COVID-19: Abnormal liver function tests

The current findings on the gut-liver axis and the molecular basis of NAFLD/NASH associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis

Recent research has highlighted the complex relationship between gut microbiota, metabolic pathways, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) progression. Gut dysbiosis, commonly observed in NAFLD patients, impairs intestinal permeability, leading to the translocation of bacterial products like lipopolysaccharides, short-chain fatty acids, and ethanol to the liver. These microbiome-associated mechanisms contribute to intestinal and hepatic inflammation, potentially advancing NAFLD to NASH. Dietary habits, particularly those rich in saturated fats and fructose, can modify the microbiome composition, leading to dysbiosis and fatty liver development. Metabolomic approaches have identified unique profiles in NASH patients, with specific metabolites like ethanol linked to disease progression. While bariatric surgery has shown promise in preventing NAFLD progression, the role of gut microbiome and metabolites in this improvement remains to be proven. Understanding these microbiome-related pathways may provide new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for NAFLD and NASH. A comprehensive review of current literature was conducted using multiple medical research databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ScienceDirect, Medline, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The review focused on studies that examine the relationship between gut microbiota composition, metabolic pathways, and NAFLD progression. Key areas of interest included microbial dysbiosis, endotoxin production, and the influence of diet on gut microbiota. The analysis revealed that gut dysbiosis contributes to NAFLD through several mechanisms, diet significantly influences gut microbiota composition, which in turn affects liver function through the gut-liver axis. High-fat diets can lead to dysbiosis, altering microbial metabolic activities and promoting liver inflammation. Specifically, gut microbiota-mediated generation of saturated fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, can activate liver macrophages and increase TNF-α expression, contributing to NASH development. Different dietary components, including cholesterol, fiber, fat, and carbohydrates, can modulate the gut microbiome and influence NAFLD progression. This gut-liver axis plays a crucial role in maintaining immune homeostasis, with the liver responding to gut-derived bacteria by activating innate and adaptive immune responses. Microbial metabolites, such as bile acids, tryptophan catabolites, and branched-chain amino acids, regulate adipose tissue and intestinal homeostasis, contributing to NASH pathogenesis. Additionally, the microbiome of NASH patients shows an elevated capacity for alcohol production, suggesting similarities between alcoholic steatohepatitis and NASH. These findings indicate that targeting the gut microbiota may be a promising approach for NASH treatment and prevention. Recent research highlights the potential of targeting gut microbiota for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The gut-liver axis plays a crucial role in NAFLD pathophysiology, with dysbiosis contributing to disease progression. Various therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating gut microbiota have shown promise, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and dietary interventions. Probiotics have demonstrated efficacy in human randomized controlled trials, while other interventions require further investigation in clinical settings. These microbiota-targeted therapies may improve NAFLD outcomes through multiple mechanisms, such as reducing inflammation and enhancing metabolic function. Although lifestyle modifications remain the primary recommendation for NAFLD management, microbiota-focused interventions offer a promising alternative for patients struggling to achieve weight loss targets.

Factors Affecting Liver Function Abnormalities After Laparoscopic Esophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the factors related to abnormal liver function in patients undergoing laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

The clinical data of 347 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair at Beijing Chao-yang Hospital of Capital Medical University between January 2018 and November 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients comprised 131 males and 216 females, ranging in age from 24 to 87 years, and were assessed using the ASA grading system between grades I and III. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of liver function abnormalities on the first day after surgery: a normal liver function group (NLA group) and an abnormal liver function group (LA group). Patients with elevation in any of the following indicators were included in the LA group: alanine aminotransferase >40 U/L, glutamine aminotransferase >40 U/L, γ-glutamyltransferase >49 U/L, alkaline phosphatase >135 U/L, total bilirubin >17.1 μmol/L, or direct bilirubin >6.8 μmol/L. The clinical data of the 2 groups of patients were compared, and only the indicators with a P -value <0.15 were included in a binary logistic regression model analysis.

RESULTS

There were 238 patients (68.6%) who developed liver function abnormalities on the first postoperative day. In comparison to the NLA group, the LA group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with esophageal hiatal hernia type II, type III, and type IV, hypotension, and high P ET CO 2 . Furthermore, the LA group had a significantly lower proportion of patients receiving blood transfusions. The maximum length and maximum cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatal hernia were also significantly larger in the LA group. In addition, the operation time was significantly longer in the LA group. (all P -values are <0.15). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged operation time (OR=1.017, 95% CI: 1.007-1.028) was the only risk factor associated with postoperative liver function abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The sole risk factor for postoperative liver function abnormalities was prolonged surgical time.

Liver injury in non-severe COVID-19 with various pandemic phases: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 severity affects liver damage. The utilization of various anti-COVID-19 drugs in non-severe cases related to liver impairment in the short term seemed intriguing.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the dynamic course of liver injury in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients within 10 days of admission and identify risk variables, including medication linkage.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study of 300 newly diagnosed mild to moderate COVID-19 cases between September 2021 and October 2022. Tertiary center hospitel, field hospital, or cohort ward admissions were made. Patient demographics and treatment were recorded. The drug, liver injury (LI) dynamics, and clinical course were evaluated.

RESULTS

Hospitel/field hospital (188) and cohort wards (112) had 300 individuals. One hundred fifteen participants had liver damage. Favipiravir (45 %), remdesivir (17.4 %), molnupiravir (11.3 %), Andrographis paniculata (ADG) (8.7 %), and favipiravir plus ivermectin (7.7 %) were given to most LI group (n = 104). The baseline AST/ALT levels of 68 (65.4 %) treated patients were abnormal. Favipiravir, remdesivir, and favipiravir + ivermectin increased mean AST/ALT in participants with normal baseline AST/ALT (p = 0.001, 0.003, and 0.016, respectively), but not molnupiravir or Andrographis paniculata. Transaminase levels climbed in untreated patients independent of baseline. The ground-glass imaging pattern was linked to mild LI. Most subjects had transaminase declines after 10 days. Preexisting liver disease did not increase the likelihood of in-hospital LI.

CONCLUSION

In the real world, a less-than-critical level of liver damage was reported in mild to moderate COVID-19 that allows clinicians to administer a variety of standard medications during short periods of hospital stay.

Role of furin in the severity of COVID-19 infection via effects on miR-20b and miR-106a

BACKGROUND

Since 2019, COVID-19 and its mutants have been among the fiercest epidemic viruses. Coronavirus is still affecting the world and will continue through its various mutants, the closest example of which is the XEC mutant. Vaccines are currently available to prevent coronavirus infections. However, the currently approved treatments after infection, especially for severely infected patients, are still limited, and they are not suitable for everyone. Many studies have investigated the ability of furin to repair coronavirus viral proteins, and other studies have shown how important miRNAs are for controlling gene expression.

AIM OF WORK

This work aims to clarify the role of furin and the possibility of alleviating the burden of viral infection with COVID-19 and its mutations via effects on miR-20b and miR-106a.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected blood samples from 40 controls and 50 patients. Each patient provided approximately 3 ml of blood, which was separated for measuring furin by ELISA and extracting RNA for real-time PCR for the relative quantification of miRNAs.

RESULTS

The serum levels of Furin and miR-106 were considerably greater in the COVID-19 group than in the control group; however, the level of miR-20b was considerably greater in the control group than in the patients group.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that furin and miR-20b concentrations could be beneficial in therapeutic approaches against COVID-19.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective study

Background

The global impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has necessitated urgent characterization of prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to delineate the epidemiological and clinical predictors of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 123 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Huoshenshan Hospital (Wuhan, China) from 1 February 2020 to 30 April 2020. Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess the independent factors with survival time. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05.

Results

The cohort exhibited a mortality rate of 49.6% (61/123), with the critical clinical type (HR = 7.970, p = 0.009), leukocytosis (HR = 3.408, p = 0.006), and lymphopenia (HR = 0.817, p = 0.038) emerging as independent predictors of reduced survival. Critical-type patients demonstrated significantly elevated inflammatory markers (neutrophils: 10.41 ± 6.23 × 109/L; CRP: 104.47 ± 29.18 mg/L) and coagulopathy (D-dimer: 5.21 ± 2.34 μg/ml) compared to non-critical cases. Deceased patients exhibited pronounced metabolic derangements, including hyperglycemia (9.81 ± 2.07 mmol/L) and hepatic dysfunction (ALP: 174.03 ± 30.13 U/L).

