Avelumab plus standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Lymphatic-preserving treatment sequencing with immune checkpoint inhibition unleashes cDC1-dependent antitumor immunity in HNSCC

Despite the promise of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), therapeutic responses remain limited. This raises the possibility that standard of care treatments delivered in concert may compromise the tumor response. To address this, we employ tobacco-signature head and neck squamous cell carcinoma murine models in which we map tumor-draining lymphatics and develop models for regional lymphablation with surgery or radiation. We find that lymphablation eliminates the tumor ICI response, worsening overall survival and repolarizing the tumor- and peripheral-immune compartments. Mechanistically, within tumor-draining lymphatics, we observe an upregulation of conventional type I dendritic cells and type I interferon signaling and show that both are necessary for the ICI response and lost with lymphablation. Ultimately, we provide a mechanistic understanding of how standard oncologic therapies targeting regional lymphatics impact the tumor response to immune-oncology therapy in order to define rational, lymphatic-preserving treatment sequences that mobilize systemic antitumor immunity, achieve optimal tumor responses, control regional metastatic disease, and confer durable antitumor immunity.

Risk of Rash in PD-1 or PD-L1-Related Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Given that immune-related rash was the most frequently reported PD-1 or PD-L1-related skin toxicity, this systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to elucidate its incidence risk.

Methods

The meta-analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. The random effect model was used in the process of all analyses. Skin rash of all grades and grades 3–5 were calculated and gathered in the final comprehensive analyses.

Results

The study included 86 clinical trials classified into 15 groups. Compared with chemotherapy, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors significantly strengthened the risk of developing rash across all grades (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: [1.31, 2.11]; p < 0.0001). This trend was significantly stronger when the control group was placebo (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: [1.88, 3.65]; p < 0.00001). Similar results were observed when PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were given together with chemotherapy (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: [1.59, 2.20]; p < 0.00001), even in patients with grades 3–5. As with other combination therapies, the risk of developing rash for all grades was enhanced when PD-1 or PD-L1 was given together with chemotherapy as the second-line option (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: [1.87, 4.75]; p=0.05). No statistically significant differences could be found in skin rash between the PD-1 and PD-L1-related subgroups.

Conclusion

Whether PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were given alone or together with others, the risk of developing rash would be enhanced. Furthermore, the risk of developing rash appeared to be higher when PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors together with other antitumor drugs were given as the second-line options. No statistically significant results of developing rash between PD-1 and PD-L1 subgroups were obtained owing to the participation of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors.

Experimental investigation of skin toxicity after immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with radiation therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy. However, structured knowledge to mitigate a patient's specific risk of developing adverse events are limited. Nevertheless, there is an exponential growth of clinical studies combining conventional therapies such as radiation therapy (RT) with ICIs. Cutaneous reactions are amongst the most common adverse events after monotherapy with either ICIs or RT. So far, little is known about inter-individual differences in the risk of developing severe tissue toxicity after the combination of RT with ICIs, and the underlying biological mechanisms are ill defined. We used experimental models of RT-induced skin injury to analyze skin toxicity after simultaneous application of ICIs. We compared different RT regimens such as fractionated or stereotactic RT with varying dose intensity. Strikingly, we found that simultaneous application of RT and ICIs did not significantly aggravate acute skin injury in two different mouse strains. Detailed examination of long-term tissue damage of the skin revealed similar signs of epidermal hyperplasia, dermal fibrosis, and adnexal atrophy. In summary, we here present the first experimental study demonstrating excellent safety profiles of concurrent treatment with RT and ICIs. These findings will help to interpret the development of adverse events of the skin after radioimmunotherapy and guide the design of new clinical trials and clinical decision making in individual cases. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Monomethyl auristatin antibody and peptide drug conjugates for trimodal cancer chemo-radio-immunotherapy

Locally advanced cancers remain therapeutically challenging to eradicate. The most successful treatments continue to combine decades old non-targeted chemotherapies with radiotherapy that unfortunately increase normal tissue damage in the irradiated field and have systemic toxicities precluding further treatment intensification. Therefore, alternative molecularly guided systemic therapies are needed to improve patient outcomes when applied with radiotherapy. In this work, we report a trimodal precision cytotoxic chemo-radio-immunotherapy paradigm using spatially targeted auristatin warheads. Tumor-directed antibodies and peptides conjugated to radiosensitizing monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) specifically produce CD8 T cell dependent durable tumor control of irradiated tumors and immunologic memory. In combination with ionizing radiation, MMAE sculpts the tumor immune infiltrate to potentiate immune checkpoint inhibition. Here, we report therapeutic synergies of targeted cytotoxic auristatin radiosensitization to stimulate anti-tumor immune responses providing a rationale for clinical translational of auristatin antibody drug conjugates with radio-immunotherapy combinations to improve tumor control.

A Pilot Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) with Tremelimumab in Combination with Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

Background: Metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) has a poor prognosis. This pilot study aims to evaluate tremelimumab plus durvalumab with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to improve overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligible patients received up to 4 doses tremelimumab (75 mg) given q4 weeks and up to 1 year of durvalumab (1500 mg) given q4 weeks. SBRT at 9 Gy × 3 fractions was given within the first 2 weeks of the start of treatment. Paired biopsies (pretreatment and between 3 and 10 weeks after the first dose of the drug treatment) were done in the medically qualified patients. Major inclusion criteria are metastatic ATC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, no prior immunotherapy, and last anticancer treatment >7 days before starting the study. The primary endpoint was 1 year OS with the combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and SBRT in metastatic ATC patients with a target of 1 year OS in ≥2 out of 12 patients. Results: A total of 13 patients signed consent but only 12 patients ultimately participated in this trial. One patient who consented to the protocol became ineligible for this study due to continued decline in performance status. Patient characteristics were as follows: male (n = 6) with a median age of 71 years (range: 49-82), and ECOG = 1. Nine patients had prior neck radiation and nine patients had prior chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 staining were done in the nine patients where tissue was available. High microsatellite instability (MSI) corresponding to mismatch repair defect was noted in two patients. There were zero confirmed responses and only one patient had stable disease and was treated with ≥4 cycles of study drugs. The median time that the patients were under treatment was 11 weeks (1-28 weeks). MSI status did not affect treatment response. High MSI patients were on treatment for 8-14 weeks before disease progression. The median OS was 14.5 weeks with only 1 patient alive beyond 1 year. The presence of a BRAF or p53 mutation did not appear to affect treatment outcome. Conclusions: Tremelimumab and durvalumab with SBRT did not improve OS for ATC. Future research is needed to examine other novel immunotherapy combinations with or without radiotherapy in the treatment of ATC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03122496.

