1
|
Polman EMN, Seijmonsbergen AC, Versteegh H, Kissling WD. Global geodiversity components are not equally represented in UNESCO Global Geoparks. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2024; 382:20230054. [PMID: 38342215 PMCID: PMC10859229 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
The aim of UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGs) is to protect globally significant geoheritage and geodiversity, but quantitative evidence on the global representativeness of geodiversity components (i.e. geology, soils, geomorphology and hydrology) in these geoparks is in short supply. Here, we provide a first assessment by deriving a global map of geodiversity to test whether the presence of geodiversity components in UGGs is representative for the global availability and distribution of geodiversity. Using openly accessible global datasets and a newly developed workflow, we have calculated metrics for each geodiversity component and a global geodiversity index; we then quantified whether UGGs represent global geodiversity and then compared their components to a randomized spatial distribution of geoparks. Our results show that lithological and topographical diversity are more represented in UGGs than outside these sites, while soil type and hydrological diversity are not significantly different. Furthermore, individual soil types and lithological classes are under-represented and unevenly distributed in Asian and European UGGs. This is probably caused by the concentration of geoparks in Asian and European mountains. To better conserve geodiversity, we suggest an initiative to consider the protection and representation of all geodiversity components in their global context. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M. N. Polman
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arie C. Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hannes Versteegh
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schrodt F, Vernham G, Bailey J, Field R, Gordon JE, Gray M, Hjort J, Hoorn C, Hunter Jr. ML, Larwood J, Lausch A, Monge-Ganuzas M, Miller S, van Ree D, Seijmonsbergen AC, Zarnetske PL, Daniel Kissling W. The status and future of essential geodiversity variables. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2024; 382:20230052. [PMID: 38342208 PMCID: PMC10859226 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Rapid environmental change, natural resource overconsumption and increasing concerns about ecological sustainability have led to the development of 'Essential Variables' (EVs). EVs are harmonized data products to inform policy and to enable effective management of natural resources by monitoring global changes. Recent years have seen the instigation of new EVs beyond those established for climate, oceans and biodiversity (ECVs, EOVs and EBVs), including Essential Geodiversity Variables (EGVs). EGVs aim to consistently quantify and monitor heterogeneity of Earth-surface and subsurface abiotic features, including geology, geomorphology, hydrology and pedology. Here we assess the status and future development of EGVs to better incorporate geodiversity into policy and sustainable management of natural resources. Getting EGVs operational requires better consensus on defining geodiversity, investments into a governance structure and open platform for curating the development of EGVs, advances in harmonizing in situ measurements and linking heterogeneous databases, and development of open and accessible computational workflows for global digital mapping using machine-learning techniques. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and partnerships with governmental and private organizations are needed to ensure the successful development and uptake of EGVs across science and policy. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Schrodt
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Grant Vernham
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Joseph Bailey
- Department of Biology, Anglia Ruskin University - Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Richard Field
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - John E. Gordon
- School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY169AL, UK
| | - Murray Gray
- Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Jan Hjort
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland
| | - Carina Hoorn
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1000 GG, The Netherlands
| | - Malcom L. Hunter Jr.
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Maine, USA
| | - Jonathan Larwood
- Strategy and Governance, Natural England, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE2 8YY, UK
| | - Angela Lausch
- Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Saxony 04318, Germany
| | - Manu Monge-Ganuzas
- Geoheritage Commission, Spanish Geological Society, Busturia, Biscay 48350, Spain
| | - Stephanie Miller
- School of Biology and Ecology; Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5751, USA
| | - Derk van Ree
- Geo-engineering, Deltares, Delft 2600 MH, The Netherlands
- Environmental Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Faculteit der Betawetenschappen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Christoffel Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| | - Phoebe L. Zarnetske
- Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gonzalez A, Vihervaara P, Balvanera P, Bates AE, Bayraktarov E, Bellingham PJ, Bruder A, Campbell J, Catchen MD, Cavender-Bares J, Chase J, Coops N, Costello MJ, Czúcz B, Delavaud A, Dornelas M, Dubois G, Duffy EJ, Eggermont H, Fernandez M, Fernandez N, Ferrier S, Geller GN, Gill M, Gravel D, Guerra CA, Guralnick R, Harfoot M, Hirsch T, Hoban S, Hughes AC, Hugo W, Hunter ME, Isbell F, Jetz W, Juergens N, Kissling WD, Krug CB, Kullberg P, Le Bras Y, Leung B, Londoño-Murcia MC, Lord JM, Loreau M, Luers A, Ma K, MacDonald AJ, Maes J, McGeoch M, Mihoub JB, Millette KL, Molnar Z, Montes E, Mori AS, Muller-Karger FE, Muraoka H, Nakaoka M, Navarro L, Newbold T, Niamir A, Obura D, O'Connor M, Paganini M, Pelletier D, Pereira H, Poisot T, Pollock LJ, Purvis A, Radulovici A, Rocchini D, Roeoesli C, Schaepman M, Schaepman-Strub G, Schmeller DS, Schmiedel U, Schneider FD, Shakya MM, Skidmore A, Skowno AL, Takeuchi Y, Tuanmu MN, Turak E, Turner W, Urban MC, Urbina-Cardona N, Valbuena R, Van de Putte A, van Havre B, Wingate VR, Wright E, Torrelio CZ. Author Correction: A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action. Nat Ecol Evol 2023; 7:2173. [PMID: 37985899 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02263-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Gonzalez
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | - Patricia Balvanera
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Mexico
| | - Amanda E Bates
- Biology Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa Bayraktarov
- EcoCommons Australia, Research, Specialised and Data Foundations, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Andreas Bruder
- Institute of Microbiology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Jillian Campbell
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael D Catchen
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan Chase
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Computer Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Nicholas Coops
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark J Costello
- Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord Universitet, Bodø, Norway
| | - Bálint Czúcz
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Guia Marine Lab, MARE, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Cascais, Portugal
| | - Grégoire Dubois
- Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - Emmett J Duffy
- Tennenbaum Marine Observatories Network and MarineGEO program, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA
| | - Hilde Eggermont
- Belgian Science Policy Office, Belgian Biodiversity Platform/Biodiversa+, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Nestor Fernandez
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Computer Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Simon Ferrier
- CSIRO Environment, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Gary N Geller
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Dominique Gravel
- Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlos A Guerra
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Robert Guralnick
- Department of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Tim Hirsch
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sean Hoban
- The Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA
| | - Alice C Hughes
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Margaret E Hunter
- US Geological Survey, Wetland & Aquatic Research Center, Sirenia Project, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Forest Isbell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Walter Jetz
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Norbert Juergens
- Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia B Krug
- bioDISCOVERY, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Kullberg
- Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Nature Solutions Unit, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yvan Le Bras
- Pôle national de données de biodiversité, PatriNat, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Station Marine de Concarneau, Concarneau, France
| | - Brian Leung
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jean-Michel Lord
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michel Loreau
- Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France
| | | | - Keping Ma
- Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Anna J MacDonald
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Melodie McGeoch
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Department of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jean Baptiste Mihoub
- Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CP 135, Paris, France
| | - Katie L Millette
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zsolt Molnar
- Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Enrique Montes
- Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
- Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Akira S Mori
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Muraoka
- River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
- Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakaoka
- Akkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Tim Newbold
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aidin Niamir
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Institute, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Mary O'Connor
- Biodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Henrique Pereira
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Timothée Poisot
- Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laura J Pollock
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andy Purvis
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| | - Adriana Radulovici
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Duccio Rocchini
- Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Science, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudia Roeoesli
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Schaepman
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dirk S Schmeller
- Laboratoire écologie fonctionnelle et environnement, Université de Toulouse, INPT, UPS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| | - Ute Schmiedel
- Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian D Schneider
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew Skidmore
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew L Skowno
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yayioi Takeuchi
- Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Mao-Ning Tuanmu
- Thematic Center for Systematics and Biodiversity Informatics, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Eren Turak
- NSW Department of Environment and Planning, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Woody Turner
- Earth Science Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mark C Urban
- Center of Biological Risk and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Nicolás Urbina-Cardona
- Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Departamento de Ecología y Territorio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ruben Valbuena
- Division of Remote Sensing of Forests, Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anton Van de Putte
- Royal Belgian Institute for Naturalsciences, Brussels, Belgium
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Elaine Wright
- NZ Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonzalez A, Vihervaara P, Balvanera P, Bates AE, Bayraktarov E, Bellingham PJ, Bruder A, Campbell J, Catchen MD, Cavender-Bares J, Chase J, Coops N, Costello MJ, Czúcz B, Delavaud A, Dornelas M, Dubois G, Duffy EJ, Eggermont H, Fernandez M, Fernandez N, Ferrier S, Geller GN, Gill M, Gravel D, Guerra CA, Guralnick R, Harfoot M, Hirsch T, Hoban S, Hughes AC, Hugo W, Hunter ME, Isbell F, Jetz W, Juergens N, Kissling WD, Krug CB, Kullberg P, Le Bras Y, Leung B, Londoño-Murcia MC, Lord JM, Loreau M, Luers A, Ma K, MacDonald AJ, Maes J, McGeoch M, Mihoub JB, Millette KL, Molnar Z, Montes E, Mori AS, Muller-Karger FE, Muraoka H, Nakaoka M, Navarro L, Newbold T, Niamir A, Obura D, O'Connor M, Paganini M, Pelletier D, Pereira H, Poisot T, Pollock LJ, Purvis A, Radulovici A, Rocchini D, Roeoesli C, Schaepman M, Schaepman-Strub G, Schmeller DS, Schmiedel U, Schneider FD, Shakya MM, Skidmore A, Skowno AL, Takeuchi Y, Tuanmu MN, Turak E, Turner W, Urban MC, Urbina-Cardona N, Valbuena R, Van de Putte A, van Havre B, Wingate VR, Wright E, Torrelio CZ. A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action. Nat Ecol Evol 2023; 7:1947-1952. [PMID: 37620553 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02171-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Gonzalez
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | - Patricia Balvanera
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Mexico
| | - Amanda E Bates
- Biology Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa Bayraktarov