Conclusion

We revealed the epidemiological and clinical features of different clinical types of SARS-CoV-2 as summarized in this paper. We found that critical type, leukocyte, and lymphocyte are risk factors that affect survival time, which could be an early and helpful marker to improve management of COVID-19 patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram to assess the occurrence of liver dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in the ICU

The global pandemic of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) has resulted in millions of deaths over the past three years. As one of the most commonly affected extra-pulmonary organs, numerous studies have reported varying degrees of liver injury in a significant proportion of patients with COVID-19, particularly in severe and critically ill patients. Early prediction of liver dysfunction in hospitalized patients would facilitate the clinical management of COVID-19 and improve clinical prognosis, but reliable and valid predictive models are still lacking.MethodsWe collected data from 286 patients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 admitted to various ICUs from the case system. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (50%) and a validation cohort (50%). In the training cohort, we first used ROC curves to measure the predictive efficiency of each of the variables for the development of liver damage during hospitalization in patients with COVID-19, followed by LASSO regression analysis to screen the variables for predictive models and logistic regression analysis to identify relevant risk factors. A nomogram based on these variables was created following the above model. Finally, the efficiency of the prediction models in the training and validation cohorts was assessed using AUC, consistency index (C index), calibration curves and Decision Curve Analysis.ResultsOut of a total of 80 parameters for COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICUs, 10 were determined to be significantly associated with the occurrence of liver dysfunction during hospitalization. Based on these predictors, further prediction models were used to construct and develop a nomogram that was offered for practical clinical application. The C-index of the column line graphs for the training and validation cohorts was 0.956 and 0.844 respectively. in addition, the calibration curves for the model showed a high degree of agreement between the predicted and actual incidence of liver dysfunction in patients with COVID-19.ConclusionBy developing a predictive model and associated nomogram, we predicted the incidence of liver dysfunction during hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. The model's predictive performance was determined in both the training and validation cohorts, contributing to the clinical management of COVID-19.

Assessing the impact of COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19: rationale and protocol design of COSMIC, a UK multicentre observational study of COVID-negative controls

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) has had an enormous health and economic impact globally. Although primarily a respiratory illness, multi-organ involvement is common in COVID-19, with evidence of vascular-mediated damage in the heart, liver, kidneys and brain in a substantial proportion of patients following moderate-to-severe infection. The pathophysiology and long-term clinical implications of multi-organ injury remain to be fully elucidated. Age, gender, ethnicity, frailty and deprivation are key determinants of infection severity, and both morbidity and mortality appear higher in patients with underlying comorbidities such as ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. Our aim is to gain mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of multiorgan dysfunction in people with COVID-19 and maximise the impact of national COVID-19 studies with a comparison group of COVID-negative controls.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19 (COSMIC) is a prospective, multicentre UK study which will recruit 200 subjects without clinical evidence of prior COVID-19 and perform extensive phenotyping with multiorgan imaging, biobank serum storage, functional assessment and patient reported outcome measures, providing a robust control population to facilitate current work and serve as an invaluable bioresource for future observational studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee East Midlands (REC reference 19/EM/0295). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

COSMIC is registered as an extension of C-MORE (Capturing Multi-ORgan Effects of COVID-19) on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04510025).

COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Hepatobiliary System: A Literature Review

COVID-19 encompasses a wide clinical spectrum, from mild influenza-like illness to severe pneumonia and systemic complications. There is emerging literature on hepatobiliary involvement in COVID-19, especially elevation in liver enzymes as surrogate markers of liver injury. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors within the hepatobiliary system are a portal of entry for SARS-CoV-2, after which injury may be perpetuated through hypoxia and cytokine storms. This literature review covers studies published before 2024 from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Springer, and BMC Library. The keywords used were "COVID-19", "liver", "SARS-CoV-2", "chronic liver disease", and other relevant terms to ensure a wide scope of investigation. The most common liver enzymes elevated among COVID-19 patients include aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase, all of which are associated with the severity of the disease. Chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have worse outcomes with increased ICU admission rates and increased mortality. COVID-19 vaccination in CLD and liver transplant recipients is very often associated with suboptimal antibody responses, adding to the risks. SARS-CoV-2 causes liver involvement through direct viral cytopathic effects, immune-mediated injury, and systemic hypoxia. Individuals with CLD are particularly vulnerable to severe illness.

Persistent hepatocyte secretory failure in lopinavir/ritonavir related to drug-induced liver injury: a case report

Lopinavir/ritonavir, an anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) drug, may be associated with the development of liver injury. In this paper, we reported an elderly female patient with drug-induced liver injury secondary to lopinavir/ritonavir, which was evaluated for their causality using the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) of 2016. She had a RUCAM score of 8 which was equivalent to a probable causality grading. Her clinical course was complicated by persistent hepatocyte secretion failure (PHSF), followed by septic shock and SARS-CoV-2 re-infection during her hospitalization. Her response to any medical intervention, including ursodeoxycholic acid, glutathione, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, rifampicin, artificial liver support, and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) was very poor, and her family members refused liver transplantation. Finally, she died. In summary, this case suggests the possibility that lopinavir/ritonavir can cause DILI and even PHSF in our clinical practice.

Chronic Hepatitis B and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes in the United States: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) on SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. Additionally, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and variant periods on outcomes in HBV/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection remain unexplored.

Methods

We utilized the TriNetX database to compare adults with HBV/SARS-CoV-2 (vs SARS-CoV-2 alone) across 97 US healthcare systems from 2020 to 2023. We assessed the odds of all inpatient hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, mechanical ventilation, 30-day, 90-day, and overall mortality. In sensitivity analyses, we excluded HIV, hepatitis C virus, and transplant cases and stratified the HBV/SARS-CoV-2 cohort by cirrhosis status. We applied propensity score matching to address confounding and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Of 4 206 774 individuals with SARS-CoV-2, about 0.2% (8293) were HBV/SARS-CoV-2. Individuals with HBV/SARS-CoV-2 (vs SARS-CoV-2 alone) had higher odds of intensive care unit admissions (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36), 90-day (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.41) and overall mortality (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.33). In sensitivity analyses, those with HBV/SARS-CoV-2 and cirrhosis had a 2.0- to 2.50-fold higher odds of adverse outcomes. Notably, even individuals with HBV/SARS-CoV-2 without cirrhosis had higher odds of mortality. Vaccinated (vs unvaccinated) individuals with HBV/SARS-CoV-2 had 57%, 54%, and 29% reduction in 30-day, 90-day, and overall mortality, respectively. The pre-Delta variant period was associated with higher odds of hospitalization compared to the Omicron but not the Delta period.

Conclusions

Chronic HBV was associated with worse SARS-CoV-2 outcomes, whereas SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduced the likelihood of adverse outcomes.

[Liver pathology in COVID-19]

The literature review presents an analysis of the pathogenesis and pathological anatomy of liver damage in COVID-19. Liver damage with the steatosis, vascular disorders, mild portal and lobular inflammatory infiltration, cholestasis and clinically - liver failure is observed in majority of the patients with COVID-19. Chronic liver diseases with infection SARS-CoV-2 tend to decompensate, which significantly worsens the prognosis of the disease. Pathogenesis of liver damage in COVID19 is unclear. There was no convincing evidence for the hypothesis of cytotoxicity for hepatocytes or cholangiocytes by SARS-CoV-2. Similar liver morphological changes described by different authors suggest their nonspecific nature and multifactorial pathogenesis related to hypoxia, cytokin storm, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis and shock, Covid-associated angio- and coagulopathy, as well as drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Further research is needed to clarify the pathogenesis and pathological anatomy of the liver pathology in COVID-19.

The clinical characteristics and SARS-CoV-2 infection in children of acute hepatitis with unknown aetiology: A meta-analysis and systematic review

The World Health Organization has issued a global alert on Acute Severe Hepatitis of Unknown Aetiology (AS-HEP-UA) since 23 April 2022,and there was still uncertainty regarding the association of AS-HEP-UA with SARS-CoV-2 as well as adenovirus. This study aimed to summarize the infection of SARS-CoV-2 and co-infections with adenovirus, as well as clinical features and outcomes in patients with AS-HEP-UA. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1 October 2021 to 8 December 2022 for studies about patients with AS-HEP-UA. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023385056). We has included 14 eligible articles. The main clinical features of AS-HEP-UA were jaundice (65%) and vomiting (59%), while other clinical features included diarrhea (45%), abdominal pain (37%), and fever (31%), roughly 10% of the children required liver transplantation. The overall positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 was 21.6% (95% CI: 0.126-0.319), with 25.5% (95% CI: 0.161-0.358) for previous infections. The positivity rate for adenovirus infection was 58.6% (95% CI:0.429-0.736) while co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 was 17.5% (95% CI: 0.049-0.342). Moreover, we found that the positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 for this hepatitis outbreak was correlated with region by subgroup analysis. In conclusion, the positive rate of adenovirus was higher than SARS-CoV-2, and the relationship between AS-Hep-UA and COVID-19 is not significant. However, it cannot be excluded that the COVID-19 epidemic is an indirect causative agent of AS-Hep-UA, which requires a larger cohort of AS-Hep-UA patients to uncover additional findings.

