Distinct HOX N-terminal arm residues are responsible for specificity of DNA recognition by HOX monomers and HOX.PBX heterodimers

Homeodomain Involvement in Nuclear HOX Protein Homo- and Heterodimerization

HOX genes play essential roles in patterning the anteroposterior axis of animal embryos and in the formation of various organs. In mammals, there are 39 HOX genes organized into four clusters (HOXA-D) located on different chromosomes. In relationship with their orderly arrangement along the chromosomes, these genes show nested expression patterns which imply that embryonic territories co-express multiple HOX genes along the main body axis. Interactomic database entries, as well as a handful of publications, support that some HOX proteins can form homodimers or interact with other HOX proteins. However, the consequences of HOX protein interactions have been poorly investigated and remain largely elusive. In this study, we compiled a repository of all HOX-HOX interactions from available databases, and taking HOXA1, HOXA2, and HOXA5 as examples, we investigated the capacity of HOX proteins to form homo- and heterodimers. We revealed that while the DNA-binding domain, the homeodomain, is not necessary for HOXA1 homodimerization, the nuclear localization of the dimerization is dependent on the homeodomain, particularly the integrity of the third helix of HOXA1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that HOXA1 can influence the localization of HOXA1 when it is deprived of the homeodomain, increasing its abundance in the chromatin-containing fraction. Moreover, HOXA1 nuclear homodimerization occurs independently of the integrity of the hexapeptide and, consequently, of its well-known interactor, the homeodomain protein PBX. These results hint at a potential involvement of dimerization in the complex landscape of HOX regulatory mechanisms.

Intra-Domain Residue Coevolution in Transcription Factors Contributes to DNA Binding Specificity

Understanding the basis of the DNA-binding specificity of transcription factors (TFs) has been of long-standing interest. Despite extensive efforts to map millions of putative TF binding sequences, identifying the critical determinants for DNA binding specificity remains a major challenge. The coevolution of residues in proteins occurs due to a shared evolutionary history. However, it is unclear how coevolving residues in TFs contribute to DNA binding specificity. Here, we systematically collected publicly available data sets from multiple large-scale high-throughput TF-DNA interaction screening experiments for the major TF families with large numbers of TF members. These families included the Homeobox, HLH, bZIP_1, Ets, HMG_box, ZF-C4, and Zn_clus TFs. We detected TF subclass-determining sites (TSDSs) and showed that the TSDSs were more likely to coevolve with other TSDSs than with non-TSDSs, particularly for the Homeobox, HLH, Ets, bZIP_1, and HMG_box TF families. By in silico modeling, we showed that mutation of the highly coevolving residues could significantly reduce the stability of the TF-DNA complex. The distant residues from the DNA interface also contributed to TF-DNA binding activity. Overall, our study gave evidence that coevolved residues relate to transcriptional regulation and provided insights into the potential application of engineered DNA-binding domains and proteins. IMPORTANCE While unraveling DNA-binding specificity of TFs is the key to understanding the basis and molecular mechanism of gene expression regulation, identifying the critical determinants that contribute to DNA binding specificity remains a major challenge. In this study, we provided evidence showing that coevolving residues in TF domains contributed to DNA binding specificity. We demonstrated that the TSDSs were more likely to coevolve with other TSDSs than with non-TSDSs. Mutation of the coevolving residue pairs (CRPs) could significantly reduce the stability of THE TF-DNA complex, and even the distant residues from the DNA interface contribute to TF-DNA binding activity. Collectively, our study expands our knowledge of the interactions among coevolved residues in TFs, tertiary contacting, and functional importance in refined transcriptional regulation. Understanding the impact of coevolving residues in TFs will help understand the details of transcription of gene regulation and advance the application of engineered DNA-binding domains and protein.

The Hox protein conundrum: The "specifics" of DNA binding for Hox proteins and their partners

Homeotic genes (Hox genes) are homeodomain-transcription factors involved in conferring segmental identity along the anterior-posterior body axis. Molecular characterization of HOX protein function raises some interesting questions regarding the source of the binding specificity of the HOX proteins. How do HOX proteins regulate common and unique target specificity across space and time? This review attempts to summarize and interpret findings in this area, largely focused on results from in vitro and in vivo studies in Drosophila and mouse systems. Recent studies related to HOX protein binding specificity compel us to reconsider some of our current models for transcription factor-DNA interactions. It is crucial to study transcription factor binding by incorporating components of more complex, multi-protein interactions in concert with small changes in binding motifs that can significantly impact DNA binding specificity and subsequent alterations in gene expression. To incorporate the multiple elements that can determine HOX protein binding specificity, we propose a more integrative Cooperative Binding model.

Prediction of neuroblastoma cell response to treatment with natural or synthetic retinoids using selected protein biomarkers

Although the administration of retinoids represents an important part of treatment for children suffering from high-risk neuroblastomas, approximately 50% of these patients do not respond to this therapy or develop resistance to retinoids during treatment. Our study focused on the comparative analysis of the expression of five genes and corresponding proteins (DDX39A, HMGA1, HMGA2, HOXC9 and PBX1) that have recently been discussed as possible predictive biomarkers of clinical response to retinoid differentiation therapy. Expression of these five candidate biomarkers was evaluated at both the mRNA and protein level in the same subset of 8 neuroblastoma cell lines after treatment with natural or synthetic retinoids. We found that the cell lines that were HMGA2-positive and/or HOXC9-negative have a reduced sensitivity to retinoids. Furthermore, the experiments revealed that the retinoid-sensitive cell lines showed a uniform pattern of change after treatment with both natural and sensitive retinoids: increased DDX39A and decreased PBX1 protein levels. Our results showed that in NBL cells, these putative protein biomarkers are associated with sensitivity or resistance to retinoids, and their endogenous or induced expression can distinguish between these two phenotypes.

Promoter methylation and Hoxd4 regulate UII mRNA tissue-specific expression in olive flounder (paralichthys olivaceus)

The peptide urotensin II (UII) mediates multiple physiology effects in mammals and fishes, and UII expression shows a tissue-specific pattern. However the mechanism is still unknown. In the present study high level of UII mRNA was detected in the caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) of the olive flounder when compared to other tissues. We examined whether epigenetic mechanisms of DNA methylation are involved in UII gene expression. Methylation DNA immune precipitation (MeDIP) assay showed low methylation of UII promoter in CNSS tissue compared with muscle and spinal cord. Methylation of UII promoter was further assessed through bisulphate sequencing analysis. Low level methylation (31%) in CpG island of UII promoter was detected in CNSS tissue, while methylation status in muscle and spinal cord was 89% and 91%, respectively. In addition, high conserved sites of Hoxd4 in UII promoter were found. Activation of Hoxd4 mRNA using transretinoic acid (RA) resulted in 18-fold increase of UII mRNA expression in CNSS and high locomotor activity in medaka, confirming that Hoxd4 is also involved in UII gene transcriptional regulation. Taken together, our data provide the first evidence of the epigenetic mechanism of promoter methylation in transcriptional regulation of UII expression in a tissue-specific manner, and Hoxd4 may also participate in UII gene transcription in flounder.

The O-GlcNAc transferase OGT interacts with and post-translationally modifies the transcription factor HOXA1

HOXA1 belongs to the HOX family of transcription factors which are key regulators of animal development. Little is known about the molecular pathways controlling HOXA1. Recent data from our group revealed distinct partner proteins interacting with HOXA1. Among them, OGT is an O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase modifying a variety of proteins involved in different cellular processes including transcription. Here, we confirm OGT as a HOXA1 interactor, we characterise which domains of HOXA1 and OGT are required for the interaction, and we provide evidence that OGT post-translationally modifies HOXA1. Mass spectrometry experiments indeed reveal that HOXA1 can be phosphorylated on the AGGTVGSPQYIHHSY peptide and that upon OGT expression, the phosphate adduct is replaced by an O-GlcNAc group.

