed by consolidation ICIs at our institution from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Failure patterns, survival outcomes, and toxicity profiles were analyzed.

Results

The 1- and 2- year PFS rates were 75.3% and 56.9%, respectively, and median PFS was 30.83 months from the start of treatment. In-field failure (18.7%) was the most common failure pattern. The most common adverse event (AE) was pneumonitis caused by ICIs or RT. The incidence of Grade 3-4 and Grade 5 pneumonitis was 5.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Further analysis showed that the induction plus consolidation ICIs group has significantly lower cumulative incidence of distant metastasis rates (HR: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.09-1.00, p=0.043) and higher incidence of pneumonitis (p=0.039) compared with patients in the consolidation ICIs group.

Conclusions

Combined CRT and consolidation ICIs achieved encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with stage III NSCLC in China. Induction plus consolidation ICIs might reduce distant metastasis and deserve further investigation.

Proton therapy (PT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with negative driver genes

PURPOSE

To discuss the optimal treatment modality for inoperable locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients with poor physical status, impaired cardio-pulmonary function, and negative driver genes, and provide clinical evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative driver genes treated at Tsukuba University Hospital(Japan) and Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital(China).The former received proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, referred to as the proton group, with 25 cases included; while the latter underwent X-ray therapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 1 year of sequential immunomodulatory maintenance therapy, referred to as the X-ray group, with 37 cases included.The treatment response and adverse reactions were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria and CTCAE v3.0, and radiotherapy planning and evaluation of organs at risk were performed using the CB-CHOP method.All data were subjected to statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism v9.0, with a T-test using P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

(1)Target dose distribution: compared to the X-ray group, the proton group exhibited smaller CTV and field sizes, with a more pronounced bragg peak.(2)Organs at risk dose: When comparing the proton group to the X-ray group, lung doses (V5, V20, MLD) and heart doses (V40, Dmax) were lower, with statistical significance (P < 0.05), while spinal cord and esophagus doses showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).(3)Treatment-related toxicities: The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events in the proton group and X-ray group was 28.6% and 4.2%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In terms of the types of adverse events, the proton group primarily experienced esophagitis and pneumonia, while the X-ray group primarily experienced pneumonia, esophagitis, and myocarditis. Both groups did not experience radiation myelitis or esophagotracheal fistula.(4)Efficacy evaluation: The RR in the proton group and X-ray group was 68.1% and 70.2%, respectively (P > 0.05), and the DCR was 92.2% and 86.4%, respectively (P > 0.05), indicating no significant difference in short-term efficacy between the two treatment modalities.(5)Survival status: The PFS in the proton group and X-ray group was 31.6 ± 3.5 months (95% CI: 24.7 ~ 38.5) and 24.9 ± 1.55 months (95% CI: 21.9 ~ 27.9), respectively (P > 0.05), while the OS was 51.6 ± 4.62 months (95% CI: 42.5 ~ 60.7) and 33.1 ± 1.99 months (95% CI: 29.2 ~ 37.1), respectively (P < 0.05).According to the annual-specific analysis, the PFS rates for the first to third years in both groups were as follows: 100%, 56.1% and 32.5% for the proton group vs. 100%, 54.3% and 26.3% for the X-ray group. No statistical differences were observed at each time point (P > 0.05).The OS rates for the first to third years in both groups were as follows: 100%, 88.2%, 76.4% for the proton group vs. 100%, 91.4%, 46.3% for the X-ray group. There was no significant difference in the first to second years (P > 0.05), but the third year showed a significant difference (P < 0.05). Survival curve graphs also depicted a similar trend.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant statistical differences observed between the two groups in terms of PFS and OS within the first two years. However, the proton group demonstrated a clear advantage over the X-ray group in terms of adverse reactions and OS in the third year. This suggests a more suitable treatment modality and clinical evidence for populations with frail health, compromised cardio-pulmonary function, post-COVID-19 sequelae, and underlying comorbidities.

Reflecting on the cardiac toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a widely used treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination with traditional radiotherapy (RT) has shown significant potential in prolonging patient survival. However, both thoracic RT and ICIs can lead to cardiac toxicity, including radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) and immunotherapy-related heart damage (IRHD). It still remains uncertain whether the combination of thoracic RT and immunotherapy will exacerbate acute or late cardiovascular (CV) toxicity and incidence. In this review, we summarize safety data from relevant clinical studies regarding CV toxicity for the combination therapy in NSCLC patients, explore the underlying synergetic mechanisms and common risk factors, and proposed treatment and management strategies. We hope to increase emphasis on the long-term assessment of CV toxicity risks associated with the combination therapy, and reduce the incidence of CV deaths resulting from such regimens.

