SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with Covid-19

A Statewide Telemedicine Referral System for Regional Monoclonal Antibody Infusion Centers

Background: Regional infusion centers (RICs) played an integral role in treating high-risk patients with COVID-19, with mild to moderate symptoms, who did not need acute hospitalization, with monoclonal antibodies. While any medical provider could place a RIC referral, it was recognized that many people face challenges with accessing care. A dedicated medical team was created to provide telemedical evaluation of patients and place appropriate referrals to RICs. The objective of this work was to assess patient populations who utilized a telemedicine referral system for COVID-19 antibody infusions. Methods: Providers used Pulsara, a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant video chat platform, to remotely screen patients and refer them to regional monoclonal antibody infusion centers if they met criteria. Basic demographic data were collected anonymously on all patients referred to the RICs, and medically underserved populations were determined using the uniform data system mapper. Results: A total of 6,031 patients were referred to RICs through Pulsara. Of these, 1,723 (29%) lived in medically underserved areas and 1,042 (17%) lived in mixed zones. In the second half of the program, 36 providers virtually screened 3,531 patients with 1,890 patients (53.5%) receiving an infusion. Conclusions: The successful implementation of a telehealth referral system facilitated the decentralization of monoclonal antibody infusion therapy from emergency departments to RICs. This system reached a significant number of people living within medically underserved areas.

T-Cell-Dependent Bispecific IgGs Protect Aged Mice From Lethal SARS-CoV-2 Infection

T-cell ageing may be a key factor in the disproportionate severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in older populations. For hospitalized COVID-19 patients, treatment involving the use of monoclonal antibodies with the ability to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 usually involves the administration of high doses but has not been very effective at preventing complications or fatality, highlighting the need for additional research into anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapies, particularly for older populations. In this study, it is discovered that older persons with a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has weaker T-cell responses. Therefore the development and characterization of spike-targeting T-cell-dependent bispecific (TDB) full-length human immunoglobulin Gs with enhanced efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19 is described. Using S-targeting TDBs, polyclonal T cells are guided to target and destroy S-expressing cells, preventing the cell-to-cell transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and thereby eliminating the need for SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity. Using animal models of COVID-19, it is shown that the selective activation of T cells improves the efficiency of treatment in preinfected mice by attenuating disease-induced weight loss and death. The significance of T-cell-based immunity during infection is highlighted by the findings. These results have implications for better clinical effectiveness of therapies for COVID-19 and the development of T-cell-dependent medicines for the elderly population.

In Silico and In Vitro Studies of the Approved Antibiotic Ceftaroline Fosamil and Its Metabolites as Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Replication

The SARS-CoV-2 proteases Mpro and PLpro are critical targets for antiviral drug development for the treatment of COVID-19. The 1,2,4-thiadiazole functional group is an inhibitor of cysteine proteases, such as papain and cathepsins. This chemical moiety is also present in ceftaroline fosamil (CF), an FDA-approved fifth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic. This study investigates the interactions between CF, its primary metabolites (M1 is dephosphorylated CF and M2 is an opened β-lactam ring) and derivatives (protonated M1H and M2H), and its open 1,2,4-thiadiazole rings derivatives (open-M1H and open-M2H) with SARS-CoV-2 proteases and evaluates CF's effects on in vitro viral replication. In silico analyses (molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations) demonstrated that CF and its metabolites are potential inhibitors of PLpro and Mpro. Docking analysis indicated that the majority of the ligands were more stable with Mpro than PLpro; however, in vitro biochemical analysis indicated PLpro as the preferred target for CF. CF inhibited viral replication in the human Calu-3 cell model at submicromolar concentrations when added to cell culture medium at 12 h. Our results suggest that CF should be evaluated as a potential repurposing agent for COVID-19, considering not only viral proteases but also other viral targets and relevant cellular pathways. Additionally, the reactivity of sulfur in the 1,2,4-thiadiazole moiety warrants further exploration for the development of viral protease inhibitors.

Functional Activity and Binding Specificity of Small Ankyrin Repeat Proteins Called Ankyrons Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Effective management of COVID-19 requires clinical tools to treat the disease in addition to preventive vaccines. Several recombinant mAbs and their cocktails have been developed to treat COVID-19 but these have limitations. Here, we evaluate small ankyrin repeat proteins called Ankyrons that were generated to bind with high affinity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Ankyrons are ankyrin repeat proteins comprised of repetitions a structural module. Each module consists of a β-turn followed by two antiparallel α-helices. The Ankyrons™ are directly selected in vitro from a highly diverse library of around a trillion clones in ribosome display and like antibodies can bind with high affinity to almost any target. We assessed Ankyrons that were generated against the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.1) variants in a binding assay. We determined that all Ankyrons were specific in that they did not bind to MERS. While all Ankyrons bound with high affinity to the variant they were generated against, some also showed cross-reactivity to all three SARS-CoV-2 variants. Binding assays are useful for screening analytes but do not provide information about clinical effectiveness. Therefore, we used a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay to show that five of the Ankyrons evaluated neutralized all three strains of SARS-CoV-2. We have provided a workflow for the evaluation of novel Ankyrons against a viral target. This suggests that Ankyrons could be useful for rapidly developing new research tools for studying other emerging infectious diseases rapidly with the optional further potential for developing Ankyrons into diagnostic and even therapeutic applications.

Computational electrostatic engineering of nanobodies for enhanced SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain recognition

This study presents a novel computational approach for engineering nanobodies (Nbs) for improved interaction with receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Using Protein Structure Reliability reports, RBD (7VYR_R) was selected and refined for subsequent Nb-RBD interactions. By leveraging electrostatic complementarity (EC) analysis, we engineered and characterized five Electrostatically Complementary Nbs (ECSb1-ECSb5) based on the CeVICA library's SR6c3 Nb. Through targeted modifications in the complementarity-determining regions (CDR) and framework regions (FR), we optimized electrostatic interactions to improve binding affinity and specificity. The engineered Nbs (ECSb3, ECSb4, and ECSb5) demonstrated high binding specificity for AS3, CA1, and CA2 epitopes. Interestingly, ECSb1 and ECSb2 selectively engaged with AS3 and CA1 instead of AS1 and AS2, respectively, due to a preference for residues that conferred superior binding complementarities. Furthermore, ECSbs significantly outperformed SR6c3 Nb in MM/GBSA results, notably, ECSb4 and ECSb3 exhibited superior binding free energies of -182.58 kcal.mol-1 and -119.07 kcal.mol-1, respectively, compared to SR6c3 (-105.50 kcal.mol-1). ECSbs exhibited significantly higher thermostability (100.4-148.3 kcal·mol⁻1) compared to SR6c3 (62.6 kcal·mol⁻1). Similarly, enhanced electrostatic complementarity was also observed for ECSb4-RBD and ECSb3-RBD (0.305 and 0.390, respectively) relative to SR6c3-RBD (0.233). Surface analyses confirmed optimized electrostatic patches and reduced aggregation propensity in the engineered Nb. This integrated EC and structural engineering approach successfully developed engineered Nbs with enhanced binding specificity, increased thermostability, and reduced aggregation, laying the groundwork for novel therapeutic applications targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

The development of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has caused a great threat to the global economy and public health, initiatives have been launched to control the spread of the virus. To explore the efficacy of drugs, a large number of clinical trials have been carried out, with the purpose of providing guidelines based on high-quality evidence for clinicians. We mainly discuss therapeutic agents for COVID-19 and explain the mechanism, including antiviral agents, tocilizumab, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, neutralizing antibody therapies and corticosteroids. In addition, the COVID-19 vaccine has been proven to be efficacious in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. We systematically analyzed four mainstream vaccine platforms: messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, viral vector vaccines, inactivated vaccines and protein subunit vaccines. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of drugs and vaccines through enumerating the most typical clinical trials. However, the emergence of novel variants has further complicated the interpretation of the available clinical data, especially vaccines and antibody therapies. In the post-epidemic era, therapeutic agents are still the first choice for controlling the progression of disease, whereas the protective effect of vaccines against different strains should be assessed comprehensively.

