Hm1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor internalization requires a domain in the third cytoplasmic loop

GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors

Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.

Knockin' on heaven's door: Molecular mechanisms of neuronal tau uptake

Since aggregates of the microtubule‐binding protein tau were found to be the main component of neurofibrillary tangles more than 30 years ago, their contribution to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and tauopathies has become well established. Recent work shows that both tau load and its distribution in the brain of AD patients correlate with cognitive decline more closely compared to amyloid plaque deposition. In addition, the amyloid cascade hypothesis has been recently challenged because of disappointing results of clinical trials designed to treat AD by reducing beta‐amyloid levels, thus fuelling a renewed interest in tau. There is now robust evidence to indicate that tau pathology can spread within the central nervous system via a prion‐like mechanism following a stereotypical pattern, which can be explained by the trans‐synaptic inter‐neuronal transfer of pathological tau. In the receiving neuron, tau has been shown to take multiple routes of internalisation, which are partially dependent on its conformation and aggregation status. Here, we review the emerging mechanisms proposed for the uptake of extracellular tau in neurons and the requirements for the propagation of its pathological conformers, addressing how they gain access to physiological tau monomers in the cytosol. Furthermore, we highlight some of the key mechanistic gaps of the field, which urgently need to be addressed to expand our understanding of tau propagation and lead to the identification of new therapeutic strategies for tauopathies.

The Neurotoxic Role of Extracellular Tau Protein

Tauopathies are a class of neurodegenerative diseases associated with the microtubule-associated protein tau, with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) being the most prevalent related disorder. Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are one of the neuropathological hallmarks present in the brains of AD patients. Because NFTs are aberrant intracellular inclusions formed by hyperphosphorylated tau, it was initially proposed that phosphorylated and/or aggregated intracellular tau protein was causative of neuronal death. However, recent studies suggest a toxic role for non-phosphorylated and non-aggregated tau when it is located in the brain extracellular space. In this work, we will discuss the neurotoxic role of extracellular tau as well its involvement in the spreading of tau pathologies.

Unraveling a molecular determinant for clathrin-independent internalization of the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Endocytosis and postendocytic sorting of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is important for the regulation of both their cell surface density and signaling profile. Unlike the mechanisms of clathrin-dependent endocytosis (CDE), the mechanisms underlying the control of GPCR signaling by clathrin-independent endocytosis (CIE) remain largely unknown. Among the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), the M4 mAChR undergoes CDE and recycling, whereas the M2 mAChR is internalized through CIE and targeted to lysosomes. Here we investigated the endocytosis and postendocytic trafficking of M2 mAChR based on a comparative analysis of the third cytoplasmic domain in M2 and M4 mAChRs. For the first time, we identified that the sequence (374)KKKPPPS(380) servers as a sorting signal for the clathrin-independent internalization of M2 mAChR. Switching (374)KKKPPPS(380) to the i3 loop of the M4 mAChR shifted the receptor into lysosomes through the CIE pathway; and therefore away from CDE and recycling. We also found another previously unidentified sequence that guides CDE of the M2 mAChR, (361)VARKIVKMTKQPA(373), which is normally masked in the presence of the downstream sequence (374)KKKPPPS(380). Taken together, our data indicate that endocytosis and postendocytic sorting of GPCRs that undergo CIE could be sequence-dependent.

Role of the third intracellular loop in the subtype-specific internalization and recycling of muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors

Muscarinic M2, M4, and M2-M4 chimera receptors were transiently expressed in HEK-293 tsA201 cells, and agonist-dependent internalization of these receptors and recycling of internalized receptors were examined by measuring the amount of cell-surface receptors as [3H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS) binding activity. Coexpression of a dominant negative form of dynamin (DN-dynamin,dynamin K44A) greatly reduced the agonist-dependent internalization of M4 receptors but not of M2 receptors, as was reported by Vögler et al. (J Biol Chem 273, 12155-12160, 1998).The agonist-dependent internalization of M2/M4-i3/M2 chimera receptors (M2 receptors with the i3 loop replaced by that of M4 receptors) was greatly reduced by co-expression of DN-dynamin as was the case for M4 receptors, whereas the agonist-dependent internalization of M4/M2-i3/M4 chimera receptors was hardly affected by co-expression of DN-dynamin as was the case for M2 receptors.Internalized M2/M4-i3/M2 receptors as well as internalized M4 receptors were shown to be recycled back to the cell surface after removal of agonists, whereas no recycling was observed for M4/M2-i3/M4 receptors as well as M2 receptors. These results indicate that the i3 loops of M2 and M4 receptors take a major role in their agonist-dependent internalization and recycling.

Allosteric modulation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor internalization and subcellular trafficking

Allosteric modulators are an attractive approach to achieve receptor subtype-selective targeting of G protein-coupled receptors. Benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA) is an unprecedented example of a highly selective positive allosteric modulator of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). However, despite favorable pharmacological characteristics of BQCA in vitro and in vivo, there is limited evidence of the impact of allosteric modulation on receptor regulatory mechanisms such as β-arrestin recruitment or receptor internalization and endocytic trafficking. In the present study we investigated the impact of BQCA on M1 mAChR regulation. We show that BQCA potentiates agonist-induced β-arrestin recruitment to M1 mAChRs. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer approach to monitor intracellular trafficking of M1 mAChRs, we show that once internalized, M1 mAChRs traffic to early endosomes, recycling endosomes and late endosomes. We also show that BQCA potentiates agonist-induced subcellular trafficking. M1 mAChR internalization is both β-arrestin and G protein-dependent, with the third intracellular loop playing an important role in the dynamics of β-arrestin recruitment. As the global effect of receptor activation ultimately depends on the levels of receptor expression at the cell surface, these results illustrate the need to extend the characterization of novel allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors to encapsulate the consequences of chronic exposure to this family of ligands.

Allosteric sodium in class A GPCR signaling

Despite their functional and structural diversity, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) share a common mechanism of signal transduction via conformational changes in the seven-transmembrane (7TM) helical domain. New major insights into this mechanism come from the recent crystallographic discoveries of a partially hydrated sodium ion that is specifically bound in the middle of the 7TM bundle of multiple class A GPCRs. This review discusses the remarkable structural conservation and distinct features of the Na(+) pocket in this most populous GPCR class, as well as the conformational collapse of the pocket upon receptor activation. New insights help to explain allosteric effects of sodium on GPCR agonist binding and activation, and sodium's role as a potential co-factor in class A GPCR function.

Muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists: effects on ocular function

Muscarinic agonists act mainly via muscarinic M₃ cholinoceptors to cause contraction of the iris sphincter, ciliary muscle and trabecular meshwork as well as increase outflow facility of aqueous humour. In the iris dilator, the effect of muscarinic agonists is species dependent but is predominantly relaxation via muscarinic M₃ receptors. In the conjunctiva, muscarinic agonists stimulate goblet cell secretion which contributes to the protective tear film. Muscarinic M₂ and M₃ receptors appear mainly involved. In the lens muscarinic agonists act via muscarinic M₁ receptors to produce depolarization and increase [Ca(2+)](i). All five subtypes of muscarinic receptor are present in the retina. In the developing retina, acetylcholine appears to limit purinergic stimulation of retinal development and decrease cell proliferation. In the adult retina acetylcholine and other muscarinic agonists may have complex effects, for example, enhancing light-evoked neuronal firing in transient ON retinal ganglion cells and inhibiting firing in OFF retinal ganglion cells. In the lacrimal gland, muscarinic agonists activate M₃ receptors on secretory globular acinar cells to stimulate tear secretion and also cause contraction of myoepithelial cells. In Sjögren's syndrome, antibodies to the muscarinic M₃ receptor disrupt normal gland function leading to xerophthalmia although the mechanism of action of the antibody is still not clear. Atropine and pirenzepine are useful in limiting the development of myopia in children probably by an action on muscarinic receptors in the sclera, although many other muscarinic receptor antagonists are not effective.