Multi-institutional analysis of aneuploidy and outcomes to chemoradiation and durvalumab in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

There is a need to identify predictive biomarkers to guide treatment strategies in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLCs). In this multi-institutional cohort of 197 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and durvalumab consolidation, we identify that low tumor aneuploidy is independently associated with prolonged progression-free survival (HR 0.63; p=0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.50; p=0.03). Tumors with high aneuploidy had a significantly greater incidence of distant metastasis and shorter median distant-metastasis free survival (p=0.04 and p=0.048, respectively), but aneuploidy level did not associate with local-regional outcomes. Multiplexed immunofluorescence analysis in a cohort of NSCLC found increased intratumoral CD8-positive, PD-1-positive cells, double-positive PD-1 CD8 cells, and FOXP3-positive T-cell in low aneuploid tumors. Additionally, in a cohort of 101 patients treated with cCRT alone, tumor aneuploidy did not associate with disease outcomes. These data support the need for upfront treatment intensification strategies in stage III NSCLC patients with high aneuploid tumors and suggest that tumor aneuploidy is a promising predictive biomarker.

Update on the Management of Stage III NSCLC: Navigating a Complex and Heterogeneous Stage of Disease

BACKGROUND

Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a heterogeneous group of patients. Many patients are treated with curative intent multimodality therapy, either surgical resection plus systemic therapy or chemoradiation plus immunotherapy. However, many patients are not suitable for curative intent therapy and are treated with palliative systemic therapy or best supportive care.

METHODS

This paper is a review of recent advances in the management of patients with curative intent disease.

RESULTS

There have been significant advances in curative intent therapy for patients with stage III NSCLC in recent years. These include both adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapies. For patients with resectable NSCLC, two trials have demonstrated that adjuvant atezolizumab or pembrolizumab, following chemotherapy, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS). In patients with tumours harbouring a common mutation of the EGFR gene, adjuvant osimertinib therapy was associated with a large improvement in both DFS and overall survival (OS). Five randomized trials have evaluated chemotherapy plus nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, or toripalimab, either as neoadjuvant or perioperative (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant) therapy. All five trials show significant improvements in the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS). OS data are currently immature. This would now be considered the standard of care for resectable stage III NSCLC. The addition of durvalumab to chemoradiation has also become the standard of care in unresectable stage III NSCLC. One year of consolidation durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiation has demonstrated significant improvements in both progression-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has become a standard recommendation in curative intent therapy for stage III NSCLC.

Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNAs predict response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has brought new hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited by the lack of clinically feasible markers, it is still difficult to select NSCLC patients who respond well and to predict patients' clinical outcomes before the treatment. Before the treatment, we isolated plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) from three cohorts (discovery, training and validation) of 78 NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. To identify differentially-expressed EV long RNAs (exLRs), we employed RNA-seq in the discovery cohort. And we subsequently used qRT-PCR to establish and validate the predictive signature in the other two cohorts. We have identified 8 candidate exLRs from 27 top-ranked exLRs differentially expressed between responders and non-responders, and tested their expression with qRT-PCR in the training cohort. We finally identified H3C2 (P = 0.029), MALAT1 (P = 0.043) and RPS3 (P = 0.0086) significantly expressed in responders for establishing the predictive signature. Integrated with PD-L1 expression, our signature performed well in predicting immunotherapeutic responses in the training (AUC=0.892) and validation cohorts (AUC=0.747). Furthermore, our signature was proven to be a predictor for favorable prognosis of patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, which demonstrates the feasibility of our signature in clinical practices (P = 0.048). Our results demonstrate that the exLR-based signature could accurately predict responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Chinese Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The TD-FOREKNOW Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The benefit of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted at 2 hospitals in China, patients aged 18 to 70 years with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC were enrolled between April 7, 2020, and January 12, 2022.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of camrelizumab (200 mg) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, 130 mg/m2, and platinum [cisplatin, 75 mg/m2; carboplatin, area under the curve, 5; or nedaplatin, 100 mg/m2]) or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery after 4 to 6 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary end points included the major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Disease-free survival (DFS, defined as the time from surgery to disease recurrence or death from any cause) was analyzed post hoc. Efficacy was assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis.