Imaging approaches and radiomics: toward a new era of ultraprecision radioimmunotherapy?

Strong rationale and a growing number of preclinical and clinical studies support combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes. However, several critical questions remain, such as the identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy and the identification of the best modalities of treatment to optimize patient response. Imaging biomarkers and radiomics have recently emerged as promising tools for the non-invasive assessment of the whole disease of the patient, allowing comprehensive analysis of the tumor microenvironment, the spatial heterogeneity of the disease and its temporal changes. This review presents the potential applications of medical imaging and the challenges to address, in order to help clinicians choose the optimal modalities of both radiotherapy and immunotherapy, to predict patient's outcomes and to assess response to these promising combinations.

Practice changing data and emerging concepts from recent radiation therapy randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Oncology treatments are constantly and rapidly evolving. We aimed at highlighting the latest radiation therapy practice changing trials and emerging concepts, through an overview of recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Requests were performed in the Medline database to identify all publications reporting radiation therapy RCTs from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

Recent RCTs sustained the role of newer combinatorial strategies through radioimmunotherapy for early stage or metastatic lung cancer, newer pro-apoptotic agents (e.g. debio 1143 in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) or nanoparticles (e.g. NBTXR3 in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma). High-tech radiotherapy allows intensifying treatments and gaining ground in some indications through the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy for example. First randomised evidence on personalised radiation therapy through imaging-based (¹⁸FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography for lung cancer or early stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma, PMSA positron emission tomography-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for high-risk prostate cancer) or biological biomarkers (PSA for prostate cancer, HPV for head and neck cancer, etc) were conducted to more tailored treatments, with more favourable outcomes. Patients' quality of life and satisfaction appeared to be increasing aims. RCTs have validated (ultra)hypofractionated schemes in many indications as for breast, prostate or rectal cancer, resulting in equivalent outcomes and toxicities, more convenient for patients and favouring shared decision making.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is a dynamic field of research, and many RCTs have greatly impacted therapeutic standards over the last years. Investments in radiotherapy research should facilitate the transfer of innovation to clinic.

Clinical evidence for synergy between immunotherapy and radiotherapy (SITAR)

Previous preclinical and clinical trials have shown promising antitumour activity and toxicity profile when employing the 'Synergy between Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy' (SITAR) strategy. Approximately, one in seven radiation therapy studies currently recruiting is investigating SITAR. This article reviews the range of cancers known to respond to immunotherapy and publications analysing SITAR. It sets the background for work that needs to be done in future clinical trials. It also reviews the potential toxicities of immunotherapy and discusses areas where caution is required when combining treatments.

Perspectives in Immunotherapy: meeting report from the Immunotherapy Bridge, December 1st-2nd, 2021

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has become an increasingly fundamental modality in the treatment of cancer. The positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibition, especially anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade, in patients with different cancers has focused attention on the potential for other immunotherapeutic approaches. These include inhibitors of additional immune checkpoints, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and therapeutic vaccines. Patients with advanced cancers who previously had limited treatment options available may now benefit from immunotherapies that can offer durable responses and improved survival outcomes. However, despite this, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, especially those with less immunoresponsive cancer types, and there remains a need for new treatment strategies.The virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 1st-2nd, 2021), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer addressed several areas of current research in immunotherapy, including lessons learned from cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy across different cancers, and these are summarised here.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review of phase-3 clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who are not candidates for local salvage therapy and of those diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic disease are dismal. A relatively new systemic therapy option that emerged in recent years in the treatment of advanced HNSCC is immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety profile and anti-tumor activity of these agents demonstrated in early phase clinical trials paved the way to the initiation of several promising phase-3 trials in the field.

AIM

To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of ICIs in HNSCC, based on published phase-3 clinical trials.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus to identify published literature evaluating immunotherapy using ICIs in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC) and locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We used a combination of standardized search terms and keywords including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent, metastatic, locally advanced, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and phase-3 clinical trial. A sensitive search filter was used to limit our results to randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Five phase-3 clinical trials have reported the data on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HNSCC so far: Four in R/M HNSCC and one in LAHNSCC. In patients with R/M HNSCC, anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated improved survival benefits in the second-line treatment setting compared to the standard of care (standard single-agent systemic therapy). While the net gain in overall survival (OS) with nivolumab was 2.4 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, P = 0.01], that with pembrolizumab was 1.5 mo (HR = 0.80 nominal P = 0.0161). The anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab with or without the anti-cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 agent tremelimumab did not result in any beneficial outcomes. In the first-line setting, in R/M HNSCC, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in significant improvement in survival with a net gain in OS of 2.3 mo (HR = 0.77, P = 0.0034) in the overall population and a net gain in OS of 4.2 mo in the PD-L1 positive (combined positive score > 20) population compared to standard of care (EXTREME regime). In patients with PD-L1 positive R/M HNSCC, monotherapy with pembrolizumab also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in survival compared to EXTREME. In LAHNSCC, immunotherapy using avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 agent) along with standard chemoradiation therapy did not result in improved outcomes compared to placebo plus chemoradiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 agents provide survival benefits in R/M HNSCC in the first and second-line settings, with acceptable toxicity profiles compared to standard therapy. There is no proven efficacy in the curative setting to date.

