1
|
Eijsackers H, van Straalen N, Maboeta M. How to bridge the gap between nature conservation and environmental risk assessment of contaminated ecosystems. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 983:179680. [PMID: 40403545 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2025] [Accepted: 05/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/24/2025]
Abstract
When evaluating the risks of contamination in nature reserves, two issues play a role: nature protection and chemical risk assessment. The approaches adopted under these two schemes are not necessarily aligned. We argue that there is a fundamental difference in how the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approach environmental assessments. The IUCN's Red List assessments focus on a species' survival potential, using population numbers, distribution areas, and broad threats without specifying these. It's a big-picture approach to identify species in need of conservation. On the other hand, EPA, EFSA and ECHA delve deeper into specific threats or hazards, specifically chemical pollutants. They assess how readily a chemical becomes available to organisms (bioavailability) and what its toxicity can be to individual species. These data are then used to predict the chemical's risk to a broader range of species through different approaches, e.g. species sensitivity distributions. In addition, arguments related to ecosystem functions, such as clean water and food production, may play a role. The current testing scheme is however, mainly focused on laboratory-cultured species and does not primarily consider specific ecological demands of red list species. We describe and analyse these two different systems, and develop a practical approach that combines their strengths. This could involve using IUCN Red List data to select species for further ecotoxicological assessment by EPA-like agencies. Integrating these results would underpin general conservation efforts and provide targeted protection for species with unique characteristics or high vulnerability to specific threats. This combined approach would move us closer to achieving the general protection of all species and the specific protection of those needing extra attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herman Eijsackers
- Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
| | - Nico van Straalen
- A-LIFE Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mark Maboeta
- Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brodie JF, Freeman BG, Mannion PD, Hargreaves AL. Shifting, expanding, or contracting? Range movement consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 2025; 40:439-448. [PMID: 40023666 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2025.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
Climate change is causing species ranges to shift, expand, and contract, with divergent and underappreciated consequences for local and global biodiversity. Widespread range shifts should increase local diversity in most areas but reduce it in the tropical lowlands. Widespread expansions should maintain diversity at low latitudes while increasing diversity elsewhere, leading to stable global biodiversity. Expansions and shifts are both common responses to climate change now and in the deep past. To understand how changing ranges will reshape Earth's biodiversity, we argue for three research directions: (i) leverage paleontological data to reveal long-term biodiversity responses, (ii) better monitor low-elevation and latitude limits to distinguish shifts from expansions, and (iii) incorporate dispersal barriers that can turn would-be shifts into contractions and extinctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jedediah F Brodie
- Division of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA; Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
| | - Benjamin G Freeman
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Philip D Mannion
- Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Anna L Hargreaves
- Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vardakas L, Perdikaris C, Freyhof J, Zimmerman B, Ford M, Vlachopoulos K, Koutsikos N, Karaouzas I, Chamoglou M, Kalogianni E. Global Patterns and Drivers of Freshwater Fish Extinctions: Can We Learn From Our Losses? GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2025; 31:e70244. [PMID: 40387501 PMCID: PMC12087526 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2025] [Revised: 04/27/2025] [Accepted: 05/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/20/2025]
Abstract
Nearly one-third of extant freshwater fish species, which account for over 50% of global fish diversity, are at risk of extinction. Despite their crucial ecological and socioeconomic importance, the extinction of freshwater fishes remains under-researched on a global scale. This is a comprehensive assessment of taxonomic, spatial, and temporal patterns of freshwater fish extinctions while identifying key extinction drivers and driver synergies. Using data from the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, 89 extinct freshwater fish and 11 extinct in the wild were analyzed. Taxonomic statistical analysis revealed the disproportionate impact on Cyprinidae, Leuciscidae, and Salmonidae. Estimated globally for the period 1851-2016, the modern extinction rate for freshwater fishes stands at 33.47 extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY), more than 100 times greater than the natural background extinction rate of 0.33 E/MSY. Extinction rates, when calculated per continent using the number of extinct species and the total number of species per continent, indicated that North America has the highest extinction rate (225.60 E/MSY), followed by Europe (220.26 E/MSY) and Asia (34.62 E/MSY). Although Africa is less affected, it still shows a 42-fold increase over the background rate. Bayesian modeling, reflecting cumulative species extinctions, indicated a strong association of North America and Asia with species loss (37 and 34 extinctions, respectively), a moderate one for Europe (20 extinctions) and a weak association of Africa (eight extinctions). Natural system modification, pollution, and invasive species emerged as the primary extinction drivers, often acting synergistically. Temporal trends indicate an acceleration in extinctions since the mid-20th century. This study highlights that, despite recent increases in conservation efforts, freshwater fish extinctions continue to rise, indicating the urgent need for integrated conservation strategies. Without immediate action, many species currently at risk may soon follow the same trajectory of extinction as the 100 extinct freshwater fishes of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas Vardakas
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland WatersAtticaGreece
| | - Costas Perdikaris
- Department of FisheriesRegional Unit of Thesprotia, Region of EpirusIgoumenitsaGreece
| | - Jörg Freyhof
- Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity ScienceBerlinGermany
| | - Brian Zimmerman
- Bristol, Clifton & West of England Zoological Society, Bristol Zoo GardensBristolUK
| | | | - Konstantinos Vlachopoulos
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland WatersAtticaGreece
| | - Nicholas Koutsikos
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland WatersAtticaGreece
| | - Ioannis Karaouzas
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland WatersAtticaGreece
| | - Maria Chamoglou
- Hydrobiological Station of Arta, Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and FoodArtaGreece
| | - Eleni Kalogianni
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland WatersAtticaGreece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assumpção ACADE, Ritter MN. Exploring the past to protect the future: an analysis of conservation paleobiology in South America. AN ACAD BRAS CIENC 2025; 97:e20240641. [PMID: 40243763 DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202520240641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Conservation paleobiology, an expanding field, employs taphonomy tools to investigate past environmental conditions and organisms before human impacts, thereby addressing key conservation issues. This review examines the concepts, approaches and events in conservation paleobiology, emphasizing aquatic and coastal organisms and the often-overlooked contributions from Brazil and South America. South America, with its vulnerable biodiversity, unique geology and rich fossil diversity, is a natural laboratory for understanding ecosystems-a considerable potential as a center for leading conservation paleobiology research. However, South America is underrepresented, contributing to only 5% of total publications (67% of it is from Brazil). Most South American authors are geoscientists publishing mainly on mollusks, also they produced fewer studies than those from more developed countries. Noteworthy, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development ranks third globally in funding for conservation paleobiology articles. Clearly, conservation paleobiology is still predominantly practiced in developed nations and geoscience fields. Other challenges include underutilization of geohistorical data and a gap between theory and practice. To address these issues, future studies should integrate conservationist perspectives and align them with societal and conservation needs. Hence, the anticipated growth in South American conservation paleobiology could bolster environmental conservation and promote sustainability for future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Clara A DE Assumpção
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Prédio 43113, Bairro Agronomia, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Matias N Ritter
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Prédio 43113, Bairro Agronomia, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Estudos Costeiros, Limnológicos e Marinhos, Av. Tramandaí, 976, Bairro Centro, 95625-000 Imbé, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Estudos de Geologia Costeira e Oceânica, Instituto de Geociências, Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Bairro Agronomia, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Woinarski JCZ, Garnett ST, Legge SM. No More Extinctions: Recovering Australia's Biodiversity. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2025; 13:507-528. [PMID: 39353087 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-111523-102004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
Most conservation programs and laws aim to prevent extinction. However, there is a gulf between such aspirations and the current reality of escalating biodiversity loss. This review focuses on efforts to prevent extinctions in Australia, but much of this consideration is likely to apply globally. As context, we consider the reasons for trying to prevent extinction, review Australia's extinction record, and note that there are likely to be many more extinctions than formally recognized. We describe recent cases where conservation actions have prevented extinction. We note that extinction is a pathway rather than solely an endpoint, and many decisions made or not made on that pathway can determine the fate of species. We conclude that all looming extinctions can and should be prevented. This will require transformational change in legislation, increased resourcing, more consideration of poorly known species, and increased societal recognition of the need to be responsible for the care of country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Z Woinarski
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia; , ,
| | - Stephen T Garnett
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia; , ,
| | - Sarah M Legge
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sayer CA, Fernando E, Jimenez RR, Macfarlane NBW, Rapacciuolo G, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Contreras-MacBeath T, Cox NA, Harrison I, Hoffmann M, Jenkins R, Smith KG, Vié JC, Abbott JC, Allen DJ, Allen GR, Barrios V, Boudot JP, Carrizo SF, Charvet P, Clausnitzer V, Congiu L, Crandall KA, Cumberlidge N, Cuttelod A, Dalton J, Daniels AG, De Grave S, De Knijf G, Dijkstra KDB, Dow RA, Freyhof J, García N, Gessner J, Getahun A, Gibson C, Gollock MJ, Grant MI, Groom AER, Hammer MP, Hammerson GA, Hilton-Taylor C, Hodgkinson L, Holland RA, Jabado RW, Juffe Bignoli D, Kalkman VJ, Karimov BK, Kipping J, Kottelat M, Lalèyè PA, Larson HK, Lintermans M, Lozano F, Ludwig A, Lyons TJ, Máiz-Tomé L, Molur S, Ng HH, Numa C, Palmer-Newton AF, Pike C, Pippard HE, Polaz CNM, Pollock CM, Raghavan R, Rand PS, Ravelomanana T, Reis RE, Rigby CL, Scott JA, Skelton PH, Sloat MR, Snoeks J, Stiassny MLJ, Tan HH, Taniguchi Y, Thorstad EB, Tognelli MF, Torres AG, Torres Y, Tweddle D, Watanabe K, Westrip JRS, Wright EGE, Zhang E, Darwall WRT. One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction. Nature 2025; 638:138-145. [PMID: 39779863 PMCID: PMC11798842 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are highly biodiverse1 and important for livelihoods and economic development2, but are under substantial stress3. To date, comprehensive global assessments of extinction risk have not included any speciose groups primarily living in freshwaters. Consequently, data from predominantly terrestrial tetrapods4,5 are used to guide environmental policy6 and conservation prioritization7, whereas recent proposals for target setting in freshwaters use abiotic factors8-13. However, there is evidence14-17 that such data are insufficient to represent the needs of freshwater species and achieve biodiversity goals18,19. Here we present the results of a multi-taxon global freshwater fauna assessment for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species covering 23,496 decapod crustaceans, fishes and odonates, finding that one-quarter are threatened with extinction. Prevalent threats include pollution, dams and water extraction, agriculture and invasive species, with overharvesting also driving extinctions. We also examined the degree of surrogacy of both threatened tetrapods and freshwater abiotic factors (water stress and nitrogen) for threatened freshwater species. Threatened tetrapods are good surrogates when prioritizing sites to maximize rarity-weighted richness, but poorer when prioritizing based on the most range-restricted species. However, they are much better surrogates than abiotic factors, which perform worse than random. Thus, although global priority regions identified for tetrapod conservation are broadly reflective of those for freshwater faunas, given differences in key threats and habitats, meeting the needs of tetrapods cannot be assumed sufficient to conserve freshwater species at local scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A Sayer
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK.