- EcoCommons Australia, Research, Specialised and Data Foundations, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Andreas Bruder
- Institute of Microbiology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Jillian Campbell
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael D Catchen
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan Chase
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Computer Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Nicholas Coops
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark J Costello
- Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord Universitet, Bodø, Norway
| | - Bálint Czúcz
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Maria Dornelas
- Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Guia Marine Lab, MARE, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Cascais, Portugal
| | - Grégoire Dubois
- Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy
| | - Emmett J Duffy
- Tennenbaum Marine Observatories Network and MarineGEO program, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA
| | - Hilde Eggermont
- Belgian Science Policy Office, Belgian Biodiversity Platform/Biodiversa+, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Nestor Fernandez
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Computer Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Simon Ferrier
- CSIRO Environment, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Gary N Geller
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Dominique Gravel
- Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlos A Guerra
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Robert Guralnick
- Department of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Tim Hirsch
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sean Hoban
- The Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA
| | - Alice C Hughes
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Margaret E Hunter
- US Geological Survey, Wetland & Aquatic Research Center, Sirenia Project, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Forest Isbell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Walter Jetz
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Norbert Juergens
- Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia B Krug
- bioDISCOVERY, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Kullberg
- Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Nature Solutions Unit, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yvan Le Bras
- Pôle national de données de biodiversité, PatriNat, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Station Marine de Concarneau, Concarneau, France
| | - Brian Leung
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Jean-Michel Lord
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michel Loreau
- Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, Moulis, France
| | | | - Keping Ma
- Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Anna J MacDonald
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Melodie McGeoch
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Department of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jean Baptiste Mihoub
- Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CP 135, Paris, France
| | - Katie L Millette
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zsolt Molnar
- Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary
| | - Enrique Montes
- Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
- Ocean Chemistry and Ecosystems Division, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Akira S Mori
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Muraoka
- River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
- Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakaoka
- Akkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Tim Newbold
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aidin Niamir
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Institute, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Mary O'Connor
- Biodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Henrique Pereira
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Halle, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Timothée Poisot
- Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laura J Pollock
- Department of Biology, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andy Purvis
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| | - Adriana Radulovici
- The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Duccio Rocchini
- Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Science, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudia Roeoesli
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Schaepman
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dirk S Schmeller
- Laboratoire écologie fonctionnelle et environnement, Université de Toulouse, INPT, UPS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| | - Ute Schmiedel
- Institute of Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian D Schneider
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew Skidmore
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew L Skowno
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yayioi Takeuchi
- Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Mao-Ning Tuanmu
- Thematic Center for Systematics and Biodiversity Informatics, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Eren Turak
- NSW Department of Environment and Planning, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Woody Turner
- Earth Science Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mark C Urban
- Center of Biological Risk and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Nicolás Urbina-Cardona
- Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Departamento de Ecología y Territorio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ruben Valbuena
- Division of Remote Sensing of Forests, Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anton Van de Putte
- Royal Belgian Institute for Naturalsciences, Brussels, Belgium
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Elaine Wright
- NZ Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wölke FJR, Cabral A, Lim JY, Kissling WD, Onstein RE. Africa as an evolutionary arena for large fruits. New Phytol 2023; 240:1574-1586. [PMID: 37334569 DOI: 10.1111/nph.19061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Strong paleoclimatic change and few Late Quaternary megafauna extinctions make mainland Africa unique among continents. Here, we hypothesize that, compared with elsewhere, these conditions created the ecological opportunity for the macroevolution and geographic distribution of large fruits. We assembled global phylogenetic, distribution and fruit size data for palms (Arecaceae), a pantropical, vertebrate-dispersed family with > 2600 species, and integrated these with data on extinction-driven body size reduction in mammalian frugivore assemblages since the Late Quaternary. We applied evolutionary trait, linear and null models to identify the selective pressures that have shaped fruit sizes. We show that African palm lineages have evolved towards larger fruit sizes and exhibited faster trait evolutionary rates than lineages elsewhere. Furthermore, the global distribution of the largest palm fruits across species assemblages was explained by occurrence in Africa, especially under low canopies, and extant megafauna, but not by mammalian downsizing. These patterns strongly deviated from expectations under a null model of stochastic (Brownian motion) evolution. Our results suggest that Africa provided a distinct evolutionary arena for palm fruit size evolution. We argue that megafaunal abundance and the expansion of savanna habitat since the Miocene provided selective advantages for the persistence of African plants with large fruits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike J R Wölke
- Evolution and Adaptation, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Andressa Cabral
- Evolution and Adaptation, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Jun Ying Lim
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block S16, 6 Science Drive 2, Singapore City, 117546, Singapore
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Sciencepark 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renske E Onstein
- Evolution and Adaptation, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333CR, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kissling WD, Shi Y, Koma Z, Meijer C, Ku O, Nattino F, Seijmonsbergen AC, Grootes MW. Country-wide data of ecosystem structure from the third Dutch airborne laser scanning survey. Data Brief 2022; 46:108798. [PMID: 36569534 PMCID: PMC9772796 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The third Dutch national airborne laser scanning flight campaign (AHN3, Actueel Hoogtebestand Nederland) conducted between 2014 and 2019 during the leaf-off season (October-April) across the whole Netherlands provides a free and open-access, country-wide dataset with ∼700 billion points and a point density of ∼10(-20) points/m2. The AHN3 point cloud was obtained with Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) technology and contains for each point the x, y, z coordinates and additional characteristics (e.g. return number, intensity value, scan angle rank and GPS time). Moreover, the point cloud has been pre-processed by 'Rijkswaterstraat' (the executive agency of the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management), comes with a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and a Digital Surface Model (DSM), and is delivered with a pre-classification of each point into one of six classes (0: Never Classified, 1: Unclassified, 2: Ground, 6: Building, 9: Water, 26: Reserved [bridges etc.]). However, no detailed information on vegetation structure is available from the AHN3 point cloud. We processed the AHN3 point cloud (∼16 TB uncompressed data volume) into 10 m resolution raster layers of ecosystem structure at a national extent, using a novel high-throughput workflow called 'Laserfarm' and a cluster of virtual machines with fast central processing units, high memory nodes and associated big data storage for managing the large amount of files. The raster layers (available as GeoTIFF files) capture 25 LiDAR metrics of vegetation structure, including ecosystem height (e.g. 95th percentiles of normalized z), ecosystem cover (e.g. pulse penetration ratio, canopy cover, and density of vegetation points within defined height layers), and ecosystem structural complexity (e.g. skewness and variability of vertical vegetation point distribution). The raster layers make use of the Dutch projected coordinate system (EPSG:28992 Amersfoort / RD New), are each ∼1 GB in size, and can be readily used by ecologists in a geographic information system (GIS) or analytical open-source software such as R and Python. Even though the class '1: Unclassified' mainly includes vegetation points, other objects such as cars, fences, and boats can also be present in this class, introducing potential biases in the derived data products. We therefore validated the raster layers of ecosystem structure using >180,000 hand-labelled LiDAR points in 100 randomly selected sample plots (10 m × 10 m each) across the Netherlands. Besides vegetation, objects such as boats, fences, and cars were identified in the sampled plots. However, the misclassification rate of vegetation points (i.e. non-vegetation points that were assumed to be vegetation) was low (∼0.05) and the accuracy of the 25 LiDAR metrics derived from the AHN3 point cloud was high (∼90%). To minimize existing inaccuracies in this country-wide data product (e.g. ships on water bodies, chimneys on roofs, or cars on roads that might be incorrectly used as vegetation points), we provide an additional mask that captures water bodies, buildings and roads generated from the Dutch cadaster dataset. This newly generated country-wide ecosystem structure data product provides new opportunities for ecology and biodiversity science, e.g. for mapping the 3D vegetation structure of a variety of ecosystems or for modelling biodiversity, species distributions, abundance and ecological niches of animals and their habitats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Daniel Kissling
- University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands,LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Laboratory and Innovations Centre (VLIC), University of Amsterdam Faculty of Science, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam,Corresponding author. @IBED_UvA
| | - Yifang Shi
- University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands,LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Laboratory and Innovations Centre (VLIC), University of Amsterdam Faculty of Science, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam
| | - Zsófia Koma
- University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Aarhus University, Department of Biology, Center for Sustainable Landscapes Under Global Change, Ny Munkegade 116, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Christiaan Meijer
- Netherlands eScience Center, Science Park 402 (Matrix III), 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ou Ku
- Netherlands eScience Center, Science Park 402 (Matrix III), 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Nattino
- Netherlands eScience Center, Science Park 402 (Matrix III), 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arie C. Seijmonsbergen
- University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meiert W. Grootes
- Netherlands eScience Center, Science Park 402 (Matrix III), 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kissling WD, Shi Y, Koma Z, Meijer C, Ku O, Nattino F, Seijmonsbergen AC, Grootes MW. Laserfarm – A high-throughput workflow for generating geospatial data products of ecosystem structure from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ECOL INFORM 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
8
|
De Groeve J, Kusumoto B, Koene E, Kissling WD, Seijmonsbergen AC, Hoeksema BW, Yasuhara M, Norder SJ, Cahyarini SY, van der Geer A, Meijer HJM, Kubota Y, Rijsdijk KF. Global raster dataset on historical coastline positions and shelf sea extents since the Last Glacial Maximum. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2022; 31:2162-2171. [PMID: 36606261 PMCID: PMC9804564 DOI: 10.1111/geb.13573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