More antibodies are not always better: Fc effector functions play a critical role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and protection

Traditional vaccinology has primarily focused on neutralizing antibody titers as the main correlate of vaccine efficacy, often overlooking the multifaceted roles of antibody Fc effector functions in orchestrating protective immune responses. Fc-mediated immune responses play a pivotal role in immune modulation and pathogen clearance. Emerging evidence from natural infections and vaccine studies highlights the critical contribution of Fc effector functions in determining the quality and durability of immunity. This work explores the limitations of current vaccine evaluation paradigms that prioritize neutralization over Fc effector mechanisms. It also describes findings from a study showing an unexpected role for SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibodies: both convalescent plasma and patient-derived monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) lead to maximum phagocytic capacity by monocytes at low concentrations, whereas at higher concentrations the phagocytic capacity was reduced. Given that the severity of COVID-19 disease and antibody titers are strongly positively correlated, this work challenges the paradigm that high antibodies offer better protection against severe disease. It is proposed that humoral and cellular responses elicited by vaccination should never be higher than those produced by natural infection. By integrating antibody Fc effector functions into vaccine development, a paradigm shift is proposed that emphasizes synergic antibody responses. Such an approach could transform vaccine efficacy assessment, enhance protection against dangerous pathogens, and drive innovation in vaccine design.

Innate and SARS-CoV-2 specific adaptive immune response kinetic in neutralizing monoclonal antibody successfully treated COVID-19 patients

The impact of anti-Spike monoclonal antibody (mAbs) treatment on the immune response of COVID19-patients is poorly explored. In particular, a comparison of the immunological influence of different therapeutic regimens has not yet been performed. Aim of the study was to compare the kinetic of innate and adaptive immune response as well as the SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and T cell response in two groups of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients treated with two different mAbs regimens: Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (BAM/ETE) or Casirivimab/Imdevimab (CAS/IMD). SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (n = 39) with mild/moderate disease were enrolled before (T0) and after 7 days (T7) and 30 day (T30) from mAbs infusion. Patients were divided in two groups on the basis of the mAb regimen: BAM/ETE (n = 15) and CAS/IMD (n = 24). The phenotype/function of immune cell subsets was evaluated by flow-cytometry and by ELISA. The Spike-specific T cell response (IFN-γ) and anti-Nucleocapside IgG were evaluated by chemiluminescence assay. SARS CoV-2 RNA in nasal swabs was evaluated by RT-PCR. Eleven out of the thirty-nine enrolled patients tested negative at T7, among which nine (81.8 %) had been treated with CAS/IMD regimen. A comparable increase in CD4 and CD8 T cells was observed in both treatment groups. Moreover, a reduction of CD38 expression on T (CD4, CD8 and Vδ2) and on NK cells was observed in both groups, as well as a reduction overtime of the perforin expression in T (CD8, Vδ2) and in NK cells reaching significance only in CAS/IMD-treated patients. The SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells response increased at T7 in BAM/ETE-treated patients and at T30 in CAS/IND group. Of note, at T30 SARS-CoV2-specific T cells was higher in CAS/IMD than in BAM/ETE group. Furthermore, the titre of anti-N IgG increased overtime in both groups with a faster kinetic in CAS/IMD group. The spontaneous production of inflammatory cytokines by monocytes and neutrophils was similar the two mAb regimens, as well as the level of plasmatic IL-6. Finally, patients were also analysed according to sex. The male group showed a higher frequency of activated CD4 T cells, NKG2A-expressing CD8 T cells and perforin-expressing Vδ2 T cells compared to female group. Moreover, a higher specific T cell response at T30 was observed in the male compared to female group. In conclusion, these results show similar effects of both mAb regimens in restoring T and NK cell homeostasis and in reducing inflammation. In contrast, CAS/IMD allows a better humoral and cellular SARS-CoV2 specific immunization.

Monoclonal Antibodies in Prevention and Early Treatment of COVID-19 in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Perspective on the Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Future

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly impacted lung transplant recipients (LTR), who remain vulnerable to severe COVID-19 despite vaccination, prompting the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as a treatment option. This systematic review summarizes the clinical efficacy of mAbs against COVID-19 in adult LTR and provides a perspective on the role of mAbs for infectious diseases in the future. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane was conducted for studies reporting clinical outcomes of adult LTR or solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) including LTR with drug-specific outcomes. Twelve studies were included. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with mAbs reduced COVID-19 breakthrough infection in LTR. Early treatment of COVID-19 with mAbs correlated with a reduced incidence of severe COVID-19 outcomes, although statistical significance varied among studies. Overall, observational studies have demonstrated a potential benefit of mAbs in the treatment of COVID-19 in LTR, both in prophylaxis and early treatment, as well as the importance of early administration. Moreover, mAb therapy appeared safe and could be a viable option against other pathogens, a route that warrants further investigation.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=382133, identifier CRD42022382133.

Long-term outcomes of passive immunotherapy for COVID-19: a pooled analysis of a large multinational platform randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Passive immunotherapy, including monoclonal antibodies and neutralizing proteins, was used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic. Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines-Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (ACTIV-3/TICO) was a multinational, randomized placebo-controlled platform trial that evaluated the effectiveness of multiple passive immunotherapy agents in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Given the long half-life of some agents studied, participants were followed for an extended period to assess the long-term efficacy and sustained safety of these agents.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data from four trials of ACTIV-3/TICO: sotrovimab, amubarvimab-romlusevimab, tixagevimab-cilgavimab, and ensovibep. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to compare time to mortality and time to mortality or rehospitalization between participants receiving active agents vs. placebo through 18 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2311 participants were enrolled between 16 December 2020 and 15 November 2021. Overall, 56.9% (1315/2311) received an active agent and 77.2% (1784/2311) of participants were unvaccinated for SARS-CoV-2. Median duration between symptom onset and enrolment was 8 days (interquartile range, 6-10), and most participants received remdesivir (92.1% [2129/2311]) and corticosteroids (70.4% [1627/2311]) before enrolment. There was no difference in mortality across all active (11.9% [157/1315]) vs. placebo (14.0% [139/996]) arms (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08). Furthermore, there was no difference in combined mortality or rehospitalization across all active (31.7% [417/1315]) vs. placebo (32.1% [320/996]) arms (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.10).

DISCUSSION

In our large study of long half-life passive immunotherapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we did not find evidence of a long-term effect on either mortality or rehospitalization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04501978.

Predictors of hospitalization, death and incomplete/non-recovery from SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory global population

OBJECTIVES

To provide globally representative data on hospitalization and death in recently SARS-CoV-2-positive ambulatory populations.

METHODS

We enrolled SARS-CoV-2-positive ambulatory adults in the cohort studies, ICOS (47 sites, 5 continents), and PCOS (Liberia) and followed for 28-days. Kaplan-Meier estimates of percentage of those hospitalized or died were derived. Risk factors for hospitalization, death, and failure to recover were identified using Cox and logistic models respectively.

RESULTS

9817(ICOS) and 125(PCOS) participants, 46.7% male; median age 43 years; 24.5% with comorbidity(s); 0.8% pregnant; 9.3% SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated, were enrolled June-2020 and January-2022. By 28 days, 424(4.3%) participants were hospitalized or had died; most within 7 days of enrolment(3.4%). Hospitalization or death declined over calendar time i.e. 7.5%(2020); 4.1(first-half 2021) and 2.1%(second-half 2021), P < 0.0001. Older age, male sex, comorbidities, pregnancy, symptomatic disease were each independently associated with hospitalization or death; SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduced this risk. At 28 days, 26.1% and 29.9% reported ongoing symptoms and failure to return to pre-morbid health respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These global SARS-CoV-2 ambulatory cohort studies identified demographic/clinical risks for hospitalization or death. Vaccination does not fully explain hospitalization and death declines over time. Symptomatic recovery and return to premorbid health were incomplete at 28 days in ≈one third.

Immunobiology and immunotherapy of COVID-19

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in late 2019 triggered a major increase in activities related to immunobiology and immunotherapy to cope with and find solutions to end the COVID-19 pandemic. The unprecedented approach to research and development of drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 has substantially improved the understanding of immunobiology for COVID-19, which can also be applied to other infectious diseases. Major efforts were dedicated to the repurposing of existing antiviral drugs and the development of novel ones. For this reason, numerous approaches to evaluating interferons, immunoglobulins, and cytokine inhibitors have been conducted. Antibody-based therapies, especially employing monoclonal antibodies have also been on the agenda. Cell-based therapies involving dendritic cells, macrophages, and CAR T-cell approaches have been evaluated. Many existing antiviral drugs have been repurposed for COVID-19 and novel formulations have been tested. The extraordinarily rapid development of efficient vaccines led to the breakthrough of novel vaccine approaches such as mRNA-based vaccines saving millions of lives. Waning immunity of existing vaccines and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants have required additional booster vaccinations and re-engineering of new versions of COVID-19 vaccines.