| | - Eresha Fernando
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | - Randall R Jimenez
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), San Jose, Costa Rica
| | | | | | - Monika Böhm
- Global Center for Species Survival, Indianapolis Zoo, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Thomas M Brooks
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland
| | - Topiltzin Contreras-MacBeath
- Laboratorio de Ictiología, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México
| | - Neil A Cox
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Washington, DC, USA
- Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ian Harrison
- Free Flowing Rivers Laboratory, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | | | - Richard Jenkins
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin G Smith
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - David J Allen
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | - Gerald R Allen
- Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | | - Savrina F Carrizo
- Zoo and Aquarium Association Australasia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Dalton
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Geert De Knijf
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Rory A Dow
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia
| | - Jörg Freyhof
- Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Joern Gessner
- Leibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Michael I Grant
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
| | | | - Michael P Hammer
- Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Rima W Jabado
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Elasmo Project, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Diego Juffe Bignoli
- Durrel Institute for Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Bakhtiyor K Karimov
- Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University (TIIAME NRU), Tashkent, Uzbekistan
| | - Jens Kipping
- BioCart Ökologische Gutachten, Taucha/Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Helen K Larson
- Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Mark Lintermans
- Centre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Fish Fondler Pty Ltd, Bungendore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Federico Lozano
- Laboratorio de Biodiversidad y Genética Ambiental - UNDAV, Avellaneda, Argentina
| | - Arne Ludwig
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Evolutionary Genetics & Humboldt University Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timothy J Lyons
- Center for Species Survival: New Mexico, New Mexico BioPark Society, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Laura Máiz-Tomé
- Mott MacDonald Environment and Social Division (ENS), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Heok Hee Ng
- Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Catherine Numa
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rajeev Raghavan
- Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS), Kochi, India
| | - Peter S Rand
- Prince William Sound Science Center, Cordova, AK, USA
| | - Tsilavina Ravelomanana
- Mention Zoologie et Biodiversité Animale, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Roberto E Reis
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Cassandra L Rigby
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet A Scott
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul H Skelton
- South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa
| | | | - Jos Snoeks
- Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren and KU Leuven (Leuven University), Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Heok Hui Tan
- Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Eva B Thorstad
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Armi G Torres
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Mathematics, Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
| | - Yan Torres
- Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | - Denis Tweddle
- South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa
| | - Katsutoshi Watanabe
- Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - James R S Westrip
- IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - E Zhang
- Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butchart SHM, Akçakaya HR, Berryman AJ, Brooks TM, Burfield IJ, Chanson J, Dias MP, Donaldson JS, Hermes C, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoffmann M, Luedtke JA, Martin R, McDougall A, Neam K, Polidoro B, Raimondo D, Rodrigues ASL, Rondinini C, Rutherford C, Scott T, Simkins AT, Stuart SN, Vine J. Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025; 380:20230206. [PMID: 39780598 PMCID: PMC11712279 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
The Red List Index (RLI) is an indicator of the average extinction risk of groups of species and reflects trends in this through time. It is calculated from the number of species in each category on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, with trends influenced by the number moving between categories when reassessed owing to genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The global RLI is aggregated across multiple taxonomic groups and can be disaggregated to show trends for subsets of species (e.g. migratory species), or driven by particular factors (e.g. international trade). National RLIs have been generated through either repeated assessments of national extinction risk in each country or through disaggregating the global index and weighting each species by the proportion of its range in each country. The RLI has achieved wide policy uptake, including by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Future priorities include expanding its taxonomic coverage, applying the RLI to the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, incorporating uncertainty in the underlying Red List assessments, integrating into national RLIs the impact of a country on species' extinction risk abroad, and improving analysis of the factors driving trends.This article is part of the discussion theme issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart H. M. Butchart
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EJ, UK
| | - H. Resit Akçakaya
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York, NY11794-5245, USA
- International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
| | - Alex J. Berryman
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Thomas M. Brooks
- International Union for Conservation of Nature, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
| | - Ian J. Burfield
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Janice Chanson
- Re:wild, PO Box 129, AustinTX 78767, USA
- IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
| | - Maria P. Dias
- Department of Animal Biology, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, Lisboa1749-016, Portugal
| | - John S. Donaldson
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria0001, South Africa
| | - Claudia Hermes
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Craig Hilton-Taylor
- International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Unit, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 83QZ, UK
| | - Mike Hoffmann
- Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, LondonNW1 4RY, UK
| | - Jennifer A. Luedtke
- Re:wild, PO Box 129, AustinTX 78767, USA
- IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
| | - Rob Martin
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Amy McDougall
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Kelsey Neam
- Re:wild, PO Box 129, AustinTX 78767, USA
- IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
| | - Beth Polidoro
- International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
- School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, GlendaleAZ 85306, USA
| | - Domitilla Raimondo
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria0001, South Africa
| | | | - Carlo Rondinini
- Global Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, Rome00185, Italy
| | - Claire Rutherford
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Tom Scott
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Ashley T. Simkins
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CambridgeCB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Simon N. Stuart
- International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, Gland1196, Switzerland
- Synchronicity Earth, 1 Chancery Lane, LondonWC2A 1LF, UK
- A Rocha International, 180 Piccadilly, LondonW1J 9HF, UK
| | - Jemma Vine
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3QZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodrigues ASL. Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025; 380:20230209. [PMID: 39780596 PMCID: PMC11712284 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Whereas preventing species extinctions remains a central objective of conservation efforts, it must be complemented by the long-term preservation of functional ecosystems and of the benefits humans derive from them. Here, I review recent approaches that explicitly account for functionality in setting large-scale conservation priorities, discussing their promise while highlighting challenges and pitfalls. Crossing data on species' distributions and ecological traits has enabled the mapping of global patterns of functional diversity and functional rarity and the identification of species that stand out for their functional distinctiveness. However, the priorities identified through these general indices do not directly address ecosystem functionality, instead, they are methods for ensuring the representation of individual functional traits as intrinsically valuable biodiversity elements. Three other approaches integrate functionality into large-scale priorities by taking into account the specific context of each ecosystem, site or species: the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Ecosystems, Key Biodiversity Areas and the Green Status of Species. Currently at various stages of development, testing and implementation, these approaches are playing an increasingly important role in the definition, implementation and monitoring of global- and national-scale conservation strategies to ensure the long-term persistence of ecosystem functions and associated ecosystem services.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tang J, Swaisgood RR, Owen MA, Zhao X, Wei W, Hong M, Zhou H, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Ecological and anthropogenic drivers of local extinction and colonization of giant pandas over the past 30 years. Ecology 2025; 106:e4507. [PMID: 39814600 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
Understanding the patterns and drivers of species range shifts is essential to disentangle mechanisms driving species' responses to global change. Here, we quantified local extinction and colonization dynamics of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) using occurrence data collected by harnessing the labor of >1000 workers and >60,000 worker days for each of the three periods (TP1: 1985-1988, TP2: 1998-2002, and TP3: 2011-2014), and evaluated how these patterns were associated with (1) protected area, (2) local rarity/abundance, and (3) abiotic factors (i.e., climate, land-use, and topography). We documented a decreased rate (from 0.433 during TP1-TP2 to 0.317 during TP2-TP3) of local extinction and a relatively stable rate (from 0.060 during TP1-TP2 to 0.056 during TP2-TP3) of local colonization through time. Furthermore, the occupancy gains have exceeded losses by a ratio of approximately 1.5 to 1, illustrating an expansion of panda's range at a rate of 1408.3 km2/decade. We also found that pandas were more likely to become locally extinct outside of protected areas, when locally rare in surrounding areas, and when certain biotic conditions were not met (e.g., increased forest cover). Local colonization was less likely in areas with high local rarity, challenging biotic conditions and unprotected area status. As the network of panda reserves expanded and the forest matured, the relative importance of other factors such as climate, biotic factors, and land-use became more influential in determining patterns of local extinction and colonization. Our findings provide insights into the factors governing the expansion of panda's range and illustrate how the relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors can change over time, indicating that effective conservation intervention may be able to mitigate some of the negative impacts of climate change and habitat degradation. This insight extends beyond pandas and highlights the role of conservation interventions can play in building resilience under a changing climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junfeng Tang
