Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Antibodies: Monitoring Antidrug Antibodies in a Clinical Context

Prediction of deep remission through serum TNF-α level at 1 year of treatment in pediatric Crohn's disease

A pilot study investigated the cytokine profile (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-17 A, and IL-10) at diagnosis, affecting infliximab (IFX) trough levels (TLs) in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). In this follow-up study, we evaluated the changes in cytokine level changes after Crohn's disease treatment. Cytokines were re-measured after 1 year of treatment. infliximab trough levels and total anti-infliximab antibodies were also measured in patients who had started infliximab treatment. In total, 29 patients followed up for a year after moderate to severe Crohn's disease diagnosis from June 2020 to June 2021 were enrolled. The mean concentrations of all cytokines at one year were significantly lower than those at the time of diagnosis. IL-6, IL-17 A, and IL-10 concentrations at 1 year maintained their correlation with each other observed at diagnosis, unlike TNF-α following infliximab treatment. At 1 year, TNF-α concentration exhibited a negative correlation with infliximab trough levels (Pearson coefficient = -0.500, p = 0.009), and a positive correlation with anti-infliximab antibody titre (Pearson coefficient = 0.510, p = 0.018). The diagnostic capability of 1-year TNF-α concentration to predict achievement of deep remission had an area under the ROC of 0.802 (p = 0.008), with a TNF-α cut-off concentration set at 9.40 pg/mL. Decreased cytokine concentrations following Crohn's disease treatment reflected reduced inflammatory burden. Targeted medical intervention (infliximab) aimed at specific cytokines, such as TNF-α, led to the reduction of the corresponding cytokines. High TNF-α level post-treatment, combined with suboptimal infliximab trough levels and increased antibody formation, may contribute to deep remission failure in patients.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dose modification of biologics has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) hosted the first US-based public workshop on TDM of biologics with contributions from a broad array of interested parties including healthcare providers, clinical pharmacologists, test developers, bioanalysis and immunogenicity scientists, health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) experts and regulators. The key insight was that despite a body of evidence to support TDM in certain therapeutic areas, there remain substantial challenges to widespread clinical implementation. There is a lack of consensus regarding the integration of TDM in clinical guidelines, and a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of TDM; both factors contribute to the difficulty that healthcare providers face in obtaining reimbursement for TDM (both coverage of testing itself, and coverage of potential dosing modifications). The HEOR experts outlined alternative routes to obtaining reimbursement and suggested advocating for changes in coverage policies to promote TDM use in the clinic. Reaching alignment across policy makers, patients and advocacy groups, payers, and healthcare providers, on specific treatment settings where TDM will be clearly beneficial, was identified as an important step to advancing TDM implementation for the benefit of patients.

High Body Mass Index is Associated with Lower Adalimumab Serum Levels and Higher Disease Activity in Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

Adalimumab, a TNF-alpha inhibitor, is the only FDA-approved biologic for non-infectious uveitis (NIU). However, treatment responses vary, potentially due to interindividual pharmacokinetic differences influenced by body mass index (BMI). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of BMI on adalimumab serum trough levels and therapeutic efficacy in patients with NIU.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, clinical study.

METHODS

Setting: Single-center study. - Study Population: 80 patients with NIU treated with Adalimumab - Observation Procedure: Adalimumab serum trough levels and anti-Adalimumab antibody (AAA) levels were measured. BMI was calculated at treatment initiation, and patients were categorized into normal weight, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese groups. - Main Outcome Measures: The correlation between BMI, adalimumab levels, and clinical response was analyzed using Pearson correlation, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Higher BMI was associated with lower adalimumab serum levels and a reduced likelihood of clinical response. A significant negative correlation was found between BMI and adalimumab levels (r = -0.408, P = .007). Logistic regression identified BMI as a significant predictor of treatment response (P = .017). A BMI threshold of 26.4 was identified, above which the probability of a positive response significantly decreased. Additionally, 51.2% of patients were non-responders, all of whom demonstrated detectable AAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI is associated with lower adalimumab trough levels and reduced treatment efficacy in NIU patients. A BMI threshold of 26.4 may serve as a clinical marker for tailoring adalimumab therapy, highlighting the need for personalized dosing strategies in patients with elevated BMI.

Navigating the landscape: A comprehensive overview of computational approaches in therapeutic antibody design and analysis

Immunotherapy, harnessing components like antibodies, cells, and cytokines, has become a cornerstone in treating diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. Therapeutic antibodies, in particular, have transformed modern medicine, providing a targeted approach that destroys disease-causing cells while sparing healthy tissues, thereby reducing the side effects commonly associated with chemotherapy. Beyond oncology, these antibodies also hold promise in addressing chronic infections where conventional therapeutics may fall short. However, antibodies identified through in vivo or in vitro methods often require extensive engineering to enhance their therapeutic potential. This optimization process, aimed at improving affinity, specificity, and reducing immunogenicity, is both challenging and costly, often involving trade-offs between critical properties. Traditional methods of antibody development, such as hybridoma technology and display techniques, are resource-intensive and time-consuming. In contrast, computational approaches offer a faster, more efficient alternative, enabling the precise design and analysis of therapeutic antibodies. These methods include sequence and structural bioinformatics approaches, next-generation sequencing-based data mining, machine learning algorithms, systems biology, immuno-informatics, and integrative approaches. These approaches are advancing the field by providing new insights and enhancing the accuracy of antibody design and analysis. In conclusion, computational approaches are essential in the development of therapeutic antibodies, significantly improving the precision and speed of discovery, optimization, and validation. Integrating these methods with experimental approaches accelerates therapeutic antibody development, paving the way for innovative strategies and treatments for various diseases ranging from cancers to autoimmune and infectious diseases.

Decreased solubility and increased adsorptivity of a biotinylated humanized anti-cocaine mAb

Biotinylation of proteins, including antibodies, is a very useful and important modification for a variety of biochemical characterizations, including anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays used to detect antibodies raised against therapeutic antibodies. We assessed different degrees of biotin labeling of an anti-cocaine mAb currently under development for treating cocaine use disorder. We noted that higher levels of biotin labeling dramatically decreased mAb solubility, and increased the tendency to bind to surfaces, complicating characterization of the biotinylated antibody. Specifically, in phosphate buffered saline, labeling stoichiometries of more than about 3 biotin/mAb resulted in decreased recoveries due to increased binding to surfaces and decreased mAb solubility. Native gel agarose electrophoresis, differential scanning fluorimetry, and isothermal titration calorimetry all demonstrated changes in the mAb which became more pronounced above a labeling ratio of 3 biotin/mAb. At 3.0 biotin/mAb, there were minimal changes in solubility, adsorptivity, exposure of hydrophobic dye-binding sites, heat stability, and cocaine binding, in stark contrast to labeling with 5.6 biotin/mAb. Thus, the degree of biotinylation should be kept at about 3 biotin/mAb to maintain antigen binding and general structure, solubility, and stability of this mAb, a finding which may be important for other similar mAbs currently in use or under development.

Early monitoring of anti-infliximab antibodies by drug-tolerant assay predicts later immunogenicity and drug survival in rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the appearance of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against infliximab (IFX) determined by drug-sensitive and drug-tolerant assays and their relationship with drug levels and drug survival.