MOTIVATION Historical changes in sea level caused shifting coastlines that affected the distribution and evolution of marine and terrestrial biota. At the onset of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) 26 ka, sea levels were >130 m lower than at present, resulting in seaward-shifted coastlines and shallow shelf seas, with emerging land bridges leading to the isolation of marine biota and the connection of land-bridge islands to the continents. At the end of the last ice age, sea levels started to rise at unprecedented rates, leading to coastal retreat, drowning of land bridges and contraction of island areas. Although a growing number of studies take historical coastline dynamics into consideration, they are mostly based on past global sea-level stands and present-day water depths and neglect the influence of global geophysical changes on historical coastline positions. Here, we present a novel geophysically corrected global historical coastline position raster for the period from 26 ka to the present. This coastline raster allows, for the first time, calculation of global and regional coastline retreat rates and land loss rates. Additionally, we produced, per time step, 53 shelf sea rasters to present shelf sea positions and to calculate the shelf sea expansion rates. These metrics are essential to assess the role of isolation and connectivity in shaping marine and insular biodiversity patterns and evolutionary signatures within species and species assemblages. MAIN TYPES OF VARIABLES CONTAINED The coastline age raster contains cells with ages in thousands of years before present (bp), representing the time since the coastline was positioned in the raster cells, for the period between 26 ka and the present. A total of 53 shelf sea rasters (sea levels <140 m) are presented, showing the extent of land (1), shelf sea (0) and deep sea (NULL) per time step of 0.5 kyr from 26 ka to the present. SPATIAL LOCATION AND GRAIN The coastline age raster and shelf sea rasters have a global representation. The spatial resolution is scaled to 120 arcsec (0.333° × 0.333°), implying cells of c. 3,704 m around the equator, 3,207 m around the tropics (±30°) and 1,853 m in the temperate zone (±60°). TIME PERIOD AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTION The coastline age raster shows the age of coastline positions since the onset of the LGM 26 ka, with time steps of 0.5 kyr. The 53 shelf sea rasters show, for each time step of 0.5 kyr, the position of the shelf seas (seas shallower than 140 m) and the extent of land. LEVEL OF MEASUREMENT Both the coastline age raster and the 53 shelf sea rasters are provided as TIFF files with spatial reference system WGS84 (SRID 4326). The values of the coastline age raster per grid cell correspond to the most recent coastline position (in steps of 0.5 kyr). Values range from 0 (0 ka, i.e., present day) to 260 (26 ka) in bins of 5 (0.5 kyr). A value of "no data" is ascribed to pixels that have remained below sea level since 26 ka. SOFTWARE FORMAT All data processing was done using the R programming language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes De Groeve
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Biodiversity and Molecular BiologyEdmund Mach Foundation Research and Innovation CentreSan Michele All'AdigeItaly
| | | | - Erik Koene
- Group Atmospheric Modelling and Remote SensingSwiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology Saint GallenSankt GallenSwitzerland
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Arie C. Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bert W. Hoeksema
- Taxonomy and Systematics GroupNaturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Moriaki Yasuhara
- Area of Ecology and Biodiversity, Swire Institute of Marine Science, Institute for Climate and Carbon Neutrality, Musketeers Foundation Institute of Data Science, and State Key Laboratory of Marine PollutionSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina
| | - Sietze J. Norder
- Environmental Science GroupCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Sri Yudawati Cahyarini
- Research Centre for Climate and AtmosphereNational Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN)BandungIndonesia
| | - Alexandra van der Geer
- Vertebrate Evolution, Development and EcologyNaturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. M. Meijer
- Department of Natural HistoryUniversity Museum of BergenBergenNorway
- Human Origins Program, National Museum of Natural HistorySmithsonian InstitutionWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Yasuhiro Kubota
- Biology Program Nishihara, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusNishiharaJapan
| | - Kenneth F. Rijsdijk
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem DynamicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O’Bryan CJ, Allan JR, Suarez-Castro AF, Delsen DM, Buij R, McClure CJW, Rehbein JA, Virani MZ, McCabe JD, Tyrrell P, Negret PJ, Greig C, Brehony P, Kissling WD. Human impacts on the world’s raptors. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.624896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Raptors are emblematic of the global biodiversity crisis because one out of five species are threatened with extinction and over half have declining populations due to human threats. Yet our understanding of where these “threats” impact raptor species is limited across terrestrial Earth. This is concerning because raptors, as apex predators, are critically positioned in ecological food webs, and their declining populations can undermine important ecosystem services ranging from pest control to disease regulation. Here, we map the distribution of 15 threats within the known ranges of 172 threatened and near threatened raptor species globally as declared by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. We analyze the proportion of each raptor range that is exposed to threats, identify global hotspots of impacted raptor richness, and investigate how human impacts on raptors vary based on several intrinsic (species traits) and extrinsic factors. We find that humans are potentially negatively affecting at least one threatened raptor species across three quarters of Earth’s terrestrial area (78%; 113 million km2). Our results also show that raptors have 66% of their range potentially impacted by threats on average (range 2.7–100%). Alarmingly, critically endangered species have 90% of their range impacted by threats on average. We also highlight 57 species (33%) of particular concern that have > 90% of their ranges potentially impacted. Without immediate conservation intervention, these 57 species, including the most heavily impacted Forest Owlet (Athene blewitti), the Madagascar Serpent-eagle (Eutriorchis astur), and the Rufous Fishing-owl (Scotopelia ussheri), will likely face extinction in the near future. Global “hotspots” of impacted raptor richness are ubiquitous, with core areas of threat in parts of the Sahel and East Africa where 92% of the assessed raptors are potentially impacted per grid cell (10 species on average), and in Northern India where nearly 100% of raptors are potentially impacted per grid cell (11 species). Additionally, “coolspots” of unimpacted richness that represent refuges from threats occur in Greenland and Canada, where 98 and 58% of raptors are potentially unimpacted per grid cell, respectively (nearly one species on average), Saharan Africa, where 21% of raptors are potentially unimpacted per grid cell (one species on average), and parts of the Amazon, where 12% of raptors are potentially unimpacted per grid cell (0.6 species on average). The results provide essential information to guide conservation planning and action for the world’s imperiled raptors.
Collapse
|
10
|
Allan JR, Possingham HP, Atkinson SC, Waldron A, Di Marco M, Butchart SHM, Adams VM, Kissling WD, Worsdell T, Sandbrook C, Gibbon G, Kumar K, Mehta P, Maron M, Williams BA, Jones KR, Wintle BA, Reside AE, Watson JEM. The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity. Science 2022; 376:1094-1101. [PMID: 35653463 DOI: 10.1126/science.abl9127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Ambitious conservation efforts are needed to stop the global biodiversity crisis. In this study, we estimate the minimum land area to secure important biodiversity areas, ecologically intact areas, and optimal locations for representation of species ranges and ecoregions. We discover that at least 64 million square kilometers (44% of terrestrial area) would require conservation attention (ranging from protected areas to land-use policies) to meet this goal. More than 1.8 billion people live on these lands, so responses that promote autonomy, self-determination, equity, and sustainable management for safeguarding biodiversity are essential. Spatially explicit land-use scenarios suggest that 1.3 million square kilometers of this land is at risk of being converted for intensive human land uses by 2030, which requires immediate attention. However, a sevenfold difference exists between the amount of habitat converted in optimistic and pessimistic land-use scenarios, highlighting an opportunity to avert this crisis. Appropriate targets in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework to encourage conservation of the identified land would contribute substantially to safeguarding biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Allan
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, 1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Hugh P Possingham
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA 22203, USA
| | - Scott C Atkinson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Waldron
- Cambridge Conservation Initiative, Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.,Faculty of Science and Engineering ARU, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Moreno Di Marco
- Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, I-00185 Rome, Italy.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Stuart H M Butchart
- BirdLife International, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.,Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Vanessa M Adams
- School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, 1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Sandbrook
- Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Gwili Gibbon
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK
| | - Kundan Kumar
- Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Piyush Mehta
- Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
| | - Martine Maron
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Brooke A Williams
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | | | - Brendan A Wintle
- School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - April E Reside
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - James E M Watson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Onstein RE, Kissling WD, Linder HP. The megaherbivore gap after the non-avian dinosaur extinctions modified trait evolution and diversification of tropical palms. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20212633. [PMID: 35414237 PMCID: PMC9006001 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs (66 Ma) led to a 25 million year gap of megaherbivores (>1000 kg) before the evolution of megaherbivorous mammals in the Late Eocene (40 Ma). The botanical consequences of this 'Palaeocene megaherbivore gap' (PMHG) remain poorly explored. We hypothesize that the absence of megaherbivores should result in changes in the diversification and trait evolution of associated plant lineages. We used phylogenetic time- and trait-dependent diversification models with palms (Arecaceae) and show that the PMHG was characterized by speciation slowdowns, decreased evolution of armature and increased evolution of megafaunal (≥4 cm) fruits. This suggests that the absence of browsing by megaherbivores during the PMHG may have led to a loss of defence traits, but the absence of megaherbivorous seed dispersers did not lead to a loss of megafaunal fruits. Instead, increases in PMHG fruit sizes may be explained by simultaneously rising temperatures, rainforest expansion, and the subsequent radiation of seed-dispersing birds and mammals. We show that the profound impact of the PMHG on plant diversification can be detected even with the overwriting of adaptations by the subsequent Late Eocene opening up of megaherbivore-associated ecological opportunities. Our study provides a quantitative, comparative framework to assess diversification and adaptation during one of the most enigmatic periods in angiosperm history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske E. Onstein
- Evolution and Adaptation, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig, Leipzig 04103 Germany
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - H. Peter Linder
- Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, ZH Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang Y, Koulouzis S, Bianchi R, Li N, Shi Y, Timmermans J, Kissling WD, Zhao Z. Scaling Notebooks as Re-configurable Cloud Workflows. Data Intelligence 2022. [DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Literate computing environments, such as the Jupyter (i.e., Jupyter Notebooks, JupyterLab, and JupyterHub), have been widely used in scientific studies; they allow users to interactively develop scientific code, test algorithms, and describe the scientific narratives of the experiments in an integrated document. To scale up scientific analyses, many implemented Jupyter environment architectures encapsulate the whole Jupyter notebooks as reproducible units and autoscale them on dedicated remote infrastructures (e.g., highperformance computing and cloud computing environments). The existing solutions are still limited in many ways, e.g., 1) the workflow (or pipeline) is implicit in a notebook, and some steps can be generically used by different code and executed in parallel, but because of the tight cell structure, all steps in the Jupyter notebook have to be executed sequentially and lack of the flexibility of reusing the core code fragments, and 2) there are performance bottlenecks that need to improve the parallelism and scalability when handling extensive input data and complex computation.