Notch4 regulatory T cells and SARS-CoV-2 viremia shape COVID19 survival outcome

BACKGROUND

Immune dysregulation and SARS-CoV-2 plasma viremia have been implicated in fatal COVID-19 disease. However, how these two factors interact to shape disease outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

We carried out viral and immunological phenotyping on a prospective cohort of 280 patients with COVID-19 presenting to acute care hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts and Genoa, Italy between June 1, 2020 and February 8, 2022. Disease severity, mortality, plasma viremia, and immune dysregulation were assessed. A mouse model of lethal H1N1 influenza infection was used to analyze the therapeutic potential of Notch4 and pyroptosis inhibition in disease outcome.

RESULTS

Stratifying patients based on %Notch4+ Treg cells and/or the presence of plasma viremia identified four subgroups with different clinical trajectories and immune phenotypes. Patients with both high %Notch4+ Treg cells and viremia suffered the most disease severity and 90-day mortality compared to the other groups even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities. Increased Notch4 and plasma viremia impacted different arms of the immune response in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Increased Notch4 was associated with decreased Treg cell amphiregulin expression and suppressive function whereas plasma viremia was associated with increased monocyte cell pyroptosis. Combinatorial therapies using Notch4 blockade and pyroptosis inhibition induced stepwise protection against mortality in a mouse model of lethal H1N1 influenza infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trajectory and survival outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is predicated on two cardinal factors in disease pathogenesis: viremia and Notch4+ Treg cells. Intervention strategies aimed at resetting the immune dysregulation in COVID-19 by antagonizing Notch4 and pyroptosis may be effective in severe cases of viral lung infection.

Design of SARS-CoV-2 RBD Immunogens to Focus Immune Responses Towards Conserved Coronavirus Epitopes

SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, with new variants emerging that evade pre-existing immunity and limit the efficacy of existing vaccines. One approach towards developing superior, variant-proof vaccines is to engineer immunogens that preferentially elicit antibodies with broad cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants by targeting conserved epitopes on spike. The inner and outer faces of the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) are two such conserved regions targeted by antibodies that recognize diverse human and animal coronaviruses. To promote the elicitation of such antibodies by vaccination, we engineered "resurfaced" RBD immunogens that contained mutations at exposed RBD residues outside the target epitopes. In the context of pre-existing immunity, these vaccine candidates aim to disfavor the elicitation of strain-specific antibodies against the immunodominant Receptor Binding Motif (RBM) while boosting the induction of inner and outer face antibodies. The engineered resurfaced RBD immunogens were stable, lacked binding to monoclonal antibodies with limited breadth, and maintained strong interactions with target broadly neutralizing antibodies. When used as vaccines, they limited humoral responses against the RBM as intended. Multimerization on nanoparticles further increased the immunogenicity of the resurfaced RBDs immunogens, thus supporting resurfacing as a promising immunogen design approach to rationally shift natural immune responses to develop more protective vaccines.

Response-Adaptive Randomization Procedure in Clinical Trials with Surrogate Endpoints

In clinical trials, subjects are usually recruited sequentially. According to the outcomes amassed thus far in a trial, the response-adaptive randomization (RAR) design has been shown to be an advantageous treatment assignment procedure that skews the treatment allocation proportion to pre-specified objectives, such as sending more patients to a more promising treatment. Unfortunately, there are circumstances under which very few data of the primary endpoints are collected in the recruitment period, such as circumstances relating to public health emergencies and chronic diseases, and RAR is thus difficult to apply in allocating treatments using available outcomes. To overcome this problem, if an informative surrogate endpoint can be acquired much earlier than the primary endpoint, the surrogate endpoint can be used as a substitute for the primary endpoint in the RAR procedure. In this paper, we propose an RAR procedure that relies only on surrogate endpoints. The validity of the statistical inference on the primary endpoint and the patient benefit of this approach are justified by both theory and simulation. Furthermore, different types of surrogate endpoint and primary endpoint are considered. The results reassure that RAR with surrogate endpoints can be a viable option in some cases for clinical trials when primary endpoints are unavailable for adaptation.

Early antiviral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are associated with upper airway clearance of SARS-CoV-2

T cells are involved in protective immunity against numerous viral infections. Data regarding functional roles of human T cells in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2) viral clearance in primary COVID-19 are limited. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed samples for associations between SARS2 upper respiratory tract viral RNA levels and early virus-specific adaptive immune responses for 95 unvaccinated clinical trial participants with acute primary COVID-19 aged 18-86 years old, approximately half of whom were considered at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Functionality and magnitude of acute SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were evaluated, in addition to antibody responses. Most individuals with acute COVID-19 developed SARS2-specific T cell responses within 6 days of COVID-19 symptom onset. Early CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell responses were polyfunctional, and both strongly associated with reduced upper respiratory tract SARS2 viral RNA, independent of neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, these findings provide evidence for protective roles for circulating SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during acute COVID-19.

A human monoclonal antibody neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants containing the L452R mutation

The effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies targeting the spike (S) receptor-binding domain (RBD) has been hampered by the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs), which have acquired mutations to escape neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). These mutations are not evenly distributed on the RBD surface but cluster on several distinct surfaces, suggesting an influence of the targeted epitope on the capacity to neutralize a broad range of VOCs. Here, we identified a potent nAb from convalescent patients targeting the receptor-binding domain of a broad range of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Except for the Lambda and BA.2.86 variants, this nAb efficiently inhibited the entry of most tested VOCs, including Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, XBB.1.5, and EG.5.1 and to a limited extent also BA.4/5, BA.4.6, and BQ.1.1. It bound recombinant S protein with picomolar affinity, reduced the viral load in the lung of infected hamsters, and prevented the severe lung pathology typical for SARS-CoV-2 infections. An X-ray structure of the nAb-RBD complex revealed an epitope that does not fall into any of the conventional classes and provided insights into its broad neutralization properties. Our findings highlight a conserved epitope within the SARS-CoV-2 RBD that should be preferably targeted by therapeutic antibodies and inform rational vaccine development.IMPORTANCETherapeutic antibodies are effective in preventing severe disease from SARS-CoV-2 infection and constitute an important option in pandemic preparedness, but mutations within the S protein of virus variants (e.g., a mutation of L452) confer resistance to many of such antibodies. Here, we identify a human antibody targeting the S protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) with an elevated escape barrier and characterize its interaction with the RBD functionally and structurally at the atomic level. A direct comparison with reported antibodies targeting the same epitope illustrates important differences in the interface, providing insights into the breadth of antibody binding. These findings highlight the relevance of an extended neutralization profiling in combination with biochemical and structural characterization of the antibody-RBD interaction for the selection of future therapeutic antibodies, which may accelerate the control of potential future pandemics.

Broad-Spectrum Engineered Multivalent Nanobodies Against SARS-CoV-1/2

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages escape most preclinical/clinical neutralizing antibodies in development, suggesting that previously employed antibody screening strategies are not well suited to counteract the rapid mutation of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, there is an urgent need to screen better broad-spectrum neutralizing antibody. In this study, a comprehensive approach to design broad-spectrum inhibitors against both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 by leveraging the structural diversity of nanobodies is proposed. This includes the de novo design of a fully human nanobody library and the camel immunization-based nanobody library, both targeting conserved epitopes, as well as the development of multivalent nanobodies that bind nonoverlapping epitopes. The results show that trivale B11-E8-F3, three nanobodies joined tandemly in trivalent form, have the broadest spectrum and efficient neutralization activity, which spans from SARS-CoV-1 to SARS-CoV-2 variants. It is also demonstrated that B11-E8-F3 has a very prominent preventive and some therapeutic effect in animal models of three authentic viruses. Therefore, B11-E8-F3 has an outstanding advantage in preventing SARS-CoV-1/SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially in immunocompromised populations or elderly people with high-risk comorbidities.