Pre-infection liver function is associated with all-cause mortality among hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection

BACKGROUND

There is ample evidence to suggest that patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant may experience liver dysfunction. However, the impact of pre-infection liver function on postinfection mortality rates remains inadequately researched.

METHODS

Data from 847 hemodialysis (HD) patients, diagnosed with Omicron across six HD centers between December 2022 and February 2023, were analyzed. Initial liver function assessments were conducted, following which patients were monitored for mortality outcomes. The stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to identify the predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

From the total, 98 patients (11.6%) succumbed, with a majority (80/98) within a month postinfection. The deceased patients were observed to be mostly older males with an increased prevalence of diabetes and tumors, signifying higher AST and C-reactive protein levels. These patients also exhibited lower hemoglobin, albumin, and prealbumin levels. An elevated AST [per 1 IU increment; HR 1.04 (95% CI 1-1.04), p = 0.026], AST/ALT ratio [per 1 increment; HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.27-2.36), p = 0.004], and reduced prealbumin [per 10 mg/L increment; HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.9-0.96), p < 0.001] were discovered to be independent indicators of an increased mortality risk. Notably, AST, AST/ALT ratio, and prealbumin proved significant predictors of mortality (AUC values were 0.59, 0.65, and 0.79 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores that pre-infection liver function, specifically AST, AST/ALT ratio, and prealbumin levels, substantially influence the mortality rates in HD patients following Omicron infection. Therefore, careful consideration of these liver function parameters could guide superior patient management strategies and potentially decrease mortality rates within this at-risk population.

Laboratory findings predictive of critical illness in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Tunisia

Background

COVID-19 disease has spread rapidly worldwide, causing high mortality. Accessible biomarkers capable of early identification of patients at risk of severe form are needed in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to determine the biological markers that predict a critical condition.

Methods

Retrospective study including patients with confirmed COVID-19 hospitalized between September 2020 and June 2021. The primary endpoint was progression to critical status within 7 days from admission. We defined two groups:Critical group: Patients who developed a critical condition or died or transferred to the ICU before or at 7 th day.Non-critical group: Patients who remained in non-critical respiratory status until 7 th day or discharged before or at 7 th day.

Results

Our study included 456 patients, with a sex ratio of 1.32 and an average age of 62 years. At the 7 th day of hospitalization, 115 (25.2%) patients were in the critical group and 341 (74.8%) patients were in the non-critical group. The univariate logistic regression indicated that laboratory findings between non-critical and critical groups showed that C-reactive protein (CRP) (p=0.047), D-Dimer (p=0.011), creatinine (0.026), creatine kinase (p=0.039), lactate dehydrogenase (p=0.04), and troponin (p=0.001) were all higher among patients in critical group. However, lymphocyte (p<0.001) and platelet (p<0.001) counts were significantly lower among the critical group. Multivariate logistic regression model, identified four independent risk factors: lymphopenia (OR=2.771, 95%CI=1.482-5.181, p=0.001), Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) (OR=2.286, 95%CI=1.461-3.578, p<0.001), thrombocytopenia (OR=1.944, 95%CI=1.092-3.459, p=0.024), and CRP>71.5 (OR=1.598, 95% CI=1.042-2.45, p=0.032) were associated to critical group.

Conclusions

Our results show the predictive value of lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, high NLR and CRP levels to evaluate the prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. A prognostic score could be proposed for guiding clinical care and improving patient outcomes.

Serum microRNA 143 and 223 Gene Expression Profiles as Potential Biomarkers in Individuals with Hepatitis and COVID-19

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) can act as biomarkers and descriptors of the association between infections and other diseases, such as hepatitis and COVID-19. This study aims to investigate the role of miRNA serum expression according to laboratory data concerning hepatitis and COVID-19. Seventy individuals recruited in Southern and Southeastern Brazil donated serum samples and were divided into four groups: (i) 20 negative subjects, (ii) 20 presenting hepatitis, (iii) 19 with COVID-19 and (iv) 11 with hepatitis and COVID-19. Three miRNAs (miR-122, miR-143 and miR-223) were evaluated using real-time PCR. Hematological and biochemical markers were also analyzed. MiR-143 and miR-223 were downregulated among the hepatitis/COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between miR-223 and lymphocytes. There was a negative correlation between alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) for miR-143 and miR-223 and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) only for miR-223 (p < 0.05). For hepatic fibrosis (FIB-4), miR-122 and miR-143 had a greater association and miR-223 was more associated with a history of vaccination against COVID-19. MicroRNAs 143 and 223 could be useful as biomarkers for hepatitis coinfection with COVID-19.

The effect of different definitions of hepatic injury on incidence and mortality rates in the ICU patient population with secondary hepatic injury

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate how different hepatic injury (HI) definitions used in the same study population change incidence and mortality rates and which would best diagnose secondary HI.

DESIGN

Single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary hospital ICU, ANKARA, Turkey.

PATIENTS

Four hundred seventy-eight adult patients were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Three definitions of HI were compared. Taking the SOFA hepatic criteria (SOFA: Total bilirubin (TBL) > 1.2 mg/dl) as the gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the modified 2017 definition by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) were calculated.

RESULTS

Incidence rates ranged from 10% to 45% according to the definition (p < 0.005), while mortality rates ranged from 38% to 57%. When the SOFA1.2 (TBL > 1.2 definition was taken as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of the ACG definition was high, and HI was found to be an independent risk factor that increased mortality four times.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study's results, the incidence and mortality rates of secondary HI vary greatly depending on the definition used. A definition that includes minimal increases in ALT, AST, and TBL predicts mortality with reasonable incidence rates.

COVID-19-related liver injury: Mechanisms, diagnosis, management; its impact on pre-existing conditions, cancer and liver transplant: A comprehensive review

AIMS

This review explores the mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for COVID-19-induced liver injury, with a focus on its impact on patients with pre-existing liver conditions, liver cancer, and those undergoing liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review included studies on clinical manifestations of liver injury due to COVID-19. Key areas examined were direct viral effects, drug-induced liver injury, cytokine storms, and impacts on individuals with chronic liver diseases, liver transplants, and the role of vaccination. Data were collected from clinical trials, observational studies, case reports, and review literature.

KEY FINDINGS

COVID-19 can cause a spectrum of liver injuries, from mild enzyme elevations to severe hepatic dysfunction. Injury mechanisms include direct viral invasion, immune response alterations, drug toxicity, and hypoxia-reperfusion injury. Patients with chronic liver conditions (such as alcohol-related liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) face increased risks of severe outcomes. The pandemic has worsened pre-existing liver conditions, disrupted cancer treatments, and complicated liver transplantation. Vaccination remains crucial for reducing severe disease, particularly in chronic liver patients and transplant recipients. Telemedicine has been beneficial in managing patients and reducing cross-infection risks.

SIGNIFICANCE

This review discusses the importance of improved diagnostic methods and management strategies for liver injury caused by COVID-19. It emphasizes the need for close monitoring and customized treatment for high-risk groups, advocating for future research to explore long-term effects, novel therapies, and evidence-based approaches to improve liver health during and after the pandemic.

Drug-induced liver injury during the era of COVID-19 polypharmacy: a statement of account, lessons learned, and a proposed approach

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a systemic illness that can result in various manifestations. In addition to severe acute respiratory syndrome, patients often exhibit complications unrelated to the respiratory system. Potential liver damage can occur in 14.8 to 53.0% of the affected patients. Liver impairment in COVID-19 can also occur because of the use of polypharmacy during disease management. It is essential to be aware of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, especially when considering the off-label usage of medications in both preventative and therapeutic regimens used on a wide scale. This review aims to give pertinent information regarding drugs utilized thus far in COVID-19 patients and their potential toxicity to the liver. We also present a suggested management approach to DILI in COVID-19 patients and lessons learned from the pharmacological management of this pandemic.

