Regulation of human interleukin-8 receptor A: identification of a phosphorylation site involved in modulating receptor functions

How do chemokines navigate neutrophils to the target site: Dissecting the structural mechanisms and signaling pathways

Chemokines play crucial roles in combating microbial infection and initiating tissue repair by recruiting neutrophils in a timely and coordinated manner. In humans, no less than seven chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8) and two receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2) mediate neutrophil functions but in a context dependent manner. Neutrophil-activating chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and their receptor binding triggers conformational changes that are coupled to G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. G-protein signaling activates a variety of effectors including Ca2+ channels and phospholipase C. β-arrestin serves as a multifunctional adaptor and is coupled to several signaling hubs including MAP kinase and tyrosine kinase pathways. Both G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways play important non-overlapping roles in neutrophil trafficking and activation. Functional studies have established many similarities but distinct differences for a given chemokine and between chemokines at the level of monomer vs. dimer, CXCR1 vs. CXCR2 activation, and G-protein vs. β-arrestin pathways. We propose that two forms of the ligand binding two receptors and activating two signaling pathways enables fine-tuned neutrophil function compared to a single form, a single receptor, or a single pathway. We summarize the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms by which chemokine monomers/dimers activate CXCR1/CXCR2 and how these interactions trigger G-protein/β-arrestin-coupled signaling pathways. We also discuss current challenges and knowledge gaps, and likely advances in the near future that will lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the chemokine-CXCR1/CXCR2-G-protein/β-arrestin axis and neutrophil function.

Differential Effects of Posttranslational Modifications of CXCL8/Interleukin-8 on CXCR1 and CXCR2 Internalization and Signaling Properties

CXCL8 or interleukin (IL)-8 directs neutrophil migration and activation through interaction with CXCR1 and CXCR2 that belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Naturally occurring posttranslational modifications of the NH₂-terminal region of CXCL8 affect its biological activities, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are only partially understood. Here, we studied the implications of site-specific citrullination and truncation for the signaling potency of CXCL8. Native CXCL8(1-77), citrullinated [Cit5]CXCL8(1-77) and the major natural isoform CXCL8(6-77) were chemically synthesized and tested in internalization assays using human neutrophils. Citrullinated and truncated isoforms showed a moderately enhanced capacity to induce internalization of CXCR1 and CXCR2. Moreover, CXCL8-mediated activation of Gαi-dependent signaling through CXCR1 and CXCR2 was increased upon modification to [Cit5]CXCL8(1-77) or CXCL8(6-77). All CXCL8 variants promoted recruitment of β-arrestins 1 and 2 to CXCR1 and CXCR2. Compared to CXCL8(1-77), CXCL8(6-77) showed an enhanced potency to recruit β-arrestin 2 to both receptors, while for [Cit5]CXCL8(1-77) only the capacity to induce β-arrestin 2 recruitment to CXCR2 was increased. Both modifications had no biasing effect, i.e., did not alter the preference of CXCL8 to activate either Gαi-protein or β-arrestin-dependent signaling through its receptors. Our results support the concept that specific chemokine activities are fine-tuned by posttranslational modifications.

Phenotypic analysis of chemokine-driven actin reorganization in primary human neutrophils

The chemokine-driven activation of CXC-type chemokine receptors 1/2 (CXCR1/2) and the subsequent reorganization of the neutrophilic actin are early key events in the induction of neutrophil migration toward centers of inflammation. In this study, an image analysis algorithm was developed to detect subtle chemokine-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton of primary human neutrophils. By this means, a discrete early step of neutrophil activation was dissected that could be initiated by concentrations of growth-related oncogen α (Gro-α) or interleukin-8 (IL-8) just above their resting-state plasma levels. The associated half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values for Gro-α and IL-8 of 8 and 22 pM, respectively, are between two and three orders of magnitude below the so-far reported EC50 values of these chemokines for the induction of neutrophilic calcium release, integrin expression, degranulation, and receptor internalization. Sch527123, a known inhibitor of CXCR2 (KD=49 pM) and with a lower potency/affinity also of CXCR1 (KD=3.9 nM), antagonized actin remodeling with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 400 pM for the CXCR2-specific agonist Gro-α and of 36 nM for the CXCR1/2-promiscuous agonist IL-8. This observation indicates that the here-described early step of chemokine-driven actin reorganization is modulated by both CXCR1 and CXCR2. Thus, the imaging-based assay format, as developed in this work, may be employed in a phenotypic screening campaign to identify inhibitors of an early step in CXCR1/2-induced neutrophilic chemotaxis.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 deficiency promotes angiogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate the activated form of G protein-coupled receptors leading to receptor desensitization and downregulation. We have recently shown that the chemokine receptor, CXCR2, couples to GRK6 to regulate cellular responses including chemotaxis, angiogenesis, and wound healing. In this study, we investigate the role of GRK6 in tumorigenesis using murine models of human lung cancer. Mice deficient in GRK6 (GRK6(-/-)) exhibited a significant increase in Lewis lung cancer growth and metastasis relative to control littermates (GRK6(+/+)). GRK6 deletion had no effect on the expression of proangiogenic chemokine or vascular endothelial growth factor, but upregulated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 release, tumor-infiltrating PMNs, and microvessel density. Because β-arrestin-2-deficient (βarr2(-/-)) mice exhibited increased Lewis lung cancer growth and metastasis similar to that of GRK6(-/-), we developed a double GRK6(-/-)/βarr2(-/-) mouse model. Surprisingly, GRK6(-/-)/βarr2(-/-) mice exhibited faster tumor growth relative to GRK6(-/-) or βarr2(-/-) mice. Treatment of the mice with anti-CXCR2 Ab inhibited tumor growth in both GRK6(-/-) and GRK6(-/-)/βarr2(-/-) animals. Altogether, the results indicate that CXCR2 couples to GRK6 to regulate angiogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis. Deletion of GRK6 increases the activity of the host CXCR2, resulting in greater PMN infiltration and MMP release in the tumor microenvironment, thereby promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. Because GRK6(-/-)/βarr2(-/-) showed greater tumor growth relative to GRK6(-/-) or βarr2(-/-) mice, the data further suggest that CXCR2 couples to different mechanisms to mediate tumor progression and metastasis.

The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 couple to distinct G protein-coupled receptor kinases to mediate and regulate leukocyte functions

The chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, couple to Gαi to induce leukocyte recruitment and activation at sites of inflammation. Upon activation by CXCL8, these receptors become phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized. In this study, we investigated the role of different G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in CXCR1- and CXCR2-mediated cellular functions. To that end, short hairpin RNA was used to inhibit GRK2, 3, 5, and 6 in RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing CXCR1 or CXCR2, and CXCL8-mediated receptor activation and regulation were assessed. Inhibition of GRK2 and GRK6 increased CXCR1 and CXCR2 resistance to phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization, respectively, and enhanced CXCL8-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis in vitro. GRK2 depletion diminished CXCR1-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation but had no effect on CXCR2-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. GRK6 depletion had no significant effect on CXCR1 function. However, peritoneal neutrophils from mice deficient in GRK6 (GRK6(-/-)) displayed an increase in CXCR2-mediated G protein activation but in vitro exhibited a decrease in chemotaxis, receptor desensitization, and internalization relative to wild-type (GRK6(+/+)) cells. In contrast, neutrophil recruitment in vivo in GRK6(-/-) mice was increased in response to delivery of CXCL1 through the air pouch model. In a wound-closure assay, GRK6(-/-) mice showed enhanced myeloperoxidase activity, suggesting enhanced neutrophil recruitment, and faster wound closure compared with GRK6(+/+) animals. Taken together, the results indicate that CXCR1 and CXCR2 couple to distinct GRK isoforms to mediate and regulate inflammatory responses. CXCR1 predominantly couples to GRK2, whereas CXCR2 interacts with GRK6 to negatively regulate receptor sensitization and trafficking, thus affecting cell signaling and angiogenesis.