Results

Ninety-four Chinese patients were randomized, and 88 (93.6%; median age, 61 years [IQR, 54-65 years]; 74 men [84.1%]) received allocated neoadjuvant treatment (43 received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, and 45 received chemotherapy alone). Among these 88 patients, the pCR rate was 32.6% (14 of 43; 95% CI, 19.1%-48.5%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs 8.9% (4 of 45; 95% CI, 2.5%-21.2%) with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.35-22.37; P = .008). The MPR rates were 65.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-79.0%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 15.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-29.5%) with chemotherapy alone. The radiographic ORRs were 72.1% (95% CI, 56.3%-84.7%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 53.3% (95% CI, 37.9%-68.3%) with chemotherapy alone. With a median follow-up of 14.1 months (IQR, 9.2-20.9 months), the median EFS and DFS were not reached in either group. The most common neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were decreased white blood cell count (6 of 43 [14.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 2 of 45 [4.4%] in the chemotherapy group) and decreased neutrophil count (3 of 43 [7.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 5 of 45 [11.1%] in the chemotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that among patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the pCR rate with manageable toxic effects.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04338620.

Recent Advances in Antitumor Dendritic Cell Vaccines

Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most important antigen-presenting cells in the body and play a key role in antigen recognition, uptake, processing, and presentation and mediate nonspecific immunity and specific immunity. Purpose: To summarize the main findings that DC vaccines are a new immunotherapy scheme combining the strengths of tumor antigens and DCs that can boost the body's identification and clearance of tumors. Methods: In this review, the authors focus on the biological characteristics of DCs, recent advances in the understanding of antitumor mechanisms, and the classification of DC vaccines. Results: The current progress of DC-based vaccine immunotherapy for common tumors with high morbidity or mortality in China were systematically summarize. Conclusions: The DC vaccines combining the strengths of tumor antigens will provide directions to explore reasonable, safe, and effective combination immunotherapy strategies for tumors in the future.

Hepatic cavernous hemangioma developed in non-small cell lung cancer patients after receiving Camrelizumab treatment: two case reports

Purpose

To report two cases of hepatic cavernous hemangioma, a rare complication, in patients with locally advanced and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Additionally, to share clinical experiences related to the management of this condition.

Methods

Two patients with locally advanced and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in our hospital. Following the NCCN guidelines and expert consensus, both patients received standard treatment with Camrelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor). Subsequent abdominal CT scans revealed hepatic focal lesions that did not exhibit typical characteristics of metastatic tumors. Therefore, further systematic investigation was conducted to study the hepatic focal lesions.

Results

(1) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hepatic cavernous hemangioma. A multidisciplinary consultation concluded that it was an adverse drug reaction to Camrelizumab. (2) Ten-gene testing for both patients did not reveal any driver gene mutations associated with lung cancer. Apart from the occurrence of hepatic cavernous hemangioma, there were no signs of disease progression or worsening. (3) Both patients had resolution of hepatic cavernous hemangioma after switching to alternative PD-1 inhibitors or discontinuing PD-1 inhibitor treatment. One patient experienced hemorrhage related to the hepatic hemangioma, which was managed with hemostasis and symptomatic treatment, resulting in improvement. (4) Clinical outcomes: The first patient achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of 33 months in first-line treatment and had not reached the PFS endpoint in second-line treatment, with an overall survival exceeding 56 months. The second patient had not reached the PFS endpoint in first-line treatment, with an overall survival exceeding 31 months.

Conclusion

Hepatic cavernous hemangioma is a rare and serious adverse reaction associated with PD-1 inhibitors. Camrelizumab may interact with the PD-1 molecule in a different manner compared to other PD-1 inhibitors, affecting the regulation of the VEGFR/ULBP2 signaling pathway. In future studies, next-generation sequencing may provide detailed molecular pathology information, which could help explain individual differences and provide a basis for the prevention or intervention of hepatic cavernous hemangioma.

Impact of TMB/PD-L1 expression and pneumonitis on chemoradiation and durvalumab response in stage III NSCLC

Although concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and durvalumab consolidation has become a standard treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), clinicopathologic and genomic factors associated with its efficacy remain poorly characterized. Here, in a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of 328 patients treated with CRT and durvalumab, we identify that very high PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) expression ( ≥ 90%) and increased tumor mutational burden (TMB) are independently associated with prolonged disease control. Additionally, we identify the impact of pneumonitis and its timing on disease outcomes among patients who discontinue durvalumab: compared to patients who experienced early-onset pneumonitis ( < 3 months) leading to durvalumab discontinuation, patients with late-onset pneumonitis had a significantly longer PFS (12.7 months vs not reached; HR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.58]; P = 0.001) and overall survival (37.2 months vs not reached; HR 0.26 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.79]; P = 0.017). These findings suggest that opportunities exist to improve outcomes in patients with lower PD-L1 and TMB levels, and those at highest risk for pneumonitis.

