Phase I study of a human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD4-binding site of HIV type 1 glycoprotein 120

The Use of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies (bNAbs) in HIV-1 Treatment and Prevention

BACKGROUND

Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectively halts disease progression in HIV infection, the complete eradication of the virus remains elusive. Additionally, challenges such as long-term ART toxicity, drug resistance, and the demanding regimen of daily and lifelong adherence required by ART highlight the imperative need for alternative therapeutic and preventative approaches. In recent years, broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) have emerged as promising candidates, offering potential for therapeutic, preventative, and possibly curative interventions against HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the passive immunization of bNAbs in HIV-1-infected individuals.

MAIN FINDINGS

Recent findings from clinical trials have highlighted the potential of bNAbs in the treatment, prevention, and quest for an HIV-1 cure. While monotherapy with a single bNAb is insufficient in maintaining viral suppression and preventing viral escape, ultimately leading to viral rebound, combination therapy with potent, non-overlapping epitope-targeting bNAbs have demonstrated prolonged viral suppression and delayed time to rebound by effectively restricting the emergence of escape mutations, albeit largely in individuals with bNAb-sensitive strains. Additionally, passive immunization with bNAb has provided a "proof of concept" for antibody-mediated prevention against HIV-1 acquisition, although complete prevention has not been obtained. Therefore, further research on the use of bNAbs in HIV-1 treatment and prevention remains imperative.

Monoclonal CCR5 Antibody: A Promising Therapy for HIV

HIV is one of the world's most devastating viral infections and has claimed tens of millions of lives worldwide since it was first identified in the 1980s. There is no cure for HIV infection. However, with tremendous progress in HIV diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, HIV has become a manageable chronic health disease. CCR5 is an important coreceptor used by HIV to infect target cells, and genetic deficiency of the chemokine receptor CCR5 confers a significant degree of protection against HIV infection. In addition, since CCR5 deficiency does not appear to cause any adverse health effects, targeting this coreceptor is a promising strategy for the treatment and prevention of HIV. Monoclonal antibodies are frequently used as therapeutics for many diseases and therefore are being used as a potential therapy for HIV-1 infection. This review reports on CCR5 antibody research in detail and describes the role and advantages of CCR5 antibodies in HIV prevention or treatment, introduces several main CCR5 antibodies, and discusses the future strategy of antibody-conjugated nanoparticles including the potential challenges. CCR5 antibodies may be a novel therapy for treating HIV infection effectively and could overcome the limitations of the currently available options.

Cryo-ET of Env on intact HIV virions reveals structural variation and positioning on the Gag lattice

HIV-1 Env mediates viral entry into host cells and is the sole target for neutralizing antibodies. However, Env structure and organization in its native virion context has eluded detailed characterization. Here, we used cryo-electron tomography to analyze Env in mature and immature HIV-1 particles. Immature particles showed distinct Env positioning relative to the underlying Gag lattice, providing insights into long-standing questions about Env incorporation. A 9.1-Å sub-tomogram-averaged reconstruction of virion-bound Env in conjunction with structural mass spectrometry revealed unexpected features, including a variable central core of the gp41 subunit, heterogeneous glycosylation between protomers, and a flexible stalk that allows Env tilting and variable exposure of neutralizing epitopes. Together, our results provide an integrative understanding of HIV assembly and structural variation in Env antigen presentation.

Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies: An Update

Even after more than 30 years since its discovery, there is no cure for HIV-1 infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is currently the only HIV-1 infection management option in clinics. Despite its success in suppressing viral replication and converting HIV-1 from a lethal infection to a chronic and manageable disease, cART treatment is life long and long-term use can result in major drawbacks such as high cost, multiple side effects, and an increase in the development of multidrug-resistant escape mutants. Recently, antibody-based anti-HIV-1 treatment has emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic modality for HIV-1 treatment and cure strategies. These antibody-based anti-HIV-1 treatments comprising either receptor-targeting antibodies or broad neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) are currently being developed and evaluated in clinical trials. These antibodies have demonstrated potent antiviral effects against multiple strains of HIV-1, and shown promise for prevention, maintenance, and prolonged remission of HIV-1 infection. This review gives an update on the current status of these antibody-based treatments for HIV-1, discusses their mechanism of action and the challenges in developing them, providing insight for their development as novel clinical therapies against HIV-1 infection.

Implementation of a three-tiered approach to identify and characterize anti-drug antibodies raised against HIV-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies

The ability to detect, quantify, and interrogate the properties of immune responses raised against biological therapeutics is not only important to our understanding of these molecules, but also to their success in the clinic. A tiered assay approach to identify the presence, specificity, and titer of anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses has been adopted as a gold standard by industry leaders, the FDA, and the EMA. In order to support pre-clinical and clinical trials, these assays must be standardized, and their performance sufficiently characterized to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of results under relevant testing conditions. Here we present implementation of electrochemiluminiscence assays that fit into the tiered paradigm of ADA testing for five HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies (3BNC117, 3BNC117-LS, 10–1074, PGT121, and PGDM1400) in compliance with Good Clinical Laboratory practices. Assay sensitivities and matrix effects were evaluated and used to inform the development of positivity cut points. Once cut points were established, assay precision, specificity, free-drug tolerance, and robustness were defined. In all cases, assay characteristics met or surpassed recommendations set forth by the FDA. To further evaluate the performance of these assays and the tiered approach, samples from non-human primates that had received a subset of the five therapeutics were evaluated. In sum, this study reports qualification of a set of ADA assays available to the scientific community as pre-clinical and clinical trials of broadly HIV-neutralizing antibodies proceed, and a framework that is easily adapted as new drug products are advanced in the clinic.

A review of CCR5 antibodies against HIV: current and future aspects

HIV is one of the most devastating viral infections the world has ever encountered. Ever since HIV was first identified in the 1980s, it has claimed millions of lives worldwide. There has been tremendous research and development in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HIV. Small molecules have been shown to reduce the virus to nondetectable level in human plasma, however, there are reservoirs of latent virus that reemerge if antiretroviral therapy is stopped. There is no vaccine to prevent or cure HIV. A significant amount of research has been reported in the literature regarding antibodies for CCR5, a HIV entry host receptor. This report describes the role of CCR5 antibody in HIV prevention/treatment and how antibody-conjugated nanoparticles could be a future strategy with the potential to effectively eradicate the virus from the human system.