Functional characterization of polymorphic variants for ovine MT1 melatonin receptors: possible implication for seasonal reproduction in sheep

In seasonal breeding species, the gene encoding for the melatonin MT(1) receptor (oMT(1)) is highly polymorphic and numerous data have reported the existence of an association between an allele of the receptor and a marked expression of the seasonality of reproduction in ewes. This allele called "m" (previously named "-" allele) carries a mutation leading to the absence of a MnlI restriction site as opposed to the "M" allele (previously named "+" allele) carrying the MnlI restriction site (previously "+" allele). This allows the determination of the three genotypes "M/M" (+/+), "M/m" (+/-) and "m/m" (-/-). This mutation is conservative and could therefore not be causal. However, it is associated with another mutation introducing the change of a valine to an isoleucine in the fifth transmembrane domain of the receptor. Homozygous "M/M" and "m/m" animals consequently express structurally different receptors respectively named oMT(1) Val(220) and oMT(1) Ile(220). The objective of this study was to test whether these polymorphic variants are functionally different. To achieve this goal, we characterized the binding properties and the transduction pathways associated with both variants of the receptors. Using a pharmacological approach, no variation in binding parameters between the two receptors when transiently expressed in COS-7. In stably transfected HEK293 cells, significant differences were detected in the inhibition of cAMP production whereas receptors internalization processes were not different. In conclusion, the possibility that subtle alterations induced by the non conservative mutation in "m/m" animals might modify the perception of the melatoninergic signal is discussed in the context of melatonin action.

Differential regulation of muscarinic M1 receptors by orthosteric and allosteric ligands

Background

Activation of muscarinic M₁ receptors is mediated via interaction of orthosteric agonists with the acetylcholine binding site or via interaction of allosteric agonists with different site(s) on the receptor. The focus of the present study was to determine if M₁ receptors activated by allosteric agonists undergo the same regulatory fate as M₁ receptors activated by orthosteric agonists.

Results

The orthosteric agonists carbachol, oxotremorine-M and pilocarpine were compared to the allosteric agonists AC-42, AC-260584, N-desmethylclozapine and xanomeline. All ligands activated M₁ receptors and stimulated interaction of the receptors with β-arrestin-1. All ligands reduced cell surface binding and induced the loss of total receptor binding. Receptor internalization was blocked by treatment with hypertonic sucrose indicating that all ligands induced formation of clathrin coated vesicles. However, internalized receptors recycled to the cell surface following removal of orthosteric, but not allosteric agonists. Whereas all ligands induced loss of cell surface receptor binding, no intracellular vesicles could be observed after treatment with AC-260584 or xanomeline. Brief stimulation of M₁ receptors with AC-260584 or xanomeline resulted in persistent activation of M₁ receptors, suggesting that continual receptor signaling might impede or delay receptor endocytosis into intracellular vesicles.

Conclusion

These results indicate that allosteric agonists differ from orthosteric ligands and among each other in their ability to induce different regulatory pathways. Thus, signaling and regulatory pathways induced by different allosteric ligands are ligand specific.

Contrasting effects of allosteric and orthosteric agonists on m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor internalization and down-regulation

A new class of subtype-selective muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor agonist that activates the receptor through interaction at a site distinct from the orthosteric acetylcholine binding site has been reported recently. Here, we have compared the effects of orthosteric (oxotremorine-M, arecoline, pilocarpine) and allosteric [4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl] piperidine (AC-42); 1-[3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (77-LH-28-1)] agonists on M(1) mACh receptor internalization and down-regulation, as well as functional coupling in a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line. In contrast to full and partial orthosteric agonists, which cause significant receptor internalization and down-regulation, prolonged exposure to AC-42 did not significantly alter either cell-surface or total cellular M(1) mACh receptor expression. 77-LH-28-1, an AC-42 homolog, did cause some receptor internalization, but not down-regulation. The presence of atropine completely prevented the orthosteric agonist-induced adaptive changes in receptor populations; however, in contrast, the copresence of atropine and AC-42 significantly increased both cell-surface receptor and total M(1) mACh receptor expression. Maximal phosphoinositide hydrolysis responses to the partial agonist arecoline were similar in CHO-M(1) cells pretreated for 24 h with either AC-42 or vehicle; in contrast, these responses were markedly reduced when cells were pretreated with oxotremorine-M or pilocarpine. These data indicate that, whereas AC-42 binding to the M(1) mACh receptor can initiate signal transduction, the AC-42-liganded receptor is resistant to the usual mechanisms regulating receptor internalization and down-regulation. In addition, our data suggest unusual interactions between allosteric agonists and orthosteric antagonists to regulate cell-surface and total cellular receptor expression.

Muscarinic M4 receptor recycling requires a motif in the third intracellular loop

The present study was performed to identify sequence(s) in the third intracellular loop (i3) of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4 subtype (M4 receptor) involved in its internalization and recycling. In transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293-tsA201 cells, 40 to 50% of cell-surface M4 receptors are internalized in an agonist-dependent manner, and approximately 65% of internalized receptors are recycled back to the cell surface after removal of the agonist. We examined the internalization and recycling of M4 receptor mutants with partial deletion in i3 and found that various mutants (M4del-K(235)-K(240), M4del-T(241)-K(271), and M4del-W(339)-N(372)) showed internalization and cell-surface recycling in a similar manner to the M4 receptor. We also found that the mutant M4del-L(272)-R(338) was internalized to only half the extent of the M4 receptor and was recycled after agonist removal, and the mutant M4del-V(373)-A(393) was also internalized to half the extent of the wild type but was not recycled back to the cell surface after agonist removal. When the sequence corresponding to Val(373)-Ala(393) was grafted onto the i3 portion of a recycling-negative mutant of muscarinic M2 receptor with deletion of almost the whole of the i3 sequence, approximately 40% of the chimeric receptor on the cell surface was internalized, and more than 65% of the internalized receptors were recycled back to the cell surface. These results indicate that the regions including Leu(272)-Arg(338) and Val(373)-Ala(393) are involved in internalization of the M4 receptor, and the region including Val(373)-Ala(393) is indispensable for its recycling, whereas the other regions of i3 are dispensable for internalization and recycling.

Cysteine Pairs in the Third Intracellular Loop of the Muscarinic M1Acetylcholine Receptor Play a Role in Agonist-Induced Internalization

We determined the functional role of a small domain in the third intracellular loop of the human muscarinic M(1) (hM(1)) receptor. Using site-directed mutagenesis, several mutant hM(1) receptors were made possessing either a deletion or point mutations within the third intracellular loop domain (252)PETPPGRCCRCC(263). Wild-type and mutant hM(1) receptors were transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and the effects of each mutation on radioligand binding, agonist-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis, and agonist-induced internalization were determined. The mutant receptors exhibited a modest reduction in affinity for [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine (pK(D) = approximately 9.0) and a moderately increased binding capacity relative to the wild-type receptor. This moderate increase in binding capacity was associated with small increases in the maximal response and potency of carbachol for eliciting phosphoinositide hydrolysis through the mutant receptors (pEC(50) = approximately 5.5) relative to wild-type (pEC(50) = 5.35 +/- 0.05). In contrast, carbachol-induced internalization of mutant hM(1) receptors possessing either C259A/C260A or C262A/C263A or both double point mutations was significantly reduced compared to the wild-type hM(1) receptor. Of the hM(1) receptor mutants tested, those possessing a C262D/C263D double point mutation had the least carbachol-induced internalization. The desensitization and down-regulation of receptors possessing either Cys/Ala or Cys/Asp double point mutations were similar to those observed for the wild-type hM(1) receptor. Collectively, these observations suggest that Cys pairs Cys259/Cys260 and Cys262/Cys263 play an important role in the agonist-induced internalization of hM(1) receptors.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype expression in avian vestibular hair cells, nerve terminals and ganglion cells

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are widely expressed in the CNS and peripheral nervous system and play an important role in modulating the cell activity and function. We have shown that the cholinergic agonist carbachol reduces the pigeon's inwardly rectifying potassium channel (pKir2.1) ionic currents in native vestibular hair cells. We have cloned and sequenced pigeon mAChR subtypes M2-M5 and we have studied the expression of all five mAChR subtypes (M1-M5) in the pigeon vestibular end organs (semicircular canal ampullary cristae and utricular maculae), vestibular nerve fibers and the vestibular (Scarpa's) ganglion using tissue immunohistochemistry (IH), dissociated single cell immunocytochemistry (IC) and Western blotting (WB). We found that vestibular hair cells, nerve fibers and ganglion cells each expressed all five (M1-M5) mAChR subtypes. Two of the three odd-numbered mAChRs (M1, M5) were present on the hair cell cilia, supporting cells and nerve terminals. And all three odd numbered mAChRs (M1, M3 and M5) were expressed on cuticular plates, myelin sheaths and Schwann cells. Even-numbered mAChRs were seen on the nerve terminals. M2 was also shown on the cuticular plates and supporting cells. Vestibular efferent fibers and terminals were not identified in our studies. Results from WB of the dissociated vestibular epithelia, nerve fibers and vestibular ganglia were consistent with the results from IH and IC. Our findings suggest that there is considerable co-expression of the subtypes on the neural elements of the labyrinth. Further electrophysiological and pharmacological studies should delineate the mechanisms of action of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on structures in the labyrinth.

