1
|
Wilson D, Hulka S, Bennun L. A review of raptor carcass persistence trials and the practical implications for fatality estimation at wind farms. PeerJ 2022; 10:e14163. [PMID: 36405013 PMCID: PMC9673768 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bird and bat turbine collision fatalities are a principal biodiversity impact at wind energy facilities. Raptors are a group at particular risk and often the focus of post-construction fatality monitoring programs. To estimate fatalities from detected carcasses requires correction for biases, including for carcasses that are removed or decompose before the following search. This is addressed through persistence trials, where carcasses are monitored until no longer detectable or the trial ends. Sourcing sufficient raptor carcasses for trials is challenging and surrogates that are typically used often have shorter persistence times than raptors. We collated information from raptor carcass persistence trials to evaluate consistencies between trials and assess the implications of using persistence values from other studies in wind facility fatality estimates. We compiled individual raptor carcass persistence times from published sources along with information on methods and location, estimated carcass persistence using GenEst and ran full fatality estimates using the carcass persistence estimates and mock datasets for other information. We compiled results from 22 trials from 17 sites across four terrestrial biomes, with trials lasting between 7 and 365 days and involving between 11 and 115 carcasses. Median carcass persistence was estimated at 420 days (90% confidence interval (CI) of 290 to 607 days) for the full dataset. Persistence time varied significantly between trials (trial-specific persistence estimates of 14 (5-42) days to 1,586 (816-3,084) days) but not between terrestrial biomes. We also found no significant relationship between either the number of carcasses in the trial or trial duration and estimated carcass persistence. Using a mock dataset with 12 observed fatalities, we estimated annual fatalities of 25 (16-33) or 26 (17-36) individuals using a 14- or 28-day search interval respectively using global dataset. When using trial-specific carcass persistence estimates and the same mock dataset, estimated annual fatalities ranged from 22 (14-30) to 37 (21-63) individuals for a 14-day search interval, and from 22 (15-31) to 47 (26-84) individuals for a 28-day search interval. The different raptor carcass persistence rates between trials translated to small effects on fatality estimates when using recommended search frequencies, since persistence rates were generally much longer than the search interval. When threatened raptor species, or raptors of particular concern to stakeholders are present, and no site-specific carcass persistence estimates are available, projects should use the lowest median carcass persistence estimate from this study to provide precautionary estimates of fatalities. At sites without threatened species, or where the risk of collision to raptors is low, the global median carcass persistence estimate from this review could be used to provide a plausible estimate for annual raptor fatalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wilson
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United Kingdom,Conservation Sciences Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sonter LJ, Simmonds JS, Watson JEM, Jones JPG, Kiesecker JM, Costa HM, Bennun L, Edwards S, Grantham HS, Griffiths VF, Jones K, Sochi K, Puydarrieux P, Quétier F, Rainer H, Rainey H, Roe D, Satar M, Soares-Filho BS, Starkey M, Ten Kate K, Victurine R, von Hase A, Wells JA, Maron M. Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals. Nat Commun 2020; 11:2072. [PMID: 32350288 PMCID: PMC7190705 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted. Countries are adopting ecological compensation policies aimed at achieving no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Here, Sonter and colleagues apply spatial simulation models to case studies in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, and Mozambique to show that compensation alone is not sufficient to preserve biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Sonter
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. .,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Jeremy S Simmonds
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - James E M Watson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.,Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | - Julia P G Jones
- School of Natural Sciences, College of Engineering and Environmental Science, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW, UK
| | | | - Hugo M Costa
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, 3E King's Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, UK and Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St., Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Stephen Edwards
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1196, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Hedley S Grantham
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | - Victoria F Griffiths
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Zoology Research and Administration Building, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Kendall Jones
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | - Kei Sochi
- Global Lands, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, CO, 80524, USA
| | | | - Fabien Quétier
- Biotope, 22 Boulevard Maréchal Foch, F-34140, BP 58, Mèze, France
| | - Helga Rainer
- Arcus Foundation, CB1 Business Centre, Leda House, Twenty Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2JD, UK
| | - Hugo Rainey
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | - Dilys Roe
- International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, WC1X 8NH, UK