The potential of engineered antibodies for HIV-1 therapy and cure

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently under investigation as a therapy for HIV-1 infection and recent clinical trials have shown prolonged viral suppression by bnAbs during antiretroviral treatment interruption. Interestingly, these bnAbs also showed the ability to activate the host immune system to clear HIV-1 infected cells. There are many possibilities to further increase the potential efficacy of bnAbs. Most notably, Fc domain engineering to improve half-life and increase engagement of effector cells will augment two advantages of bnAbs. Moreover, antibody engineering can improve affinity and recognition of conserved epitopes and allows the combination of multiple epitope specificities in a single molecule. These increasingly potent and broad antibodies may prove valuable as alternative HIV-1 therapeutic and possibly in curative approaches.

Broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies in the clinic

Combination anti-retroviral therapy (ART) has revolutionized the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Taken daily, ART prevents and suppresses the infection. However, ART interruption almost invariably leads to rebound viremia in infected individuals due to a long-lived latent reservoir of integrated proviruses. Therefore, ART must be administered on a life-long basis. Here we review recent preclinical and clinical studies suggesting that immunotherapy may be an alternative or an adjuvant to ART because, in addition to preventing new infections, anti-HIV-1 antibodies clear the virus, directly kill infected cells and produce immune complexes that can enhance host immunity to the virus.

Antibody-mediated prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection

Novel broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV-1 hold promise for their use in the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Pre-clinical results have encouraged the evaluation of these antibodies in healthy and HIV-1-infected humans. In first clinical trials, highly potent broadly neutralizing antibodies have demonstrated their safety and significant antiviral activity by reducing viremia and delaying the time to viral rebound in individuals interrupting antiretroviral therapy. While emerging antibody-resistant viral variants have indicated limitations of antibody monotherapy, strategies to enhance the efficacy of broadly neutralizing antibodies in humans are under investigation. These include the use of antibody combinations to prevent viral escape, antibody modifications to increase the half-life and the co-administration of latency-reversing agents to target the cellular reservoir of HIV-1. We provide an overview of the results of pre-clinical and clinical studies of broadly HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies, discuss their implications and highlight approaches for the ongoing advancement into humans.

Ibalizumab Targeting CD4 Receptors, An Emerging Molecule in HIV Therapy

The HIV infection is responsible for the most devastating global pandemic of the last century. More than 39 million people have died of HIV/AIDS since 1981. The development of the antiretroviral (ARV) treatment begins with the discovery of zidovudine a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. This breakthrough was followed by other ARV drug classes and representatives. Presently, HIV treatment employs 27 ARV representatives belonging to five different classes. Despite the proven benefits of ARV treatment and its long-term control of the HIV infection, there is an increasing concern about the numerous adverse effects and resistance to current ARV drugs. Therefore, the new HIV treatment strategies focus on the development of new ARV agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance and low toxicity. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) belong to a new drug class with encouraging results in the treatment of cancer, autoimmune disorders and most recently against HIV infection. The advantages of using MAbs for HIV treatment are related to their antiviral effect, lack of toxicity, good resistance profile, additional synergy with other ARV drug classes and ability to restore CD4 T-cell responses. The current article is a short summary of ibalizumab, an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody that interferes with HIV viral entry. Current studies on ibalizumab have underlined its antiviral potential, minimal adverse effects, and lack of crossed resistance with other ARV agents thus supporting its further therapeutic use in multidrug resistant HIV-infected patients.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Monoclonal Antibodies Suppress Acute Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Viremia and Limit Seeding of Cell-Associated Viral Reservoirs

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) administered shortly after human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection can suppress viremia and limit seeding of the viral reservoir, but lifelong treatment is required for the majority of patients. Highly potent broadly neutralizing HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) can reduce plasma viremia when administered during chronic HIV-1 infection, but the therapeutic potential of these antibodies during acute infection is unknown. We tested the ability of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein-specific broadly neutralizing MAbs to suppress acute simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) replication in rhesus macaques. Four groups of macaques were infected with SHIV-SF162P3 and received (i) the CD4-binding-site MAb VRC01; (ii) a combination of a more potent clonal relative of VRC01 (VRC07-523) and a V3 glycan-dependent MAb (PGT121); (iii) daily cART, all on day 10, just prior to expected peak plasma viremia; or (iv) no treatment. Daily cART was initiated 11 days after MAb administration and was continued for 13 weeks in all treated animals. Over a period of 11 days after a single administration, MAb treatment significantly reduced peak viremia, accelerated the decay slope, and reduced total viral replication compared to untreated controls. Proviral DNA in lymph node CD4 T cells was also diminished after treatment with the dual MAb. These data demonstrate the virological effect of potent MAbs and support future clinical trials that investigate HIV-1-neutralizing MAbs as adjunctive therapy with cART during acute HIV-1 infection.

IMPORTANCE

Treatment of chronic HIV-1 infection with potent broadly neutralizing HIV-1 MAbs has been shown to significantly reduce plasma viremia. However, the antiviral effect of MAb treatment during acute HIV-1 infection is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that MAbs targeting the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein both suppress acute SHIV plasma viremia and limit CD4 T cell-associated viral DNA. These findings provide support for clinical trials of MAbs as adjunctive therapy with antiretroviral therapy during acute HIV-1 infection.

Vectored antibody gene delivery for the prevention or treatment of HIV infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent progress in the use of vectors to produce antibodies in vivo as an alternative form of HIV prophylaxis or therapy. Instead of passive transfer of monoclonal antibody proteins, a transgene encoding an antibody is delivered to cells by the vector, resulting in expression and secretion by the host cell. This review will emphasize adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based strategies and summarize the evidence in support of this strategy as an alternative to traditional vaccines. We will highlight the major findings in the field and discuss the impact that this approach could have on the prevention, treatment and possibly eradication of HIV in patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this emerging field, the emphasis has been on the use of vectors delivering antibodies as an alternative to the development of an HIV vaccine. However, recent findings suggest that AAV-delivered broadly neutralizing antibodies can suppress HIV replication. As such, a single injection of AAV could mediate long-term antibody expression to act as a long-lived therapeutic in the absence of antiretroviral drugs.