In this work, we focus on how to manage the workflow in a notebook seamlessly. We 1) encapsulate the reusable cells as RESTful services and containerize them as portal components, 2) provide a composition tool for describing workflow logic of those reusable components, and 3) automate the execution on remote cloud infrastructure. Empirically, we validate the solution's usability via a use case from the Ecology and Earth Science domain, illustrating the processing of massive Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. The demonstration and analysis show that our method is feasible, but that it needs further improvement, especially on integrating distributed workflow scheduling, automatic deployment, and execution to develop as a mature approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuandou Wang
- Multiscale Networked Systems, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Spiros Koulouzis
- Multiscale Networked Systems, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Bianchi
- Multiscale Networked Systems, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Na Li
- Multiscale Networked Systems, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yifang Shi
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Timmermans
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Multiscale Networked Systems, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- LifeWatch ERIC, Virtual Lab & Innovation Center (VLIC), Science Park 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nowak L, Schleuning M, Bender IMA, Kissling WD, Fritz SA. Independent variation of avian sensitivity to climate change and trait‐based adaptive capacity along a tropical elevational gradient. DIVERS DISTRIB 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Nowak
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
- Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| | - Irene M. A. Bender
- Instituto de Ecología Regional Universidad Nacional de Tucumán‐CONICET Yerba Buena Argentina
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Susanne A. Fritz
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
- Institut für Geowissenschaften Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McFadden IR, Fritz SA, Zimmermann NE, Pellissier L, Kissling WD, Tobias JA, Schleuning M, Graham CH. Global plant-frugivore trait matching is shaped by climate and biogeographic history. Ecol Lett 2022; 25:686-696. [PMID: 35199916 PMCID: PMC9302656 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Species interactions are influenced by the trait structure of local multi‐trophic communities. However, it remains unclear whether mutualistic interactions in particular can drive trait patterns at the global scale, where climatic constraints and biogeographic processes gain importance. Here we evaluate global relationships between traits of frugivorous birds and palms (Arecaceae), and how these relationships are affected, directly or indirectly, by assemblage richness, climate and biogeographic history. We leverage a new and expanded gape size dataset for nearly all avian frugivores, and find a positive relationship between gape size and fruit size, that is, trait matching, which is influenced indirectly by palm richness and climate. We also uncover a latitudinal gradient in trait matching strength, which increases towards the tropics and varies among zoogeographic realms. Taken together, our results suggest trophic interactions have consistent influences on trait structure, but that abiotic, biogeographic and richness effects also play important, though sometimes indirect, roles in shaping the functional biogeography of mutualisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian R McFadden
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.,Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Susanne A Fritz
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Institut für Geowissenschaften, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Niklaus E Zimmermann
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Loïc Pellissier
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.,Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph A Tobias
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Catherine H Graham
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marques Dracxler C, Kissling WD. The mutualism-antagonism continuum in Neotropical palm-frugivore interactions: from interaction outcomes to ecosystem dynamics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2021; 97:527-553. [PMID: 34725900 PMCID: PMC9297963 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Frugivory, that is feeding on fruits, pulp or seeds by animals, is usually considered a mutualism when interactions involve seed dispersal, and an antagonism when it results in the predation and destruction of seeds. Nevertheless, most frugivory interactions involve both benefits and disadvantages for plants, and the net interaction outcomes thus tend to vary along a continuum from mutualism to antagonism. Quantifying outcome variation is challenging and the ecological contribution of frugivorous animals to plant demography thus remains little explored. This is particularly true for interactions in which animals do not ingest entire fruits, that is in seed‐eating and pulp‐eating. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of Neotropical palm–frugivore interactions, with a focus on how frugivore consumption behaviour (i.e. digestive processing, fruit‐handling ability and caching behaviour) and feeding types (fruit‐eating, pulp‐eating and seed‐eating) influence interaction outcomes at different demographic stages of palms. We compiled a total of 1043 species‐level palm–frugivore interaction records that explicitly captured information on which parts of palm fruits are eaten by animals. These records showed consumption of fruits of 106 Neotropical palm species by 273 vertebrate species, especially birds (50%) and mammals (45%), but also fish (3%) and reptiles (2%). Fruit‐eating involved all four taxonomic vertebrate classes whereas seed‐eating and pulp‐eating were only recorded among birds and mammals. Most fruit‐eating interactions (77%) resulted in positive interaction outcomes for plants (e.g. gut‐passed seeds are viable or seeds are successfully dispersed), regardless of the digestive processing type of vertebrate consumers (seed defecation versus regurgitation). The majority of pulp‐eating interactions (91%) also resulted in positive interaction outcomes, for instance via pulp removal that promoted seed germination or via dispersal of intact palm seeds by external transport, especially if animals have a good fruit‐handling ability (e.g. primates, and some parrots). By contrast, seed‐eating interactions mostly resulted in dual outcomes (60%), where interactions had both negative effects on seed survival and positive outcomes through seed caching and external (non‐digestive) seed dispersal. A detailed synthesis of available field studies with qualitative and quantitative information provided evidence that 12 families and 27 species of mammals and birds are predominantly on the mutualistic side of the continuum whereas five mammalian families, six mammal and one reptile species are on the antagonistic side. The synthesis also revealed that most species can act as partial mutualists, even if they are typically considered antagonists. Our review demonstrates how different consumption behaviours and feeding types of vertebrate fruit consumers can influence seed dispersal and regeneration of palms, and thus ultimately affect the structure and functioning of tropical ecosystems. Variation in feeding types of animal consumers will influence ecosystem dynamics via effects on plant population dynamics and differences in long‐distance seed dispersal, and may subsequently affect ecosystem functions such as carbon storage. The quantification of intra‐ and inter‐specific variation in outcomes of plant–frugivore interactions – and their positive and negative effects on the seed‐to‐seedling transition of animal‐dispersed plants – should be a key research focus to understand better the mutualism–antagonism continuum and its importance for ecosystem dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Marques Dracxler
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, Amsterdam, 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, Amsterdam, 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Skidmore AK, Coops NC, Neinavaz E, Ali A, Schaepman ME, Paganini M, Kissling WD, Vihervaara P, Darvishzadeh R, Feilhauer H, Fernandez M, Fernández N, Gorelick N, Geijzendorffer I, Heiden U, Heurich M, Hobern D, Holzwarth S, Muller-Karger FE, Van De Kerchove R, Lausch A, Leitão PJ, Lock MC, Mücher CA, O'Connor B, Rocchini D, Roeoesli C, Turner W, Vis JK, Wang T, Wegmann M, Wingate V. Author Correction: Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat Ecol Evol 2021; 5:1639. [PMID: 34697457 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01595-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Skidmore
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. .,Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Nicholas C Coops
- Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elnaz Neinavaz
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Abebe Ali
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Michael E Schaepman
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Paganini
- European Space Research Institute (ESRIN), European Space Agency, Frascati, Italy
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petteri Vihervaara
- Biodiversity Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Roshanak Darvishzadeh
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Hannes Feilhauer
- Institute of Geographical Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Remote Sensing Center for Earth System Research, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.,George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Néstor Fernández
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | - Uta Heiden
- Earth Observation Center (EOC), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
| | - Marco Heurich
- Department of Visitor Management and National Park Monitoring, Bavarian Forest National Park Administration, Grafenau, Germany.,Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefanie Holzwarth
- Earth Observation Center (EOC), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
| | | | | | - Angela Lausch
- Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.,Geography Department, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pedro J Leitão
- Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.,Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcelle C Lock
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caspar A Mücher
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Brian O'Connor
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Duccio Rocchini
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Claudia Roeoesli
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Woody Turner
- Earth Science Division, NASA, Washington DC, USA
| | - Jan Kees Vis
- Unilever Europe B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Wegmann
- Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Wingate
- Land Systems and Sustainable Land Management, Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Skidmore AK, Coops NC, Neinavaz E, Ali A, Schaepman ME, Paganini M, Kissling WD, Vihervaara P, Darvishzadeh R, Feilhauer H, Fernandez M, Fernández N, Gorelick N, Geijzendorffer I, Heiden U, Heurich M, Hobern D, Holzwarth S, Muller-Karger FE, Van De Kerchove R, Lausch A, Leitão PJ, Lock MC, Mücher CA, O'Connor B, Rocchini D, Roeoesli C, Turner W, Vis JK, Wang T, Wegmann M, Wingate V. Author Correction: Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat Ecol Evol 2021; 5:1318. [PMID: 34282320 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01527-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Skidmore
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. .,Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Nicholas C Coops
- Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elnaz Neinavaz
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Abebe Ali
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Michael E Schaepman
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Paganini
- European Space Research Institute (ESRIN), European Space Agency, Frascati, Italy
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petteri Vihervaara
- Biodiversity Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Roshanak Darvishzadeh
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Hannes Feilhauer
- Institute of Geographical Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Remote Sensing Center for Earth System Research, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.,George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Néstor Fernández
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | | | - Uta Heiden
- Earth Observation Center (EOC), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
| | - Marco Heurich
- Department of Visitor Management and National Park Monitoring, Bavarian Forest National Park Administration, Grafenau, Germany.,Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefanie Holzwarth
- Earth Observation Center (EOC), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
| | | | | | - Angela Lausch
- Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany.,Geography Department, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pedro J Leitão
- Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.,Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcelle C Lock
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.,Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caspar A Mücher
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Brian O'Connor
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Duccio Rocchini
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Claudia Roeoesli
- Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Woody Turner
- Earth Science Division, NASA, Washington DC, USA
| | - Jan Kees Vis
- Unilever Europe B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Wegmann
- Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Wingate
- Land Systems and Sustainable Land Management, Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lim JY, Wasserman MD, Veen J, Després-Einspenner ML, Kissling WD. Ecological and evolutionary significance of primates' most consumed plant families. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20210737. [PMID: 34130500 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Angiosperms have been essential components of primate diets for millions of years, but the relative importance of different angiosperm families remains unclear. Here, we assess the contribution and ecological and evolutionary significance of plant families to diets of wild primates by compiling an unprecedented dataset of almost 9000 dietary records from 141 primary sources covering 112 primate species. Of the 205 angiosperm plant families recorded in primate diets, only 10 were consumed by more than half of primate species. Plants of the Moraceae and Fabaceae families were the most widely and frequently consumed, and they likely represent keystone resources for primates. Over 75% of species fed on these two families, and together they made up a median of approximately 13% of primate diets. By analysing the relative proportion of different plant parts consumed, we found that Moraceae was mainly eaten as fruit and Fabaceae as non-fruit parts, with the consumption of these two families not showing a significant phylogenetic signal across primate species. Moraceae consumption was associated with small home range sizes, even though more frugivorous primates tended to have larger home ranges compared to more folivorous species, possibly due to the year-round availability of moraceous fruits and the asynchrony in their phenology. Our results suggest that primates may be intricately and subtly shaped by the plant families that they have consumed over millions of years, and highlight the importance of detailed dietary studies to better understand primate ecology and evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Ying Lim
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.,Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael D Wasserman
- Department of Anthropology and Human Biology Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Jorin Veen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lenters TP, Henderson A, Dracxler CM, Elias GA, Kamga SM, Couvreur TL, Kissling WD. Integration and harmonization of trait data from plant individuals across heterogeneous sources. ECOL INFORM 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
Vries JPR, Koma Z, WallisDeVries MF, Kissling WD. Identifying fine‐scale habitat preferences of threatened butterflies using airborne laser scanning. DIVERS DISTRIB 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Peter Reinier Vries
- Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Zsófia Koma
- Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Michiel F. WallisDeVries
- De Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly Conservation Wageningen The Netherlands
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jamison‐Daniels S, Kissling WD, Botha M, Harris MA, Gordon CE, Greve M. The role of deterministic succession during forest development within a southern African savanna. Biotropica 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/btp.12890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Monique Botha
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
- School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
| | - Mathew A. Harris
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
- FABI (Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute) University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
| | - Christopher E. Gordon
- Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World Aarhus University Aarhus C Denmark
| | - Michelle Greve
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Onstein RE, Vink DN, Veen J, Barratt CD, Flantua SGA, Wich SA, Kissling WD. Understanding the relationship between fruit colour and primate vision requires multiple lines of evidence. A reply to Heymann & Fuzessy. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20202981. [PMID: 33468009 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Renske E Onstein
- Evolution and Adaptation Group, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daphne N Vink
- Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorin Veen
- Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher D Barratt
- Evolution and Adaptation Group, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - S G A Flantua
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Serge A Wich
- Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lim JY, Svenning JC, Göldel B, Faurby S, Kissling WD. Frugivore-fruit size relationships between palms and mammals reveal past and future defaunation impacts. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4904. [PMID: 32994391 PMCID: PMC7524719 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18530-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Mammalian frugivores are critical seed dispersers, but many are under threat of extinction. Futhermore, the impact of past and future defaunation on plant assemblages has yet to be quantified at the global scale. Here, we integrate palm and mammalian frugivore trait and occurrence data and reveal a global positive relationship between fruit size and frugivore body size. Global variation in fruit size is better explained by present-day frugivore assemblages than by Late Pleistocene assemblages, suggesting ecological and evolutionary reorganization after end-Pleistocene extinctions, except in the Neotropics, where some large-fruited palm species may have outlived their main seed dispersers by thousands of years. Our simulations of frugivore extinction over the next 100 years suggest that the impact of defaunation will be highest in the Old World tropics, and an up to 4% assemblage-level decrease in fruit size would be required to maintain the global body size–fruit size relationship. Overall, our results suggest that while some palm species may be able to keep pace with future defaunation through evolutionary changes in fruit size, large-fruited species may be especially vulnerable to continued defaunation. Extinctions of megafauna can have cascading effects on their ecological communities. Here, Lim et al. investigate the relationships of historical and current mammalian frugivore body size with palm fruit size, then project how further mammal extinctions are likely to affect palm communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Ying Lim
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. .,School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637551, Singapore.