COVID-19 progression and convalescence in common variable immunodeficiency patients show dysregulated adaptive immune responses and persistent type I interferon and inflammasome activation

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most prevalent primary immunodeficiency, marked by hypogammaglobulinemia, poor antibody responses, and increased infection susceptibility. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to study the effects of prolonged viral infections on the immune responses of CVID patients. Here we use single-cell RNA-seq and spectral flow cytometry of peripheral blood samples before, during, and after SARS-CoV-2 infection showing that COVID-19 CVID patients display a persistent type I interferon signature at convalescence across immune compartments. Alterations in adaptive immunity include sustained activation of naïve B cells, increased CD21low B cells, impaired Th1 polarization, CD4+ T central memory exhaustion, and increased CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity. NK cell differentiation is defective, although cytotoxicity remains intact. Monocytes show persistent activation of inflammasome-related genes. These findings suggest the involvement of intact humoral immunity in regulating these processes and might indicate the need for early intervention to manage viral infections in CVID patients.

Schwann cell-secreted frizzled-related protein 1 dictates neuroinflammation and peripheral nerve degeneration after neurotrauma

Neurotrauma in limbs can induce sustained neuroinflammation, resulting in persistent disruption of nerve tissue architecture and retardation of axon regrowth. Despite macrophage-mediated inflammation promoting the removal of necrotic neural components and stimulating neo-vessel ingrowth, detrimental shifts in macrophage phenotype exacerbate nerve degeneration. Herein, we find that peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) result in abundant secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (sFRP1) expression, particularly by Schwann cells (SCs). Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) in macrophages recognizes sFRP1 and triggers a dysregulated secretion of inflammatory mediators. Single-cell atlas of human injured peripheral nerves reveals the appearance of sFRP1-expressing SCs with mesenchymal traits and macrophages with a proinflammatory genetic profile. Deletion of either SC-specific sFRP1 or macrophage-specific HSP90 alleviates neuroinflammation and prevents the progression of nerve degeneration. Together, our findings implicate the response of macrophages to SC-derived sFRP1 in exacerbating nerve damage following PNIs.

Safety and Efficacy of SAB-185 for Nonhospitalized Adults With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the fully human polyclonal antibody product SAB-185 in a phase 3 trial for COVID-19.

METHODS

Nonhospitalized high-risk adults within 7 days of symptom onset were randomized 1:1 to open-label SAB-185 3840 units/kg or casirivimab/imdevimab 1200 mg. Noninferiority comparison was undertaken for pre-Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab expected to be fully active) and superiority comparison for the Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab not expected to be active). Primary outcomes were the composite of all-cause hospitalizations/deaths and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through day 28. A secondary outcome was time to sustained symptom resolution.

RESULTS

Enrollment ended early due to low hospitalization/death rates upon Omicron emergence; 255 adults were in pre-Omicron and 392 in Omicron populations. Hospitalizations/deaths occurred in 6 (5.0%) and 3 (2.2%) of pre-Omicron SAB-185 and casirivimab/imdevimab arms (absolute difference 2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3%-8.6%); and 5 (2.5%) versus 3 (1.5%) (absolute difference 1.0%; 95% CI, -2.3%-4.5%) for Omicron. All risk ratios for grade ≥3 TEAEs were not significant. Time to symptom resolution was significantly shorter for SAB-185 for Omicron only: 18 versus >25 days; P =.006.

CONCLUSIONS

SAB-185 had an acceptable safety profile with faster symptom resolution in the Omicron population.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04518410.

Monoclonal antibodies against the spike protein alter the endogenous humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection

Increased use of antiviral monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for treatment and prophylaxis necessitates better understanding of their impact on endogenous immunity to vaccines and viruses. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presented an opportunity to study immunity in individuals who received antiviral mAbs and were subsequently immunized with vaccines encoding the mAb-targeted viral spike antigen. Here, we describe the impact of administration of an antibody combination, casirivimab plus imdevimab (CAS+IMD), on immune responses to subsequent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in humans, nonhuman primates, and mice. The presence of CAS+IMD at the time of vaccination led to a specific diminishment of vaccine-elicited pseudovirus neutralizing antibody titers without overall dampening of spike protein-directed immune responses, including antibody, B cell, and T cell responses. The impact on pseudovirus neutralizing titers extended to other therapeutic anti-spike protein antibodies when used as either monotherapy or combination therapy. The specific reduction in pseudovirus neutralizing titers was the result of epitope masking, a phenomenon where specific epitopes are bound by high-affinity antibodies and blocked from B cell recognition. Encouragingly, this reduction in pseudovirus neutralizing titers was reversible with additional booster vaccination. Moreover, by assessing the antiviral immune response in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals treated therapeutically with CAS+IMD, we demonstrated alteration of antiviral humoral immunity in those who had received mAb therapy, but only in those individuals who had yet to start mounting their natural immune response at the time of mAb treatment. Together, these data demonstrate that antiviral mAbs can alter endogenous humoral immunity during vaccination or infection.

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Leronlimab in Mild-To-Moderate COVID-19

PURPOSE

Early in the course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic it was hypothesised that host genetics played a role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 including a suggestion that the CCR5-Δ32 mutation may be protective in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Leronlimab is an investigational CCR5-specific humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody currently in development for HIV-1 infection. We aimed to explore the impact of leronlimab on the severity of disease symptoms among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

METHODS

The TEMPEST trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous leronlimab (700 mg) or placebo on days 0 and 7. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessed by change in total symptom score based on fever, myalgia, dyspnea, and cough, at end of treatment (day 14).

FINDINGS

Overall, 84 participants were randomized and treated with leronlimab (n = 56) or placebo (n = 28). No difference was observed in change in total symptom score (P = 0.8184) or other pre-specified secondary endpoints between treatments. However, in a post hoc analysis, 50.0% of participants treated with leronlimab demonstrated improvements from baseline in National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at day 14, compared with 20·8% of participants in the placebo group (post hoc; p = 0.0223). Among participants in this trial with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adverse events rates were numerically but not statistically significantly lower in leronlimab participants (33.9%) compared with placebo participants (50.0%).

IMPLICATIONS

At the time the TEMPEST trial was designed although CCR5 was known to be implicated in COVID-19 disease severity the exact pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection was poorly understood. Today it is well accepted that SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic-to-mild cases is primarily characterized by viral replication, with a heightened immune response, accompanied by diminished viral replication in moderate-to-severe disease and a peak in inflammatory responses with excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critical disease. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that no differences between treatments were observed in the primary endpoint or in pre-specified secondary endpoints among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, the results of the exploratory post hoc analysis showing that participants in the leronlimab group had greater improvement in NEWS2 assessment compared to placebo provided a suggestion that leronlimab may be associated with a lower likelihood of people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 progressing to more severe disease and needs to be confirmed in other appropriately designed clinical trials.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov number, NCT04343651 https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT04343651.

Fc-FcγR interactions during infections: From neutralizing antibodies to antibody-dependent enhancement

Advances in antibody technologies have resulted in the development of potent antibody-based therapeutics with proven clinical efficacy against infectious diseases. Several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), mainly against viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, HIV-1, Ebola virus, influenza virus, and hepatitis B virus, are currently undergoing clinical testing or are already in use. Although these mAbs exhibit potent neutralizing activity that effectively blocks host cell infection, their antiviral activity results not only from Fab-mediated virus neutralization, but also from the protective effector functions mediated through the interaction of their Fc domains with Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) on effector leukocytes. Fc-FcγR interactions confer pleiotropic protective activities, including the clearance of opsonized virions and infected cells, as well as the induction of antiviral T-cell responses. However, excessive or inappropriate activation of specific FcγR pathways can lead to disease enhancement and exacerbated pathology, as seen in the context of dengue virus infections. A comprehensive understanding of the diversity of Fc effector functions during infection has guided the development of engineered antiviral antibodies optimized for maximal effector activity, as well as the design of targeted therapeutic approaches to prevent antibody-dependent enhancement of disease.

