Disturbances of acquired immunity in hemodialysis patients

Association Between Telomere Shortening and Erythropoietin Resistance in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis

The relationship between telomere shortening and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has recently been investigated. Although most patients respond adequately to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), approximately 10% do not, and this is referred to as ESA resistance. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between telomere shortening and erythropoietin resistance in patients with CKD on hemodialysis. This cross-sectional, comparative, analytical, and observational study was conducted in patients of both sexes over 18 years of age diagnosed with CKD. Two groups of patients were identified. The first group consisted of 40 patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with erythropoietin resistance. The second group consisted of 40 patients with the same characteristics but without erythropoietin resistance. Telomere length was measured by real-time PCR. Eighty patients were included in the study. Mean hemoglobin levels were lower in the erythropoietin resistance group (8.8 ± 1.67 vs. 11.95 ± 1.81, p = 0.001). Differences were observed in hematocrit and albumin levels, which were lower in patients with erythropoietin resistance, while PTH levels were higher in this group (788 ± 538.47 vs. 535.65 ± 603.06, p = 0.001). A significant difference in telomere length (T/S) was observed between the two groups, with shorter telomere length in the erythropoietin resistance group (0.45 ± 0.04 vs. 0.56 ± 0.03, p = 0.01). Telomere shortening may be associated with anemia and erythropoietin resistance in patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis. This relationship suggests the need to explore whether telomere length recovery improves the response to ESAs.

Homemade formulas for nutrition support in chronic kidney disease: A narrative review of the opportunity for education, research, and innovation

Protein-energy wasting is common in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in those undergoing kidney replacement therapy. Oral nutrition supplements and enteral nutrition are strategies that have been shown to improve nutrition status, and potentially outcomes. However, access to specialized commercial products for people with CKD is limited by factors including cost and regional availability. Homemade formulas represent a potentially cheaper, accessible, and more flexible option than commercial products, but they come with their own unique set of challenges. Furthermore, some aspects of homemade products, including consistency of nutrients, physical properties, and food safety, may pose challenges in the context of physiological changes that occur in CKD. Despite evidence of their use in CKD clinics, there have been few studies using homemade formulas in this population. This narrative review article summarizes the available literature on the potential usage, benefits, and concerns related to homemade formulas, emphasizing the unique challenges in people with CKD. Given the potential usage and limited research on homemade formulas in people with CKD, additional education and research are warranted to optimize the use of these tools in this clinical population.

Risk of infections related to endovascular catheters and cardiac implantable devices in hemodialysis patients

Patients requiring dialysis are extremely vulnerable to infectious diseases. The high burden of comorbidities and weakened immune system due to uremia and previous immunosuppressive therapy expose the patient on dialysis to more infectious events than the general population. The infectious risk is further increased by the presence of endovascular catheters and implantable cardiologic devices. The former is generally placed as urgent vascular access for dialysis and in subjects requiring hemodialysis treatments without autogenous arteriovenous fistula. The high frequency of cardiovascular events also increases the likelihood of implanting indwelling implantable cardiac devices (CIED) such as pacemakers (PMs) and defibrillators (ICDs). The simultaneous presence of CVC and CIED yields an increased risk of developing severe prosthetic device-associated bloodstream infections often progressing to septicemia. Although, antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of prosthetic device-related infections, antibiotic resistance of biofilm-residing bacteria reduces the choice of infection eradication. In these cases, the resolution of the infection process relies on the removal of the prosthetic device. Compared to CVC removal, the extraction of leads is a more complex procedure and poses an increased risk of vessel tearing. As a result, the prevention of prosthetic device-related infection is of utmost importance in hemodialysis (HD) patients and relies principally on avoiding CVC as vascular access for HD and placement of a new class of wireless implantable medical devices. When the combination of CVC and CIED is inevitable, prevention of infection, mainly due translocation of skin bacteria, should be a mandatory priority for healthcare workers.

Unique Pathological Findings of Polarized Calcium Oxalate Crystals in Spondylodiscitis of an ESRD Hemodialysis Patient: A Case Report

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing chronic hemodialysis are at an increased risk of developing spondylodiscitis, an infectious condition affecting the vertebral column. In this case report, we present a 22-year-old male with ESRD, a history of hyperoxaluria, nephrolithiasis, and anemia, who developed spondylodiscitis. Notably, pathological examination of tissue samples obtained during surgical intervention revealed the presence of polarized calcium oxalate crystals within the lumbar laminae and spinal discs, a rare finding in this clinical context. The deposition of these crystals may have contributed to the development and progression of spondylodiscitis by creating an environment conducive to bacterial growth and infection. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive pathological assessment in ESRD patients with spondylodiscitis, as it may uncover uncommon manifestations that could have implications for disease management. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this rare presentation and its impact on the clinical course and treatment of spondylodiscitis in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Network Analysis of Dysregulated Immune Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients

INTRODUCTION

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) results in immune dysfunction that is characterized by both systemic inflammation and immune incompetence, leading to impaired responses to vaccination.

METHODS

To unravel the complex regulatory immune interplay in ESRD, we performed the network-based transcriptomic profiling of ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and matched healthy controls (HCs) who received the two-dose regimen of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2.

RESULTS

Co-expression networks based on blood transcription modules (BTMs) of genes differentially expressed between the HD and HC groups revealed co-expression patterns that were highly similar between the two groups but weaker in magnitude in the HD compared to HC subjects. These networks also showed weakened coregulation between BTMs within the dendritic cell (DC) family as well as with other BTM families involved with innate immunity. The gene regulatory networks of the most enriched BTMs, likewise, highlighted weakened targeting by transcription factors of key genes implicated in DC, natural killer (NK) cell, and T cell activation and function. The computational deconvolution of immune cell populations further bolstered these findings with discrepant proportions of conventional DC subtypes, NK T cells, and CD8+ T cells in HD subjects relative to HCs.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, our results indicate that constitutive inflammation in ESRD compromises the activation of DCs and NK cells, and, ultimately, their mediation of downstream lymphocytes, leading to a delayed but intact immune response to mRNA vaccination.

Challenges in Diagnosing Varicella-Zoster Virus Encephalitis in an Immunocompromised Patient

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a virus of the alphaherpesvirus family that is one of the common causes of infectious encephalitis worldwide, especially among those who are immunocompromised. In this case report, we discuss a case of a 55-year-old female with end-stage renal disease presenting with altered mental status and weakness. She was recently diagnosed with herpes zoster on oral acyclovir and multiple scattered dermatomal rashes on presentation. Cerebral spinal fluid analysis showed neutrophilic pleocytosis, high glucose and protein, and anti-VZV Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. She was started on treatment early with acyclovir and demonstrated good clinical improvement afterward two weeks. This case highlights to importance of performing lumbar puncture and looking for anti-VZV antibodies to rule out encephalitis in patients with altered mental status and starting acyclovir treatment early.

Altered transcriptomic immune responses of maintenance hemodialysis patients to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine

Background

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

Methods

The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

Results

Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

Conclusions

Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD.

Funding

F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.

Fulminant Eye Infection in a Patient With Nephrotic Syndrome: A Case Report

This case report presents the clinical course of a 53-year-old male farmer with nephrotic syndrome, specifically focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, who developed a fulminant eye infection. While receiving maintenance hemodialysis and immunosuppressive therapy, the patient presented with sudden onset redness, discharge, and decreased vision in his right eye. Initial management with topical antibiotics and steroids failed to halt the progression of the infection, leading to corneal perforation and iris prolapse within a few days. Despite the discontinuation of immunosuppressive medications and initiation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, the patient's compromised renal function and anaemia precluded surgical intervention. This case underscores the challenges in managing severe ocular infections in immunocompromised patients. It highlights the importance of early recognition, aggressive antimicrobial therapy, and close ophthalmologic monitoring in preventing sight-threatening complications. Despite intensive management, the prognosis for visual recovery in such cases may be poor, emphasizing the need for preventive strategies and careful surveillance in high-risk patient populations.

Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate with prostate cancer risk in a cross-ethnic population: a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a causal relationship exists between the estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR) and the occurrence of prostate cancer in East Asian and European populations and to determine if genetic factors influence the association between the EGFR and prostate cancer risk.

METHODS

In this Mendelian randomization study, the existence of a causal relationship between the EGFR and prostate cancer occurrence was assessed using five analytical techniques, including Mendelian randomization-Egger regression (MR-Egger), calculation of the weighted median estimator (WME), the maximum likelihood ratio method, the linear median weighting method and the random-effects inverse-variance weighting (IVW) method.

RESULTS

In the IVW model, no causal relationship was observed between the EGFR and prostate cancer in either the East Asian or European populations.

CONCLUSIONS

After excluding confounding factors and reverse causal associations using two-sample Mendelian randomization, unbiased estimates were obtained, and there was no causal relationship between prostate cancer and the EGFR in the East Asian or European populations. Therefore, for patients with suspected prostate cancer, it is considered unnecessary to improve the detection of glomerular filtration rate, which will effectively reduce the economic burden of patients.

Efficacy of vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis

SARS-CoV-2 has had a great impact on world health, patients on hemodialysis have a higher rate of infection and death due to COVID-19. Vaccination is important to control infection and improve the prognosis of infected patients. To describe the efficacy of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Chilean patients on hemodialysis during the year 2021. Retrospective observational study. A total of 9,712 clinical records were reviewed. Data were presented as summary measures. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariate logistic regression were used for the analysis. Risk and survival analysis were calculated, considering a statistical significance of less than 0.05. The average age of the patients attended was 61.5 ± 14.6 years. Average time on dialysis 67.6 months and 35.0% diabetic. 93.2% of patients were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, 70.7% of them received booster doses. The risk of infection was higher for those who received one or no dose, compared to those who received booster doses against SARS-CoV-2: OR = 252.46 [165.13; 401.57]. Of the infected patients, 15.7% died from COVID-19. The risk of death was higher in unvaccinated or single-dose patients compared to those vaccinated with two doses: OR = 2.64 [2.23; 3.12]. Patients with two doses and a booster had a longer survival compared to those who received one or no dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (p < .05). The vaccination in Chile, which started in February 2021, has demonstrated that booster doses against SARS-CoV-2 significantly reduced the risk of infection, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19 in patients on hemodialysis.

Impaired humoral immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide health problem. We aimed in this study to investigate the humoral immune response derived to HBV vaccine following completing the vaccine series in Madinah. Two hundred and two Saudi hemodialysis (HD) patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Mean concentration of Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) was significantly higher among patients who received the vaccination twice compared to patients who received the vaccination only after starting hemodialysis (252 ± 489 mIU/mL vs. 144 ± 327 mIU/mL, respectively, p = 0.008). Almost half of the study sample were non-protected and showed anti-HBs concentration < 10 mlU/mL. In contrast, 20.3% (n = 41) were identified as poor responders (10-100 mlU/mL) and only 28.2% (n = 57) were identified as good responders (10-100 mlU/mL). However, the latter two groups were accounted as protected (48.5%, n = 98). Patients sex was associated with anti-HBs concentration (non-responders; poor responders; good responders), where significantly higher proportion of good responders were females compared to males (p = 0.007). In conclusion, HBV vaccine is efficient to elicit humoral immune response in hemodialysis patients.

Dialysis Patients Respond Adequately to Influenza Vaccination Irrespective of Dialysis Modality and Chronic Inflammation

(1) Background: Chronic inflammation and suboptimal immune responses to vaccinations are considered to be aspects of immune dysregulation in patients that are undergoing dialysis. The present study aimed to evaluate immune responses in hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) patients to a seasonal inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IQIV). (2) Methods: We enrolled 172 chronic dialysis patients (87 on HD and 85 on OL-HDF) and 18 control subjects without chronic kidney disease in a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Participants were vaccinated with a seasonal IQIV, and antibody titers using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay were determined before vaccination (month 0) and 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter. Demographics and inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, IL-1β) were recorded at month 0. The primary endpoints were the rates of seroresponse (SR), defined as a four-fold increase in the HI titer, and seroprotection (SP), defined as HI titer ≥ 1/40 throughout the study period. Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 3.6.3) statistical software. The differences between groups were analyzed using chi-square and t-test analyses for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. To identify independent determinants of SR and SP, generalized linear models were built with response or protection per virus strain as the dependent variable and group, age, sex, time (month 0, 1, 3, 6), diabetes, IL-6, dialysis vintage, HD access, and HDF volume as independent explanatory variables. (3) Results: SR and SP rates were similar between control subjects, and dialysis patients were not affected by dialysis modality. SP rates were high (> 70%) at the beginning of the study and practically reached 100% after vaccination in all study groups. These results applied to all four virus strains that were included in the IQIV. IL-6 levels significantly differed between study groups, with HD patients displaying the highest values, but this did not affect SP rates. (4) Conclusions: Dialysis patients respond to influenza immunization adequately and similarly to the general population. Thus, annual vaccination policies should be encouraged in dialysis units. OL-HDF reduces chronic inflammation; however, this has no impact on SR rates.

Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Dialysis Dependent Recipients by Induction Type in the United States

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between induction type for a second kidney transplant in dialysis-dependent recipients and the long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all second kidney transplant recipients who returned to dialysis before re-transplantation. Exclusion criteria included: missing, unusual, or no-induction regimens, maintenance regimens other than tacrolimus and mycophenolate, and positive crossmatch status. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: the anti-thymocyte group (N = 9899), the alemtuzumab group (N = 1982), and the interleukin 2 receptor antagonist group (N = 1904). We analyzed recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) using the Kaplan-Meier survival function with follow-up censored at 10 years post-transplant. We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between induction and the outcomes of interest. To account for the center-specific effect, we included the center as a random effect. We adjusted the models for the pertinent recipient and organ variables.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier analyses, induction type did not alter recipient survival (log-rank P = .419) or DCGS (log-rank P = .146). Similarly, in the adjusted models, induction type was not a predictor of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys were associated with better recipient survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.65, 0.83], P < .001) and graft survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.64, 0.82], P < .001). Publicly insured recipients had worse recipient and allograft outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of average immunologic-risk dialysis-dependent second kidney transplant recipients, who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance, induction type did not influence the long-term outcomes of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys improved recipient and graft survival.

Spondylodiscitis in a Patient Undergoing Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Presenting to a Chiropractor: Case Report and a Review of the Literature

Spondylodiscitis is a rare but severe condition characterized by spinal and paraspinal infections that will present to healthcare providers, including chiropractors, because of neck pain. Patients who undergo peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease or have a complex medical history may present with musculoskeletal complaints with complicated and uncommon underlying causes. This report reviews the possible relationship between spinal infection and dialysis, as well as the role of the chiropractor in identifying and managing critical conditions. A 66-year-old Asian man undergoing peritoneal dialysis presented to a chiropractic clinic with pain in the left arm. The patient did not present with a fever. Upon examination, the upper limb muscle strength and reflexes were diminished. Neck pain was also experienced during the range of motion examination, and movement was limited in all directions. Magnetic resonance imaging was ordered. The patient was diagnosed with acute spondylodiscitis. Due to its nonspecific presentation, patients with severe and urgent cases, such as spondylodiscitis, may present to chiropractic offices to seek conservative treatment of pain symptoms. This report highlights the potential role of chiropractors in the early detection and management of complex conditions such as spondylodiscitis in patients on chronic dialysis.

Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in haemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study

End-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis (HD) have been largely excluded from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials due to safety reasons and shown to mount lower responses to vaccination. This study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine among HD patients compared to healthy controls. All subjects who received the primary inactivated COVID-19 vaccination had their blood samples tested 21 days after the second dose. We report the immunogenicity based on anti-RBD IgG titre (IU/mL), the inhibition rate of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) (%) to RBD, and seroconversion rates. Adverse events were assessed within 30 min and on the 7th day after each dose. Among 75 HD patients and 71 healthy controls, we observed no significant difference in all immunogenicity measures: anti-RBD IgG GMT (277.91 ± 7.13 IU/mL vs. 315.50 ± 3.50 IU/mL, p = 0.645), NAbs inhibition rate (82% [53-96] vs. 84% [39-98], p = 0.654), and seroconversion rates (anti-RBD IgG: 86.7% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.895; NAbs: 45.3% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.065). The number of adverse events is not significantly different between the two groups. The primary inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination elicits an adequate antibody response and can be safely administered in haemodialysis patients.

Immune response of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost regimens with adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients

Due to rare but major adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca adenoviral ChAdOx1-S-nCoV-19 vaccine (ChAd), German health authorities recommended adults under 60 who received one dose of ChAd, to receive a second dose of the BioNTech mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (BNT) as a booster. Studies in the general population suggest an enhanced efficacy of the heterologous (ChAd-BNT) compared to the homologous (BNT-BNT) vaccination regimen. However, an analysis of the efficacy in patient populations with a high risk of severe COVID-19 due to acquired immunodeficiency is still missing. We therefore compared both vaccination regimens in healthy controls, patients with gynecological tumors after chemotherapy, patients on dialysis and patients with rheumatic diseases concerning the humoral and cellular immune response. The humoral and cellular immune response differed substantially in healthy controls compared to patients with acquired immunodeficiency. Overall, the most significant differences between the two immunization regimens were found in neutralizing antibodies. These were always higher after a heterologous immunization. Healthy controls responded well to both vaccination regimens. However, the formation of neutralizing antibodies was more pronounced after a heterologous immunization. Dialysis patients, on the other hand, only developed an adequate humoral and particularly cellular immune response after a heterologous immunization. Tumor and rheumatic patients also - to a weaker extent compared to dialysis patients - benefited from a heterologous immunization. In conclusion, the heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens (ChAd-BNT) seem to have an advantage over the homologous vaccination regimens, especially in immunocompromised patients such as patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with hemodialysis.

Enhancing Immune Protection in Hemodialysis Patients: Role of the Polymethyl Methacrylate Membrane

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is characterized by deep disorders in both innate and adaptive immune systems that imply unbalance deactivation and immunosuppression. The central, widely recognized factors responsible for this immune dysregulation are uremia, uremic toxin retention, hemodialysis membrane biocompatibility, and related cardiovascular complications. Recently, several studies strengthened the concept that dialysis membranes are not considered as a simple diffusive/adsorptive device but as a platform to personalize a dialysis approach to improve the quality of life of ESRD patients. Therefore, understanding of the molecules associated with altered immune response is crucial and could lead to therapeutically intervention or adaptation of the dialysis procedure itself for the management of immunological dysfunction of ESRD patients. The polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based membrane is characterized by a symmetrical structure with large-sized pores, providing a better hydrophobic and cationic adsorption capacity compared to the other synthetic membranes. Together with hydrophobic interactions, the high adsorption rate of cytokines (i.e., IL-6) can also be enhanced by the size of nano-pores placed on the membrane surface. PMMA membranes exhibit adsorptive properties for a large amount of uremic toxins including p-cresol and indoxyl sulfate, as well as β2-microglobulin characterized by higher molecular weight, maintaining the diffusive clearance of small molecules like urea with a great biocompatibility. Besides exerting a strong anti-inflammatory effects in line with the improvement of immune responses in patients undergoing dialysis, PMMA also plays a role in modulating adaptive immune response, i.e., can clear blood from soluble CD40, a natural antagonist of the CD40/CD40L signaling that acts inhibiting immunoglobulin production by B cells. This review provides an overview of the main concepts and current understanding of immune dysfunction in hemodialysis and summarizes the recent findings regarding PMMA-based dialysis as potential strategy to restore immune balance in ESRD patients.

The Potential Modulatory Effects of Exercise on Skeletal Muscle Redox Status in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global health burden with high mortality and health costs. CKD patients exhibit lower cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, strongly associated with morbidity/mortality, which is exacerbated when they reach the need for renal replacement therapies (RRT). Muscle wasting in CKD has been associated with an inflammatory/oxidative status affecting the resident cells' microenvironment, decreasing repair capacity and leading to atrophy. Exercise may help counteracting such effects; however, the molecular mechanisms remain uncertain. Thus, trying to pinpoint and understand these mechanisms is of particular interest. This review will start with a general background about myogenesis, followed by an overview of the impact of redox imbalance as a mechanism of muscle wasting in CKD, with focus on the modulatory effect of exercise on the skeletal muscle microenvironment.

Evaluation of T helper17 as skeletal homeostasis factor in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and T helper cells of end-stage renal disease cases with impaired parathyroid hormone

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure is mainly connected with high and low parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and immunological impairments. The present study aimed to evaluate T helper 17 (Th17) cells as a crucial modulator of the immune system and skeletal homeostasis in hemodialysis patients with impaired intact PTH (iPTH).

METHODS

In this research, blood samples were taken from ESRD patients with high (> 300 pg/mL), normal (150-300 pg/mL), and low (< 150 pg/mL) serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH( levels (n = 30 in each group). The frequency of Th17 (CD4⁺ IL17⁺) cells was evaluated by flow cytometry in each group. The expression levels of Th17 cell-related master transcription factors, cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and Th cells, and the level of the mentioned cytokines were determined in the supernatant of PBMCs.

RESULTS

The number of Th17 cells remarkably increased in subjects with high iPTH against low and normal iPTH. Also, RORɣt and STAT3 levels were significantly higher in high iPTH ESRD patients than in other groups in the expression of mRNA and protein levels. These findings are confirmed by evaluating the IL-17 and IL-23 in the supernatant of cultured PBMCs and isolated Th cells.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that increased serum PTH levels in hemodialysis cases may be involved in increasing the differentiation of CD4 + cells to Th17 cells in PBMC.

Molecular epidemiology and associated risk factors of oral cavity parasites in hemodialysis patients in western Iran

Renal disorders are able to make patients more susceptible to infections, including those caused oral cavity infections. Today, it has been proven that during end stage renal failure, hemodialysis results in acquired immune response defects through failings of humoral and cell-mediated immune. This survey was intended to assess the molecular epidemiology and associated risk factors of Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax as the main oral cavity protozoa in hemodialysis patients in Lorestan Province, western Iran. The investigation was performed on 73 hemodialysis patients referring to hemodialysis centers of Lorestan Province, Iran during May 2021 to February 2022. The frequency of oral cavity protozoa was investigated using microscopic and conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A provided questionnaire with a number of demographical information and related risk factors was completed for each patient. The results showed that E. gingivalis and T. tenax parasites were found in 18 (24.6%) and 20 (27.4%) of the hemodialysis participants by microscopic and PCR test, respectively. Among samples, 13 (17.8%) of the hemodialysis participants were infected with E. gingivalis; whereas 7 (9.6%) of the participants were positive for T. tenax. No significant association was reported between gender, age, education, flossing, use of mouthwash, and prevalence of oral protozoa in hemodialysis participants. However, a significant correlation was observed among between living in rural regions (OR = 13.16; 95% CI = 2.64-56.81; p = 0.002), brushing teeth (OR = 8.51; 95% CI = 1.71-42.3; p = 0.009) and prevalence of oral protozoa in hemodialysis participants. The findings of these epidemiological study clearly showed the high frequency of oral cavity parasites in hemodialysis patients in Lorestan Province, Western Iran. Awareness of the main risk factors for oral cavity parasites particularly teeth brushing is necessary in refining public and oral health policies in hemodialysis patients. Consequently, dental practitioners, nephrologist, and urologist must be alert of these risk factors to carefully identify and achieve oral health concerns in hemodialysis patients to prevent the oral diseases and infections.