Distinct and shared roles of β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 on the regulation of C3a receptor signaling in human mast cells

Background

The complement component C3a induces degranulation in human mast cells via the activation of cell surface G protein coupled receptors (GPCR; C3aR). For most GPCRs, agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation leads to the recruitment of β-arrestin-1/β-arrestin-2; resulting in receptor desensitization and internalization. Activation of GPCRs also leads to ERK1/2 phosphorylation via two temporally distinct pathways; an early response that reflects G protein activation and a delayed response that is G protein independent but requires β-arrestins. The role of β-arrestins on C3aR activation/regulation in human mast cells, however, remains unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We utilized lentivirus short hairpin (sh)RNA to stably knockdown the expression of β-arrestin-1 and β-arrrestin-2 in human mast cell lines, HMC-1 and LAD2 that endogenously expresses C3aR. Silencing β-arrestin-2 attenuated C3aR desensitization, blocked agonist-induced receptor internalization and rendered the cells responsive to C3a for enhanced NF-κB activity as well as chemokine generation. By contrast, silencing β-arrestin-1 had no effect on these responses but resulted in a significant decrease in C3a-induced mast cell degranulation. In shRNA control cells, C3a caused a transient ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which peaked at 5 min but disappeared by 10 min. Knockdown of β-arrestin-1, β-arrestin-2 or both enhanced the early response to C3a and rendered the cells responsive for ERK1/2 phosphorylation at later time points (10–30 min). Treatment of cells with pertussis toxin almost completely blocked both early and delayed C3a-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in β-arrestin1/2 knockdown cells.

Conclusion/Significance

This study demonstrates distinct roles for β-arrestins-1 and β-arrestins-2 on C3aR desensitization, internalization, degranulation, NF-κB activation and chemokine generation in human mast cells. It also shows that both β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 play a novel and shared role in inhibiting G protein-dependent ERK1/2 phosphorylation. These findings reveal a new level of complexity for C3aR regulation by β-arrestins in human mast cells.

Targeting CXCR1/CXCR2 receptor antagonism in malignant melanoma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing throughout the world and is currently rising faster than any other cancer in men and second only to lung cancer in women. Current strategies focused on systemic therapy for treatment of melanoma have shown no effect on survival. Therefore there is a pressing need for developing novel targeted therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Our goal is to provide an overview regarding targeting CXCR1/2 in malignant melanoma, the rationale behind these approaches and the future perspective.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review illustrates our current understanding of CXCR1/2 receptor in melanoma progression and metastasis. We describe approaches that are being developed to block CXCR1/2 activation, including low-molecular-weight antagonists, modified chemokines and antibodies directed against ligands and receptors.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 and their ligands play an important role in the pathogenesis of malignant melanoma. Recent reports demonstrated that CXCR1 is constitutively expressed in all melanoma cases irrespective of stage and grade, however, CXCR2 expression was restricted to aggressive melanoma tumors,. Furthermore, modulation of CXCR1/2 expression and/or activity has been shown to regulate malignant melanoma growth, angiogenesis and metastasis, suggesting CXCR1/2 targeting as a novel therapeutic approach for malignant melanoma.

Regulation of human mast cell and basophil function by anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a

Allergic diseases such as asthma result from inappropriate immunologic responses to common environmental allergens in genetically susceptible individuals. Following allergen exposure, interaction of dendritic cells (DC) with CD4(+) T cells leads to the production of Th2 cytokines, which induce B cells to synthesize IgE molecules (sensitization phase). These IgE molecules bind to their high affinity receptors (FcvarepsilonRI) on the surface of mast cells and basophils and their subsequent cross-linking by allergen results in the release of preformed and newly synthesized mediators, which cause bronchoconstriction, lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthma (effector phase). The complement components C3a and C5a levels are increased in the lungs of patients with asthma and are likely generated via the actions of both allergen and mast cell proteases. In vivo studies with rodents have shown that while C3a facilitates allergen sensitization in some models C5a inhibits this response. Despite this difference, both anaphylatoxins promote lung inflammation and AHR in vivo indicating that cells other than DC and T cells likely mediate the functional effects of C3a and C5a in asthma. This review focuses on the contribution of C3a and C5a in the pathogenesis of asthma with a particular emphasis on mast cells and basophils. It discusses the mechanisms by which anaphylatoxins activate mast cells and basophils and the associated signaling pathways via which their receptors are regulated by priming and desensitization.

Differential activation and regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 by CXCL8 monomer and dimer

CXCL8 (also known as IL-8) activates CXCR1 and CXCR2 to mediate neutrophil recruitment and trigger cytotoxic effect at sites of infection. Under physiological conditions, CXCL8 could exist as monomers, dimers, or a mixture of monomers and dimers. Therefore, both forms of CXCL8 could interact with CXCR1 and CXCR2 with different affinities and potencies to mediate different cellular responses. In the present study, we have used a "trapped" nonassociating monomer (L25NMe) and a nondissociating dimer (R26C) to investigate their activities for human neutrophils that express both receptors and for RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing either CXCR1(RBL-CXCR1) or CXCR2 (RBL-CXCR2). The monomer was more active than the dimer for activities such as intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, phosphoinositide hydrolysis, chemotaxis. and exocytosis. Receptor regulation, however, is distinct for each receptor. The rate of monomer-mediated regulation of CXCR1 is greater for activities such as phosphorylation, desensitization, beta-arrestin translocation, and internalization. In contrast, for CXCR2, both monomeric and dimeric CXCL8 mediate these activities to a similar extent. Interestingly, receptor-mediated signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation in response to all three CXCL8 variants was more sustained for CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. Taken together, the results indicate that the CXCL8 monomer and dimer differentially activate and regulate CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors. These distinct properties of the ligand and the receptors play a critical role in orchestrating neutrophil recruitment and eliciting cytotoxic activity during an inflammatory response.

The functional significance behind expressing two IL-8 receptor types on PMN

PMN are critical to innate immunity and are fundamental to antibacterial defense. To localize to sites of infection, PMN possess receptors that detect chemoattractant stimuli elicited at the site, such as chemokines, complement split products, or bioactive lipids. Signaling through these receptors stimulates chemotaxis toward the site of infection but also activates a number of biochemical processes, with the result that PMN kill invading bacteria. PMN possess two receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, for the N-terminal ELR motif-containing CXC chemokines, although only two chemokine members bind both receptors and the remainder binding only CXCR2. This peculiar pattern in receptor specificity has drawn considerable interest and investigation into whether signaling through each receptor might impart unique properties on the PMN. Indeed, at first glance, CXCR1 and CXCR2 appear to be functionally redundant; however, there are differences. Considering these proinflammatory activities of activating PMN through chemokine receptors, there has been great interest in the possibility that blocking CXCR1 and CXCR2 on PMN will provide a therapeutic benefit. The literature examining CXCR1 and CXCR2 in PMN function during human and modeled diseases will be reviewed, asking whether the functional differences can be perceived based on alterations in the role PMN play in these processes.

Cleavage of CXCR1 on neutrophils disables bacterial killing in cystic fibrosis lung disease

Interleukin-8 (IL-8) activates neutrophils via the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. However, the airways of individuals with cystic fibrosis are frequently colonized by bacterial pathogens, despite the presence of large numbers of neutrophils and IL-8. Here we show that IL-8 promotes bacterial killing by neutrophils through CXCR1 but not CXCR2. Unopposed proteolytic activity in the airways of individuals with cystic fibrosis cleaved CXCR1 on neutrophils and disabled their bacterial-killing capacity. These effects were protease concentration-dependent and also occurred to a lesser extent in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Receptor cleavage induced the release of glycosylated CXCR1 fragments that were capable of stimulating IL-8 production in bronchial epithelial cells via Toll-like receptor 2. In vivo inhibition of proteases by inhalation of alpha1-antitrypsin restored CXCR1 expression and improved bacterial killing in individuals with cystic fibrosis. The cleavage of CXCR1, the functional consequences of its cleavage, and the identification of soluble CXCR1 fragments that behave as bioactive components represent a new pathophysiologic mechanism in cystic fibrosis and other chronic lung diseases.

Intracellular cross-talk between the GPCR CXCR1 and CXCR2: role of carboxyl terminus phosphorylation sites

In the present study, we used the human chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 as a model system for the study of intracellular cross-talk between two closely related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). In cells expressing either CXCR1 or CXCR2, exposure to the CXCL8 ligand resulted in prominent reduction in cell surface expression of the receptors. We have shown previously that the reduction in cell surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2, to be termed herein "down-regulation", is significantly lower in cells expressing both receptors together. Now we show that reduced receptor down-regulation was specific to the CXCR1+CXCR2 pair. Also, CXCR2 carboxyl terminus phosphorylation sites were required for inducing inhibition of CXCR1 down-regulation, and vice versa. Accordingly, phosphorylation of CXCR2 carboxyl terminus domain was intact when expressed together with CXCR1. Moreover, specific carboxyl terminus phosphorylation sites on each of the wild type receptors protected them from more severe inhibition of down-regulation, induced by joint expression with the other receptor. When concomitantly expressed, CXCR1 and CXCR2 were impaired in recycling to the plasma membrane, despite their undergoing intact dephosphorylation. Overall, we show that cross-talk between two GPCR is manifested by impairment of their intracellular trafficking, primarily of ligand-induced down-regulation, via carboxyl terminus phosphorylation sites.