METHODS

This longitudinal observational study included 45 patients with RA and 61 with SpA. Serum samples were obtained at weeks 2, 6, 12, 24 and 52. Serum IFX levels were measured by a capture ELISA and ADA by an in-house drug-sensitive two-site (bridging) ELISA (bELISA) and a commercially available drug-tolerant ELISA (IDK, Immundiagnostik, Germany).

RESULTS

ADA were detected earlier by IDK than by bELISA. Once ADA appeared, positivity persisted throughout the study period. Patients who were bELISA ADA+ had higher IDK ADA levels (than bELISA ADA- patients). Circulating IFX levels were detected in all patients except those found to be bELISA ADA+. Serum IFX levels were lower in IDK ADA+ than in IDK ADA- patients. Most patients (64%) discontinued due to inefficacy. The early onset of immunogenicity was related to IFX survival. In both RA and SpA, the median survival (years) was shorter in patients with earlier development of ADA (IDK+ before or at week 24) than those who became IDK+ later (after week 24) or never developed ADA.

CONCLUSION

A drug-tolerant assay detects ADA during IFX therapy earlier and more frequently than a drug-sensitive assay. The onset of immunogenicity detected by drug-tolerant assays is related to the subsequent detection of ADA by drug-sensitive assays and drug survival.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Antibodies Used for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Treatment and Clinical Considerations

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.

Efficacy of adalimumab in noninfectious pediatric uveitis: Analysis of 29 eyes from a tertiary eye care center in India

PURPOSE

To describe the treatment outcomes of adalimumab in noninfectious pediatric uveitis.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of children with noninfectious uveitis were reviewed retrospectively. The visual improvement and ocular inflammation were assessed according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature criteria before and after treatment with adalimumab.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine eyes of 16 patients were included. The mean age of children was 9.4 ± 3.8 years. There were eight (50%) males and eight (50%) females. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis was the most common cause of uveitis in these children (N = 10, 62.5%), followed by Behçet's disease (N = 3, 18.75%) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (N = 2, 12.5%). One child (6.25%) was diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Nine (56.3%) children were previously treated with methotrexate, one each with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (6.3%), azathioprine (6.3%), and tofacitinib (6.3%), and one child received MMF followed by azathioprine and cyclosporine before shifting to adalimumab. Three (18.8%) children did not receive prior immunosuppressive therapy. The average number of adalimumab injections given was 20.3 ± 12.0 at an interval of 2 weeks. The mean follow-up duration was 22.2 ± 16.6 months. Disease inactivity was achieved in 28 (96.6%) eyes at last visit ( P < 0.001). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.48 ± 0.6 logMAR (logarithm of minimum of resolution) units at baseline to 0.20 ± 0.2 logMAR units at last visit ( P = 0.018). Disease remission was achieved in 23 (79.3%) eyes at the third month ( P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab is effective in the treatment of pediatric noninfectious uveitis by achieving disease inactivity, reducing the recurrence rate and improving BCVA. The drug is safe and well tolerated.

Adalimumab Drug Monitoring and Treatment Adjustment to Drug Antibodies in Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To explore the incidence of antibodies against adalimumab (AAA) development in noninfectious uveitis (NIU) and to examine the impact of treatment adjustment in nonresponders.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

In this single-center study of patients with NIU treated with adalimumab, blood samples for adalimumab and AAA were collected and therapeutic adjustments post-monitoring in non-responders were analyzed including changes in injection intervals, addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD), and treatment alterations to biologic DMARD. The main outcome measures were the proportion of patients with positive AAA and active uveitis, decrease of AAA at final follow-up by different therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

Of 42 patients who underwent laboratory investigations at 17.9 months after adalimumab initiation, 22 (52.4%) patients who were nonresponders demonstrated AAA (1243 ng/mL) with a mean adalimumab trough level of 3.0 µg/mL, significantly lower than the mean drug levels of patients without AAA (11.8 µg/mL). Fifteen (35.7%) patients were receiving concurrent treatment with a second immunosuppressive agent, but the mean antibody level and the mean adalimumab level were not statistically significantly different from the monotherapy group (P = .13 and P = .34). Reduction in AAA levels and relapse management was greatest among nonresponders who were treated by increasing the adalimumab dose and adding an additional immunosuppressive drug (-3565 ng/mL), followed by patients who were shifted to a different biologic (-1153 ug/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of AAA was detected in 88% of nonresponder patients and was associated with undetectable adalimumab drug levels. This underscores immunogenicity as a major cause of loss of response in uveitis patients receiving biotherapies. Increasing the dose of adalimumab injections together with the addition of low-dose cDMARDs was the most effective adjustment in immunized nonresponders for whom the adalimumab drug concentration was low.

Re-thinking the current paradigm for clinical immunogenicity assessment: an update from the discussion in the European Bioanalysis Forum

Immunogenicity regulatory guidance and industry recommendations have evolved over the last two decades since unexpected immune reactions were first reported with erythropoietin. Since then, the guidelines and practices for immunogenicity have stemmed from a reaction to a high-risk molecule causing significant clinical impact. Similar thinking is often applied to all biotherapeutic drugs, even when a well-defined risk assessment suggests otherwise. In recent years, the current testing paradigm for immunogenicity has been challenged with more informative approaches being proposed. In a Focus Workshop held by the European Bioanalysis Forum in September 2023, the current immunogenicity testing paradigm was challenged based on the experience and learning of 20+ years of immunogenicity strategies. The workshop recommendations proposed a new paradigm, challenging the value of multiple tiers depending on the immunogenicity risk assessment based on context of use and moving toward treating immunogenicity as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for the drug. Such rethinking ultimately results in the appropriate and efficient focusing of resources on immunogenicity testing strategies that benefit patients most, moving to a new paradigm where implementation of appropriate and truly informative immunogenicity testing strategies, depending on the context-of-use, become the norm .

Mitigating target interference challenges in bridging immunogenicity assay to detect anti-tocilizumab antibodies

Aim: An assay to detect anti-tocilizumab antibodies in the presence of high levels of circulating target and drug is needed for immunogenicity assessment in comparative clinical studies.Methods: An assay was developed and validated using a combination of blocking agents and dilutions to overcome target interference challenges.Results: No false-positive signal was detected in serum samples spiked with 350-500 ng/ml of IL-6 receptor. As low as 50 ng/ml of positive control antibodies could be detected in the presence of either 500 ng/ml of IL-6 or 250 μg/ml of the drug product. Assay also demonstrated high sensitivity, selectivity and precision.Conclusion: A robust, easy to perform immunogenicity assay was developed and validated for detecting anti-tocilizumab antibodies.

Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives

One of the well-known X-linked genetic disorders is hemophilia, which could be hemophilia A as a result of a mutation in the F8 (factor VIII) gene or hemophilia B as a result of a mutation in the F9 (factor IX) gene, leading to insufficient levels of the proteins essential for blood coagulation cascade. In patients with severe hemophilia, factor VIII or factor IX activities in the blood plasma are considerably low, estimated to be less than 1%. This is responsible for spontaneous or post-traumatic bleeding episodes, or both, leading to disease complications and death. Current treatment of hemophilia relies on the prevention of bleeding, which consists of expensive lifelong replacement infusion therapy of blood plasma clotting factors, their recombinant versions, or therapy with recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Recently emerged gene therapy approaches may be a potential game changer that could reshape the therapeutic outcomes of hemophilia A or B using a one-off vector in vivo delivery and aim to achieve long-term endogenous expression of factor VIII or IX. This review examines both traditional approaches to the treatment of hemophilia and modern methods, primarily focusing on gene therapy, to update knowledge in this area. Recent technological advances and gene therapeutics in the pipeline are critically reviewed and summarized. We consider gene therapy to be the most promising method as it may overcome the problems associated with more traditional treatments, such as the need for constant and expensive infusions and the presence of an immune response to the antibody drugs used to treat hemophilia.

Implications of Immunogenicity Testing for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: A Quantitative Pharmacology Framework

The interpretation of immunogenicity results for a mAb product and prediction of its clinical consequences remain difficult, despite enormous advances in methodologies and efforts toward the best practice for consistent data generation and reporting. To this end, the contribution from the clinical pharmacology discipline has been largely limited to comparing descriptively the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles by antidrug antibodies (ADA) status or testing the significance of ADA as a covariate in a population PK setting, similar to the practice for small-molecule drugs in investigating the effect of an intrinsic/extrinsic factor on the drug disposition. There is a need for a mAb disposition framework that captures the dynamics of ADA formation and drug's interactions with the ADA and target as parts of the drug distribution and elimination. Here we describe such a framework and examine it against the PK, ADA, and clinical response data from a phase 3 trial in patients treated with adalimumab. The proposed framework offered a generalized understanding of how the dose, target affinity, and drug/ADA analyte forms affects the manifestation of ADA response with regard to its detections and alterations of drug disposition and effectiveness. Furthermore, as an example, its utility for dose considerations was demonstrated through predicting for late-stage trials of a PCSK9 inhibitor in terms of development in ADA incidence and titers, and consequences on the drug disposition, interaction with target, and downstream lowering effect on LDL-C.

Defining a therapeutic range for adalimumab serum concentrations in the management of pediatric noninfectious uveitis, a step towards personalized treatment

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is currently considered the most efficacious anti-TNFα agent for childhood noninfectious uveitis (NIU). The objective of this study was to define a therapeutic range for adalimumab trough levels in the treatment of childhood NIU.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, pilot study of 36 children with NIU aged < 18 years, treated with adalimumab. Serum adalimumab through levels and adalimumab anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were analysed at least 24 weeks after start adalimumab.

RESULTS

Adalimumab trough levels were significantly higher in complete responders 11.8 μg/mL (range 6.9-33.0) compared to partial or non-responders 9,2 μg/mL (range 0-13.6) (p = 0,004). Receiver-operator characteristics analyses with an area under the curve of 0,749 (95% CI, 0,561-0,937) defined 9.6 µg/mL as the lower margin for the therapeutic range. This cut-off corresponds with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 56% (positive predictive value, 85%; negative predictive value, 62.5%). A concentration effect curve defined 13 µg/mL as the upper margin. Approximately one-third (30.5%) of patients had an adalimumab trough concentration exceeding 13 µg/mL. Free ADA were observed in 2 patients (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic range of adalimumab trough levels of 9.6 to 13 µg/mL, which corresponds with an optimal clinical effect, was identified. Therapeutic drug monitoring may guide the optimisation of treatment efficacy in children with NIU in the treat-to-target era.

Development and validation of an automated assay for anti-drug-antibodies in rat serum

The potential immunogenicity of therapeutic human and humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is a significant concern, and so preclinical testing of therapeutic mAbs routinely includes assessment of anti-drug antibody (ADA) induction. Here, we report the development of automated screening and confirmatory bridging ELISAs for the detection of rat antibodies against DH1042, an engineered human mAb for the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain. The assays were evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, selectivity, absence of a prozone effect, linearity, intra- and inter- assay precision, and robustness, and found to be suitable for purpose. The assays were then used to evaluate anti-DH1042 antibodies in the sera of rats dosed with lipid-nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA encoding DH1042. Rats received two doses of 0.1, 0.4 or 0.6 mg/kg/dose LNP-mRNA 8 days apart. Twenty-one days after the second dose, 50-100% of rats had developed confirmed anti-DH1042 ADA depending on dose level. No animals in the control group developed anti-DH1042 ADA. These assays reflect new applications for a non-specialized laboratory automation platform, and the methodologies and approaches reported here provide a template that can be adapted for the automated detection and confirmation of ADA in preclinical testing of other biologics.

Preclinical risk assessment strategy to mitigate the T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein biotherapeutics: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives

Protein therapeutics hold a prominent role and have brought significant diversity in efficacious medicinal products. Not just monoclonal antibodies and different antibody formats (pegylated antigen-binding fragments, bispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates, single chain variable fragments, nanobodies, dia-, tria- and tetrabodies), but also purified blood products, growth factors, recombinant cytokines, enzyme replacement factors, fusion proteins are all good instances of therapeutic proteins that have been developed in the past decades and approved for their value in oncology, immune-oncology, and autoimmune diseases discovery programs. Although there was an ingrained belief that fully humanized proteins were expected to have limited immunogenicity, adverse effects associated with immune responses to biological therapies raised some concern in biotech companies. Consequently, drug developers are designing strategies to assess potential immune responses to protein therapeutics during both the preclinical and clinical phases of development. Despite the many factors that can contribute to protein immunogenicity, T cell- (thymus-) dependent (Td) immunogenicity seems to play a crucial role in the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to biologics. A broad range of methodologies to predict and rationally assess Td immune responses to protein drugs has been developed. This review aims to briefly summarize the preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment strategy to mitigate the risk of potential immunogenic candidates coming towards clinical phases, discussing the advantages and limitations of these technologies, and suggesting a rational approach for assessing and mitigating Td immunogenicity.

Early At-Home Measurement of Adalimumab Concentrations to Guide Anti-TNF Precision Dosing: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Underdosing of adalimumab can result in non-response and poor disease control in patients with rheumatic disease or inflammatory bowel disease. In this pilot study we aimed to predict adalimumab concentrations with population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian forecasting early in therapy.

METHODS

Adalimumab pharmacokinetic models were identified with a literature search. A fit-for-purpose evaluation of the model was performed for rheumatologic and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with adalimumab peak (first dose) and trough samples (first and seventh dose) obtained by a volumetric absorptive microsampling technique. Steady state adalimumab concentrations were predicted after the first adalimumab administration. Predictive performance was calculated with mean prediction error (MPE) and normalised root mean square error (RMSE).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (22 rheumatologic and 14 IBD) were analysed in our study. After stratification for absence of anti-adalimumab antibodies, the calculated MPE was -2.6% and normalised RMSE 24.0%. Concordance between predicted and measured adalimumab serum concentrations falling within or outside the therapeutic window was 75%. Three patients (8.3%) developed detectable concentrations of anti-adalimumab antibodies.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study demonstrates that adalimumab concentrations at steady state can be predicted from early samples during the induction phase.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register with trial registry number NTR 7692 ( www.trialregister.nl ).