Historical Perspective: How the Discovery of HPV Virus Led to the Utilization of a Robot

The treatment of oropharyngeal cancer has undergone many paradigms shifts in recent decades. First considered a surgical disease, improvements in radiotherapy led to its popularization in the 1990s. Subsequently, the discovery of the human papillomavirus (HPV) in the pathogenesis of oropharyngeal cancer, as well as the increase in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer incidence, have prompted a reevaluation of its management. Its sensitivity to standard treatment with a favorable prognosis compared to non HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer led to a focus on minimizing treatment toxicity. Advances in radiation and surgical techniques, including the use of transoral robotic surgery, gave the rationale to ongoing de-escalation clinical trials in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer.

Xevinapant or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: TrilynX phase III study design

Xevinapant is a first-in-class antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, which enhances cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In a phase II randomized study in patients with unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN), xevinapant plus standard-of-care cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) showed superior efficacy versus placebo plus CRT. Here, we describe the design of TrilynX (NCT04459715), a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. In total, 700 patients with unresected LA SCCHN will be randomized 1:1 to receive xevinapant or placebo plus standard-of-care CRT followed by xevinapant monotherapy or placebo. The primary end point is event-free survival by blinded independent review committee. Secondary end points include progression-free survival, locoregional control, overall survival and safety.

Combined radio-immunotherapy: An opportunity to increase the therapeutic ratio of oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy

The utility of radiotherapy as a means of palliating symptoms due to metastatic cancer is well-accepted. A growing body of literature suggests that radiotherapy may play a role beyond palliation in some patients with low-burden metastatic disease. Recent data suggest that oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy may improve progression-free and even overall survival in select patients. Immunotherapy also has a growing role in the management of patients with metastatic cancer and, like radiotherapy, appears to be most effective in the setting of low-volume disease. Thus, the addition of immunotherapy may be a feasible means of increasing the therapeutic ratio of metastasis-directed radiotherapy, particularly among patients with oligometastatic cancer.

Correlation Between Early Time-to-Event Outcomes and Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Overall survival (OS) is the most patient-relevant outcome in oncology; however, in early cancers, large sample sizes and extended follow-up durations are needed to detect statistically significant differences in OS between interventions. Use of early time-to-event outcomes as surrogates for OS can help facilitate faster approval of cancer therapies. In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), event-free survival (EFS) was previously evaluated as a surrogate outcome (Michiels 2009) and demonstrated a strong correlation with OS. The current study aimed to further assess the correlation between EFS and OS in LA-HNSCC using an updated systematic literature review (SLR) focusing on patients receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT).

Methods

An SLR was conducted on May 27, 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials assessing radiotherapy alone or CRT in the target population. Studies assessing CRT and reporting hazard ratios (HRs) or Kaplan-Meier data for OS and EFS were eligible for the analysis. CRT included any systemic treatments administered concurrently or sequentially with radiation therapy. Trial-level EFS/OS correlations were assessed using regression models, and the relationship strength was measured with Pearson correlation coefficient (R). Correlations were assessed across all CRT trials and in trial subsets assessing concurrent CRT, sequential CRT, RT+cisplatin, targeted therapies and intensity-modulated RT. Subgroup analysis was conducted among trials with similar EFS definitions (i.e. EFS including disease progression and/or death as events) and longer length of follow-up (i.e.≥ 5 years).

Results

The SLR identified 149 trials of which 31 were included in the analysis. A strong correlation between EFS and OS was observed in the overall analysis of all CRT trials (R=0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.93). Similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analyses of trials assessing concurrent CRT (R=0.88), sequential CRT (R=0.83), RT+cisplatin (R=0.82), targeted therapies (R=0.83) and intensity-modulated RT (R=0.86), as well as in trials with similar EFS definitions (R=0.87), with longer follow-up (R=0.81).

Conclusion

EFS was strongly correlated with OS in this trial-level analysis. Future research using individual patient-level data can further investigate if EFS could be considered a suitable early clinical endpoint for evaluation of CRT regimens in LA-HNSCC patients receiving definitive CRT.

An Update on the Immunotherapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is an uncommon malignancy worldwide. Remarkably, the rising incidence of OPSCC has been observed in many developed countries over the past few decades. On top of tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has become a major etiologic factor for OPSCC. The radiotherapy-based or surgery-based systemic therapies are recommended equally as first-line treatment, while chemotherapy-based strategy is applied to advanced diseases. Immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is currently under the spotlight, especially for patients with advanced diseases. Numerous researches on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 checkpoint inhibitors have proven beneficial to patients with metastatic HNSCC. In 2016, nivolumab and pembrolizumab were approved as the second-line treatment for advanced metastatic HNSCC by the USA Food and Drug Administration. Soon after, in 2019, the USA Food and Drug Administration approved pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable, recurrent, and metastatic HNSCC. It has been reported that HPV-positive HNSCC patients were associated with increased programmed death-ligand 1 expression; however, whether HPV status indicates different treatment outcomes among HNSCC patients treated with immunotherapy has contradicted. Notably, HPV-positive OPSCC exhibits a significantly better clinical response to primary treatment (i.e., radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy) and a more desirable prognosis compared to the HPV-negative OPSCC. This review summarizes the current publications on immunotherapy in HNSCC/OPSCC patients and discusses the impact of HPV infection in immunotherapeutic efficacy, providing an update on the immune landscape and future perspectives in OPSCC.

Changes in Gene Expression Patterns in the Tumor Microenvironment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Under Chemoradiotherapy Depend on Response

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Unfortunately, not all patients respond to this therapy and require further treatment, either salvage surgery or palliative therapy. The addition of immunotherapy to CRT is currently being investigated and early results describe a mixed response. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact of CRT on the tumor microenvironment (TME) to be able to interpret the results of the clinical trials. Paired biopsies from 30 HNSCC patients were collected before and three months after completion of primary CRT and interrogated for the expression of 1392 immune- and cancer-related genes. There was a relevant difference in the number of differentially expressed genes between the total cohort and patients with residual disease. Genes involved in T cell activation showed significantly reduced expression in these tumors after therapy. Furthermore, gene enrichment for several T cell subsets confirmed this observation. The analysis of tissue resident memory T cells (T_RM) did not show a clear association with impaired response to therapy. CRT seems to lead to a loss of T cells in patients with incomplete response that needs to be reversed. It is not clear whether the addition of anti-PD-1 antibodies alone to CRT can prevent treatment failure, as no upregulation of the targets was measurable in the TME.

