The risk of infections associated with rheumatoid arthritis, with its comorbidity and treatment

Low vaccination rates and awareness status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide cross-sectional survey study

To examine the pneumococcal, haemophilus influenza, hepatitis A virus (HAV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine rates and and predictors of vaccination among a Türkiye population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. In this multicenter, cross-sectional study, vaccination levels and related factors were questioned by face-to-face survey method during routine clinical examination of patients with RA followed in different regions of Türkiye. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software package, version 26. A total of 715 patients (mean age 53.1 ± 13 years), of whom 552 (77.2%) were women, were included in this study. The rate of vaccine awareness education in the whole patient group was 40.1%. The vaccination rates for influenza, pneumococcal, HAV, and HBV were 34.3%, 21.8%, 12.3%, and 28.5%, respectively. It was noteworthy that the level of vaccine awareness education was a positive predictive factor affecting vaccination in all vaccine types (p < 0.001, for all vaccine types). The rates of low income were higher in the vaccinated group for pneumococcal (p < 0.001) and haemophilus influenza (p = 0.011) vaccine than in the unvaccinated group. The participants with living in a rural area were significantly higher in the unvaccinated group for HAV and HBV vaccine than in the vaccinated group (p < 0.001). The frequency of less than two medical visits per year was significantly higher in the unvaccinated group for pneumococcal (p < 0.014) and haemophilus influenza (p < 0.001 ) and HBV vaccine (p = 0.009) than in the vaccinated group. multivariate analysis found that rural area (for Haemophilus influenza and HAV vaccines) and financial income (Pneumococcal vaccine) in specifically were associated with increased vaccination rates (p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of vaccination education was significantly higher in the vaccinated group for all vaccine types, which is noteworthy as a result of the positive effect of education on vaccination (p < 0.001). Vaccination awareness education and rates are low in primary prevention for RA patients. Vaccination awareness training is important in increasing the level of vaccine rates.

Vaccination and rheumatoid arthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 25,949,597 participants

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between vaccinations and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), specifically addressing concerns about a potential increased risk among vaccinated individuals.

METHODS

A systematic search for cohort studies and case-control studies examining the association between vaccinations and RA was conducted using Medical Subject Headings and relevant keywords across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to September 2024. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was employed to evaluate the overall certainty of evidence. Statistical analyses, i.e., pooling of relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were performed using a random-effects model on STATA software (version 14.0). Due to the I² value exceeding 50%, we did not perform an asymmetry test to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 16 observational studies conducted between 2008 and 2024 and involving a total of 25,949,597 participants. The follow-up duration ranged from 0.03 to 9 years, while the data collection period varied from 2.75 to 9.5 years. The analysis found no significant association between vaccination exposure and RA [RR = 1.03, 95% CI (0.95-1.11), I²=93.4%, P = 0.456, low level of evidence]. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of this result. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant risk of RA associated with HPV vaccination [RR = 1.27 95% CI (0.78-2.08), I²=81.4%, P = 0.339], influenza vaccination [RR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.98-1.23), I²=52.4%, P = 0.112], Anthrax vaccination [RR = 2.21, 95% CI (0.75-6.52)], Herpes Zoster vaccination [RR = 2.70, 95% CI (1.70-4.29)], or COVID-19 vaccination [RR = 0.94, 95% CI (0.82-1.07), I²=97.4%, P = 0.340]. However, the subgroup with a follow-up duration varying between 0.5 and 1.8 years showed that (HPV & COVID-19) vaccination had a significant protective effect on RA [RR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.87-0.98), I²=95.3%, P = 0.005].

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the association between vaccination and RA risk is insufficient, and vaccination may serve as a protective factor for RA over a less than one year follow-up duration.

Safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical use: 3-year data of all-case postmarketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVES

To assess safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This all-case postmarketing surveillance study included patients initiating baricitinib for RA from September 2017 to April 2019. Treatment duration was recorded. Safety data were collected for up to 3 years from initiation (up to 4 weeks postdiscontinuation in discontinuing patients).

RESULTS

Safety analyses included 4720 patients; 2580 (54.7%) were ≥65 years old. Baricitinib persistence rate was 45.4% (3-year Kaplan-Meier analysis); the most common discontinuation reason was insufficient effectiveness (n = 1005, 21.3%). Serious adverse events occurred in 600 patients [incidence rate (IR) 10.42/100 patient-years (PY); 95% confidence interval, 9.76-11.09]. There were 39 deaths [IR 0.43 (0.30-0.57)/100 PY]. Adverse events of special interest IRs per 100 PY were herpes zoster 4.68 (4.22-5.14), serious infection 3.05 (2.68-3.41), malignancy 1.09 (0.87-1.30), major adverse cardiovascular events 0.35 (0.23-0.48), and venous thromboembolism 0.25 (0.15-0.36). IRs did not increase with prolonged exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

No new safety concerns were identified during this 3-year postmarketing surveillance study of baricitinib in Japanese patients with RA. Patients and clinicians should be cognizant of herpes zoster and other serious infection risks during baricitinib treatment, especially in the first 6 months.

Glucocorticoids treatment and adverse infectious events in rheumatic diseases

It is well known that rheumatic diseases are characterized by an increased infection risk, due to several factors, such as an intrinsically dysfunctional immune system, disease activity, and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Glucocorticoids are widely used therapeutic agents for treating several chronic inflammatory and immune diseases, due to their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Their use is burdened by well-known side effects in dose- and duration of use-dependent manner. Physicians need to be aware of the mechanism of action of glucocorticoids, their side effects, particularly infectious side effects, and the significance of cumulative dose and duration of glucocorticoid treatment. Additionally, physicians shoultdleveld have knowledge of each patient and their comorbidities. They could use appropriate tools for assessing glucocorticoid-related toxicity and morbidity, particularly in the context of chronic glucocorticoid administration. This comprehensive understanding is crucial for ensuring the proper and safe use of these drugs, particularly in terms of minimizing infectious risks. The aim of this review is to focus on available data concerning the infectious risk associated to glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatic diseases, highlighting the role of the correct drug management in clinical practice and the role of the disease itself in the occurrence of this worthy side effect. We conducted a review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies about glucocorticoid use in autoimmune/rheumatic diseases, analyzing the infectious risk during glucocorticoid therapy, and its relationship with the used dose and duration of treatment.

COVID-19 vaccine and the risk of flares in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines aroused concerns about the risk of flares and adverse events in inflammatory arthritis (IA) since the vaccine clinical trials did not specifically investigate this subset of patients.

Methods

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis to summarize the data on joint disease flare and adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Two researchers independently evaluated the literature on Pubmed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from 22nd March 2020 to 30th September 2023. A random-effects model was used to pool odds ratios (OR) (with 95% CI) for the risk of joint disease flares and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of disease flare between different IA and adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic.

Results

A total of 9874 IA patients were included in the study: 6579 (66.6%) patients affected by RA and 3295 (33.4%) spondyloarthritis (SpA). The overall rate of flares was higher in RA vs. SpA (9.1% vs. 5.3%). However, the pooled estimated analysis showed no increased risk of joint disease flare following COVID-19 vaccination in patients affected by RA vs. SpA [OR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.00]. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed an increased risk of joint flares in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients vs. RA [OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93, p=0.004]. The pooled estimated analysis revealed no increased risk of AEFI in patients with RA vs. SpA [1.02, 95% CI: 0.63-1.65].

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis summarized the current evidence on joint disease flares and COVID-19 vaccine-associated AEFI in IA patients. Pooled analysis showed an increased risk of disease flares in PsA vs. RA patients.