Free antibodies-to-infliximab are biomarker for predicting the effect of dose intensification in pediatric Crohn's disease patients with secondary loss of response

Background

Immunogenicity to antitumor necrosis factor alpha agents, such as infliximab (IFX), may lead to therapeutic failure.

Objectives

This study evaluated the relationship between free and total antibodies-to-infliximab (ATIs), trough levels (TLs) of IFX, and the response to dose intensification.

Design

We performed a prospective, observational study including pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving IFX maintenance therapy without dose intensification.

Methods

We compared clinical and laboratory outcomes according to the presence of free and total ATIs. Factors associated with response to IFX dose intensification were investigated by analyzing IFX TLs and free and total ATIs.

Results

Of the 98 patients, 9 patients had detectable free ATIs and 38 patients had total ATIs. Patients with free ATIs had significantly lower TLs (0.7 versus 5.1 µg/mL, p < 0.001) than patients without free ATIs. However, there was no difference in the IFX TLs according to the presence of total ATIs (p = 0.2523). Analysis of the 38 samples with total ATIs showed that response to dose intensification was significantly lower in patients with free ATIs than those without free ATIs (22.2% versus 65.5%, p < 0.001). In addition, free ATIs were the only factor with poor response to dose intensification [odds ratio (OR): 14.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-151.97, p = 0.0140]. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff level indicating non-response to IFX dose intensification was 30.0 AU/mL for free ATIs concentration (area under curve, 0.792; 95% CI: 0.590-0.942; sensitivity, 60.0%; specificity, 96.7%; p = 0.0241).

Conclusion

Free ATIs, but not total ATIs, have a negative impact on the course of CD. Free ATIs are potential reliable biomarker for predicting the effect of dose intensification in patients with loss of response to IFX. Future studies based on serial and proactive therapeutic drug monitoring are required in the future.

Drug-tolerant detection of anti-drug antibodies in an antigen-binding assay using europium chelate fluorescence

Accurate anti-drug antibody (ADA) measurements in patient sera requires dissociation of ADA-drug complexes combined with sensitive and specific ADA detection. Bridging type immunoassays are often used despite several disadvantages associated with this approach. A good drug-tolerant alternative is the acid-dissociation radioimmunoassay (ARIA), but this method is not easily implemented in most labs as specialized facilities are required for working with radioactive materials. We describe an innovative method for ADA detection that combines the advantages of antigen binding tests like the ARIA with the convenience of regular immunoassays. This acid-dissociation lanthanide-fluorescence immunoassay (ALFIA) involves dissociation of ADA-drug complexes, followed by binding to an europium-labeled drug derivative and subsequently an IgG pulldown on Sepharose beads. After europium elution, detection is achieved by measuring time-resolved fluorescence originating from europium chelate complexes. We measured anti-adalimumab ADA levels in sera of 94 rheumatoid arthritis patients using the ALFIA and showed this method to be highly drug tolerant, sensitive and specific for anti-adalimumab ADAs.

Ocrelizumab concentration and antidrug antibodies are associated with B-cell count in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with multiple sclerosis on ocrelizumab have B-cell depletion after standard interval dosing of 26 weeks. With B-cell-guided dosing patients receive their next dose when B-cell repopulation occurs. Prediction of B-cell repopulation using ocrelizumab concentrations could aid in personalising treatment regimes. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the association between ocrelizumab drug concentration, antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and CD19 B-cell count, and to define a cut-off ocrelizumab concentration for start of B-cell repopulation (defined by ≥10 CD19+ B cells/µL).

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated prospective study, blood samples at various time points during ocrelizumab treatment were collected from a biobank. Serum ocrelizumab concentrations and ADAs were measured with two different assays developed for this study. Data were analysed using linear mixed effect models. An receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a cut-off ocrelizumab concentration for start of B-cell repopulation (defined by ≥10 cells/µL).

RESULTS

A total of 452 blood samples from 72 patients were analysed. Ocrelizumab concentrations were detectable up until 53.3 weeks after last infusion and ranged between <0.0025 and 204 µg/mL after 1-67 weeks. Ocrelizumab concentration was negatively associated with B-cell count, with body mass index identified as effect modifier. We found a cut-off value of 0.06 µg/mL for start of B-cell repopulation of ≥10 cells/µL. Ocrelizumab ADAs were detectable in four patients (5.7%) with corresponding low ocrelizumab concentrations and start of B-cell repopulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum ocrelizumab concentration was strongly associated with B-cell count. Measurement of ocrelizumab drug concentrations and ADAs could play an important role to further personalise treatment and predict the start of B-cell repopulation.

Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine

Biologic drugs have greatly improved treatment outcomes of inflammatory joint diseases, but a substantial proportion of patients either do not respond to treatment or lose response over time. Drug immunogenicity, manifested as the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), constitute a significant clinical problem. Anti-drug antibodies influence the pharmacokinetics of the drug, are associated with reduced clinical efficacy, and an increased risk of adverse events such as infusion reactions. The prevalence of ADAb differs among drugs and diseases, and the detection of ADAb also depends on the assay format. Most data exist for the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab, with a frequency of ADAb that ranges from 10 to 60% across studies. Measurement of ADAb and serum drug concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring, has been suggested as a strategy to optimize therapy with biologic drugs. Although the recent randomized clinical Norwegian Drug Monitoring (NOR-DRUM) trials show promise towards a personalized medicine prescribing approach by therapeutic drug monitoring, several challenges remain. A plethora of assay formats, with widely differing properties, is currently used for measuring ADAb. Comparing results between different assays and laboratories is difficult, which complicates the development of cut-offs necessary for guidelines and the implementation of ADAb measurements in clinical practice. With the possible exception of infliximab, limited data on clinical relevance and cost effectiveness exist to support therapeutic drug monitoring as a routine clinical strategy to monitor biologic drugs in inflammatory joint diseases. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the characteristics and prevalence of ADAb, predisposing factors to ADAb formation, commonly used assessment methods, clinical consequences of ADAb, and the potential implications of ADAb assessments for everyday treatment of inflammatory joint diseases.

Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) ELISA Method Development and Validation for Novel RPH-104 Drug Immunogenicity Evaluation

As the number of therapeutic protein products is growing rapidly, there is a strong need for the development of bioanalytical methods that are easy to perform, specific, sensitive, robust, and affordable. Methods for immunogenicity evaluation of therapeutic proteins take an important place in this field of bioanalytics. The aim of the study was to develop a method for immunogenicity testing of the novel RPH-104 drug using the Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) ELISA technique. RPH-104 is a promising Interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor that is currently undergoing a series of clinical studies, including those on socially significant and orphan diseases. The developed method was validated for assay cut-point, sensitivity, selectivity, drug tolerance, hook effect, specificity, precision, and stability. Method sensitivity was established at 114.9 ng/mL, while low and high positive controls were equal to anti-RPH-104 antibody concentrations of 155 ng/mL and 2500 ng/mL, respectively. Method specificity was confirmed in the presence of the interfering compounds, namely IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL1-Ra. The developed and validated ELISA method was successfully applied to subject samples.

Risk factors for anti-drug antibody formation to infliximab: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) frequently form early in the treatment course of infliximab and other tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, leading to treatment failure and adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for ADAb in the early phase of infliximab treatment.