SUMMARY

Vector-mediated antibody expression can both prevent transmission and inhibit the replication of established HIV infections. As such, it offers an alternative to immunogen-based vaccine design and a novel therapeutic intervention by enabling precise manipulation of humoral immunity. Success may enable not only the development of effective prevention against HIV but may also provide an alternative to a lifetime of antiretroviral drugs taken by those who are already infected.

Clinical development of monoclonal antibody-based drugs in HIV and HCV diseases

Today there are many licensed antiviral drugs, but the emergence of drug resistant strains sometimes invalidates the effects of the current therapies used in the treatment of infectious diseases. Compared to conventional antiviral drugs, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as pharmacological molecules have particular physical characteristics and modes of action, and, therefore, they should be considered as a distinct therapeutic class. Despite being historically validated, antibodies may represent a novel tool for combatting infectious diseases. The current high cost of mAbs' production, storage and administration (by injection only) and the consequent obstacles to development are outweighed by mAbs' clinical advantages. These are related to a low toxicity combined with high specificity and versatility, which allows a specific antibody to mediate various biological effects, ranging from the virus neutralization mechanisms to the modulation of immune responses.This review briefly summarizes the recent technological advances in the field of immunoglobulin research, and the current status of mAb-based drugs in clinical trials for HIV and HCV diseases. For each clinical trial the available data are reported and the emerging conceptual problems of the employed mAbs are highlighted.This overview helps to give a clear picture of the efficacy and challenges of the mAbs in the field of these two infectious diseases which have such a global impact.

Monoclonal antibody-based candidate therapeutics against HIV type 1

Treatment of HIV-1 infection has been highly successful with small molecule drugs. However, resistance still develops. In addition, long-term use can lead to toxicity with unpredictable effects on health. Finally, current drugs do not lead to HIV-1 eradication. The presence of the virus leads to chronic inflammation, which can result in increased morbidity and mortality after prolonged periods of infection. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been highly successful during the past two decades for therapy of many diseases, primarily cancers and immune disorders. They are relatively safe, especially human mAbs that have evolved in humans at high concentrations to fight diseases and long-term use may not lead to toxicities. Several broadly neutralizing mAbs (bnmAbs) against HIV-1 can protect animals but are not effective when used for therapy of an established infection. We have hypothesized that HIV-1 has evolved strategies to effectively escape neutralization by full-size antibodies in natural infections but not by smaller antibody fragments. Therefore, a promising direction of research is to discover and exploit antibody fragments as potential candidate therapeutics against HIV-1. Here we review several bnmAbs and engineered antibody domains (eAds), their in vitro and in vivo antiviral efficacy, mechanisms used by HIV-1 to escape them, and strategies that could be effective to develop more powerful mAb-based HIV-1 therapeutics.

Immunotherapeutic restoration in HIV-infected individuals

While the development of combined active antiretroviral therapy (cART) has dramatically improved life expectancies and quality of life in HIV-infected individuals, long-term clinical problems, such as metabolic complications, remain important constraints of life-long cART. Complete immune restoration using only cART is normally unattainable even in cases of sufficient plasma viral suppression. The need for immunologic adjuncts that complement cART remains, because while cART alone may result in the complete recovery of peripheral net CD4+ T lymphocytes, it may not affect the reservoir of HIV-infected cells. Here, we review current immunotherapies for HIV infection, with a particular emphasis on recent advances in cytokine therapies, therapeutic immunization, monoclonal antibodies, immune-modulating drugs, nanotechnology-based approaches and radioimmunotherapy.

Structural Biology and the Design of Effective Vaccines for HIV-1 and Other Viruses

Structural biology provides a wealth of information about the three-dimensional organization and chemical makeup of proteins. An understanding of atomic-level structure offers enormous potential to design rationally proteins that stimulate specific immune responses. Yet current vaccine development efforts makes little use of structural information. At the Vaccine Research Center, a major goal is to apply structural techniques to vaccine design for challenging pathogens, that include human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and other enveloped viruses such as influenza, Ebola, and respiratory syncytial viruses. Our three-part strategy involves 1.) the definition of the functional viral spike at the atomic level 2.) achieving a structural understanding of how neutralizing antibodies recognize the spike, and 3.) rational development of proteins that can elicit a specific antibody response. Overall, our strategy aims to incorporate information about viral spike-antibody interactions, to assimilate immunogenic feedback, and to leverage recent advances in immunofocusing and computational biology.

Human monoclonal antibodies and engineered antibody domains as HIV-1 entry inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the in-vivo efficacy of neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1, to discuss the recent finding that an engineered human antibody VH domain, domain antibody (dAb), exhibits exceptionally potent and broadly cross-reactive neutralizing activity against HIV-1 primary isolates by targeting a hidden conserved epitope that is not accessible by larger antibodies and to suggest the possibility of developing a novel class of potent HIV-1 inhibitors based on human dAbs.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIV-1 has evolved a number of strategies to evade humoral immunity, including protecting highly conserved and important structures from the access of antibodies generated by the immune system. We have recently demonstrated that a human dAb (size approximately 15 kDa), m36, targets a highly protected structure on the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env), gp120, and exhibits exceptionally potent neutralizing activity against HIV-1 primary isolates, with potency on average higher than those of the broadly cross-reactive neutralizing human monoclonal antibody, scFv m9, and the inhibitory peptide, C34.

SUMMARY

The efficacy of the anti-HIV-1 therapy is significantly compromised by resistance to the currently used US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiretroviral drugs, which suggests an urgent need to develop novel classes of potent inhibitors. Several broadly cross-reactive neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies are highly effective against HIV-1 infection in vitro, but their administration to HIV-1-infected humans has only resulted in modest antiviral effects. Engineered human antibody fragments, dAbs, could be more potent because of their small size (about 10-fold smaller than that of an IgG), which allows targeting of highly conserved structures on the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein that are not accessible by full-size antibodies and relatively efficient penetration into the densely packed lymphoid environment in which HIV-1 mostly replicates and spreads.