Naturally acquired adaptive immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae is impaired in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Objectives

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased susceptibility to infections, including those caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Why RA is associated with increased susceptibility to S. pneumoniae is poorly understood. This study aims to assess the effects of RA and B-cell depletion therapy on naturally acquired antibody responses to 289 S. pneumoniae protein antigens using a novel protein array.

Methods

IgG responses to S. pneumoniae were characterised in serum from RA patients and disease controls (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)) using whole-cell ELISA, a flow cytometry opsonisation assay and an S. pneumoniae protein array. For the RA patients, results were compared before and after B-cell depletion therapy.

Results

Compared to a well-characterised disease control group of ME/CFS patients, RA patients had reduced antibody responses to multiple S. pneumoniae protein antigens, with significant IgG recognition of approximately half the number of antigens along with reduced median strengths of these responses. Reduction in multiple array antigen-specific responses also correlated with reduced IgG opsonisation of S. pneumoniae. Although B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab did not reduce overall IgG recognition of S. pneumoniae in the RA group, it was associated with marked disruption of pre-existing IgG repertoire to protein antigens in individual patients.

Conclusion

These data show RA is associated with major disruption of naturally acquired adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae, which can be assessed rapidly using a protein antigen array and is likely to contribute towards the increased incidence of pneumonia in patients with RA.

Risk of infections among persons treated with opioids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Millions of persons with chronic pain across North America and Europe use opioids. While the immunosuppressive properties of opioids are associated with risks of infections, these outcomes could be mitigated through careful patient selection and monitoring practices when appropriate. It is important to recognise that some patients do benefit from a carefully tailored opioid therapy. Enough primary studies have been published to date regarding the role of opioids in potential immunosuppression presenting as an increased rate of infection acquisition, infectious complications and mortality. There is thus a critical need for a consensus in this area.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The methodology is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, the MOOSE Guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We plan to systematically search Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMB Review, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases from their inception date to December 2023. Full-text primary studies that report measurable outcomes in adults with chronic pain, all routes of opioid use, all types of infections and all settings will be included. We will identify a scope of reported infections and the evidence on the association of opioid use (including specific opioid, dosage, formulation and duration of use) with the risk of negative infectious outcomes. Opioid use-associated outcomes, comparing opioid use with another opioid or a non-opioid medication, will be reported. The meta-analysis will incorporate individual risk factors. If data are insufficient, the results will be synthesised narratively. Publication bias and confounding evaluation will be performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval for the use of published data is not required. The results will be published, presented at conferences and discussed in deliberative dialogue groups.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023402812.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors in patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune rheumatic diseases: insights from a major Australian hospital study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD) are at higher risk of severe infections because of their underlying diseases and immunosuppression. Our objective was to elucidate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with AIIRD presenting with COVID-19 and their relation to disease severity. We explored whether variables, including underlying diagnosis, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and COVID-19 vaccine status, were associated with more severe forms of COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, 151 patients with AIIRD and COVID-19 infection were analysed using a binary regression model and a multinomial regression model.

RESULTS

The average age was 61.5 years, and average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 2.1; 106 (70.2%) patients were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 70 (46.4%) patients were receiving prednisolone. In the multivariable logistic regression model, ages between 50 and 69 years (odds ratio (OR) = 5.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.35-25.25) and older than 70 years (OR = 5.29; 95% CI = 1.21-23.14), prior prednisolone treatment (OR = 7.09; 95% CI = 2.63-19.11) and vaccination status including one and two doses (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.69) and three and four doses (OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.02-0.35) were all statistically significant factors related to changes in the severity level of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Severity of COVID-19 infection in patients with AIIRD is affected by age, background steroid use and vaccination status. Factors including sex, comorbidity, diagnosis of AIIRDs and use of DMARDs, including conventional synthetic, biologics and targeted DMARDs, were not significantly associated with COVID-19 severity.

Auto-immuno-deficiency syndromes

Autoimmune diseases constitute a broad, heterogenous group with many diverse and often overlapping symptoms. Even so, they are traditionally classified as either systemic, rheumatic diseases or organ-directed diseases. Several theories exist about autoimmune diseases, including defective self-recognition, altered self, molecular mimicry, bystander activation and epitope spreading. While there is no consensus about these theories, it is generally accepted that genetic, pre-disposing factors in combination with environmental factors can result in autoimmune disease. The relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors varies between diseases, as does the significance of individual contributing factors within related diseases. Among the genetic factors, molecules involved in antigen (Ag) recognition, processing, and presentation stand out (e.g., MHC I and II) together with molecules involved in immune signaling and regulation of cellular interactions (i.e., immuno-phenotypes). Also, various immuno-deficiencies have been linked to development of autoimmune diseases. Among the environmental factors, infections (e.g., viruses) have attracted most attention, but factors modulating the immune system have also been the subject of much research (e.g., sunlight and vitamin D). Multiple sclerosis currently stands out due to a very strong and proven association with Epstein-Barr virus infection, notably in cases of late infection and in cases of EBV-associated mononucleosis. Thus, a common picture is emerging that both systemic and organ-directed autoimmune diseases may appropriately be described as auto-immuno-deficiency syndromes (AIdeSs), a concept that emphasizes and integrates existing knowledge on the role of immuno-deficiencies and chronic infections with development of overlapping disease syndromes with variable frequencies of autoantibodies and/or autoreactive T cells. This review integrates and exemplifies current knowledge on the interplay of genetically determined immuno-phenotypes and chronic infections in the development of AIdeSs.

Emergency department utilization by persons with rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study

Some emergency department (ED) visits by persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be avoidable. This study aims to describe ED use by persons with RA in Alberta, Canada over a 10-year period. Using linked population-based administrative datasets, the annual frequency of ED visits, timing of visits, acuity at presentation assessed (Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS)), return visits within 72 h, and final disposition were assessed. Most responsible diagnoses assessed by the ED provider were categorized. Between 2008 and 2017, a total of 48,633 persons with RA had 416,964 unique ED visits. There was a 41% relative increase in visits over the study period and within a fiscal year 37% of persons with RA on average attended an ED. Half of the visits were assessed as CTAS 4 'Less Urgent' (31%) and CTAS 5 'Non-Urgent' (19%). No specific diagnosis could be assigned in 36% of visits and RA was listed as the most responsible diagnosis in 2.5% of all visits. Hospital admissions, occurring on average for 14% of ED visits, increased by 15% over the 10 years, and were rare for CTAS 4 (6.4%) and CTAS 5 (1.4%) presentations. Male patients (difference to female 1.2%, 95%CI 0.6, 1.7) and urban patients (difference to rural 8.4%, 95%CI 7.7, 9.2) were more frequently admitted to hospital. Persons with RA have increased ED utilization over time, with a significant volume of less urgent and non-urgent visits. Opportunities for appropriate ambulatory care provision to reduce acute care use should be identified.

Factors associated with severe infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

This aimed to identify the factors associated with severe/critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

Two-hundred RA patients diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria with proven COVID-19 infection were recruited and categorized according to the world health organization (WHO) COVID-19 severity grading into 2 groups: patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 (n = 164) and patients with severe/critical COVID-19 (n = 36). Comparison between both groups was done to identify the risk factors associated with severe/critical infection. Incidence of RA disease activity flare defined as increase in clinical disease activity index (CDAI) more than 10 points following infection was calculated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified history of previous serious infection, age > 60 years, and diabetes as factors positively associated, whereas COVID-19 vaccination was negatively associated with severe/critical infection. Following COVID-19 infection, the number of patients with severe/critical COVID-19 who had high RA disease activity and the incidence of flares was significantly higher in comparison to patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 (P < 0.001 and 0.003; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Age > 60 years, diabetes, and history of previous serious infections are risk factors for severe/critical COVID-19, while vaccination has a protective role in RA patients. Infection particularly when severe is associated with risk of disease flare.

Cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with janus kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive immunosuppressive medications have a heightened risk of infection. The goal of our study was to calculate the pooled cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with RA treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried for randomized controlled trials comparing patients with RA treated with JAKi (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, or filgotinib), defined as the treatment group, compared with control subjects, defined as participants receiving placebo or treatment regimen that was similar to that of participants in the treatment group, with the exception of JAKi. The primary study endpoint was the relative risk (RR) of any-grade and severe infection. The secondary endpoints were RR and cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections, herpes zoster, and pneumonia. The Stata v17 software was used for all data analysis. Results showed that treatment with baricitinib was associated with an increased risk of any-grade (RR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.19-1.52) and opportunistic (RR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.22-5.94) infection, whereas treatment with filgotinib (RR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.05-1.39), peficitinib (RR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.05-1.86) and upadacitinib (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.09-1.56) was associated with increased risk of any-grade infection only. Analysis based on type of infection showed a pooled cumulative incidence of 32.44% for any-grade infections, 2.02% for severe infections, 1.74% for opportunistic infections, 1.56% for herpes zoster, and 0.49% for pneumonia in patients treated with any JAKi during the follow-up period. Treatment with specific JAKi in patients with RA is associated with an increased risk of any-grade and opportunistic infections but not severe infection. Close clinical monitoring of patients with RA treated with JAKi is required to establish the long-term infection risk profile of these agents.

Risk factors of mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a single-centre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk factors for mortality in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in comparison to patients with RA but without ILD (RA-nonILD).

METHODS

Data were extracted from a single-centre prospective cohort of RA patients with a chest computed tomography scan at an academic referral hospital in Korea. Patients with RA-ILD enroled between May 2017 and August 2022 were selected, and those without ILD were selected as comparators. The mortality rate was calculated, and the causes of each death were investigated. We used Cox proportional hazard regression with Firth's penalised likelihood method to identify the risk factors for mortality in patients with RA-ILD.

RESULTS

A total of 615 RA patients were included: 200 with ILD and 415 without ILD. In the RA-ILD group, there were 15 deaths over 540.1 person-years (PYs), resulting in mortality rate of 2.78/100 PYs. No deaths were reported in the RA-nonILD group during the 1669.9 PYs. The primary causes of death were infection (nine cases) and lung cancer (five cases), with only one death attributed to ILD aggravation. High RA activity (adjusted HR 1.87, CI 1.16-3.10), baseline diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 60% (adjusted HR 4.88, 95% CI 1.11-45.94), and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (adjusted HR 5.13, 95% CI 1.00-57.36) were identified as risk factors for mortality in RA-ILD patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA-ILD have an elevated risk of mortality compared with those without ILD. Infection-related deaths are the main causes of mortality in this population. High RA activity, low DLCO, and the UIP pattern are significantly associated with the mortality in patients with RA-ILD.

Impact on in-depth immunophenotyping of delay to peripheral blood processing

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) immunophenotyping is crucial in tracking activation, disease state, and response to therapy in human subjects. Many studies require the shipping of blood from clinical sites to a laboratory for processing to PBMC, which can lead to delays that impact sample quality. We used an extensive cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) immunophenotyping panel to analyze the impacts of delays to processing and distinct storage conditions on cell composition and quality of PBMC from seven adults across a range of ages, including two with rheumatoid arthritis. Two or more days of delay to processing resulted in extensive red blood cell contamination and increased variability of cell counts. While total memory and naïve B- and T-cell populations were maintained, 4-day delays reduced the frequencies of monocytes. Variation across all immune subsets increased with delays of up to 7 days in processing. Unbiased clustering analysis to define more granular subsets confirmed changes in PBMC composition, including decreases of classical and non-classical monocytes, basophils, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and follicular helper T cells, with each subset impacted at a distinct time of delay. Expression of activation markers and chemokine receptors changed by Day 2, with differential impacts across subsets and markers. Our data support existing recommendations to process PBMC within 36 h of collection but provide guidance on appropriate immunophenotyping experiments with longer delays.

PERI-operative biologic DMARD management: Stoppage or COntinuation during orthoPaEdic operations (the PERISCOPE trial) - a study protocol for a pragmatic, UK multicentre, superiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot, economic evaluation and nested qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (IA). However, many people with IA still require planned orthopaedic surgery to reduce pain and improve function. Currently, bDMARDs are withheld during the perioperative period due to potential infection risk. However, this predisposes patients to IA flares and loss of disease control. The question of whether to stop or continue bDMARDs in the perioperative period has not been adequately addressed in a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PERISCOPE is a multicentre, superiority, pragmatic RCT investigating the stoppage or continuation of bDMARDs. Participants will be assigned 1:1 to either stop or continue their bDMARDs during the perioperative period. We aim to recruit 394 adult participants with IA. Potential participants will be identified in secondary care hospitals in the UK, screened by a delegated clinician. If eligible and consenting, baseline data will be collected and randomisation completed. The primary outcome will be the self-reported PROMIS-29 (Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) over the first 12 weeks postsurgery. Secondary outcome measures are as follows: PROMIS - Health Assessment Questionnaire (PROMIS-HAQ), EQ-5D-5L, Disease activity: generic global Numeric Rating Scale (patient and clinician), Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction scale, Health care resource use and costs, Medication use, Surgical site infection, delayed wound healing, Adverse events (including systemic infections) and disease-specific outcomes (according to IA diagnosis). The costs associated with stopping and continuing bDMARDs will be assessed. A qualitative study will explore the patients' and clinicians' acceptability and experience of continuation/stoppage of bDMARDs in the perioperative period and the impact postoperatively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study was received from the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee on 25 April 2023 (REC Ref: 23/WS/0049). The findings from PERISCOPE will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and feed directly into practice guidelines for the use of bDMARDs in the perioperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN17691638.

Exploring the Link between Varicella-Zoster Virus, Autoimmune Diseases, and the Role of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine

The varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a human neurotropic herpes virus responsible for varicella and herpes zoster (HZ). Following primary infection in childhood, VZV manifests as varicella (chickenpox) and enters a period of latency within the dorsal root ganglion. A compromised cellular immune response due to aging or immunosuppression triggers viral reactivation and the development of HZ (shingles). Patients with autoimmune diseases have a higher risk of developing HZ owing to the immunodeficiency associated with the disease itself and/or the use of immunosuppressive agents. The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents with unique mechanisms has expanded the treatment options for autoimmune diseases but has also increased the risk of HZ. Specifically, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and anifrolumab have raised concerns regarding HZ. Despite treatment advances, a substantial number of patients suffer from complications such as postherpetic neuralgia for prolonged periods. The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is considered safe and effective even in immunocompromised patients. The widespread adoption of RZV may reduce the health and socioeconomic burdens of HZ patients. This review covers the link between VZV and autoimmune diseases, assesses the risk of HZ associated with immunosuppressant use, and discusses the benefits and risks of using RZV in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Diminished antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in rheumatoid arthritis compared to metabolic disorders following the primary series of vaccinations and its recovery with a booster: A single-center prospective observational study

AIM

To compare antibody responses after vaccinations between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and patients with metabolic disorders (MD). The study places special emphasis on understanding how common diseases affect antibody responses in individuals with RA within real-world settings.

METHODS

The participants were 117 patients with RA (66 with RA only and 51 with RA and MD) and 37 patients with MD who received both the primary series of vaccinations and a booster. Antibody titers were compared after the primary series of vaccinations and a booster, and factors influencing the antibody response were assessed.

RESULTS

Following the primary series of vaccinations, a significant reduction in antibody titers was observed in patients with longer days between vaccination and antibody measurement, the use of IL-6 inhibitors, selective T cell co-stimulation modulators, and methotrexate. Comorbid MD did not exhibit significant influences on antibody response in RA. Notably, the presence of RA itself was not significant in multivariate linear regression analysis. After the administration of the booster, however, day between vaccination and antibody measurement, the use of IL-6 inhibitor, and methotrexate no longer remained significant. Only the use of selective T cell co-stimulation modulators retained its significance.

