Transient Hysteresis in CDK4/6 Activity Underlies Passage of the Restriction Point in G1

CDK4 loss-of-function mutations cause microcephaly and short stature

Cell number is a major determinant of organism size in mammals. In humans, gene mutations in cell cycle components result in restricted growth through reduced cell numbers. Here we identified biallelic mutations in CDK4 as a cause of microcephaly and short stature. CDK4 encodes a key cell cycle kinase that associates with D-type cyclins during G1 of the cell cycle to promote S-phase entry and cell proliferation through retinoblastoma (RB) phosphorylation. CDK4 and CDK6 are believed to be functionally redundant and are targeted jointly by chemotherapeutic CDK4/6 inhibitors. Using molecular and cell biology approaches, we show that functional CDK4 protein is not detectable in cells with CDK4 mutations. Cells display impaired RB phosphorylation in G1, leading to G1/S-phase transition defects and reduced cell proliferation, consistent with complete loss of cellular CDK4 enzymatic activity. Together, these findings demonstrate that CDK4 is itself required for cell proliferation, human growth, and brain size determination during development.

UPS and Kinases-Gatekeepers of the G1/S Transition

The G1/S transition is a highly regulated and pivotal checkpoint in the cell cycle, where the cell decides whether to commit to DNA replication and subsequent division or enter a non-dividing state. This checkpoint serves as a critical control point for preventing uncontrolled cell proliferation and maintaining genomic stability. The major driving force underlying the G1/S transition is the sequential activation of Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which is regulated by the coordinated binding of Cyclin partners, as well as the phosphorylation and ubiquitin-mediated degradation of both Cyclin partners and Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs). Various E3 ligase families govern the timely degradation of these regulatory proteins, with their activity intricately controlled by phosphorylation events. This coordination enables the cells to efficiently translate the environmental cues and molecular signaling inputs to determine their fate. We explore the evolution of three distinct models describing the G1/S transition, highlighting how the traditional linear model is being challenged by recent paradigm shifts and conflicting findings. These advances reveal emerging complexity and unresolved questions in the field, particularly regarding how the latest insights into coordinated phosphorylation and ubiquitination-dependent degradation integrate into contemporary models of the G1/S transition.

Inactivation of CDK4/6, CDK2, and ERK in G1-phase triggers differentiation commitment

Terminal cell differentiation, a process vital for tissue development and regeneration where progenitor cells acquire specialized functions and permanently exit the cell cycle, is still poorly understood at the molecular level. Using live-cell imaging and adipogenesis as a model, we demonstrate that the initial stage involves a variable number of cell divisions driven by redundant CDK4/6 or CDK2 activation.. Subsequently, a delayed decrease in cyclin D1 and an increase in p27 levels leads to the attenuation of CDK4/6 and CDK2 activity. This results in G1 lengthening and the induction of PPARG, the master regulator of adipogenesis. PPARG then induces p21, and later p18, culminating in the irreversible inactivation of CDK4/6 and CDK2, and thus, permanent cell cycle exit. However, contrary to expectation, CDK inactivation alone is not sufficient to trigger commitment to differentiation and functional specialization; ERK inactivation is also required. Our study establishes that the coordinated activation and subsequent delayed inactivation of CDK4/6, CDK2, and ERK are crucial determinants for irreversible cell cycle exit and differentiation commitment in terminal cell differentiation.

Cooperation between the Hippo and MAPK pathway activation drives acquired resistance to TEAD inhibition

TEAD (transcriptional enhanced associate domain) transcription factors (TEAD1-4) serve as the primary effectors of the Hippo signaling pathway in various cancers. Targeted therapy leads to the emergence of resistance and the underlying mechanism of resistance to TEAD inhibition in cancers is less characterized. We uncover that upregulation of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) transcription factors, along with restored YAP (yes-associated protein) and TEAD activity, drives resistance to GNE-7883, a pan-TEAD inhibitor. Acute GNE-7883 treatment abrogates YAP-TEAD binding and attenuates FOSL1 (FOS like 1) activity. TEAD inhibitor resistant cells restore YAP and TEAD chromatin occupancy, acquire additional FOSL1 binding and exhibit increased MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway activity. FOSL1 is required for the chromatin binding of YAP and TEAD. This study describes a clinically relevant interplay between the Hippo and MAPK pathway and highlights the key role of MAPK pathway inhibitors in mitigating resistance to TEAD inhibition in Hippo pathway dependent cancers.

The PRC2.1 subcomplex opposes G1 progression through regulation of CCND1 and CCND2

Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

Targeting the mitotic kinase NEK2 enhances CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy by potentiating genome instability

Selective inhibitors that target cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of a subset of breast cancers and are being evaluated in numerous clinical trials for other cancers. Despite this advance, a subset of tumors are intrinsically resistant to these drugs and acquired resistance is nearly inevitable. Recent mechanistic evidence suggests that in addition to stalling the cell cycle, the antitumor effects of CDK4/6i involve the induction of chromosomal instability (CIN). Here, we exploit this mechanism by combining CDK4/6i with other instability-promoting agents to induce maladaptive CIN and irreversible cell fates. Specifically, dual targeting of CDK4/6 and the mitotic kinase NEK2 in vitro drives centrosome amplification and the accumulation of CIN that induces catastrophic mitoses, cell cycle exit, and cell death. Dual targeting also induces CIN in vivo and significantly decreases mouse tumor volume to a greater extent than either drug alone, without inducing overt toxicity. Importantly, we provide evidence that breast cancer cells are selectively dependent on NEK2, but nontransformed cells are not, in contrast with other mitotic kinases that are commonly essential in all cell types. These findings implicate NEK2 as a potential therapeutic target for breast cancer that could circumvent the dose-limiting toxicities that are commonly observed when blocking other mitotic kinases. Moreover, these data suggest that NEK2 inhibitors could be used to sensitize tumors to FDA-approved CDK4/6i for the treatment of breast cancers, improving their efficacy and providing a foundation for expanding the patient population that could benefit from CDK4/6i.