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity & Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
| | - Bastian Göldel
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity & Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
| | - Søren Faurby
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden.,Gothenberg Global Biodiversity Centre, Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chudzinska M, Dupont YL, Nabe-Nielsen J, Maia KP, Henriksen MV, Rasmussen C, Kissling WD, Hagen M, Trøjelsgaard K. Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees. Ecol Modell 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
25
|
Nascimento LFD, Guimarães PR, Onstein RE, Kissling WD, Pires MM. Associated evolution of fruit size, fruit colour and spines in Neotropical palms. J Evol Biol 2020; 33:858-868. [PMID: 32198956 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Understanding how ecological interactions have shaped the evolutionary dynamics of species traits remains a challenge in evolutionary ecology. Combining trait evolution models and phylogenies, we analysed the evolution of characters associated with seed dispersal (fruit size and colour) and herbivory (spines) in Neotropical palms to infer the role of these opposing animal-plant interactions in driving evolutionary patterns. We found that the evolution of fruit colour and fruit size was associated in Neotropical palms, supporting the adaptive interpretation of seed-dispersal syndromes and highlighting the role of frugivores in shaping plant evolution. Furthermore, we revealed a positive association between fruit size and the presence of spines on palm leaves, bracteas and stems. We hypothesize that interactions between palms and large-bodied frugivores/herbivores may explain the evolutionary relationship between fruit size and spines. Large-bodied frugivores, such as extinct megafauna, besides consuming the fruits and dispersing large seeds, may also have consumed the leaves or damaged the plants, thus simultaneously favouring the evolution of large fruits and defensive structures. Our findings show how current trait patterns can be understood as the result of the interplay between antagonistic and mutualistic interactions that have happened throughout the evolutionary history of a clade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulo R Guimarães
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renske E Onstein
- German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathias M Pires
- Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Onstein RE, Vink DN, Veen J, Barratt CD, Flantua SGA, Wich SA, Kissling WD. Palm fruit colours are linked to the broad-scale distribution and diversification of primate colour vision systems. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20192731. [PMID: 32097588 PMCID: PMC7062032 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A long-standing hypothesis in ecology and evolution is that trichromatic colour vision (the ability to distinguish red from green) in frugivorous primates has evolved as an adaptation to detect conspicuous (reddish) fruits. This could provide a competitive advantage over dichromatic frugivores which cannot distinguish reddish colours from a background of green foliage. Here, we test whether the origin, distribution and diversity of trichromatic primates is positively associated with the availability of conspicuous palm fruits, i.e. keystone fruit resources for tropical frugivores. We combine global data of colour vision, distribution and phylogenetic data for more than 400 primate species with fruit colour data for more than 1700 palm species, and reveal that species richness of trichromatic primates increases with the proportion of palm species that have conspicuous fruits, especially in subtropical African forests. By contrast, species richness of trichromats in Asia and the Americas is not positively associated with conspicuous palm fruit colours. Macroevolutionary analyses further indicate rapid and synchronous radiations of trichromats and conspicuous palms on the African mainland starting 10 Ma. These results suggest that the distribution and diversification of African trichromatic primates is strongly linked to the relative availability of conspicuous (versus non-conspicuous) palm fruits, and that interactions between primates and palms are related to the coevolutionary dynamics of primate colour vision systems and palm fruit colours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske E Onstein
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne N Vink
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorin Veen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher D Barratt
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Suzette G A Flantua
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Serge A Wich
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L33AF, Liverpool, UK
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schleuning M, Neuschulz EL, Albrecht J, Bender IMA, Bowler DE, Dehling DM, Fritz SA, Hof C, Mueller T, Nowak L, Sorensen MC, Böhning-Gaese K, Kissling WD. Trait-Based Assessments of Climate-Change Impacts on Interacting Species. Trends Ecol Evol 2020; 35:319-328. [PMID: 31987640 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Plant-animal interactions are fundamentally important in ecosystems, but have often been ignored by studies of climate-change impacts on biodiversity. Here, we present a trait-based framework for predicting the responses of interacting plants and animals to climate change. We distinguish three pathways along which climate change can impact interacting species in ecological communities: (i) spatial and temporal mismatches in the occurrence and abundance of species, (ii) the formation of novel interactions and secondary extinctions, and (iii) alterations of the dispersal ability of plants. These pathways are mediated by three kinds of functional traits: response traits, matching traits, and dispersal traits. We propose that incorporating these traits into predictive models will improve assessments of the responses of interacting species to climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Eike Lena Neuschulz
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jörg Albrecht
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Irene M A Bender
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle, Germany
| | - Diana E Bowler
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Matthias Dehling
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Susanne A Fritz
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christian Hof
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Technical University of Munich, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany
| | - Thomas Mueller
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Larissa Nowak
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marjorie C Sorensen
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E., Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
| | - Katrin Böhning-Gaese
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, 1090, GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Musche M, Adamescu M, Angelstam P, Bacher S, Bäck J, Buss HL, Duffy C, Flaim G, Gaillardet J, Giannakis GV, Haase P, Halada L, Kissling WD, Lundin L, Matteucci G, Meesenburg H, Monteith D, Nikolaidis NP, Pipan T, Pyšek P, Rowe EC, Roy DB, Sier A, Tappeiner U, Vilà M, White T, Zobel M, Klotz S. Research questions to facilitate the future development of European long-term ecosystem research infrastructures: A horizon scanning exercise. J Environ Manage 2019; 250:109479. [PMID: 31499467 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Distributed environmental research infrastructures are important to support assessments of the effects of global change on landscapes, ecosystems and society. These infrastructures need to provide continuity to address long-term change, yet be flexible enough to respond to rapid societal and technological developments that modify research priorities. We used a horizon scanning exercise to identify and prioritize emerging research questions for the future development of ecosystem and socio-ecological research infrastructures in Europe. Twenty research questions covered topics related to (i) ecosystem structures and processes, (ii) the impacts of anthropogenic drivers on ecosystems, (iii) ecosystem services and socio-ecological systems and (iv), methods and research infrastructures. Several key priorities for the development of research infrastructures emerged. Addressing complex environmental issues requires the adoption of a whole-system approach, achieved through integration of biotic, abiotic and socio-economic measurements. Interoperability among different research infrastructures needs to be improved by developing standard measurements, harmonizing methods, and establishing capacities and tools for data integration, processing, storage and analysis. Future research infrastructures should support a range of methodological approaches including observation, experiments and modelling. They should also have flexibility to respond to new requirements, for example by adjusting the spatio-temporal design of measurements. When new methods are introduced, compatibility with important long-term data series must be ensured. Finally, indicators, tools, and transdisciplinary approaches to identify, quantify and value ecosystem services across spatial scales and domains need to be advanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Musche
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120, Halle, Germany.