| | | | - Britaldo S Soares-Filho
- Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte - MG, CEP 31270-900, Brazil
| | - Malcolm Starkey
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, 3E King's Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, UK and Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St., Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
| | | | - Ray Victurine
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, 10460, USA
| | | | - Jessie A Wells
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Martine Maron
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. .,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacob C, Bochove J, Livingstone S, White T, Pilgrim J, Bennun L. Marine biodiversity offsets: Pragmatic approaches toward better conservation outcomes. Conserv Lett 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Jacob
- Laboratoire d'Economie Ecologique, Institut des sciences de la forêt tempéréeUniversité du Québec en Outaouais Gatineau Quebec Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge UK
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simmonds JS, Sonter LJ, Watson JE, Bennun L, Costa HM, Dutson G, Edwards S, Grantham H, Griffiths VF, Jones JP, Kiesecker J, Possingham HP, Puydarrieux P, Quétier F, Rainer H, Rainey H, Roe D, Savy CE, Souquet M, ten Kate K, Victurine R, Hase A, Maron M. Moving from biodiversity offsets to a target‐based approach for ecological compensation. Conserv Lett 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy S. Simmonds
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation ScienceThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
| | - Laura J. Sonter
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation ScienceThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
| | - James E.M. Watson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation ScienceThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program New York New York
| | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge United Kingdom
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom
| | - Hugo M. Costa
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program New York New York
| | - Guy Dutson
- The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Edwards
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Gland Switzerland
| | - Hedley Grantham
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program New York New York
| | | | - Julia P.G. Jones
- College of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringBangor University Bangor United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Kiesecker
- Global Conservation Lands ProgramThe Nature Conservancy Boulder Colorado
| | - Hugh P. Possingham
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation ScienceThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- The Nature Conservancy Arlington Virginia
| | | | | | | | - Hugo Rainey
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program New York New York
| | - Dilys Roe
- International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) London United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Kerry ten Kate
- Forest Trends Washington, DC
- Forest Trends Hampshire United Kingdom
| | - Ray Victurine
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Conservation Program New York New York
| | - Amrei Hase
- Forest Trends Washington, DC
- Forest Trends Cape Town South Africa
| | - Martine Maron
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation ScienceThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith RJ, Bennun L, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Cuttelod A, Di Marco M, Ferrier S, Fishpool LDC, Joppa L, Juffe‐Bignoli D, Knight AT, Lamoreux JF, Langhammer P, Possingham HP, Rondinini C, Visconti P, Watson JEM, Woodley S, Boitani L, Burgess ND, Silva N, Dudley N, Fivaz F, Game ET, Groves C, Lötter M, McGowan J, Plumptre AJ, Rebelo AG, Rodriguez JP, Scaramuzza CADM. Synergies between the key biodiversity area and systematic conservation planning approaches. Conserv Lett 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
6
|
Brauneder KM, Montes C, Blyth S, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Hoffmann M, Burgess ND, Cuttelod A, Jones MI, Kapos V, Pilgrim J, Tolley MJ, Underwood EC, Weatherdon LV, Brooks SE. Global screening for Critical Habitat in the terrestrial realm. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193102. [PMID: 29565977 PMCID: PMC5863962 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Critical Habitat has become an increasingly important concept used by the finance sector and businesses to identify areas of high biodiversity value. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) defines Critical Habitat in their highly influential Performance Standard 6 (PS6), requiring projects in Critical Habitat to achieve a net gain of biodiversity. Here we present a global screening layer of Critical Habitat in the terrestrial realm, derived from global spatial datasets covering the distributions of 12 biodiversity features aligned with guidance provided by the IFC. Each biodiversity feature is categorised as ‘likely’ or ‘potential’ Critical Habitat based on: 1. Alignment between the biodiversity feature and the IFC Critical Habitat definition; and 2. Suitability of the spatial resolution for indicating a feature’s presence on the ground. Following the initial screening process, Critical Habitat must then be assessed in-situ by a qualified assessor. This analysis indicates that a total of 10% and 5% of the global terrestrial environment can be considered as likely and potential Critical Habitat, respectively, while the remaining 85% did not overlap with any of the biodiversity features assessed and was classified as ‘unknown’. Likely Critical Habitat was determined principally by the occurrence of Key Biodiversity Areas and Protected Areas. Potential Critical Habitat was predominantly characterised by data representing highly threatened and unique ecosystems such as ever-wet tropical forests and tropical dry forests. The areas we identified as likely or potential Critical Habitat are based on the best available global-scale data for the terrestrial realm that is aligned with IFC’s Critical Habitat definition. Our results can help businesses screen potential development sites at the early project stage based on a range of biodiversity features. However, the study also demonstrates several important data gaps and highlights the need to incorporate new and improved global spatial datasets as they become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin M Brauneder