CXCR1 and CXCR2 Activation and Regulation

CXCL8 (interleukin-8) interacts with two receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, to activate leukocytes. Upon activation, CXCR2 internalizes very rapidly relative to CXCR1 ( approximately 90% versus approximately 10% after 5 min). The C termini of the receptors have been shown to be necessary for internalization but are not sufficient to explain the distinct kinetics of down-regulation. To determine the structural determinant(s) that modulate receptor internalization, various chimeric and point mutant receptors were generated by progressively exchanging specific domains or amino acids between CXCR1 and CXCR2. The receptors were stably expressed in rat basophilic leukemia 2H3 cells and characterized for receptor binding, intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, phosphoinositide hydrolysis, phosphorylation, internalization, and MAPK activation. The data herein indicate that the second extracellular loop (2ECL) of the receptors is critical for the distinct rate of internalization. Replacing the 2ECL of CXCR2 with that of CXCR1 (B(2ECL)A) or Asp(199) with its CXCR1 valine counterpart (B(D199V)A) delayed CXCR2 internalization similarly to CXCR1. Replacing Asp(199) with Asn (B(D199N)) restored CXCR2 rapid internalization. Structure modeling of the 2ECL of the receptors also suggested that Asp(199) plays a critical role in stabilizing and modulating CXCR2 rapid internalization relative to CXCR1. B(D199N) internalized rapidly but migrated as a single phosphorylated form like CXCR1 ( approximately 75 kDa), whereas B(2ECL)A and B(D199V)A showed slow and fast migrating forms like CXCR2 ( approximately 45 and approximately 65 kDa, respectively) but internalized like CXCR1. These data further undermine the role of receptor oligomerization in CXCL8 receptor internalization. Like CXCR1, B(D199V)A also induced sustained ERK activation and cross-desensitized Ca(2+) mobilization to CCR5 relative to B(D199N) and CXCR2. Altogether, the data suggest that the 2ECL of the CXCL8 receptors is important in modulating their distinct rate of down-regulation and thereby signal length and post-internalization activities.

Activation and regulation of platelet-activating factor receptor: role of G(i) and G(q) in receptor-mediated chemotactic, cytotoxic, and cross-regulatory signals

Platelet-activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerolphosphocholine; PAF) induces leukocyte accumulation and activation at sites of inflammation via the activation of a specific cell surface receptor (PAFR). PAFR couples to both pertussis toxin-sensitive and pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins to activate leukocytes. To define the role(s) of G(i) and G(q) in PAF-induced leukocyte responses, two G-protein-linked receptors were generated by fusing G alpha(i3) (PAFR-G alpha(i3)) or G alpha(q) (PAFR-G alpha(q)) at the C terminus of PAFR. Rat basophilic leukemia cell line (RBL-2H3) stably expressing wild-type PAFR, PAFR-G alpha(i3), or PAFR-G alpha(q) was generated and characterized. All receptor variants bound PAF with similar affinities to mediate G-protein activation, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, and secretion of beta-hexosaminidase. PAFR-G alpha(i3) and PAFR-G alpha(q) mediated greater GTPase activity in isolated membranes than PAFR but lower PI hydrolysis and secretion in whole cells. PAFR and PAFR-G alpha(i3), but not PAFR-G alpha(q), mediated chemotaxis to PAF. All three receptors underwent phosphorylation and desensitization upon exposure to PAF but only PAFR translocated beta arrestin to the cell membrane and internalized. In RBL-2H3 cells coexpressing the PAFRs along with CXCR1, IL-8 (CXCL8) cross-desensitized Ca2+ mobilization to PAF by all the receptors but only PAFR-G alpha(i3) activation cross-inhibited the response of CXCR1 to CXCL8. Altogether, the data indicate that G(i) exclusively mediates chemotactic and cross-regulatory signals of the PAFR, but both G(i) and G(q) activate PI hydrolysis and exocytosis by this receptor. Because chemotaxis and cross-desensitization are exclusively mediated by G(i), the data suggest that differential activation of both G(i) and G(q) by PAFR likely mediate specific as well as redundant signaling pathways.

The IL sequence in the LLKIL motif in CXCR2 is required for full ligand-induced activation of Erk, Akt, and chemotaxis in HL60 cells

The chemotaxis of differentiated HL60 cells stably expressing CXCR2 was examined in a microfluidic gradient device where the steepness of the CXCL8 chemokine gradient was varied from 2 pg/ml/mum (0-1 ng/ml over a width of 500 microm) to 50 pg/ml/microm (0-25 ng/ml over 500 microm). The differentiated HL60 cells stably expressing CXCR2 exhibited little chemotaxis in response to a 0-1 ng/ml gradient, but displayed an increasing chemotactic response as the gradient steepness increased from 0 to 5, 0 to 10, and 0 to 25 ng/ml, demonstrating that steepness of gradient is a major determinant of the relative ability of cells to persistently migrate up a chemotactic gradient. When HL60 cells expressed CXCR2 mutated in the C terminus LLKIL motif (IL to AA), ligand-induced internalization of receptors was reduced 50%, whereas cell migration along the gradient of CXCL8 was completely lost. Although both mutant and wild-type receptors could mediate Akt and Erk activation in response to CXCL8, the level of activation of these two kinases was much lower in the cell line expressing the mutant receptors. These data imply that the IL amino acid residues in the LLKIL motif are very important for activation of the signal transduction cascade, which is necessary for cells to sense the chemokine gradient and respond with chemotaxis. Moreover, because mutation of the IL residues in the LLKIL motif resulted in only 50% reduction in receptor internalization, and a 50% reduction in Akt and Erk phosphorylation, but a complete loss of chemotactic response, the data imply that IL amino acid residues in the LLKIL motif are key either for amplification or oscillation of crucial signaling events or for establishment of a threshold for signals required for chemotaxis.

Biological role of the N-formyl peptide receptors

Ligation of N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) to its specific cell surface receptors triggers different cascades of biochemical events, eventually leading to cellular activation. The formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are members of the seven-transmembrane, G-protein coupled receptors superfamily, expressed at high levels on polymorphonuclear and mononuclear phagocytes. The main responses elicited upon ligation of formylated peptides, referred to as cellular activation, are those of morphological polarization, locomotion, production of reactive-oxygen species and release of proteolytic enzymes. FPRs have in recent years been shown to be expressed also in several non myelocytic populations, suggesting other unidentified functions for this receptor family, independent of the inflammatory response. Finally, a number of ligands acting as exogenous or host-derived agonists for FPRs, as well as ligands acting as FPRs antagonists, have been described, indicating that these receptors may be differentially modulated by distinct molecules.

Normal cell surface expression and selective loss of functions resulting from Phe110 to Ser and Cys126 to Trp substitutions in the formyl peptide receptor

The N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a G protein-coupled chemoattractant receptor that mediates diverse leukocyte functions when stimulated by bacteria-derived N-formyl peptides such as fMet-Leu-Phe (fMLF). Impaired neutrophil responsiveness to fMLF parallels increased susceptibility to periodontal microorganisms among patients with localized juvenile periodontitis (LJP). To determine whether the recently identified FPR mutations in LJP patients are responsible for selective loss of receptor-mediated functions, we prepared and analyzed RBL-2H3 cells expressing FPR bearing Phe110 to Ser (FPR-F110S) or Cys-126 to Trp (FPR-C126W) replacement as well as a FPR double mutant (FPR-FSCW). All mutant receptors were expressed normally on the cell surface, but were unable to mediate release of beta-hexosaminidase upon fMLF stimulation. FPR-C126W effectively mediated fMLF uptake, an indication of receptor-mediated endocytosis, whereas FPR-F110S and FSCW exhibited markedly reduced ability to uptake fMLF. Both FPR-F110S and FPR-C126W were defective in chemotaxis and displayed reduced Ca2+ mobilization, but mutation at both positions partially restored the ability to respond to fMLF in chemotaxis assay and was nearly normal in Ca2+ mobilization assay. All mutants exhibited diminished accumulation of inositol phosphates. FPR-F110S displayed a delayed and significantly reduced ERK phosphorylation whereas FPR-FSCW nearly lost the ability to phosphorylate ERK. Taken together, these results indicate compromised signaling capabilities due to the FPR mutations, but the loss of function is selective and could be partially rescued by mutations at both positions.