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
| | - Ronald R Swaisgood
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, California, USA
| | - Megan A Owen
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, California, USA
| | - Xuzhe Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
| | - Mingsheng Hong
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
| | - Hong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
| | - Jindong Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
| | - Zejun Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
- Liziping Giant Panda's Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Nanchong, China
- College of Chemistry and Life Science, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wauchope HS, zu Ermgassen SOSE, Jones JPG, Carter H, Schulte to Bühne H, Milner-Gulland EJ. What is a unit of nature? Measurement challenges in the emerging biodiversity credit market. Proc Biol Sci 2024; 291:20242353. [PMID: 39657801 PMCID: PMC11631508 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Bending the curve of biodiversity loss requires the business and financial sectors to disclose and reduce their biodiversity impacts and help fund nature recovery. This has sparked interest in developing generalizable, standardized measurements of biodiversity-essentially a 'unit of nature'. We examine how such units are defined in the rapidly growing voluntary biodiversity credits market and present a framework exploring how biodiversity is quantified, how delivery of positive outcomes is detected and attributed to the investment and how the number of credits issued is adjusted to account for uncertainties. We demonstrate that there are deep uncertainties throughout the process and question if the benefits of biodiversity credits, and other efforts to abstract nature to a single unit, outweigh the harms. Credits can only be positive for biodiversity if they are used with unprecedentedly strict regulation that ensures businesses mostly avoid negative impacts and if they are purchased to quantify positive contributions rather than as direct offsets. While there may be a role for markets in attracting conservation funding, they will only ever be part of the solution, especially for the many aspects of nature that cannot be reduced to a unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julia P. G. Jones
- School of Environment and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
- Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheng TL, Bennett AB, Teague O'Mara M, Auteri GG, Frick WF. Persist or Perish: Can Bats Threatened with Extinction Persist and Recover from White-nose Syndrome? Integr Comp Biol 2024; 64:807-815. [PMID: 38641425 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Emerging mycoses are an increasing concern in wildlife and human health. Given the historical rarity of fungal pathogens in warm-bodied vertebrates, there is a need to better understand how to manage mycoses and facilitate recovery in affected host populations. We explore challenges to host survival and mechanisms of host recovery in three bat species (Myotis lucifugus, Perimyotis subflavus, and M. septentrionalis) threatened with extinction by the mycosis, white-nose syndrome (WNS) as it continues to spread across North America. We present evidence from the literature that bats surviving WNS are exhibiting mechanisms of avoidance (by selecting microclimates within roosts) and tolerance (by increasing winter fat reserves), which may help avoid costs of immunopathology incurred by a maladaptive host resistance response. We discuss management actions for facilitating species recovery that take into consideration disease pressures (e.g., environmental reservoirs) and mechanisms underlying persistence, and suggest strategies that alleviate costs of immunopathology and target mechanisms of avoidance (protect or create refugia) and tolerance (increase body condition). We also propose strategies that target population and species-level recovery, including increasing reproductive success and reducing other stressors (e.g., wind turbine mortality). The rarity of fungal pathogens paired with the increasing frequency of emerging mycoses in warm-bodied vertebrate systems, including humans, requires a need to challenge common conventions about how diseases operate, how hosts respond, and how these systems could be managed to increase probability of recovery in host populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina L Cheng
- Bat Conservation International, 500 N Capital of Texas Highway, Buildling 8-255, Austin, Texas 78746, USA, Science
| | - Alyssa B Bennett
- Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, 111 West St., Essex Junction, VT 05452, USA
| | - M Teague O'Mara
- Bat Conservation International, 500 N Capital of Texas Highway, Buildling 8-255, Austin, Texas 78746, USA, Science
- Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University; 808 N Pine St Ext, Hammond LA 70402, USA, Science
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, GamboaPanama
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior; Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany
| | - Giorgia G Auteri
- Missouri State University, Department of Biology, 901 S. National Ave., Springfield, MO 65897, USA
| | - Winifred F Frick
- Bat Conservation International, 500 N Capital of Texas Highway, Buildling 8-255, Austin, Texas 78746, USA, Science
- University of California, Santa Cruz, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 130 McAllister Way, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGowan PJK, Hutchinson A, Brooks TM, Elliott W, Hoffmann M, Mair L, McDougall A, Raimondo DC, Butchart SHM. Understanding and achieving species elements in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Bioscience 2024; 74:614-623. [PMID: 39421008 PMCID: PMC11480660 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted in December 2022 by the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The framework states outcomes for species to be achieved by 2050 in goal A and establishes a range of targets to reduce pressures on biodiversity and halt biodiversity loss by 2030. Target 4 calls for urgent recovery actions for species where the implementation of other targets is insufficient to eliminate extinction risk. We analyze key species elements of goal A and target 4, examine their meaning and clarify implementation needs. We emphasize that target 4 should not be seen simply as the species target, because effective implementation of all targets is essential to achieve the species ambitions in goal A, but, rather, as a target for species that require urgent focused actions and emphasize that an indicator is needed to measure the implementation of urgent management actions. We conclude by considering next steps to identify priorities, undertake further research, make use of resources, ensure cooperation and capacity development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J K McGowan
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
- IUCN Species Survival Commission Global Biodiversity Framework Task Force
| | | | - Thomas M Brooks
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Louise Mair
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - Amy McDougall
- BirdLife International, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
| | - Domitilla C Raimondo
- Threatened Species Programme manager, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Brummeria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Y, Lv Y, Wang G, Liu F, Ji Y, Liu Z, Zhao W, Liu W, Dun Zhu PB, Jin K. Identification of Individuals of Two Takin Subspecies Using Biological and Ecological Criteria in Eastern Himalayas of China. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:2426. [PMID: 39199959 PMCID: PMC11350688 DOI: 10.3390/ani14162426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Limited background data are available on the Mishmi takin (Budorcas taxicolor taxicolor) and Bhutan takin (Budorcas taxicolor whitei) subspecies in the Eastern Himalayas of China because of the lack of systematic field investigations and research. Therefore, mature-animal ecological methods were used to evaluate these takin subspecies' phenotypic characteristics, distribution range, activity rhythm, and population size. From 2013 to 2022, 214 camera traps were installed for wild ungulate monitoring and investigation in all human-accessible areas of the Eastern Himalayas, resulting in 4837 distinguishable takin photographs. The external morphological characteristics were described and compared using visual data. Artificial image correction and related technologies were used to establish physical image models based on the differences between subspecies. MaxEnt niche and random encounter models obtained distribution ranges and population densities. Mishmi takins have a distribution area of 17,314 km2, population density of 0.1729 ± 0.0134 takins/km2, and population size of 2995 ± 232. Bhutan takins have a distribution area of 25,006 km2, population density of 0.1359 ± 0.0264 takins/km2, and population size of 3398 ± 660. Long-term monitoring data confirmed that the vertical migration within the mountain ecosystems is influenced by climate. Mishmi takins are active at 500-4500 m, whereas Bhutan takins are active at 1500-4500 m. The two subspecies were active at >3500 m from May to October yearly (rainy season). In addition, surveying combined with model simulation shows that the Yarlung Zangbo River is not an obstacle to migration. This study provides basic data that contribute to animal diversity knowledge in biodiversity hotspots of the Eastern Himalayas and detailed information and references for species identification, distribution range, and population characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Wang
- Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
- Research Institute of Natural Protected Area, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
- Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
| | - Yonglei Lv
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Guanglong Wang
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
| | - Feng Liu
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
| | - Yingxun Ji
- Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Linzhi City, Tibet Autonomous Region, Linzhi 860010, China;
| | - Zheng Liu
- Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Medog County, Tibet Autonomous Region, Medog 860799, China;
| | - Wanglin Zhao
- Medog Earth Landscape and Earth System Comprehensive Observation and Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Medog 860799, China;
| | - Wulin Liu
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
| | - Pu Bu Dun Zhu
- Tibet Autonomous Region Research Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning, Lhasa 850000, China; (Y.L.); (G.W.); (F.L.); (W.L.); (P.B.D.Z.)