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Montes
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Blyth
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart H M Butchart
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil D Burgess
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Annabelle Cuttelod
- IUCN Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Matt I Jones
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Val Kapos
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John Pilgrim
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa J Tolley
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Underwood
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Lauren V Weatherdon
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon E Brooks
- UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rose D, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O’Donnell S, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland W, Robertson R. Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. RIO 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e21074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
8
|
Bennun L, Regan EC, Bird J, van Bochove JW, Katariya V, Livingstone S, Mitchell R, Savy C, Starkey M, Temple H, Pilgrim JD. The Value of the IUCN Red List for Business Decision-Making. Conserv Lett 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology; University of Cambridge; Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ UK
| | - Eugenie C. Regan
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | - Jeremy Bird
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | | | - Vineet Katariya
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | | | - Robin Mitchell
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | - Conrad Savy
- International Finance Corporation; 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20433 USA
| | - Malcolm Starkey
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | - Helen Temple
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| | - John D. Pilgrim
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB2 1SJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Marco M, Brooks T, Cuttelod A, Fishpool LDC, Rondinini C, Smith RJ, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Ferrier S, Foppen RPB, Joppa L, Juffe-Bignoli D, Knight AT, Lamoreux JF, Langhammer PF, May I, Possingham HP, Visconti P, Watson JEM, Woodley S. Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas. Conserv Biol 2016; 30:392-402. [PMID: 26307601 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
World governments have committed to increase the global protected areas coverage by 2020, but the effectiveness of this commitment for protecting biodiversity depends on where new protected areas are located. Threshold- and complementarity-based approaches have been independently used to identify important sites for biodiversity. We brought together these approaches by performing a complementarity-based analysis of irreplaceability in important bird and biodiversity areas (IBAs), which are sites identified using a threshold-based approach. We determined whether irreplaceability values are higher inside than outside IBAs and whether any observed difference depends on known characteristics of the IBAs. We focused on 3 regions with comprehensive IBA inventories and bird distribution atlases: Australia, southern Africa, and Europe. Irreplaceability values were significantly higher inside than outside IBAs, although differences were much smaller in Europe than elsewhere. Higher irreplaceability values in IBAs were associated with the presence and number of restricted-range species; number of criteria under which the site was identified; and mean geographic range size of the species for which the site was identified (trigger species). In addition, IBAs were characterized by higher irreplaceability values when using proportional species representation targets, rather than fixed targets. There were broadly comparable results when measuring irreplaceability for trigger species and when considering all bird species, which indicates a good surrogacy effect of the former. Recently, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has convened a consultation to consolidate global standards for the identification of key biodiversity areas (KBAs), building from existing approaches such as IBAs. Our results informed this consultation, and in particular a proposed irreplaceability criterion that will allow the new KBA standard to draw on the strengths of both threshold- and complementarity-based approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moreno Di Marco
- Global Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, SapienzaUniversità di Roma, viale dell' Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thomas Brooks
- International Union for Conservation of Nature, 28 rue Mauverney, 1196, Gland, Switzerland
- World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, 4031, Philippines
- School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart TAS, 7001, Australia
| | - Annabelle Cuttelod
- International Union for Conservation of Nature, Sheraton House Castle Park, Cambridge, CB3 0AX, United Kingdom