Cell-based high-content approach for SARS-CoV-2 neutralization identifies unique monoclonal antibodies and PI3K pathway inhibitors

The sudden rise of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the delay in the development of effective therapeutics to mitigate it made evident a need for ways to screen for compounds that can block infection and prevent further pathogenesis and spread. Yet, identifying effective drugs efficacious against viral infection and replication with minimal toxicity for the patient can be difficult. Monoclonal antibodies were shown to be effective, yet as the SARS-CoV-2 mutated, these antibodies became ineffective. Small molecule antivirals were identified using pseudovirus constructs to recapitulate infection in non-human cells, such as Vero E6 cells. However, the impact was limited due to poor translation of these compounds in the clinical setting. This is partly due to the lack of similarity of screening platforms to the in vivo physiology of the patient and partly because drugs effective in vitro showed dose-limiting toxicities. In this study, we performed two high-throughput screens in human lung adenocarcinoma cells with authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus to identify both monoclonal antibodies that neutralize the virus and clinically useful kinase inhibitors to block the virus and prioritize minimal host toxicity. Using high-content imaging combined with single-cell and multidimensional analysis, we identified antibodies and kinase inhibitors that reduce virus infection without affecting the host. Our screening technique uncovered novel antibodies and overlooked kinase inhibitors (i.e. PIK3i, mTORi, multiple RTKi) that could be effective against SARS-CoV-2 virus. Further characterization of these molecules will streamline the repurposing of compounds for the treatment of future pandemics and uncover novel mechanisms viruses use to hijack and infect host cells.

Monoclonal Antibody Infusions for Outpatient Management of Mild-Moderate COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.

RESULTS

There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; P = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; P = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (P = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (P = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (P = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.

Comparison of Dual Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for COVID-19 Evolution: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Neutralizing antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein reduce COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization, particularly in high-risk individuals. The COCOPREV-R study aimed to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in high-risk SARS-CoV-2 patients treated with dual monoclonal antibody therapies and to identify associated virological factors.

METHODS

The COCOPREV-R study retrospectively collected real-world data from high-risk patients receiving Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab or Casirivimab/Imdevimab dual monoclonal antibody therapies (22 February 2021 to 15 June 2021).

RESULTS

The study included 1004 patients with COVID-19, of whom 691 received Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and 313 received Casirivimab/Imdevimab. The alpha variant represented 90.1% of those for whom data were available. The risk of hospitalization within 30 days was lower with Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (12.7%, CI 95% [9.9-16.3%]) compared to Casirivimab/Imdevimab (28.4%, CI 95% [22.7-35.1%) (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rates were comparable between both groups (p = 0.982). Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity showed no difference between the two treatment groups (95.2% [93.0-96.9%] and 93.5% [89.1-96.6%] until day 30, p = 0.851 for Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and Casirivimab/Imdevimab, respectively). Among persistently positive samples with available sequencing results (n = 43), Spike protein changes occurred only in Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (42.9%) vs. Casirivimab/Imdevimab (0.0%) groups. Q493R (25.0%) and E484K (12.5%) were the most common mutations selected by Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab in follow-up samples. Other factors (immunodepression, comorbidities, and age) did not appear to be associated with the occurrence of Spike protein mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of hospitalization was seen with Casirivimab/Imdevimab (RONAPREVE®) in comparison with Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab treatment, but with the emergence of Spike mutations only in the Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab group.

Emerging and reemerging infectious diseases: global trends and new strategies for their prevention and control

To adequately prepare for potential hazards caused by emerging and reemerging infectious diseases, the WHO has issued a list of high-priority pathogens that are likely to cause future outbreaks and for which research and development (R&D) efforts are dedicated, known as paramount R&D blueprints. Within R&D efforts, the goal is to obtain effective prophylactic and therapeutic approaches, which depends on a comprehensive knowledge of the etiology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis of these diseases. In this process, the accessibility of animal models is a priority bottleneck because it plays a key role in bridging the gap between in-depth understanding and control efforts for infectious diseases. Here, we reviewed preclinical animal models for high priority disease in terms of their ability to simulate human infections, including both natural susceptibility models, artificially engineered models, and surrogate models. In addition, we have thoroughly reviewed the current landscape of vaccines, antibodies, and small molecule drugs, particularly hopeful candidates in the advanced stages of these infectious diseases. More importantly, focusing on global trends and novel technologies, several aspects of the prevention and control of infectious disease were discussed in detail, including but not limited to gaps in currently available animal models and medical responses, better immune correlates of protection established in animal models and humans, further understanding of disease mechanisms, and the role of artificial intelligence in guiding or supplementing the development of animal models, vaccines, and drugs. Overall, this review described pioneering approaches and sophisticated techniques involved in the study of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention, and clinical theatment of WHO high-priority pathogens and proposed potential directions. Technological advances in these aspects would consolidate the line of defense, thus ensuring a timely response to WHO high priority pathogens.

Inhalable dry powders of a monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2 virus made by thin-film freeze-drying

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a promising modality for the prevention and treatment of viral infections. For infections that initiate from the respiratory tract, direct administration of specific neutralizing mAbs into lungs has advantages over systemic injection of the same mAbs. Herein, using AUG-3387, a human-derived mAb with high affinity to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its various variants, as a model mAb, we formulated the mAb into dry powders by thin-film freeze-drying, confirmed that the AUG-3387 mAb reconstituted from the dry powders retained their integrity, high affinity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD), as well as ability to neutralize RBD-expressing pseudoviruses. Finally, we showed that one of the AUG-3387 mAb dry powders had desirable aerosol properties for pulmonary delivery into the lung. We concluded that thin-film freeze-drying represents a viable method to prepare inhalable powders of virus-neutralizing mAbs for pulmonary delivery into the lung.

Enhanced Omicron Variant Neutralization by a Human Antibody Tailored to Wild-Type and Delta-Variant SARS-CoV-2 RBDs

Given the previous SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the inherent unpredictability of viral antigenic drift and shift, preemptive development of diverse neutralizing antibodies targeting a broad spectrum of epitopes is essential to ensure immediate therapeutic and prophylactic interventions during emerging outbreaks. In this study, we present a monoclonal antibody engineered for cross-reactivity to both wild-type and Delta RBDs, which, surprisingly, demonstrates enhanced neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant despite a significant number of mutations. Using an Escherichia coli inner membrane display of a human naïve antibody library, we identified antibodies specific to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD). Subsequent directed evolution via yeast surface display yielded JS18.1, an antibody with high binding affinity for both the Delta and Kappa RBDs, as well as enhanced binding to other RBDs (wild-type, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Kappa, and Mu). Notably, JS18.1 (engineered for wild-type and Delta RBDs) exhibits enhanced neutralizing capability against the Omicron variant and binds to RBDs noncompetitively with ACE2, distinguishing it from other previously reported antibodies. This underscores the potential of pre-existing antibodies to neutralize emerging SARS-CoV-2 strains and offers insights into strategies to combat emerging viruses.

COVID-19: from immune response to clinical intervention

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has highlighted the pivotal role of the immune response in determining the progression and severity of viral infections. In this paper, we review the most recent studies on the complicated dynamics between SARS-CoV-2 and the host immune system, highlight the importance of understanding these dynamics in developing effective treatments and formulate potent management strategies for COVID-19. We describe the activation of the host's innate immunity and the subsequent adaptive immune response following infection with SARS-CoV-2. In addition, the review emphasizes the immune evasion strategies of the SARS-CoV-2, including inhibition of interferon production and induction of cytokine storms, along with the resulting clinical outcomes. Finally, we assess the efficacy of current treatment strategies, including antiviral drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and anti-inflammatory treatments, and discuss their role in providing immunity and preventing severe disease.

Protective Non-neutralizing anti-N-terminal Domain mAb Maintains Fc-mediated Function against SARS-COV-2 Variants up to BA.2.86-JN.1 with Superfluous In Vivo Protection against JN.1 Due to Attenuated Virulence

Substantial evidence supports that Fc-mediated effector functions of anti-spike Abs contribute to anti-SARS-Cov-2 protection. We have previously shown that two non-neutralizing but opsonic mAbs targeting the receptor-binding domain and N-terminal domain (NTD), Ab81 and Ab94, respectively, are protective against lethal Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice. In this article, we investigated whether these protective non-neutralizing Abs maintain Fc-mediated function and Ag binding against mutated SARS-CoV-2 variants. Ab81 and Ab94 retained their nanomolar affinity and Fc-mediated function toward Omicron and its subvariants, such as BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, XBB, XBB1.5, and BQ1.1. However, when encountering the more heavily mutated BA.2.86, Ab81 lost its function, whereas the 10 new mutations in the NTD did not affect Ab94. In vivo experiments with Ab94 in K18-hACE2 mice inoculated with a stringent dose of 100,000 PFU of the JN.1 variant revealed unexpected results. Surprisingly, this variant exhibited low disease manifestation in this animal model with no weight loss or death in the control group. Still, assessment of mice using a clinical scoring system showed better protection for Ab94-treated mice, indicating that Fc-mediated functions are still beneficial. Our work shows that a protective anti-receptor-binding domain non-neutralizing mAb lost reactivity when BA.2.86 emerged, whereas the anti-NTD mAb was still functional. Finally, this work adds new insight into the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by reporting that JN.1 is substantially less virulent in vivo than previous strains.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Resistance to Antiviral Monoclonal Antibody Therapy on Neutralizing Antibody Response

Background

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have played a key role as an anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2, but there is a potential for resistance to develop. The interplay between host antibody responses and the development of monoclonal antibody (mAb) resistance is a critical area of investigation. In this study, we assessed host neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses against both ancestral virus and those with treatment-emergent E484K bamlanivimab resistance mutations.