Liver function abnormality on admission predicts long COVID syndrome in digestive system

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice showed that many patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection presented with long COVID syndrome in digestive system. We sought to investigate the factor affecting the incidence of long COVID syndrome in digestive system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed at two centers of Zhongshan Hospital and one center of Shanghai Pudong Hospital from March 01, 2022 to May 31, 2022 were enrolled, collected in the hospital database, and followed up until March 30, 2023. The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in the digestive system (long COVID syndrome). Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate the relative risk (RR). This cohort study included 494 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 144 (29.1 %) patients developed liver function abnormality on admission. During the follow-up period, the primary study outcome occurred in 30 (20.8 %) of the group presenting with liver function abnormality on admission and in 20 (5.7 %) of the group without liver function abnormality on admission (adjusted, RR = 3.550, 95%CI: 2.099-6.006, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that patients with COVID-19 who experience liver function abnormality on admission have an increased risk of developing long COVID syndrome in the digestive system.

Serum albumin level is associated with mortality and hospital stays: A real-world data analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The value of serum albumin might be underestimated, especially in cancer patients. We thus aimed to evaluate the association between serum albumin level at hospital admission and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, and real-world data analysis. Hospitalized adult patients with malignant cancer were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. Serum level of albumin, which was measured within 24 h after hospital admission, was the exposure. Length of hospital stays (LOS) was the primary and all-cause in-hospital mortality was the secondary outcomes. Other information, including age, sex, types of cancer, history of hypertension and diabetes, surgery, blood routine test, liver and renal function, and dietary intake, were also abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

A total number of 5187 adult patients with cancer (2949 were men and 2238 women; average age 61.6 ± 12.4 years and average albumin 40.3 ± 5.2 g/L) were included. The prevalence of hypoalbuminemia was 12.2 % (634/5187). Older patients, patients with liver injury, anemia, and with high level of WBC were positively, while those with overweight and high level of total triglycerides, were negatively associated with hypoalbuminemia. After adjustment of covariates, hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with longer LOS in the current study. The increase of 5 g/L in serum level of albumin could result in 1.09 days (95%CI: -1.38, -0.80 days) shorter in LOS. The increase of 5 g/L in serum level of albumin was also associated with 45 % lower in risk of mortality (OR = 0.55; 95 % CI: 0.43, 0.7) after fully adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum albumin level at admission was associated with both LOS and mortality in patients with malignant cancer.

Utility of Hematological and Biochemical Parameters as a Screening Tool for Assessing Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection and its Severity

Background

The rapidly evolving pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented with clinical severity, which varies from asymptomatic cases to being fatal in others. The need of the hour is to find meaningful and cost-effective COVID-19 biomarkers out of conventional hematological and biochemical parameters, which will help in the early identification of patients with a poor prognosis, leading to timely intervention.

Aim

The aim was to analyze different biochemical and hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients and also to study the association of these parameters with disease severity.

Materials and Methods

Cross-sectional observational study was carried out on 100 COVID-19 patients from a hospital from July to October 2020. Based on saturation of oxygen (SpO2), admitted patients were grouped into mild-moderate (SpO2 ≥90%) and severe groups (SpO2 <90%). Hematological and biochemical parameters were studied in both groups, and association with disease severity was analyzed.

Results

Out of 100 patients, 57 patients were seen in the mild-moderate group (SpO2 ≥90%), while 43 patients (SpO2 <90%) belonged to the severe category. Males were predominant in both mild-moderate and severe groups. Among the hematological parameters, statistically significant higher values of absolute neutrophil count (P = 0.046) and significantly lower absolute lymphocyte count (P = 0.003) values were observed. With regard to biochemical parameters, increased urea and decreased total protein were found in the severe category and this association was statistically significant.

Conclusion

To conclude, early identification and monitoring of hematological and biochemical parameters, especially those associated with higher disease severity, may contribute toward improving disease outcomes.

Liver ultrasound evaluation of acutely increased liver function tests of COVID-19 hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hepatic abnormalities has been notably higher following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, attributed to the virus's entry into cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) surface expression. The gastrointestinal tract's significant ACE2 expression, alongside a lesser degree in the biliary epithelium, has been implicated in gastrointestinal symptoms and liver injury.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether specific ultrasonographic findings in the liver correlate with acute increases in liver function tests (LFTs) among hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on hospitalized COVID-19 patients at Hazem Mebaireek General Hospital in Qatar, from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020. The study focused on patients who experienced acute increases in LFTs, excluding those with chronic liver disease. Ultrasound imaging and patient records were reviewed to gather data.

RESULTS

Out of 223 ultrasound studies of COVID-19 patients, 158 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male, with a mean age of 47.76 ± 13.76 years. Ultrasound results showed 43.7% normal liver parenchyma, while 56.3% exhibited nonspecific abnormalities such as diffuse liver hyperechogenicity (39.2%), enlargement with diffuse hyperechogenicity (12.7%), and other findings (4.4%). The biliary tree was predominantly normal (96.2%), with 3.8% showing abnormalities, including intrahepatic (2.5%) and extrahepatic (1.3%) dilatation. Gallbladder evaluations were normal in 60.1% of cases, with 39.9% showing abnormalities like stones (6.3%), stones with sludge (13.3%), polyps (6.3%), wall thickening (1.9%), and other conditions (12%). A significant correlation was found between abnormal liver parenchyma findings and elevated levels of bilirubin (total and direct) and alkaline phosphatase, with p-values < 0.05. Only aspartate aminotransferase levels showed a significant correlation with biliary tree abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

The most common ultrasonographic finding associated with acute increases in LFTs among hospitalized COVID-19 patients was diffuse liver hyperechogenicity, with or without enlargement. These findings suggest a nonspecific yet significant association with liver function anomalies in the context of COVID-19.

Assessment of abnormal liver function tests and associated factors among COVID-19-infected patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2022: a facility-based comparative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Liver function test (LFT) abnormalities are higher in patients with severe COVID-19. Most of the studies on this theme were conducted in foreign nations, and the association with LFT abnormalities was not sufficiently addressed in the study areas. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection on liver function of patients.

SETTING

A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study was carried out from 10 April to 15 June 2022, among COVID-19 infected individuals admitted in Eka Kotebe General Hospital and Saint Petrous Specialized Hospitals, Addis Ababa, 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 284 confirmed COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative controls matched by gender and age were included in the present study.

RESULTS

Among SARS-COV-2 positive groups, 63 (44.4%) had one or more LFT abnormalities. The most common elevated level of the LFTs among patients with COVID-19 were gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 50 (35.2%), while the most common lowered level was albumin 58 (40.8%). The mean values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (35.4±26.9 vs 22.9±12.6, p<0.001) were significantly different between patients with COVID-19 and the COVID-19-free groups. Being COVID-19-positive was significantly associated with an elevated level of AST (AOR=3.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 7.4) and GGT (AOR=4.55, 95% CI 2.02 to 10.3). Being male was significantly associated with an elevated level of total bilirubin (BILT, AOR=2.41, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.9) and direct bilirubin (BILD, AOR=3.7, 95% CI 1.72 to 8.2), and also severe stage of COVID-19 was associated with hypoalbuminaemia (AOR=3.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 7.9). SARS-COV-2 infection was independently associated with LFT abnormality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COVID-19 had decreased albumin levels, and elevated AST, GGT, BILT and BILD levels.

Impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Many studies have revealed a link between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), making understanding the relationship between these two conditions an absolute requirement.

AIM

To provide a qualitative synthesis on the currently present data evaluating COVID-19 and NAFLD.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided by preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the questionnaire utilized the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework. The search strategy was run on three separate databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central, which were systematically searched from inception until March 2024 to select all relevant studies. In addition, ClinicalTrials.gov, Medrxiv.org, and Google Scholar were searched to identify grey literature.

RESULTS

After retrieval of 11 studies, a total of 39282 patients data were pooled. Mortality was found in 11.5% and 9.4% of people in NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups. In all, 23.2% of NAFLD patients and 22% of non-NAFLD admissions diagnosed with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit, with days of stay varying. Ventilatory support ranged from 5% to 40.5% in the NAFLD cohort and from 3.1% to 20% in the non-NAFLD cohort. The incidence of acute liver injury showed significance. Clinical improvement on days 7 and 14 between the two classifications was significant. Hospitalization stay ranged from 9.6 days to 18.8 days and 7.3 days to 16.4 days in the aforementioned cohorts respectively, with 73.3% and 76.3% of patients being discharged. Readmission rates varied.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes except mortality consistently showed a worsening trend in patients with NAFLD and concomitant COVID-19. Further research in conducting prospective longitudinal studies is essential for a more powerful conclusion.