Studying Mitogen-Independent Proliferation in Murine B Cells

The prevailing dogma of the cell cycle posits that a mitogenic signal is required at the end of each mitosis for cells to progress through the next G1. This textbook model is based mostly on experiments with fibroblast cultures. Burnet's clonal selection theory states that selected B and T cells expand rapidly to initiate immune response. To achieve this, it is plausible that lymphocytes do not follow the canonical rules of cell cycle progression. One such cell cycle anomaly lymphocytes demonstrate is non-dependency on mitogenic signals during proliferative phases. Such modified cell cycle regulation mechanisms can play a critical role in the outcome of immune response to the invading antigens. Similarly, such responses against self-antigens can lead to autoimmunity, and dysregulation of this process can cause lymphoma and leukemias. Here, we provide a method to explore mitogen-independent proliferation properties of murine splenic B cells. This protocol can be further combined with other molecular techniques to obtain deeper molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation in lymphocytes.

Long Non-Coding RNA LINC01116 Promotes the Proliferation of Lung Adenocarcinoma by Targeting miR-9-5p/CCNE1 Axis

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) LINC01116 is crucial in promoting cell proliferation, invasion and migration in solid tumours, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). LINC01116 acts as a competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) that binds competitively to microRNAs and plays a critical role in tumour migration and invasion. However, other mechanisms of action besides the ceRNA theory have been rarely reported and remain to be elucidated further. The differences in RNA and protein levels in cells and tissues were assessed through real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot analysis. In vitro functional assays and in vivo xenograft models were used to analyse the function of LINC01116 in LUAD. Thus, the molecular correlation between miR-9-5p and CCNE1 was investigated through direct and indirect mechanism experiments. LINC01116, miR-9-5p and CCNE1 were upregulated in LUAD cell lines and tissues and were associated with a poor prognosis in patients. LINC01116 depletion inhibited proliferation but facilitated cell apoptosis. AGO2-RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (AGO2-RIP) experiments confirmed that AGO2 binds to LINC01116 and miR-9-5p, indicating that LINC01116 interacts with miR-9-5p. The overexpression of miR-9-5p and CCNE1 effectively counteracts the biological effects of LINC01116 knockdown on reduced proliferation and cell cycle arrest in LUAD cells. The downregulation of miR-9-5p significantly reduces the CCNE1 level in A549 cells, and the upregulation of LINC01116 counteracts the downregulation of miR-9-5p effect, restoring the expression level of CCNE1. Our data demonstrated that LINC01116 regulates the expression of CCNE1 by positively regulating miR-9-5p, thereby affecting cell cycle, proliferation and participating in the development of LUAD.

Therapeutic benefits of maintaining CDK4/6 inhibitors and incorporating CDK2 inhibitors beyond progression in breast cancer

The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy has revolutionized treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer. However, the emergence of resistance in most patients often leads to treatment discontinuation with no consensus on effective second-line therapies. The therapeutic benefits of maintaining CDK4/6i or incorporating CDK2 inhibitors (CDK2i) after disease progression remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that sustained CDK4/6i therapy, either alone or combined with CDK2i, significantly suppresses the growth of drug-resistant HR+ breast cancer. Continued CDK4/6i treatment induces a non-canonical pathway for retinoblastoma protein (Rb) inactivation via post-translational degradation, resulting in diminished E2F activity and delayed G1 progression. Importantly, our data highlight that CDK2i should be combined with CDK4/6i to effectively suppress CDK2 activity and overcome resistance. We also identify cyclin E overexpression as a key driver of resistance to CDK4/6 and CDK2 inhibition. These findings provide crucial insights into overcoming resistance in HR+ breast cancer, supporting the continued use of CDK4/6i and the strategic incorporation of CDK2i to improve therapeutic outcomes.

The G1-S transition is promoted by Rb degradation via the E3 ligase UBR5

Mammalian cells make the decision to divide at the G1-S transition in response to diverse signals impinging on the retinoblastoma protein Rb, a cell cycle inhibitor and tumor suppressor. Passage through the G1-S transition is initially driven by Rb inactivation via phosphorylation and by Rb's decreasing concentration in G1. While many studies have identified the mechanisms of Rb phosphorylation, the mechanism underlying Rb's decreasing concentration in G1 was unknown. Here, we found that Rb's concentration decrease in G1 requires the E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR5. UBR5 knockout cells have increased Rb concentration in early G1, exhibited a lower G1-S transition rate, and are more sensitive to inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (Cdk4/6). This last observation suggests that UBR5 inhibition can strengthen the efficacy of Cdk4/6 inhibitor-based cancer therapies.

Uncoupling of mTORC1 from E2F activity maintains DNA damage and senescence

DNA damage is a primary trigger for cellular senescence, which in turn causes organismal aging and is a promising target of anti-aging therapies. Most DNA damage occurs when DNA is fragile during DNA replication in S phase, but senescent cells maintain DNA damage long-after DNA replication has stopped. How senescent cells induce DNA damage and why senescent cells fail to repair damaged DNA remain open questions. Here, we combine reversible expression of the senescence-inducing CDK4/6 inhibitory protein p16INK4 (p16) with live single-cell analysis and show that sustained mTORC1 signaling triggers senescence in non-proliferating cells by increasing transcriptional DNA damage and inflammation signaling that persists after p16 is degraded. Strikingly, we show that activation of E2F transcriptional program, which is regulated by CDK4/6 activity and promotes expression of DNA repair proteins, repairs transcriptionally damaged DNA without requiring DNA replication. Together, our study suggests that senescence can be maintained by ongoing mTORC1-induced transcriptional DNA damage that cannot be sufficiently repaired without induction of protective E2F target genes.

The PRC2.1 Subcomplex Opposes G1 Progression through Regulation of CCND1 and CCND2

Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including CML, breast cancer and immortalized cell lines.

A patent review of small molecule CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer: 2020-present

INTRODUCTION

Cyclin-dependent protein kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) is a class of serine/threonine protein kinases that plays a key role in the regulation of the cell cycle. CDK4/6 is highly expressed in cancers such as breast cancer, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, a variety of CDK4/6 inhibitors have been developed, aiming to develop effective inhibitors to solve CDK4/6 resistance and toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

This article searches patents through Espacenet and reviews the development of widely studied CDK inhibitors and FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as the latest progress of patented inhibitors with good inhibitory activity against CDK4/6 from 2020 to now.

EXPERT OPINION

CDK4/6 is highly expressed in many tumors and has become an important anti-tumor target. Among the patents from 2020 to the present, many inhibitors have good kinase inhibitory effects on CDK4/6 and also show great development potential in anti-tumor. However, there is still an urgent need to develop novel CDK4/6 inhibitors that address challenges such as drug resistance, toxicity, and selectivity.

