Effects of sudden shock load on simultaneous biohythane production in two-stage anerobic digestion of high-strength organic wastewater

The two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) for biohythane production is a sustainable solution, but it is sensitive to organic shock load that disrupts reactors and inhibits biohythane production. This study investigated biohythane production, reactor performance, and the possibility of post-failure restoration in a two-stage AD system designed for treating high-strength organic wastewater. Sudden shock load was applied by increasing the OLR threefold higher after reaching steady state phase. During shock load phase, hydrogen content, hydrogen yield and methane production rate (MPR) reached its peak values of 62.61 %, 1.641 mol H2/mol glucose, and 1.003 L CH4/L⋅d respectively before declining significantly. Interestingly, during the restorative phase, hydrogen production sharply declined to nearly zero, while methane production exhibited a resilience and reached its peak methane content of 52.2 %. The study successfully demonstrated the system's resilience to sudden shock load, ensuring stable methane production, while hydrogen production did not exhibit the same capability.

Potential of biofuel production from leather solid wastes: Indian scenario

India is one among the major leather-producing countries in the world which shares close to one-fourth of the world's leather solid wastes and most of these wastes are not effectively utilized. These wastes are rich in protein and lipids that could be a potential feedstock for biofuel production, i.e., biogas, biodiesel, etc. Among the 150,000 tons of daily leather solid wastes in India, approximately 87,150 tons are shared by pre-tanning operations (i.e., raw trimmings, fleshing, and hair wastes) while the rest of the 62,850 tons are shared by tanning, post-tanning, and finishing operations (i.e., wet blue trimmings, chrome splits, shavings, buffing dust, crust trimming wastes). This review article shows that there is considerable bioenergy potential for the use of leather solid wastes as a green fuel. The biogas potential of leather solid wastes is estimated to be 40,532.9 m3/day whereas the biodiesel potential is estimated as 15,452.6 L/day. The bio-oil and bio-char potential of leather solid wastes is estimated to be 80,513.0 L/day and 45.8 tons/day, respectively. Several factors influence the biofuel process efficacy, which needs to be taken into consideration while setting up a biofuel recovery plant. The overall biofuel potential of leather solid wastes shows that this feedstock is an untapped resource for energy recovery to add commercial benefits to India's energy supply. Furthermore, in addition to the economic benefits for investors, the use of leather solid wastes for biofuel production will yield a positive environmental impact.

Two-stage biohydrogen and methane production from sugarcane-based sugar and ethanol industrial wastes: A comprehensive review

The transition to renewable energy sources is crucial to ensure a sustainable future. Although the sugar and ethanol industries benefit from this transition, there are untapped opportunities to utilize the waste generated from the sugar and ethanol process chains through two-stage anaerobic digestion (TSAD). This review comprehensively discusses the utilization of various sugarcane-based industrial wastes by TSAD for sequential biohydrogen and methane production. Factors influencing TSAD process performance, including pH, temperature, hydraulic retention time, volatile fatty acids and alkalinity, nutrient imbalance, microbial population, and inhibitors, were discussed in detail. The potential of TSAD to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases is demonstrated. Recent findings, implications, and promising future research related to TSAD, including the integration of meta-omics approaches, gene manipulation and bioaugmentation, and application of artificial intelligence, are highlighted. The review can serve as important literature for the implementation, improvement, and advancements in TSAD research.

Coproduction of amino acids and biohythane from microalgae via cascaded hydrothermal and anaerobic process

In search of the candidate for animal feed and clean energy, a new vision of algal biorefinery was firstly proposed to coproduce amino acids and biohythane via hydrothermal treatment and two-stage anaerobic fermentation. This study focused on the comprehensive analysis of amino acids recovered from Chlorella sp. and the subsequent biohythane production from microalgal residues. The content and recovery rate of amino acids were in the range of 2.07-27.62 g/100 g and 3.65 %-48.66 % with increasing temperature due to more cell wall disruptions. Furthermore, it was rich in essential amino acids for livestock, including leucine, arginine, isoleucine, valine and phenylalanine. A comparable hydrogen production (9 mL/g volatile solids (VS)) was reached at 70 °C and 90 °C, while it reduced to 5.84 mL/gVS at 150 °C. The group at 70 °C got the maximum methane generation of 311.9 mL/gVS, which was 16.67 %, 24.94 %, 38.38 % and 46.49 % higher than that of other groups. Microalgal residues at lower temperature contained more organics, which was the reason for the better biohythane production. The coproduction of amino acids and biohythane at 130 °C was favorable, which led to 43.71 % amino acids recovery and 93.82 mL biohythane production from per gVS of Chlorella sp. The improved microalgal biorefinery could provide an alternative way to mitigate the crisis of food and energy, but animal experimentations and techno-economic assessments should be considered for further study.

Application of Doehlert design in optimizing the solid-state hydrogenogenic stage augmented with biomass fly ash in a two-stage biohythane production process

This study aimed to optimize the solid-state hydrogenogenic stage supplemented with biomass fly ash in a two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) process for biohythane production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Doehlert's experimental design was used to obtain the optimal set of two investigated variables, namely total solids (TS) content and biomass fly ash dosage in the defined ranges of 0-20 g/L and 20-40%, respectively. Applying the optimal conditions of TS content (29.1%) and fly ash dosage (19.2 g/L) in the first stage led not only to a total H₂ yield of 95 mL/gVS_added, which was very close to the maximum H₂ yield predicted by the developed model (97 mL/gVS_added), but also to a high CH₄ yield of 400 mL/gVS_added (76% of the theoretical CH₄ yield). Moreover, the biohythane obtained from the optimized two-stage process met the standards of a biohythane fuel with an H₂ content of 19% v/v.