Outcomes of vaccinations against respiratory diseases in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Due to the nature of the disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients suffer from dysfunction of the adaptive immune system, which leads to a poorer response to vaccination. Accordingly, it is crucial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of management strategies, including vaccinations, which could potentially reduce the risk of respiratory diseases, such as pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19, and its associated outcomes. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases using designated MeSH keywords. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was investigated using forest plots and I2 statistics. This systematic review included a total of 48 studies, with 13 studies of influenza (H1N1 and H3N2) vaccination and 35 studies of COVID-19 vaccination. H1N1 vaccination in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis induced lower seroconversion rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56-0.68, p <0.00001) and lower seroprotection rates (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, p <0.00001) compared to controls. H3N2 vaccination in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis yielded lower seroconversion rates (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85, p <0.00001) and lower seroprotection rates (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, p <0.00001) compared to controls. Twenty-nine studies demonstrate significantly lower antibody levels in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis compared to the controls following COVID-19 vaccination. This review presents evidence of lower seroconversion and seroprotection rates after vaccination against viral respiratory diseases in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Since hemodialysis patients are more susceptible to infection and severe disease progression, a weakened yet substantial serological response can be considered adequate to recommend vaccination against respiratory diseases in this population. Vaccination dose, schedule, or strategy adjustments should be considered in stable ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Trial registration: Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021255983, identifier: CRD42021255983.

Immune response to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis patients: cohort study

Background

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

Methods

A transcriptomic analysis of the immune response to the Covid-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and seven days after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-Spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified six months after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

Results

Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with predominant T cell activity in controls one week after the first vaccination dose, compared to predominant myeloid cell activity in HD at this time point. HD demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p < 0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at six months in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

Conclusion

Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance hemodialysis subjects (HD) comparable to healthy controls (HC) and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-Spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of end stage renal disease (ESRD).

Funding

F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.

Leucine-enriched amino acid supplementation and exercise to prevent sarcopenia in patients on hemodialysis: a single-arm pilot study

Background

Sarcopenia, which is strongly associated with mortality and quality of life, occurs in up to 40% of hemodialysis patients. Here, we investigated the preventive effects of leucine-enriched amino acid supplementation and resistance exercise in non-sarcopenic hemodialysis patients, and characterized the biochemical and immunophenotypic profiles of those who benefited from the intervention.

Methods

Twenty-two patients on maintenance hemodialysis at our hospital were enrolled in this single center, prospective, single-arm pilot trial. For the first 12 weeks, the subjects were administered a total of 6 g of leucine per day. Three grams were supplied via capsules, and the remaining three grams were provided via beverages containing macro- and micro- nutrients, such as 10 μg of vitamin D and 290 mg of calcium. The supplements were not provided for the next 12 weeks. Muscle mass, grip strength, and physical performance were measured using the bioimpedance analyzer (BIA), handgrip strength (HGS), and short physical performance battery (SPPB) protocols, respectively, at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. In addition, serum biochemistry, immunophenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and nutritional status was assessed at the three time points. Those who showed 5% or more improvement in parameters were defined as responders, otherwise, as non-responders (ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04927208).

Results

Twenty-one out of twenty-two patients (95.4%) showed improvement in at least one or more parameters among muscle mass, grip strength, and physical performance. After 12 weeks of intervention, skeletal muscle index was increased in 14 patients (63.6%), and grip strength was improved in 7 patients (31.8%). Baseline grip strength lower than 35.0 kg was the strongest predictor of improvement in grip strength (AUC 0.933 from ROC curve). Grip strength showed a significant increase in females than males (7.6 ± 8.2 vs. -1.6 ± 7.2%, p = 0.03), in age over 60 than under 60 (5.3 ± 6.2 vs. -1.4 ± 9.1%, p = 0.04), and in higher (≥95%) than lower (<95%) exercise compliance (6.8 ± 7.7 vs. -3.2 ± 6.4%, p = 0.004). In SPPB study, gait speed and sit-to-stand time was improved in 13 patients (59.1%) and 14 patients (63.6%), respectively. Baseline hemoglobin lower than 10.5 g/dl and hematocrit lower than 30.8% were predictor of improvement in the sit-to-stand time (AUC 0.862 and 0.848, respectively). Serum biochemistry results showed that, compared to non-responders, responders in muscle mass had lower baseline monocyte fraction (8.4 ± 1.9 vs. 6.9 ± 1.1%, p = 0.03), and responders in grip strength had lower baseline total protein (6.7 ± 0.4 vs. 6.4 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.04). Immunophenotypic analysis found that the intervention tended to increase the naïve/memory CD8+ T cell ratio (from 1.2 ± 0.8 to 1.4 ± 1.1, p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Leucine-enriched amino acid supplementation and resistance exercise induced significant improvement in muscle mass, strength, and physical function in subpopulation of the non-sarcopenic hemodialysis patients. Those who benefited from the intervention were old-age females with lower baseline grip strength or lower hemoglobin or hematocrit, and who have good exercise compliance. Therefore, we propose that the intervention will help to prevent sarcopenia in selected patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Free Light Chains, High Mobility Group Box 1, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Uremic toxins are associated with immune dysfunction and inflammation. The inadequate removal by hemodialysis (HD) of serum free light chains (FLCs) determines their accumulation. This study evaluated FLCs in HD patients, analyzing their relations with other biomarkers, such as serum high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). Methods: FLC and HMGB1 were evaluated in a cohort of 119 HD patients. κFLC and λFLC were summated to give a combined (c) FLC concentration. Patients were followed prospectively until the end of the observation period of four years, or until the endpoint: the patient’s death. Results: cFLC values in HD patients were 244.4 (197.9−273.5) mg/L. We detected a significant reduction in CD8+ cells and a decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio. HMGB1 levels were 94.5 (55−302) pg/mL. After multivariate analysis, cFLCs correlated with β2-microglobulin and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Subjects with cFLC values above 263 mg/L and with sHMGB1 values < 80 pg/mL experienced a significantly faster evolution to the endpoint (mean follow-up time to progression of 27.5 and 28.5 months, respectively; p < 0.001). After an adjusted multivariate Cox analysis, cFLCs were associated with 11% increased risk of death, whereas low sHMGB1 increased this risk by 5%. Conclusions: cFLCs and HMGB1 reflect the inflammation and immune dysfunction in HD patients representing two strong and independent risk markers of mortality.

Two cases of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for dialysis patients with advanced bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

Nivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors. Combination therapy with these two drugs has been shown to improve the outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, data about the safety and the efficacy of combination therapy with these two drugs in hemodialysis patients are small. A 59-year-old male hemodialysis patient presented with bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma, which was located at the right femur. He received nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. At 7 months after treatment, he was diagnosed with diabetes as an immune-related adverse event. He was managed with insulin therapy. At 11 months after treatment, CT revealed cytoreduction of metastasis. A 74-year-old male hemodialysis patient presented with bone metastasis of renal cell carcinoma located at the sacrum and left scapula. He received nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. At 6 months after treatment, CT showed no progression of metastasis. Nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy might be a viable treatment for hemodialysis patients with bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. However, close attention should be paid immune-related adverse events in such patients.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Kidney transplant candidates and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at particular risk of severe complications of COVID-19 disease. In Western countries, mortality in affected hospitalized KTRs ranges between 19% and 50%. COVID-19 vaccination remains the most important measure to prevent the severity of infection in candidates and recipients of kidney transplant. However, the uraemic condition may affect the vaccine-induced immunity in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in KTRs. Retention of uraemic toxins, dysbiosis, dysmetabolism, and dialysis can diminish the normal response to vaccination, leading to dysfunction of inflammatory and immune cells. In KTRs the efficacy of vaccines may be reduced by the immunosuppressive medications, and more than half of kidney transplant recipients are unable to build an immune response even after four administrations of anti-COVID-19 vaccines. The lack of antibody response leaves these patients at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease. The aim of the present review is to focus on the main reasons for the impaired immunological response among candidates and kidney transplant recipients and to highlight some of the present options available to solve the problem.

Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infections: a nationwide Danish study

AIMS

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a severe complication to modern management of cardiac arrhythmias. The CIED type and the type of surgery are recognized as risk factors for CIED infections, but knowledge of patient-related risk factors is scarce. This study aimed to identify lifelong patient-related risk factors for CIED infections.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive Danish patients undergoing a CIED implantation or reoperation between January 1996 and April 2018 were included. The cohort consisted of 84 429 patients undergoing 108 494 CIED surgeries with a combined follow-up of 458 257 CIED-years. A total of 1556 CIED explantations were classified as either pocket (n = 1022) or systemic CIED infection (n = 534). Data were cross-linked with records from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Using multiple-record and multiple-event per subject proportional hazard analysis, specific patient-related risk factors were identified but with several variations amongst the subtypes of CIED infection. CIED reoperations were associated with the highest risk of pocket CIED infection but also CIED type, young age, and prior valvular surgery [hazard ratio (HR): 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.04]. Severe renal insufficiency/dialysis (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65-3.49), dermatitis (HR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.92-4.05), and prior valvular surgery (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.59-2.75) were associated with the highest risk of systemic CIED infections. Congestive heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and temporary pacing were not significant at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Specific comorbidities and surgical procedures were associated with a higher risk of CIED infections but with variations amongst pocket and systemic CIED infection. Pocket CIED infections were associated with CIED reoperations, young age and more complex type of CIED, whereas systemic CIED infections were associated with risk factors predisposing to bacteraemia.

Humoral Response to Hepatitis B and COVID-19 Vaccine among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients have impaired immunological responses to pathogens and vaccines. In this study, we compared the humoral response to HBV and COVID-19 vaccines in a cohort of MHD patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics of vaccine responders and non-responders were also compared, and the association between the humoral responses to both vaccines was evaluated. The cohort included 94 MHD patients who were vaccinated at least once for HBV and twice for COVID-19. Among the 94 patients, 28 (29.8%) did not develop protective titers to HBV. Hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure were more common in non-responders. Among MHD patients, 85% had positive IgG anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 levels 6 months after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biotech) vaccine. Age and immunosuppressive therapy were the main predictors of humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. We did not find any association between non-responders to HBV and non-responders to COVID-19 vaccine. There was no difference in IgG anti-spike titers between HBV responders and non-responders (505 ± 644 vs. 504 ± 781, p = 0.9) Our results suggest that reduced humoral response to hepatitis B is not associated with reduced response to COVID-19 vaccine. Different risk-factors were associated with poor immune response to HBV and to COVID-19 vaccines.

Cancer Risk and Mortality in Patients With Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for cancer. CKD may also be associated with worse cancer outcomes. This study examined cancer incidence and mortality across the spectrum of CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

All adult Ontario residents with data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or who were receiving maintenance dialysis or had received a kidney transplant (2007-2016).

EXPOSURE

Patients were categorized as of the first date they had 2 eGFR assessments or were registered as receiving maintenance dialysis or having received a kidney transplant. eGFR levels were further categorized as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, 15-29, and <15 mL/min/1.73 m²; the latter 4 groups are consistent with KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) CKD categories G3a, G3b, G4, and G5, respectively.

OUTCOMES

Overall and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 5,882,388 individuals with eGFR data, 29,809 receiving dialysis, and 4,951 having received a kidney transplant, there were 325,895 cancer diagnoses made during 29,993,847 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of cancer ranged between 10.8% and 15.3% in patients with kidney disease. Compared with patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m², adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for a cancer diagnosis among patients with CKD G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.07-1.10), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), respectively. The AHRs for patients receiving dialysis and who had received a transplant were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96-1.07) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.12-1.39), respectively. Patients with kidney disease had higher proportions of stage 4 cancers at diagnosis. Patients with CKD G3a, G3b, and G4 and transplant recipients had increased risks of cancer-specific mortality (AHRs of 1.27 [95% CI, 1.23-1.32], 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.33], and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87], respectively). The risks of bladder and kidney cancers and multiple myeloma were particularly increased in CKD, and mortality from these malignancies increased with worsening kidney function.

LIMITATIONS

Possible unmeasured confounding and limited ability to infer causal associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer incidence in the setting of kidney disease is substantial. Cancer risk was increased in mild to moderate CKD and among transplant recipients, but not in advanced kidney disease. Cancer-related mortality was significantly higher among patients with kidney disease, particularly urologic cancers and myeloma. Strategies to detect and manage these cancers in the CKD population are needed.

A randomized prospective cross over study on the effects of medium cut-off membranes on T cellular and serologic immune phenotypes in hemodialysis

Extended cut-off filtration by medium cut-off membranes (MCO) has been shown to be safe in maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The notion of using them for the control of chronic low-grade inflammation and positively influencing cellular immune aberrations seems tempting. We conducted an open label, multicenter, randomized, 90 day 2-phase cross over clinical trial (MCO- vs. high flux-HD). 46 patients underwent randomization of which 34 completed the study. Dialysate- or pre- and post-dialysis serum inflammatory mediators were assayed for each study visit. Ex vivo T cell activation was assessed from cryopreserved leucocytes by flow cytometry. Linear mixed models were used to compare treatment modalities, with difference in pre-dialysis serum MCP-1 levels after 3 months as the predefined primary endpoint. Filtration/dialysate concentrations of most mediators, including MCP-1 (mean ± SD: 10.5 ± 5.9 vs. 5.1 ± 3.8 pg/ml, P < 0.001) were significantly increased during MCO- versus high flux-HD. However, except for the largest mediator studied, i.e., YKL-40, this did not confer any advantages for single session elimination kinetics (post-HD mean ± SD: 360 ± 334 vs. 564 ± 422 pg/ml, P < 0.001). No sustained reduction of any of the studied mediators was found neither. Still, the long-term reduction of CD69+ (P = 0.01) and PD1+ (P = 0.02) activated CD4+ T cells was striking. Thus, MCO-HD does not induce reduction of a broad range of inflammatory mediators studied here. Long-term reduction over a 3-month period was not possible. Increased single session filtration, as evidenced by increased dialysate concentrations of inflammatory mediators during MCO-HD, might eventually be compensated for by compartment redistribution or increased production during dialysis session. Nevertheless, lasting effects on the T-cell phenotype were seen, which deserves further investigation.

Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rationale and objective

COVID-19 vaccination is the most effective way to prevent COVID-19. For chronic kidney disease patients on long-term dialysis, there is a lack of evidence on the pros and cons of COVID-19 vaccination. This study was conducted to investigate the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients on dialysis.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systemically searched for cohort, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cross-sectional studies. Data on immunogenicity rate, antibody titer, survival rate, new infection rate, adverse events, type of vaccine, and patient characteristics such as age, sex, dialysis vintage, immunosuppression rate, and prevalence of diabetes were extracted and analyzed using REVMAN 5.4 and Stata software. A random effects meta-analysis was used to perform the study.