Agonist-induced Internalization of the Caenorhabditis elegans Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor GAR-3 in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Many membrane-bound neurotransmitter receptors are known to be internalized by exposure to agonist. This agonist-induced receptor internalization is considered to play important roles in receptor-mediated signaling. Here we investigated the internalization of GAR-3, a Caenorhabditis elegans muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, using cultured mammalian cells. When Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing GAR-3 were treated with carbachol, GAR-3 was internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Approximately 60% of the cell surface receptor was internalized by exposure to 1 mM carbachol for 1 h. Carbachol-induced GAR-3 internalization was suppressed by treatment with hypertonic sucrose, which blocks the formation of clathrin-coated pits. Overexpression of a dominant-negative dynamin mutant (DynK44A), but not of a dominant-negative beta-arrestin mutant (Arr319-418), substantially inhibited carbachol-induced internalization of GAR-3. Thus, these data suggest that GAR-3 undergoes agonist-induced internalization via a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent but beta-arrestin-independent pathway. Depletion of Ca2+ by simultaneous treatment of the cells with BAPTA/AM (Ca2+ mobilization blocker) and EGTA (Ca2+ influx blocker) almost completely blocked agonist-induced GAR-3 internalization. Moreover, treatment of the cells with the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 led to GAR-3 internalization in the absence of agonist. These results indicate that Ca2+ plays a critical role in GAR-3 internalization. We tested whether the third intracellular (i3) loop of GAR-3 is involved in agonist-stimulated receptor internalization. A GAR-3 deletion mutant lacking a large central portion of the i3 loop exhibited an internalization pattern comparable to that of the wild type, suggesting that the central i3 loop is not required for the internalization of GAR-3.

Quantitative Analysis of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Homo- and Heterodimerization in Live Cells

Although previous pharmacological and biochemical data support the notion that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) form homo- and heterodimers, the existence of mAChR oligomers in live cells is still a matter of controversy. Here we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate that M(1), M(2), and M(3) mAChR can form constitutive homo- and heterodimers in living HEK 293 cells. Quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis has revealed that the cell receptor population in cells expressing a single subtype of M(1), M(2), or M(3) mAChR is predominantly composed of high affinity homodimers. Saturation curve analysis of cells expressing two receptor subtypes demonstrates the existence of high affinity M(1)/M(2), M(2)/M(3), and M(1)/M(3) mAChR heterodimers, although the relative affinity values were slightly lower than those for mAChR homodimers. Short term agonist treatment did not modify the oligomeric status of homo- and heterodimers. When expressed in JEG-3 cells, the M(2) receptor exhibits much higher susceptibility than the M(3) receptor to agonist-induced down-regulation. Coexpression of M(3) mAChR with increasing amounts of the M(2) subtype in JEG-3 cells resulted in an increased agonist-induced down-regulation of M(3), suggesting a novel role of heterodimerization in the mechanism of mAChR long term regulation.

Regulation of KCNQ2/KCNQ3 current by G protein cycling: the kinetics of receptor-mediated signaling by Gq

Receptor-mediated modulation of KCNQ channels regulates neuronal excitability. This study concerns the kinetics and mechanism of M₁ muscarinic receptor–mediated regulation of the cloned neuronal M channel, KCNQ2/KCNQ3 (Kv7.2/Kv7.3). Receptors, channels, various mutated G-protein subunits, and an optical probe for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) were coexpressed by transfection in tsA-201 cells, and the cells were studied by whole-cell patch clamp and by confocal microscopy. Constitutively active forms of Gα_q and Gα₁₁, but not Gα₁₃, caused a loss of the plasma membrane PIP₂ and a total tonic inhibition of the KCNQ current. There were no further changes upon addition of the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-M (oxo-M). Expression of the regulator of G-protein signaling, RGS2, blocked PIP₂ hydrolysis and current suppression by muscarinic stimulation, confirming that the G_q family of G-proteins is necessary. Dialysis with the competitive inhibitor GDPβS (1 mM) lengthened the time constant of inhibition sixfold, decreased the suppression of current, and decreased agonist sensitivity. Removal of intracellular Mg²⁺ slowed both the development and the recovery from muscarinic suppression. When combined with GDPβS, low intracellular Mg²⁺ nearly eliminated muscarinic inhibition. With nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs, current suppression developed spontaneously and muscarinic inhibition was enhanced. Such spontaneous suppression was antagonized by GDPβS or GTP or by expression of RGS2. These observations were successfully described by a kinetic model representing biochemical steps of the signaling cascade using published rate constants where available. The model supports the following sequence of events for this G_q-coupled signaling: A classical G-protein cycle, including competition for nucleotide-free G-protein by all nucleotide forms and an activation step requiring Mg²⁺, followed by G-protein–stimulated phospholipase C and hydrolysis of PIP₂, and finally PIP₂ dissociation from binding sites for inositol lipid on the channels so that KCNQ current was suppressed. Further experiments will be needed to refine some untested assumptions.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Functional significance of the BBXXB motif reversed present in the cytoplasmic domains of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

The minimal structural motif, BBXXB (where B represents a basic amino acid residue and X a non-basic residue), located in particular regions of the intracellular domains of cell surface membrane receptors is involved in the G protein-activating activity of a number of G protein-coupled receptors. The human FSH receptor (hFSHR) exhibits a reversed BBXXB motif (BXXBB) in the juxtamembrane region of the third intracellular loop (IL3) and the carboxyl terminus (Ctail) of the receptor; however the importance of this sequence on receptor function remains unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutations in this structural motif on hFSHR expression, receptor-mediated effector activation and agonist-provoked receptor internalization. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids containing the cDNA of the wild-type (Wt) hFSHR or several hFSHR mutants in which basic amino acids of the minimal structural motif at the IL3 and Ctail were replaced with alanine (i.e. AXXAA, AXXBB, BXXAB and BXXBA mutants). Alanine substitution of the three basic residues present in the IL3-BXXBB (IL3-AXXAA mutant) yielded a < or =60 kDa possibly under-glycosylated form of the FSHR, whereas the same substitutions in the Ctail resulted in the immature >62 kDa form of the receptor; both AXXAA hFSHR mutants completely failed to bind agonist and activate effector. Individual substitutions resulted in different cAMP responses to agonist stimulation: the IL3-AXXBB and IL3-BXXBA mutant hFSHRs failed to evoke Gs protein activation, whereas agonist-stimulated cAMP production was completely normal when the IL3-BXXAB mutant was expressed. All three IL3 mutants bound [125I]-labelled FSH in a similar fashion to the Wt hFSHR. Ligand-binding, cell surface membrane receptor expression and agonist-provoked effector activation were significantly affected by the individual substitutions at the Ctail-BXXBB motif: the Ctail-AXXBB variant exhibited reduced (approximately 50%) maximal cAMP response and ability to bind ligand, whereas both ligand binding and effector activation was severely reduced or abolished by expression of the Ctail-BXXBA and -BXXAB hFSHR mutants; the expression levels of the 80 kDa form of the receptor correlated with the magnitude of ligand-provoked cAMP production and binding capability of the mutant receptors. Upon stimulation by agonist, all mutants with detectable ligand-binding activity internalized following the pattern exhibited by the Wt hFSHR species. These results indicate that the BXXBB motif at the IL3 of the hFSHR is essential for coupling the activated receptor to the Gs protein, whereas the same motif in the Ctail is apparently more important for membrane expression.