A high-value biohythane production: Feedstocks, reactor configurations, pathways, challenges, technoeconomics and applications

In recent years, the demand for high-quality biofuels from renewable sources has become an aspirational goal to offer a clean environment by alternating the depleting fossil fuels to meet future energy needs. In this aspect, biohythane production from wastes has received extensive research interest since it contains superior fuel characteristics than the promising conventional biofuel i.e. biogas. The main aim is to promote research and potentials of biohythane production by a systematic review of scientific literature on the biohythane production pathways, substrate/microbial consortium suitability, reactor design, and influential process/operational factors. Reactor configuration also decides the product yield in addition to other key factors like waste composition, temperature, pH, retention time and loading rates. Hence, a detailed emphasis on different reactor configurations with respect to the type of feedstock has also been given. The technical challenges are highlighted towards process optimization and system scale up. Meanwhile, solutions to improve product yield, technoeconomics, applications and key policy and governance factors to build a hydrogen based society have also been discussed.

Biohythane: a Potential Biofuel of the Future

Today, the world is becoming more dependent on fossil fuels. The major drawbacks of these non-renewable energy resources include an extreme environmental pollution and an extinction threat. Several technologies including microalgal biodiesel production, biomass gasification, and bioethanol production have been explored for the generation of renewable energy especially, biofuels. One such promising research has been carried out in the generation of biohythane which has the potential to become an alternative fuel to the existing non-renewable ones. It has been reported that biohydrogen can be produced from organic wastes or agricultural feedstocks with the help of acidogens. Dark fermentation can be carried out by acidogens to produce biohydrogen under anaerobic conditions by utilizing lignocellulosic biomass or sugarcane feedstocks in the absence of light. The spent medium contains volatile short-chain fatty acids like acetate, butyrate, and propionate that can serve as substrates for acetogenesis followed by methane biosynthesis by methanogens. Therefore, the sequential two-stage anaerobic digestion (AD) involves a production of biohydrogen followed by the biosynthesis of methane. This combined process is termed as a single eponym "Biohythane" (hydrogen + methane). Several studies have demonstrated about the effectiveness of biofuel, and it is believed to have a greater energy recovery, environmental friendliness, and shorter fermentation time. Biohythane can serve as an alternative future green biofuel and solve the present energy crisis in India as well as the entire world.

Integrative biohydrogen- and biomethane-producing bioprocesses for comprehensive production of biohythane

The production of biohythane, a combination of energy-dense hydrogen and methane, from the anaerobic digestion of low-cost organic wastes has attracted attention as a potential candidate for the transition to a sustainable circular economy. Substantial research has been initiated to upscale the process engineering to establish a hythane-based economy by addressing major challenges associated with the process and product upgrading. This review provides an overview of the feasibility of biohythane production in various anaerobic digestion systems (single-stage, dual-stage) and possible technologies to upgrade biohythane to hydrogen-enriched renewable natural gas. The main goal of this review is to promote research in biohythane production technology by outlining critical needs, including meta-omics and metabolic engineering approaches for the advancements in biohythane production technology.

Fundamentals and recent progress in bioelectrochemical system-assisted biohythane production

Biohythane, a balanced mixture of 10%-30% v/v of hydrogen and 70%-90% v/v of methane, could be the backbone of an all-purpose future energy supply. Recently, bioelectrochemical systems (BES) became a new sensation among environmental biotechnology processes with the potential to sustainably generate biohythane. Therefore, to unleash its full potential for scaling up, researchers are consistently improving microbial metabolic pathways, novel reactors, and electrode designs. This review presents a detailed analysis of recently discovered fundamental mechanisms and science and engineering intervention of different strategies to improve the biohythane composition and production rate from BES. However, several milestones are to be achieved, for instance, improving electrode kinetics using efficient catalysts, engineered microbial communities, and improved reactor configurations, for commercializing this sustainable technology. Thus, a future perspective section is included to recommend novel research lines, mainly focusing on the microbial communities and the efficient electrocatalysts, to enhance reactor performance.

Can digestate recirculation promote biohythane production from two-stage co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure?

Digestate recirculation is often considered an important way to improve system stability (system acidification, ammonia inhibition, hydrolysis limitations, etc.) and gas production performance. However, it is not clear how the promotion of biohythane production works in anaerobic co-digestion with digestate recirculation of rice straw (RS) and pig manure (PM). Two sets of laboratory-scale two-stage continuous stirred tank reactors were operated continuously for 95 d to investigate the performance of biohythane production in the first/second phase under mesophilic (M)/thermophilic (T) and digestate recirculation conditions. Firstly, biohythane was not produced by PM with RS under digestate recirculation. The main reasons were: 1) Digestive recirculation promoted the growth of hydrogenotrophic methanogenic bacteria; and 2) limitations in hydrolysis. Secondly, digestate recirculation has positive effects on the removal rates (removal rates of TS, VS, polysaccharide, protein and TCOD increased by 30.4%, 22.3%, 9.9%, 31.4%, and 11.9%, respectively) and energy yield (up to 68.7%). Finally, there was a higher abundance of hydrogen-producing bacteria (Fervidobacterium [44.9%] and Coprothermobacter [18.8%]) in T2, accounting for >80% of the total, and of which the huge hydrogen production potential cannot be ignored. The results provide new ideas for alleviating the energy crisis and developing green energy in the future.