Neutralization of HIV by antibodies

Antibodies can neutralize HIV-1 with potency and cross-reactivity that varies widely and is related but not correlated to their antigen-binding affinity. Therefore, in addition to measuring binding affinity, an evaluation of the antibody neutralizing activity in tissue cultures is important for development of antibody-based therapeutics, design of candidate vaccine immunogens, and understanding the mechanisms of virus entry, neutralization, and evasion of immune responses. The development of a standardized assay for measurement of the in vitro neutralizing activities of the antibody has remained a challenging goal in the last two decades. There are two types of widely used assays, which vary in details between different laboratories--assays based on cell line/pseudovirus and assays based on infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Here we describe in detail the PBMC-based assay, which is more laborious but in our opinion represents a closer approximation of the in vivo situation. As with all other in vitro assays the results of such measurements are only an indication of the antibody potency in vivo, and animal studies and ultimately clinical trials are needed for the development of such antibodies as potential prophylactics and therapeutics.

Antibodies for HIV treatment and prevention: window of opportunity?

Monoclonal antibodies are routinely used as therapeutics in a number of disease settings and have thus also been explored as potential treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection. Antibodies targeting viral antigens, and those directed to the cellular receptors, have been considered for use in prevention and therapy. For virus-targeted antibodies, attention has focused primarily on their neutralizing activity, but such antibodies also have the potential to exert antiviral effects via effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), opsonization, or complement activation. Anti-cell antibodies act through occlusion or down-modulation of the viral receptors with notable impact in vivo, as recent trials have shown. This review summarizes the diverse specificities and modes of action of therapeutic antibodies against HIV-1 infection. Successes, challenges, and future opportunities of harnessing antibodies for therapy of HIV-1 infection are discussed.

Antibody-based inhibitors of HIV infection

The demand for new treatment options against HIV is becoming increasingly desperate as the side effects and the expansion and spread of drug-resistant virus within the infected population limit the clinical benefits provided by available anti-HIV drugs. Preparations of polyclonal antibodies have a long history of proven clinical utility against some viruses; however, they have enjoyed very limited success against HIV. Recent clinical trials and in vitro experiments suggest that monoclonal antibodies against HIV may have promise clinically. These antibodies and antibody-based reagents target either the viral envelope glycoprotein, the receptor (CD4) or coreceptor (CCR5) molecules, or transition-state structures that appear during viral entry. The challenge is whether an antibody-based therapy can be identified (with or without their small molecule brethren) that presents long-term clinical efficacy, low toxicity and minimal risk of clinical failure from viral resistance.

Binding kinetics, uptake and intracellular accumulation of F105, an anti-gp120 human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody, in HIV-1 infected cells

The use of targeting moieties is a new and exciting field of scientific research for facilitating the specific delivery of therapeutic agents in HIV-infected patients. The interaction of a potential targeting moiety with its ligand is a crucial factor in the evaluation of a targeted approach for chemotherapeutic intervention. Therefore, we have further characterized the interaction between a potential targeting agent, the monoclonal human antibody F105, and its ligand gp120, a glycoprotein expressed on the surface of HIV-1 infected cells. We demonstrate the specificity of binding and entry of F105 to infected cells. F105 was rapidly taken up into the cell and accumulated in the Golgi apparatus. Kinetic analysis of the F105-gp120 interaction revealed an equilibrium dissociation constant (K(D)) of 0.62 nM, compared with the gp120-CD4 interaction where the K(D) was determined at 35 nM. Consequently, F105 displayed a higher gp120 affinity. This was due to a slower dissociation as compared with the natural ligand. These data further underline the potential of monoclonal antibodies as targeting agents, and offer new insights into the possibility of F105 as a targeting moiety for the delivery of antiretroviral drugs to HIV-1 infected cells.

Structure and function of the HIV envelope glycoprotein as entry mediator, vaccine immunogen, and target for inhibitors

This chapter discusses the advances of the envelope glycoprotein (Env) structure as related to the interactions of conserved Env structures with receptor molecules and antibodies with implications for the design of vaccine immunogens and inhibitors. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Env binds to cell surface–associated receptor (CD4) and coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4) by one of its two non-covalently associated subunits, gp120. The induced conformational changes activate the other subunit (gp41), which causes the fusion of the viral with the plasma cell membranes resulting in the delivery of the viral genome into the cell and the initiation of the infection cycle. As the only HIV protein exposed to the environment, the Env is also a major immunogen to which neutralizing antibodies are directed and a target that is relatively easy to access by inhibitors. A fundamental problem in the development of effective vaccines and inhibitors against HIV is the rapid generation of alterations at high levels of expression during long chronic infection and the resulting significant heterogeneity of the Env. The preservation of the Env function as an entry mediator and limitations on size and expression impose restrictions on its variability and lead to the existence of conserved structures.

Selection of a novel gp41-specific HIV-1 neutralizing human antibody by competitive antigen panning

The HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) is composed of two non-covalently associated subunits: gp120 and gp41. Panning of phage-displayed antibody libraries against Env-based antigens has resulted mostly in selection of anti-gp120 antibodies. Native gp41 in the absence of gp120 is unstable. The use of gp41 fragments as antigens has resulted in selection of antibodies with only relatively modest neutralizing activity. To enhance selection of antibodies specific for gp41 in the context of the whole Env we developed a methodology termed competitive antigen panning (CAP). Using CAP, we identified a novel gp41-specific human monoclonal antibody (hmAb), m48, from an immune library derived from long-term nonprogressors with high titers of broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies (bcnAbs). Selection of m48 was only successful using CAP and not through the conventional pre-incubation methodology. In assays based on spreading infection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) m48 neutralized a panel of HIV-1 primary isolates from different clades more potently than the well-characterized broadly cross-reactive HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies IgG1 4E10 and Fab Z13. These results may have implications for the selection of novel gp41-specific bcnAbs and other antibodies, and for the development of HIV-1 inhibitors and vaccine immunogens.

Time dependence of protective post-exposure prophylaxis with human monoclonal antibodies against pathogenic SHIV challenge in newborn macaques

In a primate model of postnatal virus transmission, we have previously shown that 1 h post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with a triple combination of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nmAbs) conferred sterilizing protection to neonatal macaques against oral challenge with pathogenic simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV). Here, we show that nmAbs can also partially protect SHIV-exposed newborn macaques against infection or disease, when given as 12 or 24 h PEP, respectively. This work delineates the potential and the limits of passive immunoprophylaxis with nmAbs. Even though 24 h PEP with nmAbs did not provide sterilizing immunity to neonatal monkeys, it contained viremia and protected infants from acute disease. Taken together with our results from other PEP studies, these data show that the success of passive immunization depends on the nmAb potency/dose and the time window between virus exposure and start of immunotherapy.