| | - Kun Jin
- Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
- Research Institute of Natural Protected Area, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
- Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dedman S, Moxley JH, Papastamatiou YP, Braccini M, Caselle JE, Chapman DD, Cinner JE, Dillon EM, Dulvy NK, Dunn RE, Espinoza M, Harborne AR, Harvey ES, Heupel MR, Huveneers C, Graham NAJ, Ketchum JT, Klinard NV, Kock AA, Lowe CG, MacNeil MA, Madin EMP, McCauley DJ, Meekan MG, Meier AC, Simpfendorfer CA, Tinker MT, Winton M, Wirsing AJ, Heithaus MR. Ecological roles and importance of sharks in the Anthropocene Ocean. Science 2024; 385:adl2362. [PMID: 39088608 DOI: 10.1126/science.adl2362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
In ecosystems, sharks can be predators, competitors, facilitators, nutrient transporters, and food. However, overfishing and other threats have greatly reduced shark populations, altering their roles and effects on ecosystems. We review these changes and implications for ecosystem function and management. Macropredatory sharks are often disproportionately affected by humans but can influence prey and coastal ecosystems, including facilitating carbon sequestration. Like terrestrial predators, sharks may be crucial to ecosystem functioning under climate change. However, large ecosystem effects of sharks are not ubiquitous. Increasing human uses of oceans are changing shark roles, necessitating management consideration. Rebuilding key populations and incorporating shark ecological roles, including less obvious ones, into management efforts are critical for retaining sharks' functional value. Coupled social-ecological frameworks can facilitate these efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Dedman
- Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
| | - Jerry H Moxley
- Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
| | - Yannis P Papastamatiou
- Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
| | - Matias Braccini
- Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, North Beach, WA 6920, Australia
| | - Jennifer E Caselle
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Demian D Chapman
- Sharks and Rays Conservation Research Program, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236, USA
| | - Joshua Eli Cinner
- Thriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Erin M Dillon
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama
| | - Nicholas K Dulvy
- Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Ruth Elizabeth Dunn
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
- The Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4BA, UK
| | - Mario Espinoza
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, San José 2060-11501, Costa Rica
- Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, San José 2060-11501, Costa Rica
- MigraMar, Bodega Bay, CA 94923, USA
| | - Alastair R Harborne
- Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
| | - Euan S Harvey
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, WA, Australia
| | - Michelle R Heupel
- Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, Australia
- Integrated Marine Observing System, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Charlie Huveneers
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - James T Ketchum
- MigraMar, Bodega Bay, CA 94923, USA
- Pelagios Kakunjá, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico
| | - Natalie V Klinard
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Alison A Kock
- Cape Research Centre, South African National Parks, Cape Town, South Africa
- South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB), Makhanda (Grahamstown), South Africa
| | - Christopher G Lowe
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
| | - M Aaron MacNeil
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Elizabeth M P Madin
- Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Kāne'ohe, HI 96744, USA
| | - Douglas J McCauley
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Mark G Meekan
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Amelia C Meier
- Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Kāne'ohe, HI 96744, USA
| | - Colin A Simpfendorfer
- Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - M Tim Tinker
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
- US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Megan Winton
- Atlantic White Shark Conservancy, North Chatham, MA 02650, USA
| | - Aaron J Wirsing
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael R Heithaus
- Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gonçalves F, Farooq H, Harfoot M, Pires MM, Villar N, Sales L, Carvalho C, Bello C, Emer C, Bovendorp RS, Mendes C, Beca G, Lautenschlager L, Souza Y, Pedrosa F, Paz C, Zipparro VB, Akkawi P, Bercê W, Farah F, Freitas AVL, Silveira LF, Olmos F, Geldmann J, Dalsgaard B, Galetti M. A global map of species at risk of extinction due to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2321068121. [PMID: 38885390 PMCID: PMC11214083 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321068121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
An often-overlooked question of the biodiversity crisis is how natural hazards contribute to species extinction risk. To address this issue, we explored how four natural hazards, earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, and volcanoes, overlapped with the distribution ranges of amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles that have either narrow distributions or populations with few mature individuals. To assess which species are at risk from these natural hazards, we combined the frequency and magnitude of each natural hazard to estimate their impact. We considered species at risk if they overlapped with regions where any of the four natural hazards historically occurred (n = 3,722). Those species with at least a quarter of their range subjected to a high relative impact were considered at high risk (n = 2,001) of extinction due to natural hazards. In total, 834 reptiles, 617 amphibians, 302 birds, and 248 mammals were at high risk and they were mainly distributed on islands and in the tropics. Hurricanes (n = 983) and earthquakes (n = 868) affected most species, while tsunamis (n = 272), and volcanoes (n = 171) affected considerably fewer. The region with the highest number of species at high risk was the Pacific Ring of Fire, especially due to volcanoes, earthquakes, and tsunamis, while hurricane-related high-risk species were concentrated in the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, and northwestern Pacific Ocean. Our study provides important information regarding the species at risk due to natural hazards and can help guide conservation attention and efforts to safeguard their survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Gonçalves
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Section for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen1350, Denmark
| | - Harith Farooq
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen1350, Denmark
- Faculty of Natural Sciences, Lúrio University, Pemba3200, Mozambique
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg41319, Sweden
| | - Mike Harfoot
- Vizzuality, Calle de Fuencarral, Madrid28010, Spain
| | - Mathias M. Pires
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo13083-862, Brazil
| | - Nacho Villar
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Department of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, PB6708, The Netherlands
| | - Lilian Sales
- Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographic Sciences, Irving K. Barber, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BCV1V 1V8, Canada
| | - Carolina Carvalho
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, Pará66055-090, Brazil
| | - Carolina Bello
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich8092, Switzerland
| | - Carine Emer
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro22460-030, Brazil
| | - Ricardo S. Bovendorp
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Applied Ecology and Conservation Lab, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia45662-900, Brazil
| | - Calebe Mendes
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Asean School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gabrielle Beca
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Australian Wildlife Conservancy, Subiaco, WA6008, Australia
| | - Laís Lautenschlager
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL33124
| | - Yuri Souza
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL33124
| | - Felipe Pedrosa
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - Claudia Paz
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - Valesca B. Zipparro
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - Paula Akkawi
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - William Bercê
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - Fabiano Farah
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
| | - André V. L. Freitas
- Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo13083-862, Brazil
- Museu de Diversidade Biológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo13083-862, Brazil
| | - Luís Fábio Silveira
- Museu de Zoologia de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo04263-000, Brazil
| | - Fábio Olmos
- Permian Global, LondonW1G 0LB, United Kingdom
| | - Jonas Geldmann
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen1350, Denmark
| | - Bo Dalsgaard
- Section for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen1350, Denmark
| | - Mauro Galetti
- Center for Research on Biodiversity Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of Biodiversity, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Sao Paulo13506-900, Brazil
- Kimberly Green Latin American and Caribbean Center, Florida International University, Miami, FL33199
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Callaghan CT, Santini L, Spake R, Bowler DE. Population abundance estimates in conservation and biodiversity research. Trends Ecol Evol 2024; 39:515-523. [PMID: 38508923 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Measuring and tracking biodiversity from local to global scales is challenging due to its multifaceted nature and the range of metrics used to describe spatial and temporal patterns. Abundance can be used to describe how a population changes across space and time, but it can be measured in different ways, with consequences for the interpretation and communication of spatiotemporal patterns. We differentiate between relative and absolute abundance, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each for biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and ecological research. We highlight when absolute abundance can be advantageous and should be prioritized in biodiversity monitoring and research, and conclude by providing avenues for future research directions to better assess the necessity of absolute abundance in biodiversity monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey T Callaghan
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, FL 33314-7719, USA.