Introducing Checkpoint Inhibitors Into the Curative Setting of Head and Neck Cancers: Lessons Learned, Future Considerations

The emergence of immunotherapy, in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors, has irrevocably altered the paradigm of cancer treatment over the past decade. Multiple characteristics of the immune landscape in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma suggest a strong rationale for the use of immunotherapies in this disease. Data from studies with both single-agent immunotherapies and chemotherapy and immunotherapy combinations in patients with incurable, relapsed disease have confirmed the potential for immune checkpoint inhibitors to be translated into settings in which patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are treated with curative intent. Indeed, a number of single-arm and randomized studies, including trials of immunotherapy with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, have already been completed or are ongoing. In this review, we present promising data from studies in which immunotherapy has been used in conjunction with curative-intent surgery, both as neoadjuvant/induction treatment and as an adjuvant approach. In addition, we discuss the fact that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is, once again, allowing oncologists to revisit the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as part of definitive treatment regimens for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we address the increasing interest in exploiting synergistic interactions between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the context of radical radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy regimens. As a consequence of these new areas of research, we are optimistic that the next decade may see immunotherapy embedded within recommended standard-of-care curative regimens for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

A phase I/II trial of concurrent immunotherapy with chemoradiation in locally advanced larynx cancer

Objectives

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is an established organ-preserving strategy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer, but long-term survival remains suboptimal. Immunotherapy has been studied in the metastatic and unresectable recurrent settings. However, additional data are needed to assess its role in organ preservation for locally advanced laryngeal cancer.

Methods

This trial was an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional study with a Phase I run-in portion followed by a planned Phase II component, which closed early due to low accrual. Study patients had Stage III or IV (T2-3; N0-3; M0) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and were candidates for larynx preservation. Pembrolizumab was given 2-3 weeks prior to chemoradiation and then, q21 days concurrently with high-dose cisplatin and radiation prescribed to a total dose of 70 Gy. The primary endpoint of the trial was organ-preservation rate (OPR) at 18 months.

Results

A total of nine patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 30.1 months. No patient required laryngectomy, resulting in 100% OPR at 18 months. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 77.8% and the median duration of OS was not reached. All acute Grade 4 (n = 3) toxicities occurred in a single patient with poorly controlled diabetes at baseline. One patient had late Grade 4 laryngeal edema requiring tracheostomy 8 months after chemoradiation, which self-resolved.

Conclusion

UCCI-HN-15-02 demonstrated the safety of the addition of immunotherapy to definitive chemoradiation and the patient outcomes suggest the potential for improving long-term survival while minimizing negative impact from treatment. While results from this trial were promising, a randomized study with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up is warranted to verify this treatment approach prior to wider adoption. NCT #: NCT02759575.Level of evidence: 2b.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Local-Regionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with resected, local-regionally advanced, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a one-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 65%-69% despite adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant PD-1 immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated clinical activity, but biomarkers of response and effect on survival remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx, or oropharynx (p16-negative) and clinical stage T3-T4 and/or two or more nodal metastases or clinical extracapsular nodal extension (ENE). Patients received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg 1-3 weeks prior to surgery, were stratified by absence (intermediate-risk) or presence (high-risk) of positive margins and/or ENE, and received adjuvant radiotherapy (60-66 Gy) and concurrent pembrolizumab (every 3 weeks × 6 doses). Patients with high-risk HNSCC also received weekly, concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2). Primary outcome was one-year DFS. Secondary endpoints were one-year overall survival (OS) and pathologic response (PR). Safety was evaluated with CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

From February 2016 to October 2020, 92 patients enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 27-80), 30% were female, 86% had stage T3-T4, and 69% had ≥N2. At a median follow-up of 28 months, one-year DFS was 97% (95% CI, 71%-90%) in the intermediate-risk group and 66% (95% CI, 55%-84%) in the high-risk group. Patients with a PR had significantly improved one-year DFS relative to patients without response (93% vs. 72%, hazard ratio 0.29; 95% CI, 11%-77%). No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab increased one-year DFS rate in intermediate-risk, but not high-risk, HNSCC relative to historical control. PR to neoadjuvant ICB is a promising surrogate for DFS.

Phase I Trial of Cetuximab, Radiotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Concurrent radiotherapy with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR mAb, is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4-positive (CTLA-4+) regulatory T cells (Treg) dampen cellular immunity and correlate negatively with clinical outcomes. This phase I study added ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 mAb, to cetuximab-radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A (3 + 3) design was used to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ipilimumab, added at week 5 for four, every-3-week doses to fixed, standard cetuximab-radiotherapy. Eligible subjects had stage III to IVb, high-risk [human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-)] or intermediate-risk HPV-positive (HPV+)] HNSCC. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 adverse event (AE) except in-field radiation dermatitis or immune-related (ir) AE requiring ≥2 weeks of systemic steroids. Baseline tumor and serial blood specimens were collected for immune correlatives.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to May 2016, 18 patients enrolled. Two of 6 in cohort 1 (ipilimumab 3 mg/kg) experienced grade 3 dermatologic DLTs, triggering deescalation of ipilimumab to 1 mg/kg. Dose level -1 was expanded to N  =  12 without DLT. irAE included: grade 1, 2, and 3 dermatitis (2, 1, and 3 cases), grade 4 colitis (1), and grade 1 hyperthyroidism (1). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 72% [90% confidence interval (CI), 57-92] and 72% (90% CI, 56-92). High expression of coinhibitory receptors PD1/LAG3/CD39 on baseline tumor-infiltrating Treg was associated with worse DFS (HR = 5.6; 95% CI, 0.83-37.8; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D for ipilimumab plus standard cetuximab-radiotherapy is 1 mg/kg in weeks 5, 8, 11, and 14. The regimen is tolerable and yields acceptable survival without cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Chemo- immunotherapy and radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer: Where do we stand?