Neutralizing epitopes in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-1 gp41: genetic variability and co-variation

Recent investigations on the passive immunization have proved that neutralizing antibodies directed to the membrane-proximal region of HIV-1 gp41 are potent anti-viral components, so this region is thought to be an attractive target for AIDS vaccine. Three key neutralizing epitopes, ELDKWA (aa662-667), NWFDIT (aa671-676) and ERDRDR (aa739-744) have been mapped in this region. In this study, their genetic variability and co-variation was evaluated. There exists marked shift in the predominant sequence patterns on these three neutralizing epitopes over time. Compared with subtype B, non-B clades exhibit significant genetic variability and co-variation on these three epitopes. Among HIV-1 strains isolated in recent 5 years, about one third displays epitope variants simultaneously on three epitopes. The newly isolated strains with co-variations on several neutralizing epitopes ought to be of strict surveillance in clinical treatment, and those frequent epitope variants should also be considered in vaccine design.

Long-term multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope gp120 (MAb 2G12) and gp41 (MAbs 4E10 and 2F5)

While certain antibodies directed against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope have the potential to suppress virus replication in vitro, the impact of neutralizing antibodies in vivo remains unclear. In a recent proof-of-concept study, the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies 2G12, 4E10, and 2F5 exhibited inhibitory activities in vivo, as exemplified by a delay of the viral rebound following the interruption of antiretroviral therapy. Unexpectedly, the antiviral effect seen was most prominently due to 2G12 activity. To further investigate whether differential HIV-inhibitory activity was due to different pharmacokinetic properties of the antibodies, we performed a formal pharmacokinetic analysis with 14 patients. Repeated infusions at high dose levels were well tolerated by the patients and did not elicit an endogenous immune response against the monoclonal antibodies. The pharmacokinetic parameters of all three antibodies correlated with each other. Mean estimates were 0.047, 0.035, and 0.044 liter/kg for the central volume of distribution of 2G12, 4E10, and 2F5, respectively, and 0.0018, 0.0058, and 0.0077 liter/kg . day for the systemic clearance of 2G12, 4E10, and 2F5, respectively. Monoclonal antibody 2G12 had a significantly longer elimination half-life (21.8 +/- 7.2 days [P < 0.0001]) than monoclonal antibodies 4E10 (5.5 +/- 2.2 days) and 2F5 (4.3 +/- 1.1 days). The comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from this long-term multiple-dose phase II study were coherent with those from previous short-term phase I studies, as assessed by compartmental and noncompartmental techniques. The anti-HIV type 1 antibodies studied showed distribution and elimination kinetics similar to those seen for other human-like antibodies. Further studies examining tissue concentrations to explain the differential in vivo activity of the anti-gp120 antibody compared with those of the two anti-gp41 antibodies are warranted.

Clinical experience with therapeutic AIDS vaccines

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in therapeutic vaccination as an adjunct or alternative to current treatment options for HIV. The first immunotherapeutic trial relevant to this topic was published in 1983. Since then, several dozen therapeutic vaccine trials have been carried out. The results have consistently shown that although in vitro-measured HIV-specific immune responses were evident as a result of vaccination, clinical improvement has been seldom observed. The instances of apparent clinical benefit however, were invariably associated with the usage of vaccines that acted in accord with the principles of allo- or autoimmunization. The majority of these vaccines were derived from the blood of HIV carriers or a cell culture and therefore inherently contained host-cell antigens unrelated to HIV. These observations raise the issue of whether this clinically successful approach has been unduly neglected. Most commercial vaccines on the market today are made the old-fashioned way, but very little support or attention has been given to the development of such vaccines for AIDS therapy. The current strategy, biased toward vaccines which have shown little evidence of clinical efficacy, is shortsighted and needs to be revised.

Induction of long-term protective antiviral endogenous immune response by short neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment

Long-term immune control of viral replication still remains a major challenge in retroviral diseases. Several monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have already shown antiviral activities in vivo, including in the clinic but their effects on the immune system of treated individuals are essentially unknown. Using the lethal neurodegeneration induced in mice upon infection of neonates by the FrCas(E) retrovirus as a model, we report here that transient treatment by a neutralizing MAb shortly after infection can, after an immediate antiviral effect, favor the development of a strong protective host immune response containing viral propagation long after the MAb has disappeared. In vitro virus neutralization- and complement-mediated cell lysis assays, as well as in vivo viral challenges and serum transfer experiments, indicate a clear and essential contribution of the humoral response to antiviral protection. Our observation may have important therapeutic consequences as it suggests that short antibody-based therapies early after infection should be considered, at least in the case of maternally infected infants, as adjunctive treatment strategies against human immunodeficiency virus, not only for a direct effect on the viral load but also for favoring the emergence of an endogenous antiviral immune response.

Delay of HIV-1 rebound after cessation of antiretroviral therapy through passive transfer of human neutralizing antibodies

To determine the protective potential of the humoral immune response against HIV-1 in vivo we evaluated the potency of three neutralizing antibodies (2G12, 2F5 and 4E10) in suppressing viral rebound in six acutely and eight chronically HIV-1-infected individuals undergoing interruption of antiretroviral treatment (ART). Only two of eight chronically infected individuals showed evidence of a delay in viral rebound during the passive immunization. Rebound in antibody-treated acutely infected individuals upon cessation of ART was substantially later than in a control group of 12 individuals with acute infection. Escape mutant analysis showed that the activity of 2G12 was crucial for the in vivo effect of the neutralizing antibody cocktail. By providing further direct evidence of the potency, breadth and titers of neutralizing antibodies that are required for in vivo activity, these data underline both the potential and the limits of humoral immunity in controlling HIV-1 infection.