| | - Lincoln D C Fishpool
- BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, United Kingdom
| | - Carlo Rondinini
- Global Mammal Assessment Program, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, SapienzaUniversità di Roma, viale dell' Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert J Smith
- Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom
| | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy Ltd, 3E King's Parade, Cambridge, CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart H M Butchart
- BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Ferrier
- CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Ruud P B Foppen
- Sovon, Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, P.O. Box 6521, 6503, GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- European Bird Census Council, P.O. Box 6521, 6503, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud University, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, P.O. Box 9100, 6500, GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Joppa
- Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Diego Juffe-Bignoli
- United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Road, CB3 0DL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew T Knight
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom
- Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 77000, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa
| | - John F Lamoreux
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, D.C., 20005, U.S.A
| | - Penny F Langhammer
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 874601, Tempe, Arizona, 85287-4601, U.S.A
| | - Ian May
- BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, United Kingdom
| | - Hugh P Possingham
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom
| | | | - James E M Watson
- Global Conservation Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York, 10460, U.S.A
| | - Stephen Woodley
- WCPA-SSC Joint Task Force on Biodiversity and Protected Areas, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 64 Juniper Road, Chelsea, Quebec, J9B 1T3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Pilgrim
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB1 2RR UK
| | - Leon Bennun
- The Biodiversity Consultancy; 3E King's Parade Cambridge CB1 2RR UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sutherland WJ, Aveling R, Bennun L, Chapman E, Clout M, Côté IM, Depledge MH, Dicks LV, Dobson AP, Fellman L, Fleishman E, Gibbons DW, Keim B, Lickorish F, Lindenmayer DB, Monk KA, Norris K, Peck LS, Prior SV, Scharlemann JP, Spalding M, Watkinson AR. A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2012. Trends Ecol Evol 2012; 27:12-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2011] [Accepted: 10/31/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
12
|
Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clements A, Coomes D, Entwistle A, Hodge I, Kapos V, Scharlemann JPW, Sutherland WJ, Vira B. Culture and Biodiversity Losses Linked—Response. Science 2011. [DOI: 10.1126/science.331.6013.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. W. Rands
- Cambridge Conservation Initiative, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1AG, UK
| | - William M. Adams
- Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK
| | - Leon Bennun
- BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Cambridge CB3 0NA, UK
| | | | - Andrew Clements
- British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK
| | - David Coomes
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK
| | | | - Ian Hodge
- Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK
| | - Valerie Kapos
- United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK
- Cambridge Conservation Forum, c/o Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Jörn P. W. Scharlemann
- United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK
| | - William J. Sutherland
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Bhaskar Vira
- Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sutherland WJ, Bardsley S, Bennun L, Clout M, Côté IM, Depledge MH, Dicks LV, Dobson AP, Fellman L, Fleishman E. Horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2011. Trends Ecol Evol 2011; 26:10-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2010] [Accepted: 11/03/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Carpenter KE, Chanson J, Collen B, Cox NA, Darwall WRT, Dulvy NK, Harrison LR, Katariya V, Pollock CM, Quader S, Richman NI, Rodrigues ASL, Tognelli MF, Vié JC, Aguiar JM, Allen DJ, Allen GR, Amori G, Ananjeva NB, Andreone F, Andrew P, Aquino Ortiz AL, Baillie JEM, Baldi R, Bell BD, Biju SD, Bird JP, Black-Decima P, Blanc JJ, Bolaños F, Bolivar-G W, Burfield IJ, Burton JA, Capper DR, Castro F, Catullo G, Cavanagh RD, Channing A, Chao NL, Chenery AM, Chiozza F, Clausnitzer V, Collar NJ, Collett LC, Collette BB, Cortez Fernandez CF, Craig MT, Crosby MJ, Cumberlidge N, Cuttelod A, Derocher AE, Diesmos AC, Donaldson JS, Duckworth JW, Dutson G, Dutta SK, Emslie RH, Farjon A, Fowler S, Freyhof J, Garshelis DL, Gerlach J, Gower DJ, Grant TD, Hammerson GA, Harris RB, Heaney LR, Hedges SB, Hero JM, Hughes B, Hussain SA, Icochea M J, Inger RF, Ishii N, Iskandar DT, Jenkins RKB, Kaneko Y, Kottelat M, Kovacs KM, Kuzmin SL, La Marca E, Lamoreux JF, Lau MWN, Lavilla EO, Leus K, Lewison RL, Lichtenstein G, Livingstone SR, Lukoschek V, Mallon DP, McGowan PJK, McIvor A, Moehlman PD, Molur S, Muñoz Alonso A, Musick JA, Nowell K, Nussbaum RA, Olech W, Orlov NL, Papenfuss TJ, Parra-Olea G, Perrin WF, Polidoro BA, Pourkazemi M, Racey PA, Ragle JS, Ram M, Rathbun G, Reynolds RP, Rhodin AGJ, Richards SJ, Rodríguez LO, Ron SR, Rondinini C, Rylands AB, Sadovy de Mitcheson Y, Sanciangco JC, Sanders KL, Santos-Barrera G, Schipper J, Self-Sullivan C, Shi Y, Shoemaker A, Short