Gradient electro-processing strategy for efficient conversion of harmful algal blooms to biohythane with mechanisms insight

Globally eruptive harmful algal blooms (HABs) have caused numerous negative effects on aquatic ecosystem and human health. Conversion of HABs into biohythane via dark fermentation (DF) is a promising approach to simultaneously cope with environmental and energy issues, but low HABs harvesting efficiency and biohythane productivity severely hinder its application. Here we designed a gradient electro-processing strategy for efficient HABs harvesting and disruption, which had intrinsic advantages of no secondary pollution and high economic feasibility. Firstly, low current density (0.888-4.444 mA/cm²) was supplied to HABs suspension to harvest biomass via electro-flocculation, which achieved 98.59% harvesting efficiency. A mathematic model considering coupling effects of multi-influencing factors on HABs harvesting was constructed to guide large-scale application. Then, the harvested HABs biomass was disrupted via electro-oxidation under higher current density (44.44 mA/cm²) to improve bioavailability for DF. As results, hydrogen and methane yields of 64.46 mL/ (g VS) and 171.82 mL/(g VS) were obtained under 6 min electro-oxidation, along with the highest energy yield (50.1 kJ/L) and energy conversion efficiency (44.87%). Mechanisms of HABs harvesting and disruption under gradient electro-processing were revealed, along with the conversion pathways from HABs to biohythane. Together, this work provides a promising strategy for efficient disposal of HABs with extra benefit of biohythane production.

Biohythane production from food waste in a two-stage process: assessing the energy recovery potential

ABSTRACTBiohythane (hydrogen + methane) production in a two stage dark fermentation (DF) and anaerobic digestion (AD) process from food waste (FW) has been studied. This paper investigated the effect of operation temperature, i.e. mesophilic (34 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) , on biohythane yield and total energy recovery carried out at the initial culture pH 5.5 and pH 7, respectively for DF and AD batch tests. The mesophilic DF tests gave a higher hydrogen yield of 53.5 (±4) mL H₂/g VS added compared to thermophilic DF tests, i.e. 37.6 (±1) mL H₂/g VS added. However, higher methane yields, i.e. 307.5 (± 10) mL CH₄/g VS, were obtained at thermophilic AD tests compared to mesophilic AD, i.e. 276.5 (±4.3) mL CH₄/g VS. The total energy recovery from thermophilic DF + AD was higher (11.4 MJ/kg VS) than the mesophilic (10.4 MJ/kg VS) combined process. Interestingly, the analysis of kinetic parameters of mesophilic tests, determined from the Modified Gompertz equation, showed that mesophilic DF had faster H₂ production kinetics, which can be attributed to a faster adaptation of the heat-shocked inoculum used in the tests to the incubation temperature. However, thermophilic AD tests exhibited faster kinetics for methane production.

Combination of ultrasonic and acidic pretreatments for enhancing biohythane production from tofu processing residue via one-stage anaerobic digestion

Tofu processing residues (TPR) have received more attention as a source of bioenergy. However, their low solubility has hindered biohythane generation. Consequently, the ultrasonic and H₂SO₄ pretreatments were combined and compared for the first time to improve the hydrolysis of organic matter and carbohydrate and increase free amino nitrogen generation from TPR. Besides, the impact of pretreatments on biohythane generation was investigated. Under the optimal conditions of 7.54% substrate level, 8% H₂SO₄ concentration, 80 °C and 50 min, the coincident ultrasonic-H₂SO₄ pretreatment enriched the contents of soluble chemical oxygen demand, reducing sugar, and free amino nitrogen to 49675 mg/L, 26 g/L, and 1721 mg/L, respectively, greater than individual pretreatments. Also, Biohythane yield increased by 4.24-13.61% over control (389.42 ± 23.7 ml/g-VS_fed). Furthermore, hydrogen yield at 42.5 ± 2.08 and 28.1 ± 1.07 ml/g-VS_fed and sulfate removal efficiency at 93 and 92% were significantly improved with ultrasonic-H₂SO₄ and H₂SO₄ pretreatments, respectively, indicating acidogenic and sulfidogenic activity enhancement.