PRDM14, a putative histone methyl-transferase, interacts with and decreases the stability and activity of the HOXA1 transcription factor

Understanding how the activity of transcription factors like HOX proteins is regulated remains a widely open question. In a recent screen for proteins interacting with HOXA1, we identified a PRDM protein family member, PRDM14, which is known to be transiently co-expressed with HOXA1 in epiblast cells before their specification towards somatic versus germ cell fate. Here, we confirm PRDM14 is an interactor of HOXA1 and we identify the homeodomain of HOXA1 as well as the PR domain and Zinc fingers of PRDM14 to be required for the interaction. An 11-His repeat of HOXA1 previously highlighted to contribute to HOXA1-mediated protein-protein interactions is also involved. At a functional level, we provide evidence that HOXA1 displays an unexpectedly long half-life and demonstrate that PRDM14 can reduce the stability and affect the transcriptional activity of HOXA1.

Genetic Variants Contributing to Colistin Cytotoxicity: Identification of TGIF1 and HOXD10 Using a Population Genomics Approach

Colistin sulfate (polymixin E) is an antibiotic prescribed with increasing frequency for severe Gram-negative bacterial infections. As nephrotoxicity is a common side effect, the discovery of pharmacogenomic markers associated with toxicity would benefit the utility of this drug. Our objective was to identify genetic markers of colistin cytotoxicity that were also associated with expression of key proteins using an unbiased, whole genome approach and further evaluate the functional significance in renal cell lines. To this end, we employed International HapMap lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) of Yoruban ancestry with known genetic information to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) with cellular sensitivity to colistin. Further association studies revealed that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with gene expression and protein expression were significantly enriched in SNPs associated with cytotoxicity (p ≤ 0.001 for gene and p = 0.015 for protein expression). The most highly associated SNP, chr18:3417240 (p = 6.49 × 10⁻⁸), was nominally a cis-expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) of the gene TGIF1 (transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-induced factor-1; p = 0.021) and was associated with expression of the protein HOXD10 (homeobox protein D10; p = 7.17 × 10⁻⁵). To demonstrate functional relevance in a murine colistin nephrotoxicity model, HOXD10 immunohistochemistry revealed upregulated protein expression independent of mRNA expression in response to colistin administration. Knockdown of TGIF1 resulted in decreased protein expression of HOXD10 and increased resistance to colistin cytotoxicity. Furthermore, knockdown of HOXD10 in renal cells also resulted in increased resistance to colistin cytotoxicity, supporting the physiological relevance of the initial genomic associations.

Molecular dynamics simulations show altered secondary structure of clawless in binary complex with DNA providing insights into aristaless-clawless-DNA ternary complex formation

Aristaless (Al) and clawless (Cll) homeodomains that are involved in leg development in Drosophila melanogaster are known to bind cooperatively to 5'-(T/C)TAATTAA(T/A)(T/A)G-3' DNA sequence, but the mechanism of their binding to DNA is unknown. Molecular dynamics (MD) studies have been carried out on binary, ternary, and reconstructed protein-DNA complexes involving Al, Cll, and DNA along with binding free energy analysis of these complexes. Analysis of MD trajectories of Cll-3A01, binary complex reveals that C-terminal end of helixIII of Cll, unwind in the absence of Al and remains so in reconstructed ternary complex, Cll-3A01-Al. In addition, this change in secondary structure of Cll does not allow it to form protein-protein interactions with Al in the ternary reconstructed complex. However, secondary structure of Cll and its interactions are maintained in other reconstructed ternary complex, Al-3A01-Cll where Cll binds to Al-3A01, binary complex to form ternary complex. These interactions as observed during MD simulations compare well with those observed in ternary crystal structure. Thus, this study highlights the role of helixIII of Cll and protein-protein interactions while proposing likely mechanism of recognition in ternary complex, Al-Cll-DNA.

Cdx1 interacts physically with a subset of Hox proteins

Cdx and Hox gene families encode homeodomain-containing transcription factors involved in anterior-posterior vertebral patterning. Although Cdx proteins are direct transcriptional regulators of Hox gene expression, both Hox and Cdx proteins are known to interact with other homeodomain transcription factors, leading us to speculate that Cdx and Hox proteins may also interact physically. In testing this, we found that that Cdx1 is indeed capable of associating with a subset of Hox proteins. This interaction is localized to the homeodomain region of both classes of proteins, is reliant on specific arginine residues in helix I of the Hox homeodomain, and is further modulated by N-terminal Hox sequences. More promiscuous interactions were seen with Hox proteins expressed in vivo, suggestive of bridging factors or post-translational modifications. Finally, we demonstrate that this interaction modulates Cdx-Hox transcriptional activity on a Hox-responsive element. This study is the first example of Cdx-Hox protein interactions and suggests that such complexes may modulate Hox and/or Cdx function.

Protein interactions of the transcription factor Hoxa1

Background

Hox proteins are transcription factors involved in crucial processes during animal development. Their mode of action remains scantily documented. While other families of transcription factors, like Smad or Stat, are known cell signaling transducers, such a function has never been squarely addressed for Hox proteins.

Results

To investigate the mode of action of mammalian Hoxa1, we characterized its interactome by a systematic yeast two-hybrid screening against ~12,200 ORF-derived polypeptides. Fifty nine interactors were identified of which 45 could be confirmed by affinity co-purification in animal cell lines. Many Hoxa1 interactors are proteins involved in cell-signaling transduction, cell adhesion and vesicular trafficking. Forty-one interactions were detectable in live cells by Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation which revealed distinctive intracellular patterns for these interactions consistent with the selective recruitment of Hoxa1 by subgroups of partner proteins at vesicular, cytoplasmic or nuclear compartments.

Conclusions

The characterization of the Hoxa1 interactome presented here suggests unexplored roles for Hox proteins in cell-to-cell communication and cell physiology.

HOXB1 founder mutation in humans recapitulates the phenotype of Hoxb1-/- mice

Members of the highly conserved homeobox (HOX) gene family encode transcription factors that confer cellular and tissue identities along the antero-posterior axis of mice and humans. We have identified a founder homozygous missense mutation in HOXB1 in two families from a conservative German American population. The resulting phenotype includes bilateral facial palsy, hearing loss, and strabismus and correlates extensively with the previously reported Hoxb1(-/-) mouse phenotype. The missense variant is predicted to result in the substitution of a cysteine for an arginine at amino acid residue 207 (Arg207Cys), which corresponds to the highly conserved Arg5 of the homeodomain. Arg5 interacts with thymine in the minor groove of DNA through hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attraction. Molecular modeling and an in vitro DNA-protein binding assay predict that the mutation would disrupt these interactions, destabilize the HOXB1:PBX1:DNA complex, and alter HOXB1 transcriptional activity.