Importance of amino acids of the central portion of the second intracellular loop of the gastrin-releasing Peptide receptor for phospholipase C activation, internalization, and chronic down-regulation

Little is known about the function of the central portion of the second intracellular loop (i2 loop) of peptide receptors in activation of downstream pathways and receptor modulatory processes such as receptor internalization or chronic down-regulation (DR). Recent data suggest a role for i2 loop hydrophobic amino acids in these processes. We used site-directed mutagenesis to address these issues with the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R). Each i2 loop residue from 142 to 148 was mutated and the receptors were expressed in Balb 3T3 cells. Two mutants showed a minimal (<2-fold) decrease in affinity. Five mutants showed decreased efficacy for activating phospholipase C (PLC). Two double mutants (IM143.147AA and VM144.147AA) showed a minimal decrease in affinity but had a decreased ability to fully activate PLC. Only the IM double mutation had decreased maximal internalization, whereas the R145A single mutant showed an increase, suggesting a tonic inhibitory role for Arg-145 in internalization. Three single and both double mutants showed decreases in receptor DR. There was a weak correlation between the extent of GRP-R internalization and the maximal PLC activation, whereas changes in the maximal PLC activation were significantly (p = 0.008) coupled to receptor DR. This study shows that amino acids of the i2 loop of the GRP-R are important in activation of PLC, internalization and down-regulation, but not for affinity. Our results support the proposal that internalization and chronic down-regulation have differing dependence on PLC and are largely independent processes, because some mutants showed no changes in internalization, but significant alterations in down-regulation.

Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signaling

Multiple mechanisms regulate the signaling of the five members of the family of the guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)-coupled muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (mAChRs). Following activation by classical or allosteric agonists, mAChRs can be phosphorylated by a variety of receptor kinases and second messenger-regulated kinases. The phosphorylated mAChR subtypes can interact with beta-arrestin and presumably other adaptor proteins as well. As a result, the various mAChR signaling pathways may be differentially altered, leading to short-term or long-term desensitization of a particular signaling pathway, receptor-mediated activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway downstream of mAChR phosphorylation, as well as long-term potentiation of mAChR-mediated phospholipase C stimulation. Agonist activation of mAChRs may also induce receptor internalization and down-regulation, which proceed in a highly regulated manner, depending on receptor subtype and cell type. In this review, our current understanding of the complex regulatory processes that underlie signaling of mAChR is summarized.

Serum response factor activation by muscarinic receptors via RhoA. Novel pathway specific to M1 subtype involving calmodulin, calcineurin, and Pyk2

The muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) subtypes share high sequence similarity except in their third intracellular loop and COOH terminus, domains thought to be involved in signal transduction. Subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple mainly through Galpha(q/11), and M2 and M4 couple mainly through Galpha(i/o). Whether subtypes within each of these two groups differ in their signaling pathways remains to be resolved. This study focused on nuclear signaling pathways leading to activation of the transcription factor, serum response factor (SRF). Genes encoding M1, M2, and M3 were co-expressed in Jurkat T lymphocytes with a reporter gene driven by a mutant serum response element, SRE.L, which responds to SRF activation. We show that only M1 mAChR activated SRF through a pathway involving the small GTPase RhoA, with no response observed for M2 and M3. Transfection of GTPase-deficient Galpha subunits (GalphaQL; constitutively active form) demonstrated that SRF was activated by Galpha(13)QL but only marginally by Galpha(q)QL and Galpha(12)QL in Jurkat cells. Yet transfection of regulator of G protein-signaling protein, RGS2 and RGS4, which inhibit Galpha(q/11) activity, indicated that Galpha(q/11) and Ca(2+) mobilization were required for SRF activation by M1. Calmodulin inhibitors suppressed the M1 and the Galpha(13)QL pathways, acting both upstream and downstream of RhoA. However, calcineurin inhibitors and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein selectively suppressed SRF activation by M1, but not by Galpha(13)QL, indicating the presence of separate pathways. The calmodulin-dependent tyrosine kinase Pyk2 was also activated by M1 but not M3, and Pyk2 appears also to play a role in M1-SRF activation, as judged by experiments with two dominant-negative Pyk2 mutants. These results reveal a novel calmodulin-dependent RhoA-SRF signaling pathway unique to the M1 mAChR subtype.

Structural determinants in the second intracellular loop of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor are involved in G(s) protein activation

In the present study, we analyzed the structural determinants present in the second intracellular loop (IL-2) of the human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor (R) involved in G(s) protein-mediated signal transduction. Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells, stably expressing wild-type (Wt) human FSHR (HEK-293((+))), were transiently transfected with plasmids containing cDNAs encoding the entire IL-2 or several IL-2 sequences mutated in R467 (a residue located at the center of the conserved ERW motif in the glycoprotein hormone receptors), T470 (a potential site for phosphorylation by protein kinase-A and -C) or L477 (a residue conserved in all glycoprotein hormone receptors). Expression of the IL-2 Wt in HEK-293((+)) cells reduced the maximum FSH-stimulated cAMP production significantly by approximately 40%; similar results were observed with the R467A and R467K IL-2 mutants. The IL-2(R467H), IL-2(T470A), the triple R467A/T470A/L477A IL-2 mutant and the IL-2 of the oxytocin receptor (G(q/11)-coupled) had no effects on Wt FSHR-mediated intracellular signaling whereas the L477A mutation provoked a higher ( approximately 55%) inhibition of FSH-stimulated cAMP than the free, Wt IL-2. These results suggested a specific role of IL-2 residues in FSHR function. Site directed mutagenesis of the FSHR and the expression of resulting mutants in HEK-293 cells were performed in order to corroborate the effects of these substitutions. Expression of FSHR(R467H), FSHR(R467A) and FSHR(T470A) failed to mediate ligand-provoked G(s) protein activation, whereas the R467K mutant behaved as the Wt receptor. Interestingly, the expression of L477A, L477D and L477P FSHR mutants conferred elevated basal cAMP levels to HEK-293 cells. This study indicates that the IL-2 of the human FSHR possesses amino acid residues that are important for both coupling the receptor to the G(s) protein (R467 and T470) and maintaining the receptor molecule in an inactive conformation (L477). It appears that this particular intracellular domain may act as a conformational switch to produce the activation of G proteins as has been reported for the IL-2 of other G protein-coupled receptors.

Agonist-induced internalization of the platelet-activating factor receptor is dependent on arrestins but independent of G-protein activation. Role of the C terminus and the (D/N)PXXY motif

As with most G-protein-coupled receptors, repeated agonist stimulation of the platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) results in its desensitization, sequestration, and internalization. In this report, we show that agonist-induced PAFR internalization is independent of G-protein activation but is dependent on arrestins and involves the interaction of arrestins with a limited region of the PAFR C terminus. In cotransfected COS-7 cells, both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 could be coimmunoprecipitated with PAFR, and agonist stimulation of PAFR induced the translocation of both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. Furthermore, coexpression of arrestin-2 with PAFR potentiated receptor internalization, whereas agonist-induced PAFR internalization was inhibited by a dominant negative mutant of arrestin-2. The coexpression of a minigene encoding the C-terminal segment of the receptor abolished PAF-induced arrestin translocation and inhibited PAFR internalization. Using C terminus deletion mutants, we determined that the association of arrestin-2 with the receptor was dependent on the region between threonine 305 and valine 330 because arrestin-2 could be immunoprecipitated with the mutant PAFRstop330 but not PAFRstop305. Consistently, stop330 could mediate agonist-induced arrestin-2 translocation, whereas stop305 could not. Two other deletion mutants with slightly longer regions of the C terminus, PAFRstop311 and PAFRstop317, also failed to induce arrestin-2 translocation. Finally, the PAFR mutant Y293A, containing a single substitution in the putative internalization motif DPXXY in the seventh transmembrane domain (which we had shown to be able to internalize but not to couple to G-proteins) could efficiently induce arrestin translocation. Taken together, our results indicate that ligand-induced PAFR internalization is dependent on arrestins, that PAFR can associate with both arrestin-2 and -3, and that their translocation involves interaction with the region of residues 318-330 in the PAFR C terminus but is independent of G-protein activation.