Results

We screened 191 records and included 38 studies regarding 5,628 participants. The overall immunogenicity of dialysis patients was 87% (95% CI, 84-89%). The vaccine response rate was 85.1 in hemodialysis patients (HDPs) (1,201 of 1,412) and 97.4% in healthy controls (862 of 885). The serological positivity rate was 82.9% (777 of 937) in infection-naive individuals and 98.4% (570 of 579) in patients with previous infection. The Standard Mean Difference (SMD) of antibody titers in dialysis patients with or without previous COVID-19 infection was 1.14 (95% CI, 0.68-1.61). Subgroup analysis showed that the immunosuppression rate was an influential factor affecting the immunogenicity rate (P < 0.0001). Nine studies reported safety indices, among which four local adverse events and seven system adverse events were documented.

Conclusions

Vaccination helped dialysis patients achieve effective humoral immunity, with an overall immune efficiency of 87.5%. Dialysis patients may experience various adverse events after vaccination; however, the incidence of malignant events is very low, and no reports of death or acute renal failure after vaccination are available, indicating that vaccine regimens may be necessary.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42022342565, identifier: CRD42022342565.

Antibody Response and Adverse Events of AZD1222 COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study

This study observed the antibody response and adverse events of AZD1222 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) vaccination in dialysis patients. A prospective cohort study was conducted in E-Da Healthcare Group hospitals between 1 July and 30 November 2021. Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD, n = 204) or peritoneal dialysis (PD, n = 116) were enrolled alongside healthy subjects (control, n = 34). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD IgG antibodies were measured before the first vaccination (T0), four to six weeks afterwards (T1), one week before the second dose (T2), and four to six weeks afterwards (T3). Adverse events were recorded one week after each dose. The positive IgG rates in the HD (T1: 72%; T2: 62%) and PD (T1: 69%; T2: 70%) groups were lower than the control group (T1: 97%; T2: 91%), with lower median antibody titers. At T3, the positive antibody response rates (HD: 94%; PD: 93%; control: 100%) and titers were similar. Titers were higher after the second dose in all groups. Adverse events were more severe after the first dose and less common with HD than PD or controls. Dialysis patients exhibited lower antibody responses than controls after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine but achieved similar responses after consecutive vaccination. Age, health status, two vaccine doses, and alcohol consumption may influence antibody levels.

Kidney replacement therapy patients with COVID-19 in the vaccine era: what do we need to know?

Kidney disease is one of the most important factors affecting the prognosis of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT; dialysis and kidney transplant recipients) are vulnerable to severe complications of COVID-19. As the pandemic evolves and preventive strategies, availability of healthcare facilities, treatment approaches and vaccination strategies change, studies are needed on COVID-19 epidemiology and outcomes in KRT patients that contribute to vaccination regimens, treatment protocols and immunosuppressive therapies of KRT patients with COVID-19. In their registry-based study, Quiroga et al. analyzed COVID-19 KRT patients in Spain across six pandemic waves in order to evaluate dynamic treatment approaches and outcomes as well as the efficacy of vaccination.

Pre-Existing Comorbidities Diminish the Likelihood of Seropositivity after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination

BACKGROUND

The impact of chronic health conditions (CHCs) on serostatus post-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is unknown.

METHODS

We assessed serostatus post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among fully vaccinated adult residents of Jefferson County, Kentucky, USA, from April 2021 to August 2021. Serostatus was determined by qualitative analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific Spike IgG antibodies via enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) in peripheral blood samples.

RESULTS

Of the 5178 fully vaccinated participants, 51 were seronegative and 5127 were seropositive. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and autoimmune disease showed the highest association with negative serostatus in fully vaccinated individuals. The absence of any CHC was strongly associated with positive serostatus. The risk of negative serostatus increased as the total number of pre-existing CHCs increased. Similarly, the use of two or more CHC-related medications was associated with seronegative status.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of any CHC, especially CKD or autoimmune disease, increased the likelihood of seronegative status among individuals who were fully vaccinated to SAR-CoV-2. This risk increased with a concurrent increase in number of comorbidities, especially with multiple medications. The absence of any CHC was protective and increased the likelihood of a positive serological response. These results will help develop appropriate guidelines for booster doses and targeted vaccination programs.

Antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hemodialysis patients: Is inactivated vaccine effective?

INTRODUCTION

Vaccines generally have reduced effectiveness in hemodialysis patients and a similar condition may also apply for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to analyze humoral responses of hemodialysis patients to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

METHODS

Eighty-five maintenance hemodialysis patients who received either inactivated or mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were investigated. Antibody levels were measured by a commercial antibody kit, which detected antibodies toward receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Comparative analyzes were carried between vaccine groups and with a control group of 103 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Seropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in hemodialysis patients who received inactivated vaccine (p = 0.000). While mRNA vaccine had better immunogenicity, both vaccines protected from symptomatic infection when seropositivity was achieved.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

When used in the same dose with the general population, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines generate reduced humoral response in hemodialysis patients. mRNA vaccines have better immunogenicity in this group.

BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness in chronic kidney disease patients – an observational study

Background

chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate real-life effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for a range of outcomes in patients with CKD compared to matched controls.

Methods

Data from Israel's largest healthcare organization were retrospectively used. Vaccinated CKD (eGFR&lt;60ml/min/1.73m2) and maintenance dialysis patients were matched to vaccinated controls without CKD (eGFR&gt; = 60ml/min/1.73m2) according to demographic and clinical characteristics. Study outcomes included documented infection with SARS-CoV-2, symptomatic infection, COVID-19 related hospitalization, severe disease, and death. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as the risk ratio [RR] at days 7-28 following the second vaccine dose, using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Effectiveness measures were also evaluated separately for various stages of CKD.

Results

There were 67,861 CKD patients not treated with dialysis, 2,606 hemodialysis patients, and 70,467 matched controls. The risk of sever disease (RR1.84, 95% CI 0.95-2.67) and death (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.99-5.20) was increased in non-dialysis CKD patients compared with controls without CKD following vaccination.

For the subgroup of patients with eGFR below 30 ml/min/1.73m2, the risk of severe disease and death was increased compared to controls (RR 6.42, 95% CI 1.85-17.51 and RR 8.81, 95% CI 1.63-13.81, respectively). The risks for all study outcomes was increased in hemodialysis patients, compared with controls.

Conclusion

Two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine were found less efficient for patients with eGFR&lt;30ml/min/1.73m2. Risk in hemodialysis patients is increased for all outcomes. These results suggest prioritizing patients with eGFR&lt;30ml/min/1.73m2 for booster shots, pre and post exposure prophylaxis, and early COVID-19 therapy.

Single-Cell RNA and ATAC Sequencing Reveal Hemodialysis-Related Immune Dysregulation of Circulating Immune Cell Subpopulations

Background

An increased risk of infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular diseases in maintenance hemodialysis patients is associated with hemodialysis-related immunity disturbances. Although defects in T-lymphocyte-dependent immune responses and preactivation of antigen-presenting cells have been documented in hemodialysis patients, the effects of long-term hemodialysis on the transcriptional program and chromosomal accessibility of circulating immune cell subpopulations remain poorly defined.

Methods

We integrated single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) to characterize the transcriptome profiles of peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy controls and maintenance hemodialysis patients. Validation of differentially expressed genes in CD4+ T cells and monocytes were performed by magnetic bead separation and quantitative real-time PCR.

Results

We identified 16 and 15 PBMC subgroups in scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq datasets, respectively. Hemodialysis significantly suppressed the expression levels of T cell receptor (TCR) genes in CD4+ T cell subsets (e.g., TRAV4, CD45, CD3G, CD3D, CD3E) and major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II) pathway-related genes in monocytes (HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DPB1). Downstream pathways of TCR signaling, including PI3K-Akt-mTOR, MAPK, TNF, and NF-κB pathways, were also inhibited in CD4+ T cell subpopulations during the hemodialysis procedure. Hemodialysis altered cellular communication patterns between PBMC subgroups, particularly TGF-TGFBR, HVEM-BTLA, and IL16-CD4 signalings between CD4+ T cells and monocytes. Additionally, we found that hemodialysis inhibited the expression of AP-1 family transcription factors (JUN, JUND, FOS, FOSB) by interfering with the chromatin accessibility profile.