CONCLUSIONS

MD did not exhibit a significant impact on antibody responses in RA patients. The reduced antibody response following the primary series in RA patients appeared to be attributed more to specific RA medications rather than to the disease itself. Booster vaccines are vital in restoring the antibody response in RA.

Staphylococcus aureus subcapsular splenic abscess and associated empyema in the setting of tocilizumab therapy: A case report

We report a case of Staphylococcus aureus subcapsular splenic abscess and associated empyema after recent commencement of tocilizumab, masquerading as musculoskeletal pain. This highlights the importance of considering unusual underlying infections in patients on tocilizumab.

Higher infection risk for JAK inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib compared to subcutaneous biological DMARDs

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is usually treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and more recently, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Randomized trials suggest similar infection risks for JAKi and bDMARDs, but real-world data are scarce.

METHODS

From a nationally representative prescription database, adult RA patients starting a new JAKi or bDMARD between August 1st, 2018, and January 31st, 2021, were included. Prescriptions of antibiotic, antiviral or antifungal medication were used as proxy for infections. Infection incidence rates (IR) were compared between JAKi and bDMARDs and infection risks were estimated using multilevel Poisson regression adjusted for follow-up time and potential confounders and stratified for age < 65 and ≥ 65 years.

RESULTS

In 14,989 patients, we identified 20,050 treatment episodes with either JAKi or bDMARDs. The infection IR was significantly higher in JAKi (48/100 patient years) compared bDMARDs (35/100 patient years, adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33). More herpes zoster infections were seen in JAKi compared to bDMARDs (adjusted IRR 2.65, 95% CI 1.94-3.60). No significant differences in infection IRs were found comparing JAKi baricitinib and tofacitinib. In older patients, infection IRs were higher, but IRRs were similar between age groups.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to bDMARDs, JAKi are associated with a slightly higher infection risk and a higher risk of herpes zoster specifically. In older patients, infection IRs are higher but similar infection risks for JAKi and bDMARDs are observed. No differences in infection risk between tofacitinib and baricitinib were found. Key Points • Compared to bDMARDs, JAKi are associated with a slightly higher infection risk for all ages • An increased risk of herpes zoster in patients who use JAK inhibitors was confirmed • No significant differences in infection incidence were found between tofacitinib and baricitinib.

Short- and Long-Term Mortality of Hospitalized Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Serious Infections: A National Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Infectious conditions are a significant cause of mortality in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). Among patients hospitalized with an infection, we compared in-hospital and long-term (3-year) mortality between those with and without ARD.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included members of the largest health maintenance organization in Israel, aged > 18 years at the first episode of infection, who required hospitalization during 2003-2019. We compared in-hospital mortality and the results of a 3-year landmark analysis of those who survived the index hospitalization between patients with ARD, according to disease subgroups, and patients without ARD. Additionally, we compared mortality outcomes among patients with ARD, according to subgroup diagnosis, matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, and ethnicity to patients without ARD.

RESULTS

Included were 365,247 patients who were admitted for the first time with the diagnosis of a serious infection. Of these, we identified 9755 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 1351 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 2120 with spondyloarthritis (SpA), 584 with systemic sclerosis, and 3214 with vasculitis. In a matched multivariate analysis, the risk for in-hospital mortality was lower among patients with RA (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) and SpA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94). In a similar analysis, the risk of 3-year mortality was lower among patients with RA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86) and vasculitis (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Among patients hospitalized for an infection, the risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality was not increased among those with ARD compared to those without ARD.

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: result from COVAD e-survey study

COVID-19 has been suggested as a possible trigger of disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors associated with disease flares remain unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with breakthrough infection (BIs) and disease flares in patients with RA following COVID-19. We analysed data from RA patients who participated in the COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study. Demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities, pharmacologic treatment and details regarding disease flares were extracted from the COVAD database. Factors associated with disease flare-ups were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis comprised 1928 patients with RA who participated in the COVAD study. Younger age, Caucasian ethnicity, comorbidities with obstructive chronic pulmonary disease and asthma were associated with COVID-19 breakthrough infection. Moreover, younger age (odds ratio (OR): 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001), ethnicity other than Asian, past history of tuberculosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI 1.12-12.94, p = 0.033), treatment with methotrexate (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.56-4.17, p < 0.001), poor global physical health (OR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15, p = 0.044) and mental health (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated disease flares in patients with RA. Our study highlights the impact of socio-demographic factors, clinical characteristics and mental health on disease flares in patients with RA. These insights may help determine relevant strategies to proactively manage RA patients at risk of flares.

Real-World Coverage With Influenza, Pneumococcal, and Herpes Zoster Vaccines Among Patients With Rheumatic Diseases in a Nationwide Healthcare Plan

OBJECTIVE

Vaccination against preventable infections is important for the management of rheumatic diseases (RDs). This study assessed the vaccination coverage and predictors among patients with RDs using real-world data from Israel.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study, based on a Maccabi Healthcare Services database, included adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as of April 30, 2019. Age-specific vaccination coverage for influenza (past year), pneumococcal (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPSV23] and/or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV13]), and live-attenuated herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines (past 5 years) was reported. Logistic regression was used to investigate predictors of vaccination.

RESULTS

The study included 14,528 patients (RA: n = 6932; PsA: n = 4395; SLE: n = 1951; > 1 condition: n = 1250). Influenza vaccine coverage among patients with RA, PsA, and SLE was 45.1%, 36.2%, and 33.7%, respectively. For PPSV23, corresponding rates were 19.6%, 16.2%, and 12.6%, respectively. In the elderly population (≥ 65 years), 63.2% had influenza vaccine in the past year and 83.4% had a PPSV23 vaccine in the past 5 years or at age ≥ 65. For PCV13 and HZ, coverage in the overall study population was low at 4.8% and 3.6%, respectively. Central residence and treatment with corticosteroids and biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs within the past 5 years were significant predictors of vaccination coverage across all vaccines (P < 0.05). Other predictors varied by vaccine, including female sex (influenza, PPSV23, PCV13), age (influenza, PPSV23), chronic comorbidities (influenza, PPSV23, PCV13), shorter disease duration (PCV13), and high socioeconomic status (PCV13, HZ).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated suboptimal coverage of influenza, pneumococcal, and HZ vaccination in patients with RA, PsA, and SLE, in particular among younger adults in Israel.

Comparison of active tuberculosis occurrence associated with Janus kinase inhibitors and biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of tuberculosis associated with the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in South Korea.

METHODS

In this nationwide matched-cohort study, we retrospectively identified adult patients with new-onset RA from the National Health Insurance Service database who were prescribed bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors and recently underwent latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening during 2012‒2021, and followed them up until the end of 2022 for the development of active tuberculosis. HRs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression in a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Among 16 760 matched patients with RA (3352 JAK inhibitor users and 13 408 bDMARD users), 18.8% received tuberculosis preventive therapy for LTBI. Overall, JAK inhibitor users had a significantly lower risk of tuberculosis than bDMARD users (HR (95% CI)=0.37 (0.22 to 0.62)). Among the patients treated for LTBI, patients with low treatment adherence had a significantly higher risk than those without LTBI (HR (95% CI)=2.78 (1.74 to 4.44)). Patients without LTBI and using JAK inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of tuberculosis across all ages and sexes compared with bDMARD users.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA using JAK inhibitors have a significantly lower risk of active tuberculosis than bDMARD users in South Korea; however, patients with RA having LTBI are equally at risk regardless of the treatment received (JAK inhibitor vs bDMARD). Therefore, vigilant tuberculosis monitoring, especially in patients with low adherence to tuberculosis preventive therapy, is essential.