Onset Investigation on Dynamic Change of Biohythane Generation and Microbial Structure in Dual-chamber versus Single-chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cells

Biohythane is alternative fuel to replace fossil fuel for car combustion, and biohythane generation could be potential pathway for energy recovery from wastewater treatment. Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is electrochemical technique to convert waste to methane and hydrogen gas for biohythane generation, but the feasibility and stability of MEC needs further investigation to assure sustainable energy recovery. System configuration is paramount factor for electrochemical reaction and mass transfer, and this study was to investigate the configuration impact (single vs dual chamber) of MEC for biohythane generation rate and stability. This study showed that dual-chamber MEC could separate methane and hydrogen gas production in the anode and cathode, and combined both together to produce biohythane. To reduce ohmic resistance for higher current, cation exchange membrane (CEM) was removed from dual-chamber to single-chamber MEC. However, free hydrogen diffusion was allowed in the single chamber since CEM was removed. The diffused hydrogen and substrate towards the cathode would favor the methanogen growth, and thus the hydrogen was consumed to reduce the biohythane generation and energy recovery efficiency (i.e., 7.5 × 10^-3 reduced to 5.7 × 10^-3 kWh kg^-1 degraded COD day^-1 after converting dual-chamber to single-chamber MEC). Absolute abundance of methanogen in single-chamber MEC was greatly boosted, as Methanosarcina and Methanobacteriale on the anode surface, increased by 132% and 243%, respectively, while the original dual-chamber MEC could maintain Geobacter growth for high current generation. This is the keystone study to demonstrate the importance of dual-chamber MEC for the feasibility and stability for the biohythane generation, building up the foundation to use electrochemical device to convert the organic waste to the alternative biohythane.

Long-term in situ bioelectrochemical monitoring of biohythane process: Metabolic interactions and microbial evolution

Microbial stability and evolution are a critical aspect for biosensors, especially in detecting dynamic and emerging anaerobic biohythane production. In this study, two upflow air-cathode chamber microbial fuel cells (UMFCs) were developed for in situ monitoring of the biohydrogen and biomethane reactors under a COD range of 1000-6000 mg/L and 150-1000 mg/L, respectively. Illumina MiSeq sequencing evidenced the dramatic shift of dominant microbial communities in UMFCs from hydrolytic and acidification bacteria (Clostridiaceae_1, Ruminococcaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae) to acetate-oxidizing bacteria (Synergistaceae, Dysgonomonadaceae, Spirochaetaceae). In addition, exoelectroactive bacteria evaluated from Enterobacteriaceae and Burkholderiaceae to Desulfovibrionaceae and Propionibacteriaceae. Especially, Hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanobacteriaceae) were abundant at 93.41% in UMFC (for monitoring hydrogen reactor), which was speculated to be a major metabolic pathway for methane production. Principal component analysis revealed a similarity in microbial structure between UMFCs and methane bioreactors. Microbial network analysis suggested a more stable community structure of UMFCs with 205 days' operation.

Two-Stage anaerobic digestion in agroindustrial waste treatment: A review

The anaerobic digestion is a process widely recognized as an interesting alternative for the treatment and stabilization of residual organic substrates. However, several technical limitations were observed based on the characteristics of the organic matter submitted to the process, such as the presence of high concentrations of soluble sugars or fats. The technology of anaerobic digestion in multiple stages is described as a viable option in the control of variables, optimizing the environmental conditions of the main microorganisms involved in the process, assuring high solid removal and methane production, besides allowing a higher energy yield through the generation of molecular fuel hydrogen. Several studies reviewed the process of anaerobic digestion in multiple stages in the treatment of food waste, although few report its use applied directly to agroindustrial residues. Thus, the present work aims to review the literature evaluating the scenario and viability of the multi-stage anaerobic digestion process applied to agroindustrial effluents. Effluents such as manipueira, vinasse, and dairy wastewater are substrates that present high yields when treated by AD processes with stage separation. The high concentration of easily fermentable sugars results in a high production of molecular hydrogen (co-product of the production of volatile acids in the acid phase) and methane (methanogenic phase). The great challenges related to the development of the sector are focused on the stability of the composition and yield of hydrogen in the acid phase, besides the problems resulting from the treatment of complex residues. Thus, the present study suggests that future works should focus on the technologies of new microorganisms and optimization of process parameters, providing maturation and scale-up of the two-stage anaerobic digestion technique.

Biohythane production and microbial characteristics of two alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two-stage anaerobic co-digesters fed with rice straw and pig manure

To investigate biohythane production and microbial behavior during temperature-phased (TP) anaerobic co-digestion (AcD) of rice straw (RS) and pig manure (PM), a mesophilic-thermophilic (M1-T1) AcD system and a thermophilic-mesophilic (T2-M2) AcD system were continuously operated for 95 days in parallel. The maximal ratio (8.44%v/v) of produced hydrogen to methane demonstrated the feasibility of biohythane production by co-digestion of RS and PM. T2-M2 exhibited higher hydrogen (16.68 ± 1.88 mL/gVS) and methane (197.73 ± 11.77 mL/gVS) yields than M1-T1 (3.08 ± 0.39 and 109.03 ± 4.97 mL/gVS, respectively). Methanobrevibacter (75.62%, a hydrogenotrophic methanogen) dominated in the M1 reactor, resulting in low hydrogen production. Hydrogen-producing bacteria (Thermoanaerobacterium 32.06% and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 27.33%) dominated in T2, but the abundance of hydrolytic bacteria was low, indicating that hydrolysis could be a rate-limiting step. The thermophilic acid-producing phase provided effective selective pressure for hydrogen-consuming microbes, and the high diversity of microbes in M2 implied a more efficient pathway of methane production.