METHODS

Patients (n = 410) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who initiated infliximab treatment were included in the 38-week Norwegian Drug Monitoring Trial (NOR-DRUM) A and randomised 1:1 to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) or standard therapy. Serum levels of infliximab and ADAb were measured at each infusion. Possible risk factors for ADAb formation were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

ADAb were detected in 78 (19%) patients. A diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.6]) and lifetime smoking (OR, 2.0 [CI 1.1-3.6]) were baseline risk factors, while baseline use of concomitant immunosuppressors (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2-0.8]) and a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2-0.8]) reduced the risk of ADAb. Higher disease activity during follow-up (OR, 1.1 [CI 1.0-1.1]) and "drug holidays" of more than 11 weeks (OR, 4.1 [CI 1.2-13.8]) increased the risk of ADAb, whereas higher infliximab doses (OR, 0.1 [CI 0.0-0.3) and higher serum infliximab concentrations (OR, 0.7 [CI 0.6-0.8]) reduced the risk of immunogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors for ADAb formation during early-phase infliximab treatment were identified. This knowledge provides a basis for treatment strategies to mitigate the formation of ADAb and identify patients in whom these measures are of particular importance.

Switching Among Biosimilars: A Review of Clinical Evidence

Biological medicines have improved patients' outcomes, but their high costs may limit access. Biosimilars, alternatives that have demonstrated high similarity in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed originator biological product, could increase competition and decrease prices. Given the expanding number of biosimilars, patients may switch from originator to biosimilar or among biosimilars. Randomized trials and observational studies conducted with multiple biosimilars over many disease areas confirmed the safety and efficacy of switching from originator to biosimilar. This study summarizes evidence on switching between biosimilars for which there are concerns to provide future guidance. A systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for studies on anti-TNF agents, assessing clinical efficacy and safety of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch in chronic inflammatory diseases, was performed. We retrieved 320 records and included 19 clinical studies. One study with historical control compared switching between biosimilars to maintenance of the same biosimilar. Ten were controlled cohort studies comparing switching between two biosimilars vs. switching from originator to a biosimilar or vs. multiple switches. Eight were single-arm cohort studies, where participants switched from one biosimilar to another, and the outcomes were compared before and after the switch. Overall, these studies did not highlight significant concerns in switching between biosimilars. Therefore, switching studies seem difficult to perform and unnecessary with the body of evidence suggesting no real problems in practice coupled with stringent regulatory requirements. Monitoring the use of biosimilars in clinical practice could support clinical decision-making, rational use of biological medicines, and help to further realize possible savings.

Development and Functional Characterization of a Versatile Radio-/Immunotheranostic Tool for Prostate Cancer Management

Simple Summary

In previous studies, we described a modular Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell platform which we termed UniCAR. In contrast to conventional CARs, the interaction of UniCAR T cells does not occur directly between the CAR T cell and the tumor cell but is mediated via bispecific adaptor molecules so-called target modules (TMs). Here we present the development and functional characterization of a novel IgG4-based TM, directed to the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), which is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). We show that this anti-PSCA IgG4-TM cannot only be used for (i) redirection of UniCAR T cells to PCa cells but also for (ii) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, and (iii) alpha particle-based endoradiotherapy. For radiolabeling, the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM was conjugated with the chelator DOTAGA. PET imaging was performed using the ⁶⁴Cu-labeled anti-PSCA IgG4-TM. According to PET imaging, the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM accumulates with high contrast in the PSCA-positive tumors of experimental mice without visible uptake in other organs. For endoradiotherapy the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM-DOTAGA conjugate was labeled with ²²⁵Ac³⁺. Targeted alpha therapy resulted in tumor control over 60 days after a single injection of the ²²⁵Ac-labeled TM. The favorable pharmacological profile of the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM, and its usage for (i) imaging, (ii) targeted alpha therapy, and (iii) UniCAR T cell immunotherapy underlines the promising radio-/immunotheranostic capabilities for the diagnostic imaging and treatment of PCa.

Abstract

Due to its overexpression on the surface of prostate cancer (PCa) cells, the prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is a potential target for PCa diagnosis and therapy. Here we describe the development and functional characterization of a novel IgG4-based anti-PSCA antibody (Ab) derivative (anti-PSCA IgG4-TM) that is conjugated with the chelator DOTAGA. The anti-PSCA IgG4-TM represents a multimodal immunotheranostic compound that can be used (i) as a target module (TM) for UniCAR T cell-based immunotherapy, (ii) for diagnostic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, and (iii) targeted alpha therapy. Cross-linkage of UniCAR T cells and PSCA-positive tumor cells via the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM results in efficient tumor cell lysis both in vitro and in vivo. After radiolabeling with ⁶⁴Cu²⁺, the anti-PSCA IgG4-TM was successfully applied for high contrast PET imaging. In a PCa mouse model, it showed specific accumulation in PSCA-expressing tumors, while no uptake in other organs was observed. Additionally, the DOTAGA-conjugated anti-PSCA IgG4-TM was radiolabeled with ²²⁵Ac³⁺ and applied for targeted alpha therapy. A single injection of the ²²⁵Ac-labeled anti-PSCA IgG4-TM was able to significantly control tumor growth in experimental mice. Overall, the novel anti-PSCA IgG4-TM represents an attractive first member of a novel group of radio-/immunotheranostics that allows diagnostic imaging, endoradiotherapy, and CAR T cell immunotherapy.

An Introduction to Biosimilars for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: A Narrative Review

Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of disease across a number of therapeutic areas including retinal diseases. However, on occasion, such treatments may be relatively more expensive compared to small molecule therapies. This can restrict patient access and treatment length leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes. Several biosimilar candidates of ranibizumab and aflibercept are currently in development and the first biosimilar of ranibizumab received EMA approval in August and FDA approval in September 2021. Biosimilars are biological medicines that are highly similar to an already-approved biological medicine (reference product). The physicochemical and clinical similarity of a biosimilar is determined by a rigorous analytical and clinical program, including extensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis with phase III equivalence studies where appropriate. These phase III studies are carried out in a patient population that is representative of all of the potential approved therapeutic indications of the originator product and the most sensitive for detecting potential differences between the biosimilar and the reference product. Biosimilars have been used successfully across a wide range of therapeutic areas for the past 15 years where they have achieved substantial cost savings that can be reinvested into healthcare systems without affecting the quality of patient care. The current review provides an introduction to biosimilars with the aim of preparing retinal specialists for discussing these products with their patients.

Therapeutic Antibodies: An Overview

Polyclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) preparations have been used for several decades for treatment of primary and secondary immunodeficiencies and for treatment of some infections and intoxications. This has demonstrated the importance of Igs, also called antibodies (Abs) for prevention and elimination of infections. Moreover, elucidation of the structure and functions of Abs has suggested that they might be useful for targeted treatment of several diseases, including cancers and autoimmune diseases. The development of technologies for production of specific monoclonal Abs (MAbs) in large amounts has led to the production of highly effective therapeutic antibodies (TAbs), a collective term for MAbs (MAbs) with demonstrated clinical efficacy in one or more diseases. The number of approved TAbs is currently around hundred, and an even larger number is under development, including several engineered and modified Ab formats. The use of TAbs has provided new treatment options for many severe diseases, but prediction of clinical effect is difficult, and many patients eventually lose effect, possibly due to development of Abs to the TAbs or to other reasons. The therapeutic efficacy of TAbs can be ascribed to one or more effects, including binding and neutralization of targets, direct cytotoxicity, Ab-dependent complement-dependent cytotoxicity, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or others. The therapeutic options for TAbs have been expanded by development of several new formats of TAbs, including bispecific Abs, single domain Abs, TAb-drug conjugates, and the use of TAbs for targeted activation of immune cells. Most promisingly, current research and development can be expected to increase the number of clinical conditions, which may benefit from TAbs.