Conclusions

Our study provides a valuable framework for future investigations of hemodialysis-related immune dysregulation and identifies potential therapeutic targets for reconstituting the circulating immune system in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Adequacy of Hemodialysis Serves as an Independent Predictor of Humoral Response to ChAdOx1 Prime-Boost Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Immune response assessed by the quantification of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) and predictors associated with immunogenicity after the prime-boost ChAdOx1 (Oxford−AstraZeneca) COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis (HD) patients remains unclear. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 174 HD patients and 67 healthy subjects to evaluate antibodies against the spike protein 1 and receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 after prime-booster vaccination, by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and applied spline-based generalized additive model regression analysis to predict 50% neutralization titer (NT50). The correlation between HD parameters and NT50 was analyzed. Results: NT50 was lower in HD patients compared with healthy controls after the prime-boost dose (p < 0.001). The geometric mean titer ratios were higher in first-dose seronegative than in the seropositive subgroup in HD patients and healthy controls (6.96 vs. 2.36, p = 0.002, and 9.28 vs. 1.26, p = 0.011, respectively). After two doses of ChAdOx1, one-way ANOVA showed that Ca × P was positively associated with NT50 (p trend = 0.043) and multiple linear regression showed the similar results (p = 0.021). Kt/V (a quantification of dialysis adequacy) (OR = 20.295, p = 0.005) could independently predict seroconversion (NT50 ≥ 35.13 IU/mL). Conclusion: Adequacy of hemodialysis could independently predict seroconversion in HD subjects vaccinated with prime-boost doses of ChAdOx1.

Heterologous immunization with BNT162b2 followed by mRNA-1273 in dialysis patients: seroconversion and presence of neutralizing antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The vital renal replacement therapy makes it impossible for dialysis patients to distance themselves socially. This results in a high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and developing coronavuris disease 2019, with excess mortality due to disease burden and immunosuppression. We determined the efficacy of a 100-µg booster of mRNA-1273 (Moderna, Cambridge, MA, USA) 6 months after two doses of BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany/New York, USA) in 194 SARS-CoV-2-naïve dialysis patients.

METHODS

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were measured with the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) 4 and 10-12 weeks after two doses of BNT162b2 as well as 4 weeks after the mRNA-1273 booster. The presence of neutralizing antibodies was measured by the SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (GenScript Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Two different cut-offs for positivity were used, one according to the manufacturer's specifications and one correlating with positivity in a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to match the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody cut-offs with the cut-offs in the surrogate neutralization assay accordingly.

RESULTS

Any level of immunoreactivity determined by the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assay was found in 87.3% (n = 144/165) and 90.6% (n = 164/181) of patients 4 and 10-12 weeks, respectively, after two doses of BNT162b2. This was reduced to 68.5% or 60.6% 4 weeks and 51.7% or 35.4% 10-12 weeks, respectively, when using the ROC cut-offs for neutralizing antibodies in the surrogate neutralization test (manufacturer's cut-off ≥103 U/mL and cut-off correlating with PRNT ≥196 U/mL). Four weeks after the mRNA-1273 booster, the concentration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies increased to 23 119.9 U/mL and to 97.3% for both cut-offs of neutralizing antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Two doses of BNT162b2 followed by one dose of mRNA-1273 within 6 months in patients receiving maintenance dialysis resulted in significant titres of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies. While two doses of mRNA vaccine achieved adequate humoral immunity in a minority, the third vaccination boosts the development of virus-neutralizing quantities of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (against wild-type SARS-CoV-2) in almost all patients.

Temporal Trends of Device-Related Infection in De Novo Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Medicare Patients with Underlying Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease is a risk factor for device infection in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) implants, with mechanisms that include immunodeficiency and a portal of entry for bacteria that can seed indwelling devices.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of both kidney disease and dialysis-dependence on the incidence of device-related infection after de novo TV-ICD implantation and how the incidence changes over time in.

METHODS

Medicare 100% administrative and claims data were used to identify patients who underwent de novo TV-ICD implantation between 7/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. Baseline characteristics included underlying kidney disease (none; non-dialysis; and dialysis), plus device infection during follow-up. Patients were followed for TV-ICD infection up to 78 weeks after implantation. Piecewise Poisson regression was used to predict the incidence of and hazard ratios for infection over time.

RESULTS

Overall, 809/42,200 (1.9%) patients had at least one device infection during a mean follow-up of 66 weeks: 484/31,217 (1.6%) none; 202/9,151 (2.2%) non-dialysis; and 123/1,832 (6.7%) dialysis (p<0.001 via log-rank test). The incidence of infection increased during the first 8-12 weeks and declined thereafter. Hazard ratios increased over time (dialysis week 12=4.9/1,000 PYs and week 52=9.8; non-dialysis week 12=1.4 and week 52=2.5; all p<0.05), as did the difference in the cumulative incidence compared with none (dialysis week 12=Δ11.8 and week 78=Δ53.5; non-dialysis week 12= Δ1.4 and week 78=Δ7.0.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of infection after de novo TV-ICD implantation is higher when patients have kidney disease and is substantially higher when patients are dialysis-dependent.

Which criteria should we use to end isolation in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19?

Safe and timely discontinuation of quarantine of in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients with a previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a challenging issue for the nephrological community because current guidelines for ending isolation do not mention dialysis patients. To prevent potentially fatal outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a cautionary approach has been adopted by most dialysis units. The criteria for ending the isolation in the HD population generally coincide with those recommended for immunocompromised people. Thus, a test-based strategy relying on two consecutive negative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs has been adopted to terminate quarantine. This strategy has the disadvantage of prolonging isolation as RT-PCR positivity does not equate to SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Consequentially, prolonged positivity of SARS-CoV-2 results in excessive workload for the HD staff who must face an increasing number of COVID-19 patients requiring isolation. This condition leads also to serious implications for the patients and their households including work productivity loss, postponement of health-care appointments and an increased risk of COVID-19 reinfection. To counteract this problem, other diagnostic tests should be used to provide the best care to HD patients. Recent results seem to encourage the use of RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and rapid antigen tests given their better correlation with cell culture for SARS-CoV-2 than RT-PCR testing. Here, we provide an overview of the current scientific evidence on the tests used to verify the infectiousness of the virus in order to stimulate the nephrological community to adopt a streamlined and pragmatic procedure to end isolation in COVID-19 patients on HD.

Humoral Response after Three Doses of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Hemodialysis Patients

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a worldwide health issue. Among hemodialysis (HD) patients, two-dose immunization schemes with mRNA vaccines have contributed to preventing severe COVID-19 cases; however, some have not produced a sufficient humoral response, and most have developed a rapid decline in antibody levels over the months following vaccination. This observational, prospective, multi-center study evaluated the humoral response in terms of presence and levels of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the S1 spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-S1-RBD IgG) to the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, either the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer), in 153 patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain). Most hemodialysis patients responded intensely to this third vaccine dose, achieving the seroconversion in three out of four non- or weak responders to two doses. Moreover, 96.1% maintained the upper limit or generated higher titers than after the second. BNT162b2 vaccine, active cancer, and immunosuppressive treatment were related to a worse humoral response. Every hemodialysis patient should be administered a third vaccine dose six months after receiving the second one. Despite the lack of data, immunosuppressed patients and those with active cancer may benefit from more frequent vaccine boosters.