The Pbx interaction motif of Hoxa1 is essential for its oncogenic activity

Hoxa1 belongs to the Hox family of homeodomain transcription factors involved in patterning embryonic territories and governing organogenetic processes. In addition to its developmental functions, Hoxa1 has been shown to be an oncogene and to be overexpressed in the mammary gland in response to a deregulation of the autocrine growth hormone. It has therefore been suggested that Hoxa1 plays a pivotal role in the process linking autocrine growth hormone misregulation and mammary carcinogenesis. Like most Hox proteins, Hoxa1 can interact with Pbx proteins. This interaction relies on a Hox hexapeptidic sequence centred on conserved Tryptophan and Methionine residues. To address the importance of the Hox-Pbx interaction for the oncogenic activity of Hoxa1, we characterized here the properties of a Hoxa1 variant with substituted residues in the hexapeptide and demonstrate that the Hoxa1 mutant lost its ability to stimulate cell proliferation, anchorage-independent cell growth, and loss of contact inhibition. Therefore, the hexapeptide motif of Hoxa1 is required to confer its oncogenic activity, supporting the view that this activity relies on the ability of Hoxa1 to interact with Pbx.

Pbx homeodomain proteins: TALEnted regulators of limb patterning and outgrowth

Limb development has long provided an excellent model for understanding the genetic principles driving embryogenesis. Studies utilizing chick and mouse have led to new insights into limb patterning and morphogenesis. Recent research has centered on the regulatory networks underlying limb development. Here, we discuss the hierarchical, overlapping, and iterative roles of Pbx family members in appendicular development that have emerged from genetic analyses in the mouse. Pbx genes are essential in determining limb bud positioning, early bud formation, limb axes establishment and coordination, and patterning and morphogenesis of most elements of the limb and girdle. Pbx proteins directly regulate critical effectors of limb and girdle development, including morphogen-encoding genes like Shh in limb posterior mesoderm, and transcription factor-encoding genes like Alx1 in pre-scapular domains. Interestingly, at least in limb buds, Pbx appear to act not only as Hox cofactors, but also in the upstream control of 5' HoxA/D gene expression.

Pentapeptide insertion mutagenesis of the Hoxa1 protein: mapping of transcription activation and DNA-binding regulatory domains

The mode of action of Hoxa1, like that of most Hox proteins, remains poorly characterized. In an effort to identify functional determinants contributing to the activity of Hoxa1 as a transcription factor, we generated 18 pentapeptide insertion mutants of the Hoxa1 protein and we assayed them in transfected cells for their activity on target enhancers from the EphA2 and Hoxb1 genes known to respond to Hoxa1 in the developing hindbrain. Only four mutants displayed a complete loss-of-function. Three of them contained an insertion in the homeodomain of Hoxa1, whereas the fourth loss-of-function mutant harbored an insertion in the very N-terminal end of the protein. Transcription activation assays in yeast further revealed that the integrity of both the N-terminal end and homeodomain is required for Hoxa1-mediated transcriptional activation. Furthermore, an insertion in the serine-threonine-proline rich C-terminal extremity of Hoxa1 induced an increase in activity in mammalian cells as well as in the yeast assay. The C-terminal extremity thus modulates the transcriptional activation capacity of the protein. Finally, electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the N-terminal extremity of the protein also exerts a modulatory influence on DNA binding by Hoxa1-Pbx1a heterodimers.

Reexamining the DNA target selectivity of Scalloped

Selector proteins are transcription factors that coordinate the formation and identity of organs and appendages. The proper formation of these tissues requires the selector proteins to regulate the expression of a large set of genes. Many selector proteins are involved in regulating multiple developmental processes, yet it is not completely clear how they are able to activate different sets of genes in a tissue-specific manner. An association with cofactors is thought to be one method by which enhancer selectivity is achieved. During wing development the selector protein Scalloped (SD) interacts with the cofactor Vestigial (VG). This interaction leads to the activation of a specific set of downstream wing genes. Herein, data are presented indicating that the switch in binding selectivity is likely achieved by VG altering the general affinity that the SD protein has for DNA. The decreased affinity for DNA is compensated for by the fact that the VG protein forms a complex containing two SD proteins. These two properties ensure that the SD–VG complex is able to bind only to enhancers that have two consecutive binding sites. Furthermore, data are presented that indicate that the function of the two terminal domains of the VG protein is not restricted to activating transcription and promoting the recruitment of two SD proteins.

The truncated Hoxa1 protein interacts with Hoxa1 and Pbx1 in stem cells

Hox genes contain a homeobox encoding a 60-amino acid DNA binding sequence. The Hoxa1 gene (Hox1.6, ERA1) encodes two alternatively spliced mRNAs that encode distinct proteins, one with the homeodomain (Hoxa1-993), and another protein lacking this domain (Hoxa1-399). The functions of Hoxa1-399 are unknown. We detected Hoxa1-993 and Hoxa1-399 by immunoprecipitation using Hoxa1 antibodies. To assess whether Hoxa1-399 functions in cellular differentiation, we analyzed Hoxb1, a Hoxa1 target gene. Hoxa1-993 and its cofactor, Pbx1, bind to the Hoxb1 SOct-R3 promoter to transcriptionally activate a luciferase reporter. Results from F9 stem cells that stably express ectopic Hoxa1-399 (the F9-399 line) show that Hoxa1-399 reduces this transcriptional activation. Gel shift assays demonstrate that Hoxa1-399 reduces Hoxa1-993/Pbx1 binding to the Hoxb1 SOct-R3 region. GST pull-down experiments suggest that Hoxa1-399, Hoxa1-993, and Pbx1 form a trimer. However, the F9-399 line exhibits no differences in RA-induced proliferation arrest or endogenous Hoxb1, Pbx1, Hoxa5, Cyp26a1, GATA4, or Meis mRNA levels when compared to F9 wild-type.

Trithorax, Hox, and TALE-class homeodomain proteins ensure cell survival through repression of the BH3-only gene egl-1

Mutations that aberrantly activate trithorax-group proteins, Hox transcription factors and TALE-class Hox cofactors promote leukemogenesis, but their target genes critical for leukemogenesis remain largely unknown. Through genetic analyses in C. elegans, we find that the trithorax-group gene lin-59 and the TALE-class Hox cofactor unc-62 are required for survival of the VC motor neurons. With the goal of providing a model for how aberrantly active Hox complexes might promote leukemia, we elucidate the mechanism through which these new inhibitors of programmed cell death act: lin-59 maintains transcription of the Hox gene lin-39, while unc-62 promotes nuclear localization of the TALE-class Hox cofactor ceh-20. A LIN-39/CEH-20 complex binds the promoter of the pro-apoptotic BH3-only gene egl-1, repressing its transcription and ensuring survival of the VC neurons. In the absence of this regulatory mechanism, egl-1 is transcribed and the VC neurons die. Furthermore, ectopic expression of the Hox gene lin-39, as occurs for human Hox genes in leukemia, is sufficient to block death of some cells. This work identifies BH3-only pro-apoptotic genes as targets of Hox-mediated repression and suggests that aberrant activation of Hox networks may promote leukemia in part by inhibiting apoptosis.

Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age

Despite decades of research, morphogenesis along the various body axes remains one of the major mysteries in developmental biology. A milestone in the field was the realisation that a set of closely related regulators, called Hox genes, specifies the identity of body segments along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis in most animals. Hox genes have been highly conserved throughout metazoan evolution and code for homeodomain-containing transcription factors. Thus, they exert their function mainly through activation or repression of downstream genes. However, while much is known about Hox gene structure and molecular function, only a few target genes have been identified and studied in detail. Our knowledge of Hox downstream genes is therefore far from complete and consequently Hox-controlled morphogenesis is still poorly understood. Genome-wide approaches have facilitated the identification of large numbers of Hox downstream genes both in Drosophila and vertebrates, and represent a crucial step towards a comprehensive understanding of how Hox proteins drive morphological diversification. In this review, we focus on the role of Hox genes in shaping segmental morphologies along the AP axis in Drosophila, discuss some of the conclusions drawn from analyses of large target gene sets and highlight methods that could be used to gain a more thorough understanding of Hox molecular function. In addition, the mechanisms of Hox target gene regulation are considered with special emphasis on recent findings and their implications for Hox protein specificity in the context of the whole organism.