Recycling ability of the mouse and the human neurotensin type 2 receptors depends on a single tyrosine residue

Receptor recycling plays a key role in the modulation of cellular responses to extracellular signals. The purpose of this work was to identify residues in G-protein coupled neurotensin receptors that are directly involved in recycling. Both the high affinity receptor-1 (NTR1) and the levocabastine-sensitive NTR2 are internalized after neurotensin binding. Here, we show that only the mouse NTR2 recycled to the plasma membrane, whereas the rat NTR1 and the human NTR2 did not. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrate that tyrosine 237 in the third intracellular loop is crucial for recycling of the mouse NTR2. We show that the mouse NTR2 is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues by NT. This phosphorylation is essential for receptor recycling since the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein blocks this process. The absence of recycling observed with the human NTR2 could be completely explained by the presence of a cysteine instead of a tyrosine in position 237. Indeed, substitution of this cysteine by a tyrosine gave a mutant receptor that has acquired the ability to recycle to the cell surface after neurotensin-induced internalization. This work demonstrates that a single tyrosine residue in the third intracellular loop of a G-protein-coupled receptor is responsible for receptor phosphorylation and represents an essential structural element for receptor recycling.

Three functional isoforms of GAR-2, a Caenorhabditis elegans G-protein-linked acetylcholine receptor, are produced by alternative splicing

We have previously isolated a cDNA clone from Caenorhabditis elegans that encodes a novel form of G-protein-linked acetylcholine receptor, termed GAR-2. GAR-2 is similar to but pharmacologically distinct from muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Here we report the identification of two gar-2 cDNA clones that are different from the previous one. These newly identified cDNAs encode polypeptides of 664 and 627 amino acids, whereas the previous one encodes a polypeptide of 614 amino acids. The three GAR-2 isoforms, which differ only in the third intracellular loop, arise from alternative splicing. Electrophysiological analyses using the Xenopus oocyte system showed that all three GAR-2 isoforms couple to the activation of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK1) channel with similar drug specificity. Our results indicate that alternative splicing plays an important role in promoting molecular diversity of G-protein-linked acetylcholine receptors in C. elegans.

Structural and functional characterization of human CXCR4 as a chemokine receptor and HIV-1 co-receptor by mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies

The human CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is a receptor for the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1alpha) and a co-receptor for the entry of specific strains of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1). CXCR4 is also recognized by an antagonistic chemokine, the viral macrophage inflammatory protein II (vMIP-II) encoded by human herpesvirus type VIII. SDF-1alpha or vMIP-II binding to CXCR4 can inhibit HIV-1 entry via this co-receptor. An approach combining protein structural modeling and site-directed mutagenesis was used to probe the structure-function relationship of CXCR4, and interactions with its ligands SDF-1alpha and vMIP-II and HIV-1 envelope protein gp120. Hypothetical three-dimensional structures were proposed by molecular modeling studies of the CXCR4.SDF-1alpha complex, which rationalize extensive biological information on the role of CXCR4 in its interactions with HIV-1 envelope protein gp120. With site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified that the amino acid residues Asp (D20A) and Tyr (Y21A) in the N-terminal domain and the residue Glu (E268A) in extracellular loop 3 (ECL3) are involved in ligand binding, whereas the mutation Y190A in extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) impairs the signaling mediated by SDF-1alpha. As an HIV-1 co-receptor, we found that the N-terminal domain, ECL2, and ECL3 of CXCR4 are involved in HIV-1 entry. These structural and mutational studies provide valuable information regarding the structural basis for CXCR4 activity in chemokine binding and HIV-1 viral entry, and could guide the design of novel targeted inhibitors.

Apparent capacity of cardiac muscarinic receptors for different radiolabeled antagonists

Muscarinic receptors in sarcolemmal membranes, digitonin-solubilized extracts, and purified preparations from porcine atria have revealed a shortfall in the apparent capacity for N-[3H]methylscopolamine, which was only about 75% of that for [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate. Since binding at near-saturating concentrations of [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate was inhibited fully at comparatively low concentrations of unlabeled N-methylscopolamine, the data are inconsistent with the notion that [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate binds selectively to a subclass of distinct, non-interconverting, and mutually independent sites. The discrepancy is resolved by adjusting the specific activity of N-[3H]methylscopolamine to account for unlabeled scopolamine that was identified in some batches of the radioligand. Also, there was no shortfall in capacity when N-[3H]methylscopolamine was devoid of scopolamine, and the predicted effect was obtained when pure N-[3H]methylscopolamine was supplemented with known amounts of scopolamine. A small discrepancy in the levels of scopolamine estimated pharmacologically and by mass spectrometry can be attributed largely to a difference in the efficiency of ionization between scopolamine and N-methylscopolamine. Different capacities for different radioligands are not uncommon with muscarinic and other G protein-coupled receptors, and in some cases the effect may have been due wholly or in part to an unlabeled impurity. Binding data can be mechanistically ambiguous, particularly when acquired only at graded concentrations of the radioligand. The predicted effects of an unlabeled impurity mimic or resemble those of alternative scenarios such as sequestration behind a hydrophobic barrier, a nucleotide-regulated interconversion from one state of affinity to another, and cooperativity between interacting sites.

Subtype-specific trafficking of endothelin receptors

We investigated the subcellular localization of two endothelin receptors (ET(A)R and ET(B)R). To visualize these receptors directly, the C terminus of each receptor was fused to the N terminus of enhanced green fluorescent protein (designated as ETR-EGFP). When transiently expressed in various mammalian cell lines, ET(A)R-EGFP was predominantly localized on the plasma membrane. By contrast, ET(B)R-EGFP was, independent of ligand stimulation, predominantly localized on the intracellular vesicular structures containing Lamp-1. Immunoblot analyses revealed that at steady state ET(B)R-EGFP was highly degraded, and its degradation was inhibited by bafilomycin A(1). Antibody uptake experiments suggested that the ET(B)R-EGFP molecules were internalized from the plasma membrane. It is therefore likely that ET(B)R is first transported to the plasma membrane and then internalized, irrespective of ligand stimulation, to lysosomes where it undergoes proteolytic degradation. Exchanging the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of the two ETRs revealed that the cytoplasmic tail is responsible for both the intracellular localization and the degradation of the receptors. Deletion of the extreme C-terminal 35 amino acids from both receptors allowed the receptor proteins to localize predominantly in the intracellular vesicles and to degrade. These observations indicate that the cytoplasmic tail of ET(A)R determines its plasma membrane localization. Stimulation with endothelin-1 increased the amount of intact ETR-EGFP fusion proteins without increasing their de novo synthesis, suggesting that binding of endothelin-1 stabilizes the ETRs.

Expression and function of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor are dependent on a conserved apolar amino acid in the third intracellular loop

The coupling of agonist-activated heptahelical receptors to their cognate G proteins is often dependent on the amino-terminal region of the third intracellular loop. Like many G protein-coupled receptors, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor contains an apolar amino acid in this region at a constant distance from conserved Pro and Tyr/Asn residues in the fifth transmembrane domain (TM V). An analysis of the role of this conserved residue (Leu(237)) in GnRH receptor function revealed that the binding affinities of the L237I and L237V mutant receptors were unchanged, but their abilities to mediate GnRH-induced inositol phosphate signaling, G protein coupling, and agonist-induced internalization were significantly impaired. Receptor expression at the cell surface was reduced by replacement of Leu(237) with Val, and abolished by replacement with Ala, Arg, or Asp residues. These results are consistent with molecular modeling of the TM V and VI regions of the GnRH receptor, which predicts that Leu(237) is caged by several apolar amino acids (Ile(233), Ile(234), and Val(240) in TM V, and Leu(262), Leu(265), and Val(269) in TM VI) to form a tight hydrophobic cluster. These findings indicate that the conserved apolar residue (Leu(237)) in the third intracellular loop is an important determinant of GnRH receptor expression and activation, and possibly that of other G protein-coupled receptors.