Biohythane production via single-stage fermentation using gel-entrapped anaerobic microorganisms: Effect of hydraulic retention time

Research of single-stage anaerobic biohythane production is still in an infant stage. A single-stage dark fermentation system using separately-entrapped H₂- and CH₄-producing microbes was operated to produce biohythane at hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 48, 36, 24, 12 and 6 h. Peak biohythane production was obtained at HRT 12 h with H₂ and CH₄ production rates of 3.16 and 4.25 L/L-d, respectively. At steady-state conditions, H₂ content in biohythane and COD removal efficiency were in ranges of 7.3-84.6 % and 70.4-77.9%, respectively. During the fermentation, the microbial community structure of the entrapped H₂-producing microbes was HRT-independent whereas entrapped CH₄-producing microbes changed at HRTs 12 and 6 h. Caproiciproducens and Methanobacterium were the dominant genera for producing H₂ and CH₄, respectively. The novelty of this work is to develop a single-stage biohythane production system using entrapped anaerobic microbes which requires fewer controls than two-stage systems.

Synergy of anoxic microenvironment and facultative anaerobes on acidogenic metabolism in a self-induced electrofermentation system

Metabolic potential of two different cultures, facultative (FB) and strict anaerobes (AB) under two microenvironments [anoxic (ANOX) and anaerobic (ANA)] was evaluated to understand acidogenic fermentation in a self-induced electrofermentation (EF) system for the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA: C2-C4) and biogas. ANA condition positively influenced FB and AB metabolism towards higher acetic (C2:2390 mg/L) and propionic acid (C3: 717 mg/L) production, while butyric acid (C4:1481 mg/L) favored ANOX microenvironment (AB). ANOX microenvironment showed a better self-induced potential compared to ANA metabolism (0.46 V (FB_ANOX); 0.45 V (AB_ANOX)). An improved H₂ (>30%) fraction was noticed with FB while CH₄ production was found favourable with AB. The study illustrated the role of system microenvironment in association with metabolic function towards regulating electrofermentation towards specific products synthesis.

Biohythane production via single-stage anaerobic fermentation using entrapped hydrogenic and methanogenic bacteria

This study demonstrates the continuous biohythane production in a single-stage anaerobic digester using a biomass mixture of separately entrapped hydrogenic and methanogenic bacteria (H₂- and CH₄-producing bacteria, respectively). The entrapped hydrogenic/methanogenic bacteria biomass ratios of 1/4, 2/3, 3/2 and 4/1 were tested and shown to have a great effect on the single-stage biohythane production performance. At steady-states, the cultivations had biohythane production rates in the range of 381-480 mL/L-d, with H₂ content in biohythane (HCH) varying from 1% to 75% (v/v) and chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies (TCOD_re) of 57.6-81.9%. Biomass ratio 2/3 (weight ratio 1/1.5) resulted in peak biohythane production with H₂ and CH₄ production rates being 64.6 and 395 mL/L-d, respectively, HCH 15% and TCOD_re 74.4%. The novelty of this work is to show the potential of producing biohythane from an innovative single-stage dark fermentation system using entrapped hydrogenic and methanogenic bacteria.

Pretreatment of polysaccharidic wastes with cellulolytic Aspergillus fumigatus for enhanced production of biohythane in a dual-stage process

Biological pretreatment of polysaccharidic wastes (PWs) is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach to improve the digestibility and utilization of these valuable substrates in dual-stage biohythane production. In order to reduce the prolonged incubation time and loss of carbohydrate during the pretreatment of PWs with Aspergillus fumigatus, a systematic optimization using Taguchi methodology resulted in an unprecedented recovery of soluble carbohydrates (362.84 mg g^-1) within 5 days. The disruption and fragmentation of lignocellulosic structures in PWs, and possible saccharification of cellulose and hemicellulose components, increased its digestibility. A dual-stage biohythane production with pretreated PWs showed increased yield (214.13 mL g^-1 VS_added), which was 56% higher than the corresponding value with the untreated PWs. This resulted in 47% higher energy recovery as biohythane in pretreated biomass compared to untreated biomass. Optimized fungal pretreatment is, therefore, an effective method to improve the digestibility of PWs and its subsequent conversion to biohythane.

An innovative multistage anaerobic hythane reactor (MAHR): Metabolic flux, thermodynamics and microbial functions

Biohythane production from wastewater via anaerobic fermentation currently relies on two-stage physically separated biohydrogen and biomethane reactors, which requires closed monitoring, the implementation of a control system, and cost-intensive, complex operation. Herein, an innovative multistage anaerobic hythane reactor (MAHR) was reported via integrating two-stage fermentation into one reactor. MAHR was constructed using an internal down-flow packed bed reactor and an external up-flow sludge blanket to enhance microbial enrichment and thermodynamic feasibility of the associated bioreactions. The performance of MAHR was investigated for 160 d based on biogas production, metabolic flux and microbial structure in comparison to a typical anaerobic high-rate reactor (up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB)). A biohythane production with an optimized hydrogen volume ratio (10-20%) and a high methane content (75-80%) was achieved in the hythane zone (M_H) and methane zone (M_M) in MAHR, respectively. In addition, MAHR showed a stronger capability to accommodate a high organic loading rate (120 g COD/L/d), and it enhanced the conversion of organics leading to a methane production rate 66% higher than UASB. Thermodynamic analysis suggested that hydrogen extraction in M_H significantly decreased the hydrogen partial pressure (<0.1% vol) which favored acetogenesis in M_M. Metabolic flux and microbial function analysis further supported the superior performance of MAHR over UASB, which was primarily attributed to enhanced acetogenesis and acetoclastic methanogenesis.