Recent advances in COVID-19-induced liver injury: causes, diagnosis, and management

Since the start of the pandemic, considerable advancements have been made in our understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the associated COVID-19 on the hepatic system. There is a broad range of clinical symptoms for COVID-19. It affects multiple systems and has a dominant lung illness depending on complications. The progression of COVID-19 in people with pre-existing chronic liver disease (CLD) has also been studied in large multinational groups. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a higher risk of hepatic decompensation and death in patients with cirrhosis. In this review, the source, composition, mechanisms, transmission characteristics, clinical characteristics, therapy, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 were clarified and discussed, as well as the evolution and variations of the virus. This review briefly discusses the causes and effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with CLD. As part of COVID-19, In addition, we assess the potential of liver biochemistry as a diagnostic tool examine the data on direct viral infection of liver cells, and investigate potential pathways driving SARS-CoV-2-related liver damage. Finally, we explore how the pandemic has had a significant impact on patient behaviors and hepatology services, which may increase the prevalence and severity of liver disease in the future. The topics encompassed in this review encompass the intricate relationships between SARS-CoV-2, liver health, and broader health management strategies, providing valuable insights for both current clinical practice and future research directions.

Simultaneous occurrence of autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia after COVID-19 infection: case report and literature review

Various autoimmune diseases have been reported to develop as a result of a coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infection. There have been some reports of COVID-19-triggered autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia infection, but none have reported simultaneous onset of these diseases. A 15-year-old girl was admitted to our hospital with severe liver injury and anemia. Three weeks before admission, her father was diagnosed with COVID-19, after which she became aware of a sore throat. Two weeks later, she visited her doctor for malaise. She was referred to our hospital due to severe anemia, elevated hepatobiliary enzymes, and jaundice. A COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test was positive at the time of referral. She was diagnosed with autoimmune hemolytic anemia based on decreased hemoglobin and haptoglobin, positive direct Coombs test, and increased urinary urobilinogen. Blood tests were positive for antinuclear antibodies, and a liver biopsy revealed interface hepatitis and plasma cell infiltration, consistent with autoimmune hepatitis. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia triggered by COVID-19 infection was made. Steroid therapy was initiated, which resulted in rapid improvement of blood markers and symptoms.

Association between COVID-19 severity with liver abnormalities: A retrospective study in a referral hospital in Indonesia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by an acute respiratory infection with multisystem involvement and the association of its severity to liver function abnormalities is not well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the severity of COVID-19 patients and liver function abnormalities. This retrospective study included adult patients with confirmed COVID-19, which were classified as non-severe or severe according to World Health Organization guidelines. Liver function test results were compared between the severity groups. A total of 339 patients were included of which 150 (44.25%) were severe cases. The male-to-female ratio was 0.9:1 and 3:2 in the non-severe and severe groups, respectively (p=0.031). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and total bilirubin levels and acute liver injury (ALI) incidence were significantly higher in the severe group compared to non-severe group (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.025, p=0.014, respectively). In contrast, albumin levels were significantly lower (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that ALI was significantly associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (odds ratio (OR): 5.275; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.165-23.890, p=0.031), hemoglobin level (OR: 1.214; 95%CI: 1.083-1.361, p=0.001), and hypoalbuminemia (OR: 2.627; 95%CI: 1.283-5.379, p=0.008). Pre-existing liver diseases were present in 6.5% of patients. No significant differences were observed between the groups based on COVID-19 severity and ALI presence. Liver function test abnormalities, including ALI, are more prevalent in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. HIV infection, high hemoglobin levels, and hypoalbuminemia may be potential risk factors for ALI.

Assessment of the liver with two-dimensional shear wave elastography following COVID-19 infection: A pilot study

Introduction/Purpose

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a widely spread viral infectious disease, which can impact multiple organs, including the liver. Elevated liver enzymes have been reported in COVID-19 patients; however, potential changes in liver stiffness following the viral infection remain uncertain. The main aim of this pilot study was to determine if there is a significant difference in liver stiffness between individuals who have never been infected with COVID-19 and those who had been infected with COVID-19 <6 months, experiencing only mild symptoms. The secondary aim was to compare the liver stiffness between participants infected with COVID-19 depending on the elapsed time since infection.

Methods

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) was performed prospectively on 68 participants. Thirty-four participants had been infected with COVID-19 (all for <6 months) (COVID-19 group), and another 34 had never been infected with COVID-19 (control group). The mean 2D-SWE measurements of both the COVID-19 group and the control group were compared using an independent t-test. The mean 2D-SWE measurements of the COVID-19 subgroups A (<2 months), B (2 to <4 months) and C (4 to <6 months) were compared using a one-way ANOVA test (P < 0.05).

Results

The (mean ± standard deviation) liver stiffness (kPa) of the COVID-19 group (5.26 ± 1.63 kPa) was significantly higher than the control group (4.30 ± 0.96 kPa) (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in liver stiffness among subgroups A (5.20 ± 1.79 kPa), B (4.70 ± 1.53 kPa) and C (5.96 ± 1.48 kPa) (P = 0.143) respectively.

Discussion

The mean liver stiffness of 4.30  ±  0.96k Pa in the control group showed a high probability of being normal as per guidelines. Conversely, the mean liver stiffness of 5.26  ±  1.63 kPa in the COVID-19 group exhibited a statistically significant increase compared to the control group. However, compensated advanced chronic liver disease was ruled out without other known clinical signs, as per guidelines.

Conclusion

A statistically significant increase in liver stiffness value was observed in the post-COVID-19 infection group compared to the group who had never been infected. This highlights the potential for short-term impact on liver stiffness associated with COVID-19 infection. However, it is unclear if these changes in liver stiffness are associated with liver injury. Further study is warranted to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection and its long-term impact on the liver.

The association between serum phosphate and length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality in adult patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Data is limited on the prevalence of hypophosphatemia in general hospitalized patients, and its association with length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality remained unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of admission phosphate abnormality and the association between serum phosphate level and length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality in adult patients.

METHODS

This was a multi-center retrospective study based on real-world data. Participants were classified into five groups according to serum phosphate level (inorganic phosphorus, iP) within 48 h after admission: G1, iP < 0.64 mmol/L; G2, iP 0.64-0.8 mmol/L; G3, iP 0.8-1.16 mmol/L; G4, iP 1.16-1.45 mmol/L; and G5, iP ≥ 1.45 mmol/L, respectively. Both LOS and in-hospital mortality were considered as outcomes. Clinical information, including age, sex, primary diagnosis, co-morbidity, and phosphate-metabolism related parameters, were also abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

A total number of 23,479 adult patients (14,073 males and 9,406 females, aged 57.7 ± 16.8 y) were included in the study. The prevalence of hypophosphatemia was 4.74%. An "L-shaped" non-linear association was determined between serum phosphate level and LOS and the inflection point was 1.16 mmol/L in serum phosphate level. Compared with patients in G4, patients in G1, G2 or G3 were significantly associated with longer LOS after full adjustment of covariates. Each 0.1 mmol/L decrease in serum phosphate level to the left side of the inflection point led to 0.64 days increase in LOS [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 0.81; p for trend < 0.001]. But there was no association between serum phosphate and LOS where serum levels of phosphate ≥ 1.16 mmol/L. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that adjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality was 3.08-fold greater in patients in G1 than those in G4 (95% CI: 1.52, 6.25; p for trend = 0.001). Similarly, no significant association with either LOS or mortality were found in patients in G5, comparing with G4.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypophosphatemia, but not hyperphosphatemia, was associated with LOS and all-cause mortality in adult inpatients. It is meaningful to monitor serum levels of phosphate to facilitate early diagnosis and intervention.

Insight into COVID-19 associated liver injury: Mechanisms, evaluation, and clinical implications

COVID-19 has affected millions worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality. While predominantly involving the respiratory tract, SARS-CoV-2 has also caused systemic illnesses involving other sites. Liver injury due to COVID-19 has been variably reported in observational studies. It has been postulated that liver damage may be due to direct damage by the SARS-CoV-2 virus or multifactorial secondary to hepatotoxic therapeutic options, as well as cytokine release syndrome and sepsis-induced multiorgan dysfunction. The approach to a COVID-19 patient with liver injury requires a thorough evaluation of the pattern of hepatocellular injury, along with the presence of underlying chronic liver disease and concurrent medications which may cause drug-induced liver injury. While studies have shown uneventful recovery in the majority of mildly affected patients, severe COVID-19 associated liver injury has been associated with higher mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and greater morbidity in survivors. Furthermore, its impact on long-term outcomes remains to be ascertained as recent studies report an association with metabolic-fatty liver disease. This present review provides insight into the subject by describing the postulated mechanism of liver injury, its impact in the presence of pre-existing liver disease, and its short- and long-term clinical implications.