A bridging assay for detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies to dostarlimab, a new anti-PD-1 therapeutic monoclonal antibody

Dostarlimab (JEMPERLI) is a humanized anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-kappa monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and competitively inhibits binding of its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. Dostarlimab was recently approved in the USA and the European Union. Because dostarlimab is a macromolecular therapeutic, it has the potential to elicit the formation of anti-drug antibodies, which have the capability to impact the drug’s safety and efficacy and to alter pharmacokinetics. The immunogenic potential of dostarlimab remains unknown, and it was therefore necessary to develop analytical assays to detect and characterize anti-drug antibodies as a key component in the mitigation of immunogenicity risk. Here, we present the development and optimization of a 3-tiered electrochemiluminescense bridging assay for the investigation of dostarlimab clinical immunogenicity. In this work, the full details of the method, statistical data analysis and cut point determinations, assay performance during clinical sample analysis, and associated regulatory expectations are discussed. The full validation of this 3-tier anti-drug antibody assay enabled dostarlimab immunogenicity evaluation in clinical studies. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02715284. Registered 9 March 2016

A competitive ligand-binding assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against dostarlimab (TSR-042)

Dostarlimab is a humanized anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Dostarlimab (JEMPERLI; TSR-042) was recently approved in the USA and in the EU. The presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a cause for concern because they block the therapeutic function of the antibody and reduce drug efficacy. Therefore, programs developing therapeutic biologics need to develop and validate assays that adequately assess the presence of NAbs in the serum of patients treated with biologic therapies. Presented here is the development and validation of a competitive ligand-binding assay that specifically detects anti-dostarlimab NAbs in human serum. Precision, sensitivity, hook effect, selectivity, assay robustness, stabilities, and system suitability were evaluated. In addition, drug tolerance of the assay with the implementation of a drug removal process was investigated. The cut point factor for the detection of NAbs in human serum at a 1% false-positive rate was determined. The assay’s precision, sensitivity, hook effect, selectivity, robustness, and drug interference were tested and found to be acceptable. With system suitability and stability established, this assay has been used to evaluate NAbs to guide the development of dostarlimab.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02715284. Registered 9 March 2016

Targeted Toxins for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, new treatment options are urgently needed for advanced stages of the disease. Targeted toxins are chemical conjugates or fully recombinant proteins consisting of a binding domain directed against a target antigen on the surface of cancer cells and a toxin domain, which is transported into the cell for the induction of apoptosis. In the last decades, targeted toxins against prostate cancer have been developed. Several challenges, however, became apparent that prevented their direct clinical use. They comprise immunogenicity, low target antigen binding, endosomal entrapment, and lysosomal/proteasomal degradation of the targeted toxins. Moreover, their efficacy is impaired by prostate tumors, which are marked by a dense microenvironment, low target antigen expression, and apoptosis resistance. In this review, current findings in the development of targeted toxins against prostate cancer in view of effective targeting, reduction of immunogenicity, improvement of intracellular trafficking, and overcoming apoptosis resistance are discussed. There are promising approaches that should lead to the clinical use of targeted toxins as therapeutic alternatives for advanced prostate cancer in the future.

Concomitant use of an immunomodulator with ustekinumab as an induction therapy for Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ustekinumab (UST), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against the p40 subunit of interleukin-12/23, is effective for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). The benefit of concomitant use of an immunomodulator (IM) with UST, however, is unclear. This study aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of concomitant use of an IM with UST as an induction therapy for CD patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Japana Centra Revuo Medicina from inception to October 31, 2019. The main outcome measure was achievement of clinical efficacy (remission, response, and clinical benefit) at 6-12 weeks. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. The fixed-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios.

RESULTS

From 189 yielded articles, six including a total of 1507 patients were considered in this meta-analysis. Concomitant use of an IM with UST was significantly effective than UST monotherapy as an induction therapy (pooled odds ratio in the fixed-effects model: 1.35, 95% confidence interval [1.06-1.71], P = 0.015). The heterogeneity among studies was low (I²  = 2.6%). No statistical comparisons of the occurrence of adverse events between UST monotherapy and concomitant use of an IM with UST were performed.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of concomitant use of an IM with UST as an induction therapy for CD was significantly superior to that of monotherapy with UST.

Impact of immunogenicity on clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of biologic agents used for treatment of inflammatory arthritis in children compared to adults

The treatment of inflammatory arthritis has been revolutionised by the introduction of biologic treatments. Many biologic agents are currently licensed for use in both paediatric and adult patients with inflammatory arthritis and contribute to improved disease outcomes compared with the pre-biologic era. However, immunogenicity to biologic agents, characterised by an immune reaction leading to the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), can negatively impact the therapeutic efficacy of biologic drugs and induce side effects to treatment. This review explores for the first time the impact of immunogenicity against all licensed biologic treatments currently used in inflammatory arthritis across age, and will examine any significant differences between ADA prevalence, titres and timing of development, as well as ADA impact on therapeutic drug levels, clinical efficacy and side effects between paediatric and adult patients. In addition, we will investigate factors associated with differences in immunogenicity across biologic agents used in inflammatory arthritis, and their potential therapeutic implications.

Monoclonal Antibody Monitoring: Clinically Relevant Aspects, A Systematic Critical Review

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy does not usually lead to a clinical response in all patients and resistance may increase over time after repeated mAb administration. This lack or loss of response to the treatment may originate from different and little-known epigenetic, biomolecular, or pathophysiological mechanisms, although an inadequate serum concentration is perhaps the most likely cause, even if not widely recognized and investigated yet. Patient factors that influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a mAb should be taken into account. Multiple analyses of patient-derived PK data have identified various factors influencing the clearance of mAbs. These factors include the presence of antidrug antibodies, low serum albumin, high serum levels of C-reactive protein, high body weight, and gender differences among others. The same clearance processes involved in systemic clearance after intravenous administration are also involved in local first-pass catabolism after subcutaneous administration of mAbs. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a way to understand and respond to the variability in clinical response and remission. For both classes of mAbs with anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects, dose-guided optimization based on the measurement of serum concentrations in individual patients could be the next step for a personalized and targeted mAb therapy.