Incidence of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients

Introduction

Given the increased COVID-19 observed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and haemodialysis patients, several studies have tried to establish the efficacy of mRNA vaccines in these populations by evaluating their humoral and cellular responses. However, there is currently no information on clinical protection (deaths and hospitalizations), a gap that this study aims to fill.

Methods

Observational prospective study involving 1,336 KTRs and haemodialysis patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain, vaccinated with two doses of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The outcomes measured were SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed by a positive RT-PCR fourteen days after the second vaccine dose, hospital admissions derived from infection, and a severe COVID-19 composite outcome, defined as either ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or death.

Results

Six per cent (18/302) of patients on haemodialysis were infected, of whom four required hospital admission (1.3%), only one (0.3%) had severe COVID-19, and none of them died. In contrast, 4.3% (44/1034) of KTRs were infected, and presented more hospital admissions (26 patients, 2.5%), severe COVID-19 (11 patients, 1.1%) or death (4 patients, 0.4%). KTRs had a significantly higher risk of hospital admission than HD patients, and this risk increased with age and male sex (HR 3.37 and 4.74, respectively).

Conclusions

The study highlights the need for booster doses in KTRs. In contrast, the haemodialysis population appears to have an adequate clinical response to vaccination, at least up to four months from its administration.

Graphical abstract

Secondary Immunodeficiency Related to Kidney Disease (SIDKD)-Definition, Unmet Need, and Mechanisms

Kidney disease is a known risk factor for poor outcomes of COVID-19 and many other serious infections. Conversely, infection is the second most common cause of death in patients with kidney disease. However, little is known about the underlying secondary immunodeficiency related to kidney disease (SIDKD). In contrast to cardiovascular disease related to kidney disease, which has triggered countless epidemiologic, clinical, and experimental research activities or interventional trials, investments in tracing, understanding, and therapeutically targeting SIDKD have been sparse. As a call for more awareness of SIDKD as an imminent unmet medical need that requires rigorous research activities at all levels, we review the epidemiology of SIDKD and the numerous aspects of the abnormal immunophenotype of patients with kidney disease. We propose a definition of SIDKD and discuss the pathogenic mechanisms of SIDKD known thus far, including more recent insights into the unexpected immunoregulatory roles of elevated levels of FGF23 and hyperuricemia and shifts in the secretome of the intestinal microbiota in kidney disease. As an ultimate goal, we should aim to develop therapeutics that can reduce mortality due to infections in patients with kidney disease by normalizing host defense to pathogens and immune responses to vaccines.

Analysis of Experiences in Preventing COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Centers of the North of Poland before the Era of Vaccination

BACKGROUND

The appearance of very contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants and waning vaccine immunity may indicate the need to return to using universal methods of preventing the spread of COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort survey study to describe the methods used in dialysis units to prevent and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and also the association between these methods and the incidence of COVID-19 among hemodialyzed (HD) patients before the era of vaccination. The study population included all maintenance HD patients (n = 1569) in 14 dialysis units in the Pomeranian Voivodeship.

RESULTS

The group of 352 patients (199 men, 153 female) were confirmed for COVID-19. The absolute cumulative incidence in the studied period was 22.4%. It varied widely by dialysis units, ranging from 9.4% to 36.9%. Universal preventive methods were applied by all units. Different additional methods were implemented in some stations with varying frequency (36-86%). In order to quantify the scale of the applied additional preventive methods, we calculated a summary prevention index (PI), i.e., one point for one additional method. Lower incidence was found in centers applying dialysis in isolation of patients hospitalized due to diseases requiring hospitalization (17.42% ± 6.89 vs. 26.54 ± 6.34; p = 0.028) and higher incidence in medium-size dialysis centers (ANOVA F: p = 0.017). Significant inverse correlation between PI and incidence was demonstrated as well (r = -0.759; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The higher the number of implemented preventive measures, the lower the risk of COVID-19 infection in HD patients. Among applied procedures the isolation of hospitalized patients is of significant importance. The measures proved to be effective in prevention before the vaccination era should be continued, as the threat of SARS-CoV-2 still exists.

Neutralization Assessments Reveal High Cardiothoracic Ratio and Old Age as Independent Predictors of Low Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Hemodialysis Patients Receiving a Single Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Data are lacking regarding predictors of quantification of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) based on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 50% neutralization titer (NT50) after a single dose of COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study enrolled 200 HD patients and 82 healthy subjects to estimate antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein 1 and receptor-binding domain after a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1 or mRNA-1273), measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and applied spline-based generalized additive model regression analysis to predict NT50 converted to international units.

RESULTS

After the first dose of ChAdOx1, multiple linear regression showed that age (p = 0.011) and cardiothoracic ratio (p = 0.002) were negatively associated with NT50. Older age (OR = 0.958, p = 0.052) and higher cardiothoracic ratio (OR < 0.001, p = 0.037) could predict negative humoral response (NT50 < 35.13 IU/mL). NT50 was lower in HD patients compared with healthy controls receiving ChAdOx1 (10.68 vs. 43.01 IU/m, p < 0.001) or mRNA-1273 (36.39 vs. 262.2 IU/mL, p < 0.001). ChAdOx1 elicited lower GMTs than mRNA-1273 in the HD cohort (10.68 vs. 36.39 IU/mL, p < 0.001) and in healthy controls (43.01 vs. 262.22 IU/mL, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High cardiothoracic ratio and old age could independently predict a decline in nAb titers in an HD cohort vaccinated with a single dose of ChAdOx1.

Real-World Effectiveness and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients on hemodialysis have an elevated risk for COVID-19 but were not included in efficacy trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study to estimate the real-world effectiveness and immunogenicity of two mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a large, representative population of adult hemodialysis patients in the United States. In separate, parallel analyses, patients who began a vaccination series with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 in January and February 2021 were matched with unvaccinated patients and risk for outcomes were compared for days 1-21, 22-42, and ≥43 after first dose. In a subset of consented patients, blood samples were collected approximately 28 days after the second dose and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 12,169 patients received the BNT162b2 vaccine (matched with 44,377 unvaccinated controls); 23,037 patients received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (matched with 63,243 unvaccinated controls). Compared with controls, vaccinated patients' risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 postvaccination became progressively lower during the study period (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for BNT162b2 was 0.21 [0.13, 0.35] and for mRNA-1273 was 0.27 [0.17, 0.42] for days ≥43). After a COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccinated patients were significantly less likely than unvaccinated patients to be hospitalized (for BNT162b2, 28.0% versus 43.4%; for mRNA-1273, 37.2% versus 45.6%) and significantly less likely to die (for BNT162b2, 4.0% versus 12.1%; for mRNA-1273, 5.6% versus 14.5%). Antibodies were detected in 98.1% (309/315) and 96.0% (308/321) of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients on hemodialysis, vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and lower risk of hospitalization or death among those diagnosed with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in nearly all patients after vaccination. These findings support the use of these vaccines in this population.

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Postoperative Complications in End Stage Renal Disease Patients

Background:

The prevalence of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring general surgical procedures is increasing. Our aim was to explore the effect of ESRD on patients undergoing elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Methods:

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2010–2015) database was used to identify patients who underwent elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Multivariable analysis was performed adjusting for risk variables including age, gender, race, comorbidity status, body mass index ≥ 35, and presence of ESRD.

Results:

A total of 8,789 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were identified. Sixty-four patients (0.73%) had ESRD. ESRD was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia (odds ration [OR] 6.91, p = 0.00363), sepsis (OR 18.58, p = 0.000286), and length of stay (IRR 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.19 – 2.27, p = 0.0036).

Conclusions:

ESRD patients undergoing elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair had an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia, sepsis, and length of stay. Clinicians should be cognizant of these risks when performing elective operations on ESRD patients.