Metabolic profiling of Verbena bonariensis L. extract by LC/MS and evaluation of the hepatoprotective potential with isoniazid- and rifampicin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats

The study explored the hepatoprotective activity and metabolic profile of Verbena bonariensis L. methanol extract (VBM) and fractions using isoniazid as well as rifampicin-triggered liver toxicity in Wistar albino rats. Metabolite profiling of VBM using HPLC-PDA-ESI-MS identified 12 compounds, mainly iridoids, phenylpropanoids, and flavonoids, where verbascoside represents the major compound. Different biochemical parameters such as aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin, and total protein levels were used to assess liver functions. All the evaluated samples exhibited hepatoprotective potential, but VBM exhibited maximum activity and a notable decline in ALP (p < 0.05, significant), even better than the standard drug (silymarin). VBM significantly reduced the elevated ALT, AST, ALP, and total bilirubin. It also triggered a significant elevation in total proteins compared with diseased animals. This was further consolidated by histopathological studies. Verbena bonariensis L. could serve as a potent hepatoprotective agent and may alleviate liver ailments.

Incidence, characteristics, and risk factors of new liver disorders 3.5 years post COVID-19 pandemic in the Montefiore Health System in Bronx

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of newly diagnosed liver disorders (LD) up to 3.5-year post-acute COVID-19, and risk factors associated with new LD.

METHODS

We analyzed 54,699 COVID-19 patients and 1,409,547 non-COVID-19 controls from March-11-2020 to Jan-03-2023. New liver disorders included abnormal liver function tests, advanced liver failure, alcohol and non-alcohol related liver disorders, and cirrhosis. Comparisons were made with ambulatory non-COVID-19 patients and patients hospitalized for other lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, incomes, insurance status, and unmet social needs were tabulated. The primary outcome was new LD at least two weeks following COVID-19 positive test.

RESULTS

Incidence of new LD was not significantly different between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts (incidence:1.99% vs 1.90% p>0.05, OR = 1.04[95%CI: 0.92,1.17], p = 0.53). COVID-19 patients with new LD were older, more likely to be Hispanic and had higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and obesity compared to patients without new LD. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients had no elevated risk of LD compared to hospitalized LRTI patients (2.90% vs 2.07%, p>0.05, OR = 1.29[0.98,1.69], p = 0.06). Among COVID-19 patients, those who developed LD had fewer patients with higher incomes (14.18% vs 18.35%, p<0.05) and more with lower incomes (21.72% vs 17.23%, p<0.01), more Medicare and less Medicaid insurance, and more patients with >3 unmet social needs (6.49% vs 2.98%, p<0.001) and fewer with no unmet social needs (76.19% vs 80.42%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, Hispanic ethnicity, and obesity, but not COVID-19 status, posed increased risk for developing new LD. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher incidence of new LD.

Comparison of safety and efficacy between Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in patients with advanced kidney disease: a retrospective observational study

Background

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with normal or mild renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). There is limited data regarding its use in advanced kidney disease (eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2). We performed a retrospective territory-wide observational study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir when compared with molnupiravir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease.

Methods

We adopted target trial emulation using data from a territory-wide electronic health record database on eligible patients aged ≥18 years with advanced kidney disease (history of eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) who were infected with COVID-19 and were prescribed with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within five days of infection during the period from 16 March 2022 to 31 December 2022. A sequence trial approach and 1:4 propensity score matching was applied based on the baseline covariates including age, sex, number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), hospitalisation, eGFR, renal replacement therapy, comorbidities (cancer, respiratory disease, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, diabetes, hypertension), and drug use (renin-angiotensin-system agents, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, lipid lowering agents, insulins, oral antidiabetic drugs, antiplatelets, immuno-suppressants, corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, monoclonal antibody infusion) within past 90 days. Individuals were followed up from the index date until the earliest outcome occurrence, death, 90 days from index date or the end of data availability. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted with baseline covariates was used to compare the risk of outcomes between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients and molnupiravir recipients which include (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) intensive care unit (ICU) admission, (iii) ventilatory support, (iv) hospitalisation, (v) hepatic impairment, (vi) ischaemic stroke, and (vii) myocardial infarction. Subgroup analyses included age (<70; ≥70 years); sex, Charlson comorbidity index (≤5; >5), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received (0-1; ≥2 doses).

Findings

A total of 4886 patients were included (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 1462; molnupiravir: 3424). There were 347 events of all-cause mortality (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 74, 5.06%; molnupiravir: 273, 7.97%), 10 events of ICU admission (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 4, 0.27%; molnupiravir: 6, 0.18%), 48 events of ventilatory support (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 13, 0.89%; molnupiravir: 35, 1.02%), 836 events of hospitalisation (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 218, 23.98%; molnupiravir: 618, 28.14%), 1 event of hepatic impairment (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 0, 0%; molnupiravir: 1, 0.03%), 8 events of ischaemic stroke (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 3, 0.22%; molnupiravir: 5, 0.16%) and 9 events of myocardial infarction (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: 2, 0.15%; molnupiravir: 7, 0.22%). Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir users had lower rates of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction (ARR) at 90 days 2.91%, 95% CI: 1.47-4.36%) and hospitalisation (ARR at 90 days 4.16%, 95% CI: 0.81-7.51%) as compared with molnupiravir users. Similar rates of ICU admission (ARR at 90 days -0.09%, 95% CI: -0.4 to 0.2%), ventilatory support (ARR at 90 days 0.13%, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.72%), hepatic impairment (ARR at 90 days 0.03%, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.09%), ischaemic stroke (ARR at 90 days -0.06%, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.22%), and myocardial infarction (ARR at 90 days 0.07%, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.33%) were found between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir users. Consistent results were observed in relative risk adjusted with baseline characteristics. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.455-0.857) and hospitalisation (HR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.64-0.954).

Interpretation

Patients with COVID-19 with advanced kidney disease receiving nirmatrelvir-ritonavir had a lower rate of all-cause mortality and hospital admission when compared with molnupiravir. Other adverse clinical outcomes were similar in both treatment groups.

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund (COVID1903010), Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Multi-Organ Systems Involvement in COVID-19 is Associated With a Worse Prognosis

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has multiple organ system involvement but the association of organ system involvement with disease prognosis has not been reported. We study the association of organ systems involved with in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) in COVID-19.

Methods

Retrospective study of 808 consecutive patients with confirmed-laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in a New York hospital from March 1-May 15, 2020.

Results

Increased number of organs systems involved was associated with increased odds for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.66, p < 0.01) and increased LOS (B = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p < 0.05). Increased platelet count was associated with decreased odds for mortality (OR: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.994-0.998, p < 0.001). Increased white blood cell count was associated with increased odds for mortality (OR: 14.00, 95% CI: 3.41-57.38, p < 0.001). Increased creatinine and glucose were each associated with increased LOS (B = 0.11, SE = 0.04, p < 0.01, and B = 0.12, SE = 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). Increased odds for mortality were also found in high FiO2 oxygen requirement (OR: 11.63, 95% CI: 3.90-34.75, p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR: 109.93, 95% CI: 29.44-410.45, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Multiple organ systems involvement in COVID-19 is associated with worse prognosis. Clinical/laboratory values corresponding to each organ system may be used as prognostic tools in clinical settings to tailor treatments for COVID-19 patients.

Host determinants and responses underlying SARS-CoV-2 liver tropism

Hepatic sequelae are frequently reported in coronavirus disease 2019 cases and are correlated with increased disease severity. Therefore, a detailed exploration of host factors contributing to hepatic impairment and ultimately infection outcomes in patients is essential for improved clinical management. The causes of hepatic injury are not limited to drug-mediated toxicity or aberrant host inflammatory responses. Indeed, multiple studies report the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in liver autopsies and the susceptibility of explanted human hepatocytes to infection. In this review, we confirm that hepatic cells express an extensive range of factors implicated in SARS-CoV-2 entry. We also provide an overview of studies reporting evidence for direct infection of liver cell types and the infection-induced cell-intrinsic processes that likely contribute to hepatic impairment.

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE COVID-19 AND CIRRHOSIS OR LIVER TRANSPLANT IN A BRAZILIAN QUATERNARY CENTER

BACKGROUND

Specific associations between liver cirrhosis and liver transplant with poorer outcomes in COVID-19 are still not completely clear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 and cirrhosis or liver transplant in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted in a quaternary hospital. Patients with COVID-19 and liver cirrhosis or liver transplant were selected. The clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as the outcomes, were assessed using electronic records.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients with COVID-19 and liver condition were included in the study. Patients with liver cirrhosis had significantly more endotracheal intubation and a higher relative risk of death than liver transplant recipients. Patients with higher MELD-Na scores had increased death rates and lower survival probability and survival time.