| | - Luca Santini
- Department of Biology and Biotechnologies 'Charles Darwin', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rebecca Spake
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, UK
| | - Diana E Bowler
- UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Linsky J, Byrne A, Handley V, Coffey EED, Alvarez‐Clare S, Crowley D, Meyer A. Integrated plant conservation through the Global Conservation Consortia. APPLICATIONS IN PLANT SCIENCES 2024; 12:e11586. [PMID: 38912129 PMCID: PMC11192158 DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
The 2020 State of the World's Plants and Fungi report revealed that two in five plant species are threatened with extinction. Despite their diverse ecosystem services and myriad human uses, plants receive a fraction of the conservation resources directed at animal taxa. Several existing frameworks-including International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Specialist Groups, the American Public Gardens Association Plant Collections Network, and the Center for Plant Conservation National Collection of Endangered Plants-have spurred conservation action, but there remains an urgent need to scale up conservation efforts for the world's plants. Here, a new approach to coordinated conservation action for plant taxa is described: the Global Conservation Consortia (GCC). GCC catalyze institutions and experts to collaboratively develop and implement comprehensive strategies to prevent extinction of threatened plant groups. This review focuses on three tree-focused, U.S.-led consortia: cycads, magnolias, and oaks, but the GCC framework is applicable to other taxonomic groups. This review covers consortia design and implementation, provides conservation action case studies, and shares preliminary successes and challenges as this new and exciting approach to conservation is developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Linsky
- Atlanta Botanical GardenPiedmont Avenue NEAtlanta30309GeorgiaUSA
| | - Amy Byrne
- The Morton Arboretum4100 Illinois Route 53Lisle60532IllinoisUSA
| | - Vanessa Handley
- Montgomery Botanical Center11901 Old Cutler RoadCoral Gables33156FloridaUSA
| | | | - Silvia Alvarez‐Clare
- The Morton Arboretum4100 Illinois Route 53Lisle60532IllinoisUSA
- Botanic Gardens Conservation InternationalDescanso House, 199 Kew RoadRichmondTW9 3BWUnited Kingdom
| | - Dan Crowley
- Botanic Gardens Conservation InternationalDescanso House, 199 Kew RoadRichmondTW9 3BWUnited Kingdom
- Westonbirt, The National Arboretum, Forestry England, TetburyGloucestershireGL8 8QSUnited Kingdom
| | - Abby Meyer
- Botanic Gardens Conservation International‐US, at The Huntington Library, Art Museum, and Botanical Gardens1151 Oxford RoadSan Marino91108CaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Munteanu C, Kraemer BM, Hansen HH, Miguel S, Milner-Gulland EJ, Nita M, Ogashawara I, Radeloff VC, Roverelli S, Shumilova OO, Storch I, Kuemmerle T. The potential of historical spy-satellite imagery to support research in ecology and conservation. Bioscience 2024; 74:159-168. [PMID: 38560619 PMCID: PMC10977866 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Remote sensing data are important for assessing ecological change, but their value is often restricted by their limited temporal coverage. Major historical events that affected the environment, such as those associated with colonial history, World War II, or the Green Revolution are not captured by modern remote sensing. In the present article, we highlight the potential of globally available black-and-white satellite photographs to expand ecological and conservation assessments back to the 1960s and to illuminate ecological concepts such as shifting baselines, time-lag responses, and legacy effects. This historical satellite photography can be used to monitor ecosystem extent and structure, species' populations and habitats, and human pressures on the environment. Even though the data were declassified decades ago, their use in ecology and conservation remains limited. But recent advances in image processing and analysis can now unlock this research resource. We encourage the use of this opportunity to address important ecological and conservation questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalina Munteanu
- Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Geography Department at Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Kraemer
- Environmental Hydrological Systems at the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Henry H Hansen
- Technology Department of Environmental and Life Sciences Biology at Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Sofia Miguel
- Departamento de Geología, Geografía, y Medio Ambiente, Environmental Remote Sensing Research Group, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - E J Milner-Gulland
- Department of Biology at the University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Mihai Nita
- Department of Forest Engineering, in the Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - Igor Ogashawara
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker C Radeloff
- SILVIS Lab, in the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Simone Roverelli
- Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ilse Storch
- Wildlife Ecology and Managementm University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kuemmerle
- Geography Department and the Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human–Environment Systems, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mychajliw AM, Adams AJ, Brown KC, Campbell BT, Hardesty-Moore M, Welch ZS, Page HM, Southon JR, Cooper SD, Alagona PS. Coupled social and ecological change drove the historical extinction of the California grizzly bear ( Ursus arctos californicus). Proc Biol Sci 2024; 291:20230921. [PMID: 38196370 PMCID: PMC10777157 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Large carnivores (order Carnivora) are among the world's most threatened mammals due to a confluence of ecological and social forces that have unfolded over centuries. Combining specimens from natural history collections with documents from archival records, we reconstructed the factors surrounding the extinction of the California grizzly bear (Ursus arctos californicus), a once-abundant brown bear subspecies last seen in 1924. Historical documents portrayed California grizzlies as massive hypercarnivores that endangered public safety. Yet, morphological measurements on skulls and teeth generate smaller body size estimates in alignment with extant North American grizzly populations (approx. 200 kg). Stable isotope analysis (δ13C, δ15N) of pelts and bones (n = 57) revealed that grizzlies derived less than 10% of their nutrition from terrestrial animal sources and were therefore largely herbivorous for millennia prior to the first European arrival in this region in 1542. Later colonial land uses, beginning in 1769 with the Mission era, led grizzlies to moderately increase animal protein consumption (up to 26% of diet), but grizzlies still consumed far less livestock than otherwise claimed by contemporary accounts. We show how human activities can provoke short-term behavioural shifts, such as heightened levels of carnivory, that in turn can lead to exaggerated predation narratives and incentivize persecution, triggering rapid loss of an otherwise widespread and ecologically flexible animal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis M. Mychajliw
- Department of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, USA
- Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, USA
- La Brea Tar Pits & Museum, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea J. Adams
- Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Kevin C. Brown
- Environmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Beau T. Campbell
- Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Molly Hardesty-Moore
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Zoë S. Welch
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Henry M. Page
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - John R. Southon
- Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Scott D. Cooper
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Peter S. Alagona
- Environmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Oosterhout C. AI-informed conservation genomics. Heredity (Edinb) 2024; 132:1-4. [PMID: 38151537 PMCID: PMC10798949 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00666-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cock van Oosterhout
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
- Conservation Genetics Specialist Group, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dussex N, Kurland S, Olsen RA, Spong G, Ericsson G, Ekblom R, Ryman N, Dalén L, Laikre L. Range-wide and temporal genomic analyses reveal the consequences of near-extinction in Swedish moose. Commun Biol 2023; 6:1035. [PMID: 37848497 PMCID: PMC10582009 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05385-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Ungulate species have experienced severe declines over the past centuries through overharvesting and habitat loss. Even if many game species have recovered thanks to strict hunting regulation, the genome-wide impacts of overharvesting are still unclear. Here, we examine the temporal and geographical differences in genome-wide diversity in moose (Alces alces) over its whole range in Sweden by sequencing 87 modern and historical genomes. We found limited impact of the 1900s near-extinction event but local variation in inbreeding and load in modern populations, as well as suggestion of a risk of future reduction in genetic diversity and gene flow. Furthermore, we found candidate genes for local adaptation, and rapid temporal allele frequency shifts involving coding genes since the 1980s, possibly due to selective harvesting. Our results highlight that genomic changes potentially impacting fitness can occur over short time scales and underline the need to track both deleterious and selectively advantageous genomic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Dussex
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway.