Mechanistic modeling of cell viability assays with in silico lineage tracing

Data from cell viability assays, which measure cumulative division and death events in a population and reflect substantial cellular heterogeneity, are widely available. However, interpreting such data with mechanistic computational models is hindered because direct model/data comparison is often muddled. We developed an algorithm that tracks simulated division and death events in mechanistically detailed single-cell lineages to enable such a model/data comparison and suggest causes of cell-cell drug response variability. Using our previously developed model of mammalian single-cell proliferation and death signaling, we simulated drug dose response experiments for four targeted anti-cancer drugs (alpelisib, neratinib, trametinib and palbociclib) and compared them to experimental data. Simulations are consistent with data for strong growth inhibition by trametinib (MEK inhibitor) and overall lack of efficacy for alpelisib (PI-3K inhibitor), but are inconsistent with data for palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and neratinib (EGFR inhibitor). Model/data inconsistencies suggest (i) the importance of CDK4/6 for driving the cell cycle may be overestimated, and (ii) that the cellular balance between basal (tonic) and ligand-induced signaling is a critical determinant of receptor inhibitor response. Simulations show subpopulations of rapidly and slowly dividing cells in both control and drug-treated conditions. Variations in mother cells prior to drug treatment all impinging on ERK pathway activity are associated with the rapidly dividing phenotype and trametinib resistance. This work lays a foundation for the application of mechanistic modeling to large-scale cell viability assay datasets and better understanding determinants of cellular heterogeneity in drug response.

Slower CDK4 and faster CDK2 activation in the cell cycle

Dysregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) impacts cell proliferation, driving cancer. Here, we ask why the cyclin-D/CDK4 complex governs cell cycle progression through the longer G1 phase, whereas cyclin-E/CDK2 regulates the shorter G1/S phase transition. We consider available experimental cellular and structural data including cyclin-E's high-level burst, sustained duration of elevated cyclin-D expression, and explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations of the inactive monomeric and complexed states, to establish the conformational tendencies along the landscape of the distinct activation scenarios of cyclin-D/CDK4 and cyclin-E/CDK2 in the G1 phase and G1/S transition of the cell cycle, respectively. These lead us to propose slower activation of cyclin-D/CDK4 and rapid activation of cyclin-E/CDK2. We provide the mechanisms through which this occurs, offering innovative CDK4 drug design considerations. Our insightful mechanistic work addresses a compelling cell cycle regulation question and illuminates the distinct activation speeds between the G1 and the G1/S phases, which are crucial for function.

Cancer takes many paths through G1/S

In the commonly accepted paradigm for control of the mammalian cell cycle, sequential cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and cyclin activities drive the orderly transition from G1 to S phase. However, recent studies using different technological approaches and examining a broad range of cancer cell types are challenging this established paradigm. An alternative model is evolving in which cell cycles utilize different drivers and take different trajectories through the G1/S transition. We are discovering that cancer cells in particular can adapt their drivers and trajectories, which has important implications for antiproliferative therapies. These studies have helped to refine an understanding of how CDK inhibition impinges on proliferation and have significance for understanding fundamental features of cell biology and cancer.

Sustained ERK signaling promotes G2 cell cycle exit and primes cells for whole-genome duplication

Whole-genome duplication (WGD) is a frequent event in cancer evolution that fuels chromosomal instability. WGD can result from mitotic errors or endoreduplication, yet the molecular mechanisms that drive WGD remain unclear. Here, we use live single-cell analysis to characterize cell-cycle dynamics upon aberrant Ras-ERK signaling. We find that sustained ERK signaling in human cells leads to reactivation of the APC/C in G2, resulting in tetraploid G0-like cells that are primed for WGD. This process is independent of DNA damage or p53 but dependent on p21. Transcriptomics analysis and live-cell imaging showed that constitutive ERK activity promotes p21 expression, which is necessary and sufficient to inhibit CDK activity and which prematurely activates the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). Finally, either loss of p53 or reduced ERK signaling allowed for endoreduplication, completing a WGD event. Thus, sustained ERK signaling-induced G2 cell cycle exit represents an alternative path to WGD.

An intermediate Rb-E2F activity state safeguards proliferation commitment

Tissue repair, immune defence and cancer progression rely on a vital cellular decision between quiescence and proliferation1,2. Mammalian cells proliferate by triggering a positive feedback mechanism3,4. The transcription factor E2F activates cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), which in turn phosphorylates and inactivates the E2F inhibitor protein retinoblastoma (Rb). This action further increases E2F activity to express genes needed for proliferation. Given that positive feedback can inadvertently amplify small signals, understanding how cells keep this positive feedback in check remains a puzzle. Here we measured E2F and CDK2 signal changes in single cells and found that the positive feedback mechanism engages only late in G1 phase. Cells spend variable and often extended times in a reversible state of intermediate E2F activity before committing to proliferate. This intermediate E2F activity is proportional to the amount of phosphorylation of a conserved T373 residue in Rb that is mediated by CDK2 or CDK4/CDK6. Such T373-phosphorylated Rb remains bound on chromatin but dissociates from it once Rb is hyperphosphorylated at many sites, which fully activates E2F. The preferential initial phosphorylation of T373 can be explained by its relatively slower rate of dephosphorylation. Together, our study identifies a primed state of intermediate E2F activation whereby cells sense external and internal signals and decide whether to reverse and exit to quiescence or trigger the positive feedback mechanism that initiates cell proliferation.

Endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contact gradients direct cell migration

Directed cell migration is driven by the front-back polarization of intracellular signalling1-3. Receptor tyrosine kinases and other inputs activate local signals that trigger membrane protrusions at the front2,4-6. Equally important is a long-range inhibitory mechanism that suppresses signalling at the back to prevent the formation of multiple fronts7-9. However, the identity of this mechanism is unknown. Here we report that endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane (ER-PM) contact sites are polarized in single and collectively migrating cells. The increased density of these ER-PM contacts at the back provides the ER-resident PTP1B phosphatase more access to PM substrates, which confines receptor signalling to the front and directs cell migration. Polarization of the ER-PM contacts is due to microtubule-regulated polarization of the ER, with more RTN4-rich curved ER at the front and more CLIMP63-rich flattened ER at the back. The resulting ER curvature gradient leads to small and unstable ER-PM contacts only at the front. These contacts flow backwards and grow to large and stable contacts at the back to form the front-back ER-PM contact gradient. Together, our study suggests that the structural polarity mediated by ER-PM contact gradients polarizes cell signalling, directs cell migration and prolongs cell migration.