Biohythane production from food processing wastes - Challenges and perspectives

The food industry generates enormous quantity of food waste (FW) either directly or indirectly including the processing sector, which turned into biofuels for waste remediation. Six types of food processing wastes (FPW) such as oil, fruit and vegetable, dairy, brewery, livestock and finally agriculture based materials that get treated via dark fermentation/anaerobic digestion has been discussed. Production of both hydrogen and methane is daunting for oil, fruit and vegetable processing wastes because of the presence of polyphenols and essential oils. Moreover, acidic pH and high protein are the reasons for increased concentration of ammonia and accumulation of volatile fatty acids in FPW, especially in dairy, brewery, and livestock waste streams. Moreover, the review brought to forefront the enhancing methods, (pretreatment and co-digestion) operational, and environmental parameters that can influence the production of biohythane. Finally, the nature of feedstock's role in achieving successful circular bio economy is also highlighted.

Flexible control of biohythane composition and production by dual cathodes in a bioelectrochemical system

Flexible control of CH₄/H₂ ratio in biohythane is important to its applications but remains a challenge. Herein, a dual-cathode bioelectrochemical system (BES) was developed for achieving biohythane production with controllable composition through adjusting external resistance. The BES was started as a microbial electrolysis cell to produce hydrogen in both cathodes ("H₂-cathode") and then evolved to produce methane production in one cathode with inoculation of anaerobic sludge ("CH₄-cathode"). When increasing the external resistance of the H₂-cathode from 10 to 330 Ω, its H₂ production decreased from 173 ± 11 to 8 ± 2 L m^-3 d^-1. This redistribution of electrons has benefited the CH₄-cathode that had an increased CH₄ production from 25 ± 3 to 90 ± 5 L m^-3 d^-1. The CH₄/H₂ ratio increased from 0.14 to 11, making biohythane more applicable to natural gas engines. Those results will help to formulate a BES-based approach to accomplish controllable biohythane production.

Effects of hydraulic retention time on biohythane production via single-stage anaerobic fermentation in a two-compartment bioreactor

Hythane has been well known as a mixture of hydrogen and methane gases but their production is mostly in a different way. The present study dealt with the potential biohythane production in a two-compartment (lower, hydrogenesis; upper, methanogenesis) reactor via a single-stage anaerobic fermentation at mesophilic temperature. The effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) was tested at 10-2 d using food waste substrate. HRT 2 d resulted in (1) maximum removal efficiencies for COD, carbohydrate, lipid and protein contents with values of 58.5, 58.4, 62.6 and 79.1%, respectively; (2) peak hydrogen and methane production rates of 714 and 254 mL/L-d, respectively; and (3) biogas contents of hydrogen 8.6% and methane 48.0% in the produced gas. At this HRT, Clostridium sensu stricto 2 and Methanosaeta were dominant species in H₂ and CH₄ compartments, respectively. The novelty of this work is creating a novel two-compartment reactor for single-stage anaerobic biohythane fermentation.

Effect of Biohythane Production from Distillery Spent Wash with Addition of Landfill Leachate and Sewage Wastewater

Rapid development of the industrial and domestic sectors has led to the rise of several energy and environmental issues. In accordance with sustainable development and waste minimization issues, biohydrogen production along with biomethane production via two-stage fermentation process using microorganisms from renewable sources has received considerable attention. In the present study, biohythane production with simultaneous wastewater treatment was studied in a two-stage (Biohydrogen and Biomethane) fermentation process under anaerobic conditions. Optimization of high organic content (COD) distillery spent wash effluent (DSPW) with dilution using sewage wastewater was carried out. Addition of leachate as a nutrient source was also studied for effective biohythane production. The experimental results showed that the maximum biohythane production at optimized concentration (substrate concentration of 60 g/L with 30% of leachate as a nutrient source) was 67 mmol/L bio-H₂ and with bio-CH₄ production of 42 mmol/L. Graphical Abstract.

Co-production of biohydrogen and biomethane from food waste and paper waste via recirculated two-phase anaerobic digestion process: Bioenergy yields and metabolic distribution

To achieve the co-production of H₂ and CH₄, co-digestion of food waste (FW) and paper waste (PW) was performed on the recirculated two-phase anaerobic digestion (R-TPAD). The PW content in the feedstock increased from 0% to 20%, 40% and 50% (in total solids) with FW as the rest. The results showed that bioH₂ and bioCH₄ were simultaneously and stably produced in the long-term operation. With the increasing PW content, the removal efficiency of volatile solids decreased slightly from 84.9% to 78.4%; the bioH₂ yields increased from 50 to 79 NL-H₂/kg-VS_fed while the bioCH₄ yields decreased from 426 to 329 NL-CH₄/kg-VS_fed. With the fixed amount of FW, adding PW could significantly increase the total bioenergy yields. The relative abundance showed that the key H₂-producing bacteria, Caproiciproducens and Thermoanaerobacterium, increased after PW addition. The microbial distribution suggests that the H₂-producers were recirculated to the first stage after proliferating in the second stage.