Characterization of a novel human anti-HIV-1 gp41 IgM monoclonal antibody designated clone 37

Human monoclonal antibodies (HuMAbs) demonstrate great potential for passive immunotherapy against HIV-1. The gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein of HIV has an important role in the pathogenicity of AIDS and importantly displays considerably less hypervariability than the gp120 surface envelope HIV glycoprotein, which makes it particularly a better candidate for the development of passive and active immunotherapies. The general aim of this study was to develop HuMAbs to HIV surface glycoproteins and particularly gp41. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from an HIV-seropositive long-term nondisease progressing patient. B-cells from this individual were then immortalized by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transformation, and antibody production was stabilized by fusion of transformed cells with a heteromyeloma. Subsets of the human heterohybridomas so generated were analyzed by ELISA. The hybridoma with the highest binding by immunoassay against gp160 was further analyzed. This hybridoma, designated as clone 37 (C37), was determined to be an IgM Kappa antibody and overlapping peptides of HIV envelope proteins (derived from the MN tissue culture line adapted HIV isolate) were used to map the specific binding domain of this HuMAb. Overlapping peptides designated 2026 (SWSNKSLDDIWNN, AA614-626), and 2027 (DDIWNNMTWMQWEREIDNYT, AA621-640) within the HIV-1 gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein were demonstrated to bind to C37 indicating that the specific binding domain for the antibody was DDIWNN. High affinity binding of C37 by ELISA to recombinant gp41 was demonstrated as well. Few IgM HuMAbs against HIV have been generated and characterized. Theoretically, because of the pentameric binding nature of IgM antibodies as well as their very efficient ability to activate complement, such reagents could have potential as anti-HIV agents.

Dichotomy in cross-clade reactivity and neutralization by HIV-1 sera: Implications for active and passive immunotherapy

The identification of broadly reactive and cross-clade neutralizing antibodies will facilitate the development of a more universally effective vaccine for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Antibodies in sera from individuals infected with Clade B HIV bind native primary viral isolates, and virus binding correlates with neutralization and stable clinical disease. In this study, we quantified cross-clade antibody reactivity and neutralization by Clades B and C sera. Primary viral isolates were captured by serum IgG bound to anti-human IgG and quantitated as p24 released by lysis of captured virus. Neutralization was determined using PHA-stimulated PBMC. Clade B antibodies reacted more frequently with Clade B R5 virus, but positive sera captured quantitatively more X4 virus than R5 and R5X4 virus. Clade B sera reacted less frequently and captured less Clade C virus than Clade B virus. Antibodies in Clade C sera captured Clades B and C isolates with equal frequency and quantity. There was no difference in neutralization of Clade B virus by either group of sera; however, Clade C sera neutralized Clade C virus, whereas Clade B sera were ineffective against Clade C virus. Thus, there are distinct differences in cross-clade reactivity of and neutralization by antibodies induced in response to Clade C infection compared to Clade B infection. Understanding antibody responses to native virions after Clade C infection and cross clade antibody behavior has implications for understanding pathogenesis and vaccine development.

Identification and characterization of a new cross-reactive human immunodeficiency virus type 1-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody

The identification and characterization of new human monoclonal antibodies (hMAbs) able to neutralize primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates from different subtypes may help in our understanding of the mechanisms of virus entry and neutralization and in the development of entry inhibitors and vaccines. For enhanced selection of broadly cross-reactive antibodies, soluble HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Envs proteins) from two isolates complexed with two-domain soluble CD4 (sCD4) were alternated during panning of a phage-displayed human antibody library; these two Env proteins (89.6 and IIIB gp140s), and one additional Env (JR-FL gp120) alone and complexed with sCD4 were used for screening. An antibody with relatively long HCDR3 (17 residues), designated m14, was identified that bound to all antigens and neutralized heterologous HIV-1 isolates in multiple assay formats. Fab m14 potently neutralized selected well-characterized subtype B isolates, including JRCSF, 89.6, IIIB, and Yu2. Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) m14 was more potent than Fab m14 and neutralized 7 of 10 other clade B isolates; notably, although the potency was on average significantly lower than that of IgG1 b12, IgG1 m14 neutralized two of the isolates with significantly lower 50% inhibitory concentrations than did IgG1 b12. IgG1 m14 neutralized four of four selected clade C isolates with potency higher than that of IgG1 b12. It also neutralized 7 of 17 clade C isolates from southern Africa that were difficult to neutralize with other hMAbs and sCD4. IgG1 m14 neutralized four of seven primary HIV-1 isolates from other clades (A, D, E, and F) much more efficiently than did IgG1 b12; for the other three isolates, IgG b12 was much more potent. Fab m14 bound with high (nanomolar range) affinity to gp120 and gp140 from various isolates; its binding was reduced by soluble CD4 and antibodies recognizing the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) on gp120, and its footprint as defined by alanine-scanning mutagenesis overlaps that of b12. These results suggest that m14 is a novel CD4bs cross-reactive HIV-1-neutralizing antibody that exhibits a different inhibitory profile compared to the only known potent broadly neutralizing CD4bs human antibody, b12, and may have implications for our understanding of the mechanisms of immune evasion and for the development of inhibitors and vaccines.

Immunoprophylaxis to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1

Antiretroviral therapy can profoundly reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV, but the drugs have a relatively short half-life and should thus be administered throughout breast-feeding to optimally prevent postnatal infection of the infant. The potential toxicities and the development of resistance may limit the long-term efficacy of antiretroviral prophylaxis, and a safe and effective active/passive immunoprophylaxis regimen, begun at birth, and potentially overlapping with interpartum or neonatal chemoprophylaxis, would pose an attractive alternative. This review draws on data presented at the Ghent Workshop on prevention of breast milk transmission and on selected issues from a workshop specifically relating to immunoprophylaxis held in Seattle in October 2002. This purpose of this review is to address the scientific rationale for the development of passive (antibody) and active (vaccine) immunization strategies for prevention of MTCT. Data regarding currently or imminently available passive and active immunoprophylaxis products are reviewed for their potential use in neonatal trials within the coming 1-2 years.

Binding and neutralization activity of human IgG1 and IgG3 from serum of HIV-infected individuals

The IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses represent the predominant antibody response to viral infections, including HIV. IgG subclasses differ in their interaction with antigen and functional effects due to specific physiochemical features. With an elongated hinge, IgG3 antibodies tend to have more segmental flexibility, which can render the antibody more effective at interacting with antigen. We have previously shown that the change of the human anti-CD4-binding site monoclonal antibody F105 from IgG1 to IgG3 results in neutralization of a T cell line-adapted isolate (TCLA) resistant to neutralization by the parental IgG1. In the studies presented here, we have purified IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses from the sera of HIV-infected individuals and tested for immunoreactivity with and neutralization of HIV. Purified total IgG3 tended to have less relative reactivity and mediated relatively poorer neutralization of either laboratory or primary isolates. IgG3 also tended to react relatively less well with gp160 and gp120 and more robustly with gp41 and p24. The contrasting results with serum, as opposed to F105, may result from the polyclonal nature of serum antibodies. There is also a failure to make a robust IgG3 response to neutralizing epitopes on envelope glycoproteins during natural infection. These studies suggest that the investigation of isotype effects on neutralization will require isotype-switched human monoclonal antibodies. Understanding isotype and neutralization will provide important data necessary for designing the most effective possible vaccines.