Functional analysis of human mutations in homeodomain transcription factor PITX3

BACKGROUND

The homeodomain-containing transcription factor PITX3 was shown to be essential for normal eye development in vertebrates. Human patients with point mutations in PITX3 demonstrate congenital cataracts along with anterior segment defects in some cases when one allele is affected and microphthalmia with brain malformations when both copies are mutated. The functional consequences of these human mutations remain unknown.

RESULTS

We studied the PITX3 mutant proteins S13N and G219fs to determine the type and severity of functional defects. Our results demonstrate alterations in DNA-binding profiles and/or transactivation activities and suggest a partial loss-of-function in both mutants with the G219fs form being more severely affected. No anomalies in cellular distribution and no dominant-negative effects were discovered for these mutants. Interestingly, the impairment of the G219fs activity varied between different ocular cell lines.

CONCLUSION

The G219fs mutation was found in multiple families affected with congenital cataracts along with anterior segment malformations in many members. Our data suggest that the presence/severity of anterior segment defects in families affected with G219fs may be determined by secondary factors that are expressed in the developing anterior segment structures and may modify the effect(s) of this mutation. The S13N mutant showed only minor alteration of transactivation ability and DNA binding pattern and may represent a rare polymorphism in the PITX3 gene. A possible contribution of this mutation to human disease needs to be further investigated.

Structural Basis for Induced Fit Mechanisms in DNA Recognition by the Pdx1 Homeodomain,

Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (Pdx1) is a homeodomain transcription factor belonging to the ParaHox family. Pdx1 plays an essential role in pancreatic endocrine and exocrine cell development and maintenance of adult islet beta-cell function. Mutations in the human pdx1 gene are linked to an early onset form of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, MODY-4. We demonstrate that the homeodomain reproduces the binding specificity of the full-length protein. We report the 2.4 A resolution crystal structure of the homeodomain bound to a target DNA. The two Pdx1/DNA complexes in the asymmetric unit display conformational differences: in the DNA curvature, the orientation of the homeodomain in the major groove, and the order of the N-terminal arm. Comparing the two complexes indicates invariant protein-DNA contacts, and variant contacts that are unique to each binding orientation. An induced fit model is proposed that depends on the DNA conformation and provides a mechanism for nonlocal contributions to binding specificity.

Enhanced autophagic cell death in expanded polyhistidine variants of HOXA1 reduces PBX1-coupled transcriptional activity and inhibits neuronal differentiation

HOXA1 is a member of the homeobox gene family and is involved in early brain development. In our previous study, we identified novel variants of polyhistidine repeat tract in HOXA1 gene and showed that ectopic expression of expanded variants led to enhanced intranuclear aggregation and accelerated cell death in a time-dependent manner. Here, we further investigate the implications of polyhistidine variants on HOXA1 function. Aside from intranuclear aggregation, we observed cytosolic aggregates during the early stages of expression. Rapamycin, an autophagy inducer, resulted in decreased protein aggregation and cell death. Here, we also show an interaction between variants of HOXA1 and one of the HOX protein known cofactors, PBX1. Expanded HOXA1 variants exhibited reduced PBX1-coupled transcriptional activity through a regulatory enhancer of HOXB1. Moreover, we demonstrate that both deleted and expanded variants inhibited neurite outgrowth in retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation in neuroblastoma cells. These results provide further evidence that expanded polyhistidine repeats in HOXA1 enhance aggregation and cell death, resulting in impaired neuronal differentiation and cooperative binding with PBX1.

Pbx1 is a co-factor for Cdx-2 in regulating proglucagon gene expression in pancreatic A cells

A number of Hox and Hox-like homeodomain (HD) proteins have been previously shown to utilize members of the TALE HD protein family as co-factors in regulating gene expression. The caudal HD protein Cdx-2 is a transactivator for the proglucagon gene, expressed in pancreatic A cells and intestinal endocrine L cells. We demonstrate here that co-transfection of the TALE homeobox gene Pbx1 enhanced the activation of Cdx-2 on the proglucagon promoter in either the pancreatic A cell line InR1-G9 or BHK fibroblasts. The activation was observed for proglucagon promoter constructs with or without the binding motifs for Pbx1. Furthermore, mutating the penta-peptide motif (binding motif for TALE HD proteins) on Cdx-2 substantially attenuated its activation on proglucagon promoter, but not on the sucrase-isomaltase gene (SI) promoter, or its own (Cdx-2) promoter; suggesting that Cdx-2 utilizes Pbx1 as a co-factor for regulating the expression of selected target genes. Physical interaction between Cdx-2 and Pbx1 was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation as well as GST fusion protein pull-down. We suggest that this study reveals a novel function for Pbx1 in pancreatic islet physiology: regulating proglucagon expression by serving as a co-factor for Cdx-2.

Comparative analysis of genes downstream of the Hoxd cluster in developing digits and external genitalia

Mammalian Hox genes encode transcription factors that are crucial for proper morphogenesis along the various body axes. Despite their extensive structural and functional characterization, the nature of their target genes remains elusive. We have addressed this question by using DNA microarrays to screen for genes whose expression in developing distal forelimbs and genital eminences was significantly modified in the absence of the full Hoxd gene complement. This comparative approach not only identified specific candidate genes, but also allowed the examination of whether a similar Hox expression pattern in distinct tissues leads to the modulation of the same or different downstream genes. We report here a set of potential target genes, most of which were not previously known to play a role in the early stages of either limb or genital bud development. Interestingly, we find that the majority of these candidate genes are differentially expressed in both structures,although often at different times. This supports the idea that both appendices involve similar genetic controls, both upstream and downstream of the Hox gene family. These results highlight the surprising mechanistic relationship between these rather different body parts and suggest a common developmental strategy to build up the most distal appendicular structures of the body, i.e. the digits and the penis/clitoris.

Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system

1. Homeobox (Hox) genes were originally discovered in the fruit fly Drosophila, where they function through a conserved homeodomain as transcriptional regulators to control embryonic morphogenesis. Since then over 1000 homeodomain proteins have been identified in several species. In vertebrates, 39 Hox genes have been identified as homologs of the original Drosophila complex, and like their Drosophila counterparts they are organized within chromosomal clusters. Vertebrate Hox genes have also been shown to play a critical role in embryonic development as transcriptional regulators. 2. Both the Drosophila and vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to interact with various cofactors, such as the TALE homeodomain proteins, in recognition of consensus sequences within regulatory elements of their target genes. These protein-protein interactions are believed to contribute to enhancing the specificity of target gene recognition in a cell-type or tissue- dependent manner. The regulatory activity of a particular Hox protein on a specific regulatory element is highly variable and dependent on its interacting partners within the transcriptional complex. 3. In vertebrates, Hox genes display spatially restricted patterns of expression within the developing CNS, both along the anterioposterior and dorsoventral axis of the embryo. Their restricted gene expression is suggestive of a regulatory role in patterning of the CNS, as well as in cell specification. Determining the precise function of individual Hox genes in CNS morphogenesis through classical mutational analyses is complicated due to functional redundancy between Hox genes. 4. Understanding the precise mechanisms through which Hox genes mediate embryonic morphogenesis requires the identification of their downstream target genes. Although Hox genes have been implicated in the regulation of several pathways, few target genes have been shown to be under their direct regulatory control. Development of methodologies used for the isolation of target genes and for the analysis of putative targets will be beneficial in establishing the genetic pathways controlled by Hox factors. 5. Within the developing CNS various cell adhesion molecules and signaling molecules have been identified as candidate downstream target genes of Hox proteins. These targets play a role in processes such as cell migration and differentiation, and are implicated in contributing to neuronal processes such as plasticity and/or specification. Hence, Hox genes not only play a role in patterning of the CNS during early development, but may also contribute to cell specification and identity.