| | - Mihai Adamescu
- University of Bucharest, Research Center for Systems Ecology and Sustainability, Spl. Independentei 91 - 95, 050095, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Per Angelstam
- School for Forest Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 43, SE-739 21, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
| | - Sven Bacher
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Jaana Bäck
- Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 27, 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heather L Buss
- School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Duffy
- Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 212 Sackett, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - Giovanna Flaim
- Department of Sustainable Agro-ecosystems and Bioresources, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy
| | - Jerome Gaillardet
- CNRS and Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238, Paris, cedex 05, France
| | - George V Giannakis
- School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, University Campus, 73100, Chania, Greece
| | - Peter Haase
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Clamecystr. 12, 63571, Gelnhausen, Germany; University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, 45141, Essen, Germany
| | - Luboš Halada
- Institute of Landscape Ecology SAS, Branch Nitra, Akademicka 2, 949 10, Nitra, Slovakia
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090, GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Lundin
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Giorgio Matteucci
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agricultural and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-ISAFOM), Via Patacca, 85 I-80056, Ercolano, NA, Italy
| | - Henning Meesenburg
- Northwest German Forest Research Institute, Grätzelstr. 2, 37079, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Don Monteith
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Nikolaos P Nikolaidis
- School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, University Campus, 73100, Chania, Greece
| | - Tanja Pipan
- ZRC SAZU Karst Research Institute, Titov trg 2, SI-6230, Postojna, Slovenia; UNESCO Chair on Karst Education, University of Nova Gorica, Glavni trg 8, SI-5271, Vipava, Slovenia
| | - Petr Pyšek
- The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic; Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ed C Rowe
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bangor, LL57 4NW, UK
| | - David B Roy
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8EF, UK
| | - Andrew Sier
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK
| | - Ulrike Tappeiner
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestrasse 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria; Eurac research, Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, 41005, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Tim White
- Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, 2217 EES Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16828, USA
| | - Martin Zobel
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai St.40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia
| | - Stefan Klotz
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kissling WD, Balslev H, Baker WJ, Dransfield J, Göldel B, Lim JY, Onstein RE, Svenning JC. PalmTraits 1.0, a species-level functional trait database of palms worldwide. Sci Data 2019; 6:178. [PMID: 31551423 PMCID: PMC6760217 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0189-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Plant traits are critical to plant form and function -including growth, survival and reproduction- and therefore shape fundamental aspects of population and ecosystem dynamics as well as ecosystem services. Here, we present a global species-level compilation of key functional traits for palms (Arecaceae), a plant family with keystone importance in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. We derived measurements of essential functional traits for all (>2500) palm species from key sources such as monographs, books, other scientific publications, as well as herbarium collections. This includes traits related to growth form, stems, armature, leaves and fruits. Although many species are still lacking trait information, the standardized and global coverage of the data set will be important for supporting future studies in tropical ecology, rainforest evolution, paleoecology, biogeography, macroecology, macroevolution, global change biology and conservation. Potential uses are comparative eco-evolutionary studies, ecological research on community dynamics, plant-animal interactions and ecosystem functioning, studies on plant-based ecosystem services, as well as conservation science concerned with the loss and restoration of functional diversity in a changing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Henrik Balslev
- Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | | | - Bastian Göldel
- Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Jun Ying Lim
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renske E Onstein
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
- Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Bioscience, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Steenvoorden J, Meddens AJH, Martinez AJ, Foster LJ, Kissling WD. The potential importance of unburned islands as refugia for the persistence of wildlife species in fire-prone ecosystems. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:8800-8812. [PMID: 31410281 PMCID: PMC6686341 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The persistence of wildlife species in fire-prone ecosystems is under increasing pressure from global change, including alterations in fire regimes caused by climate change. However, unburned islands might act to mitigate negative effects of fire on wildlife populations by providing habitat in which species can survive and recolonize burned areas. Nevertheless, the characteristics of unburned islands and their role as potential refugia for the postfire population dynamics of wildlife species remain poorly understood.We used a newly developed unburned island database of the northwestern United States from 1984 to 2014 to assess the postfire response of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus), a large gallinaceous bird inhabiting the sagebrush ecosystems of North America, in which wildfires are common. Specifically, we tested whether prefire and postfire male attendance trends at mating locations (leks) differed between burned and unburned areas, and to what extent postfire habitat composition at multiple scales could explain such trends.Using time-series of male counts at leks together with spatially explicit fire history information, we modeled whether male attendance was negatively affected by fire events. Results revealed that burned leks often exhibit sustained decline in male attendance, whereas leks within unburned islands or >1.5 km away from fire perimeters tend to show stable or increasing trends.Analyses of postfire habitat composition further revealed that sagebrush vegetation height within 0.8 km around leks, as well elevation within 0.8 km, 6.4 km, and 18 km around leks, had a positive effect on male attendance trends. Moreover, the proportion of the landscape with cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) cover >8% had negative effects on male attendance trends within 0.8 km, 6.4 km, and 18 km of leks, respectively. Synthesis and applications. Our results indicate that maintaining areas of unburned vegetation within and outside fire perimeters may be crucial for sustaining sage-grouse populations following wildfire. The role of unburned islands as fire refugia requires more attention in wildlife management and conservation planning because their creation, protection, and maintenance may positively affect wildlife population dynamics in fire-prone ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Steenvoorden
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nowak L, Kissling WD, Bender IMA, Dehling DM, Töpfer T, Böhning‐Gaese K, Schleuning M. Projecting consequences of global warming for the functional diversity of fleshy‐fruited plants and frugivorous birds along a tropical elevational gradient. DIVERS DISTRIB 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Nowak
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
- Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Irene M. A. Bender
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin‐Luther‐University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
| | - D. Matthias Dehling
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand
| | - Till Töpfer
- Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK) Bonn Germany
| | - Katrin Böhning‐Gaese
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
- Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Frankfurt (Main) Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Onstein RE, Baker WJ, Couvreur TLP, Faurby S, Herrera-Alsina L, Svenning JC, Kissling WD. To adapt or go extinct? The fate of megafaunal palm fruits under past global change. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 285:rspb.2018.0882. [PMID: 29899077 PMCID: PMC6015859 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Past global change may have forced animal-dispersed plants with megafaunal fruits to adapt or go extinct, but these processes have remained unexplored at broad spatio-temporal scales. Here, we combine phylogenetic, distributional and fruit size data for more than 2500 palm (Arecaceae) species in a time-slice diversification analysis to quantify how extinction and adaptation have changed over deep time. Our results indicate that extinction rates of palms with megafaunal fruits have increased in the New World since the onset of the Quaternary (2.6 million years ago). In contrast, Old World palms show a Quaternary increase in transition rates towards evolving small fruits from megafaunal fruits. We suggest that Quaternary climate oscillations and concurrent habitat fragmentation and defaunation of megafaunal frugivores in the New World have reduced seed dispersal distances and geographical ranges of palms with megafaunal fruits, resulting in their extinction. The increasing adaptation to smaller fruits in the Old World could reflect selection for seed dispersal by ocean-crossing frugivores (e.g. medium-sized birds and bats) to colonize Indo-Pacific islands against a background of Quaternary sea-level fluctuations. Our macro-evolutionary results suggest that megafaunal fruits are increasingly being lost from tropical ecosystems, either due to extinctions or by adapting to smaller fruit sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske E Onstein
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Søren Faurby
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.,Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Leonel Herrera-Alsina
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bakx TRM, Koma Z, Seijmonsbergen AC, Kissling WD. Use and categorization of Light Detection and Ranging vegetation metrics in avian diversity and species distribution research. DIVERS DISTRIB 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan R. M. Bakx
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Zsófia Koma
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Arie C. Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Muñoz G, Kissling WD, van Loon EE. Biodiversity Observations Miner: A web application to unlock primary biodiversity data from published literature. Biodivers Data J 2019:e28737. [PMID: 30692868 PMCID: PMC6344444 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.7.e28737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A considerable portion of primary biodiversity data is digitally locked inside published literature which is often stored as pdf files. Large-scale approaches to biodiversity science could benefit from retrieving this information and making it digitally accessible and machine-readable. Nonetheless, the amount and diversity of digitally published literature pose many challenges for knowledge discovery and retrieval. Text mining has been extensively used for data discovery tasks in large quantities of documents. However, text mining approaches for knowledge discovery and retrieval have been limited in biodiversity science compared to other disciplines. New information Here, we present a novel, open source text mining tool, the Biodiversity Observations Miner (BOM). This web application, written in R, allows the semi-automated discovery of punctual biodiversity observations (e.g. biotic interactions, functional or behavioural traits and natural history descriptions) associated with the scientific names present inside a corpus of scientific literature. Furthermore, BOM enable users the rapid screening of large quantities of literature based on word co-occurrences that match custom biodiversity dictionaries. This tool aims to increase the digital mobilisation of primary biodiversity data and is freely accessible via GitHub or through a web server.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Muñoz
- NASUA, Biodiversity research and conservation section, Quito, Ecuador NASUA, Biodiversity research and conservation section Quito Ecuador.,Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Biology, Concordia University Montreal Canada
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Faculty of Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Faculty of Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - E Emiel van Loon
- Faculty of Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Faculty of Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hardisty AR, Michener WK, Agosti D, Alonso García E, Bastin L, Belbin L, Bowser A, Buttigieg PL, Canhos DA, Egloff W, De Giovanni R, Figueira R, Groom Q, Guralnick RP, Hobern D, Hugo W, Koureas D, Ji L, Los W, Manuel J, Manset D, Poelen J, Saarenmaa H, Schigel D, Uhlir PF, Kissling WD. The Bari Manifesto: An interoperability framework for essential biodiversity variables. ECOL INFORM 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
36
|
Kissling WD, Walls R, Bowser A, Jones MO, Kattge J, Agosti D, Amengual J, Basset A, van Bodegom PM, Cornelissen JHC, Denny EG, Deudero S, Egloff W, Elmendorf SC, Alonso García E, Jones KD, Jones OR, Lavorel S, Lear D, Navarro LM, Pawar S, Pirzl R, Rüger N, Sal S, Salguero-Gómez R, Schigel D, Schulz KS, Skidmore A, Guralnick RP. Towards global data products of Essential Biodiversity Variables on species traits. Nat Ecol Evol 2018; 2:1531-1540. [PMID: 30224814 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0667-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) allow observation and reporting of global biodiversity change, but a detailed framework for the empirical derivation of specific EBVs has yet to be developed. Here, we re-examine and refine the previous candidate set of species traits EBVs and show how traits related to phenology, morphology, reproduction, physiology and movement can contribute to EBV operationalization. The selected EBVs express intra-specific trait variation and allow monitoring of how organisms respond to global change. We evaluate the societal relevance of species traits EBVs for policy targets and demonstrate how open, interoperable and machine-readable trait data enable the building of EBV data products. We outline collection methods, meta(data) standardization, reproducible workflows, semantic tools and licence requirements for producing species traits EBVs. An operationalization is critical for assessing progress towards biodiversity conservation and sustainable development goals and has wide implications for data-intensive science in ecology, biogeography, conservation and Earth observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Daniel Kissling
- Department of Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Anne Bowser
- Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC, USA
| | - Matthew O Jones
- University of Montana, W. A. Franke Department of Forestry and Conservation, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Jens Kattge
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Josep Amengual
- Area de Conservacion, Seguimiento y Programas de la Red, Organismo Autonomo Parques Nacionales, Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Basset
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
| | - Peter M van Bodegom
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H C Cornelissen
- Systems Ecology, Department of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Denny
- USA National Phenology Network, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Salud Deudero
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Sarah C Elmendorf
- National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle Ecology, Boulder, CO, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | | - Katherine D Jones
- National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle Ecology, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Owen R Jones
- Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Sandra Lavorel
- Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS - Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Dan Lear
- Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Laetitia M Navarro
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Samraat Pawar
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, UK
| | - Rebecca Pirzl
- CSIRO and Atlas of Living Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Nadja Rüger
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama
| | - Sofia Sal
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, Berkshire, UK
| | - Roberto Salguero-Gómez
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.,Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Evolutionary Demography Laboratory, Max Plank Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
| | - Dmitry Schigel
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Katja-Sabine Schulz
- Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, USA
| | - Andrew Skidmore
- Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Environmental Science, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert P Guralnick
- Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Onstein RE, Baker WJ, Couvreur TLP, Faurby S, Svenning JC, Kissling WD. Frugivory-related traits promote speciation of tropical palms. Nat Ecol Evol 2017; 1:1903-1911. [PMID: 29062122 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0348-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Animal-mediated seed dispersal by frugivorous birds and mammals is central to the ecology and functioning of ecosystems, but whether and how frugivory-related traits have affected plant speciation remains little explored. Fruit size is directly linked to plant dispersal capacity and therefore influences gene flow and genetic divergence of plant populations. Using a global species-level phylogeny with comprehensive data on fruit sizes and plant species distributions, we test whether fruit size has affected speciation rates of palms (Arecaceae), a plant family characteristic of tropical rainforests. Globally, the results reveal that palms with small fruit sizes have increased speciation rates compared with those with large (megafaunal) fruits. Speciation of small-fruited palms is particularly high in the understory of tropical rainforests in the New World, and on islands in the Old World. This suggests that frugivory-related traits in combination with geography and the movement behaviour of frugivores can influence the speciation of fleshy-fruited plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske E Onstein
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, Amsterdam, 1090 GE, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Søren Faurby
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.,Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, Amsterdam, 1090 GE, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kissling WD, Ahumada JA, Bowser A, Fernandez M, Fernández N, García EA, Guralnick RP, Isaac NJB, Kelling S, Los W, McRae L, Mihoub J, Obst M, Santamaria M, Skidmore AK, Williams KJ, Agosti D, Amariles D, Arvanitidis C, Bastin L, De Leo F, Egloff W, Elith J, Hobern D, Martin D, Pereira HM, Pesole G, Peterseil J, Saarenmaa H, Schigel D, Schmeller DS, Segata N, Turak E, Uhlir PF, Wee B, Hardisty AR. Building essential biodiversity variables (
EBV
s) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2017; 93:600-625. [DOI: 10.1111/brv.12359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Daniel Kissling
- Department Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248 1090 GE Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jorge A. Ahumada
- TEAM Network, Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Dr. Suite 500 Arlington VA 22202 U.S.A
| | - Anne Bowser
- Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20004 U.S.A
| | - Miguel Fernandez
- Biodiversity Conservation Group, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e 04103 Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
- Instituto de Ecología Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (UMSA), Campus Universitario, Cota cota La Paz Bolivia
| | - Néstor Fernández
- Biodiversity Conservation Group, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e 04103 Leipzig Germany
- Estación Biológica de Doñana EBD‐CSIC, Américo Vespucio s.n 41092 Sevilla Spain
| | - Enrique Alonso García
- Councillor of State of the Kingdom of Spain and Honorary Researcher of the Franklin Institute of the University of Alcalá Madrid Spain
| | - Robert P. Guralnick
- University of Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida at Gainesville Gainesville FL 32611‐2710 U.S.A
| | - Nick J. B. Isaac
- Biological Records Centre, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford OX10 8BB Wallingford U.K
| | - Steve Kelling
- Cornell Lab of Ornithology Cornell University, 158 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 U.S.A
| | - Wouter Los
- Department Theoretical and Computational Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248 1090 GE Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Louise McRae
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park NW1 4RY London U.K
| | - Jean‐Baptiste Mihoub
- UPMC Université Paris 06, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, CESCO, UMR 7204 Sorbonne Universités, 61 rue Buffon 75005 Paris France
- Department of Conservation Biology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15 04318 Leipzig Germany
| | - Matthias Obst
- Department of Marine Sciences Göteborg University, Box 463 SE‐40530 Göteborg Sweden
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461 SE‐405 30 Göteborg Sweden
| | - Monica Santamaria
- CNR‐Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Amendola 165/A Street 70126 Bari Italy
| | - Andrew K. Skidmore
- Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geo‐Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente, P.O. Box 217 7500AE Enschede The Netherlands
| | - Kristen J. Williams
- Land and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), PO Box 1600 Canberra Australian Capital Territory 2601 Australia
| | | | - Daniel Amariles
- Decision and Policy Analysis (DAPA), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) AA6713 Cali Colombia
- Instituto Alexander von Humboldt CALLE 28A # 15‐09 Bogota D.C. Colombia
| | - Christos Arvanitidis
- Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Thalassokosmos, Former US Base at Gournes 71003 Heraklion, Crete Greece
| | - Lucy Bastin
- School of Engineering and Applied Science Aston University, Aston Triangle B4 7ET Birmingham U.K
- Knowledge Management Unit Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Via Enrico Fermi 21027 Varese Italy
| | - Francesca De Leo
- CNR‐Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Amendola 165/A Street 70126 Bari Italy
| | | | - Jane Elith
- School of BioSciences (Building 143) University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Donald Hobern
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat, Universitetsparken 15 2100 København Ø Denmark
| | - David Martin
- Land and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), PO Box 1600 Canberra Australian Capital Territory 2601 Australia
| | - Henrique M. Pereira
- Biodiversity Conservation Group, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e 04103 Leipzig Germany
- Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle Germany
| | - Graziano Pesole
- CNR‐Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Amendola 165/A Street 70126 Bari Italy
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics University of Bari “A. Moro”, via Orabona 4 70125 Bari Italy
| | - Johannes Peterseil
- Department for Ecosystem Research & Environmental Information Management Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Lände 5 1090 Vienna Austria
| | - Hannu Saarenmaa
- Department of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu Science Park, Länsikatu 15 FI‐80110 Joensuu Finland
| | - Dmitry Schigel
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat, Universitetsparken 15 2100 København Ø Denmark
| | - Dirk S. Schmeller
- UPMC Université Paris 06, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, CESCO, UMR 7204 Sorbonne Universités, 61 rue Buffon 75005 Paris France
- ECOLAB, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, UPS Toulouse France
| | - Nicola Segata
- Centre for Integrative Biology University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9 38123 Trento Italy
| | - Eren Turak
- NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, PO Box A290 Sydney South NSW 1232 Australia
- Australian Museum, 6 College Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
| | - Paul F. Uhlir
- Consultant, Data Policy and Management, P.O. Box 305, Callicoon NY 12723 U.S.A
| | - Brian Wee
- Massive Connections, 2410 17th St NW, Apt 306 Washington DC 20009 U.S.A
| | - Alex R. Hardisty
- School of Computer Science & Informatics Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, 5 The Parade Cardiff CF24 3AA U.K
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barratt CD, Bwong BA, Onstein RE, Rosauer DF, Menegon M, Doggart N, Nagel P, Kissling WD, Loader SP. Front Cover. DIVERS DISTRIB 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
40
|
Kissling WD, Seijmonsbergen A, Foppen R, Bouten W. eEcoLiDAR, eScience infrastructure for ecological applications of LiDAR point clouds: reconstructing the 3D ecosystem structure for animals at regional to continental scales. RIO 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e14939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
41
|
|
42
|
Barratt CD, Bwong BA, Onstein RE, Rosauer DF, Menegon M, Doggart N, Nagel P, Kissling WD, Loader SP. Environmental correlates of phylogenetic endemism in amphibians and the conservation of refugia in the Coastal Forests of Eastern Africa. DIVERS DISTRIB 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D. Barratt
- Biogeography Research Group; Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED); University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Beryl A. Bwong
- Biogeography Research Group; Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
- Herpetology Section; National Museums of Kenya; Nairobi Kenya
| | - Renske E. Onstein
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED); University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Dan F. Rosauer
- Research School of Biology and Centre for Biodiversity Analysis; Australian National University; Acton ACT Australia
| | - Michele Menegon
- Tropical Biodiversity Section; Museo delle Scienze; Trento Italy
| | - Nike Doggart
- Tanzania Forest Conservation Group; Dar es Salaam Tanzania
| | - Peter Nagel
- Biogeography Research Group; Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED); University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Simon P. Loader
- Biogeography Research Group; Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
- Department of Life Sciences; University of Roehampton; London UK
- Department of Life Sciences; Natural History Museum; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bender IMA, Kissling WD, Böhning-Gaese K, Hensen I, Kühn I, Wiegand T, Dehling DM, Schleuning M. Functionally specialised birds respond flexibly to seasonal changes in fruit availability. J Anim Ecol 2017; 86:800-811. [PMID: 28493450 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Interactions between resource and consumer species result in complex ecological networks. The overall structure of these networks is often stable in space and time, but little is known about the temporal stability of the functional roles of consumer species in these networks. We used a trait-based approach to investigate whether consumers (frugivorous birds) show similar degrees of functional specialisation on resources (plants) in ecological networks across seasons. We additionally tested whether closely related bird species have similar degrees of functional specialisation and whether birds that are functionally specialised on specific resource types within a season are flexible in switching to other resource types in other seasons. We analysed four seasonal replicates of two species-rich plant-frugivore networks from the tropical Andes. To quantify fruit preferences of frugivorous birds, we projected their interactions with plants into a multidimensional plant trait space. To measure functional specialisation of birds, we calculated a species' functional niche breadth (the extent of seasonal plant trait space utilised by a particular bird) and functional originality (the extent to which a bird species' fruit preference functionally differs from those of other species in a seasonal network). We additionally calculated functional flexibility, i.e. the ability of bird species to change their fruit preference across seasons in response to variation in plant resources. Functional specialisation of bird species varied more among species than across seasons, and phylogenetically similar bird species showed similar degrees of functional niche breadth (phylogenetic signal λ = 0·81) and functional originality (λ = 0·89). Additionally, we found that birds with high functional flexibility across seasons had narrow functional niche breadth and high functional originality per season, suggesting that birds that are seasonally specialised on particular resources are most flexible in switching to other fruit resources across seasons. The high flexibility of functionally specialised bird species to switch seasonally to other resources challenges the view that consumer species rely on functionally similar resources throughout the year. This flexibility of consumer species may be an important, but widely neglected mechanism that could potentially stabilise consumer-resource networks in response to human disturbance and environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene M A Bender
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle, Germany.,Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, POSTBUS 94248, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrin Böhning-Gaese
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt (Main), Germany.,Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Goethe University Frankfurt, Biologicum, Max von Laue Str. 13, 60439, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| | - Isabell Hensen
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle, Germany
| | - Ingolf Kühn
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle, Germany.,Department Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Thorsten Wiegand
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Department Ecological Modelling, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Matthias Dehling