Methods

Study participants were enrolled in the ACTIV-2/Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally (ACTG) A5401 phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of bamlanivimab 700 mg mAb therapy (NCT04518410). Anterior nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing and S gene next-generation sequencing to identify the E484K bamlanivimab resistance mutation. Serum nAb titers were assessed by pseudovirus neutralization assays.

Results

Higher baseline (pre-treatment) nAb titers against either ancestral or E484K virus was associated with lower baseline viral load. Participants with emerging resistance had low levels of nAb titers against either ancestral or E484K nAb at the time of study entry. Participants with emergent E484K resistance developed significantly higher levels of E484K-specific nAb titers compared to mAb-treated individuals who did not develop resistance. All participants who developed the E484K mAb resistance mutation were eventually able to clear the virus.

Conclusion

Emerging drug resistance after SARS-CoV-2-specific mAb therapy led to a heightened host neutralizing antibody response to the mAb-resistant variant that was associated with eventual viral clearance. This demonstrates the interplay between the antiviral treatment-directed viral evolution and subsequent host immune response in viral clearance.

Novel antibody language model accelerates IgG screening and design for broad-spectrum antiviral therapy

Therapeutic antibodies have become one of the most influential therapeutics in modern medicine to fight against infectious pathogens, cancer, and many other diseases. However, experimental screening for highly efficacious targeting antibodies is labor-intensive and of high cost, which is exacerbated by evolving antigen targets under selective pressure such as fast-mutating viral variants. As a proof-of-concept, we developed a machine learning-assisted antibody generation pipeline AbGen that greatly accelerates the screening and re-design of immunoglobulins G (IgGs) against a broad spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus variant strains. Our AbGen centers around a novel antibody language model (AbLM) that is pretrained on 12 million generic protein domain sequences and fine-tuned on 4,000+ paired VH-VL sequences, with IgG-specific CDR-masking and VH-VL cross-attention. AbLM provides a latent space of IgG sequence embeddings for AbGen, including (a) landscapes of IgGs' activities in neutralizing the wild-type virus are analyzed through structure prediction for IgG and IgG-antigen (viral protein spike's receptor binding domain, RBD) interactions; and (b) landscapes of IgGs' susceptibility in neutralizing variant viruses are predicted through Gaussian process regression, despite that as few as 14 clinical antibodies' responses to variants of concern are available. The AbGen pipeline was applied to over 1300 IgG sequences we collected from RBD-binding B cells of convalescent patients. With experimental validations, AbGen efficiently prioritized IgG candidates against a broad spectrum of viral variants (wildtype, Delta, and Omicron), preventing the infection of host cells in vitro and hACE2 transgenic mice in vivo. Compared to other existing protein language models that require 10-100 times more model parameters, AbLM improved the precision from around 50% to 75% to predict IgGs with low variant susceptibility. Furthermore, AbGen enables structure-based computational protein redesign for selected IgG clones with single amino acid substitutions at the RBD-binding interface that doubled the IgG blockade efficacy for one of the severe, therapy-resistant strains - Delta (B.1.617). Our work expedites applications of artificial intelligence in antibody screen and re-design combining data-driven protein language models and Kriging for antibody sequence analysis and activity prediction, in synergy with physics-driven protein docking and design for antibody-antigen interface analyses and functional optimization.

Early antiviral CD4 and CD8 T cell responses and antibodies are associated with upper respiratory tract clearance of SARS-CoV-2

T cells are involved in protective immunity against numerous viral infections. Data regarding functional roles of human T cells in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2) viral clearance in primary COVID-19 are limited. To address this knowledge gap, samples were assessed for associations between SARS2 upper respiratory tract viral RNA levels and early virus-specific adaptive immune responses for 95 unvaccinated clinical trial participants with acute primary COVID-19 aged 18-86 years old, approximately half of whom were considered high risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Functionality and magnitude of acute SARS2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated, in addition to antibody responses. Most individuals with acute COVID-19 developed SARS2-specific T cell responses within 6 days of COVID-19 symptom onset. Early CD4 T cell and CD8 T cell responses were polyfunctional, and both strongly associated with reduced upper respiratory tract SARS2 viral RNA, independent of neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, these findings provide evidence for protective roles for circulating SARS2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells during acute COVID-19.

Characterization of Treatment Resistance and Viral Kinetics in the Setting of Single-Active Versus Dual-Active Monoclonal Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a crucial antiviral strategy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether combination mAbs offer a benefit over single-active mAb treatment. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalizations or death in the ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Certain SARS-CoV-2 variants are intrinsically resistant against romlusevimab, leading to only single-active mAb therapy with amubarvimab in these variants. We evaluated virologic outcomes in individuals treated with single- versus dual-active mAbs.

METHODS

Participants were nonhospitalized adults at higher risk of clinical progression randomized to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and targeted S-gene next-generation sequencing was performed on anterior nasal samples. We compared viral load kinetics and resistance emergence between individuals treated with effective single- versus dual-active mAbs depending on the infecting variant.

RESULTS

Study participants receiving single- or dual-active mAbs had similar demographics, baseline nasal viral load, symptom score, and symptom duration. Compared with single-active mAb treatment, treatment with dual-active mAbs led to faster viral load decline at study days 3 (P < .001) and 7 (P < .01). Treatment-emergent resistance mutations were more likely to be detected after amubarvimab plus romlusevimab treatment than with placebo (2.6% vs 0%; P < .001) and were more frequently detected in the setting of single-active compared with dual-active mAb treatment (7.3% vs 1.1%; P < .01). Single-active and dual-active mAb treatment resulted in similar decrease in rates of hospitalizations or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single-active mAb therapy, dual-active mAbs led to similar clinical outcomes but significantly faster viral load decline and a lower risk of emergent resistance.

Clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 treated with monoclonal antibody therapy versus an untreated control cohort

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in adults at a high-risk for progression to severe disease in November 2020. This study assessed the impact of MAT on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study comparing 30-day COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, admissions, and mortality in patients receiving MAT (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, or casirivimab-imdevimab) between 16 November 2020 and 19 June 2021, compared to a control group of high-risk adults diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 prior to MAT availability between 16 May 2020 and 15 November 2020. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval evaluating the relationship between clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

1187 patients who received MAT were compared to 1103 patients not treated with MAT. Multivariable regression model adjusted for possible confounders showed patients who received MAT had lower rates of ED visits (3.2% vs 7.4%, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.31-0.70, p < .001) and hospital admissions (4.3% vs 7.8%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.29-0.62, p < .001) compared to the control group. After adjusting for confounders, MAT was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.36, p = .035). In the MAT group, those treated within 2 days of COVID-19 diagnosis had lower mortality than those treated more than 2 days post-diagnosis (unadjusted OR = 0.152, 95% CI = 0.031-0.734, p = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals treated with MAT had lower rates of 30-day COVID-19-related ED visits and hospital admissions compared to those not receiving MAT. Early MAT resulted in lower 30-day mortality compared to receipt >2 days post COVID-19 diagnosis.

Protective non-neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies

Recent studies show an important role for non-neutralizing anti-spike antibodies, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in robustly protecting against SARS-CoV-2 infection. These mAbs use Fc-mediated functions such as complement activation, phagocytosis, and cellular cytotoxicity. There is an untapped potential for using non-neutralizing mAbs in durable antibody treatments; because of their available conserved epitopes, they may not be as sensitive to virus mutations as neutralizing mAbs. Here, we discuss evidence of non-neutralizing mAb-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. We explore how non-neutralizing mAb Fc-mediated functions can be enhanced via novel antibody-engineering techniques. Important questions remain to be answered regarding the characteristics of protective non-neutralizing mAbs, including the models and assays used for study, the risks of ensuing detrimental inflammation, as well as the durability and mechanisms of protection.

Efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin in the treatment of mild to moderate Covid-19 patients: a multi-centre double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence on ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19 is controversial. A Cochrane review concluded that the efficacy and safety of ivermectin is uncertain (evidence up to April 2022) and WHO recommended its use only in the setting of clinical trials. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin in hospitalized patients with mild to moderate Covid-19.

TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among RT-PCR-confirmed, adults, hospitalised within the first four days of symptoms. Patients received oral ivermectin 24 mg or placebo daily for five days. RT-PCR was repeated on days five and ten. Clinical progression was monitored using the World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale. Serum ivermectin levels were measured on days three, five, and seven. The primary outcome was the difference in the viral load between day zero and ten in the two groups.

RESULTS

Out of 1699 patients screened, 249 underwent randomization and 127 received ivermectin, and 122 placebo. D10 median viral load for E gene (IQR) was 2,000 copies/mL (100 - 20,500) with ivermectin (n = 80) and 4,100 copies/mL (1,000-65,600) with placebo (n = 81, p = 0.028), per protocol analysis. The difference in Log viral load between day zero and ten between ivermectin and placebo was 3.72 and 2.97 respectively (p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the WHO clinical progression scale or the adverse effects. Ivermectin blood levels taken before or with meals were not significantly different. Only 7 and 17 patients achieved blood levels above 160ng/ML and 100ng/ML respectively and they did not achieve a significantly lower viral load.

CONCLUSION

Although ivermectin resulted in statistically significant lower viral load in patients with mild to moderate Covid-19, it had no significant effect on clinical symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

SLCTR/2021/020, Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry. 19/07/2021.

From bench to bedside: potential of translational research in COVID-19 and beyond

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been around for more than 3 years now. However, due to constant viral evolution, novel variants are emerging, leaving old treatment protocols redundant. As treatment options dwindle, infection rates continue to rise and seasonal infection surges become progressively common across the world, rapid solutions are required. With genomic and proteomic methods generating enormous amounts of data to expand our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 biology, there is an urgent requirement for the development of novel therapeutic methods that can allow translational research to flourish. In this review, we highlight the current state of COVID-19 in the world and the effects of post-infection sequelae. We present the contribution of translational research in COVID-19, with various current and novel therapeutic approaches, including antivirals, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines, as well as alternate treatment methods such as immunomodulators, currently being studied and reiterate the importance of translational research in the development of various strategies to contain COVID-19.

Computational Insights into SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Mutations and Nirmatrelvir Efficacy: The Effects of P132H and P132H-A173V

Nirmatrelvir, a pivotal component of the oral antiviral Paxlovid for COVID-19, targets the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) as a covalent inhibitor. Here, we employed combined computational methods to explore how the prevalent Omicron variant mutation P132H, alone and in combination with A173V (P132H-A173V), affects nirmatrelvir's efficacy. Our findings suggest that P132H enhances the noncovalent binding affinity of Mpro for nirmatrelvir, whereas P132H-A173V diminishes it. Although both mutants catalyze the rate-limiting step more efficiently than the wild-type (WT) Mpro, P132H slows the overall rate of covalent bond formation, whereas P132H-A173V accelerates it. Comprehensive analysis of noncovalent and covalent contributions to the overall binding free energy of the covalent complex suggests that P132H likely enhances Mpro sensitivity to nirmatrelvir, while P132H-A173V may confer resistance. Per-residue decompositions of the binding and activation free energies pinpoint key residues that significantly affect the binding affinity and reaction rates, revealing how the mutations modulate these effects. The mutation-induced conformational perturbations alter drug-protein local contact intensities and the electrostatic preorganization of the protein, affecting noncovalent binding affinity and the stability of key reaction states, respectively. Our findings inform the mechanisms of nirmatrelvir resistance and sensitivity, facilitating improved drug design and the detection of resistant strains.

COVID-19 drug discovery and treatment options

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused substantial morbidity and mortality, and serious social and economic disruptions worldwide. Unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated older individuals with underlying diseases are especially prone to severe disease. In patients with non-fatal disease, long COVID affecting multiple body systems may persist for months. Unlike SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, which have either been mitigated or remained geographically restricted, SARS-CoV-2 has disseminated globally and is likely to continue circulating in humans with possible emergence of new variants that may render vaccines less effective. Thus, safe, effective and readily available COVID-19 therapeutics are urgently needed. In this Review, we summarize the major drug discovery approaches, preclinical antiviral evaluation models, representative virus-targeting and host-targeting therapeutic options, and key therapeutics currently in clinical use for COVID-19. Preparedness against future coronavirus pandemics relies not only on effective vaccines but also on broad-spectrum antivirals targeting conserved viral components or universal host targets, and new therapeutics that can precisely modulate the immune response during infection.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of severe COVID-19: a retrospective study during Omicron BA.1 variant surge

Among treatment options for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showed to be effective in preventing disease progression, but real-world data during the Omicron variant surge are still lacking. Multicentre retrospective study evaluating the effectiveness of sotrovimab and casirivimab-imdevimab in fragile patients with mild SARS-CoV-2 infection between November 2021 and March 2022. Unfavourable outcome was defined as increased need for oxygen supplementation and/or death. Of 268 study-participants, 12 (4.48%) previously needed supplemental oxygen, while 6 (2.24%) had active solid neoplasia (2.24%); 186 (69%) have previously received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Overall, 22 (8%) had unfavourable outcomes (42% versus 6% of patients with and without previous oxygen need and 50% versus 7% of patients with and without active solid neoplasia). Both supplemental oxygen therapy before SARS-CoV-2 infection and solid malignant tumour have shown to be risk factors for treatment failure. Log-rank test did not identify differences between sotrovimab and casirivimab-imdevimab treatment. Despite diffusion of Omicron variant, the rate of unfavourable outcome was higher than expected. The presence of underlying risk factors, including solid cancer and previous oxygen therapy are independently associated with risk of COVID-19 progression, suggesting the need for antiviral treatments not limited to mAbs and implementation of vaccine campaign.

Efficacy and safety of casirivimab and imdevimab for preventing and treating COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ongoing global epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a serious public health problem. The selection of safe and effective therapeutic agents is of paramount importance. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of casirivimab and imdevimab in the treatment of global cases of COVID-19.

Methods

To identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the combined administration of casirivimab and imdevimab for COVID-19 management, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to September 10, 2022. Data on the efficacy and safety of casirivimab and imdevimab were extracted. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 851 articles were searched. Twelve studies were finally included in the meta-analysis, with 27,179 participants. Dichotomous and continuous variables were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Compared to placebo or alternative medications, the combination of casirivimab and imdevimab reduced viral load (WMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.38, P<0.01), all-cause mortality (OR =0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.99, P=0.03), the incidence of any serious adverse events (OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95, P=0.01), the incidence of Grade 3 or more severe adverse events (OR =0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.92, P=0.01), the likelihood of contracting COVID-19, the incidence of hospitalization, emergency room visits, and mortality (OR =0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.93, P=0.03).

Conclusions

The monoclonal antibody combination of casirivimab and imdevimab is effective in treating patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as they can reduce viral load, all-cause mortality, infection rates, and the incidence of clinical outcomes of special interest after treatment, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients With COVID-19 (September 2022)

There are many pharmacologic therapies that are being used or considered for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with rapidly changing efficacy and safety evidence from trials. The objective was to develop evidence-based, rapid, living guidelines intended to support patients, clinicians, and other healthcare professionals in their decisions about treatment and management of patients with COVID-19. In March 2020, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of infectious disease clinicians, pharmacists, and methodologists with varied areas of expertise to regularly review the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and management of persons with COVID-19. The process used a living guideline approach and followed a rapid recommendation development checklist. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted at regular intervals. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. Based on the most recent search conducted on 31 May 2022, the IDSA guideline panel has made 32 recommendations for the treatment and management of the following groups/populations: pre- and postexposure prophylaxis, ambulatory with mild-to-moderate disease, and hospitalized with mild-to-moderate, severe but not critical, and critical disease. As these are living guidelines, the most recent recommendations can be found online at: https://idsociety.org/COVID19guidelines. At the inception of its work, the panel has expressed the overarching goal that patients be recruited into ongoing trials. Since then, many trials were conducted that provided much-needed evidence for COVID-19 therapies. There still remain many unanswered questions as the pandemic evolved, which we hope future trials can answer.