Immunogenicity to biological drugs in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, defined as biological drugs, have modified the natural history of numerous immune-mediated disorders, allowing the development of therapies aimed at blocking the pathophysiological pathways of the disease, providing greater efficacy and safety than conventional treatment strategies. Virtually all therapeutic proteins elicit an immune response, producing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. Immunogenicity against biological drugs can alter their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, thereby reducing the efficacy of these drugs. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the therapeutic effects of the drug or cause serious adverse effects, mainly hypersensitivity reactions. The prevalence of ADAs varies widely depending on the type of test used, occurrence of false-negative results, and non-specific binding to the drug, making it difficult to accurately assess their clinical impact. Concomitant use of immunosuppressors efficiently reduces the immunogenicity in a dose-dependent manner, either by decreasing the frequency of detectable ADAs or by delaying their appearance, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies. Among the new therapeutic strategies for the management of psoriasis, biological agents have gained increasing importance in recent years as they interrupt key inflammation pathways involved in the physiopathology of the disease. Reports regarding ADA in new biologics are still scarce, but the most recent evidence tends to show little impact on the clinical response to the drug, even with prolonged treatment. It is therefore essential to standardize laboratory tests to determine the presence and titles of ADAs to establish their administration and management guidelines that allow the determination of the real clinical impact of these drugs.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatology

Biologic agents have become a core component of therapeutic strategies for many inflammatory rheumatic diseases. However, perhaps reflecting the specificity and generally high affinity of biologic agents, these therapeutics have been used by rheumatologists with less consideration of their pharmacokinetics than that of conventional synthetic DMARDs. Immunogenicity was recognized as a potential limitation to the use of biologic agents at an early stage in their development, although regulatory guidance was relatively limited and assays to measure immunogenicity were less sophisticated than today. The advent of biosimilars has sparked a renewed interest in immunogenicity that has resulted in the development of increasingly sensitive assays, an enhanced appreciation of the pharmacokinetic consequences of immunogenicity and the development of comprehensive and specific guidance from regulatory authorities. As a result, rheumatologists have a greatly improved understanding of the field in general, including the factors responsible for immunogenicity, its potential clinical consequences and the implications for everyday treatment. In some specialties, immunogenicity testing is becoming a part of routine clinical management, but definitive evidence of its cost-effectiveness in rheumatology is awaited.

Development of a SARS-CoV-2 Total Antibody Assay and the Dynamics of Antibody Response over Time in Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized Patients with COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infections often cause only mild disease that may evoke relatively low Ab titers compared with patients admitted to hospitals. Generally, total Ab bridging assays combine good sensitivity with high specificity. Therefore, we developed sensitive total Ab bridging assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Abs to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid protein in addition to conventional isotype-specific assays. Ab kinetics was assessed in PCR-confirmed, hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients (n = 41) and three populations of patients with COVID-19 symptoms not requiring hospital admission: PCR-confirmed convalescent plasmapheresis donors (n = 182), PCR-confirmed hospital care workers (n = 47), and a group of longitudinally sampled symptomatic individuals highly suspect of COVID-19 (n = 14). In nonhospitalized patients, the Ab response to RBD is weaker but follows similar kinetics, as has been observed in hospitalized patients. Across populations, the RBD bridging assay identified most patients correctly as seropositive. In 11/14 of the COVID-19-suspect cases, seroconversion in the RBD bridging assay could be demonstrated before day 12; nucleocapsid protein Abs emerged less consistently. Furthermore, we demonstrated the feasibility of finger-prick sampling for Ab detection against SARS-CoV-2 using these assays. In conclusion, the developed bridging assays reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 Abs in hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients and are therefore well suited to conduct seroprevalence studies.

The Molecular Mechanisms That Underlie the Immune Biology of Anti-drug Antibody Formation Following Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a crucial asset for human health and modern medicine, however, the repeated administration of mAbs can be highly immunogenic. Drug immunogenicity manifests in the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and some mAbs show immunogenicity in up to 70% of patients. ADAs can alter a drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, reducing drug efficacy. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the drug's therapeutic effects or cause severe adverse events to the patient. While some contributing factors to ADA formation are known, the molecular mechanisms of how therapeutic mAbs elicit ADAs are not completely clear. Accurate ADA detection is necessary to provide clinicians with sufficient information for patient monitoring and clinical intervention. However, ADA assays present unique challenges because both the analyte and antigen are antibodies, so most assays are cumbersome, costly, time consuming, and lack standardization. This review will discuss aspects related to ADA formation following mAb drug administration. First, we will provide an overview of the prevalence of ADA formation and the available diagnostic tools for their detection. Next, we will review studies that support possible molecular mechanisms causing the formation of ADA. Finally, we will summarize recent approaches used to decrease the propensity of mAbs to induce ADAs.

Ocular Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is one of the leading causes of inflammatory eye disease. Any part of the eye and its adnexal tissues can be involved. Uveitis and optic neuropathy are the main manifestations, which may require systemic treatment. Two groups of patients with sarcoid uveitis can be distinguished: one of either sex and any ethnicity in which ophthalmological findings are various and another group of elderly Caucasian women with mostly chronic posterior uveitis. Clinically isolated uveitis revealing sarcoidosis remains a strictly ocular condition in a large majority of cases. Although it can be a serious condition involving functional prognosis, early recognition in addition to a growing therapeutic arsenal (including intravitreal implant) has improved the visual prognosis of the disease in recent years. Systemic corticosteroids are indicated when uveitis does not respond to topical corticosteroids or when there is bilateral posterior involvement, especially macular edema. In up to 30% of the cases that require an unacceptable dosage of corticosteroids to maintain remission, additional immunosuppression is used, especially methotrexate. As with other forms of severe noninfectious uveitis, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-α have been used. However, only very rarely does sarcoid uveitis fail to respond to combined corticosteroids and methotrexate therapy, a situation that should suggest either poor adherence or another granulomatous disease. Optic neuropathy often affects women of African and Caribbean origins. Some authors recommend that patients should be treated with high-dose of corticosteroids and concurrent immunosuppression from the onset of this manifestation, which is associated with a poorer outcome.

Reducing Episodic Cluster Headaches: Focus on Galcanezumab

The involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine and cluster headache has led to the recent development of new therapies. Galcanezumab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide, is approved for the migraine prevention and has recently been tested for the prevention of cluster headache. Two clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in episodic cluster headache and chronic cluster headache. While efficacy endpoints were not met in the chronic subtype, galcanezumab reduced the weekly frequency of attacks in patients with episodic cluster headaches. In both studies, the antibody was well tolerated. This review summarizes and critically reviews the available data regarding the rationale behind targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide with galcanezumab for the prevention of cluster headache.

Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics: A Lymph Node Perspective

The continuous development of molecular biology and protein engineering technologies enables the expansion of the breadth and complexity of protein therapeutics for in vivo administration. However, the immunogenicity and associated in vivo development of antibodies against therapeutics are a major restriction factor for their usage. The B cell follicular and particularly germinal center areas in secondary lymphoid organs are the anatomical sites where the development of antibody responses against pathogens and immunogens takes place. A growing body of data has revealed the importance of the orchestrated function of highly differentiated adaptive immunity cells, including follicular helper CD4 T cells and germinal center B cells, for the optimal generation of these antibody responses. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the antibody responses against therapeutics could lead to novel strategies to reduce their immunogenicity and increase their efficacy.