Immunocytochemical detection of HoxD9 and Pbx1 homeodomain protein expression in Chinese esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

AIM

To evaluate the expression pattern of two novel oncofetal antigens, the HoxD9 and Pbx1 homeoproteins in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) to determine what role they would play in the carcinogenesis of ESCC.

METHODS

We obtained tissue samples of ESCC from 56 patients who underwent esophagectomy but not preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The diagnosis of ESCC was established and confirmed by staff pathologists. We used a highly sensitive, indirect, immunocytochemical method to detect HoxD9 and PbX1 proteins. We qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated cells that exhibited and staining using a light microscope.

RESULTS

In all observed carcinoma tissue samples, more than 60% of neoplastic cells stained lightly or strongly for HoxD9, and more than 50% of neoplastic cells stained lightly or strongly for Pbx1.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that HoxD9 and Pbx1 are inappropriately expressed in most human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Understanding the role of Hox genes in esophageal epithelial cell carcinogenesis may not only augment early detection but also offer new avenues for treatment of this disease.

Identification of transcriptional targets of HOXA5

The homeobox gene HOXA5 encodes a transcription factor that has been shown to play important roles in embryogenesis, hematopoiesis, and tumorigenesis. In order to decipher downstream signaling pathways of HOXA5, we utilized oligonucleotide microarray analysis to identify genes that are differentially expressed in HOXA5-induced cells compared with uninduced cells. Comparative analysis of gene expression changes after 9 h of HOXA5 induction in Hs578T breast cancer cells identified 306 genes whose expression was modulated at least 2-fold. Ten of these 306 genes were also up-regulated by at least 2-fold at 6 h post-induction. The expression of all of these 10 genes was confirmed by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Among these 10 genes, which are most likely to be direct targets of HOXA5, we initiated an investigation into the pleiotrophin gene by first cloning its promoter. Transient transfection assays indicated that HOXA5 can specifically activate the pleiotrophin promoter. Promoter deletion, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, and gel-shift assays were performed to show that HOXA5 can directly bind to one binding site on the pleiotrophin promoter. These data strongly suggest that microarray analysis can successfully identify many potential direct downstream genes of HOXA5. Further functional analysis of these targets will allow us to better understand the diverse functions of HOXA5 in embryonic development and tumorigenesis.

Engineering the Loop Region of a Homeodomain-Leucine Zipper Protein Promotes Efficient Binding to a Monomeric DNA Binding Site

Plant homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) proteins, unlike many animal homeodomains (HDs), are unable to bind DNA as monomers. To investigate the molecular basis of their different behavior, we have constructed chimeras between the HD of the sunflower HD-Zip protein Hahb-4 and that of Drosophila engrailed (EN). Analysis of the interaction of these proteins with the pseudopalindromic Hahb-4 binding site and the monomeric EN binding site suggests that the loop located between helix I and helix II (amino acids 21-28) of EN is enough to confer efficient DNA binding activity to the Hahb-4 HD. Accordingly, the combined mutation of residues 24 and 25 of Hahb-4 to those present in EN (S24R/R25Y) originated an HD able to interact with the EN binding site, while single mutations were ineffective. We have also determined that a protein with the leucine zipper and helix III of Hahb-4 fused to the rest of the EN HD binds to the Hahb-4 pseudopalindomic binding site with increased affinity and shows extended contacts with DNA respective to Hahb-4. We conclude that the loop located between helix I and helix II of the HD must be regarded as one of the segments that contribute to the present-day diversity in the properties of different HDs.

Loss of function but no gain of function caused by amino acid substitutions in the hexapeptide of Hoxa1 in vivo

Homeodomain containing transcription factors of the Hox family play critical roles in patterning the anteroposterior embryonic body axis, as well as in controlling several steps of organogenesis. Several Hox proteins have been shown to cooperate with members of the Pbx family for the recognition and activation of identified target enhancers. Hox proteins contact Pbx via a conserved hexapeptide motif. Previous biochemical studies provided evidence that critical amino acid substitutions in the hexapeptide sequence of Hoxa1 abolish its interaction with Pbx. As a result, these substitutions also abolish Hoxa1 activity on known target enhancers in cellular models, suggesting that Hoxa1 activity relies on its capacity to interact with Pbx. Here, we show that mice with mutations in the Hoxa1 hexapeptide display hindbrain, cranial nerve, and skeletal defects highly reminiscent of those reported for the Hoxa1 loss of function. Since similar hexapeptide mutations in the mouse Hoxb8 and the Drosophila AbdA proteins result in activity modulation and gain of function, our data demonstrate that the functional importance of the hexapeptide in vivo differs according to the Hox proteins.

The role of a retinoic acid response element in establishing the anterior neural expression border of Hoxd4 transgenes

The zebrafish hoxd4a locus was compared to its murine ortholog, Hoxd4. The sequence of regulatory elements, including a DR5 type retinoic acid response element (RARE) required for Hoxd4 neural enhancer activity, are highly conserved. Additionally, zebrafish and mouse neural enhancers function identically in transgenic mouse embryos. We tested whether sequence conservation reflects functional importance by altering the spacing and sequence of the RARE in the Hoxd4 neural enhancer. Stabilizing receptor-DNA interactions did not anteriorize transgene expression. By contrast, conversion of the RARE from a DR5 to a DR2 type element decreased receptor-DNA stability and posteriorized expression. Hence, the setting of the Hox anterior expression border is not a simple function of the affinity of retinoid receptors for their cognate element.

Lock and key binding of the HOX YPWM peptide to the PBX homeodomain

HOX homeodomain proteins bind short core DNA sequences to control very specific developmental processes. DNA binding affinity and sequence selectivity are increased by the formation of cooperative complexes with the PBX homeodomain protein. A conserved YPWM motif in the HOX protein is necessary for cooperative binding with PBX. We have determined the structure of a PBX homeodomain bound to a 14-mer DNA duplex. A relaxation-optimized procedure was developed to measure DNA residual dipolar couplings at natural abundance in the 20-kDa binary complex. When the PBX homeodomain binds to DNA, a fourth alpha-helix is formed in the homeodomain. This helix rigidifies the DNA recognition helix of PBX and forms a hydrophobic binding site for the HOX YPWM peptide. The HOX peptide itself shows some structure in solution and suggests that the interaction between PBX and HOX is an example of "lock and key" binding. The NMR structure explains the requirement of DNA for the PBX-HOX interaction and the increased affinity of DNA binding.