Research progress of biomarkers in the prediction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapeutic efficiency in lung cancer

Currently, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors is widely used in the treatment of multiple cancer types including lung cancer, which is a leading cause of cancer death in the world. However, only a limited proportion of lung cancer patients will benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Therefore, it is of importance to predict the response to immunotherapy for the precision treatment of patients. Although the expression of PD-L1 and tumor mutation burden (TMB) are commonly used to predict the clinical response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, other factors such as tumor-specific genes, dMMR/MSI, and gut microbiome are also promising predictors for immunotherapy in lung cancer. Furthermore, invasive peripheral blood biomarkers including blood DNA-related biomarkers (e.g., ctDNA and bTMB), blood cell-related biomarkers (e.g., immune cells and TCR), and other blood-related biomarkers (e.g., soluble PD-L1 and cytokines) were utilized to predict the immunotherapeutic response. In this review, the current achievements of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and the potential biomarkers for the prediction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment were summarized and discussed.

Application of CRISPR screen in mechanistic studies of tumor development, tumor drug resistance, and tumor immunotherapy

Tumor is one of the biggest threats to human health. Though tumor therapy has been dramatically advanced by the progress of technology and research in recent decades, it is still far from expectations. Thus, it is of great significance to explore the mechanisms of tumor growth, metastasis, and resistance. Screen based on Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) 9 gene editing technology are powerful tools for exploring the abovementioned facets. This review summarizes the recent screen performed in cancer cells and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. The screens in cancer cells mainly focus on exploring the mechanisms underlying cancer cells' growth, metastasis, and how cancer cells escape from the FDA approved drugs or immunotherapy. And the studies in tumor-associated immune cells are primarily aimed at identifying signaling pathways that can enhance the anti-tumor function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), CAR-T cells, and macrophages. Moreover, we discuss the limitations, merits of the CRISPR screen, and further its future application in tumor studies. Importantly, recent advances in high throughput tumor related CRISPR screen have deeply contributed to new concepts and mechanisms underlying tumor development, tumor drug resistance, and tumor immune therapy, all of which will eventually potentiate the clinical therapy for tumor patients.

Treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC: Real world cohort study and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, the treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT), delivered either concurrently (cCRT) or sequentially (sCRT). There is limited data on the outcomes and safety of CRT in a real-world setting. We conducted a real-world cohort analysis of our Leuven Lung Cancer Group (LLCG) experience with CRT for unresectable stage III NSCLC, prior to the era of consolidation treatment with immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this observational, real-world monocentric cohort study, a total of 163 consecutive patients were included. They were diagnosed with unresectable stage III primary NSCLC and treated with CRT between January 1st, 2011, and December 31st, 2018. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, toxicity, and primary outcome parameters such as PFS, OS and pattern of relapse were captured.

RESULTS

CRT was concurrent in 108 patients, sequential in 55. Overall tolerability was good, with two thirds of patients without severe adverse events such as severe febrile neutropenia, ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis, or ≥ grade 3 esophagitis. All registered adverse events were more frequent in the cCRT group compared to the sCRT group. Median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 10.3-16.2), median OS was 23.3 months (95% CI 18.3-28.0), with a 47.5% survival rate at 2 years, and 29.4% at five years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a clinically relevant benchmark on the outcomes and toxicity of concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC in a real-world setting in the pre-PACIFIC era.

Minimally invasive surgery vs. open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery [MIS, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] and open thoracotomy (OT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N2 disease.

Methods

We searched online databases and studies from the creation of the database to August 2022, comparing the MIS group to the OT group for NSCLC with N2 disease. Study endpoints included intraoperative outcomes [e.g., conversion, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgery time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), and R0 resection], postoperative outcomes [e.g., length of stay (LOS) and complication], and survival outcomes [e.g., 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)]. We estimated outcomes using random effects meta-analysis to account for studies with high heterogeneity (I² > 50 or p < 0.05). Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and standard mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. Treatment effects on OS and DFS were described by hazard ratio (HR).

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies on MIS vs. OT for NSCLC with N2 disease included 8,374 patients. Compared to OT, patients that underwent MIS had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (SMD = - 64.82, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD = -0.15, p < 0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.22, p = 0.049), lower 30-day mortality (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.61, P < 0.01). The results showed no statistically significant differences in surgical time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Current data suggest that minimally invasive surgery may provide satisfying outcomes, a higher R0 resection rate, and better short-term and long-term survival than open thoracotomy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022355712.