Structure-activity relationships of G protein-coupled receptors

The primary function of cell-surface receptors is to discriminate the specific signaling molecule or ligand from a large array of chemically diverse extracellular substances and to activate an effector signaling cascade that triggers an intracellular response and eventually a biological effect. G protein-coupled cell-surface receptors (GPCRs) mediate their intracellular actions through the activation of guanine nucleotide-binding signal-transducing proteins (G proteins), which form a diverse family of regulatory GTPases that, in the GTP-bound state, bind and activate downstream membrane-localized effectors. Hundreds of GPCRs signal through one or more of these G proteins in response to a large variety of stimuli including photons, neurotransmitters, and hormones of variable molecular structure. The mechanisms by which these ligands provoke activation of the receptor/G-protein system are highly complex and multifactorial. Knowledge and mapping of the structural determinants and requirements for optimal GPCR function are of paramount importance, not only for a better and more detailed understanding of the molecular basis of ligand action and receptor function in normal and abnormal conditions, but also for a rational design of early diagnostic and therapeutic tools that may allow exogenous regulation of receptor and G protein function in disease processes.

Functional characterization and potential applications for enhanced green fluorescent protein- and epitope-fused human M1 muscarinic receptors

Four recombinant human M1 (hM1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) combining several modifications were designed and overexpressed in HEK293 cells. Three different fluorescent chimera were obtained through fusion of the receptor N terminus with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), potential glycosylation sites and a large part of the third intracellular (i3) loop were deleted, a hexahistidine tag sequence was introduced at the receptor C terminus, and, finally, a FLAG epitope was either fused at the receptor N terminus or inserted into its shortened i3 loop. High expression levels and ligand binding properties similar to those of the wild-type hM1 receptor together with confocal microscopy imaging demonstrated that the recombinant proteins were correctly folded and targeted to the plasma membrane, provided that a signal peptide was added to the N-terminal domain of the fusion proteins. Their functional properties were examined through McN-A-343-evoked Ca2+ release. Despite the numerous modifications introduced within the hM1 sequence, all receptors retained nearly normal abilities (EC50 values) to mediate the Ca2+ response, although reduced amplitudes (Emax values) were obtained for the i3-shortened constructs. Owing to the bright intrinsic fluorescence of the EGFP-fused receptors, their detection, quantitation, and visualization as well as the selection of cells with highest expression were straightforward. Moreover, the presence of the different epitopes was confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Altogether, this work demonstrates that these EGFP- and epitope-fused hM1 receptors are valuable tools for further functional, biochemical, and structural studies of muscarinic receptors.

Identification and molecular characterization of m3 muscarinic receptor dimers

Several studies suggest, but do not prove directly, that muscarinic receptors may be able to form dimeric or oligomeric arrays. To address this issue in a more direct fashion, we designed a series of biochemical experiments using a modified version of the rat m3 muscarinic receptor (referred to as m3') as a model system. When membrane lysates prepared from m3' receptor-expressing COS-7 cells were subjected to Western blot analysis under non-reducing conditions, several immunoreactive species were observed corresponding in size to putative receptor monomers, dimers, and oligomers. However, under reducing conditions, the monomeric receptor species represented the only detectable immunoreactive protein, consistent with the presence of disulfide-linked m3 receptor complexes. Similar results were obtained when native m3 muscarinic receptors present in rat brain membranes were analyzed. Control experiments carried out in the presence of high concentrations of the SH group alkylating agent, N-ethylmaleimide, suggested that disulfide bond formation did not occur artifactually during the preparation of cell lysates. The formation of m3' receptor dimers/multimers was confirmed in coimmunoprecipitation studies using differentially epitope-tagged m3' receptor constructs. In addition, these studies showed that m3' receptors were also able to form non-covalently associated receptor dimers and that m3' receptor dimer formation was receptor subtype-specific. Immunological studies also demonstrated that m3' receptor dimers/multimers were abundantly expressed on the cell surface. Site-directed mutagenesis studies indicated that two conserved extracellular Cys residues (Cys-140 and Cys-220) play key roles in the formation of disulfide-linked m3' receptor dimers. These results provide the first direct evidence for the existence of muscarinic receptor dimers and highlight the specificity and molecular diversity of G protein-coupled receptor dimerization/oligomerization.

Use of a disulfide cross-linking strategy to study muscarinic receptor structure and mechanisms of activation

To gain insight into the molecular architecture of the cytoplasmic surface of G protein-coupled receptors, we have developed a disulfide cross-linking strategy using the m3 muscarinic receptor as a model system. To facilitate the interpretation of disulfide cross-linking data, we initially generated a mutant m3 muscarinic receptor (referred to as m3'(3C)-Xa) in which most native Cys residues had been deleted or substituted with Ala or Ser (remaining Cys residues Cys-140, Cys-220, and Cys-532) and in which the central portion of the third intracellular loop had been replaced with a factor Xa cleavage site. Radioligand binding and second messenger assays showed that the m3'(3C)-Xa mutant receptor was fully functional. In the next step, pairs of Cys residues were reintroduced into the m3'(3C)-Xa construct, thus generating 10 double Cys mutant receptors. All 10 mutant receptors contained a Cys residue at position 169 at the beginning of the second intracellular loop and a second Cys within the C-terminal portion of the third intracellular loop, at positions 484-493. Radioligand binding studies and phosphatidylinositol assays indicated that all double Cys mutant receptors were properly folded. Membrane lysates prepared from COS-7 cells transfected with the different mutant receptor constructs were incubated with factor Xa protease and the oxidizing agent Cu(II)-(1,10-phenanthroline)3, and the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds between juxtaposed Cys residues was monitored by using a combined immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting strategy. To our surprise, efficient disulfide cross-linking was observed with 8 of the 10 double Cys mutant receptors studied (Cys-169/Cys-484 to Cys-491), suggesting that the intracellular m3 receptor surface is characterized by pronounced backbone fluctuations. Moreover, [35S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assays indicated that the formation of intramolecular disulfide cross-links prevented or strongly inhibited receptor-mediated G protein activation, suggesting that the highly dynamic character of the cytoplasmic receptor surface is a prerequisite for efficient receptor-G protein interactions. This is the first study using a disulfide mapping strategy to examine the three-dimensional structure of a hormone-activated G protein-coupled receptor.

Role for the third intracellular loop in cell surface stabilization of the alpha2A-adrenergic receptor

Previous studies have shown that alpha2A-adrenergic receptor (alpha2A-AR) retention at the basolateral surface of polarized MDCKII cells involves its third intracellular (3i loop). The present studies examining mutant alpha2A-ARs possessing short deletions of the 3i loop indicate that no single region can completely account for the accelerated surface turnover of the Delta3ialpha2A-AR, suggesting that the entire 3i loop is involved in basolateral retention. Both wild-type and Delta3i loop alpha2A-ARs are extracted from polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells with 0.2% Triton X-100 and with a similar concentration/response profile, suggesting that Triton X-100-resistant interactions of the alpha2A-AR with cytoskeletal proteins are not involved in receptor retention on the basolateral surface. The indistinguishable basolateral t(1)/(2) for either the wild-type or nonsense 3i loop alpha2A-AR suggests that the stabilizing properties of the alpha2A-AR 3i loop are not uniquely dependent on a specific sequence of amino acids. The accelerated turnover of Delta3i alpha2A-AR cannot be attributed to alteration in agonist-elicited alpha2A-AR redistribution, because alpha2A-ARs are not down-regulated in response to agonist. Taken together, the present studies show that stabilization of the alpha2A-AR on the basolateral surface of MDCKII cells involves multiple mechanisms, with the third intracellular loop playing a central role in regulating these processes.

Conserved extracellular cysteine pair in the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is essential for proper receptor cell surface localization but not for G protein coupling

Most G protein-coupled receptors contain a conserved pair of extracellular cysteine residues that are predicted to form a disulfide bond linking the first and second extracellular loops. Previous studies have shown that this disulfide bond may be critical for ligand binding, receptor activation, and/or proper receptor folding. However, the potential importance of the two conserved cysteine residues for proper receptor cell surface localization has not been investigated systematically. To address this issue, we used the rat M3 muscarinic receptor as a model system. Most studies were carried out with a modified version of this receptor subtype (lacking potential N-glycosylation sites and the central portion of the third intracellular loop) that could be readily detected via western blot analysis. Cys-->Ala mutant receptors were generated, transiently expressed in COS-7 cells, and then examined for their subcellular distribution and functional properties. ELISA and immunofluorescence studies showed that the presence of both conserved cysteine residues (corresponding to C140 and C220 in the rat M3 muscarinic receptor sequence) is required for efficient expression of the M3 muscarinic receptor on the cell surface. On the other hand, these residues were found not to be essential for protein stability (determined via immunoblotting) and receptor-mediated G protein activation (studied in second messenger assays). These results shed new light on the functional role of the two extracellular cysteine residues present in most G protein-coupled receptors.