A Molecular Revolution in the Treatment of Hemophilia

For decades, the monogenetic bleeding disorders hemophilia A and B (coagulation factor VIII and IX deficiency) have been treated with systemic protein replacement therapy. Now, diverse molecular medicines, ranging from antibody to gene to RNA therapy, are transforming treatment. Traditional replacement therapy requires twice to thrice weekly intravenous infusions of factor. While extended half-life products may reduce the frequency of injections, patients continue to face a lifelong burden of the therapy, suboptimal protection from bleeding and joint damage, and potential development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (inhibitors) that require less efficacious bypassing agents and further reduce quality of life. Novel non-replacement and gene therapies aim to address these remaining issues. A recently approved factor VIII-mimetic antibody accomplishes hemostatic correction in patients both with and without inhibitors. Antibodies against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and antithrombin-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) target natural anticoagulant pathways to rebalance hemostasis. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy provides lasting clotting factor replacement and can also be used to induce immune tolerance. Multiple gene-editing techniques are under clinical or preclinical investigation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of these approaches, explain how they differ from standard therapies, and predict how the hemophilia treatment landscape will be reshaped.

Immunogenicity of TNF-Inhibitors

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have significantly improved treatment outcome of rheumatic diseases since their incorporation into treatment protocols two decades ago. Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of patients experiences either primary or secondary failure to TNFi due to ineffectiveness of the drug or adverse reactions. Secondary failure and adverse events can be related to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The earliest studies that reported ADA toward TNFi mainly used drug-sensitive assays. Retrospectively, we recognize this has led to an underestimation of the amount of ADA produced due to drug interference. Drug-tolerant ADA assays also detect ADA in the presence of drug, which has contributed to the currently reported higher incidence of ADA development. Comprehension and awareness of the assay format used for ADA detection is thus essential to interpret ADA measurements correctly. In addition, a concurrent drug level measurement is informative as it may provide insight in the extent of underestimation of ADA levels and improves understanding the clinical consequences of ADA formation. The clinical effects are dependent on the ratio between the amount of drug that is neutralized by ADA and the amount of unbound drug. Pharmacokinetic modeling might be useful in this context. The ADA response generally gives rise to high affinity IgG antibodies, but this response will differ between patients. Some patients will not reach the phase of affinity maturation while others generate an enduring high titer high affinity IgG response. This response can be transient in some patients, indicating a mechanism of tolerance induction or B-cell anergy. In this review several different aspects of the ADA response toward TNFi will be discussed. It will highlight the ADA assays, characteristics and regulation of the ADA response, impact of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics of TNFi, clinical implications of ADA formation, and possible mitigation strategies.

Methotrexate effect on immunogenicity and long-term maintenance of adalimumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a multicentric randomised trial

Objectives

Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are responsible for decreased adalimumab efficacy in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). We aimed to evaluate the ability of methotrexate (MTX) to decrease adalimumab immunisation.

Methods

A total of 110 patients eligible to receive adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) every other week were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive, 2 weeks before adalimumab (W-2) and weekly, MTX 10 mg s.c. (MTX+) or not (MTX−). ADA detection and adalimumab serum concentration were assessed at weeks 4 (W4), 8 (W8), 12 (W12) and 26 (W26) after starting adalimumab (W0). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ADA at W26. Four years after the study completion, we retrospectively analysed adalimumab maintenance in relation with MTX co-treatment duration.

Results

We analysed data for 107 patients (MTX+; n=52; MTX-; n=55). ADA were detected at W26 in 39/107 (36.4%) patients: 13/52 (25%) in the MTX+ group and 26/55 (47.3%) in the MTX− group (p=0.03). Adalimumab concentration was significantly higher in the MTX+ than MTX− group at W4, W8, W12 and W26. The two groups did not differ in adverse events or efficacy. In the follow-up study, MTX co-treatment >W26 versus no MTX or ≤W26 was significantly associated with adalimumab long-term maintenance (p=0.04).

Conclusion

MTX reduces the immunogenicity and ameliorate the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in axial SpA. A prolonged co-treatment of MTX>W26 seems to increase adalimumab long-term maintenance.

Molecular Landscape of Anti-Drug Antibodies Reveals the Mechanism of the Immune Response Following Treatment With TNFα Antagonists

Drugs formulated from monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are clinically effective in various diseases. Repeated administration of mAbs, however, elicits an immune response in the form of anti-drug-antibodies (ADA), thereby reducing the drug's efficacy. Notwithstanding their importance, the molecular landscape of ADA and the mechanisms involved in their formation are not fully understood. Using a newly developed quantitative bio-immunoassay, we found that ADA concentrations specific to TNFα antagonists can exceed extreme concentrations of 1 mg/ml with a wide range of neutralization capacity. Our data further suggest a preferential use of the λ light chain in a subset of neutralizing ADA. Moreover, we show that administration of TNFα antagonists result in a vaccine-like response whereby ADA formation is governed by the extrafollicular T cell-independent immune response. Our bio-immunoassay coupled with insights on the nature of the immune response can be leveraged to improve mAb immunogenicity assessment and facilitate improvement in therapeutic intervention strategies.

Biosimilars: Exploring the History, Science, and Progress

BACKGROUND

Biosimilars provide opportunities for improving healthcare access and outcomes and reducing overall healthcare costs for patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this article is to explore the history of biosimilars, regulatory pathways, and barriers to biosimilar approval. This article also aims to describe the patient and clinician barriers to biosimilars use and the progress that has been achieved since the first biosimilar approval in Europe in 2006 and in the United States in 2015.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to retrieve articles that are highly relevant to the history of biosimilars development and regulatory pathways in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Canada. Patient and clinician perspectives on safety issues and concerns regarding immunogenicity and bioequivalence that limit use of biosimilars are also included.

FINDINGS

Patient and provider concerns regarding immunologic patient safety issues, such as immunogenicity, lack of comparability, and low biosimilarity, still exist. The clinical safety, efficacy, and tolerability of biosimilars are among the top concerns in patients, prescribers, and clinicians.

[Are there different responses to different PCSK9 inhibitors?]

The case is presented of a 62-year-old patient who required lipid-lowering therapy with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type9 (PCSK9). It was empirically decided to change one drug to another of the two currently available, obtaining a different response. Our objective is to present our experience and to consider a possible therapeutic option in patients in whom, exceptionally, this could happen.

Immunogenicity of immunomodulatory, antibody-based, oncology therapeutics

The increasing use of multiple immunomodulatory (IMD) agents for cancer therapies (e.g. antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cells), is raising questions on their potential immunogenicity and effects on treatment. In this review, we outline the mechanisms of action (MOA) of approved, antibody-based IMD agents, potentially related to their immunogenicity, and discuss the reported incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) as well as their clinical relevance in patients with cancer. In addition, we discuss the impact of the administration route and potential strategies to reduce the incidence of ADA and manage treated patients. Analysis of published reports indicated that the risk of immunogenicity did not appear to correlate with the MOA of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 monoclonal antibodies nor to substantially affect treatment with most of these agents in the majority of patients evaluated to date. Treatment with B-cell depleting agents appears associated with a low risk of immunogenicity. No significant difference in ADA incidence was found between the intravenous and subcutaneous administration routes for a panel of non-oncology IMD antibodies. Additionally, while the data suggest a higher likelihood of immunogenicity for antibodies with T-cell or antigen-presenting cell (APC) targets versus B-cell targets, it is possible to have targets expressed on APCs or T cells and still have a low incidence of immunogenicity.