The serological immunogenicity of the third and fourth doses of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on different biologic or targeted DMARDs: a Swedish nationwide study (COVID-19-REUMA)

Studies investigating the immunogenicity of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) are still limited. The objective was to explore the antibody response including response to omicron virus subvariants (sBA.1 and sBS.2) after third and fourth COVID-19 vaccine doses in Swedish IRD patients treated with immunomodulating drugs compared to controls. Antibody levels to spike wild-type antigens (full-length protein and S1) and the omicron variants sBA.1 and sBA.2 (full-length proteins) were measured. A positive response was defined as having antibody levels over cut-off or ≥fourfold increase in post-vaccination levels for both antigens. Patients with arthritis, vasculitis, and other autoimmune diseases (n = 414), and controls (n = 61) receiving biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with or without conventional synthetic DMARDs participated. Of these, blood samples were available for 370 patients and 52 controls after three doses, and 65 patients and 15 controls after four doses. Treatment groups after three vaccine doses were rituximab (n = 133), abatacept (n = 22), IL6r inhibitors (n = 71), JAnus Kinase inhibitors (JAK-inhibitors) (n = 56), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-inhibitors) (n = 61), IL12/23/17 inhibitors (n = 27), and controls (n = 52). The percentage of responders after three and four vaccine doses was lower in rituximab-treated patients (59% and 57%) compared to controls (100%) (P < 0.001). After three doses, the percentage of responders in all other groups was 100%, including response to omicron sBA.1 and sBA.2. In rituximab-treated patients, higher baseline immunoglobulin G (IgG) and longer time-period between rituximab and vaccination predicted better response. In this Swedish nationwide study including IRD patients three and four COVID-19 vaccine doses were immunogenic in patients treated with IL6r inhibitors, TNF-inhibitors, JAK-inhibitors, and IL12/23/17-inhibitors but not in rituximab. As >50% of rituximab patients responded to vaccines including omicron subvariants, these patients should be prioritized for additional vaccine doses.

IMPORTANCE

Results from this study provide further evidence that additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines are immunogenic and result in satisfactory antibody response in a majority of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) receiving potent immunomodulating treatments such as biological or targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) given as monotherapy or combined with traditional DMARDs. We observed that rituximab treatment, both as monotherapy and combined with csDMARDs, impaired antibody response, and only roughly 50% of patients developed a satisfactory antibody response including response to omicron subvariants after the third vaccine. In addition, higher IgG levels at the last rituximab course before the third vaccine dose and a longer time after the last rituximab treatment increased the chance of a satisfactory antibody response. These results indicate that rituximab-treated patients should be prioritized for additional vaccine doses.

CLINICAL TRIALS

EudraCT (European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database) with number 2021-000880-63.

Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose: Results From a Multicenter Noninferiority Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial Assessing Tocilizumab or Abatacept Injection Spacing in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission

OBJECTIVE

We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission.

METHODS

This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4).

CONCLUSION

The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy.

Multiple morbidities are associated with serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between a comprehensive list of morbidities and serious infection (SI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This study evaluated SI risk associated with 55 comorbidities using a population-based inception cohort including all adult patients with incident RA from 1999 through 2014 with follow up through 2021. Morbidities and SI were ascertained using previously validated international classification of disease (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes. Conditional frailty models were utilized to analyze the association between each morbidity and SI: Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and calendar year; Model 2 adjusted for factors in Model 1 and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) Risk Score of Infections; and Model 3 adjusted for factors in Model 1 and the Mayo SI Risk Score.

RESULTS

911 patients (70 % female, mean age 56 years, 66 % seropositive) were included. There were 293 SI among 155 patients (17 %), corresponding to an incidence of 3.9 SI per 100 person-years. Eighteen SI were fatal. Risk of SI was significantly increased in 27 of 55 morbidities in Model 1, 11 morbidities in Model 2, and 23 morbidities in Model 3. Additionally, several morbidities included in the RABBIT and Mayo risk scores continued to have large effect sizes despite adjustment. Serious infection risk increased by 11-16 % per morbidity in the three models.

CONCLUSIONS

Several morbidities are associated with an increased risk for SI. Future risk scores may include morbidities identified in this study for improved SI risk assessment.

Predictors of serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis-a prospective Brazilian cohort

BACKGROUND

Infections increase mortality and morbidity and often limit immunosuppressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the occurrence of serious infections and the associated factors in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients under real-life conditions.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the REAL, a prospective observational study, that evaluated Brazilian RA patients, with clinical and laboratory data collected over a year. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed from the adjustment of the logistic regression model Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE), with the primary outcome being the occurrence of serious infection, defined as need for hospitalization or use of intravenous antibiotics for its treatment.

RESULTS

841 patients were included with an average follow-up time of 11.2 months (SD 2.4). Eighty-nine serious infections occurred, corresponding to 13 infections per 100 patient-years. Pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and central nervous system disease increased the chances of serious infection by 3.2 times (95% CI: 1.5-6.9), 3.6 times (95% CI: 1.2-10.4) and 2.4 times (95% CI: 1.2-5.0), respectively. The use of corticosteroids in moderate doses increased the chances by 5.4 times (95% CI: 2.3-12.4), and for each increase of 1 unit in the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), the chance increased 60% (95% CI: 20-120%).

CONCLUSION

The use of corticosteroids at moderate doses increased the risk of serious infection in RA patients. Reduced functionality assessed by the HAQ and comorbidities were other important factors associated with serious infection in this cohort.

Influence of Janus kinase inhibitors on early postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing orthopaedic surgeries

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively reviewed the records of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery to examine the influence of the perioperative use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors on early postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with RA under disease control with JAK inhibitors who underwent 49 orthopaedic procedures were included in the study. Patient records after surgery were investigated for surgical site infection (SSI), delayed wound healing (DWH), a flare-up of the disease, preoperative and postoperative absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), venous thromboembolism, and other postoperative complications.

RESULTS

JAK inhibitors were continued during the perioperative period in 31 procedures. In the remaining 18 procedures, JAK inhibitors were discontinued perioperatively with a mean discontinuation period of 2.4 days. No instances of SSI were identified in any patient during at least 90 days' follow-up, while DWH was seen in one patient. Disease flare-up was noted in two patients after 3 and 9 days of discontinuation of JAK inhibitors, respectively. The ALCs significantly decreased on postoperative Day 1 (P < .0001), and there was a significant correlation between pre- and post-one-day ALCs (r = 0.75, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

JAK inhibitors seem to be safe during the perioperative period of orthopaedic surgery.

Clinical course of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) has not been well established. In this study, we investigated the clinical course of NTM-PD in patients with RA and the impact of RA on the prognosis of NTM-PD.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who developed NTM-PD after being diagnosed with RA from January 2004 to August 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. The patient's baseline characteristics, clinical course, and prognosis were evaluated. An optimal matching analysis was performed to measure the impact of RA on the risk of mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, 18 patients with RA [median age, 68 years; interquartile range (IQR) 59-73; female, 88.9%] developed NTM-PD. The median interval between RA diagnosis and subsequent NTM-PD development was 14.8 years (IQR, 8.6-19.5). At a median of 30 months (IQR, 27-105) after NTM-PD diagnosis, 10 of 18 (55.6%) patients received anti-mycobacterial treatment for NTM-PD and 5 (50.0%) patients achieved microbiological cure. When matched to patients with NTM-PD but without RA, patients with both RA and NTM-PD had a higher risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 8.14; 95% confidence interval, 2.43-27.2).

CONCLUSION

NTM-PD occurring after RA is associated with a higher risk of mortality than NTM-PD in the absence of RA.