CDK4/6 activity is required during G2 arrest to prevent stress-induced endoreplication

Cell cycle events are coordinated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) to ensure robust cell division. CDK4/6 and CDK2 regulate the growth 1 (G1) to synthesis (S) phase transition of the cell cycle by responding to mitogen signaling, promoting E2F transcription and inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex. We found that this mechanism was still required in G2-arrested cells to prevent cell cycle exit after the S phase. This mechanism revealed a role for CDK4/6 in maintaining the G2 state, challenging the notion that the cell cycle is irreversible and that cells do not require mitogens after passing the restriction point. Exit from G2 occurred during ribotoxic stress and was actively mediated by stress-activated protein kinases. Upon relief of stress, a significant fraction of cells underwent a second round of DNA replication that led to whole-genome doubling.

Characterizing heterogeneous single-cell dose responses computationally and experimentally using threshold inhibition surfaces and dose-titration assays

Single cancer cells within a tumor exhibit variable levels of resistance to drugs, ultimately leading to treatment failures. While tumor heterogeneity is recognized as a major obstacle to cancer therapy, standard dose-response measurements for the potency of targeted kinase inhibitors aggregate populations of cells, obscuring intercellular variations in responses. In this work, we develop an analytical and experimental framework to quantify and model dose responses of individual cancer cells to drugs. We first explore the connection between population and single-cell dose responses using a computational model, revealing that multiple heterogeneous populations can yield nearly identical population dose responses. We demonstrate that a single-cell analysis method, which we term a threshold inhibition surface, can differentiate among these populations. To demonstrate the applicability of this method, we develop a dose-titration assay to measure dose responses in single cells. We apply this assay to breast cancer cells responding to phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibition (PI3Ki), using clinically relevant PI3Kis on breast cancer cell lines expressing fluorescent biosensors for kinase activity. We demonstrate that MCF-7 breast cancer cells exhibit heterogeneous dose responses with some cells requiring over ten-fold higher concentrations than the population average to achieve inhibition. Our work reimagines dose-response relationships for cancer drugs in an emerging paradigm of single-cell tumor heterogeneity.

4-Hydroxy-2-pyridone derivatives with antitumor activity produced by mangrove endophytic fungus Talaromyces sp. CY-3

OSMAC strategy is a useful tool for discovering series of metabolites from microorganism. Five new sambutoxin derivatives (1-2, 4, 8-9), together with seven known compounds (3, 5-7, 10-12), were isolated from Talaromyces sp. CY-3 under OSMAC strategy and guidance of molecular networking. Their planar structures and absolute configurations were determined by NMR, HRESIMS, ECD spectra and common biosynthetic pathway. In bioassay, compounds 1-12 showed cytotoxicity to tumor cell lines with IC50 values in the range of 1.76-49.13 μM. The antitumor molecular mechanism of 10 was also explored. In vitro compound 10 significantly inhibited the growth and proliferation of two lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H1703). Furthermore, colony formation, EdU analysis, flow cytometry and Western blot analysis showed that 10 could induce cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase by promoting the expression of p53 and p21. The molecular mechanism of its antitumor effects in vitro is that 10 arrests the cell cycle by activating the p21/CyclinD1/Rb signaling pathway and the p53 pathway. Our results identified a lead small molecule compound with efficient antitumor growth and proliferation activity.

A fast-acting lipid checkpoint in G1 prevents mitotic defects

Lipid synthesis increases during the cell cycle to ensure sufficient membrane mass, but how insufficient synthesis restricts cell-cycle entry is not understood. Here, we identify a lipid checkpoint in G1 phase of the mammalian cell cycle by using live single-cell imaging, lipidome, and transcriptome analysis of a non-transformed cell. We show that synthesis of fatty acids in G1 not only increases lipid mass but extensively shifts the lipid composition to unsaturated phospholipids and neutral lipids. Strikingly, acute lowering of lipid synthesis rapidly activates the PERK/ATF4 endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway that blocks cell-cycle entry by increasing p21 levels, decreasing Cyclin D levels, and suppressing Retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation. Together, our study identifies a rapid anticipatory ER lipid checkpoint in G1 that prevents cells from starting the cell cycle as long as lipid synthesis is low, thereby preventing mitotic defects, which are triggered by low lipid synthesis much later in mitosis.

Non-canonical pathway for Rb inactivation and external signaling coordinate cell-cycle entry without CDK4/6 activity

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are critical for initiating cell proliferation by inactivating the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. However, mammalian cells can bypass CDK4/6 for Rb inactivation. Here we show a non-canonical pathway for Rb inactivation and its interplay with external signals. We find that the non-phosphorylated Rb protein in quiescent cells is intrinsically unstable, offering an alternative mechanism for initiating E2F activity. Nevertheless, this pathway incompletely induces Rb-protein loss, resulting in minimal E2F activity. To trigger cell proliferation, upregulation of mitogenic signaling is required for stabilizing c-Myc, thereby augmenting E2F activity. Concurrently, stress signaling promotes Cip/Kip levels, competitively regulating cell proliferation with mitogenic signaling. In cancer, driver mutations elevate c-Myc levels, facilitating adaptation to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Differentiated cells, despite Rb-protein loss, maintain quiescence through the modulation of c-Myc and Cip/Kip levels. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into an alternative model of cell-cycle entry and the maintenance of quiescence.

APC/C prevents non-canonical order of cyclin/CDK activity to maintain CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced arrest

Regulated cell cycle progression ensures homeostasis and prevents cancer. In proliferating cells, premature S phase entry is avoided by the E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/C (anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome), although the APC/C substrates whose degradation restrains G1-S progression are not fully known. The APC/C is also active in arrested cells that exited the cell cycle, but it is not clear if APC/C maintains all types of arrest. Here by expressing the APC/C inhibitor, EMI1, we show that APC/C activity is essential to prevent S phase entry in cells arrested by pharmacological CDK4/6 inhibition (Palbociclib). Thus, active protein degradation is required for arrest alongside repressed cell cycle gene expression. The mechanism of rapid and robust arrest bypass from inhibiting APC/C involves cyclin-dependent kinases acting in an atypical order to inactivate RB-mediated E2F repression. Inactivating APC/C first causes mitotic cyclin B accumulation which then promotes cyclin A expression. We propose that cyclin A is the key substrate for maintaining arrest because APC/C-resistant cyclin A, but not cyclin B, is sufficient to induce S phase entry. Cells bypassing arrest from CDK4/6 inhibition initiate DNA replication with severely reduced origin licensing. The simultaneous accumulation of S phase licensing inhibitors, such as cyclin A and geminin, with G1 licensing activators disrupts the normal order of G1-S progression. As a result, DNA synthesis and cell proliferation are profoundly impaired. Our findings predict that cancers with elevated EMI1 expression will tend to escape CDK4/6 inhibition into a premature, underlicensed S phase and suffer enhanced genome instability.