| | - Sara Kurland
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Remi-André Olsen
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-171 21, Solna, Sweden
| | - Göran Spong
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Göran Ericsson
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Robert Ekblom
- Wildlife Analysis Unit, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, SE-106 48, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nils Ryman
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Love Dalén
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda Laikre
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dussex N, Morales HE, Grossen C, Dalén L, van Oosterhout C. Purging and accumulation of genetic load in conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2023; 38:961-969. [PMID: 37344276 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Our ability to assess the threat posed by the genetic load to small and declining populations has been greatly improved by advances in genome sequencing and computational approaches. Yet, considerable confusion remains around the definitions of the genetic load and its dynamics, and how they impact individual fitness and population viability. We illustrate how both selective purging and drift affect the distribution of deleterious mutations during population size decline and recovery. We show how this impacts the composition of the genetic load, and how this affects the extinction risk and recovery potential of populations. We propose a framework to examine load dynamics and advocate for the introduction of load estimates in the management of endangered populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Dussex
- Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Erling Skakkes Gate 47A, 7012 Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Hernán E Morales
- Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christine Grossen
- WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Love Dalén
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cock van Oosterhout
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NR4 7TJ Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gaston KJ, Phillips BB, Soga M. Personalised ecology and the future of biodiversity. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. EXTINCTION 2023; 1:e18. [PMID: 40078673 PMCID: PMC11895722 DOI: 10.1017/ext.2023.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
The future of biodiversity lies not just in the strategies and mechanisms by which ecosystems and species are practically best protected from anthropogenic pressures. It lies also, and perhaps foremost, in the many billions of decisions that people make that, intentionally or otherwise, shape their impact on nature and the conservation policies and interventions that are implemented. Personalised ecology - the set of direct sensory interactions that each of us has with nature - is one important consideration in understanding the decisions that people make. Indeed, it has long been argued that people's personalised ecologies have powerful implications, as captured in such concepts as biophilia, extinction of experience and shifting baselines. In this paper, we briefly review the connections between personalised ecology and the future of biodiversity, and the ways in which personalised ecologies might usefully be enhanced to improve that future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J. Gaston
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
| | | | - Masashi Soga
- Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lloyd NA, Keating LM, Friesen AJ, Cole DM, McPherson JM, Akçakaya HR, Moehrenschlager A. Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2023; 37:e14051. [PMID: 36661059 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Over 1 million species around the world are at risk of extinction, and conservation organizations have to decide where to invest their limited resources. Cost-effectiveness can be increased by leveraging funding opportunities and increasing collaborative partnerships to achieve shared conservation goals. We devised a structured decision-making framework to prioritize species' conservation programs based on a cost-benefit analysis that takes collaborative opportunities into account in an examination of national and global conservation return on investment. Conservation benefit is determined by modifying the novel International Union for the Conservation of Nature Green Status for Species to provide an efficient, high-level measure that is comparable among species, even with limited information and time constraints. We applied this prioritization approach to the Wilder Institute/Calgary Zoo, Canada, a nonprofit organization seeking to increase the number of species it assists with conservation translocations. We sought to identify and prioritize additional species' programs for which conservation translocation expertise and actions could make the most impact. Estimating the likelihood of cost-sharing potential enabled total program cost to be distinguished from costs specific to the organization. Comparing a benefit-to-cost ratio on different geographic scales allowed decision makers to weigh alternative options for investing in new species' programs in a transparent and effective manner. Our innovative analysis aligns with general conservation planning frameworks and can be adapted for any organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A Lloyd
- Wilder Institute/Calgary Zoo, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- IUCN Species Survival Commission Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Dylan M Cole
- Wilder Institute/Calgary Zoo, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - H Resit Akçakaya
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- IUCN Species Survival Commission, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Axel Moehrenschlager
- Wilder Institute/Calgary Zoo, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- IUCN Species Survival Commission Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lamb CT, Willson R, Menzies AK, Owens-Beek N, Price M, McNay S, Otto SP, Hessami M, Popp JN, Hebblewhite M, Ford AT. Braiding Indigenous rights and endangered species law. Science 2023; 380:694-696. [PMID: 37200437 DOI: 10.1126/science.adg9830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Recovery targets fall short of culturally meaningful abundance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton T Lamb
- Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Wildlife Science Center-Biodiversity Pathways, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | | | - Allyson K Menzies
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Michael Price
- Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sarah P Otto
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mateen Hessami
- Wildlife Science Center-Biodiversity Pathways, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Jesse N Popp
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Hebblewhite
- Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Adam T Ford
- Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Wildlife Science Center-Biodiversity Pathways, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rodríguez-Caro RC, Graciá E, Blomberg SP, Cayuela H, Grace M, Carmona CP, Pérez-Mendoza HA, Giménez A, Salguero-Gómez R. Anthropogenic impacts on threatened species erode functional diversity in chelonians and crocodilians. Nat Commun 2023; 14:1542. [PMID: 36977697 PMCID: PMC10050202 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37089-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The Anthropocene is tightly associated with a drastic loss of species worldwide and the disappearance of their key ecosystem functions. The orders Testudines (turtles and tortoises) and Crocodilia (crocodiles, alligators, and gharials) contain numerous threatened, long-lived species for which the functional diversity and potential erosion by anthropogenic impacts remains unknown. Here, we examine 259 (69%) of the existing 375 species of Testudines and Crocodilia, quantifying their life history strategies (i.e., trade-offs in survival, development, and reproduction) from open-access data on demography, ancestry, and threats. We find that the loss of functional diversity in simulated extinction scenarios of threatened species is greater than expected by chance. Moreover, the effects of unsustainable local consumption, diseases, and pollution are associated with life history strategies. In contrast, climate change, habitat disturbance, and global trade affect species independent of their life history strategy. Importantly, the loss of functional diversity for threatened species by habitat degradation is twice that for all other threats. Our findings highlight the importance of conservation programmes focused on preserving the functional diversity of life history strategies jointly with the phylogenetic representativity of these highly threatened groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R C Rodríguez-Caro
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
- Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain.
- Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante, San Vicent del Raspeig, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
| | - E Graciá
- Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain
- Centro de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03312, Orihuela, Spain
| | - S P Blomberg
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - H Cayuela
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, F-769622, Villeurbanne, France
| | - M Grace
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - C P Carmona
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 50409, Tartu, Estonia
| | - H A Pérez-Mendoza
- Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Autónoma de México, 54090, Tlalnepantla, México
| | - A Giménez
- Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain
- Centro de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03312, Orihuela, Spain
| | - R Salguero-Gómez
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
- Max Plank Institute for Demographic Research, Konrad-Zuße Straße 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Exploring Old Data with New Tricks: Long-Term Monitoring Indicates Spatial and Temporal Changes in Populations of Sympatric Prairie Grouse in the Nebraska Sandhills. DIVERSITY 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/d15010114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The contiguous grasslands of the Sandhills region in Nebraska, USA, provide habitat for two sympatric, grassland-obligate species of grouse, the greater prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido pinnatus) and the plains sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesi). Collectively referred to as prairie grouse, these birds are monitored and managed jointly by wildlife practitioners who face the novel challenge of conserving historically allopatric species in shared range. We reconstructed region-wide and route-specific prairie grouse population trends in the Sandhills, using a 63-year timeseries of breeding ground counts aggregated from old reports and paper archives. Our objective was to repurpose historical data collected for harvest management to address questions pertinent to the conservation of prairie grouse, species whose populations have declined precipitously throughout their respective ranges. Because we cannot change the sampling protocol of historical data to answer new questions, we applied 3 different methods of data analysis—traditional regional mean counts used to adjust harvest regulations, spatially implicit, site-specific counts, and spatially explicit trends. Prairie-chicken populations have increased since the 1950s, whereas sharp-tailed grouse populations have remained stable or slightly declined. However, each species exhibited unique shifts in abundance and distribution over time, and regional indices masked important aspects of population change. Our findings indicate that legacy data have the capacity to tell new stories apart from the questions they were collected to answer. By integrating concepts from landscape ecology—a discipline that emerged decades after the collection of our count data began—we demonstrate the potential of historical data to address questions of modern-day conservation concern, using prairie grouse as a case study.
Collapse
|
28
|
Barnes AE, Davies JG, Martay B, Boersch-Supan PH, Harris SJ, Noble DG, Pearce-Higgins JW, Robinson RA. Rare and declining bird species benefit most from designating protected areas for conservation in the UK. Nat Ecol Evol 2023; 7:92-101. [PMID: 36471120 PMCID: PMC9834046 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01927-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There have been recent renewed commitments to increase the extent of protected areas to combat the growing biodiversity crisis but the underpinning evidence for their effectiveness is mixed and causal connections are rarely evaluated. We used data gathered by three large-scale citizen science programmes in the UK to provide the most comprehensive assessment to date of whether national (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) and European (Special Protection Areas/Special Areas of Conservation) designated areas are associated with improved state (occurrence, abundance), change (rates of colonization, persistence and trend in abundance), community structure and, uniquely, demography (productivity) on a national avifauna, while controlling for differences in land cover, elevation and climate. We found positive associations with state that suggest these areas are well targeted and that the greatest benefit accrued to the most conservation-dependent species since positive associations with change were largely restricted to rare and declining species and habitat specialists. We suggest that increased productivity provides a plausible demographic mechanism for positive effects of designation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. E. Barnes