Multiple interactions across the surface of the gp120 core structure determine the global neutralization resistance phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Resistance to neutralization is an important characteristic of primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that relates to the potential for successful vaccination to prevent infection and use of immunotherapeutics for treatment of established infection. In order to further elucidate mechanisms responsible for neutralization resistance, we studied the molecular mechanisms that determine the resistance of the primary virus isolate of the strain HIV-1 MN to neutralization by soluble CD4 (sCD4). As is the case for the global neutralization resistance phenotype, sCD4 resistance depended upon sequences in the amino-terminal heptad repeat region of gp41 (HR1), as well as on multiple functional interactions within the envelope complex. The functional interactions that determined the resistance included interactions between the variable loop 1 and 2 (V1/V2) region and sequences in or near the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) and with the V3 loop. Additionally, the V3 loop region was found to interact functionally with sequences in the outer domain of gp120, distant from the CD4bs and coreceptor-binding site, as well as with a residue thought to be located centrally in the coreceptor-binding site. These and previous results provide the basis for a model by which functional signals that determine the neutralization resistance, high-infectivity phenotype depend upon interactions occurring across the surface of the gp120 core structure and involving variable loop structures and gp41. This model should be useful in efforts to define epitopes that may be important for primary virus neutralization.

Conformational changes in env oligomer induced by an antibody dependent on the V3 loop base

OBJECTIVE

The HIV-1 env oligomer is structured such that conserved, neutralizing epitopes are obscured by gp120 variable loops. We have studied the ability of an IgG2 human monoclonal antibody (hmAb), F425 B4e8 (B4e8), dependent upon the base of the V3 loop, to induce conformational changes in the env oligomer.

DESIGN

The effect of B4e8 antibody on the exposure of neutralizing epitopes and viral neutralization was studied in combination with other hmAb.

METHODS

Epitope exposure and viral neutralization was determined using native, intact primary isolate virions.

RESULTS

B4e8 antibody neutralizes infection and binds to HIV-infected cells and primary isolate virions. B4e8 and 2G12 enhanced the binding of each other to infected cells or virus and the combination resulted in synergistic neutralization. B4e8 also enhanced the binding of CD4i and CD4 binding site antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The conserved epitopes exposed by B4e8 are similar to those exposed by the movement of the variable loops following CD4 engagement. Further studies with select antibody combinations should provide important information for the design of effective immunotherapeutic agents.

Primary African HIV clade A and D isolates: effective cross-clade neutralization with a quadruple combination of human monoclonal antibodies raised against clade B

We investigated the ability of several human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nmAbs), originally raised against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clade B isolates, to neutralize primary clade A and D isolates as single agents and in combinations. All four primary HIV clade A isolates and five primary HIV clade D isolates tested were neutralized >99% by the quadruple combination of nmAbs IgG1b12, 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10. These mAbs recognize conserved epitopes on HIV-1 envelope (Env), resulting in strong cross-clade neutralization. Previously, we showed synergistic neutralization of primary HIV-1 clade C isolates in vitro by the same nMAb combination. We and others also showed neutralization of primary HIV clade B strains. Together, our data show that the quadruple combination of mAbs effectively neutralized primary HIV clade A, B, C, and D isolates.

Interactions of human antibodies, epitope exposure, antibody binding and neutralization of primary isolate HIV-1 virions

OBJECTIVE

Development of an effective HIV vaccine has been limited because of the inherent structural properties of the HIV envelope on native virions and the failure of the immune system to respond in an effective manner. Identification of the interactions of human antibodies with virions resulting in neutralization will facilitate vaccine design.

DESIGN

Combinations of human monoclonal antibodies (hMAb) were studied for binding to and neutralization of primary isolate virions.

METHODS

Virion binding and neutralization were measured using primary isolate virions.

RESULTS

Antibodies and combinations of antibodies to epitopes exposed upon CD4 binding (CD4i) and V3 loop antibodies resulted in additive binding and neutralization of R5X4 virus. Antibodies did not bind to or neutralize R5 virus as well. The combination of V3 loop antibody with 2G12 resulted in enhanced neutralization and binding to the R5X4 isolate but not the R5 isolate. Preincubation of the R5X4 isolate with F240, a non-neutralizing anti-gp41 antibody, significantly enhanced binding and neutralization by CD4i hMAb and 2F5. F240 also enhanced the binding of 2F5 to the R5 isolate and the neutralization of the R5 isolate mediated by 2G12.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutralizing epitopes are obscured on intact primary isolate virions and are dynamically exposed upon ligand (CD4) interactions. Interestingly, a non-neutralizing antibody to gp41 also increased binding and neutralizing activity of some hMAb that poorly neutralized R5 virus. These data suggest that non-neutralizing epitopes may be appropriate targets for vaccine design and epitope exposure should be considered in the development of immunotherapeutic strategies for HIV.

Antiviral activity of the neutralizing antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected humans: a phase I evaluation

BACKGROUND

The human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 2F5 and 2G12 were identified to be two of the most potent neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1. In a first human study they have been shown to be safe after repeated intravenous infusions to asymptomatic HIV-1-infected individuals. However, the antiviral effects of antibody treatment have not been fully analyzed in this first clinical trial.

METHODS

The aim of the present study was to gain a preliminary insight into the antiviral effects of 2F5 and 2G12 in humans. For this purpose, plasma samples obtained from the previous phase I study were studied for RNA copy numbers by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. As a measure for activation of complement levels of the major complement factor C3 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Flow cytometry was used to study T-lymphocyte counts and the amount of infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was determined by co-culture with uninfected donor PBMC. Virus escape from antibody neutralization was determined in vitro in a PBMC neutralization assay.