Ligand-induced partitioning of human CXCR1 chemokine receptors with lipid raft microenvironments facilitates G-protein-dependent signaling

Ligand binding to a chemokine receptor triggers signaling events through heterotrimeric G-proteins. The mechanisms underlying receptor-mediated G-protein activation in the heterogeneous microenvironments of the plasma membrane are unclear. Here, using live-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging to detect the proximity between CXCR1-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and fluorescence probes that label lipid raft or non-lipid raft microdomains and using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis to measure the lateral diffusion of CXCR1-CFP, we found that interleukin-8 induces association between the receptors and lipid raft microenvironments. Disruption of lipid rafts impaired G-protein-dependent signaling, such as Ca2+ responses and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation, but had no effect on ligand-binding function and did not completely abolish ligand-induced receptor phosphorylation. Our results suggest a novel mechanism by which ligand binding to CXCR1 promotes lipid raft partitioning of receptors and facilitates activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins.

Cross-Desensitization among CXCR1, CXCR2, and CCR5: Role of Protein Kinase C-ε

The IL-8 (or CXCL8) chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, activate protein kinase C (PKC) to mediate leukocyte functions. To investigate the roles of different PKC isoforms in CXCL8 receptor activation and regulation, human mononuclear phagocytes were treated with CXCL8 or CXCL1 (melanoma growth-stimulating activity), which is specific for CXCR2. Plasma membrane association was used as a measure of PKC activation. Both receptors induced time-dependent association of PKCalpha, -beta1, and -beta2 to the membrane, but only CXCR1 activated PKCepsilon. CXCL8 also failed to activate PKCepsilon in RBL-2H3 cells stably expressing CXCR2. DeltaCXCR2, a cytoplasmic tail deletion mutant of CXCR2 that is resistant to internalization, activated PKCepsilon as well as CXCR1. Expression of the PKCepsilon inhibitor peptide epsilonV1 in RBL-2H3 cells blocked PKCepsilon translocation and inhibited receptor-mediated exocytosis, but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis or peak intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization. epsilonV1 also inhibited CXCR1-, CCR5-, and DeltaCXCR2-mediated cross-regulatory signals for GTPase activity, Ca(2+) mobilization, and internalization. Peritoneal macrophages from PKCepsilon-deficient mice (PKCepsilon(-/-)) also showed decreased CCR5-mediated cross-desensitization of G protein activation and Ca(2+) mobilization. Taken together, the results indicate that CXCR1 and CCR5 activate PKCepsilon to mediate cross-inhibitory signals. Inhibition or deletion of PKCepsilon decreases receptor-induced exocytosis and cross-regulatory signals, but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis or peak intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, suggesting that cross-regulation is a Ca(2+)-independent process. Because DeltaCXCR2, but not CXCR2, activates PKCepsilon and cross-desensitizes CCR5, the data further suggest that signal duration leading to activation of novel PKC may modulate receptor-mediated cross-inhibitory signals.

Role of interleukin-8 in PiT-1 expression and CXCR1-mediated inorganic phosphate uptake in chondrocytes

OBJECTIVE

The proinflammatory chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) induces chondrocyte hypertrophy. Moreover, chondrocyte hypertrophy develops in situ in osteoarthritic (OA) articular cartilage and promotes dysregulated matrix repair and calcification. Growth plate chondrocyte hypertrophy is associated with expression of the type III sodium-dependent inorganic phosphate (Pi) cotransporter phosphate transporter/retrovirus receptor 1 (PiT-1). This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that IL-8 promotes chondrocyte hypertrophy by modulating chondrocyte PiT-1 expression and sodium-dependent Pi uptake, and to assess differential roles in this activity.

METHODS

The selective IL-8 receptor CXCR1 and the promiscuous chemokine receptor CXCR2 were used. Human knee OA cartilage, cultured normal bovine knee chondrocytes, and immortalized human articular chondrocytic CH-8 cells were transfected with CXCR1/CXCR2 chimeric receptors in which the 40-amino acid C-terminal cytosolic tail domains were swapped and site mutants of a CXCR1-specific region were generated.

RESULTS

Up-regulated PiT-1 expression was detected in OA cartilage. IL-8, but not IL-1 or the CXCR2 ligand growth-related oncogene alpha, induced PiT-1 expression and increased sodium-dependent Pi uptake by >40% in chondrocytes. The sodium/phosphate cotransport inhibitor phosphonoformic acid blocked IL-8-induced chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation. Signaling mediated by kinase Pyk-2 was essential for IL-8 induction of PitT-1 expression and Pi uptake. Signaling through the TSYT(346-349) region of the CXCR1 cytosolic tail, a region divergent from the CXCR2 cytosolic tail, was essential for IL-8 to induce Pi uptake.

CONCLUSION

Our results link low-grade IL-8-mediated cartilaginous inflammation in OA to altered chondrocyte differentiation and disease progression through PiT-1 expression and sodium-dependent Pi uptake mediated by CXCR1 signaling.

Prospective study of neutrophil chemokine responses in trauma patients at risk for pneumonia

Neutrophil hyperactivity contributes to organ failure, whereas hypofunction permits sepsis. The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 are central to polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) function. We prospectively assessed CXCR function and expression in PMNs from trauma patients at high risk for pneumonia and their matched volunteer controls. CXCR2-specific calcium flux and chemotaxis were desensitized by injury, returning toward normal after 1 week. CXCR1 responses were relatively maintained. These defects appeared to be caused by preferential suppression of CXCR2 surface expression. To evaluate potential mechanisms of in vivo chemokine receptor regulation further we studied cross-desensitization of chemokine receptors in normal PMNs. Susceptibility to desensitization was in the order CXCR2 > CXCR1 > formyl peptide or C5a receptors. Trauma desensitizes CXC receptors, with CXCR2 being especially vulnerable. Desensitization is most marked immediately postinjury, generally resolving by Day 7. High-affinity chemoattractant receptors responsible for PMN chemotaxis from bloodstream to tissue appear to be regulated by injury. Receptors for end-target chemoattractants regulate CXCR1 and CXCR2 but resist suppression themselves and respond normally after injury. CXCR2 desensitization occurs before pneumonia, which developed in 44% of these patients. Suppression of high-affinity PMN receptors, like CXCR2, may predispose to pneumonia after trauma or other inflammatory conditions that lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colon carcinoma involves expression of IL-8 and CXCR-1-mediated chemotaxis

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an essential component of embryonic development, tissue remodeling, and wound repair. In addition, many epithelial tumors, including colorectal carcinomas, appear to undergo this transition that may facilitate their invasion. Using a novel model of EMT in colon carcinoma in which the inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha accelerates this TGF-beta directed process, we report that TNF-alpha stimulation upregulates expression of the chemokine IL-8, and that this upregulation is dependent on the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Significantly, this effect is not merely an inflammatory response by these colon carcinoma cells because IL-8 expression is induced in cells undergoing a TGF-beta-driven EMT in the absence of exogenous TNF-alpha. During the EMT, a concomitant increase in the chemokine receptor CXCR-1, but not CXCR-2, also occurs. Moreover, both IL-8 and CXCR-1 function in the chemokinetic and chemotactic migration of colon carcinoma cells as assessed by antibody inhibition studies. These studies establish that the regulated expression of a specific chemokine and its receptor are linked to the EMT and they provide a biochemical framework for understanding the mechanisms by which the EMT promotes migration.

Comparative analysis of high-affinity ligand binding and G protein coupling of the human CXCR1 chemokine receptor and of a CXCR1-Galpha fusion protein after heterologous production in baculovirus-infected insect cells

In order to perform biochemical and pharmacological characterization of CXCR1, we designed several CXCR1 constructs. All constructs, including a CXCR1-G(i2)alpha fusion protein, were produced in insect cells after infection with recombinant baculovirus. The recombinant receptors exhibited specific high-affinity binding of (125)I-labelled interleukin-8, and Scatchard transformation of the binding data indicated the presence of a population of single homogenous binding sites. Furthermore, the pharmacological profiles for the different CXCR1 constructs produced in the baculovirus-infected insect cells were almost identical to those reported for CXCR1 on human neutrophils. Interestingly, when the CXCR1 constructs were coproduced with G(i2) protein as a result of coinfection with baculoviruses encoding the G(i2)alpha-, the beta- and the gamma- subunits, the B(max) values were significantly increased. Hence, the level of FlagCXCR1Bio, after coproduction with G(i2) protein, was found to be almost 10 times higher than that of the FlagCXCR1Bio alone. However, no differences in the K(i) values were observed of the receptor constructs produced either after single infection or coinfection of insect cells. The addition of guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate resulted in a dramatic reduction of the number of binding sites; however, the K(i) values remained unchanged, indicating coupling of the receptor to the guanine nucleotide-binding protein.