Biohythane production of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater: A comparison of two-stage fermentation and catalytic hydrothermal gasification

Developing efficient methods to recover energy from post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater (PHW) is critical for scaling up hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) technology. Here we evaluated two-stage fermentation (TF) and catalytic hydrothermal gasification (CHG) for biohythane production using PHW. A hydrogen yield of 29 mL·g^-1 COD and methane yield of 254 mL·g^-1 COD were achieved via TF. In comparison, a higher hydrogen yield (116 mL·g^-1 COD) and lower methane yield (65 mL·g^-1 COD) were achieved during CHG. Further, a techno-economic and sensitivity analysis was conducted. The capital cost and operating cost for TF varied with the different reactor systems. TF with high-rate reactors suggested its promising commercialized application as it had a lower minimum selling price (-0.71 to 2.59 USD per gallon of gasoline equivalent) compared with conventional fossil fuels under both the best and reference market conditions. Compared with TF, CHG was only likely to be profitable under the best case conditions.

Recent developments in biohythane production from household food wastes: A review

Biohythane is a hydrogen-methane blend with hydrogen concentration between 10 and 30% v/v. It can be produced from different organic substrates by two sequential anaerobic stages: a dark fermentation step followed by a second an anaerobic digestion step, for hydrogen and methane production, respectively. The advantages of this blend compared to either hydrogen or methane, as separate biofuels, are first presented in this work. The two-stage anaerobic process and the main operative parameters are then discussed. Attention is focused on the production of biohythane from household food wastes, one of the most abundant organic substrate available for anaerobic digestion: the main milestones and the future trends are exposed. In particular, the possibility to co-digest food wastes and sewage sludge to improve the process yield is discussed. Finally, the paper illustrates the developments of biohythane application in the automotive sector as well as its reduced environmental burden.

Improvement in biohythane production using organic solid waste and distillery effluent

Biohythane is a two-stage anaerobic fermentation process consisting of biohydrogen production followed by biomethanation. This serves as an environment friendly and economically sustainable approach for the improved valorization of organic wastes. The characteristics of organic wastes depend on their respective sources. The choice of an appropriate combination of complementary organic wastes can vastly improve the bioenergy generation besides achieving the significant cost reduction. The present study assess the suitability and economic viability of using the groundnut deoiled cake (GDOC), mustard deoiled cake (MDOC), distillers' dried grain with solubles (DDGS) and algal biomass (AB) as a co-substrate for the biohythane process. Results showed that maximum gaseous energy of 23.93, 16.63, 23.44 and 16.21kcal/L were produced using GDOC, MDOC, DDGS and AB in the two stage biohythane production, respectively. Both GDOC and DDGS were found to be better co-substrates as compared to MDOC and AB. The maximum cumulative hydrogen and methane production of 150 and 64mmol/L were achieved using GDOC. 98% reduction in substrate input cost (SIC) was achieved using the co-supplementation procedure.

Boosting dark fermentation with co-cultures of extreme thermophiles for biohythane production from garden waste

Proof of principle of biohythane and potential energy production from garden waste (GW) is demonstrated in this study in a two-step process coupling dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion. The synergistic effect of using co-cultures of extreme thermophiles to intensify biohydrogen dark fermentation is demonstrated using xylose, cellobiose and GW. Co-culture of Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga maritima showed higher hydrogen production yields from xylose (2.7±0.1molmol(-1) total sugar) and cellobiose (4.8±0.3molmol(-1) total sugar) compared to individual cultures. Co-culture of extreme thermophiles C. saccharolyticus and Caldicellulosiruptor bescii increased synergistically the hydrogen production yield from GW (98.3±6.9Lkg(-1) (VS)) compared to individual cultures and co-culture of T. maritima and C. saccharolyticus. The biochemical methane potential of the fermentation end-products was 322±10Lkg(-1) (CODt). Biohythane, a biogas enriched with 15% hydrogen could be obtained from GW, yielding a potential energy generation of 22.2MJkg(-1) (VS).

Biologically pretreated sugarcane top as a potential raw material for the enhancement of gaseous energy recovery by two stage biohythane process

The aim of the present study was to develop a suitable pretreatment method to enhance the microbial degradation of lignocellulosic biomass and to maximize the overall energy recovery by using biohythane process. An efficient and eco-friendly biological pretreatment was used. Maximum lignin removal using biological pretreatment of sugarcane top was 60.4% w/w after 21d incubation at 28°C in static condition. Confocal microscopy observation and FTIR analysis confirmed the removal of lignin from sugarcane top. The maximum hydrogen production rate (Rm), hydrogen production potential (P) and lag time (λ) using pretreated sugarcane top were 16.76mL/g-VS/h, 87.40mL/g-VS and 3.38h respectively. The maximum methane production potential using spent medium of dark fermentation was 180.86mL/g-VS with the lag time of 2.9d. The overall gaseous energy recovery was 37.7% which is 54% higher than that of the untreated one.