RESULTS

Transient reduction in viral loads was observed in five of seven patients. Vigorous complement activation was observed directly after HIV-specific antibody infusions. The number of infective peripheral blood mononuclear cells was reduced in some patients whereas CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts and CD4+/CD8+ ratios were transiently increased in all patients. Virus escape occurred only against 2G12.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of disease progression markers indicate that antibody therapy may have antiviral effects. These findings suggest that neutralizing antibodies should be further evaluated as an alternative therapeutic approach in HIV-1 disease.

Neutralizing antibodies against HIV -- back in the major leagues?

The past few months have seen encouraging successes for neutralizing antibodies against HIV; human monoclonal antibodies targeting conserved HIV envelope epitopes potently neutralized primary virus isolates, including strains of different clades. In primates, passive immunization with combinations containing human monoclonal antibodies completely prevented infection, even after mucosal virus challenges. Epitopes recognized by the protective monoclonal antibodies are important determinants for protection and provide a rational basis for AIDS vaccine development.

Passive immunization with human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies: correlates of protective immunity against HIV

Passive immunization with synergistic combinations of human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against conserved epitopes of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope completely protected 13 out of 16 rhesus monkeys challenged intravenously or orally with chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strains; partial protection was seen in another two. A high degree of protection was seen among orally challenged neonates. Thus, we propose that passive immunization with synergistic combinations of neutralizing human mAbs may be effective in preventing maternal HIV transmission when given as post-exposure prophylaxis at birth and as prophylaxis against milk-borne transmission. Because we only used mAbs with well-defined epitope specificities, our studies also yield key information for designing AIDS vaccines: the correlates of immune protection. Vaccine strategies that can evoke antibody responses to epitopes recognized by the mAbs used in our primate studies could be important components of successful AIDS vaccines.

A phase I trial with two human monoclonal antibodies (hMAb 2F5, 2G12) against HIV-1

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of two intravenously administered human monoclonal antibodies (hMAb 2F5, 2G12) against HIV-1 in humans.

DESIGN

Open label clinical phase I trial.

SETTING

Primary institutional care.

PATIENTS

Seven HIV-1-infected healthy volunteers with > or = 500 x 10(6)CD4 cells/l and < or = 10,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, not treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), entered and finished the study.

INTERVENTIONS

and main outcome measures: Eight separate infusions of the hMAb were administered over a 4-week period (total dose 14 g). The safety was assessed by physical examination, blood chemistry, complete blood cell count and recording adverse events. 2F5 and 2G12 plasma levels were determined prior to and at the end of each infusion and during the follow-up period of 22 weeks.

RESULTS

No clinical or laboratory abnormalities were observed throughout the study. The median distribution half-life (t(1/2 alpha)) of 2F5 and 2G12 was 1.02 (range, 0.77-1.47) days and 2.49 (range, 0.92-4.59) days, respectively. The elimination half-life (t(1/2 beta)) was calculated to be 7.94 (range, 3.46-8.31) days for 2F5 and 16.48 (range, 12.84-24.85) days for 2G12. The median plasma concentration immediately after the first infusion was 216 microg/ml (range, 158-409 microg/ml) for 2F5 and 238 microg/ml (range, 197-402 microg/ml) for 2G12. Multiple infusions resulted in maximum plasma concentrations of 374 microg/ml (range, 304-700 microg/ml) and 605 microg/ml (range, 479-897 microg/ml) for 2F5 and 2G12, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the hMAb 2F5 and 2G12 are safe and well tolerated by HIV-1-infected subjects.

Protection of neonatal macaques against experimental SHIV infection by human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

Neonatal macaques were completely protected against oral challenge with SHIV-vpu+, a simian-human immunodeficiency virus that encodes the envelope gene of a laboratory-adapted HIV strain, by pre- and post-natal treatment with a triple combination of human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The mAbs were directed either against the CD4 binding site, a glycosylation-dependent gp120 epitope, or against a linear epitope on gp41. This triple combination was highly synergistic in vitro and neutralized primary HIV completely. Subsequently, oral challenge was performed with pathogenic SHIV89.6P, an animal-passaged variant of a chimeric virus that encodes the envelope gene of the primary, dual-tropic HIV89.6. Only post-natal treatment with a similar triple mAb combination was used. One out of 4 mAb-treated infants was completely protected from infection. In the other 3 treated animals, there was a tendency towards lower peak viral RNA loads compared with untreated controls. Two out of 4 mAb-treated infants maintained normal CD4+ T-cell numbers, in contrast to all controls that had steep declines at 2 weeks post-challenge. We conclude that the triple mAb combination significantly protected the neonates, even against mucosal challenge with pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Passively administered synergistic human mAbs may play a role in preventing mother-infant transmission of HIV, both against intrapartum transmission as well as against infection through breast milk. As passive immunization is a tool to assess correlates of immune protection, we conclude that the epitopes recognized by the mAbs in our combinations are important for AIDS vaccine development. Future passive immunization studies may reveal other important conserved epitopes.

Minimal incidence of serum antibodies reactive with intact primary isolate virions in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals

Immunoglobulin G reactive with primary isolate virions was detected in 36% of serum samples from individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Of these individuals, serum samples from only 7% captured significant quantities of virus. Virion-specific antibody correlated with CD4 counts and, of more significance, primary isolate neutralization. Further dissection of this response should lead to the identification of antibodies and antigenic epitopes for vaccine purposes.

Passive antibody therapies: progress and continuing challenges

In recent years antibody-based therapies have returned as first-line therapy for a variety of diverse conditions that include viral infections, inflammatory disorders, and certain malignancies. Renewed interest in antibody-based therapies is a consequence of major advances in the technology of antibody production and the need for new therapeutic agents. Dozens of antibody preparations are in clinical use. Several monoclonal antibodies are now licensed for clinical use and many are in advanced clinical development. Antibody-based therapies have both significant advantages and disadvantages relative to conventional chemotherapy. Advantages include versatility, specificity, and biological functions not replicated by available chemotherapeutic drugs. Disadvantages include high cost and small markets that hinder commercial development. The available experience suggests that antibody-based therapies can be successfully developed for use in clinical situations where no effective therapy is available. Continued success in the development of antibody-based therapies will require extensive clinical research to learn how to use these compounds optimally and basic immunological research to define the basic mechanisms of antibody action.