G1 Dynamics at the Crossroads of Pluripotency and Cancer

G1 cell cycle phase dynamics are regulated by intricate networks involving cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and CDK inhibitors, which control G1 progression and ensure proper cell cycle transitions. Moreover, adequate origin licensing in G1 phase, the first committed step of DNA replication in the subsequent S phase, is essential to maintain genome integrity. In this review, we highlight the intriguing parallels and disparities in G1 dynamics between stem cells and cancer cells, focusing on their regulatory mechanisms and functional outcomes. Notably, SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and the pluripotency reprogramming facilitator c-MYC, known for their role in establishing and maintaining stem cell pluripotency, are also aberrantly expressed in certain cancer cells. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the regulatory role of these pluripotency factors in G1 dynamics in the context of stem cells and cancer cells, which may offer new insights into the interconnections between pluripotency and tumorigenesis.

Cyclers' kinases in cell division: from molecules to cancer therapy

Faithful eucaryotic cell division requires spatio-temporal orchestration of multiple sequential events. To ensure the dynamic nature of these molecular and morphological transitions, a swift modulation of key regulatory pathways is necessary. The molecular process that most certainly fits this description is phosphorylation, the post-translational modification provided by kinases, that is crucial to allowing the progression of the cell cycle and that culminates with the separation of two identical daughter cells. In detail, from the early stages of the interphase to the cytokinesis, each critical step of this process is tightly regulated by multiple families of kinases including the Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), kinases of the Aurora, Polo, Wee1 families, and many others. While cell-cycle-related CDKs control the timing of the different phases, preventing replication machinery errors, the latter modulate the centrosome cycle and the spindle function, avoiding karyotypic abnormalities typical of chromosome instability. Such chromosomal abnormalities may result from replication stress (RS) and chromosome mis-segregation and are considered a hallmark of poor prognosis, therapeutic resistance, and metastasis in cancer patients. Here, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of how different families of kinases concur to govern cell cycle, preventing RS and mitotic infidelity. Additionally, considering the growing number of clinical trials targeting these molecules, we review to what extent and in which tumor context cell-cycle-related kinases inhibitors are worth exploiting as an effective therapeutic strategy.

Cell cycle progression mechanisms: slower cyclin-D/CDK4 activation and faster cyclin-E/CDK2

Dysregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) impacts cell proliferation, driving cancer. Here, we ask why the cyclin-D/CDK4 complex governs cell cycle progression through the longer G1 phase, whereas cyclin-E/CDK2 regulates the short G1/S phase transition. We consider the experimentally established high-level bursting of cyclin-E, and sustained duration of elevated cyclin-D expression in the cell, available experimental cellular and structural data, and comprehensive explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations to provide the mechanistic foundation of the distinct activation scenarios of cyclin-D/CDK4 and cyclin-E/CDK2 in the G1 phase and G1/S transition of the cell cycle, respectively. These lead us to propose slower activation of cyclin-D/CDK4 and rapid activation of cyclin-E/CDK2. Importantly, we determine the mechanisms through which this occurs, offering innovative CDK4 drug design considerations. Our insightful mechanistic work addresses the compelling cell cycle regulation question and illuminates the distinct activation speeds in the G1 versus G1/S phases, which are crucial for cell function.

Loss of CDK4/6 activity in S/G2 phase leads to cell cycle reversal

In mammalian cells, the decision to proliferate is thought to be irreversibly made at the restriction point of the cell cycle1,2, when mitogen signalling engages a positive feedback loop between cyclin A2/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and the retinoblastoma protein3-5. Contrary to this textbook model, here we show that the decision to proliferate is actually fully reversible. Instead, we find that all cycling cells will exit the cell cycle in the absence of mitogens unless they make it to mitosis and divide first. This temporal competition between two fates, mitosis and cell cycle exit, arises because cyclin A2/CDK2 activity depends upon CDK4/6 activity throughout the cell cycle, not just in G1 phase. Without mitogens, mitosis is only observed when the half-life of cyclin A2 protein is long enough to sustain CDK2 activity throughout G2/M. Thus, cells are dependent on mitogens and CDK4/6 activity to maintain CDK2 activity and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation throughout interphase. Consequently, even a 2-h delay in a cell's progression towards mitosis can induce cell cycle exit if mitogen signalling is lost. Our results uncover the molecular mechanism underlying the restriction point phenomenon, reveal an unexpected role for CDK4/6 activity in S and G2 phases and explain the behaviour of all cells following loss of mitogen signalling.

Rapid adaptation to CDK2 inhibition exposes intrinsic cell-cycle plasticity

CDK2 is a core cell-cycle kinase that phosphorylates many substrates to drive progression through the cell cycle. CDK2 is hyperactivated in multiple cancers and is therefore an attractive therapeutic target. Here, we use several CDK2 inhibitors in clinical development to interrogate CDK2 substrate phosphorylation, cell-cycle progression, and drug adaptation in preclinical models. Whereas CDK1 is known to compensate for loss of CDK2 in Cdk2-/- mice, this is not true of acute inhibition of CDK2. Upon CDK2 inhibition, cells exhibit a rapid loss of substrate phosphorylation that rebounds within several hours. CDK4/6 activity backstops inhibition of CDK2 and sustains the proliferative program by maintaining Rb1 hyperphosphorylation, active E2F transcription, and cyclin A2 expression, enabling re-activation of CDK2 in the presence of drug. Our results augment our understanding of CDK plasticity and indicate that co-inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4/6 may be required to suppress adaptation to CDK2 inhibitors currently under clinical assessment.

Modeling breast cancer proliferation, drug synergies, and alternating therapies

Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is responsive to a number of targeted therapies used clinically. Unfortunately, the continuous application of targeted therapy often results in resistance, driving the consideration of combination and alternating therapies. Toward this end, we developed a mathematical model that can simulate various mono, combination, and alternating therapies for ER + breast cancer cells at different doses over long time scales. The model is used to look for optimal drug combinations and predicts a significant synergism between Cdk4/6 inhibitors in combination with the anti-estrogen fulvestrant, which may help explain the clinical success of adding Cdk4/6 inhibitors to anti-estrogen therapy. Furthermore, the model is used to optimize an alternating treatment protocol so it works as well as monotherapy while using less total drug dose.