Immunotherapy represents an effective therapeutic option in the management of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, along with chemotherapy in metastatic disease or radiotherapy/re-irradiation for (locoregionally confined) recurrent disease. On the other hand, concomitant chemo-radiation remains the primary treatment modality in many patients with locally advanced disease. In spite of promising preclinical, it is difficult to clearly establish the role of immunotherapy in the upfront management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its integration with the standard of care. In this paper, we discuss/review the main results thus far available and outline some unanswered questions that might help design future clinical trials.

Advances in Organ Preservation for Laryngeal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

At the University of Wisconsin, all treatment of head and neck cancer patients begins with discussion at our multi-disciplinary tumor board. Most patients with T4 disease, with existing laryngeal dysfunction, considered unlikely to complete definitive CRT or who have a high risk of persistent aspiration after non-operative management undergo total laryngectomy. A laryngeal sparing approach is attempted on most other patients. Radiotherapy is delivered over 6.5 weeks, preferably with concurrent weekly cisplatin. If the patient is hesitant of chemotherapy or has contraindications to cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab may be offered. Patients treated with RT alone are often treated to the same dose, but via an accelerated schedule by adding a 6th fraction per week. The 6th fraction is given by delivering two treatments at least 6 h apart on a weekday of the patient's choosing. We consider the following to be major risk factors for clinically significant weight loss during treatment: a 10% or greater loss of weight in the 6 months prior to starting treatment, delivery of concurrent cisplatin, and treatment of the bilateral neck with radiation. Patients who have 2-3 of these characteristics are often given gastrostomy tubes prophylactically. Patients are seen 2 weeks after completion of therapy, and then every 3 months after completion for 2 years. A CT neck and PET-CT are performed at the first 3-month visit. They are seen twice in year three, and then yearly until years 5-7. At each of these visits, we have a low threshold to present the patient at our multidisciplinary tumor board for consideration of salvage laryngectomy if there are signs of progression.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Head and Neck Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has received global attention as a promising prognostic cancer biomarker that can aid in clinical decision making. Proof of their significance was first shown in breast cancer, where TILs are now recommended in the classification of breast tumors. Emerging evidence indicates that the significance of TILs extends to other cancer types, including head and neck cancer. In the era of immunotherapy as a treatment choice for head and neck cancer, assessment of TILs and immune checkpoints is of high clinical relevance. The availability of the standardized method from the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group (IIBWG) is an important cornerstone toward standardized assessment. The aim of the current article is to summarize the accumulated evidence and to establish a clear premise for future research toward the implementation of TILs in the personalized management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

[Highlights from the 2021 ASCO and ESMO annual meetings on radiotherapy of head and neck cancer]

At this year's annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), several studies on radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer were presented. For the indication of definitive radiochemotherapy, particularly the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors concomitant to radiotherapy was investigated. In the phase III GORTEC-REACH trial, combined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) concomitant to radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer was inferior to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. However, this therapeutic approach may be more efficient than radiotherapy with simultaneous EGFR inhibition alone. The concept of the phase II CheckRad-CD8 trial with induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy after appropriate patient selection also proved to be highly efficient. In initial phase II trials, dose de-escalation of radiotherapy seems feasible for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer after appropriate patient selection both postoperatively (ECOG-ACRIN E3311 trial) and after induction therapy (Optima II trial). However, dose de-escalation should currently not be performed outside of clinical trials. In addition, first studies indicate a benefit of functional imaging (diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or F‑fluoromisonidazole positron-emission tomography [FMISO-PET]) to establish personalized dose concepts in radiotherapy.

HPV as a Carcinomic Driver in Head and Neck Cancer: a De-escalated Future?

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathologic risk factors) are both acceptable treatment options for patients. The decision on which treatment is optimal depends on individual patient factors and should be made in a multi-disciplinary setting with input from a radiation oncologist, head and neck surgeon, and medical oncologist. Where appropriate, patients in this setting should be considered for enrollment on clinical studies evaluating de-escalation of treatment intensity given the very favorable outcomes and high toxicity profile associated with conventional therapies. However, caution is needed given negative data for de-escalation in the definitive chemotherapy and radiation setting. It remains unclear what the prognostic significance of HPV status is in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck outside of the oropharynx.

Harnessing radiotherapy-induced NK-cell activity by combining DNA damage-response inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade

BACKGROUND

Despite therapeutic gains from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in many tumor types, new strategies are needed to extend treatment benefits, especially in patients failing to mount effective antitumor T-cell responses. Radiation and drug therapies can profoundly affect the tumor immune microenvironment. Here, we aimed to identify immunotherapies to increase the antitumor response conferred by combined ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase inhibition and radiotherapy.

METHODS

Using the human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative murine oral squamous cell carcinoma model, MOC2, we assessed the nature of the antitumor response following ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor (ATRi)/radiotherapy (RT) by performing RNA sequencing and detailed flow cytometry analyses in tumors. The benefit of immunotherapies based on T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) and Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint blockade following ATRi/RT treatment was assessed in the MOC2 model and confirmed in another HPV-negative murine oral squamous cell carcinoma model called SCC7. Finally, immune profiling was performed by flow cytometry on blood samples in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in the PATRIOT clinical trial of combined ATRi/RT.

RESULTS

ATRi enhances radiotherapy-induced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment, with natural killer (NK) cells playing a central role in maximizing treatment efficacy. We demonstrated that antitumor activity of NK cells can be further boosted with ICI targeting TIGIT and PD-1. Analyses of clinical samples from patients receiving ATRi (ceralasertib) confirm the translational potential of our preclinical studies.

CONCLUSION

This work delineates a previously unrecognized role for NK cells in the antitumor immune response to radiotherapy that can be augmented by small-molecule DNA damage-response inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade.

Pharmacologic inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant treatment challenges, with high recurrence rates for locally advanced disease despite aggressive therapy typically involving a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. HNSCCs commonly exhibit reduced or absent TP53 function due to genomic alterations or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, leading to dependence on the S- and G2/M checkpoints for cell cycle regulation. Both of these checkpoints are activated by Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), which tends to be overexpressed in HNSCC relative to adjacent normal tissues and represents a potentially promising therapeutic target, particularly in combination with other treatments. ATR is a DNA damage signaling kinase that is activated in response to replication stress and single-stranded DNA breaks, such as those induced by radiation therapy and certain chemotherapies. ATR kinase inhibitors are currently being investigated in several clinical trials as part of the management of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HNSCC, along with other malignancies. In this review article, we summarize the rationale and preclinical data supporting incorporation of ATR inhibition into therapeutic regimens for HNSCC.

Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions

Antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 rescue T cells from exhausted status and revive immune response against cancer cells. Based on the immense success in clinical trials, ten α-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, zimberelimab, prolgolimab, and dostarlimab) and three α-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for various types of cancers. Nevertheless, the low response rate of α-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remains to be resolved. For most cancer patients, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is not the sole speed-limiting factor of antitumor immunity, and it is insufficient to motivate effective antitumor immune response by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 axis. It has been validated that some combination therapies, including α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, targeted therapy, other immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonists of the co-stimulatory molecule, stimulator of interferon genes agonists, fecal microbiota transplantation, epigenetic modulators, or metabolic modulators, have superior antitumor efficacies and higher response rates. Moreover, bifunctional or bispecific antibodies containing α-PD-1/PD-L1 moiety also elicited more potent antitumor activity. These combination strategies simultaneously boost multiple processes in cancer-immunity cycle, remove immunosuppressive brakes, and orchestrate an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarized the synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other therapies. Moreover, we focused on the advances of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies in clinical studies. Given the heterogeneity across patients and cancer types, individualized combination selection could improve the effects of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies and relieve treatment resistance.

Evolution of a Paradigm Switch in Diagnosis and Treatment of HPV-Driven Head and Neck Cancer—Striking the Balance Between Toxicity and Cure

More than a decade after the discovery of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate for human papilloma virus (HPV)-driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), p16-IHC has become a routinely evaluated biomarker to stratify oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) into a molecularly distinct subtype with favorable clinical prognosis. Clinical trials of treatment de-escalation frequently use combinations of biomarkers (p16-IHC, HPV-RNA in situ hybridization, and amplification of HPV-DNA by PCR) to further improve molecular stratification. Implementation of these methods into clinical routine may be limited in the case of RNA by the low RNA quality of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks (FFPE) or in the case of DNA by cross contamination with HPV-DNA and false PCR amplification errors. Advanced technological developments such as investigation of tumor mutational landscape (NGS), liquid-biopsies (LBx and cell-free cfDNA), and other blood-based HPV immunity surrogates (antibodies in serum) may provide novel venues to further improve diagnostic uncertainties. Moreover, the value of HPV/p16-IHC outside the oropharynx in HNSCC patients needs to be clarified. With regards to therapy, postoperative (adjuvant) or definitive (primary) radiochemotherapy constitutes cornerstones for curative treatment of HNSCC. Side effects of chemotherapy such as bone-marrow suppression could lead to radiotherapy interruption and may compromise the therapy outcome. Therefore, reduction of chemotherapy or its replacement with targeted anticancer agents holds the promise to further optimize the toxicity profile of systemic treatment. Modern radiotherapy gradually adapts the dose. Higher doses are administered to the visible tumor bulk and positive lymph nodes, while a lower dose is prescribed to locoregional volumes empirically suspected to be invaded by tumor cells. Further attempts for radiotherapy de-escalation may improve acute toxicities, for example, the rates for dysphagia and feeding tube requirement, or ameliorate late toxicities like tissue scars (fibrosis) or dry mouth. The main objective of current de-intensification trials is therefore to reduce acute and/or late treatment-associated toxicity while preserving the favorable clinical outcomes. Deep molecular characterization of HPV-driven HNSCC and radiotherapy interactions with the tumor immune microenvironment may be instructive for the development of next-generation de-escalation strategies.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in oropharyngeal cancer: a validation study according to the criteria of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group

Background

The evaluation of immune response can aid in prediction of cancer behaviour. Here, we assessed the prognostic significance of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

Methods

A total of 182 patients treated for OPSCC were included in this study. Assessment of TILs was conducted on tumour sections stained with standard haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. We used the scoring criteria proposed by the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group.

Results

The multivariable analysis showed that TILs associated with disease-specific survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.13 (95% CI 1.14–3.96; P = 0.017). Similarly, TILs associated significantly with overall survival with HR of 1.87 (95% CI 1.11–3.13; P = 0.018). In a sub-analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases separately, TILs showed a significant prognostic value in both groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The evaluation of TILs as proposed by the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group is a simple and promising method in prediction of survival of OPSCC. It is easily applicable and after further validation can be implemented in the routine pathological report as a basic immune parameter.

[Immunotherapy of head and neck cancer : Highlights of the ASCO and ESMO annual meetings 2021]

BACKGROUND

This year's American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting included interesting data on first-line therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinomas with PD‑1 inhibitors and on checkpoint inhibition in various clinical constellations. At the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting, the results of the CheckMate-651 study were presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All abstracts and presentations from the ASCO and ESMO meetings 2021 on immunotherapy in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) were evaluated for their relevance. The most interesting studies are elaborated upon herein.

RESULTS

Studies on locally advanced HNSCC showed an improved response after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab administration. A second cycle did not improve the response rate, but the proportion of patients with a good response was almost doubled. The CheckRad CD8 study showed an improvement in progression-free survival by induction chemoimmunotherapy with tremelimumab and durvalumab followed by stratification according to the CD8 immune cell infiltrate. Two studies were presented on first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Chemoimmunotherapy showed a higher response rate and prolonged progression-free survival with a similar adverse event profile. In recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, the CheckMate 651 study showed an increased duration of response with nivolumab and ipilimumab and higher response rates than pembrolizumab alone. The primary endpoints for overall survival were not achieved.

CONCLUSION

PD‑1 inhibition has great potential to change the therapeutic landscape for nasopharyngeal carcinomas in the future. In HNSCC, CD8 tumor infiltrate presents a promising predictive marker for selecting patients who can benefit from radioimmunotherapy. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab did not improve overall survival in palliative first-line therapy; thus, no change in the current standard is expected.

Induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by CD8+ immune cell-based patient selection for chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The first aim of the trial is to study feasibility of combined programmed death protein ligand 1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibition concomitant to radiotherapy. In addition, efficacy of the entire treatment scheme consisting of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection will be analyzed.

METHODS

Patients with stage III-IVB head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30 mg/m² days 1-3, docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, durvalumab 1500 mg fix dose day 5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fix dose day 5. Patients with increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the rebiopsy entered RIT up to a total dose of 70 Gy. Patients received further three cycles of durvalumab/tremelimumab followed by eight cycles of durvalumab mono (every 4 weeks). The intended treatment for patients not meeting these criteria was standard radiochemotherapy outside the trial. Primary endpoint was a feasibility rate of patients entering RIT to receive treatment until at least cycle 6 of immunotherapy of ≥80%.

RESULTS

Between September 2018 and May 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (one excluded). Out of these, 23 patients had human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Median follow-up was 17.2 months. After induction chemoimmunotherapy 41 patients had pCR and 31 had increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cells. Of 60 patients entering RIT (primary endpoint cohort), 10 experienced imiting toxic (mainly hepatitis) and four discontinued for other reasons, resulting in a feasibility rate of 82%. The RIT cohort (n=60) had a progression-free survival (PFS) rate at one and 2 years of 78% and 72%, respectively, and an overall survival rate at one and 2 years of 90% and 84%, respectively. Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers had greater benefit from RIT with a 2-year PFS rate of 94% compared with 64% for HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers and other locations. In the entire study cohort (n=79) the 2-year PFS rate was 68% (91% for HPV-positive oropharynx vs 59% for others). Toxicity grade 3-4 mainly consisted of dysphagia (53%), leukopenia (52%) and infections (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The trial met the primary endpoint feasibility of RIT. Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free RIT after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection has promising PFS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03426657). The trial was conducted as investigator-sponsored trial (IST).

Induction Chemotherapy in Low-Risk HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rapidly increasing in incidence, and has now become the most common head and neck cancer (HNC). Studies have demonstrated that HPV associated OPSCC is associated with a favorable prognosis compared with its HPV-negative counterparts, yet standard multimodality therapy is often associated with substantial acute and late treatment-related toxicity. While locoregional control is improved in HPV+ OPSCC, distant metastasis rate has gained recognition as a major cause of death in this population, with some studies suggesting similar rates as non-HPV-related cancers. Induction chemotherapy has been of long-standing interest in locoregionally advanced HNC, yet its use in combination with concomitant chemoradiation remains an area of controversy as a survival benefit remains unproven following randomized trials. Nevertheless, response to induction chemotherapy remains an important dynamic and prognostic biomarker, with response-adaptive de-intensified therapy in HPV+ OPSCC gaining traction in single-arm phase II studies demonstrating promising results. The emergence of immunotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting for HNC has led to enthusiasm to incorporate in the curative setting, yet its role remains undefined. Our institutional paradigm for HPV+ OPSCC incorporates induction therapy followed by risk and response adaptive locoregional treatment. Ultimately, the role of induction therapy in HPV+ OPSCC will need to be investigated in a randomized setting to be incorporated routinely into clinical practice.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC): An update on 26 trials and 7080 patients

Purpose

Chemotherapy, when added to radiotherapy, improves survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This article presents the second update of the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in NPC.

Methods

Published or unpublished randomized trials assessing radiotherapy (±a second chemotherapy timing) with/without chemotherapy in non-metastatic NPC patients were identified. Updated data were sought for studies included in the previous rounds of the meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. All trials were analyzed following the intent-to-treat principle using a fixed-effects model. Treatments were classified in five subsets according to chemotherapy timing. The statistical analysis plan was pre-specified.

Results

Eighteen new trials were identified. Individual patient data were available for seven. In total, the meta-analysis now included 26 trials and 7,080 patients. The addition of chemotherapy reduced the risk of death, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.73; 0.85]), and an absolute survival increase at 5 and 10 years of 6.1% [+3.9; +8.3] and + 8.4% [+5.7; +11.1], respectively. The largest effect was observed for concomitant + adjuvant, induction (with concomitant in both arms) and concomitant chemotherapy, with respective HR [95%CI] of 0.68 [0.59; 0.79] (absolute survival increase at 5 years: 12.3% (7.0%;17.6%)), 0.73 [0.63; 0.86] (6.0% (2.5%;9.5%)) and 0.81 [0.70; 0.92] (5.2% (0.8%;9.6%)). The benefit of chemotherapy was also demonstrated by improvement in progression-free survival, cancer mortality, locoregional control and distant control. There was a significant interaction between patient age and chemotherapy effect.

Conclusion

This updated meta-analysis confirms the benefit of concomitant chemotherapy and concomitant + adjuvant chemotherapy, and suggests that addition of induction or adjuvant chemotherapy to concomitant chemotherapy improves tumor control and survival. The benefit of chemotherapy decreases with increasing patient age.

Excavating novel diagnostic and prognostic long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an integrated bioinformatics analysis of competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) and gene co-expression networks