U50,488H-induced internalization of the human kappa opioid receptor involves a beta-arrestin- and dynamin-dependent mechanism. Kappa receptor internalization is not required for mitogen-activated protein kinase activation

Agonist-promoted internalization of some G protein-coupled receptors has been shown to mediate receptor desensitization, resensitization, and down-regulation. In this study, we investigated whether opioids induced internalization of the human and rat kappa opioid receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, the potential mechanisms involved in this process and its possible role in activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Exposure of the human kappa receptor to the agonists U50,488H, U69,593, ethylketocyclazocine, or tifluadom, but not etorphine, promoted receptor internalization. However, none of these agonists induced significant internalization of the rat kappa opioid receptor. U50, 488H-induced human kappa receptor internalization was time- and concentration-dependent, with 30-40% of the receptors internalized following a 30-min exposure to 1 microM U50,488H. Agonist removal resulted in the receptors gradually returning to the cell surface over a 60-min period. The antagonist naloxone blocked U50, 488H-induced internalization without affecting internalization itself, while pretreatment with pertussis toxin had no effect on U50, 488H-induced internalization. In contrast, incubation with sucrose (0.4-0.8 M) significantly reduced U50,488H-induced internalization of the kappa receptor. While co-expression of the wild type GRK2, beta-arrestin, or dynamin I had no effect on kappa receptor internalization, co-expression of the dominant negative mutants GRK2-K220R, beta-arrestin (319-418), or dynamin I-K44A significantly inhibited receptor internalization. Whether receptor internalization is critical for MAP kinase activation was next investigated. Co-expression of dominant negative mutants of beta-arrestin or dynamin I, which greatly reduced U50,488H-induced internalization, did not affect MAP kinase activation by the agonist. In addition, etorphine, which did not promote human kappa receptor internalization, was able to fully activate MAP kinase. Moreover, U50,488H or etorphine stimulation of the rat kappa receptor, which did not undergo internalization, also effectively activated MAP kinase. Thus, U50,488H-induced internalization of the human kappa opioid receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs via a GRK-, beta-arrestin-, and dynamin I-dependent process that likely involves clathrin-coated pits. In addition, internalization of the kappa receptor is not required for activation of MAP kinase.

Desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors in the cardiovascular system

Multiple mechanisms exist to control the signaling and density of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs). Upon agonist binding and receptor activation, a series of reactions participate in the turn off or desensitization of GPRs. Many GPRs are phosphorylated by protein kinases and consequently uncoupled from G proteins. In addition, many GPRs are sequestered from the cell surface and become inaccessible to their activating ligands. Both receptor:G protein uncoupling and receptor sequestration may involve the participation of arrestins or other proteins. A model for receptor regulation has been developed from studies of the beta-adrenergic receptor. However, recent studies suggest that other GPRs important in the cardiovascular system, such as the muscarinic cholinergic receptors that regulate heart rate, might be regulated by mechanisms other than those that regulate the beta-adrenergic receptors. This review summarizes our current understanding of the processes involved in the desensitization of GPRs.

Internalization of the TXA2 receptor alpha and beta isoforms. Role of the differentially spliced cooh terminus in agonist-promoted receptor internalization

Thromboxane A2 (TXA2) potently stimulates platelet aggregation and smooth muscle constriction and is thought to play a role in myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, and bronchial asthma. The TXA2 receptor (TXA2R) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and is found as two alternatively spliced isoforms, alpha (343 residues) and beta (407 residues), which share the first 328 residues. In the present report, we demonstrate by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence microscopy that the TXA2Rbeta, but not the TXA2Ralpha, undergoes agonist-induced internalization when expressed in HEK293 cells as well as several other cell types. Various dominant negative mutants were used to demonstrate that the internalization of the TXA2Rbeta is dynamin-, GRK-, and arrestin-dependent in HEK293 cells, suggesting the involvement of receptor phosphorylation and clathrin-coated pits in this process. Interestingly, the agonist-stimulated internalization of both the alpha and beta isoforms, but not of a mutant truncated after residue 328, can be promoted by overexpression of arrestin-3, identifying the C-tails of both receptors as necessary in arrestin-3 interaction. Simultaneous mutation of two dileucine motifs in the C-tail of TXA2Rbeta did not affect agonist-promoted internalization. Analysis of various C-tail deletion mutants revealed that a region between residues 355 and 366 of the TXA2Rbeta is essential for agonist-promoted internalization. These data demonstrate that alternative splicing of the TXA2R plays a critical role in regulating arrestin binding and subsequent receptor internalization.

Fluorescent muscarinic EGFP-hM1 chimeric receptors: design, ligand binding and functional properties

We describe the construction, expression and characterization of recombinant proteins comprising the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fused to the amino-terminal part of the muscarinic hM1 receptor together or not with an additional hexahistidine tag placed at the C-terminal end of the receptor. Expression of the fluorescent proteins reaches levels identical to those of the wt hM1 receptor, provided that fusion takes place at the very N-terminal end of the receptor. Also correct protein folding and targeting to plasma membrane is obtained upon addition of a signal peptide promoting amino-terminal domain translocation through the membrane. Ligand binding properties of--and activation of the calcium release response by--the fusion proteins are almost identical to those of the wild-type muscarinic receptor, indicating that such fluorescently-labelled receptors are valuable model systems for further functional, biochemical and structural studies.

Structural correlates for down-regulation of m1 and m2 muscarinic receptor subtypes

Three chimeric receptors stably expressed in murine fibroblast (B82) cells were used to examine how different parts of the rat muscarinic m1 and m2 receptors contribute to the down-regulation process. The MCH7 chimeric m2 receptor contained a fragment between VIth TM and C-terminal end derived from the m1 receptor. The MCH3 and MCH5 receptors have exchanged N-terminal and third intracellular loop regions of the MCH7 receptor. Fibroblast cells stably expressing individual muscarinic wild type (m1, m2) or chimeric (MCH3, MCH5, or MCH7) receptors were treated with plain medium (control) or medium containing carbachol for 24 h. Receptor density changes were measured by [3H](-)1-N-methyl-3-quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H](-)MQNB) saturation binding studies. There was a significant loss of receptor density, different for each receptor studied, following carbachol treatment relative to control cells. We related this loss of [3H](-)MQNB binding to the number of amino acids derived from m1 or m2 receptors for each constructed chimera and to the affinity of carbachol to the receptors studied. We demonstrate that: 1) the region from the VIth TMD to the end of C-terminal controls the extent of m1 and m2 receptor down-regulation; 2) the overall receptor conformation and the interaction between intracellular portions of the receptor influence the extent of receptor down-regulation; and 3) resistance to down-regulation by carbachol correlates with the affinity of carbachol to the muscarinic receptor construct.

The second intracellular loop of the m5 muscarinic receptor is the switch which enables G-protein coupling

We have completed a systematic search of the intracellular loops of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor for domains that govern G-protein coupling. A unique feature of the second intracellular (i2) loop was an ordered cluster of residues where diverse substitutions cause constitutive activation. A second group of residues in i2 was identified where mutations compromised receptor/G-protein coupling. The residues of each group alternate and are spaced three to four positions apart, suggesting an alpha-helical structure where these groups form opposing faces of the helix. We propose that the constitutively activating face normally constrains the receptor in the "off-state," while the other face couples G-proteins in the "on-state." Therefore, the i2 loop functions as the switch enabling G-protein activation.