Cell cycle exits and U-turns: Quiescence as multiple reversible forms of arrest

Cell proliferation control is essential during development and for maintaining adult tissues. Loss of that control promotes not only oncogenesis when cells proliferate inappropriately but also developmental abnormalities or degeneration when cells fail to proliferate when and where needed. To ensure that cells are produced at the right place and time, an intricate balance of pro-proliferative and anti-proliferative signals impacts the probability that cells undergo cell cycle exit to quiescence, or G0 phase. This brief review describes recent advances in our understanding of how and when quiescence is initiated and maintained in mammalian cells. We highlight the growing appreciation for quiescence as a collection of context-dependent distinct states.

Multiomics reveals glutathione metabolism as a driver of bimodality during stem cell aging

With age, skeletal muscle stem cells (MuSCs) activate out of quiescence more slowly and with increased death, leading to defective muscle repair. To explore the molecular underpinnings of these defects, we combined multiomics, single-cell measurements, and functional testing of MuSCs from young and old mice. The multiomics approach allowed us to assess which changes are causal, which are compensatory, and which are simply correlative. We identified glutathione (GSH) metabolism as perturbed in old MuSCs, with both causal and compensatory components. Contrary to young MuSCs, old MuSCs exhibit a population dichotomy composed of GSHhigh cells (comparable with young MuSCs) and GSHlow cells with impaired functionality. Mechanistically, we show that antagonism between NRF2 and NF-κB maintains this bimodality. Experimental manipulation of GSH levels altered the functional dichotomy of aged MuSCs. These findings identify a novel mechanism of stem cell aging and highlight glutathione metabolism as an accessible target for reversing MuSC aging.

Commentary: locating the restriction point

Attempts to map the Restriction Point in the mammalian cell cycle typically involve stimulating quiescent cells with mitogens for increasing intervals, removing the stimulus and then determining the proportion of cells that reach S phase at some point later. This "fixed point" estimate assumes that further cell cycle commitment ceases as soon as the stimulus is removed. In fact, kinetic analysis shows that the probability of cell cycle commitment does not fall back to its initial low value, immediately after a pulse of mitogens, but may instead remain slightly elevated for some while afterwards, compared to the starting quiescent population. Thus, cells entering S phase after a brief exposure to mitogens are not those that pass the Restriction Point early. Rather, they represent cells that continue on to S phase as a result of this residual, low probability of cell cycle commitment. Instead, the mitogen-regulated process(es) affecting the probability of cell cycle commitment are much closer to the start of S phase itself. Since the acquisition of (apparent) mitogen independence is such a poor indicator of the timing of cell cycle commitment, it is argued that a better measure is the point of insensitivity to CDK4,6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, which indicates when hyperphosphorylation of the Retinoblastoma Protein, RB, ceases to be dependent on mitogen-signalling pathways regulating CDK4,6/cyclin D activity.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Pancreatobiliary Cancers: Opportunities and Challenges

Existing treatment strategies for pancreatobiliary malignancies are limited. Nowadays, surgery is the only path to cure these types of cancer, but only a small number of patients present with resectable tumors at the time of diagnosis. The notoriously poor prognosis, lack of diverse treatment options associated with pancreaticobiliary cancers, and their resistance to current therapies reflect the urge for the development of novel therapeutic targets. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have emerged as an attractive therapeutic strategy in a number of cancers since their approval for treatment in patients with ER+/HER- breast cancer in combination with antiestrogens. In this article, we discuss the therapeutic potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors in pancreatobiliary cancers, notably cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

TEAD Proteins Associate With DNA Repair Proteins to Facilitate Cellular Recovery From DNA Damage

Transcriptional enhanced associate domain family members 1 to 4 (TEADs) are a family of four transcription factors and the major transcriptional effectors of the Hippo pathway. In order to activate transcription, TEADs rely on interactions with other proteins, such as the transcriptional effectors Yes-associated protein and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif. Nuclear protein interactions involving TEADs influence the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell growth, tissue homeostasis, and tumorigenesis. Clearly, protein interactions for TEADs are functionally important, but the full repertoire of TEAD interaction partners remains unknown. Here, we employed an affinity purification mass spectrometry approach to identify nuclear interacting partners of TEADs. We performed affinity purification mass spectrometry experiment in parallel in two different cell types and compared a wildtype TEAD bait protein to a nuclear localization sequence mutant that does not localize to the nucleus. We quantified the results using SAINT analysis and found a significant enrichment of proteins linked to DNA damage including X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5 (XRCC5), X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 (XRCC6), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), and Rap1-interacting factor 1 (RIF1). In cellular assays, we found that TEADs co-localize with DNA damage-induced nuclear foci marked by histone H2AX phosphorylated on S139 (γH2AX) and Rap1-interacting factor 1. We also found that depletion of TEAD proteins makes cells more susceptible to DNA damage by various agents and that depletion of TEADs promotes genomic instability. Additionally, depleting TEADs dampens the efficiency of DNA double-stranded break repair in reporter assays. Our results connect TEADs to DNA damage response processes, positioning DNA damage as an important avenue for further research of TEAD proteins.

CDT1 inhibits CMG helicase in early S phase to separate origin licensing from DNA synthesis

Human cells license tens of thousands of origins of replication in G1 and then must stop all licensing before DNA synthesis in S phase to prevent re-replication and genome instability that ensue when an origin is licensed on replicated DNA. However, the E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4^Cdt2 only starts to degrade the licensing factor CDT1 after origin firing, raising the question of how cells prevent re-replication before CDT1 is fully degraded. Here, using quantitative microscopy and in-vitro-reconstituted human DNA replication, we show that CDT1 inhibits DNA synthesis during an overlap period when CDT1 is still present after origin firing. CDT1 inhibits DNA synthesis by suppressing CMG helicase at replication forks, and DNA synthesis commences once CDT1 is degraded. Thus, in contrast to the prevailing model that human cells prevent re-replication by strictly separating licensing from firing, licensing and firing overlap, and cells instead separate licensing from DNA synthesis.