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been demonstrated to fine-tune gene regulations that govern a broad spectrum of oncogenic processes. Nonetheless, our understanding of the roles of lncRNAs and their interactions with miRNAs and mRNAs in HNSCC is still highly rudimentary. Here, we present a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis in which competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network construction and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were combined to explore novel diagnostic and prognostic lncRNAs for HNSCC. Differentially expressed mRNAs (DEGs), miRNAs (DEMs) and lncRNAs (DELs) were identified based on the RNA sequencing data and clinical data retrieved from TCGA database. LncRNA-regulated ceRNA networks were constructed based on the interactive RNA pairs predicted by miRDB, miRcode and TargetScan. WGCNA was conducted to identify lncRNAs that were significantly correlated with patient overall survival (OS) and HNSCC tumor. RT-qPCR was employed to validate the expression of lncRNAs in HNSCC cell lines and patient sera. A ceRNA network consisting of 90 DEGs, 7 DEMs and 67 DELs associated with clinical traits was established. WGCNA and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that 5 DELs (MIR4435-2 HG, CASC9, LINC01980, STARD4-AS1 and MIR99AHG) were significantly correlated with OS of HNSCC patients, whereas DEL PART1 was most significantly correlated with the HNSCC tumor. The in silico predicted expression patterns of PART1, LINC01980 and MIR4435-2 HG were further validated in HNSCC cell lines and patient sera. Collectively, the present study provided novel insights into the lncRNA-regulated ceRNA networks in HNSCC and identified novel lncRNAs that harbor diagnostic and prognostic potentials for HNSCC.Abbreviations BP, biological process. CC, cellular component. ceRNA, competing endogenous RNA. DEG, differential expressions of mRNA. DEL, differentially expressed lncRNA. DEM, differentially expressed miRNA. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. FPKM, Fragments Per Kilobase Million. GO, Gene Ontology. GS, gene significance. HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. LncRNA, long non-coding RNA. MCC, Maximal Clique Centrality. ME, module eigengenes. MF, molecular functions. MM, module membership. MRE, miRNA-binding site. MYO5A, Myosin-Va. PART1, prostate androgen-regulated transcript 1. RBM3, RNA‑binding motif protein 3. TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas. TOM, topological overlap measure. TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma. WGCNA, weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck cancer: Rationale, current evidence and future perspective

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown to improve survival in the first- and second-line settings of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In the past two years more than a dozen neoadjuvant IO studies have been reported in SCCHN, demonstrating the feasibility of one or a few doses of single agent or combination ICIs. This approach seems safe with no surgical delays due to toxicity in most of the studies with no new safety signals. Efficacy in terms of pathologic response appears promising both with single-agent ICIs and especially with chemo-IO combinations. The scientific rationale and current clinical evidence of neoadjuvant IO trials in SCCHN will be reviewed, including currently debated aspects such as the methodology for radiological and pathological evaluation as well as types and criteria for biomarker use in this setting. Finally, the future perspective of neoadjuvant IO in SCCHN will be approached.

Prospective Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of Combination Radiation Therapy With Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) lead to durable responses in a subset of patients with cancer, but most patients do not respond to ICI, prompting interest in combining immunotherapy with other therapeutic regimens. Preclinical evidence supports the potential for therapeutic synergy between immunotherapy and radiation therapy through modulation of the tumor microenvironment and antitumor immune responses. Local therapy also has the potential to overcome localized sites of relative immune suppression and resistance. Prospective clinical trials have been initiated to test these hypotheses in the clinic as well as to investigate the toxicities and adverse events associated with combination immunotherapy and radiation therapy. In this review, we discuss the emerging results from prospective clinical trials of combination immunotherapy and radiation therapy, the safety and efficacy of their combination, concordance with preclinical and retrospective data, and some of the remaining open questions to be addressed by future clinical trials.

Moving Beyond the Standard of Care: Accelerate Testing of Radiation-Drug Combinations

Radiation therapy is a major treatment modality used in > 60% of cancer patients as definitive local treatment for inoperable locoregionally confined tumors and as palliative therapy. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy enhances the effectiveness of treatment, the benefit over radiation therapy alone is modest. There is a need to enhance the effectiveness of local tumor control over what sequentially or concurrently administered cytotoxic chemotherapy provides. Although many biological pathways are known to enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy, there is currently a paucity of drugs approved for use in combination. Several clinical trials have tested the effectiveness of combining targeted agents or immunotherapies with radiation therapy, but the results of these trials have been negative, likely stemming from the relative lack of preclinical evidence using appropriate experimental standardization or model systems. Accelerating the identification of agents tested in an appropriate clinical context and experimental systems or models would greatly enhance the potential to bring forward early testing of drugs that would not only be safe but also more effective. This article provides an overview of the opportunities and challenges of developing therapeutics to combine with radiation therapy, and some guidance toward preclinical and early clinical testing to improve the chance that advanced phase testing of drug-radiation combinations would be successful in the long term.

Immunotherapy Approaches in HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer

Immunotherapy approaches for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are rapidly advancing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as a causative agent in a subset of oropharyngeal cancers (OPC). HPV-positive OPC comprises a distinct clinical and pathologic disease entity and has a unique immunophenotype. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors has exhibited improved outcomes for patients with advanced HNSCC, irrespective of HPV status. To date, the clinical management of HPV-positive HNSCC and HPV-negative HNSCC has been identical, despite differences in the tumor antigens, immune microenvironment, and immune signatures of these two biologically distinct tumor types. Numerous clinical trials are underway to further refine the application of immunotherapy and develop new immunotherapy approaches. The aim of this review is to highlight the developing role of immunotherapy in HPV-positive HNSCC along with the clinical evidence and preclinical scientific rationale behind emerging therapeutic approaches, with emphasis on promising HPV-specific immune activators that exploit the universal presence of foreign, non-self tumor antigens.

Prognostic impact of matted lymphadenopathy in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cervical matted lymphadenopathy (ML) is associated with outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OPSCC patients treated at our institution with CRT were included (n = 417). ML was defined by three adjacent nodes without an intervening fat plane. Patients were stratified into favorable OPSCC (p16 + with ≤ 10 pack-years smoking history) or unfavorable OPSCC (p16- and/or > 10 pack years). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidences of regional recurrence (RR) and distant metastasis (DM).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for the surviving cohort was 49.9 months. In favorable OPSCC (n = 220), there were no significant associations between ML and any outcome. In unfavorable OPSCC (n = 197), ML had a significant negative impact on OS and PFS, with 3-year OS for patients without and with matted nodes at 74% and 56% (HR, 1.61, 95% CI 1.01-2.58). On multivariable Cox regression, patients with ML experienced significantly worsened OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.65) and PFS (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.28-2.93). The cumulative incidence of DM was also higher with ML (31% vs. 9%, adjusted HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.71-6.48).

CONCLUSION

ML carries no prognostic importance in patients with favorable OPSCC. However, ML portends significantly worse outcomes in individuals with HPV-negative disease or a significant smoking history. Thus, ML may help risk-stratify this latter population for treatment intensification, but does not seem to be a contraindication for treatment de-escalation in the former.