Arrestin-independent internalization of the m1, m3, and m4 subtypes of muscarinic cholinergic receptors

To understand what processes contribute to the agonist-induced internalization of subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, we analyzed the role of arrestins. Whereas the m2 mAChR has been shown to undergo augmented internalization when arrestins 2 and 3 are overexpressed (Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., Gurevich, V. V., Lee, K. B., Ptasienski, J. A., Benovic, J. L., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23682-23689), the agonist-induced internalization of m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs was unchanged when arrestins 2 or 3 were overexpressed in transiently transfected HEK-tsA201 cells. Furthermore, when a dominant-negative arrestin was used to interrupt endogenous arrestin function, there was no change in the internalization of the m1, m3, and m4 mAChR whereas the internalization of the beta2 adrenergic receptor was completely blocked. Wild-type and GTPase-deficient dominant-negative dynamin were used to determine which endocytic machinery played a role in the endocytosis of the subtypes of mAChRs. Interestingly, when dynamin function was blocked by overexpression of the GTPase-deficient dynamin, agonist- induced internalization of the the m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs was suppressed. These results suggested that the internalization of the m1, m3, and m4 mAChRs occurs via an arrestin-independent but dynamin-dependent pathway. To ascertain whether domains that confer arrestin sensitivity and dynamin insensitivity could be functionally exchanged between subtypes of mAChRs, chimeric m2/m3 receptors were analyzed for their properties of agonist-induced internalization. The results demonstrated that the third intracellular loop of the m2 mAChR conferred arrestin sensitivity and dynamin insensitivity to the arrestin-insensitive, dynamin-sensitive m3 mAChR while the analogous domain of the m3 mAChR conferred arrestin resistance and dynamin sensitivity to the previously arrestin-sensitive, dynamin-insensitive m2 mAChR.

The third intracellular loop of the rat gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor couples the receptor to Gs- and G(q/11)-mediated signal transduction pathways: evidence from loop fragment transfection in GGH3 cells

The GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) belongs to the rhodopsin/beta-adrenergic family of G protein-coupled receptors. The intracellular domains of these receptors, particularly the regions closest to the plasma membrane in intracellular loops 2 (2i) and 3 (3i) as well as some regions located in the membrane-proximal end of the COOH-terminus, are frequently important sites for G protein coupling and specificity determination. Although studies in mouse and human GnRH-R have identified loop 2i as a critical determinant for coupling the receptor to the G(q/11)-mediated signal transduction pathway, given the functional similarity among the members of this particular G protein-coupled receptor subfamily and the fact that the GnRH-R lacks the typical intracellular COOH-terminal domain of its superfamily (a potential site for G protein coupling), we investigated the possibility that loop 3i of this receptor also participates in GnRH-R coupling to G proteins. GGH(3)1' cells, a pituitary-derived cell line that expresses a functional rat GnRH-R coupled to both Gs and G(q/11) proteins, were transiently transfected with a plasmid DNA containing a complementary DNA (cDNA) coding for the entire loop 3i of the GnRH-R as well as with other expression plasmids containing cDNAs encoding loop 3i of other Gs-, G(i/o)-, or G(q/11)-coupled receptors. The effects of coexpression of these loops with the wild-type GnRH-R on inositol phosphate (IP) production, cAMP accumulation, and PRL release were then examined. Transfection of GGH(3)1' cells with the cDNA for loop 3i of the rat GnRH-R (efficiency, 35-45%) maximally inhibited buserelin-stimulated IP turnover by 20% as well as cAMP accumulation and PRL secretion by 30%. This attenuation in cellular responses to a GnRH agonist was statistically significant (P < 0.05) compared with the responses exhibited by GGH(3)1' cells transfected with a control plasmid and stimulated with the same GnRH agonist. Transfection of minigenes coding for loop 3i of the M1Ach-muscarinic and the alpha1B-adrenergic (G(q/11)-coupled) receptors resulted in 25-55% inhibition of maximal GnRH-evoked IP turnover. Paradoxically, loop 3i from the M1Ach-muscarinic receptor also maximally inhibited GnRH agonist-stimulated cAMP accumulation and PRL release by 40% (both effects mediated through activation of the Gs protein). Transfection of loop 3i from the D1A -dopamine receptor (coupled to the Gs protein) produced a selective attenuation (40%) in Gs-mediated cellular responses. In contrast, receptor/G protein coupling appeared unaffected by expression of loop 3i domains derived from two receptors coupled to G(i/o) proteins (M2Ach-muscarinic and alpha2A-adrenergic receptors). These data indicate that the third intracellular loop of the rat GnRH-R is involved in receptor G(q/11) protein coupling and/or selectivity, and in the GGH(3)1' cell line, this loop is also involved in signal transduction mediated through the Gs protein pathway.

Structure/function relationships of a G-protein coupling pocket formed by the third intracellular loop of the m5 muscarinic receptor

Using random saturation mutagenesis, we have previously identified the amino acids K439, A440, and A441 in the C-terminus of the third intracellular loop (Ci3) of the m5 muscarinic receptor as being critical for G-protein coupling [Burstein, E. S., Spalding, T. A., Hill-Eubanks, D., and Brann, M. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3141-3146]. In the present study, we have constructed a series of point mutants at each of these residues and characterized their functional phenotypes in order to define the structure/function relationships of each of these residues for G-protein coupling. Although a wide variety of substitutions were tolerated at K439, most caused significant increases in the EC50 of carbachol and decreases in the maximum response (Rmax). Only other basic residues were well tolerated (<10-fold increase in EC50, >70% of wild type). Acidic substitutions had the largest effects, reducing Rmax to under 20% of wild type. At A440, only the conservative substitution threonine was well tolerated. Substitutions by hydrophobic, polar, and basic residues caused 10-80-fold increases in EC50 values and in many cases also significantly reduced Rmax (<70% of wild type). In contrast, at A441 mutations selectively affected EC50 but not Rmax values. Previously we identified I216, Y217, T220, and R223 as the residues in the N-terminus of the i3 loop of m5 (Ni3) that are critical for G-protein coupling [Burstein, E. S., Spalding, T. S., and Brann, M. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2882-2885]. To investigate whether there were additive contributions of Ni3 and Ci3 to G-protein coupling, the functional responses of two double mutants, R223E/K439E and Y217S/A441T, were evaluated. Though these mutations were tolerated individually, both double mutant receptors produced almost indetectable responses. Little or no changes in expression levels or ligand binding properties were detected, suggesting the observed effects were caused primarily by changes receptor/G-protein coupling. We conclude that K439 participates in G-protein activation through an ionic mechanism, that A440 fulfills a structural role forming part of the G-protein coupling pocket, and that A441 contributes to receptor affinity for G-proteins. We propose that the third intracellular loop forms a G-protein coupling pocket comprised of a positively charged "lip" and a hydrophobic core.

Interruption of G protein-coupling in CXCR2 does not alter ligand binding, but eliminates ligand-activation of GTPgamma35S binding, calcium mobilization, and chemotaxis

CXCR2 is a seven-transmembrane receptor that transduces intracellular signals in response to the chemokines IL-8, MGSA/GRO, and other ELR motif-containing CXC chemokines by coupling to heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins. In this study, we have mutated two putative G protein-coupling regions of CXCR2 and characterized the effects of these mutations on ligand-activated signal transductions: aspartic acid 89 in the second transmembrane domain and the HRAMR sequence (BBXXB motif, found in the third intracellular loop where B indicates a basic amino acid and X represents any amino acid). The Asp89 was replaced by either asparagine (D89N) or glutamic acid (D89E). For the BBXXB motif, the first two basic amino acids were mutated to two neutral isoleucines (HR-II), or alternatively, two isoleucines were inserted between alanine and methionine (II-insert). When expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, the D89E mutant was localized intracellularly with no detectable cell surface expression. In contrast, D89N, HR-II, and II-insert mutants displayed cell surface expression, with Kd values and expression levels similar to that of the wild-type transfectant. The ability of the mutants to transduce signal was assessed by ligand-stimulated GTPgamma35S binding, mobilization of intracellular free Ca2+, and chemotaxis assays. Both D89N and HR-II mutants signaled similarly to a wild-type receptor in all three assays. However, the II-insert mutant exhibited a loss of ligand-stimulated GTPgamma35S binding, calcium mobilization, and chemotaxis. Unexpectedly, this receptor underwent ligand-induced sequestration comparable to wild-type CXCR2. These data indicate that Asp89 and the basic amino acids in the third intracellular domain do not play essential roles in ligand-induced signal transduction through CXCR2. However, proper secondary structure and orientation of the third intracellular loop of CXCR2 are essential for ligand-mediated signal transduction but not for receptor sequestration.