CONCLUSION

Patients with liver cirrhosis, especially those with higher MELD-Na scores, had poorer outcomes in COVID-19. Liver transplant recipients do not seem to be linked to poorer COVID-19 outcomes.

Multi-cohort study on cytokine and chemokine profiles in the progression of COVID-19

Various substances in the blood plasma serve as prognostic indicators of the progression of COVID-19. Consequently, multi-omics studies, such as proteomic and metabolomics, are ongoing to identify accurate biomarkers. Cytokines and chemokines, which are crucial components of immune and inflammatory responses, play pivotal roles in the transition from mild to severe illness. To determine the relationship between plasma cytokines and the progression of COVID-19, we used four study cohorts to perform a systematic study of cytokine levels in patients with different disease stages. We observed differential cytokine expression between patients with persistent-mild disease and patients with mild-to-severe transformation. For instance, IL-4 and IL-17 levels significantly increased in patients with mild-to-severe transformation, indicating differences within the mild disease group. Subsequently, we analysed the changes in cytokine and chemokine expression in the plasma of patients undergoing two opposing processes: the transition from mild to severe illness and the transition from severe to mild illness. We identified several factors, such as reduced expression of IL-16 and IL-18 during the severe phase of the disease and up-regulated expression of IL-10, IP-10, and SCGF-β during the same period, indicative of the deterioration or improvement of patients' conditions. These factors obtained from fine-tuned research cohorts could provide auxiliary indications for changes in the condition of COVID-19 patients.

Algorithmic Approach to Deranged Liver Functions After Transplantation

Liver transplant (LT) recipients require close follow-up with regular monitoring of the liver function tests (LFTs). Evaluation of deranged LFT should be individualized depending upon the time since LT, peri-operative events, clinical course, and any complications. These derangements can range from mild and asymptomatic to severe and symptomatic elevations requiring expedited personalized assessment and management. Pattern of LFT derangement (hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed), donor-recipient risk factors, timing after LT (post-operative, 1-12 months, and >12 months since LT) along with clinical context and symptomatology are important considerations before proceeding with the initial evaluation. Compliance to immunosuppression and drug interactions should be ascertained along with local epidemiology of infections. Essential initial evaluation must include an ultrasound abdomen with Doppler to rule out any structural causes such as biliary or vascular complications apart from focussed laboratory evaluation. Early allograft dysfunction, ischemia reperfusion injury, small-for-size syndrome, biliary leaks, hepatic artery, and portal vein thrombosis are usual culprits in the early post-operative period whereas viral hepatitis (acute or reactivation), opportunistic infections, and recurrence of the primary disease are more frequent in the later period. Graft rejection, biliary strictures, sepsis, and drug induced liver injury remain possible etiologies at all times points after LT. Initial evaluation algorithm must be customized based on history, clinical examination, risk factors, and pattern and severity of deranged LFT. Allograft rejection is a diagnosis of exclusion and requires liver biopsy to confirm and assess severity. Empirical treatment of rejection sans liver biopsy is discouraged.

Coronavirus disease 19 (Covid-19): A comparative study of pattern of liver injury in adult patients in different waves of Covid-19 infection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Liver dysfunction is a common manifestation of the COVID-19 infection. We aimed to study transaminase abnormalities through different waves of COVID-19 and their relations to disease severity or mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study included 521 Egyptian patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Data was retrieved from the medical records of patients who were admitted from April 2020 to October 2021 in Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, with categorization according to disease severity in correspondence to the four waves.

RESULTS

The median age was lower in the first wave compared to other waves, with male predominance across all waves. The most commonly encountered comorbidity overall was hypertension, followed by diabetes mellitus. White blood cells, ferritin, and interleukin-6 showed the highest median values in the second wave, with significantly higher median C-reactive protein on day 1 in the first wave. Forty percent of the patients showed elevated hepatic transaminases on admission in four waves, with no statistically significant difference between waves. On day 5, around half of the patients had elevated transaminases, with no significant difference between waves. Most CT findings were of moderate severity. Clinical severity was higher in the second wave. It was observed that the higher the disease severity, the greater the proportion of patients with elevated hepatic transaminases. The mortality rate was markedly high in cases who had elevated ALT or AST on day 5. The association between elevated enzymes on admission and mortality was seen in the first wave only, with a fatality rate of 22.5% in cases with increased baseline ALT and AST versus 5% in those with normal baseline enzymes.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in transaminases between the four waves. Elevated transaminases were positively associated with increased mortality and severity, reflecting their prognostic value.

Deregulated expression of autophagy genes; PIK3C3 and RAB7A in COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

The role of autophagy in coronaviruses infection and replication has a lot of debate. Autophagy involves the catalytic breakdown of intracellular components to be subsequently recycled by the lysosome. The aim of the study was to evaluate autophagy genes; PIK3C3 and RAB7A expressions in COVID-19 patients, and identify if PIK3C3 and RAB7A can be used as markers for monitoring COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

A case-control study was carried out on 50 patients and 50 healthy controls. Genes expression was performed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, PIK3C3 and RAB7A gene expression levels were significantly lower in patients (p < 0.001) with approximately with 9.4 and 2.3 decreased fold in PIK3C3 and RAB7A respectively. The ROC curve of PIK3C3 and RAB7A expressions showed sensitivity of 84 % and 74 % and specificity of 98 % and 78 % respectively. There was a positive correlation between PIK3C3 expression and WBCs, absolute neutrophil count, interleukin-6, D-dimer, and ALT among patients and between RAB7A expression and WBCs, CRP, IL-6, D-dimer and ALT in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed reduction of PIK3C3 and RAB7A expressions in COVID-19 patients. However, further studies are recommended to clarify their roles in the disease pathogenies as autophagy genes.

Spectrum of COVID-19 induced liver injury: A review report

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused changes in the global health system, causing significant setbacks in healthcare systems worldwide. This pandemic has also shown resilience, flexibility, and creativity in reacting to the tragedy. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection targets most of the respiratory tract, resulting in a severe sickness called acute respiratory distress syndrome that may be fatal in some individuals. Although the lung is the primary organ targeted by COVID-19 viruses, the clinical aspect of the disease is varied and ranges from asymptomatic to respiratory failure. However, due to an unorganized immune response and several affected mechanisms, the liver may also experience liver cell injury, ischemic liver dysfunction, and drug-induced liver injury, which can result in respiratory failure because of the immune system's disordered response and other compromised processes that can end in multisystem organ failure. Patients with liver cirrhosis or those who have impaired immune systems may be more likely than other groups to experience worse results from the SARS-CoV-2 infection. We thus intend to examine the pathogenesis, current therapy, and consequences of liver damage concerning COVID-19.

Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy during COVID-19 Pandemic

Background and Objectives: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) stands as one of the most prevalent concerns in maternal-fetal medicine, presenting a significant risk to fetal health and often associated with liver dysfunction. Concurrently, the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) infection can lead to hepatic cell injury through both direct and indirect pathways. Hypothetically, these two conditions may coincide, influencing each other. This study aimed to comparatively assess the incidence and severity of ICP before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing the incidence and severity of ICP between January 2018 and February 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period) and March 2020 to March 2022 (COVID-19 period) across two hospitals, encompassing 7799 deliveries. The diagnosis of ICP was established using the ICD-10 code and defined as total bile acids (BA) levels ≥ 10 μmol/L. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, as well as multiple or logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 226 cases of ICP were identified. The incidence of mild cholestasis (BA < 40 μmol/L) was lower during the pandemic compared to before (3% before versus 2%, p < 0.05), while the incidence of moderate and severe ICP remained unchanged (0.6% before vs. 0.4%, p = 0.2). Overall, the total incidence of ICP was lower during the pandemic (3.6% before versus 2.4%, p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in severity (as defined by BA and liver function test levels), rates of caesarean section, or neonatal birth weights. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the total incidence of ICP appeared to be lower. However, this reduction was primarily observed in cases of mild ICP, potentially indicating challenges in detection or reduced access to medical services during this period. The incidence of moderate and severe ICP remained unchanged, suggesting that these forms of the condition were unaffected by the pandemic's circumstances.