FT, Sillero-Zubiri C, Silvano DL, Smith KG, Smith AT, Snoeks J, Stattersfield AJ, Symes AJ, Taber AB, Talukdar BK, Temple HJ, Timmins R, Tobias JA, Tsytsulina K, Tweddle D, Ubeda C, Valenti SV, van Dijk PP, Veiga LM, Veloso A, Wege DC, Wilkinson M, Williamson EA, Xie F, Young BE, Akçakaya HR, Bennun L, Blackburn TM, Boitani L, Dublin HT, da Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Lacher TE, Mace GM, Mainka SA, McNeely JA, Mittermeier RA, Reid GM, Rodriguez JP, Rosenberg AA, Samways MJ, Smart J, Stein BA, Stuart SN. The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science 2010; 330:1503-9. [PMID: 20978281 DOI: 10.1126/science.1194442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 662] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Using data for 25,780 species categorized on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, we present an assessment of the status of the world's vertebrates. One-fifth of species are classified as Threatened, and we show that this figure is increasing: On average, 52 species of mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction each year. However, this overall pattern conceals the impact of conservation successes, and we show that the rate of deterioration would have been at least one-fifth again as much in the absence of these. Nonetheless, current conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of biodiversity loss in these groups: agricultural expansion, logging, overexploitation, and invasive alien species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hoffmann
- IUCN SSC Species Survival Commission, c/o United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clements A, Coomes D, Entwistle A, Hodge I, Kapos V, Scharlemann JPW, Sutherland WJ, Vira B. Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010. Science 2010; 329:1298-303. [PMID: 20829476 DOI: 10.1126/science.1189138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 661] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The continued growth of human populations and of per capita consumption have resulted in unsustainable exploitation of Earth’s biological diversity, exacerbated by climate change, ocean acidification, and other anthropogenic environmental impacts. We argue that effective conservation of biodiversity is essential for human survival and the maintenance of ecosystem processes. Despite some conservation successes (especially at local scales) and increasing public and government interest in living sustainably, biodiversity continues to decline. Moving beyond 2010, successful conservation approaches need to be reinforced and adequately financed. In addition, however, more radical changes are required that recognize biodiversity as a global public good, that integrate biodiversity conservation into policies and decision frameworks for resource production and consumption, and that focus on wider institutional and societal changes to enable more effective implementation of policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R W Rands
- Cambridge Conservation Initiative, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1AG, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mwangi Githiru
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K
- Department of Ornithology, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658 00100 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Luc Lens
- Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B‐9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Leon Bennun
- BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Githiru M, Lens L, Bennun L. Ranging behaviour and habitat use by an Afrotropical songbird in a fragmented landscape. Afr J Ecol 2007. [DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-6707.2007.00772.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
19
|
Balmford A, Bennun L, Brink BT, Cooper D, Côte IM, Crane P, Dobson A, Dudley N, Dutton I, Green RE, Gregory RD, Harrison J, Kennedy ET, Kremen C, Leader-Williams N, Lovejoy TE, Mace G, May R, Mayaux P, Morling P, Phillips J, Redford K, Ricketts TH, Rodríguez JP, Sanjayan M, Schei PJ, van Jaarsveld AS, Walther BA. ECOLOGY: The Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 Target. Science 2005; 307:212-3. [PMID: 15653489 DOI: 10.1126/science.1106281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 295] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
20
|
Lamoreux J, Resit Akçakaya H, Bennun L, Collar NJ, Boitani L, Brackett D, Bräutigam A, Brooks TM, da Fonseca GA, Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Gärdenfors U, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace G, Stein BA, Stuart S. Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol Evol 2003. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
21
|
Greaves ED, Bennun L, Gomez J, Nemeth P, Sajo-Bohus L. Determination of metal-ligand stoichiometries for inorganic complexes using total reflection X-ray fluorescence. Inorg Chem 2000; 39:3463-5. [PMID: 11196803 DOI: 10.1021/ic990628e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The methods usually used to determine the ratio metal-ligand in inorganic complexes require a set of solutions with different concentrations for both the ligand and metal. We propose a new method using the total reflection X-ray fluorescence technique, in which the ratio between metal and ligand is determined precisely, easily, and quickly. Experimental results provide evidence that for different chemical complexes, the ligand-metal ratio determined by this technique deviates at most from stoichiometric values by 6%. The technique is restricted usually to elements with Z above 14, and its detection limit is on the order of 10(-8) g/g.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E D Greaves
- Universidad Simón Bolívar, Sección de Física Nuclear, Apartado 89000, Caracas, Venezuela.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
|