Mathematically Modeling the Effect of Endocrine and Cdk4/6 Inhibitor Therapies on Breast Cancer Cells

Mathematical modeling of cancer systems is beginning to be used to design better treatment regimens, especially in chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The effectiveness of mathematical modeling to inform treatment decisions and identify therapy protocols, some of which are highly nonintuitive, is because it enables the exploration of a huge number of therapeutic possibilities. Considering the immense cost of laboratory research and clinical trials, these nonintuitive therapy protocols would likely never be found by experimental approaches. While much of the work to date in this area has involved high-level models, which look simply at overall tumor growth or the interaction of resistant and sensitive cell types, mechanistic models that integrate molecular biology and pharmacology can contribute greatly to the discovery of better cancer treatment regimens. These mechanistic models are better able to account for the effect of drug interactions and the dynamics of therapy. The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate the use of ordinary differential equation-based mechanistic models to describe the dynamic interactions between the molecular signaling of breast cancer cells and two key clinical drugs. In particular, we illustrate the procedure for building a model of the response of MCF-7 cells to standard therapies used in the clinic. Such mathematical models can be used to explore the vast number of potential protocols to suggest better treatment approaches.

Crystal structure of active CDK4-cyclin D and mechanistic basis for abemaciclib efficacy

Despite the biological and therapeutic relevance of CDK4/6 for the treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer, the detailed mode of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors is not completely understood. Of particular interest, phosphorylation of CDK4 at T172 (pT172) is critical for generating the active conformation, yet no such crystal structure has been reported to date. We describe here the x-ray structure of active CDK4-cyclin D3 bound to the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib and discuss the key aspects of the catalytically-competent complex. Furthermore, the effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors on CDK4 T172 phosphorylation has not been explored, despite its role as a potential biomarker of CDK4/6 inhibitor response. We show mechanistically that CDK4/6i stabilize primed (pT172) CDK4-cyclin D complex and selectively displace p21 in responsive tumor cells. Stabilization of active CDK4-cyclin D1 complex can lead to pathway reactivation following alternate dosing regimen. Consequently, sustained binding of abemaciclib to CDK4 leads to potent cell cycle inhibition in breast cancer cell lines and prevents rebound activation of downstream signaling. Overall, our study provides key insights demonstrating that prolonged treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and composition of the CDK4/6-cyclin D complex are both critical determinants of abemaciclib efficacy, with implications for this class of anticancer therapy.

CDK4/6 initiates Rb inactivation and CDK2 activity coordinates cell-cycle commitment and G1/S transition

External signaling controls cell-cycle entry until cells irreversibly commit to the cell cycle to ensure faithful DNA replication. This process is tightly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). Here, using live-cell sensors for CDK4/6 and CDK2 activities, we propose that CDK4/6 initiates Rb inactivation and CDK2 activation, which coordinates the timing of cell-cycle commitment and sequential G1/S transition. Our data show that CDK4/6 activation induces Rb inactivation and thereby E2F activation, driving a gradual increase in CDK2 activity. We found that rapid CDK4/6 inhibition can reverse cell-cycle entry until CDK2 activity reaches to high levels. This suggests that high CDK2 activity is required to initiate CDK2-Rb positive feedback and CDK4/6-indpendent cell-cycle progression. Since CDK2 activation also facilitates initiation of DNA replication, the timing of CDK2-Rb positive feedback is coupled with the G1/S transition. Our experiments, which acutely increased CDK2 activity by cyclin E1 overexpression, indicate that cells commit to the cell cycle before triggering DNA replication. Together, our data suggest that CDK4/6 inactivates Rb to begin E2F and CDK2 activation, and high CDK2 activity is necessary and sufficient to generate a bistable switch for Rb phosphorylation before DNA replication. These findings highlight how cells initiate the cell cycle and subsequently commit to the cell cycle before the G1/S transition.

Construction of a three commitment points for S phase entry cell cycle model and immune-related ceRNA network to explore novel therapeutic options for psoriasis

While competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) play pivotal roles in various diseases, the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes are becoming a research focus in psoriasis. Therefore, the three commitment points for S phase entry (CP1-3) cell cycle model has pointed to a new research direction in these areas. However, it is unclear what role ceRNA regulatory mechanisms play in the interaction between keratinocytes and the immune system in psoriasis. In addition, the ceRNA network-based screening of potential therapeutic agents for psoriasis has not been explored. Therefore, we used multiple bioinformatics approaches to construct a ceRNA network for psoriasis, identified CTGF as the hub gene, and constructed a ceRNA subnetwork, after which validation datasets authenticated the results' accuracy. Subsequently, we used multiple online databases and the single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis algorithm, including the CP1-3 cell cycle model, to explore the mechanisms accounting for the increased proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes and the possible roles of the ceRNA subnetwork in psoriasis. Next, we performed cell cycle and cell trajectory analyses based on a single-cell RNA-seq dataset of psoriatic skin biopsies. We also used weighted gene co-expression network analysis and single-gene batch correlation analysis-based gene set enrichment analysis to explore the functions of CTGF. Finally, we used the Connectivity Map to identify MS-275 (entinostat) as a novel treatment for psoriasis, SwissTargetPrediction to predict drug targets, and molecular docking to investigate the minimum binding energy and binding sites of the drug to target proteins.

Centrosome function is critical during terminal erythroid differentiation

Red blood cells are produced by terminal erythroid differentiation, which involves the dramatic morphological transformation of erythroblasts into enucleated reticulocytes. Microtubules are important for enucleation, but it is not known if the centrosome, a key microtubule-organizing center, is required as well. Mice lacking the conserved centrosome component, CDK5RAP2, are likely to have defective erythroid differentiation because they develop macrocytic anemia. Here, we show that fetal liver-derived, CDK5RAP2-deficient erythroid progenitors generate fewer and larger reticulocytes, hence recapitulating features of macrocytic anemia. In erythroblasts, but not in embryonic fibroblasts, loss of CDK5RAP2 or pharmacological depletion of centrosomes leads to highly aberrant spindle morphologies. Consistent with such cells exiting mitosis without chromosome segregation, tetraploidy is frequent in late-stage erythroblasts, thereby giving rise to fewer but larger reticulocytes than normal. Our results define a critical role for CDK5RAP2 and centrosomes in spindle formation specifically during blood production. We propose that disruption of centrosome and spindle function could contribute to the emergence of macrocytic anemias, for instance, due to nutritional deficiency or exposure to chemotherapy.