Biohythane production from organic wastes: present state of art

The economy of an industrialized country is greatly dependent on fossil fuels. However, these nonrenewable sources of energy are nearing the brink of extinction. Moreover, the reliance on these fuels has led to increased levels of pollution which have caused serious adverse impacts on the environment. Hydrogen has emerged as a promising alternative since it does not produce CO2 during combustion and also has the highest calorific value. The biohythane process comprises of biohydrogen production followed by biomethanation. Biological H2 production has an edge over its chemical counterpart mainly because it is environmentally benign. Maximization of gaseous energy recovery could be achieved by integrating dark fermentative hydrogen production followed by biomethanation. Intensive research work has already been carried out on the advancement of biohydrogen production processes, such as the development of suitable microbial consortium (mesophiles or thermophiles), genetically modified microorganism, improvement of the reactor designs, use of different solid matrices for the immobilization of whole cells, and development of two-stage process for higher rate of H2 production. Scale-up studies of the dark fermentation process was successfully carried out in 20- and 800-L reactors. However, the total gaseous energy recovery for two stage process was found to be 53.6 %. From single-stage H2 production, gaseous energy recovery was only 28 %. Thus, two-stage systems not only help in improving gaseous energy recovery but also can make biohythane (mixture of H2 and CH4) concept commercially feasible.

Multiple syntrophic interactions drive biohythane production from waste sludge in microbial electrolysis cells

BACKGROUND

Biohythane is a new and high-value transportation fuel present as a mixture of biomethane and biohydrogen. It has been produced from different organic matters using anaerobic digestion. Bioenergy can be recovered from waste activated sludge through methane production during anaerobic digestion, but energy yield is often insufficient to sludge disposal. Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is also a promising approach for bioenergy recovery and waste sludge disposal as higher energy efficiency and biogas production. The systematic understanding of microbial interactions and biohythane production in MEC is still limited. Here, we report biohythane production from waste sludge in biocathode microbial electrolysis cells and reveal syntrophic interactions in microbial communities based on high-throughput sequencing and quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA gene.

RESULTS

The alkali-pretreated sludge fed MECs (AS-MEC) showed the highest biohythane production rate of 0.148 L·L(-1)-reactor·day(-1), which is 40 and 80 % higher than raw sludge fed MECs (RS-MEC) and anaerobic digestion (open circuit MEC, RS-OCMEC). Current density, metabolite profiles, and hydrogen-methane ratio results all confirm that alkali-pretreatment and microbial electrolysis greatly enhanced sludge hydrolysis and biohythane production. Illumina Miseq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons indicates that anode biofilm was dominated by exoelectrogenic Geobacter, fermentative bacteria and hydrogen-producing bacteria in the AS-MEC. The cathode biofilm was dominated by fermentative Clostridium. The dominant archaeal populations on the cathodes of AS-MEC and RS-MEC were affiliated with hydrogenotrophic Methanobacterium (98 %, relative abundance) and Methanocorpusculum (77 %), respectively. Multiple pathways of gas production were observed in the same MEC reactor, including fermentative and electrolytic H2 production, as well as hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and electromethanogenesis. Real-time quantitative PCR analyses showed that higher amount of methanogens were enriched in AS-MEC than that in RS-MEC and RS-OCMEC, suggesting that alkali-pretreated sludge and MEC facilitated hydrogenotrophic methanogen enrichment.

CONCLUSION

This study proves for the first time that biohythane could be produced directly in biocathode MECs using waste sludge. MEC and alkali-pretreatment accelerated enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogen and hydrolysis of waste sludge. The results indicate syntrophic interactions among fermentative bacteria, exoelectrogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea in MECs are critical for highly efficient conversion of complex organics into biohythane, demonstrating that MECs can be more competitive than conventional anaerobic digestion for biohythane production using carbohydrate-deficient substrates. Biohythane production from waste sludge by MEC provides a promising new way for practical application of microbial electrochemical technology.

Recovery of reducing sugars and volatile fatty acids from cornstalk at different hydrothermal treatment severity

This study focused on the degradation of cornstalk and recovery of reducing sugars and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) at different hydrothermal treatment severity (HTS) (4.17-8.28, 190-320°C). The highest recovery of reducing sugars and VFAs reached 92.39% of aqueous products, equal to 34.79% based on dry biomass (HTS, 6.31). GC-MS and HPLC identified that the aqueous contained furfural (0.35-2.88 g/L) and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (0-0.85 g/L) besides reducing sugars and VFAs. Hemicellulose and cellulose were completely degraded at a HTS of 5.70 and 7.60, respectively. SEM analysis showed that cornstalk was gradually changed from rigid and highly ordered fibrils to molten and grainy structure as HTS increased. FT-IR and TGA revealed the significant changes of organic groups for cornstalk before and after hydrothermal treatment at different HTS. Hydrothermal treatment might be promising for providing feedstocks suitable for biohythane production.

coupling dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion

Potential biohythane production from Sargassum sp. was evaluated in a two stage process. In the first stage, hydrogen dark fermentation was performed by Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Sargassum sp. concentrations (VS) of 2.5, 4.9 and 7.4gL(-1) and initial inoculum concentrations (CDW) of 0.04 and 0.09gL(-1) of C. saccharolyticus were used in substrate/inoculum ratios ranging from 28 to 123. The end products from hydrogen production process were subsequently used for biogas production. The highest hydrogen and methane production yields, 91.3±3.3Lkg(-1) and 541±10Lkg(-1), respectively, were achieved with 2.5gL(-1) of Sargassum sp. (VS) and 0.09gL(-1)of inoculum (CDW). The biogas produced contained 14-20% of hydrogen. Potential energy production from Sargassum sp. in two stage process was estimated in 242GJha(-1)yr(-1). A maximum energy supply of 600EJyr(-1) could be obtained from the ocean potential area for macroalgae production.