Interchange of DNA-binding modes in the deformed and ultrabithorax homeodomains: a structural role for the N-terminal arm

The deformed (Dfd) and ultrabithorax (Ubx) homeoproteins regulate developmental gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster by binding to specific DNA sequences within its genome. DNA binding is largely accomplished via a highly conserved helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain that is known as a homeodomain (HD). Despite nearly identical DNA recognition helices and similar target DNA sequence preferences, the in vivo functions of the two proteins are quite different. We have previously revealed differences between the two HDs in their interactions with DNA. In an effort to define the individual roles of the HD N-terminal arm and recognition helix in sequence-specific binding, we have characterized the structural details of two Dfd/Ubx chimeric HDs in complex with both the Dfd and Ubx-optimal-binding site sequences. We utilized hydroxyl radical cleavage of DNA to assess the positioning of the proteins on the binding sites. The effects of missing nucleosides and purine methylation on HD binding were also analyzed. Our results show that both the Dfd and Ubx HDs have similar DNA-binding modes when in complex with the Ubx-optimal site. There are subtle but reproducible differences in these modes that are completely interchanged when the Dfd N-terminal arm is replaced with the corresponding region of the Ubx HD. In contrast, we showed previously that the Dfd-optimal site sequence elicits a very different binding mode for the Ubx HD, while the Dfd HD maintains a mode similar to that elicited by the Ubx-optimal site. Our current methylation interference studies suggest that this alternate binding mode involves interaction of the Ubx N-terminal arm with the minor groove on the opposite face of DNA relative to the major groove that is occupied by the recognition helix. As judged by hydroxyl radical footprinting and the missing nucleoside experiment, it appears that interaction of the Ubx recognition helix with the DNA major groove is reduced. Replacing the Dfd N-terminal arm with that of Ubx does not elicit a complete interchange of the DNA-binding mode. Although the position of the chimera relative to DNA, as judged by hydroxyl radical footprinting, is similar to that of the Dfd HD, the missing nucleoside and methylation interference patterns resemble those of the Ubx HD. Repositioning of amino acid side-chains without wholesale structural alteration in the polypeptide appears to occur as a function of N-terminal arm identity and DNA-binding site sequence. Complete interchange of binding modes was achieved only by replacement of the Dfd N-terminal arm and the recognition helix plus 13 carboxyl-terminal residues with the corresponding residues of Ubx. The position of the N-terminal arm in the DNA minor groove appears to differ in a manner that depends on the two base-pair differences between the Dfd and Ubx-optimal-binding sites. Thus, N-terminal arm position dictates the binding mode and the interaction of the recognition helix with nucleosides in the major groove.

Changing homeodomain residues 2 and 3 of Hoxa1 alters its activity in a cell-type and enhancer dependent manner

The second and third amino acid residues of the N-terminal arm of most Hox protein homeodomains are basic (lysine or arginine), whereas they are asparagine and alanine, respectively, in the Hoxa1 homeodomain. Previous reports pinpointed these residues as specificity determinants in the function of Hoxa1 when it is acting as a monomer. However, in vitro data supported that these residues do not influence the target specificity of Hoxa1 in Pbx1a-Hoxa1 heterodimers. Here, we have analysed the transcriptional activity of a Hoxa1(NA-KR) mutant for which the asparagine and alanine residues of the homeodomain have been replaced by lysine and arginine, respectively. Comparison between the wild-type and mutant Hoxa1 reveals that they show distinct activity on the TSEII enhancer of the somatostatin gene, but that they are equally active in the presence of Pbx and Prep cofactors. This therefore corroborates the biochemical evidence having shown that the second and third residues of the homeodomain do not contribute to the DNA binding of Hoxa1-Pbx dimers. However, on the hoxb1 autoregulatory enhancer, Hoxa1 and Hoxa1(NA-KR) may display distinct activity despite the presence of Pbx, in a cell-type dependent manner. Therefore, our data suggest that, depending on the enhancer, these residues may contribute to the functional specificity of Hoxa1 and that this contribution may not be abrogated by the interaction with Pbx.

An Abd-B class HOX.PBX recognition sequence is required for expression from the mouse Ren-1c gene

Expression from the mouse Ren-1(c) gene in As4.1 cells is dependent on a proximal promoter element (PPE) located at approximately -60 and a 241-base pair enhancer region located at -2625 relative to the transcription start site. The PPE (TAATAAATCAA) is identical to a consensus HOX.PBX binding sequence. Further, PBX1b has been shown to be a component of a PPE-specific binding complex present in nuclear extracts from As4.1 cells. The binding affinities of different paralog HOX members to the PPE were examined in the absence or presence of PBX1b. HOXB6, -B7, and -C8 failed to bind the PPE alone but showed weak affinity in the presence of PBX1b. In contrast, HOXD10 and to a lesser degree HOXB9 bound the PPE with high affinities regardless of whether PBX1b was present. Abd-B HOX members, including HOXD10, -A10, -A9, -B9, and -C9, are expressed in As4.1 cells. The ability of HOX and PBX1b to form a ternary complex with PREP1 on the PPE is also demonstrated both in vivo and in vitro. Point mutations in either the HOX or PBX half-site of the PPE disrupted the formation of the HOX.PBX complex and dramatically decreased transcriptional activity of the Ren-1(c) gene demonstrating that both the HOX and PBX half-sites are critical for mouse renin gene expression. These results strongly implicate Abd-B class Hox genes and their cofactors as major determinants of the sites of renin expression.

Differential and opposed transcriptional effects of protein fusions containing the VP16 activation domain

Overexpression of strong transcriptional activators like herpes simplex virion protein 16 (VP16) may lead to non-specific inhibition of gene expression as a result of the titration of transcription factors. Here we report that a fusion between the homeoprotein Hoxa2 and the VP16 activation domain inhibits transcription from the strong promoter/enhancers of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). A similar fusion involving a Hoxa2 mutant protein that is defective in DNA binding has no effect on the CMV promoter but increases, rather than inhibits, the RSV promoter activity. This suggests that depending on its ability to bind DNA, the VP16 activator can interact with different sets of cofactors, giving rise to distinct transcriptional effects.

The binding of Ku antigen to homeodomain proteins promotes their phosphorylation by DNA-dependent protein kinase

The Ku antigen (70- and 80-kDa subunits) is a regulatory subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) that promotes the recruitment of the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) to DNA ends and to specific DNA sequences from which the kinase is activated. Ku and DNA-PKcs plays essential roles in double-stranded DNA break repair and V(D)J recombination and have been implicated in the regulation of specific gene transcription. In a yeast two-hybrid screen of a Jurkat T cell cDNA library, we have identified a specific interaction between the 70-kDa subunit of Ku heterodimer and the homeodomain of HOXC4, a homeodomain protein expressed in the hematopoietic system. Unexpectedly, a similar interaction with Ku was observed for several additional homeodomain proteins including octamer transcription factors 1 and 2 and Dlx2, suggesting that specific binding to Ku may be a property shared by many homeodomain proteins. Ku-homeodomain binding was mediated through the extreme C terminus of Ku70 and was abrogated by amino acid substitutions at Lys595/Lys596. Ku binding allowed the recruitment of the homeodomain to DNA ends and dramatically enhanced the phosphorylation of homeodomain-containing proteins by DNA-PK. These results suggest that Ku functions as a substrate docking protein for signaling by DNA-PK to homeodomain proteins from DNA ends.

DiSSiMiL: Diverse Small Size Mini-Libraries applied to simple and rapid epitope mapping of a monoclonal antibody

Methods for screening protein-protein interactions are useful in protein science and for the generation of drug leads. We set out to develop a simplified assay to rapidly test protein-protein interactions, with a library of 400 pentapeptides comprising the 20 natural amino acids at two variable positions followed by three glycines (NH2-X1X2GGG). The library was used to identify the epitope of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 10D11 directed against the HOXD4 protein. Three pentapeptide 'hits' were selected (VYGGG, PWGGG and WKGGG) from direct binding assays screening for pentapeptide-mAb interactions; and from assays using pentapeptides in solution to competitively block HOXD4-mAb interactions. Alignment of the three 'hit' pentapeptides to the HOXD4 sequence predicts the mAb 10D11 epitope as NH2-VYPWMK. Synthesis of NH2-VYPWMK hexapeptide confirmed this prediction; and an alanine scan of HOXD4 ablated binding by mAb 10D11 when amino acids in the putative epitope were mutated. We propose that these simplified but diverse libraries can be used for rapid epitope mapping of some mAbs, and for generating lead small peptide analogs that interfere with receptor-ligand or other protein-protein interactions, or with enzymatic activity.