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK
| | - J. G. Davies
- grid.11918.300000 0001 2248 4331British Trust for Ornithology (Scotland), Unit 15 Beta Centre, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, UK
| | - B. Martay
- grid.11918.300000 0001 2248 4331British Trust for Ornithology (Scotland), Unit 15 Beta Centre, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, UK
| | - P. H. Boersch-Supan
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK
| | - S. J. Harris
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK
| | - D. G. Noble
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK
| | - J. W. Pearce-Higgins
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - R. A. Robinson
- grid.423196.b0000 0001 2171 8108British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Galante PJ, Chang Triguero S, Paz A, Aiello‐Lammens M, Gerstner BE, Johnson BA, Kass JM, Merow C, Noguera‐Urbano EA, Pinilla‐Buitrago GE, Blair ME. changeRangeR
: An R package for reproducible biodiversity change metrics from species distribution estimates. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Galante
- Center for Biodiversity and Conservation American Museum of Natural History New York New York USA
| | - Samuel Chang Triguero
- Department of Environmental Studies and Science Pace University Pleasantville New York USA
| | - Andrea Paz
- Biology Department City College of New York, City University of New York New York New York USA
- Ph.D. Program in Biology, Graduate Center City University of New York New York New York USA
- Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland
| | - Matthew Aiello‐Lammens
- Department of Environmental Studies and Science Pace University Pleasantville New York USA
| | - Beth E. Gerstner
- Department of Fisheries & Wildlife and Ecology Evolution & Behavior Program, Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
| | - Bethany A. Johnson
- Biology Department City College of New York, City University of New York New York New York USA
| | - Jamie M. Kass
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University Okinawa Japan
| | - Cory Merow
- Eversource Energy Center University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut USA
| | | | - Gonzalo E. Pinilla‐Buitrago
- Biology Department City College of New York, City University of New York New York New York USA
- Ph.D. Program in Biology, Graduate Center City University of New York New York New York USA
| | - Mary E. Blair
- Center for Biodiversity and Conservation American Museum of Natural History New York New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Piloting development of species conservation action plans in Guinea. ORYX 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s0030605322000138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Conservation action plans need to be devised and implemented if we are to reduce the extinction risk faced by globally threatened plants. However, most plant species categorized as threatened globally on the IUCN Red List lack conservation action plans. In West Africa, Guinea is one of the most diverse countries in terms of botanical species. In total, 273 plant species in Guinea have been assessed as being threatened globally, reflecting increasing pressure from the extractive industry and a growing population requiring food and fuel. In parallel with the implementation of an Important Plant Area programme in Guinea, we developed conservation action plans for 20 threatened plant species through a pilot study. We outline the methods we used and demonstrate the importance of adopting a collaborative approach and having up-to-date field information. The need for such plans is urgent, with recent estimates suggesting that one-third of African plants are threatened with extinction. Based on our experience with the first 20 conservation action plans for Guinea species, we suggest that the preparation of multi-species conservation action plans would be an efficient use of the limited resources available for species conservation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bending the curve: Simple but massive conservation action leads to landscape-scale recovery of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2123070119. [PMID: 36215493 PMCID: PMC9586276 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2123070119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The global decline of amphibians is part of the global freshwater biodiversity crisis. In human-dominated landscapes, amphibian population declines are driven by multiple stressors. A better understanding of the benefits of conservation action can contribute to the halting and reversal of population declines. Our analysis of 20 y of monitoring data shows that the large-scale construction of hundreds of new ponds in northern Switzerland has halted or even reversed declining trends for the majority of amphibian species, including multiple Red-Listed species undergoing declines at the national level. This conservation success suggests that increasing habitat availability benefits threatened amphibian species despite the continued presence of stressors known to negatively affect populations. Success stories are rare in conservation science, hindered also by the research-implementation gap, where scientific insights rarely inform practice and practical implementation is rarely evaluated scientifically. Amphibian population declines, driven by multiple stressors, are emblematic of the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Habitat creation is a straightforward conservation action that has been shown to locally benefit amphibians, as well as other taxa, but does it benefit entire amphibian communities at large spatial scales? Here, we evaluate a landscape-scale pond-construction program by fitting dynamic occupancy models to 20 y of monitoring data for 12 pond-breeding amphibian species in the Swiss state Aargau, a densely populated area of the Swiss lowlands with intensive land use. After decades of population declines, the number of occupied ponds increased statewide for 10 out of 12 species, while one species remained stable and one species further declined between 1999 and 2019. Despite regional differences, in 77% of all 43 regional metapopulations, the colonization and subsequent occupation of new ponds stabilized (14%) or increased (63%) metapopulation size. Likely mechanisms include increased habitat availability, restoration of habitat dynamics, and increased connectivity between ponds. Colonization probabilities reflected species-specific preferences for characteristics of ponds and their surroundings, which provides evidence-based information for future pond construction targeting specific species. The relatively simple but landscape-scale and persistent conservation action of constructing hundreds of new ponds halted declines and stabilized or increased the state-wide population size of all but one species, despite ongoing pressures from other stressors in a human-dominated landscape.
Collapse
|
32
|
Cogoni D, Grace MK, Long B, Orsenigo S, Fenu G. The IUCN Green Status of Species: A Call for Mediterranean Botanists to Contribute to This New Ambitious Effort. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 11:2592. [PMID: 36235458 PMCID: PMC9572627 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In the Mediterranean Basin, a critical focal point for the conservation of plant diversity, there has been a large increase in practical conservation actions for many plant species to prevent extinction and to improve their conservation status; quantifying the effectiveness of these initiatives in reversing species declines is urgently important. In 2021, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) launched a new tool that allows the impact of conservation actions on plant species to be assessed. The Green Status of Species is a new set of metrics under the Red List of Threatened Species that assigns species to recovery categories, complementary to the classic extinction risk categories. Crucially, the Green Status of Species provides methods to evaluate the impact of past conservation, and the potential for future conservation impact, on species status and recovery in a standardized way. Considering the efforts made so far for the conservation of Mediterranean threatened plants, using the Green Status of Species would be highly useful to direct future conservation policies. We, therefore, encourage botanists and practitioners working on threatened plants in the Mediterranean area to use this new assessment tool to inform conservation and recovery programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Cogoni
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Via S. Ignazio da Laconi 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Molly K. Grace
- Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Barney Long
- Re: Wild, P.O. Box 129, Austin, TX 78767, USA
| | - Simone Orsenigo
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fenu
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Via S. Ignazio da Laconi 13, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jackson HA, Percival‐Alwyn L, Ryan C, Albeshr MF, Venturi L, Morales HE, Mathers TC, Cocker J, Speak SA, Accinelli GG, Barker T, Heavens D, Willman F, Dawson D, Ward L, Tatayah V, Zuël N, Young R, Concannon L, Whitford H, Clavijo B, Bunbury N, Tyler KM, Ruhomaun K, Grace MK, Bruford MW, Jones CG, Tollington S, Bell DJ, Groombridge JJ, Clark M, Van Oosterhout C. Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13918. [PMID: 35554972 PMCID: PMC9546124 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The pink pigeon (Nesoenas mayeri) is an endemic species of Mauritius that has made a remarkable recovery after a severe population bottleneck in the 1970s to early 1990s. Prior to this bottleneck, an ex situ population was established from which captive-bred individuals were released into free-living subpopulations to increase population size and genetic variation. This conservation rescue led to rapid population recovery to 400-480 individuals, and the species was twice downlisted on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. We analyzed the impacts of the bottleneck and genetic rescue on neutral genetic variation during and after population recovery (1993-2008) with restriction site-associated sequencing, microsatellite analyses, and quantitative genetic analysis of studbook data of 1112 birds from zoos in Europe and the United States. We used computer simulations to study the predicted changes in genetic variation and population viability from the past into the future. Genetic variation declined rapidly, despite the population rebound, and the effective population size was approximately an order of magnitude smaller than census size. The species carried a high genetic load of circa 15 lethal equivalents for longevity. Our computer simulations predicted continued inbreeding will likely result in increased expression of deleterious mutations (i.e., a high realized load) and severe inbreeding depression. Without continued conservation actions, it is likely that the pink pigeon will go extinct in the wild within 100 years. Conservation rescue of the pink pigeon has been instrumental in the recovery of the free-living population. However, further genetic rescue with captive-bred birds from zoos is required to recover lost variation, reduce expression of harmful deleterious variation, and prevent extinction. The use of genomics and modeling data can inform IUCN assessments of the viability and extinction risk of species, and it helps in assessments of the conservation dependency of populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel A. Jackson
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
| | | | - Camilla Ryan
- School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
- The Earlham InstituteNorwichUK
| | - Mohammed F. Albeshr
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
- Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Luca Venturi
- Department of Life SciencesThe Natural History MuseumLondonUK
| | | | | | - Jonathan Cocker
- The Earlham InstituteNorwichUK
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - Samuel A. Speak
- School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | | | | | | | - Faye Willman
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
| | - Deborah Dawson
- NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility, Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Lauren Ward
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
- NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility, Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | | | - Nicholas Zuël
- Mauritian Wildlife FoundationVacoas‐PhoenixMauritius
| | - Richard Young
- Durrell Wildlife Conservation TrustJerseyChannel Islands
| | | | | | | | - Nancy Bunbury
- Seychelles Islands FoundationVictoriaSeychelles
- Centre for Ecology and ConservationUniversity of ExeterPenrynUK
| | - Kevin M. Tyler
- Norwich Medical SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - Kevin Ruhomaun
- National Parks and Conservation Service, Ministry of EnvironmentGovernment of MauritiusRéduitMauritius
| | - Molly K. Grace
- Molly K. Grace, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Carl G. Jones
- Mauritian Wildlife FoundationVacoas‐PhoenixMauritius
- Durrell Wildlife Conservation TrustJerseyChannel Islands
| | - Simon Tollington
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
- NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility, Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- North of England Zoological SocietyChester ZooChesterUK
| | - Diana J. Bell
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - Jim J. Groombridge
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and ConservationUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
| | - Matt Clark
- The Earlham InstituteNorwichUK