Evasion from NK cell immunity by MHC class I chain-related molecules expressing colon adenocarcinoma

Evasion of host immune responses is well documented for viruses and may also occur during tumor immunosurveillance. The mechanisms involve alterations in MHC class I expression, Ag processing and presentation, chemokine and cytokine production, and lymphocyte receptor expression. Epithelial tumors overexpress MHC class I chain-related (MIC) molecules, which are ligands for the activating receptor NKG2D on NK and T cells. We report that NK cells from patients with colorectal cancer lack expression of activating NKG2D and chemokine CXCR1 receptors, both of which are internalized. Serum levels of soluble MIC (sMIC) are elevated and are responsible for down-modulation of NKG2D and CXCR1. In contrast, high serum levels of CXC ligands, IL-8, and epithelial-neutrophil-activating peptide (ENA-78) do not down-modulate CXCR1. In vitro, internalization of NKG2D and CXCR1 occurs within 4 and 24 h, respectively, of incubating normal NK cells with sMIC-containing serum. Furthermore, natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44 and chemokine receptor CCR7 are also down-modulated in IL-2-activated NK cells cocultured in MIC-containing serum-an effect secondary to the down-modulation of NKG2D and not directly caused by physical association with sMIC. The patients' NK cells up-regulate expression of NKG2D, NKp44, CXCR1, and CCR7 when cultured in normal serum or anti-MIC Ab-treated autologous serum. NKG2D(+) but not NKG2D(-) NK cells are tumoricidal in vitro, and in vivo they selectively traffic to the xenografted carcinoma, form immunological synapse with tumor cells, and significantly retard tumor growth in the SCID mice. These results suggest that circulating sMIC in the cancer patients deactivates NK immunity by down-modulating important activating and chemokine receptors.

Inflammatory chemoreceptor cross-talk suppresses leukotriene B4 receptor 1-mediated neutrophil calcium mobilization and chemotaxis after trauma

G protein-coupled chemoattractants recruit neutrophils (PMN) to sites of injury and infection. The leukotrienes (LT) and CXC chemokines (CXC) and their receptors (BLT1/BLT2 and CXCR1/CXCR2) are all known to play roles in these responses. Each system has been studied separately in vitro, but in vivo they act concurrently, and the clinical interactions between the two systems are unstudied. We prospectively studied calcium mobilization and chemotactic responses to LTB(4) in PMN from major trauma patients. The responses of the high affinity BLT1 receptor were suppressed at the 3-day postinjury time point, but recovered by 1 wk. Trauma patients had transient elevations of plasma LT and CXC levels. Functional deficits identical with those in trauma PMN were reproduced in vitro by exposing healthy PMN to CXCs at the elevated plasma concentrations found. Functional responses to LTB(4) were suppressed by cross-talk with CXC and BLT2 receptors that desensitize BLT1. Since the suppression of intracellular calcium mobilization was prominent, we also studied the role of suppressed cell calcium mobilization in the defective chemotactic responses to LTB(4). We noted that PMN chemotaxis to LTB(4) showed far more dependence on store-operated calcium entry than on the release of cellular calcium stores, and that store-operated calcium responses to BLT1 activation were markedly inhibited during the same time period as was chemotaxis. The intermittent release of inflammatory mediators after injury can blunt PMN responses to LTs by suppressing BLT1 as well as downstream calcium entry. Diminished LT receptor activity due to cross-talk with CXC receptors can inhibit PMN recruitment to infective sites. This may predispose injured patients to septic complications.

Interleukin-8-mediated heterologous receptor internalization provides resistance to HIV-1 infectivity. Role of signal strength and receptor desensitization

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry into CD4(+) cells requires the chemokine receptors CCR5 or CXCR4 as co-fusion receptors. We have previously demonstrated that chemokine receptors are capable of cross-regulating the functions of each other and, thus, affecting cellular responsiveness at the site of infection. To investigate the effects of chemokine receptor cross-regulation in HIV-1 infection, monocytes and MAGIC5 and rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cell lines co-expressing the interleukin-8 (IL-8 or CXCL8) receptor CXCR1 and either CCR5 (ACCR5) or CXCR4 (ACXCR4) were generated. IL-8 activation of CXCR1, but not the IL-8 receptor CXCR2, cross-phosphorylated CCR5 and CXCR4 and cross-desensitized their responsiveness to RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted) (CCL5) and stromal derived factor (SDF-1 or CXCL12), respectively. CXCR1 activation internalized CCR5 but not CXCR4 despite cross-phosphorylation of both. IL-8 pretreatment also inhibited CCR5- but not CXCR4-mediated virus entry into MAGIC5 cells. A tail-deleted mutant of CXCR1, DeltaCXCR1, produced greater signals upon activation (Ca(2+) mobilization and phosphoinositide hydrolysis) and cross-internalized CXCR4, inhibiting HIV-1 entry. The protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine prevented phosphorylation and internalization of the receptors by CXCR1 activation. Taken together, these results indicate that chemokine receptor-mediated HIV-1 cell infection is blocked by receptor internalization but not desensitization alone. Thus, activation of chemokine receptors unrelated to CCR5 and CXCR4 may play a cross-regulatory role in the infection and propagation of HIV-1. Since DeltaCXCR1, but not CXCR1, cross-internalized and cross-inhibited HIV-1 infection to CXCR4, the data indicate the importance of the signal strength of a receptor and, as a consequence, protein kinase C activation in the suppression of HIV-1 infection by cross-receptor-mediated internalization.

Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration, activation, and regulation

IL-8 (or CXCL8) activates the receptors CXCR1 (IL-8RA) and CXCR2 (IL-8RB) to induce chemotaxis in leukocytes, but only CXCR1 mediates cytotoxic and cross-regulatory signals. This may be due to the rapid internalization of CXCR2. To investigate the roles of the intracellular domains in receptor regulation, wild-type, chimeric, phosphorylation-deficient, and cytoplasmic tail (C-tail) deletion mutants of both receptors were expressed in RBL-2H3 cells and studied for cellular activation, receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. All but one chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and mediated signal transduction, chemotaxis, and exocytosis. Upon IL-8 activation, the chimeric receptors underwent receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. One was resistant to internalization, yet it mediated normal levels of beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr-2) translocation. The lack of internalization by this receptor may be due to its reduced association with beta arr-2 and the adaptor protein-2 beta. The C-tail-deleted and phosphorylation-deficient receptors were resistant to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, arrestin translocation, and internalization. They also mediated greater phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, but diminished chemotaxis. These data indicate that phosphorylation of the C-tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for arrestin translocation and internalization, but are not sufficient to explain the rapid internalization of CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. The data also show that receptor internalization is not required for chemotaxis. The lack of receptor phosphorylation was correlated with greater signal transduction but diminished chemotaxis, indicating that second messenger production, not receptor internalization, negatively regulates chemotaxis.

Intracellular trafficking of human CXCR1 and CXCR2: regulation by receptor domains and actin-related kinases

In this study we investigated the regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 intracellular trafficking. First, we produced a chimeric CXCR2 receptor that contained the internalization motifs of both CXCR2 and CXCR1 (CXCR2: LLKIL sequence; CXCR1: C-terminal phosphorylation sites). Elevated levels of internalization were induced by different ELR-expressing CXC chemokines on the chimeric receptor, as compared to wild-type CXCR2. Analysis of inter-relationships between CXCR1 and CXCR2 during internalization indicated that the exposure of cells that expressed both CXCR1 and CXCR2 to CXCL8 or CXCL6 resulted in decreased levels of CXCR1 internalization as compared to those in cells that expressed only CXCR1. To characterize the role of actin-related components in CXCR1 and CXCR2 trafficking, wortmannin, a potent inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol kinases, was used. The presence of wortmannin during receptor recycling inhibited CXCR1 and CXCR2 re-expression following CXCL8-induced internalization, and resulted in a marked disruption of the proper organization of actin filaments. The kinase-dependent recycling process required CXCR2 C-terminal phosphorylation sites. Our results suggest that actin-related kinases are required for the proper functionality of actin filaments, which are the instrumental factors needed for receptor recycling. In all, CXCR1 and CXCR2 internalization and recycling are tightly regulated by receptor domains and by actin-related kinases.

Chemokines and chemokine receptors in leukocyte trafficking

Chemokines regulate inflammation, leukocyte trafficking, and immune cell differentiation. The role of chemokines in homing of naive T lymphocytes to secondary lymphatic organs is probably the best understood of these processes, and information on chemokines in inflammation, asthma, and neurological diseases is rapidly increasing. Over the past 15 years, understanding of the size and functional complexity of the chemokine family of peptide chemoattractants has grown substantially. In this review, we first present information regarding the structure, expression, and signaling properties of chemokines and their receptors. The second part is a systems physiology-based overview of the roles that chemokines play in tissue-specific homing of lymphocyte subsets and in trafficking of inflammatory cells. This review draws on recent experimental findings as well as current models proposed by experts in the chemokine field.