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt (Main), Germany.,Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cámara-Leret R, Faurby S, Macía MJ, Balslev H, Göldel B, Svenning JC, Kissling WD, Rønsted N, Saslis-Lagoudakis CH. Fundamental species traits explain provisioning services of tropical American palms. Nat Plants 2017; 3:16220. [PMID: 28112717 DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The well-being of the global human population rests on provisioning services delivered by 12% of the Earth's ∼400,000 plant species1. Plant utilization by humans is influenced by species traits2-4, but it is not well understood which traits underpin different human needs5. Here, we focus on palms (Arecaceae), one of the most economically important plant groups globally6, and demonstrate that provisioning services related to basic needs, such as food and medicine, show a strong link to fundamental functional and geographic traits. We integrate data from 2,201 interviews on plant utilization from three biomes in South America-spanning 68 communities, 43 ethnic groups and 2,221 plant uses-with a dataset of 4 traits (leaf length, stem volume, fruit volume, geographic range size) and a species-level phylogeny7. For all 208 palm species occurring in our study area, we test for relations between their traits and perceived value. We find that people preferentially use large, widespread species rather than small, narrow-ranged species, and that different traits are linked to different uses. Further, plant size and geographic range size are stronger predictors of ecosystem service realization for palm services related to basic human needs than less-basic needs (for example, ritual). These findings suggest that reliance on plant size and availability may have prevented our optimal realization of wild-plant services, since ecologically rare yet functionally important (for example, chemically) clades may have been overlooked. Beyond expanding our understanding of how local people use biodiversity in mega-diverse regions, our trait- and phylogeny-based approach helps to understand the processes that underpin ecosystem service realization, a necessary step to meet societal needs in a changing world with a growing human population5,8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Cámara-Leret
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Søren Faurby
- Department of Biogeography and Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Manuel J Macía
- Departamento de Biología, Área de Botánica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Darwin 2, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Henrik Balslev
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Bastian Göldel
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Rønsted
- Evolutionary Genomics Section, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83S, 1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis
- Evolutionary Genomics Section, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83S, 1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kissling WD, Blach-Overgaard A, Zwaan RE, Wagner P. Historical colonization and dispersal limitation supplement climate and topography in shaping species richness of African lizards (Reptilia: Agaminae). Sci Rep 2016; 6:34014. [PMID: 27671620 PMCID: PMC5037428 DOI: 10.1038/srep34014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
To what extent deep-time dispersal limitation shapes present-day biodiversity at broad spatial scales remains elusive. Here, we compiled a continental dataset on the distributions of African lizard species in the reptile subfamily Agaminae (a relatively young, Neogene radiation of agamid lizards which ancestors colonized Africa from the Arabian peninsula) and tested to what extent historical colonization and dispersal limitation (i.e. accessibility from areas of geographic origin) can explain present-day species richness relative to current climate, topography, and climate change since the late Miocene (~10 mya), the Pliocene (~3 mya), and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 0.021 mya). Spatial and non-spatial multi-predictor regression models revealed that time-limited dispersal via arid corridors is a key predictor to explain macro-scale patterns of species richness. In addition, current precipitation seasonality, current temperature of the warmest month, paleo-temperature changes since the LGM and late Miocene, and topographic relief emerged as important drivers. These results suggest that deep-time dispersal constraints — in addition to climate and mountain building — strongly shape current species richness of Africa’s arid-adapted taxa. Such historical dispersal limitation might indicate that natural movement rates of species are too slow to respond to rates of ongoing and projected future climate and land use change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Blach-Overgaard
- Section for Ecoinformatics &Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Roelof E Zwaan
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Wagner
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstr. 21, D81247 München, Germany.,Villanova University, Department of Biology, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Kissling WD, Carvalheiro LG, WallisDeVries MF, Franzén M, Biesmeijer JC. Functional traits help to explain half-century long shifts in pollinator distributions. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24451. [PMID: 27079784 PMCID: PMC4832205 DOI: 10.1038/srep24451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Changes in climate and land use can have important impacts on biodiversity. Species respond to such environmental modifications by adapting to new conditions or by shifting their geographic distributions towards more suitable areas. The latter might be constrained by species’ functional traits that influence their ability to move, reproduce or establish. Here, we show that functional traits related to dispersal, reproduction, habitat use and diet have influenced how three pollinator groups (bees, butterflies and hoverflies) responded to changes in climate and land-use in the Netherlands since 1950. Across the three pollinator groups, we found pronounced areal range expansions (>53%) and modelled range shifts towards the north (all taxa: 17–22 km), west (bees: 14 km) and east (butterflies: 11 km). The importance of specific functional traits for explaining distributional changes varied among pollinator groups. Larval diet preferences (i.e. carnivorous vs. herbivorous/detritivorous and nitrogen values of host plants, respectively) were important for hoverflies and butterflies, adult body size for hoverflies, and flight period length for all groups. Moreover, interactions among multiple traits were important to explain species’ geographic range shifts, suggesting that taxon-specific multi-trait analyses are needed to predict how global change will affect biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Biodiversity Dynamics, postbus 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Computational Geo-Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 HX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Computational Geo-Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 HX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luísa G Carvalheiro
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.,Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Michiel F WallisDeVries
- De Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly Conservation, P.O. Box 506, 6700 AM Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Wageningen University, Laboratory of Entomology, P.O. Box 16, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Franzén
- Department of Community Ecology, UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle, Germany
| | - Jacobus C Biesmeijer
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Biodiversity Dynamics, postbus 9517, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Computational Geo-Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 HX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kissling WD, Hardisty A, García EA, Santamaria M, De Leo F, Pesole G, Freyhof J, Manset D, Wissel S, Konijn J, Los W. Towards global interoperability for supporting biodiversity research on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/14888386.2015.1068709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
48
|
Weigelt P, Kissling WD, Kisel Y, Fritz SA, Karger DN, Kessler M, Lehtonen S, Svenning JC, Kreft H. Global patterns and drivers of phylogenetic structure in island floras. Sci Rep 2015. [PMID: 26198002 PMCID: PMC4510489 DOI: 10.1038/srep12213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Islands are ideal for investigating processes that shape species assemblages because they are isolated and have discrete boundaries. Quantifying phylogenetic assemblage structure allows inferences about these processes, in particular dispersal, environmental filtering and in-situ speciation. Here, we link phylogenetic assemblage structure to island characteristics across 393 islands worldwide and 37,041 vascular plant species (representing angiosperms overall, palms and ferns). Physical and bioclimatic factors, especially those impeding colonization and promoting speciation, explained more variation in phylogenetic structure of angiosperms overall (49%) and palms (52%) than of ferns (18%). The relationships showed different or contrasting trends among these major plant groups, consistent with their dispersal- and speciation-related traits and climatic adaptations. Phylogenetic diversity was negatively related to isolation for palms, but unexpectedly it was positively related to isolation for angiosperms overall. This indicates strong dispersal filtering for the predominantly large-seeded, animal-dispersed palm family whereas colonization from biogeographically distinct source pools on remote islands likely drives the phylogenetic structure of angiosperm floras. We show that signatures of dispersal limitation, environmental filtering and in-situ speciation differ markedly among taxonomic groups on islands, which sheds light on the origin of insular plant diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Weigelt
- 1] Biodiversity, Macroecology &Conservation Biogeography Group, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany [2] Systemic Conservation Biology, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yael Kisel
- Biodiversity, Macroecology &Conservation Biogeography Group, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Susanne A Fritz
- Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) &Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dirk Nikolaus Karger
- 1] Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland [2] Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
| | - Michael Kessler
- Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Samuli Lehtonen
- Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics &Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Holger Kreft
- Biodiversity, Macroecology &Conservation Biogeography Group, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Eskildsen A, Carvalheiro LG, Kissling WD, Biesmeijer JC, Schweiger O, Høye TT. Ecological specialization matters: long-term trends in butterfly species richness and assemblage composition depend on multiple functional traits. DIVERS DISTRIB 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Eskildsen
- Biodiversity & Conservation; Department of Bioscience; Aarhus University; Grenåvej 14 DK-8410 Rønde Denmark
- Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity; Department of Bioscience; Aarhus University; DK-8000 Aarhus C Denmark
| | - Luísa G. Carvalheiro
- School of Biology; University of Leeds; LS2 9JT Leeds UK
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center; P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C); Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa; 1749-016 Lisboa Portugal
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED); University of Amsterdam; P.O. Box 94248 1090 GE Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus C. Biesmeijer
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center; P.O. Box 9517 2300RA Leiden The Netherlands
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED); University of Amsterdam; P.O. Box 94248 1090 GE Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Schweiger
- Department of Community Ecology; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ; Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 4 DE-06210 Halle Germany
| | - Toke T. Høye
- Biodiversity & Conservation; Department of Bioscience; Aarhus University; Grenåvej 14 DK-8410 Rønde Denmark
- Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies; Aarhus University; Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 6B DK-8000 Aarhus C Denmark
- Arctic Research Centre; Aarhus University; DK-8000 Aarhus C Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Couvreur TLP, Kissling WD, Condamine FL, Svenning JC, Rowe NP, Baker WJ. Global diversification of a tropical plant growth form: environmental correlates and historical contingencies in climbing palms. Front Genet 2015; 5:452. [PMID: 25620977 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tropical rain forests (TRF) are the most diverse terrestrial biome on Earth, but the diversification dynamics of their constituent growth forms remain largely unexplored. Climbing plants contribute significantly to species diversity and ecosystem processes in TRF. We investigate the broad-scale patterns and drivers of species richness as well as the diversification history of climbing and non-climbing palms (Arecaceae). We quantify to what extent macroecological diversity patterns are related to contemporary climate, forest canopy height, and paleoclimatic changes. We test whether diversification rates are higher for climbing than non-climbing palms and estimate the origin of the climbing habit. Climbers account for 22% of global palm species diversity, mostly concentrated in Southeast Asia. Global variation in climbing palm species richness can be partly explained by past and present-day climate and rain forest canopy height, but regional differences in residual species richness after accounting for current and past differences in environment suggest a strong role of historical contingencies in climbing palm diversification. Climbing palms show a higher net diversification rate than non-climbers. Diversification analyses of palms detected a diversification rate increase along the branches leading to the most species-rich clade of climbers. Ancestral character reconstructions revealed that the climbing habit originated between early Eocene and Miocene. These results imply that changes from non-climbing to climbing habits may have played an important role in palm diversification, resulting in the origin of one fifth of all palm species. We suggest that, in addition to current climate and paleoclimatic changes after the late Neogene, present-day diversity of climbing palms can be explained by morpho-anatomical innovations, the biogeographic history of Southeast Asia, and/or ecological opportunities due to the diversification of high-stature dipterocarps in Asian TRFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas L P Couvreur
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR-DIADE, Montpellier France ; Laboratoire de Botanique Systématique et d'Ecologie, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université de Yaoundé I - Ecole Normale Supérieure, Yaoundé Cameroon
| | - W Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Fabien L Condamine
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg Sweden
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus Denmark
| | - Nick P Rowe
- University Montpellier 2, Montpellier France ; CNRS, UMR AMAP, Montpellier France
| | | |
Collapse
|