Cell signaling switches HOX-PBX complexes from repressors to activators of transcription mediated by histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases

The Hoxb1 autoregulatory element comprises three HOX-PBX binding sites. Despite the presence of HOXB1 and PBX1, this enhancer fails to activate reporter gene expression in retinoic acid-treated P19 cell monolayers. Activation requires cell aggregation in addition to RA. This suggests that HOX-PBX complexes may repress transcription under some conditions. Consistent with this, multimerized HOX-PBX binding sites repress reporter gene expression in HEK293 cells. We provide a mechanistic basis for repressor function by demonstrating that a corepressor complex, including histone deacetylases (HDACs) 1 and 3, mSIN3B, and N-CoR/SMRT, interacts with PBX1A. We map a site of interaction with HDAC1 to the PBX1 N terminus and show that the PBX partner is required for repression by the HOX-PBX complex. Treatment with the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A not only relieves repression but also converts the HOX-PBX complex to a net activator of transcription. We show that this activation function is mediated by the recruitment of the coactivator CREB-binding protein by the HOX partner. Interestingly, HOX-PBX complexes are switched from transcriptional repressors to activators in response to protein kinase A signaling or cell aggregation. Together, our results suggest a model whereby the HOX-PBX complex can act as a repressor or activator of transcription via association with corepressors and coactivators. The model implies that cell signaling is a direct determinant of HOX-PBX function in the patterning of the animal embryo.

TALE homeoproteins as HOX11-interacting partners in T-cell leukemia

The mammalian PBX and Meis proteins belong to the TALE (three-amino acid-loop-extension) superfamily of homeodomain-containing transcription factors. Members of both the PBX and Meis groups have been implicated in tumorigenesis and are known to cooperatively bind DNA with Class I (clustered) HOX homeoproteins. Here we show that PBX and Meis homeoproteins cooperatively bind the PBX-responsive sequence in vitro with the oncoprotein encoded by the non-clustered homeobox gene HOX11 activated by the t(10;14)(q24;q11) chromosomal translocation in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). An FPWME motif N-terminal to the homeodomain is required for interaction with PBX proteins, which appears to confer DNA-binding specificity to HOX11. PBX proteins are highly expressed in HOX11 immortalized/transformed hematopoietic cells; in particular, the 10q24 translocation-carrying T-ALL Sil and K3P lines were found to selectively express PBX2. Ectopic retroviral-directed overexpression of PBX2 in concert with HOX11 in NIH3T3 cells resulted in decreased contact inhibition of growth as evidenced by focus formation in confluent cell monolayers. The accumulated data are thus consistent with a role of TALE homeoproteins in HOX11-mediated leukemogenesis.

Heterodimeric Pbx-Prep1 homeodomain protein binding to the glucagon gene restricting transcription in a cell type-dependent manner

Homeodomain proteins specify developmental pathways and cell-specific gene transcription whereby proteins of the PBC subclass can direct target gene specificity of Hox proteins. Proteins encoded by nonclustered homeobox genes have been shown to be essential for cell lineage differentiation and gene expression in pancreatic islets. Using specific antiserum in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and in vitro transcribed/translated proteins, the nuclear proteins binding domain B of the G3 enhancer-like element of the glucagon gene were identified in the present study as heterodimers consisting of the ubiquitously expressed homeodomain protein Prep1 and the also widely expressed PBC homeoprotein Pbx (isoform 1a, 1b, or 2). These heterodimeric complexes were found to bind also to the glucagon cAMP response element and to a newly identified element termed G5 (from -169 to -140). Whereas the expression of Prep1 or Pbx forms alone had no effect, coexpression of Pbx1a/1b-Prep1 inhibited the glucagon promoter when activated by cotransfected Pax6 or another transcription factor in non-glucagon-producing cells. In contrast, in glucagon-producing pancreatic islet cells, Pbx-Prep1 had no effect on GAL4-Pax6-induced mutant glucagon promoter activity or on Pax6-dependent wild-type glucagon promoter activity. Furthermore, 5'-deletion of G5 enhanced glucagon promoter activity in a non-glucagon-producing cell line but not in glucagon-producing islet cells. This study thus identifies a novel target and Hox-independent function of Pbx-Prep1 heterodimers that, through repression of glucagon gene transcription in non-glucagon-producing cells, may help to establish islet cell-specific expression of the glucagon gene.

Conformational changes in the PBX homeodomain and C-terminal extension upon binding DNA and HOX-derived YPWM peptides

PBX is a member of the three amino acid loop extension (TALE) class of homeodomains. PBX binds DNA cooperatively with HOX homeodomain proteins that contain a conserved YPWM motif. The amino acids immediately C-terminal to the PBX homeodomain increase the affinity of the homeodomain for its DNA site and HOX proteins. We have determined the structure of the free PBX homeodomain using NMR spectroscopy. Both the PBX homeodomain and the extended PBX homeodomain make identical contacts with a 5'-TGAT-3' DNA site and a YPWM peptide. A fourth alpha-helix, which forms upon binding to DNA, stabilizes the extended PBX structure. Variations in DNA sequence selectivity of heterodimeric PBX-HOX complexes depend on the HOX partner; however, a comparison of five different HOX-derived YPWM peptides showed that each bound to PBX in the same way, differing only in the strength of the association.

Murine hoxd4 expression in the CNS requires multiple elements including a retinoic acid response element

We have identified a retinoic acid response element (RARE) within a neural enhancer located 3' to the Hoxd4 gene. This RARE is required for the initiation and maintenance of Hoxd4 transgene expression in neurectoderm, and for full anteriorized expression upon retinoic acid (RA) treatment. Mutations within the sequence TTTTCTG, located 2 bp downstream of the RARE, posteriorized transgene activity. However, the onset of transgene expression and its response to RA were indistinguishable from wild type. While the TTTTCTG motif resembles a CDX binding site, human CDX1 protein did not interact with this element in vitro. Three additional regions were also shown to control transgene expression in neurectoderm, establishing that multiple elements constitute the Hoxd4 neural enhancer.

Mammalian Dlx homeobox gene control of craniofacial and inner ear morphogenesis

The Dlx homeobox gene family is of ancient origin, with apparent ancestral developmental functions in both nervous system regionalization and appendage (limb) outgrowth. Additional roles in inner ear and craniofacial development were likely acquired by the Dlx gene family during the course of animal evolution. Loss-of-function genetic mutations generated in the mouse have revealed a striking role for Dlx genes in patterning of the mammalian central nervous system, craniofacial structures and inner ear. Interestingly, none of the individual murine Dlx gene mutations to date have resulted in limb defects, suggesting a potentially significant developmental overlap of Dlx activity in this embryonic structure. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppls. 32/33:133-140, 1999.