Elevated genetic risk for multiple sclerosis emerged in steppe pastoralist populations

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuro-inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that is most prevalent in Northern Europe. Although it is known that inherited risk for MS is located within or in close proximity to immune-related genes, it is unknown when, where and how this genetic risk originated1. Here, by using a large ancient genome dataset from the Mesolithic period to the Bronze Age2, along with new Medieval and post-Medieval genomes, we show that the genetic risk for MS rose among pastoralists from the Pontic steppe and was brought into Europe by the Yamnaya-related migration approximately 5,000 years ago. We further show that these MS-associated immunogenetic variants underwent positive selection both within the steppe population and later in Europe, probably driven by pathogenic challenges coinciding with changes in diet, lifestyle and population density. This study highlights the critical importance of the Neolithic period and Bronze Age as determinants of modern immune responses and their subsequent effect on the risk of developing MS in a changing environment.

Evaluation of Depression and Anxiety in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, associated comorbidities, and therapy-related side effects impair the physical, social, and emotional dimensions of the patient's health. Presently, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a broad range of psychosocial disorders in various populations. Patients with RA are especially vulnerable to such effects.

Objectives

Detect the prevalence of recent COVID-19 infection among patients with RA, assess depression and anxiety in these patients and their associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic and their potential relation to disease activity.

Design and Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted on 120 adult Egyptian patients diagnosed with RA during the COVID-19 pandemic. The prevalence of recent COVID-19 infection among the patients was evaluated. The patients underwent psychological assessment using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A) to measure levels of depression and anxiety levels. The RA disease activity was assessed using Disease Activity Score (DAS) Das-28-ESR.

Results

This study encompasses a total of 120 RA patients. The prevalence of patients with a recent history of COVID-19 infection was 40.8%. Both groups exhibited significantly elevated mean scores on the Das-28-ESR scale and also scored higher on measures of depression and anxiety. Interestingly, the COVID-19 group exhibited a higher percentage of unmarried individuals, had educational attainment below the university level, and were unemployed. Patients with recent COVID-19 had significantly lower numbers of children, higher disease duration, higher Das-28-ESR scores, and elevated depression and anxiety scores. The statistical analysis revealed that the COVID-19 infection and disease duration were significant predictors of depression and anxiety. The results also exhibited that the depression score was positively correlated with age and DAS scores.

Conclusions

It was observed that patients diagnosed with RA revealed a higher prevalence of COVID-19 infection. The occurrence of depression and anxiety was observed to be widespread among patients diagnosed with RA and, more significantly, prevalent in RA patients who had a recent COVID-19 and had a higher level of disease activity. The occurrence of COVID-19 and disease duration were identified as factors that can anticipate the development of depression and anxiety.

Recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To present recommendations based on the available evidence and the consensus of experts, for risk management of biological treatment and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the purpose of the document were identified. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome or outcome) by a panel of experts, selected based on their experience in the area. A systematic review of the evidence was carried out, grading according to the GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Specific recommendations were then formulated.

RESULTS

6 PICO questions were proposed by the panel of experts based on their clinical relevance and the existence of recent information regarding the risk of occurrence of serious infections, the risk of reactivation of the hepatitis B virus, the risk of reactivation of the virus varicella-zoster, the risk of appearance of skin (melanoma and non-melanoma) or haematological cancer, the risk of appearance of thromboembolic disease and the risk of progression of the human papilloma virus. A total of 28 recommendations were formulated, structured by question, based on the evidence found and the consensus of the experts.

CONCLUSIONS

The SER recommendations on risk management of treatment with biologic therapies and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are presented.

Risk of severe infections after the introduction of biologic DMARDs in people with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of the introduction of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on severe infections among people newly diagnosed with RA compared with non-RA individuals.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative data (from 1990-2015) for British Columbia, Canada, all incident RA patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2007 were identified. General population controls with no inflammatory arthritis were matched to RA patients based on age and gender, and were assigned the diagnosis date (i.e. index date) of the RA patients they were matched with. RA/controls were then divided into quarterly cohorts according to their index dates. The outcome of interest was all severe infections necessitating hospitalization or occurring during hospitalization after the index date. We calculated 8-year severe infection rates for each cohort and conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare severe infection trends in RA/controls with index date during pre-bDMARDs (1995-2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003-2007) periods.

RESULTS

A total of 60 226 and 588 499 incident RA/controls were identified. We identified 14 245 severe infections in RA, and 79 819 severe infections in controls. The 8-year severe infection rates decreased among RA/controls with increasing calendar year of index date in the pre-bDMARDs period, but increased over time only among RA, not controls, with index date in the post-bDMARDs period. The adjusted difference between the pre- and post-bDMARDs secular trends in 8-year severe infection rates was 1.85 (P = 0.001) in RA and 0.12 (P = 0.29) in non-RA.

CONCLUSION

RA onset after bDMARDs introduction was associated with an elevated severe infection risk in RA patients compared with matched non-RA individuals.

Effect of treatment regimen of the rheumatoid arthritis patients on the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 by modulating the inflammatory mediators

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic profile of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly consists of immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory compounds. Here in this research, we assessed the potential effect of drug treatment in the RA patients in increasing the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 200 subjects with RA were recruited. The treatment profile of the subjects for the past 6 months was collected. The COVID-19 diagnosis was implemented based on the standard molecular tests and clinical examinations. Serum concentration of cytokines was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

It was detected that there was an increased risk of COVID-19 in RA subjects receiving Etanercept (OR = 3.51, 95% CI 1.19-10.30, P = 0.022). Concentrations of Interleukin (IL)-1β, Interferon (IFN)-γ, Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-23 were significantly higher in the RA patients with COVID-19 relative to RA cases without COVID-19. In RA/COVID-19 cases receiving Etanercept, serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were significantly lower than RA/COVID-19 subjects without Etanercept therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that Etanercept therapy in RA cases might increase proneness of the COVID-19 risk in these cases. The mechanism of this increased risk may stem from suppressing a protective immunity state in the RA cases.

Time-varying risks of infection in patients as they proceed through the phases of 'pre-RA': results from the Scottish Early RA inception cohort

ObjectiveRheumatoid arthritis (RA) develops after progressing through sequential 'pre-RA' phases. The mechanisms driving progression from one phase to the next remain poorly understood. This study examined the longitudinal rates of community and hospital infections in patients during sequential stages of pre-RA and early arthritis.

METHODS

The Scottish Early RA inception cohort recruited patients with newly diagnosed RA. Incidences of infection were determined from community antibiotic prescriptions and serious infections were determined by hospital discharge coding. Dates of diagnosis and symptom onset allowed identification of asymptomatic/symptomatic pre-RA and early arthritis eras to analyse infection rates over time compared with age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

The incidence rate ratio (IRR) seen in the period 0-6 months prior to symptom onset was 1.28 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.42). In 'symptomatic pre-RA', the IRR was 1.33 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.49) which persisted into 'early arthritis'. The rate of hospital admissions was numerically greater in 'pre-RA' and significantly greater in 'early arthritis' (IRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic risk is increased in patients with 'pre-RA' at least 6 months before symptoms develop, and this persists throughout the symptomatic pre-RA phase. Infections may be important in the mechanisms that drive progression to RA or be a manifestation of immune dysfunction (or both). These observations could inform safety and efficacy considerations for interventions in pre-RA to prevent progression. Patients with 'pre-RA' with recurrent antibiotic use may also be an identifiable 'high risk' group that could enrich the study population for intervention studies in pre-RA.