Distinct Patterns of Liver Chemistry Changes in Pediatric Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Origin and COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

In 2021 and 2022, there were noted to be clusters of pediatric acute hepatitis of unknown origin (AHUO) occurring across the globe. While there was not necessarily a global increase in cases, understanding the pattern of liver injury in AHUO is crucial to properly identify cases of this unexplained phenomenon, especially since it occurred simultaneously with a global resurgence of COVID-19. The objective of this study was to contrast the patterns in liver-relevant biochemical data from COVID-19 patients and AHUO. Studies reporting liver chemistries for cases of AHUO and COVID-19 were identified by a systematic review and search of the literature. For each case, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and international normalized ratio (INR) levels were extracted as available. These were normalized to multiples of the upper limit of normal by patient age. There were statistically significant greater elevations of ALT and AST in patients with AHUO than in those with COVID-19. Only a subset of patients with COVID-19 had an AST or ALT greater than the normal range. INR elevation could be substantial for both conditions but was also statistically higher in the AHUO group. Liver chemistry changes were not statistically correlated with age. The pattern of liver chemistry changes between AHUO and COVID-19 have some distinctions, which suggests that AHUO is not a phenomenon driven primarily by SARS-CoV-2 infection alone. Differentiating AHUO and COVID-19 would be challenging based on patterns of liver chemistry changes alone.

Peripheral blood indicators and COVID-19: an observational and bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Blood is critical for health, supporting key functions like immunity and oxygen transport. While studies have found links between common blood clinical indicators and COVID-19, they cannot provide causal inference due to residual confounding and reverse causality. To identify indicators affecting COVID-19, we analyzed clinical data (n = 2,293, aged 18-65 years) from Guangzhou Medical University's first affiliated hospital (2022-present), identifying 34 significant indicators differentiating COVID-19 patients from healthy controls. Utilizing bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses, integrating data from over 2.46 million participants from various large-scale studies, we established causal links for six blood indicators with COVID-19 risk, five of which is consistent with our observational findings. Specifically, elevated Troponin I and Platelet Distribution Width levels are linked with increased COVID-19 susceptibility, whereas higher Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, and Neutrophil counts confer a protective effect. Reverse MR analysis confirmed four blood biomarkers influenced by COVID-19, aligning with our observational data for three of them. Notably, COVID-19 exhibited a positive causal relationship with Troponin I (Tnl) and Serum Amyloid Protein A, while a negative association was observed with Plateletcrit. These findings may help identify high-risk individuals and provide further direction on the management of COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: role of viral proteins and genomic diversity in virus infection and COVID-19 progression

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); a severe respiratory distress that has emerged from the city of Wuhan, Hubei province, China during December 2019. COVID-19 is currently the major global health problem and the disease has now spread to most countries in the world. COVID-19 has profoundly impacted human health and activities worldwide. Genetic mutation is one of the essential characteristics of viruses. They do so to adapt to their host or to move to another one. Viral genetic mutations have a high potentiality to impact human health as these mutations grant viruses unique unpredicted characteristics. The difficulty in predicting viral genetic mutations is a significant obstacle in the field. Evidence indicates that SARS-CoV-2 has a variety of genetic mutations and genomic diversity with obvious clinical consequences and implications. In this review, we comprehensively summarized and discussed the currently available knowledge regarding SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks with a fundamental focus on the role of the viral proteins and their mutations in viral infection and COVID-19 progression. We also summarized the clinical implications of SARS-CoV-2 variants and how they affect the disease severity and hinder vaccine development. Finally, we provided a massive phylogenetic analysis of the spike gene of 214 SARS-CoV-2 isolates from different geographical regions all over the world and their associated clinical implications.

The Association between Serum Level of Vitamin D and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Real-World Data

Objective

The association between vitamin D status and inflammation remains unclear in hospitalized patients.

Materials and Methods

We performed the current study based on real-world data from two teaching hospitals. Serum level of vitamin D (assessed by 25-hydroxyvitamin D) was evaluated within 2 days after admission. All the patients were further classified into three groups: deficiency (<12 ng/mL), insufficiency (12-20 ng/mL), and adequate (≥20 ng/mL). White blood cell (WBC) count, serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin were also measured and used to evaluate inflammation. Other potential covariates were abstracted from medical records. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated to assess the severity of disease.

Results

A total number of 35,528 hospitalized adult patients (21,171 men and 14,357 women) were included. The average age and BMI were 57.5 ± 16.2 years and 23.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively, while medium vitamin D level was 16.1 ng/mL (interquartile range: 11.4 ng/mL, 21.6 ng/mL) and median CCI was one point (interquartile range: 0 point, two points). The prevalence of deficiency and insufficiency was 28.0% and 40.5%. Multivariate linear regression model showed that serum level of vitamin D was significantly associated with WBC and CRP but not associated with procalcitonin. Each standard deviation (≈7.4 ng/mL) increase in vitamin D was associated with a decrease in WBC by 0.13 × 109/mL (95% CI: 0.2 × 109/mL, 0.06 × 109/mL) and 0.62 mg/L (95% CI: 0.88 mg/L, 0.37 mg/L) for CRP. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis (excluding those whose eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, those whose daily calorie intake <1,000 kcal, and those who were recruited from Xin Hua hospital) generated similar results.

Conclusions

The deficiency and insufficiency of vitamin D in the hospitalized adult patients was very common. However, the results should be interpreted with caution for limited representation of the whole inpatients. Low level of vitamin D was associated with inflammatory biomarkers, which provide the evidences to early intervention for lower the risk of infection.

Liver injury in COVID-19: an insight into pathobiology and roles of risk factors

COVID-19 is a complex disease that can lead to fatal respiratory failure with extrapulmonary complications, either as a direct result of viral invasion in multiple organs or secondary to oxygen supply shortage. Liver is susceptible to many viral pathogens, and due to its versatile functions in the body, it is of great interest to determine how hepatocytes may interact with SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients. Liver injury is a major cause of death, and SARS-CoV-2 is suspected to contribute significantly to hepatopathy. Owing to the lack of knowledge in this field, further research is required to address these ambiguities. Therefore, we aimed to provide a comprehensive insight into host-virus interactions, underlying mechanisms, and associated risk factors by collecting results from epidemiological analyses and relevant laboratory experiments. Backed by an avalanche of recent studies, our findings support that liver injury is a sequela of severe COVID-19, and certain pre-existing liver conditions can also intensify the morbidity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in synergy. Notably, age, sex, lifestyle, dietary habits, coinfection, and particular drug regimens play a decisive role in the final outcome and prognosis as well. Taken together, our goal was to unravel these complexities concerning the development of novel diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic approaches with a focus on prioritizing high-risk groups.

Long-Term Outcomes of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, it has become clear that patients with diabetes are at risk for more severe and fatal COVID-19. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a major risk factor for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The goal of study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with or without T2D in the hospital and at 10-month follow-up (FU).

METHODS

A total of 2486 hospitalized patients in the first wave of COVID-19 were analyzed according to the absence/presence of T2D, with 2082 (84.1%) patients in the control COVID-19 group and 381 (15.5%) in the T2D group. Twenty-three patients had other types of diabetes and were therefore excluded from the study. In-hospital mortality and cardiovascular endpoints (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular deaths and hospitalizations and composite endpoints) at the 10-month follow-up were analyzed. To remove bias in patients' characteristics disproportion, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used for hospital and follow-up endpoints.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was considerably greater in T2D than in the control COVID-19 group (13.89% vs. 4.89%, p < 0.0001), and the difference remained after PSM (p < 0.0001). Higher glucose-level T2D patients had a higher mortality rate (p = 0.018). The most significant predictors of hospital death in T2D patients were a high CRP, glucose, neutrophils count, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The follow-up of patients over 10 months showed a non-significant increase for all endpoints in the T2D group (p > 0.05), and significant increase in stroke (p < 0.042). After the PSM, the difference decreased in stroke (p = 0.090), but became significant in cardiovascular hospitalizations (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In T2D patients with COVID-19, an increase in hospital mortality, stroke and cardiovascular hospitalizations rates in the follow-up was observed.

COVID-19, Possible Hepatic Pathways and Alcohol Abuse-What Do We Know up to 2023?

The pandemic period due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revolutionized all possible areas of global health. Significant consequences were also related to diverse extrapulmonary manifestations of this pathology. The liver was found to be a relatively common organ, beyond the respiratory tract, affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Multiple studies revealed the essential role of chronic liver disease (CLD) in the general outcome of coronavirus infection. Present concerns in this field are related to the direct hepatic consequences caused by COVID-19 and pre-existing liver disorders as risk factors for the severe course of the infection. Which mechanism has a key role in this phenomenon-previously existing hepatic disorder or acute liver failure due to SARS-CoV-2-is still not fully clarified. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) constitutes another not fully elucidated context of coronavirus infection. Should the toxic effects of ethanol or already developed liver cirrhosis and its consequences be perceived as a causative or triggering factor of hepatic impairment in COVID-19 patients? In the face of these discrepancies, we decided to summarize the role of the liver in the whole picture of coronavirus infection, paying special attention to ALD and focusing on the pathological pathways related to COVID-19, ethanol toxicity and liver cirrhosis.