Reciprocal regulation of p21 and Chk1 controls the Cyclin D1-RB pathway to mediate senescence onset after G2 arrest

Senescence is an irreversible proliferation withdrawal that can be initiated after DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest in G2 phase to prevent genomic instability. Senescence onset in G2 requires p53 and RB family tumour suppressors, but how they are regulated to convert a temporary cell cycle arrest into a permanent one remains unknown. Here, we show that a previously unrecognised balance between the CDK inhibitor p21 and Chk1 controls D-type cyclin-CDK activity during G2 arrest. In non-transformed cells, p21 activates RB in G2 by inhibiting Cyclin D1-CDK2/CDK4. The resulting G2 exit, which precedes appearance of senescence markers, is associated with a mitotic bypass, Chk1 downregulation and DNA damage foci reduction. In p53/RB-proficient cancer cells, compromised G2 exit correlates with sustained Chk1 activity, delayed p21 induction, untimely Cyclin E1 re-expression and genome reduplication. Conversely, Chk1 depletion promotes senescence by inducing p21 binding to Cyclin D1 and Cyclin E1-CDK complexes and down-regulating CDK6, whereas Chk2 knockdown enables RB phosphorylation and delays G2 exit. In conclusion, p21 and Chk2 oppose Chk1 to maintain RB activity, thus promoting DNA damage-induced senescence onset in G2.

The structure of the human cell cycle

Understanding the organization of the cell cycle has been a longstanding goal in cell biology. We combined time-lapse microscopy, highly multiplexed single-cell imaging of 48 core cell cycle proteins, and manifold learning to render a visualization of the human cell cycle. This data-driven approach revealed the comprehensive "structure" of the cell cycle: a continuum of molecular states that cells occupy as they transition from one cell division to the next, or as they enter or exit cell cycle arrest. Paradoxically, progression deeper into cell cycle arrest was accompanied by increases in proliferative effectors such as CDKs and cyclins, which can drive cell cycle re-entry by overcoming p21 induction. The structure also revealed the molecular trajectories into senescence and the unique combination of molecular features that define this irreversibly arrested state. This approach will enable the comparison of alternative cell cycles during development, in response to environmental perturbation and in disease. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

An updated view on the centrosome as a cell cycle regulator

The centrosome is a multifunctional organelle that is known primarily for its microtubule organising function. Centrosomal defects caused by changes in centrosomal structure or number have been associated with human diseases ranging from congenital defects to cancer. We are only beginning to appreciate how the non-microtubule organising roles of the centrosome are related to these clinical conditions. In this review, we will discuss the historical evidence that led to the proposal that the centrosome participates in cell cycle regulation. We then summarize the body of work that describes the involvement of the mammalian centrosome in triggering cell cycle progression and checkpoint signalling. Then we will highlight work from the fission yeast model organism, revealing the molecular details that explain how the spindle pole body (SPB, the yeast functional equivalent of the centrosome), participates in these cell cycle transitions. Importantly, we will discuss some of the emerging questions from recent discoveries related to the role of the centrosome as a cell cycle regulator.

CDK4 and CDK6 kinases: From basic science to cancer therapy

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) and their activating partners, D-type cyclins, link the extracellular environment with the core cell cycle machinery. Constitutive activation of cyclin D–CDK4/6 represents the driving force of tumorigenesis in several cancer types. Small-molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 have been used with great success in the treatment of hormone receptor–positive breast cancers and are in clinical trials for many other tumor types. Unexpectedly, recent work indicates that inhibition of CDK4/6 affects a wide range of cellular functions such as tumor cell metabolism and antitumor immunity. We discuss how recent advances in understanding CDK4/6 biology are opening new avenues for the future use of cyclin D–CDK4/6 inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Cell cycle control in cancer

Cancer is a group of diseases in which cells divide continuously and excessively. Cell division is tightly regulated by multiple evolutionarily conserved cell cycle control mechanisms, to ensure the production of two genetically identical cells. Cell cycle checkpoints operate as DNA surveillance mechanisms that prevent the accumulation and propagation of genetic errors during cell division. Checkpoints can delay cell cycle progression or, in response to irreparable DNA damage, induce cell cycle exit or cell death. Cancer-associated mutations that perturb cell cycle control allow continuous cell division chiefly by compromising the ability of cells to exit the cell cycle. Continuous rounds of division, however, create increased reliance on other cell cycle control mechanisms to prevent catastrophic levels of damage and maintain cell viability. New detailed insights into cell cycle control mechanisms and their role in cancer reveal how these dependencies can be best exploited in cancer treatment.

Palbociclib-mediated cell cycle arrest can occur in the absence of the CDK inhibitors p21 and p27

The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of a wide range of cancers is an area of ongoing investigation. Despite their increasing clinical use, there is limited understanding of the determinants of sensitivity and resistance to these drugs. Recent data have cast doubt on how CDK4/6 inhibitors arrest proliferation, provoking renewed interest in the role(s) of CDK4/6 in driving cell proliferation. As the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in cancer therapies becomes more prominent, an understanding of their effect on the cell cycle becomes more urgent. Here, we investigate the mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors in promoting cell cycle arrest. Two main models explain how CDK4/6 inhibitors cause G1 cell cycle arrest, which differ in their dependence on the CDK inhibitor proteins p21 and p27. We have used live and fixed single-cell quantitative imaging, with inducible degradation systems, to address the roles of p21 and p27 in the mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors. We find that CDK4/6 inhibitors can initiate and maintain a cell cycle arrest without p21 or p27. This work clarifies our current understanding of the mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors and has implications for cancer treatment and patient stratification.

Cell Cycle Commitment and the Origins of Cell Cycle Variability

Exit of cells from quiescence following mitogenic stimulation is highly asynchronous, and there is a great deal of heterogeneity in the response. Even in a single, clonal population, some cells re-enter the cell cycle after a sub-optimal mitogenic signal while other, seemingly identical cells, do not, though they remain capable of responding to a higher level of stimulus. This review will consider the origins of this variability and heterogeneity, both in cells re-entering the cycle from quiescence and in the context of commitment decisions in continuously cycling populations. Particular attention will be paid to the role of two interacting molecular networks, namely the RB-E2F and APC/C^CDH1 "switches." These networks have the property of bistability and it seems likely that they are responsible for dynamic behavior previously described kinetically by Transition Probability models of the cell cycle. The relationship between these switches and the so-called Restriction Point of the cell cycle will also be considered.