- Department of Life SciencesThe Natural History MuseumLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rønsted N, Walsh SK, Clark M, Edmonds M, Flynn T, Heintzman S, Loomis A, Lorence D, Nagendra U, Nyberg B, Opgenorth M, Weisenberger L, Williams A, Wolkis D, Wood KR, Keir M. Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13896. [PMID: 35146804 PMCID: PMC9544520 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN Red List) is the world's most comprehensive information source on the global conservation status of species. Governmental agencies and conservation organizations increasingly rely on IUCN Red List assessments to develop conservation policies and priorities. Funding agencies use the assessments as evaluation criteria, and researchers use meta-analysis of red-list data to address fundamental and applied conservation science questions. However, the circa 143,000 IUCN assessments represent a fraction of the world's biodiversity and are biased in regional and organismal coverage. These biases may affect conservation priorities, funding, and uses of these data to understand global patterns. Isolated oceanic islands are characterized by high endemicity, but the unique biodiversity of many islands is experiencing high extinction rates. The archipelago of Hawaii has one of the highest levels of endemism of any floristic region; 90% of its 1367 native vascular plant taxa are classified as endemic. We used the IUCN's assessment of the complete single-island endemic (SIE) vascular plant flora of Kauai, Hawaii, to assess the proportion and drivers of decline of threatened plants in an oceanic island setting. We compared the IUCN assessments with federal, state, and other local assessments of Kauai species or taxa of conservation concern. Finally, we conducted a preliminary assessment for all 1044 native vascular plants of Hawaii based on IUCN criterion B by estimating area of occupancy, extent of occurrence, and number of locations to determine whether the pattern found for the SIE vascular flora of Kauai is comparable to the native vascular flora of the Hawaiian Islands. We compared our results with patterns observed for assessments of other floras. According to IUCN, 256 SIE vascular plant taxa are threatened with extinction and 5% are already extinct. This is the highest extinction risk reported for any flora to date. The preliminary assessment of the native vascular flora of Hawaii showed that 72% (753 taxa) is threatened. The flora of Hawaii may be one of the world's most threatened; thus, increased and novel conservation measures in the state and on other remote oceanic islands are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Rønsted
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
- Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Seana K. Walsh
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
- Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | | | - Tim Flynn
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
| | - Scott Heintzman
- Plant Extinction Prevention ProgramUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | | | | | - Uma Nagendra
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
| | - Ben Nyberg
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
- Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Michael Opgenorth
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
- Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Lauren Weisenberger
- Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife OfficeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServicesHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | - Adam Williams
- Division of Forestry and WildlifeState of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural ResourcesHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | - Dustin Wolkis
- National Tropical Botanical GardenKalaheoHawaiiUSA
- Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Matthew Keir
- Division of Forestry and WildlifeState of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural ResourcesHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cox N, Young BE, Bowles P, Fernandez M, Marin J, Rapacciuolo G, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Hedges SB, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoffmann M, Jenkins RKB, Tognelli MF, Alexander GJ, Allison A, Ananjeva NB, Auliya M, Avila LJ, Chapple DG, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Cogger HG, Colli GR, de Silva A, Eisemberg CC, Els J, Fong G A, Grant TD, Hitchmough RA, Iskandar DT, Kidera N, Martins M, Meiri S, Mitchell NJ, Molur S, Nogueira CDC, Ortiz JC, Penner J, Rhodin AGJ, Rivas GA, Rödel MO, Roll U, Sanders KL, Santos-Barrera G, Shea GM, Spawls S, Stuart BL, Tolley KA, Trape JF, Vidal MA, Wagner P, Wallace BP, Xie Y. A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods. Nature 2022; 605:285-290. [PMID: 35477765 PMCID: PMC9095493 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04664-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Comprehensive assessments of species’ extinction risks have documented the extinction crisis1 and underpinned strategies for reducing those risks2. Global assessments reveal that, among tetrapods, 40.7% of amphibians, 25.4% of mammals and 13.6% of birds are threatened with extinction3. Because global assessments have been lacking, reptiles have been omitted from conservation-prioritization analyses that encompass other tetrapods4–7. Reptiles are unusually diverse in arid regions, suggesting that they may have different conservation needs6. Here we provide a comprehensive extinction-risk assessment of reptiles and show that at least 1,829 out of 10,196 species (21.1%) are threatened—confirming a previous extrapolation8 and representing 15.6 billion years of phylogenetic diversity. Reptiles are threatened by the same major factors that threaten other tetrapods—agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species—although the threat posed by climate change remains uncertain. Reptiles inhabiting forests, where these threats are strongest, are more threatened than those in arid habitats, contrary to our prediction. Birds, mammals and amphibians are unexpectedly good surrogates for the conservation of reptiles, although threatened reptiles with the smallest ranges tend to be isolated from other threatened tetrapods. Although some reptiles—including most species of crocodiles and turtles—require urgent, targeted action to prevent extinctions, efforts to protect other tetrapods, such as habitat preservation and control of trade and invasive species, will probably also benefit many reptiles. An extinction-risk assessment of reptiles shows that at least 21.1% of species are threatened by factors such as agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species, and that efforts to protect birds, mammals and amphibians probably also benefit many reptiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Cox
- Biodiversity Assessment Unit, IUCN-Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Philip Bowles
- Biodiversity Assessment Unit, IUCN-Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.,Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation and Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.,Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia
| | - Julie Marin
- Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, IAME, Bobigny, France
| | - Giovanni Rapacciuolo
- Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Monika Böhm
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| | - Thomas M Brooks
- IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.,World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of The Philippines, Los Baños, The Philippines.,Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - S Blair Hedges
- Center for Biodiversity, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Craig Hilton-Taylor
- Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, IUCN, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Conservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| | - Richard K B Jenkins
- Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team, IUCN, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marcelo F Tognelli
- Biodiversity Assessment Unit, IUCN-Conservation International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Graham J Alexander
- Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Natalia B Ananjeva
- Department of Herpetology, Zoological Institute, St Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Mark Auliya
- Department of Herpetology, Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Luciano Javier Avila
- Grupo Herpetología Patagónica (GHP-LASIBIBE), Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales (IPEEC-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Argentina
| | - David G Chapple
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Diego F Cisneros-Heredia
- Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Museo de Zoología, Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical iBIOTROP, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador.,Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Harold G Cogger
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Guarino R Colli
- Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Anslem de Silva
- South Asia Regional Office, Crocodile Specialist Group, Gampols, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Johannes Els
- Environment and Protected Areas Authority, Government of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ansel Fong G
- Centro Oriental de Ecosistemas y Biodiversidad (BIOECO), Museo de Historia Natural "Tomás Romay", Santiago de Cuba, Cuba
| | - Tandora D Grant
- Conservation Science & Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Noriko Kidera
- Department of Biosphere-Geosphere Science, Okayama University of Science, Okayama, Japan.,National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Marcio Martins
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Shai Meiri
- School of Zoology & the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nicola J Mitchell
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Ortiz
- Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Johannes Penner
- Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Gilson A Rivas
- Museo de Biología, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela
| | - Mark-Oliver Rödel
- Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uri Roll
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel
| | - Kate L Sanders
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Glenn M Shea
- Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney School of Veterinary Science B01, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Bryan L Stuart
- Section of Research & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Krystal A Tolley
- Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Marcela A Vidal
- Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile
| | | | | | - Yan Xie
- Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tierney DA. Linking restoration to the
IUCN
red list for ecosystems: A case study of how we might track the Earth's ecosystems. AUSTRAL ECOL 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/aec.13168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Tierney
- Conservation and Restoration Science Department of Planning and Environment Parramatta New South Wales 2150 Australia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales 2006 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals. Nat Rev Genet 2022; 23:492-503. [PMID: 35136196 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00448-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Genetic variation, which is generated by mutation, recombination and gene flow, can reduce the mean fitness of a population, both now and in the future. This 'genetic load' has been estimated in a wide range of animal taxa using various approaches. Advances in genome sequencing and computational techniques now enable us to estimate the genetic load in populations and individuals without direct fitness estimates. Here, we review the classic and contemporary literature of genetic load. We describe approaches to quantify the genetic load in whole-genome sequence data based on evolutionary conservation and annotations. We show that splitting the load into its two components - the realized load (or expressed load) and the masked load (or inbreeding load) - can improve our understanding of the population genetics of deleterious mutations.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kraus D, Murphy S, Armitage D. Ten bridges on the road to recovering Canada’s endangered species. Facets (Ott) 2021. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Wildlife is declining around the world. Many developed nations have enacted legislation on endangered species protection and provide funding for wildlife recovery. Protecting endangered species is also supported by the public and judiciary. Yet, despite what appear as enabling conditions, wild species continue to decline. Our paper explores pathways to endangered species recovery by analyzing the barriers that have been identified in Canada, the United States, and Australia. We summarize these findings based on Canada’s Species at Risk Conservation Cycle (assessment, protection, recovery planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation) and then identify 10 “bridges” that could help overcome these barriers and bend our current trajectory of wildlife loss to recovery. These bridges include ecosystem approaches to recovery, building capacity for community co-governance, linking wildlife recovery to ecosystem services, and improving our storytelling about the loss and recovery of wildlife. The focus of our conclusions is the Canadian setting, but our findings can be applied in other national and subnational settings to reverse the decline of wildlife and halt extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kraus
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
- Nature Conservancy of Canada, 245 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 410, Toronto, ON M4P 3J1, Canada
| | - Stephen Murphy
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Derek Armitage
- Faculty of Environment, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Environment 2, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|