Associations between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Various Comorbid Conditions in Germany-A Retrospective Cohort Study

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of physical and mental health comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, in order to better understand the complex clinical picture and its consequences.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was based on data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and included individuals aged ≥ 16 years with an initial documented diagnosis of RA between 2015 and 2021 (index date). RA patients were matched 1:1 with non-RA individuals using nearest neighbor propensity score matching. The study investigated associations between RA and various disorders documented within 365 days after the index date. The cumulative incidence of defined disorders was calculated for individuals with and without RA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to study these associations.

RESULTS

Data were available for a total of 49,713 patients with and 49,713 patients without RA (mean age: 60.4 (SD: 15.5) years; 66.7% female). A significant and clinically relevant positive association was observed between RA and seven disorders: soft tissue disorders (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.42-1.52), renal failure (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.26-1.47), anemia (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.24-1.40), liver diseases (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.23-1.41), osteopathies and chondropathies (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.22-1.3), diseases of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), and nutritional deficiencies (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed significant associations between RA and several comorbidities, which have clinical relevance for the care of RA patients not only in general practices but also in specialist settings.

Effect of Immunosuppressive or Immunomodulatory Agents on Severe COVID-19 Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We estimated the association between immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agent (IIA) exposure and severe COVID-19 outcomes in a population-based cohort study.

METHODS

Participants were 18 years or older, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February 6, 2020, and August 15, 2021, and were from administrative health data for the entire province of British Columbia, Canada. IIA use within 3 months prior to positive SARS-CoV-2 test included conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (antimalarials, methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, individually), immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolate sodium [MMF], cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, individually and collectively), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, collectively), non-TNFi biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) (rituximab separately from abatacept, anakinra, secukinumab, tocilizumab, tofacitinib and ustekinumab collectively), and glucocorticoids. Severe COVID-19 outcomes were hospitalizations for COVID-19, ICU admissions, and deaths within 60 days of a positive test. Exposure score-overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics of participants with IIA use compared with nonuse of that IIA. Logistic regression measured the association between IIA use and severe COVID-19 outcomes.

RESULTS

From 147,301 participants, we identified 515 antimalarial, 573 methotrexate, 72 leflunomide, 180 sulfasalazine, 468 immunosuppressant, 378 TNFi biologic, 49 rituximab, 144 other non-TNFi biologic or tsDMARD, and 1348 glucocorticoid prescriptions. Risk of hospitalizations for COVID-19 was significantly greater for MMF (odds ratio [95% CI]): 2.82 [1.81-4.40], all immunosuppressants: 2.08 [1.51-2.87], and glucocorticoids: 1.63 [1.36-1.96], relative to nonuse. Similar outcomes were seen for ICU admission and MMF: 2.52 [1.34-4.74], immunosuppressants: 2.88 [1.73-4.78], and glucocorticoids: 1.86 [1.37-2.54]. Only glucocorticoids use was associated with a significant increase in 60-day mortality: 1.58 [1.21-2.06]. No other IIAs displayed statistically significant associations with severe COVID-19 outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current use of MMF and glucocorticoids were associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with nonuse. These results emphasize the variety of circumstances of patients taking IIAs.

Glucocorticoid exposure and the risk of serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis: a marginal structural model application

OBJECTIVE

Observational studies have reported an increased risk of infections associated with glucocorticoids in RA, not supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials. Inappropriately accommodating time-varying exposure and confounding in observational studies might explain the conflicting results. Therefore, we compared the incidence of serious infections between different oral glucocorticoid dose patterns over three years in a prospective inception cohort, adjusting for time-varying confounders in marginal structural models.

METHODS

We included 9654 newly diagnosed RA patients from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register between 2007-2018 and followed them for three years after the first rheumatology visit. Follow-up was divided into 90-day periods. A mean oral prednisone daily dose was calculated for each period and categorized into 'no use', 'low' (≤10 mg/day) and 'high' (>10 mg/day) doses. The incidence of serious infections (hospitalization for infection) over follow-up periods was modelled by pooled logistic regression allowing separate effects for recent and past exposure.

RESULTS

An increased incidence of serious infections was associated with higher compared with lower doses and with more recent compared with past glucocorticoid exposure. Over 3 years of follow-up, the marginal structural models predicted one additional serious infection for every 83 individuals treated with low GC doses for the first 6 months, and for every 125 individuals treated with high GC doses for the first 3 months, compared with no GC use.

CONCLUSION

Our results broadly agree with previous observational studies showing a dose dependent increased risk of infection associated with (recent) use of oral glucocorticoids.

Association between glucocorticoid discontinuation and incidence of infection in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective cohort study

AIM

Old age and glucocorticoid (GC) use increase the susceptibility to infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Accordingly, we investigated whether GC discontinuation reduces the incidence of infection in older adults with RA and analyzed factors associated with GC discontinuation.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with RA aged ≥60 years were retrieved, and the association between GC use and the incidence of infection was investigated. The participants were divided into three groups: GC-continued, GC-discontinued, and non-GC; the incidence of infection was statistically analyzed. Furthermore, patient treatments and comorbidities were examined.

RESULTS

Among 389 patients with RA included in the study (n = 122, n = 126, and n = 141 in the GC-discontinued, GC-continued, and non-GC groups, respectively), 65 (16.7%) patients developed infection, and the incidence of infection was significantly higher in the GC-continued group than in the GC-discontinued (p = .021) and non-GC (p = .0003) groups; there was no significant difference between the non-GC and GC-discontinued groups (p = .659). The GC-discontinued group was more likely to require biologic use throughout the disease course than the other two groups. Comorbidities, especially malignancies (p = .004), were more common in the GC-continued group than in the GC-discontinued group (p = .007).

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA aged ≥60 years receiving GCs, GC discontinuation reduced the incidence of infection. Therefore, a further analysis of factors that help reduce GC use is necessary.

Infections in Biological and Targeted Synthetic Drug Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Where do We Stand? A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The advent of biological and targeted synthetic therapies has revolutionized rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. However, this has come at the price of an increased risk of infections. The aim of this study was to present an integrated overview of both serious and non-serious infections, and to identify potential predictors of infection risk in RA patients using biological or targeted synthetic drugs.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed available literature from PubMed and Cochrane and performed multivariate meta-analysis with meta-regression on the reported infections. Randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective observational studies including patient registry studies were analyzed, combined as well as separately. We excluded studies focusing on viral infections only.

RESULTS

Infections were not reported in a standardized manner. Meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity that persisted after forming subgroups by study design and follow-up duration. Overall, the pooled proportions of patients experiencing an infection during a study were 0.30 (95% CI, 0.28-0.33) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.028-0.035) for any kind of infections or serious infections only, respectively. We found no potential predictors that were consistent across all study subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The high heterogeneity and the inconsistency of potential predictors between studies show that we do not yet have a complete picture of infection risk in RA patients using biological or targeted synthetic drugs. Besides, we found non-serious infections outnumbered serious infections by a factor 10:1, but only a few studies have focused on their occurrence. Future studies should apply a uniform method of infectious adverse event reporting and also focus on non-serious infections and their impact on treatment decisions and quality of life.

Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Multiple Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors were developed as potential treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). There is a substantial amount of safety data from recent trials of oral JAK inhibitors in patients with AD. However, the vast majority of safety data for oral JAK inhibitors is derived from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated disorders, and is primarily derived from tofacitinib, a pan-selective JAK inhibitor. This narrative review examines safety data for oral JAK inhibitors from studies in AD and other indications. The available data do demonstrate that rare but serious and life-threatening adverse events can occur with oral JAK inhibitor treatment and should be carefully considered in therapeutic shared decision making.