Cell type-specific autoregulation of the Caudal-related homeobox gene Cdx-2/3

The caudal-related homeobox gene Cdx-2/3 is a critical "master" control gene in embryogenesis. Mice heterozygous for a null mutation in Cdx-2/3 exhibit multiple malfunctions including tail abnormalities, stunted growth, a homeotic shift in vertebrae, and the development of multiple intestinal adenomatous polyps, indicating that Cdx-2/3 is haplo-insufficient. In vitro studies have identified more than a half-dozen downstream target genes expressed in pancreatic and intestinal cells for this transcription factor. We have examined the transcriptional properties of the mouse Cdx-2/3 promoter. This promoter could be autoregulated in pancreatic and intestinal cells that express endogenous Cdx-2/3. In contrast, Cdx-2/3 transfection represses the Cdx-2/3 promoter in fibroblasts, which do not express endogenous Cdx-2/3. Since Cdx-2/3 activates proglucagon gene promoter in both pancreatic and intestinal cells and in fibroblasts, we suggest that some, yet to be identified, cell type-specific components are required for activating selected target gene promoters of Cdx-2/3, including the Cdx-2/3 promoter itself. Cdx-2/3 binds to the TATA box and another AT-rich motif, designated as DBS, within an evolutionarily conserved proximal element of the Cdx-2/3 promoter. The DBS motif is critical for the autoregulation, whereas the TATA box may act as an attenuating element for the autoregulatory loop. Finally, overexpression of Cdx-2/3 in a pancreatic cell line activated the expression of the endogenous Cdx-2/3. Taken together, our results indicate that the dose-dependent phenotype of Cdx-2/3 expression on its downstream targets in vivo could be regulated initially via a transcriptional network involving cell type-specific autoregulation of the Cdx-2/3 promoter.

Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex

To regulate their target genes, the Hox proteins of Drosophila often bind to DNA as heterodimers with the homeodomain protein Extradenticle (EXD). For EXD to bind DNA, it must be in the nucleus, and its nuclear localization requires a third homeodomain protein, Homothorax (HTH). Here we show that a conserved N-terminal domain of HTH directly binds to EXD in vitro, and is sufficient to induce the nuclear localization of EXD in vivo. However, mutating a key DNA binding residue in the HTH homeodomain abolishes many of its in vivo functions. HTH binds to DNA as part of a HTH/Hox/EXD trimeric complex, and we show that this complex is essential for the activation of a natural Hox target enhancer. Using a dominant negative form of HTH we provide evidence that similar complexes are important for several Hox- and exd-mediated functions in vivo. These data suggest that Hox proteins often function as part of a multiprotein complex, composed of HTH, Hox, and EXD proteins, bound to DNA.

PBX and MEIS as non-DNA-binding partners in trimeric complexes with HOX proteins

HOX, PBX, and MEIS transcription factors bind DNA through a homeodomain. PBX proteins bind DNA cooperatively as heterodimers with MEIS family members and also with HOX proteins from paralog groups 1 to 10. MEIS proteins cooperatively bind DNA with ABD-B class HOX proteins of groups 9 and 10. Here, we examine aspects of dimeric and higher-order interactions between these three homeodomain classes. The most significant results can be summarized as follows. (i) Most of PBX N terminal to the homeodomain is required for efficient cooperative binding with HOXD4 and HOXD9. (ii) MEIS and PBX proteins form higher-order complexes on a heterodimeric binding site. (iii) Although MEIS does not cooperatively bind DNA with ANTP class HOX proteins, it does form a trimer as a non-DNA-binding partner with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD4. (iv) The N terminus of HOXD4 negatively regulates trimer formation. (v) MEIS forms a similar trimer with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD9. (vi) A related trimer (where MEIS is a non-DNA-binding partner) is formed on a transcriptional promoter within the cell. (vii) We observe an additional trimer class involving non-DNA-bound PBX and DNA-bound MEIS-HOXD9 or MEIS-HOXD10 heterodimers that is enhanced by mutation of the PBX homeodomain. (viii) In this latter trimer, PBX is likely to contact both MEIS and HOXD9/D10. (ix) The stability of DNA binding by all trimers is enhanced relative to the heterodimers. These findings suggest novel functions for PBX and MEIS in modulating the function of DNA-bound MEIS-HOX and PBX-HOX heterodimers, respectively.

The oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1a collaborates with Hoxa9 to acutely transform primary bone marrow cells

A recurrent translocation between chromosome 1 (Pbx1) and 19 (E2A) leading to the expression of the E2A-Pbx1 fusion oncoprotein occurs in approximately 5 to 10% of acute leukemias in humans. It has been proposed that some of the oncogenic potential of E2A-Pbx1 could be mediated through heterocomplex formation with Hox proteins, which are also involved in human and mouse leukemias. To directly test this possibility, mouse bone marrow cells were engineered by retroviral gene transfer to overexpress E2A-Pbx1a together with Hoxa9. The results obtained demonstrated a strong synergistic interaction between E2A-Pbx1a and Hoxa9 in inducing growth factor-independent proliferation of transduced bone marrow cells in vitro and leukemic growth in vivo in only 39 +/- 2 days. The leukemic blasts which coexpress E2A-Pbx1a and Hoxa9 showed little differentiation and produced cytokines such as interleukin-3, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and Steel. Together, these studies demonstrate that the Hoxa9 and E2A-Pbx1a gene products collaborate to produce a highly aggressive acute leukemic disease.

The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle

We characterize a 37-bp element (fkh[250]) derived from the fork head (fkh) gene, a natural target of the Hox gene Sex combs reduced (Scr). In vitro, Scr cooperatively binds to this DNA with the Hox cofactor Extradenticle (Exd), and the activation of this enhancer in vivo requires Scr and exd. Other Hox/Exd heterodimers do not activate this element in vivo and do not bind this element with high affinity in vitro. The amino-terminal arm of the Scr homeodomain is crucial for the specific activation of this element in vivo. By mutating two base pairs within this element, we can convert the Scr/Exd-binding site to a Hox/Exd consensus site that binds several different Hox/Exd heterodimers. This element, fkh[250(con)], is activated by Scr, Antennapedia (Antp), and Ultrabithorax (Ubx) but repressed by abdominal-A (abd-A). We also show that Scr and Exd are only able to activate the fkh[250] element during the early stages of embryogenesis because, by stage 11, Scr negatively regulates the gene homothorax (hth), which is required for the nuclear localization of Exd. These results suggest that Exd is a specificity cofactor for the trunk Hox genes, and that the control of Exd subcellular localization is a mechanism to regulate Hox activity during development.

Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax-Extradenticle homeodomain complex

During the development of multicellular organisms, gene expression must be tightly regulated, both spatially and temporally. One set of transcription factors that are important in animal development is encoded by the homeotic (Hox) genes, which govern the choice between alternative developmental pathways along the anterior-posterior axis. Hox proteins, such as Drosophila Ultrabithorax, have low DNA-binding specificity by themselves but gain affinity and specificity when they bind together with the homeoprotein Extradenticle (or Pbxl in mammals). To understand the structural basis of Hox-Extradenticle pairing, we determine here the crystal structure of an Ultrabithorax-Extradenticle-DNA complex at 2.4 A resolution, using the minimal polypeptides that form a cooperative heterodimer. The Ultrabithorax and Extradenticle homeodomains bind opposite faces of the DNA, with their DNA-recognition helices almost touching each other. However, most of the cooperative interactions arise from the YPWM amino-acid motif of Ultrabithorax-located amino-terminally to its homeodomain-which forms a reverse turn and inserts into a hydrophobic pocket on the Extradenticle homeodomain surface. Together, these protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions define the general principles by which homeotic proteins interact with Extradenticle (or Pbx1) to affect development along the anterior-posterior axis of animals.