Nigella sativa, Anthemis hyaline and Citrus sinensis extracts reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication by fluctuating Rho GTPase, PI3K-AKT, and MAPK/ERK pathways in HeLa-CEACAM1a cells

Traditional remedies have long utilized Anthemis hyaline, Nigella sativa, and Citrus sinensis peel extracts as treatments for microbial infections. This study aimed to investigate the influence of Anthemis hyaline, Nigella sativa, and Citrus sinensis extracts on coronavirus replication and apoptosis-related pathways. HeLa-CEACAM1a cells were exposed to mouse hepatitis virus-A59. After viral inoculation, the mRNA levels of 36 genes were quantified using a Fluidigm Dynamic Array nanofluidic chip. IL-8 level and intracellular Ca2+ concentration was measured, and viral titer was assessed by the TCID50/ml assay to detect the extent of infection. Treatment with Nigella sativa extract surged the inflammatory cytokine IL-8 level at both 24 and 48-hour. Changes in gene expression were notable for RHOA, VAV3, ROCK2, CFL1, RASA1, and MPRIP genes following treatment with any of the extracts. The addition of Anthemis hyaline, Nigella sativa, or Citrus sinensis extracts to coronavirus-infected cells reduced viral presence, with Anthemis hyaline extract leading to a virtually undetectable viral load at 6- and 8-hours after infection. While all treatments influenced IL-8 production and viral levels, Anthemis hyaline extract displayed the most pronounced reduction in viral load. Consequently, Anthemis hyaline extract emerges as the most promising agent, harboring potential therapeutic compounds.

Identification and Analysis of Biomarkers Associated with Lipophagy and Therapeutic Agents for COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Lipids, as a fundamental cell component, play an regulating role in controlling the different cellular biological processes involved in viral infections. A notable feature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is impaired lipid metabolism. The function of lipophagy-related genes in COVID-19 is unknown. The present study aimed to investigate biomarkers and drug targets associated with lipophagy and lipophagy-based therapeutic agents for COVID-19 through bioinformatics analysis.

METHODS

Lipophagy-related biomarkers for COVID-19 were identified using machine learning algorithms such as random forest, Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination, Generalized Linear Model, and Extreme Gradient Boosting in three COVID-19-associated GEO datasets: scRNA-seq (GSE145926) and bulk RNA-seq (GSE183533 and GSE190496). The cMAP database was searched for potential COVID-19 medications.

RESULTS

The lipophagy pathway was downregulated, and the lipid droplet formation pathway was upregulated, resulting in impaired lipid metabolism. Seven lipophagy-related genes, including ACADVL, HYOU1, DAP, AUP1, PRXAB2, LSS, and PLIN2, were used as biomarkers and drug targets for COVID-19. Moreover, lipophagy may play a role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. As prospective drugs for treating COVID-19, seven potential downregulators (phenoxybenzamine, helveticoside, lanatoside C, geldanamycin, loperamide, pioglitazone, and trichostatin A) were discovered. These medication candidates showed remarkable binding energies against the seven biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

The lipophagy-related genes ACADVL, HYOU1, DAP, AUP1, PRXAB2, LSS, and PLIN2 can be used as biomarkers and drug targets for COVID-19. Seven potential downregulators of these seven biomarkers may have therapeutic effects for treating COVID-19.

Rapid initiation of nasal saline irrigation to reduce severity in high-risk COVID+ outpatients

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether initiating saline nasal irrigation after COVID-19 diagnosis reduces hospitalization and death in high-risk outpatients compared with observational controls, and if irrigant composition impacts severity.

METHODS

Participants 55 and older were enrolled within 24 hours of a + PCR COVID-19 test between September 24 and December 21, 2020. Among 826 screened, 79 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to add 2.5 mL povidone-iodine 10% or 2.5 mL sodium bicarbonate to 240 mL of isotonic nasal irrigation twice daily for 14 days. The primary outcome was hospitalization or death from COVID-19 within 28 days of enrollment by daily self-report confirmed with phone calls and hospital records, compared to the CDC Surveillance Dataset covering the same time. Secondary outcomes compared symptom resolution by irrigant additive.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine high-risk participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 64 [8] years; 36 [46%] women; 71% Non-Hispanic White), with mean BMI 30.3. Analyzed by intention-to-treat, by day 28, COVID-19 symptoms resulted in one ED visit and no hospitalizations in 42 irrigating with alkalinization, one hospitalization of 37 in the povidone-iodine group, (1.27%) and no deaths. Of nearly three million CDC cases, 9.47% were known to be hospitalized, with an additional 1.5% mortality in those without hospitalization data. Age, sex, and percentage with pre-existing conditions did not significantly differ by exact binomial test from the CDC dataset, while reported race and hospitalization rate did. The total risk of hospitalization or death (11%) was 8.57 times that of enrolled nasal irrigation participants (SE = 2.74; P = .006). Sixty-two participants completed daily surveys (78%), averaging 1.8 irrigations/day. Eleven reported irrigation-related complaints and four discontinued use. Symptom resolution was more likely for those reporting twice daily irrigation (X2 = 8.728, P = .0031) regardless of additive.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2+ participants initiating nasal irrigation were over 8 times less likely to be hospitalized than the national rate.

Screening and optimization of shark nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD

SARS-CoV-2 continues to threaten human health, antibody therapy is one way to control the infection. Because new SARS-CoV-2 mutations are constantly emerging, there is an urgent need to develop broadly neutralizing antibodies to block the viral entry into host cells. VNAR from sharks is the smallest natural antigen binding domain, with the advantages of small size, flexible paratopes, good stability, and low manufacturing cost. Here, we used recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike-RBD to immunize sharks and constructed a VNAR phage display library. VNAR R1C2, selected from the library, efficiently binds to the RBD domain and blocks the infection of ACE2-positive cells by pseudovirus. Next, homologous bivalent VNARs were constructed through the tandem fusion of two R1C2 units, which enhanced both the affinity and neutralizing activity of R1C2. R1C2 was predicted to bind to a relatively conserved region within the RBD. By introducing mutations at four key binding sites within the CDR3 and HV2 regions of R1C2, the affinity and neutralizing activity of R1C2 were significantly improved. Furthermore, R1C2 also exhibits an effective capacity of binding to the Omicron variants (BA.2 and XBB.1). Together, these results suggest that R1C2 could serve as a valuable candidate for preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infections.

SARS-CoV-2 active infection and antibodies amongst health personnel during the outbreak in Cameroon: Strengthening the health system for response to future public health emergencies

BACKGROUND

Health personnel (HP) are on the frontlines during response to public health emergencies like COVID-19. This risk of exposure suggests the need for safety in responding to any pandemic. Therefore, to ascertain the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunity, and their determinants amongst HP become relevant.

METHODS

A cross sectional health facility-based study was carried-out amongst HP in the Centre Region of Cameroon from 1st February to 30th June 2021. Characteristics and access to preventive tools were collected using face-to-face administered questionnaire. Nasopharyngeal swabs and whole blood were collected for PCR, IgG and IgM testing respectively. STATA version 17 software was used for data analysis. Determinants of COVID-19 infection were explored by estimating crude and adjusted Odd Ratio.

RESULTS

Out of 510 HP reached, 458 were enrolled with mean age of 35 (±10) years. Thirty-four (7.4%) were PCR-positive to SARS-CoV-2 with 73.5% being clinicians versus 9 (26.4%) non-clinicians (p = 0.05). Sero-positivity to SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM was 40.2% (184/458), with 84.2% being clinicians versus 29 (15.8%) non-clinicians (p = 0.733). Amongst the 34 HP with PCR-positivity, 16 (47%) had no antibodies, while, 15 (44%) were IgG only. An estimate of HP (43.7%) had at least an evidence of PCR, IgG or IgM contact to COVID-19. Determinants of PCR-positivity was being clinical staff (AOR = 0.29, P = 0.039); and that of IgG/IgM were being non clinical staff (AOR = 0.41, p = 0.018) and regular use of face masks (AOR = 0.44, p = 0.001). HP trained on IPC (24%) were mainly from peripheral level (74.7%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Active infections were within the range of pandemic control (<10%). However, around two-fifths of participants have had contact with the virus, indicating that HP remains a population at risk of COVID-19 and other similarly-transmitted epidemic prone diseases, and also an important source of transmission. There is need of vaccine to achieve protectiveness, and optimal response also requires capacity building to improve the health system when challenged by a future pandemic.