Distinct roles of receptor phosphorylation, G protein usage, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation on platelet activating factor-induced leukotriene C(4) generation and chemokine production

Platelet activating factor (PAF) interacts with cell surface G protein-coupled receptors on leukocytes to induce degranulation, leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)) generation, and chemokine CCL2 production. Using a basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cell line expressing wild-type PAF receptor (PAFR) and a phosphorylation-deficient mutant (mPAFR), we have previously demonstrated that receptor phosphorylation mediates desensitization of PAF-induced degranulation. Here, we sought to determine the role of receptor phosphorylation on PAF-induced LTC(4) generation and CCL2 production. We found that PAF caused a significantly enhanced LTC(4) generation in cells expressing mPAFR when compared with PAFR cells. In contrast, PAF-induced CCL2 production was greatly reduced in mPAFR cells. Pertussis toxin and U0126, which inhibit G(i) and p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK) activation, respectively, caused very little inhibition of PAF-induced CCL2 production (approximately 20% inhibition). In contrast, these inhibitors almost completely blocked both PAF-induced ERK phosphorylation and LTC(4) generation in PAFR cells. However, in mPAFR cells pertussis toxin only partially inhibited PAF-induced ERK phosphorylation. A Ca(2+)/calmodulin inhibitor had no effect on PAF-induced ERK phosphorylation in PAFR cells but completely blocked the response in mPAFR cells. These data demonstrate that receptor phosphorylation, which serves to desensitize PAF-induced LTC(4) generation, is required for chemokine CCL2 production. They also indicate a previously unrecognized selectivity in G protein usage and ERK activation for PAF-induced responses. Whereas PAF-induced CCL2 production is, in large part, mediated independently of G(i) activation or ERK phosphorylation, LTC(4) generation requires ERK phosphorylation, which is mediated by different G proteins depending on the phosphorylation status of the receptor.

Cutting edge: Differential regulation of chemoattractant receptor-induced degranulation and chemokine production by receptor phosphorylation

Phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors and the subsequent recruitment of beta-arrestin play an important role in desensitization of receptor-mediated responses, including degranulation in leukocytes. In this study, we report that receptor phosphorylation also provides a stimulatory signal for CCR ligand 2 (CCL2) production. C3a stimulated degranulation in a basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cell expressing wild-type C3aR or a phosphorylation-deficient mutant (DeltaST-C3aR). In contrast, C3a caused CCL2 production only in C3aR but not DeltaST-C3aR cells. Furthermore, overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 resulted in enhancement of both ligand-induced receptor phosphorylation and CCL2 production but inhibition of degranulation. Agonist activation of C3aR, but not DeltaST-C3aR, led to the translocation of green fluorescent protein tagged beta-arrestin 2 from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. These data demonstrate that receptor phosphorylation, which provides a turn off signal for degranulation, is essential for CCL2 production.

Signal transduction by the chemokine receptor CXCR5: structural requirements for G protein activation analyzed by chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 molecules

The human chemokine receptors CXCR5 and CXCR1 activate signaling pathways via pertussis toxin-sensitive as well as insensitive G proteins. CXCR5 induces Ca2+ signaling and chemotaxis independently of inhibitory G proteins, whereas the same signaling pathways are entirely dependent on inhibitory G proteins for CXCR1. In contrast, activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 is a pertussis toxin-sensitive signaling event for both receptors. Using chimeric CXCR1/CXCR5 receptors we investigated structural requirements for the activation of signal transduction pathways by CXCR5. Individual or multiple intracellular domains of CXCR1 were exchanged for the corresponding sequences of CXCR5, leading to receptors resembling CXCR5 at the cytoplasmic surface to a varying extent. Replacing the second intracellular domain of CXCR1 had a major influence on signaling mediated by inhibitory G proteins, whereas the exchange of the third or carboxy-terminal intracellular domain had only minor effects on signal transduction. Activation of the MAP kinase cascade via ERK1/2 and chemotaxis are largely reduced in chimeras comprising the second intracellular domain of CXCR5, although coupling to inhibitory G proteins is retained in all chimeric receptors. In summary, these data characterize the contribution of the intracellular domains of CXCR5 to receptor signaling, thereby disclosing unique structural requirements that modulate G protein coupling by the receptor.

Dancing to the tune of chemokines

Since their discovery 13 years ago, chemokines have emerged as the most important regulators of leukocyte trafficking. On target cells, chemokines bind to seven-transmembrane-domain receptors that are coupled to heterotrimeric Gi proteins. The common response of all cells to chemokine stimulation is chemotaxis. In addition, leukocyte activation triggers diverse signal transduction cascades; which cascade is triggered depends on the chemokine and receptor engaged. The selective activation of distinct pathways suggests that the receptors couple not only to G proteins but also to additional downstream effectors. This review discusses recent advances in the elucidation of the signal transduction that occurs in proximity to receptors and that leads to the early biochemical events in leukocyte activation.

Actin filaments are involved in the regulation of trafficking of two closely related chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2

The ligand-induced internalization and recycling of chemokine receptors play a significant role in their regulation. In this study, we analyzed the involvement of actin filaments and of microtubules in the control of ligand-induced internalization and recycling of CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)1 and CXCR2, two closely related G protein-coupled receptors that mediate ELR-expressing CXC chemokine-induced cellular responses. Nocodazole, a microtubule-disrupting agent, did not affect the IL-8-induced reduction in cell surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2, nor did it affect the recycling of these receptors following ligand removal and cell recovery at 37 degrees C. In contrast, cytochalasin D, an actin filament depolymerizing agent, promoted the IL-8-induced reduction in cell surface expression of both CXCR1 and CXCR2. Cytochalasin D significantly inhibited the recycling of both CXCR1 and CXCR2 following IL-8-induced internalization, the inhibition being more pronounced for CXCR2 than for CXCR1. Potent inhibition of recycling was observed also when internalization of CXCR2 was induced by another ELR-expressing CXC chemokine, granulocyte chemotactic protein-2. By the use of carboxyl terminus-truncated CXCR1 and CXCR2 it was observed that the carboxyl terminus domains of CXCR1 and CXCR2 were partially involved in the regulation of the actin-mediated process of receptor recycling. The cytochalasin D-mediated inhibition of CXCR2 recycling had a functional relevance because it impaired the ability of CXCR2-expressing cells to mediate cellular responses. These results suggest that actin filaments, but not microtubules, are involved in the regulation of the intracellular trafficking of CXCR1 and CXCR2, and that actin filaments may be required to enable cellular resensitization following a desensitized refractory period.

Regulation of tyrosine kinase activation and granule release through beta-arrestin by CXCRI

Chemoattractant-stimulated granule release from neutrophils, basophils and eosinophils is critical for the innate immune response against infectious bacteria. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) activation of the chemokine receptor CXCRI was found to stimulate rapid formation of beta-arrestin complexes with Hck or c-Fgr. Formation of beta-arrestin-Hck complexes led to Hck activation and trafficking of the complexes to granule-rich regions. Granulocytes expressing a dominant-negative beta-arrestin-mutant did not release granules or activate tyrosine kinases after IL-8 stimulation. Thus, beta-arrestins regulate chemokine-induced granule exocytosis, indicating a broader role for beta-arrestins in the regulation of cellular functions than was previously suspected.

Deficient homologous desensitization of formyl peptide receptors stably expressed in undifferentiated HL-60 cells

The ability of formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) stably expressed in undifferentiated HL-60 cells to undergo ligand-induced desensitization was compared with their ability in normal and vector-transfected HL-60 cells following granulocyte differentiation with DMSO. fMet-Leu-Phe failed to induce uncoupling of FPRs from G-proteins in FPR-transfected cells, whereas uncoupling was induced in differentiated HL-60 cells and differentiated vector-transfected HL-60 cells, as determined by ligand-stimulated guanosine 5'-(gamma-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding and GTPgammaS inhibition of fMet-Leu-Phe binding to isolated membranes. Immunoprecipitation of Galpha(i2) from solubilized, azidoanalide (AA-gammaGTP) photolabeled membranes showed that receptors in desensitized FPR-transfected HL-60 cells remained coupled to Galpha(i2), whereas desensitized receptors in differentiated HL-60 cell membranes were uncoupled from Galpha(i2). As determined by immunoblotting, Galpha(i2) expression was similar in undifferentiated and differentiated HL-60 cells and FPR-transfected cells. Ligand-stimulated receptor internalization and desensitization of calcium redistribution were similar in all three groups of cells. Immunoblotting also indicated that G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) 2 and 4 were present in undifferentiated FPR-transfected HL-60 cells at 50% of the level seen in differentiated HL-60 cells. However, differentiation did not increase GRK2 or GRK4 expression, indicating that differences in GRK expression do not explain deficient desensitization. The data indicated that undifferentiated HL-60 cells are unable to induce homologous desensitization of FPRs.