The Emerging Safety Profile of JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatic Diseases

Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) medications are small-molecule drugs that affect intracellular signal transduction. They are highly effective oral medications that have been approved for the treatment of various rheumatic diseases, with rheumatoid arthritis being a key example of an autoimmune rheumatic disease. JAKi are oral-route medications that are alternatives to injectable biologic therapies, launched in the late 1990s. While most safety concerns with JAKi are similar to the biologics, there are many differences. New data on comparative safety of JAKi versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were recently published that led to new black box warnings by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about cardiovascular and cancer risks and a label change for JAKi. This review summarizes the current published data with regards to the safety of JAKi, focused on rheumatic diseases. Specifically, any risk differences between agents or across different indications are discussed, as well as the risk factors for these adverse outcomes.

Vaccines - beliefs and concerns: the voice of patients with inflammatory immunomediated diseases

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is a key issue in patients with immunomodulated inflammatory diseases on immune-mediated therapy. Still, vaccination rates in these patients are low. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and fears of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) regarding vaccines, with the ultimate goal of increasing vaccination rates through the definition and implementation of more effective communication strategies with the patient.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a Portuguese hospital, between January 2019-December 2020, and included adult patients with an IMID. A questionnaire was developed and applied to evaluate knowledge and fears regarding vaccines.

RESULTS

From the 275 included patients, more than 90% answered correctly to all questions on general knowledge, with an exception for the question related to protection from severe disease, without differences between age groups or education levels, except for the question about vaccine contraindications (P = 0.017). Regarding vaccines in immunocompromised hosts, the proportion of correct answers was lower and significantly different between education levels (P = 0.00-0.042),. More than 50% of the participants showed moderate to very high concern about several aspects of vaccines, with differences between age groups (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Our patients have general knowledge of vaccines but regarding vaccines in immunocompromised patients knowledge is lower and dependent on the education level. In addition, age influences the pattern of concerns related to vaccines. The information gathered in this study shall be considered to identify potential local interventions targeted to improve vaccination.

Zoonotic Transmission of Vaccine-Derived Bordetella bronchiseptica

We describe a unique case of a 43-year-old-female with a Bordetella bronchiseptica infection caused by zoonotic transmission following vaccination of her dog. With this report, we want to raise awareness of potential zoonotic transmission of live attenuated vaccines from animals to patients with impaired immunity.

JAK-inhibitors and risk on serious viral infection, venous thromboembolism and cardiac events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A protocol for a prevalent new-user cohort study using the Danish nationwide DANBIO register

Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and represent an important alternative to treat patients with moderate to high rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. Safety concerns associated with increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious viral infection, and, more recently, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in JAKi users have emerged worldwide. However, as the exact mechanisms to explain these safety concerns remain unclear, the increased risk of VTE, MACE, and serious viral infection in JAKi users is heavily debated. In light of the need to enrich the safety profile of JAKis in real-world data, we aim to quantify the incidence and risk of MACE, VTE, and serious viral infections in RA patients registered in the Danish DANBIO registry, a nationwide registry of biological therapies used in rheumatology. Therefore, we will conduct a population-based cohort study using a prevalent new-user design. We will identify all RA patients in the DANBIO, ≥ 18 years old, receiving a JAKi or a tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNF-αi) from January 2017 to December 2022. Prevalent and new users of JAKis will be matched to TNF-αi comparators with similar exposure history using time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS). We will describe the cumulative incidence of the outcomes (VTE, MACE, serious viral infection) in each exposure group (JAKi users; TNF-αi users), stratified by outcome type. Additionally, the Aalen-Johansen method will be used to estimate the time-to-event survival function stratified by outcome type. We will also estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of each outcome in both exposure groups using the time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. Results will enrich the safety profile of JAKis in real-world data.

Comparative risk of infections between JAK inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

To compare infectious risk between JAK inhibitors (JAKis) versus TNF inhibitors (TNFis) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Korea.

METHODS

Using 2009-2019 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a cohort study on RA patients initiating a JAKi or TNFi. The primary outcomes were herpes zoster (HZ), serious bacterial (SBI), and opportunistic infections (OI). Propensity-score fine-stratification (PSS) and weighting were applied to adjust for > 70 baseline covariates. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models comparing JAKi versus TNFi users.

RESULTS

We included 2963 JAKi initiators PSS-weighted on 5169 TNFi initiators. During a follow-up of 1.16 years, the most frequent type of infections was HZ with incidence rate (IR) per 100 person-years of 11.54 and 4.88 in JAKi and TNFi users, respectively. The IR of SBI was 1.39 and 1.32, respectively. The OI was rare with a majority being tuberculosis and showed an IR of 0.11 and 0.49 in JAKi and TNFi users, respectively. The PSS-weighted HR (95% CI) for individual types of infections was 2.37 (2.00-2.80) for HZ, 1.04 (0.71-1.52) for SBI, and 0.25 (0.09-0.73) for OI.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study on RA patients treated with JAKi or TNFi in Korea showed an exceptionally high IR of HZ in both treatment groups compared to that from Western countries, with an approximately doubled risk associated with JAKi versus TNFi use. The risk of SBI was comparable, but the risk of OI, particularly tuberculosis, was less among JAKi than TNFi initiators.

Occurrence and outcome of COVID-19 in AIRD patients on concomitant treatment with Tofacitinib- results from KRA COVID COHORT (KRACC) subset

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the risk factors and outcome of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases(AIRD) who contracted infection while on background treatment with tofacitinib.

METHODS

This is a non-interventional, cross-sectional, questionnaire based telephonic study which included consecutive AIRD patients on tofacitinib co-treatment. Data related to the AIRD subset, disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs(DMARDs) including glucocorticoids and comorbidities, was collected from 7 rheumatology centers across Karnataka during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic. The information about COVID-19 occurrence and COVID-19 vaccination was recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period (Jun-July 2021), 335 AIRD patients (80.6% female) on treatment with tofacitinib were included. The mean duration of tofacitinib use was 3.4+/-3.1months. Thirty-six(10.75%) patients developed COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04 (OR 2.60 (1.13-5.99)) was identified as a risk factor for COVID-19 in our cohort. Almost half of our cohort was COVID-19 vaccinated with at least one dose, with resultant decline in incidence of COVID-19(OR 0.15 (0.06-0.39) among the vaccinated. Recovery amongst COVID-19 infection group was 91.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The subset of AIRD patients who were on treatment with tofacitinib were found to have a higher rate of COVID-19 infection as compared to our KRACC cohort. Pre-existing comorbidity of diabetes mellitus was the significant risk factor in our cohort. This subset of the KRACC cohort shows RA patients had a lesser infection and PsA patients had a higher infection.

Trends in severe outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalized patients with rheumatic diseases: a monocentric observational and case-control study in northern Italy

Rheumatic disease patients are at greater risk of infection due to their disease, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive therapy. COVID-19 outcomes in this patient setting appeared to be similar to those of the general population. However, data on this topic were mainly related to small studies on a limited number of patients. Consequently, to date, this field remains poorly explored, particularly in the pre-vaccine era. This monocentric study aimed to describe the intrahospital mortality in rheumatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 consecutively hospitalized from 21 February to 31 December 2020, before anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration spread, compared with non-rheumatic patients. Of 2491 included patients, 65 [3%, median (interquartile range) age 75 (64.76-82.239 years, 65% women] were suffering from rheumatic diseases. A total of 20 deaths were reported [case fatality rate 31%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 19-42] compared with 433 deaths (19%, 95% CI: 17-20) in patients without rheumatic diseases (p=0.024). However, the rheumatic disease was not associated with a significant increase in univariate mortality hazards (hazard ratio 1.374, 95% CI: 0.876-2.154), and after adjustment (hazard ratio 1.199, 95% CI: 0.759-1.894) by age, sex and Charlson comorbidity index. The incidence of intensive care unit admission, death, and discharge in the case-control study was comparable between rheumatic and non-rheumatic patients. The presence of rheumatic diseases in SARS-CoV-2-hospitalized patients did not represent an independent risk factor for severe disease or mortality.