Chemokine signaling in inflammation

The events that lead to an inflammatory response are characterized by recognition of the site of injury by inflammatory cells, specific recruitment of subpopulations of leukocytes into tissue, removal of the offending agent and "debridement" of the injured cells/tissue, and repair of the site of injury with attempts to reestablish normal parenchymal, stromal, and extracellular matrix relationship. The molecular regulation of this complex physiologic process involves the interaction between cell surface, extracellular matrix, and soluble mediators, such as chemokines. Chemokine activities are mediated through G-protein coupled receptors. This is the largest known family of cell-surface receptors, which mediate transmission of stimuli as diverse as hormones, peptides, glycopeptides, and chemokines. In this review, we will focus on the signaling pathways involved in the production and function of chemokines as they relate to the inflammatory response.

GCP-2–induced internalization of IL-8 receptors: hierarchical relationships between GCP-2 and other ELR+-CXC chemokines and mechanisms regulating CXCR2 internalization and recycling

The chemotactic potencies of ELR+-CXC chemokines during acute inflammation are regulated by their binding affinities and by their ability to activate, desensitize, and internalize their specific receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2. To gain insight into the fine mechanisms that control acute inflammatory processes, we have focused in this study on the highly potent ELR+-CXC chemokine Granulocyte Chemotactic Protein 2 (GCP-2), and on its ability to control the cell surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2. Although GCP-2 has been considered an effective ligand for both CXCR1 and CXCR2, our findings demonstrated that it was a potent inducer of CXCR2 internalization only. A functional hierarchy was shown to exist between GCP-2 and 2 other ELR+-CXC chemokines, IL-8 and NAP-2, in their abilities to induce CXCR1 and CXCR2 internalization, according to the following: IL-8 > GCP-2 > NAP-2. By the use of pertussis toxin (PTx), it was demonstrated that the actual events of Gi-coupling to CXCR2 do not have a major role in the regulation of its internalization. Rather, CXCR2 internalization was shown to be negatively controlled by induction of signaling events, as indicated by the promotion of CXCR2 internalization following exposure to wortmannin, a potent inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3 kinases and PI4 kinases. Furthermore, our results suggest that rab11+-endosomes participate in the trafficking of CXCR2 through the endocytic pathway, to eventually allow its recycling back to the plasma membrane. To conclude, our findings shed light on the interrelationships between GCP-2 and other ELR+-CXC chemokines, and determine the mechanisms involved in the regulation of GCP-2–induced internalization and recycling of CXCR2.

The synthetic chemoattractant Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-DMet activates neutrophils preferentially through the lipoxin A4 receptor

A D-methionine–containing peptide, Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-D-Met-NH2 (WKYMVm), featuring a unique receptor specificity was investigated with respect to its ability to activate neutrophil effector functions. The peptide was found to be more potent than the N-formylated peptide N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLF) at inducing neutrophil chemotaxis, mobilization of neutrophil complement receptor 3 (CR3), and activation of the neutrophil NADPH-oxidase. The fact that binding of fML[3H]F was inhibited by both fMLF and WKYMVm suggests that N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is shared by these peptides. However, the neutrophil response induced by the WKYMVm peptide was insensitive to the fMLF antagonists, cyclosporin H, and Boc-FLFLF that specifically block the function of the FPR. These results suggest that even though WKYMVm may bind FPR the cells are activated preferentially through a receptor distinct from the FPR. Using transfected HL-60 cells expressing either the FPR or its neutrophil homologue FPRL1, also referred to as LXA4R because it has been shown to bind lipoxin A4, we show that WKYMVm is about 300-fold more active at mobilizing intracellular calcium through FPRL1 than through FPR. The WKYMVm activates FPRL1-expressing cells in a cyclosporin H-independent manner with an EC50 of around 75 pmol/L, whereas it activates FPR-expressing cells with an EC50 of around 25 nmol/L. The observation that exudated cells are primed in their response to WKYMVm suggests that FPRL1/LXA4R like FPR is stored in mobilizable organelles.

Differential modes of regulation of cxc chemokine-induced internalization and recycling of human CXCR1 and CXCR2

Studies of human neutrophil IL-8 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, have shown that the two receptors are differentially regulated by ELR(+)-CXC chemokines, that they differ functionally and may have diverse roles in mediating the inflammatory process. To elucidate the role of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in inflammation and to delineate the basis for the divergent regulation of these receptors by IL-8 and NAP-2, we characterized the IL-8- and NAP-2-induced mechanisms regulating the expression of each receptor, focusing on receptor internalization and recycling. Using HEK 293 cell transfectants, IL-8 was shown to induce significantly higher levels of CXCR2 internalization than NAP-2. Moreover, although CXCR2 bound IL-8 and NAP-2 with similarly high affinity, IL-8 functionally competed with and displaced NAP-2, and prompted high levels of internalization, similar to those induced by IL-8 alone. In a system providing an identical cellular milieu for reliable comparisons between CXCR1 and CXCR2, we have shown that the mechanisms controlling the internalization of CXCR1 diverge from those regulating CXCR2 internalization. Whereas IL-8-induced internalization of CXCR1 was profoundly dependent on a region of the carboxyl terminus expressing six phosphorylation sites, internalization of CXCR2 was primarily regulated by a membrane proximal domain of the carboxyl terminus that does not express phosphorylation sites. Analysis of receptor re-expression on the plasma membrane indicated that at early time points following removal of free ligand and incubation of the cells at 37 degrees C, receptor recycling accounted for recovery of CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression, whereas at later time points other processes may be involved in receptor re-expression. Phosphorylation-independent mechanisms were shown to direct both receptors to the recycling pathway. The differential control of CXCR1 vs CXCR2 internalization by IL-8 and NAP-2, as well as by phosphorylation-mediated mechanisms, suggests that a chemokine- and receptor-specific mode of regulation of internalization may contribute to the divergent activities of these receptors.

Alternative splicing produces transcripts encoding four variants of mouse G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 6

A family of protein kinases, termed G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK1-6), is known to phosphorylate agonist-occupied G-protein-coupled receptors. We have identified mRNAs encoding four distinct mouse GRK6 isoforms (mGRK6), designated mGRK6-A through mGRK6-D. Mouse GRK6-B and mGRK6-C diverge from the known human GRK6 (577 residues) at residue 560 and are 13 residues longer and 16 residues shorter, respectively, than human GRK6, while mGRK6-A very likely represents the mouse equivalent of human GRK6. Mouse GRK6-D is identical to the other mGRK6 variants in the amino-terminal region, but comprises only 59 of the 263 amino acids of the putative catalytical domain. As mGRK6-D retains the region involved in interacting with activated receptors, but most likely lacks catalytic activity, this variant might represent a naturally occurring inhibitor of other GRKs. Analysis of the genomic organization of mGRK6 gene revealed that the four mRNAs are generated by alternative RNA splicing from a single approximately 14. 5-kb gene, made up of at least 17 exons and located on mouse chromosome 13. Similar to human GRK6, mGRK6-A contains three cysteine residues within its carboxyl-terminal region known to serve as substrates for palmitoylation. Mouse GRK6-B lacks these palmitoylation sites, but carries a basic carboxyl-terminus containing consensus sequences for phosphorylation by protein kinases C and cAMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinases. Mouse GRK6-C displays none of these motifs. Thus, mGRK6-A, mGRK6-B, and mGRK6-C are predicted to differ in terms of their regulation by carboxyl-terminal posttranslational modification. Analysis of mRNA expression revealed that the four mGRK6 mRNAs are differentially expressed in mouse tissues, suggesting that the four mGRK6 isoforms are involved in regulating tissue- or cell type-specific functions in vivo.

Metalloproteinases Are Involved in Lipopolysaccharide– and Tumor Necrosis Factor-–Mediated Regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 Chemokine Receptor Expression

The neutrophil-specific G-protein–coupled chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, bind with high affinity to the potent chemoattractant interleukin-8 (IL-8). The mechanisms of IL-8 receptor regulation are not well defined, although previous studies have suggested a process of ligand-promoted internalization as a putative regulatory pathway. Herein, we provide evidence for two distinct processes of CXCR1 and CXCR2 regulation. Confocal microscopy data showed a redistribution of CXCR1 expression from the cell surface of neutrophils to internal compartments after stimulation with IL-8, whereas stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) did not induce CXCR1 internalization but instead mediated a significant loss of membrane-proximal CXCR1 staining intensity. To investigate whether proteolytic cleavage was the mechanism responsible for LPS- and TNF-–induced downmodulation of IL-8 receptors, we tested a panel of proteinase inhibitors. The downmodulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 by LPS and TNF- was most dramatically inhibited by metalloproteinase inhibitors; 1,10-phenanthroline and EDTA significantly attenuated LPS- and TNF-–induced loss of CXCR1 and CXCR2 cell surface expression. Metalloproteinase inhibitors also blocked the release of CXCR1 cleavage fragments into the cell supernatants of LPS- and TNF-–stimulated neutrophils. In addition, while treatment of neutrophils with LPS and TNF- inhibited IL-8 receptor–mediated calcium mobilization and IL-8–directed neutrophil chemotaxis, both 1,10-phenanthroline and EDTA blocked these inhibitory processes. In contrast, metalloproteinase inhibitors did not affect IL-8–mediated downmodulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 cell surface expression or receptor signaling. Thus, these findings may provide further insight into the mechanisms of leukocyte regulation during immunologic and inflammatory responses.

Metalloproteinases Are Involved in Lipopolysaccharide– and Tumor Necrosis Factor-–Mediated Regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 Chemokine Receptor Expression

The neutrophil-specific G-protein–coupled chemokine receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, bind with high affinity to the potent chemoattractant interleukin-8 (IL-8). The mechanisms of IL-8 receptor regulation are not well defined, although previous studies have suggested a process of ligand-promoted internalization as a putative regulatory pathway. Herein, we provide evidence for two distinct processes of CXCR1 and CXCR2 regulation. Confocal microscopy data showed a redistribution of CXCR1 expression from the cell surface of neutrophils to internal compartments after stimulation with IL-8, whereas stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) did not induce CXCR1 internalization but instead mediated a significant loss of membrane-proximal CXCR1 staining intensity. To investigate whether proteolytic cleavage was the mechanism responsible for LPS- and TNF-–induced downmodulation of IL-8 receptors, we tested a panel of proteinase inhibitors. The downmodulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 by LPS and TNF- was most dramatically inhibited by metalloproteinase inhibitors; 1,10-phenanthroline and EDTA significantly attenuated LPS- and TNF-–induced loss of CXCR1 and CXCR2 cell surface expression. Metalloproteinase inhibitors also blocked the release of CXCR1 cleavage fragments into the cell supernatants of LPS- and TNF-–stimulated neutrophils. In addition, while treatment of neutrophils with LPS and TNF- inhibited IL-8 receptor–mediated calcium mobilization and IL-8–directed neutrophil chemotaxis, both 1,10-phenanthroline and EDTA blocked these inhibitory processes. In contrast, metalloproteinase inhibitors did not affect IL-8–mediated downmodulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 cell surface expression or receptor signaling. Thus, these findings may provide further insight into the mechanisms of leukocyte regulation during immunologic and inflammatory responses.

Differential effects of CC chemokines on CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) phosphorylation and identification of phosphorylation sites on the CCR5 carboxyl terminus

The binding of CC chemokines to CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) triggers cellular responses that, generally, are only transient in nature. To explore the potential role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in the regulation of CCR5, we performed phosphorylation experiments in a rat basophilic leukemia cell line stably expressing CCR5. The ability of various CCR5 ligands to stimulate calcium mobilization in these cells correlated with their ability to induce receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization, and GRK association with the receptor. Aminooxypentane-RANTES, a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus infection, has been proposed to act through enhanced CCR5 internalization and inhibition of receptor recycling. Aminooxypentane-RANTES profoundly induced CCR5 phosphorylation, but had no effect on CCR1. In permeabilized rat basophilic leukemia CCR5 cells, monoclonal antibodies with specificity for GRK2/3 inhibited RANTES-induced receptor phosphorylation. Consistent with a role for these kinases in CCR5 regulation, 1-2 x 10(5) copies of GRK2 or GRK3 were found to be expressed in peripheral blood leukocytes. Phosphoamino acid analysis revealed that RANTES-induced CCR5 phosphorylation selectively occurs on serine residues. Our findings with receptor mutants indicate that serine residues at positions 336, 337, 342, and 349 represent GRK phosphorylation sites on CCR5. This study demonstrates that chemokines differ in their ability to induce CCR5 phosphorylation and desensitization and provides a molecular mechanism for the agonist-induced attenuation of CCR5 signaling.

Inverse agonist abolishes desensitization of a constitutively active mutant of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor: role of cellular calcium and protein kinase C

1. C335Stop is a constitutively active mutant of the TRH receptor (TRH-R). To investigate the mechanism of the decreased responsiveness of C335Stop TRH-R, we studied cellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in AtT20 cells stably transfected with C335Stop TRH-R cDNA, or Ca2+-activated chloride currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing this mutant receptor after injection of cRNA. The competitive TRH-R binding antagonist, chlorodiazepoxide (CDE), was used as an inverse agonist to study the contribution of constitutive activity to desensitization. 2. Acute treatment with CDE resulted in a rapid (within minutes) decrease in [Ca2+]i and an increase in the response amplitude to TRH with no measurable change in receptor density. Conversely, removal of chronically administered CDE caused a rapid increase in [Ca2+]i and a decrease in TRH response amplitude. 3. CDE abolished heterologous desensitization induced by C335Stop TRH-R on muscarinic m1-receptor (ml-R) co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 4. Chelation of extracellular calcium with EGTA caused a rapid decrease in [Ca2+]i and a concomitant increase in the response to TRH in AtT20 cells expressing C335Stop TRH-Rs. 5. Chelerythrine, a specific inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), reversed the heterologous desensitization of the response to acetylcholine (ACh). The phosphoserine/phosphothreonine phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, abolished the effect of chelerythrine. 6. Down-regulation of PKC by chronic exposure to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) or acute inhibition with chelerythrine caused a partial resensitization of the response to TRH. 7. Western analysis indicated that the alpha subtype of protein kinase C was down-regulated in cells expressing C335Stop TRH-Rs. Following a 5 min exposure to PMA, the residual alphaPKC translocated to the particular fraction. 8. We propose that cells expressing the constitutively active mutant TRH-R rapidly desensitize their response, utilizing a mechanism mediated by an increase in [Ca2+]i and PKC.

Characterization of the Signal Transduction Pathway Activated in Human Monocytes and Dendritic Cells by MPIF-1, a Specific Ligand for CC Chemokine Receptor 1

The receptor specificity and signal transduction pathway has been identified and characterized for a truncated form of myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor-1 (MPIF-124–99). MPIF-1 binds specifically to sites, in particular CCR1, shared with macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) on the surface of human monocytes and dendritic cells, as inferred by its ability to compete for [125I]MIP-1α, but not for [125I]MIP-1β or [125I]monocyte chemotactic protein-1(MCP-1) binding to intact cells. Based on calcium flux, MPIF-1 is an agonist on CCR1-transfected HEK-293 cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells, but not on CCR5-, CCR8-, or CX3CR1-transfected cells. The inhibitory effect of guanosine 5′-O-(3-thio-triphosphate) (GTP-γS) or pertussis toxin pretreatment on MPIF-1 binding and calcium mobilization, respectively, indicates the involvement of G proteins in the interaction of MPIF-1 and its receptor(s). The increase in intracellular free calcium concentration following MPIF-1 treatment is mainly due to the influx of calcium from an extracellular pool. However, a portion of the intracellular free calcium concentration is derived from a phospholipase C inhibitor-sensitive intracellular pool. MPIF-1 induces a rapid dose-dependent release of [3H]arachidonic acid from monocytes that is dependent on extracellular calcium and is blocked by phospholipase A2 (PLA2) inhibitors. Furthermore, PLA2 activation is shown to be necessary for filamentous actin formation in monocytes. Thus, the MPIF-1 signal transduction pathway appears to include binding to CCR1; transduction by G proteins; effector function by phospholipase C, protein kinase C, calcium flux, and PLA2; and cytoskeletal remodeling.

G protein-coupled receptor kinases

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) constitute a family of six mammalian serine/threonine protein kinases that phosphorylate agonist-bound, or activated, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as their primary substrates. GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation rapidly initiates profound impairment of receptor signaling, or desensitization. This review focuses on the regulation of GRK activity by a variety of allosteric and other factors: agonist-stimulated GPCRs, beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins, phospholipid cofactors, the calcium-binding proteins calmodulin and recoverin, posttranslational isoprenylation and palmitoylation, autophosphorylation, and protein kinase C-mediated GRK phosphorylation. Studies employing recombinant, purified proteins, cell culture, and transgenic animal models attest to the general importance of GRKs in regulating a vast array of GPCRs both in vitro and in vivo.